Arms Sales Notification, 6166-6169 [2018-02876]
Download as PDF
6166
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2018 / Notices
• Propose ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
• Propose ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Comments
A 60-day Notice requesting public
comment was published in the Federal
Register on July 19, 2017 at Vol. 82, No.
137, Page 33072. This comment period
ended September 18, 2017. No public
comments were received from this
Notice.
Description: The Financial
Management Survey collects
information about the capacity of
organizations to manage federal grant
funds. Information from the survey is
used to assess an organization’s
structure and capacity-building needs
and identify any appropriate technical
assistance and/or resources to
strengthen federal grant management
and compliance operations. CNCS seeks
to renew the current information
collection. The information collection
will otherwise be used in the same
manner as the existing application.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:12 Feb 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
CNCS also seeks to continue using the
current application until the revised
application is approved by OMB. The
current application expired on
September 30, 2017.
Type of Review: Renewal.
Agency: Corporation for National and
Community Service.
Title: Financial Management Survey.
OMB Number: 3045–0102.
Agency Number: None.
Affected Public: Non-profit
Organizations, State, Local and Tribal
Governments that are first-time
recipients of CNCS grant funds, or
renewing their ability to receive CNCS
grant funds.
Total Respondents: 200.
Frequency: Once.
Average Time per Response: Averages
2.00 hours.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 400
hours.
Total Burden Cost (capital/startup):
None.
Total Burden Cost (operating/
maintenance): None.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Dated: February 2, 2018.
Joseph Liciardello,
Acting Chief Grants Officer.
[FR Doc. 2018–02880 Filed 2–12–18; 8:45 am]
Dated: February 8, 2018.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 6050–28–P
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Office of the Secretary
[Transmittal No. 17–76]
Arms Sales Notification
Defense Security Cooperation
Agency, Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Arms sales notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Defense is
publishing the unclassified text of an
arms sales notification.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pamela Young, (703) 697–9107,
pamela.a.young14.civ@mail.mil or
Kathy Valadez, (703) 697–9217,
kathy.a.valadez.civ@mail.mil; DSCA/
DSA–RAN.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
36(b)(1) arms sales notification is
published to fulfill the requirements of
section 155 of Public Law 104–164
dated July 21, 1996. The following is a
copy of a letter to the Speaker of the
House of Representatives, Transmittal
17–76 with attached Policy Justification
and Sensitivity of Technology.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2018 / Notices
6167
to
BILLING CODE 5001–06–C
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:12 Feb 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
EN13FE18.006
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
a
6168
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2018 / Notices
Kits, four (4) RTM–84L–4 Harpoon
Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of Block II Grade B Exercise SurfaceOffer Pursuant to Section 36(b)(1) of the Launched Missiles, and four (4) RTM–
84Q–4 Harpoon Block II+ ER Grade B
Arms Export Control Act, as amended
Exercise Surface-Launched Missiles.
(i) Prospective Purchaser: Government Also included are containers, spare and
of Finland
repair parts, support and test
(ii) Total Estimated Value:
equipment, publications and technical
Major Defense Equipment *
$434 million documentation, personnel training and
Other ....................................
$188 million training equipment, technical
assistance, engineering and logistics
Total ..................................
$622 million support services, and other related
elements of logistical support. The
(iii) Description and Quantity or
estimated total case value is $622
Quantities of Articles or Services under
million.
Consideration for Purchase:
This proposed sale will support the
Major Defense Equipment (MDE):
foreign policy and national security
One hundred (100) RGM–84Q–4
objectives of the United States by
Harpoon Block II Plus (+) Extended
Range (ER) Grade B Surface-Launched improving the security of a partner
nation that has been, and continues to
Missiles
Twelve (12) RGM–84L–4 Harpoon Block be, an important force for political
II Grade B Surface-Launched Missiles stability and economic progress in
Europe.
Twelve (12) RGM–84Q–4 Harpoon
Finland intends to use the missiles on
Block II+ ER Grade B Surfaceits Hamina class ships, Multirole
Launched Upgrade Kits
Corvette ships, and Coastal Batteries.
Four (4) RTM–84L–4 Harpoon Block II
The missiles will provide enhanced
Grade B Exercise Surface-Launched
capabilities in effective defense of
Missiles
Four (4) RTM–84Q–4 Harpoon Block II+ critical sea lanes. The proposed sale of
the missiles and support will increase
ER Grade B Exercise Surfacethe Finnish Navy’s maritime
Launched Missiles
partnership potential and increase
Non-MDE:
regional security capability. Finland has
Also included are containers, spare
not purchased Harpoon Block II+ ER
and repair parts, support and test
previously, but will have no difficulty
equipment, publications and technical
incorporating this capability into its
documentation, personnel training and
armed forces.
training equipment, technical
The proposed sale of this equipment
assistance, engineering and logistics
and support will not alter the basic
support services, and other related
military balance in the region.
elements of logistical support.
The principal contractor will be The
(iv) Military Department: Navy (FI–P–
Boeing Company, St. Louis, MO. The
LBQ)
purchaser typically requests offsets. Any
(v) Prior Related Cases, if any: None
offset agreement will be defined in
(vi) Sales Commission, Fee, etc., Paid,
negotiations between the purchaser and
Offered, or Agreed to be Paid: None
the contractor.
(vii) Sensitivity of Technology
Implementation of this proposed sale
Contained in the Defense Article or
will require up to 21 U.S. Government
Defense Services Proposed to be Sold:
personnel to travel to Finland providing
See Attached Annex
support over a period of ten years.
(viii) Date Report Delivered to
There will be no adverse impact on
Congress: February 5, 2018
U.S. defense readiness as a result of this
* As defined in Section 47(6) of the
proposed sale.
Arms Export Control Act.
Transmittal No. 17–76
POLICY JUSTIFICATION
Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of
Finland—RGM–84Q–4 Harpoon Block
Offer Pursuant to Section 36(b)(1) of the
II+ ER Grade B Surface-Launched
Arms Export Control Act
Missiles and RGM–84L–4 Harpoon Block
Annex
II Grade B Surface-Launched Missiles
Item No. vii
The Government of Finland has
requested a possible sale of one hundred
(vii) Sensitivity of Technology:
(100) RGM–84Q–4 Harpoon Block II
1. The RGM–84Q Harpoon Block II+
Plus (+) Extended Range (ER) Grade B
ER Surface-Launched missile system is
Surface-Launched Missiles, twelve (12)
classified SECRET. The Harpoon missile
RGM–84L–4 Harpoon Block II Grade B
is a non-nuclear tactical weapon system.
Surface-Launched Missiles, twelve (12)
It provides a day, night, and adverse
RGM–84Q–4 Harpoon Block II+ ER
weather, standoff air-to-surface
Grade B Surface-Launched Upgrade
capability and is an effective Anti-
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Transmittal No. 17–76
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:12 Feb 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Surface Warfare missile. The RGM–84Q
incorporates components, software, and
technical design information that is
considered sensitive. The following
components being conveyed by the
proposed sale that are considered
sensitive include:
a. Classified CONFIDENTIAL:
(1) Radar Seeker
(2) GPS/INS System
(3) Operational Flight Program Software
(4) Missile operational characteristics
and performance data
b. Classified up to SECRET:
(1) Weapon Data Link (depending on
key classification)
(2) Warhead
These elements are essential to the
ability of the Harpoon missile to
selectively engage hostile targets under
a wide range of operations, tactical and
environmental conditions. The Harpoon
is a Coastal Target Suppressions land
attack weapon.
2. The RGM–84L Harpoon Block II
Surface-Launched missile system is
classified CONFIDENTIAL. The
Harpoon missile is a non-nuclear
tactical weapon system currently in
service in the U.S. Navy and in 29 other
foreign nations. It provides a day, night,
and adverse weather, standoff air-tosurface capability and is an effective
Anti-Surface Warfare missile. The
RGM–84L incorporates components,
software, and technical design
information that are considered
sensitive. The following components
being conveyed by the proposed sale
that are considered sensitive and are
classified CONFIDENTIAL are:
Classified CONFIDENTIAL:
(1) Radar Seeker
(2) GPS/INS System
(3) Operational Flight Program Software
(4) Missile operational characteristics
and performance data
3. The RTM–84 Exercise Harpoon
Surface-Launched missile is classified
up to SECRET. The RTM–84 Exercise
Harpoon incorporates components,
software, and technical design
information that are considered
sensitive. The following components
being conveyed by the proposed sale
that are considered sensitive include:
a. Classified CONFIDENTIAL:
(1) Radar Seeker
(2) GPS/INS System
(3) Operational Flight Program Software
(4) Missile operational characteristics
and performance data
b. Classified up to SECRET:
(1) Weapon Data Link (depending on
key classification)
4. If a technologically advanced
adversary were to obtain knowledge of
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 30 / Tuesday, February 13, 2018 / Notices
specific hardware, the information
could be used to develop
countermeasures which might reduce
weapons system effectiveness or be used
in the development of a system with
similar or advanced capabilities.
5. A determination has been made
that Finland can provide substantially
the same degree of protection for
sensitive technology being released as
the U.S. Government. This proposed
sustainment program is necessary to the
furtherance of the U.S. foreign policy
and national security objectives
outlined in the policy justification.
6. All defense articles and services
listed on this transmittal are authorized
for release and export to the
Government of Finland.
[FR Doc. 2018–02876 Filed 2–12–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
Notice of Intent To Prepare a Tiered
Environmental Impact Statement for
the New York New Jersey Harbor and
Tributaries Coastal Storm Risk
Management Feasibility Study
AGENCY:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
DOD.
ACTION:
Notice of intent.
Pursuant to the requirements
of section 102(2)(C) of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New
York District (Corps) is preparing an
integrated Feasibility Report/Tiered
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for the proposed New York New Jersey
Harbor and Tributaries Coastal Storm
Risk Management Feasibility Study
(NYNJHAT). The study is assessing the
feasibility of coastal storm risk
management alternatives to be
implemented within the authorized
study area with a specific emphasis on
the New York New Jersey Harbor,
including Raritan Bay, the tidallyaffected stretches of the Passaic and
Hackensack Rivers, and the Hudson
River to Troy, New York.
ADDRESSES: Pertinent information about
the study can be found at: https://
www.nan.usace.army.mil/Missions/
Civil-Works/Projects-in-New-York/NewYork-New-Jersey-Harbor-TributariesFocus-Area-Feasibility-Study/.
Interested parties are welcome to send
written comments and suggestions
concerning the scope of issues to be
evaluated within the Tiered EIS to
Nancy J. Brighton, Chief, Watershed
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:12 Feb 12, 2018
Jkt 244001
Section, Environmental Analysis
Branch, Planning Division, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, New York District,
26 Federal Plaza, New York, Room
2151, NY 10279–0090; Phone: (917)
790–8703; email: Nancy.J.Brighton@
usace.army.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions about the overall NYNJHAT
study should be directed to Bryce
Wisemiller, Project Manager, U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers, New York District,
Programs and Project Management
Division, Civil Works Programs Branch,
26 Federal Plaza, Room 2127, New
York, NY 10279–0090; Phone: (917)
790–8307; email: Bryce.W.Wisemiller@
usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Background
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
(Corps), in partnership with the New
York State Department of
Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC)
and the New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection (NJDEP) as
the non-federal sponsors, are
undertaking this study. In addition, the
City of New York is a non-federal
partner. The NYNJHAT study area,
which encompasses the New York
metropolitan area, is highly vulnerable
to damage from coastal storm surge,
wave attack, erosion, and intense
rainfall-storm water runoff events that
cause riverine or inland flooding, which
can exacerbate coastal flooding. The
NYNJHAT study is authorized under
Public Law 84–71, June 15, 1955 (69
Stat. 132) to conduct an investigation
into potential coastal storm risk
management solutions. A Feasibility
Cost Sharing Agreement (FCSA) was
executed in 2016 with the NYSDEC and
NJDEP.
2. Study Area
The study area encompasses
approximately 2,150 square miles and
includes parts of Bergen, Passaic,
Morris, Essex, Hudson, Union,
Somerset, Middlesex, and Monmouth
Counties in New Jersey and Rensselaer,
Albany, Columbia, Greene, Duchess,
Ulster, Putnam, Orange, Westchester,
Rockland, Bronx, New York, Queens,
Kings, Richmond, and Nassau Counties
in New York. The study area extends
upstream of the Hudson River to the
federal lock and dam at Troy, New York,
the Passaic River to the Dundee Dam,
and the Hackensack River to the Oradell
Reservoir.
meetings in January and February 2017,
with representatives from federal and
state agencies, as well as representatives
from local agencies and towns. The
Corps, NYSDEC and NJDEP are
anticipating hosting a NEPA Scoping
Meetings in March and April 2018.
Public notices announcing the meeting
date, time, location and agenda will be
published in the appropriate local
newspapers, municipality web pages,
and the Corps’ New York District web
page (see STUDY WEB PAGE and
ADDRESSES above) and will be
distributed to the local stakeholders and
known interested parties.
A scoping comment period of 30 days
will be established from the scheduled
date of the meeting to allow agencies,
organizations and individuals to submit
comments, questions and/or concerns
regarding the Feasibility Study.
Comments, concerns and information
submitted to the Corps will be evaluated
and considered during the development
of the Draft EIS.
Lead and Cooperating Agencies
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is
the lead federal agency for the
preparation of a Tiered Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) in order to meet
the requirements of the NEPA and the
NEPA Implementing Regulations of the
President’s Council on Environmental
Quality (40 CFR 1500–1508). The Corps
has invited the U.S. Coast Guard, the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the
National Marine Fisheries Service, the
National Park Service, and the Federal
Emergency Management Agency to be
Cooperating or Participating Agencies
on this study. The preparation of a
Tiered EIS will be coordinated with
New York State, New Jersey State and
local municipalities with discretionary
authority relative to the proposed
actions. The Draft integrated Feasibility
Report/Tiered EIS is currently
scheduled for distribution to the public
Summer 2018.
Dated: February 6, 2018.
Peter M. Weppler,
Chief, Environmental Analysis Branch,
Planning Division.
[FR Doc. 2018–02874 Filed 2–12–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720–58–P
3. Public Participation
The Corps, the NYSDEC and the
NJDEP hosted three agency workshop
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
6169
E:\FR\FM\13FEN1.SGM
13FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6166-6169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02876]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Transmittal No. 17-76]
Arms Sales Notification
AGENCY: Defense Security Cooperation Agency, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Arms sales notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Defense is publishing the unclassified text
of an arms sales notification.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela Young, (703) 697-9107,
[email protected] or Kathy Valadez, (703) 697-9217,
[email protected]; DSCA/DSA-RAN.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This 36(b)(1) arms sales notification is
published to fulfill the requirements of section 155 of Public Law 104-
164 dated July 21, 1996. The following is a copy of a letter to the
Speaker of the House of Representatives, Transmittal 17-76 with
attached Policy Justification and Sensitivity of Technology.
Dated: February 8, 2018.
Aaron Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P
[[Page 6167]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN13FE18.006
BILLING CODE 5001-06-C
[[Page 6168]]
Transmittal No. 17-76
Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of Offer Pursuant to Section
36(b)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act, as amended
(i) Prospective Purchaser: Government of Finland
(ii) Total Estimated Value:
Major Defense Equipment *............................... $434 million
Other................................................... $188 million
---------------
Total................................................. $622 million
(iii) Description and Quantity or Quantities of Articles or
Services under Consideration for Purchase:
Major Defense Equipment (MDE):
One hundred (100) RGM-84Q-4 Harpoon Block II Plus (+) Extended Range
(ER) Grade B Surface-Launched Missiles
Twelve (12) RGM-84L-4 Harpoon Block II Grade B Surface-Launched
Missiles
Twelve (12) RGM-84Q-4 Harpoon Block II+ ER Grade B Surface-Launched
Upgrade Kits
Four (4) RTM-84L-4 Harpoon Block II Grade B Exercise Surface-Launched
Missiles
Four (4) RTM-84Q-4 Harpoon Block II+ ER Grade B Exercise Surface-
Launched Missiles
Non-MDE:
Also included are containers, spare and repair parts, support and
test equipment, publications and technical documentation, personnel
training and training equipment, technical assistance, engineering and
logistics support services, and other related elements of logistical
support.
(iv) Military Department: Navy (FI-P-LBQ)
(v) Prior Related Cases, if any: None
(vi) Sales Commission, Fee, etc., Paid, Offered, or Agreed to be
Paid: None
(vii) Sensitivity of Technology Contained in the Defense Article or
Defense Services Proposed to be Sold: See Attached Annex
(viii) Date Report Delivered to Congress: February 5, 2018
* As defined in Section 47(6) of the Arms Export Control Act.
POLICY JUSTIFICATION
Finland--RGM-84Q-4 Harpoon Block II+ ER Grade B Surface-Launched
Missiles and RGM-84L-4 Harpoon Block II Grade B Surface-Launched
Missiles
The Government of Finland has requested a possible sale of one
hundred (100) RGM-84Q-4 Harpoon Block II Plus (+) Extended Range (ER)
Grade B Surface-Launched Missiles, twelve (12) RGM-84L-4 Harpoon Block
II Grade B Surface-Launched Missiles, twelve (12) RGM-84Q-4 Harpoon
Block II+ ER Grade B Surface-Launched Upgrade Kits, four (4) RTM-84L-4
Harpoon Block II Grade B Exercise Surface-Launched Missiles, and four
(4) RTM-84Q-4 Harpoon Block II+ ER Grade B Exercise Surface-Launched
Missiles. Also included are containers, spare and repair parts, support
and test equipment, publications and technical documentation, personnel
training and training equipment, technical assistance, engineering and
logistics support services, and other related elements of logistical
support. The estimated total case value is $622 million.
This proposed sale will support the foreign policy and national
security objectives of the United States by improving the security of a
partner nation that has been, and continues to be, an important force
for political stability and economic progress in Europe.
Finland intends to use the missiles on its Hamina class ships,
Multirole Corvette ships, and Coastal Batteries. The missiles will
provide enhanced capabilities in effective defense of critical sea
lanes. The proposed sale of the missiles and support will increase the
Finnish Navy's maritime partnership potential and increase regional
security capability. Finland has not purchased Harpoon Block II+ ER
previously, but will have no difficulty incorporating this capability
into its armed forces.
The proposed sale of this equipment and support will not alter the
basic military balance in the region.
The principal contractor will be The Boeing Company, St. Louis, MO.
The purchaser typically requests offsets. Any offset agreement will be
defined in negotiations between the purchaser and the contractor.
Implementation of this proposed sale will require up to 21 U.S.
Government personnel to travel to Finland providing support over a
period of ten years.
There will be no adverse impact on U.S. defense readiness as a
result of this proposed sale.
Transmittal No. 17-76
Notice of Proposed Issuance of Letter of Offer Pursuant to Section
36(b)(1) of the Arms Export Control Act
Annex
Item No. vii
(vii) Sensitivity of Technology:
1. The RGM-84Q Harpoon Block II+ ER Surface-Launched missile system
is classified SECRET. The Harpoon missile is a non-nuclear tactical
weapon system. It provides a day, night, and adverse weather, standoff
air-to-surface capability and is an effective Anti-Surface Warfare
missile. The RGM-84Q incorporates components, software, and technical
design information that is considered sensitive. The following
components being conveyed by the proposed sale that are considered
sensitive include:
a. Classified CONFIDENTIAL:
(1) Radar Seeker
(2) GPS/INS System
(3) Operational Flight Program Software
(4) Missile operational characteristics and performance data
b. Classified up to SECRET:
(1) Weapon Data Link (depending on key classification)
(2) Warhead
These elements are essential to the ability of the Harpoon missile
to selectively engage hostile targets under a wide range of operations,
tactical and environmental conditions. The Harpoon is a Coastal Target
Suppressions land attack weapon.
2. The RGM-84L Harpoon Block II Surface-Launched missile system is
classified CONFIDENTIAL. The Harpoon missile is a non-nuclear tactical
weapon system currently in service in the U.S. Navy and in 29 other
foreign nations. It provides a day, night, and adverse weather,
standoff air-to-surface capability and is an effective Anti-Surface
Warfare missile. The RGM-84L incorporates components, software, and
technical design information that are considered sensitive. The
following components being conveyed by the proposed sale that are
considered sensitive and are classified CONFIDENTIAL are:
Classified CONFIDENTIAL:
(1) Radar Seeker
(2) GPS/INS System
(3) Operational Flight Program Software
(4) Missile operational characteristics and performance data
3. The RTM-84 Exercise Harpoon Surface-Launched missile is
classified up to SECRET. The RTM-84 Exercise Harpoon incorporates
components, software, and technical design information that are
considered sensitive. The following components being conveyed by the
proposed sale that are considered sensitive include:
a. Classified CONFIDENTIAL:
(1) Radar Seeker
(2) GPS/INS System
(3) Operational Flight Program Software
(4) Missile operational characteristics and performance data
b. Classified up to SECRET:
(1) Weapon Data Link (depending on key classification)
4. If a technologically advanced adversary were to obtain knowledge
of
[[Page 6169]]
specific hardware, the information could be used to develop
countermeasures which might reduce weapons system effectiveness or be
used in the development of a system with similar or advanced
capabilities.
5. A determination has been made that Finland can provide
substantially the same degree of protection for sensitive technology
being released as the U.S. Government. This proposed sustainment
program is necessary to the furtherance of the U.S. foreign policy and
national security objectives outlined in the policy justification.
6. All defense articles and services listed on this transmittal are
authorized for release and export to the Government of Finland.
[FR Doc. 2018-02876 Filed 2-12-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P