Request for Information Regarding the Bureau's Supervision Program, 7166-7168 [2018-03358]
Download as PDF
7166
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 20, 2018 / Notices
Dated: February 14, 2018.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
warranted, further amend the permit in
response to those comments.
In compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), a final
determination has been made that the
activity proposed is categorically
excluded from the requirement to
prepare an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement.
[FR Doc. 2018–03366 Filed 2–16–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XF592
Marine Mammals; File No. 21158–01
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of permit
amendment.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
major amendment to Permit No. 21158
has been issued to Robert Garrott, Ph.D.,
Montana State University, 310 Lewis
Hall, Bozeman, MT 59717.
ADDRESSES: The permit amendment and
related documents are available for
review upon written request or by
appointment in the Permits and
Conservation Division, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 EastWest Highway, Room 13705, Silver
Spring, MD 20910; phone (301) 427–
8401; fax (301) 713–0376.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sara
Young or Carrie Hubard, (301) 427–
8401.
SUMMARY:
On
November 8, 2017, a notice was
published in the Federal Register (82
FR 51822) that a request for an
amendment Permit No. 21158 to
conduct research on Weddell seals had
been submitted by the above-named
applicant. The requested permit
amendment has been issued under the
authority of the Marine Mammal
Protection Act of 1972, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) and the regulations
governing the taking and importing of
marine mammals (50 CFR part 216).
The permit amendment authorizes an
increase in takes of seal pups authorized
to be flipper tagged from a total of 675
to a total take of 1,000 pups. This field
season the research team has observed
an abnormally high number of pups and
current take numbers are not be
adequate to meet the stated scientific
goals of tagging all pups produced in the
Erebus Bay colonies each year. This
increase is only for the 2017–18 field
season and not for the duration of the
permit. At the end of the public
comment period, we will assess all
substantive comments received and if
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:55 Feb 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
Dated: February 14, 2018.
Julia Harrison,
Chief, Permits and Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–03392 Filed 2–16–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Agency: National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Title: Pacific Halibut Fisheries:
Charter Permits.
OMB Control Number: 0648–0592.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Request: Regular (revision
and extension of a currently approved
information collection).
Number of Respondents: 236.
Average Hours per Response: 2 hours
for Application for Transfer of Charter
Halibut Permit; 0.5 hours for
Application for Military Charter Permit;
2 hours for Application for Transfer
between IFQ and Guided Angler Fish
(GAF); and 4 hours for Appeals if an
Application for Transfer between IFQ
and GAF is denied by NMFS.
Burden Hours: 559.
Needs and Uses: This request is for
revision and extension of a currently
approved information collection.
The Alaska Pacific Halibut Charter
Program established Federal Charter
Halibut Permits (CHPs) for operators in
the charter halibut fishery in IPHC
regulatory Areas 2C (Southeast Alaska)
and 3A (Central Gulf of Alaska). Since
February 1, 2011, all vessel operators in
Areas 2C and 3A with charter anglers
onboard catching and retaining Pacific
halibut must have a valid CHP onboard
during every charter vessel fishing trip.
CHPs must be endorsed with the
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
appropriate regulatory area and number
of anglers.
The National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) implemented this program
based on recommendations by the North
Pacific Fishery Management Council to
meet allocation objectives in the charter
halibut fishery. This program provides
stability in the fishery by limiting the
number of charter vessels that may
participate in Areas 2C and 3A and
decreasing the overall number of
available CHPs over time. The program
goals are to increase the value of the
resource, limit boats to qualified active
participants in the guided sport halibut
sector, and enhance economic stability
in rural coastal communities.
An appeal letter was inadvertently
removed from this collection
previously, now reinstated.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofit organizations; individuals and
households.
Frequency: On occasion.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
This information collection request
may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow
the instructions to view Department of
Commerce collections currently under
review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806.
Dated: February 14, 2018.
Sarah Brabson,
NOAA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018–03365 Filed 2–16–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL
PROTECTION
[Docket No. CFPB–2018–0004]
Request for Information Regarding the
Bureau’s Supervision Program
Bureau of Consumer Financial
Protection.
ACTION: Notice and request for
information.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection (Bureau) is seeking
comments and information from
interested parties to assist the Bureau in
assessing the overall efficiency and
effectiveness of its Supervision Program,
and, consistent with the law,
considering whether any changes to the
program would be appropriate.
DATES: Comments must be received by
May 21, 2018.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 20, 2018 / Notices
You may submit responsive
information and other comments,
identified by Docket No. CFPB–2018–
0004, by any of the following methods:
• Electronic: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: FederalRegisterComments@
cfpb.gov. Include Docket No. CFPB–
2018–0004 in the subject line of the
message.
• Mail: Comment Intake, Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau, 1700 G
Street NW, Washington, DC 20552.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Comment
Intake, Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau, 1700 G Street NW, Washington,
DC 20552.
Instructions: The Bureau encourages
the early submission of comments. All
submissions must include the document
title and docket number. Please note the
number of the topic on which you are
commenting at the top of each response
(you do not need to address all topics).
Because paper mail in the Washington,
DC area and at the Bureau is subject to
delay, commenters are encouraged to
submit comments electronically. In
general, comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, with exceptions
including those noted below. In
addition, comments will be available for
public inspection and copying at 1700
G St NW, Washington, DC 20552, on
official business days between the hours
of 10 a.m. and 5 p.m. eastern standard
time. You can make an appointment to
inspect the documents by telephoning
202–435–7275.
Submissions in response to this
request for information, including
attachments and other supporting
materials, will become part of the public
record and subject to public disclosure.
Proprietary information or sensitive
personal information, such as account
numbers or Social Security numbers, or
names of other individuals should not
be included.
Commenters should also refrain from
submitting confidential supervisory
information (CSI), as defined in 12 CFR
1070.2(i). If discussing interactions on
an examination, commenters should
speak in generalities, and should refrain
from describing the content of
supervisory communications or the
results of specific exams. Commenters
may wish to submit input anonymously
or through a representative if associating
their name with their public comment
would disclose the fact that they have
been examined by the Bureau or the
results of a particular exam. The Bureau
reserves the right to redact or refrain
from publishing CSI consistent with 12
CFR 1070.41 et seq.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:55 Feb 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
For
general inquiries and submission
process questions, please call Brian
Shearer, Counsel, at (202) 435–7611.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Bureau has supervisory authority over
insured depository institutions and
credit unions with total assets over $10
billion and their affiliates, as well as
non-depository financial institutions,
regardless of size, in certain specific
markets including mortgage companies
(originators, brokers, servicers, and
offerors of loan modifications or
foreclosure relief services), payday
lenders and private education lenders.
The Bureau also has supervisory
authority over non-depository larger
participants of other markets as the
Bureau defines by rule. To date, this
includes larger participants in the
consumer reporting, debt collection,
student loan servicing, international
money transfer, and automobile finance
markets. Additionally, the Bureau has
authority over service providers of the
above referenced supervised entities,
and service providers to a substantial
number of depository institutions and
credit unions with total assets of $10
billion or less. More detail regarding the
Bureau’s supervisory authority can be
found principally at 12 U.S.C. 5514–
5516 and 12 CFR parts 1090 and 1091.
The Bureau is, as described below,
issuing this request for information
seeking public comment on how best to
achieve meaningful burden reduction or
other improvement to the processes
used by the Bureau to supervise for
compliance with Federal consumer
financial law (Supervision Program)
while continuing to meet the Bureau’s
statutory and regulatory objectives and
ensuring a fair and transparent process
for supervised entities.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Overview of This Request for
Information
The Bureau is using this request for
information to seek public input
regarding its Supervision Program. The
Bureau’s ability to supervise entities is
an essential part of the Bureau’s
statutory mission of enforcing Federal
consumer financial laws. The Bureau
engages in supervisory activities in
accordance with applicable law and in
furtherance of its statutory mandate.
The Bureau understands, however, that
the Bureau’s supervisory activities can
impose burdens on entities. The Bureau
encourages comments from all
interested members of the public. The
Bureau anticipates that the responding
public may include supervised entities
or companies supervised by other
agencies, compliance professionals or
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7167
members of the bar who represent these
entities, individual consumers,
consumer advocates, regulators, and
researchers, or members of academia.
Suggested Topics for Commenters
To allow the Bureau to evaluate
suggestions more effectively, the Bureau
requests that, where possible, comments
include:
• Specific suggestions regarding any
potential updates or modifications to
the Bureau’s Supervision Program,
consistent with the Bureau’s statutory
objectives, and including, in as much
detail as possible (though without
disclosing CSI), potential updates or
modifications, supporting data or other
information on impacts and costs, or
information concerning alignment with
the processes of other agencies with
similar authorities; and
• Specific identification of any
aspects of the Bureau’s Supervision
Program that should not be modified,
consistent with the Bureau’s statutory
objectives, and including supporting
data or other information on impacts
and costs, or information concerning
alignment with the processes of other
agencies with similar authorities.
The following list represents a
preliminary attempt by the Bureau to
identify elements of Bureau processes
related to its Supervision Program that
may be deserving of more immediate
focus. This non-exhaustive list is meant
to assist in the formulation of comments
and is not intended to restrict the issues
that may be addressed. In addressing
these topics or others, the Bureau
requests that commenters identify with
specificity the Bureau regulations or
practices at issue, providing legal
citations where appropriate and
available. Please feel free to comment on
some or all of the topics below, but
please be sure to indicate on which area
you are commenting. As noted in the
instructions above, please refrain from
revealing CSI in your public comment.
The Bureau is seeking feedback on all
aspects of its Supervision Program,
including but not limited to:
1. The timing, frequency, and scope of
supervisory exams.
2. The timing, method or process used
by the Bureau to collect information and
documents from a supervised entity
prior to the commencement of an
examination. Typically, the Bureau
sends an examination Information
Request (IR) to a supervised entity prior
to the commencement of an
examination. An IR is a list of
information and documents that the
supervised entity is asked to provide to
the Bureau for off-site review or to make
available when examiners are onsite at
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
7168
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 34 / Tuesday, February 20, 2018 / Notices
the entity. An IR is typically sent to an
entity at least 60 days prior to the onsite
start of an examination.
3. The type and volume of
information and documents requested
in IRs.
4. The effectiveness and accessibility
of the CFPB Supervision and
Examination Manual (Exam Manual).
The Exam Manual provides internal
direction to supervisory staff, including
summaries of statutes and regulations
and specific examination procedures for
use by examiners in conducting exams.
It is published on the Bureau’s website
to promote transparency and assist the
public in understanding how the Bureau
oversees supervised entities.
5. The efficiency and effectiveness of
onsite examination work. Typically,
while onsite, examination teams may
review documents and data, hold
meetings with management, conduct
interviews with staff, make
observations, and conduct transaction
testing.
6. The effectiveness of Supervision’s
communications when potential
violations are identified, including the
usefulness and content of the potential
action and request for response (PARR)
letter. A PARR letter provides an entity
with notice of preliminary findings of
conduct that may violate Federal
consumer financial laws and advises the
entity that the Bureau is considering
taking supervisory action or a public
enforcement action based on the
potential violations identified in the
letter. Supervision invites the entity to
respond to the PARR letter within 14
days and to set forth in the response any
reasons of fact, law or policy why the
Bureau should not take action against
the entity. The Bureau often permits
extensions of the response time when
requested.
7. The clarity, organization, and
quality of communications that report
the results of supervisory activities,
including oral communications from
examiners and Supervisory Letters and
Examination Reports.
8. The clarity of matters requiring
attention (MRA) and the reasonability of
timing requirements to satisfy MRAs.
An MRA is used to address violation(s)
of Federal consumer financial law or
compliance management weaknesses.
MRAs often require a written response
to the Bureau and will include a due
date for completion.
9. The process for appealing
supervisory findings.
10. The use of third parties contracted
by supervised entities to conduct
assessments specified in MRAs, or to
assess the sufficiency of completion of
an MRA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:55 Feb 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
11. The usefulness of Supervisory
Highlights to share findings and
promote transparency. The Bureau
periodically publishes Supervisory
Highlights to apprise the public about
its examination program, including the
concerns that it finds during the course
of its work.
12. The manner and extent to which
the Bureau can and should coordinate
its supervisory activity with Federal and
state supervisory agencies, including
through use of simultaneous exams,
where feasible and consistent with
statutory directives.
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 5511(c).
Dated: February 12, 2018.
Mick Mulvaney,
Acting Director, Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection.
[FR Doc. 2018–03358 Filed 2–16–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AM–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
[Docket ID: USAF–2018–HQ–0001]
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request
AGENCY:
Department of the Air Force,
DoD.
ACTION:
60-Day information collections
notice.
In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS), Strategic
Deterrence and Nuclear Integration (HQ
USAF/A10), on behalf of the Secretary
of the Air Force, the Department of
Defense (DoD) Executive Agent for the
DoD Foreign Clearance Program,
announces a proposed public
information collection and seeks public
comment on the provisions thereof.
Comments are invited on: Whether the
proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways
to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and ways to minimize the
burden of the information collection on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
DATES: Consideration will be given to all
comments received by April 23, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Department of Defense, Office
of the Chief Management Officer,
Directorate for Oversight and
Compliance, 4800 Mark Center Drive,
Mailbox #24, Suite 08D09B, Alexandria,
VA 22350–1700.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name, docket
number and title for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
Any associated form(s) for this
collection may be located within this
same electronic docket and downloaded
for review/testing. Follow the
instructions at https://
www.regulations.gov for submitting
comments. Please submit comments on
any given form identified by docket
number, form number, and title.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request more information on this
proposed information collection or to
obtain a copy of the proposal and
associated collection instruments,
please write to the Deputy Chief of Staff
(DCS), Strategic Deterrence and Nuclear
Integration Executive Services Office
(HQ USAF/A10E), ATTN: Ms. April
Powell-Donnell, 1488 Air Force
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20330–1488,
at (703) 695–7467.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title; Associated Form; and OMB
Number: Aircraft and Personnel
Automated Clearance System (APACS);
OMB Control Number 0701–XXXX.
Needs and Uses: The information
collection requirement is necessary to
obtain PII information which is used by
in-country U.S. Embassy approvers to
grant country travel clearances,
Geographical Combatant Commands
approvers to grant theater travel
clearances and by the Office of Secretary
of Defense for Policy approvers to grant
special area travel clearances. Aircrew
PII information is used for verification,
identification and authentication of
travelers for aircraft and personnel
travel clearances, as required by DoDD
4500.54E, DoD Foreign Clearance
Program.
Affected Public: DoD-sponsored
contractors and DoD-sponsored foreign
nationals.
Annual Burden Hours: 15,400.
Number of Respondents: 30,800.
E:\FR\FM\20FEN1.SGM
20FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7166-7168]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03358]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
BUREAU OF CONSUMER FINANCIAL PROTECTION
[Docket No. CFPB-2018-0004]
Request for Information Regarding the Bureau's Supervision
Program
AGENCY: Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
ACTION: Notice and request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (Bureau) is
seeking comments and information from interested parties to assist the
Bureau in assessing the overall efficiency and effectiveness of its
Supervision Program, and, consistent with the law, considering whether
any changes to the program would be appropriate.
DATES: Comments must be received by May 21, 2018.
[[Page 7167]]
ADDRESSES: You may submit responsive information and other comments,
identified by Docket No. CFPB-2018-0004, by any of the following
methods:
Electronic: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Email: [email protected]. Include Docket
No. CFPB-2018-0004 in the subject line of the message.
Mail: Comment Intake, Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau, 1700 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20552.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Comment Intake, Consumer Financial
Protection Bureau, 1700 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20552.
Instructions: The Bureau encourages the early submission of
comments. All submissions must include the document title and docket
number. Please note the number of the topic on which you are commenting
at the top of each response (you do not need to address all topics).
Because paper mail in the Washington, DC area and at the Bureau is
subject to delay, commenters are encouraged to submit comments
electronically. In general, comments received will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov, with exceptions including those
noted below. In addition, comments will be available for public
inspection and copying at 1700 G St NW, Washington, DC 20552, on
official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 5 p.m. eastern
standard time. You can make an appointment to inspect the documents by
telephoning 202-435-7275.
Submissions in response to this request for information, including
attachments and other supporting materials, will become part of the
public record and subject to public disclosure. Proprietary information
or sensitive personal information, such as account numbers or Social
Security numbers, or names of other individuals should not be included.
Commenters should also refrain from submitting confidential
supervisory information (CSI), as defined in 12 CFR 1070.2(i). If
discussing interactions on an examination, commenters should speak in
generalities, and should refrain from describing the content of
supervisory communications or the results of specific exams. Commenters
may wish to submit input anonymously or through a representative if
associating their name with their public comment would disclose the
fact that they have been examined by the Bureau or the results of a
particular exam. The Bureau reserves the right to redact or refrain
from publishing CSI consistent with 12 CFR 1070.41 et seq.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general inquiries and submission
process questions, please call Brian Shearer, Counsel, at (202) 435-
7611.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Bureau has supervisory authority over
insured depository institutions and credit unions with total assets
over $10 billion and their affiliates, as well as non-depository
financial institutions, regardless of size, in certain specific markets
including mortgage companies (originators, brokers, servicers, and
offerors of loan modifications or foreclosure relief services), payday
lenders and private education lenders. The Bureau also has supervisory
authority over non-depository larger participants of other markets as
the Bureau defines by rule. To date, this includes larger participants
in the consumer reporting, debt collection, student loan servicing,
international money transfer, and automobile finance markets.
Additionally, the Bureau has authority over service providers of the
above referenced supervised entities, and service providers to a
substantial number of depository institutions and credit unions with
total assets of $10 billion or less. More detail regarding the Bureau's
supervisory authority can be found principally at 12 U.S.C. 5514-5516
and 12 CFR parts 1090 and 1091.
The Bureau is, as described below, issuing this request for
information seeking public comment on how best to achieve meaningful
burden reduction or other improvement to the processes used by the
Bureau to supervise for compliance with Federal consumer financial law
(Supervision Program) while continuing to meet the Bureau's statutory
and regulatory objectives and ensuring a fair and transparent process
for supervised entities.
Overview of This Request for Information
The Bureau is using this request for information to seek public
input regarding its Supervision Program. The Bureau's ability to
supervise entities is an essential part of the Bureau's statutory
mission of enforcing Federal consumer financial laws. The Bureau
engages in supervisory activities in accordance with applicable law and
in furtherance of its statutory mandate. The Bureau understands,
however, that the Bureau's supervisory activities can impose burdens on
entities. The Bureau encourages comments from all interested members of
the public. The Bureau anticipates that the responding public may
include supervised entities or companies supervised by other agencies,
compliance professionals or members of the bar who represent these
entities, individual consumers, consumer advocates, regulators, and
researchers, or members of academia.
Suggested Topics for Commenters
To allow the Bureau to evaluate suggestions more effectively, the
Bureau requests that, where possible, comments include:
Specific suggestions regarding any potential updates or
modifications to the Bureau's Supervision Program, consistent with the
Bureau's statutory objectives, and including, in as much detail as
possible (though without disclosing CSI), potential updates or
modifications, supporting data or other information on impacts and
costs, or information concerning alignment with the processes of other
agencies with similar authorities; and
Specific identification of any aspects of the Bureau's
Supervision Program that should not be modified, consistent with the
Bureau's statutory objectives, and including supporting data or other
information on impacts and costs, or information concerning alignment
with the processes of other agencies with similar authorities.
The following list represents a preliminary attempt by the Bureau
to identify elements of Bureau processes related to its Supervision
Program that may be deserving of more immediate focus. This non-
exhaustive list is meant to assist in the formulation of comments and
is not intended to restrict the issues that may be addressed. In
addressing these topics or others, the Bureau requests that commenters
identify with specificity the Bureau regulations or practices at issue,
providing legal citations where appropriate and available. Please feel
free to comment on some or all of the topics below, but please be sure
to indicate on which area you are commenting. As noted in the
instructions above, please refrain from revealing CSI in your public
comment.
The Bureau is seeking feedback on all aspects of its Supervision
Program, including but not limited to:
1. The timing, frequency, and scope of supervisory exams.
2. The timing, method or process used by the Bureau to collect
information and documents from a supervised entity prior to the
commencement of an examination. Typically, the Bureau sends an
examination Information Request (IR) to a supervised entity prior to
the commencement of an examination. An IR is a list of information and
documents that the supervised entity is asked to provide to the Bureau
for off-site review or to make available when examiners are onsite at
[[Page 7168]]
the entity. An IR is typically sent to an entity at least 60 days prior
to the onsite start of an examination.
3. The type and volume of information and documents requested in
IRs.
4. The effectiveness and accessibility of the CFPB Supervision and
Examination Manual (Exam Manual). The Exam Manual provides internal
direction to supervisory staff, including summaries of statutes and
regulations and specific examination procedures for use by examiners in
conducting exams. It is published on the Bureau's website to promote
transparency and assist the public in understanding how the Bureau
oversees supervised entities.
5. The efficiency and effectiveness of onsite examination work.
Typically, while onsite, examination teams may review documents and
data, hold meetings with management, conduct interviews with staff,
make observations, and conduct transaction testing.
6. The effectiveness of Supervision's communications when potential
violations are identified, including the usefulness and content of the
potential action and request for response (PARR) letter. A PARR letter
provides an entity with notice of preliminary findings of conduct that
may violate Federal consumer financial laws and advises the entity that
the Bureau is considering taking supervisory action or a public
enforcement action based on the potential violations identified in the
letter. Supervision invites the entity to respond to the PARR letter
within 14 days and to set forth in the response any reasons of fact,
law or policy why the Bureau should not take action against the entity.
The Bureau often permits extensions of the response time when
requested.
7. The clarity, organization, and quality of communications that
report the results of supervisory activities, including oral
communications from examiners and Supervisory Letters and Examination
Reports.
8. The clarity of matters requiring attention (MRA) and the
reasonability of timing requirements to satisfy MRAs. An MRA is used to
address violation(s) of Federal consumer financial law or compliance
management weaknesses. MRAs often require a written response to the
Bureau and will include a due date for completion.
9. The process for appealing supervisory findings.
10. The use of third parties contracted by supervised entities to
conduct assessments specified in MRAs, or to assess the sufficiency of
completion of an MRA.
11. The usefulness of Supervisory Highlights to share findings and
promote transparency. The Bureau periodically publishes Supervisory
Highlights to apprise the public about its examination program,
including the concerns that it finds during the course of its work.
12. The manner and extent to which the Bureau can and should
coordinate its supervisory activity with Federal and state supervisory
agencies, including through use of simultaneous exams, where feasible
and consistent with statutory directives.
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 5511(c).
Dated: February 12, 2018.
Mick Mulvaney,
Acting Director, Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.
[FR Doc. 2018-03358 Filed 2-16-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AM-P