Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Requirements and Services for Able-Bodied Adults Without Dependents; Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 8013-8016 [2018-03752]
Download as PDF
8013
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 83, No. 37
Friday, February 23, 2018
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
7 CFR Part 273
RIN 0584–AE57
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance
Program: Requirements and Services
for Able-Bodied Adults Without
Dependents; Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking
Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Advanced notice of proposed
rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Food and Nutrition Act
of 2008, as amended (the Act), limits the
amount of time an able-bodied adult
without dependents (ABAWD) can
receive Supplemental Nutrition
Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits to 3
months in a 36-month period, unless the
individual is working and/or
participating in a work program halftime or more, or participating in
workfare. The Act exempts individuals
from the time limit for several reasons,
including age, unfitness for work, or
having a dependent child. The Act also
provides State agencies with flexibility
to request a waiver of this time limit if
unemployment is high or the area does
not have a sufficient number of jobs to
provide employment. Moreover, the Act
gives States discretion to exempt 15
percent of the individuals who would
otherwise be subject to the time limit.
The Department of Agriculture’s
(Department’s) policy goal is to address
food insecurity by providing
supplemental food assistance and
helping able-bodied SNAP participants
move out of poverty and into work in
a manner that is consistent with the
structure and the intent of the Act. As
described in Sections 2 and 6(d) of the
Act, the goals of the program are to
promote food security, self-sufficiency,
well-being, and economic mobility. In
this Notice, the Department is seeking
public input to inform potential policy,
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Feb 22, 2018
Jkt 244001
program, and regulatory changes to
more consistently advance this goal.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before April 9, 2018 to
be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: The Food and Nutrition
Service, USDA, invites interested
persons to submit written comments on
this advanced notice of proposed
rulemaking. Comments may be
submitted in writing by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: Send comments to SNAP
Program Development Division, Food
and Nutrition, Services, USDA, 3101
Park Center Drive, Room 812,
Alexandria, Virginia 22302.
• All written comments submitted in
response to this advanced notice of
proposed rulemaking will be included
in the record and will be made available
to the public. Please be advised that the
substance of the comments and the
identity of the individuals or entities
submitting the comments will be subject
to public disclosure. FNS will make the
written comments publicly available on
the internet via https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sasha Gersten-Paal, Chief, Certification
Policy Branch, SNAP Program
Development Division, Food and
Nutrition, Services, USDA, 3101 Park
Center Drive, Room 812, Alexandria,
Virginia 22302 or (703) 305–2507 during
regular business hours 8:30 a.m. to 5
p.m.) Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Need To Issue This Notice
SNAP offers nutrition assistance to
millions of low-income individuals and
families. SNAP is the largest federal
nutrition assistance program in the
United States. As a result of the Great
Recession, the national unemployment
rate peaked at 9.7 percent for Fiscal
Year (FY) 2010. As with other
recessions, there was a lag between the
time that the national unemployment
rate began to decrease and the time that
the national poverty rate and SNAP
participation began to decrease. SNAP
participation peaked at an average of
47.6 million recipients per month in FY
2013. During that time period, the
national average unemployment rate
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
was 7.6 percent. In FY 2017, the
program served an average of 42.1
million recipients per month, and the
national average unemployment rate
was 4.5 percent. As Americans get back
to work, it is appropriate to review how
SNAP can better promote work and selfsufficiency so that fewer Americans
need assistance from the program.
The Department is soliciting public
comments on potential policy, program,
and regulatory changes that could
advance its goal of addressing food
insecurity by helping able-bodied SNAP
recipients obtain and maintain
employment and aligning program
regulations with the President’s Budget
proposals related to ABAWDs. The
Department will consider comments
received through this Notice to help
inform development of potential policy,
program, or regulatory changes.
The Department seeks input on
potential regulatory or other changes
that might better support States in
accurately identifying ABAWDs subject
to the time limit and providing
meaningful opportunities for them to
move towards self-sufficiency. The
Department is also asking whether
changes should be made to the existing
process by which State agencies request
to waive the ABAWD time limit, the
information and data States are required
to provide in supporting the waiver
request, and the Department’s
implementation and duration of the
waiver approval. If so, the Department
is asking for information on changes
that would better support the
Department’s goals. Moreover, the
Department seeks input on 15 percent
exemptions and how they may be better
used to support State efforts to serve
ABAWDs. The Department is receptive
to suggested changes that could be made
within the current statutory authority as
well as changes that may require new or
revised statutory authority. The
Department believes that this public
comment can inform the development
of any rule that may ultimately be
proposed.
References—the Following References
May Be Useful To Help Inform Those
Wishing To Provide Comments
(1) Section 6(d) and section 6(o) of the Food
and Nutrition Act of 2008, as amended
(2) Code of Federal Regulations Title 7, Parts
273.7 and 273.24
(3) Food Stamp Program: Personal
Responsibility Provisions of the Personal
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
8014
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Responsibility and Work Opportunity
Reconciliation Act of 1996, Proposed
Rule, 64 FR 70920 (December 17, 1999).
Available at: https://www.federalregister.
gov/documents/1999/12/17/99-32527/
food-stamp-program-personalresponsibility-provisions-of-the-personalresponsibility-and-work
(4) Food Stamp Program: Personal
Responsibility Provisions of the Personal
Responsibility and Work Opportunity
Reconciliation Act of 1996, Final Rule,
66 FR 4437 (January 17, 2001). Available
at: https://www.federalregister.gov/
documents/2001/01/17/01-1025/foodstamp-program-personal-responsibilityprovisions-of-the-personal-responsibilityand-work
(5) Guide to Serving ABAWDs Subject to
Time-limited Participation, 2015.
Available at: https://fns-prod.azureedge.
net/sites/default/files/Guide_to_Serving_
ABAWDs_Subject_to_Time_Limit.pdf
(6) Guide to Supporting Requests to Waiver
the Time Limit for Able-Bodied Adults
without Dependents, 2016. Available at:
https://fns-prod.azureedge.net/sites/
default/files/snap/SNAP-Guide-toSupporting-Requests-to-Waive-the-TimeLimit-for-ABAWDs.pdf
(7) Expiration of Statewide ABAWD Time
Limit Waivers, 2015. Available at:
https://fns-prod.azureedge.net/sites/
default/files/snap/SNAP-Expiration-ofStatewide-ABAWD-Time-LimitWaivers.pdf
(8) ABAWD Time Limit Policy and Program
Access, 2015. Available at: https://fnsprod.azureedge.net/sites/default/files/
snap/ABAWD-Time-Limit-Policy-andProgram-Access-Memo-Nov2015.pdf
(9) ABAWD Questions and Answers, 2015.
Available at: https://fns-prod.azureedge.
net/sites/default/files/snap/ABAWDQuestions-and-Answers-June%
202015.pdf
(10) ABAWD Questions and Answers, 2013.
Available at internet site: https://fnsprod.azureedge.net/sites/default/files/
snap/ABAWD-Questions-and-AnswersDecember-2013.pdf
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Overview of Current SNAP Work
Policies
SNAP work-related policies are best
understood as three distinct, but
interrelated and mutually supportive
areas: The general work requirements,
SNAP Employment and Training (SNAP
E&T) programs, and the ABAWD time
limit and work requirement. These
work-related policies, the people they
affect, and the ways in which they
interact are summarized below.
The General Work Requirements:
Section 6(d) of the Act and 7 CFR 273.7
The general work requirements apply
to people ages 16 through 59, except for
those who are physically or mentally
unfit for employment, care for a child
under age 6 or an incapacitated person,
are already employed 30 hours or more
per week, are already participating in a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Feb 22, 2018
Jkt 244001
work program, or are in school half-time
or more. In order to be eligible for SNAP
benefits, people who are subject to the
general work requirements must register
for work, report to an employer if
referred by the State agency, accept a
bona fide offer of a suitable job, not
voluntarily quit a job or reduce their
work hours below 30 hours a week, and
participate in a SNAP E&T program or
a workfare program if assigned by the
State agency.
People subject to the general work
requirements are commonly called
‘‘work registrants.’’ People that do not
comply with the general work
requirements without good cause are
disqualified from receiving SNAP for a
period of time. These disqualification
periods can vary by State and
circumstances. When a person subject to
the general work requirements does not
comply, the State must determine
whether the person has good cause
before imposing any disqualification.
Examples of good cause include illness,
household emergency, lack of
transportation, or other circumstances
beyond the person’s control. In
accordance with current law, if the State
finds that a person has good cause, it
must not disqualify them.
The ABAWD Time Limit and Work
Requirement: Section 6(o) of the Act
and 7 CFR 273.24
The ABAWD time limit and work
requirement apply to people ages 18
through 49, unless they are already
exempt from the general work
requirements, medically certified as
physically or mentally unfit for
employment, responsible for a child
under 18, or pregnant. ABAWDs are also
work registrants and must meet the
general work requirements. In addition,
ABAWDs subject to the time limit must
work and/or participate in a work
program 80 hours per month or more, or
participate in and comply with workfare
in order to receive SNAP for more than
3 months in a 36-month period.
Participation in SNAP E&T, which is a
type of work program, is one way a
person can meet the 80 hour per month
ABAWD work requirement, but other
work programs are acceptable as well.
State agencies can request to waive
the ABAWD time limit if an area has an
unemployment rate of over 10 percent
or the State can meet one of the
regulatory options to show it does not
have a sufficient number of jobs to
provide employment. If the time limit is
waived, individuals are not required to
meet the ABAWD work requirement in
order to receive SNAP for more than 3
months in a 36-month period. However,
even if the time limit is waived,
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ABAWDs remain subject to the general
work requirements, as ABAWDs are
work registrants, and the general work
requirements cannot be waived. State
agencies also have discretion to exempt,
on a month-to-month basis, 15 percent
of the individuals who would otherwise
be subject to the time limit as estimated
by the Department each year. Each 15
percent exemption extends eligibility to
one ABAWD for one month.
SNAP Employment and Training
Programs: Section 6(d) of the Act and 7
CFR 273.7
The Department strongly supports the
goal that individuals obtain gainful
employment as a means to move to selfsufficiency. SNAP E&T programs are
intended to help SNAP recipients gain
skills, training, work, or experience that
will increase their ability to obtain
regular employment and become selfsufficient. The State agency must
operate E&T programs, though it has
significant flexibility in program design.
The State determines who to serve
through its E&T programs, what kind of
activities to provide, and where to
provide them. The State may provide
other wrap-around services such as ongoing case management, job coaching, or
job retention services. The State is
required to provide participant
reimbursements for things that are
necessary for participation in SNAP
E&T such as transportation, books,
safety equipment, or other items or
services.
The State has the option to offer E&T
on a voluntary basis to certain or all
SNAP participants; or, the State can
require all or certain work registrants to
participate in E&T as a condition of
eligibility, often referred to as
‘‘mandatory E&T’’. If a work registrant is
required to participate in E&T and does
not comply without good cause, they are
disqualified from receiving SNAP as
explained above under The General
Work Requirements. In deciding
whether to require E&T participation the
State must carefully consider its
capacity to serve E&T participants and
provide reimbursements for participants
with access barriers such as lack of
transportation or child care.
Currently, States have several options
to provide ABAWDs nutrition assistance
while getting experience or training that
will help them get jobs and become selfsufficient. States may refer ABAWDs to
other work programs such as State or
local programs or programs operated
through the Workforce Innovation
Opportunity Act (WIOA) American Job
Centers (AJCs). States may provide
ABAWDs a slot in a workfare program
or a SNAP E&T Program. However, all
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2018 / Proposed Rules
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
of these options may have their own
limitations such as funding, capacity, or
competing State priorities.
There is no current requirement that
States serve any or all ABAWDs through
their SNAP E&T programs. However, if
the State does require ABAWDs who are
subject to the time limit to participate in
E&T, it must apply the time limit and
disqualify ABAWDs who fail to comply
with the mandatory E&T requirements
through the sanction process. In
addition, States are eligible for a portion
of a pool of $20 million in additional
E&T funds if they pledge to offer all
ABAWDs who are in the last month of
their 3-month time limit a slot in an
E&T component that fulfills the work
requirement. These 100 percent federal
funds are allocated across all pledge
States based on the number of ABAWDs
in each participating State, as a
percentage of ABAWDs in all of the
participating States.
Discussion
The Department is concerned that, in
some cases, the State flexibilities
provided under 7 CFR 273.7 and 7 CFR
273.24 have been used in ways that do
not strengthen the goal of helping SNAP
recipients find and keep work when
jobs are sufficiently available. In
particular, the ABAWD time limit
waivers represent an area of concern for
the Department.
The decision to request and
implement an ABAWD time limit
waiver rests with the States. States can
request to waive some areas in the State
but not others, and not all States that are
eligible for ABAWD time limit waivers
request one. Economic conditions in the
wake of the Great Recession resulted in
an increase in the use of ABAWD time
limit waivers. The American Recovery
and Reinvestment Act suspended the
time limit across the country from April
1, 2009, through September 30, 2010,
effectively waiving the time limit in all
50 States, the District of Columbia,
Guam, and the Virgin Islands for the
second half of FY 2009 and all of FY
2010. From October 2010 through
December 2013, the vast majority of
States qualified for and continued to
implement statewide ABAWD time
limit waivers, meaning the waivers
covered the entire State or jurisdiction.
Since that time, as economic
conditions improved, there has been a
decline in the use of these waivers. In
the fourth quarter of FY 2013, 45 states,
the District of Columbia, Guam, and the
Virgin Islands had waivers of the
ABAWD time limit. Of those, 42
covered the entire state or jurisdiction
and 6 covered only certain areas in the
state or jurisdiction. In the fourth
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Feb 22, 2018
Jkt 244001
quarter of FY 2017, 33 states, the
District of Columbia, Guam, and the
Virgin Islands had waivers of the
ABAWD time limit. Of those, 9 covered
the entire state or jurisdiction, and 27
covered only certain areas in the state or
jurisdiction. However, the Department
is concerned that the number of areas
waived has not decreased as much as
would be expected during the continued
decline in unemployment rates over this
time period. For these reasons, the
Department is seeking comments on
how to ensure the waiver criteria best
reflects economic conditions.
ABAWD Policy Review Issues
The following questions represent
particular areas in which the
Department is interested in receiving
comments. The questions are focused on
ideas for regulatory or policy changes
and seek information on better ways to
meet the needs of SNAP participants
and State agencies. However, the
Department also invites commenters to
address additional issues that are not
described below but are within the
scope of this review, particularly as it
relates to opportunities to help
participants move to self-sufficiency.
Other comments that are not within the
scope of this Notice will not be
considered; therefore please refrain from
including any comments that are not
responsive to this particular request.
The Department believes that this
review will benefit from a broad scope
of public input. However, in addressing
the questions that follow, commenters
are encouraged to be as specific as
possible. Please be sure to include the
rationale underlying any suggested
changes.
1. The Department is reviewing how
it could take action on limiting ABAWD
waivers as proposed in the President’s
budget proposals. In light of the
Department’s interest in helping SNAP
participants find and maintain
meaningful employment, how could the
process for requesting to waive the time
limit, the information needed to support
waiver approval, and the waiver
eligibility parameters be changed in
order to provide appropriate relief for
areas of high unemployment and a
clearly demonstrated lack of jobs?
(a) How could the definition of ‘‘lack
of sufficient jobs’’ be revised to better
support these goals?
(b) States currently have discretion to
define the area they are requesting to
waive. Should States maintain this
flexibility? Should an ‘‘economic area’’
be limited in geographic scope, such as
to a single county, metropolitan area, or
labor market area?
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
8015
(c) Should FNS accept data from
additional sources of information that
are currently not considered? If so:
1. What data sources would that be?
2. What review process should FNS
use to verify the validity of the data?
(d) How recent should the data and
information used in support of a waiver
be in relation to the waiver
implementation date?
(e) Waivers are typically approved for
1 year, although under certain criteria 2
year waivers are available. Should FNS
consider waivers of different time
periods? If so, what time period and
under what conditions?
2. How can existing authority and
resources be best used to support
ABAWDs as they transition to
meaningful work and self-sufficiency?
How could the Department better
support State efforts to assess
individuals’ work readiness and identify
appropriate services to help participants
obtain and retain employment?
(a) What challenges and barriers do
States face in helping ABAWDs find and
maintain employment? What do States
need to build or strengthen their
capacity, investment, and expertise in
working with this population?
(b) What is the appropriate role of
States in assessing ABAWDs for barriers
to employment, job skills, and career
interests in order identify appropriate
opportunities for fulfilling the work
requirements? At what point in the
process is this most useful? During the
interview? After certification?
(c) How can existing resources be
leveraged by States to help ABAWDs
find and maintain employment? Are
there State/local/Federal or other
stakeholders that can be leveraged to
provide holistic services to ABAWDs?
(d) Are there evidence-based activities
that States could offer through their
SNAP E&T programs that would help
reduce barriers to employment among
ABAWDs? What kinds of support
services, job-retention services and
other activities would increase success
of ABAWDs moving into gainful
employment?
(e) Are there additional ways that
States could incentivize employers to
provide jobs to ABAWDs?
(f) Should ABAWDs be subject to
additional reporting requirements or be
limited to a specific type of reporting
system (e.g., change reporting, monthly
reporting, quarterly reporting, or
simplified reporting)? Have States that
have assigned ABAWDs to a reporting
system other than simplified reporting
found this to be beneficial?
(g) What approaches have States
found effective in communicating with
ABAWDs to educate them on the
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
8016
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2018 / Proposed Rules
program’s work requirements, tools and
resources that can help them find or
keep employment, and crucial
administrative actions or deadlines they
must adhere to?
3. The accurate determination of
whether an individual is physically or
mentally unfit for employment is
fundamental to applying the time limit
to the proper individuals, and
exempting others, consistent with the
Act. In addition, it allows States to focus
work strategies on those individuals
who are truly capable of benefiting from
them.
(a) What is the appropriate scope of
conditions and indicators of physical or
mental unfitness for employment under
current statutory authority, particularly
in State determinations of whether an
individual is obviously physically or
mentally unfit for employment? What
level of State flexibility is appropriate in
this area? Why?
(b) How do current certification
processes (use of technology, lack of
face-to-face interaction) affect the ability
to determine exceptions or exemptions
to the ABAWD time limit? How can
these processes be modified or
enhanced to best support these
determinations, while providing any
needed reasonable accommodations for
individuals?
(c) Who should determine whether a
participant is fit to work? What
technical and information resources, or
other resources, would best support
States to better screen for unfitness for
employment and other exceptions to the
ABAWD time limit? What performance
and/or accountability measures would
support this process?
(d) How can the Department/States
better engage and serve individuals
determined to be unfit for employment?
How can State agencies provide these
individuals with services or
opportunities that may increase their
fitness for work?
(e) What are best practices for the use
of 15 percent exemptions in supporting
the appropriate application of ABAWD
requirements?
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. This action
has been determined to be significant
and was reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
Executive Order 13771
This Advanced Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking is not a regulatory action
under Executive Order 13771.
Executive Order 13175
This Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (ANPRM) has been
reviewed in accordance with the
requirements of Executive Order 13175,
‘‘Consultation and Coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments.’’ Executive
Order 13175 requires Federal agencies
to consult and coordinate with tribes on
a government-to-government basis on
policies that have tribal implications,
including regulations, legislative
comments or proposed legislation, and
other policy statements or actions that
have substantial direct effects on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
The Food and Nutrition Service (FNS)
has assessed the impact of this ANPRM
on Indian tribes and determined that
this ANPRM does not, to our
knowledge, have tribal implications that
require tribal consultation under E.O.
13175. If a Tribe requests consultation,
FNS will work with the Office of Tribal
Relations to ensure meaningful
consultation is provided where changes,
additions and modifications identified
herein are not expressly mandated by
Congress.
Dated: February 20, 2018.
Brandon Lipps,
Acting Deputy Under Secretary Food,
Nutrition, and Consumer Services.
[FR Doc. 2018–03752 Filed 2–22–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
Procedural Matters
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Executive Order 12866 and 13563
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:44 Feb 22, 2018
Jkt 244001
10 CFR Part 430
[EERE–2017–BT–STD–0059]
Energy Conservation Program: Energy
Conservation Standards Program
Design
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Notice of comment period
extension.
ACTION:
The Department of Energy
(DOE) published, on November 28,
2017, a Request for Information (RFI)
seeking comments from interested
parties to assist DOE in evaluating the
potential advantages and disadvantages
of additional flexibilities in the U.S.
Appliance and Equipment Energy
Conservations Standards (ECS) program.
The comment period for the RFI ends on
February 26, 2018. Through this notice,
DOE extends the comment period until
March 26, 2018.
DATES: The comment period for the RFI
published in the Federal Register on
November 28, 2017 (82 FR 56181) is
extended to March 26, 2018. Written
comments and information are
requested on or before March 26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
encouraged to submit comments by any
of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: ProgramDesign
2017STD0059@ee.doe.gov. Include
‘‘EERE–2017–BT–STD–0059’’ in the
subject line of the message.
• Postal Mail: Appliance and
Equipment Standards Program, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Office, Mailstop EE–5B,
1000 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC, 20585–0121.
Docket: The docket for this activity,
which includes Federal Register
notices, comments, and other
supporting documents/materials, is
available for review at https://
www.regulations.gov. All documents in
the docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. However,
some documents listed in the index,
such as those containing information
that is exempt from public disclosure,
may not be publicly available.
The docket web page can be found at
https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=
EERE-2017-BT-STD-0059. The docket
web page will contain simple
instructions on how to access all
documents, including public comments,
in the docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Appliance and Equipment Standards
Program Staff, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Program, EE–5B, 1000
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 287–
1445. Email: ProgramDesign
2017STD0059@ee.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\23FEP1.SGM
23FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 8013-8016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03752]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2018 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 8013]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
7 CFR Part 273
RIN 0584-AE57
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Requirements and
Services for Able-Bodied Adults Without Dependents; Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Advanced notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Nutrition Act of 2008, as amended (the Act),
limits the amount of time an able-bodied adult without dependents
(ABAWD) can receive Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)
benefits to 3 months in a 36-month period, unless the individual is
working and/or participating in a work program half-time or more, or
participating in workfare. The Act exempts individuals from the time
limit for several reasons, including age, unfitness for work, or having
a dependent child. The Act also provides State agencies with
flexibility to request a waiver of this time limit if unemployment is
high or the area does not have a sufficient number of jobs to provide
employment. Moreover, the Act gives States discretion to exempt 15
percent of the individuals who would otherwise be subject to the time
limit.
The Department of Agriculture's (Department's) policy goal is to
address food insecurity by providing supplemental food assistance and
helping able-bodied SNAP participants move out of poverty and into work
in a manner that is consistent with the structure and the intent of the
Act. As described in Sections 2 and 6(d) of the Act, the goals of the
program are to promote food security, self-sufficiency, well-being, and
economic mobility. In this Notice, the Department is seeking public
input to inform potential policy, program, and regulatory changes to
more consistently advance this goal.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before April 9, 2018 to
be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: The Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, invites interested
persons to submit written comments on this advanced notice of proposed
rulemaking. Comments may be submitted in writing by one of the
following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Mail: Send comments to SNAP Program Development Division,
Food and Nutrition, Services, USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 812,
Alexandria, Virginia 22302.
All written comments submitted in response to this
advanced notice of proposed rulemaking will be included in the record
and will be made available to the public. Please be advised that the
substance of the comments and the identity of the individuals or
entities submitting the comments will be subject to public disclosure.
FNS will make the written comments publicly available on the internet
via https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sasha Gersten-Paal, Chief,
Certification Policy Branch, SNAP Program Development Division, Food
and Nutrition, Services, USDA, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 812,
Alexandria, Virginia 22302 or (703) 305-2507 during regular business
hours 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.) Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Need To Issue This Notice
SNAP offers nutrition assistance to millions of low-income
individuals and families. SNAP is the largest federal nutrition
assistance program in the United States. As a result of the Great
Recession, the national unemployment rate peaked at 9.7 percent for
Fiscal Year (FY) 2010. As with other recessions, there was a lag
between the time that the national unemployment rate began to decrease
and the time that the national poverty rate and SNAP participation
began to decrease. SNAP participation peaked at an average of 47.6
million recipients per month in FY 2013. During that time period, the
national average unemployment rate was 7.6 percent. In FY 2017, the
program served an average of 42.1 million recipients per month, and the
national average unemployment rate was 4.5 percent. As Americans get
back to work, it is appropriate to review how SNAP can better promote
work and self-sufficiency so that fewer Americans need assistance from
the program.
The Department is soliciting public comments on potential policy,
program, and regulatory changes that could advance its goal of
addressing food insecurity by helping able-bodied SNAP recipients
obtain and maintain employment and aligning program regulations with
the President's Budget proposals related to ABAWDs. The Department will
consider comments received through this Notice to help inform
development of potential policy, program, or regulatory changes.
The Department seeks input on potential regulatory or other changes
that might better support States in accurately identifying ABAWDs
subject to the time limit and providing meaningful opportunities for
them to move towards self-sufficiency. The Department is also asking
whether changes should be made to the existing process by which State
agencies request to waive the ABAWD time limit, the information and
data States are required to provide in supporting the waiver request,
and the Department's implementation and duration of the waiver
approval. If so, the Department is asking for information on changes
that would better support the Department's goals. Moreover, the
Department seeks input on 15 percent exemptions and how they may be
better used to support State efforts to serve ABAWDs. The Department is
receptive to suggested changes that could be made within the current
statutory authority as well as changes that may require new or revised
statutory authority. The Department believes that this public comment
can inform the development of any rule that may ultimately be proposed.
References--the Following References May Be Useful To Help Inform Those
Wishing To Provide Comments
(1) Section 6(d) and section 6(o) of the Food and Nutrition Act of
2008, as amended
(2) Code of Federal Regulations Title 7, Parts 273.7 and 273.24
(3) Food Stamp Program: Personal Responsibility Provisions of the
Personal
[[Page 8014]]
Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996,
Proposed Rule, 64 FR 70920 (December 17, 1999). Available at:
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/1999/12/17/99-32527/food-stamp-program-personal-responsibility-provisions-of-the-personal-responsibility-and-work
(4) Food Stamp Program: Personal Responsibility Provisions of the
Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of
1996, Final Rule, 66 FR 4437 (January 17, 2001). Available at:
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2001/01/17/01-1025/food-stamp-program-personal-responsibility-provisions-of-the-personal-responsibility-and-work
(5) Guide to Serving ABAWDs Subject to Time-limited Participation,
2015. Available at: https://fns-prod.azureedge.net/sites/default/files/Guide_to_Serving_ABAWDs_Subject_to_Time_Limit.pdf
(6) Guide to Supporting Requests to Waiver the Time Limit for Able-
Bodied Adults without Dependents, 2016. Available at: https://fns-prod.azureedge.net/sites/default/files/snap/SNAP-Guide-to-Supporting-Requests-to-Waive-the-Time-Limit-for-ABAWDs.pdf
(7) Expiration of Statewide ABAWD Time Limit Waivers, 2015.
Available at: https://fns-prod.azureedge.net/sites/default/files/snap/SNAP-Expiration-of-Statewide-ABAWD-Time-Limit-Waivers.pdf
(8) ABAWD Time Limit Policy and Program Access, 2015. Available at:
https://fns-prod.azureedge.net/sites/default/files/snap/ABAWD-Time-Limit-Policy-and-Program-Access-Memo-Nov2015.pdf
(9) ABAWD Questions and Answers, 2015. Available at: https://fns-prod.azureedge.net/sites/default/files/snap/ABAWD-Questions-and-Answers-June%202015.pdf
(10) ABAWD Questions and Answers, 2013. Available at internet site:
https://fns-prod.azureedge.net/sites/default/files/snap/ABAWD-Questions-and-Answers-December-2013.pdf
Overview of Current SNAP Work Policies
SNAP work-related policies are best understood as three distinct,
but interrelated and mutually supportive areas: The general work
requirements, SNAP Employment and Training (SNAP E&T) programs, and the
ABAWD time limit and work requirement. These work-related policies, the
people they affect, and the ways in which they interact are summarized
below.
The General Work Requirements: Section 6(d) of the Act and 7 CFR 273.7
The general work requirements apply to people ages 16 through 59,
except for those who are physically or mentally unfit for employment,
care for a child under age 6 or an incapacitated person, are already
employed 30 hours or more per week, are already participating in a work
program, or are in school half-time or more. In order to be eligible
for SNAP benefits, people who are subject to the general work
requirements must register for work, report to an employer if referred
by the State agency, accept a bona fide offer of a suitable job, not
voluntarily quit a job or reduce their work hours below 30 hours a
week, and participate in a SNAP E&T program or a workfare program if
assigned by the State agency.
People subject to the general work requirements are commonly called
``work registrants.'' People that do not comply with the general work
requirements without good cause are disqualified from receiving SNAP
for a period of time. These disqualification periods can vary by State
and circumstances. When a person subject to the general work
requirements does not comply, the State must determine whether the
person has good cause before imposing any disqualification. Examples of
good cause include illness, household emergency, lack of
transportation, or other circumstances beyond the person's control. In
accordance with current law, if the State finds that a person has good
cause, it must not disqualify them.
The ABAWD Time Limit and Work Requirement: Section 6(o) of the Act and
7 CFR 273.24
The ABAWD time limit and work requirement apply to people ages 18
through 49, unless they are already exempt from the general work
requirements, medically certified as physically or mentally unfit for
employment, responsible for a child under 18, or pregnant. ABAWDs are
also work registrants and must meet the general work requirements. In
addition, ABAWDs subject to the time limit must work and/or participate
in a work program 80 hours per month or more, or participate in and
comply with workfare in order to receive SNAP for more than 3 months in
a 36-month period. Participation in SNAP E&T, which is a type of work
program, is one way a person can meet the 80 hour per month ABAWD work
requirement, but other work programs are acceptable as well.
State agencies can request to waive the ABAWD time limit if an area
has an unemployment rate of over 10 percent or the State can meet one
of the regulatory options to show it does not have a sufficient number
of jobs to provide employment. If the time limit is waived, individuals
are not required to meet the ABAWD work requirement in order to receive
SNAP for more than 3 months in a 36-month period. However, even if the
time limit is waived, ABAWDs remain subject to the general work
requirements, as ABAWDs are work registrants, and the general work
requirements cannot be waived. State agencies also have discretion to
exempt, on a month-to-month basis, 15 percent of the individuals who
would otherwise be subject to the time limit as estimated by the
Department each year. Each 15 percent exemption extends eligibility to
one ABAWD for one month.
SNAP Employment and Training Programs: Section 6(d) of the Act and 7
CFR 273.7
The Department strongly supports the goal that individuals obtain
gainful employment as a means to move to self-sufficiency. SNAP E&T
programs are intended to help SNAP recipients gain skills, training,
work, or experience that will increase their ability to obtain regular
employment and become self-sufficient. The State agency must operate
E&T programs, though it has significant flexibility in program design.
The State determines who to serve through its E&T programs, what kind
of activities to provide, and where to provide them. The State may
provide other wrap-around services such as on-going case management,
job coaching, or job retention services. The State is required to
provide participant reimbursements for things that are necessary for
participation in SNAP E&T such as transportation, books, safety
equipment, or other items or services.
The State has the option to offer E&T on a voluntary basis to
certain or all SNAP participants; or, the State can require all or
certain work registrants to participate in E&T as a condition of
eligibility, often referred to as ``mandatory E&T''. If a work
registrant is required to participate in E&T and does not comply
without good cause, they are disqualified from receiving SNAP as
explained above under The General Work Requirements. In deciding
whether to require E&T participation the State must carefully consider
its capacity to serve E&T participants and provide reimbursements for
participants with access barriers such as lack of transportation or
child care.
Currently, States have several options to provide ABAWDs nutrition
assistance while getting experience or training that will help them get
jobs and become self-sufficient. States may refer ABAWDs to other work
programs such as State or local programs or programs operated through
the Workforce Innovation Opportunity Act (WIOA) American Job Centers
(AJCs). States may provide ABAWDs a slot in a workfare program or a
SNAP E&T Program. However, all
[[Page 8015]]
of these options may have their own limitations such as funding,
capacity, or competing State priorities.
There is no current requirement that States serve any or all ABAWDs
through their SNAP E&T programs. However, if the State does require
ABAWDs who are subject to the time limit to participate in E&T, it must
apply the time limit and disqualify ABAWDs who fail to comply with the
mandatory E&T requirements through the sanction process. In addition,
States are eligible for a portion of a pool of $20 million in
additional E&T funds if they pledge to offer all ABAWDs who are in the
last month of their 3-month time limit a slot in an E&T component that
fulfills the work requirement. These 100 percent federal funds are
allocated across all pledge States based on the number of ABAWDs in
each participating State, as a percentage of ABAWDs in all of the
participating States.
Discussion
The Department is concerned that, in some cases, the State
flexibilities provided under 7 CFR 273.7 and 7 CFR 273.24 have been
used in ways that do not strengthen the goal of helping SNAP recipients
find and keep work when jobs are sufficiently available. In particular,
the ABAWD time limit waivers represent an area of concern for the
Department.
The decision to request and implement an ABAWD time limit waiver
rests with the States. States can request to waive some areas in the
State but not others, and not all States that are eligible for ABAWD
time limit waivers request one. Economic conditions in the wake of the
Great Recession resulted in an increase in the use of ABAWD time limit
waivers. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act suspended the time
limit across the country from April 1, 2009, through September 30,
2010, effectively waiving the time limit in all 50 States, the District
of Columbia, Guam, and the Virgin Islands for the second half of FY
2009 and all of FY 2010. From October 2010 through December 2013, the
vast majority of States qualified for and continued to implement
statewide ABAWD time limit waivers, meaning the waivers covered the
entire State or jurisdiction.
Since that time, as economic conditions improved, there has been a
decline in the use of these waivers. In the fourth quarter of FY 2013,
45 states, the District of Columbia, Guam, and the Virgin Islands had
waivers of the ABAWD time limit. Of those, 42 covered the entire state
or jurisdiction and 6 covered only certain areas in the state or
jurisdiction. In the fourth quarter of FY 2017, 33 states, the District
of Columbia, Guam, and the Virgin Islands had waivers of the ABAWD time
limit. Of those, 9 covered the entire state or jurisdiction, and 27
covered only certain areas in the state or jurisdiction. However, the
Department is concerned that the number of areas waived has not
decreased as much as would be expected during the continued decline in
unemployment rates over this time period. For these reasons, the
Department is seeking comments on how to ensure the waiver criteria
best reflects economic conditions.
ABAWD Policy Review Issues
The following questions represent particular areas in which the
Department is interested in receiving comments. The questions are
focused on ideas for regulatory or policy changes and seek information
on better ways to meet the needs of SNAP participants and State
agencies. However, the Department also invites commenters to address
additional issues that are not described below but are within the scope
of this review, particularly as it relates to opportunities to help
participants move to self-sufficiency. Other comments that are not
within the scope of this Notice will not be considered; therefore
please refrain from including any comments that are not responsive to
this particular request.
The Department believes that this review will benefit from a broad
scope of public input. However, in addressing the questions that
follow, commenters are encouraged to be as specific as possible. Please
be sure to include the rationale underlying any suggested changes.
1. The Department is reviewing how it could take action on limiting
ABAWD waivers as proposed in the President's budget proposals. In light
of the Department's interest in helping SNAP participants find and
maintain meaningful employment, how could the process for requesting to
waive the time limit, the information needed to support waiver
approval, and the waiver eligibility parameters be changed in order to
provide appropriate relief for areas of high unemployment and a clearly
demonstrated lack of jobs?
(a) How could the definition of ``lack of sufficient jobs'' be
revised to better support these goals?
(b) States currently have discretion to define the area they are
requesting to waive. Should States maintain this flexibility? Should an
``economic area'' be limited in geographic scope, such as to a single
county, metropolitan area, or labor market area?
(c) Should FNS accept data from additional sources of information
that are currently not considered? If so:
1. What data sources would that be?
2. What review process should FNS use to verify the validity of the
data?
(d) How recent should the data and information used in support of a
waiver be in relation to the waiver implementation date?
(e) Waivers are typically approved for 1 year, although under
certain criteria 2 year waivers are available. Should FNS consider
waivers of different time periods? If so, what time period and under
what conditions?
2. How can existing authority and resources be best used to support
ABAWDs as they transition to meaningful work and self-sufficiency? How
could the Department better support State efforts to assess
individuals' work readiness and identify appropriate services to help
participants obtain and retain employment?
(a) What challenges and barriers do States face in helping ABAWDs
find and maintain employment? What do States need to build or
strengthen their capacity, investment, and expertise in working with
this population?
(b) What is the appropriate role of States in assessing ABAWDs for
barriers to employment, job skills, and career interests in order
identify appropriate opportunities for fulfilling the work
requirements? At what point in the process is this most useful? During
the interview? After certification?
(c) How can existing resources be leveraged by States to help
ABAWDs find and maintain employment? Are there State/local/Federal or
other stakeholders that can be leveraged to provide holistic services
to ABAWDs?
(d) Are there evidence-based activities that States could offer
through their SNAP E&T programs that would help reduce barriers to
employment among ABAWDs? What kinds of support services, job-retention
services and other activities would increase success of ABAWDs moving
into gainful employment?
(e) Are there additional ways that States could incentivize
employers to provide jobs to ABAWDs?
(f) Should ABAWDs be subject to additional reporting requirements
or be limited to a specific type of reporting system (e.g., change
reporting, monthly reporting, quarterly reporting, or simplified
reporting)? Have States that have assigned ABAWDs to a reporting system
other than simplified reporting found this to be beneficial?
(g) What approaches have States found effective in communicating
with ABAWDs to educate them on the
[[Page 8016]]
program's work requirements, tools and resources that can help them
find or keep employment, and crucial administrative actions or
deadlines they must adhere to?
3. The accurate determination of whether an individual is
physically or mentally unfit for employment is fundamental to applying
the time limit to the proper individuals, and exempting others,
consistent with the Act. In addition, it allows States to focus work
strategies on those individuals who are truly capable of benefiting
from them.
(a) What is the appropriate scope of conditions and indicators of
physical or mental unfitness for employment under current statutory
authority, particularly in State determinations of whether an
individual is obviously physically or mentally unfit for employment?
What level of State flexibility is appropriate in this area? Why?
(b) How do current certification processes (use of technology, lack
of face-to-face interaction) affect the ability to determine exceptions
or exemptions to the ABAWD time limit? How can these processes be
modified or enhanced to best support these determinations, while
providing any needed reasonable accommodations for individuals?
(c) Who should determine whether a participant is fit to work? What
technical and information resources, or other resources, would best
support States to better screen for unfitness for employment and other
exceptions to the ABAWD time limit? What performance and/or
accountability measures would support this process?
(d) How can the Department/States better engage and serve
individuals determined to be unfit for employment? How can State
agencies provide these individuals with services or opportunities that
may increase their fitness for work?
(e) What are best practices for the use of 15 percent exemptions in
supporting the appropriate application of ABAWD requirements?
Procedural Matters
Executive Order 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This action has been determined to be significant and was
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in conformance
with Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 13771
This Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is not a regulatory
action under Executive Order 13771.
Executive Order 13175
This Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) has been
reviewed in accordance with the requirements of Executive Order 13175,
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments.''
Executive Order 13175 requires Federal agencies to consult and
coordinate with tribes on a government-to-government basis on policies
that have tribal implications, including regulations, legislative
comments or proposed legislation, and other policy statements or
actions that have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
The Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) has assessed the impact of
this ANPRM on Indian tribes and determined that this ANPRM does not, to
our knowledge, have tribal implications that require tribal
consultation under E.O. 13175. If a Tribe requests consultation, FNS
will work with the Office of Tribal Relations to ensure meaningful
consultation is provided where changes, additions and modifications
identified herein are not expressly mandated by Congress.
Dated: February 20, 2018.
Brandon Lipps,
Acting Deputy Under Secretary Food, Nutrition, and Consumer Services.
[FR Doc. 2018-03752 Filed 2-22-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P