Product Change-Priority Mail and First-Class Package Service Negotiated Service Agreement, 5468-5469 [2018-02458]
Download as PDF
5468
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
ML17332A148 and ML17332A150,
respectively. A summary of the
amendment documents is provided in
Section III of this document.
II. Exemption
Reproduced below is the exemption
document issued to VEGP Units 3 and
Unit 4. It makes reference to the
combined safety evaluation that
provides the reasoning for the findings
made by the NRC (and listed under Item
1) in order to grant the exemption:
1. In a letter dated November 30,
2016, as revised by letters dated June 16,
and October 6, 2017, Southern Nuclear
Operating Company requested from the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC
or Commission) an exemption to allow
departures from Tier 1 information in
the certified Design Control Document
(DCD) incorporated by reference in 10
CFR part 52, appendix D, ‘‘Design
Certification Rule for the AP1000
Design,’’ as part of license amendment
request (LAR) 16–031, ‘‘Shield Building
Roof Changes.’’
For the reasons set forth in Section 3.1
of the NRC staff’s Safety Evaluation
which can be found in (ADAMS
Accession No. ML17332A154) the
Commission finds that:
A. The exemption is authorized by
law;
B. the exemption presents no undue
risk to public health and safety;
C. the exemption is consistent with
the common defense and security;
D. special circumstances are present
in that the application of the rule in this
circumstance is not necessary to serve
the underlying purpose of the rule;
E. the special circumstances outweigh
any decrease in safety that may result
from the reduction in standardization
caused by the exemption; and
F. the exemption will not result in a
significant decrease in the level of safety
otherwise provided by the design.
2. Accordingly, the licensee is granted
an exemption from the certified DCD
Tier 1 information, allowing changes to
the plant-specific DCD Tier 1 with
corresponding changes to Appendix C
of the Facility Combined License as
described in the request dated
November 30, 2016, as revised by letters
dated June 16, and October 6, 2017. This
exemption is related to, and necessary
for, the granting of License Amendment
No. 106, which is being issued
concurrently with this exemption.
3. As explained in Section 5.0 of the
NRC staff’s Safety Evaluation (ADAMS
Accession No. ML17332A154), this
exemption meets the eligibility criteria
for categorical exclusion set forth in 10
CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to
10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:17 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
impact statement or environmental
assessment needs to be prepared in
connection with the issuance of the
exemption.
4. This exemption is effective as of the
date of its issuance.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Jennifer L. Dixon-Herrity,
Chief, Licensing Branch 4, Division of New
Reactor Licensing, Office of New Reactors.
[FR Doc. 2018–02472 Filed 2–6–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
III. License Amendment Request
By letter dated November 30, 2016,
(ADAMS Accession No. ML16335A453)
and revised by letters dated June 16 and
October 6, 2017, (ADAMS Accession
Nos. ML17167A335 and ML17279B086,
respectively), the licensee requested that
the NRC amend the COLs for VEGP,
Units 3 and 4, COLs NPF–91 and NPF–
92. The proposed amendment is
described in Section I of this Federal
Register notice.
The Commission has determined for
these amendments that the application
complies with the standards and
requirements of the Atomic Energy Act
of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the
Commission’s rules and regulations.
The Commission has made appropriate
findings as required by the Act and the
Commission’s rules and regulations in
10 CFR chapter I, which are set forth in
the license amendment.
A notice of consideration of issuance
of amendment to facility operating
license or COL, as applicable, proposed
no significant hazards consideration
determination, and opportunity for a
hearing in connection with these
actions, was published in the Federal
Register on March 8, 2017 (82 FR
13019). No comments were received
during the 30-day comment period.
The Commission has determined that
these amendments satisfy the criteria for
categorical exclusion in accordance
with 10 CFR 51.22. Therefore, pursuant
to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental
impact statement or environmental
assessment need be prepared for these
amendments.
Using the reasons set forth in the
combined safety evaluation, the staff
granted the exemption and issued the
amendment that the licensee requested
on November 30, 2016, as revised by
letters dated June 16, and October 6,
2017.
The exemption and amendment were
issued to the licensee on January 11,
2018, as part of a combined package
(ADAMS Accession No. ML17332A146).
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 2nd day
of February 2018.
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Product Change—Parcel Select
Negotiated Service Agreement
Sfmt 4703
Postal ServiceTM.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Postal Service gives
notice of filing a request with the Postal
Regulatory Commission to add a
domestic shipping services contract to
the list of Negotiated Service
Agreements in the Mail Classification
Schedule’s Competitive Products List.
DATES: Date of notice required under 39
U.S.C. 3642(d)(1): February 7, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth A. Reed, 202–268–3179.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
United States Postal Service® hereby
gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C.
3642 and 3632(b)(3), on February 2,
2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory
Commission a Request of the United
States Postal Service to Add Parcel
Select Contract 30 to Competitive
Product List. Documents are available at
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018–122,
CP2018–165.
SUMMARY:
Elizabeth A. Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018–02459 Filed 2–6–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
POSTAL SERVICE
Product Change—Priority Mail and
First-Class Package Service
Negotiated Service Agreement
Postal ServiceTM.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
IV. Conclusion
PO 00000
POSTAL SERVICE
The Postal Service gives
notice of filing a request with the Postal
Regulatory Commission to add a
domestic shipping services contract to
the list of Negotiated Service
Agreements in the Mail Classification
Schedule’s Competitive Products List.
DATES: Date of required notice: February
7, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth A. Reed, 202–268–3179.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
United States Postal Service® hereby
gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C.
3642 and 3632(b)(3), on February 2,
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Notices
2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory
Commission a USPS Request to Add
Priority Mail & First-Class Package
Service Contract 74 to Competitive
Product List. Documents are available at
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2018–121,
CP2018–164.
Elizabeth A. Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018–02458 Filed 2–6–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–82614; File No. SR–
CboeBZX–2018–006]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change to Rule 21.1,
Definitions, To Adopt a New Time in
Force and To Modify an Existing Time
in Force Applicable to the Exchange’s
Equity Options Platform
February 1, 2018.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January
25, 2018, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Exchange has
designated this proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder,4 which renders it effective
upon filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange filed a proposal to
amend Rule 21.1 to adopt a new Time
in Force and to modify an existing Time
in Force applicable to the Exchange’s
equity options platform (‘‘BZX
Options’’).
The text of the proposed rule change
is available at the Exchange’s website at
www.markets.cboe.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
2 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:17 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant parts of such
statements.
(A) Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange propose to adopt a new
Time in Force under Rule 21.1,
Definitions. Specifically, the Exchange
proposes to adopt the Time in Force of
‘‘Good Til Cancelled’’, or ‘‘GTC’’, which,
as proposed shall mean, for an order so
designated, that if after entry into the
System, the order is not fully executed,
the order (or the unexecuted portion
thereof) shall remain available for
potential display and/or execution
unless cancelled by the entering party,
or until the option expires, whichever
comes first. The Exchange proposes to
adopt the Time in Force of GTC in subparagraph (f)(4) of Rule 21.1, which is
currently reserved. The proposed
definition of GTC is based on and
identical to Rule 21.1(f)(4) of the
Exchange’s affiliate, EDGX.
The Exchange also proposes to amend
sub-paragraph (f)(1) of Exchange Rule
21.1, to modify the Good Til Day (or
‘‘GTD’’) Time in Force. Currently, GTD
orders are limited to the specific trading
day on which they are entered, as the
Exchange does not currently offer any
orders that continue to remain on the
Exchange for more than a single trading
day (i.e., does not carry any orders
overnight). Specifically, in connection
with the adoption of the Time in Force
of GTC, the Exchange proposes to
modify the GTD Time in Force to also
allow GTD orders to remain in effect
past the day on which they were
entered, and therefore proposes to
remove language that refers to the time
of expiration as needing to be ‘‘during
such trading day’’. In addition, to avoid
confusion, the Exchange proposes to
modify the name of the GTD Time in
Force to ‘‘Good Til Date’’, which is more
reflective of a Time in Force that can
last for more than one trading day.
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
5469
The Exchange does not believe that
offering GTD functionality that allows
orders to remain with the Exchange for
more than one trading day raises any
issues that are not already present with
GTC orders. In turn, GTC is a common
time in force and is typically
implemented to allow orders to remain
for more than one trading day.5 The
Exchange simply has not offered such
functionality previously and therefore
has had specific language reflecting that
an expiration time must be during the
trading day. The Exchange notes that
EDGX recently filed to make the same
change to its definition and
functionality related to GTD.6 The
Exchange also notes that a GTD modifier
providing a Time in Force that could
last more than one day has been
previously offered by at least one
equities exchange not affiliated with the
Exchange.7
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act 8 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act 9
in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest.
The Exchange believes the proposed
amendment will provide additional
flexibility to Users that wish to enter an
order that will last past the trading day
on which it is entered by allowing such
Users to either enter an order with the
GTC Time in Force, without a specific
expiration time, or to use the GTD Time
in Force to set a specific expiration time
on an order. As noted above, the
Exchange proposes to adopt the GTC
Time in Force in the near future, which
will persist over multiple trading days
unless cancelled, and believes that the
Time in Force of GTD should similarly
be able to persist over multiple trading
days. The Exchange believes it could be
confusing and inconsistent to offer a
GTC Time in Force that can persist for
longer than a single trading day and a
GTD Time in Force, which commonly
means ‘‘Good Til Date’’, but that would
5 See,
e.g., C2 Rule 6.10(d)(2).
SR–CboeEDGX–2018–003, filed January 25,
2018, available at: https://markets.cboe.com/us/
options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/.
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75497
(July 21, 2015), 80 FR 45022 (July 28, 2015) (SR–
NYSEArca–2015–56) (notice of filing by NYSE Arca
describing proposed changes in connection with
migration of technology to new platform, including
retirement of GTD modifier).
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
6 See
E:\FR\FM\07FEN1.SGM
07FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 7, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5468-5469]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02458]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL SERVICE
Product Change--Priority Mail and First-Class Package Service
Negotiated Service Agreement
AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.
DATES: Date of required notice: February 7, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth A. Reed, 202-268-3179.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg]
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on
February 2,
[[Page 5469]]
2018, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS Request to
Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package Service Contract 74 to
Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov,
Docket Nos. MC2018-121, CP2018-164.
Elizabeth A. Reed,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2018-02458 Filed 2-6-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P