Approval of Arizona Air Plan Revisions, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality, 7614-7616 [2018-03526]
Download as PDF
7614
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 36 / Thursday, February 22, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED VIRGINIA REGULATIONS AND STATUTES—Continued
State citation
State effective
date
Title/subject
*
*
*
*
9 VAC 5, Chapter 160
*
*
*
5–160–30 ..........
Applicability ............................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2017–0468; FRL–9974–
68—Region 9]
Approval of Arizona Air Plan
Revisions, Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final action to
approve a revision to the Arizona
Department of Environmental Quality
(ADEQ) portion of the Arizona State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This
SUMMARY:
*
*
*
*
General Conformity
*
General Provisions
11/16/16
*
[FR Doc. 2018–03524 Filed 2–21–18; 8:45 am]
*
*
Part II
Explanation
[former SIP citation]
EPA approval date
2/22/18, [Insert Federal
Register Citation].
*
Subdivision A. is amended to address revoked
federal standards.
Previous approval 12/12/11.
*
revision concerns emissions of leadbearing fugitive dust from roads, storage
piles and other activities associated
with the primary copper smelter located
in Hayden, Arizona. We are approving
a state rule and associated appendix to
regulate these emissions under the
Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule is effective on March
26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2017–0468. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
*
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine Vineyard, EPA Region IX,
(415) 947–4125, vineyard.christine@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On November 27, 2017 (82 FR 55966),
the EPA proposed to approve the
following rule and appendix into the
Arizona SIP.
Local agency
Rule No.
Rule title
ADEQ ................
ADEQ ................
R18–2–B1301.01 ...............
Appendix 15 .......................
Limits on Lead-Bearing Fugitive Dust from the Hayden Smelter .......................
Test Methods for Determining Opacity and Stabilization of Unpaved Roads ....
We proposed to approve the rule and
associated appendix because we
determined that they comply with the
relevant CAA requirements. Our
proposed action contains more
information on the rule and associated
appendix and our evaluation.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
*
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received three
comments. Two commenters raised
issues that are outside of the scope of
this rulemaking, including forest
management, wildfire suppression, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:01 Feb 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
greenhouse-gas and other emissions
from wildfires. A third commenter
requested that the EPA ‘‘regulate the
amount of poisonous dust that is kicked
up into the air.’’ As explained in our
proposed action, Rule R18–2–B1301.01
establishes requirements to control leadbearing fugitive dust emissions
surrounding the Hayden copper smelter.
Our approval of this rule into the
Arizona SIP will make these
requirements federally enforceable.
Commenters did not raise any specific
issues germane to the approvability of
the rule and appendix.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Submitted
04/06/17
04/06/17
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment of the rule and
associated appendix as described in our
proposed action. Therefore, as
authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the
Act, the EPA is fully approving this rule
and associated appendix into the
Arizona SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
E:\FR\FM\22FER1.SGM
22FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 36 / Thursday, February 22, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
incorporation by reference of the ADEQ
rule and associated appendix described
in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set
forth below. The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been
approved by the EPA for inclusion in
the SIP, have been incorporated by
reference by the EPA into that plan, are
fully federally enforceable under
sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of
the effective date of the final rulemaking
of the EPA’s approval, and will be
incorporated by reference by the
Director of the Federal Register in the
next update to the SIP compilation.1
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Act. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
1 62
FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:01 Feb 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or pre-empt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
7615
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by April 23, 2018. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Lead, Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 12, 2018.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart D—Arizona
2. Section 52.120 is amended by
adding in paragraph (c), under the table
heading ‘‘Table 2—EPA-Approved
Arizona Regulations’’ a subheading for
‘‘Article 13 (State Implementation Plan
Rules for Specific Locations)’’ and
entries for ‘‘R18–2–B1301.01’’ and
‘‘Appendix 15’’ after the entry for
‘‘Table 6’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.120
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
E:\FR\FM\22FER1.SGM
22FER1
*
*
7616
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 36 / Thursday, February 22, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2—EPA-APPROVED ARIZONA REGULATIONS
State citation
State effective
date
Title/subject
EPA approval date
Additional explanation
Arizona Administrative Code
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Article 13 (State Implementation Plan Rules For Specific Locations)
R18–2–B1301.01 ..
Limits on Lead-Bearing Fugitive Dust from the Hayden
Smelter.
December 1, 2018
Appendix 15 ..........
Test Methods for Determining Opacity and Stabilization of
Unpaved Roads.
May 7, 2017 .........
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–03526 Filed 2–21–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0314; FRL–9972–04]
Methyl-alpha-D-mannopyranoside
(Alpha Methyl Mannoside); Exemption
From the Requirement of a Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of the biochemical
methyl-alpha-D-mannopyranoside
(alpha methyl mannoside) in or on all
raw agricultural commodities when
applied/used as a plant growth
regulator. BRANDT iHammer submitted
a petition to EPA under the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA),
requesting an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance. This
regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level
for residues of alpha methyl mannoside.
DATES: This regulation is effective
February 22, 2018. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before April 23, 2018, and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0314, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:01 Feb 21, 2018
Jkt 244001
*
[INSERT Federal Register
CITATION], February 22,
2018.
[INSERT Federal Register
CITATION], February 22,
2018.
*
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805. Please review
the visitor instructions and additional
information about the docket available
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert McNally, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P),
Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001; main telephone number:
(703) 305–7090; email address:
BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s e-CFR site at https://
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
Submitted on April 6, 2017.
Submitted on April 6, 2017.
*
www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl. To access the OCSPP test
guidelines referenced in this document
electronically, please go to https://
www.epa.gov/ocspp and select ‘‘Test
Methods and Guidelines.’’
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2017–0314 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before April 23, 2018. Addresses for
mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40
CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2017–0314, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
E:\FR\FM\22FER1.SGM
22FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 36 (Thursday, February 22, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 7614-7616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03526]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2017-0468; FRL-9974-68--Region 9]
Approval of Arizona Air Plan Revisions, Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a revision to the Arizona Department of Environmental
Quality (ADEQ) portion of the Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP).
This revision concerns emissions of lead-bearing fugitive dust from
roads, storage piles and other activities associated with the primary
copper smelter located in Hayden, Arizona. We are approving a state
rule and associated appendix to regulate these emissions under the
Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES: This rule is effective on March 26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2017-0468. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine Vineyard, EPA Region IX,
(415) 947-4125, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On November 27, 2017 (82 FR 55966), the EPA proposed to approve the
following rule and appendix into the Arizona SIP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADEQ........................ R18-2-B1301.01........................... Limits on Lead-Bearing 04/06/17
Fugitive Dust from the
Hayden Smelter.
ADEQ........................ Appendix 15.............................. Test Methods for 04/06/17
Determining Opacity
and Stabilization of
Unpaved Roads.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed to approve the rule and associated appendix because we
determined that they comply with the relevant CAA requirements. Our
proposed action contains more information on the rule and associated
appendix and our evaluation.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received three comments. Two commenters raised
issues that are outside of the scope of this rulemaking, including
forest management, wildfire suppression, and greenhouse-gas and other
emissions from wildfires. A third commenter requested that the EPA
``regulate the amount of poisonous dust that is kicked up into the
air.'' As explained in our proposed action, Rule R18-2-B1301.01
establishes requirements to control lead-bearing fugitive dust
emissions surrounding the Hayden copper smelter. Our approval of this
rule into the Arizona SIP will make these requirements federally
enforceable. Commenters did not raise any specific issues germane to
the approvability of the rule and appendix.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rule
and associated appendix as described in our proposed action. Therefore,
as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully
approving this rule and associated appendix into the Arizona SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
[[Page 7615]]
incorporation by reference of the ADEQ rule and associated appendix
described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA
has made, and will continue to make, these documents available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA for
inclusion in the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by the EPA
into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and
113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of the
EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference by the Director
of the Federal Register in the next update to the SIP compilation.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the Act. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or pre-empt
tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by April 23, 2018. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 12, 2018.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart D--Arizona
0
2. Section 52.120 is amended by adding in paragraph (c), under the
table heading ``Table 2--EPA-Approved Arizona Regulations'' a
subheading for ``Article 13 (State Implementation Plan Rules for
Specific Locations)'' and entries for ``R18-2-B1301.01'' and ``Appendix
15'' after the entry for ``Table 6'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.120 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
[[Page 7616]]
Table 2--EPA-Approved Arizona Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional
State citation Title/subject State effective date EPA approval date explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona Administrative Code
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article 13 (State Implementation Plan Rules For Specific Locations)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
R18-2-B1301.01.......... Limits on Lead- December 1, 2018........ [INSERT Federal Submitted on April
Bearing Fugitive Register 6, 2017.
Dust from the CITATION],
Hayden Smelter. February 22, 2018.
Appendix 15............. Test Methods for May 7, 2017............. [INSERT Federal Submitted on April
Determining Register 6, 2017.
Opacity and CITATION],
Stabilization of February 22, 2018.
Unpaved Roads.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-03526 Filed 2-21-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P