Auction of Cross-Service FM Translator Construction Permits Scheduled for May 15, 2018; Comment Sought on Competitive Bidding Procedures for Auction 99, 6141-6148 [2018-03025]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2018 / Proposed Rules
References
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
Appendix
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Chapter 27B Subchapter 3—Air Test Method
3: Sampling and Analytical Procedures for
the Determination of Volatile Organic
Compounds from Source Operations
(Effective 12/1/2008)
N.J.A.C. 7:27B–3.1. Definitions
N.J.A.C. 7:27B–3.2. Sampling and analytical
protocol: acceptable test methods
N.J.A.C. 7:27B–3.3. Operating conditions
during the test
N.J.A.C. 7:27B–3.4. Sampling facilities
N.J.A.C. 7:27B–3.5. Source operations and
applicable test methods
N.J.A.C. 7:27B–3.6. Procedures for the
determinations of vapor pressures of a
single known VOC or mixtures of known
and/or unknown VOC
N.J.A.C. 7:27B–3.7. Procedures for the direct
measurement of volatile organic
compounds using a flame ionization
detector (FID), a photoionization detector
(PID) or a non-dispersive infrared analyzer
(NDIR)
N.J.A.C. 7:27B–3.8. Procedures for the direct
measurement of volatile organic
compounds using a gas chromatograph
(GC) with a flame ionization detector (FID)
or other suitable detector
N.J.A.C. 7:27B–3.9. Procedures for the
sampling and remote analysis of known
volatile organic compounds using a gas
chromatograph (GC) with a flame
ionization detector (FID) or other suitable
detector
N.J.A.C. 7:27B–3.10. Procedures for the
determination of volatile organic
compounds in surface coating formulations
N.J.A.C. 7:27B–3.11. Procedures for the
determination of volatile organic
compounds emitted from transfer
operations using a flame ionization
detector (FID) or non-dispersive infrared
analyzer (NDIR)
N.J.A.C. 7:27B–3.12. Procedures for the
determination of volatile organic
compounds in cutback and emulsified
asphalts
N.J.A.C. 7:27B–3.13. Procedures for the
determination of leak tightness of gasoline
delivery vessels
N.J.A.C. 7:27B–3.14. Procedures for the direct
detection of fugitive volatile organic
compound leaks
N.J.A.C. 7:27B–3.15. Procedures for the direct
detection of fugitive volatile organic
compound leaks from gasoline tank trucks
and vapor collection systems using a
combustible gas detector
N.J.A.C. 7:27B–3.18. Test methods and
sources incorporated by reference.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–02815 Filed 2–12–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Feb 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
47 CFR Parts 1 and 73
[AU Docket No. 17–143; DA 18–91]
Auction of Cross-Service FM
Translator Construction Permits
Scheduled for May 15, 2018; Comment
Sought on Competitive Bidding
Procedures for Auction 99
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule; proposed auction
procedures.
AGENCY:
The Wireless
Telecommunications and Media
Bureaus (the Bureaus) announce an
auction of certain cross-service FM
translator construction permits. This
document also seeks comment on
competitive bidding procedures and
proposed minimum opening bids for
Auction 99.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
February 13, 2018, and reply comments
are due on or before February 21, 2018.
Bidding for FM translator construction
permits in Auction 99 is scheduled to
begin on May 15, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may
submit comments in response to the
Auction 99 Comment Public Notice by
any of the following methods:
• FCC’s website: Federal
Communication Commission’s
Electronic Comment Filing System
(ECFS): https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail: FCC Headquarters, 445 12th
Street SW, Room TW–A325,
Washington, DC 20554.
• People with Disabilities: To request
materials in accessible formats for
people with disabilities (braille, large
print, electronic files, or audio format),
send an email to FCC504@fcc.gov or call
the Consumer & Governmental Affairs
Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice), 202–
418–0432 (TTY).
For detailed instructions for
submitting comments, see the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
auction legal questions, Lynne Milne in
the Wireless Telecommunications
Bureau’s Auctions and Spectrum Access
Division at (202) 418–0660. For general
auction questions, the Auctions Hotline
at (717) 338–2868. For FM translator
service questions, James Bradshaw, Lisa
Scanlan or Tom Nessinger in the Media
Bureau’s Audio Division at (202) 418–
2700.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6141
This is a
summary of the Auction 99 Comment
Public Notice in AU Docket No. 17–143,
DA 18–91, released on January 31, 2018.
The complete text of this document,
including its attachment, is available for
public inspection and copying from 8:00
a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time (ET)
Monday through Thursday or from 8:00
a.m. to 11:30 a.m. ET on Fridays in the
FCC Reference Information Center, 445
12th Street SW, Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554. The Auction 99
Comment Public Notice and related
documents also are available on the
internet at the Commission’s website:
https://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/99/, or
by using the search function for AU
Docket No. 17–143 on the Commission’s
ECFS web page at https://www.fcc.gov/
cgb/ecfs/.
All filings in response to the Auction
99 Comment Public Notice must refer to
AU Docket No.17–143. The Bureaus
strongly encourage interested parties to
file comments electronically, and
request that an additional copy of all
comments and reply comments be
submitted electronically to the
following address: auction99@fcc.gov.
Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the internet by
accessing ECFS: https://apps.fcc.gov/
ecfs. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
one copy of each filing. Filings can be
sent by hand or messenger delivery, by
commercial overnight courier or by firstclass or overnight U.S. Postal Service
mail. All filings must be addressed to
the Commission’s Secretary, Office of
the Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission (FCC). All hand-delivered
or messenger-delivered paper filings for
the Commission’s Secretary must be
delivered to the FCC Headquarters at
445 12th Street SW, Room TW–A325,
Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours
are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time
(ET). All hand deliveries must be held
together with rubber bands or fasteners.
Any envelope or box must be disposed
of before entering the building.
Commercial overnight mail (other than
U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and
Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050
Junction Drive, Annapolis Junction, MD
20701. U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be
addressed to 445 12th Street SW,
Washington, DC 20554.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Introduction
1. On June 1, 2017, the Bureaus
announced an auction filing window for
AM broadcasters seeking new crossservice FM translator station
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
6142
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2018 / Proposed Rules
construction permits. By this Public
Notice, the Bureaus announce an
auction of certain cross-service FM
translator construction permits and seek
comment on the procedures to be used
for this auction, designated as Auction
99. Bidding in this auction is scheduled
to commence on May 15, 2018. Auction
99 will be a closed auction: Only those
entities listed in Attachment A of the
Auction 99 Comment Public Notice will
be eligible to participate further in
Auction 99.
II. Construction Permits in Auction 99
2. Auction 99 will resolve mutually
exclusive (MX) applications for
construction permits for commercial
cross-service FM translator stations.
Competitive bidding will be used to
select winning bidders for up to 12 new
cross-service FM translator permits. A
list of the locations and channels of
these proposed stations is included in
Attachment A of the Auction 99
Comment Public Notice. Attachment A
also listed a proposed minimum
opening bid and a proposed upfront
payment amount for each construction
permit.
3. An applicant listed in Attachment
A may become qualified to bid only if
it meets the additional filing,
qualification, payment and other
applicable rules, policies and
procedures. Each qualified bidder may
become eligible to bid on only those
construction permits specified for that
applicant in Attachment A to the
Auction 99 Comment Public Notice.
Each of the engineering proposals
within each MX group are directly
mutually exclusive with one another;
therefore, no more than one
construction permit will be awarded for
each MX group identified in Attachment
A. Under the Commission’s established
precedent, because mutual exclusivity
exists for auction purposes, once
mutually exclusive applications are
accepted, even if only one applicant for
a particular construction permit
becomes qualified to bid, that applicant
must submit a bid in order to be eligible
to obtain that construction permit.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
III. Processing of Short-Form
Applications (FCC FORM 175) and
Minor Corrections
A. Initial Review of FCC Form 175
4. The Bureaus will process all timely
submitted Forms 175 to determine
which are complete, and subsequently
will issue a public notice identifying
those that are complete and those that
are incomplete or deficient because of
minor defects that may be corrected.
That public notice will provide
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Feb 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
instructions for applicants to make only
minor corrections to their Forms 175.
The public notice will include a
deadline for resubmitting corrected
Forms 175.
B. Updates to Auction Applications
Outside of Filing Windows
5. Section 1.65 of the Commission’s
rules requires an applicant to maintain
the accuracy and completeness of
information furnished in its pending
application and to notify the
Commission of any substantial change
that may be of decisional significance to
that application. Thus, section 1.65
requires an auction applicant to notify
the Commission of any substantial
change to the information or
certifications included in its pending
short-form application. See also 47 CFR
1.2105(b)(4), (c).
6. If information needs to be
submitted pursuant to sections 1.65 or
1.2105 outside of the upcoming
resubmission window in Auction 99,
the applicant must submit a letter
briefly summarizing the changes by
email to auction99@fcc.gov. Such email
must include a subject or caption
referring to Auction 99 and the name of
the applicant. If any information needs
to be submitted during the upcoming
resubmission window pursuant to
sections 1.65 or 1.2105, that information
must be submitted within an applicant’s
Form 175.
IV. Bureau Seeks Comment on
Procedures for Auction Applications
7. The Bureaus seek comment on
whether our application of certain
aspects of the current rules governing
auctions should be modified to
implement our prior decision to allow
eligible AM licensees having any of the
same controlling interests in common to
file separate Forms 175, rather than a
single Form 175, as is currently
required. In recognition of the specific
eligibility provisions and filing
procedures for this auction window, the
Bureaus waived, for Auction 99, section
1.2105(a)(3)’s prohibition on the filing
of more than one Form 175 in an
auction by entities with any of the same
controlling interests. Thus, the Bureaus
permitted entities controlled by the
same individual or set of individuals to
file separate Forms 175 for Auction 99.
8. The prohibition on the filing of
more than one Form 175 in an auction
by entities with any of the same
controlling interests was adopted in
2015 in conjunction with other rule
changes. Under section 1.2105(a), as
revised in 2015, each auction applicant
must certify that it has disclosed any
arrangements or understandings of any
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
kind relating to the licenses being
auctioned to which it (or any party that
controls or is controlled by it) is a party,
and must certify that it (or any party
that controls or is controlled by it) has
not entered and will not enter any
arrangement or understanding of any
kind relating directly or indirectly to
bidding at auction with any other
applicant for the auction, among others.
In 2015, the Commission also revised
the rule prohibiting certain
communications, section 1.2105(c), to
prohibit a communication of bids or
bidding strategies between any
applicants in an auction, and thus the
prohibition is no longer limited to a
communication between applicants that
had applied for construction permits to
serve the same area. In addition, the
revisions to that rule removed a prior
exception to section 1.2105(c) under
which applicants that had entered into
bidding-related agreements could
engage in certain communications so
long as each entity had disclosed the
other as a party to such an agreement on
its auction application pursuant to
section 1.2105(a)(2)(viii). For purposes
of section 1.2105(c), an applicant is
defined as including all officers and
directors of the entity submitting a Form
175, all controlling interests of that
entity, as well as all holders of
partnership and other ownership
interests and any stock interest
amounting to 10 percent or more of the
entity, or outstanding stock, or
outstanding voting stock of the entity
submitting a Form 175. In applying the
prohibited communication rule, the
Bureaus have found that, where an
individual served as an officer and
director for two or more applicants
subject to the rule, the bids and bidding
strategies of one applicant are
presumptively conveyed to the other
applicant. Consequently, the Bureaus
determined that, absent a disclosed
bidding agreement between such
applicants creating an applicable
exception under the prior rule, an
apparent violation of section 1.2105(c)
would occur.
9. Finally, in a change related to the
prohibition on joint bidding agreements
and the changes to the prohibited
communication rule, revised section
1.2105(a)(2)(iii) now prohibits any
individual from serving as an
authorized bidder of more than one
applicant.
10. In the event that Auction 99
applicants under common control may
have filed separate Forms 175 pursuant
to the Bureaus’ waiver of section
1.2105(a)(3), such applicants could be at
risk of violating section 1.2105(c)
because the Commission presumes that
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2018 / Proposed Rules
bidding strategies are communicated
between entities that share a common
officer or director. Moreover, current
rules bar most kinds of joint bidding
agreements that may have, under the
prior rule, permitted certain
communications between commonly
controlled entities or other auction
applicants under the former rules.
11. Accordingly, the Bureaus seek
comment on whether it would be
appropriate to waive or modify the
application of section 1.2105 provisions
so that Auction 99 applicants relying on
the waiver of section 1.2105(a)(3) will
not thereby violate such other
provisions. With respect to a
communication between commonly
owned applicants, this auction appears
analogous to the circumstances of
Auction 1001, the reverse auction
portion of the broadcast incentive
auction. In that case, as here, applicants
to participate in the auction were
limited to specified current licensees of
the Commission. Consequently, it was
clear that multiple applicants would be
commonly controlled.
12. With respect to implementing the
commonly controlled applicant
exception in the broadcast incentive
auction, the Commission provided that
the prohibition did not apply to a
communication between different
applicants if they share a common
controlling interest, director, officer, or
governing board member as of the
deadline for submitting applications to
participate in the reverse auction. The
Commission expressly noted that an
applicant’s communication would not
qualify for this exception based on a
new director, officer or governing board
member added after the application
deadline. According to the Commission,
if a covered licensee were to appoint a
new officer after the broadcast incentive
auction application deadline, that new
officer would be subject to the rule and
not included within the exception.
13. In this auction, when applying the
Commission’s general competitive
bidding rules, do the limitations on
eligibility to bid on specific permits in
this closed auction similarly provide
good cause to waive section 1.2105(c)
for communications between commonly
controlled applicants consistent with
the exception provided for in the
broadcast incentive auction? Do other
factors demonstrate good cause for such
relief, or some other form of relief?
Commenters are encouraged to identify
circumstances of this auction that
should guide us in developing
application procedures under the
current competitive bidding rules,
including specific aspects of the auction
application process and processing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Feb 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
procedures, the nature of the permits to
be awarded, or other relevant
considerations.
V. Bureaus Seek Comment on Bidding
Procedures
14. The Bureaus, under delegated
authority, seek comment on a variety of
auction-specific procedures prior to the
start of bidding in Auction 99.
A. Auction Structure
15. Simultaneous Multiple Round
Auction Design. The Bureaus propose
using the Commission’s standard
simultaneous multiple-round auction
format for Auction 99. This type of
auction offers every construction permit
for bid at the same time and consists of
successive bidding rounds in which
eligible bidders may place bids on
individual construction permits.
Typically, bidding remains open on all
construction permits until bidding stops
on every construction permit. The
Bureaus seek comment on this proposal.
16. Bidding Rounds. Auction 99 will
consist of sequential bidding rounds,
each followed by the release of round
results. The Commission will conduct
Auction 99 over the internet using the
FCC auction bidding system. Bidders
will also have the option of placing bids
by telephone through a dedicated
auction bidder line.
17. The Bureaus propose to retain the
discretion to change the bidding
schedule in order to foster an auction
pace that reasonably balances speed
with the bidders’ need to study round
results and adjust their bidding
strategies. Under this proposal, the
Bureaus may change the amount of time
for the bidding rounds, the amount of
time between rounds, or the number of
rounds per day, depending upon
bidding activity and other factors. The
Bureaus seek comment on this proposal.
Commenters on this issue should
address the role of the bidding schedule
in managing the pace of the auction,
specifically discussing the tradeoffs in
managing auction pace by bidding
schedule changes, by changing the
activity requirements or bid amount
parameters, or by using other means.
18. Stopping Rule. To complete the
auction within a reasonable time, the
Bureaus propose to employ a
simultaneous stopping rule approach for
Auction 99, which means all
construction permits remain available
for bidding until bidding stops on every
construction permit. Specifically,
bidding would close on all construction
permits after the first round in which no
bidder submits any new bids, no bidder
applies a proactive waiver, or, if bid
withdrawals are permitted in this
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6143
auction, no bidder withdraws any
provisionally winning bid which is a
bid that would become a final winning
bid if the auction were to close in that
given round. Thus, unless the Bureaus
announce alternative procedures,
bidding would remain open on all
construction permits until bidding stops
on every construction permit.
Consequently, it is not possible to
determine in advance how long the
bidding in this auction will last.
19. Further, the Bureaus propose to
retain the discretion to exercise any of
the following options during Auction
99. (1) Use a modified version of the
simultaneous stopping rule that would
close the auction for all construction
permits after the first round in which no
bidder applies a waiver, no bidder
withdraws a provisionally winning bid
(if withdrawals are permitted in this
auction), or no bidder places any new
bid on a construction permit for which
it is not the provisionally winning
bidder, which means that, absent any
other bidding activity, a bidder placing
a new bid on a construction permit for
which it is the provisionally winning
bidder would not keep the auction open
under this modified stopping rule. (2)
Use a modified version of the
simultaneous stopping rule that would
close the auction for all construction
permits after the first round in which no
bidder applies a waiver, no bidder
withdraws a provisionally winning bid
(if withdrawals are permitted in this
auction), or no bidder places any new
bid on a construction permit that
already has a provisionally winning bid,
which means that, absent any other
bidding activity, a bidder placing a new
bid on an FCC-held construction permit
(a construction permit that does not
already have a provisionally winning
bid) would not keep the auction open
under this modified stopping rule. (3)
Use a modified version of the
simultaneous stopping rule that
combines options (1) and (2). (4) The
auction would close after a specified
number of additional rounds (special
stopping rule) to be announced by the
Bureaus. If the Bureaus invoke this
special stopping rule, they will accept
bids in the specified final round(s), after
which the auction will close. (5) The
auction would remain open even if no
bidder places any new bid, applies a
waiver, or withdraws any provisionally
winning bid (if withdrawals are
permitted in this auction). In this event,
the effect will be the same as if a bidder
had applied a waiver. The activity rule
will apply as usual, and a bidder with
insufficient activity will either lose
bidding eligibility or use a waiver.
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
6144
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2018 / Proposed Rules
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
20. The Bureaus propose to exercise
these options only in certain
circumstances, for example, where the
auction is proceeding unusually slowly
or quickly, there is minimal overall
bidding activity, or it appears likely that
the auction will not close within a
reasonable period of time or will close
prematurely. Before exercising these
options, the Bureaus are likely to
attempt to change the pace of the
auction. For example, the Bureaus may
adjust the pace of bidding by changing
the number of bidding rounds per day
and/or the minimum acceptable bids.
The Bureaus proposed to retain the
discretion to exercise any of these
options with or without prior
announcement during the auction. The
Bureaus seek comment on these
proposals.
21. Auction Delay, Suspension or
Cancellation. Pursuant to 47 CFR
1.2104(i), the Bureaus propose that they
may delay, suspend, or cancel bidding
in Auction 99 in the event of a natural
disaster, technical obstacle,
administrative or weather necessity,
evidence of an auction security breach
or unlawful bidding activity, or for any
other reason that affects the fair and
efficient conduct of competitive
bidding. The Bureaus would notify
participants of any such delay,
suspension or cancellation by public
notice and/or through the FCC auction
bidding system’s announcement
function. If bidding is delayed or
suspended, the Bureaus may, in their
sole discretion, elect to resume the
auction starting from the beginning of
the current round or from some
previous round, or cancel the auction in
its entirety. Network interruption may
cause the Bureaus to delay or suspend
the auction. The Bureaus emphasized
that they will exercise this authority
solely at their discretion, and not as a
substitute for situations in which
bidders may wish to apply activity rule
waivers. The Bureaus seek comment on
this proposal.
B. Auction Procedures
22. Upfront Payments and Bidding
Eligibility. The Bureaus have delegated
authority and discretion to determine an
appropriate upfront payment for each
construction permit being auctioned,
taking into account such factors as the
efficiency of the auction process and the
potential value of similar construction
permits. The upfront payment is a
refundable deposit made by an
applicant to establish eligibility to bid
on construction permits. Upfront
payments that are related to the specific
construction permits being auctioned
protect against frivolous or insincere
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Feb 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
bidding and provide the Commission
with a source of funds from which to
collect payments owed at the close of
bidding. With these considerations in
mind, the Bureaus proposed the upfront
payments set forth in Attachment A of
the Auction 99 Comment Public Notice.
The Bureaus seek comment on the
upfront payments specified in this
Attachment A.
23. The Bureaus further propose that
the amount of the upfront payment
submitted by a bidder will determine its
initial bidding eligibility in bidding
units. The Bureaus propose to assign
each construction permit a specific
number of bidding units, equal to one
bidding unit per dollar of the upfront
payment listed in Attachment A of the
Auction 99 Comment Public Notice. The
number of bidding units for a given
construction permit is fixed and does
not change during the auction as prices
change. If an applicant is found to be
qualified to bid on more than one
permit in Auction 99, such a bidder may
place bids on multiple construction
permits, provided that the total number
of bidding units associated with those
construction permits does not exceed
the bidder’s current eligibility. A bidder
cannot increase its eligibility during the
auction; it can only maintain its
eligibility or decrease its eligibility.
Thus, in calculating its upfront payment
amount and hence its initial bidding
eligibility, an applicant must determine
the maximum number of bidding units
on which it may wish to bid (or hold
provisionally winning bids) in any
single round, and submit an upfront
payment amount covering that total
number of bidding units. The Bureaus
request comment on these proposals.
24. Activity Rule. In order to ensure
that the auction closes within a
reasonable period of time, an activity
rule requires bidders to bid actively
throughout the auction, rather than wait
until late in the auction before
participating. The Bureaus propose a
single stage auction with the following
activity requirement: In each round of
the auction, a bidder desiring to
maintain its current bidding eligibility
is required to be active on 100 percent
of its bidding eligibility. A bidder’s
activity in a round will be the sum of
the bidding units associated with any
construction permits upon which it
places bids during the current round
and the bidding units associated with
any construction permits for which it
holds provisionally winning bids.
Failure to maintain the requisite activity
level would result in the use of an
activity rule waiver, if any, or a
reduction in the bidder’s eligibility,
possibly curtailing or eliminating the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
bidder’s ability to place additional bids
in the auction. The Bureaus seek
comment on this proposal.
25. Activity Rule Waivers and
Reducing Eligibility. When a bidder’s
activity in the current round is below
the required minimum level, it may
preserve its current level of eligibility
through an activity rule waiver, if
available. An activity rule waiver
applies to an entire round of bidding,
not to a particular construction permit.
Activity rule waivers can be either
proactive or automatic. Activity rule
waivers are principally a mechanism for
a bidder to avoid the loss of bidding
eligibility in the event that exigent
circumstances prevent it from bidding
in a particular round.
26. The FCC auction bidding system
will assume that a bidder that does not
meet the activity requirement would
prefer to use an activity rule waiver (if
available) rather than lose bidding
eligibility. Therefore, the system will
automatically apply a waiver at the end
of any bidding round in which a
bidder’s activity is below the minimum
required unless (1) the bidder has no
activity rule waivers remaining or (2)
the bidder overrides the automatic
application of a waiver by reducing
eligibility, thereby meeting the activity
requirement. If a bidder has no waivers
remaining and does not satisfy the
required activity level, the bidder’s
current eligibility will be permanently
reduced, possibly curtailing or
eliminating the ability to place
additional bids in the auction.
27. A bidder with insufficient activity
may wish to reduce its bidding
eligibility rather than use an activity
rule waiver. If so, the bidder must
affirmatively override the automatic
waiver mechanism during the bidding
round by using the reduce eligibility
function in the FCC auction bidding
system. In this case, the bidder’s
eligibility would be permanently
reduced to bring it into compliance with
the specified activity requirement.
Reducing eligibility is an irreversible
action; once eligibility has been
reduced, a bidder cannot regain its lost
bidding eligibility.
28. Under the proposed simultaneous
stopping rule, a bidder may apply an
activity rule waiver proactively as a
means to keep the auction open without
placing a bid. If a bidder proactively
were to apply an activity rule waiver
(using the proactive waiver function in
the FCC auction bidding system) during
a bidding round in which no bids are
placed or withdrawn (if bid withdrawals
are permitted in this auction), the
auction would remain open and the
bidder’s eligibility would be preserved.
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2018 / Proposed Rules
An automatic waiver applied by the
FCC auction bidding system in a round
in which there are no new bid, no bid
withdrawal (if bid withdrawals are
permitted in this auction), or no
proactive waiver will not keep the
auction open. The Bureaus propose that
each bidder in Auction 99 be provided
with three activity rule waivers that may
be used at the bidder’s discretion during
the course of the auction. The Bureaus
seek comment on this proposal.
29. Reserve Price or Minimum
Opening Bids. Normally, a reserve price
is an absolute minimum price below
which a construction permit or license
will not be sold in a given auction. The
Bureaus did not propose to establish
separate reserve prices for the Auction
99 construction permits.
30. A minimum opening bid is the
minimum bid price set at the beginning
of the auction below which no bids are
accepted. Because it is an effective tool
for accelerating the competitive bidding
process, the Bureaus propose minimum
opening bid amounts for Auction 99
determined by taking into account the
type of service and class of facility
offered, market size, population covered
by the proposed broadcast facility, and
recent broadcast transaction data.
Attachment A of the Auction 99
Comment Public Notice lists a proposed
minimum opening bid amount for each
construction permit available in
Auction 99. The Bureaus seek comment
on the minimum opening bid amounts
specified in Attachment A of the
Auction 99 Comment Public Notice.
31. If commenters believe that these
minimum opening bid amounts will
result in unsold construction permits,
are not reasonable amounts, or should
instead operate as reserve prices, they
should explain why this is so and
comment on the desirability of an
alternative approach. The Bureaus ask
commenters to support their claims
with valuation analyses and suggested
amounts or formulas for reserve prices
or minimum opening bids. In
establishing the minimum opening bid
amounts, the Bureaus particularly seek
comment on factors that could
reasonably have an impact on bidders’
valuation of the broadcast spectrum,
including the type of service offered,
market size, population covered by the
proposed broadcast facility, and any
other relevant factors.
32. Bid Amounts. The Bureaus
propose that, if the bidder has sufficient
eligibility to place a bid on a particular
construction permit in a round, an
eligible bidder will be able to place a
bid on that construction permit in any
of up to nine different amounts. Under
this proposal, the FCC auction bidding
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Feb 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
system interface will list the acceptable
bid amounts for each construction
permit.
33. The first of the acceptable bid
amounts is called the minimum
acceptable bid amount. The minimum
acceptable bid amount for a
construction permit will be equal to its
minimum opening bid amount until
there is a provisionally winning bid for
the construction permit. After there is a
provisionally winning bid for a
construction permit, the minimum
acceptable bid amount will be a certain
percentage higher. The percentage used
for this calculation, the minimum
acceptable bid increment percentage, is
multiplied by the provisionally winning
bid amount, and the resulting amount is
added to the provisionally winning bid
amount. If, for example, the minimum
acceptable bid increment percentage is
10 percent, then the provisionally
winning bid amount is multiplied by 10
percent. The result of that calculation is
added to the provisionally winning bid
amount, and that sum is rounded using
the Commission’s standard rounding
procedure for auctions. If bid
withdrawals are permitted in this
auction, in the case of a construction
permit for which the provisionally
winning bid has been withdrawn, the
minimum acceptable bid amount will
equal the second highest bid received
for the construction permit.
34. The FCC will calculate the eight
additional bid amounts using the
minimum acceptable bid amount and an
additional bid increment percentage.
The minimum acceptable bid amount is
multiplied by the additional bid
increment percentage, and that result,
rounded, is the additional increment
amount. The first additional acceptable
bid amount equals the minimum
acceptable bid amount plus the
additional increment amount. The
second additional acceptable bid
amount equals the minimum acceptable
bid amount plus two times the
additional increment amount; the third
additional acceptable bid amount is the
minimum acceptable bid amount plus
three times the additional increment
amount; etc. If, for example, the
additional bid increment percentage is 5
percent, then the calculation of the
additional increment amount is
(minimum acceptable bid amount) *
(0.05), rounded. The first additional
acceptable bid amount equals
(minimum acceptable bid amount) +
(additional increment amount); the
second additional acceptable bid
amount equals (minimum acceptable
bid amount) + (2 * (additional
increment amount)); the third additional
acceptable bid amount equals
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6145
(minimum acceptable bid amount) + (3
* (additional increment amount)); etc.
The Bureaus will round the results
using the Commission’s standard
rounding procedures for auctions.
35. For Auction 99, the Bureaus
propose to use a minimum acceptable
bid increment percentage of 10 percent.
This means that the minimum
acceptable bid amount for a
construction permit will be
approximately 10 percent greater than
the provisionally winning bid amount
for the construction permit. To calculate
the additional acceptable bid amounts,
the Bureaus propose to use an
additional bid increment percentage of
5 percent. The Bureaus seek comment
on these proposals.
36. The Bureaus propose to retain the
discretion to change the minimum
acceptable bid amounts, the minimum
acceptable bid increment percentage,
the additional bid increment percentage,
and the number of acceptable bid
amounts if the Bureaus determine that
circumstances so dictate. Further, the
Bureaus retain the discretion to do so on
a construction-permit-by-constructionpermit basis. The Bureaus also propose
to retain the discretion to limit (a) the
amount by which a minimum
acceptable bid for a construction permit
may increase compared with the
corresponding provisionally winning
bid, and (b) the amount by which an
additional bid amount may increase
compared with the immediately
preceding acceptable bid amount. For
example, the Bureaus could set a $1,000
limit on increases in minimum
acceptable bid amounts over
provisionally winning bids. Thus, if
calculating a minimum acceptable bid
using the minimum acceptable bid
increment percentage results in a
minimum acceptable bid amount that is
$1,200 higher than the provisionally
winning bid on a construction permit,
the minimum acceptable bid amount
would instead be capped at $1,000
above the provisionally winning bid.
The Bureaus seek comment on the
circumstances under which the Bureaus
should employ such a limit, factors the
Bureaus should consider when
determining the dollar amount of the
limit, and the tradeoffs in setting such
a limit or changing other parameters,
such as changing the minimum
acceptable bid percentage, the bid
increment percentage, or the number of
acceptable bid amounts. If the Bureaus
exercise this discretion, they will alert
bidders by announcement in the FCC
auction bidding system during the
auction. The Bureaus seek comment on
these proposals.
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
6146
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2018 / Proposed Rules
37. Provisionally Winning Bids.
Provisionally winning bids are bids that
would become winning bids if the
auction were to close in that given
round. At the end of each bidding
round, the FCC auction bidding system
will determine a provisionally winning
bid for each construction permit based
on the highest bid amount received for
that permit. A provisionally winning
bid will remain the provisionally
winning bid until there is a higher bid
on the same construction permit at the
close of a subsequent round.
Provisionally winning bids become the
winning bid at the end of the auction.
38. The auction bidding system
assigns a random number to each bid
when the bid is entered. If identical
high bid amounts are submitted on a
construction permit in any given round
(i.e., tied bids), the FCC auction bidding
system will use a pseudo-random
number generator to select a single
provisionally winning bid from among
the tied bids. The tied bid with the
highest random number wins the
tiebreaker and becomes the
provisionally winning bid. The
remaining bidders, as well as the
provisionally winning bidder, can
submit higher bids in subsequent
rounds. However, if the auction were to
close with no other bids being placed,
the winning bidder would be the one
that placed the provisionally winning
bid. If the construction permit receives
any bids in a subsequent round, the
provisionally winning bid again will be
determined by the highest bid amount
received for the construction permit.
39. A provisionally winning bid will
be retained until there is a higher bid on
the construction permit at the close of
a subsequent round, unless the
provisionally winning bid is withdrawn
(if bid withdrawals are permitted in this
auction). As a reminder, provisionally
winning bids count toward a bidder’s
activity level for purposes of the activity
rule.
40. Bid Removal and Bid Withdrawal.
The FCC auction bidding system allows
each bidder to remove any of the bids
it placed in a round before the close of
that round. By removing a bid placed
within a round, a bidder effectively
unsubmits the bid. In contrast to the bid
withdrawal provisions, a bidder
removing a bid placed in the same
round is not subject to a withdrawal
payment. Once a round closes, a bidder
is no longer permitted to remove a bid.
41. The Bureaus seek comment on
whether bid withdrawals should be
permitted in Auction 99. When
permitted in an auction, bid
withdrawals provide a bidder with the
option of withdrawing bids placed in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Feb 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
prior rounds that have become
provisionally winning bids. A bidder
would be able to withdraw its
provisionally winning bids using the
withdraw function in the FCC auction
bidding system. A bidder that
withdraws its provisionally winning
bid(s), if permitted in this auction, is
subject to the bid withdrawal payment
provisions of 47 CFR 1.2104(g) and
1.2109.
42. Based on the nature of the permits
available in Auction 99 and on the
experience of the Bureaus with past
auctions of broadcast construction
permits, the Bureaus propose to prohibit
bidders from withdrawing any bid after
the close of the round in which the bid
was placed. The Bureaus made this
proposal in light of the site- and
applicant-specific nature and wide
geographic dispersion of the permits
available in this closed auction, which
suggests that potential applicants for
this auction will have limited
opportunity to aggregate construction
permits through the auction process
because of the closed MX groups
previously established. Thus, the
Bureaus believe that it is unlikely that
bidders will have a need to withdraw
bids in this auction. Also, allowing bid
withdrawals may encourage insincere
bidding or increase opportunities for
anti-competitive bidding in certain
circumstances. The Bureaus also remain
mindful that bid withdrawals,
particularly those made late in this
auction, could result in delays in
licensing new FM translator stations
and attendant delays in the offering of
new broadcast service to the public. The
Bureaus seek comment on their
proposal to prohibit bid withdrawals in
Auction 99.
applied toward any final bid withdrawal
payment that is ultimately assessed.
44. Pursuant to 47 CFR 1.2104(g)(1),
the amount of the interim bid
withdrawal payment may range from 3
to 20 percent of the withdrawn bid
amount. If bid withdrawals are allowed
in Auction 99, the Bureaus propose that
the interim bid withdrawal payment be
20 percent of the withdrawn bid. The
Bureaus request comment on using 20
percent for calculating an interim bid
withdrawal payment amount in Auction
99. Commenters advocating the use of
bid withdrawals in Auction 99 should
also address the percentage of the
interim bid withdrawal payment.
45. Additional Default Payment
Percentage. Any winning bidder that
defaults or is disqualified after the close
of an auction (i.e., fails to remit the
required down payment by the specified
deadline, fails to submit a timely longform application, fails to make full and
timely final payment, or is otherwise
disqualified) is liable for a default
payment under 47 CFR 1.2104(g)(2).
This default payment consists of a
deficiency payment equal to the
difference between the amount of the
Auction 99 bidder’s winning bid and
the amount of the winning bid the next
time a construction permit covering the
same spectrum is won in an auction,
plus an additional payment equal to a
percentage of the defaulter’s bid or of
the subsequent winning bid, whichever
is less. Based on the nature of the
service and the construction permits
being offered, the Bureaus propose for
Auction 99 an additional default
payment of 20 percent of the relevant
bid. The Bureaus seek comment on this
proposal.
C. Post-Auction Payments
A. Supplemental Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis
46. As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 as amended
(RFA), 5 U.S.C. 603, the Bureaus have
prepared this Supplemental Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(Supplemental IRFA) of the possible
significant economic impact on small
entities of the policies and rules
addressed in the Public Notice to
supplement the Commission’s Initial
and Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analyses completed in the Broadcast
First Report and Order and multiple
other Commission rulemaking orders
pursuant to which Auction 99 will be
conducted. Written public comments
are requested on this Supplemental
IRFA. Comments must be identified as
responses to the Supplemental IRFA
and must be filed by the same filing
43. Interim Withdrawal Payment
Percentage. A bidder that withdraws a
bid during an auction is subject to a
withdrawal payment equal to the
difference between the amount of the
withdrawn bid and the amount of the
winning bid in the same or a subsequent
auction. However, if a construction
permit for which a bid has been
withdrawn does not receive a
subsequent higher bid or winning bid in
the same auction, the FCC cannot
calculate the final withdrawal payment
until that construction permit receives a
higher bid or winning bid in a
subsequent auction. In such cases, when
that final withdrawal payment cannot
yet be calculated, the FCC imposes on
the bidder responsible for the
withdrawn bid an interim bid
withdrawal payment, which will be
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
VI. Procedural Matters
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2018 / Proposed Rules
deadline for comments specified on the
first page of the Auction 99 Comment
Public Notice. The Commission will
send a copy of the Public Notice,
including this Supplemental IRFA, to
the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration (SBA).
47. Need for, and Objectives of, the
Proposed Rules. The Auction 99
Comment Public Notice seeks comment
on proposed procedures to govern
Auction 99, an auction of up to 12 crossservice FM translator construction
permits. To promote the efficient and
fair administration of the competitive
bidding process for all Auction 99
participants, the Bureaus seek comment
on the following: (1) Application of the
current rules prohibiting certain
communications between auction
applicants and the related prohibition
on joint bidding arrangements to
implement the Bureaus’ prior decision
to allow eligible AM licensees having
any of the same controlling interest in
common to file separate Forms 175,
rather than a single Form 175; (2) Use
of a simultaneous multiple-round
auction format, consisting of sequential
bidding rounds with a simultaneous
stopping rule (with discretion by the
Bureaus to exercise alternative stopping
rules under certain circumstances); (3)
A specific minimum opening bid
amount for each construction permit
available in Auction 99; (4) A specific
upfront payment amount for each
construction permit; (5) Establishment
of a bidder’s initial bidding eligibility in
bidding units based on that bidder’s
upfront payment through assignment of
a specific number of bidding units for
each construction permit; (6) Use of an
activity rule that would require bidders
to bid actively during the auction rather
than waiting until late in the auction
before participating; (7) A single stage
auction in which a bidder is required to
be active on 100 percent of its bidding
eligibility in each round of the auction;
(8) Provision of three activity rule
waivers for each bidder to allow it to
preserve bidding eligibility during the
course of the auction; (9) Use of
minimum acceptable bid amounts and
additional acceptable increments, along
with a proposed methodology for
calculating such amounts, with the
Bureaus retaining discretion to change
their methodology if circumstances
dictate; (10) A procedure for breaking
ties if identical high bid amounts are
submitted on a permit in a given round;
(11) Bid removal procedures; (12)
Whether to permit bid withdrawals; (13)
Establishment of an interim bid
withdrawal percentage of 20 percent of
the withdrawn bid in the event the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Feb 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
Bureaus allow bid withdrawals in
Auction 99; and (14) Establishment of
an additional default payment of 20
percent under 47 CFR 1.2104(g)(2) in
the event that a winning bidder defaults
or is disqualified after the auction.
48. Legal Basis. The Commission’s
statutory obligations to small businesses
under the Communications Act of 1934,
as amended, are found in 47 U.S.C.
309(j)(3)(B) and 309(j)(4)(D). The
statutory basis for the Commission’s
competitive bidding rules is found in
various provisions of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, including 47 U.S.C. 154(i),
301, 302, 303(e), 303(f), 303(r), 304, 307,
and 309(i). The Commission has
established a framework of competitive
bidding rules pursuant to which it has
conducted auctions since the inception
of the auction program in 1994 and
would conduct Auction 99. The
Commission has directed the Bureaus,
under delegated authority, to seek
comment on a variety of auctionspecific procedures prior to the start of
bidding in each auction.
49. Description and Estimate of the
Number of Small Entities to Which the
Proposed Rules Will Apply. The RFA
directs agencies to provide a description
of and, where feasible, an estimate of
the number of small entities that may be
affected by the proposed rules, if
adopted. The RFA generally defines the
term small entity as having the same
meaning as the terms small business,
small organization, and small
government jurisdiction. In addition,
the term small business has the same
meaning as the term small business
concern under the Small Business Act,
15 U.S.C. 632. A small business concern
is one which: (1) Is independently
owned and operated, (2) is not
dominant in its field of operation, and
(3) satisfies any additional criteria
established by the Small Business
Administration (SBA).
50. Radio Stations. This Economic
Census category comprises
establishments primarily engaged in
broadcasting aural programs by radio to
the public. Programming may originate
in their own studio, from an affiliated
network, or from external sources. The
SBA has established a small business
size standard for this category as firms
having $38.5 million or less in annual
receipts. Economic Census data for 2012
shows that 2,849 radio station firms
operated during that year. Of that
number, 2,806 firms operated with
annual receipts of less than $25 million
per year, 17 with annual receipts
between $25 million and $49,999,999
million and 26 with annual receipts of
$50 million or more. Therefore, based
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6147
on the SBA’s size standard the majority
of such entities are small entities.
51. According to Commission staff
review of the BIA/Kelsey, LLC’s Media
Access Pro Radio Database as of January
30, 2018, about 11,261 (or about 99.92
percent) of 11,270 commercial radio
stations had revenues of $38.5 million
or less and thus qualify as small entities
under the SBA definition. The Bureaus
note, however, that the SBA size
standard data does not enable the
Bureaus to make a meaningful estimate
of the number of small entities who may
participate in Auction 99. There are a
maximum of 26 entities that may
become qualified bidders in Auction 99,
in which applicant eligibility is closed.
The specific procedures and minimum
opening bid amounts on which
comment is sought in the Auction 99
Comment Public Notice will affect
directly all applicants participating in
Auction 99.
52. In addition, the Bureaus note that
they are unable to accurately develop an
estimate of how many of these 26
entities are small businesses based on
the number of small entities that
applied to participate in prior broadcast
auctions, because that information is not
collected from applicants for broadcast
auctions in which bidding credits are
not based on an applicant’s size (as is
the case in auctions of licenses for
wireless services). Potential eligible
bidders in Auction 99 may include
existing holders of broadcast station
construction permits or licenses. In
2013, the Commission estimated that 97
percent of radio broadcasters met the
SBA’s prior definition of small business
concern, based on annual revenues of $7
million. The SBA has since increased
that revenue threshold to $38.5 million,
which suggests that an even greater
percentage of radio broadcasters would
fall within the SBA’s definition. Based
on Commission data 4,635 (99.94%) of
4,638 a.m. radio stations have revenue
of $38.5 million or less. Accordingly,
based on this data, the Bureaus
conclude that the majority of Auction 99
eligible bidders will likely meet the
SBA’s definition of a small business
concern.
53. Description of Projected
Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements for Small
Entities. The Commission designed the
auction application process itself to
minimize reporting and compliance
requirements for applicants, including
small business applicants. In the first
part of the Commission’s two-phased
auction application process, parties
desiring to participate in an auction file
streamlined, short-form applications in
which they certify under penalty of
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
6148
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2018 / Proposed Rules
perjury as to their qualifications.
Eligibility to participate in bidding is
based on an applicant’s short-form
application and certifications, as well as
its upfront payment. In the second
phase of the process, winning bidders
file a more comprehensive long-form
application. Thus, a small business
which fails to become a winning bidder
does not need to file a long-form
application and provide the additional
showings and more detailed
demonstrations required of a winning
bidder.
54. Steps Taken to Minimize the
Significant Economic Impact on Small
Entities, and Significant Alternatives
Considered. The RFA requires an
agency to describe any significant,
specifically small business, alternatives
that it has considered in reaching its
proposed approach, which may include
the following four alternatives (among
others): (1) The establishment of
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance and reporting requirements
under the rule for such small entities;
(3) the use of performance rather than
design standards; and (4) an exemption
from coverage of the rule, or any part
thereof, for such small entities.
55. The Commission has taken steps
to minimize any economic impact of its
auction procedures on small businesses
through among other things, the many
resources it provides potential auction
participants. Small entities and other
auction participants may seek
clarification of or guidance on
complying with competitive bidding
rules and procedures, reporting
requirements, and the FCC’s auction
system. An FCC Auctions Hotline
provides access to Commission staff for
information about the auction process
and procedures. The FCC Auctions
Technical Support Hotline is another
resource which provides technical
assistance to applicants, including small
business entities, on issues such as
access to or navigation within the
electronic FCC Form 175 and use of the
FCC’s auction system. Small entities
may also utilize the web-based,
interactive online tutorial produced by
Commission staff for each auction to
familiarize themselves with auction
procedures, filing requirements, bidding
procedures and other matters related to
an auction. The Bureaus also make
various databases and other sources of
information, including the Media
Bureau’s Consolidated Database System,
the Auctions program websites, and
copies of Commission decisions,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:06 Feb 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
available to the public without charge,
providing a low-cost mechanism for
small businesses to conduct research
prior to and throughout the auction.
Prior to and at the close of Auction 99,
the Bureaus will post public notices on
the Auctions website, which articulate
the procedures and deadlines. The
Bureaus make this information easily
accessible and without charge to benefit
all Auction 99 applicants, including
small businesses, thereby lowering their
administrative costs to comply with the
Commission’s competitive bidding
rules.
56. Prior to the start of bidding in
each auction, eligible bidders are given
an opportunity to become familiar with
auction procedures and the bidding
system by participating in a mock
auction. Further, the Commission
intends to conduct Auction 99
electronically over the internet using its
web-based auction system that
eliminates the need for bidders to be
physically present in a specific location.
Qualified bidders also have the option
to place bids by telephone. These
mechanisms are made available to
facilitate participation in Auction 99 by
all eligible bidders, and may result in
significant cost savings for small
business entities who utilize these
alternatives. Moreover, the adoption of
bidding procedures in advance of the
auction, consistent with statutory
directive, is designed to ensure that the
auction will be administered
predictably and fairly for all
participants, including small
businesses.
57. These proposed procedures for the
conduct of Auction 99 constitute the
more specific implementation of the
competitive bidding rules contemplated
by Parts 1 and 73 of the Commission’s
rules and the underlying rulemaking
orders, including the Broadcast First
Report and Order and relevant
competitive bidding orders, and are
fully consistent therewith.
58. Federal Rules that May Duplicate,
Overlap or Conflict with the Proposed
Rules. None.
B. Ex Parte Rules
59. This proceeding has been
designated as a permit-but-disclose
proceeding in accordance with the
Commission’s ex parte rules. While
additional information is provided in
the Auction 99 Comment Public Notice
on these reporting requirements,
participants in Auction 99 should
familiarize themselves with the
Commission’s ex parte rules.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Federal Communications Commission.
Gary D. Michaels,
Deputy Chief, Auctions and Spectrum Access
Division, WTB.
[FR Doc. 2018–03025 Filed 2–12–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 571
[Docket No. NHTSA–2018–0009]
Removing Regulatory Barriers for
Vehicles With Automated Driving
Systems
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Request for comment; public
meeting.
AGENCY:
NHTSA is announcing a
public meeting as part of the Agency’s
effort to seek public comments to
identify any regulatory barriers in the
existing Federal Motor Vehicle Safety
Standards (FMVSS) to the testing,
compliance certification, and
compliance verification of vehicles with
Automated Driving Systems (ADSs) and
certain unconventional interior designs.
The Agency published a Federal
Register Notice of Request for
Comments (RFC) titled Removing
Regulatory Barriers for Vehicles with
Automated Driving Systems on January
18, 2018, that included specific
questions for which the Agency seeks
comment (83 FR 2607, Docket No.
NHTSA–2018–0009). NHTSA is holding
this public meeting to present to the
public a summary of the RFC and
activities underway at NHTSA and
across the industry regarding the
identification and removal of barriers
that might impede safe deployment of
ADSs. This material is intended to
better inform the public as they prepare
comments in response to the RFC.
Public comments are welcome at this
meeting, but all should be oral, and any
supporting presentations or materials
should be submitted to the docket for
consideration.
SUMMARY:
NHTSA will hold the public
meeting on March 6, 2018, in
Washington, DC. The meeting will start
at 10 a.m. and continue until 3:30 p.m.,
EST. Check-in (through security) will
begin at 9 a.m. Attendees should arrive
early enough to enable them to go
through security by 9:50 a.m.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\13FEP1.SGM
13FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 13, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6141-6148]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03025]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 1 and 73
[AU Docket No. 17-143; DA 18-91]
Auction of Cross-Service FM Translator Construction Permits
Scheduled for May 15, 2018; Comment Sought on Competitive Bidding
Procedures for Auction 99
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule; proposed auction procedures.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Wireless Telecommunications and Media Bureaus (the
Bureaus) announce an auction of certain cross-service FM translator
construction permits. This document also seeks comment on competitive
bidding procedures and proposed minimum opening bids for Auction 99.
DATES: Comments are due on or before February 13, 2018, and reply
comments are due on or before February 21, 2018. Bidding for FM
translator construction permits in Auction 99 is scheduled to begin on
May 15, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may submit comments in response to the
Auction 99 Comment Public Notice by any of the following methods:
FCC's website: Federal Communication Commission's
Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS): https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs2/. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: FCC Headquarters, 445 12th Street SW, Room TW-A325,
Washington, DC 20554.
People with Disabilities: To request materials in
accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print,
electronic files, or audio format), send an email to [email protected] or
call the Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530
(voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY).
For detailed instructions for submitting comments, see the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For auction legal questions, Lynne
Milne in the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau's Auctions and Spectrum
Access Division at (202) 418-0660. For general auction questions, the
Auctions Hotline at (717) 338-2868. For FM translator service
questions, James Bradshaw, Lisa Scanlan or Tom Nessinger in the Media
Bureau's Audio Division at (202) 418-2700.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Auction 99 Comment
Public Notice in AU Docket No. 17-143, DA 18-91, released on January
31, 2018. The complete text of this document, including its attachment,
is available for public inspection and copying from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30
p.m. Eastern Time (ET) Monday through Thursday or from 8:00 a.m. to
11:30 a.m. ET on Fridays in the FCC Reference Information Center, 445
12th Street SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The Auction 99
Comment Public Notice and related documents also are available on the
internet at the Commission's website: https://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/99/, or by using the search function for AU Docket No. 17-143 on the
Commission's ECFS web page at https://www.fcc.gov/cgb/ecfs/.
All filings in response to the Auction 99 Comment Public Notice
must refer to AU Docket No.17-143. The Bureaus strongly encourage
interested parties to file comments electronically, and request that an
additional copy of all comments and reply comments be submitted
electronically to the following address: [email protected].
Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically using the
internet by accessing ECFS: https://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must file an
original and one copy of each filing. Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial overnight courier or by first-class
or overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All filings must be addressed to
the Commission's Secretary, Office of the Secretary, Federal
Communications Commission (FCC). All hand-delivered or messenger-
delivered paper filings for the Commission's Secretary must be
delivered to the FCC Headquarters at 445 12th Street SW, Room TW-A325,
Washington, DC 20554. The filing hours are 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
Eastern Time (ET). All hand deliveries must be held together with
rubber bands or fasteners. Any envelope or box must be disposed of
before entering the building. Commercial overnight mail (other than
U.S. Postal Service Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to
9050 Junction Drive, Annapolis Junction, MD 20701. U.S. Postal Service
first-class, Express, and Priority mail must be addressed to 445 12th
Street SW, Washington, DC 20554.
I. Introduction
1. On June 1, 2017, the Bureaus announced an auction filing window
for AM broadcasters seeking new cross-service FM translator station
[[Page 6142]]
construction permits. By this Public Notice, the Bureaus announce an
auction of certain cross-service FM translator construction permits and
seek comment on the procedures to be used for this auction, designated
as Auction 99. Bidding in this auction is scheduled to commence on May
15, 2018. Auction 99 will be a closed auction: Only those entities
listed in Attachment A of the Auction 99 Comment Public Notice will be
eligible to participate further in Auction 99.
II. Construction Permits in Auction 99
2. Auction 99 will resolve mutually exclusive (MX) applications for
construction permits for commercial cross-service FM translator
stations. Competitive bidding will be used to select winning bidders
for up to 12 new cross-service FM translator permits. A list of the
locations and channels of these proposed stations is included in
Attachment A of the Auction 99 Comment Public Notice. Attachment A also
listed a proposed minimum opening bid and a proposed upfront payment
amount for each construction permit.
3. An applicant listed in Attachment A may become qualified to bid
only if it meets the additional filing, qualification, payment and
other applicable rules, policies and procedures. Each qualified bidder
may become eligible to bid on only those construction permits specified
for that applicant in Attachment A to the Auction 99 Comment Public
Notice. Each of the engineering proposals within each MX group are
directly mutually exclusive with one another; therefore, no more than
one construction permit will be awarded for each MX group identified in
Attachment A. Under the Commission's established precedent, because
mutual exclusivity exists for auction purposes, once mutually exclusive
applications are accepted, even if only one applicant for a particular
construction permit becomes qualified to bid, that applicant must
submit a bid in order to be eligible to obtain that construction
permit.
III. Processing of Short-Form Applications (FCC FORM 175) and Minor
Corrections
A. Initial Review of FCC Form 175
4. The Bureaus will process all timely submitted Forms 175 to
determine which are complete, and subsequently will issue a public
notice identifying those that are complete and those that are
incomplete or deficient because of minor defects that may be corrected.
That public notice will provide instructions for applicants to make
only minor corrections to their Forms 175. The public notice will
include a deadline for resubmitting corrected Forms 175.
B. Updates to Auction Applications Outside of Filing Windows
5. Section 1.65 of the Commission's rules requires an applicant to
maintain the accuracy and completeness of information furnished in its
pending application and to notify the Commission of any substantial
change that may be of decisional significance to that application.
Thus, section 1.65 requires an auction applicant to notify the
Commission of any substantial change to the information or
certifications included in its pending short-form application. See also
47 CFR 1.2105(b)(4), (c).
6. If information needs to be submitted pursuant to sections 1.65
or 1.2105 outside of the upcoming resubmission window in Auction 99,
the applicant must submit a letter briefly summarizing the changes by
email to [email protected]. Such email must include a subject or
caption referring to Auction 99 and the name of the applicant. If any
information needs to be submitted during the upcoming resubmission
window pursuant to sections 1.65 or 1.2105, that information must be
submitted within an applicant's Form 175.
IV. Bureau Seeks Comment on Procedures for Auction Applications
7. The Bureaus seek comment on whether our application of certain
aspects of the current rules governing auctions should be modified to
implement our prior decision to allow eligible AM licensees having any
of the same controlling interests in common to file separate Forms 175,
rather than a single Form 175, as is currently required. In recognition
of the specific eligibility provisions and filing procedures for this
auction window, the Bureaus waived, for Auction 99, section
1.2105(a)(3)'s prohibition on the filing of more than one Form 175 in
an auction by entities with any of the same controlling interests.
Thus, the Bureaus permitted entities controlled by the same individual
or set of individuals to file separate Forms 175 for Auction 99.
8. The prohibition on the filing of more than one Form 175 in an
auction by entities with any of the same controlling interests was
adopted in 2015 in conjunction with other rule changes. Under section
1.2105(a), as revised in 2015, each auction applicant must certify that
it has disclosed any arrangements or understandings of any kind
relating to the licenses being auctioned to which it (or any party that
controls or is controlled by it) is a party, and must certify that it
(or any party that controls or is controlled by it) has not entered and
will not enter any arrangement or understanding of any kind relating
directly or indirectly to bidding at auction with any other applicant
for the auction, among others. In 2015, the Commission also revised the
rule prohibiting certain communications, section 1.2105(c), to prohibit
a communication of bids or bidding strategies between any applicants in
an auction, and thus the prohibition is no longer limited to a
communication between applicants that had applied for construction
permits to serve the same area. In addition, the revisions to that rule
removed a prior exception to section 1.2105(c) under which applicants
that had entered into bidding-related agreements could engage in
certain communications so long as each entity had disclosed the other
as a party to such an agreement on its auction application pursuant to
section 1.2105(a)(2)(viii). For purposes of section 1.2105(c), an
applicant is defined as including all officers and directors of the
entity submitting a Form 175, all controlling interests of that entity,
as well as all holders of partnership and other ownership interests and
any stock interest amounting to 10 percent or more of the entity, or
outstanding stock, or outstanding voting stock of the entity submitting
a Form 175. In applying the prohibited communication rule, the Bureaus
have found that, where an individual served as an officer and director
for two or more applicants subject to the rule, the bids and bidding
strategies of one applicant are presumptively conveyed to the other
applicant. Consequently, the Bureaus determined that, absent a
disclosed bidding agreement between such applicants creating an
applicable exception under the prior rule, an apparent violation of
section 1.2105(c) would occur.
9. Finally, in a change related to the prohibition on joint bidding
agreements and the changes to the prohibited communication rule,
revised section 1.2105(a)(2)(iii) now prohibits any individual from
serving as an authorized bidder of more than one applicant.
10. In the event that Auction 99 applicants under common control
may have filed separate Forms 175 pursuant to the Bureaus' waiver of
section 1.2105(a)(3), such applicants could be at risk of violating
section 1.2105(c) because the Commission presumes that
[[Page 6143]]
bidding strategies are communicated between entities that share a
common officer or director. Moreover, current rules bar most kinds of
joint bidding agreements that may have, under the prior rule, permitted
certain communications between commonly controlled entities or other
auction applicants under the former rules.
11. Accordingly, the Bureaus seek comment on whether it would be
appropriate to waive or modify the application of section 1.2105
provisions so that Auction 99 applicants relying on the waiver of
section 1.2105(a)(3) will not thereby violate such other provisions.
With respect to a communication between commonly owned applicants, this
auction appears analogous to the circumstances of Auction 1001, the
reverse auction portion of the broadcast incentive auction. In that
case, as here, applicants to participate in the auction were limited to
specified current licensees of the Commission. Consequently, it was
clear that multiple applicants would be commonly controlled.
12. With respect to implementing the commonly controlled applicant
exception in the broadcast incentive auction, the Commission provided
that the prohibition did not apply to a communication between different
applicants if they share a common controlling interest, director,
officer, or governing board member as of the deadline for submitting
applications to participate in the reverse auction. The Commission
expressly noted that an applicant's communication would not qualify for
this exception based on a new director, officer or governing board
member added after the application deadline. According to the
Commission, if a covered licensee were to appoint a new officer after
the broadcast incentive auction application deadline, that new officer
would be subject to the rule and not included within the exception.
13. In this auction, when applying the Commission's general
competitive bidding rules, do the limitations on eligibility to bid on
specific permits in this closed auction similarly provide good cause to
waive section 1.2105(c) for communications between commonly controlled
applicants consistent with the exception provided for in the broadcast
incentive auction? Do other factors demonstrate good cause for such
relief, or some other form of relief? Commenters are encouraged to
identify circumstances of this auction that should guide us in
developing application procedures under the current competitive bidding
rules, including specific aspects of the auction application process
and processing procedures, the nature of the permits to be awarded, or
other relevant considerations.
V. Bureaus Seek Comment on Bidding Procedures
14. The Bureaus, under delegated authority, seek comment on a
variety of auction-specific procedures prior to the start of bidding in
Auction 99.
A. Auction Structure
15. Simultaneous Multiple Round Auction Design. The Bureaus propose
using the Commission's standard simultaneous multiple-round auction
format for Auction 99. This type of auction offers every construction
permit for bid at the same time and consists of successive bidding
rounds in which eligible bidders may place bids on individual
construction permits. Typically, bidding remains open on all
construction permits until bidding stops on every construction permit.
The Bureaus seek comment on this proposal.
16. Bidding Rounds. Auction 99 will consist of sequential bidding
rounds, each followed by the release of round results. The Commission
will conduct Auction 99 over the internet using the FCC auction bidding
system. Bidders will also have the option of placing bids by telephone
through a dedicated auction bidder line.
17. The Bureaus propose to retain the discretion to change the
bidding schedule in order to foster an auction pace that reasonably
balances speed with the bidders' need to study round results and adjust
their bidding strategies. Under this proposal, the Bureaus may change
the amount of time for the bidding rounds, the amount of time between
rounds, or the number of rounds per day, depending upon bidding
activity and other factors. The Bureaus seek comment on this proposal.
Commenters on this issue should address the role of the bidding
schedule in managing the pace of the auction, specifically discussing
the tradeoffs in managing auction pace by bidding schedule changes, by
changing the activity requirements or bid amount parameters, or by
using other means.
18. Stopping Rule. To complete the auction within a reasonable
time, the Bureaus propose to employ a simultaneous stopping rule
approach for Auction 99, which means all construction permits remain
available for bidding until bidding stops on every construction permit.
Specifically, bidding would close on all construction permits after the
first round in which no bidder submits any new bids, no bidder applies
a proactive waiver, or, if bid withdrawals are permitted in this
auction, no bidder withdraws any provisionally winning bid which is a
bid that would become a final winning bid if the auction were to close
in that given round. Thus, unless the Bureaus announce alternative
procedures, bidding would remain open on all construction permits until
bidding stops on every construction permit. Consequently, it is not
possible to determine in advance how long the bidding in this auction
will last.
19. Further, the Bureaus propose to retain the discretion to
exercise any of the following options during Auction 99. (1) Use a
modified version of the simultaneous stopping rule that would close the
auction for all construction permits after the first round in which no
bidder applies a waiver, no bidder withdraws a provisionally winning
bid (if withdrawals are permitted in this auction), or no bidder places
any new bid on a construction permit for which it is not the
provisionally winning bidder, which means that, absent any other
bidding activity, a bidder placing a new bid on a construction permit
for which it is the provisionally winning bidder would not keep the
auction open under this modified stopping rule. (2) Use a modified
version of the simultaneous stopping rule that would close the auction
for all construction permits after the first round in which no bidder
applies a waiver, no bidder withdraws a provisionally winning bid (if
withdrawals are permitted in this auction), or no bidder places any new
bid on a construction permit that already has a provisionally winning
bid, which means that, absent any other bidding activity, a bidder
placing a new bid on an FCC-held construction permit (a construction
permit that does not already have a provisionally winning bid) would
not keep the auction open under this modified stopping rule. (3) Use a
modified version of the simultaneous stopping rule that combines
options (1) and (2). (4) The auction would close after a specified
number of additional rounds (special stopping rule) to be announced by
the Bureaus. If the Bureaus invoke this special stopping rule, they
will accept bids in the specified final round(s), after which the
auction will close. (5) The auction would remain open even if no bidder
places any new bid, applies a waiver, or withdraws any provisionally
winning bid (if withdrawals are permitted in this auction). In this
event, the effect will be the same as if a bidder had applied a waiver.
The activity rule will apply as usual, and a bidder with insufficient
activity will either lose bidding eligibility or use a waiver.
[[Page 6144]]
20. The Bureaus propose to exercise these options only in certain
circumstances, for example, where the auction is proceeding unusually
slowly or quickly, there is minimal overall bidding activity, or it
appears likely that the auction will not close within a reasonable
period of time or will close prematurely. Before exercising these
options, the Bureaus are likely to attempt to change the pace of the
auction. For example, the Bureaus may adjust the pace of bidding by
changing the number of bidding rounds per day and/or the minimum
acceptable bids. The Bureaus proposed to retain the discretion to
exercise any of these options with or without prior announcement during
the auction. The Bureaus seek comment on these proposals.
21. Auction Delay, Suspension or Cancellation. Pursuant to 47 CFR
1.2104(i), the Bureaus propose that they may delay, suspend, or cancel
bidding in Auction 99 in the event of a natural disaster, technical
obstacle, administrative or weather necessity, evidence of an auction
security breach or unlawful bidding activity, or for any other reason
that affects the fair and efficient conduct of competitive bidding. The
Bureaus would notify participants of any such delay, suspension or
cancellation by public notice and/or through the FCC auction bidding
system's announcement function. If bidding is delayed or suspended, the
Bureaus may, in their sole discretion, elect to resume the auction
starting from the beginning of the current round or from some previous
round, or cancel the auction in its entirety. Network interruption may
cause the Bureaus to delay or suspend the auction. The Bureaus
emphasized that they will exercise this authority solely at their
discretion, and not as a substitute for situations in which bidders may
wish to apply activity rule waivers. The Bureaus seek comment on this
proposal.
B. Auction Procedures
22. Upfront Payments and Bidding Eligibility. The Bureaus have
delegated authority and discretion to determine an appropriate upfront
payment for each construction permit being auctioned, taking into
account such factors as the efficiency of the auction process and the
potential value of similar construction permits. The upfront payment is
a refundable deposit made by an applicant to establish eligibility to
bid on construction permits. Upfront payments that are related to the
specific construction permits being auctioned protect against frivolous
or insincere bidding and provide the Commission with a source of funds
from which to collect payments owed at the close of bidding. With these
considerations in mind, the Bureaus proposed the upfront payments set
forth in Attachment A of the Auction 99 Comment Public Notice. The
Bureaus seek comment on the upfront payments specified in this
Attachment A.
23. The Bureaus further propose that the amount of the upfront
payment submitted by a bidder will determine its initial bidding
eligibility in bidding units. The Bureaus propose to assign each
construction permit a specific number of bidding units, equal to one
bidding unit per dollar of the upfront payment listed in Attachment A
of the Auction 99 Comment Public Notice. The number of bidding units
for a given construction permit is fixed and does not change during the
auction as prices change. If an applicant is found to be qualified to
bid on more than one permit in Auction 99, such a bidder may place bids
on multiple construction permits, provided that the total number of
bidding units associated with those construction permits does not
exceed the bidder's current eligibility. A bidder cannot increase its
eligibility during the auction; it can only maintain its eligibility or
decrease its eligibility. Thus, in calculating its upfront payment
amount and hence its initial bidding eligibility, an applicant must
determine the maximum number of bidding units on which it may wish to
bid (or hold provisionally winning bids) in any single round, and
submit an upfront payment amount covering that total number of bidding
units. The Bureaus request comment on these proposals.
24. Activity Rule. In order to ensure that the auction closes
within a reasonable period of time, an activity rule requires bidders
to bid actively throughout the auction, rather than wait until late in
the auction before participating. The Bureaus propose a single stage
auction with the following activity requirement: In each round of the
auction, a bidder desiring to maintain its current bidding eligibility
is required to be active on 100 percent of its bidding eligibility. A
bidder's activity in a round will be the sum of the bidding units
associated with any construction permits upon which it places bids
during the current round and the bidding units associated with any
construction permits for which it holds provisionally winning bids.
Failure to maintain the requisite activity level would result in the
use of an activity rule waiver, if any, or a reduction in the bidder's
eligibility, possibly curtailing or eliminating the bidder's ability to
place additional bids in the auction. The Bureaus seek comment on this
proposal.
25. Activity Rule Waivers and Reducing Eligibility. When a bidder's
activity in the current round is below the required minimum level, it
may preserve its current level of eligibility through an activity rule
waiver, if available. An activity rule waiver applies to an entire
round of bidding, not to a particular construction permit. Activity
rule waivers can be either proactive or automatic. Activity rule
waivers are principally a mechanism for a bidder to avoid the loss of
bidding eligibility in the event that exigent circumstances prevent it
from bidding in a particular round.
26. The FCC auction bidding system will assume that a bidder that
does not meet the activity requirement would prefer to use an activity
rule waiver (if available) rather than lose bidding eligibility.
Therefore, the system will automatically apply a waiver at the end of
any bidding round in which a bidder's activity is below the minimum
required unless (1) the bidder has no activity rule waivers remaining
or (2) the bidder overrides the automatic application of a waiver by
reducing eligibility, thereby meeting the activity requirement. If a
bidder has no waivers remaining and does not satisfy the required
activity level, the bidder's current eligibility will be permanently
reduced, possibly curtailing or eliminating the ability to place
additional bids in the auction.
27. A bidder with insufficient activity may wish to reduce its
bidding eligibility rather than use an activity rule waiver. If so, the
bidder must affirmatively override the automatic waiver mechanism
during the bidding round by using the reduce eligibility function in
the FCC auction bidding system. In this case, the bidder's eligibility
would be permanently reduced to bring it into compliance with the
specified activity requirement. Reducing eligibility is an irreversible
action; once eligibility has been reduced, a bidder cannot regain its
lost bidding eligibility.
28. Under the proposed simultaneous stopping rule, a bidder may
apply an activity rule waiver proactively as a means to keep the
auction open without placing a bid. If a bidder proactively were to
apply an activity rule waiver (using the proactive waiver function in
the FCC auction bidding system) during a bidding round in which no bids
are placed or withdrawn (if bid withdrawals are permitted in this
auction), the auction would remain open and the bidder's eligibility
would be preserved.
[[Page 6145]]
An automatic waiver applied by the FCC auction bidding system in a
round in which there are no new bid, no bid withdrawal (if bid
withdrawals are permitted in this auction), or no proactive waiver will
not keep the auction open. The Bureaus propose that each bidder in
Auction 99 be provided with three activity rule waivers that may be
used at the bidder's discretion during the course of the auction. The
Bureaus seek comment on this proposal.
29. Reserve Price or Minimum Opening Bids. Normally, a reserve
price is an absolute minimum price below which a construction permit or
license will not be sold in a given auction. The Bureaus did not
propose to establish separate reserve prices for the Auction 99
construction permits.
30. A minimum opening bid is the minimum bid price set at the
beginning of the auction below which no bids are accepted. Because it
is an effective tool for accelerating the competitive bidding process,
the Bureaus propose minimum opening bid amounts for Auction 99
determined by taking into account the type of service and class of
facility offered, market size, population covered by the proposed
broadcast facility, and recent broadcast transaction data. Attachment A
of the Auction 99 Comment Public Notice lists a proposed minimum
opening bid amount for each construction permit available in Auction
99. The Bureaus seek comment on the minimum opening bid amounts
specified in Attachment A of the Auction 99 Comment Public Notice.
31. If commenters believe that these minimum opening bid amounts
will result in unsold construction permits, are not reasonable amounts,
or should instead operate as reserve prices, they should explain why
this is so and comment on the desirability of an alternative approach.
The Bureaus ask commenters to support their claims with valuation
analyses and suggested amounts or formulas for reserve prices or
minimum opening bids. In establishing the minimum opening bid amounts,
the Bureaus particularly seek comment on factors that could reasonably
have an impact on bidders' valuation of the broadcast spectrum,
including the type of service offered, market size, population covered
by the proposed broadcast facility, and any other relevant factors.
32. Bid Amounts. The Bureaus propose that, if the bidder has
sufficient eligibility to place a bid on a particular construction
permit in a round, an eligible bidder will be able to place a bid on
that construction permit in any of up to nine different amounts. Under
this proposal, the FCC auction bidding system interface will list the
acceptable bid amounts for each construction permit.
33. The first of the acceptable bid amounts is called the minimum
acceptable bid amount. The minimum acceptable bid amount for a
construction permit will be equal to its minimum opening bid amount
until there is a provisionally winning bid for the construction permit.
After there is a provisionally winning bid for a construction permit,
the minimum acceptable bid amount will be a certain percentage higher.
The percentage used for this calculation, the minimum acceptable bid
increment percentage, is multiplied by the provisionally winning bid
amount, and the resulting amount is added to the provisionally winning
bid amount. If, for example, the minimum acceptable bid increment
percentage is 10 percent, then the provisionally winning bid amount is
multiplied by 10 percent. The result of that calculation is added to
the provisionally winning bid amount, and that sum is rounded using the
Commission's standard rounding procedure for auctions. If bid
withdrawals are permitted in this auction, in the case of a
construction permit for which the provisionally winning bid has been
withdrawn, the minimum acceptable bid amount will equal the second
highest bid received for the construction permit.
34. The FCC will calculate the eight additional bid amounts using
the minimum acceptable bid amount and an additional bid increment
percentage. The minimum acceptable bid amount is multiplied by the
additional bid increment percentage, and that result, rounded, is the
additional increment amount. The first additional acceptable bid amount
equals the minimum acceptable bid amount plus the additional increment
amount. The second additional acceptable bid amount equals the minimum
acceptable bid amount plus two times the additional increment amount;
the third additional acceptable bid amount is the minimum acceptable
bid amount plus three times the additional increment amount; etc. If,
for example, the additional bid increment percentage is 5 percent, then
the calculation of the additional increment amount is (minimum
acceptable bid amount) * (0.05), rounded. The first additional
acceptable bid amount equals (minimum acceptable bid amount) +
(additional increment amount); the second additional acceptable bid
amount equals (minimum acceptable bid amount) + (2 * (additional
increment amount)); the third additional acceptable bid amount equals
(minimum acceptable bid amount) + (3 * (additional increment amount));
etc. The Bureaus will round the results using the Commission's standard
rounding procedures for auctions.
35. For Auction 99, the Bureaus propose to use a minimum acceptable
bid increment percentage of 10 percent. This means that the minimum
acceptable bid amount for a construction permit will be approximately
10 percent greater than the provisionally winning bid amount for the
construction permit. To calculate the additional acceptable bid
amounts, the Bureaus propose to use an additional bid increment
percentage of 5 percent. The Bureaus seek comment on these proposals.
36. The Bureaus propose to retain the discretion to change the
minimum acceptable bid amounts, the minimum acceptable bid increment
percentage, the additional bid increment percentage, and the number of
acceptable bid amounts if the Bureaus determine that circumstances so
dictate. Further, the Bureaus retain the discretion to do so on a
construction-permit-by-construction-permit basis. The Bureaus also
propose to retain the discretion to limit (a) the amount by which a
minimum acceptable bid for a construction permit may increase compared
with the corresponding provisionally winning bid, and (b) the amount by
which an additional bid amount may increase compared with the
immediately preceding acceptable bid amount. For example, the Bureaus
could set a $1,000 limit on increases in minimum acceptable bid amounts
over provisionally winning bids. Thus, if calculating a minimum
acceptable bid using the minimum acceptable bid increment percentage
results in a minimum acceptable bid amount that is $1,200 higher than
the provisionally winning bid on a construction permit, the minimum
acceptable bid amount would instead be capped at $1,000 above the
provisionally winning bid. The Bureaus seek comment on the
circumstances under which the Bureaus should employ such a limit,
factors the Bureaus should consider when determining the dollar amount
of the limit, and the tradeoffs in setting such a limit or changing
other parameters, such as changing the minimum acceptable bid
percentage, the bid increment percentage, or the number of acceptable
bid amounts. If the Bureaus exercise this discretion, they will alert
bidders by announcement in the FCC auction bidding system during the
auction. The Bureaus seek comment on these proposals.
[[Page 6146]]
37. Provisionally Winning Bids. Provisionally winning bids are bids
that would become winning bids if the auction were to close in that
given round. At the end of each bidding round, the FCC auction bidding
system will determine a provisionally winning bid for each construction
permit based on the highest bid amount received for that permit. A
provisionally winning bid will remain the provisionally winning bid
until there is a higher bid on the same construction permit at the
close of a subsequent round. Provisionally winning bids become the
winning bid at the end of the auction.
38. The auction bidding system assigns a random number to each bid
when the bid is entered. If identical high bid amounts are submitted on
a construction permit in any given round (i.e., tied bids), the FCC
auction bidding system will use a pseudo-random number generator to
select a single provisionally winning bid from among the tied bids. The
tied bid with the highest random number wins the tiebreaker and becomes
the provisionally winning bid. The remaining bidders, as well as the
provisionally winning bidder, can submit higher bids in subsequent
rounds. However, if the auction were to close with no other bids being
placed, the winning bidder would be the one that placed the
provisionally winning bid. If the construction permit receives any bids
in a subsequent round, the provisionally winning bid again will be
determined by the highest bid amount received for the construction
permit.
39. A provisionally winning bid will be retained until there is a
higher bid on the construction permit at the close of a subsequent
round, unless the provisionally winning bid is withdrawn (if bid
withdrawals are permitted in this auction). As a reminder,
provisionally winning bids count toward a bidder's activity level for
purposes of the activity rule.
40. Bid Removal and Bid Withdrawal. The FCC auction bidding system
allows each bidder to remove any of the bids it placed in a round
before the close of that round. By removing a bid placed within a
round, a bidder effectively unsubmits the bid. In contrast to the bid
withdrawal provisions, a bidder removing a bid placed in the same round
is not subject to a withdrawal payment. Once a round closes, a bidder
is no longer permitted to remove a bid.
41. The Bureaus seek comment on whether bid withdrawals should be
permitted in Auction 99. When permitted in an auction, bid withdrawals
provide a bidder with the option of withdrawing bids placed in prior
rounds that have become provisionally winning bids. A bidder would be
able to withdraw its provisionally winning bids using the withdraw
function in the FCC auction bidding system. A bidder that withdraws its
provisionally winning bid(s), if permitted in this auction, is subject
to the bid withdrawal payment provisions of 47 CFR 1.2104(g) and
1.2109.
42. Based on the nature of the permits available in Auction 99 and
on the experience of the Bureaus with past auctions of broadcast
construction permits, the Bureaus propose to prohibit bidders from
withdrawing any bid after the close of the round in which the bid was
placed. The Bureaus made this proposal in light of the site- and
applicant-specific nature and wide geographic dispersion of the permits
available in this closed auction, which suggests that potential
applicants for this auction will have limited opportunity to aggregate
construction permits through the auction process because of the closed
MX groups previously established. Thus, the Bureaus believe that it is
unlikely that bidders will have a need to withdraw bids in this
auction. Also, allowing bid withdrawals may encourage insincere bidding
or increase opportunities for anti-competitive bidding in certain
circumstances. The Bureaus also remain mindful that bid withdrawals,
particularly those made late in this auction, could result in delays in
licensing new FM translator stations and attendant delays in the
offering of new broadcast service to the public. The Bureaus seek
comment on their proposal to prohibit bid withdrawals in Auction 99.
C. Post-Auction Payments
43. Interim Withdrawal Payment Percentage. A bidder that withdraws
a bid during an auction is subject to a withdrawal payment equal to the
difference between the amount of the withdrawn bid and the amount of
the winning bid in the same or a subsequent auction. However, if a
construction permit for which a bid has been withdrawn does not receive
a subsequent higher bid or winning bid in the same auction, the FCC
cannot calculate the final withdrawal payment until that construction
permit receives a higher bid or winning bid in a subsequent auction. In
such cases, when that final withdrawal payment cannot yet be
calculated, the FCC imposes on the bidder responsible for the withdrawn
bid an interim bid withdrawal payment, which will be applied toward any
final bid withdrawal payment that is ultimately assessed.
44. Pursuant to 47 CFR 1.2104(g)(1), the amount of the interim bid
withdrawal payment may range from 3 to 20 percent of the withdrawn bid
amount. If bid withdrawals are allowed in Auction 99, the Bureaus
propose that the interim bid withdrawal payment be 20 percent of the
withdrawn bid. The Bureaus request comment on using 20 percent for
calculating an interim bid withdrawal payment amount in Auction 99.
Commenters advocating the use of bid withdrawals in Auction 99 should
also address the percentage of the interim bid withdrawal payment.
45. Additional Default Payment Percentage. Any winning bidder that
defaults or is disqualified after the close of an auction (i.e., fails
to remit the required down payment by the specified deadline, fails to
submit a timely long-form application, fails to make full and timely
final payment, or is otherwise disqualified) is liable for a default
payment under 47 CFR 1.2104(g)(2). This default payment consists of a
deficiency payment equal to the difference between the amount of the
Auction 99 bidder's winning bid and the amount of the winning bid the
next time a construction permit covering the same spectrum is won in an
auction, plus an additional payment equal to a percentage of the
defaulter's bid or of the subsequent winning bid, whichever is less.
Based on the nature of the service and the construction permits being
offered, the Bureaus propose for Auction 99 an additional default
payment of 20 percent of the relevant bid. The Bureaus seek comment on
this proposal.
VI. Procedural Matters
A. Supplemental Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
46. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 as
amended (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 603, the Bureaus have prepared this
Supplemental Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (Supplemental
IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on small entities of
the policies and rules addressed in the Public Notice to supplement the
Commission's Initial and Final Regulatory Flexibility Analyses
completed in the Broadcast First Report and Order and multiple other
Commission rulemaking orders pursuant to which Auction 99 will be
conducted. Written public comments are requested on this Supplemental
IRFA. Comments must be identified as responses to the Supplemental IRFA
and must be filed by the same filing
[[Page 6147]]
deadline for comments specified on the first page of the Auction 99
Comment Public Notice. The Commission will send a copy of the Public
Notice, including this Supplemental IRFA, to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration (SBA).
47. Need for, and Objectives of, the Proposed Rules. The Auction 99
Comment Public Notice seeks comment on proposed procedures to govern
Auction 99, an auction of up to 12 cross-service FM translator
construction permits. To promote the efficient and fair administration
of the competitive bidding process for all Auction 99 participants, the
Bureaus seek comment on the following: (1) Application of the current
rules prohibiting certain communications between auction applicants and
the related prohibition on joint bidding arrangements to implement the
Bureaus' prior decision to allow eligible AM licensees having any of
the same controlling interest in common to file separate Forms 175,
rather than a single Form 175; (2) Use of a simultaneous multiple-round
auction format, consisting of sequential bidding rounds with a
simultaneous stopping rule (with discretion by the Bureaus to exercise
alternative stopping rules under certain circumstances); (3) A specific
minimum opening bid amount for each construction permit available in
Auction 99; (4) A specific upfront payment amount for each construction
permit; (5) Establishment of a bidder's initial bidding eligibility in
bidding units based on that bidder's upfront payment through assignment
of a specific number of bidding units for each construction permit; (6)
Use of an activity rule that would require bidders to bid actively
during the auction rather than waiting until late in the auction before
participating; (7) A single stage auction in which a bidder is required
to be active on 100 percent of its bidding eligibility in each round of
the auction; (8) Provision of three activity rule waivers for each
bidder to allow it to preserve bidding eligibility during the course of
the auction; (9) Use of minimum acceptable bid amounts and additional
acceptable increments, along with a proposed methodology for
calculating such amounts, with the Bureaus retaining discretion to
change their methodology if circumstances dictate; (10) A procedure for
breaking ties if identical high bid amounts are submitted on a permit
in a given round; (11) Bid removal procedures; (12) Whether to permit
bid withdrawals; (13) Establishment of an interim bid withdrawal
percentage of 20 percent of the withdrawn bid in the event the Bureaus
allow bid withdrawals in Auction 99; and (14) Establishment of an
additional default payment of 20 percent under 47 CFR 1.2104(g)(2) in
the event that a winning bidder defaults or is disqualified after the
auction.
48. Legal Basis. The Commission's statutory obligations to small
businesses under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, are found
in 47 U.S.C. 309(j)(3)(B) and 309(j)(4)(D). The statutory basis for the
Commission's competitive bidding rules is found in various provisions
of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, including 47 U.S.C.
154(i), 301, 302, 303(e), 303(f), 303(r), 304, 307, and 309(i). The
Commission has established a framework of competitive bidding rules
pursuant to which it has conducted auctions since the inception of the
auction program in 1994 and would conduct Auction 99. The Commission
has directed the Bureaus, under delegated authority, to seek comment on
a variety of auction-specific procedures prior to the start of bidding
in each auction.
49. Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to
Which the Proposed Rules Will Apply. The RFA directs agencies to
provide a description of and, where feasible, an estimate of the number
of small entities that may be affected by the proposed rules, if
adopted. The RFA generally defines the term small entity as having the
same meaning as the terms small business, small organization, and small
government jurisdiction. In addition, the term small business has the
same meaning as the term small business concern under the Small
Business Act, 15 U.S.C. 632. A small business concern is one which: (1)
Is independently owned and operated, (2) is not dominant in its field
of operation, and (3) satisfies any additional criteria established by
the Small Business Administration (SBA).
50. Radio Stations. This Economic Census category comprises
establishments primarily engaged in broadcasting aural programs by
radio to the public. Programming may originate in their own studio,
from an affiliated network, or from external sources. The SBA has
established a small business size standard for this category as firms
having $38.5 million or less in annual receipts. Economic Census data
for 2012 shows that 2,849 radio station firms operated during that
year. Of that number, 2,806 firms operated with annual receipts of less
than $25 million per year, 17 with annual receipts between $25 million
and $49,999,999 million and 26 with annual receipts of $50 million or
more. Therefore, based on the SBA's size standard the majority of such
entities are small entities.
51. According to Commission staff review of the BIA/Kelsey, LLC's
Media Access Pro Radio Database as of January 30, 2018, about 11,261
(or about 99.92 percent) of 11,270 commercial radio stations had
revenues of $38.5 million or less and thus qualify as small entities
under the SBA definition. The Bureaus note, however, that the SBA size
standard data does not enable the Bureaus to make a meaningful estimate
of the number of small entities who may participate in Auction 99.
There are a maximum of 26 entities that may become qualified bidders in
Auction 99, in which applicant eligibility is closed. The specific
procedures and minimum opening bid amounts on which comment is sought
in the Auction 99 Comment Public Notice will affect directly all
applicants participating in Auction 99.
52. In addition, the Bureaus note that they are unable to
accurately develop an estimate of how many of these 26 entities are
small businesses based on the number of small entities that applied to
participate in prior broadcast auctions, because that information is
not collected from applicants for broadcast auctions in which bidding
credits are not based on an applicant's size (as is the case in
auctions of licenses for wireless services). Potential eligible bidders
in Auction 99 may include existing holders of broadcast station
construction permits or licenses. In 2013, the Commission estimated
that 97 percent of radio broadcasters met the SBA's prior definition of
small business concern, based on annual revenues of $7 million. The SBA
has since increased that revenue threshold to $38.5 million, which
suggests that an even greater percentage of radio broadcasters would
fall within the SBA's definition. Based on Commission data 4,635
(99.94%) of 4,638 a.m. radio stations have revenue of $38.5 million or
less. Accordingly, based on this data, the Bureaus conclude that the
majority of Auction 99 eligible bidders will likely meet the SBA's
definition of a small business concern.
53. Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements for Small Entities. The Commission designed the
auction application process itself to minimize reporting and compliance
requirements for applicants, including small business applicants. In
the first part of the Commission's two-phased auction application
process, parties desiring to participate in an auction file
streamlined, short-form applications in which they certify under
penalty of
[[Page 6148]]
perjury as to their qualifications. Eligibility to participate in
bidding is based on an applicant's short-form application and
certifications, as well as its upfront payment. In the second phase of
the process, winning bidders file a more comprehensive long-form
application. Thus, a small business which fails to become a winning
bidder does not need to file a long-form application and provide the
additional showings and more detailed demonstrations required of a
winning bidder.
54. Steps Taken to Minimize the Significant Economic Impact on
Small Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered. The RFA
requires an agency to describe any significant, specifically small
business, alternatives that it has considered in reaching its proposed
approach, which may include the following four alternatives (among
others): (1) The establishment of differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into account the resources
available to small entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or
simplification of compliance and reporting requirements under the rule
for such small entities; (3) the use of performance rather than design
standards; and (4) an exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part
thereof, for such small entities.
55. The Commission has taken steps to minimize any economic impact
of its auction procedures on small businesses through among other
things, the many resources it provides potential auction participants.
Small entities and other auction participants may seek clarification of
or guidance on complying with competitive bidding rules and procedures,
reporting requirements, and the FCC's auction system. An FCC Auctions
Hotline provides access to Commission staff for information about the
auction process and procedures. The FCC Auctions Technical Support
Hotline is another resource which provides technical assistance to
applicants, including small business entities, on issues such as access
to or navigation within the electronic FCC Form 175 and use of the
FCC's auction system. Small entities may also utilize the web-based,
interactive online tutorial produced by Commission staff for each
auction to familiarize themselves with auction procedures, filing
requirements, bidding procedures and other matters related to an
auction. The Bureaus also make various databases and other sources of
information, including the Media Bureau's Consolidated Database System,
the Auctions program websites, and copies of Commission decisions,
available to the public without charge, providing a low-cost mechanism
for small businesses to conduct research prior to and throughout the
auction. Prior to and at the close of Auction 99, the Bureaus will post
public notices on the Auctions website, which articulate the procedures
and deadlines. The Bureaus make this information easily accessible and
without charge to benefit all Auction 99 applicants, including small
businesses, thereby lowering their administrative costs to comply with
the Commission's competitive bidding rules.
56. Prior to the start of bidding in each auction, eligible bidders
are given an opportunity to become familiar with auction procedures and
the bidding system by participating in a mock auction. Further, the
Commission intends to conduct Auction 99 electronically over the
internet using its web-based auction system that eliminates the need
for bidders to be physically present in a specific location. Qualified
bidders also have the option to place bids by telephone. These
mechanisms are made available to facilitate participation in Auction 99
by all eligible bidders, and may result in significant cost savings for
small business entities who utilize these alternatives. Moreover, the
adoption of bidding procedures in advance of the auction, consistent
with statutory directive, is designed to ensure that the auction will
be administered predictably and fairly for all participants, including
small businesses.
57. These proposed procedures for the conduct of Auction 99
constitute the more specific implementation of the competitive bidding
rules contemplated by Parts 1 and 73 of the Commission's rules and the
underlying rulemaking orders, including the Broadcast First Report and
Order and relevant competitive bidding orders, and are fully consistent
therewith.
58. Federal Rules that May Duplicate, Overlap or Conflict with the
Proposed Rules. None.
B. Ex Parte Rules
59. This proceeding has been designated as a permit-but-disclose
proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. While
additional information is provided in the Auction 99 Comment Public
Notice on these reporting requirements, participants in Auction 99
should familiarize themselves with the Commission's ex parte rules.
Federal Communications Commission.
Gary D. Michaels,
Deputy Chief, Auctions and Spectrum Access Division, WTB.
[FR Doc. 2018-03025 Filed 2-12-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P