Incentive Auction Task Force and Media Bureau Announce Post Incentive Auction Special Displacement Window April 10, 2018 Through May 15, 2018 and Make Location and Channel Data Available, 8074-8084 [2018-03732]
Download as PDF
8074
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2018 / Notices
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact
Statements
Filed 02/12/2018 through 02/16/2018
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
Notice
Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act
requires that EPA make public its
comments on EISs issued by other
Federal agencies. EPA’s comment letters
on EISs are available at: https://
cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-nepa-public/
action/eis/search
EIS No. 20180021, Final, USFWS, CA,
City of San Diego Vernal Pool Habitat
Conservation Plan EIS/EIR, Review
Period Ends: 03/26/2018, Contact:
Susan Wynn, 760–431–9440
EIS No. 20180022, Final, USFS, BLM,
USFWS, ID, Coeur d’ Alene Basin
Restoration Plan and Environmental
Impact Statement, Review Period
Ends: 03/26/2018, Contact: Jeffrey
Johnson, 208–765–7442
EIS No. 20180023, Final, USAF, AK,
Proposal to Improve F–22 Operational
Efficiency at Joint Base ElmendorfRichardson, Alaska, Review Period
Ends: 03/26/2018, Contact: Major
Matthew Smith, 907–552–8151
EIS No. 20180024, Draft, USFS, OR, East
Hills Project DRAFT Environmental
Impact Statement, Comment Period
Ends: 04/09/2018, Contact: Jody
Perozzi, 541–353–2723
Amended Notices
EIS No. 20170243, Draft, DOT, TX
Dallas to Houston High Speed Rail
DRAFT Environmental Impact
Statement, Comment Period Ends:
02/20/2018, Contact: Kevin Wright
(202) 493–0845, Revision to FR Notice
Published 12/22/2017; Correction to
Extend Comment Period from 02/20/
2018 to 03/09/2018
Dated: February 20, 2018.
Kelly Knight,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2018–03757 Filed 2–22–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
[DA 18–124]
Incentive Auction Task Force and
Media Bureau Announce Post
Incentive Auction Special
Displacement Window April 10, 2018
Through May 15, 2018 and Make
Location and Channel Data Available
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Feb 22, 2018
Jkt 244001
The Incentive Auction Task
Force and Media Bureau provide sixty
days’ advance notice of the opening of
a displacement application filing
window for low power television, TV
translator stations, and analog-to-digital
replacement translators that were
displaced by the incentive auction and
repacking process. The IATF and Media
Bureau also announce that simultaneous
with the release of the Public Notice
they are releasing a channel study to
assist stations in identifying potential
new channels in the repacked television
bands.
DATES: The Special Displacement
Window will open April 10, 2018 and
will close on May 15, 2018 at 11:59 p.m.
EDT.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shaun Maher, Video Division, Media
Bureau, Federal Communications
Commission, Shaun.Maher@fcc.gov,
(202) 418–2324.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Incentive Auction Task Force (IATF)
and the Media Bureau hereby provide
sixty days’ advance notice of the
opening of a displacement application
filing window for low power television
(LPTV), TV translator stations, and
analog-to-digital replacement translators
(DRT) (referred to collectively as
‘‘LPTV/translator stations’’) that were
displaced by the incentive auction and
repacking process (Special
Displacement Window). The Special
Displacement Window will open on
Tuesday, April 10, 2018, and close on
Tuesday, May 15, 2018, at 11:59 p.m.
EDT. The IATF and Media Bureau also
announce that simultaneous with the
release of this Public Notice they are
releasing a channel study to assist
stations in identifying potential new
channels in the repacked television
bands. The Public Notice provides
details regarding the channel study,
reiterate some of the eligibility and
filing procedures for the window, and
lifts the displacement application filing
freeze for eligible stations. The Public
Notice also reminds eligible full power
television stations that they may begin
filing applications for digital-to-digital
replacement translators (DTDRTs) on
April 10, 2018.
The Commission in 2015 sought
comment on whether to preserve a
vacant television channel for use by
unlicensed white space devices and
wireless microphones in all areas of the
country. See Preservation of One Vacant
Channel in the UHF Television Band
For Use By White Space Devices and
Wireless Microphones, MB Docket No.
15–146, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
30 FCC Rcd 6711 (2015). In that
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
proceeding, the Commission proposed
that applications filed in the
displacement window would have to
demonstrate that they do not eliminate
the last remaining vacant channel in
their proposed service area. Id. at 6719,
para. 17. While the Commission has not
issued an order in this proceeding to
date, it is noted that the opening of the
displacement window and acceptance
of displacement applications does not
preclude the preservation of a vacant
television channel. Because new 600
MHz licensees have already begun to
deploy service in the 600 MHz Band
and the earliest transitioning full-power
and Class A stations will begin testing
on their post-auction channels in a few
months, the IATF and Media Bureau
believe time is of the essence in opening
the special displacement window and
processing displacement applications in
order to ‘‘preserve the important
services provided by LPTV and TV
translator stations.’’ In the Matter of
Expanding the Economic and
Innovation Opportunities of Spectrum
Through Incentive Auctions, Report and
Order, 29 FCC Rcd 6567, 6576, para. 21
(2014). In addition, the IATF and Media
Bureau expect that in many areas of the
country there will likely be vacant
channels available even after
displacement applications are processed
and granted.
Channel Study. As described more
fully in the Appendix to the Public
Notice, the IATF and Media Bureau
have compiled and are releasing data
that identifies locations and channels
where LPTV/translator stations filing
applications in the Special
Displacement Window likely cannot
propose displacement facilities because
of the presence of non-displaced LPTV/
translator stations and permittees, full
power and Class A television stations,
or land mobile operations. The release
of this data satisfies the Commission’s
directive to provide channel availability
data to assist eligible LPTV/TV
translator stations sixty days prior to the
opening of the Special Displacement
Window. See Rules for Digital Low
Power Television and Television
Translator Stations, MB Docket No. 03–
185, Third Report and Order and Fourth
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 30 FCC
Rcd 14927, 14946–47, paras. 40–42
(2015). Identification of the locations
and channels where eligible LPTV/
translator stations likely cannot operate
will provide important information to
help facilitate the LPTV/translator
displacement application process.
Stations are encouraged to use this
information to help identify available
channels and to use TVStudy to ensure
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2018 / Notices
the facilities they plan to propose will
satisfy station needs. Stations are
reminded that they must also use
TVStudy to verify that the displacement
facilities they propose will not create
harmful interference. Additionally,
given the public interest in promoting
the efficient use of spectrum, LPTV/
translator stations operating outside of
the largest 40 DMAs are encouraged to
select new channels for displaced
stations that are adjacent to channels in
use by other broadcast television
stations to help provide flexibility in the
future. Once a station has identified a
suitable channel, it should file a
construction permit application for it
during the Special Displacement
Window.
The data being provided is based on
use of the incentive auction repacking
and optimization software nationwide,
and includes: (1) All other primary
users in the repacked television band or
in adjacent bands, including land
mobile operations; (2) licenses and valid
construction permits for LPTV/
translator stations; (3) licenses and valid
construction permits for full power and
Class A stations that were not
reassigned to new channels in
repacking; (4) the full power and Class
A television station technical
parameters in the Closing and Channel
Reassignment Public Notice; (5) full
power and Class A television station
modifications proposed in the two
alternate channel/expanded facilities
filing windows; and (6) full power and
Class A television station applications
filed during the period from November
28 to December 7, 2017, when the April
2013 freeze on the filing of applications
for minor modifications was lifted. See
Media Bureau Temporarily Lifts the
Freeze on the Filing of Minor
Modification Applications That Expand
the Contour of Full Power and Class A
Television Stations From November 28
Through December 7, 2017, Public
Notice, 32 FCC Rcd 9328 (MB 2017). If
an application filed during either of the
alternate channel/expanded facilities
filing windows is granted and
supersedes the full power or Class A
station’s facility as listed in the Closing
and Channel Reassignment Public
Notice, then an LPTV/translator station
filing an application in the Special
Displacement Window need only
demonstrate that it will not cause
interference to the facility authorized in
the granted window application. The
data is provided on the same 2 x 2
kilometer basis as used in connection
with the incentive auction. The data is
available online at https://data.fcc.gov/
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Feb 22, 2018
Jkt 244001
download/incentive-auctions/LPTVData.
It is noted that the data shows those
locations and channels that are
potentially unavailable for displaced
LPTV/translator stations. The data also
indicates which LPTV/translator
stations are potentially displaced as a
result of causing interference or
receiving interference based on certain
assumptions that are described in more
detail in the attached Appendix. This
information is provided as guidance,
and stations must conduct their own
interference studies using TVStudy,
particularly since technical parameters
for stations may change. Technical
showings will be required to
demonstrate that LPTV/translator
station displacement applications are
predicted to cause less than the amount
of interference prescribed in our rules to
other TV stations, including other
LPTV/translator stations.
In addition, the Incentive Auction
Task Force and the Media Bureau
announce today that they will host a
webinar on the data on Wednesday,
February 28, 2018 at 1 p.m., to review
the assumptions described in the
Appendix and the data we are
providing, and to respond to questions
from LPTV/translator stations.
Additional information on this webinar
will be provided in a future Public
Notice.
Reminder of Certain Eligibility and
Filing Procedures. To be eligible to file
in the Special Displacement Window,
an LPTV/translator station must be both
‘‘operating’’ and ‘‘displaced.’’
‘‘Operating’’ LPTV/translator stations
are those that had licensed their
authorized construction permit
facilities, or had an application for a
license to cover on file with the
Commission, as of April 13, 2017—the
release date of the Closing and Channel
Reassignment Public Notice. See Media
Bureau Announces Date By Which
LPTV and TV Translator Stations Must
Be ‘‘Operating’’ In Order To Participate
In Post-Incentive Auction Special
Displacement Window, Public Notice,
31 FCC Rcd 5383 (MB 2016). In order
to be ‘‘displaced’’ for purposes of filing
in the Special Displacement Window,
an LPTV/translator station must: (1) Be
subject to displacement by a full power
or Class A television station on the
repacked television band (channels 2–
36) as a result of the incentive auction
and repacking process; (2) be licensed
on frequencies repurposed for new,
flexible use by a 600 MHz Band wireless
licensee (channels 38–51); or (3) be
licensed on frequencies that will serve
as part of the 600 MHz Band guard
bands (which includes the duplex gap).
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8075
During the Special Displacement
Window, all of the requirements of the
current displacement rules will
continue to apply (e.g., required
interference showing and limits on
transmitter moves), except for the
requirement that displacement
applications be submitted only after the
primary full power or Class A station
obtains a construction permit or license.
Eligible digital stations may propose a
change in transmitter site of not more
than 48 kilometers from the reference
coordinates of the existing station’s
community of license. Eligible analog
stations may propose a change in
antenna location of not more than 16.1
kilometers. In addition, eligible stations
may apply only for a channel that
continues to be allocated to broadcast
television service (i.e., channels 2–36),
and not for channels that have been
repurposed for the new, flexible 600
MHz Band for wireless services or
reserved for the 600 MHz guard band
and duplex gap (i.e., former television
channels 38–51).
In order to ensure that as many
potential channels as possible are
available for operating LPTV/translator
stations that are subject to displacement,
we will permit stations to file
displacement applications proposing
pre-auction channels in the repacked
television band (channels 2–36) that full
power and Class A stations will
relinquish as a result of the incentive
auction and repacking process. This
includes channels that were voluntarily
relinquished by License Relinquishment
Stations, Channel Sharing Stations, and
Band Changing Stations as well as the
pre-auction channels of Reassigned
Stations. Applicants proposing such
channels must include a request to
waive the contingent application rule.
The Media Bureau expects to view
favorably requests to waive the
contingent application rule filed by
operating LPTV/translator stations that
are subject to displacement if the station
demonstrates that the requested channel
is necessary to allow the station to
continue to serve its current viewers. In
addition, in order to comply with
Section 73.3700(g)(2), the station must
agree to a condition that it will not
begin transmitting on the requested
channel prior to discontinuation of
operation by the full power or Class A
station that is currently licensed to use
that channel. If a conditional grant
would require an LPTV/translator
station to be silent for a consecutive 12month period prior to discontinuation
of operation by the full power or Class
A station, the Media Bureau will
consider a request for extension or
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
8076
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2018 / Notices
reinstatement pursuant to Section 312(g)
of the Communications Act and a
request for waiver of the applicable
Commission rule.
Lifting of Displacement Application
Filing Freeze. To facilitate filing in the
Special Displacement Window, the
current freeze on the filing of
displacement applications will be lifted
on April 10, 2018, solely for the
purposes of accepting applications by
eligible stations during the Special
Displacement Window. The
displacement application filing freeze
will be reinstated upon the completion
of the Special Displacement Window on
May 15, 2018, at 11:59 p.m. EST.
Displaced LPTV/translator stations
that do not qualify for the Special
Displacement Window (e.g., permittees
that were not operating as of the Closing
and Channel Reassignment Public
Notice), and stations that are eligible but
do not file during the Special
Displacement Window are reminded
that they must wait until the freeze is
lifted to submit a displacement
application. In addition, stations are
reminded that minor change filings and
digital companion channel applications
also remain frozen. The Media Bureau
will announce a lifting of these three
freezes in one or more subsequent
public notices following the completion
of the Special Displacement Window.
Applications for DTDRTs. Beginning
April 10, 2018, eligible full power
television stations may file applications
for DTDRTs. Applications will continue
to be accepted until July 13, 2021 (one
year after completion of the postincentive auction transition period).
Additional information about eligibility
and filing procedures for DTDRTs is
contained in the May 2017 LPTV
Procedures Public Notice.
Appendix A
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Data To Assist LPTV/Translator Stations in
Identifying Potential New Channels Prior to
the Special Displacement Window
I. Introduction
This appendix describes the maps and data
(collectively, ‘‘Channel Study’’) released in
conjunction with this Public Notice. As
previously indicatd, the Channel Study
provides location and channel availability
information to assist eligible low power
television (‘‘LPTV’’) stations, TV translator
stations, and analog-to-digital replacement
translators (‘‘DRT’’) (referred collectively as
‘‘LPTV/translator stations’’) in identifying
potential new channels in the repacked TV
bands, consistent with the Commission’s
direction in Rules for Digital Low Power
Television and Television Translator
Stations, MB Docket No. 03–185, Third
Report and Order and Fourth Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, 30 FCC Rcd 14927,
14946–47, paras. 40–42 (2015). The data is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Feb 22, 2018
Jkt 244001
available at https://data.fcc.gov/download/
incentive-auctions/LPTV-Data.
The Channel Study includes detailed
information on a 2 x 2 km cell level about
locations and channels that are likely not
available for LPTV/translator station
displacement facilities because of the
presence of full power and Class A television
stations, non-displaced LPTV/translator
stations and permittees, or land mobile
operations. The Channel Study also includes
maps available in Tableau files to provide
LPTV/translator stations a method to visually
identify locations and channels that are
likely unavailable as displaced channels.
Both the maps and the detailed 2 x 2 km celllevel information should allow LPTV/
translator stations to narrow their search
options to the most viable locations and
channels.
The Channel Study is based on the
assumptions detailed in this appendix.
Eligible displaced LPTV/translator stations
must also conduct their own interference
analysis using TVStudy prior to submitting
displacement applications during the Special
Displacement Window.
II. Overview of Study Process and
Assumptions
a. Overview
The Channel Study examined potential
interference caused by LPTV/translator
stations to full power or Class A stations and
interference received by LPTV/translator
stations from full power and Class A stations.
For each full power, Class A and LPTV/
translator station, the Incentive Auction Task
Force and Media Bureau (referred to
collectively as ‘‘we’’) determine the station’s
current interference-free population and then
determined how much interference it caused
and how much interference it received from
each other station using two post auction
scenarios—one scenario utilizing the most
recent universe of granted applications and
the second scenario utilizing the most recent
universe of both pending and granted
applications.
b. Compiling the List of Stations
Compiling a complete list of stations and
permittees was a necessary first step in
developing the Channel Study. On January
17, 2018 (the ‘‘pull date’’), we pulled a
station list from the Commission’s Licensing
and Management System (LMS) that
included the following categories of stations:
• All licensed full-power and Class A
stations that existed prior to the auction;
• all LPTV/translator licensees and
permittees (including DRTs, digital
companion channels, permittees whose
status is currently ‘‘CP Off Air,’’ and the set
of LPTVs which have already been displaced
as a result of the auction); and
• all Mexican and Canadian stations.
More specifically, we included all
Canadian and Mexican stations in the border
regions that were protected during the
incentive auction. This approach is
consistent with what was done during the
incentive auction, however, the data set also
includes additional Mexican allotments
which need to be protected after the auction.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
c. Calculating Interference
We entered the compiled list of stations
into TVStudy to calculate the interferencefree populations for all LPTV/translator
stations to create a baseline, using the
methodology described in OET Bulletin 69
(OET–69) and at a 2 x 2 km cell level of
granularity consistent with the repacking
software used in connection with the
incentive auction. We then used TVStudy to
run pairwise studies to determine whether
two TV stations on either the same channel
or on an adjacent channel within the same
region would create new pairwise
interference greater than 0.5% between the
two stations.
In order for a displaced LPTV/translator
station to receive the most complete picture
of likely channel availability, two separate
sets of data were generated. The first set of
data used the parameters from the most
recent universe of granted construction
permits or licenses. This set will inform
LPTV/translator stations of the required
protections for full power and Class A
stations as of the pull date. The following
parameters were used to create this first set
of data:
• The operating parameters from the most
recent granted construction permits for any
full power, Class A and LPTV/translator
station as of the pull date;
• the post-auction baseline parameters for
full power and Class A stations that did not
have a granted construction permit since the
close of the auction;
• the licensed operating parameters of
LPTV/translator stations that did not have a
granted construction permit since the close of
the auction; and
• the protected parameters of Canadian
and Mexican stations (including Mexican
auction allotments).
Note that in addition to granted
construction permits and licensed operating
facilities included in this first set, we also
included a small number of pending minor
modifications for LPTV/translator stations in
this first set. These pending minor
modifications are likely either awaiting
international coordination or were otherwise
filed prior to the December 20, 2017 freeze
on LPTV/translator minor modifications and,
in either case, will require protection from
applications filed in the Special
Displacement Window. See Media Bureau
Freezes the Filing of Minor Change
Applications for LPTV/Translator Stations,
Public Notice, DA 17–1227 (rel. Dec. 20,
2017).
The second set of data used the operating
parameters from the most recent universe of
both granted and pending applications for
any station that has an application still under
consideration as of the pull date. This set
will inform LPTV/translator stations of the
pending operating parameters that may be
granted by the Commission. Even if a full
power or Class A application is still pending
when a displacement application is
considered, it must nevertheless be protected
from interference, as must any pending
LPTV/translator minor modification
application filed before December 20, 2017.
The following parameters were used in this
second set of data:
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2018 / Notices
• The operating parameters from the most
recent pending construction permits for any
full power, Class A, and LPTV/translator
stations (including LPTV/translator stations
that have already been displaced as a result
of the incentive auction) as of the pull date;
• the operating parameters from the most
recent granted construction permit for any
full power, Class A, and LPTV/translator
station that did not have a pending
construction permit as of the pull date;
• the post-auction baseline parameters for
full power and Class A stations that did not
have a pending or granted construction
permit since the close of the auction;
• the licensed operating parameters of
LPTV/translator stations that did not have a
pending or granted construction permit since
the close of the auction; and
• the protected parameters of Canadian
and Mexican stations (including Mexican
auction allotments).
We had to make one minor correction to
the set of stations included in the pending
and granted applications study. WWDT–CD
(facility ID: 58261) was accidentally not
included in the data used by TVStudy to
create this scenario. To provide a more
accurate picture for this study, WWDT–CD’s
interference-free service area was added
manually into the data used to create the
Tableau maps. WWDT–CD was, however,
correctly included in the study that
considered only granted applications.
The results of these pairwise studies
indicate, for each 2 x 2 km cell, whether the
LPTV/translator station causes interference to
a full power or Class A station or whether the
LPTV/translator station receives interference
from a full power or Class A station. If the
LPTV/translator station was predicted to
cause more than 0.5% new interference to
the interference-free population of a full
power or Class A station, it is considered
displaced in the Channel Study due to
interference caused. In addition, by
aggregating the pairwise studies, the resulting
output shows whether a LPTV/translator
station receives in aggregate more than 2%
new interference to its interference-free
population from any combination of
repacked full power and Class A stations.
Any station that receives more than 2% new
interference in aggregate but does not cause
more than 0.5% interference will be
considered displaced in the Channel Study
due to interference received. We used the 2%
threshold as a conservative measurement of
displacement based on the pairwise
protections that LPTV/translator stations owe
other LPTV/translator stations.
LPTV/translator stations that are marked as
displaced, either because they cause or
receive more than the stated threshold
amount of interference, may not in fact be
displaced because LPTV/translator stations
have the option to modify their facility to
eliminate such interference issues and
remain on their current channel.
Nevertheless, for purposes of the Channel
Study, we mark these stations as being
potentially displaced so that other LPTV/
translator stations will be aware of this fact.
Also, LPTV/translator stations that currently
broadcast on channels (38–51) are
automatically displaced because they are in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Feb 22, 2018
Jkt 244001
the new 600 MHz band for mobile broadband
service and are not included in the
interference studies underlying the Channel
Study.
This data was then aggregated by point
(i.e., each 2 x 2 km cell) for each channel.
Any point that exists in an interference-free
service area (‘‘service area’’) for a given
channel is categorized using the first valid
condition from the following list:
• Protected due to land mobile or off shore
radio;
• within a full power or Class A station’s
service area;
• within an LPTV/translator station’s
service area where that station does not cause
more than 0.5% interference to a full power
or Class A station or receive more the 2%
aggregate interference;
• within an LPTV/translator station’s
service area where that station receives more
the 2% aggregate interference; or
• within an LPTV/translator station’s
service area where that station causes more
than 0.5% interference to a full power or
Class A station.
Note that for purposes of generating the
Channel Study, we continued to use the same
distance-based protections that were used in
the incentive auction. See Incentive Auction
Task Force Releases Information Related to
Incentive Auction Repacking, ET Docket No.
13–26, GN Docket No. 12–268, Public Notice,
28 FCC Rcd 10370, 10407–10 (2013). This
conservative approach was adopted for ease
of use, but displaced LPTV/translator stations
can still make a technical showing to
demonstrate that they can operate on these
excluded channels and locations.
Points are categorized in this way to show
areas likely to be unable to accommodate a
displaced LPTV/translator station. Land
mobile, full power and Class A stations, and
LPTV/translator stations not causing or
receiving interference are unlikely to modify
their facilities and their current service areas
are unlikely to be able to accommodate a
displaced LPTV/translator station. LPTV/
translator stations that are receiving
interference may accept the interference and
continue to broadcast or make modifications
to mitigate the interference, or, if they cannot
tolerate or eliminate the interference, they
may file for a new channel in the Special
Displacement Window. LPTV/translator
stations causing interference must make
modifications to mitigate the interference or
file for a new channel in the Special
Displacement Window.
III. Description of Maps and CSV Data Files
a. Maps Overview
We provide four types of maps as visual
tools to assist LPTV/translator stations in
identifying available channels in their service
area. All visualizations are Tableau
workbooks that can be viewed using the free
Tableau Reader (available here https://
www.tableau.com/products/reader).
The first and second workbooks show the
locations and channels currently in the
service area of full power, Class A, nondisplaced LPTV/translator, or land mobile
operations, and are therefore likely not
available to displaced LPTV/translator
stations. The third and fourth workbook
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8077
show which LPTV/translator stations that
remain in the TV band are displaced either
as a result of causing or receiving
interference. The four visualizations are
identified in the bullets below and described
in more detail in the following subsections.
• Protected Points by Channel—Granted:
These maps provide a visual representation
of granted construction permits or licensed
stations, as described in detail in Section II.c,
paragraph 6, to identify locations and
channels that are potentially not available for
displaced LPTV/translator stations.
• Protected Points by Channel—Pending
and Granted: These maps provide a visual
representation of pending construction
permits, granted construction permits, or
licensed stations, as described in detail in
Section II.c, paragraph 7, to identify locations
and channels that are potentially not
available for displaced LPTV/translator
stations.
• Potentially Displaced LPTV Stations
Map—Granted: These maps provide a visual
representation of granted construction
permits or licensed stations, as described in
detail in Section II.c, paragraph 6 (except
those stations in the new 600 MHz band—
i.e., channels 38–51—which are
automatically displaced), to identify LPTV/
translator stations that are potentially
displaced.
• Potentially Displaced LPTV Stations
Map—Pending and Granted: These maps
provide a visual representation of pending
construction permits, granted construction
permits, or licensed stations, as described in
detail in Section II.c, paragraph 7 (except
those stations in the new 600 MHz band—
i.e., channels 38–51—which are
automatically displaced), to identify LPTV/
translator stations that are potentially
displaced.
b. Protected Points by Channel Maps
The two Protected Points by Channel
visualizations display color coded maps. The
colors identified below signify the existence
of certain services in an area. Points that do
not fall within any relevant service’s or
station’s service area are not colored.
Examples of these visualizations are
provided in Figure 1 and Figure 2 below, and
comprehensive information is available in
the CSV files discussed below and posted
online.
• Green denotes an area protected due to
land mobile or off shore radio.
• Blue denotes an area within a full power
or Class A station’s service area.
• Light blue denotes an area within an
LPTV/translator station’s service area where
that station does not cause more than 0.5%
new interference to a full power or Class A
station or receive more the 2% new aggregate
interference.
• Orange denotes an area within an LPTV/
translator station’s service area where that
station receives more than 2% new aggregate
interference.
• Red denotes an area within an LPTV/
translator station’s service area where that
station causes more than 0.5% interference to
a full power or Class A station.
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
8078
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2018 / Notices
Figure 1: From Protected Points by Channel- Granted Workbook: Protected Service Areas for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Feb 22, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
EN23FE18.000
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Channel 14
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2018 / Notices
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Feb 22, 2018
Jkt 244001
c. Potentially Displaced LPTV Stations Maps
The two Potentially Displaced LPTV
Station Map visualizations show LPTV/
translator stations that are potentially
displaced because they cause new pairwise
interference greater than 0.5% to a full power
or Class A station or because they receive
aggregate new interference greater than 2%.
The 2% parameter is a default used in the
data but it can be changed using a filter next
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
to the map. Using the lasso tool within
Tableau, the user can select a geographic
region to generate a table containing the
pairwise and aggregate interference data, and
also view the interference free service area of
individual LPTV stations to see the impact of
new interference. Examples of the
visualizations available are provided in
Figure 3 through Figure 6 below and
comprehensive information is available in
the data provided online.
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
EN23FE18.001
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
As noted above, there are two Tableau
workbooks for each visualization. One
workbook reflects the data set using the
service area parameters from the most
recently granted construction permits or
licenses of full or Class A TV stations as of
the pull date and the second workbook
reflects the data set using the service area
parameters from pending construction
permits as of the pull date.
8079
8080
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2018 / Notices
Figure 3: From Potentially Displaced LPTV Stations - Granted Workbook: LPTV stations
displaced by causing new pairwise interference or receiving new aggregate interference. For
pairwise-displaced stations, a line is drawn between the displaced LPTV station and the full
power or Class A station (marked as "Protected" stations in the map shown above) receiving the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Feb 22, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
EN23FE18.002
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
pairwise interference.
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2018 / Notices
8081
Figure 4: From Potentially Displaced LPTV Stations- Granted Workbook: Data captured by the
lasso tool.
data captured by the lasso tool in Figure 4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Feb 22, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
EN23FE18.003 EN23FE18.004
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Figure 5: From Potentially Displaced LPTV Stations - Granted Workbook: Table containing
8082
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2018 / Notices
BILLING CODE 6712–01–C
d. CSV Data Files
The online Channel Study includes three
zip files. The first zip file contains the three
CSV files unique to the granted applications
study. The second zip file contains the three
CSV files unique to the pending and granted
applications study. The third zip file
contains the two CSV files common to both
studies. The CSV files contained in these
three zip files were used to generate the
Tableau maps. Each study contains a CSV
file, lptv_aggregated.csv, which is the
aggregated 2 x 2 km point data as categorized
above, and forms the basis for the Tableau
maps. The other two CSV files combined
with the common two CSV files contain the
underlying point data for each LPTV/
translator station used to generate the
aggregated data. These are provided in
comma separated value format and are
available to users to generate their own study
scenario or to replicate our analysis.
The following three files (detailed in
Tables 1–3 below) are in the zip file unique
to each study. The lptv_aggregated.csv file
identifies, for each channel, any point that
falls within a service area. The file contains
the fields listed in Table 1 below:
TABLE 1—DATA DICTIONARY FOR LPTV_AGGREGATED.CSV
Description
Type
Pointkey .......................
The unique identification for a 2 x 2 grid cell
determined by TVStudy.
The channel number assigned to the station
of the protection category indicated by the
‘‘type’’ field.
The classification of service for that point according to the priorities listed above.
Integer ........................
e.g., 62592057.
Integer ........................
e.g., 29.
String ..........................
Types will be one of the following:
• LM/LMW/Offshore.
• FP/CA.
• LPTV.
• LPTV—Agg IX.
• LPTV—Pairwise IX.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Channel .......................
Type .............................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Feb 22, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Sample
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
EN23FE18.005
Field
8083
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2018 / Notices
The stations_points.csv file identifies the
interference-free points for each station on
the station’s assigned channel in the study.
These points establish the total interferencefree population for a given station and also
the possible locations for interference to that
station. The file contains the fields listed in
Table 2 below:
TABLE 2—DATA DICTIONARY FOR STATIONS_POINTS.CSV
Field
Description
Type
Facility_id .....................
Channel_id ...................
Pointkey .......................
The unique facility ID assigned to the station
The channel number assigned to the station
The unique ID of each 2 x 2 km cell ..............
Integer ........................
Integer ........................
Integer ........................
The ix_paired.csv file identifies
interference between any two stations (LPTV/
translator stations and full power/Class A
stations) according to TVStudy at a given
Sample
e.g., 52887.
e.g., 29.
e.g., 62592057.
point. The file contains the following fields
listed in Table 3 below:
TABLE 3—DATA DICTIONARY FOR IX_PAIRED.CSV
Field
Description
Facility_id .....................
Channel_id ...................
ix_facility_id ..................
ix_channel_id ...............
Pointkey .......................
The unique facility ID assigned to
receiving interference.
The channel number assigned to
receiving interference.
The unique facility ID assigned to
causing interference.
The channel number assigned to
causing interference.
The unique ID of the 2 x 2 km cell
The following two files (detailed in Tables
4–5 below) are in the other zip file and are
common to both runs. The lm_points.csv file
Type
Sample
the station
Integer ........................
e.g., 52887.
the station
Integer ........................
e.g., 29.
the station
Integer ........................
e.g., 53442
the station
Integer ........................
e.g., 35.
.................
Integer ........................
e.g., 62592057.
identifies points that must be protected on a
specific channel due to land mobile, land
mobile waivers, and off shore radio (LM/
LMW/OSR). The file contains the fields listed
in Table 4 below:
TABLE 4—DATA DICTIONARY FOR LM_POINTS.CSV
Field
Description
Type
Sample
Facility_id .....................
The unique facility ID assigned to the LM/
LMW/OSR station.
Integer ........................
Channel_id ...................
The channel number assigned to the LM/
LMW/OSR station.
The unique ID of each 2 x 2 km cell ..............
Integer ........................
e.g., 52887.
Note: facility_id 999999 is used for off shore
radio.
e.g., 29.
Integer ........................
e.g., 62592057.
Pointkey .......................
The pointkeys.csv file identifies the
characteristics associated with each point,
specifically latitude, longitude, country and
population. The file contains the fields listed
in Table 5 below:
TABLE 5—DATA DICTIONARY FOR POINTKEYS.CSV
Field
Description
Type
Pointkey .......................
Latitude ........................
Longitude .....................
The unique ID of each 2 x 2 km cell ..............
The latitude coordinate of the 2 x 2 km point
The longitude coordinate of the 2 x 2 km
point.
The country where the 2 x 2 km point is located.
Integer ........................
Decimal ......................
Decimal ......................
e.g., 62592057.
e.g., 28.586667.
e.g., ¥81.082778.
String ..........................
The population of the 2 x 2 km cell ................
Integer ........................
One of the following:
• US
• CA
• MX.
e.g., 586.
Country ........................
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Population ....................
e. TVStudy Scenarios
We are also making available on the
website a zip file that contains the three
TVStudy XML scenarios used to generate the
interference data used in the Channel Study.
The first scenario, ‘‘180124-Pre.xml’’, was
used to generate the interference-free service
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Feb 22, 2018
Jkt 244001
areas of LPTV/translator stations on their
current channels. The second scenario,
‘‘180124-PostG.xml’’, was used to calculate
the interference to/from LPTV/translator
stations in the granted applications study.
The third scenario, ‘‘180124-PostP.xml’’, was
used to calculate interference to/from LPTV/
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Sample
translator stations in the pending and granted
applications study. These studies were run
using the Interference Check template
included with TVStudy 2.2.4. The output of
these three TVStudy scenarios was combined
into the data tables described in III.d. above.
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
8084
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 37 / Friday, February 23, 2018 / Notices
Federal Communications Commission.
Barbara Kreisman,
Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2018–03732 Filed 2–22–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
Notice of Agreements Filed
The Commission hereby gives notice
of the filing of the following agreements
under the Shipping Act of 1984.
Interested parties may submit comments
on the agreements to the Secretary,
Federal Maritime Commission,
Washington, DC 20573, within twelve
days of the date this notice appears in
the Federal Register. Copies of the
agreements are available through the
Commission’s website (www.fmc.gov) or
by contacting the Office of Agreements
at (202)-523–5793 or tradeanalysis@
fmc.gov.
Agreement No.: 012447–001.
Title: THE Alliance/Zim MED–USEC
Slot Exchange Agreement.
Parties: Hapag-Lloyd AG; Kawasaki
Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.; Mitsui O.S.K. Lines,
Ltd.; Nippon Yusen Kaisha; Yang Ming
Marine Transport Corporation; Yang
Ming (UK) Ltd.; and Zim Integrated
Shipping Services Ltd.
Filing Party: Joshua Stein; Cozen
O’Connor; 1200 Nineteenth Street NW,
Washington, DC 20036.
Synopsis: The amendment revises the
Agreement to provide for the transition
that will occur following the
combination of the container liner
operations of Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha,
Ltd.; Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.; and
Nippon Yusen Kaisha into a new
company known as Ocean Network
Express Pte. Ltd. effective April 1, 2018.
Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd. is
added as a party. In addition, the
amendment adds Yang Ming (UK) Ltd.
as a party (operating as a single party
with Yang Ming Marine Transport
Corp.).
Agreement No.: 012488–001.
Title: THE Alliance/OOCL Vessel
Sharing Agreement.
Parties: Hapag-Lloyd AG; Kawasaki
Kisen Kaisha, Ltd.; Mitsui O.S.K. Lines,
Ltd.; Nippon Yusen Kaisha; Yang Ming
Marine Transport Corporation; Yang
Ming (UK) Ltd.; and Orient Overseas
Container Line Limited.
Filing Party: Joshua Stein; Cozen
O’Connor; 1200 Nineteenth Street NW,
Washington, DC 20036.
Synopsis: The amendment revises the
Agreement to provide for the transition
that will occur following the
combination of the container liner
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Feb 22, 2018
Jkt 244001
operations of Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha,
Ltd.; Mitsui O.S.K. Lines, Ltd.; and
Nippon Yusen Kaisha into a new
company known as Ocean Network
Express Pte. Ltd. effective April 1, 2018.
Ocean Network Express Pte. Ltd. is
added as a party. In addition, the
amendment adds Yang Ming (UK) Ltd.
as a party (operating as a single party
with Yang Ming Marine Transport
Corp.).
Agreement No.: 201240.
Title: Husky—Ports America
Washington Marine Terminal
Cooperative Working Agreement.
Parties: Ports America Washington,
Inc. and Husky Terminal and
Stevedoring, Inc.
Filing Party: Eric Lee; Holland &
Knight LLP; 800 17th Street NW, Suite
1100, Washington, DC 20006.
Synopsis: The Agreement authorizes
the parties to (1) establish and maintain
terminal rates, service charges and fees,
rules, and practices related to their
operations at terminals owned and
operated by them at the Port of Tacoma,
and (2) meet, discuss, exchange
information and data, and agree on
issues regarding their respective
operations, facilities, and services at the
Port.
Agreement No.: 201241.
Title: Tacoma Marine Terminal
Operator Conference Agreement.
Parties: Husky Terminal and
Stevedoring, Inc. and Washington
United Terminals, Inc.
Filing Party: Eric Lee; Holland &
Knight LLP; 800 17th Street NW, Suite
1100, Washington, DC 20006.
Synopsis: The Agreement authorizes
the parties to establish and maintain
rates, charges, schedules, classifications,
regulations, rules, and practices related
to operations, facilities, and services at
marine terminals owned or operated by
the parties at the Port of Tacoma.
Agreement No.: 201242.
Title: Tacoma Marine Terminal
Operator Cooperative Working
Agreement.
Parties: Husky Terminal and
Stevedoring, Inc. and Washington
United Terminals, Inc.
Filing Party: Eric Lee; Holland &
Knight LLP; 800 17th Street NW, Suite
1100, Washington, DC 20006.
Synopsis: The Agreement authorizes
the parties to discuss and agree on
various operational issues at facilities in
the Port of Tacoma.
Dated: February 20, 2018.
Rachel E. Dickon,
Secretary.
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The applications will also be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than March 19,
2018.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of San
Francisco (Gerald C. Tsai, Director,
Applications and Enforcement) 101
Market Street, San Francisco, California
94105–1579:
1. TriCo Bancshares, Chico,
California; to acquire and merge with
FNB Bancorp, and thereby indirectly
acquire First National Bank of Northern
California, both of South San Francisco,
California.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, February 16, 2018.
Ann Misback,
Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. 2018–03684 Filed 2–22–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
[FR Doc. 2018–03750 Filed 2–22–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6731–AA–P
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\23FEN1.SGM
23FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8074-8084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03732]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
[DA 18-124]
Incentive Auction Task Force and Media Bureau Announce Post
Incentive Auction Special Displacement Window April 10, 2018 Through
May 15, 2018 and Make Location and Channel Data Available
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Incentive Auction Task Force and Media Bureau provide
sixty days' advance notice of the opening of a displacement application
filing window for low power television, TV translator stations, and
analog-to-digital replacement translators that were displaced by the
incentive auction and repacking process. The IATF and Media Bureau also
announce that simultaneous with the release of the Public Notice they
are releasing a channel study to assist stations in identifying
potential new channels in the repacked television bands.
DATES: The Special Displacement Window will open April 10, 2018 and
will close on May 15, 2018 at 11:59 p.m. EDT.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shaun Maher, Video Division, Media
Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, [email protected], (202)
418-2324.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Incentive Auction Task Force (IATF) and
the Media Bureau hereby provide sixty days' advance notice of the
opening of a displacement application filing window for low power
television (LPTV), TV translator stations, and analog-to-digital
replacement translators (DRT) (referred to collectively as ``LPTV/
translator stations'') that were displaced by the incentive auction and
repacking process (Special Displacement Window). The Special
Displacement Window will open on Tuesday, April 10, 2018, and close on
Tuesday, May 15, 2018, at 11:59 p.m. EDT. The IATF and Media Bureau
also announce that simultaneous with the release of this Public Notice
they are releasing a channel study to assist stations in identifying
potential new channels in the repacked television bands. The Public
Notice provides details regarding the channel study, reiterate some of
the eligibility and filing procedures for the window, and lifts the
displacement application filing freeze for eligible stations. The
Public Notice also reminds eligible full power television stations that
they may begin filing applications for digital-to-digital replacement
translators (DTDRTs) on April 10, 2018.
The Commission in 2015 sought comment on whether to preserve a
vacant television channel for use by unlicensed white space devices and
wireless microphones in all areas of the country. See Preservation of
One Vacant Channel in the UHF Television Band For Use By White Space
Devices and Wireless Microphones, MB Docket No. 15-146, Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, 30 FCC Rcd 6711 (2015). In that proceeding, the
Commission proposed that applications filed in the displacement window
would have to demonstrate that they do not eliminate the last remaining
vacant channel in their proposed service area. Id. at 6719, para. 17.
While the Commission has not issued an order in this proceeding to
date, it is noted that the opening of the displacement window and
acceptance of displacement applications does not preclude the
preservation of a vacant television channel. Because new 600 MHz
licensees have already begun to deploy service in the 600 MHz Band and
the earliest transitioning full-power and Class A stations will begin
testing on their post-auction channels in a few months, the IATF and
Media Bureau believe time is of the essence in opening the special
displacement window and processing displacement applications in order
to ``preserve the important services provided by LPTV and TV translator
stations.'' In the Matter of Expanding the Economic and Innovation
Opportunities of Spectrum Through Incentive Auctions, Report and Order,
29 FCC Rcd 6567, 6576, para. 21 (2014). In addition, the IATF and Media
Bureau expect that in many areas of the country there will likely be
vacant channels available even after displacement applications are
processed and granted.
Channel Study. As described more fully in the Appendix to the
Public Notice, the IATF and Media Bureau have compiled and are
releasing data that identifies locations and channels where LPTV/
translator stations filing applications in the Special Displacement
Window likely cannot propose displacement facilities because of the
presence of non-displaced LPTV/translator stations and permittees, full
power and Class A television stations, or land mobile operations. The
release of this data satisfies the Commission's directive to provide
channel availability data to assist eligible LPTV/TV translator
stations sixty days prior to the opening of the Special Displacement
Window. See Rules for Digital Low Power Television and Television
Translator Stations, MB Docket No. 03-185, Third Report and Order and
Fourth Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 30 FCC Rcd 14927, 14946-47,
paras. 40-42 (2015). Identification of the locations and channels where
eligible LPTV/translator stations likely cannot operate will provide
important information to help facilitate the LPTV/translator
displacement application process. Stations are encouraged to use this
information to help identify available channels and to use TVStudy to
ensure
[[Page 8075]]
the facilities they plan to propose will satisfy station needs.
Stations are reminded that they must also use TVStudy to verify that
the displacement facilities they propose will not create harmful
interference. Additionally, given the public interest in promoting the
efficient use of spectrum, LPTV/translator stations operating outside
of the largest 40 DMAs are encouraged to select new channels for
displaced stations that are adjacent to channels in use by other
broadcast television stations to help provide flexibility in the
future. Once a station has identified a suitable channel, it should
file a construction permit application for it during the Special
Displacement Window.
The data being provided is based on use of the incentive auction
repacking and optimization software nationwide, and includes: (1) All
other primary users in the repacked television band or in adjacent
bands, including land mobile operations; (2) licenses and valid
construction permits for LPTV/translator stations; (3) licenses and
valid construction permits for full power and Class A stations that
were not reassigned to new channels in repacking; (4) the full power
and Class A television station technical parameters in the Closing and
Channel Reassignment Public Notice; (5) full power and Class A
television station modifications proposed in the two alternate channel/
expanded facilities filing windows; and (6) full power and Class A
television station applications filed during the period from November
28 to December 7, 2017, when the April 2013 freeze on the filing of
applications for minor modifications was lifted. See Media Bureau
Temporarily Lifts the Freeze on the Filing of Minor Modification
Applications That Expand the Contour of Full Power and Class A
Television Stations From November 28 Through December 7, 2017, Public
Notice, 32 FCC Rcd 9328 (MB 2017). If an application filed during
either of the alternate channel/expanded facilities filing windows is
granted and supersedes the full power or Class A station's facility as
listed in the Closing and Channel Reassignment Public Notice, then an
LPTV/translator station filing an application in the Special
Displacement Window need only demonstrate that it will not cause
interference to the facility authorized in the granted window
application. The data is provided on the same 2 x 2 kilometer basis as
used in connection with the incentive auction. The data is available
online at https://data.fcc.gov/download/incentive-auctions/LPTV-Data.
It is noted that the data shows those locations and channels that
are potentially unavailable for displaced LPTV/translator stations. The
data also indicates which LPTV/translator stations are potentially
displaced as a result of causing interference or receiving interference
based on certain assumptions that are described in more detail in the
attached Appendix. This information is provided as guidance, and
stations must conduct their own interference studies using TVStudy,
particularly since technical parameters for stations may change.
Technical showings will be required to demonstrate that LPTV/translator
station displacement applications are predicted to cause less than the
amount of interference prescribed in our rules to other TV stations,
including other LPTV/translator stations.
In addition, the Incentive Auction Task Force and the Media Bureau
announce today that they will host a webinar on the data on Wednesday,
February 28, 2018 at 1 p.m., to review the assumptions described in the
Appendix and the data we are providing, and to respond to questions
from LPTV/translator stations. Additional information on this webinar
will be provided in a future Public Notice.
Reminder of Certain Eligibility and Filing Procedures. To be
eligible to file in the Special Displacement Window, an LPTV/translator
station must be both ``operating'' and ``displaced.'' ``Operating''
LPTV/translator stations are those that had licensed their authorized
construction permit facilities, or had an application for a license to
cover on file with the Commission, as of April 13, 2017--the release
date of the Closing and Channel Reassignment Public Notice. See Media
Bureau Announces Date By Which LPTV and TV Translator Stations Must Be
``Operating'' In Order To Participate In Post-Incentive Auction Special
Displacement Window, Public Notice, 31 FCC Rcd 5383 (MB 2016). In order
to be ``displaced'' for purposes of filing in the Special Displacement
Window, an LPTV/translator station must: (1) Be subject to displacement
by a full power or Class A television station on the repacked
television band (channels 2-36) as a result of the incentive auction
and repacking process; (2) be licensed on frequencies repurposed for
new, flexible use by a 600 MHz Band wireless licensee (channels 38-51);
or (3) be licensed on frequencies that will serve as part of the 600
MHz Band guard bands (which includes the duplex gap).
During the Special Displacement Window, all of the requirements of
the current displacement rules will continue to apply (e.g., required
interference showing and limits on transmitter moves), except for the
requirement that displacement applications be submitted only after the
primary full power or Class A station obtains a construction permit or
license. Eligible digital stations may propose a change in transmitter
site of not more than 48 kilometers from the reference coordinates of
the existing station's community of license. Eligible analog stations
may propose a change in antenna location of not more than 16.1
kilometers. In addition, eligible stations may apply only for a channel
that continues to be allocated to broadcast television service (i.e.,
channels 2-36), and not for channels that have been repurposed for the
new, flexible 600 MHz Band for wireless services or reserved for the
600 MHz guard band and duplex gap (i.e., former television channels 38-
51).
In order to ensure that as many potential channels as possible are
available for operating LPTV/translator stations that are subject to
displacement, we will permit stations to file displacement applications
proposing pre-auction channels in the repacked television band
(channels 2-36) that full power and Class A stations will relinquish as
a result of the incentive auction and repacking process. This includes
channels that were voluntarily relinquished by License Relinquishment
Stations, Channel Sharing Stations, and Band Changing Stations as well
as the pre-auction channels of Reassigned Stations. Applicants
proposing such channels must include a request to waive the contingent
application rule. The Media Bureau expects to view favorably requests
to waive the contingent application rule filed by operating LPTV/
translator stations that are subject to displacement if the station
demonstrates that the requested channel is necessary to allow the
station to continue to serve its current viewers. In addition, in order
to comply with Section 73.3700(g)(2), the station must agree to a
condition that it will not begin transmitting on the requested channel
prior to discontinuation of operation by the full power or Class A
station that is currently licensed to use that channel. If a
conditional grant would require an LPTV/translator station to be silent
for a consecutive 12-month period prior to discontinuation of operation
by the full power or Class A station, the Media Bureau will consider a
request for extension or
[[Page 8076]]
reinstatement pursuant to Section 312(g) of the Communications Act and
a request for waiver of the applicable Commission rule.
Lifting of Displacement Application Filing Freeze. To facilitate
filing in the Special Displacement Window, the current freeze on the
filing of displacement applications will be lifted on April 10, 2018,
solely for the purposes of accepting applications by eligible stations
during the Special Displacement Window. The displacement application
filing freeze will be reinstated upon the completion of the Special
Displacement Window on May 15, 2018, at 11:59 p.m. EST.
Displaced LPTV/translator stations that do not qualify for the
Special Displacement Window (e.g., permittees that were not operating
as of the Closing and Channel Reassignment Public Notice), and stations
that are eligible but do not file during the Special Displacement
Window are reminded that they must wait until the freeze is lifted to
submit a displacement application. In addition, stations are reminded
that minor change filings and digital companion channel applications
also remain frozen. The Media Bureau will announce a lifting of these
three freezes in one or more subsequent public notices following the
completion of the Special Displacement Window.
Applications for DTDRTs. Beginning April 10, 2018, eligible full
power television stations may file applications for DTDRTs.
Applications will continue to be accepted until July 13, 2021 (one year
after completion of the post-incentive auction transition period).
Additional information about eligibility and filing procedures for
DTDRTs is contained in the May 2017 LPTV Procedures Public Notice.
Appendix A
Data To Assist LPTV/Translator Stations in Identifying Potential New
Channels Prior to the Special Displacement Window
I. Introduction
This appendix describes the maps and data (collectively,
``Channel Study'') released in conjunction with this Public Notice.
As previously indicatd, the Channel Study provides location and
channel availability information to assist eligible low power
television (``LPTV'') stations, TV translator stations, and analog-
to-digital replacement translators (``DRT'') (referred collectively
as ``LPTV/translator stations'') in identifying potential new
channels in the repacked TV bands, consistent with the Commission's
direction in Rules for Digital Low Power Television and Television
Translator Stations, MB Docket No. 03-185, Third Report and Order
and Fourth Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, 30 FCC Rcd 14927, 14946-
47, paras. 40-42 (2015). The data is available at https://data.fcc.gov/download/incentive-auctions/LPTV-Data.
The Channel Study includes detailed information on a 2 x 2 km
cell level about locations and channels that are likely not
available for LPTV/translator station displacement facilities
because of the presence of full power and Class A television
stations, non-displaced LPTV/translator stations and permittees, or
land mobile operations. The Channel Study also includes maps
available in Tableau files to provide LPTV/translator stations a
method to visually identify locations and channels that are likely
unavailable as displaced channels. Both the maps and the detailed 2
x 2 km cell-level information should allow LPTV/translator stations
to narrow their search options to the most viable locations and
channels.
The Channel Study is based on the assumptions detailed in this
appendix. Eligible displaced LPTV/translator stations must also
conduct their own interference analysis using TVStudy prior to
submitting displacement applications during the Special Displacement
Window.
II. Overview of Study Process and Assumptions
a. Overview
The Channel Study examined potential interference caused by
LPTV/translator stations to full power or Class A stations and
interference received by LPTV/translator stations from full power
and Class A stations. For each full power, Class A and LPTV/
translator station, the Incentive Auction Task Force and Media
Bureau (referred to collectively as ``we'') determine the station's
current interference-free population and then determined how much
interference it caused and how much interference it received from
each other station using two post auction scenarios--one scenario
utilizing the most recent universe of granted applications and the
second scenario utilizing the most recent universe of both pending
and granted applications.
b. Compiling the List of Stations
Compiling a complete list of stations and permittees was a
necessary first step in developing the Channel Study. On January 17,
2018 (the ``pull date''), we pulled a station list from the
Commission's Licensing and Management System (LMS) that included the
following categories of stations:
All licensed full-power and Class A stations that
existed prior to the auction;
all LPTV/translator licensees and permittees (including
DRTs, digital companion channels, permittees whose status is
currently ``CP Off Air,'' and the set of LPTVs which have already
been displaced as a result of the auction); and
all Mexican and Canadian stations.
More specifically, we included all Canadian and Mexican stations
in the border regions that were protected during the incentive
auction. This approach is consistent with what was done during the
incentive auction, however, the data set also includes additional
Mexican allotments which need to be protected after the auction.
c. Calculating Interference
We entered the compiled list of stations into TVStudy to
calculate the interference-free populations for all LPTV/translator
stations to create a baseline, using the methodology described in
OET Bulletin 69 (OET-69) and at a 2 x 2 km cell level of granularity
consistent with the repacking software used in connection with the
incentive auction. We then used TVStudy to run pairwise studies to
determine whether two TV stations on either the same channel or on
an adjacent channel within the same region would create new pairwise
interference greater than 0.5% between the two stations.
In order for a displaced LPTV/translator station to receive the
most complete picture of likely channel availability, two separate
sets of data were generated. The first set of data used the
parameters from the most recent universe of granted construction
permits or licenses. This set will inform LPTV/translator stations
of the required protections for full power and Class A stations as
of the pull date. The following parameters were used to create this
first set of data:
The operating parameters from the most recent granted
construction permits for any full power, Class A and LPTV/translator
station as of the pull date;
the post-auction baseline parameters for full power and
Class A stations that did not have a granted construction permit
since the close of the auction;
the licensed operating parameters of LPTV/translator
stations that did not have a granted construction permit since the
close of the auction; and
the protected parameters of Canadian and Mexican
stations (including Mexican auction allotments).
Note that in addition to granted construction permits and
licensed operating facilities included in this first set, we also
included a small number of pending minor modifications for LPTV/
translator stations in this first set. These pending minor
modifications are likely either awaiting international coordination
or were otherwise filed prior to the December 20, 2017 freeze on
LPTV/translator minor modifications and, in either case, will
require protection from applications filed in the Special
Displacement Window. See Media Bureau Freezes the Filing of Minor
Change Applications for LPTV/Translator Stations, Public Notice, DA
17-1227 (rel. Dec. 20, 2017).
The second set of data used the operating parameters from the
most recent universe of both granted and pending applications for
any station that has an application still under consideration as of
the pull date. This set will inform LPTV/translator stations of the
pending operating parameters that may be granted by the Commission.
Even if a full power or Class A application is still pending when a
displacement application is considered, it must nevertheless be
protected from interference, as must any pending LPTV/translator
minor modification application filed before December 20, 2017. The
following parameters were used in this second set of data:
[[Page 8077]]
The operating parameters from the most recent pending
construction permits for any full power, Class A, and LPTV/
translator stations (including LPTV/translator stations that have
already been displaced as a result of the incentive auction) as of
the pull date;
the operating parameters from the most recent granted
construction permit for any full power, Class A, and LPTV/translator
station that did not have a pending construction permit as of the
pull date;
the post-auction baseline parameters for full power and
Class A stations that did not have a pending or granted construction
permit since the close of the auction;
the licensed operating parameters of LPTV/translator
stations that did not have a pending or granted construction permit
since the close of the auction; and
the protected parameters of Canadian and Mexican
stations (including Mexican auction allotments).
We had to make one minor correction to the set of stations
included in the pending and granted applications study. WWDT-CD
(facility ID: 58261) was accidentally not included in the data used
by TVStudy to create this scenario. To provide a more accurate
picture for this study, WWDT-CD's interference-free service area was
added manually into the data used to create the Tableau maps. WWDT-
CD was, however, correctly included in the study that considered
only granted applications.
The results of these pairwise studies indicate, for each 2 x 2
km cell, whether the LPTV/translator station causes interference to
a full power or Class A station or whether the LPTV/translator
station receives interference from a full power or Class A station.
If the LPTV/translator station was predicted to cause more than 0.5%
new interference to the interference-free population of a full power
or Class A station, it is considered displaced in the Channel Study
due to interference caused. In addition, by aggregating the pairwise
studies, the resulting output shows whether a LPTV/translator
station receives in aggregate more than 2% new interference to its
interference-free population from any combination of repacked full
power and Class A stations. Any station that receives more than 2%
new interference in aggregate but does not cause more than 0.5%
interference will be considered displaced in the Channel Study due
to interference received. We used the 2% threshold as a conservative
measurement of displacement based on the pairwise protections that
LPTV/translator stations owe other LPTV/translator stations.
LPTV/translator stations that are marked as displaced, either
because they cause or receive more than the stated threshold amount
of interference, may not in fact be displaced because LPTV/
translator stations have the option to modify their facility to
eliminate such interference issues and remain on their current
channel. Nevertheless, for purposes of the Channel Study, we mark
these stations as being potentially displaced so that other LPTV/
translator stations will be aware of this fact. Also, LPTV/
translator stations that currently broadcast on channels (38-51) are
automatically displaced because they are in the new 600 MHz band for
mobile broadband service and are not included in the interference
studies underlying the Channel Study.
This data was then aggregated by point (i.e., each 2 x 2 km
cell) for each channel. Any point that exists in an interference-
free service area (``service area'') for a given channel is
categorized using the first valid condition from the following list:
Protected due to land mobile or off shore radio;
within a full power or Class A station's service area;
within an LPTV/translator station's service area where
that station does not cause more than 0.5% interference to a full
power or Class A station or receive more the 2% aggregate
interference;
within an LPTV/translator station's service area where
that station receives more the 2% aggregate interference; or
within an LPTV/translator station's service area where
that station causes more than 0.5% interference to a full power or
Class A station.
Note that for purposes of generating the Channel Study, we
continued to use the same distance-based protections that were used
in the incentive auction. See Incentive Auction Task Force Releases
Information Related to Incentive Auction Repacking, ET Docket No.
13-26, GN Docket No. 12-268, Public Notice, 28 FCC Rcd 10370, 10407-
10 (2013). This conservative approach was adopted for ease of use,
but displaced LPTV/translator stations can still make a technical
showing to demonstrate that they can operate on these excluded
channels and locations.
Points are categorized in this way to show areas likely to be
unable to accommodate a displaced LPTV/translator station. Land
mobile, full power and Class A stations, and LPTV/translator
stations not causing or receiving interference are unlikely to
modify their facilities and their current service areas are unlikely
to be able to accommodate a displaced LPTV/translator station. LPTV/
translator stations that are receiving interference may accept the
interference and continue to broadcast or make modifications to
mitigate the interference, or, if they cannot tolerate or eliminate
the interference, they may file for a new channel in the Special
Displacement Window. LPTV/translator stations causing interference
must make modifications to mitigate the interference or file for a
new channel in the Special Displacement Window.
III. Description of Maps and CSV Data Files
a. Maps Overview
We provide four types of maps as visual tools to assist LPTV/
translator stations in identifying available channels in their
service area. All visualizations are Tableau workbooks that can be
viewed using the free Tableau Reader (available here https://www.tableau.com/products/reader).
The first and second workbooks show the locations and channels
currently in the service area of full power, Class A, non-displaced
LPTV/translator, or land mobile operations, and are therefore likely
not available to displaced LPTV/translator stations. The third and
fourth workbook show which LPTV/translator stations that remain in
the TV band are displaced either as a result of causing or receiving
interference. The four visualizations are identified in the bullets
below and described in more detail in the following subsections.
Protected Points by Channel--Granted: These maps
provide a visual representation of granted construction permits or
licensed stations, as described in detail in Section II.c, paragraph
6, to identify locations and channels that are potentially not
available for displaced LPTV/translator stations.
Protected Points by Channel--Pending and Granted: These
maps provide a visual representation of pending construction
permits, granted construction permits, or licensed stations, as
described in detail in Section II.c, paragraph 7, to identify
locations and channels that are potentially not available for
displaced LPTV/translator stations.
Potentially Displaced LPTV Stations Map--Granted: These
maps provide a visual representation of granted construction permits
or licensed stations, as described in detail in Section II.c,
paragraph 6 (except those stations in the new 600 MHz band--i.e.,
channels 38-51--which are automatically displaced), to identify
LPTV/translator stations that are potentially displaced.
Potentially Displaced LPTV Stations Map--Pending and
Granted: These maps provide a visual representation of pending
construction permits, granted construction permits, or licensed
stations, as described in detail in Section II.c, paragraph 7
(except those stations in the new 600 MHz band--i.e., channels 38-
51--which are automatically displaced), to identify LPTV/translator
stations that are potentially displaced.
b. Protected Points by Channel Maps
The two Protected Points by Channel visualizations display color
coded maps. The colors identified below signify the existence of
certain services in an area. Points that do not fall within any
relevant service's or station's service area are not colored.
Examples of these visualizations are provided in Figure 1 and Figure
2 below, and comprehensive information is available in the CSV files
discussed below and posted online.
Green denotes an area protected due to land mobile or
off shore radio.
Blue denotes an area within a full power or Class A
station's service area.
Light blue denotes an area within an LPTV/translator
station's service area where that station does not cause more than
0.5% new interference to a full power or Class A station or receive
more the 2% new aggregate interference.
Orange denotes an area within an LPTV/translator
station's service area where that station receives more than 2% new
aggregate interference.
Red denotes an area within an LPTV/translator station's
service area where that station causes more than 0.5% interference
to a full power or Class A station.
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
[[Page 8078]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23FE18.000
[[Page 8079]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23FE18.001
As noted above, there are two Tableau workbooks for each
visualization. One workbook reflects the data set using the service
area parameters from the most recently granted construction permits
or licenses of full or Class A TV stations as of the pull date and
the second workbook reflects the data set using the service area
parameters from pending construction permits as of the pull date.
c. Potentially Displaced LPTV Stations Maps
The two Potentially Displaced LPTV Station Map visualizations
show LPTV/translator stations that are potentially displaced because
they cause new pairwise interference greater than 0.5% to a full
power or Class A station or because they receive aggregate new
interference greater than 2%. The 2% parameter is a default used in
the data but it can be changed using a filter next to the map. Using
the lasso tool within Tableau, the user can select a geographic
region to generate a table containing the pairwise and aggregate
interference data, and also view the interference free service area
of individual LPTV stations to see the impact of new interference.
Examples of the visualizations available are provided in Figure 3
through Figure 6 below and comprehensive information is available in
the data provided online.
[[Page 8080]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23FE18.002
[[Page 8081]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23FE18.003
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23FE18.004
[[Page 8082]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN23FE18.005
BILLING CODE 6712-01-C
d. CSV Data Files
The online Channel Study includes three zip files. The first zip
file contains the three CSV files unique to the granted applications
study. The second zip file contains the three CSV files unique to
the pending and granted applications study. The third zip file
contains the two CSV files common to both studies. The CSV files
contained in these three zip files were used to generate the Tableau
maps. Each study contains a CSV file, lptv_aggregated.csv, which is
the aggregated 2 x 2 km point data as categorized above, and forms
the basis for the Tableau maps. The other two CSV files combined
with the common two CSV files contain the underlying point data for
each LPTV/translator station used to generate the aggregated data.
These are provided in comma separated value format and are available
to users to generate their own study scenario or to replicate our
analysis.
The following three files (detailed in Tables 1-3 below) are in
the zip file unique to each study. The lptv_aggregated.csv file
identifies, for each channel, any point that falls within a service
area. The file contains the fields listed in Table 1 below:
Table 1--Data Dictionary for lptv_aggregated.csv
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field Description Type Sample
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pointkey.......................... The unique identification Integer.............. e.g., 62592057.
for a 2 x 2 grid cell
determined by TVStudy.
Channel........................... The channel number Integer.............. e.g., 29.
assigned to the station
of the protection
category indicated by the
``type'' field.
Type.............................. The classification of String............... Types will be one of the
service for that point following:
according to the LM/LMW/Offshore.
priorities listed above. FP/CA.
LPTV.
LPTV--Agg IX.
LPTV--Pairwise
IX.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 8083]]
The stations_points.csv file identifies the interference-free
points for each station on the station's assigned channel in the
study. These points establish the total interference-free population
for a given station and also the possible locations for interference
to that station. The file contains the fields listed in Table 2
below:
Table 2--Data Dictionary for stations_points.csv
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field Description Type Sample
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facility_id....................... The unique facility ID Integer.............. e.g., 52887.
assigned to the station.
Channel_id........................ The channel number Integer.............. e.g., 29.
assigned to the station.
Pointkey.......................... The unique ID of each 2 x Integer.............. e.g., 62592057.
2 km cell.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The ix_paired.csv file identifies interference between any two
stations (LPTV/translator stations and full power/Class A stations)
according to TVStudy at a given point. The file contains the
following fields listed in Table 3 below:
Table 3--Data Dictionary for ix_paired.csv
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field Description Type Sample
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facility_id....................... The unique facility ID Integer.............. e.g., 52887.
assigned to the station
receiving interference.
Channel_id........................ The channel number Integer.............. e.g., 29.
assigned to the station
receiving interference.
ix_facility_id.................... The unique facility ID Integer.............. e.g., 53442
assigned to the station
causing interference.
ix_channel_id..................... The channel number Integer.............. e.g., 35.
assigned to the station
causing interference.
Pointkey.......................... The unique ID of the 2 x 2 Integer.............. e.g., 62592057.
km cell.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following two files (detailed in Tables 4-5 below) are in
the other zip file and are common to both runs. The lm_points.csv
file identifies points that must be protected on a specific channel
due to land mobile, land mobile waivers, and off shore radio (LM/
LMW/OSR). The file contains the fields listed in Table 4 below:
Table 4--Data Dictionary for lm_points.csv
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field Description Type Sample
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facility_id....................... The unique facility ID Integer.............. e.g., 52887.
assigned to the LM/LMW/ Note: facility_id 999999
OSR station. is used for off shore
radio.
Channel_id........................ The channel number Integer.............. e.g., 29.
assigned to the LM/LMW/
OSR station.
Pointkey.......................... The unique ID of each 2 x Integer.............. e.g., 62592057.
2 km cell.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The pointkeys.csv file identifies the characteristics associated
with each point, specifically latitude, longitude, country and
population. The file contains the fields listed in Table 5 below:
Table 5--Data Dictionary for pointkeys.csv
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Field Description Type Sample
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pointkey.......................... The unique ID of each 2 x Integer.............. e.g., 62592057.
2 km cell.
Latitude.......................... The latitude coordinate of Decimal.............. e.g., 28.586667.
the 2 x 2 km point.
Longitude......................... The longitude coordinate Decimal.............. e.g., -81.082778.
of the 2 x 2 km point.
Country........................... The country where the 2 x String............... One of the following:
2 km point is located. US
CA
MX.
Population........................ The population of the 2 x Integer.............. e.g., 586.
2 km cell.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
e. TVStudy Scenarios
We are also making available on the website a zip file that
contains the three TVStudy XML scenarios used to generate the
interference data used in the Channel Study. The first scenario,
``180124-Pre.xml'', was used to generate the interference-free
service areas of LPTV/translator stations on their current channels.
The second scenario, ``180124-PostG.xml'', was used to calculate the
interference to/from LPTV/translator stations in the granted
applications study. The third scenario, ``180124-PostP.xml'', was
used to calculate interference to/from LPTV/translator stations in
the pending and granted applications study. These studies were run
using the Interference Check template included with TVStudy 2.2.4.
The output of these three TVStudy scenarios was combined into the
data tables described in III.d. above.
[[Page 8084]]
Federal Communications Commission.
Barbara Kreisman,
Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2018-03732 Filed 2-22-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P