Filing of Contracts; Modernization of Media Regulation Initiative, 6823-6830 [2018-03098]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2018 / Proposed Rules
that TBAC is negligibly reactive, that
there was no evidence that TBAC was
being used at levels that cause concern
for ozone formation, and that the data
that had been collected under these
reporting, recordkeeping, modeling, and
inventory requirements had proven to
be of limited utility in judging the
cumulative impacts of exempted
compounds, like TBAC.3
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
Regulation 61–62.1—Definitions and
General Requirements, effective August
25, 2017. EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 4 office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve South
Carolina’s September 5, 2017,
submission submitted by the State of
South Carolina through SC DEHC. The
submission revises Regulation 61–
62.1—Definitions and General
Requirements.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. This action merely proposes to
approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this proposed action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
3 This current proposed rulemaking does not, and
is not intended to, reopen any prior final EPA
rulemaking or findings made therein, including
EPA’s 2004 final rule (69 FR 69298) and EPA’s 2016
final rule (81 FR 9339).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Feb 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule for
South Carolina does not have Tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), because it does not have
substantial direct effects on an Indian
Tribe. The Catawba Indian Nation
Reservation is located within the state of
South Carolina. Pursuant to the Catawba
Indian Claims Settlement Act, S.C. Code
Ann. 27–16–120, ‘‘all state and local
environmental laws and regulations
apply to the [Catawba Indian Nation]
and Reservation and are fully
enforceable by all relevant state and
local agencies and authorities.’’ EPA
notes this action will not impose
substantial direct costs on Tribal
governments or preempt Tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6823
Dated: February 6, 2018.
Onis ‘‘Trey’’ Glenn, III,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2018–03079 Filed 2–14–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[MB Docket Nos. 18–4, 17–105; FCC 18–
8]
Filing of Contracts; Modernization of
Media Regulation Initiative
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, the Federal
Communications Commission
(Commission) seeks comment on
whether and how to modernize the
Commission’s rules, which requires
each licensee or permittee of a
commercial and noncommercial AM,
FM, television, or international
broadcast station to file certain contracts
and other documents with the
Commission within 30 days after
execution. This document continues the
Commission’s efforts to modernize its
regulations and reduce unnecessary
requirements that can impede
competition and innovation in the
media marketplace.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
March 19, 2018. Reply comments are
due on or before April 2, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may
submit comments and replies, identified
by MB Docket Nos. 18–4, 17–105, by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Federal Communications
Commission’s website: https://
www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail
(although the Commission continues to
experience delays in receiving U.S.
Postal Service mail). All filings must be
addressed to the Commission’s
Secretary, Office of the Secretary,
Federal Communications Commission.
• People with Disabilities: Contact the
FCC to request reasonable
accommodations (accessible format
documents, sign language interpreters,
CART, etc.) by email: FCC504@fcc.gov
or phone: 202–418–0530 or TTY: 202–
418–0432.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
6824
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2018 / Proposed Rules
For detailed instructions for submitting
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Clark of the Industry
Analysis Division, Media Bureau, at
(202) 418–2609.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), FCC 18–
8, adopted and released on January 30,
2018. The full text of this document is
available electronically via the FCC’s
Electronic Document Management
System (EDOCS) website at https://
apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/
FCC-18-8A1.pdf. Documents will be
available electronically in ASCII,
Microsoft Word, and/or Adobe Acrobat.
This document is also available for
public inspection and copying during
regular business hours in the FCC
Reference Information Center, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street SW, CY–A257, Washington, DC
20554. Alternative formats are available
for people with disabilities (Braille,
large print, electronic files, audio
format), by sending an email to fcc504@
fcc.gov or calling the Commission’s
Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau at (202) 418–0530 (voice), 202
418–0432 (TTY).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Synopsis
1. Background. Since the late 1930s,
the Commission has required broadcast
station licensees and permittees to file
with the Commission copies of certain
contracts and other documents relating
to ownership and operation of stations.
Historically, this filing requirement was
intended to keep the Commission and
the public informed with respect to the
ownership and control of broadcast
stations and to enable the Commission
to be advised of compliance with its
rules relating to those matters. In the
past, the Commission has also used the
information contained in some of these
agreements to formulate certain
broadcasting policies and rules or to
enhance its understanding of the
broadcast industry. At the time,
requiring that broadcast licensees and
permittees submit paper copies to the
Commission was the most efficient
mechanism available for the
Commission to obtain copies of the
documents and helped ensure that
certain documents were also available
for public inspection.
2. Beginning in 1965, broadcast
licensees and permittees were also
required to make copies of these
documents available via a local public
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Feb 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
inspection file. This additional
obligation provided another source for
public inspection of documents relating
to ownership and control of a broadcast
station for those able to travel to a
station’s main studio during regular
business hours. In 1998, the
Commission amended its public file
rules to give broadcast licensees and
permittees the option of maintaining an
up-to-date list of such documents in the
public file and providing copies of the
actual documents to requesting parties
within seven days, in lieu of
maintaining the documents themselves
in the file. In 2012, the Commission
amended its public file rules in general
to require that public file materials be
posted to an online database hosted by
the Commission rather than maintained
in a paper file at the station. Under the
2012 amendment to the rules, licensees
and permittees that choose to retain a
list of Section 73.3613 (47 CFR 73. 3613)
documents in the public file must
continue to provide a copy of any such
documents to requesting parties within
seven days. Television stations
completed their transition to the online
public file in 2014. The last group of
remaining radio stations to transition
must begin using the online file by
March 2018. The transition to online
public inspection files enables greater
public access to the contents of the files,
including documents filed pursuant to
Section 73.3613—which are either
placed directly in the public file or
provided on demand based on an up-todate list—particularly for those who are
unable to travel to a station or the
Commission during regular business
hours.
3. The Commission has periodically
re-evaluated the paper filing
requirement in Section 73.3613 and
revised the rule as necessary to
eliminate unnecessary paperwork and
reduce administrative burdens on
licensees and the Commission. For
example, prior to the late 1970s, the
Commission revised Section 73.3613 on
multiple occasions to eliminate the
obligation to routinely submit paper
copies of several documents and instead
require that certain documents be kept
at the station and made available upon
request. Beginning in the late 1970s, the
Commission took several steps to
eliminate unnecessary paperwork
burdens resulting from the requirement
that stations submit paper copies of
certain network affiliation contracts that
the Commission no longer needed to
collect routinely. For example, the
Commission eliminated the requirement
that radio stations file network
affiliation and transcription contracts
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
with the Commission, and it limited the
mandatory filing of television network
affiliation contracts to just those
agreements with national networks. The
Commission subsequently proposed to
eliminate the routine filing requirement
for national television network affiliates
as well and instead require that
television licensees make their national
network affiliation agreements available
to the Commission upon request. This
proposal remained pending until the
Commission terminated the proceeding
in 2011.
4. The types of documents that must
be filed with the Commission under the
current rule include network affiliation
agreements between a television station
and a national network; documents that
relate to ownership or control of the
licensee or permittee; contracts that
relate to management of a station by
someone other than a regular employee,
officer, or director of the station, or by
any person where the contract also
provides for both a percentage of profits
and sharing in losses; attributable time
brokerage agreements; and attributable
joint sales agreements. In addition, the
current rule also requires that the
following documents be kept at the
station and made available for
inspection upon request by the
Commission: Subchannel leasing
agreements for Subsidiary
Communications Authorization
operation; franchise/leasing agreements
for operation of telecommunications
services on the television vertical
blanking interval and in the visual
signal; time sales contracts with the
same sponsor for four or more hours per
day, except where the length of the
events broadcast is not under control of
the station; and contracts with chief
operators.
5. In May 2017, the Commission
issued a Media Modernization Initiative
Public Notice launching a review of its
media regulations to eliminate or
modify those that are outdated,
unnecessary, or unduly burdensome. In
response to that Media Modernization
Initiative Public Notice, several
commenters in the Media
Modernization proceeding urged the
Commission to eliminate the existing
paper filing requirements in Section
73.3613. These commenters generally
assert that the Commission’s and the
public’s information needs can be
sufficiently met through the existing
public file requirements. No
commenters opposed these
recommendations.
6. AM, FM, and Television Stations.
We tentatively conclude that the Section
73.3613 paper filing requirement for
licensees and permittees of commercial
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2018 / Proposed Rules
and noncommercial AM, FM, and
television stations should be eliminated.
While paper filings may have previously
been the most efficient mechanism for
ensuring that the Commission and the
public had ready access to these
materials, we believe that is no longer
the case. The vast majority of
Commission forms are now filed
electronically, and the Commission has
taken many recent steps to eliminate or
streamline paper submissions and other
document retention obligations. For
example, the transition to online public
files, which is largely complete and will
be finalized in March 2018, has
significantly reduced burdens on
stations and provided both the
Commission and the public with easy
access to station information and
documents retained in the public
inspection file.
7. Indeed, the Section 73.3613
documents of commercial and
noncommercial AM, FM, and television
stations are already available via their
public inspection files, and such access
will continue even without the Section
73.3613 paper filing requirement.
Licensees and permittees of these
stations currently file ownership reports
electronically on FCC Forms 323 and
323–E, and on these ownership reports
licensees and permittees are required to
list all documents required to be filed
pursuant to Section 73.3613 for all of
the stations covered by the report. Our
public file rules, contained in Section
73.3526 (commercial broadcast stations)
and Section 73.3527 (noncommercial
broadcast stations) of our rules, require
that the licensees and permittees of
these stations make the documents
listed in their ownership reports—i.e.,
their Section 73.3613 documents—
available for public inspection via their
public files. Specifically, the public file
rules require these licensees and
permittees, at their discretion, to either
(i) retain in their public inspection files
copies of the documents listed in their
ownership reports or (ii) maintain an
up-to-date list of such documents in
their public inspection files and provide
copies to a requesting party within
seven days. Our public file rules also
require licensees and permittees to
retain copies of time brokerage
agreements and joint sales agreements
involving a commercial AM, FM, or
television station in the station’s public
file. In light of this existing requirement
and after evaluating our own document
needs, we believe that eliminating the
paper filing requirement as discussed
herein will not meaningfully impact the
ability of the Commission and other
interested parties to review Section
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Feb 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
73.3613 documents, and will reduce
burdens on licensees.
8. Accordingly, consistent with
comments to the Media Modernization
Initiative Public Notice, we tentatively
conclude that relying on the existing
public file rules—subject to the
proposed modifications discussed
herein—will provide the Commission
and the public with sufficient access to
Section 73.3613 documents for
commercial and noncommercial AM,
FM, and television stations. We seek
comment on this tentative conclusion.
Our existing public file rules provide
these stations with flexibility to select
the disclosure method that is less
burdensome with respect to Section
73.3613 documents. We therefore
propose to eliminate the Section
73.3613 requirement that licensees and
permittees of commercial and
noncommercial AM, FM, and television
stations file paper copies of such
documents with the Commission.
Instead, we propose that stations make
such documents available to the
Commission and the public via the
options set forth in the existing public
file requirement. We seek comment on
this proposal.
9. As discussed above, our existing
public file rules currently give stations
the option of either (i) retaining copies
of the documents listed in their
ownership reports in the public file or
(ii) maintaining an up-to-date list of
such documents in the public file and
providing copies to a requesting party
within seven days. In order to preserve
the current level of access to these
documents, we propose to clarify that a
station must ensure that its inventory of
Section 73.3613 documents in its public
file is up to date, regardless of whether
the station chooses to retain copies or a
list of documents in the public file, and
provide copies of its Section 73.3613
documents to the Commission and the
public within seven days upon request.
We seek comment on this proposal.
10. For additional clarity, we also
seek comment on whether to revise the
relevant public file rules to refer
specifically to Section 73.3613, instead
of referencing the documents listed in
ownership reports (which are the same
as the Section 73.3613 documents). In
the alternative, we seek comment on
whether to eliminate Section 73.3613 of
the rules entirely—subject to the
discussion of international broadcast
stations below—and instead list these
same documents in Sections 73.3526
and 73.3527 of our rules. Which
approach would most effectively keep
licensees informed of their obligations?
If we eliminate Section 73.3613, how
should we address the documents
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6825
currently specified in Section
73.3613(e), which need not be filed with
the Commission but must be kept at the
station and made available for
inspection upon request by the
Commission under the current rule?
Similarly, how should we address
Section 73.3613(a)(1), which currently
includes a definition of ‘‘network’’ that
is cross-referenced in the
Telecommunications Act of 1996 and in
the Commission’s Dual Network Rule?
We seek comment on these issues.
11. Under Section 73.3613,
documents are required to be filed
within 30 days after execution. By
contrast, the public file rules do not
explicitly state how quickly licensees
and permittees must add the documents
listed in their most recent ownership
report or update the list of such
documents, though licensees and
permittees are expected to update their
files in a timely fashion and to maintain
orderly files. Is the existing practice for
public file updates sufficient or should
we adopt a specific timeframe for
updating the Section 73.3613
documents in the station’s public file? If
so, how long (e.g., continue to require
updates within 30 days after execution,
consistent with the current practice
under Section 73.3613)? In addition to
the specific issues discussed in Section
B of this NPRM, we invite comment on
any other modifications or conforming
changes to Section 73.3613, or any other
Commission rule, that are necessary or
appropriate to implement the proposals
discussed in this NPRM and on any
alternative proposals for making these
documents available in a less costly and
more effective manner.
12. International Broadcast Stations.
Unlike AM, FM, and television stations,
international broadcast stations do not
serve local communities in the United
States. These stations, which are
authorized on a seasonal basis, employ
frequencies allocated to the
broadcasting service between 5900 and
26100 kHz, the transmissions of which
are intended to be received in foreign
countries. Currently, two seasons exist:
A summer season and a winter season.
International broadcast stations, which
are often operated by churches and
other religious organizations, typically
do not have network affiliations and do
not enter into time brokerage
arrangements or joint sales agreements.
As of December 13, 2017, there were 16
international broadcast stations
operating. These stations are subject to
the Section 73.3613 filing requirements
but do not have public file obligations
like those applicable to AM, FM, and
television stations. Similarly, these
stations are not currently subject to the
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
6826
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2018 / Proposed Rules
routine ownership reporting obligations
applicable to other broadcast services.
13. Based upon our review, we
tentatively conclude that the current
justifications for requiring disclosure of
Section 73.3613 documents by
commercial and noncommercial AM,
FM, and television stations do not apply
to international broadcast stations. As
mentioned above, for example, licensees
and permittees of commercial and
noncommercial AM, FM, and television
stations are required to list Section
73.3613 documents in the broadcast
ownership reports they file with the
Commission and make copies of such
documents available via a public
inspection file, but international
broadcast stations are not subject to
such obligations. Previously,
international broadcast stations were
subject to the ownership reporting
requirements that applied to AM, FM,
and television stations, but this is no
longer the case. While the disclosure of
Section 73.3613 documents by
commercial and noncommercial AM,
FM, and television stations supplements
the ownership information that they
must routinely report to the
Commission, the same is not true for
international broadcast stations.
Furthermore, these stations are not
subject to the ownership rules
applicable to commercial AM, FM, and
television stations, nor are they subject
to the relevant operational provisions
applicable to noncommercial stations.
Moreover, it does not appear that the
Section 73.3613 documents that
international broadcast stations are
required to file with the Commission
have been reviewed by Commission
staff in the recent past. Accordingly, we
tentatively conclude that there is no
need to continue requiring the licensees
and permittees of international
broadcast stations to routinely file
Section 73.3613 documents with the
Commission.
14. Instead, we believe that the
Commission’s information needs can be
met by retaining our ability to obtain
these documents from licensees and
permittees of international broadcast
stations upon request, as needed. For
example, if there are concerns about the
ownership or control of an international
broadcast station, the Commission could
request copies of the relevant Section
73.3613 documents as part of an
investigation. For purposes of enforcing
the statutory bar against de facto
transfers of control of an international
broadcast station without prior
Commission authorization, we believe
that it is sufficient to retain our ability
to obtain Section 73.3613 documents
from licensees and permittees of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Feb 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
international broadcast stations upon
request. We seek comment on how to
implement this requirement. Should the
Commission’s rules continue to
delineate the documents subject to
disclosure (either in Section 73.3613 or
in a new rule section relevant only to
international broadcast stations) or is
the Commission’s general authority to
request relevant information during an
investigation or to otherwise fulfill its
statutory obligations sufficient?
15. We seek comment on these
proposals. Is there a continuing need for
these licensees and permittees to
routinely file paper copies of Section
73.3613 documents with the
Commission? What is the value, if any,
of retaining the Section 73.3613 paper
filing requirement for international
broadcast stations for the Commission
and the public? Would eliminating the
requirement and retaining our ability to
obtain Section 73.3613 documents upon
request adequately ensure that the
Commission will have access to
information concerning ownership and
control of international broadcast
stations and compliance with our rules?
Are there any reasons that would
support a requirement that international
broadcast stations make these
documents available to members of the
public? If so, what is the least costly and
most effective manner of doing so? We
note that these stations transmit
programming that is intended to be
received in foreign countries and are not
required to have public inspection files,
and thus do not currently make Section
73.3613 documents available to the U.S.
public in that manner. And, considering
the very small number of stations
operating nationally, Section 73.3613
documents of international broadcast
stations may be of little relevance to the
U.S. public. We seek comment on these
issues.
16. Time Brokerage Agreements and
Joint Sales Agreements. A time
brokerage agreement (TBA), also
referred to as local marketing agreement
(LMA), involves the sale by a licensee
of discrete blocks of time to a broker
that supplies the programming to fill
that time and sells the commercial spot
announcements in it. A joint sales
agreement (JSA) is an agreement that
authorizes a broker to sell some or all
of the advertising time on the brokered
station. Pursuant to Section 73.3613(d),
attributable TBAs and attributable JSAs
must be filed with the Commission by
the brokering station. In addition, our
existing public file rule for commercial
stations requires that all TBAs and JSAs
involving commercial stations,
regardless of their attribution status,
also be placed in the public inspection
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
file for all participating stations; that is,
under the current rules commercial
broadcast stations cannot elect merely to
list these agreements in their public
files. Because Section 73.3613(d)
duplicates an existing public file
requirement for a limited subset of
TBAs and JSAs, we tentatively conclude
that we may eliminate this requirement
as it applies to commercial stations. We
believe that elimination is appropriate,
regardless of the disclosure requirement
that may ultimately be selected. Under
the current rule, attributable TBAs and
attributable JSAs—like all other Section
73.3613 documents—must be filed with
the Commission within 30 days of
execution. However, our existing public
file rules do not explicitly state how
quickly licensees and permittees must
add these documents to their public file.
As noted above, however, we are
seeking comment on whether to adopt a
specific timeframe for updating Section
73.3613 documents. We seek comment
on this issue.
17. Unlike commercial stations,
noncommercial stations are not
currently required to maintain copies of
all TBAs or JSAs in their public
inspection files; rather, under our public
file rules, these stations have the option
of only maintaining a list of all Section
73.3613 documents, including certain
TBAs and JSAs, and must provide a
copy of these documents to requesting
parties. When the Commission adopted
the public file rules requiring that all
TBAs and/or JSAs involving commercial
stations be placed in the public
inspection file, it did not discuss a
similar requirement for noncommercial
stations. Given the nature of and rules
applicable to the noncommercial
service, it is likely that TBAs and JSAs
involving noncommercial stations are
not as prevalent as those involving
commercial stations. Accordingly, no
change to Section 73.3613(d) is
necessary with respect to
noncommercial stations, which are
already required to list these agreements
in their public files and make them
available upon request. We seek
comment on this issue.
18. Redaction of Confidential or
Proprietary Information. Section
73.3613 explicitly allows the redaction
of confidential or proprietary
information for attributable TBAs and
JSAs, provided that unredacted versions
of the agreements shall be provided to
the Commission upon request. A similar
rule applies to TBAs and JSAs required
to be placed in the public inspection
file. Section 73.3613 does not currently
provide for redaction of other
agreements filed pursuant to the
provision. However, the Commission’s
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2018 / Proposed Rules
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
general rules provide a procedure for
seeking such redactions, and other
agreements filed pursuant to this section
that contain confidential or proprietary
information are routinely submitted to
the Commission in both redacted and
unredacted forms along with a request
for confidential treatment. We have no
evidence that this practice—both the
specific provisions allowing the
redaction of TBAs and JSAs and the
routine submission of redacted and
unredacted versions of other 73.3613
documents pursuant to Section 0.459 of
the Commission’s rules—has impaired
the ability of the Commission or other
interested parties to evaluate these
agreements. Accordingly, we tentatively
conclude that Section 73.3613’s specific
provision allowing the redaction of
TBAs and JSAs, including the
requirement that unredacted copies
shall be made available to the
Commission upon request, should apply
to all Section 73.3613 documents to the
extent that they contain confidential or
proprietary information. Under our
proposal herein, redaction would only
be necessary when a document is posted
to the online public file or provided to
the Commission or the public upon
request. We seek comment on this
tentative conclusion.
Procedural Matters
19. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act
Analysis. This document contains
proposed modified information
collection requirements. The
Commission, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork burdens,
invites the general public and the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) to
comment on the information collection
requirements contained in this
document, as required by the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104–
13. In addition, pursuant to the Small
Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002,
Public Law 107–198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4), we seek specific comment on
how we might further reduce the
information collection burden for small
business concerns with fewer than 25
employees.
20. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding
shall be treated as a ‘‘permit-butdisclose’’ proceeding in accordance
with the Commission’s ex parte rules.
Persons making ex parte presentations
must file a copy of any written
presentation or a memorandum
summarizing any oral presentation
within two business days after the
presentation (unless a different deadline
applicable to the Sunshine period
applies). Persons making oral ex parte
presentations are reminded that
memoranda summarizing the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Feb 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
presentation must (1) list all persons
attending or otherwise participating in
the meeting at which the ex parte
presentation was made, and (2)
summarize all data presented and
arguments made during the
presentation. If the presentation
consisted in whole or in part of the
presentation of data or arguments
already reflected in the presenter’s
written comments, memoranda or other
filings in the proceeding, the presenter
may provide citations to such data or
arguments in his or her prior comments,
memoranda, or other filings (specifying
the relevant page and/or paragraph
numbers where such data or arguments
can be found) in lieu of summarizing
them in the memorandum. Documents
shown or given to Commission staff
during ex parte meetings are deemed to
be written ex parte presentations and
must be filed consistent with rule
1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by
rule 1.49(f) or for which the
Commission has made available a
method of electronic filing, written ex
parte presentations and memoranda
summarizing oral ex parte
presentations, and all attachments
thereto, must be filed through the
electronic comment filing system
available for that proceeding, and must
be filed in their native format (e.g., .doc,
.xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants
in this proceeding should familiarize
themselves with the Commission’s ex
parte rules.
21. Comments and Replies. Pursuant
to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of the
Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 1.415 and
1.419, interested parties may file
comments and reply comments on or
before the dates indicated on the first
page of this document. Comments may
be filed using the Commission’s
Electronic Comment Filing System
(ECFS). Electronic Filing of Documents
in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR
24121 (1998).
• Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the internet by
accessing the ECFS: https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/.
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
one copy of each filing. If more than one
docket or rulemaking number appears in
the caption of this proceeding, filers
must submit two additional copies for
each additional docket or rulemaking
number.
Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6827
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
• All hand-delivered or messengerdelivered paper filings for the
Commission’s Secretary must be
delivered to FCC Headquarters at 445
12th St. SW, Room TW–A325,
Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours
are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand
deliveries must be held together with
rubber bands or fasteners. Any
envelopes and boxes must be disposed
of before entering the building.
• Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050
Junction Drive, Annapolis Junction, MD
20701.
• U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be
addressed to 445 12th Street SW,
Washington, DC 20554.
22. Availability of Documents.
Comments, reply comments, and ex
parte submissions will be available for
public inspection during regular
business hours in the FCC Reference
Center, Federal Communications
Commission, 445 12th Street SW, CY–
A257, Washington, DC 20554. These
documents will also be available via
ECFS. Documents will be available
electronically in ASCII, Microsoft Word,
and/or Adobe Acrobat.
23. People with Disabilities. To
request materials in accessible formats
for people with disabilities (Braille,
large print, electronic files, audio
format), send an email to fcc504@fcc.gov
or call the FCC’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY).
24. Additional Information. For
additional information on this
proceeding, contact Christopher Clark of
the Industry Analysis Division, Media
Bureau, at (202) 418–2609.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act
Analysis
25. As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended
(RFA) the Commission has prepared this
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act
Analysis (IRFA) of the possible
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities by
the policies and rules proposed in this
NPRM. Written public comments are
requested on this IRFA. Comments must
be identified as responses to the IRFA
and must be filed by the deadlines for
comments provided on the first page of
the NPRM. The Commission will send a
copy of the NPRM, including this IRFA,
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration (SBA).
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
6828
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2018 / Proposed Rules
26. Need for, and Objectives of, the
Proposed Rules. In this NPRM, the
Commission seeks comment on how to
modernize Section 73.3613 of the
Commission’s rules, which requires
each licensee or permittee of a
commercial and noncommercial AM,
FM, television, or international
broadcast station to file certain contracts
and other documents with the
Commission within 30 days after
execution. The types of documents that
must be filed with the Commission
under the current rule include network
affiliation agreements between a
television station and a national
network; documents that relate to
ownership or control of the licensee or
permittee; contracts that relate to
management of a station by someone
other than a regular employee, officer,
or director of the station, or by any
person where the contract also provides
for both a percentage of profits and
sharing in losses; attributable time
brokerage agreements; and attributable
joint sales agreements. In addition, the
current rule also requires that the
following documents be kept at the
station and made available for
inspection upon request by the
Commission: Subchannel leasing
agreements for Subsidiary
Communications Authorization
operation; franchise/leasing agreements
for operation of telecommunications
services on the television vertical
blanking interval and in the visual
signal; time sales contracts with the
same sponsor for four or more hours per
day, except where the length of the
events broadcast is not under control of
the station; and contracts with chief
operators. The potential rule changes
discussed in the NPRM stem from a
Public Notice issued by the Commission
in May 2017 launching an initiative to
modernize the Commission’s media
regulations. Several commenters in the
proceeding have argued that the
Commission should amend Section
73.3613 to eliminate the paper filing
requirement and other duplicate or
unnecessary filing requirements.
27. The NPRM proposes to eliminate
the Section 73.3613 paper filing
requirement for licensees and
permittees of commercial and
noncommercial AM, FM, television, and
international broadcast stations. In
addition, the NPRM also seeks comment
on other proposed modifications to
broadcasters’ current obligations under
Section 73.3613, including, among other
things, eliminating certain redundant
filing obligations and providing
enhanced confidentiality protections.
The rule revisions on which the NPRM
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Feb 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
seeks comment are intended to reduce
unnecessary regulation and regulatory
burdens that can impede competition
and innovation in the media
marketplace.
28. Legal Basis. The proposed action
is authorized pursuant to Sections 1,
4(i), 4(j), 303(r), 309, 310, and 336 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j),
303(r), 309, 310, and 336.
29. Description and Estimates of the
Number of Small Entities to Which the
Proposed Rules Will Apply. The RFA
directs agencies to provide a description
of and, where feasible, an estimate of
the number of small entities that may be
affected by the proposed rules, if
adopted. The RFA generally defines the
term ‘‘small entity’’ as having the same
meaning as the terms ‘‘small business,’’
‘‘small organization,’’ and ‘‘small
governmental jurisdiction.’’ In addition,
the term ‘‘small business’’ has the same
meaning as the term ‘‘small business
concern’’ under the Small Business Act.
A small business concern is one which:
(1) Is independently owned and
operated; (2) is not dominant in its field
of operation; and (3) satisfies any
additional criteria established by the
SBA. Application of the statutory
criteria of dominance in its field of
operation and independence are
sometimes difficult to apply in the
context of broadcast television.
Accordingly, the Commission’s
statistical account of television stations
may be over-inclusive.
30. The rules proposed herein will
directly affect small radio, television,
and international broadcast stations.
Below, we provide a description of
these small entities, as well as an
estimate of the number of such small
entities, where feasible.
31. Radio Stations. This Economic
Census category comprises
establishments primarily engaged in
broadcasting aural programs by radio to
the public. Programming may originate
in their own studio, from an affiliated
network, or from external sources. The
SBA has established a small business
size standard for this category as firms
having $38.5 million or less in annual
receipts. Economic Census data for 2012
shows that 2,849 radio station firms
operated during that year. Of that
number, 2,806 firms operated with
annual receipts of less than $25 million
per year, 17 with annual receipts
between $24,999,999 and $50 million,
and 26 with annual receipts of $50
million or more. Therefore, based on the
SBA’s size standard the majority of such
entities are small entities.
32. According to Commission staff
review of the BIA/Kelsey, LLC’s Media
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Access Pro Radio Database on January 8,
2018, about 11,372 (or about 99.9
percent) of 11,383 commercial radio
stations had revenues of $38.5 million
or less and thus qualify as small entities
under the SBA definition. The
Commission has estimated the number
of licensed commercial AM radio
stations to be 4,639 stations and the
number of commercial FM radio
stations to be 6,744, for a total number
of 11,383. We note the Commission has
also estimated the number of licensed
noncommercial (NCE) FM radio stations
to be 4,120. Nevertheless, the
Commission does not compile and
otherwise does not have access to
information on the revenue of NCE
stations that would permit it to
determine how many such stations
would qualify as small entities.
33. We also note, that in assessing
whether a business entity qualifies as
small under the above definition,
business control affiliations must be
included. Business concerns are
affiliates of each other when one
concern controls or has the power to
control the other, or a third party or
parties controls or has power to control
both. The Commission’s estimate
therefore likely overstates the number of
small entities that might be affected by
its action, because the revenue figure on
which it is based does not include or
aggregate revenues from affiliated
companies. In addition, to be
determined a ‘‘small business,’’ an
entity may not be dominant in its field
of operation. We further note that it is
difficult at times to assess these criteria
in the context of media entities, and the
estimate of small businesses to which
these rules may apply does not exclude
any radio station from the definition of
a small business on these basis; thus,
our estimate of small businesses may
therefore be over-inclusive. Also, as
noted above, an additional element of
the definition of ‘‘small business’’ is that
the entity must be independently owned
and operated. The Commission notes
that it is difficult at times to assess these
criteria in the context of media entities,
and the estimates of small businesses to
which they apply may be over-inclusive
to this extent.
34. Television Broadcasting. This
Economic Census category comprises
establishments primarily engaged in
broadcasting images together with
sound. These establishments operate
television broadcast studios and
facilities for the programming and
transmission of programs to the public.
These establishments also produce or
transmit visual programming to
affiliated broadcast television stations,
which in turn broadcast the programs to
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2018 / Proposed Rules
the public on a predetermined schedule.
Programming may originate in their own
studio, from an affiliated network, or
from external sources. The SBA has
created the following small business
size standard for such businesses: Those
having $38.5 million or less in annual
receipts. The 2012 Economic Census
reports that 751 firms in this category
operated in that year. Of this number,
656 had annual receipts of $25 million
or less, 25 had annual receipts between
$24,999,999 and $50 million, and 70
had annual receipts of $50 million or
more. Based on this data we therefore
estimate that the majority of commercial
television broadcasters are small entities
under the applicable SBA size standard.
35. The Commission has estimated
the number of licensed commercial
television stations to be 1,377. Of this
total, 1,257 stations had revenues of
$38.5 million or less, according to
Commission staff review of the BIA
Kelsey Inc. Media Access Pro Television
Database (BIA) on January 8, 2018, and
therefore these licensees qualify as
small entities under the SBA definition.
In addition, the Commission has
estimated the number of licensed
noncommercial educational (NCE)
television stations to be 390.
Notwithstanding, the Commission does
not compile and otherwise does not
have access to information on the
revenue of NCE stations that would
permit it to determine how many such
stations would qualify as small entities.
36. We note, however, that in
assessing whether a business concern
qualifies as ‘‘small’’ under the above
definition, business (control) affiliations
must be included. Business concerns are
affiliates of each other when one
concern controls or has the power to
control the other or a third party or
parties controls or has the power to
control both. Our estimate, therefore,
likely overstates the number of small
entities that might be affected by our
action, because the revenue figure on
which it is based does not include or
aggregate revenues from affiliated
companies. In addition, another element
of the definition of ‘‘small business’’
requires that an entity not be dominant
in its field of operation. We are unable
at this time to define or quantify the
criteria that would establish whether a
specific television broadcast station is
dominant in its field of operation.
Accordingly, the estimate of small
businesses to which rules may apply
does not exclude any television station
from the definition of a small business
on this basis and is therefore possibly
over-inclusive. Also, as noted above, an
additional element of the definition of
‘‘small business’’ is that the entity must
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Feb 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
be independently owned and operated.
The Commission notes that it is difficult
at times to assess these criteria in the
context of media entities and its
estimates of small businesses to which
they apply may be over-inclusive to this
extent.
37. International Broadcast Stations.
Neither the Commission nor the SBA
has developed a definition of small
entities specifically applicable to
International Broadcast Stations. The
closest applicable SBA size standards
and U.S. Census Bureau category is
Radio Stations. Establishments in this
industry are primarily engaged in
broadcasting aural programs by radio to
the public with programming that may
originate in their own studio, from an
affiliated network, or from external
sources. The SBA small business size
standard for this category is firms
having $38.5 million or less in annual
receipts. U.S. Census Bureau data for
2012 shows that 2,849 radio station
firms operated during that year. Of that
number, 2,806 firms operated with
annual receipts of less than $25 million
per year, 17 with annual receipts
between $24,999,999 and $50 million,
and 26 with annual receipts of $50
million or more. Therefore, based on the
SBA’s size standard the majority of
entities in this industry are small
entities.
38. According to the Commission’s
records there were 16 international
broadcast stations operating as of
December 13, 2017. The Commission
however does not request nor collect
annual revenue information; therefore,
the Commission is unable to estimate
the number of international broadcast
stations that would constitute a small
business under the SBA definition.
39. Description of Projected
Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements. In this
section, we identify the reporting,
recordkeeping, and other compliance
requirements proposed in the NPRM
and consider whether small entities are
affected disproportionately by any such
requirements.
40. Reporting Requirements. The
NPRM seeks comment on how quickly
licensees and permittees must update
the Section 73.3613 documents in their
public file or update the list of such
documents. Presently, licensees and
permittees are expected to update their
files in a timely fashion and to maintain
orderly files. The NPRM seeks comment
on whether to retain the existing
practice for public file updates or to
adopt a specific timeframe for updating
the Section 73.3613 documents in the
station’s public file (e.g., continue to
require updates within 30 days after
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6829
execution, consistent with the current
practice under Section 73.3613).
41. Recordkeeping Requirements. The
existing public file rules currently give
stations the option of either (i) retaining
copies of the documents listed in their
ownership reports in the public file or
(ii) maintaining an up-to-date list of
such documents in the public file and
providing copies to a requesting party
within seven days. To preserve the
current level of access to these
documents, the NPRM proposes to
clarify that a station must maintain an
up-to-date inventory of its Section
73.3613 documents in its public file,
regardless of whether the station
chooses to retain copies or a list of
documents in the public file, and
provide copies of its Section 73.3613
documents to the Commission and the
public within seven days upon request.
42. Other Compliance Requirements.
Section 73.3613 explicitly allows the
redaction of confidential or proprietary
information for attributable TBAs and
JSAs, provided that unredacted versions
of the agreements shall be provided to
the Commission upon request. The rule
does not currently provide for redaction
of other agreements filed pursuant to the
provision. The NPRM tentatively
concludes that Section 73.3613’s
specific provision allowing the
redaction of TBAs and JSAs, including
the requirement that unredacted copies
shall be made available to the
Commission upon request, should apply
to all Section 73.3613 documents to the
extent that they contain confidential or
proprietary information. Under this
proposal, redaction would only be
necessary when a document is posted to
the online public file or provided to the
Commission or the public upon request.
43. The proposed revisions to Section
73.3613 will relieve affected broadcast
stations, including smaller stations, of
the obligation to file certain information
with the Commission. And although
there were not any comments filed
providing specific information
quantifying the costs and administrative
burdens of complying with the existing
Section 73.3613 filing requirements, and
we cannot precisely estimate the impact
on small entities of eliminating those
requirements, no party in the Media
Modernization proceeding, including
smaller entities, has opposed the
proposals discussed in the NPRM. We
therefore find it reasonable to conclude
that the benefits of adopting the
proposals discussed therein would
outweigh any costs.
44. Steps Taken to Minimize
Significant Economic Impact on Small
Entities, and Significant Alternatives
Considered. The RFA requires an
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
6830
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 32 / Thursday, February 15, 2018 / Proposed Rules
agency to describe any significant,
specifically small business, alternatives
that it has considered in reaching its
proposed approach, which may include
the following four alternatives (among
others): (1) The establishment of
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance and reporting requirements
under the rule for such small entities;
(3) the use of performance, rather than
design, standards; and (4) an exemption
from coverage of the rule, or any part
thereof, for small entities.
45. The NPRM proposes to amend
Section 73.3613 to eliminate the paper
filing requirement for Section 73.3613
documents, and seeks comment on
other proposed modifications to
broadcasters’ current obligations under
Section 73.3613, including, among other
things, eliminating certain redundant
filing obligations and providing
enhanced confidentiality protections.
Under the proposal in the NPRM,
redaction of confidential or proprietary
information would only be necessary
when a document is posted to the
online public file or provided to the
Commission or the public upon request.
The rule changes proposed in the
NPRM, if adopted, would relieve
broadcast licensees and permittees,
including small entities, of the time and
expense associated with filing paper
copies of Section 73.3613 documents
with the Commission.
46. For licensees and permittees of
commercial and noncommercial AM,
FM, and television stations, the NPRM
proposes to rely instead on the
Commission’s existing public file rules,
which already require that these
licensees and permittees make copies of
Section 73.3613 documents available to
the public. The existing public file rules
provide these licensees and permittees
with flexibility to select the disclosure
method that is less burdensome with
respect to Section 73.3613 documents,
while still ensuring timely access to the
documents by the public and the
Commission. For international
broadcast stations, the NPRM proposes
that the Commission retain its ability to
obtain Section 73.3613 documents from
licensees and permittees of these
stations upon request, as needed.
47. We anticipate that affected small
entities will only benefit from the
revisions proposed in the NPRM.
However, in an effort to better
understand the impact and identify
alternative actions that can be taken to
minimize any significant economic
impact on small entities, the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Feb 14, 2018
Jkt 244001
Commission has invited comment on
modifications or conforming changes to
Section 73.3613, or any other
Commission rule, that are necessary or
appropriate to implement the proposals
discussed in the NPRM and on any
alternative proposals for making these
documents available in a less costly and
more effective manner. The Commission
will review and analyze any information
received in promulgating any final rules
in this proceeding.
48. Federal Rules that May Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict with the Proposed
Rule. None.
49. Ordering Clauses. Accordingly, it
is ordered that, pursuant to the
authority found in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j),
303(r), 309, 310, and 336 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j),
303(r), 309, 310, and 336, this Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking is adopted.
50. It is further ordered that the
Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference
Information Center, shall send a copy of
this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
including the Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Act Analysis, to the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–03098 Filed 2–14–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 170627600–8076–01]
RIN 0648–BG99
Fisheries of the Caribbean, Gulf of
Mexico, and South Atlantic; Reef Fish
Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico; Mutton
Snapper and Gag Management
Measures
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes to implement
management measures described in a
framework action to the Fishery
Management Plan for the Reef Fish
Resources of the Gulf of Mexico (FMP),
as prepared by the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf)
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Fishery Management Council (Gulf
Council). This proposed rule would
revise the mutton snapper commercial
and recreational minimum size limits,
the recreational bag limit, and the stock
annual catch limit (ACL). In addition,
this proposed rule would revise the gag
commercial minimum size limit. The
purpose of this proposed rule is to
reduce harvest of mutton snapper to
prevent overfishing while also achieving
optimum yield (OY), and to streamline
management measures to help increase
compliance with the fishing regulations
for mutton snapper and gag in the
exclusive economic zone (EEZ) of the
Gulf off Florida.
DATES: Written comments must be
received by March 17, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on the proposed rule, identified by
‘‘NOAA–NMFS–2017–0082’’ by either
of the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic comments via the Federal
Rulemaking Portal. Go to
www.regulations.gov/NOAA–NMFS–
2017–0082, click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’
icon, complete the required fields, and
enter your attached comments.
• Mail: Submit all written comments
to Rich Malinowski, NMFS Southeast
Regional Office (SERO), 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NMFS. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NMFS will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in required fields if you wish to
remain anonymous).
Electronic copies of the framework
action, which includes an
environmental assessment, Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) analysis, and a
regulatory impact review, may be
obtained from www.regulations.gov or
the SERO website at https://
sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/sustainable_
fisheries/gulf_fisheries/reef_fish/2017/
mutton_gag/mutton_gag_index.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rich
Malinowski, NMFS SERO, telephone:
727–824–5305, email:
Rich.Malinowski@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Gulf
reef fish fishery includes mutton
snapper and gag and is managed under
E:\FR\FM\15FEP1.SGM
15FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 32 (Thursday, February 15, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6823-6830]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03098]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[MB Docket Nos. 18-4, 17-105; FCC 18-8]
Filing of Contracts; Modernization of Media Regulation Initiative
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal Communications Commission
(Commission) seeks comment on whether and how to modernize the
Commission's rules, which requires each licensee or permittee of a
commercial and noncommercial AM, FM, television, or international
broadcast station to file certain contracts and other documents with
the Commission within 30 days after execution. This document continues
the Commission's efforts to modernize its regulations and reduce
unnecessary requirements that can impede competition and innovation in
the media marketplace.
DATES: Comments are due on or before March 19, 2018. Reply comments are
due on or before April 2, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may submit comments and replies,
identified by MB Docket Nos. 18-4, 17-105, by any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Federal Communications Commission's website: https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery,
by commercial overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S.
Postal Service mail (although the Commission continues to experience
delays in receiving U.S. Postal Service mail). All filings must be
addressed to the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary,
Federal Communications Commission.
People with Disabilities: Contact the FCC to request
reasonable accommodations (accessible format documents, sign language
interpreters, CART, etc.) by email: [email protected] or phone: 202-418-
0530 or TTY: 202-418-0432.
[[Page 6824]]
For detailed instructions for submitting comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Clark of the Industry
Analysis Division, Media Bureau, at (202) 418-2609.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), FCC 18-8, adopted and released on
January 30, 2018. The full text of this document is available
electronically via the FCC's Electronic Document Management System
(EDOCS) website at https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-18-8A1.pdf. Documents will be available electronically in ASCII,
Microsoft Word, and/or Adobe Acrobat. This document is also available
for public inspection and copying during regular business hours in the
FCC Reference Information Center, Federal Communications Commission,
445 12th Street SW, CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. Alternative formats
are available for people with disabilities (Braille, large print,
electronic files, audio format), by sending an email to [email protected]
or calling the Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at
(202) 418-0530 (voice), 202 418-0432 (TTY).
Synopsis
1. Background. Since the late 1930s, the Commission has required
broadcast station licensees and permittees to file with the Commission
copies of certain contracts and other documents relating to ownership
and operation of stations. Historically, this filing requirement was
intended to keep the Commission and the public informed with respect to
the ownership and control of broadcast stations and to enable the
Commission to be advised of compliance with its rules relating to those
matters. In the past, the Commission has also used the information
contained in some of these agreements to formulate certain broadcasting
policies and rules or to enhance its understanding of the broadcast
industry. At the time, requiring that broadcast licensees and
permittees submit paper copies to the Commission was the most efficient
mechanism available for the Commission to obtain copies of the
documents and helped ensure that certain documents were also available
for public inspection.
2. Beginning in 1965, broadcast licensees and permittees were also
required to make copies of these documents available via a local public
inspection file. This additional obligation provided another source for
public inspection of documents relating to ownership and control of a
broadcast station for those able to travel to a station's main studio
during regular business hours. In 1998, the Commission amended its
public file rules to give broadcast licensees and permittees the option
of maintaining an up-to-date list of such documents in the public file
and providing copies of the actual documents to requesting parties
within seven days, in lieu of maintaining the documents themselves in
the file. In 2012, the Commission amended its public file rules in
general to require that public file materials be posted to an online
database hosted by the Commission rather than maintained in a paper
file at the station. Under the 2012 amendment to the rules, licensees
and permittees that choose to retain a list of Section 73.3613 (47 CFR
73. 3613) documents in the public file must continue to provide a copy
of any such documents to requesting parties within seven days.
Television stations completed their transition to the online public
file in 2014. The last group of remaining radio stations to transition
must begin using the online file by March 2018. The transition to
online public inspection files enables greater public access to the
contents of the files, including documents filed pursuant to Section
73.3613--which are either placed directly in the public file or
provided on demand based on an up-to-date list--particularly for those
who are unable to travel to a station or the Commission during regular
business hours.
3. The Commission has periodically re-evaluated the paper filing
requirement in Section 73.3613 and revised the rule as necessary to
eliminate unnecessary paperwork and reduce administrative burdens on
licensees and the Commission. For example, prior to the late 1970s, the
Commission revised Section 73.3613 on multiple occasions to eliminate
the obligation to routinely submit paper copies of several documents
and instead require that certain documents be kept at the station and
made available upon request. Beginning in the late 1970s, the
Commission took several steps to eliminate unnecessary paperwork
burdens resulting from the requirement that stations submit paper
copies of certain network affiliation contracts that the Commission no
longer needed to collect routinely. For example, the Commission
eliminated the requirement that radio stations file network affiliation
and transcription contracts with the Commission, and it limited the
mandatory filing of television network affiliation contracts to just
those agreements with national networks. The Commission subsequently
proposed to eliminate the routine filing requirement for national
television network affiliates as well and instead require that
television licensees make their national network affiliation agreements
available to the Commission upon request. This proposal remained
pending until the Commission terminated the proceeding in 2011.
4. The types of documents that must be filed with the Commission
under the current rule include network affiliation agreements between a
television station and a national network; documents that relate to
ownership or control of the licensee or permittee; contracts that
relate to management of a station by someone other than a regular
employee, officer, or director of the station, or by any person where
the contract also provides for both a percentage of profits and sharing
in losses; attributable time brokerage agreements; and attributable
joint sales agreements. In addition, the current rule also requires
that the following documents be kept at the station and made available
for inspection upon request by the Commission: Subchannel leasing
agreements for Subsidiary Communications Authorization operation;
franchise/leasing agreements for operation of telecommunications
services on the television vertical blanking interval and in the visual
signal; time sales contracts with the same sponsor for four or more
hours per day, except where the length of the events broadcast is not
under control of the station; and contracts with chief operators.
5. In May 2017, the Commission issued a Media Modernization
Initiative Public Notice launching a review of its media regulations to
eliminate or modify those that are outdated, unnecessary, or unduly
burdensome. In response to that Media Modernization Initiative Public
Notice, several commenters in the Media Modernization proceeding urged
the Commission to eliminate the existing paper filing requirements in
Section 73.3613. These commenters generally assert that the
Commission's and the public's information needs can be sufficiently met
through the existing public file requirements. No commenters opposed
these recommendations.
6. AM, FM, and Television Stations. We tentatively conclude that
the Section 73.3613 paper filing requirement for licensees and
permittees of commercial
[[Page 6825]]
and noncommercial AM, FM, and television stations should be eliminated.
While paper filings may have previously been the most efficient
mechanism for ensuring that the Commission and the public had ready
access to these materials, we believe that is no longer the case. The
vast majority of Commission forms are now filed electronically, and the
Commission has taken many recent steps to eliminate or streamline paper
submissions and other document retention obligations. For example, the
transition to online public files, which is largely complete and will
be finalized in March 2018, has significantly reduced burdens on
stations and provided both the Commission and the public with easy
access to station information and documents retained in the public
inspection file.
7. Indeed, the Section 73.3613 documents of commercial and
noncommercial AM, FM, and television stations are already available via
their public inspection files, and such access will continue even
without the Section 73.3613 paper filing requirement. Licensees and
permittees of these stations currently file ownership reports
electronically on FCC Forms 323 and 323-E, and on these ownership
reports licensees and permittees are required to list all documents
required to be filed pursuant to Section 73.3613 for all of the
stations covered by the report. Our public file rules, contained in
Section 73.3526 (commercial broadcast stations) and Section 73.3527
(noncommercial broadcast stations) of our rules, require that the
licensees and permittees of these stations make the documents listed in
their ownership reports--i.e., their Section 73.3613 documents--
available for public inspection via their public files. Specifically,
the public file rules require these licensees and permittees, at their
discretion, to either (i) retain in their public inspection files
copies of the documents listed in their ownership reports or (ii)
maintain an up-to-date list of such documents in their public
inspection files and provide copies to a requesting party within seven
days. Our public file rules also require licensees and permittees to
retain copies of time brokerage agreements and joint sales agreements
involving a commercial AM, FM, or television station in the station's
public file. In light of this existing requirement and after evaluating
our own document needs, we believe that eliminating the paper filing
requirement as discussed herein will not meaningfully impact the
ability of the Commission and other interested parties to review
Section 73.3613 documents, and will reduce burdens on licensees.
8. Accordingly, consistent with comments to the Media Modernization
Initiative Public Notice, we tentatively conclude that relying on the
existing public file rules--subject to the proposed modifications
discussed herein--will provide the Commission and the public with
sufficient access to Section 73.3613 documents for commercial and
noncommercial AM, FM, and television stations. We seek comment on this
tentative conclusion. Our existing public file rules provide these
stations with flexibility to select the disclosure method that is less
burdensome with respect to Section 73.3613 documents. We therefore
propose to eliminate the Section 73.3613 requirement that licensees and
permittees of commercial and noncommercial AM, FM, and television
stations file paper copies of such documents with the Commission.
Instead, we propose that stations make such documents available to the
Commission and the public via the options set forth in the existing
public file requirement. We seek comment on this proposal.
9. As discussed above, our existing public file rules currently
give stations the option of either (i) retaining copies of the
documents listed in their ownership reports in the public file or (ii)
maintaining an up-to-date list of such documents in the public file and
providing copies to a requesting party within seven days. In order to
preserve the current level of access to these documents, we propose to
clarify that a station must ensure that its inventory of Section
73.3613 documents in its public file is up to date, regardless of
whether the station chooses to retain copies or a list of documents in
the public file, and provide copies of its Section 73.3613 documents to
the Commission and the public within seven days upon request. We seek
comment on this proposal.
10. For additional clarity, we also seek comment on whether to
revise the relevant public file rules to refer specifically to Section
73.3613, instead of referencing the documents listed in ownership
reports (which are the same as the Section 73.3613 documents). In the
alternative, we seek comment on whether to eliminate Section 73.3613 of
the rules entirely--subject to the discussion of international
broadcast stations below--and instead list these same documents in
Sections 73.3526 and 73.3527 of our rules. Which approach would most
effectively keep licensees informed of their obligations? If we
eliminate Section 73.3613, how should we address the documents
currently specified in Section 73.3613(e), which need not be filed with
the Commission but must be kept at the station and made available for
inspection upon request by the Commission under the current rule?
Similarly, how should we address Section 73.3613(a)(1), which currently
includes a definition of ``network'' that is cross-referenced in the
Telecommunications Act of 1996 and in the Commission's Dual Network
Rule? We seek comment on these issues.
11. Under Section 73.3613, documents are required to be filed
within 30 days after execution. By contrast, the public file rules do
not explicitly state how quickly licensees and permittees must add the
documents listed in their most recent ownership report or update the
list of such documents, though licensees and permittees are expected to
update their files in a timely fashion and to maintain orderly files.
Is the existing practice for public file updates sufficient or should
we adopt a specific timeframe for updating the Section 73.3613
documents in the station's public file? If so, how long (e.g., continue
to require updates within 30 days after execution, consistent with the
current practice under Section 73.3613)? In addition to the specific
issues discussed in Section B of this NPRM, we invite comment on any
other modifications or conforming changes to Section 73.3613, or any
other Commission rule, that are necessary or appropriate to implement
the proposals discussed in this NPRM and on any alternative proposals
for making these documents available in a less costly and more
effective manner.
12. International Broadcast Stations. Unlike AM, FM, and television
stations, international broadcast stations do not serve local
communities in the United States. These stations, which are authorized
on a seasonal basis, employ frequencies allocated to the broadcasting
service between 5900 and 26100 kHz, the transmissions of which are
intended to be received in foreign countries. Currently, two seasons
exist: A summer season and a winter season. International broadcast
stations, which are often operated by churches and other religious
organizations, typically do not have network affiliations and do not
enter into time brokerage arrangements or joint sales agreements. As of
December 13, 2017, there were 16 international broadcast stations
operating. These stations are subject to the Section 73.3613 filing
requirements but do not have public file obligations like those
applicable to AM, FM, and television stations. Similarly, these
stations are not currently subject to the
[[Page 6826]]
routine ownership reporting obligations applicable to other broadcast
services.
13. Based upon our review, we tentatively conclude that the current
justifications for requiring disclosure of Section 73.3613 documents by
commercial and noncommercial AM, FM, and television stations do not
apply to international broadcast stations. As mentioned above, for
example, licensees and permittees of commercial and noncommercial AM,
FM, and television stations are required to list Section 73.3613
documents in the broadcast ownership reports they file with the
Commission and make copies of such documents available via a public
inspection file, but international broadcast stations are not subject
to such obligations. Previously, international broadcast stations were
subject to the ownership reporting requirements that applied to AM, FM,
and television stations, but this is no longer the case. While the
disclosure of Section 73.3613 documents by commercial and noncommercial
AM, FM, and television stations supplements the ownership information
that they must routinely report to the Commission, the same is not true
for international broadcast stations. Furthermore, these stations are
not subject to the ownership rules applicable to commercial AM, FM, and
television stations, nor are they subject to the relevant operational
provisions applicable to noncommercial stations. Moreover, it does not
appear that the Section 73.3613 documents that international broadcast
stations are required to file with the Commission have been reviewed by
Commission staff in the recent past. Accordingly, we tentatively
conclude that there is no need to continue requiring the licensees and
permittees of international broadcast stations to routinely file
Section 73.3613 documents with the Commission.
14. Instead, we believe that the Commission's information needs can
be met by retaining our ability to obtain these documents from
licensees and permittees of international broadcast stations upon
request, as needed. For example, if there are concerns about the
ownership or control of an international broadcast station, the
Commission could request copies of the relevant Section 73.3613
documents as part of an investigation. For purposes of enforcing the
statutory bar against de facto transfers of control of an international
broadcast station without prior Commission authorization, we believe
that it is sufficient to retain our ability to obtain Section 73.3613
documents from licensees and permittees of international broadcast
stations upon request. We seek comment on how to implement this
requirement. Should the Commission's rules continue to delineate the
documents subject to disclosure (either in Section 73.3613 or in a new
rule section relevant only to international broadcast stations) or is
the Commission's general authority to request relevant information
during an investigation or to otherwise fulfill its statutory
obligations sufficient?
15. We seek comment on these proposals. Is there a continuing need
for these licensees and permittees to routinely file paper copies of
Section 73.3613 documents with the Commission? What is the value, if
any, of retaining the Section 73.3613 paper filing requirement for
international broadcast stations for the Commission and the public?
Would eliminating the requirement and retaining our ability to obtain
Section 73.3613 documents upon request adequately ensure that the
Commission will have access to information concerning ownership and
control of international broadcast stations and compliance with our
rules? Are there any reasons that would support a requirement that
international broadcast stations make these documents available to
members of the public? If so, what is the least costly and most
effective manner of doing so? We note that these stations transmit
programming that is intended to be received in foreign countries and
are not required to have public inspection files, and thus do not
currently make Section 73.3613 documents available to the U.S. public
in that manner. And, considering the very small number of stations
operating nationally, Section 73.3613 documents of international
broadcast stations may be of little relevance to the U.S. public. We
seek comment on these issues.
16. Time Brokerage Agreements and Joint Sales Agreements. A time
brokerage agreement (TBA), also referred to as local marketing
agreement (LMA), involves the sale by a licensee of discrete blocks of
time to a broker that supplies the programming to fill that time and
sells the commercial spot announcements in it. A joint sales agreement
(JSA) is an agreement that authorizes a broker to sell some or all of
the advertising time on the brokered station. Pursuant to Section
73.3613(d), attributable TBAs and attributable JSAs must be filed with
the Commission by the brokering station. In addition, our existing
public file rule for commercial stations requires that all TBAs and
JSAs involving commercial stations, regardless of their attribution
status, also be placed in the public inspection file for all
participating stations; that is, under the current rules commercial
broadcast stations cannot elect merely to list these agreements in
their public files. Because Section 73.3613(d) duplicates an existing
public file requirement for a limited subset of TBAs and JSAs, we
tentatively conclude that we may eliminate this requirement as it
applies to commercial stations. We believe that elimination is
appropriate, regardless of the disclosure requirement that may
ultimately be selected. Under the current rule, attributable TBAs and
attributable JSAs--like all other Section 73.3613 documents--must be
filed with the Commission within 30 days of execution. However, our
existing public file rules do not explicitly state how quickly
licensees and permittees must add these documents to their public file.
As noted above, however, we are seeking comment on whether to adopt a
specific timeframe for updating Section 73.3613 documents. We seek
comment on this issue.
17. Unlike commercial stations, noncommercial stations are not
currently required to maintain copies of all TBAs or JSAs in their
public inspection files; rather, under our public file rules, these
stations have the option of only maintaining a list of all Section
73.3613 documents, including certain TBAs and JSAs, and must provide a
copy of these documents to requesting parties. When the Commission
adopted the public file rules requiring that all TBAs and/or JSAs
involving commercial stations be placed in the public inspection file,
it did not discuss a similar requirement for noncommercial stations.
Given the nature of and rules applicable to the noncommercial service,
it is likely that TBAs and JSAs involving noncommercial stations are
not as prevalent as those involving commercial stations. Accordingly,
no change to Section 73.3613(d) is necessary with respect to
noncommercial stations, which are already required to list these
agreements in their public files and make them available upon request.
We seek comment on this issue.
18. Redaction of Confidential or Proprietary Information. Section
73.3613 explicitly allows the redaction of confidential or proprietary
information for attributable TBAs and JSAs, provided that unredacted
versions of the agreements shall be provided to the Commission upon
request. A similar rule applies to TBAs and JSAs required to be placed
in the public inspection file. Section 73.3613 does not currently
provide for redaction of other agreements filed pursuant to the
provision. However, the Commission's
[[Page 6827]]
general rules provide a procedure for seeking such redactions, and
other agreements filed pursuant to this section that contain
confidential or proprietary information are routinely submitted to the
Commission in both redacted and unredacted forms along with a request
for confidential treatment. We have no evidence that this practice--
both the specific provisions allowing the redaction of TBAs and JSAs
and the routine submission of redacted and unredacted versions of other
73.3613 documents pursuant to Section 0.459 of the Commission's rules--
has impaired the ability of the Commission or other interested parties
to evaluate these agreements. Accordingly, we tentatively conclude that
Section 73.3613's specific provision allowing the redaction of TBAs and
JSAs, including the requirement that unredacted copies shall be made
available to the Commission upon request, should apply to all Section
73.3613 documents to the extent that they contain confidential or
proprietary information. Under our proposal herein, redaction would
only be necessary when a document is posted to the online public file
or provided to the Commission or the public upon request. We seek
comment on this tentative conclusion.
Procedural Matters
19. Initial Paperwork Reduction Act Analysis. This document
contains proposed modified information collection requirements. The
Commission, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork
burdens, invites the general public and the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) to comment on the information collection requirements
contained in this document, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, Public Law 104-13. In addition, pursuant to the Small Business
Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(4), we seek specific comment on how we might further reduce the
information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees.
20. Ex Parte Rules. This proceeding shall be treated as a ``permit-
but-disclose'' proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte
rules. Persons making ex parte presentations must file a copy of any
written presentation or a memorandum summarizing any oral presentation
within two business days after the presentation (unless a different
deadline applicable to the Sunshine period applies). Persons making
oral ex parte presentations are reminded that memoranda summarizing the
presentation must (1) list all persons attending or otherwise
participating in the meeting at which the ex parte presentation was
made, and (2) summarize all data presented and arguments made during
the presentation. If the presentation consisted in whole or in part of
the presentation of data or arguments already reflected in the
presenter's written comments, memoranda or other filings in the
proceeding, the presenter may provide citations to such data or
arguments in his or her prior comments, memoranda, or other filings
(specifying the relevant page and/or paragraph numbers where such data
or arguments can be found) in lieu of summarizing them in the
memorandum. Documents shown or given to Commission staff during ex
parte meetings are deemed to be written ex parte presentations and must
be filed consistent with rule 1.1206(b). In proceedings governed by
rule 1.49(f) or for which the Commission has made available a method of
electronic filing, written ex parte presentations and memoranda
summarizing oral ex parte presentations, and all attachments thereto,
must be filed through the electronic comment filing system available
for that proceeding, and must be filed in their native format (e.g.,
.doc, .xml, .ppt, searchable .pdf). Participants in this proceeding
should familiarize themselves with the Commission's ex parte rules.
21. Comments and Replies. Pursuant to sections 1.415 and 1.419 of
the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.415 and 1.419, interested parties may
file comments and reply comments on or before the dates indicated on
the first page of this document. Comments may be filed using the
Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). Electronic Filing
of Documents in Rulemaking Proceedings, 63 FR 24121 (1998).
Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically
using the internet by accessing the ECFS: https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and one copy of each filing. If more than one docket
or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, filers
must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or
rulemaking number.
Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service
mail. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary,
Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
All hand-delivered or messenger-delivered paper filings
for the Commission's Secretary must be delivered to FCC Headquarters at
445 12th St. SW, Room TW-A325, Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours
are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. All hand deliveries must be held together
with rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelopes and boxes must be
disposed of before entering the building.
Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050 Junction Drive,
Annapolis Junction, MD 20701.
U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority
mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554.
22. Availability of Documents. Comments, reply comments, and ex
parte submissions will be available for public inspection during
regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW, CY-A257, Washington, DC
20554. These documents will also be available via ECFS. Documents will
be available electronically in ASCII, Microsoft Word, and/or Adobe
Acrobat.
23. People with Disabilities. To request materials in accessible
formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic
files, audio format), send an email to [email protected] or call the FCC's
Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530 (voice),
(202) 418-0432 (TTY).
24. Additional Information. For additional information on this
proceeding, contact Christopher Clark of the Industry Analysis
Division, Media Bureau, at (202) 418-2609.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis
25. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as
amended (RFA) the Commission has prepared this Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Act Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities by the policies and
rules proposed in this NPRM. Written public comments are requested on
this IRFA. Comments must be identified as responses to the IRFA and
must be filed by the deadlines for comments provided on the first page
of the NPRM. The Commission will send a copy of the NPRM, including
this IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA).
[[Page 6828]]
26. Need for, and Objectives of, the Proposed Rules. In this NPRM,
the Commission seeks comment on how to modernize Section 73.3613 of the
Commission's rules, which requires each licensee or permittee of a
commercial and noncommercial AM, FM, television, or international
broadcast station to file certain contracts and other documents with
the Commission within 30 days after execution. The types of documents
that must be filed with the Commission under the current rule include
network affiliation agreements between a television station and a
national network; documents that relate to ownership or control of the
licensee or permittee; contracts that relate to management of a station
by someone other than a regular employee, officer, or director of the
station, or by any person where the contract also provides for both a
percentage of profits and sharing in losses; attributable time
brokerage agreements; and attributable joint sales agreements. In
addition, the current rule also requires that the following documents
be kept at the station and made available for inspection upon request
by the Commission: Subchannel leasing agreements for Subsidiary
Communications Authorization operation; franchise/leasing agreements
for operation of telecommunications services on the television vertical
blanking interval and in the visual signal; time sales contracts with
the same sponsor for four or more hours per day, except where the
length of the events broadcast is not under control of the station; and
contracts with chief operators. The potential rule changes discussed in
the NPRM stem from a Public Notice issued by the Commission in May 2017
launching an initiative to modernize the Commission's media
regulations. Several commenters in the proceeding have argued that the
Commission should amend Section 73.3613 to eliminate the paper filing
requirement and other duplicate or unnecessary filing requirements.
27. The NPRM proposes to eliminate the Section 73.3613 paper filing
requirement for licensees and permittees of commercial and
noncommercial AM, FM, television, and international broadcast stations.
In addition, the NPRM also seeks comment on other proposed
modifications to broadcasters' current obligations under Section
73.3613, including, among other things, eliminating certain redundant
filing obligations and providing enhanced confidentiality protections.
The rule revisions on which the NPRM seeks comment are intended to
reduce unnecessary regulation and regulatory burdens that can impede
competition and innovation in the media marketplace.
28. Legal Basis. The proposed action is authorized pursuant to
Sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 303(r), 309, 310, and 336 of the Communications
Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 303(r), 309,
310, and 336.
29. Description and Estimates of the Number of Small Entities to
Which the Proposed Rules Will Apply. The RFA directs agencies to
provide a description of and, where feasible, an estimate of the number
of small entities that may be affected by the proposed rules, if
adopted. The RFA generally defines the term ``small entity'' as having
the same meaning as the terms ``small business,'' ``small
organization,'' and ``small governmental jurisdiction.'' In addition,
the term ``small business'' has the same meaning as the term ``small
business concern'' under the Small Business Act. A small business
concern is one which: (1) Is independently owned and operated; (2) is
not dominant in its field of operation; and (3) satisfies any
additional criteria established by the SBA. Application of the
statutory criteria of dominance in its field of operation and
independence are sometimes difficult to apply in the context of
broadcast television. Accordingly, the Commission's statistical account
of television stations may be over-inclusive.
30. The rules proposed herein will directly affect small radio,
television, and international broadcast stations. Below, we provide a
description of these small entities, as well as an estimate of the
number of such small entities, where feasible.
31. Radio Stations. This Economic Census category comprises
establishments primarily engaged in broadcasting aural programs by
radio to the public. Programming may originate in their own studio,
from an affiliated network, or from external sources. The SBA has
established a small business size standard for this category as firms
having $38.5 million or less in annual receipts. Economic Census data
for 2012 shows that 2,849 radio station firms operated during that
year. Of that number, 2,806 firms operated with annual receipts of less
than $25 million per year, 17 with annual receipts between $24,999,999
and $50 million, and 26 with annual receipts of $50 million or more.
Therefore, based on the SBA's size standard the majority of such
entities are small entities.
32. According to Commission staff review of the BIA/Kelsey, LLC's
Media Access Pro Radio Database on January 8, 2018, about 11,372 (or
about 99.9 percent) of 11,383 commercial radio stations had revenues of
$38.5 million or less and thus qualify as small entities under the SBA
definition. The Commission has estimated the number of licensed
commercial AM radio stations to be 4,639 stations and the number of
commercial FM radio stations to be 6,744, for a total number of 11,383.
We note the Commission has also estimated the number of licensed
noncommercial (NCE) FM radio stations to be 4,120. Nevertheless, the
Commission does not compile and otherwise does not have access to
information on the revenue of NCE stations that would permit it to
determine how many such stations would qualify as small entities.
33. We also note, that in assessing whether a business entity
qualifies as small under the above definition, business control
affiliations must be included. Business concerns are affiliates of each
other when one concern controls or has the power to control the other,
or a third party or parties controls or has power to control both. The
Commission's estimate therefore likely overstates the number of small
entities that might be affected by its action, because the revenue
figure on which it is based does not include or aggregate revenues from
affiliated companies. In addition, to be determined a ``small
business,'' an entity may not be dominant in its field of operation. We
further note that it is difficult at times to assess these criteria in
the context of media entities, and the estimate of small businesses to
which these rules may apply does not exclude any radio station from the
definition of a small business on these basis; thus, our estimate of
small businesses may therefore be over-inclusive. Also, as noted above,
an additional element of the definition of ``small business'' is that
the entity must be independently owned and operated. The Commission
notes that it is difficult at times to assess these criteria in the
context of media entities, and the estimates of small businesses to
which they apply may be over-inclusive to this extent.
34. Television Broadcasting. This Economic Census category
comprises establishments primarily engaged in broadcasting images
together with sound. These establishments operate television broadcast
studios and facilities for the programming and transmission of programs
to the public. These establishments also produce or transmit visual
programming to affiliated broadcast television stations, which in turn
broadcast the programs to
[[Page 6829]]
the public on a predetermined schedule. Programming may originate in
their own studio, from an affiliated network, or from external sources.
The SBA has created the following small business size standard for such
businesses: Those having $38.5 million or less in annual receipts. The
2012 Economic Census reports that 751 firms in this category operated
in that year. Of this number, 656 had annual receipts of $25 million or
less, 25 had annual receipts between $24,999,999 and $50 million, and
70 had annual receipts of $50 million or more. Based on this data we
therefore estimate that the majority of commercial television
broadcasters are small entities under the applicable SBA size standard.
35. The Commission has estimated the number of licensed commercial
television stations to be 1,377. Of this total, 1,257 stations had
revenues of $38.5 million or less, according to Commission staff review
of the BIA Kelsey Inc. Media Access Pro Television Database (BIA) on
January 8, 2018, and therefore these licensees qualify as small
entities under the SBA definition. In addition, the Commission has
estimated the number of licensed noncommercial educational (NCE)
television stations to be 390. Notwithstanding, the Commission does not
compile and otherwise does not have access to information on the
revenue of NCE stations that would permit it to determine how many such
stations would qualify as small entities.
36. We note, however, that in assessing whether a business concern
qualifies as ``small'' under the above definition, business (control)
affiliations must be included. Business concerns are affiliates of each
other when one concern controls or has the power to control the other
or a third party or parties controls or has the power to control both.
Our estimate, therefore, likely overstates the number of small entities
that might be affected by our action, because the revenue figure on
which it is based does not include or aggregate revenues from
affiliated companies. In addition, another element of the definition of
``small business'' requires that an entity not be dominant in its field
of operation. We are unable at this time to define or quantify the
criteria that would establish whether a specific television broadcast
station is dominant in its field of operation. Accordingly, the
estimate of small businesses to which rules may apply does not exclude
any television station from the definition of a small business on this
basis and is therefore possibly over-inclusive. Also, as noted above,
an additional element of the definition of ``small business'' is that
the entity must be independently owned and operated. The Commission
notes that it is difficult at times to assess these criteria in the
context of media entities and its estimates of small businesses to
which they apply may be over-inclusive to this extent.
37. International Broadcast Stations. Neither the Commission nor
the SBA has developed a definition of small entities specifically
applicable to International Broadcast Stations. The closest applicable
SBA size standards and U.S. Census Bureau category is Radio Stations.
Establishments in this industry are primarily engaged in broadcasting
aural programs by radio to the public with programming that may
originate in their own studio, from an affiliated network, or from
external sources. The SBA small business size standard for this
category is firms having $38.5 million or less in annual receipts. U.S.
Census Bureau data for 2012 shows that 2,849 radio station firms
operated during that year. Of that number, 2,806 firms operated with
annual receipts of less than $25 million per year, 17 with annual
receipts between $24,999,999 and $50 million, and 26 with annual
receipts of $50 million or more. Therefore, based on the SBA's size
standard the majority of entities in this industry are small entities.
38. According to the Commission's records there were 16
international broadcast stations operating as of December 13, 2017. The
Commission however does not request nor collect annual revenue
information; therefore, the Commission is unable to estimate the number
of international broadcast stations that would constitute a small
business under the SBA definition.
39. Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements. In this section, we identify the reporting,
recordkeeping, and other compliance requirements proposed in the NPRM
and consider whether small entities are affected disproportionately by
any such requirements.
40. Reporting Requirements. The NPRM seeks comment on how quickly
licensees and permittees must update the Section 73.3613 documents in
their public file or update the list of such documents. Presently,
licensees and permittees are expected to update their files in a timely
fashion and to maintain orderly files. The NPRM seeks comment on
whether to retain the existing practice for public file updates or to
adopt a specific timeframe for updating the Section 73.3613 documents
in the station's public file (e.g., continue to require updates within
30 days after execution, consistent with the current practice under
Section 73.3613).
41. Recordkeeping Requirements. The existing public file rules
currently give stations the option of either (i) retaining copies of
the documents listed in their ownership reports in the public file or
(ii) maintaining an up-to-date list of such documents in the public
file and providing copies to a requesting party within seven days. To
preserve the current level of access to these documents, the NPRM
proposes to clarify that a station must maintain an up-to-date
inventory of its Section 73.3613 documents in its public file,
regardless of whether the station chooses to retain copies or a list of
documents in the public file, and provide copies of its Section 73.3613
documents to the Commission and the public within seven days upon
request.
42. Other Compliance Requirements. Section 73.3613 explicitly
allows the redaction of confidential or proprietary information for
attributable TBAs and JSAs, provided that unredacted versions of the
agreements shall be provided to the Commission upon request. The rule
does not currently provide for redaction of other agreements filed
pursuant to the provision. The NPRM tentatively concludes that Section
73.3613's specific provision allowing the redaction of TBAs and JSAs,
including the requirement that unredacted copies shall be made
available to the Commission upon request, should apply to all Section
73.3613 documents to the extent that they contain confidential or
proprietary information. Under this proposal, redaction would only be
necessary when a document is posted to the online public file or
provided to the Commission or the public upon request.
43. The proposed revisions to Section 73.3613 will relieve affected
broadcast stations, including smaller stations, of the obligation to
file certain information with the Commission. And although there were
not any comments filed providing specific information quantifying the
costs and administrative burdens of complying with the existing Section
73.3613 filing requirements, and we cannot precisely estimate the
impact on small entities of eliminating those requirements, no party in
the Media Modernization proceeding, including smaller entities, has
opposed the proposals discussed in the NPRM. We therefore find it
reasonable to conclude that the benefits of adopting the proposals
discussed therein would outweigh any costs.
44. Steps Taken to Minimize Significant Economic Impact on Small
Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered. The RFA requires an
[[Page 6830]]
agency to describe any significant, specifically small business,
alternatives that it has considered in reaching its proposed approach,
which may include the following four alternatives (among others): (1)
The establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements or
timetables that take into account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of
compliance and reporting requirements under the rule for such small
entities; (3) the use of performance, rather than design, standards;
and (4) an exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof,
for small entities.
45. The NPRM proposes to amend Section 73.3613 to eliminate the
paper filing requirement for Section 73.3613 documents, and seeks
comment on other proposed modifications to broadcasters' current
obligations under Section 73.3613, including, among other things,
eliminating certain redundant filing obligations and providing enhanced
confidentiality protections. Under the proposal in the NPRM, redaction
of confidential or proprietary information would only be necessary when
a document is posted to the online public file or provided to the
Commission or the public upon request. The rule changes proposed in the
NPRM, if adopted, would relieve broadcast licensees and permittees,
including small entities, of the time and expense associated with
filing paper copies of Section 73.3613 documents with the Commission.
46. For licensees and permittees of commercial and noncommercial
AM, FM, and television stations, the NPRM proposes to rely instead on
the Commission's existing public file rules, which already require that
these licensees and permittees make copies of Section 73.3613 documents
available to the public. The existing public file rules provide these
licensees and permittees with flexibility to select the disclosure
method that is less burdensome with respect to Section 73.3613
documents, while still ensuring timely access to the documents by the
public and the Commission. For international broadcast stations, the
NPRM proposes that the Commission retain its ability to obtain Section
73.3613 documents from licensees and permittees of these stations upon
request, as needed.
47. We anticipate that affected small entities will only benefit
from the revisions proposed in the NPRM. However, in an effort to
better understand the impact and identify alternative actions that can
be taken to minimize any significant economic impact on small entities,
the Commission has invited comment on modifications or conforming
changes to Section 73.3613, or any other Commission rule, that are
necessary or appropriate to implement the proposals discussed in the
NPRM and on any alternative proposals for making these documents
available in a less costly and more effective manner. The Commission
will review and analyze any information received in promulgating any
final rules in this proceeding.
48. Federal Rules that May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict with the
Proposed Rule. None.
49. Ordering Clauses. Accordingly, it is ordered that, pursuant to
the authority found in sections 1, 4(i), 4(j), 303(r), 309, 310, and
336 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151,
154(i), 154(j), 303(r), 309, 310, and 336, this Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking is adopted.
50. It is further ordered that the Commission's Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, shall send a
copy of this Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, including the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Act Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy
of the Small Business Administration.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene H. Dortch,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-03098 Filed 2-14-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P