Notice of Inquiry; Request for Comments Regarding Review of United States Munitions List Categories V, X, and XI, 5970-5971 [2018-02495]
Download as PDF
5970
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 29 / Monday, February 12, 2018 / Proposed Rules
BIS is also seeking comments on
potential cost savings to private entities
from shifting control of specific
commercial items from USML to the
CCL. To the extent possible, please
quantify the cost of compliance with
USML control of commercial items, to
include the time saved, the reduction in
paperwork, and any other cost savings
for a particular change.
Dated: January 31, 2018.
Richard E. Ashooh,
Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2018–02496 Filed 2–9–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
List Review
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 121
[Public Notice 9980; Docket Number DOS–
2017–0017]
RIN 1400–AE46
Notice of Inquiry; Request for
Comments Regarding Review of
United States Munitions List
Categories V, X, and XI
Department of State.
Notice of Inquiry; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of State
requests comments from the public to
inform its review of the controls
implemented in recent revisions to
Categories V, X, and XI of the United
States Munitions List (USML). The
Department periodically reviews USML
categories to ensure that they are clear,
do not inadvertently control items in
normal commercial use, account for
technological developments, and
properly implement the national
security and foreign policy objectives of
the United States.
DATES: The Department will accept
comments on the Notice of Inquiry up
to April 13, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
identified by docket number DOS–
2017–0017, by any of the following
methods:
• Email: DDTCPublicComments@
state.gov. Include docket number DOS–
2017 in the subject line with, ‘‘Request
for Comments Regarding Review of
USML Categories V, X and XI.’’
• Internet: At www.regulations.gov
Follow the instructions for sending
comments using docket number, DOS–
2017–0017.
Comments submitted through
www.regulations.gov will be visible to
other members of the public; the
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Feb 09, 2018
Department will publish all comments
on the Directorate of Defense Trade
Controls website
(www.pmddtc.state.gov). Therefore,
commenters are cautioned not to
include proprietary or other sensitive
information in their comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Engda Wubneh, Office of Defense Trade
Controls Policy, Department of State,
telephone (202) 663–2816; email
wubnehem@state.gov. ATTN: Request
for Comments Regarding Review of
USML Categories V, X and XI.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Jkt 244001
On December 10, 2010, the
Department provided notice to the
public of its intent to revise the USML
to create a ‘‘positive list’’ that describes
controlled items using, to the extent
possible, objective criteria rather than
broad, open-ended, subjective, catch-all,
or design intent-based criteria (see 75
FR 76935). This meant revising USML
categories so that, with some
exceptions, the descriptions of defense
articles that continued to warrant
control under the USML did not use
catch-all phrases to control unspecified
items. With limited exceptions, the
defense articles that warranted control
under the USML were those that
provided the United States with a
critical military or intelligence
advantage. All other items were to
become subject to the Export
Administration Regulations. Since that
time, the Department has published
final rules setting forth revisions for 18
USML categories, each of which have
been reorganized into a uniform and
more positive list structure.
The advantage of revising the USML
into a more positive list is that its
controls can be tailored to satisfy the
national security and foreign policy
objectives of the U.S. government by
maintaining control over those defense
articles that provide a critical military or
intelligence advantage, or otherwise
warrant control under the International
Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR),
without inadvertently controlling items
in normal commercial use. This
approach, however, requires that the
lists be regularly revised and updated to
account for technological developments,
practical application issues identified
by exporters and reexporters, and
changes in the military and commercial
applications of items affected by the list.
This Notice of Inquiry is the third in
a series of solicitations requesting
feedback on revised USML categories.
Previous Notices of Inquiry requested
comments on Categories VIII and XIX
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(see 80 FR 11314) and Categories VI, VII,
XIII, and XX (see 80 FR 61138). As
indicated above, the subjects of this
Notice of Inquiry are Categories V and
X, which was most recently revised on
January 2, 2014 (see 79 FR 34), and
Category XI, which was most recently
revised on July 1, 2014 (see 79 FR
37536). Additionally, the Department
determined that it is in the interest of
the security of the United States to
temporarily revise USML Category XI
paragraph (b), pursuant to the
provisions of 22 CFR 126.2, while a
long-term solution is developed. A
recent final rule extends the July 2, 2015
modification (80 FR 78130) to August
30, 2018 to allow the U.S. government
to review USML Category XI in full and
publish proposed and final rules. As
with previous inquiries, the Department
seeks comment from the public on the
condition and efficacy of these
categories.
Request for Comments
The Department requests public
comment on USML Categories V, X and
XI. General comments on other aspects
of the ITAR, to include other categories
of the USML, are outside of the scope
of this inquiry. In order to contribute
effectively to the USML review process,
all commenters are encouraged to
provide comments that are responsive
specifically to the prompts set forth
below.
The Department requests comment on
the following topics, as they relate to
Categories V, X and XI:
1. Emerging and new technologies
that are appropriately controlled by one
of the referenced categories, but which
are not currently described in subject
categories or not described with
sufficient clarity.
2. Defense articles that are described
in subject categories, but which have
entered into normal commercial use
since the most recent revisions to the
category at issue. For such comments,
be sure to include documentation to
support claims that defense articles
have entered into normal commercial
use.
3. Defense articles for which
commercial use is proposed, intended,
or anticipated in the next 5 years.
4. Drafting or other technical issues in
the text of all of the referenced
categories.
5. Comments regarding USML
Category XI paragraph (b) modification.
6. Potential cost savings to private
entities from shifting control of specific
commercial items from USML to the
Export Administration Regulations. To
the extent possible, please quantify the
cost of compliance with USML control
E:\FR\FM\12FEP1.SGM
12FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 29 / Monday, February 12, 2018 / Proposed Rules
of commercial items, to include the time
saved, the reduction in paperwork, and
any other cost savings for a particular
change.
The Department will review all
comments from the public. If a
rulemaking is warranted based on the
comments received, the Department will
respond to comments received in a
proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register.
Richard Koelling,
Acting Director, Office of Defense Trade
Controls Policy, Bureau of Political-Military
Affairs, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2018–02495 Filed 2–9–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 55
[EPA–R01–OAR–2018–0011; FRL–9974–28–
Region 1]
Outer Continental Shelf Air
Regulations; Consistency Update for
Massachusetts
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to update a
portion of the Outer Continental Shelf
(OCS) Air Regulations. Requirements
applying to OCS sources located within
25 miles of states’ seaward boundaries
must be updated periodically to remain
consistent with the requirements of the
corresponding onshore area (COA), as
mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the
Clean Air Act. The portion of the OCS
air regulations that is being updated
pertains to the requirements for OCS
sources for which Massachusetts is the
designated COA. The intended effect of
approving the OCS requirements for the
Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection is to regulate
emissions from OCS sources in
accordance with the requirements for
onshore sources. The Commonwealth of
Massachusetts’ requirements discussed
in this document are proposed to be
incorporated by reference into the Code
of Federal Regulations and listed in the
appendix to the OCS air regulations.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before March 14, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R01–
OAR–2018–0011 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
wortman.eric@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Feb 09, 2018
Jkt 244001
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets. Publicly
available docket materials are available
at https://www.regulations.gov or at the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
EPA New England Regional Office,
Office of Ecosystem Protection, Air
Permitting, Toxics, and Indoor Programs
Unit, 5 Post Office Square—Suite 100,
Boston, MA. EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the contact listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your
inspection. The Regional Office’s
official hours of business are Monday
through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
excluding legal holidays.
Eric
Wortman, Office of Ecosystem
Protection, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, EPA New England
Regional Office, 5 Post Office Square
(Mail Code OEP05–2), Boston, MA
02109, (617) 918–1624, wortman.eric@
epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Background and Purpose
II. EPA’s Evaluation
III. Proposed Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5971
I. Background and Purpose
On September 4, 1992, the EPA
promulgated 40 CFR part 55,1 which
established requirements to control air
pollution from OCS sources in order to
attain and maintain federal and state
ambient air quality standards and to
comply with the provisions of part C of
title I of the CAA. The regulations at 40
CFR part 55 apply to all OCS sources
offshore of the states except those
located in the Gulf of Mexico west of
87.5 degrees longitude. Section 328 of
the CAA requires that for such sources
located within 25 miles of a state’s
seaward boundary, the requirements
shall be the same as would be
applicable if the sources were located in
the COA. Because the OCS requirements
are based on onshore requirements, and
onshore requirements may change,
section 328(a)(1) requires that the EPA
update the OCS requirements as
necessary to maintain consistency with
onshore requirements.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 55.12, consistency
reviews will occur (1) at least annually;
(2) upon receipt of a Notice of Intent
(NOI) under 40 CFR 55.4; or (3) when
a state or local agency submits a rule to
the EPA to be considered for
incorporation by reference in 40 CFR
part 55. This proposed action is being
taken in response to the submittal of a
NOI on December 11, 2017 by Vineyard
Wind, LLC. Public comments received
in writing within 30 days of publication
of this document will be considered by
the EPA before publishing a final rule.
Section 328(a) of the CAA requires
that the EPA establish requirements to
control air pollution from OCS sources
located within 25 miles of States’
seaward boundaries that are the same as
onshore requirements. To comply with
this statutory mandate, the EPA must
incorporate applicable onshore rules
into 40 CFR part 55 as they exist
onshore. This limits the EPA’s
flexibility in deciding which
requirements will be incorporated into
40 CFR part 55 and prevents the EPA
from making substantive changes to the
requirements it incorporates. As a
result, the EPA may be incorporating
rules into 40 CFR part 55 that do not
conform to all of the EPA’s state
implementation plan (SIP) guidance or
certain requirements of the CAA.
Consistency updates may result in the
inclusion of state or local rules or
regulations into 40 CFR part 55, even
1 The reader may refer to the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, December 5, 1991 (56 FR 63774), and
the preamble to the final rule promulgated
September 4, 1992 (57 FR 40792) for further
background and information on the OCS
regulations.
E:\FR\FM\12FEP1.SGM
12FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 29 (Monday, February 12, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5970-5971]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02495]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 121
[Public Notice 9980; Docket Number DOS-2017-0017]
RIN 1400-AE46
Notice of Inquiry; Request for Comments Regarding Review of
United States Munitions List Categories V, X, and XI
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Notice of Inquiry; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of State requests comments from the public to
inform its review of the controls implemented in recent revisions to
Categories V, X, and XI of the United States Munitions List (USML). The
Department periodically reviews USML categories to ensure that they are
clear, do not inadvertently control items in normal commercial use,
account for technological developments, and properly implement the
national security and foreign policy objectives of the United States.
DATES: The Department will accept comments on the Notice of Inquiry up
to April 13, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by docket number DOS-2017-
0017, by any of the following methods:
Email: [email protected]. Include docket number
DOS-2017 in the subject line with, ``Request for Comments Regarding
Review of USML Categories V, X and XI.''
Internet: At www.regulations.gov Follow the instructions
for sending comments using docket number, DOS-2017-0017.
Comments submitted through www.regulations.gov will be visible to
other members of the public; the Department will publish all comments
on the Directorate of Defense Trade Controls website
(www.pmddtc.state.gov). Therefore, commenters are cautioned not to
include proprietary or other sensitive information in their comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Engda Wubneh, Office of Defense
Trade Controls Policy, Department of State, telephone (202) 663-2816;
email [email protected]. ATTN: Request for Comments Regarding Review
of USML Categories V, X and XI.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
List Review
On December 10, 2010, the Department provided notice to the public
of its intent to revise the USML to create a ``positive list'' that
describes controlled items using, to the extent possible, objective
criteria rather than broad, open-ended, subjective, catch-all, or
design intent-based criteria (see 75 FR 76935). This meant revising
USML categories so that, with some exceptions, the descriptions of
defense articles that continued to warrant control under the USML did
not use catch-all phrases to control unspecified items. With limited
exceptions, the defense articles that warranted control under the USML
were those that provided the United States with a critical military or
intelligence advantage. All other items were to become subject to the
Export Administration Regulations. Since that time, the Department has
published final rules setting forth revisions for 18 USML categories,
each of which have been reorganized into a uniform and more positive
list structure.
The advantage of revising the USML into a more positive list is
that its controls can be tailored to satisfy the national security and
foreign policy objectives of the U.S. government by maintaining control
over those defense articles that provide a critical military or
intelligence advantage, or otherwise warrant control under the
International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), without inadvertently
controlling items in normal commercial use. This approach, however,
requires that the lists be regularly revised and updated to account for
technological developments, practical application issues identified by
exporters and reexporters, and changes in the military and commercial
applications of items affected by the list.
This Notice of Inquiry is the third in a series of solicitations
requesting feedback on revised USML categories. Previous Notices of
Inquiry requested comments on Categories VIII and XIX (see 80 FR 11314)
and Categories VI, VII, XIII, and XX (see 80 FR 61138). As indicated
above, the subjects of this Notice of Inquiry are Categories V and X,
which was most recently revised on January 2, 2014 (see 79 FR 34), and
Category XI, which was most recently revised on July 1, 2014 (see 79 FR
37536). Additionally, the Department determined that it is in the
interest of the security of the United States to temporarily revise
USML Category XI paragraph (b), pursuant to the provisions of 22 CFR
126.2, while a long-term solution is developed. A recent final rule
extends the July 2, 2015 modification (80 FR 78130) to August 30, 2018
to allow the U.S. government to review USML Category XI in full and
publish proposed and final rules. As with previous inquiries, the
Department seeks comment from the public on the condition and efficacy
of these categories.
Request for Comments
The Department requests public comment on USML Categories V, X and
XI. General comments on other aspects of the ITAR, to include other
categories of the USML, are outside of the scope of this inquiry. In
order to contribute effectively to the USML review process, all
commenters are encouraged to provide comments that are responsive
specifically to the prompts set forth below.
The Department requests comment on the following topics, as they
relate to Categories V, X and XI:
1. Emerging and new technologies that are appropriately controlled
by one of the referenced categories, but which are not currently
described in subject categories or not described with sufficient
clarity.
2. Defense articles that are described in subject categories, but
which have entered into normal commercial use since the most recent
revisions to the category at issue. For such comments, be sure to
include documentation to support claims that defense articles have
entered into normal commercial use.
3. Defense articles for which commercial use is proposed, intended,
or anticipated in the next 5 years.
4. Drafting or other technical issues in the text of all of the
referenced categories.
5. Comments regarding USML Category XI paragraph (b) modification.
6. Potential cost savings to private entities from shifting control
of specific commercial items from USML to the Export Administration
Regulations. To the extent possible, please quantify the cost of
compliance with USML control
[[Page 5971]]
of commercial items, to include the time saved, the reduction in
paperwork, and any other cost savings for a particular change.
The Department will review all comments from the public. If a
rulemaking is warranted based on the comments received, the Department
will respond to comments received in a proposed rulemaking in the
Federal Register.
Richard Koelling,
Acting Director, Office of Defense Trade Controls Policy, Bureau of
Political-Military Affairs, U.S. Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2018-02495 Filed 2-9-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P