Wireless Emergency Alerts; Emergency Alert System, 8619-8624 [2018-03990]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2018 / Rules and Regulations with concentrations of titanium dioxide exceeding 45% by weight of the formulations containing anthraquinone. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES VI. Conclusions Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is established under 40 CFR 180.1195 for titanium dioxide (CAS Reg. No. 13463–67–7) when used as an inert ingredient (colorant) up to 45% in foliar pesticide formulations containing anthraquinone. VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews This action establishes an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled ‘‘Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the exemption in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not apply. This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this action alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:11 Feb 27, 2018 Jkt 244001 power and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). This action does not involve any technical standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). VIII. Congressional Review Act Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180 Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: February 15, 2018. Michael L. Goodis, Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs. Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows: PART 180—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. 2. Section 180.1195 is amended by adding paragraph (c) to read as follows: ■ § 180.1195 Titanium dioxide. * * * * * (c) Titanium dioxide (CAS Reg. No. 13463–67–7) is exempted from the requirement of a tolerance for residues in or on growing crops, when used as an inert ingredient (colorant) in foliar applications at no more than 45% of the formulations containing anthraquinone. [FR Doc. 2018–04108 Filed 2–27–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 8619 FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 10 [PS Docket Nos. 15–91, 15–94; FCC 18– 4] Wireless Emergency Alerts; Emergency Alert System Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: This document adopts revisions to Wireless Emergency Alert (WEA) rules to improve utility of WEA as a life-saving tool. By this action, the Commission adopts rules that will improve the accuracy with which Participating CMS Providers transmit Alert Messages to the specified target area. This document also adopts rules to preserve Alert Messages on mobile devices, inform consumers about WEA capabilities at the point of sale, define participation in WEA, and extend the compliance deadline for Spanish language alerting. Through this action, the Commission hopes to empower state and local alert originators to utilize WEA during emergencies. DATES: Effective dates: The amendments to §§ 10.10 and 10.210 are effective April 30, 2018. The amendments to §§ 10.450 and 10.500 are effective November 30, 2019. The amendment to § 10.240 contains new or modified information collection requirements and will not be effective until those information collection requirements are approved by the Office of Management and Budget. The Federal Communications Commission will publish a document in the Federal Register announcing the effective date for the section. Compliance dates: Participating CMS Providers must comply with the new point of sale disclosure rules by November 30, 2019, or as specified by publication in the Federal Register of a document announcing approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the relevant effective date, whichever is later. CMS Providers are required to update their WEA election status within June 28, 2018 of a document announcing approval by the Office of Management and Budget of the modified information collection requirements. Applicability date: The requirement to support Spanish language Alert Messages in § 10.480 is applicable beginning May 1, 2019. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Wiley, Attorney Advisor, Cybersecurity and Communications SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\28FER1.SGM 28FER1 8620 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2018 / Rules and Regulations Reliability Division, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, at 202–418– 1678, or by email at James.Wiley@ fcc.gov. For additional information concerning the information collection requirements contained in this document, send an email to PRA@ fcc.gov or contact Nicole Ongele, Office of Managing Director, Performance Evaluation and Records Management, 202–418–2991, or by email to PRA@ fcc.gov. This is a summary of the Commission’s Second Report and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration (Second Report and Order) in PS Docket No. 15–91, No. 15– 94, FCC 18–4, released on January 31, 2018. The full text of this document is available for inspection and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center (Room CY–1257), 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554, or online at: https:// transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_ Business/2018/db0131/FCC-18-4A1.pdf. The rules in this part are issued pursuant to the authority contained in the Warning, Alert, and Response Network Act, Title VI of the Security and Accountability for Every Port Act of 2006, Public Law 109–347, Titles I through III of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and Executive Order 13407 of June 26, 2006, Public Alert and Warning System, 71 FR 36975 (2006). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES Synopsis 1. In this Second Report and Order, the Federal Communication Commission takes measures to enhance the effectiveness of Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA). In particular, the Commission improves the accuracy with which emergency managers can geographically target the delivery of WEA Alert Messages to areas within their jurisdiction. New rules will ensure that consumers will continue to be able to retrieve and review Alert Message content for 24 hours from receipt. The Order also defines what it means for a Commercial Mobile Service (CMS) Provider to participate in WEA ‘‘in whole’’ versus ‘‘in part.’’ In the Second Order on Reconsideration, the Commission aligns the deadline for supporting Alert Messages initiated in Spanish with the deadline for extending the length of WEA messages from 90 to 360 characters. I. Background 2. The WEA system is a tool for authorized federal, state and local government entities to geographically target alerts and warnings to the WEA- VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:11 Feb 27, 2018 Jkt 244001 capable mobile devices of Participating CMS Providers’ subscribers. The Warning Alert and Response Network (WARN) Act gives the Federal Communications Commission (Commission) authority to adopt ‘‘relevant technical standards, protocols, procedures and other technical requirements’’ governing WEA. In September 2016, the Commission adopted the WEA Report and Order, 81 FR 75710 (Nov. 1, 2016), which included requirements to support Spanish language Alert Messages. It also adopted the WEA Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (WEA FNPRM), 81 FR 78539 (Nov. 8, 2016), seeking comment on measures to further improve emergency managers’ ability to geographically target (geo-target) Alert Messages; to preserve Alert Messages on mobile devices for consumer review until they expire; and to define the extent of participation in WEA. II. Discussion 3. Geo-targeting of Alert Messages. This Order requires Participating CMS Providers to deliver Alert Messages to an area that matches the target area specified by alert originators, as proposed in the WEA FNPRM. The record demonstrates a compelling public interest need for WEA Alert Messages to be delivered in a more geographically targeted manner. Emergency managers and others emphasize that more accurate geotargeting will encourage alert originators to use WEA, enable them to use WEA to more effectively motivate consumers to take protective actions, and will reduce the potential for over-alerting and subscriber opt-out of receiving WEA Alert Messages. In addition to supporting the need for more stringent geo-targeting requirements, the majority of commenters indicate that it is technically feasible to match delivery of WEA Alert Messages to an area prescribed by the alert originator. The Order defines ‘‘matching’’ the target area as delivering an Alert Message to 100 percent of the target area with no more than 0.1 of a mile overshoot. The majority of emergency managers support this degree of geo-targeting accuracy as sufficient to meet their alerting needs. The Order does not specify the technological approach Participating CMS Providers should take to comply with this geo-targeting requirement. 4. The Order acknowledges that, in certain circumstances, a Participating CMS Provider may be technically incapable of matching the target area. These circumstances include when the target area is outside of the Participating CMS Provider’s network coverage area, PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 when mobile devices have location services disabled, and when legacy networks or devices cannot be updated to support this functionality. These circumstances do not include where a CMS Provider cannot match the target area using network-based solutions and declines to pursue other available technologies. Furthermore, the Commission expects network infrastructure constraints to more granular geo-targeting will be a time limited issue. 5. If some or all of a Participating CMS Provider’s network infrastructure is technically incapable of matching the specified target area, Participating CMS Providers must deliver the Alert Message to an area that best approximates the target area on and only on those aspects of its network infrastructure that are incapable of matching the target area. Any Participating CMS Provider that is technically capable of matching the target area is required to do so. Inability to comply with this rule by November 30, 2019 does not constitute technical incapability. In addition, a Participating CMS Provider must match only the portion of the target area that falls within its network’s coverage area. The Order clarifies that CMS Providers are no longer allowed to transmit an Alert Message to an area no larger than the propagation area of a single transmission site. 6. The requirement to match the target area applies only to new mobile devices offered for sale after November 30, 2019 and to existing devices capable of being upgraded to support this matching standard. For existing mobile devices that cannot be upgraded, Participating CMS Providers must deliver the Alert Message to their ‘‘best approximation’’ of the target area. These devices will still be considered ‘‘WEA-capable’’ as of November 30, 2019, as long as the CMS Provider delivers Alert Messages to these devices using its ‘‘best approximation’’ of the target area. WEAcapable mobile devices with location services turned off (or otherwise unavailable) at the time of the Alert Message receipt should display the Alert Message by default, provided they are within a Participating CMS Provider’s best approximation of the target area. 7. In matching the target area, Participating CMS Providers may not limit emergency managers’ ability to use the full 360 characters of alphanumeric text allocated for displayable WEA Alert Messages. The record indicates that it is technically feasible for Participating CMS Providers to transmit polygon coordinates to mobile devices without E:\FR\FM\28FER1.SGM 28FER1 sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2018 / Rules and Regulations affecting the 360-character allotment for displayable Alert Message text, by using lossless compression techniques or limiting the number of vertices used to describe the target area. The Order specifies that Participating CMS Providers that choose to use devicebased geo-fencing to match the target area are only required to transmit 76 vertices of up to four decimal places specifying the target area to a mobile device. 8. The Order requires Participating CMS Providers to comply with this requirement by November 30, 2019. The record indicates that enhanced geotargeting can be implemented sooner than the 42 months proposed in the WEA FNPRM. In light of this record, and the urgent public safety benefits of enhanced geo-targeting, we find that the November 30, 2019 compliance deadline is feasible and in the public interest. The Commission expects the industry to move expeditiously to meet the November 30, 2019 compliance deadline. However, if the standards process is delayed or prolonged through no fault of a Participating CMS provider, the Commission may consider waiver of this requirement. 9. Consumer Disclosure Requirements. Section 10.240 of the Commission’s rules requires that CMS Providers participating in WEA ‘‘in part’’ provide notice to consumers that WEA may not be available on all devices or within the entire service area, as well as details about the availability of WEA service. The Order further requires CMS Providers participating in WEA ‘‘in part’’ to disclose the extent to which enhanced geo-targeting is available on their network and devices at the point of sale, and the benefits of enhanced geo-targeting. These disclosures will allow consumers to make more informed choices about their ability to receive WEA Alert Messages that are relevant to them. The Commission suggests, but does not require, that Participating CMS Providers disclose to consumers at the point of sale that if they have not enabled location services on their devices, they may receive Alert Messages that are not relevant to them. Participating CMS Providers must comply with these enhanced disclosure rules by November 30, 2019, or as specified by publication in the Federal Register of a document announcing approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the relevant effective date, whichever is later. 10. Preservation of Alert Messages. The Order adopts the WEA FNPRM’s proposal to amend § 10.500 of the WEA rules to state that WEA-capable mobile VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:11 Feb 27, 2018 Jkt 244001 devices must preserve Alert Messages in a consumer-accessible format and location for at least 24 hours after the Alert Message is received on the subscriber’s mobile device, or until deleted by the subscriber. The record shows that allowing consumers to review Alert Messages after they have been dismissed can improve comprehension of potentially life-saving information. Commenters indicate that it is feasible to preserve Alert Messages, and that some WEA-capable mobile devices are already capable of preserving Alert Messages. For those mobile devices that do not currently preserve Alert Messages, the record shows this capability can be enabled through a software update. 11. The Order require Participating CMS Providers to comply with this requirement by November 30, 2019. The record shows that 22 months is sufficient time for Participating CMS Providers to implement the software update needed to enable this functionality—and making this requirement align with the precise geotargeting requirement should ease administration and oversight. Because the Order does not mandate a uniform approach to the preservation of Alert Messages, compliance with this requirement does not implicate changes to the provision of WEA that would necessitate standards development. Accordingly, the Order concludes that it is both feasible and in the public interest to require this functionality on WEA-capable mobile devices by November 30, 2019. 12. Defining WEA Participation. As proposed in the WEA FNPRM, the Order amends § 10.10 of the Commission’s rules to state that CMS Providers participate in WEA ‘‘in whole’’ when they agree to transmit WEA Alert Messages in a manner consistent with the technical standards, protocols, procedures, and other technical requirements implemented by the Commission in the entirety of their geographic service area, and when all mobile devices that they offer at the point of sale are WEA-capable. It further amends § 10.10 to state that CMS Providers participate in WEA ‘‘in part’’ when they agree to transmit WEA Alert Messages in a manner consistent with the technical standards, protocols, procedures, and other technical requirements implemented by the Commission in some, but not in all, of their geographic service areas, or not all mobile devices that they offer at the point of sale are WEA-capable. The Order clarifies that CMS Providers that participate in WEA ‘‘in part’’ need not offer WEA on all devices available at the PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 8621 point of sale. These definitions will provide greater clarity to consumers about the availability of WEA service on networks and devices. 13. These definitions will become effective 60 days from their publication in the Federal Register. Commenters agree that CMS Providers should be required to renew their elections, if necessary to remain accurate and consistent with these definitions. Accordingly, the Order allows CMS Providers 120 days from the date of publication in the Federal Register of a document announcing approval by the Office of Management and Budget of the modified information collection requirements to update their WEA election status. This renewal will ensure that Participating CMS Providers’ election notices are consistent with the definitions of ‘‘in whole’’ and ‘‘in part’’ participation adopted in this Order, and will promote public awareness and understanding of CMS Provider participation. 14. Second Order on Reconsideration. The Second Order on Reconsideration grants CTIA’s request that the Commission extend the compliance deadline for supporting Spanishlanguage Alert Messages from two years to 30 months from the rule’s publication in the Federal Register, to be consistent with the deadline for the rule that CMS Providers support WEA messages of up to 360 characters in length. The Order concludes that aligning the Spanishlanguage alert implementation compliance timeframe with the 360character length requirement timeframe will both ensure that Spanish-language alerts are as effective as possible and will reduce costs for Participating CMS Providers. Absent such relief, Participating CMS Providers would have to incur separate costs of testing for both Spanish-language and 360character WEA messages. Accordingly, the Order finds that extending the compliance deadline for Spanishlanguage alerting is in the public interest. This requirement will become applicable beginning May 1, 2019. 15. Cost and Benefit Analysis. The Order shows that the benefits from the improvements to WEA adopted in the Order should exceed their cost. The Order estimates the cost burden on CMS Providers as $41 million. This cost results mainly from modifications to standards and software. The Order estimates that the public safety benefit of the rules adopted in this Order will be in excess of these costs. This assessment of costs is based on the quantitative framework described in the WEA FNPRM, which no commenter opposed. The WEA FNPRM sought E:\FR\FM\28FER1.SGM 28FER1 sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES 8622 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2018 / Rules and Regulations comment on the costs and benefits of the proposed rules, but the Commission received a sparse record in response, including no dollar figure estimates. 16. Costs. The Order finds that the primary cost incurred by these rules will stem from the Order’s enhanced geo-targeting requirement. In the WEA FNPRM, the Commission estimated that the rules could present a $41 million one-time cost to all Participating CMS Providers, which includes $1,140,000 for updating standards and specifications, $39,680,000 for new or modified software, $20,000 for recordkeeping costs, and a small incremental cost for consumer disclosure. 17. The cost of modifying an existing standard is less than the cost of creating a new standard. Assuming that enhanced geo-targeting will require the development of three new standards and the modification of 12 standards, the Order concludes that the maximum reasonable cost of standards modifications necessary to support enhanced geo-targeting will be $76,000 per standard times fifteen standards, or $1,140,000 as a one-time cost. After standards are set, Participating CMS Providers will need to develop and test new software to support enhanced geotargeting and alert preservation. The WEA FNPRM anticipated that the software updates implicated by its proposals would cost, at most, $39,680,000 over 12 months. No commenters objected to this level of anticipated costs. The Order concludes that the cost of developing and testing new or modified software required to comply with the new rules would be no more than $39,680,000. Finally, the WEA FNPRM estimated that the total annual recordkeeping cost of the election requirement would be $18,074.53. The Commission received no objections to this estimate in the record. The Order concludes that a reasonable ceiling on the cost of renewing elections under the definitions of ‘‘in whole’’ and ‘‘in part’’ would be $20,000, and will be covered by the $41 million total cost estimate. 18. Benefits. Enhanced geo-targeting will improve the quality of WEA to the public and to emergency managers. Without more granular geo-targeting, the use of WEA can result in over-alerting, which leads to ‘‘alert fatigue’’ and confusion for consumers. Consumers that are outside of an area of concern, but receive alerts anyway, begin to ignore alerts or even choose to opt out of receiving future WEA Alert Messages on their mobile devices. Over-alerting can cause confusion and a burden on emergency resources by people who are VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:23 Feb 27, 2018 Jkt 244001 not certain about how to respond to alerts. In the case of a wildfire, for example, alerting a wide area that is not in direct danger can result in clogged evacuation routes and many calls to emergency officials for additional information. Faced with the real cost of over-alerting, many emergency managers have declined to use WEA. Enhanced geo-targeting directly addresses the over-alerting problem and benefits both consumers and emergency managers. 19. The Order concludes that a one percent reduction in relevant fatalities, injuries, and costs for emergency services is a modest quantification of the benefits of more targeted WEA alerts. The benefit of a one percent reduction in relevant fatalities ($134 million), injuries (at least $2 million) and costs for emergency services ($48 million) yields a total benefit of $184 million. This is well in excess of the anticipated costs. Even if benefits were half of this projection, yielding only one half of one percent reduction in relevant fatalities, injuries and emergency response costs, that would still yield a benefit of $92 million, still significantly above the costs. No commenter has objected to the previous analysis claiming that the benefits of enhanced geo-targeting are sufficient to cover the $41 million costs imposed by this Second Report and Order. 20. In addition, alert preservation will allow subscribers to review details in WEA messages such as shelter locations, improving their ability to seek safety. Additional disclosure requirements will allow consumers to choose a provider and a phone that will bring them WEA alerts that they might otherwise miss. III. Procedural Matters A. Accessible Formats 21. To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an email to fcc504@ fcc.gov or call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202– 418–0530 (voice), 202–418–0432 (TTY). B. Final Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis 22. Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (RFA), see 5 U.S.C. 603, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was included in the FNPRM in PS Docket No. 15–91. The Commission sought written comment on the proposals in this docket, including comment on the IRFA. This Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis conforms to the RFA. PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 C. Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis 23. This Report and Order contains new or modified information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The requirements will be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under section 3507(d) of the PRA. OMB, the general public, and other Federal agencies will be invited to comment on the new or modified information collection requirements contained in this proceeding. In addition, we note that pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), we previously sought specific comment on how the Commission might further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees. 24. In this document, we have assessed the effects of new consumer disclosure and election renewal requirements, and find that these rules will impose reasonable implementation costs on small businesses with fewer than 25 employees. D. Congressional Review Act 25. The Commission will send a copy of this Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). IV. Ordering Clauses 26. Accordingly, it is ordered, pursuant to sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(o), 301, 303(r), 303(v), 307, 309, 335, 403, 624(g), 706, and 715 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i), 154(o), 301, 301(r), 303(v), 307, 309, 335, 403, 544(g), 606, and 615, as well as by sections 602(a),(b),(c), (f), 603, 604 and 606 of the WARN Act, 47 U.S.C. 1202(a),(b),(c), (f), 1203, 1204 and 1206, that the Second WEA Report and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration in PS Docket Nos. 15–91 and 15–94 is hereby adopted. 27. It is further ordered that the Commission’s rules and requirements are hereby amended as set forth in Appendix A of the Second Report and Order. 28. It is further ordered that the rules adopted herein will become effective as described herein. Those rules and requirements which contain new or modified information collection requirements that require approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction E:\FR\FM\28FER1.SGM 28FER1 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2018 / Rules and Regulations Act will become effective 120 days after publication in the Federal Register of a document announcing such approval, except for the amendment to 47 CFR 10.240, which will become effective on November 30, 2019 or as specified by publication in the Federal Register of a document announcing OMB approval and the relevant effective date, whichever is later. 29. It is further ordered, pursuant to sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(o), 301, 303(r), 303(v), 307, 309, 335, 403, 624(g), and 706 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i), 154(o), 301, 301(r), 303(v), 307, 309, 335, 403, 544(g), and 606, as well as by sections 602(a),(b),(c), (f), 603, 604 and 606 of the WARN Act, 47 U.S.C. 1202(a),(b),(c), (f), 1203, 1204 and 1206, that the CTIA Petition is granted to the extent specified herein and in the First Order on Reconsideration. 30. It is further ordered that, as set forth in this Second Order on Reconsideration, the effective date of the requirement imposed by 47 CFR 10.480 published at 81 FR 75710 is delayed until May 1, 2019, the same effective date as other rules adopted by the WEA R&O that were made effective 30 months from the publication of the rules adopted in the WEA R&O in the Federal Register. 31. It is further ordered that the Commission’s Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, shall send a copy of the Second WEA Report and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration, including the Final and Supplemental Final Regulatory Flexibility Analyses, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration. 32. It is further ordered that the Commission shall send a copy of the Second WEA Report and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A). List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 10 sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES Communications common carriers, Emergency alerting. Federal Communications Commission. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, Office of the Secretary. Final Rules For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission amends 47 CFR part 10 to read as follows: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:23 Feb 27, 2018 Jkt 244001 PART 10—WIRELESS EMERGENCY ALERTS 1. The authority citation for part 10 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i) and (o), 201, 303(r), 403, and 606; sections 602(a), (b), (c), (f), 603, 604 and 606 of Pub. L. 109–347, 120 Stat. 1884. 2. Amend § 10.10 by adding paragraphs (k) and (l) to read as follows: ■ § 10.10 Definitions. * * * * * (k) CMS Provider participation ‘‘in whole.’’ CMS Providers that have agreed to transmit WEA Alert Messages in a manner consistent with the technical standards, protocols, procedures, and other technical requirements implemented by the Commission in the entirety of their geographic service area, and when all mobile devices that the CMS Providers offer at the point of sale are WEA-capable. (l) CMS Provider participation ‘‘in part.’’ CMS Providers that have agreed to transmit WEA Alert Messages in a manner consistent with the technical standards, protocols, procedures, and other technical requirements implemented by the Commission in some, but not in all of their geographic service areas, or CMS Providers that offer mobile devices at the point of sale that are not WEA-capable. ■ 3. Amend § 10.210 by revising paragraph (a) introductory text to read as follows: § 10.210 WEA participation election procedures. (a) A CMS provider that elects to transmit WEA Alert Messages, in part or in whole as defined by § 10.10(k) and (l), shall electronically file with the Commission a letter attesting that the Provider: * * * * * ■ 4. Amend § 10.240 by revising paragraph (c) to read as follows: § 10.240 Notification to new subscribers of non-participation in WEA. * * * * * (c) CMS Providers electing to transmit alerts ‘‘in part’’ shall use the following notification: NOTICE REGARDING TRANSMISSION OF WIRELESS EMERGENCY ALERTS (Commercial Mobile Alert Service) [[CMS provider]] has chosen to offer wireless emergency alerts, including enhanced geo-targeting, within portions of its service area, as defined by the terms and conditions of its service agreement, on wireless emergency alert capable devices. There is no additional PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 8623 charge for these wireless emergency alerts. Wireless emergency alerts, including enhanced geo-targeting, may not be available on all devices or in the entire service area, or if a subscriber is outside of the [[CMS provider]] service area. For details on the availability of this service and wireless emergency alert capable devices, including the availability and benefits of enhanced geo-targeting, please ask a sales representative, or go to [[CMS provider’s URL]]. Notice required by FCC Rule 47 CFR 10.240 (Commercial Mobile Alert Service) * * * * * ■ 5. Amend § 10.450 by revising paragraph (a) and adding paragraph (c) to read as follows: § 10.450 Geo-targeting. * * * * * (a) This section establishes minimum requirements for the geographic targeting of Alert Messages. A Participating CMS Provider will determine which of its network facilities, elements, and locations will be used to geographically target Alert Messages. A Participating CMS Provider must deliver any Alert Message that is specified by a circle or polygon to an area that matches the specified circle or polygon. A Participating CMS Provider is considered to have matched the target area when they deliver an Alert Message to 100 percent of the target area with no more than 0.1 of a mile overshoot. If some or all of a Participating CMS Provider’s network infrastructure is technically incapable of matching the specified target area, then that Participating CMS Provider must deliver the Alert Message to an area that best approximates the specified target area on and only on those aspects of its network infrastructure that are incapable of matching the target area. A Participating CMS Provider’s network infrastructure may be considered technically incapable of matching the target area in limited circumstances, including when the target area is outside of the Participating CMS Provider’s network coverage area, when mobile devices have location services disabled, and when legacy networks or devices cannot be updated to support this functionality. * * * * * (c) In matching the target area, Participating CMS Providers may not limit the availability of 360 characters for the Alert Message text. ■ 6. Amend § 10.500 by revising the introductory text and adding paragraph (h) to read as follows: E:\FR\FM\28FER1.SGM 28FER1 8624 § 10.500 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 40 / Wednesday, February 28, 2018 / Rules and Regulations General requirements. WEA mobile device functionality is dependent on the capabilities of a Participating CMS Provider’s delivery technologies. Mobile devices are required to perform the following functions: * * * * * (h) Preservation of Alert Messages in a consumer-accessible format and location for at least 24 hours or until deleted by the subscriber. [FR Doc. 2018–03990 Filed 2–27–18; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Parts 20 and 68 [CG Docket No. 13–46, WT Docket Nos. 07– 250 and 10–254; FCC 17–135] Hearing Aid Compatibility Standards Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Commission amends its hearing aid compatibility (HAC) rules to enhance equal access to the national telecommunications network by people with hearing loss and implement the Twenty-First Century Communications and Video Accessibility Act. The changes incorporate by reference a revised technical standard for volume control for wireline telephones, expand the scope of the wireline HAC rules, add a volume control requirement for wireless handsets, and eliminate an outdated wireless technical standard. DATES: Effective March 30, 2018, except 47 CFR 68.501 through 68.504, which contain modified information collection requirements that require approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), and which will become effective after the Commission publishes a document in the Federal Register announcing such approval and the relevant effective date. The incorporation by reference of ANSI/TIA–4965–2012 is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of March 30, 2018. The incorporation by reference of the material in § 20.19 was approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of June 6, 2008 and August 16, 2012. The incorporation by reference of the other material in § 68.317 was approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of October 23, 1996. Compliance Dates: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Bahr, Disability Rights Office, sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:11 Feb 27, 2018 Jkt 244001 Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, at (202) 418–0573 or email: Susan.Bahr@fcc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission’s Report and Order and Order on Reconsideration, document FCC 17– 135, adopted on October 24, 2017, released on October 26, 2017, in CG Docket No. 13–46, WT Docket Nos. 07– 250 and 10–254. The full text of this document will be available for public inspection and copying during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW, Room CY–A257, Washington, DC 20554. To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), (844) 432–2272 (videophone), or (202) 418– 0432 (TTY). Document FCC 17–135 concerns the Commission’s rules for HAC for wireline and wireless handsets. The Commission previously sought comment on these issues in Access to Telecommunication Equipment and Services by Persons with Disabilities; Amendment of the Commission’s Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Mobile Handsets; Comment Sought on 2010 Review of Hearing Aid Compatibility Regulations, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, published at 80 FR 80722, December 28, 2015 (NPRM). Document FCC 17–135 also responds to the Petition for Partial Reconsideration filed by LG Electronics MobileComm U.S.A., Inc., et al. on October 8, 2010, concerning Amendment of the Commission’s Rules Governing Hearing Aid-Compatible Mobile Handsets, Policy Statement and Second Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, document FCC 10–145, published at 75 FR 54508, September 8, 2010 (August 2010 Report and Order). Compliance Dates Wireline telephones manufactured or imported into the United States on or after February 28, 2020, must comply with the revised wireline volume control technical standard (ANSI/TIA– 4965–2012) incorporated by reference into 47 CFR 68.317. Wireline telephones manufactured or imported into the United States before February 28, 2020, may comply with either ANSI/TIA– 4965–2012 or the existing wireline volume control standard referenced in 47 CFR 68.317(a)(1). Wireline telephones used for advanced PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 communications services (ACS telephonic CPE) must comply with the applicable provisions of 47 CFR part 68 as amended by document FCC 17–135 if they are manufactured or imported on or after February 28, 2020. However, §§ 68.501 through 68.504 contain information collections that have not yet been approved by OMB. In the event that OMB approval does not occur before February 28, 2020, the FCC will publish a document in the Federal Register extending the compliance deadline for these provisions and will subsequently publish a document announcing a later compliance date. Wireless handsets submitted for equipment certification or for a permissive change relating to hearing aid compatibility starting March 1, 2021, must comply with the wireless volume control requirements set forth in 47 CFR 20.19. Any grants of certification issued to wireless handsets not equipped with such volume control that were submitted for certification before March 1, 2021, remain valid for HAC purposes. Wireless handsets submitted for equipment certification or for a permissive change relating to HAC beginning August 28, 2018, must comply with the M3 and T3 ratings associated with the ANSI C63.19–2011 standard. Any grants of certification issued for wireless handsets that were submitted for certification before August 28, 2018, under ANSI C63.19–2011, or previous versions of ANSI 63.19, remain valid for HAC purposes. Incorporation by Reference The Office of Federal Register (OFR) recently revised its regulations to require that agencies must discuss in the preamble of a final rule ways that the materials the agency is incorporating by reference are reasonably available to interested parties or how it worked to make those materials reasonably available to interested parties. In addition, the preamble of the final rule must summarize the material. Several standards are incorporated by reference: (a) Paragraph 4.1.2 (including table 4.4) of ANSI/EIA–470–A–1987; (b) paragraph 4.3.2 of ANSI/EIA/TIA–579– 1991; (c) ANSI/TIA–4965–2012; (d) ANSI C63.19–2007; and (e) ANSI C63.19–2011. These standards address the use of wireless and wireline handsets by people with hearing loss, including people who use hearing aids. The standards listed as (a), (b) and (c) apply to inductive coupling and volume control for wireline telephones, and by document FCC 17–135, to ACS telephonic CPE. Standards (a) and (b) were previously incorporated in the E:\FR\FM\28FER1.SGM 28FER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 28, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8619-8624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03990]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 10

[PS Docket Nos. 15-91, 15-94; FCC 18-4]


Wireless Emergency Alerts; Emergency Alert System

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document adopts revisions to Wireless Emergency Alert 
(WEA) rules to improve utility of WEA as a life-saving tool. By this 
action, the Commission adopts rules that will improve the accuracy with 
which Participating CMS Providers transmit Alert Messages to the 
specified target area. This document also adopts rules to preserve 
Alert Messages on mobile devices, inform consumers about WEA 
capabilities at the point of sale, define participation in WEA, and 
extend the compliance deadline for Spanish language alerting. Through 
this action, the Commission hopes to empower state and local alert 
originators to utilize WEA during emergencies.

DATES: Effective dates: The amendments to Sec. Sec.  10.10 and 10.210 
are effective April 30, 2018. The amendments to Sec. Sec.  10.450 and 
10.500 are effective November 30, 2019. The amendment to Sec.  10.240 
contains new or modified information collection requirements and will 
not be effective until those information collection requirements are 
approved by the Office of Management and Budget. The Federal 
Communications Commission will publish a document in the Federal 
Register announcing the effective date for the section.
    Compliance dates: Participating CMS Providers must comply with the 
new point of sale disclosure rules by November 30, 2019, or as 
specified by publication in the Federal Register of a document 
announcing approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and 
the relevant effective date, whichever is later. CMS Providers are 
required to update their WEA election status within June 28, 2018 of a 
document announcing approval by the Office of Management and Budget of 
the modified information collection requirements.
    Applicability date: The requirement to support Spanish language 
Alert Messages in Sec.  10.480 is applicable beginning May 1, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Wiley, Attorney Advisor, 
Cybersecurity and Communications

[[Page 8620]]

Reliability Division, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, at 
202-418-1678, or by email at [email protected]. For additional 
information concerning the information collection requirements 
contained in this document, send an email to [email protected] or contact 
Nicole Ongele, Office of Managing Director, Performance Evaluation and 
Records Management, 202-418-2991, or by email to [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Second 
Report and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration (Second Report and 
Order) in PS Docket No. 15-91, No. 15-94, FCC 18-4, released on January 
31, 2018. The full text of this document is available for inspection 
and copying during normal business hours in the FCC Reference Center 
(Room CY-1257), 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554, or online at: 
https://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2018/db0131/FCC-18-4A1.pdf. The rules in this part are issued pursuant to the 
authority contained in the Warning, Alert, and Response Network Act, 
Title VI of the Security and Accountability for Every Port Act of 2006, 
Public Law 109-347, Titles I through III of the Communications Act of 
1934, as amended, and Executive Order 13407 of June 26, 2006, Public 
Alert and Warning System, 71 FR 36975 (2006).

Synopsis

    1. In this Second Report and Order, the Federal Communication 
Commission takes measures to enhance the effectiveness of Wireless 
Emergency Alerts (WEA). In particular, the Commission improves the 
accuracy with which emergency managers can geographically target the 
delivery of WEA Alert Messages to areas within their jurisdiction. New 
rules will ensure that consumers will continue to be able to retrieve 
and review Alert Message content for 24 hours from receipt. The Order 
also defines what it means for a Commercial Mobile Service (CMS) 
Provider to participate in WEA ``in whole'' versus ``in part.'' In the 
Second Order on Reconsideration, the Commission aligns the deadline for 
supporting Alert Messages initiated in Spanish with the deadline for 
extending the length of WEA messages from 90 to 360 characters.

I. Background

    2. The WEA system is a tool for authorized federal, state and local 
government entities to geographically target alerts and warnings to the 
WEA-capable mobile devices of Participating CMS Providers' subscribers. 
The Warning Alert and Response Network (WARN) Act gives the Federal 
Communications Commission (Commission) authority to adopt ``relevant 
technical standards, protocols, procedures and other technical 
requirements'' governing WEA. In September 2016, the Commission adopted 
the WEA Report and Order, 81 FR 75710 (Nov. 1, 2016), which included 
requirements to support Spanish language Alert Messages. It also 
adopted the WEA Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (WEA FNPRM), 81 
FR 78539 (Nov. 8, 2016), seeking comment on measures to further improve 
emergency managers' ability to geographically target (geo-target) Alert 
Messages; to preserve Alert Messages on mobile devices for consumer 
review until they expire; and to define the extent of participation in 
WEA.

II. Discussion

    3. Geo-targeting of Alert Messages. This Order requires 
Participating CMS Providers to deliver Alert Messages to an area that 
matches the target area specified by alert originators, as proposed in 
the WEA FNPRM. The record demonstrates a compelling public interest 
need for WEA Alert Messages to be delivered in a more geographically 
targeted manner. Emergency managers and others emphasize that more 
accurate geo-targeting will encourage alert originators to use WEA, 
enable them to use WEA to more effectively motivate consumers to take 
protective actions, and will reduce the potential for over-alerting and 
subscriber opt-out of receiving WEA Alert Messages. In addition to 
supporting the need for more stringent geo-targeting requirements, the 
majority of commenters indicate that it is technically feasible to 
match delivery of WEA Alert Messages to an area prescribed by the alert 
originator. The Order defines ``matching'' the target area as 
delivering an Alert Message to 100 percent of the target area with no 
more than 0.1 of a mile overshoot. The majority of emergency managers 
support this degree of geo-targeting accuracy as sufficient to meet 
their alerting needs. The Order does not specify the technological 
approach Participating CMS Providers should take to comply with this 
geo-targeting requirement.
    4. The Order acknowledges that, in certain circumstances, a 
Participating CMS Provider may be technically incapable of matching the 
target area. These circumstances include when the target area is 
outside of the Participating CMS Provider's network coverage area, when 
mobile devices have location services disabled, and when legacy 
networks or devices cannot be updated to support this functionality. 
These circumstances do not include where a CMS Provider cannot match 
the target area using network-based solutions and declines to pursue 
other available technologies. Furthermore, the Commission expects 
network infrastructure constraints to more granular geo-targeting will 
be a time limited issue.
    5. If some or all of a Participating CMS Provider's network 
infrastructure is technically incapable of matching the specified 
target area, Participating CMS Providers must deliver the Alert Message 
to an area that best approximates the target area on and only on those 
aspects of its network infrastructure that are incapable of matching 
the target area. Any Participating CMS Provider that is technically 
capable of matching the target area is required to do so. Inability to 
comply with this rule by November 30, 2019 does not constitute 
technical incapability. In addition, a Participating CMS Provider must 
match only the portion of the target area that falls within its 
network's coverage area. The Order clarifies that CMS Providers are no 
longer allowed to transmit an Alert Message to an area no larger than 
the propagation area of a single transmission site.
    6. The requirement to match the target area applies only to new 
mobile devices offered for sale after November 30, 2019 and to existing 
devices capable of being upgraded to support this matching standard. 
For existing mobile devices that cannot be upgraded, Participating CMS 
Providers must deliver the Alert Message to their ``best 
approximation'' of the target area. These devices will still be 
considered ``WEA-capable'' as of November 30, 2019, as long as the CMS 
Provider delivers Alert Messages to these devices using its ``best 
approximation'' of the target area. WEA-capable mobile devices with 
location services turned off (or otherwise unavailable) at the time of 
the Alert Message receipt should display the Alert Message by default, 
provided they are within a Participating CMS Provider's best 
approximation of the target area.
    7. In matching the target area, Participating CMS Providers may not 
limit emergency managers' ability to use the full 360 characters of 
alphanumeric text allocated for displayable WEA Alert Messages. The 
record indicates that it is technically feasible for Participating CMS 
Providers to transmit polygon coordinates to mobile devices without

[[Page 8621]]

affecting the 360-character allotment for displayable Alert Message 
text, by using lossless compression techniques or limiting the number 
of vertices used to describe the target area. The Order specifies that 
Participating CMS Providers that choose to use device-based geo-fencing 
to match the target area are only required to transmit 76 vertices of 
up to four decimal places specifying the target area to a mobile 
device.
    8. The Order requires Participating CMS Providers to comply with 
this requirement by November 30, 2019. The record indicates that 
enhanced geo-targeting can be implemented sooner than the 42 months 
proposed in the WEA FNPRM. In light of this record, and the urgent 
public safety benefits of enhanced geo-targeting, we find that the 
November 30, 2019 compliance deadline is feasible and in the public 
interest. The Commission expects the industry to move expeditiously to 
meet the November 30, 2019 compliance deadline. However, if the 
standards process is delayed or prolonged through no fault of a 
Participating CMS provider, the Commission may consider waiver of this 
requirement.
    9. Consumer Disclosure Requirements. Section 10.240 of the 
Commission's rules requires that CMS Providers participating in WEA 
``in part'' provide notice to consumers that WEA may not be available 
on all devices or within the entire service area, as well as details 
about the availability of WEA service. The Order further requires CMS 
Providers participating in WEA ``in part'' to disclose the extent to 
which enhanced geo-targeting is available on their network and devices 
at the point of sale, and the benefits of enhanced geo-targeting. These 
disclosures will allow consumers to make more informed choices about 
their ability to receive WEA Alert Messages that are relevant to them. 
The Commission suggests, but does not require, that Participating CMS 
Providers disclose to consumers at the point of sale that if they have 
not enabled location services on their devices, they may receive Alert 
Messages that are not relevant to them. Participating CMS Providers 
must comply with these enhanced disclosure rules by November 30, 2019, 
or as specified by publication in the Federal Register of a document 
announcing approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and 
the relevant effective date, whichever is later.
    10. Preservation of Alert Messages. The Order adopts the WEA 
FNPRM's proposal to amend Sec.  10.500 of the WEA rules to state that 
WEA-capable mobile devices must preserve Alert Messages in a consumer-
accessible format and location for at least 24 hours after the Alert 
Message is received on the subscriber's mobile device, or until deleted 
by the subscriber. The record shows that allowing consumers to review 
Alert Messages after they have been dismissed can improve comprehension 
of potentially life-saving information. Commenters indicate that it is 
feasible to preserve Alert Messages, and that some WEA-capable mobile 
devices are already capable of preserving Alert Messages. For those 
mobile devices that do not currently preserve Alert Messages, the 
record shows this capability can be enabled through a software update.
    11. The Order require Participating CMS Providers to comply with 
this requirement by November 30, 2019. The record shows that 22 months 
is sufficient time for Participating CMS Providers to implement the 
software update needed to enable this functionality--and making this 
requirement align with the precise geo-targeting requirement should 
ease administration and oversight. Because the Order does not mandate a 
uniform approach to the preservation of Alert Messages, compliance with 
this requirement does not implicate changes to the provision of WEA 
that would necessitate standards development. Accordingly, the Order 
concludes that it is both feasible and in the public interest to 
require this functionality on WEA-capable mobile devices by November 
30, 2019.
    12. Defining WEA Participation. As proposed in the WEA FNPRM, the 
Order amends Sec.  10.10 of the Commission's rules to state that CMS 
Providers participate in WEA ``in whole'' when they agree to transmit 
WEA Alert Messages in a manner consistent with the technical standards, 
protocols, procedures, and other technical requirements implemented by 
the Commission in the entirety of their geographic service area, and 
when all mobile devices that they offer at the point of sale are WEA-
capable. It further amends Sec.  10.10 to state that CMS Providers 
participate in WEA ``in part'' when they agree to transmit WEA Alert 
Messages in a manner consistent with the technical standards, 
protocols, procedures, and other technical requirements implemented by 
the Commission in some, but not in all, of their geographic service 
areas, or not all mobile devices that they offer at the point of sale 
are WEA-capable. The Order clarifies that CMS Providers that 
participate in WEA ``in part'' need not offer WEA on all devices 
available at the point of sale. These definitions will provide greater 
clarity to consumers about the availability of WEA service on networks 
and devices.
    13. These definitions will become effective 60 days from their 
publication in the Federal Register. Commenters agree that CMS 
Providers should be required to renew their elections, if necessary to 
remain accurate and consistent with these definitions. Accordingly, the 
Order allows CMS Providers 120 days from the date of publication in the 
Federal Register of a document announcing approval by the Office of 
Management and Budget of the modified information collection 
requirements to update their WEA election status. This renewal will 
ensure that Participating CMS Providers' election notices are 
consistent with the definitions of ``in whole'' and ``in part'' 
participation adopted in this Order, and will promote public awareness 
and understanding of CMS Provider participation.
    14. Second Order on Reconsideration. The Second Order on 
Reconsideration grants CTIA's request that the Commission extend the 
compliance deadline for supporting Spanish-language Alert Messages from 
two years to 30 months from the rule's publication in the Federal 
Register, to be consistent with the deadline for the rule that CMS 
Providers support WEA messages of up to 360 characters in length. The 
Order concludes that aligning the Spanish-language alert implementation 
compliance timeframe with the 360-character length requirement 
timeframe will both ensure that Spanish-language alerts are as 
effective as possible and will reduce costs for Participating CMS 
Providers. Absent such relief, Participating CMS Providers would have 
to incur separate costs of testing for both Spanish-language and 360-
character WEA messages. Accordingly, the Order finds that extending the 
compliance deadline for Spanish-language alerting is in the public 
interest. This requirement will become applicable beginning May 1, 
2019.
    15. Cost and Benefit Analysis. The Order shows that the benefits 
from the improvements to WEA adopted in the Order should exceed their 
cost. The Order estimates the cost burden on CMS Providers as $41 
million. This cost results mainly from modifications to standards and 
software. The Order estimates that the public safety benefit of the 
rules adopted in this Order will be in excess of these costs. This 
assessment of costs is based on the quantitative framework described in 
the WEA FNPRM, which no commenter opposed. The WEA FNPRM sought

[[Page 8622]]

comment on the costs and benefits of the proposed rules, but the 
Commission received a sparse record in response, including no dollar 
figure estimates.
    16. Costs. The Order finds that the primary cost incurred by these 
rules will stem from the Order's enhanced geo-targeting requirement. In 
the WEA FNPRM, the Commission estimated that the rules could present a 
$41 million one-time cost to all Participating CMS Providers, which 
includes $1,140,000 for updating standards and specifications, 
$39,680,000 for new or modified software, $20,000 for recordkeeping 
costs, and a small incremental cost for consumer disclosure.
    17. The cost of modifying an existing standard is less than the 
cost of creating a new standard. Assuming that enhanced geo-targeting 
will require the development of three new standards and the 
modification of 12 standards, the Order concludes that the maximum 
reasonable cost of standards modifications necessary to support 
enhanced geo-targeting will be $76,000 per standard times fifteen 
standards, or $1,140,000 as a one-time cost. After standards are set, 
Participating CMS Providers will need to develop and test new software 
to support enhanced geo-targeting and alert preservation. The WEA FNPRM 
anticipated that the software updates implicated by its proposals would 
cost, at most, $39,680,000 over 12 months. No commenters objected to 
this level of anticipated costs. The Order concludes that the cost of 
developing and testing new or modified software required to comply with 
the new rules would be no more than $39,680,000. Finally, the WEA FNPRM 
estimated that the total annual recordkeeping cost of the election 
requirement would be $18,074.53. The Commission received no objections 
to this estimate in the record. The Order concludes that a reasonable 
ceiling on the cost of renewing elections under the definitions of ``in 
whole'' and ``in part'' would be $20,000, and will be covered by the 
$41 million total cost estimate.
    18. Benefits. Enhanced geo-targeting will improve the quality of 
WEA to the public and to emergency managers. Without more granular geo-
targeting, the use of WEA can result in over-alerting, which leads to 
``alert fatigue'' and confusion for consumers. Consumers that are 
outside of an area of concern, but receive alerts anyway, begin to 
ignore alerts or even choose to opt out of receiving future WEA Alert 
Messages on their mobile devices. Over-alerting can cause confusion and 
a burden on emergency resources by people who are not certain about how 
to respond to alerts. In the case of a wildfire, for example, alerting 
a wide area that is not in direct danger can result in clogged 
evacuation routes and many calls to emergency officials for additional 
information. Faced with the real cost of over-alerting, many emergency 
managers have declined to use WEA. Enhanced geo-targeting directly 
addresses the over-alerting problem and benefits both consumers and 
emergency managers.
    19. The Order concludes that a one percent reduction in relevant 
fatalities, injuries, and costs for emergency services is a modest 
quantification of the benefits of more targeted WEA alerts. The benefit 
of a one percent reduction in relevant fatalities ($134 million), 
injuries (at least $2 million) and costs for emergency services ($48 
million) yields a total benefit of $184 million. This is well in excess 
of the anticipated costs. Even if benefits were half of this 
projection, yielding only one half of one percent reduction in relevant 
fatalities, injuries and emergency response costs, that would still 
yield a benefit of $92 million, still significantly above the costs. No 
commenter has objected to the previous analysis claiming that the 
benefits of enhanced geo-targeting are sufficient to cover the $41 
million costs imposed by this Second Report and Order.
    20. In addition, alert preservation will allow subscribers to 
review details in WEA messages such as shelter locations, improving 
their ability to seek safety. Additional disclosure requirements will 
allow consumers to choose a provider and a phone that will bring them 
WEA alerts that they might otherwise miss.

III. Procedural Matters

A. Accessible Formats

    21. To request materials in accessible formats for people with 
disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), 
send an email to [email protected] or call the Consumer & Governmental 
Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY).

B. Final Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis

    22. Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended 
(RFA), see 5 U.S.C. 603, an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 
(IRFA) was included in the FNPRM in PS Docket No. 15-91. The Commission 
sought written comment on the proposals in this docket, including 
comment on the IRFA. This Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 
conforms to the RFA.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis

    23. This Report and Order contains new or modified information 
collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 
(PRA), Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The requirements will 
be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review 
under section 3507(d) of the PRA. OMB, the general public, and other 
Federal agencies will be invited to comment on the new or modified 
information collection requirements contained in this proceeding. In 
addition, we note that pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief 
Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), we 
previously sought specific comment on how the Commission might further 
reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns 
with fewer than 25 employees.
    24. In this document, we have assessed the effects of new consumer 
disclosure and election renewal requirements, and find that these rules 
will impose reasonable implementation costs on small businesses with 
fewer than 25 employees.

D. Congressional Review Act

    25. The Commission will send a copy of this Order in a report to be 
sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to 
the Congressional Review Act, see U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

IV. Ordering Clauses

    26. Accordingly, it is ordered, pursuant to sections 1, 2, 4(i), 
4(o), 301, 303(r), 303(v), 307, 309, 335, 403, 624(g), 706, and 715 of 
the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i), 
154(o), 301, 301(r), 303(v), 307, 309, 335, 403, 544(g), 606, and 615, 
as well as by sections 602(a),(b),(c), (f), 603, 604 and 606 of the 
WARN Act, 47 U.S.C. 1202(a),(b),(c), (f), 1203, 1204 and 1206, that the 
Second WEA Report and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration in PS 
Docket Nos. 15-91 and 15-94 is hereby adopted.
    27. It is further ordered that the Commission's rules and 
requirements are hereby amended as set forth in Appendix A of the 
Second Report and Order.
    28. It is further ordered that the rules adopted herein will become 
effective as described herein. Those rules and requirements which 
contain new or modified information collection requirements that 
require approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
Paperwork Reduction

[[Page 8623]]

Act will become effective 120 days after publication in the Federal 
Register of a document announcing such approval, except for the 
amendment to 47 CFR 10.240, which will become effective on November 30, 
2019 or as specified by publication in the Federal Register of a 
document announcing OMB approval and the relevant effective date, 
whichever is later.
    29. It is further ordered, pursuant to sections 1, 2, 4(i), 4(o), 
301, 303(r), 303(v), 307, 309, 335, 403, 624(g), and 706 of the 
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 154(i), 
154(o), 301, 301(r), 303(v), 307, 309, 335, 403, 544(g), and 606, as 
well as by sections 602(a),(b),(c), (f), 603, 604 and 606 of the WARN 
Act, 47 U.S.C. 1202(a),(b),(c), (f), 1203, 1204 and 1206, that the CTIA 
Petition is granted to the extent specified herein and in the First 
Order on Reconsideration.
    30. It is further ordered that, as set forth in this Second Order 
on Reconsideration, the effective date of the requirement imposed by 47 
CFR 10.480 published at 81 FR 75710 is delayed until May 1, 2019, the 
same effective date as other rules adopted by the WEA R&O that were 
made effective 30 months from the publication of the rules adopted in 
the WEA R&O in the Federal Register.
    31. It is further ordered that the Commission's Consumer and 
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, shall send a 
copy of the Second WEA Report and Order and Second Order on 
Reconsideration, including the Final and Supplemental Final Regulatory 
Flexibility Analyses, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small 
Business Administration.
    32. It is further ordered that the Commission shall send a copy of 
the Second WEA Report and Order and Second Order on Reconsideration to 
Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the 
Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 10

    Communications common carriers, Emergency alerting.

Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary.

Final Rules

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal 
Communications Commission amends 47 CFR part 10 to read as follows:

PART 10--WIRELESS EMERGENCY ALERTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 10 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i) and (o), 201, 303(r), 403, and 
606; sections 602(a), (b), (c), (f), 603, 604 and 606 of Pub. L. 
109-347, 120 Stat. 1884.


0
2. Amend Sec.  10.10 by adding paragraphs (k) and (l) to read as 
follows:


Sec.  10.10  Definitions.

* * * * *
    (k) CMS Provider participation ``in whole.'' CMS Providers that 
have agreed to transmit WEA Alert Messages in a manner consistent with 
the technical standards, protocols, procedures, and other technical 
requirements implemented by the Commission in the entirety of their 
geographic service area, and when all mobile devices that the CMS 
Providers offer at the point of sale are WEA-capable.
    (l) CMS Provider participation ``in part.'' CMS Providers that have 
agreed to transmit WEA Alert Messages in a manner consistent with the 
technical standards, protocols, procedures, and other technical 
requirements implemented by the Commission in some, but not in all of 
their geographic service areas, or CMS Providers that offer mobile 
devices at the point of sale that are not WEA-capable.

0
3. Amend Sec.  10.210 by revising paragraph (a) introductory text to 
read as follows:


Sec.  10.210  WEA participation election procedures.

    (a) A CMS provider that elects to transmit WEA Alert Messages, in 
part or in whole as defined by Sec.  10.10(k) and (l), shall 
electronically file with the Commission a letter attesting that the 
Provider:
* * * * *

0
4. Amend Sec.  10.240 by revising paragraph (c) to read as follows:


Sec.  10.240  Notification to new subscribers of non-participation in 
WEA.

* * * * *
    (c) CMS Providers electing to transmit alerts ``in part'' shall use 
the following notification:
    NOTICE REGARDING TRANSMISSION OF WIRELESS EMERGENCY ALERTS 
(Commercial Mobile Alert Service)
    [[CMS provider]] has chosen to offer wireless emergency alerts, 
including enhanced geo-targeting, within portions of its service area, 
as defined by the terms and conditions of its service agreement, on 
wireless emergency alert capable devices. There is no additional charge 
for these wireless emergency alerts.
    Wireless emergency alerts, including enhanced geo-targeting, may 
not be available on all devices or in the entire service area, or if a 
subscriber is outside of the [[CMS provider]] service area. For details 
on the availability of this service and wireless emergency alert 
capable devices, including the availability and benefits of enhanced 
geo-targeting, please ask a sales representative, or go to [[CMS 
provider's URL]].
    Notice required by FCC Rule 47 CFR 10.240 (Commercial Mobile Alert 
Service)
* * * * *

0
5. Amend Sec.  10.450 by revising paragraph (a) and adding paragraph 
(c) to read as follows:


Sec.  10.450  Geo-targeting.

* * * * *
    (a) This section establishes minimum requirements for the 
geographic targeting of Alert Messages. A Participating CMS Provider 
will determine which of its network facilities, elements, and locations 
will be used to geographically target Alert Messages. A Participating 
CMS Provider must deliver any Alert Message that is specified by a 
circle or polygon to an area that matches the specified circle or 
polygon. A Participating CMS Provider is considered to have matched the 
target area when they deliver an Alert Message to 100 percent of the 
target area with no more than 0.1 of a mile overshoot. If some or all 
of a Participating CMS Provider's network infrastructure is technically 
incapable of matching the specified target area, then that 
Participating CMS Provider must deliver the Alert Message to an area 
that best approximates the specified target area on and only on those 
aspects of its network infrastructure that are incapable of matching 
the target area. A Participating CMS Provider's network infrastructure 
may be considered technically incapable of matching the target area in 
limited circumstances, including when the target area is outside of the 
Participating CMS Provider's network coverage area, when mobile devices 
have location services disabled, and when legacy networks or devices 
cannot be updated to support this functionality.
* * * * *
    (c) In matching the target area, Participating CMS Providers may 
not limit the availability of 360 characters for the Alert Message 
text.

0
6. Amend Sec.  10.500 by revising the introductory text and adding 
paragraph (h) to read as follows:

[[Page 8624]]

Sec.  10.500  General requirements.

    WEA mobile device functionality is dependent on the capabilities of 
a Participating CMS Provider's delivery technologies. Mobile devices 
are required to perform the following functions:
* * * * *
    (h) Preservation of Alert Messages in a consumer-accessible format 
and location for at least 24 hours or until deleted by the subscriber.

[FR Doc. 2018-03990 Filed 2-27-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.