Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; Rules for Open Burning and Incinerators, 6972-6975 [2018-03251]
Download as PDF
6972
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 33 / Friday, February 16, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22,
2001) because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
and related administrative requirements
(i.e., monitoring, recordkeeping and
reporting requirements) to the EPA’s
2012 FIP.
This rule is exempt from the CRA
because it is a rule of particular
applicability.
Dated: February 8, 2018.
E. Scott Pruitt,
Administrator.
J. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
This rulemaking does not involve
technical standards. Therefore, the EPA
is not considering the use of any
voluntary consensus standards.
M. Judicial Review
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action does
not have disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority populations, lowincome populations and/or indigenous
peoples, as specified in Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
As explained previously, the SIP
revision being approved in this action
includes identical BART emission limits
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by April 17, 2018. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See CAA
section 307(b)(2).
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart HH—New York
2. In § 52.1670, the table in paragraph
(d) is amended by revising the entry
‘‘Roseton Generating Station-Dynegy’’ to
read as follows:
■
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
§ 52.1670
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(d) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED NEW YORK SOURCE-SPECIFIC PROVISIONS
Name of source
*
*
Roseton Generating Station ...........
*
*
*
§ 52.1686
*
NYSDEC Facility No.
33346000075.
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–03192 Filed 2–15–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R01–OAR–2017–0138; FRL–9973–19–
Region 1]
Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire;
Rules for Open Burning and
Incinerators
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
Jkt 244001
*
2/16/2018
Final rule.
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
*
*
Best Available Retrofit Technology
(BART) emission limits for SO2
pursuant to 6 NYCRR part 249
for Units 1 and 2.
*
*
This rule is effective on March
19, 2018.
DATES:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions
submitted by the State of New
Hampshire on August 9, 2011 and July
23, 2013. These SIP revisions establish
rules for open burning and establish
emission standards and operating
practices for incinerators and wood
waste burners that are not regulated
pursuant to Federal incinerator
standards. We are also approving
revisions to the definitions of
‘‘Incinerator’’ and ‘‘Wood Waste
Burner,’’ submitted by the State on July
23, 2013 and October 26, 2016,
respectively. This action is being taken
in accordance with the Clean Air Act
(CAA).
PO 00000
Comments
*
SUMMARY:
3. Section 52.1686 is removed and
reserved.
EPA approval
date
12/5/2016
*
ACTION:
■
17:46 Feb 15, 2018
*
*
[Removed and Reserved]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
State effective
date
Identifier No.
Sfmt 4700
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R01–OAR–
2017–0138. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, i.e., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available at www.regulations.gov or at
the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, EPA New England Regional
Office, Office of Ecosystem Protection,
Air Quality Planning Unit, 5 Post Office
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM
16FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 33 / Friday, February 16, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Square—Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alison C. Simcox, Environmental
Scientist, Air Quality Planning Unit, Air
Programs Branch (Mail Code OEP05–
02), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 1, 5 Post Office Square,
Suite 100, Boston, Massachusetts,
02109–3912; (617) 918–1684;
simcox.alison@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
Table of Contents
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
I. Background and Purpose
II. Response to Comments
III. Final Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background and Purpose
On January 10, 2003, New Hampshire
Department of Environmental Services
(NH DES) submitted a SIP revision for
Env-A 1000 (Prevention, Abatement and
Control of Open Source Air Pollution).
On August 9, 2011, NH DES submitted
an updated version of this regulation.
Because the 2011 submittal superseded
the previous submission, the State
withdrew the 2003 submittal on May 5,
2014. The withdrawal letter is included
in the docket for this action.
On July 23, 2013, NH DES submitted
Env-A 1900 (Incinerators and Wood
Waste Burners) and Env-A 101.104
(definition of ‘‘Incinerator’’) to EPA for
approval. Env-A 1900 is not currently
part of the federally-approved New
Hampshire SIP. The definition of the
term ‘‘Incinerator’’ is currently part of
the New Hampshire SIP, but is codified
at Env-A 101.59 1 and does not include
a reference to ‘‘wood-waste burners.’’
The submitted definition of
‘‘Incinerator’’ adds ‘‘wood-waste
burners’’ to the definition and is
codified at Env-A 101.104. The current
SIP-approved version of the definition
of ‘‘Incinerator’’ (Env-A 101.59) will be
replaced by the new definition of that
term (Env-A 101.104) as a result of this
approval.
A definition of ‘‘Wood Waste Burner’’
is currently part of the New Hampshire
SIP, but is codified as Env-A 101.95 and
1 This appears to be an error because there are two
different terms numbered 101.59 in Env-A 101, and
the term ‘‘incinerator’’ is listed after term number
48 and before term number 50.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Feb 15, 2018
Jkt 244001
explicitly excludes incinerators. On
October 26, 2016, NH DES submitted a
revision of the definition of ‘‘Wood
Waste Burner’’ (Env-A 101.219) to EPA
for approval. This revised definition
does not exclude incinerators. The
current SIP-approved version of the
definition of ‘‘Wood Waste Burner’’
(Env-A 101.95) will be replaced by the
new definition of that term (Env-A
101.219) as a result of this approval.
The version of Env-A 1900
(Incinerators and Wood Waste Burners)
submitted by the State to EPA included
an affirmative defense provision for
malfunction, which is defined as a
sudden and unavoidable breakdown of
process or control equipment. On April
13, 2016, NH DES sent a letter to EPA
withdrawing the affirmative defense
provision in Env-A 1900 (i.e., 1902.02).
In addition, an earlier SIP submission of
Env-A 1900 had included an exception
to the 20-percent visible emissions limit
that would have allowed these
emissions to be exceeded for one period
of 6 continuous minutes in any 60minute period during startup,
shutdown, or malfunction. However,
NH DES removed this exception from
the July 23, 2013 submittal.
These SIP revisions establish rules for
open burning and establish emission
standards and operating practices for
incinerators and wood waste burners
that are not regulated pursuant to
Federal incinerator standards. New
Hampshire also submitted revisions to
the definitions of ‘‘Incinerator’’ and
‘‘Wood Waste Burner’’ on July 23, 2013
and October 26, 2016, respectively.
On September 6, 2017, EPA published
a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (82 FR
42054) and Direct Final Rulemaking
(DFRN) (82 FR 42037) proposing to
approve and approving, respectively,
the revisions submitted by New
Hampshire on August 9, 2011, July 23,
2013, and October 26, 2016.
In the DFRN, EPA stated that if an
adverse comment were to be submitted
to EPA by October 6, 2017, the action
would be withdrawn and not take effect,
and a final rule would be issued based
on the NPR. EPA received a comment
that is not relevant to this SIP action,
and one adverse comment that is
relevant, before the close of the
comment period. Therefore, EPA
withdrew the DFRN on November 6,
2017 (82 FR 51349).
This action is a final rule based on the
NPR. A detailed discussion of New
Hampshire’s August 9, 2011; July 23,
2013; and October 26, 2016, SIP
revisions, and EPA’s rationale for
approving these were provided in the
DFRN and will not be restated here,
except to the extent relevant to our
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
6973
response to the public comments we
received.
II. Response to Comments
EPA received public comments from
anonymous commenters on our
September 6, 2017 NPR. All of the
comments are contained in the docket
for this final action. One commenter
submitted a comment that is not
relevant to this SIP action and,
therefore, requires no response. One
commenter submitted two comments
that are adverse and are discussed
below.
Comment 1: An anonymous
commenter noted that the proposed
revisions to New Hampshire’s Env-A
1000 (Prevention, Abatement and
Control of Open Source Air Pollution)
removes the reference to National
Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS) nonattainment areas for
particulate matter (PM) pollution that
appears in the current SIP-approved
version of Env-A 1000. The commenter
stated that ‘‘EPA should not be allowed
to reduce emission standards just
because a corporation or company
incinerator wants to burn more wood.
Wood is a particularly dirty fuel source
that causes significant particulate matter
pollution both 2.5 microns and 10
microns.’’
Response 1: The SIP-approved Env-A
1000 (provision 1001.02) allowed for
certain types of open burning if: (1) Not
prohibited by local ordinance or
officials having jurisdiction, such as
state forest fire wardens, and (2) where
the particular area has not been
designated nonattainment in relation to
the NAAQS for PM. Under Env-A 1000,
such burning was allowed in NAAQS
nonattainment areas for PM (when not
prohibited by local ordinance or
officials having jurisdiction) if written
authorization had been obtained by the
NH DES. In the revised version of EnvA 1000, the State has removed the
restriction on these activities in
nonattainment areas for particulates.
EPA believes that the version of Env-A
1000 we are approving is consistent
with CAA requirements for SIP
revisions, notwithstanding the absence
of references to nonattainment areas for
NAAQS as a limiting condition on
certain types of burning. Because there
have never been any designated
nonattainment areas for PM in New
Hampshire, the current provision is not
in fact imposing any restrictions on
emissions. Thus, the emissions
reductions attributable to the revised
version of Env-A 1000 we are approving
is functionally the same as the prior
version. Moreover, we note that the
current ambient levels of PM within the
E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM
16FER1
6974
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 33 / Friday, February 16, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
State are below the currently applicable
PM NAAQS. In the event that ambient
PM in New Hampshire were to exceed
the applicable NAAQS, we would
expect the State to add additional
emissions controls to address the
appropriate sources to bring the area
back into attainment.
Comment 2: The same anonymous
commenter asserted that the ‘‘EPA also
can’t remove nuisance provisions as
they can cover enforcement of NAAQS
pollutants that cause nuisances to
neighboring communities and
disadvantages communities. Sometimes
only nuisance provisions are the only
enforcement mechanism available to the
little people that can’t afford big lawyers
or consent decrees with big companies.’’
Response 2: New Hampshire’s
revision to Env-A 1000 removes two
references to ‘‘nuisance’’ in the current
SIP, which was approved in 1994. EPA
believes that the State’s revised version
of the regulation is approvable under
the CAA because the term ‘‘nuisance’’ in
Env-A 1000, as defined in state law, is
a broad concept that could be applied to
prohibit impacts that bear no reasonable
connection to the NAAQS and related
air-quality goals of the CAA. The fact
that something may cause a nuisance
does not necessarily equate to a
condition that would interfere with
attainment or maintenance of the
NAAQS. The wording of the prior
version of the SIP provision was not
sufficiently related to attainment and
maintenance of the PM NAAQS to
warrant inclusion in the SIP. See, for
example, analogous instances in which
EPA has removed from SIPs certain
regulations that prohibit odors (61 FR
47058, September 6, 1996), or that
contain a general prohibition against air
pollution (63 FR 65557, November 27,
1998).
III. Final Action
EPA is approving and incorporating
two regulations into the New Hampshire
SIP. The two regulations include revised
Env-A 1000 (Prevention, Abatement and
Control of Open Source Air Pollution)
submitted by the State of New
Hampshire on August 9, 2011, effective
on May 1, 2011; and Env-A 1900
(Incinerators and Wood Waste Burners)
submitted by the State on July 23, 2013,
effective April 23, 2013, except for the
withdrawn affirmative defense
provision. The revised version of Env-A
1000 that we are approving into the SIP
will replace the existing SIP-approved
version of Env-A 1000.
In addition, EPA is approving a
revised definition of ‘‘Incinerator’’ (EnvA 101.104), submitted by the State on
July 23, 2013, effective April 23, 2013,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Feb 15, 2018
Jkt 244001
which replaces the definition of
‘‘Incinerator’’ currently in the New
Hampshire SIP (numbered Env-A
101.59). We are also approving a revised
definition of ‘‘Wood Waste Burner’’
(Env-A 101.219), submitted by the State
on October 26, 2016, effective January
14, 2005, which replaces the definition
of ‘‘Wood Waste Burner’’ currently in
the New Hampshire SIP (numbered EnvA 101.95). Thus, the SIP at Env-A
101.59 and at Env-A 101.95 will read
‘‘[reserved].’’
New Hampshire organizes Env-A 101
(Definitions) alphabetically, and also
assigns a codification number, in
sequential order, to each defined term.
Because the State’s SIP submissions did
not include the entirety of Env-A 101,
and the State has added other
definitions to Env-A 101 over time (not
all of which are SIP-approved), our
approval of the two definitions in this
action will result in the numbered
codification assigned to the defined
terms being out of numerical sequence
in the SIP. However, the two defined
terms will still be in alphabetical order.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the New
Hampshire Code of Administrative
Rules described in the amendments to
40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA
has made, and will continue to make,
these materials generally available
through https://www.regulations.gov,
and/or at the EPA Region 1 Office
(please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this preamble for more
information).
Therefore, these materials have been
approved by EPA for inclusion in the
SIP, have been incorporated by
reference by EPA into that plan, are
fully federally enforceable under
sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of
the effective date of the final rulemaking
of EPA’s approval, and will be
incorporated by reference by the
Director of the Federal Register in the
next update to the SIP compilation.2
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
2 62
PO 00000
FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
submissions, EPA’s role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet
the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Public Law 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801
et seq., as added by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a
E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM
16FER1
6975
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 33 / Friday, February 16, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. Section 804, however,
exempts from section 801 the following
types of rules: Rules of particular
applicability; rules relating to agency
management or personnel; and rules of
agency organization, procedure, or
practice that do not substantially affect
the rights or obligations of nonagency
parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). Because this is
a rule of particular applicability, EPA is
not required to submit a rule report
regarding this action under section 801.
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air
Act, petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by November 20, 2017. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart EE—New Hampshire
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
2. In § 52.1520 paragraph (c), amend
the table by:
■ a. Adding four entries for‘‘Env-A 100’’
after the entry ‘‘Env-A 100;
Organizational Rules: Definitions’’;
■ b. Revising the entry ‘‘Env-A 1000’’;
and
■ c. Adding in numerical order an entry
‘‘Env-A 1900’’.
The revision and additions read as
follows:
■
Dated: February 6, 2018.
Alexandra Dapolito Dunn,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as
follows:
§ 52.1520
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED NEW HAMPSHIRE REGULATIONS
State effective
date
EPA approval date 1
Explanations
State citation
Title/subject
*
Env-A 100 ........................
*
*
Definition of ‘‘Incinerator’’
*
*
04/29/2003 02/16/2018, [Insert Federal Register citation].
Env-A 100 ........................
Definition of ‘‘Wood
Waste Burner’’.
04/29/2003
02/16/2018, [Insert Federal Register citation].
Env-A 100 ........................
Definition of ‘‘Incinerator’’
04/23/2013
Env-A 100 ........................
Definition of ‘‘Wood
Waste Burner’’.
01/14/2005
02/16/2018, [Insert Federal Register citation].
02/16/2018, [Insert Federal Register citation].
*
Env-A 1000 ......................
*
*
Control of Open Burning
*
*
05/01/2011 02/16/2018, [Insert Federal Register citation].
*
*
Approve Part Env–A 1000 ‘‘Prevention,
Abatement and Control of Open
Source Air Pollution.’’
*
Env-A 1900 ......................
*
*
Emission Standards and
Operating Practices for
Incinerators.
*
*
04/23/2013 02/16/2018, [Insert Federal Register citation].
*
*
Approve Part Env–A 1900 ‘‘Incinerators
and Wood Waste Burners.’’
*
*
*
*
*
*
Remove Part Env–A 101.59, definition of
‘‘Incinerator’’ and replace with ‘‘[reserved].’’
Remove Part Env–A 101.95, definition of
‘‘Wood Waste Burner’’ and replace with
‘‘[reserved].’’
Approve Part Env–A 101.104, definition
of ‘‘Incinerator.’’
Approve Part Env–A 101.219, definition
of ‘‘Wood Waste Burner.’’
*
*
*
1 In
order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–03251 Filed 2–15–18; 8:45 am]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2014–0247; FRL–9973–03]
Pendimethalin; Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:46 Feb 15, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This regulation amends the
tolerances for residues of pendimethalin
in or on alfalfa, forage and alfalfa, hay.
BASF Corporation requested these
tolerances under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective
February 16, 2018. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before April 17, 2018, and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16FER1.SGM
16FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 33 (Friday, February 16, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 6972-6975]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03251]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R01-OAR-2017-0138; FRL-9973-19-Region 1]
Air Plan Approval; New Hampshire; Rules for Open Burning and
Incinerators
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of New
Hampshire on August 9, 2011 and July 23, 2013. These SIP revisions
establish rules for open burning and establish emission standards and
operating practices for incinerators and wood waste burners that are
not regulated pursuant to Federal incinerator standards. We are also
approving revisions to the definitions of ``Incinerator'' and ``Wood
Waste Burner,'' submitted by the State on July 23, 2013 and October 26,
2016, respectively. This action is being taken in accordance with the
Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This rule is effective on March 19, 2018.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R01-OAR-2017-0138. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., confidential
business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available at www.regulations.gov or at the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England Regional Office, Office of Ecosystem
Protection, Air Quality Planning Unit, 5 Post Office
[[Page 6973]]
Square--Suite 100, Boston, MA. EPA requests that if at all possible,
you contact the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding legal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alison C. Simcox, Environmental
Scientist, Air Quality Planning Unit, Air Programs Branch (Mail Code
OEP05-02), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 1, 5 Post
Office Square, Suite 100, Boston, Massachusetts, 02109-3912; (617) 918-
1684; [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background and Purpose
II. Response to Comments
III. Final Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background and Purpose
On January 10, 2003, New Hampshire Department of Environmental
Services (NH DES) submitted a SIP revision for Env-A 1000 (Prevention,
Abatement and Control of Open Source Air Pollution). On August 9, 2011,
NH DES submitted an updated version of this regulation. Because the
2011 submittal superseded the previous submission, the State withdrew
the 2003 submittal on May 5, 2014. The withdrawal letter is included in
the docket for this action.
On July 23, 2013, NH DES submitted Env-A 1900 (Incinerators and
Wood Waste Burners) and Env-A 101.104 (definition of ``Incinerator'')
to EPA for approval. Env-A 1900 is not currently part of the federally-
approved New Hampshire SIP. The definition of the term ``Incinerator''
is currently part of the New Hampshire SIP, but is codified at Env-A
101.59 \1\ and does not include a reference to ``wood-waste burners.''
The submitted definition of ``Incinerator'' adds ``wood-waste burners''
to the definition and is codified at Env-A 101.104. The current SIP-
approved version of the definition of ``Incinerator'' (Env-A 101.59)
will be replaced by the new definition of that term (Env-A 101.104) as
a result of this approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This appears to be an error because there are two different
terms numbered 101.59 in Env-A 101, and the term ``incinerator'' is
listed after term number 48 and before term number 50.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A definition of ``Wood Waste Burner'' is currently part of the New
Hampshire SIP, but is codified as Env-A 101.95 and explicitly excludes
incinerators. On October 26, 2016, NH DES submitted a revision of the
definition of ``Wood Waste Burner'' (Env-A 101.219) to EPA for
approval. This revised definition does not exclude incinerators. The
current SIP-approved version of the definition of ``Wood Waste Burner''
(Env-A 101.95) will be replaced by the new definition of that term
(Env-A 101.219) as a result of this approval.
The version of Env-A 1900 (Incinerators and Wood Waste Burners)
submitted by the State to EPA included an affirmative defense provision
for malfunction, which is defined as a sudden and unavoidable breakdown
of process or control equipment. On April 13, 2016, NH DES sent a
letter to EPA withdrawing the affirmative defense provision in Env-A
1900 (i.e., 1902.02). In addition, an earlier SIP submission of Env-A
1900 had included an exception to the 20-percent visible emissions
limit that would have allowed these emissions to be exceeded for one
period of 6 continuous minutes in any 60-minute period during startup,
shutdown, or malfunction. However, NH DES removed this exception from
the July 23, 2013 submittal.
These SIP revisions establish rules for open burning and establish
emission standards and operating practices for incinerators and wood
waste burners that are not regulated pursuant to Federal incinerator
standards. New Hampshire also submitted revisions to the definitions of
``Incinerator'' and ``Wood Waste Burner'' on July 23, 2013 and October
26, 2016, respectively.
On September 6, 2017, EPA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(82 FR 42054) and Direct Final Rulemaking (DFRN) (82 FR 42037)
proposing to approve and approving, respectively, the revisions
submitted by New Hampshire on August 9, 2011, July 23, 2013, and
October 26, 2016.
In the DFRN, EPA stated that if an adverse comment were to be
submitted to EPA by October 6, 2017, the action would be withdrawn and
not take effect, and a final rule would be issued based on the NPR. EPA
received a comment that is not relevant to this SIP action, and one
adverse comment that is relevant, before the close of the comment
period. Therefore, EPA withdrew the DFRN on November 6, 2017 (82 FR
51349).
This action is a final rule based on the NPR. A detailed discussion
of New Hampshire's August 9, 2011; July 23, 2013; and October 26, 2016,
SIP revisions, and EPA's rationale for approving these were provided in
the DFRN and will not be restated here, except to the extent relevant
to our response to the public comments we received.
II. Response to Comments
EPA received public comments from anonymous commenters on our
September 6, 2017 NPR. All of the comments are contained in the docket
for this final action. One commenter submitted a comment that is not
relevant to this SIP action and, therefore, requires no response. One
commenter submitted two comments that are adverse and are discussed
below.
Comment 1: An anonymous commenter noted that the proposed revisions
to New Hampshire's Env-A 1000 (Prevention, Abatement and Control of
Open Source Air Pollution) removes the reference to National Ambient
Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) nonattainment areas for particulate
matter (PM) pollution that appears in the current SIP-approved version
of Env-A 1000. The commenter stated that ``EPA should not be allowed to
reduce emission standards just because a corporation or company
incinerator wants to burn more wood. Wood is a particularly dirty fuel
source that causes significant particulate matter pollution both 2.5
microns and 10 microns.''
Response 1: The SIP-approved Env-A 1000 (provision 1001.02) allowed
for certain types of open burning if: (1) Not prohibited by local
ordinance or officials having jurisdiction, such as state forest fire
wardens, and (2) where the particular area has not been designated
nonattainment in relation to the NAAQS for PM. Under Env-A 1000, such
burning was allowed in NAAQS nonattainment areas for PM (when not
prohibited by local ordinance or officials having jurisdiction) if
written authorization had been obtained by the NH DES. In the revised
version of Env-A 1000, the State has removed the restriction on these
activities in nonattainment areas for particulates. EPA believes that
the version of Env-A 1000 we are approving is consistent with CAA
requirements for SIP revisions, notwithstanding the absence of
references to nonattainment areas for NAAQS as a limiting condition on
certain types of burning. Because there have never been any designated
nonattainment areas for PM in New Hampshire, the current provision is
not in fact imposing any restrictions on emissions. Thus, the emissions
reductions attributable to the revised version of Env-A 1000 we are
approving is functionally the same as the prior version. Moreover, we
note that the current ambient levels of PM within the
[[Page 6974]]
State are below the currently applicable PM NAAQS. In the event that
ambient PM in New Hampshire were to exceed the applicable NAAQS, we
would expect the State to add additional emissions controls to address
the appropriate sources to bring the area back into attainment.
Comment 2: The same anonymous commenter asserted that the ``EPA
also can't remove nuisance provisions as they can cover enforcement of
NAAQS pollutants that cause nuisances to neighboring communities and
disadvantages communities. Sometimes only nuisance provisions are the
only enforcement mechanism available to the little people that can't
afford big lawyers or consent decrees with big companies.''
Response 2: New Hampshire's revision to Env-A 1000 removes two
references to ``nuisance'' in the current SIP, which was approved in
1994. EPA believes that the State's revised version of the regulation
is approvable under the CAA because the term ``nuisance'' in Env-A
1000, as defined in state law, is a broad concept that could be applied
to prohibit impacts that bear no reasonable connection to the NAAQS and
related air-quality goals of the CAA. The fact that something may cause
a nuisance does not necessarily equate to a condition that would
interfere with attainment or maintenance of the NAAQS. The wording of
the prior version of the SIP provision was not sufficiently related to
attainment and maintenance of the PM NAAQS to warrant inclusion in the
SIP. See, for example, analogous instances in which EPA has removed
from SIPs certain regulations that prohibit odors (61 FR 47058,
September 6, 1996), or that contain a general prohibition against air
pollution (63 FR 65557, November 27, 1998).
III. Final Action
EPA is approving and incorporating two regulations into the New
Hampshire SIP. The two regulations include revised Env-A 1000
(Prevention, Abatement and Control of Open Source Air Pollution)
submitted by the State of New Hampshire on August 9, 2011, effective on
May 1, 2011; and Env-A 1900 (Incinerators and Wood Waste Burners)
submitted by the State on July 23, 2013, effective April 23, 2013,
except for the withdrawn affirmative defense provision. The revised
version of Env-A 1000 that we are approving into the SIP will replace
the existing SIP-approved version of Env-A 1000.
In addition, EPA is approving a revised definition of
``Incinerator'' (Env-A 101.104), submitted by the State on July 23,
2013, effective April 23, 2013, which replaces the definition of
``Incinerator'' currently in the New Hampshire SIP (numbered Env-A
101.59). We are also approving a revised definition of ``Wood Waste
Burner'' (Env-A 101.219), submitted by the State on October 26, 2016,
effective January 14, 2005, which replaces the definition of ``Wood
Waste Burner'' currently in the New Hampshire SIP (numbered Env-A
101.95). Thus, the SIP at Env-A 101.59 and at Env-A 101.95 will read
``[reserved].''
New Hampshire organizes Env-A 101 (Definitions) alphabetically, and
also assigns a codification number, in sequential order, to each
defined term. Because the State's SIP submissions did not include the
entirety of Env-A 101, and the State has added other definitions to
Env-A 101 over time (not all of which are SIP-approved), our approval
of the two definitions in this action will result in the numbered
codification assigned to the defined terms being out of numerical
sequence in the SIP. However, the two defined terms will still be in
alphabetical order.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the New
Hampshire Code of Administrative Rules described in the amendments to
40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to
make, these materials generally available through https://www.regulations.gov, and/or at the EPA Region 1 Office (please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion
in the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by EPA into that plan,
are fully federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA
as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of EPA's approval, and
will be incorporated by reference by the Director of the Federal
Register in the next update to the SIP compilation.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The
Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a
[[Page 6975]]
rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. Section
804, however, exempts from section 801 the following types of rules:
Rules of particular applicability; rules relating to agency management
or personnel; and rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice
that do not substantially affect the rights or obligations of nonagency
parties. 5 U.S.C. 804(3). Because this is a rule of particular
applicability, EPA is not required to submit a rule report regarding
this action under section 801. Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air
Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the
United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by November
20, 2017. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of
this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the
effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged
later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: February 6, 2018.
Alexandra Dapolito Dunn,
Regional Administrator, EPA New England.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is
amended as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart EE--New Hampshire
0
2. In Sec. 52.1520 paragraph (c), amend the table by:
0
a. Adding four entries for``Env-A 100'' after the entry ``Env-A 100;
Organizational Rules: Definitions'';
0
b. Revising the entry ``Env-A 1000''; and
0
c. Adding in numerical order an entry ``Env-A 1900''.
The revision and additions read as follows:
Sec. 52.1520 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved New Hampshire Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State EPA approval date
State citation Title/subject effective date \1\ Explanations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Env-A 100....................... Definition of 04/29/2003 02/16/2018, [Insert Remove Part Env-A
``Incinerator''. Federal Register 101.59, definition
citation]. of ``Incinerator''
and replace with
``[reserved].''
Env-A 100....................... Definition of 04/29/2003 02/16/2018, [Insert Remove Part Env-A
``Wood Waste Federal Register 101.95, definition
Burner''. citation]. of ``Wood Waste
Burner'' and
replace with
``[reserved].''
Env-A 100....................... Definition of 04/23/2013 02/16/2018, [Insert Approve Part Env-A
``Incinerator''. Federal Register 101.104, definition
citation]. of ``Incinerator.''
Env-A 100....................... Definition of 01/14/2005 02/16/2018, [Insert Approve Part Env-A
``Wood Waste Federal Register 101.219, definition
Burner''. citation]. of ``Wood Waste
Burner.''
* * * * * * *
Env-A 1000...................... Control of Open 05/01/2011 02/16/2018, [Insert Approve Part Env-A
Burning. Federal Register 1000 ``Prevention,
citation]. Abatement and
Control of Open
Source Air
Pollution.''
* * * * * * *
Env-A 1900...................... Emission Standards 04/23/2013 02/16/2018, [Insert Approve Part Env-A
and Operating Federal Register 1900 ``Incinerators
Practices for citation]. and Wood Waste
Incinerators. Burners.''
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In order to determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the
Federal Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-03251 Filed 2-15-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P