60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Evaluation of the Supportive Services Demonstration, 8691-8693 [2018-04041]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2018 / Notices
seeking approval from OMB for the
information collection described in
Section A.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection:
Choice Neighborhoods.
OMB Approval Number: 2577–0269.
Type of Request: Revision of currently
approved collection.
Form Number: SF–424, SF–LLL, HUD
2880, HUD 53150, HUD 53152, HUD
53232, HUD 53151, HUD 53154, HUD–
53233, HUD–53234, HUD–53238, HUD–
53231, HUD–53235, HUD–53237, HUD–
53236, HUD–53239, HUD–2530, HUD–
2991, HUD–2995, HUD–53421, HUD–
53230, HUD–52515, HUD–50163.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: The
information collection is required to
administer the Choice Neighborhoods
program, including applying for funds
and grantee reporting.
Respondents (i.e., affected public):
Potential applicants and grantees
(which would include local
governments, tribal entities, public
housing authorities, nonprofits, and forprofit developers that apply jointly with
a public entity).
Estimated Number of Respondents:
264 annually.
Estimated Number of Responses: 440
annually.
Frequency of Response: Frequency of
response varies depending on what
information is being provided (e.g., once
per year for applications and four times
per year for grantee reporting).
Burden Hours per Response: Burden
hours per response varies depending on
what information is being provided
(e.g., Choice Neighborhoods
Implementation grant application:
71.09; Choice Neighborhoods Planning
grant application: 36.59; Choice
Neighborhoods information collections
unrelated to the NOFA, including
grantee reporting and program
management: 14.58).
Total Estimated Burdens: Total
burden hours is estimated to be
4,562.45. Total burden cost is estimated
to be $192,672.26.
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Feb 27, 2018
Jkt 244001
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond; including through
the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comment in response to these
questions.
Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
Dated: February 1, 2018.
Merrie Nichols-Dixon,
Director, Office of Policy, Programs and
Legislative Initiatives.
[FR Doc. 2018–04045 Filed 2–27–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–7007–N–02]
60-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Evaluation of the
Supportive Services Demonstration
Office of Policy Development
and Research, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
HUD is seeking approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for the information collection
described below. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is
requesting comment from all interested
parties on the proposed collection of
information. The purpose of this notice
is to allow for 60 days of public
comment.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Comments Due Date: April 30,
2018.
Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to:
Anna P. Guido, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW, Room 4176, Washington, DC
20410–5000; telephone 202–402–5534
(this is not a toll-free number) or email
at Anna.P.Guido@hud.gov for a copy of
the proposed forms or other available
information. Persons with hearing or
speech impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–
8339.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anna P. Guido, Reports Management
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8691
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW, Washington, DC 20410; email Anna
P. Guido at Anna.P.Guido@hud.gov or
telephone 202–402–5535. This is not a
toll-free number. Persons with hearing
or speech impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–
8339. Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Ms. Guido.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the
information collection described in
Section A.
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection:
Evaluation of the Supportive Services
Demonstration.
OMB Approval Number: 2528Pending.
Type of Request: New.
Form Number: No agency forms will
be used.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: The U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) has contracted with
Abt Associates Inc. to conduct and
evaluate HUD’s Supportive Services
Demonstration (SSD), also referred to as
Integrated Wellness in Supportive
Housing (IWISH). The SSD is a threeyear demonstration sponsored by HUD
to test the impact of a new model of
housing-based supportive services on
the healthcare utilization and housing
stability of low-income older adults.
The goal of the SSD model is to help
older adults in HUD-assisted housing to
age in place successfully. The SSD
model funds a full-time Resident
Wellness Director (RWD) and part-time
Wellness Nurse (WN) to work in HUDassisted housing developments that
either predominantly or exclusively
serve households headed by people
aged 62 or over. These services are not
typically available in HUD-assisted
housing developments for this
population and are anticipated to
positively impact outcomes.
Eligible HUD-assisted properties
applied for the demonstration were
randomly assigned to one of three
groups: A ‘‘treatment group’’ that
received grant funding to hire a RWD
and WN and implement the SSD model
(40 properties); an ‘‘active control’’
group that did not receive grant funding
but received a stipend to participate in
the evaluation (37 properties); and a
‘‘passive control’’ group that received
neither grant funding nor a stipend (47
properties). The random assignment
permits an evaluation that quantifies the
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
8692
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2018 / Notices
impact of the SSD model by comparing
outcomes at the 40 treatment group
properties to outcomes at the 84
properties in the active and passive
control groups.
Under contract with HUD’s Office of
Policy Development and Research, Abt
Associates Inc. will conduct a two-part
evaluation—a process study to describe
the implementation of the
demonstration and an impact study to
measure the impact of the SSD model
on residents’ use of healthcare services
and housing stability. The evaluation
features analysis of administrative data
and the following types of primary data
collection: (1) Questionnaires for one to
two housing and wellness staff at each
of the 40 treatment properties and the
37 active control properties (RWD,
service coordinator, and/or property
manager); (2) interviews with up to four
housing and wellness staff (RWDs, WNs,
and property managers) at the 40
treatment sites, with one to two staff
(service coordinator and/or property
manager) at the 37 active control
properties, and with a sample of 10 to
15 owners across the 40 treatment
properties; (3) focus groups with
residents of 20 of the treatment
properties; and, (4) focus groups with
community service provider partners at
20 of the treatment properties. The
purpose of these activities is to collect
data from multiple perspectives about
implementation experience with the
demonstration, the strengths and
weakness of the model, and how
resident wellness activities compare
across treatment and control properties.
The evaluation will also incorporate
data collected by The Lewin Group as
part of the implementation of the
demonstration. Information on the SSD
information collection was published in
the Federal Register on January 9, 2017
(FR–5915–N–14).
Respondents (i.e., affected public):
Resident Wellness Directors, Wellness
Nurses, Service Coordinators, and
housing property staff; property owners;
HUD-assisted residents (aged 62 and
over); and community health and
supportive services staff.
Total Estimated Burdens: The
estimated average burden for the
questionnaires is 1.25 hours per person
per questionnaire. The questionnaire
will take an average of 45 minutes to
complete by telephone or online, with
an additional 30 minutes for scheduling
and preparation. There will be one to
two respondents from each property and
two questionnaires over the course of
the evaluation. The total estimated
number of respondents for the
questionnaires is 117 and the total
estimated burden is 292.5 hours.
The estimated average burden for the
interviews is 1.5 hours. The interviews
will average one hour, with an
additional 30 minutes for scheduling
and preparation. There will be between
one and four interview respondents per
property for a total estimated number of
respondents of 182 and a total estimated
burden of 273 hours.
The estimated average burden for the
resident focus group is 1.5 hours. The
focus group discussion will average 60
minutes, with an additional 15 minutes
at the start for participants to orient
themselves to the group and 15 minutes
at the end for participants to ask any
questions they might have about the
study and or how the information will
be used. There will be up to 10
participants per resident focus group
across 20 properties, for a total of 200
respondents and 300 burden hours.
The estimated average burden for the
community partner focus group is 1.75
hours. The focus group discussion will
average 75 minutes, with an additional
15 minutes at the start and end for the
resident focus group. There will be up
to 15 participants per community
partner focus group across 20
properties, for a total of 300 respondents
and 525 burden hours.
ESTIMATED HOUR AND COST BURDEN OF INFORMATION COLLECTION
Information collection
Number of
respondents
Frequency of
response
Burden
hour per
response
Responses
per annum
Annual
burden hour
Hourly
cost per
response
Annual
cost
117
182
2
1
1
1
1.25
1.5
292.5
273
$34.95
36.84
$10,221.63
10,056.72
200
1
1
1.5
300
7.90
2,369.42
300
1
1
1.75
525
40.96
21,503.32
Total ......................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Questionnaires .............
Interviews .....................
Focus groups—residents .........................
Focus groups—providers ........................
799
........................
........................
........................
1,390.5
........................
44,151.09
The total estimated annual cost for
this information collection is
$44,151.09. To estimate the cost per
hour for each type of respondent, we
used the most recent (May 2016) Bureau
of Labor Statistics, Occupational
Employment Statistics median hourly
wage for selected occupations classified
by Standard Occupational Classification
(SOC) codes and added 31.7 percent to
account for benefits costs. (According to
the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ Employer
Costs for Employee Compensation data
from September 2017, benefit costs
averaged 31.7 percent of employer costs
for employee compensation across all
job categories). To estimate hourly wage
rates for Resident Wellness Directors
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Feb 27, 2018
Jkt 244001
and Service Coordinators, we used the
occupation code Healthcare Social
Workers (21–1022) with a median
hourly wage of $25.85 and an estimated
cost with benefits of $34.04. For
property owners and managers of
properties, we used the occupation code
Property, Real Estate, and Community
Association Managers (11–940) with a
median hourly wage of $27.42 and an
estimated cost with benefits of $36.11.
For WNs, we used Registered Nurses
(29–1141) with a median hourly wage of
$32.91 and an estimated cost with
benefits of $43.34. We created weighted
averages of these rates, depending on
the respondent pool, to estimate the
costs of the questionnaires and
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
interviews. For the community partner
focus groups, we used Social and
Community Service Managers (11–9151)
with a median hourly wage of $31.10
and an estimated cost with benefits of
$40.96.
Most of the properties in the SSD are
funded through HUD’s Supportive
Housing for the Elderly (Section 202)
program. According to HUD’s Picture of
Subsidized Households for 2016
(https://www.huduser.gov/portal/
datasets/assthsg.html), the average
household income for Section 202
residents is $13,311. Some 98 percent of
households have something other than
wages or welfare benefits as their major
source of income, in most cases Social
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2018 / Notices
Security benefits. To estimate the hourly
cost for the residents of properties in the
SSD, we translated the average monthly
Social Security benefit for retired
workers, which in 2017 was $1,369
(https://www.ssa.gov/news/press/
factsheets/basicfact-alt.pdf), into an
hourly rate of $7.90 (by multiplying by
12 months and dividing by 2,080 hours).
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice solicits comments from
members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond; including the use
of appropriate automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comment in response to these
questions.
Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
Dated: February 7, 2018.
Todd M. Richardson,
Acting General Deputy Assistant, Secretary
for Policy Development and Research.
[FR Doc. 2018–04041 Filed 2–27–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR–7002–N–03]
60-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Protection and
Enhancement of Environmental Quality
Office of Community Planning
and Development, HUD.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
A. Overview of Information Collection
Notice.
HUD is seeking approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for the information collection
described below. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is
requesting comment from all interested
parties on the proposed collection of
information. The purpose of this notice
is to allow for 60 days of public
comment.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
8693
Comments Due Date: April 30,
2018.
Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to:
Colette Pollard, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street
SW, Room 4176, Washington, DC
20410–5000; telephone 202–402–3400
(this is not a toll-free number) or email
at Colette.Pollard@hud.gov for a copy of
the proposed forms or other available
information. Persons with hearing or
speech impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–
8339.
ADDRESSES:
Liz
Zepeda, Environmental Specialist,
Office of Environment and Energy,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW,
Washington, DC 20410; email Liz
Zepeda at elizabeth.g.zepeda@hud.gov
or telephone 202–402–3988. This is not
a toll-free number. Persons with hearing
or speech impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the tollfree Federal Relay Service at 800–877–
8339.
Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Ms. Zepeda.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
This
notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the
information collection described in
Section A.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title of Information Collection: 24
CFR Part 50—Protection and
Enhancement of Environmental Quality.
OMB Approval Number: 2506–0177.
Type of Request: Extension of
currently approved collection.
Form Number: N/A.
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use: HUD
requests its applicants to supply
environmental information that is not
otherwise available to HUD staff for the
environmental review on an applicant’s
proposal for HUD financial assistance to
develop or improve housing or
community facilities. HUD itself must
perform an environmental review for
the purpose of compliance with its
environmental regulations found at 24
CFR part 50, Protection and
Enhancement of Environmental Quality.
Part 50 implements the National
Environmental Policy Act and
implementing procedures of the Council
on Environmental Quality, as well as
the related federal environmental laws
and executive orders. HUD’s agencywide provisions—24 CFR 50.3(h)(1) and
50.32—regulate how individual HUD
program staffs are to utilize such
collected data when HUD itself prepares
the environmental review and
compliance. Separately, individual HUD
programs each have their own
regulations and guidance implementing
environmental and related collection
responsibilities. For the next three
years, this approved collection will
continue unchanged under this OMB
control number to assure adequate
coverage for all HUD programs subject
to part 50.
Respondents (i.e., affected public):
Businesses, not-for-profit institutions,
and local governments receiving HUD
funding.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
1,800.
Estimated Number of Responses:
1,800.
Frequency of Response: 1.
Average Hours per Response: 3.
Total Estimated Burdens: 5,400.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Information collection
Number of
respondents
Frequency
of response
Responses
per annum
Burden
hour per
response
Annual
burden hours
Hourly
cost per
response
Annual cost
Total .............................
1,800
1
1,800
3
5,400
$40.74
$219,996
Number of responses per annum was
based on a combination of data and
estimates. Most, but not all, HUD
programs complete their part 50
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:25 Feb 27, 2018
Jkt 244001
environmental reviews using the HUD
Environmental Review Online System
(HEROS). There were 1,565 part 50
environmental reviews completed in
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
HEROS in calendar year 2017. HUD
estimates that, with the additional part
50 environmental reviews completed
outside of HEROS, roughly 1,800 part 50
E:\FR\FM\28FEN1.SGM
28FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 28, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8691-8693]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-04041]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-7007-N-02]
60-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Evaluation of
the Supportive Services Demonstration
AGENCY: Office of Policy Development and Research, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: HUD is seeking approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for the information collection described below. In
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is requesting comment
from all interested parties on the proposed collection of information.
The purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment.
DATES: Comments Due Date: April 30, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to: Anna P. Guido, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th
Street SW, Room 4176, Washington, DC 20410-5000; telephone 202-402-5534
(this is not a toll-free number) or email at [email protected] for a
copy of the proposed forms or other available information. Persons with
hearing or speech impairments may access this number through TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna P. Guido, Reports Management
Officer, QDAM, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th
Street SW, Washington, DC 20410; email Anna P. Guido at
[email protected] or telephone 202-402-5535. This is not a toll-free
number. Persons with hearing or speech impairments may access this
number through TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at
(800) 877-8339. Copies of available documents submitted to OMB may be
obtained from Ms. Guido.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the information collection described in
Section A.
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection: Evaluation of the Supportive
Services Demonstration.
OMB Approval Number: 2528-Pending.
Type of Request: New.
Form Number: No agency forms will be used.
Description of the need for the information and proposed use: The
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has contracted
with Abt Associates Inc. to conduct and evaluate HUD's Supportive
Services Demonstration (SSD), also referred to as Integrated Wellness
in Supportive Housing (IWISH). The SSD is a three-year demonstration
sponsored by HUD to test the impact of a new model of housing-based
supportive services on the healthcare utilization and housing stability
of low-income older adults. The goal of the SSD model is to help older
adults in HUD-assisted housing to age in place successfully. The SSD
model funds a full-time Resident Wellness Director (RWD) and part-time
Wellness Nurse (WN) to work in HUD-assisted housing developments that
either predominantly or exclusively serve households headed by people
aged 62 or over. These services are not typically available in HUD-
assisted housing developments for this population and are anticipated
to positively impact outcomes.
Eligible HUD-assisted properties applied for the demonstration were
randomly assigned to one of three groups: A ``treatment group'' that
received grant funding to hire a RWD and WN and implement the SSD model
(40 properties); an ``active control'' group that did not receive grant
funding but received a stipend to participate in the evaluation (37
properties); and a ``passive control'' group that received neither
grant funding nor a stipend (47 properties). The random assignment
permits an evaluation that quantifies the
[[Page 8692]]
impact of the SSD model by comparing outcomes at the 40 treatment group
properties to outcomes at the 84 properties in the active and passive
control groups.
Under contract with HUD's Office of Policy Development and
Research, Abt Associates Inc. will conduct a two-part evaluation--a
process study to describe the implementation of the demonstration and
an impact study to measure the impact of the SSD model on residents'
use of healthcare services and housing stability. The evaluation
features analysis of administrative data and the following types of
primary data collection: (1) Questionnaires for one to two housing and
wellness staff at each of the 40 treatment properties and the 37 active
control properties (RWD, service coordinator, and/or property manager);
(2) interviews with up to four housing and wellness staff (RWDs, WNs,
and property managers) at the 40 treatment sites, with one to two staff
(service coordinator and/or property manager) at the 37 active control
properties, and with a sample of 10 to 15 owners across the 40
treatment properties; (3) focus groups with residents of 20 of the
treatment properties; and, (4) focus groups with community service
provider partners at 20 of the treatment properties. The purpose of
these activities is to collect data from multiple perspectives about
implementation experience with the demonstration, the strengths and
weakness of the model, and how resident wellness activities compare
across treatment and control properties. The evaluation will also
incorporate data collected by The Lewin Group as part of the
implementation of the demonstration. Information on the SSD information
collection was published in the Federal Register on January 9, 2017
(FR-5915-N-14).
Respondents (i.e., affected public): Resident Wellness Directors,
Wellness Nurses, Service Coordinators, and housing property staff;
property owners; HUD-assisted residents (aged 62 and over); and
community health and supportive services staff.
Total Estimated Burdens: The estimated average burden for the
questionnaires is 1.25 hours per person per questionnaire. The
questionnaire will take an average of 45 minutes to complete by
telephone or online, with an additional 30 minutes for scheduling and
preparation. There will be one to two respondents from each property
and two questionnaires over the course of the evaluation. The total
estimated number of respondents for the questionnaires is 117 and the
total estimated burden is 292.5 hours.
The estimated average burden for the interviews is 1.5 hours. The
interviews will average one hour, with an additional 30 minutes for
scheduling and preparation. There will be between one and four
interview respondents per property for a total estimated number of
respondents of 182 and a total estimated burden of 273 hours.
The estimated average burden for the resident focus group is 1.5
hours. The focus group discussion will average 60 minutes, with an
additional 15 minutes at the start for participants to orient
themselves to the group and 15 minutes at the end for participants to
ask any questions they might have about the study and or how the
information will be used. There will be up to 10 participants per
resident focus group across 20 properties, for a total of 200
respondents and 300 burden hours.
The estimated average burden for the community partner focus group
is 1.75 hours. The focus group discussion will average 75 minutes, with
an additional 15 minutes at the start and end for the resident focus
group. There will be up to 15 participants per community partner focus
group across 20 properties, for a total of 300 respondents and 525
burden hours.
Estimated Hour and Cost Burden of Information Collection
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Frequency of Responses per Burden hour Annual burden Hourly cost
Information collection respondents response annum per response hour per response Annual cost
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Questionnaires.......................... 117 2 1 1.25 292.5 $34.95 $10,221.63
Interviews.............................. 182 1 1 1.5 273 36.84 10,056.72
Focus groups--residents................. 200 1 1 1.5 300 7.90 2,369.42
Focus groups--providers................. 300 1 1 1.75 525 40.96 21,503.32
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total............................... 799 .............. .............. .............. 1,390.5 .............. 44,151.09
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The total estimated annual cost for this information collection is
$44,151.09. To estimate the cost per hour for each type of respondent,
we used the most recent (May 2016) Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Occupational Employment Statistics median hourly wage for selected
occupations classified by Standard Occupational Classification (SOC)
codes and added 31.7 percent to account for benefits costs. (According
to the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Employer Costs for Employee
Compensation data from September 2017, benefit costs averaged 31.7
percent of employer costs for employee compensation across all job
categories). To estimate hourly wage rates for Resident Wellness
Directors and Service Coordinators, we used the occupation code
Healthcare Social Workers (21-1022) with a median hourly wage of $25.85
and an estimated cost with benefits of $34.04. For property owners and
managers of properties, we used the occupation code Property, Real
Estate, and Community Association Managers (11-940) with a median
hourly wage of $27.42 and an estimated cost with benefits of $36.11.
For WNs, we used Registered Nurses (29-1141) with a median hourly wage
of $32.91 and an estimated cost with benefits of $43.34. We created
weighted averages of these rates, depending on the respondent pool, to
estimate the costs of the questionnaires and interviews. For the
community partner focus groups, we used Social and Community Service
Managers (11-9151) with a median hourly wage of $31.10 and an estimated
cost with benefits of $40.96.
Most of the properties in the SSD are funded through HUD's
Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202) program. According to
HUD's Picture of Subsidized Households for 2016 (https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/assthsg.html), the average household
income for Section 202 residents is $13,311. Some 98 percent of
households have something other than wages or welfare benefits as their
major source of income, in most cases Social
[[Page 8693]]
Security benefits. To estimate the hourly cost for the residents of
properties in the SSD, we translated the average monthly Social
Security benefit for retired workers, which in 2017 was $1,369 (https://www.ssa.gov/news/press/factsheets/basicfact-alt.pdf), into an hourly
rate of $7.90 (by multiplying by 12 months and dividing by 2,080
hours).
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice solicits comments from members of the public and
affected parties concerning the collection of information described in
Section A on the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond; including the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of responses.
HUD encourages interested parties to submit comment in response to
these questions.
Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
Dated: February 7, 2018.
Todd M. Richardson,
Acting General Deputy Assistant, Secretary for Policy Development and
Research.
[FR Doc. 2018-04041 Filed 2-27-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P
