List of Fisheries for 2018, 5349-5372 [2018-02442]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
2011, IBR approved for §§ 770.1(c) and
770.3.
[FR Doc. 2018–02144 Filed 2–6–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 229
[Docket No. 170303230–8047–02]
RIN 0648–BG72
List of Fisheries for 2018
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) publishes its
final List of Fisheries (LOF) for 2018, as
required by the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA). The LOF for
2018 reflects new information on
interactions between commercial
fisheries and marine mammals. NMFS
must classify each commercial fishery
on the LOF into one of three categories
under the MMPA based upon the level
of mortality and serious injury of marine
mammals that occurs incidental to each
fishery. The classification of a fishery on
the LOF determines whether
participants in that fishery are subject to
certain provisions of the MMPA, such as
registration, observer coverage, and take
reduction plan (TRP) requirements.
DATES: The applicability date of this
final rule is March 9, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Chief, Marine Mammal and
Sea Turtle Conservation Division, Office
of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910.
SUMMARY:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristy Long, Office of Protected
Resources, 301–427–8402; Allison
Rosner, Greater Atlantic Region, 978–
281–9328; Jessica Powell, Southeast
Region, 727–824–5312; Dan Lawson,
West Coast Region, 562–980–3209;
Suzie Teerlink, Alaska Region, 907–
586–7240; Kevin Brindock, Pacific
Islands Region, 808–725–5146.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the
hearing impaired may call the Federal
Information Relay Service at 1–800–
877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
Eastern time, Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
What is the List of Fisheries?
Section 118 of the MMPA requires
NMFS to place all U.S. commercial
fisheries into one of three categories
based on the level of incidental
mortality and serious injury of marine
mammals occurring in each fishery (16
U.S.C. 1387(c)(1)). The classification of
a fishery on the LOF determines
whether participants in that fishery may
be required to comply with certain
provisions of the MMPA, such as
registration, observer coverage, and take
reduction plan requirements. NMFS
must reexamine the LOF annually,
considering new information in the
Marine Mammal Stock Assessment
Reports (SARs) and other relevant
sources, and publish in the Federal
Register any necessary changes to the
LOF after notice and opportunity for
public comment (16 U.S.C. 1387
(c)(1)(C)).
How does NMFS determine in which
category a fishery is placed?
The definitions for the fishery
classification criteria can be found in
the implementing regulations for section
118 of the MMPA (50 CFR 229.2). The
criteria are also summarized here.
Fishery Classification Criteria
The fishery classification criteria
consist of a two-tiered, stock-specific
approach that first addresses the total
impact of all fisheries on each marine
mammal stock and then addresses the
impact of individual fisheries on each
stock. This approach is based on
consideration of the rate, in numbers of
animals per year, of incidental
mortalities and serious injuries of
marine mammals due to commercial
fishing operations relative to the
potential biological removal (PBR) level
for each marine mammal stock. The
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1362 (20)) defines the
PBR level as the maximum number of
animals, not including natural
mortalities, that may be removed from a
marine mammal stock while allowing
that stock to reach or maintain its
optimum sustainable population (OSP).
This definition can also be found in the
implementing regulations for section
118 of the MMPA (50 CFR 229.2).
Tier 1: Tier 1 considers the
cumulative fishery mortality and serious
injury for a particular stock. If the total
annual mortality and serious injury of a
marine mammal stock, across all
fisheries, is less than or equal to 10
percent of the PBR level of the stock, all
fisheries interacting with the stock will
be placed in Category III (unless those
fisheries interact with other stock(s) for
which total annual mortality and
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5349
serious injury is greater than 10 percent
of PBR). Otherwise, these fisheries are
subject to the next tier (Tier 2) of
analysis to determine their
classification.
Tier 2: Tier 2 considers fisheryspecific mortality and serious injury for
a particular stock.
Category I: Annual mortality and
serious injury of a stock in a given
fishery is greater than or equal to 50
percent of the PBR level (i.e., frequent
incidental mortality and serious injury
of marine mammals).
Category II: Annual mortality and
serious injury of a stock in a given
fishery is greater than 1 percent and less
than 50 percent of the PBR level (i.e.,
occasional incidental mortality and
serious injury of marine mammals).
Category III: Annual mortality and
serious injury of a stock in a given
fishery is less than or equal to 1 percent
of the PBR level (i.e., a remote
likelihood of or no known incidental
mortality and serious injury of marine
mammals).
Additional details regarding how the
categories were determined are
provided in the preamble to the final
rule implementing section 118 of the
MMPA (60 FR 45086; August 30, 1995).
Because fisheries are classified on a
per-stock basis, a fishery may qualify as
one category for one marine mammal
stock and another category for a
different marine mammal stock. A
fishery is typically classified on the LOF
at its highest level of classification (e.g.,
a fishery qualifying for Category III for
one marine mammal stock and for
Category II for another marine mammal
stock will be listed under Category II).
Stocks driving a fishery’s classification
are denoted with a superscript ‘‘1’’ in
Tables 1 and 2.
Other Criteria That May Be Considered
The tier analysis requires a minimum
amount of data, and NMFS does not
have sufficient data to perform a tier
analysis on certain fisheries. Therefore,
NMFS has classified certain fisheries by
analogy to other Category I or II fisheries
that use similar fishing techniques or
gear that are known to cause mortality
or serious injury of marine mammals, or
according to factors discussed in the
final LOF for 1996 (60 FR 67063;
December 28, 1995) and listed in the
regulatory definition of a Category II
fishery: In the absence of reliable
information indicating the frequency of
incidental mortality and serious injury
of marine mammals by a commercial
fishery, NMFS will determine whether
the incidental mortality or serious
injury is ‘‘frequent,’’ ‘‘occasional,’’ or
‘‘remote’’ by evaluating other factors
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
5350
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
such as fishing techniques, gear used,
methods used to deter marine mammals,
target species, seasons and areas fished,
qualitative data from logbooks or
fishermen reports, stranding data, and
the species and distribution of marine
mammals in the area, or at the
discretion of the Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries (50 CFR
229.2).
Further, eligible commercial fisheries
not specifically identified on the LOF
are deemed to be Category II fisheries
until the next LOF is published (50 CFR
229.2).
fisheries with no observer coverage and
for observed fisheries with evidence
indicating that undocumented
interactions may be occurring (e.g.,
fishery has low observer coverage and
stranding network data include
evidence of fisheries interactions that
cannot be attributed to a specific
fishery) species and stocks may be
retained for longer than five years. For
these fisheries, NMFS will review the
other sources of information listed
above and use its discretion to decide
when it is appropriate to remove a
species or stock.
How does NMFS determine which
species or stocks are included as
incidentally killed or injured in a
fishery?
The LOF includes a list of marine
mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in each
commercial fishery. The list of species
and/or stocks incidentally killed or
injured includes ‘‘serious’’ and ‘‘nonserious’’ documented injuries as
described later in the List of Species
and/or Stocks Incidentally Killed or
Injured in the Pacific Ocean and the
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean sections. To determine which
species or stocks are included as
incidentally killed or injured in a
fishery, NMFS annually reviews the
information presented in the current
SARs and injury determination reports.
The SARs are based upon the best
available scientific information and
provide the most current and inclusive
information on each stock’s PBR level
and level of interaction with
commercial fishing operations. The best
available scientific information used in
the SARs reviewed for the 2018 LOF
generally summarizes data from 2010–
2014. NMFS also reviews other sources
of new information, including injury
determination reports, bycatch
estimation reports, observer data,
logbook data, stranding data,
disentanglement network data,
fishermen self-reports (i.e., MMPA
mortality/injury reports), and anecdotal
reports from that time period. In some
cases, more recent information may be
available and used in the LOF, but in an
effort to be consistent with the most
recent SARs and across the LOF, NMFS
typically restricts the analysis to data
within the five-year time period
summarized in the current SAR.
For fisheries with observer coverage,
species or stocks are generally removed
from the list of marine mammal species
and/or stocks incidentally killed or
injured if no interactions are
documented in the five-year timeframe
summarized in that year’s LOF. For
Where does NMFS obtain information
on the level of observer coverage in a
fishery on the LOF?
The best available information on the
level of observer coverage and the
spatial and temporal distribution of
observed marine mammal interactions is
presented in the SARs. Data obtained
from the observer program and observer
coverage levels are important tools in
estimating the level of marine mammal
mortality and serious injury in
commercial fishing operations. Starting
with the 2005 SARs, each Pacific and
Alaska SAR includes an appendix with
detailed descriptions of each Category I
and II fishery on the LOF, including the
observer coverage in those fisheries. For
Atlantic fisheries, this information can
be found in the LOF Fishery Fact
Sheets. The SARs generally do not
provide detailed information on
observer coverage in Category III
fisheries because, under the MMPA,
Category III fisheries are generally not
required to accommodate observers
aboard vessels due to the remote
likelihood of mortality and serious
injury of marine mammals. Fishery
information presented in the SARs’
appendices and other resources
referenced during the tier analysis may
include: Level of observer coverage;
target species; levels of fishing effort;
spatial and temporal distribution of
fishing effort; characteristics of fishing
gear and operations; management and
regulations; and interactions with
marine mammals. Copies of the SARs
are available on the NMFS Office of
Protected Resources website at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/.
Information on observer coverage levels
in Category I, II, and III fisheries can be
found in the fishery fact sheets on the
NMFS Office of Protected Resources’
website: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
interactions/fisheries/lof.html.
Additional information on observer
programs in commercial fisheries can be
found on the NMFS National Observer
Program’s website: https://
www.st.nmfs.gov/observer-home/.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
How do I find out if a specific fishery
is in Category I, II, or III?
The LOF includes three tables that list
all U.S. commercial fisheries by
Category. Table 1 lists all of the
commercial fisheries in the Pacific
Ocean (including Alaska); Table 2 lists
all of the commercial fisheries in the
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean; and Table 3 lists all U.S.authorized commercial fisheries on the
high seas. A fourth table, Table 4, lists
all commercial fisheries managed under
applicable TRPs or take reduction teams
(TRTs).
Are high seas fisheries included on the
LOF?
Beginning with the 2009 LOF, NMFS
includes high seas fisheries in Table 3
of the LOF, along with the number of
valid High Seas Fishing Compliance Act
(HSFCA) permits in each fishery. As of
2004, NMFS issues HSFCA permits only
for high seas fisheries analyzed in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and
the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The
authorized high seas fisheries are broad
in scope and encompass multiple
specific fisheries identified by gear type.
For the purposes of the LOF, the high
seas fisheries are subdivided based on
gear type (e.g., trawl, longline, purse
seine, gillnet, troll, etc.) to provide more
detail on composition of effort within
these fisheries. Many fisheries operate
in both U.S. waters and on the high
seas, creating some overlap between the
fisheries listed in Tables 1 and 2 and
those in Table 3. In these cases, the high
seas component of the fishery is not
considered a separate fishery, but an
extension of a fishery operating within
U.S. waters (listed in Table 1 or 2).
NMFS designates those fisheries in
Tables 1, 2, and 3 by a ‘‘*’’ after the
fishery’s name. The number of HSFCA
permits listed in Table 3 for the high
seas components of these fisheries
operating in U.S. waters does not
necessarily represent additional effort
that is not accounted for in Tables 1 and
2. Many vessels/participants holding
HSFCA permits also fish within U.S.
waters and are included in the number
of vessels and participants operating
within those fisheries in Tables 1 and 2.
HSFCA permits are valid for five
years, during which time Fishery
Management Plans (FMPs) can change.
Therefore, some vessels/participants
may possess valid HSFCA permits
without the ability to fish under the
permit because it was issued for a gear
type that is no longer authorized under
the most current FMP. For this reason,
the number of HSFCA permits
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
displayed in Table 3 is likely higher
than the actual U.S. fishing effort on the
high seas. For more information on how
NMFS classifies high seas fisheries on
the LOF, see the preamble text in the
final 2009 LOF (73 FR 73032; December
1, 2008). Additional information about
HSFCA permits can be found at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/ia/permits/
highseas.html.
Where can I find specific information
on fisheries listed on the LOF?
Starting with the 2010 LOF, NMFS
developed summary documents, or
fishery fact sheets, for each Category I
and II fishery on the LOF. These fishery
fact sheets provide the full history of
each Category I and II fishery, including:
When the fishery was added to the LOF;
the basis for the fishery’s initial
classification; classification changes to
the fishery; changes to the list of species
and/or stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the fishery; fishery gear and
methods used; observer coverage levels;
fishery management and regulation; and
applicable TRPs or TRTs, if any. These
fishery fact sheets are updated after each
final LOF and can be found under ‘‘How
Do I Find Out if a Specific Fishery is in
Category I, II, or III?’’ on the NMFS
Office of Protected Resources’ website:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/
interactions/fisheries/lof.html, linked to
the ‘‘List of Fisheries by Year’’ table.
NMFS is developing similar fishery fact
sheets for each Category III fishery on
the LOF. However, due to the large
number of Category III fisheries on the
LOF and the lack of accessible and
detailed information on many of these
fisheries, the development of these
fishery fact sheets is taking significant
time to complete. NMFS began posting
Category III fishery fact sheets online
with the LOF for 2016.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Am I required to register under the
MMPA?
Owners of vessels or gear engaging in
a Category I or II fishery are required
under the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1387(c)(2)),
as described in 50 CFR 229.4, to register
with NMFS and obtain a marine
mammal authorization to lawfully take
non-endangered and non-threatened
marine mammals incidental to
commercial fishing operations. Owners
of vessels or gear engaged in a Category
III fishery are not required to register
with NMFS or obtain a marine mammal
authorization.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
How do I register and receive my
Marine Mammal Authorization
Program (MMAP) authorization
certificate?
NMFS has integrated the MMPA
registration process, implemented
through the Marine Mammal
Authorization Program (MMAP), with
existing state and Federal fishery
license, registration, or permit systems
for Category I and II fisheries on the
LOF. Participants in these fisheries are
automatically registered under the
MMAP and are not required to submit
registration or renewal materials.
In the Pacific Islands, West Coast, and
Alaska regions, NMFS will issue vessel
or gear owners an authorization
certificate via U.S. mail or with their
state or Federal license or permit at the
time of issuance or renewal.
In the West Coast Region,
authorization certificates may be
obtained from the website https://
www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/
protected_species/marine_mammals/
fisheries_interactions.html.
In the Alaska Region, authorization
certificates may be obtained by visiting
the Alaska Regional Office website
https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/pr/
mmapregistration.
In the Greater Atlantic Region, NMFS
will issue vessel or gear owners an
authorization certificate via U.S. mail
automatically at the beginning of each
calendar year. Certificates may also be
obtained by visiting the Greater Atlantic
Regional Office website https://
www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov/
mmap/.
In the Southeast Region, NMFS will
issue vessel or gear owners an
authorization certificate via U.S. mail
automatically at the beginning of each
calendar year. Vessel or gear owners can
receive additional authorization
certificates by contacting the Southeast
Regional Office at 727–209–5952 or by
visiting the Southeast Regional Office
website https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/
protected_resources/marine_mammal_
authorization_program/ and following
the instructions for printing the
certificate.
The authorization certificate, or a
copy, must be on board the vessel while
it is operating in a Category I or II
fishery, or for non-vessel fisheries, in
the possession of the person in charge
of the fishing operation (50 CFR
229.4(e)). Although efforts are made to
limit the issuance of authorization
certificates to only those vessel or gear
owners that participate in Category I or
II fisheries, not all state and Federal
license or permit systems distinguish
between fisheries as classified by the
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5351
LOF. Therefore, some vessel or gear
owners in Category III fisheries may
receive authorization certificates even
though they are not required for
Category III fisheries.
Individuals fishing in Category I and
II fisheries for which no state or Federal
license or permit is required must
register with NMFS by contacting their
appropriate Regional Office (see
ADDRESSES).
How do I renew my registration under
the MMAP?
In Alaska regional and Greater
Atlantic regional fisheries, registrations
of vessel or gear owners are
automatically renewed and participants
should receive an authorization
certificate by January 1 of each new
year. Certificates can also be obtained
from the region’s website. In Pacific
Islands regional fisheries, vessel or gear
owners receive an authorization
certificate by January 1 for state fisheries
and with their permit renewal for
Federal fisheries. In West Coast regional
fisheries, vessel or gear owners receive
authorization either with each renewed
state fishing license in Washington and
Oregon, with their permit renewal for
Federal fisheries (the timing of which
varies based on target species), or via
U.S. mail. Vessel or gear owners who
participate in fisheries in these regions
and have not received authorization
certificates by January 1 or with
renewed fishing licenses must contact
the appropriate NMFS Regional Office
(see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).
In Southeast regional fisheries, vessel or
gear owners’ registrations are
automatically renewed and participants
will receive an authorization certificate
via U.S. mail automatically at the
beginning of each calendar year.
Additional authorization certificates are
available for printing on the Southeast
Regional Office website https://
sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/protected_
resources/marine_mammal_
authorization_program/.
Am I required to submit reports when
I kill or injure a marine mammal
during the course of commercial fishing
operations?
In accordance with the MMPA (16
U.S.C. 1387(e)) and 50 CFR 229.6, any
vessel owner or operator, or gear owner
or operator (in the case of non-vessel
fisheries), participating in a fishery
listed on the LOF must report to NMFS
all incidental mortalities and injuries of
marine mammals that occur during
commercial fishing operations,
regardless of the category in which the
fishery is placed (I, II, or III) within 48
hours of the end of the fishing trip or,
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
5352
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
in the case of non-vessel fisheries,
fishing activity. ‘‘Injury’’ is defined in
50 CFR 229.2 as a wound or other
physical harm. In addition, any animal
that ingests fishing gear or any animal
that is released with fishing gear
entangling, trailing, or perforating any
part of the body is considered injured,
regardless of the presence of any wound
or other evidence of injury, and must be
reported.
Mortality/injury reporting forms and
instructions for submitting forms to
NMFS can be found at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/
mmap/#form or by contacting the
appropriate regional office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). Forms
may be submitted via any of the
following means: (1) Online using the
electronic form; (2) emailed as an
attachment to nmfs.mireport@noaa.gov;
(3) faxed to the NMFS Office of
Protected Resources at 301–713–0376;
or (4) mailed to the NMFS Office of
Protected Resources (mailing address is
provided on the postage-paid form that
can be printed from the web address
listed above). Reporting requirements
and procedures can be found in 50 CFR
229.6.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Am I required to take an observer
aboard my vessel?
Individuals participating in a
Category I or II fishery are required to
accommodate an observer aboard their
vessel(s) upon request from NMFS.
MMPA section 118 states that the
Secretary is not required to place an
observer on a vessel if the facilities for
quartering an observer or performing
observer functions are so inadequate or
unsafe that the health or safety of the
observer or the safe operation of the
vessel would be jeopardized; thereby
authorizing the exemption of vessels too
small to safely accommodate an
observer from this requirement.
However, U.S. Atlantic Ocean,
Caribbean, or Gulf of Mexico large
pelagics longline vessels operating in
special areas designated by the Pelagic
Longline Take Reduction Plan
implementing regulations (50 CFR
229.36(d)) will not be exempted from
observer requirements, regardless of
their size. Observer requirements can be
found in 50 CFR 229.7.
Am I required to comply with any
marine mammal TRP regulations?
Table 4 provides a list of fisheries
affected by TRPs and TRTs. TRP
regulations can be found at 50 CFR
229.30 through 229.37. A description of
each TRT and copies of each TRP can
be found at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
pr/interactions/trt/teams.html. It is the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
responsibility of fishery participants to
comply with applicable take reduction
regulations.
Where can I find more information
about the LOF and the MMAP?
Information regarding the LOF and
the MMAP, including: Registration
procedures and forms; current and past
LOFs; descriptions of each Category I
and II fishery and some Category III
fisheries; observer requirements; and
marine mammal mortality/injury
reporting forms and submittal
procedures; may be obtained at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/
fisheries/lof.html, or from any NMFS
Regional Office at the addresses listed
below:
NMFS, Greater Atlantic Regional
Fisheries Office, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930–2298,
Attn: Allison Rosner;
NMFS, Southeast Region, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701,
Attn: Jessica Powell;
NMFS, West Coast Region, Long
Beach Office, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite
4200, Long Beach, CA 90802–4213,
Attn: Dan Lawson;
NMFS, Alaska Region, Protected
Resources, P.O. Box 22668, 709 West
9th Street, Juneau, AK 99802, Attn:
Suzie Teerlink; or
NMFS, Pacific Islands Regional
Office, Protected Resources Division,
1845 Wasp Blvd., Building 176,
Honolulu, HI 96818, Attn: Kevin
Brindock.
Sources of Information Reviewed for
the 2018 LOF
NMFS reviewed the marine mammal
incidental mortality and serious injury
information presented in the SARs for
all fisheries to determine whether
changes in fishery classification are
warranted. The SARs are based on the
best scientific information available at
the time of preparation, including the
level of mortality and serious injury of
marine mammals that occurs incidental
to commercial fishery operations and
the PBR levels of marine mammal
stocks. The information contained in the
SARs is reviewed by regional Scientific
Review Groups (SRGs) representing
Alaska, the Pacific (including Hawaii),
and the U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico,
and Caribbean. The SRGs were created
by the MMPA to review the science that
informs the SARs, and to advise NMFS
on marine mammal population status,
trends, and stock structure,
uncertainties in the science, research
needs, and other issues.
NMFS also reviewed other sources of
new information, including marine
mammal stranding data, observer
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
program data, fishermen self-reports,
reports to the SRGs, conference papers,
FMPs, and ESA documents.
The LOF for 2018 was based on,
among other things, stranding data;
fishermen self-reports; and SARs,
primarily the 2016 SARs, which are
based on data from 2010–2014. The
SARs referenced in this LOF include:
2014 (80 FR 50599; August 20, 2015),
2015 (81 FR 38676; June 14, 2016), 2016
(82 FR 29039; June 27, 2017). The SARs
are available at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received letters containing
comments on the proposed LOF for
2018 (82 FR 47424; October 12, 2017)
from the Marine Mammal Commission
(Commission); five non-governmental
organizations (Center for Biological
Diversity (CBD), Hawaii Longline
Association (HLA), Southeast Alaska
Fishermen’s Alliance (SEAFA),
Southeast Alaska Sperm Whale
Avoidance Project (SEASWAP), and
Turtle Island Restoration Network
(TIRN); and two individuals. Responses
to substantive comments are below;
comments on actions not related to the
LOF are not included.
Comments on Commercial Fisheries in
the Pacific Ocean
Comment 1: The Commission believes
that NMFS’ approach to classifying the
Gulf of Alaska sablefish longline (GOA
SLL) fishery based on the statutory
definitions of fishery categories in the
MMPA, in the absence of an estimate of
PBR, is appropriate. Further, the
Commission states that NMFS has the
discretion to classify a fishery as
Category I in the absence of the data
necessary to calculate mortality and
serious injury (M/SI) as a fraction of
PBR. The Commission notes that while
the current M/SI is almost certainly
greater than 10 percent of PBR, exactly
where M/SI as a percentage of PBR falls
relative to the Category I and II
thresholds depends on what proportion
of the stock’s U.S. range was surveyed,
and other factors not taken into account
in NMFS’ analysis. The Commission
recommends that the GOA SLL fishery
should be classified as at least a
Category II fishery. However, two other
commenters, SEASWAP and SEAFA,
oppose the proposed change to
reclassify the GOA SLL from a Category
III to a Category II fishery based on
interactions with sperms whales. These
commenters disagree that these
temporary sperm whale entanglements
resulted in serious injuries and assert
that prorating these serious injuries to
mortalities is not appropriate (see
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
comments 3, 4, and 5 below). They urge
NMFS to retain the existing Category III
ranking for the fishery.
Response: NMFS agrees with the
Commission and has reclassified the
fishery as Category II. Given our
analysis of the estimated mean annual
M/SI attributed to the GOA SLL fishery,
and our best available information
regarding the North Pacific sperm whale
stock, the AK Gulf of Alaska sablefish
pot fishery will be classified as Category
II in the 2018 LOF; NMFS will continue
to consider all available data in its
future classifications of this fishery.
Comment 2: The Commission
recommends that NMFS give high
priority to: (1) Surveying enough of the
range of sperm whales to provide a
reliable estimate of PBR for the portion
of the stock that occupies the EEZ in
Alaska, (2) increasing observer coverage
in the GOA SLL fishery (currently 14–
19 percent), and (3) developing a take
reduction plan for the North Pacific
stock of sperm whales. The Commission
comments that these actions will enable
NMFS to more definitively classify the
GOA SLL fishery and to mitigate the
bycatch problem.
Response: NMFS agrees with the
Commission on the need for reliable
estimates of abundance and PBR for the
North Pacific sperm whale stock;
however, the funding necessary for
surveying sperm whales in the Gulf of
Alaska is currently unavailable. Next,
observer coverage is determined through
the Annual Deployment Plan (ADP)
process, which provides a statisticallybased sampling approach for the
random deployment of human observers
onto longline vessels operating in the
Gulf of Alaska. The ADP is part of a
larger annual process where NMFS
consults with the North Pacific Fishery
Management Council and its Scientific
and Statistical Committee on to
determine the amount of coverage for an
upcoming year. This method is
described in the 2018 ADP (available at
https://www.afsc.noaa.gov/
Publications/ProcRpt/PR2017-07.pdf).
Regarding take reduction plans, NMFS’
available resources for Take Reduction
Teams (TRTs) are fully utilized at this
time. When NMFS lacks sufficient
funding to convene a TRT for all stocks
that interact with Category I and II
fisheries, NMFS gives highest priority
for developing and implementing new
take reduction plans to species and
stocks whose level of incidental
mortality and serious injury exceeds
PBR, that have a small population size,
and that are declining most rapidly,
pursuant to MMPA section 118(f)(3).
Comment 3: SEASWAP and SEAFA
assert that NMFS’ assignment of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
significant injury and 75 percent
mortality rate to temporary sperm whale
entanglements is unsubstantiated and
inconsistent with the determination
criteria used for other cetacean species,
such as beluga and humpback whales.
SEASWAP and SEAFA request that
NMFS lower the pro-rated mortality rate
for sperm whales.
Response: NMFS implemented a
policy for distinguishing serious from
non-serious injury of marine mammals
to increase transparency and
consistency nationwide in assessing and
quantifying serious injuries of marine
mammals in 2012 (NMFS 2012). This
policy serves as the basis for evaluating
injury reports of marine mammals. The
policy involves applying guidelines to
determine whether an injury should be
considered serious and describes a
variety of injuries specific to large
cetaceans, small cetaceans, and
pinnipeds. The policy and guidelines
cover most types of injury and were
developed to fit data rich as well as data
poor injury events.
Criteria for evaluating large whale
injuries include three types of
entanglements. Two of these types are
‘‘constricting wrap,’’ a serious injury
(SI), and ‘‘loose wrap, bridled or draped
gear,’’ a non-serious injury (NSI). If
documentation of a confirmed
entanglement is inadequate to assign an
entanglement to either of these types a
third category is used, ‘‘evidence of
entanglement.’’ Events falling in this
category are prorated. To prorate, the
number of events assigned to this
category within the assessment period is
multiplied by 0.75. This value was
calculated based on 114 documented
entanglement events with known
outcomes that occurred between 2004
and 2008, of which 85 (75 percent)
resulted in the whales’ deteriorating
health or death. Although more severe
or prolonged entanglements may be
more likely to be reported, the 0.75
prorating reflects the probability that
some confirmed entanglement reports
lacking detail will be of minor events.
SEASWAP and SEAFA are correct
that using a prorate value of 0.75 for
sperm whale entanglements reflects
assumptions about the fate of the
entangled animals. We would welcome
data analyses or other information from
SEASWAP on sperm whale interactions
with longline fisheries that would help
inform future injury determinations.
The 0.75 value is based on the best
available information.
The other injury determinations
referenced by SEASWAP are also
consistent with NMFS’ policy and
guidelines for distinguishing serious
from non-serious injury. The vessel
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5353
strike that left a piece of whale skin on
a vessel’s hull was categorized as a
‘‘superficial laceration’’ and a vessel
strike under ‘‘vessel any size less than
10 knots,’’ both of which are considered
non-serious injuries. Injuries to small
cetaceans, such as beluga whales, are
assigned to a category from a list
specific to small cetaceans. The beluga
entangled in gillnet that was later freed
from gear was assigned to the
‘‘anchored, immobilized, entangled, or
entrapped before being freed without
gear attached’’ category. This category
does not have a defined injury value,
and instead requires a case-specific
assessment. NMFS evaluated the record
of the injury and considered it a nonserious injury because the animal was
able to surface while entangled and was
confirmed to be free of gear when
released.
Comment 4: SEASWAP and SEAFA
disagree with the conclusion in the
March 2016 NOAA report (NOAA–TM–
AFSC–315) that the temporary sperm
whale entanglements reported during
2010–2014 resulted in 6.25 dead sperm
whales. They further assert that of the
five cases described by observers, not
one included a documented case of the
whales remaining entangled or having
visible injury from the entanglement,
yet ‘‘serious injury’’ was assigned in
four cases (Haul numbers 225, 7, 82, and
116). SEASWAP and SEAFA urge
NOAA to reassign these ‘‘significant
injury’’ designations to ‘‘non-serious
injury.’’
Response: When we review
entanglement records, we pay close
attention to the observer’s recorded
description of events. When an observer
codes an interaction as ‘‘entangled in
gear (not trailing gear),’’ we still assess
whether gear could have remained on
the animal post hoc. Fishery observers
are not trained to assess the severity of
marine mammal injuries, and we do not
use their assessment of injury severity.
This explains the differences SEASWAP
noted between the observer’s
assessment on the marine mammal
interaction form and the final injury
determinations as reported in ‘‘HumanCaused Injury and Mortality of NMFSmanaged Alaska Marine Mammal
Stocks, 2010–2014’’ (Helker et al.,
2016).
In response to SEASWAP’s and
SEAFA’s comments, we will reevaluate
these entanglements and injury
determinations; if we determine any
changes to the injury determinations
due to these entanglements are
necessary, they will be reviewed
consistent with NMFS policy and
reported in the 2018 Marine Mammal
Stock Assessment Reports and Human-
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
5354
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
caused Serious Injury and Mortality
Report.
Comment 5: SEASWAP and SEAFA
disagree with NMFS’ extrapolation of
the observed temporary entanglements
to the sperm whale/GOA SLL fishery
interactions, including the pro-rating to
the unobserved fleet, and assert that
NMFS is oversimplifying sperm whale
behavior near fishing boats. SEAFA
argues that because some sperm whales
have been documented as serial longline
depredators, the actual M/SI is likely
less than NMFS’ estimate and it is
inappropriate to extrapolate across the
fleet. SEAFA comments that NMFS does
not provide enough information to
verify if the extrapolated data is
reasonable and how these data were
handled prior to and following the
restructuring of the observer program to
correct for bias in observer coverage.
Response: Extrapolating bycatch
events that are observed in fisheries
with partial observer coverage, such as
components of the GOA SLL fishery, is
standard practice. Bycatch extrapolation
relies on the observed bycatch in a
sampled portion of a fishery to estimate
the bycatch across that entire fishery.
Depredation by sperm whales is a
common occurrence in this fishery, and
an entanglement preceded by
depredation is treated no differently
than other bycatch events since it
reflects one of the risks posed to marine
mammals by the fishery.
The methodology for estimating
bycatch is explained in NOAA Tech.
Memo. NMFS–AFSC–260 (Breiwick
2013) and has not changed appreciably
since that time. Specifically, the serious
injuries are extrapolated only within a
stratum defined by the NMFS statistical
area, three categories of vessel size
(>125, between 60 and 125, <60), and
three time periods (January to April,
May through August, September
through December). The two serious
injuries that were extrapolated in 2012
occurred in vessels between 60 and 125
feet, whereas the one serious injury in
2013 that was extrapolated occurred on
a vessel <60 feet, so the observer
coverage within that stratum is much
lower, which is what is actually used to
extrapolate the serious injury. We do
not extrapolate observed bycatch in one
statum to strata where no bycatch was
observed. For simplicity, we do not
report the observer coverage within the
extrapolated strata, but instead report
observer coverage for the entire fishery
across all strata. Therefore, it is not
possible for the reader to extrapolate the
observed bycatch to estimate the total
bycatch (see Breiwick 2013).
Comment 6: SEAFA notes that the
proposed rule suggests breaking the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
Category III AK Miscellaneous finfish
handline/hand troll and mechanical jig
fishery into several fisheries by gear
type and geography. In order to
maintain consistency with the State of
Alaska fishery permits, SEAFA
recommends the new names for the
groundfish troll fisheries be (2) AK BSAI
groundfish hand troll and dinglebar troll
and (4) AK Gulf of Alaska groundfish
hand troll and dinglebar troll.
Response: NMFS agrees. We will
adopt and use the suggested
clarifications to fisheries names (AK
Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands groundfish
hand troll and dinglebar troll and AK
Gulf of Alaska groundfish hand troll and
dinglebar troll) in the 2018 LOF.
Comment 7: SEAFA comments that it
is unclear whether the proposed
updates in Table 1 for the ‘‘estimated
number of vessels/persons’’
participating in a fishery reflects the
total number of potential participants or
the number of actual participants in a
fishery. SEAFA recommends that NMFS
consult with the State of Alaska’s
Commercial Fisheries Entry
Commission for the most accurate
information about the number of
available permits versus the number of
permits actively fished, particularly for
the AK Southeast shrimp pot fishery
and AK Southeast Alaska crab pot
fisheries.
Response: NMFS has been making
efforts to report the category ‘‘estimated
number of vessels/persons’’ across Table
1 more consistently. As SEAFA points
out, this is especially important for
fisheries where there is a large
discrepancy between the number of
valid permits versus the number of
active permits. Where possible, Table 1
will report the number of active permits
to most accurately depict the relative
effort of each fishery. In response to this
comment, we have revisited the number
of participants for the AK Southeast
shrimp pot fishery and AK Southeast
Alaska crab pot fishery and identified
that the wrong permit count was used
for the AK Southeast shrimp pot fishery.
To correct this, in the final LOF NMFS
changed the estimated number of
vessels/persons for this fishery to the
number of active permits (99).
Comment 8: TIRN and CBD comment
that before listing the AK Gulf of Alaska
sablefish pot fishery as a Category III
fishery, NMFS should analyze the data
of all Alaska and West Coast sablefish
pot fisheries and humpback interactions
and compare it to an updated humpback
whale stock assessment. They
recommend that, as a precautionary
measure, the fishery should be listed as
Category II. TIRN and CBD assert that,
in the absence of statistically-reliable
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
data regarding humpback whale serious
injuries and mortalities for Alaska pot
fisheries, NMFS must list these fisheries
as Category II until: (a) The MMPA
humpback stock is revised to be
consistent with the ESA stock listings
and (b) NMFS uses available fishing
effort and humpback abundance data to
determine co-occurrence.
Response: NMFS considers data from
several sources for the mean annual
M/SI estimates and LOF process,
including observer data, self-reports,
and stranding data. We acknowledge
that reliable data are not always
available and that analogous fisheries
can provide more insight into the
potential for incidental M/SI. However,
these situations require a clear
justification for which fishery is being
considered analogous and why. In the
case of the AK Gulf of Alaska sablefish
pot fishery, NMFS considers the newly
authorized fishery to be most analogous
with the other sablefish pot fisheries in
the State, which are Category III.
Further, the AK Gulf of Alaska sablefish
pot fishery has observer coverage, and
NMFS will continue to consider any
new data collected by the observer
program or other sources in future LOF
analyses.
Comment 9: TIRN and CBD
recommend that humpback whales be
listed as marine mammal species and/or
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the AK Aleutian Islands sablefish pot
fishery and the Category III AK Bering
Sea sablefish pot fishery, based on
observer records that humpback whales
have been incidentally caught in both
these fisheries.
Response: The species and/or stocks
listed as incidentally killed or injured in
Table 1 includes the species and/or
stocks in which there are recent reports
of incidental mortality or injury by a
particular fishery consistent with the
information reported in the SARs.
Typically, species and/or stocks are
removed from Table 1 when recent data
do not include documented mortality or
injury of that species or stock. NMFS
has a report of a humpback whale
considered seriously injured in the AK
Bering Sea sablefish pot fishery in 2002.
However, NMFS has observed this
fishery since that time and there were
no documented injuries or mortalities.
Therefore, in 2013, NMFS removed
humpback whales from the list of
species/stocks killed or injured in this
fishery (78 FR 53336, August 29, 2013).
Comment 10: TIRN and CBD support
combining the Category III AK Aleutian
Islands sablefish pot fishery in the LOF
with the Category III AK Bering Sea
sablefish pot fishery for consistency
with other regional designations in the
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
LOF, but urge NMFS to analyze
humpback whale interactions first
before listing this combined fishery as
Category III.
Response: The LOF uses data
consistent with the SARs, which is
generally from a 5-year rolling window
to evaluate a fishery’s impacts to marine
mammal stocks. For the 2018 LOF,
2010–2014 data are considered in the
LOF tier analyses. There are no
documented reports of incidental M/SI
of humpback whales during this time in
either of the fisheries being combined.
Given all available data, including
recent observer data for the AK Bering
Sea sablefish pot fishery, NMFS believes
that Category III is most appropriate for
this location, target species, and gear
type. Thus, we will classify the newly
combined AK Bering Sea, Aleutian
Island sablefish pot fishery as Category
III.
Comment 11: The Commission
concurs with NMFS that the CA
thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet
fishery should be reclassified from
Category I to Category II based on the
most recent estimate of M/SI for the
California/Oregon/Washington stock of
sperm whales in this fishery.
Response: NMFS agrees and has
reclassified the CA thresher shark/
swordfish drift gillnet (≥14 in mesh)
fishery from Category I to Category II
based on the most recent estimates of
marine mammal M/SI in this fishery.
Comment 12: TIRN and CBD
comment that more than a year has
passed since the listing of the Central
America humpback whale distinct
population segment (DPS), and reported
entanglements are at record highs in the
area off California that is the nearexclusive feeding grounds for this DPS.
They assert that NMFS should consider
the Central American humpback whale
DPS as a relevant stock in its
determinations for the 2018 List of
Fisheries.
Response: For the 2018 LOF, NMFS
relied upon information on the current
status of humpback whale stocks on the
U.S. west coast as described in the most
recent SAR available (Carretta et al.,
2017a). The most recent SAR available
does not contain an MMPA stock
delineation for humpback whales that
corresponds with the recent ESA-listing
decision that established several DPSs
of humpback whales that may be
present in U.S. west coast waters. While
NMFS may consider updates to
humpback whale stock delineations
under the MMPA in light of the recent
ESA-listing decision, we will continue
to rely upon the most current SAR for
the status of humpback whale stocks on
the U.S. west coast relative to human-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
caused M/SI and the classification of
fisheries under the MMPA LOF.
Currently, there is no Central America
DPS stock of marine mammals
delineated under the MMPA. NMFS is
currently evaluating the humpback
whale stock structure under the MMPA
with respect to the ESA listing.
Comment 13: CBD and TIRN urge
NMFS to designate the CA Dungeness
crab pot fishery as a Category I fishery
because it frequently entangles,
seriously injures, and kills imperiled
humpback whales. CBD and TIRN state
that the PBR calculation for the
international stock of Central America
humpbacks results in an estimated PBR
of 0.8 humpback whales per year, and
the best estimate of minimum average
annual M/SI is 1.35 whales per year,
well above the PBR estimate. They
further maintain that the average
numbers of annual M/SI is an
underestimate as it is based on reported
entanglements, and does not account for
many entanglements that go
unobserved, and does not include the
2016 entanglement of 19 humpback
whales in the CA Dungeness crab pot
fishery. CBD and TIRN suggest that
according to the historical rate of
serious injury determinations, 84
percent of these entanglements, or 16
whales, resulted in a serious injury or
mortality and this is well above the PBR
estimate. CBD and TIRN assert that the
available information clearly
demonstrates that NMFS should
reclassify the fishery as Category I.
Response: The most recent SAR for
humpback whales on the U.S. west
coast does not establish or provide a
PBR for the Central America DPS of
humpback whales because it is not a
delineated MMPA stock, as explained in
Comment 12 above. Until such time that
the SAR reports a PBR for an MMPA
stock delineation of humpback whales
that may more closely reflect the Central
America DPS as suggested by the
commenter, calculation of hypothetical
PBRs by any other sources are
considered premature. NMFS will
continue to rely upon the most recent
SAR for the calculation of PBR for
humpback whale stocks on the U.S.
west coast for classifying fisheries under
the LOF. In addition, commenters
reference data sources from 2016 that
have not yet been reviewed for M/SI in
the SARs; NMFS will use those data for
classifying fisheries once they have been
incorporated into the SARs.
Comment 14: CBD and TIRN state that
preliminary evidence shows that the CA
Dungeness crab pot fishery, and not the
Oregon or Washington Dungeness crab
pot fishery, primarily impacts the
Central America humpback whale DPS.
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5355
They recommend that without
additional information, all interactions
of the CA Dungeness crab pot fishery
should be assigned to the Central
America DPS.
Response: As described in Comment
12 above, the most current SAR does not
delineate a Central America DPS of
humpback whales as a stock under the
MMPA. Until such time that the
humpback whale stock structure under
the MMPA with respect to the ESA
listing has been completed, assignment
of M/SI to humpback stocks in the SAR
and under the LOF will continue to
reflect the current MMPA stock
delineations.
Comment 15: CBD and TIRN
recommend that NMFS add blue
whales, ENP, Offshore killer whales,
and the western North Pacific gray
whale to the list of species incidentally
killed or injured in the CA Dungeness
crab pot fisheries.
Response: Entanglement data from the
U.S. west coast that has been reviewed
for M/SI include recent data through
2015 (Carretta et al., 2017b). We note
that through 2015, no blue whale
injuries have been documented in the
CA Dungeness crab pot fishery.
Information on entanglements reported
in 2016 and 2017 referenced by
commenters will be used to inform the
list of marine mammal stocks
incidentally killed or injured in any
U.S. west coast fisheries once it has
been incorporated into the SARs, at
which time NMFS will use those data
for the LOF.
We thank the commenter for pointing
out that we omitted the identity of the
killer whale stock associated with a
dead killer whale reported to NMFS in
2015 that was entangled with CA
Dungeness crab gear. NMFS is currently
reviewing the available information
regarding the identification of the stock
of killer whales to which this individual
belongs. Once this information has been
evaluated and reported in a future SAR,
NMFS will add the appropriate stock of
killer whales to the list of marine
mammal stocks incidentally killed or
injured by the CA Dungeness crab
fishery in the LOF. As stated previously,
entanglement information from 2016
has not yet been evaluated for M/SI and
will not be used to inform the list of
marine mammal stocks incidentally
killed or injured in any U.S. west coast
fisheries at this time.
NMFS acknowledges that the most
recent SAR suggests that because some
Western North Pacific gray whales occur
in U.S. waters, there is a possibility
these whales could be killed or injured
by ship strikes or entangled in fishing
gear within U.S. waters. However, while
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
5356
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
it may be possible that at least one or
more Western North Pacific gray whales
have been among the many gray whales
reported entangled on the U.S. west
coast historically, NMFS recognizes that
relatively few of those instances are
known to have involved gear from the
CA Dungeness crab fishery. We also
acknowledge that many other U.S.
commercial fisheries on the U.S. west
coast have been identified as associated
with entanglements of gray whales
historically, and it is likely other U.S.
commercial, tribal, and foreign fisheries
from countries surrounding gray whale
migration routes that have not been
identified have also been involved. In
the absence of more specific information
from any particular entanglement of
gray whales that involved CA
Dungeness crab gear to suggest those
entanglements involved a Western
North Pacific gray whale, NMFS does
not have sufficient data to conclude that
Western North Pacific gray whales have
been entangled in CA Dungeness crab
gear versus other fisheries throughout
the range of gray whales; thus, we will
not include Western North Pacific gray
whales on the list of stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the CA Dungeness
crab fishery at this time. Based on the
relative population sizes of the Western
North Pacific and Eastern North Pacific
stocks of gray whales, and what is
known about migrations of the Western
North Pacific stock to the eastern North
Pacific (Moore and Weller 2013), NMFS
has concluded the likelihood that any of
the particular gray whales that are
known to have interacted with CA
Dungeness crab fishery were Western
North Pacific stock gray whales is
extremely low. NMFS strives to collect
photographic or genetic data from
entangled gray whales that may allow
for stock and will continue to develop
and promote this aspect as a key data
need surrounding all gray whale
strandings and entanglements.
Comment 16: TIRN and CBD oppose
NMFS’ proposal to lower the CA
thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet
fishery classification from Category I to
Category II. They note that NMFS’
decreased annual take estimate of sperm
whales may not adequately reflect the
mortality or serious injury that the
fishery causes for sperm whales. In
addition, TIRN/CBD comment that the
MMPA Section 101(a)(5)(E)
authorization to take humpback and
sperm whales by this fishery has
expired, and a reclassification of the
fishery to Category II prior to the
completion of the rulemaking process
for a new authorization is premature.
Based on the uncertainty stemming from
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
low observer coverage and the past
observation of sperm whale M/SI, and
the pending MMPA authorization rulemaking, TIRN/CBD urge NMFS to
maintain the CA thresher shark/
swordfish drift gillnet fishery’s
classification as Category I.
Response: The reclassification of this
fishery from Category I to Category II is
based upon published scientific
information that includes estimates of
bycatch and subsequent M/SI in this
fishery that are considered robust given
annual variance in observer coverage
rates. These estimates are based on
methodologies that represent an
improved approach to estimate
relatively rare bycatch events over time
compared to methods referenced in
previous SARs and classifications under
the LOF. NMFS has determined these
estimates are appropriate to inform the
LOF classification of the CA thresher
shark/swordfish drift gillnet (≥14 in
mesh) fishery as Category II. Further,
classifications made under the LOF are
based on the best available science and
are not dependent or related to the
current status of other regulatory
processes including the issuance of
authorizations under section
101(a)(5)(E) of the MMPA.
Comment 17: TIRN and CBD support
NMFS’ proposal to add the CA/OR/WA
stock of Dall’s porpoise to the list of
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category I California thresher shark/
swordfish drift gillnet (≥14 in mesh)
fishery based on a 2014 observed
entanglement.
Response: NMFS agrees and has
added the CA/OR/WA stock of Dall’s
porpoise to the list of stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Category I CA thresher shark/swordfish
drift gillnet (≥14 in mesh) fishery.
Comment 18: TIRN and CBD
recommend, based on interactions
between 2010 through 2016, that NMFS
add Guadalupe fur seals to the list of
species and/or stocks incidentally killed
or injured in the California drift gillnet
fishery, and the gillnet fisheries that
operate from Tillamook County, OR, to
Jefferson County, WA, such as the WA
Willapa Bay drift gillnet, WA/OR lower
Columbia River drift gillnet, and the
WA Grays Harbor salmon drift gillnet
fishery.
Response: NMFS has reviewed the
available information on Guadalupe fur
seal interactions and M/SI associated
with gillnet entanglements from 2010–
2014. Based on information that is
available (Carretta et al., 2017a and
Carretta et al., 2017b), we are not able
to determine the fishery origin of
Guadalupe fur seal strandings that have
been associated with gillnet
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
entanglements. Guadalupe fur seals
have a wide range that brings them into
potential contact with numerous gillnet
fisheries that include U.S. commercial
fisheries as well as tribal and foreign
fisheries from neighboring countries.
While we continually aim to improve
our ability to evaluate incoming
information and identify the origins of
fishing gear present on all stranded
marine mammals, we will not attribute
any Guadalupe fur seal M/SI to any U.S.
gillnet fisheries or list Guadalupe fur
seals as a marine mammal stock that is
killed or injured by any U.S. gillnet
fisheries at this time absent more
specific information regarding the
origins of gillnet interactions.
Comment 19: TIRN and CBD
recommend NMFS add Guadalupe fur
seals to the list of species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Hawaii deep-set and Hawaii shallow-set
longline fisheries based on 2015 and
2016 reported interactions.
Response: The recently observed
Guadalupe fur seal interaction from
2015 has not yet been included in a
SAR, an injury determination has not
been finalized for this interaction, and
the interaction has not yet been
evaluated as part of the tier analysis for
these fisheries. This species will be
included in a future LOF, as
appropriate.
Comment 20: HLA opposes including
the Hawaii stock of Kogia species
(Hawaii) on the list of species injured or
killed in the Hawaii-based deep-set
longline fishery. HLA requests that
NMFS remove Kogia species from the
list of stocks that are interacting with
the deep-set longline fishery, because
the most recent SAR (2013) for Hawaii
pygmy whales and dwarf sperm whales
identifies no observed interactions
between either of these stocks and this
fishery. However, two other
commenters, TIRN and CBD, support
NMFS’ proposal to add the Hawaii stock
of Kogia spp. to the list of stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Category I HI deep-set longline fishery
based upon the serious injury of a
pygmy or dwarf sperm whale in 2014 in
this fishery.
Response: Although the 2013 SAR
does not include observed interactions
with Hawaii pygmy whales and dwarf
sperm whales, a Kogia spp. interaction
was observed in the Hawaii deep-set
longline fishery on February 25, 2014,
resulting in a serious injury (Carretta et
al., 2017b). This injury determination
has been finalized, and the interaction
is included in the draft 2017 SAR (82 FR
60181; December 19, 2017).
Comment 21: The HLA restates a
previous comment that the Hawaii-
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
based deep-set longline fishery does not
interact with the MHI insular or
Northwestern Hawaiian Islands (NWHI)
stocks of false killer whales. HLA notes
that (a) the False Killer Whale Take
Reduction Plan closed the deep-set
longline fishery for almost the entire
range of the MHI insular and NWHI
stocks, (b) since this change was made
in 2013 there have been no interactions
between the fishery and an animal from
either stock, and (c) there has never
been a deep-set longline fishery
interaction in the very small area of the
stocks’ respective ranges that are not
closed to longline fishing. HLA requests
that NMFS remove these two stocks
from the list of marine mammals that
interact with the deep-set longline
fishery, as the best available information
demonstrates the fishery is not
interacting with either of these stocks.
Response: This comment has been
addressed previously (see 78 FR 53336,
August 29, 2013, comment 11; 79 FR
14418, March 14, 2014, comment 4; 79
FR 77919, December 29, 2014, comment
2; and 81 FR 20550, April 8, 2016,
comment 5). NMFS determines which
species or stocks are included as
incidentally killed or injured in a
fishery by annually reviewing the
information presented in the current
SARs, among other relevant sources.
The SARs are based on the best
available scientific information and
provide information on each stock,
including range, abundance, PBR, and
level of interaction with commercial
fishing operations. Determinations in
the LOF are based on the information
reported in the SARs.
The 2018 LOF is based on the 2016
SARs, which report fishery interactions
from 2010–2014; this is the best
scientific and commercial information
available for the time period examined.
As reported in the 2016 SAR, 12 false
killer whales were taken within the
Hawaiian EEZ between 2010 and 2014,
ten of those occurred within the range
of the pelagic stock, and two occurred
within an overlap zone that included
the range of more than one false killer
whale stock. Applying the proration
methods described in detail in the 2016
SAR for takes in overlap zones, NMFS
estimates a five-year average mortality
and serious injury level of 0.1 MHI
insular and 0.4 NWHI false killer whales
per year incidental to the Hawaii-based
deep-set longline fishery from 2010–
2014 (Carretta et al., 2017a). NMFS is
retaining the stocks on the list of marine
mammal stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Hawaii deep-set longline
fishery.
Comment 22: HLA opposes including
the pygmy killer whale (Hawaii stock)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
on the list of species injured or killed in
the Hawaii-based deep-set fishery. HLA
requests that NMFS remove the pygmy
killer whale from the list of stocks that
are interacting with the deep-set fishery,
because the most recent SAR (2013)
identifies no observed interactions
between the stock and the deep-set
longline fishery.
Response: The 2013 SAR reports
marine mammal interactions with the
deep-set fishery that occurred between
2007 and 2011. Although the 2013 SAR
does not include any observed
interactions with pygmy killer whales,
an interaction was observed between a
pygmy killer whale and the Hawaii
deep-set longline fishery on January 5,
2013, resulting in a serious injury
(Carretta et al., 2017b). This injury
determination has been finalized, and
the interaction is included in the draft
2017 SAR (82 FR 60181; December 19,
2017).
Comment 23: TIRN and CBD support
NMFS’ proposal to add the Central
North Pacific stock of humpback whale
to the list of stocks incidentally killed
or injured in the Category I Hawaii
deep-set longline fishery based upon the
serious injury of a humpback in 2014 in
this fishery.
Response: NMFS agrees and has
added the Central North Pacific stock of
humpback whale to the list of stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Hawaii deep-set longline fishery.
Comment 24: TIRN and CBD
recommend that the California/Oregon/
Washington (CA/OR/WA) humpback
whale stock be added to the list of
species or stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category I Hawaii deepset longline fishery based upon known
M/SI to the Central North Pacific
humpback stock from interaction with
this fishery in 2014. In addition, they
comment that NMFS is currently
considering an exempted fishing permit
to allow the use of both deep-set and
shallow-set longline gear within the
West Coast EEZ, which would provide
this fishery greater access to this stock
and further increase the pressure on the
stock.
Response: The LOF relies on
information reported in the SARs to
add/remove species/stocks that are
killed or injured in a particular fishery.
The 2016 SAR reports a humpback
whale from the Central North Pacific
stock was seriously injured in 2014 in
the Category I Hawaii deep-set longline
fishery; consequently, this stock is
included in the list of stocks
incidentally killed or injured in this
fishery. The SAR does not list any
mortalities or injuries of the CA/OR/WA
humpback whale stock in the Hawaii
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5357
deep-set fishery in 2014; consequently,
this stock is not included in the list of
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category I Hawaii deep-set longline
fishery.
Comment 25: TIRN and CBD request
that the CA/OR/WA humpback whale
stock be added to the list of stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Category I Hawaii shallow-set longline
fishery. They assert that the fishery’s
potential for interactions with this stock
is justified by the inclusion of the
Central North Pacific humpback whale
stock in the list of species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured. In
addition, TIRN/CBD comment that
NMFS currently is considering an
exempted fishing permit to allow the
use of both deep-set and shallow-set
longline gear within the West Coast
EEZ, which would provide this fishery
greater access to this stock and further
increase the pressure on the stock.
Response: NMFS uses the criteria
described in the preamble to classify
fisheries and list species or stocks that
may be incidentally killed or injured by
those fisheries. Under these criteria,
NMFS lists species or stocks as
incidentally killed or injured based on
documented mortalities or injuries
using the best scientific information
available (i.e., SARs). Because there are
no documented mortalities or injuries of
CA/OR/WA humpbacks, NMFS is not
including this stock as incidentally
killed or injured by the Category I
Hawaii shallow-set longline fishery.
Should NMFS approve an exempted
fishing permit for the deep-set and
shallow-set longline fishery operating
within the U.S. West Coast EEZ, NMFS
will continue to use all relevant
information to inform future LOFs.
Comment 26: HLA contends that the
best available science does not support
a determination that the Hawaii-based
shallow-set longline fishery has
‘‘occasional’’ interactions with the
pelagic false killer whale stock and
should therefore be listed as Category
III. They note that the 2016 SAR
attributes a 0.3 M/SI rate to the shallowset fishery for the Pelagic FKW Stock in
the U.S. EEZ, which amounts to 1.07
percent of the Pelagic FKW Stock’s PBR
level. However, the 0.3 M/SI rate
derives entirely from an interaction that
occurred in 2012 for which NMFS was
unable to make an injury determination
(i.e. ‘‘cannot be determined’’ or ‘‘CBD’’
determination). Further, the ‘‘CBD’’
interaction was prorated as 0.3 M/SI
because, in the previous five years, there
had been three EEZ interactions
between the shallow-set fishery and the
Pelagic FKW Stock, only one of which
(in 2009) was ‘‘serious’’ (a one-third
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
5358
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
M/SI rate). HLA notes that if the 2012
‘‘CBD’’ interaction is prorated based
upon the five-year lookback period used
in the 2016 SAR (2010–14) (the best
available data), then it would be 0.0
because there were only two other
interactions in 2010–14, both of which
were determined to be non-serious. HLA
argues that the Category II status of the
shallow-set fishery hinges on a single
interaction in 2012 for which no injury
determination was made and that NMFS
prorated based upon data that is no
longer relevant or accurate. For these
reasons, HLA recommends the shallowset fishery be listed as Category III, as
the fishery is more accurately described
as having a ‘‘remote likelihood’’ of
interaction with the stock.
Response: NMFS uses the
classification criteria described in the
preamble to classify fisheries as
Category I, Category II, or Category III.
A fishery is classified under Category II
if the annual mortality and serious
injury of a stock in a given fishery is
greater than 1 percent and less than 50
percent of the stock’s PBR level.
Additional details regarding
categorization of fisheries is provided in
the preamble to the final rule
implementing section 118 of the MMPA
(60 FR 45086; August 30, 1995). The
false killer whale interaction in 2012
that resulted in a ‘‘CBD’’ determination
was prorated following the methods
described in the 2016 SAR (Carretta et
al., 2017a), which prorates serious
versus non-serious injuries using the
historic rate of serious injury while
accounting for changes in gear following
implementation of the False Killer
Whale Take Reduction Plan in 2013.
This proration resulted in a 0.3 M/SI for
the Pelagic FKW stock as reported in the
2016 SAR, which is 1.07 percent of PBR
and within the range of 1–50 percent of
PBR, requiring NMFS to classify the
fishery as a Category II fishery
consistent with section 118 of the
MMPA.
Comment 27: HLA opposes including
the rough-toothed dolphin (Hawaii
stock) on the list of species injured or
killed in the Hawaii-based shallow-set
fishery. HLA requests that NMFS
remove the rough-toothed dolphin from
the list of stocks that are interacting
with the shallow-set fishery, because the
most recent SAR (2013) identifies no
observed interactions between the stock
and the shallow-set longline fishery.
Response: The 2013 SAR reports
marine mammal interactions with the
shallow-set fishery that occurred
between 2007 and 2011. Although the
2013 SAR does not include observed
interactions with rough-toothed
dolphins, an interaction was observed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
between a rough-toothed dolphin and
the Hawaii shallow-set longline fishery
on April 24, 2013, resulting in a
mortality (Carretta et al., 2017b). This
interaction has been finalized and is
included in the draft 2017 SAR (82 FR
60181, December 19, 2017).
Comment 28: HLA restates a previous
comment that the LOF should
distinguish between high seas stocks
and U.S. EEZ stocks when listing stocks
with which fisheries interact, and
requests that NMFS revise the LOF to
attribute species interactions in
transboundary fisheries to only those
geographic regions where interactions
are actually observed. HLA recommends
that if NMFS does not revise the LOF,
then they should include a footnote in
the LOF to clarify, for certain stocks and
fisheries, that interactions have only
been observed on the high seas or in the
U.S. EEZ, as appropriate. HLA notes
that NMFS readily separates
transboundary stocks into high seas and
U.S. EEZ components for reporting
purposes in its SARs and for the
purpose of comparing M/SI rates to PBR
levels (a trigger for the take reduction
planning process), and asserts that the
LOF should make similar distinctions
when reporting the stocks with which
fisheries interact.
Response: This comment has been
addressed previously (see 79 FR 14418,
March 14, 2014, comment 7; 79 FR
77919, December 29, 2014, comment 5;
and 81 FR 20550, April 8, 2016,
comment 8). As described in the
preamble, NMFS has included high seas
fisheries in Table 3 of the LOF since
2009. Several fisheries operate in both
U.S. waters and on the high seas,
creating some overlap between the
fisheries listed in Tables 1 and 2 and
those in Table 3. In these cases, the high
seas component of the fishery is not
considered a separate fishery but an
extension of a fishery operating within
U.S. waters. For these fisheries, the lists
of species or stocks injured or killed in
Table 3 are identical to their Tables 1 or
2 counterparts, except for those species
or stocks with distributions known to
occur on only one side of the EEZ
boundary. Because the fisheries and the
marine mammal lists are the same, takes
of these animals are not being attributed
to one geographic area or the other, even
when that information may be available.
This parallel list structure is explained
in the footnotes for each table. We are
not including additional footnotes to
individual stocks and fisheries to
indicate whether interactions have only
been observed on the high seas or in the
U.S. EEZ, but that information may be
available in previous LOFs when
species and stocks are added or deleted.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Summary of Changes From the
Proposed Rule
NMFS renames the newly classified
fisheries, ‘‘AK BSAI groundfish troll’’
and the ‘‘AK Gulf of Alaska groundfish
troll,’’ as listed in the proposed LOF for
2018, to ‘‘AK BSAI groundfish hand
troll and dinglebar troll’’ and ‘‘AK Gulf
of Alaska groundfish hand troll and
dinglebar troll,’’ respectively. This
change is the result of public comment
on the proposed rule and maintains
consistency with the State of Alaska
fishery permits.
NMFS corrects the estimated number
of vessels/persons for the AK Southeast
shrimp pot fishery (Table 1) from 210,
as listed in the proposed LOF for 2018,
to 99 in the final LOF based on a
reanalysis of permit data.
NMFS corrects the estimated number
of vessels/persons for the Gulf of Maine,
U.S. Mid-Atlantic tuna, shark, swordfish
hook-and-line/harpoon in the Atlantic
Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
(Table 2) from 3,084, as listed in the
proposed LOF for 2018, to 2,846 in the
final LOF based on a review of permit
data. Permits for this fishery are based
on target species rather than gear type,
so these numbers indicate the total
number of fishers that have the potential
to use the specified gear type.
Summary of Changes to the LOF for
2018
The following summarizes changes to
the LOF for 2018, including the
classification of fisheries, fisheries
listed, the estimated number of vessels/
persons in a particular fishery, and the
species and/or stocks that are
incidentally killed or injured in a
particular fishery. NMFS re-classifies
two fisheries in the LOF for 2018.
Additionally, NMFS adds two fisheries
to the LOF and removes 12 fisheries
from the LOF. NMFS makes changes to
the estimated number of vessels/persons
and list of species and/or stocks killed
or injured in certain fisheries. The
classifications and definitions of U.S.
commercial fisheries for 2018 are
identical to those provided in the LOF
for 2017 with the changes discussed
below. State and regional abbreviations
used in the following paragraphs
include: AK (Alaska), BSAI (Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands), CA (California),
DE (Delaware), FL (Florida), GOA (Gulf
of Alaska), GMX (Gulf of Mexico), HI
(Hawaii), MA (Massachusetts), ME
(Maine), NC (North Carolina), NY (New
York), OR (Oregon), RI (Rhode Island),
SC (South Carolina), VA (Virginia), WA
(Washington), and WNA (Western North
Atlantic).
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Commercial Fisheries in the Pacific
Ocean
Classification of Fisheries
NMFS reclassifies the CA thresher
shark/swordfish drift gillnet (≥14 inch
(in) mesh) fishery from Category I to
Category II.
NMFS reclassifies the Category III AK
Gulf of Alaska sablefish longline fishery
to Category II based on M/SI of North
Pacific sperm whales.
Addition of Fisheries
NMFS adds the AK BSAI halibut
longline fishery as a Category III fishery.
NMFS adds the AK Gulf of Alaska
sablefish pot fishery as a Category III
fishery.
Removal of Fisheries
NMFS removes the following
Category III fisheries from the LOF:
• AK miscellaneous finfish set gillnet
fishery
• AK miscellaneous finfish beach seine
fishery
• AK miscellaneous finfish purse seine
fishery
• AK octopus/squid purse seine fishery
• AK BSAI rockfish longline fishery
• AK Gulf of Alaska rockfish longline
fishery
• AK halibut longline/set line (state and
Federal waters)
• AK miscellaneous finfish otter/beam
trawl fishery
• AK statewide miscellaneous finfish
pot fishery
• AK snail pot fishery
• AK octopus/squid handline fishery
• AK abalone fishery
Fishery Name and Organizational
Changes and Clarification
NMFS clarifies that the Category II AK
BSAI rockfish trawl fishery includes
sablefish as a target species.
NMFS adds a superscript ‘‘1’’ to the
CA/OR/WA stock of humpback whale to
indicate it is driving the Category II
classification of the CA spiny lobster
fishery.
NMFS renames the Category III AK
salmon purse seine (excluding salmon
purse seine fisheries listed elsewhere)
fishery to AK salmon purse seine
(Prince William Sound, Chignik, Alaska
Peninsula) fishery.
NMFS clarifies that the Category III
AK Gulf of Alaska rockfish trawl fishery
includes sablefish as a target species.
NMFS renames the Category III AK
food/bait herring trawl fishery to AK
Kodiak food/bait herring otter trawl
fishery.
NMFS renames the Category III AK
shrimp otter trawl and beam trawl
(statewide and Cook Inlet) fishery to AK
shrimp otter trawl and beam trawl
fishery.
NMFS renames the Category III AK
State-managed waters of Cook Inlet,
Kachemak Bay, Prince William Sound,
Southeast AK groundfish trawl fishery
to AK State-managed waters of Prince
William Sound groundfish trawl fishery.
NMFS combines the Category III AK
Aleutian Islands sablefish pot fishery in
the LOF with the Category III AK Bering
Sea sablefish pot fishery for consistency
with other regional designations in the
LOF. The combined fishery is named
the AK BSAI sablefish pot fishery.
NMFS separates the Category III AK
miscellaneous finfish handline/hand
troll and mechanical jig fishery into
several fisheries by gear and geography
for improved fishery categorization of
potential impacts to marine mammals.
The new Category III fishery names are:
(1) AK BSAI groundfish jig, (2) AK BSAI
groundfish hand troll and dinglebar
troll, (3) AK Gulf of Alaska groundfish
jig, (4) AK Gulf of Alaska groundfish
hand troll and dinglebar troll.
NMFS renames the Category III AK
North Pacific halibut handline/hand
troll and mechanical jig fishery to AK
halibut jig fishery for clarity and
consistency.
NMFS renames the Category III AK
urchin and other fish/shellfish fishery to
AK miscellaneous invertebrates hand
pick fishery for clarity and consistency.
NMFS makes an administrative
change to the Category III Alaska scallop
dredge fishery to be renamed AK scallop
dredge for consistency.
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates the estimated number
of vessels/persons in the Pacific Ocean
(Table 1) as follows:
Number of
vessels/persons
(2017 LOF)
Fishery
I ..............................
II .............................
II .............................
III ............................
III ............................
III ............................
III ............................
III ............................
III ............................
III ............................
III ............................
III ............................
III ............................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Category
HI deep-set longline ............................................................................................
HI shallow-set longline ........................................................................................
American Samoa longline ...................................................................................
AK Gulf of Alaska crab pot .................................................................................
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod pot .......................................................................
AK Southeast Alaska crab pot ............................................................................
AK Southeast Alaska shrimp pot ........................................................................
AK shrimp pot, except Southeast .......................................................................
AK octopus/squid pot ..........................................................................................
AK herring spawn on kelp ...................................................................................
AK miscellaneous invertebrates handpick ..........................................................
American Samoa bottomfish handline ................................................................
AK commercial passenger fishing vessel ...........................................................
List of Species and/or Stocks
Incidentally Killed or Injured in the
Pacific Ocean
NMFS adds the Central North Pacific
stock of humpback whale to the list of
species and/or stocks incidentally killed
or injured in the Category I Hawaii
deep-set longline fishery.
NMFS adds the Hawaii stock of Kogia
spp. (Pygmy or dwarf sperm whale) to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
the list of species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Category I Hawaii deep-set longline
fishery.
NMFS adds the CA/OR/WA stock of
Dall’s porpoise to the list of species
and/or stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category I CA thresher
shark/swordfish drift gillnet (≥14 in
mesh) fishery.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5359
Number of
vessels/persons
(2018 LOF)
139
20
20
381
128
41
269
236
26
339
398
24
2,702
143
22
18
271
116
375
99
141
15
266
214
17
1,006
Commercial Fisheries in the Atlantic
Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates the estimated number
of vessels/persons in the Atlantic
Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
(Table 2) as follows:
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
5360
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Number of
vessels/persons
(2017 LOF)
Category
Fishery
I ..............................
II .............................
III ............................
III ............................
Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics longline ...................
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark gillnet .............................................................
Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid-Atlantic tuna, shark, swordfish hook-and-line/harpoon
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shark bottom longline/hook-andline.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean pelagic hook-andline/harpoon.
III ............................
List of Species and/or Stocks
Incidentally Killed or Injured in the
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean
NMFS adds the Northern Gulf of
Mexico stock of rough-toothed dolphin
to the list of species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Category I Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean,
Gulf of Mexico large pelagics longline
fishery.
NMFS removes the WNA stock of
white-sided dolphin from the species
and/or stocks listed as incidentally
killed or injured in the Category II MidAtlantic mid-water trawl fishery.
NMFS adds the WNA stock of whitesided dolphin to the list of species
and/or stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category II Mid-Atlantic
bottom trawl fishery.
NMFS adds the WNA offshore stock
of bottlenose dolphin to the list of
species and/or stocks incidentally killed
or injured in the Category III Gulf of
Maine, U.S., Mid-Atlantic tuna, shark,
swordfish hook-and-line/harpoon
fishery.
NMFS adds three stocks to the list of
species and/or stocks incidentally killed
or injured in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of
Mexico, Caribbean commercial
passenger fishing vessel fishery. The
three stocks are: (1) WNA stock of shortfinned pilot whale and (2) Barataria Bay
estuarine system stock and (3)
Mississippi Sound, Lake Borgne, Bay
Boudreau stock of bottlenose dolphins.
NMFS corrects three administrative
errors in Table 2. Under species and/or
stocks listed as incidentally killed or
injured in the Atlantic Ocean,
Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagic
longline fishery, NMFS updates the
stock name for Atlantic spotted dolphin
from ‘‘GMX continental and oceanic’’ to
‘‘Northern GMX’’. Second, in the
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico,
Caribbean commercial passenger fishing
vessel fishery, NMFS updates the stock
name for bottlenose dolphin from
‘‘Southern SC/GA coastal’’ to ‘‘SC/GA
coastal’’. Lastly, NMFS removes the
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
420
30
428
<125
1,446
Removal of Fisheries
NMFS removes the Category II
Atlantic highly migratory species drift
gillnet fishery from the LOF as there are
currently no participants.
Fishery Name and Organizational
Changes and Clarification
NMFS designates the list of species
and/or stocks incidentally killed or
injured in a fishery from
‘‘undetermined’’ to ‘‘no information’’ for
clarity that no data are available on
mortalities or injuries incidental to a
particular fishery.
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates to the estimated
number of vessels/persons on the High
Seas (Table 3) as follows:
Number of
vessels/persons
(2017 LOF)
I ..............................
I ..............................
I ..............................
II .............................
II .............................
II .............................
II .............................
II .............................
II .............................
II .............................
II .............................
II .............................
II .............................
II .............................
II .............................
II .............................
III ............................
III ............................
III ............................
III ............................
Atlantic highly migratory species longline ...........................................................
Western Pacific pelagic longline (HI deep-set component) ................................
Pacific highly migratory species drift gillnet ........................................................
Atlantic highly migratory species trawl ................................................................
South Pacific tuna purse seine ...........................................................................
Western Pacific pelagic purse seine ...................................................................
South Pacific albacore troll longline ....................................................................
South Pacific tuna longline .................................................................................
Western Pacific pelagic longline (HI shallow-set component) ............................
Atlantic highly migratory species handline/pole and line ....................................
Pacific highly migratory species handline/pole and line .....................................
South Pacific albacore troll handline/pole and line .............................................
Western Pacific pelagic handline/pole and line ..................................................
Atlantic highly migratory species troll .................................................................
South Pacific albacore troll .................................................................................
Western Pacific pelagic troll ................................................................................
Pacific highly migratory species longline ............................................................
Pacific highly migratory species purse seine ......................................................
Northwest Atlantic trawl ......................................................................................
Pacific highly migratory species troll ...................................................................
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
NMFS adds the Hawaii stock of Kogia
spp. (Pygmy or dwarf sperm whale) to
the list of species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4700
680
Commercial Fisheries on the High Seas
Fishery
VerDate Sep<11>2014
280
23
2,846
39
WNA stocks of Risso’s dolphin and
white-sided dolphin from the species
and/or stocks listed as incidentally
injured or killed in the Category I MidAtlantic gillnet fishery.
Category
List of Species and/or Stocks
Incidentally Killed or Injured on the
High Seas
Sfmt 4700
Number of
vessels/persons
(2018 LOF)
86
139
5
1
38
3
10
2
20
3
46
7
2
2
30
17
114
6
1
187
Number of
vessels/persons
(2018 LOF)
79
143
4
2
35
1
9
4
22
2
42
11
5
1
22
6
105
7
2
149
Category I Western Pacific Pelagic (HI
deep-set component) longline fishery.
NMFS adds the Central North Pacific
stock of humpback whale to the list of
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
species and/or stocks incidentally killed
or injured in the Category I Western
Pacific Pelagic (HI deep-set component)
longline fishery.
List of Fisheries
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
The following tables set forth the list
of U.S. commercial fisheries according
to their classification under section 118
of the MMPA. Table 1 lists commercial
fisheries in the Pacific Ocean (including
Alaska), Table 2 lists commercial
fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of
Mexico, and Caribbean, Table 3 lists
commercial fisheries on the high seas,
and Table 4 lists fisheries affected by
TRPs or TRTs.
In Tables 1 and 2, the estimated
number of vessels or persons
participating in fisheries operating
within U.S. waters is expressed in terms
of the number of active participants in
the fishery, when possible. If this
information is not available, the
estimated number of vessels or persons
licensed for a particular fishery is
provided. If no recent information is
available on the number of participants,
vessels, or persons licensed in a fishery,
then the number from the most recent
LOF is used for the estimated number of
vessels or persons in the fishery. NMFS
acknowledges that, in some cases, these
estimates may be inflations of actual
effort. For example, the State of Hawaii
does not issue fishery-specific licenses,
and the number of participants reported
in the LOF represents the number of
commercial marine license holders who
reported using a particular fishing gear
type/method at least once in a given
year, without considering how many
times the gear was used. For these
fisheries, effort by a single participant is
counted the same whether the
fisherman used the gear only once or
every day. In the Mid-Atlantic and New
England fisheries, the numbers
represent the potential effort for each
fishery, given the multiple gear types for
which several state permits may allow.
Changes made to Mid-Atlantic and New
England fishery participants will not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
affect observer coverage or bycatch
estimates, as observer coverage and
bycatch estimates are based on vessel
trip reports and landings data. Tables 1
and 2 serve to provide a description of
the fishery’s potential effort (state and
Federal). If NMFS is able to extract more
accurate information on the gear types
used by state permit holders in the
future, the numbers will be updated to
reflect this change. For additional
information on fishing effort in fisheries
found on Table 1 or 2, contact the
relevant regional office (contact
information included above in
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
For high seas fisheries, Table 3 lists
the number of valid HSFCA permits
currently held. Although this likely
overestimates the number of active
participants in many of these fisheries,
the number of valid HSFCA permits is
the most reliable data on the potential
effort in high seas fisheries at this time.
As noted previously in this LOF, the
number of HSFCA permits listed in
Table 3 for the high seas components of
fisheries that also operate within U.S.
waters does not necessarily represent
additional effort that is not accounted
for in Tables 1 and 2. Many vessels
holding HSFCA permits also fish within
U.S. waters and are included in the
number of vessels and participants
operating within those fisheries in
Tables 1 and 2.
Tables 1, 2, and 3 also list the marine
mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured (seriously
or non-seriously) in each fishery based
on SARs, injury determination reports,
bycatch estimation reports, observer
data, logbook data, stranding data,
disentanglement network data,
fishermen self-reports (i.e., MMPA
reports), and anecdotal reports. The best
available scientific information
included in these reports is based on
data through 2012. This list includes all
species and/or stocks known to be killed
or injured in a given fishery but also
includes species and/or stocks for
which there are anecdotal records of a
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5361
mortality or injury. Additionally,
species identified by logbook entries,
stranding data, or fishermen self-reports
(i.e., MMPA reports) may not be
verified. In Tables 1 and 2, NMFS has
designated those species/stocks driving
a fishery’s classification (i.e., the fishery
is classified based on mortalities and
serious injuries of a marine mammal
stock that are greater than or equal to 50
percent (Category I), or greater than 1
percent and less than 50 percent
(Category II), of a stock’s PBR) by a ‘‘1’’
after the stock’s name.
In Tables 1 and 2, there are several
fisheries classified as Category II that
have no recent documented mortalities
or serious injuries of marine mammals,
or fisheries that did not result in a
mortality or serious injury rate greater
than 1 percent of a stock’s PBR level
based on known interactions. NMFS has
classified these fisheries by analogy to
other Category I or II fisheries that use
similar fishing techniques or gear that
are known to cause mortality or serious
injury of marine mammals, as discussed
in the final LOF for 1996 (60 FR 67063;
December 28, 1995), and according to
factors listed in the definition of a
‘‘Category II fishery’’ in 50 CFR 229.2
(i.e., fishing techniques, gear types,
methods used to deter marine mammals,
target species, seasons and areas fished,
qualitative data from logbooks or
fishermen reports, stranding data, and
the species and distribution of marine
mammals in the area). NMFS has
designated those fisheries listed by
analogy in Tables 1 and 2 by a ‘‘2’’ after
the fishery’s name.
There are several fisheries in Tables 1,
2, and 3 in which a portion of the
fishing vessels cross the exclusive
economic zone (EEZ) boundary and
therefore operate both within U.S.
waters and on the high seas. These
fisheries, though listed separately
between Table 1 or 2 and Table 3, are
considered the same fisheries on either
side of the EEZ boundary. NMFS has
designated those fisheries in each table
by a ‘‘*’’ after the fishery’s name.
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
5362
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN
Estimated
number of
vessels/
persons
Fishery description
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally
killed or injured
CATEGORY I
LONGLINE/SET LINE FISHERIES:
HI deep-set longline * ∧ ........................................................
143 .................
Bottlenose dolphin, HI Pelagic, False killer whale, MHI Insular,1 False killer whale, HI Pelagic,1 False killer whale,
NWHI, Humpback whale. Central North Pacific, Kogia spp.
(Pygmy or dwarf sperm whale), HI, Pygmy killer whale, HI,
Risso’s dolphin, HI, Short-finned pilot whale, HI, Sperm
whale, HI, Striped dolphin, HI.
CATEGORY II
GILLNET FISHERIES:
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (≥14 in mesh) * ....
18 ...................
50 ...................
CA yellowtail, barracuda, and white seabass drift gillnet
(mesh size ≥3.5 in and <14 in) 2.
AK Bristol Bay salmon drift gillnet 2 .....................................
30 ...................
1,862 ..............
AK Bristol Bay salmon set gillnet 2 ......................................
979 .................
AK Kodiak salmon set gillnet ..............................................
188 .................
AK Cook Inlet salmon set gillnet .........................................
736 .................
AK Cook Inlet salmon drift gillnet ........................................
569 .................
AK Peninsula/Aleutian Islands salmon drift gillnet 2 ............
162 .................
AK Peninsula/Aleutian Islands salmon set gillnet 2 .............
113 .................
AK Prince William Sound salmon drift gillnet ......................
537 .................
AK Southeast salmon drift gillnet ........................................
474 .................
AK Yakutat salmon set gillnet 2 ...........................................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
CA halibut/white seabass and other species set gillnet
(>3.5 in mesh).
168 .................
WA Puget Sound Region salmon drift gillnet (includes all
inland waters south of US-Canada border and eastward
of the Bonilla-Tatoosh line-Treaty Indian fishing is excluded).
TRAWL FISHERIES:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands flatfish trawl .....................
210 .................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00066
32 ...................
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Bottlenose dolphin, CA/OR/WA offshore, California sea lion,
U.S., Dall’s porpoise, CA/OR/WA, Humpback whale, CA/
OR/WA, Long-beaked common dolphin, CA, Minke whale,
CA/OR/WA, Northern elephant seal, CA breeding, Northern
right-whale dolphin, CA/OR/WA, Pacific white-sided dolphin,
CA/OR/WA, Risso’s dolphin, CA/OR/WA, Short-beaked
common dolphin, CA/OR/WA, Short-finned pilot whale, CA/
OR/WA, Sperm Whale, CA/OR/WA.1
California sea lion, U.S., Harbor seal, CA, Humpback whale,
CA/OR/WA 1, Long-beaked common dolphin, CA, Northern
elephant seal, CA breeding, Sea otter, CA, Short-beaked
common dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
California sea lion, U.S., Long-beaked common dolphin, CA,
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Beluga whale, Bristol Bay, Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific,
Harbor seal, Bering Sea, Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific,
Pacific white-sided dolphin, North Pacific, Spotted seal, AK,
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Beluga whale, Bristol Bay, Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific,
Harbor seal, Bering Sea, Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific,
Spotted seal, AK.
Harbor porpoise, GOA 1, Harbor seal, GOA, Sea otter, Southwest AK, Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Beluga whale, Cook Inlet, Dall’s porpoise, AK, Harbor porpoise, GOA, Harbor seal, GOA, Humpback whale, Central
North Pacific 1, Sea otter, South central AK, Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
Beluga whale, Cook Inlet, Dall’s porpoise, AK, Harbor porpoise, GOA 1, Harbor seal, GOA, Steller sea lion, Western
U.S.
Dall’s porpoise, AK, Harbor porpoise, GOA, Harbor seal,
GOA, Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific.
Harbor porpoise, Bering Sea, Northern sea otter, Southwest
AK, Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Dall’s porpoise, AK, Harbor porpoise, GOA 1, Harbor seal,
GOA, Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific, Pacific white-sided
dolphin, North Pacific, Sea otter, South central AK, Steller
sea lion, Western U.S.1
Dall’s porpoise, AK, Harbor porpoise, Southeast AK, Harbor
seal, Southeast AK, Humpback whale, Central North Pacific 1, Pacific white-sided dolphin, North Pacific, Steller sea
lion, Eastern U.S.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific, Harbor Porpoise, Southeastern AK, Harbor seal, Southeast AK, Humpback whale,
Central North Pacific (Southeast AK).
Dall’s porpoise, CA/OR/WA, Harbor porpoise, inland WA 1,
Harbor seal, WA inland.
Bearded seal, AK, Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific, Harbor
porpoise, Bering Sea, Harbor seal, Bering Sea, Humpback
whale, Western North Pacific 1, Killer whale, AK resident,1
Killer whale, GOA, AI, BS transient,1 Northern fur seal,
Eastern Pacific, Ringed seal, AK, Ribbon seal, AK, Spotted
seal, AK, Steller sea lion, Western U.S. 1, Walrus, AK.
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
5363
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Estimated
number of
vessels/
persons
Fishery description
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands pollock trawl ....................
102 .................
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands rockfish trawl ...................
17 ...................
POT, RING NET, AND TRAP FISHERIES:
CA spiny lobster ..................................................................
194 .................
CA spot prawn pot ...............................................................
25 ...................
CA Dungeness crab pot ......................................................
570 .................
OR Dungeness crab pot ......................................................
433 .................
WA/OR/CA sablefish pot .....................................................
WA coastal Dungeness crab pot .........................................
309 .................
228 .................
LONGLINE/SET LINE FISHERIES:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod longline .........
45 ...................
AK Gulf of Alaska sablefish longline ...................................
HI shallow-set longline * ......................................................
295 .................
22 ...................
American Samoa longline 2 .................................................
18 ...................
HI shortline 2 ........................................................................
9 .....................
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally
killed or injured
Bearded Seal, AK, Dall’s porpoise, AK, Harbor seal, AK,
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific, Humpback whale,
Western North Pacific, Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific,
Ribbon seal, AK, Ringed seal, AK, Spotted seal, AK, Steller
sea lion, Western U.S. 1
Killer whale, ENP AK resident 1, Killer whale, GOA, AI, BS
transient.1
Bottlenose dolphin, CA/OR/WA offshore, Humpback whale,
CA/OR/WA 1, Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific, Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA 1.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific, Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA 1.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific, Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA 1.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA 1.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific, Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA 1.
Dall’s Porpoise, AK, Killer whale, GOA, BSAI transient 1.
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific, Ringed seal, AK.
Sperm whale, North Pacific.
Blainville’s beaked whale, HI, Bottlenose dolphin, HI Pelagic,
False killer whale, HI Pelagic 1. Humpback whale, Central
North Pacific, Risso’s dolphin, HI, Rough-toothed dolphin,
HI, Short-finned pilot whale, HI, Striped dolphin, HI.
Bottlenose dolphin, unknown, Cuvier’s beaked whale, unknown, False killer whale, American Samoa, Rough-toothed
dolphin, American Samoa, Short-finned pilot whale, unknown.
None documented.
CATEGORY III
GILLNET FISHERIES:
AK Kuskokwim, Yukon, Norton Sound, Kotzebue salmon
gillnet.
AK Prince William Sound salmon set gillnet .......................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
AK roe herring and food/bait herring gillnet ........................
CA set gillnet (mesh size <3.5 in) .......................................
HI inshore gillnet ..................................................................
WA Grays Harbor salmon drift gillnet (excluding treaty
Tribal fishing).
WA/OR Mainstem Columbia River eulachon gillnet ...........
WA/OR lower Columbia River (includes tributaries) drift
gillnet.
WA Willapa Bay drift gillnet .................................................
1,778 ..............
Harbor porpoise, Bering Sea.
29 ...................
920 .................
296 .................
36 ...................
24 ...................
Harbor seal, GOA, Sea otter, South central AK, Steller sea
lion, Western U.S.
None documented.
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, HI, Spinner dolphin, HI.
Harbor seal, OR/WA coast.
15 ...................
110 .................
None documented.
California sea lion, U.S., Harbor seal, OR/WA coast.
82 ...................
Harbor seal, OR/WA coast, Northern elephant seal, CA breeding.
MISCELLANEOUS NET FISHERIES:
AK Cook Inlet salmon purse seine ......................................
AK Kodiak salmon purse seine ...........................................
AK Southeast salmon purse seine ......................................
AK Metlakatla salmon purse seine ......................................
AK roe herring and food/bait herring beach seine ..............
AK roe herring and food/bait herring purse seine ...............
AK salmon beach seine ......................................................
AK salmon purse seine (Prince William Sound, Chignik,
Alaska Peninsula).
WA/OR sardine purse seine ................................................
CA anchovy, mackerel, sardine purse seine ......................
CA squid purse seine ..........................................................
83 ...................
376 .................
315 .................
10 ...................
10 ...................
356 .................
31 ...................
936 .................
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
None documented in the most recent five years of data.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
Harbor seal, GOA, Harbor seal, Prince William Sound.
42 ...................
65 ...................
80 ...................
CA tuna purse seine * ..........................................................
WA/OR Lower Columbia River salmon seine .....................
WA/OR herring, smelt, squid purse seine or lampara ........
WA salmon purse seine ......................................................
WA salmon reef net .............................................................
10 ...................
10 ...................
130 .................
75 ...................
11 ...................
None documented.
California sea lion, U.S., Harbor seal, CA.
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
5364
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Estimated
number of
vessels/
persons
Fishery description
HI lift net ..............................................................................
HI inshore purse seine ........................................................
HI throw net, cast net ..........................................................
HI seine net .........................................................................
DIP NET FISHERIES:
CA squid dip net ..................................................................
MARINE AQUACULTURE FISHERIES:
CA marine shellfish aquaculture .........................................
CA salmon enhancement rearing pen ................................
CA white seabass enhancement net pens .........................
HI offshore pen culture ........................................................
WA salmon net pens ...........................................................
WA/OR shellfish aquaculture ..............................................
TROLL FISHERIES:
WA/OR/CA albacore surface hook and line/troll .................
CA halibut hook and line/handline ......................................
CA white seabass hook and line/handline ..........................
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands groundfish hand troll and
dinglebar troll.
AK Gulf of Alaska groundfish hand troll and dinglebar troll
AK salmon troll ....................................................................
American Samoa tuna troll ..................................................
CA/OR/WA salmon troll .......................................................
HI troll ..................................................................................
HI rod and reel ....................................................................
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands tuna troll
Guam tuna troll ....................................................................
LONGLINE/SET LINE FISHERIES:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Greenland turbot longline
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands sablefish longline ............
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands halibut longline ................
AK Gulf of Alaska halibut longline .......................................
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod longline ................................
AK octopus/squid longline ...................................................
AK state-managed waters longline/setline (including sablefish, rockfish, lingcod, and miscellaneous finfish).
WA/OR/CA groundfish, bottomfish longline/set line ............
WA/OR Pacific halibut longline ...........................................
CA pelagic longline ..............................................................
HI kaka line ..........................................................................
HI vertical line ......................................................................
TRAWL FISHERIES:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Atka mackerel trawl ........
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod trawl .............
AK Gulf of Alaska flatfish trawl ............................................
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod trawl ....................................
AK Gulf of Alaska pollock trawl ...........................................
17
<3
23
24
...................
...................
...................
...................
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally
killed or injured
None
None
None
None
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
115 .................
None documented.
unknown ........
>1 ...................
13 ...................
2 .....................
14 ...................
23 ...................
None documented.
None documented.
California sea lion, U.S.
None documented.
California sea lion, U.S., Harbor seal, WA inland waters.
None documented.
705 .................
unknown ........
unknown ........
unknown ........
None
None
None
None
unknown ........
1,908 ..............
13 ...................
4,300 ..............
2,117 ..............
322 .................
40 ...................
432 .................
None documented.
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S., Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
None documented.
None documented.
Pantropical spotted dolphin, HI.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
4 .....................
22 ...................
127 .................
855 .................
92 ...................
3 .....................
464 .................
Killer whale, AK resident.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
None documented.
None documented.
367 .................
350 .................
1 .....................
15 ...................
3 .....................
Bottlenose dolphin, CA/OR/WA offshore.
None documented.
None documented in the most recent five years of data.
None documented.
None documented.
13
72
36
55
67
Ribbon seal, AK, Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Ringed seal, AK, Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Northern elephant seal, North Pacific.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Dall’s porpoise, AK, Fin whale, Northeast Pacific, Northern
elephant seal, North Pacific, Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
...................
...................
...................
...................
...................
47 ...................
CA sea cucumber trawl .......................................................
WA/OR/CA shrimp trawl ......................................................
WA/OR/CA groundfish trawl ................................................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
AK Gulf of Alaska rockfish trawl ..........................................
AK Kodiak food/bait herring otter trawl ...............................
AK shrimp otter trawl and beam trawl .................................
AK state-managed waters of Prince William Sound
groundfish trawl.
CA halibut bottom trawl .......................................................
16 ...................
300 .................
160–180 .........
California sea lion, U.S., Harbor porpoise, unknown, Harbor
seal, unknown, Northern elephant seal, CA breeding, Steller
sea lion, unknown.
None documented.
None documented.
California sea lion, U.S., Dall’s porpoise, CA/OR/WA, Harbor
seal, OR/WA coast, Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific, Pacific white-sided dolphin, CA/OR/WA, Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
POT, RING NET, AND TRAP FISHERIES:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands sablefish pot ...................
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod pot ................
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands crab pot ...........................
AK Gulf of Alaska crab pot ..................................................
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod pot .......................................
AK Gulf of Alaska sablefish pot ..........................................
6 .....................
59 ...................
540 .................
271 .................
116 .................
248 .................
None documented.
None documented.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
None documented.
Harbor seal, GOA.
None documented.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00068
43 ...................
4 .....................
38 ...................
2 .....................
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
5365
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Estimated
number of
vessels/
persons
Fishery description
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
AK Southeast Alaska crab pot ............................................
AK Southeast Alaska shrimp pot ........................................
AK shrimp pot, except Southeast ........................................
AK octopus/squid pot ..........................................................
CA/OR coonstripe shrimp pot .............................................
CA rock crab pot .................................................................
WA/OR/CA hagfish pot ........................................................
WA/OR shrimp pot/trap .......................................................
WA Puget Sound Dungeness crab pot/trap ........................
HI crab trap ..........................................................................
HI fish trap ...........................................................................
HI lobster trap ......................................................................
HI shrimp trap ......................................................................
HI crab net ...........................................................................
HI Kona crab loop net .........................................................
HOOK-AND-LINE, HANDLINE, AND JIG FISHERIES:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands groundfish jig ..................
AK Gulf of Alaska groundfish jig .........................................
AK halibut jig .......................................................................
American Samoa bottomfish ...............................................
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
bottomfish.
Guam bottomfish .................................................................
HI aku boat, pole, and line ..................................................
HI bottomfish handline .........................................................
HI inshore handline .............................................................
HI pelagic handline ..............................................................
WA groundfish, bottomfish jig .............................................
Western Pacific squid jig .....................................................
HARPOON FISHERIES:
CA swordfish harpoon .........................................................
POUND NET/WEIR FISHERIES:
AK herring spawn on kelp pound net ..................................
AK Southeast herring roe/food/bait pound net ....................
HI bullpen trap .....................................................................
BAIT PENS:
WA/OR/CA bait pens ...........................................................
DREDGE FISHERIES:
AK scallop dredge ...............................................................
DIVE, HAND/MECHANICAL COLLECTION FISHERIES:
AK clam ...............................................................................
AK Dungeness crab ............................................................
AK herring spawn on kelp ...................................................
AK miscellaneous invertebrates handpick ..........................
HI black coral diving ............................................................
HI fish pond .........................................................................
HI handpick ..........................................................................
HI lobster diving ...................................................................
HI spearfishing .....................................................................
WA/CA kelp .........................................................................
WA/OR bait shrimp, clam hand, dive, or mechanical collection.
OR/CA sea urchin, sea cucumber hand, dive, or mechanical collection.
COMMERCIAL PASSENGER FISHING VESSEL (CHARTER
BOAT) FISHERIES:
AK/WA/OR/CA commercial passenger fishing vessel ........
LIVE FINFISH/SHELLFISH FISHERIES:
CA nearshore finfish live trap/hook-and-line .......................
HI aquarium collecting .........................................................
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally
killed or injured
375 .................
99 ...................
141 .................
15 ...................
36 ...................
124 .................
54 ...................
254 .................
249 .................
5 .....................
9 .....................
<3 ...................
10 ...................
4 .....................
33 ...................
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific (Southeast AK).
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific (Southeast AK).
None documented.
None documented.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific, Harbor seal, CA.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific, Harbor seal, CA.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
None documented.
None documented in recent years.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
2 .....................
214 .................
71 ...................
17 ...................
28 ...................
None documented.
Fin whale, Northeast Pacific.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
>300 ...............
<3 ...................
578 .................
357 .................
534 .................
679 .................
0 .....................
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
6 .....................
None documented.
291 .................
2 .....................
3 .....................
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
13 ...................
California sea lion, U.S.
108 (5 AK) .....
None documented.
130 .................
2 .....................
266 .................
214 .................
<3 ...................
5 .....................
46 ...................
19 ...................
163 .................
4 .....................
201 .................
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
10 ...................
None documented.
>7,000 (1,006
AK).
Killer whale, unknown, Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S., Steller
sea lion, Western U.S.
93 ...................
90 ...................
None documented.
None documented.
documented.
documented.
documented in recent years.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
List of Abbreviations and Symbols Used in Table 1: AI—Aleutian Islands; AK—Alaska; BS—Bering Sea; CA—California; ENP—Eastern North
Pacific; GOA—Gulf of Alaska; HI—Hawaii; MHI—Main Hawaiian Islands; OR—Oregon; WA—Washington.
1 Fishery classified based on mortalities and serious injuries of this stock, which are greater than or equal to 50 percent (Category I) or greater
than 1 percent and less than 50 percent (Category II) of the stock’s PBR.
2 Fishery classified by analogy.
* Fishery has an associated high seas component listed in Table 3.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
5366
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
∧ The list of marine mammal species and/or stocks killed or injured in this fishery is identical to the list of species and/or stocks killed or injured
in high seas component of the fishery, minus species and/or stocks that have geographic ranges exclusively on the high seas. The species and/
or stocks are found, and the fishery remains the same, on both sides of the EEZ boundary. Therefore, the EEZ components of these fisheries
pose the same risk to marine mammals as the components operating on the high seas.
TABLE 2—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN
Estimated
number of
vessels/
persons
Fishery description
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally
killed or injured
CATEGORY I
GILLNET FISHERIES:
Mid-Atlantic gillnet ...............................................................
3,950 ..............
Northeast sink gillnet ...........................................................
4,332 ..............
TRAP/POT FISHERIES:
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot ................
10,163 ............
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine, Minke whale, Canadian east
coast, North Atlantic right whale, WNA 1.
280 .................
Atlantic spotted dolphin, Northern GMX, Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX oceanic, Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore,
Common dolphin, WNA, Cuvier’s beaked whale, WNA,
False killer whale, WNA, Harbor porpoise, GME, BF, Kogia
spp. (Pygmy or dwarf sperm whale), WNA, Long-finned pilot
whale, WNA 1, Mesoplodon beaked whale, WNA, Minke
whale, Canadian East coast, Pantropical spotted dolphin,
Northern GMX, Pygmy sperm whale, GMX, Risso’s dolphin,
Northern GMX, Risso’s dolphin, WNA, Rough-toothed dolphin, Northern GMX, Short-finned pilot whale, Northern
GMX, Short-finned pilot whale, WNA1.
LONGLINE FISHERIES:
Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics
longline *.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern Migratory coastal 1, Bottlenose
dolphin, Southern Migratory coastal 1, Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern NC estuarine system 1, Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC estuarine system 1, Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore, Common dolphin, WNA, Gray seal, WNA, Harbor
porpoise, GME/BF, Harbor seal, WNA, Harp seal, WNA,
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine, Minke whale, Canadian
east coast.
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore, Common dolphin, WNA,
Fin whale, WNA, Gray seal, WNA, Harbor porpoise, GME/
BF 1, Harbor seal, WNA, Harp seal, WNA, Hooded seal,
WNA, Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine, Long-finned pilot
whale, WNA, Minke whale, Canadian east coast, North Atlantic right whale, WNA, Risso’s dolphin, WNA, White-sided
dolphin, WNA.
CATEGORY II
248 .................
Gulf of Mexico gillnet 2 .........................................................
248 .................
NC inshore gillnet ................................................................
2,850 ..............
Northeast anchored float gillnet 2 ........................................
852 .................
Northeast drift gillnet 2 .........................................................
Southeast Atlantic gillnet 2 ...................................................
1,036 ..............
273 .................
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark gillnet ..............................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
GILLNET FISHERIES:
Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet 2 .......................................
23 ...................
TRAWL FISHERIES:
Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl (including pair trawl) ..............
Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl .....................................................
382 .................
785 .................
Northeast mid-water trawl (including pair trawl) ..................
1,087 ..............
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Bottlenose dolphin, unknown (Northern migratory coastal or
Southern migratory coastal).
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay, sound, and estuarine,
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX coastal, Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system 1,
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC estuarine system 1.
Harbor seal, WNA, Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine, Whitesided dolphin, WNA.
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL coastal, Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern FL coastal, Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA coastal,
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, unknown (Central FL, Northern FL, SC/GA
coastal, or Southern migratory coastal), North Atlantic right
whale, WNA.
Gray seal, WNA, Harbor seal, WNA.
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore, Common dolphin, WNA 1,
Gray seal, WNA, Harbor seal, WNA, Risso’s dolphin,
WNA 1, White-sided dolphin, WNA.
Common dolphin, WNA, Gray seal, WNA, Harbor seal, WNA,
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA 1, Minke whale, Canadian
East Coast.
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
5367
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN—
Continued
Estimated
number of
vessels/
persons
Fishery description
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally
killed or injured
Northeast bottom trawl ........................................................
2,238 ..............
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore, Common dolphin, WNA,
Gray seal, WNA, Harbor porpoise, GME/BF, Harbor seal,
WNA, Harp seal, WNA, Long-finned pilot whale, WNA,
Risso’s dolphin, WNA, White-sided dolphin, WNA 1.
Atlantic spotted dolphin, GMX continental and oceanic,
Bottlenose dolphin, Charleston estuarine system, Bottlenose
dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal 1, Bottlenose dolphin, GMX
bay, sound, estuarine 1, Bottlenose dolphin, GMX continental shelf, Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX coastal,
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA coastal 1, Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern migratory coastal, Bottlenose dolphin, Western
GMX coastal1, West Indian manatee, Florida.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl ....
4,950 ..............
TRAP/POT FISHERIES:
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico stone crab
trap/pot 2.
1,384 ..............
Atlantic mixed species trap/pot 2 .........................................
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot ...................................................
3,436 ..............
7,714 ..............
PURSE SEINE FISHERIES:
Gulf of Mexico menhaden purse seine ...............................
40–42 .............
Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine 2 ..................................
19 ...................
HAUL/BEACH SEINE FISHERIES:
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine .............................................
359 .................
NC long haul seine ..............................................................
30 ...................
STOP NET FISHERIES:
NC roe mullet stop net ........................................................
1 .....................
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system, Bottlenose
dolphin, unknown (Southern migratory coastal or Southern
NC estuarine system).
POUND NET FISHERIES:
VA pound net .......................................................................
26 ...................
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern migratory coastal, Bottlenose
dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system, Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern Migratory coastal 1.
Bottlenose dolphin, Biscayne Bay estuarine, Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL coastal, Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX
coastal, Bottlenose dolphin, FL Bay, Bottlenose dolphin,
GMX bay, sound, estuarine (FL west coast portion),
Bottlenose dolphin, Indian River Lagoon estuarine system,
Bottlenose dolphin, Jacksonville estuarine system,
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX coastal.
Fin whale, WNA, Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL coastal, Bottlenose dolphin,
Central GA estuarine system, Bottlenose dolphin, Charleston estuarine system 1, Bottlenose dolphin, Indian River Lagoon estuarine system, Bottlenose dolphin, Jacksonville estuarine system, Bottlenose dolphin, Northern FL coastal 1,
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GA/Southern SC estuarine
system, Bottlenose dolphin, Northern Migratory coastal,
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system 1,
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern SC estuarine system,
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA coastal, Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern GA estuarine system, Bottlenose dolphin, Southern Migratory coastal, Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC estuarine system, West Indian manatee, FL.
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay, sound, estuarine, Bottlenose
dolphin, Mississippi Sound, Lake Borgne, Bay Boudreau,
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX coastal 1, Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX coastal 1.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern Migratory coastal, Bottlenose
dolphin, Southern Migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern Migratory coastal 1, Bottlenose
dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system 1, Bottlenose dolphin, Southern Migratory coastal 1.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system 1,
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC estuarine system.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
CATEGORY III
GILLNET FISHERIES:
Caribbean gillnet ..................................................................
DE River inshore gillnet .......................................................
Long Island Sound inshore gillnet .......................................
RI, southern MA (to Monomoy Island), and NY Bight
(Raritan and Lower NY Bays) inshore gillnet.
Southeast Atlantic inshore gillnet ........................................
TRAWL FISHERIES:
Atlantic shellfish bottom trawl ..............................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00071
>991 ...............
unknown ........
unknown ........
unknown ........
None
None
None
None
unknown ........
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern SC estuarine system.
>58 .................
None documented.
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
documented
documented
documented
documented
in
in
in
in
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
the
the
the
the
most
most
most
most
07FER1
recent
recent
recent
recent
five
five
five
five
years
years
years
years
of
of
of
of
data.
data.
data.
data.
5368
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN—
Continued
Estimated
number of
vessels/
persons
Fishery description
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally
killed or injured
Gulf of Mexico butterfish trawl .............................................
2 .....................
Gulf of Mexico mixed species trawl ....................................
GA cannonball jellyfish trawl ...............................................
MARINE AQUACULTURE FISHERIES:
Finfish aquaculture ..............................................................
Shellfish aquaculture ...........................................................
PURSE SEINE FISHERIES:
Gulf of Maine Atlantic herring purse seine ..........................
Gulf of Maine menhaden purse seine .................................
FL West Coast sardine purse seine ....................................
U.S. Atlantic tuna purse seine * ...........................................
LONGLINE/HOOK-AND-LINE FISHERIES:
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic bottom longline/hook-and-line .........
Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid-Atlantic tuna, shark, swordfish
hook-and-line/harpoon..
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
snapper-grouper and other reef fish bottom longline/
hook-and-line.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shark bottom
longline/hook-and-line.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
pelagic hook-and-line/harpoon.
U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico trotline ...................................
TRAP/POT FISHERIES:
Caribbean mixed species trap/pot .......................................
Caribbean spiny lobster trap/pot .........................................
FL spiny lobster trap/pot ......................................................
20 ...................
1 .....................
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX oceanic, Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX continental shelf.
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA coastal.
48 ...................
unknown ........
Harbor seal, WNA.
None documented.
>7 ...................
>2 ...................
10 ...................
5 .....................
Harbor seal, WNA, Gray seal, WNA.
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal.
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA, Short-finned pilot whale, WNA.
>1,207 ............
2,846 ..............
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore, Humpback whale, Gulf of
Maine.
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX continental shelf.
>5,000 ............
39 ...................
680 .................
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal, Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX continental shelf.
None documented.
unknown ........
None documented.
>501 ...............
>197 ...............
1,268 ..............
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Gulf of Mexico blue crab trap/pot ........................................
4,113 ..............
Gulf of Mexico mixed species trap/pot ................................
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico golden crab
trap/pot.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic eel trap/pot ..............................................
STOP SEINE/WEIR/POUND NET/FLOATING TRAP/FYKE
NET FISHERIES:
Gulf of Maine herring and Atlantic mackerel stop seine/
weir.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic crab stop seine/weir ................................
U.S. Mid-Atlantic mixed species stop seine/weir/pound net
(except the NC roe mullet stop net).
RI floating trap .....................................................................
Northeast and Mid-Atlantic fyke net ....................................
DREDGE FISHERIES:
Gulf of Maine sea urchin dredge .........................................
Gulf of Maine mussel dredge ..............................................
Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid-Atlantic sea scallop dredge ..........
Mid-Atlantic blue crab dredge .............................................
Mid-Atlantic soft-shell clam dredge .....................................
Mid-Atlantic whelk dredge ...................................................
U.S. Mid-Atlantic/Gulf of Mexico oyster dredge ..................
New England and Mid-Atlantic offshore surf clam/quahog
dredge.
HAUL/BEACH SEINE FISHERIES:
Caribbean haul/beach seine ................................................
Gulf of Mexico haul/beach seine .........................................
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic haul/beach seine ......................
DIVE, HAND/MECHANICAL COLLECTION FISHERIES:
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean shellfish dive,
hand/mechanical collection.
Gulf of Maine urchin dive, hand/mechanical collection .......
unknown ........
10 ...................
None documented.
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, Biscayne Bay estuarine Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL coastal, Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX
coastal, Bottlenose dolphin, FL Bay estuarine, Bottlenose
dolphin, FL Keys.
Bottlenose dolphin, Barataria Bay, Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern
GMX coastal, Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay, sound, estuarine, Bottlenose dolphin, Mississippi Sound, Lake Borgne,
Bay Boudreau, Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX coastal,
Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX coastal, West Indian
manatee, FL.
None documented.
None documented.
unknown ........
None documented.
>1 ...................
2,600 ..............
unknown ........
Harbor porpoise, GME/BF, Harbor seal, WNA, Minke whale,
Canadian east coast, Atlantic white-sided dolphin, WNA.
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system.
9 .....................
unknown ........
None documented.
None documented.
unknown ........
unknown ........
>403 ...............
unknown ........
unknown ........
unknown ........
7,000 ..............
unknown ........
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
15 ...................
unknown ........
25 ...................
None documented in the most recent five years of data.
None documented.
None documented.
20,000 ............
None documented.
unknown ........
None documented.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
5369
TABLE 2—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN—
Continued
Estimated
number of
vessels/
persons
Fishery description
Gulf of Mexico, Southeast Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, and Caribbean cast net.
COMMERCIAL PASSENGER FISHING VESSEL (CHARTER
BOAT) FISHERIES:
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean commercial
passenger fishing vessel.
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally
killed or injured
unknown ........
None documented.
4,000 ..............
Bottlenose dolphin, Barataria Bay estuarine system,
Bottlenose dolphin, Biscayne Bay estuarine, Bottlenose dolphin,
Central
FL
coastal,
Bottlenose
dolphin,
Choctawhatchee Bay, Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX
coastal, Bottlenose dolphin, FL Bay, Bottlenose dolphin,
GMX bay, sound, estuarine, Bottlenose dolphin, Indian
River Lagoon estuarine system, Bottlenose dolphin, Jacksonville estuarine system, Bottlenose dolphin, Mississippi
Sound, Lake Borgne, Bay Boudreau, Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern FL coastal, Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GA/
Southern SC estuarine, Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX
coastal, Bottlenose dolphin, Northern migratory coastal,
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine, Bottlenose dolphin, Southern migratory coastal, Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC estuarine system, Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA coastal, Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX coastal, Short-finned
pilot whale, WNA.
List of Abbreviations and Symbols Used in Table 2: DE—Delaware; FL—Florida; GA—Georgia; GME/BF—Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy; GMX—
Gulf of Mexico; MA—Massachusetts; NC—North Carolina; NY—New York; RI—Rhode Island; SC—South Carolina; VA—Virginia; WNA—Western North Atlantic.
1 Fishery classified based on mortalities and serious injuries of this stock, which are greater than or equal to 50 percent (Category I) or greater
than 1 percent and less than 50 percent (Category II) of the stock’s PBR.
2 Fishery classified by analogy.
* Fishery has an associated high seas component listed in Table 3.
TABLE 3—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES ON THE HIGH SEAS
Number of
HSFCA
permits
Fishery description
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally
killed or injured
CATEGORY I
LONGLINE FISHERIES:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species * ......................................
79
Western Pacific Pelagic (HI Deep-set component) * ∧ ........
143
Atlantic spotted dolphin, WNA, Bottlenose dolphin, Northern
GMX oceanic, Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore, Common
dolphin, WNA, Cuvier’s beaked whale, WNA, False killer
whale, WNA, Killer whale, GMX oceanic, Kogia spp. whale
(Pygmy or dwarf sperm whale), WNA, Long-finned pilot
whale, WNA, Mesoplodon beaked whale, WNA, Minke
whale, Canadian East coast, Pantropical spotted dolphin,
WNA, Risso’s dolphin, GMX, Risso’s dolphin, WNA, Shortfinned pilot whale, WNA.
Bottlenose dolphin, HI Pelagic, False killer whale, HI Pelagic,
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific, Kogia spp. (Pygmy
or dwarf sperm whale), HI, Pygmy killer whale, HI, Risso’s
dolphin, HI, Short-finned pilot whale, HI, Sperm whale, HI,
Striped dolphin, HI.
CATEGORY II
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
DRIFT GILLNET FISHERIES:
Pacific Highly Migratory Species * ∧ ....................................
4
2
0
TRAWL FISHERIES:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species * * ....................................
CCAMLR ..............................................................................
PURSE SEINE FISHERIES:
South Pacific Tuna Fisheries ...............................................
Western Pacific Pelagic .......................................................
LONGLINE FISHERIES:
CCAMLR ..............................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA, Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA, Northern right-whale dolphin, CA/OR/WA, Pacific
white-sided dolphin, CA/OR/WA, Risso’s dolphin, CA/OR/
WA, Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
No information.
Antarctic fur seal.
35
1
0
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
No information.
No information.
None documented.
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
5370
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 3—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES ON THE HIGH SEAS—Continued
Number of
HSFCA
permits
Fishery description
South Pacific Albacore Troll ................................................
South Pacific Tuna Fisheries * * ...........................................
Western Pacific Pelagic (HI Shallow-set component) * ∧ ....
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally
killed or injured
9
4
22
2
42
11
5
No
No
No
No
information.
information.
information.
information.
1
22
4
6
HANDLINE/POLE AND LINE FISHERIES:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species ........................................
Pacific Highly Migratory Species .........................................
South Pacific Albacore Troll ................................................
Western Pacific Pelagic .......................................................
TROLL FISHERIES:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species ........................................
South Pacific Albacore Troll ................................................
South Pacific Tuna Fisheries * * ...........................................
Western Pacific Pelagic .......................................................
No information.
No information.
Blainville’s beaked whale, HI, Bottlenose dolphin, HI Pelagic,
False killer whale, HI Pelagic, Humpback whale, Central
North Pacific, Northern elephant seal, CA breeding, Risso’s
dolphin, HI, Rough-toothed dolphin, HI, Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA, Short-finned pilot whale, HI,
Striped dolphin, HI.
No
No
No
No
information.
information.
information.
information.
CATEGORY III
LONGLINE FISHERIES:
Northwest Atlantic Bottom Longline ....................................
Pacific Highly Migratory Species .........................................
PURSE SEINE FISHERIES:
Pacific Highly Migratory Species * ∧ ....................................
TRAWL FISHERIES:
Northwest Atlantic ................................................................
TROLL FISHERIES:
Pacific Highly Migratory Species * .......................................
1
105
None documented.
None documented in the most recent 5 years of data.
7
None documented.
2
None documented.
149
None documented.
List of Terms, Abbreviations, and Symbols Used in Table 3: CA-California; GMX-Gulf of Mexico; HI-Hawaii; OR-Oregon; WA-Washington;
WNA-Western North Atlantic.
* Fishery is an extension/component of an existing fishery operating within U.S. waters listed in Table 1 or 2. The number of permits listed in
Table 3 represents only the number of permits for the high seas component of the fishery.
* * These gear types are not authorized under the Pacific HMS FMP (2004), the Atlantic HMS FMP (2006), or without a South Pacific Tuna
Treaty license (in the case of the South Pacific Tuna fisheries). Because HSFCA permits are valid for five years, permits obtained in past years
exist in the HSFCA permit database for gear types that are now unauthorized. Therefore, while HSFCA permits exist for these gear types, it
does not represent effort. In order to land fish species, fishers must be using an authorized gear type. Once these permits for unauthorized gear
types expire, the permit-holder will be required to obtain a permit for an authorized gear type.
∧ The list of marine mammal species and/or stocks killed or injured in this fishery is identical to the list of marine mammal species and/or
stocks killed or injured in U.S. waters component of the fishery, minus species and/or stocks that have geographic ranges exclusively in coastal
waters, because the marine mammal species and/or stocks are also found on the high seas and the fishery remains the same on both sides of
the EEZ boundary. Therefore, the high seas components of these fisheries pose the same risk to marine mammals as the components of these
fisheries operating in U.S. waters.
TABLE 4—FISHERIES AFFECTED BY TAKE REDUCTION TEAMS AND PLANS
Take reduction plans
Affected fisheries
Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan (ALWTRP)—50 CFR 229.32
Category I:
Mid-Atlantic gillnet, Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot,
Northeast sink gillnet.
Category II:
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot, Atlantic mixed species trap/pot, Northeast
anchored float gillnet, Northeast drift gillnet, Southeast Atlantic
gillnet, Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark gillnet *, Southeastern, U.S.
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico stone crab trap/pot. ∧
Category I:
Mid-Atlantic gillnet.
Category II:
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot, Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet fishery,
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine, Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine,
NC inshore gillnet, NC long haul seine, NC roe mullet stop net,
Southeast Atlantic gillnet, Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark gillnet,
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl ∧, Southeastern, U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico stone crab trap/pot ∧, VA
pound net.
Category I:
HI deep-set longline.
Category II:
HI shallow-set longline.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Plan (BDTRP)—50 CFR 229.35 ....
False Killer Whale Take Reduction Plan (FKWTRP)—50 CFR 229.37 ..
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
5371
TABLE 4—FISHERIES AFFECTED BY TAKE REDUCTION TEAMS AND PLANS—Continued
Take reduction plans
Affected fisheries
Harbor Porpoise Take Reduction Plan (HPTRP)—50 CFR 229.33 (New
England) and 229.34 (Mid-Atlantic).
Pelagic Longline Take Reduction Plan (PLTRP)—50 CFR 229.36 .........
Category I:
Mid-Atlantic gillnet, Northeast sink gillnet.
Category I:
Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics longline.
Category I:
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (≥14 in mesh).
Category II:
Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl, Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl (including pair
trawl), Northeast bottom trawl, Northeast mid-water trawl (including
pair trawl).
Pacific Offshore Cetacean Take Reduction Plan (POCTRP)—50 CFR
229.31.
Atlantic Trawl Gear Take Reduction Team (ATGTRT) ............................
* Only applicable to the portion of the fishery operating in U.S. waters; ∧Only applicable to the portion of the fishery operating in the Atlantic
Ocean.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Classification
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce certified
to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration (SBA) at
the proposed rule stage that this rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. No comments were received on
that certification, and no new
information has been discovered to
change that conclusion. Accordingly, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is
required, and none has been prepared.
This rule contains collection-ofinformation (COI) requirements subject
to the Paperwork Reduction Act. The
COI for the registration of individuals
under the MMPA has been approved by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under OMB control number
0648–0293 (0.15 hours per report for
new registrants). The requirement for
reporting marine mammal mortalities or
injuries has been approved by OMB
under OMB control number 0648–0292
(0.15 hours per report). These estimates
include the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the COI. Send comments
regarding these reporting burden
estimates or any other aspect of the COI,
including suggestions for reducing
burden, to NMFS and OMB (see
ADDRESSES and SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a COI,
subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, unless that
COI displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
This rule has been determined to be
not significant for the purposes of
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
This rule is not expected to be an E.O.
13771 regulatory action because this
rule is not significant under E.O. 12866.
In accordance with the Companion
Manual for NAO 216–6A, NMFS
determined that publishing this LOF
qualifies to be categorically excluded
from further NEPA review. Issuance of
this final rule is consistent with
categories of activities identified in
Categorical Exclusion G7 of the
Companion Manual, and we have not
identified any extraordinary
circumstances listed in Chapter 4 of the
Companion Manual for NAO 216–6A
that would preclude application of this
categorical exclusion. If NMFS takes a
management action, for example,
through the development of a TRP,
NMFS would first prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
or Environmental Assessment (EA), as
required under NEPA, specific to that
action.
This rule would not affect species
listed as threatened or endangered
under the ESA or their associated
critical habitat. The impacts of
numerous fisheries have been analyzed
in various biological opinions, and this
rule will not affect the conclusions of
those opinions. The classification of
fisheries on the LOF is not considered
to be a management action that would
adversely affect threatened or
endangered species. If NMFS takes a
management action, for example,
through the development of a TRP,
NMFS would consult under ESA section
7 on that action.
This rule would have no adverse
impacts on marine mammals and may
have a positive impact on marine
mammals by improving knowledge of
marine mammals and the fisheries
interacting with marine mammals
through information collected from
observer programs, stranding and
sighting data, or take reduction teams.
This rule would not affect the land or
water uses or natural resources of the
coastal zone, as specified under section
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
307 of the Coastal Zone Management
Act.
References
Allen, B.M. and R.P. Angliss, editors. 2016.
Alaska Marine Mammal Stock
Assessments, 2015. NOAA Tech. Memo.
NMFS–AFSC–323. 309 p.
Breiwick, J.M. 2013. North Pacific Marine
Mammal Bycatch Estimation
Methodology and Results, 2007–2011.
NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS–AFSC–260.
40 p.
Carretta, J.V., E. Oleson, D.W. Weller, A.R.
Lang, K.A. Forney, J. Baker, M.M. Muto,
B. Hanson, A.J. Orr, H. Huber, M.S.
Lowry, J. Barlow, J.E. Moore, D. Lynch,
L. Carswell, and R.L. Brownell Jr. 2015.
U.S. Pacific Marine Mammal Stock
Assessments: 2014. NOAA Technical
Memorandum NOAA–TM–NMFS–
SWFSC–549. 414 p.
Carretta, J.V., K.A. Forney, E. Oleson, D.W.
Weller, A.R. Lang, J. Baker, M.M. Muto,
B. Hanson, A.J. Orr, H. Huber, M.S.
Lowry, J. Barlow, J.E. Moore, D. Lynch,
L. Carswell, and R.L. Brownell Jr. 2017a.
U.S. Pacific Marine Mammal Stock
Assessments: 2016. NOAA Technical
Memorandum NOAA–TM–NMFS–
SWFSC–577. 414 p.
Carretta, J.V., J.E. Moore, and K.A. Forney.
2017. Regression tree and ratio estimates
of marine mammal, sea turtle, and
seabird bycatch in the California drift
gillnet fishery: 1990–2015. NOAA
Technical Memorandum, NOAA–TM–
NMFS–SWFSC–568. 83 p. doi:10.7289/
V5/TM–SWFSC–568.
Carretta, J.V., M.M. Muto, S. Wilkin, J.
Greenman, K. Wilkinson, D. Lawson, J.
Viezbicke, and J. Jannot. 2017b. Sources
of human-related injury and mortality for
U.S. Pacific west coast marine mammal
stocks assessments, 2011–2015. NOAA
Technical Memorandum, NOAA–TM–
NMFS–SWFSC–579. 126 p.
Hayes, S.A., E. Josephson, K. Maze-Foley,
and P.E. Rosel, editors. 2017. U.S.
Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Marine
Mammal Stocks Assessments, 2016.
NOAA Technical Memorandum, NOAA–
TM–NE–241. 274 p.
Helker, V.T., M.M. Muto, and L.A. Jemison.
2016. Human-Caused Injury and
Mortality of NMFS-managed Alaska
Marine Mammal Stocks, 2010–2014.
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
5372
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 7, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
NOAA Technical Memorandum, NOAA–
NMFS–AFSC–315. 89 p.
Jannot, J.E., V. Tuttle, K. Somers, Y–W. Lee,
J. McVeigh. 2016. Marine Mammal,
Seabird, and Sea Turtle Summary of
Observed Interactions, 2002–2014.
Fisheries Observation Science, Fishery
Resource Analysis and Monitoring
Division, Northwest Fisheries Science
Center.
McCracken, M.L. 2016. Assessment of
Incidental Interactions with Marine
Mammals in the Hawaii Deep and
Shallow Set Fisheries from 2010 through
2014. NMFS Pacific Islands Fisheries
Science Center, PIFSC Internal Report
IR–16–008. 2 p. + Excel spreadsheet.
Moore, J.E. and D.W. Weller. 2013.
Probability of taking a western North
Pacific gray whale during the proposed
Makah hunt. NOAA Tech. Memo.
NMFS–SWFSC–506. 13 p.
Muto, M.M, V.T. Helker, R.P. Angliss, B.A.
Allen, P.L. Boveng, J.M. Breiwick, M.F.
Cameron, P.J. Clapham, S.P. Dahle, M.E.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Feb 06, 2018
Jkt 244001
Dahlheim, B.S. Fadely, M.C. Ferguson,
L.W. Fritz, R.C. Hobbs, Y.V.
Ivashchenko, A.S. Kennedy, J.M.
London, S.A. Mizroch, R.R. Ream, E.L.
Richmond, K.E.W. Shelden, R.G. Towell,
P.R. Wade, J.M. Waite, and A.N. Zerbini.
2017. Alaska Marine Mammal Stock
Assessments, 2016. NOAA Technical
Memorandum NOAA–TM–NMFS–
AFSC–355. 367 p.
National Marine Fisheries Service. 2012.
National Marine Fisheries Service Policy
Directive 02-238. Process for
Distinguishing Serious from Non-Serious
Injury of Marine Mammals, 4 p.
(Available at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
op/pds/documents/02/02-238.pdf).
Rone, B. K., A. N. Zerbini, A.B. Douglas,
D.W. Weller, and P.J. Clapham. 2016.
Abundance and distribution of cetaceans
in the Gulf of Alaska. Marine Biology
164:23.
Waring, G.T., E. Josephson, K. Maze-Foley,
and P.E. Rosel, editors. 2016. U.S.
Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Marine
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
Mammal Stocks Assessments, 2015.
NOAA Technical Memorandum NOAA–
NE–238. 512 p.
Western Pacific Regional Fishery
Management Council (WPRFMC). 2015a.
Stock Assessment and Fishery
Evaluation (SAFE) Report Pacific Island
Pelagic Fisheries. 396 p.
Western Pacific Regional Fishery
Management Council (WPRFMC). 2015b.
Annual Stock Assessment and Fishery
Evaluation Report: Fishery Ecosystem
Plan for the American Samoa
Archipelago. 202 p.
Dated: February 2, 2018.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–02442 Filed 2–6–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\07FER1.SGM
07FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 7, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5349-5372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02442]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 229
[Docket No. 170303230-8047-02]
RIN 0648-BG72
List of Fisheries for 2018
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) publishes its
final List of Fisheries (LOF) for 2018, as required by the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). The LOF for 2018 reflects new information
on interactions between commercial fisheries and marine mammals. NMFS
must classify each commercial fishery on the LOF into one of three
categories under the MMPA based upon the level of mortality and serious
injury of marine mammals that occurs incidental to each fishery. The
classification of a fishery on the LOF determines whether participants
in that fishery are subject to certain provisions of the MMPA, such as
registration, observer coverage, and take reduction plan (TRP)
requirements.
DATES: The applicability date of this final rule is March 9, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Chief, Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver
Spring, MD 20910.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristy Long, Office of Protected
Resources, 301-427-8402; Allison Rosner, Greater Atlantic Region, 978-
281-9328; Jessica Powell, Southeast Region, 727-824-5312; Dan Lawson,
West Coast Region, 562-980-3209; Suzie Teerlink, Alaska Region, 907-
586-7240; Kevin Brindock, Pacific Islands Region, 808-725-5146.
Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the hearing
impaired may call the Federal Information Relay Service at 1-800-877-
8339 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. Eastern time, Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
What is the List of Fisheries?
Section 118 of the MMPA requires NMFS to place all U.S. commercial
fisheries into one of three categories based on the level of incidental
mortality and serious injury of marine mammals occurring in each
fishery (16 U.S.C. 1387(c)(1)). The classification of a fishery on the
LOF determines whether participants in that fishery may be required to
comply with certain provisions of the MMPA, such as registration,
observer coverage, and take reduction plan requirements. NMFS must
reexamine the LOF annually, considering new information in the Marine
Mammal Stock Assessment Reports (SARs) and other relevant sources, and
publish in the Federal Register any necessary changes to the LOF after
notice and opportunity for public comment (16 U.S.C. 1387 (c)(1)(C)).
How does NMFS determine in which category a fishery is placed?
The definitions for the fishery classification criteria can be
found in the implementing regulations for section 118 of the MMPA (50
CFR 229.2). The criteria are also summarized here.
Fishery Classification Criteria
The fishery classification criteria consist of a two-tiered, stock-
specific approach that first addresses the total impact of all
fisheries on each marine mammal stock and then addresses the impact of
individual fisheries on each stock. This approach is based on
consideration of the rate, in numbers of animals per year, of
incidental mortalities and serious injuries of marine mammals due to
commercial fishing operations relative to the potential biological
removal (PBR) level for each marine mammal stock. The MMPA (16 U.S.C.
1362 (20)) defines the PBR level as the maximum number of animals, not
including natural mortalities, that may be removed from a marine mammal
stock while allowing that stock to reach or maintain its optimum
sustainable population (OSP). This definition can also be found in the
implementing regulations for section 118 of the MMPA (50 CFR 229.2).
Tier 1: Tier 1 considers the cumulative fishery mortality and
serious injury for a particular stock. If the total annual mortality
and serious injury of a marine mammal stock, across all fisheries, is
less than or equal to 10 percent of the PBR level of the stock, all
fisheries interacting with the stock will be placed in Category III
(unless those fisheries interact with other stock(s) for which total
annual mortality and serious injury is greater than 10 percent of PBR).
Otherwise, these fisheries are subject to the next tier (Tier 2) of
analysis to determine their classification.
Tier 2: Tier 2 considers fishery-specific mortality and serious
injury for a particular stock.
Category I: Annual mortality and serious injury of a stock in a
given fishery is greater than or equal to 50 percent of the PBR level
(i.e., frequent incidental mortality and serious injury of marine
mammals).
Category II: Annual mortality and serious injury of a stock in a
given fishery is greater than 1 percent and less than 50 percent of the
PBR level (i.e., occasional incidental mortality and serious injury of
marine mammals).
Category III: Annual mortality and serious injury of a stock in a
given fishery is less than or equal to 1 percent of the PBR level
(i.e., a remote likelihood of or no known incidental mortality and
serious injury of marine mammals).
Additional details regarding how the categories were determined are
provided in the preamble to the final rule implementing section 118 of
the MMPA (60 FR 45086; August 30, 1995).
Because fisheries are classified on a per-stock basis, a fishery
may qualify as one category for one marine mammal stock and another
category for a different marine mammal stock. A fishery is typically
classified on the LOF at its highest level of classification (e.g., a
fishery qualifying for Category III for one marine mammal stock and for
Category II for another marine mammal stock will be listed under
Category II). Stocks driving a fishery's classification are denoted
with a superscript ``1'' in Tables 1 and 2.
Other Criteria That May Be Considered
The tier analysis requires a minimum amount of data, and NMFS does
not have sufficient data to perform a tier analysis on certain
fisheries. Therefore, NMFS has classified certain fisheries by analogy
to other Category I or II fisheries that use similar fishing techniques
or gear that are known to cause mortality or serious injury of marine
mammals, or according to factors discussed in the final LOF for 1996
(60 FR 67063; December 28, 1995) and listed in the regulatory
definition of a Category II fishery: In the absence of reliable
information indicating the frequency of incidental mortality and
serious injury of marine mammals by a commercial fishery, NMFS will
determine whether the incidental mortality or serious injury is
``frequent,'' ``occasional,'' or ``remote'' by evaluating other factors
[[Page 5350]]
such as fishing techniques, gear used, methods used to deter marine
mammals, target species, seasons and areas fished, qualitative data
from logbooks or fishermen reports, stranding data, and the species and
distribution of marine mammals in the area, or at the discretion of the
Assistant Administrator for Fisheries (50 CFR 229.2).
Further, eligible commercial fisheries not specifically identified
on the LOF are deemed to be Category II fisheries until the next LOF is
published (50 CFR 229.2).
How does NMFS determine which species or stocks are included as
incidentally killed or injured in a fishery?
The LOF includes a list of marine mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in each commercial fishery. The list of
species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured includes
``serious'' and ``non-serious'' documented injuries as described later
in the List of Species and/or Stocks Incidentally Killed or Injured in
the Pacific Ocean and the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
sections. To determine which species or stocks are included as
incidentally killed or injured in a fishery, NMFS annually reviews the
information presented in the current SARs and injury determination
reports. The SARs are based upon the best available scientific
information and provide the most current and inclusive information on
each stock's PBR level and level of interaction with commercial fishing
operations. The best available scientific information used in the SARs
reviewed for the 2018 LOF generally summarizes data from 2010-2014.
NMFS also reviews other sources of new information, including injury
determination reports, bycatch estimation reports, observer data,
logbook data, stranding data, disentanglement network data, fishermen
self-reports (i.e., MMPA mortality/injury reports), and anecdotal
reports from that time period. In some cases, more recent information
may be available and used in the LOF, but in an effort to be consistent
with the most recent SARs and across the LOF, NMFS typically restricts
the analysis to data within the five-year time period summarized in the
current SAR.
For fisheries with observer coverage, species or stocks are
generally removed from the list of marine mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured if no interactions are documented in the
five-year timeframe summarized in that year's LOF. For fisheries with
no observer coverage and for observed fisheries with evidence
indicating that undocumented interactions may be occurring (e.g.,
fishery has low observer coverage and stranding network data include
evidence of fisheries interactions that cannot be attributed to a
specific fishery) species and stocks may be retained for longer than
five years. For these fisheries, NMFS will review the other sources of
information listed above and use its discretion to decide when it is
appropriate to remove a species or stock.
Where does NMFS obtain information on the level of observer coverage in
a fishery on the LOF?
The best available information on the level of observer coverage
and the spatial and temporal distribution of observed marine mammal
interactions is presented in the SARs. Data obtained from the observer
program and observer coverage levels are important tools in estimating
the level of marine mammal mortality and serious injury in commercial
fishing operations. Starting with the 2005 SARs, each Pacific and
Alaska SAR includes an appendix with detailed descriptions of each
Category I and II fishery on the LOF, including the observer coverage
in those fisheries. For Atlantic fisheries, this information can be
found in the LOF Fishery Fact Sheets. The SARs generally do not provide
detailed information on observer coverage in Category III fisheries
because, under the MMPA, Category III fisheries are generally not
required to accommodate observers aboard vessels due to the remote
likelihood of mortality and serious injury of marine mammals. Fishery
information presented in the SARs' appendices and other resources
referenced during the tier analysis may include: Level of observer
coverage; target species; levels of fishing effort; spatial and
temporal distribution of fishing effort; characteristics of fishing
gear and operations; management and regulations; and interactions with
marine mammals. Copies of the SARs are available on the NMFS Office of
Protected Resources website at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/.
Information on observer coverage levels in Category I, II, and III
fisheries can be found in the fishery fact sheets on the NMFS Office of
Protected Resources' website: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/fisheries/lof.html. Additional information on observer programs in
commercial fisheries can be found on the NMFS National Observer
Program's website: https://www.st.nmfs.gov/observer-home/.
How do I find out if a specific fishery is in Category I, II, or III?
The LOF includes three tables that list all U.S. commercial
fisheries by Category. Table 1 lists all of the commercial fisheries in
the Pacific Ocean (including Alaska); Table 2 lists all of the
commercial fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean; and Table 3 lists all U.S.-authorized commercial fisheries
on the high seas. A fourth table, Table 4, lists all commercial
fisheries managed under applicable TRPs or take reduction teams (TRTs).
Are high seas fisheries included on the LOF?
Beginning with the 2009 LOF, NMFS includes high seas fisheries in
Table 3 of the LOF, along with the number of valid High Seas Fishing
Compliance Act (HSFCA) permits in each fishery. As of 2004, NMFS issues
HSFCA permits only for high seas fisheries analyzed in accordance with
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Endangered Species
Act (ESA). The authorized high seas fisheries are broad in scope and
encompass multiple specific fisheries identified by gear type. For the
purposes of the LOF, the high seas fisheries are subdivided based on
gear type (e.g., trawl, longline, purse seine, gillnet, troll, etc.) to
provide more detail on composition of effort within these fisheries.
Many fisheries operate in both U.S. waters and on the high seas,
creating some overlap between the fisheries listed in Tables 1 and 2
and those in Table 3. In these cases, the high seas component of the
fishery is not considered a separate fishery, but an extension of a
fishery operating within U.S. waters (listed in Table 1 or 2). NMFS
designates those fisheries in Tables 1, 2, and 3 by a ``*'' after the
fishery's name. The number of HSFCA permits listed in Table 3 for the
high seas components of these fisheries operating in U.S. waters does
not necessarily represent additional effort that is not accounted for
in Tables 1 and 2. Many vessels/participants holding HSFCA permits also
fish within U.S. waters and are included in the number of vessels and
participants operating within those fisheries in Tables 1 and 2.
HSFCA permits are valid for five years, during which time Fishery
Management Plans (FMPs) can change. Therefore, some vessels/
participants may possess valid HSFCA permits without the ability to
fish under the permit because it was issued for a gear type that is no
longer authorized under the most current FMP. For this reason, the
number of HSFCA permits
[[Page 5351]]
displayed in Table 3 is likely higher than the actual U.S. fishing
effort on the high seas. For more information on how NMFS classifies
high seas fisheries on the LOF, see the preamble text in the final 2009
LOF (73 FR 73032; December 1, 2008). Additional information about HSFCA
permits can be found at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/ia/permits/highseas.html.
Where can I find specific information on fisheries listed on the LOF?
Starting with the 2010 LOF, NMFS developed summary documents, or
fishery fact sheets, for each Category I and II fishery on the LOF.
These fishery fact sheets provide the full history of each Category I
and II fishery, including: When the fishery was added to the LOF; the
basis for the fishery's initial classification; classification changes
to the fishery; changes to the list of species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the fishery; fishery gear and methods
used; observer coverage levels; fishery management and regulation; and
applicable TRPs or TRTs, if any. These fishery fact sheets are updated
after each final LOF and can be found under ``How Do I Find Out if a
Specific Fishery is in Category I, II, or III?'' on the NMFS Office of
Protected Resources' website: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/fisheries/lof.html, linked to the ``List of Fisheries by Year'' table.
NMFS is developing similar fishery fact sheets for each Category III
fishery on the LOF. However, due to the large number of Category III
fisheries on the LOF and the lack of accessible and detailed
information on many of these fisheries, the development of these
fishery fact sheets is taking significant time to complete. NMFS began
posting Category III fishery fact sheets online with the LOF for 2016.
Am I required to register under the MMPA?
Owners of vessels or gear engaging in a Category I or II fishery
are required under the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1387(c)(2)), as described in 50
CFR 229.4, to register with NMFS and obtain a marine mammal
authorization to lawfully take non-endangered and non-threatened marine
mammals incidental to commercial fishing operations. Owners of vessels
or gear engaged in a Category III fishery are not required to register
with NMFS or obtain a marine mammal authorization.
How do I register and receive my Marine Mammal Authorization Program
(MMAP) authorization certificate?
NMFS has integrated the MMPA registration process, implemented
through the Marine Mammal Authorization Program (MMAP), with existing
state and Federal fishery license, registration, or permit systems for
Category I and II fisheries on the LOF. Participants in these fisheries
are automatically registered under the MMAP and are not required to
submit registration or renewal materials.
In the Pacific Islands, West Coast, and Alaska regions, NMFS will
issue vessel or gear owners an authorization certificate via U.S. mail
or with their state or Federal license or permit at the time of
issuance or renewal.
In the West Coast Region, authorization certificates may be
obtained from the website https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/protected_species/marine_mammals/fisheries_interactions.html.
In the Alaska Region, authorization certificates may be obtained by
visiting the Alaska Regional Office website https://alaskafisheries.noaa.gov/pr/mmapregistration.
In the Greater Atlantic Region, NMFS will issue vessel or gear
owners an authorization certificate via U.S. mail automatically at the
beginning of each calendar year. Certificates may also be obtained by
visiting the Greater Atlantic Regional Office website https://www.greateratlantic.fisheries.noaa.gov/mmap/.
In the Southeast Region, NMFS will issue vessel or gear owners an
authorization certificate via U.S. mail automatically at the beginning
of each calendar year. Vessel or gear owners can receive additional
authorization certificates by contacting the Southeast Regional Office
at 727-209-5952 or by visiting the Southeast Regional Office website
https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/protected_resources/marine_mammal_authorization_program/ and following the instructions for
printing the certificate.
The authorization certificate, or a copy, must be on board the
vessel while it is operating in a Category I or II fishery, or for non-
vessel fisheries, in the possession of the person in charge of the
fishing operation (50 CFR 229.4(e)). Although efforts are made to limit
the issuance of authorization certificates to only those vessel or gear
owners that participate in Category I or II fisheries, not all state
and Federal license or permit systems distinguish between fisheries as
classified by the LOF. Therefore, some vessel or gear owners in
Category III fisheries may receive authorization certificates even
though they are not required for Category III fisheries.
Individuals fishing in Category I and II fisheries for which no
state or Federal license or permit is required must register with NMFS
by contacting their appropriate Regional Office (see ADDRESSES).
How do I renew my registration under the MMAP?
In Alaska regional and Greater Atlantic regional fisheries,
registrations of vessel or gear owners are automatically renewed and
participants should receive an authorization certificate by January 1
of each new year. Certificates can also be obtained from the region's
website. In Pacific Islands regional fisheries, vessel or gear owners
receive an authorization certificate by January 1 for state fisheries
and with their permit renewal for Federal fisheries. In West Coast
regional fisheries, vessel or gear owners receive authorization either
with each renewed state fishing license in Washington and Oregon, with
their permit renewal for Federal fisheries (the timing of which varies
based on target species), or via U.S. mail. Vessel or gear owners who
participate in fisheries in these regions and have not received
authorization certificates by January 1 or with renewed fishing
licenses must contact the appropriate NMFS Regional Office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). In Southeast regional fisheries, vessel
or gear owners' registrations are automatically renewed and
participants will receive an authorization certificate via U.S. mail
automatically at the beginning of each calendar year. Additional
authorization certificates are available for printing on the Southeast
Regional Office website https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/protected_resources/marine_mammal_authorization_program/.
Am I required to submit reports when I kill or injure a marine mammal
during the course of commercial fishing operations?
In accordance with the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1387(e)) and 50 CFR 229.6,
any vessel owner or operator, or gear owner or operator (in the case of
non-vessel fisheries), participating in a fishery listed on the LOF
must report to NMFS all incidental mortalities and injuries of marine
mammals that occur during commercial fishing operations, regardless of
the category in which the fishery is placed (I, II, or III) within 48
hours of the end of the fishing trip or,
[[Page 5352]]
in the case of non-vessel fisheries, fishing activity. ``Injury'' is
defined in 50 CFR 229.2 as a wound or other physical harm. In addition,
any animal that ingests fishing gear or any animal that is released
with fishing gear entangling, trailing, or perforating any part of the
body is considered injured, regardless of the presence of any wound or
other evidence of injury, and must be reported.
Mortality/injury reporting forms and instructions for submitting
forms to NMFS can be found at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/mmap/#form or by contacting the appropriate regional
office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). Forms may be submitted
via any of the following means: (1) Online using the electronic form;
(2) emailed as an attachment to [email protected]; (3) faxed to
the NMFS Office of Protected Resources at 301-713-0376; or (4) mailed
to the NMFS Office of Protected Resources (mailing address is provided
on the postage-paid form that can be printed from the web address
listed above). Reporting requirements and procedures can be found in 50
CFR 229.6.
Am I required to take an observer aboard my vessel?
Individuals participating in a Category I or II fishery are
required to accommodate an observer aboard their vessel(s) upon request
from NMFS. MMPA section 118 states that the Secretary is not required
to place an observer on a vessel if the facilities for quartering an
observer or performing observer functions are so inadequate or unsafe
that the health or safety of the observer or the safe operation of the
vessel would be jeopardized; thereby authorizing the exemption of
vessels too small to safely accommodate an observer from this
requirement. However, U.S. Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, or Gulf of Mexico
large pelagics longline vessels operating in special areas designated
by the Pelagic Longline Take Reduction Plan implementing regulations
(50 CFR 229.36(d)) will not be exempted from observer requirements,
regardless of their size. Observer requirements can be found in 50 CFR
229.7.
Am I required to comply with any marine mammal TRP regulations?
Table 4 provides a list of fisheries affected by TRPs and TRTs. TRP
regulations can be found at 50 CFR 229.30 through 229.37. A description
of each TRT and copies of each TRP can be found at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/trt/teams.html. It is the
responsibility of fishery participants to comply with applicable take
reduction regulations.
Where can I find more information about the LOF and the MMAP?
Information regarding the LOF and the MMAP, including: Registration
procedures and forms; current and past LOFs; descriptions of each
Category I and II fishery and some Category III fisheries; observer
requirements; and marine mammal mortality/injury reporting forms and
submittal procedures; may be obtained at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/interactions/fisheries/lof.html, or from any NMFS Regional Office at
the addresses listed below:
NMFS, Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-2298, Attn: Allison Rosner;
NMFS, Southeast Region, 263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL
33701, Attn: Jessica Powell;
NMFS, West Coast Region, Long Beach Office, 501 W. Ocean Blvd.,
Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802-4213, Attn: Dan Lawson;
NMFS, Alaska Region, Protected Resources, P.O. Box 22668, 709 West
9th Street, Juneau, AK 99802, Attn: Suzie Teerlink; or
NMFS, Pacific Islands Regional Office, Protected Resources
Division, 1845 Wasp Blvd., Building 176, Honolulu, HI 96818, Attn:
Kevin Brindock.
Sources of Information Reviewed for the 2018 LOF
NMFS reviewed the marine mammal incidental mortality and serious
injury information presented in the SARs for all fisheries to determine
whether changes in fishery classification are warranted. The SARs are
based on the best scientific information available at the time of
preparation, including the level of mortality and serious injury of
marine mammals that occurs incidental to commercial fishery operations
and the PBR levels of marine mammal stocks. The information contained
in the SARs is reviewed by regional Scientific Review Groups (SRGs)
representing Alaska, the Pacific (including Hawaii), and the U.S.
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean. The SRGs were created by the
MMPA to review the science that informs the SARs, and to advise NMFS on
marine mammal population status, trends, and stock structure,
uncertainties in the science, research needs, and other issues.
NMFS also reviewed other sources of new information, including
marine mammal stranding data, observer program data, fishermen self-
reports, reports to the SRGs, conference papers, FMPs, and ESA
documents.
The LOF for 2018 was based on, among other things, stranding data;
fishermen self-reports; and SARs, primarily the 2016 SARs, which are
based on data from 2010-2014. The SARs referenced in this LOF include:
2014 (80 FR 50599; August 20, 2015), 2015 (81 FR 38676; June 14, 2016),
2016 (82 FR 29039; June 27, 2017). The SARs are available at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received letters containing comments on the proposed LOF for
2018 (82 FR 47424; October 12, 2017) from the Marine Mammal Commission
(Commission); five non-governmental organizations (Center for
Biological Diversity (CBD), Hawaii Longline Association (HLA),
Southeast Alaska Fishermen's Alliance (SEAFA), Southeast Alaska Sperm
Whale Avoidance Project (SEASWAP), and Turtle Island Restoration
Network (TIRN); and two individuals. Responses to substantive comments
are below; comments on actions not related to the LOF are not included.
Comments on Commercial Fisheries in the Pacific Ocean
Comment 1: The Commission believes that NMFS' approach to
classifying the Gulf of Alaska sablefish longline (GOA SLL) fishery
based on the statutory definitions of fishery categories in the MMPA,
in the absence of an estimate of PBR, is appropriate. Further, the
Commission states that NMFS has the discretion to classify a fishery as
Category I in the absence of the data necessary to calculate mortality
and serious injury (M/SI) as a fraction of PBR. The Commission notes
that while the current M/SI is almost certainly greater than 10 percent
of PBR, exactly where M/SI as a percentage of PBR falls relative to the
Category I and II thresholds depends on what proportion of the stock's
U.S. range was surveyed, and other factors not taken into account in
NMFS' analysis. The Commission recommends that the GOA SLL fishery
should be classified as at least a Category II fishery. However, two
other commenters, SEASWAP and SEAFA, oppose the proposed change to
reclassify the GOA SLL from a Category III to a Category II fishery
based on interactions with sperms whales. These commenters disagree
that these temporary sperm whale entanglements resulted in serious
injuries and assert that prorating these serious injuries to
mortalities is not appropriate (see
[[Page 5353]]
comments 3, 4, and 5 below). They urge NMFS to retain the existing
Category III ranking for the fishery.
Response: NMFS agrees with the Commission and has reclassified the
fishery as Category II. Given our analysis of the estimated mean annual
M/SI attributed to the GOA SLL fishery, and our best available
information regarding the North Pacific sperm whale stock, the AK Gulf
of Alaska sablefish pot fishery will be classified as Category II in
the 2018 LOF; NMFS will continue to consider all available data in its
future classifications of this fishery.
Comment 2: The Commission recommends that NMFS give high priority
to: (1) Surveying enough of the range of sperm whales to provide a
reliable estimate of PBR for the portion of the stock that occupies the
EEZ in Alaska, (2) increasing observer coverage in the GOA SLL fishery
(currently 14-19 percent), and (3) developing a take reduction plan for
the North Pacific stock of sperm whales. The Commission comments that
these actions will enable NMFS to more definitively classify the GOA
SLL fishery and to mitigate the bycatch problem.
Response: NMFS agrees with the Commission on the need for reliable
estimates of abundance and PBR for the North Pacific sperm whale stock;
however, the funding necessary for surveying sperm whales in the Gulf
of Alaska is currently unavailable. Next, observer coverage is
determined through the Annual Deployment Plan (ADP) process, which
provides a statistically-based sampling approach for the random
deployment of human observers onto longline vessels operating in the
Gulf of Alaska. The ADP is part of a larger annual process where NMFS
consults with the North Pacific Fishery Management Council and its
Scientific and Statistical Committee on to determine the amount of
coverage for an upcoming year. This method is described in the 2018 ADP
(available at https://www.afsc.noaa.gov/Publications/ProcRpt/PR2017-07.pdf). Regarding take reduction plans, NMFS' available resources for
Take Reduction Teams (TRTs) are fully utilized at this time. When NMFS
lacks sufficient funding to convene a TRT for all stocks that interact
with Category I and II fisheries, NMFS gives highest priority for
developing and implementing new take reduction plans to species and
stocks whose level of incidental mortality and serious injury exceeds
PBR, that have a small population size, and that are declining most
rapidly, pursuant to MMPA section 118(f)(3).
Comment 3: SEASWAP and SEAFA assert that NMFS' assignment of the
significant injury and 75 percent mortality rate to temporary sperm
whale entanglements is unsubstantiated and inconsistent with the
determination criteria used for other cetacean species, such as beluga
and humpback whales. SEASWAP and SEAFA request that NMFS lower the pro-
rated mortality rate for sperm whales.
Response: NMFS implemented a policy for distinguishing serious from
non-serious injury of marine mammals to increase transparency and
consistency nationwide in assessing and quantifying serious injuries of
marine mammals in 2012 (NMFS 2012). This policy serves as the basis for
evaluating injury reports of marine mammals. The policy involves
applying guidelines to determine whether an injury should be considered
serious and describes a variety of injuries specific to large
cetaceans, small cetaceans, and pinnipeds. The policy and guidelines
cover most types of injury and were developed to fit data rich as well
as data poor injury events.
Criteria for evaluating large whale injuries include three types of
entanglements. Two of these types are ``constricting wrap,'' a serious
injury (SI), and ``loose wrap, bridled or draped gear,'' a non-serious
injury (NSI). If documentation of a confirmed entanglement is
inadequate to assign an entanglement to either of these types a third
category is used, ``evidence of entanglement.'' Events falling in this
category are prorated. To prorate, the number of events assigned to
this category within the assessment period is multiplied by 0.75. This
value was calculated based on 114 documented entanglement events with
known outcomes that occurred between 2004 and 2008, of which 85 (75
percent) resulted in the whales' deteriorating health or death.
Although more severe or prolonged entanglements may be more likely to
be reported, the 0.75 prorating reflects the probability that some
confirmed entanglement reports lacking detail will be of minor events.
SEASWAP and SEAFA are correct that using a prorate value of 0.75
for sperm whale entanglements reflects assumptions about the fate of
the entangled animals. We would welcome data analyses or other
information from SEASWAP on sperm whale interactions with longline
fisheries that would help inform future injury determinations. The 0.75
value is based on the best available information.
The other injury determinations referenced by SEASWAP are also
consistent with NMFS' policy and guidelines for distinguishing serious
from non-serious injury. The vessel strike that left a piece of whale
skin on a vessel's hull was categorized as a ``superficial laceration''
and a vessel strike under ``vessel any size less than 10 knots,'' both
of which are considered non-serious injuries. Injuries to small
cetaceans, such as beluga whales, are assigned to a category from a
list specific to small cetaceans. The beluga entangled in gillnet that
was later freed from gear was assigned to the ``anchored, immobilized,
entangled, or entrapped before being freed without gear attached''
category. This category does not have a defined injury value, and
instead requires a case-specific assessment. NMFS evaluated the record
of the injury and considered it a non-serious injury because the animal
was able to surface while entangled and was confirmed to be free of
gear when released.
Comment 4: SEASWAP and SEAFA disagree with the conclusion in the
March 2016 NOAA report (NOAA-TM-AFSC-315) that the temporary sperm
whale entanglements reported during 2010-2014 resulted in 6.25 dead
sperm whales. They further assert that of the five cases described by
observers, not one included a documented case of the whales remaining
entangled or having visible injury from the entanglement, yet ``serious
injury'' was assigned in four cases (Haul numbers 225, 7, 82, and 116).
SEASWAP and SEAFA urge NOAA to reassign these ``significant injury''
designations to ``non-serious injury.''
Response: When we review entanglement records, we pay close
attention to the observer's recorded description of events. When an
observer codes an interaction as ``entangled in gear (not trailing
gear),'' we still assess whether gear could have remained on the animal
post hoc. Fishery observers are not trained to assess the severity of
marine mammal injuries, and we do not use their assessment of injury
severity. This explains the differences SEASWAP noted between the
observer's assessment on the marine mammal interaction form and the
final injury determinations as reported in ``Human-Caused Injury and
Mortality of NMFS-managed Alaska Marine Mammal Stocks, 2010-2014''
(Helker et al., 2016).
In response to SEASWAP's and SEAFA's comments, we will reevaluate
these entanglements and injury determinations; if we determine any
changes to the injury determinations due to these entanglements are
necessary, they will be reviewed consistent with NMFS policy and
reported in the 2018 Marine Mammal Stock Assessment Reports and Human-
[[Page 5354]]
caused Serious Injury and Mortality Report.
Comment 5: SEASWAP and SEAFA disagree with NMFS' extrapolation of
the observed temporary entanglements to the sperm whale/GOA SLL fishery
interactions, including the pro-rating to the unobserved fleet, and
assert that NMFS is oversimplifying sperm whale behavior near fishing
boats. SEAFA argues that because some sperm whales have been documented
as serial longline depredators, the actual M/SI is likely less than
NMFS' estimate and it is inappropriate to extrapolate across the fleet.
SEAFA comments that NMFS does not provide enough information to verify
if the extrapolated data is reasonable and how these data were handled
prior to and following the restructuring of the observer program to
correct for bias in observer coverage.
Response: Extrapolating bycatch events that are observed in
fisheries with partial observer coverage, such as components of the GOA
SLL fishery, is standard practice. Bycatch extrapolation relies on the
observed bycatch in a sampled portion of a fishery to estimate the
bycatch across that entire fishery. Depredation by sperm whales is a
common occurrence in this fishery, and an entanglement preceded by
depredation is treated no differently than other bycatch events since
it reflects one of the risks posed to marine mammals by the fishery.
The methodology for estimating bycatch is explained in NOAA Tech.
Memo. NMFS-AFSC-260 (Breiwick 2013) and has not changed appreciably
since that time. Specifically, the serious injuries are extrapolated
only within a stratum defined by the NMFS statistical area, three
categories of vessel size (>125, between 60 and 125, <60), and three
time periods (January to April, May through August, September through
December). The two serious injuries that were extrapolated in 2012
occurred in vessels between 60 and 125 feet, whereas the one serious
injury in 2013 that was extrapolated occurred on a vessel <60 feet, so
the observer coverage within that stratum is much lower, which is what
is actually used to extrapolate the serious injury. We do not
extrapolate observed bycatch in one statum to strata where no bycatch
was observed. For simplicity, we do not report the observer coverage
within the extrapolated strata, but instead report observer coverage
for the entire fishery across all strata. Therefore, it is not possible
for the reader to extrapolate the observed bycatch to estimate the
total bycatch (see Breiwick 2013).
Comment 6: SEAFA notes that the proposed rule suggests breaking the
Category III AK Miscellaneous finfish handline/hand troll and
mechanical jig fishery into several fisheries by gear type and
geography. In order to maintain consistency with the State of Alaska
fishery permits, SEAFA recommends the new names for the groundfish
troll fisheries be (2) AK BSAI groundfish hand troll and dinglebar
troll and (4) AK Gulf of Alaska groundfish hand troll and dinglebar
troll.
Response: NMFS agrees. We will adopt and use the suggested
clarifications to fisheries names (AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands
groundfish hand troll and dinglebar troll and AK Gulf of Alaska
groundfish hand troll and dinglebar troll) in the 2018 LOF.
Comment 7: SEAFA comments that it is unclear whether the proposed
updates in Table 1 for the ``estimated number of vessels/persons''
participating in a fishery reflects the total number of potential
participants or the number of actual participants in a fishery. SEAFA
recommends that NMFS consult with the State of Alaska's Commercial
Fisheries Entry Commission for the most accurate information about the
number of available permits versus the number of permits actively
fished, particularly for the AK Southeast shrimp pot fishery and AK
Southeast Alaska crab pot fisheries.
Response: NMFS has been making efforts to report the category
``estimated number of vessels/persons'' across Table 1 more
consistently. As SEAFA points out, this is especially important for
fisheries where there is a large discrepancy between the number of
valid permits versus the number of active permits. Where possible,
Table 1 will report the number of active permits to most accurately
depict the relative effort of each fishery. In response to this
comment, we have revisited the number of participants for the AK
Southeast shrimp pot fishery and AK Southeast Alaska crab pot fishery
and identified that the wrong permit count was used for the AK
Southeast shrimp pot fishery. To correct this, in the final LOF NMFS
changed the estimated number of vessels/persons for this fishery to the
number of active permits (99).
Comment 8: TIRN and CBD comment that before listing the AK Gulf of
Alaska sablefish pot fishery as a Category III fishery, NMFS should
analyze the data of all Alaska and West Coast sablefish pot fisheries
and humpback interactions and compare it to an updated humpback whale
stock assessment. They recommend that, as a precautionary measure, the
fishery should be listed as Category II. TIRN and CBD assert that, in
the absence of statistically-reliable data regarding humpback whale
serious injuries and mortalities for Alaska pot fisheries, NMFS must
list these fisheries as Category II until: (a) The MMPA humpback stock
is revised to be consistent with the ESA stock listings and (b) NMFS
uses available fishing effort and humpback abundance data to determine
co-occurrence.
Response: NMFS considers data from several sources for the mean
annual M/SI estimates and LOF process, including observer data, self-
reports, and stranding data. We acknowledge that reliable data are not
always available and that analogous fisheries can provide more insight
into the potential for incidental M/SI. However, these situations
require a clear justification for which fishery is being considered
analogous and why. In the case of the AK Gulf of Alaska sablefish pot
fishery, NMFS considers the newly authorized fishery to be most
analogous with the other sablefish pot fisheries in the State, which
are Category III. Further, the AK Gulf of Alaska sablefish pot fishery
has observer coverage, and NMFS will continue to consider any new data
collected by the observer program or other sources in future LOF
analyses.
Comment 9: TIRN and CBD recommend that humpback whales be listed as
marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the AK Aleutian Islands sablefish pot fishery and the Category III AK
Bering Sea sablefish pot fishery, based on observer records that
humpback whales have been incidentally caught in both these fisheries.
Response: The species and/or stocks listed as incidentally killed
or injured in Table 1 includes the species and/or stocks in which there
are recent reports of incidental mortality or injury by a particular
fishery consistent with the information reported in the SARs.
Typically, species and/or stocks are removed from Table 1 when recent
data do not include documented mortality or injury of that species or
stock. NMFS has a report of a humpback whale considered seriously
injured in the AK Bering Sea sablefish pot fishery in 2002. However,
NMFS has observed this fishery since that time and there were no
documented injuries or mortalities. Therefore, in 2013, NMFS removed
humpback whales from the list of species/stocks killed or injured in
this fishery (78 FR 53336, August 29, 2013).
Comment 10: TIRN and CBD support combining the Category III AK
Aleutian Islands sablefish pot fishery in the LOF with the Category III
AK Bering Sea sablefish pot fishery for consistency with other regional
designations in the
[[Page 5355]]
LOF, but urge NMFS to analyze humpback whale interactions first before
listing this combined fishery as Category III.
Response: The LOF uses data consistent with the SARs, which is
generally from a 5-year rolling window to evaluate a fishery's impacts
to marine mammal stocks. For the 2018 LOF, 2010-2014 data are
considered in the LOF tier analyses. There are no documented reports of
incidental M/SI of humpback whales during this time in either of the
fisheries being combined. Given all available data, including recent
observer data for the AK Bering Sea sablefish pot fishery, NMFS
believes that Category III is most appropriate for this location,
target species, and gear type. Thus, we will classify the newly
combined AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Island sablefish pot fishery as
Category III.
Comment 11: The Commission concurs with NMFS that the CA thresher
shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery should be reclassified from
Category I to Category II based on the most recent estimate of M/SI for
the California/Oregon/Washington stock of sperm whales in this fishery.
Response: NMFS agrees and has reclassified the CA thresher shark/
swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh) fishery from Category I to
Category II based on the most recent estimates of marine mammal M/SI in
this fishery.
Comment 12: TIRN and CBD comment that more than a year has passed
since the listing of the Central America humpback whale distinct
population segment (DPS), and reported entanglements are at record
highs in the area off California that is the near-exclusive feeding
grounds for this DPS. They assert that NMFS should consider the Central
American humpback whale DPS as a relevant stock in its determinations
for the 2018 List of Fisheries.
Response: For the 2018 LOF, NMFS relied upon information on the
current status of humpback whale stocks on the U.S. west coast as
described in the most recent SAR available (Carretta et al., 2017a).
The most recent SAR available does not contain an MMPA stock
delineation for humpback whales that corresponds with the recent ESA-
listing decision that established several DPSs of humpback whales that
may be present in U.S. west coast waters. While NMFS may consider
updates to humpback whale stock delineations under the MMPA in light of
the recent ESA-listing decision, we will continue to rely upon the most
current SAR for the status of humpback whale stocks on the U.S. west
coast relative to human-caused M/SI and the classification of fisheries
under the MMPA LOF. Currently, there is no Central America DPS stock of
marine mammals delineated under the MMPA. NMFS is currently evaluating
the humpback whale stock structure under the MMPA with respect to the
ESA listing.
Comment 13: CBD and TIRN urge NMFS to designate the CA Dungeness
crab pot fishery as a Category I fishery because it frequently
entangles, seriously injures, and kills imperiled humpback whales. CBD
and TIRN state that the PBR calculation for the international stock of
Central America humpbacks results in an estimated PBR of 0.8 humpback
whales per year, and the best estimate of minimum average annual M/SI
is 1.35 whales per year, well above the PBR estimate. They further
maintain that the average numbers of annual M/SI is an underestimate as
it is based on reported entanglements, and does not account for many
entanglements that go unobserved, and does not include the 2016
entanglement of 19 humpback whales in the CA Dungeness crab pot
fishery. CBD and TIRN suggest that according to the historical rate of
serious injury determinations, 84 percent of these entanglements, or 16
whales, resulted in a serious injury or mortality and this is well
above the PBR estimate. CBD and TIRN assert that the available
information clearly demonstrates that NMFS should reclassify the
fishery as Category I.
Response: The most recent SAR for humpback whales on the U.S. west
coast does not establish or provide a PBR for the Central America DPS
of humpback whales because it is not a delineated MMPA stock, as
explained in Comment 12 above. Until such time that the SAR reports a
PBR for an MMPA stock delineation of humpback whales that may more
closely reflect the Central America DPS as suggested by the commenter,
calculation of hypothetical PBRs by any other sources are considered
premature. NMFS will continue to rely upon the most recent SAR for the
calculation of PBR for humpback whale stocks on the U.S. west coast for
classifying fisheries under the LOF. In addition, commenters reference
data sources from 2016 that have not yet been reviewed for M/SI in the
SARs; NMFS will use those data for classifying fisheries once they have
been incorporated into the SARs.
Comment 14: CBD and TIRN state that preliminary evidence shows that
the CA Dungeness crab pot fishery, and not the Oregon or Washington
Dungeness crab pot fishery, primarily impacts the Central America
humpback whale DPS. They recommend that without additional information,
all interactions of the CA Dungeness crab pot fishery should be
assigned to the Central America DPS.
Response: As described in Comment 12 above, the most current SAR
does not delineate a Central America DPS of humpback whales as a stock
under the MMPA. Until such time that the humpback whale stock structure
under the MMPA with respect to the ESA listing has been completed,
assignment of M/SI to humpback stocks in the SAR and under the LOF will
continue to reflect the current MMPA stock delineations.
Comment 15: CBD and TIRN recommend that NMFS add blue whales, ENP,
Offshore killer whales, and the western North Pacific gray whale to the
list of species incidentally killed or injured in the CA Dungeness crab
pot fisheries.
Response: Entanglement data from the U.S. west coast that has been
reviewed for M/SI include recent data through 2015 (Carretta et al.,
2017b). We note that through 2015, no blue whale injuries have been
documented in the CA Dungeness crab pot fishery. Information on
entanglements reported in 2016 and 2017 referenced by commenters will
be used to inform the list of marine mammal stocks incidentally killed
or injured in any U.S. west coast fisheries once it has been
incorporated into the SARs, at which time NMFS will use those data for
the LOF.
We thank the commenter for pointing out that we omitted the
identity of the killer whale stock associated with a dead killer whale
reported to NMFS in 2015 that was entangled with CA Dungeness crab
gear. NMFS is currently reviewing the available information regarding
the identification of the stock of killer whales to which this
individual belongs. Once this information has been evaluated and
reported in a future SAR, NMFS will add the appropriate stock of killer
whales to the list of marine mammal stocks incidentally killed or
injured by the CA Dungeness crab fishery in the LOF. As stated
previously, entanglement information from 2016 has not yet been
evaluated for M/SI and will not be used to inform the list of marine
mammal stocks incidentally killed or injured in any U.S. west coast
fisheries at this time.
NMFS acknowledges that the most recent SAR suggests that because
some Western North Pacific gray whales occur in U.S. waters, there is a
possibility these whales could be killed or injured by ship strikes or
entangled in fishing gear within U.S. waters. However, while
[[Page 5356]]
it may be possible that at least one or more Western North Pacific gray
whales have been among the many gray whales reported entangled on the
U.S. west coast historically, NMFS recognizes that relatively few of
those instances are known to have involved gear from the CA Dungeness
crab fishery. We also acknowledge that many other U.S. commercial
fisheries on the U.S. west coast have been identified as associated
with entanglements of gray whales historically, and it is likely other
U.S. commercial, tribal, and foreign fisheries from countries
surrounding gray whale migration routes that have not been identified
have also been involved. In the absence of more specific information
from any particular entanglement of gray whales that involved CA
Dungeness crab gear to suggest those entanglements involved a Western
North Pacific gray whale, NMFS does not have sufficient data to
conclude that Western North Pacific gray whales have been entangled in
CA Dungeness crab gear versus other fisheries throughout the range of
gray whales; thus, we will not include Western North Pacific gray
whales on the list of stocks incidentally killed or injured in the CA
Dungeness crab fishery at this time. Based on the relative population
sizes of the Western North Pacific and Eastern North Pacific stocks of
gray whales, and what is known about migrations of the Western North
Pacific stock to the eastern North Pacific (Moore and Weller 2013),
NMFS has concluded the likelihood that any of the particular gray
whales that are known to have interacted with CA Dungeness crab fishery
were Western North Pacific stock gray whales is extremely low. NMFS
strives to collect photographic or genetic data from entangled gray
whales that may allow for stock and will continue to develop and
promote this aspect as a key data need surrounding all gray whale
strandings and entanglements.
Comment 16: TIRN and CBD oppose NMFS' proposal to lower the CA
thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet fishery classification from
Category I to Category II. They note that NMFS' decreased annual take
estimate of sperm whales may not adequately reflect the mortality or
serious injury that the fishery causes for sperm whales. In addition,
TIRN/CBD comment that the MMPA Section 101(a)(5)(E) authorization to
take humpback and sperm whales by this fishery has expired, and a
reclassification of the fishery to Category II prior to the completion
of the rulemaking process for a new authorization is premature. Based
on the uncertainty stemming from low observer coverage and the past
observation of sperm whale M/SI, and the pending MMPA authorization
rule-making, TIRN/CBD urge NMFS to maintain the CA thresher shark/
swordfish drift gillnet fishery's classification as Category I.
Response: The reclassification of this fishery from Category I to
Category II is based upon published scientific information that
includes estimates of bycatch and subsequent M/SI in this fishery that
are considered robust given annual variance in observer coverage rates.
These estimates are based on methodologies that represent an improved
approach to estimate relatively rare bycatch events over time compared
to methods referenced in previous SARs and classifications under the
LOF. NMFS has determined these estimates are appropriate to inform the
LOF classification of the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet
(>=14 in mesh) fishery as Category II. Further, classifications made
under the LOF are based on the best available science and are not
dependent or related to the current status of other regulatory
processes including the issuance of authorizations under section
101(a)(5)(E) of the MMPA.
Comment 17: TIRN and CBD support NMFS' proposal to add the CA/OR/WA
stock of Dall's porpoise to the list of stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category I California thresher shark/swordfish drift
gillnet (>=14 in mesh) fishery based on a 2014 observed entanglement.
Response: NMFS agrees and has added the CA/OR/WA stock of Dall's
porpoise to the list of stocks incidentally killed or injured in the
Category I CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh)
fishery.
Comment 18: TIRN and CBD recommend, based on interactions between
2010 through 2016, that NMFS add Guadalupe fur seals to the list of
species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the California
drift gillnet fishery, and the gillnet fisheries that operate from
Tillamook County, OR, to Jefferson County, WA, such as the WA Willapa
Bay drift gillnet, WA/OR lower Columbia River drift gillnet, and the WA
Grays Harbor salmon drift gillnet fishery.
Response: NMFS has reviewed the available information on Guadalupe
fur seal interactions and M/SI associated with gillnet entanglements
from 2010-2014. Based on information that is available (Carretta et
al., 2017a and Carretta et al., 2017b), we are not able to determine
the fishery origin of Guadalupe fur seal strandings that have been
associated with gillnet entanglements. Guadalupe fur seals have a wide
range that brings them into potential contact with numerous gillnet
fisheries that include U.S. commercial fisheries as well as tribal and
foreign fisheries from neighboring countries. While we continually aim
to improve our ability to evaluate incoming information and identify
the origins of fishing gear present on all stranded marine mammals, we
will not attribute any Guadalupe fur seal M/SI to any U.S. gillnet
fisheries or list Guadalupe fur seals as a marine mammal stock that is
killed or injured by any U.S. gillnet fisheries at this time absent
more specific information regarding the origins of gillnet
interactions.
Comment 19: TIRN and CBD recommend NMFS add Guadalupe fur seals to
the list of species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the
Hawaii deep-set and Hawaii shallow-set longline fisheries based on 2015
and 2016 reported interactions.
Response: The recently observed Guadalupe fur seal interaction from
2015 has not yet been included in a SAR, an injury determination has
not been finalized for this interaction, and the interaction has not
yet been evaluated as part of the tier analysis for these fisheries.
This species will be included in a future LOF, as appropriate.
Comment 20: HLA opposes including the Hawaii stock of Kogia species
(Hawaii) on the list of species injured or killed in the Hawaii-based
deep-set longline fishery. HLA requests that NMFS remove Kogia species
from the list of stocks that are interacting with the deep-set longline
fishery, because the most recent SAR (2013) for Hawaii pygmy whales and
dwarf sperm whales identifies no observed interactions between either
of these stocks and this fishery. However, two other commenters, TIRN
and CBD, support NMFS' proposal to add the Hawaii stock of Kogia spp.
to the list of stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category I
HI deep-set longline fishery based upon the serious injury of a pygmy
or dwarf sperm whale in 2014 in this fishery.
Response: Although the 2013 SAR does not include observed
interactions with Hawaii pygmy whales and dwarf sperm whales, a Kogia
spp. interaction was observed in the Hawaii deep-set longline fishery
on February 25, 2014, resulting in a serious injury (Carretta et al.,
2017b). This injury determination has been finalized, and the
interaction is included in the draft 2017 SAR (82 FR 60181; December
19, 2017).
Comment 21: The HLA restates a previous comment that the Hawaii-
[[Page 5357]]
based deep-set longline fishery does not interact with the MHI insular
or Northwestern Hawaiian Islands (NWHI) stocks of false killer whales.
HLA notes that (a) the False Killer Whale Take Reduction Plan closed
the deep-set longline fishery for almost the entire range of the MHI
insular and NWHI stocks, (b) since this change was made in 2013 there
have been no interactions between the fishery and an animal from either
stock, and (c) there has never been a deep-set longline fishery
interaction in the very small area of the stocks' respective ranges
that are not closed to longline fishing. HLA requests that NMFS remove
these two stocks from the list of marine mammals that interact with the
deep-set longline fishery, as the best available information
demonstrates the fishery is not interacting with either of these
stocks.
Response: This comment has been addressed previously (see 78 FR
53336, August 29, 2013, comment 11; 79 FR 14418, March 14, 2014,
comment 4; 79 FR 77919, December 29, 2014, comment 2; and 81 FR 20550,
April 8, 2016, comment 5). NMFS determines which species or stocks are
included as incidentally killed or injured in a fishery by annually
reviewing the information presented in the current SARs, among other
relevant sources. The SARs are based on the best available scientific
information and provide information on each stock, including range,
abundance, PBR, and level of interaction with commercial fishing
operations. Determinations in the LOF are based on the information
reported in the SARs.
The 2018 LOF is based on the 2016 SARs, which report fishery
interactions from 2010-2014; this is the best scientific and commercial
information available for the time period examined. As reported in the
2016 SAR, 12 false killer whales were taken within the Hawaiian EEZ
between 2010 and 2014, ten of those occurred within the range of the
pelagic stock, and two occurred within an overlap zone that included
the range of more than one false killer whale stock. Applying the
proration methods described in detail in the 2016 SAR for takes in
overlap zones, NMFS estimates a five-year average mortality and serious
injury level of 0.1 MHI insular and 0.4 NWHI false killer whales per
year incidental to the Hawaii-based deep-set longline fishery from
2010-2014 (Carretta et al., 2017a). NMFS is retaining the stocks on the
list of marine mammal stocks incidentally killed or injured in the
Hawaii deep-set longline fishery.
Comment 22: HLA opposes including the pygmy killer whale (Hawaii
stock) on the list of species injured or killed in the Hawaii-based
deep-set fishery. HLA requests that NMFS remove the pygmy killer whale
from the list of stocks that are interacting with the deep-set fishery,
because the most recent SAR (2013) identifies no observed interactions
between the stock and the deep-set longline fishery.
Response: The 2013 SAR reports marine mammal interactions with the
deep-set fishery that occurred between 2007 and 2011. Although the 2013
SAR does not include any observed interactions with pygmy killer
whales, an interaction was observed between a pygmy killer whale and
the Hawaii deep-set longline fishery on January 5, 2013, resulting in a
serious injury (Carretta et al., 2017b). This injury determination has
been finalized, and the interaction is included in the draft 2017 SAR
(82 FR 60181; December 19, 2017).
Comment 23: TIRN and CBD support NMFS' proposal to add the Central
North Pacific stock of humpback whale to the list of stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the Category I Hawaii deep-set
longline fishery based upon the serious injury of a humpback in 2014 in
this fishery.
Response: NMFS agrees and has added the Central North Pacific stock
of humpback whale to the list of stocks incidentally killed or injured
in the Hawaii deep-set longline fishery.
Comment 24: TIRN and CBD recommend that the California/Oregon/
Washington (CA/OR/WA) humpback whale stock be added to the list of
species or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category I
Hawaii deep-set longline fishery based upon known M/SI to the Central
North Pacific humpback stock from interaction with this fishery in
2014. In addition, they comment that NMFS is currently considering an
exempted fishing permit to allow the use of both deep-set and shallow-
set longline gear within the West Coast EEZ, which would provide this
fishery greater access to this stock and further increase the pressure
on the stock.
Response: The LOF relies on information reported in the SARs to
add/remove species/stocks that are killed or injured in a particular
fishery. The 2016 SAR reports a humpback whale from the Central North
Pacific stock was seriously injured in 2014 in the Category I Hawaii
deep-set longline fishery; consequently, this stock is included in the
list of stocks incidentally killed or injured in this fishery. The SAR
does not list any mortalities or injuries of the CA/OR/WA humpback
whale stock in the Hawaii deep-set fishery in 2014; consequently, this
stock is not included in the list of stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category I Hawaii deep-set longline fishery.
Comment 25: TIRN and CBD request that the CA/OR/WA humpback whale
stock be added to the list of stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category I Hawaii shallow-set longline fishery. They assert that
the fishery's potential for interactions with this stock is justified
by the inclusion of the Central North Pacific humpback whale stock in
the list of species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured. In
addition, TIRN/CBD comment that NMFS currently is considering an
exempted fishing permit to allow the use of both deep-set and shallow-
set longline gear within the West Coast EEZ, which would provide this
fishery greater access to this stock and further increase the pressure
on the stock.
Response: NMFS uses the criteria described in the preamble to
classify fisheries and list species or stocks that may be incidentally
killed or injured by those fisheries. Under these criteria, NMFS lists
species or stocks as incidentally killed or injured based on documented
mortalities or injuries using the best scientific information available
(i.e., SARs). Because there are no documented mortalities or injuries
of CA/OR/WA humpbacks, NMFS is not including this stock as incidentally
killed or injured by the Category I Hawaii shallow-set longline
fishery. Should NMFS approve an exempted fishing permit for the deep-
set and shallow-set longline fishery operating within the U.S. West
Coast EEZ, NMFS will continue to use all relevant information to inform
future LOFs.
Comment 26: HLA contends that the best available science does not
support a determination that the Hawaii-based shallow-set longline
fishery has ``occasional'' interactions with the pelagic false killer
whale stock and should therefore be listed as Category III. They note
that the 2016 SAR attributes a 0.3 M/SI rate to the shallow-set fishery
for the Pelagic FKW Stock in the U.S. EEZ, which amounts to 1.07
percent of the Pelagic FKW Stock's PBR level. However, the 0.3 M/SI
rate derives entirely from an interaction that occurred in 2012 for
which NMFS was unable to make an injury determination (i.e. ``cannot be
determined'' or ``CBD'' determination). Further, the ``CBD''
interaction was prorated as 0.3 M/SI because, in the previous five
years, there had been three EEZ interactions between the shallow-set
fishery and the Pelagic FKW Stock, only one of which (in 2009) was
``serious'' (a one-third
[[Page 5358]]
M/SI rate). HLA notes that if the 2012 ``CBD'' interaction is prorated
based upon the five-year lookback period used in the 2016 SAR (2010-14)
(the best available data), then it would be 0.0 because there were only
two other interactions in 2010-14, both of which were determined to be
non-serious. HLA argues that the Category II status of the shallow-set
fishery hinges on a single interaction in 2012 for which no injury
determination was made and that NMFS prorated based upon data that is
no longer relevant or accurate. For these reasons, HLA recommends the
shallow-set fishery be listed as Category III, as the fishery is more
accurately described as having a ``remote likelihood'' of interaction
with the stock.
Response: NMFS uses the classification criteria described in the
preamble to classify fisheries as Category I, Category II, or Category
III. A fishery is classified under Category II if the annual mortality
and serious injury of a stock in a given fishery is greater than 1
percent and less than 50 percent of the stock's PBR level. Additional
details regarding categorization of fisheries is provided in the
preamble to the final rule implementing section 118 of the MMPA (60 FR
45086; August 30, 1995). The false killer whale interaction in 2012
that resulted in a ``CBD'' determination was prorated following the
methods described in the 2016 SAR (Carretta et al., 2017a), which
prorates serious versus non-serious injuries using the historic rate of
serious injury while accounting for changes in gear following
implementation of the False Killer Whale Take Reduction Plan in 2013.
This proration resulted in a 0.3 M/SI for the Pelagic FKW stock as
reported in the 2016 SAR, which is 1.07 percent of PBR and within the
range of 1-50 percent of PBR, requiring NMFS to classify the fishery as
a Category II fishery consistent with section 118 of the MMPA.
Comment 27: HLA opposes including the rough-toothed dolphin (Hawaii
stock) on the list of species injured or killed in the Hawaii-based
shallow-set fishery. HLA requests that NMFS remove the rough-toothed
dolphin from the list of stocks that are interacting with the shallow-
set fishery, because the most recent SAR (2013) identifies no observed
interactions between the stock and the shallow-set longline fishery.
Response: The 2013 SAR reports marine mammal interactions with the
shallow-set fishery that occurred between 2007 and 2011. Although the
2013 SAR does not include observed interactions with rough-toothed
dolphins, an interaction was observed between a rough-toothed dolphin
and the Hawaii shallow-set longline fishery on April 24, 2013,
resulting in a mortality (Carretta et al., 2017b). This interaction has
been finalized and is included in the draft 2017 SAR (82 FR 60181,
December 19, 2017).
Comment 28: HLA restates a previous comment that the LOF should
distinguish between high seas stocks and U.S. EEZ stocks when listing
stocks with which fisheries interact, and requests that NMFS revise the
LOF to attribute species interactions in transboundary fisheries to
only those geographic regions where interactions are actually observed.
HLA recommends that if NMFS does not revise the LOF, then they should
include a footnote in the LOF to clarify, for certain stocks and
fisheries, that interactions have only been observed on the high seas
or in the U.S. EEZ, as appropriate. HLA notes that NMFS readily
separates transboundary stocks into high seas and U.S. EEZ components
for reporting purposes in its SARs and for the purpose of comparing M/
SI rates to PBR levels (a trigger for the take reduction planning
process), and asserts that the LOF should make similar distinctions
when reporting the stocks with which fisheries interact.
Response: This comment has been addressed previously (see 79 FR
14418, March 14, 2014, comment 7; 79 FR 77919, December 29, 2014,
comment 5; and 81 FR 20550, April 8, 2016, comment 8). As described in
the preamble, NMFS has included high seas fisheries in Table 3 of the
LOF since 2009. Several fisheries operate in both U.S. waters and on
the high seas, creating some overlap between the fisheries listed in
Tables 1 and 2 and those in Table 3. In these cases, the high seas
component of the fishery is not considered a separate fishery but an
extension of a fishery operating within U.S. waters. For these
fisheries, the lists of species or stocks injured or killed in Table 3
are identical to their Tables 1 or 2 counterparts, except for those
species or stocks with distributions known to occur on only one side of
the EEZ boundary. Because the fisheries and the marine mammal lists are
the same, takes of these animals are not being attributed to one
geographic area or the other, even when that information may be
available. This parallel list structure is explained in the footnotes
for each table. We are not including additional footnotes to individual
stocks and fisheries to indicate whether interactions have only been
observed on the high seas or in the U.S. EEZ, but that information may
be available in previous LOFs when species and stocks are added or
deleted.
Summary of Changes From the Proposed Rule
NMFS renames the newly classified fisheries, ``AK BSAI groundfish
troll'' and the ``AK Gulf of Alaska groundfish troll,'' as listed in
the proposed LOF for 2018, to ``AK BSAI groundfish hand troll and
dinglebar troll'' and ``AK Gulf of Alaska groundfish hand troll and
dinglebar troll,'' respectively. This change is the result of public
comment on the proposed rule and maintains consistency with the State
of Alaska fishery permits.
NMFS corrects the estimated number of vessels/persons for the AK
Southeast shrimp pot fishery (Table 1) from 210, as listed in the
proposed LOF for 2018, to 99 in the final LOF based on a reanalysis of
permit data.
NMFS corrects the estimated number of vessels/persons for the Gulf
of Maine, U.S. Mid-Atlantic tuna, shark, swordfish hook-and-line/
harpoon in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean (Table 2)
from 3,084, as listed in the proposed LOF for 2018, to 2,846 in the
final LOF based on a review of permit data. Permits for this fishery
are based on target species rather than gear type, so these numbers
indicate the total number of fishers that have the potential to use the
specified gear type.
Summary of Changes to the LOF for 2018
The following summarizes changes to the LOF for 2018, including the
classification of fisheries, fisheries listed, the estimated number of
vessels/persons in a particular fishery, and the species and/or stocks
that are incidentally killed or injured in a particular fishery. NMFS
re-classifies two fisheries in the LOF for 2018. Additionally, NMFS
adds two fisheries to the LOF and removes 12 fisheries from the LOF.
NMFS makes changes to the estimated number of vessels/persons and list
of species and/or stocks killed or injured in certain fisheries. The
classifications and definitions of U.S. commercial fisheries for 2018
are identical to those provided in the LOF for 2017 with the changes
discussed below. State and regional abbreviations used in the following
paragraphs include: AK (Alaska), BSAI (Bering Sea and Aleutian
Islands), CA (California), DE (Delaware), FL (Florida), GOA (Gulf of
Alaska), GMX (Gulf of Mexico), HI (Hawaii), MA (Massachusetts), ME
(Maine), NC (North Carolina), NY (New York), OR (Oregon), RI (Rhode
Island), SC (South Carolina), VA (Virginia), WA (Washington), and WNA
(Western North Atlantic).
[[Page 5359]]
Commercial Fisheries in the Pacific Ocean
Classification of Fisheries
NMFS reclassifies the CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet
(>=14 inch (in) mesh) fishery from Category I to Category II.
NMFS reclassifies the Category III AK Gulf of Alaska sablefish
longline fishery to Category II based on M/SI of North Pacific sperm
whales.
Addition of Fisheries
NMFS adds the AK BSAI halibut longline fishery as a Category III
fishery.
NMFS adds the AK Gulf of Alaska sablefish pot fishery as a Category
III fishery.
Removal of Fisheries
NMFS removes the following Category III fisheries from the LOF:
AK miscellaneous finfish set gillnet fishery
AK miscellaneous finfish beach seine fishery
AK miscellaneous finfish purse seine fishery
AK octopus/squid purse seine fishery
AK BSAI rockfish longline fishery
AK Gulf of Alaska rockfish longline fishery
AK halibut longline/set line (state and Federal waters)
AK miscellaneous finfish otter/beam trawl fishery
AK statewide miscellaneous finfish pot fishery
AK snail pot fishery
AK octopus/squid handline fishery
AK abalone fishery
Fishery Name and Organizational Changes and Clarification
NMFS clarifies that the Category II AK BSAI rockfish trawl fishery
includes sablefish as a target species.
NMFS adds a superscript ``1'' to the CA/OR/WA stock of humpback
whale to indicate it is driving the Category II classification of the
CA spiny lobster fishery.
NMFS renames the Category III AK salmon purse seine (excluding
salmon purse seine fisheries listed elsewhere) fishery to AK salmon
purse seine (Prince William Sound, Chignik, Alaska Peninsula) fishery.
NMFS clarifies that the Category III AK Gulf of Alaska rockfish
trawl fishery includes sablefish as a target species.
NMFS renames the Category III AK food/bait herring trawl fishery to
AK Kodiak food/bait herring otter trawl fishery.
NMFS renames the Category III AK shrimp otter trawl and beam trawl
(statewide and Cook Inlet) fishery to AK shrimp otter trawl and beam
trawl fishery.
NMFS renames the Category III AK State-managed waters of Cook
Inlet, Kachemak Bay, Prince William Sound, Southeast AK groundfish
trawl fishery to AK State-managed waters of Prince William Sound
groundfish trawl fishery.
NMFS combines the Category III AK Aleutian Islands sablefish pot
fishery in the LOF with the Category III AK Bering Sea sablefish pot
fishery for consistency with other regional designations in the LOF.
The combined fishery is named the AK BSAI sablefish pot fishery.
NMFS separates the Category III AK miscellaneous finfish handline/
hand troll and mechanical jig fishery into several fisheries by gear
and geography for improved fishery categorization of potential impacts
to marine mammals. The new Category III fishery names are: (1) AK BSAI
groundfish jig, (2) AK BSAI groundfish hand troll and dinglebar troll,
(3) AK Gulf of Alaska groundfish jig, (4) AK Gulf of Alaska groundfish
hand troll and dinglebar troll.
NMFS renames the Category III AK North Pacific halibut handline/
hand troll and mechanical jig fishery to AK halibut jig fishery for
clarity and consistency.
NMFS renames the Category III AK urchin and other fish/shellfish
fishery to AK miscellaneous invertebrates hand pick fishery for clarity
and consistency.
NMFS makes an administrative change to the Category III Alaska
scallop dredge fishery to be renamed AK scallop dredge for consistency.
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates the estimated number of vessels/persons in the Pacific
Ocean (Table 1) as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of vessels/ Number of vessels/
Category Fishery persons (2017 LOF) persons (2018 LOF)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I.................................... HI deep-set longline............. 139 143
II................................... HI shallow-set longline.......... 20 22
II................................... American Samoa longline.......... 20 18
III.................................. AK Gulf of Alaska crab pot....... 381 271
III.................................. AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod pot 128 116
III.................................. AK Southeast Alaska crab pot..... 41 375
III.................................. AK Southeast Alaska shrimp pot... 269 99
III.................................. AK shrimp pot, except Southeast.. 236 141
III.................................. AK octopus/squid pot............. 26 15
III.................................. AK herring spawn on kelp......... 339 266
III.................................. AK miscellaneous invertebrates 398 214
handpick.
III.................................. American Samoa bottomfish 24 17
handline.
III.................................. AK commercial passenger fishing 2,702 1,006
vessel.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Species and/or Stocks Incidentally Killed or Injured in the
Pacific Ocean
NMFS adds the Central North Pacific stock of humpback whale to the
list of species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the
Category I Hawaii deep-set longline fishery.
NMFS adds the Hawaii stock of Kogia spp. (Pygmy or dwarf sperm
whale) to the list of species and/or stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category I Hawaii deep-set longline fishery.
NMFS adds the CA/OR/WA stock of Dall's porpoise to the list of
species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category I
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh) fishery.
Commercial Fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates the estimated number of vessels/persons in the
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean (Table 2) as follows:
[[Page 5360]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of vessels/ Number of vessels/
Category Fishery persons (2017 LOF) persons (2018 LOF)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I.................................... Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf 420 280
of Mexico large pelagics
longline.
II................................... Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark 30 23
gillnet.
III.................................. Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid-Atlantic 428 2,846
tuna, shark, swordfish hook-and-
line/harpoon.
III.................................. Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf <125 39
of Mexico shark bottom longline/
hook-and-line.
III.................................. Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf 1,446 680
of Mexico, and Caribbean pelagic
hook-and-line/harpoon.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Species and/or Stocks Incidentally Killed or Injured in the
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
NMFS adds the Northern Gulf of Mexico stock of rough-toothed
dolphin to the list of species and/or stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category I Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico
large pelagics longline fishery.
NMFS removes the WNA stock of white-sided dolphin from the species
and/or stocks listed as incidentally killed or injured in the Category
II Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl fishery.
NMFS adds the WNA stock of white-sided dolphin to the list of
species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category II
Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl fishery.
NMFS adds the WNA offshore stock of bottlenose dolphin to the list
of species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category
III Gulf of Maine, U.S., Mid-Atlantic tuna, shark, swordfish hook-and-
line/harpoon fishery.
NMFS adds three stocks to the list of species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico,
Caribbean commercial passenger fishing vessel fishery. The three stocks
are: (1) WNA stock of short-finned pilot whale and (2) Barataria Bay
estuarine system stock and (3) Mississippi Sound, Lake Borgne, Bay
Boudreau stock of bottlenose dolphins.
NMFS corrects three administrative errors in Table 2. Under species
and/or stocks listed as incidentally killed or injured in the Atlantic
Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagic longline fishery, NMFS
updates the stock name for Atlantic spotted dolphin from ``GMX
continental and oceanic'' to ``Northern GMX''. Second, in the Atlantic
Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean commercial passenger fishing vessel
fishery, NMFS updates the stock name for bottlenose dolphin from
``Southern SC/GA coastal'' to ``SC/GA coastal''. Lastly, NMFS removes
the WNA stocks of Risso's dolphin and white-sided dolphin from the
species and/or stocks listed as incidentally injured or killed in the
Category I Mid-Atlantic gillnet fishery.
Commercial Fisheries on the High Seas
Removal of Fisheries
NMFS removes the Category II Atlantic highly migratory species
drift gillnet fishery from the LOF as there are currently no
participants.
Fishery Name and Organizational Changes and Clarification
NMFS designates the list of species and/or stocks incidentally
killed or injured in a fishery from ``undetermined'' to ``no
information'' for clarity that no data are available on mortalities or
injuries incidental to a particular fishery.
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates to the estimated number of vessels/persons on the High
Seas (Table 3) as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of vessels/ Number of vessels/
Category Fishery persons (2017 LOF) persons (2018 LOF)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I.................................... Atlantic highly migratory species 86 79
longline.
I.................................... Western Pacific pelagic longline 139 143
(HI deep-set component).
I.................................... Pacific highly migratory species 5 4
drift gillnet.
II................................... Atlantic highly migratory species 1 2
trawl.
II................................... South Pacific tuna purse seine... 38 35
II................................... Western Pacific pelagic purse 3 1
seine.
II................................... South Pacific albacore troll 10 9
longline.
II................................... South Pacific tuna longline...... 2 4
II................................... Western Pacific pelagic longline 20 22
(HI shallow-set component).
II................................... Atlantic highly migratory species 3 2
handline/pole and line.
II................................... Pacific highly migratory species 46 42
handline/pole and line.
II................................... South Pacific albacore troll 7 11
handline/pole and line.
II................................... Western Pacific pelagic handline/ 2 5
pole and line.
II................................... Atlantic highly migratory species 2 1
troll.
II................................... South Pacific albacore troll..... 30 22
II................................... Western Pacific pelagic troll.... 17 6
III.................................. Pacific highly migratory species 114 105
longline.
III.................................. Pacific highly migratory species 6 7
purse seine.
III.................................. Northwest Atlantic trawl......... 1 2
III.................................. Pacific highly migratory species 187 149
troll.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Species and/or Stocks Incidentally Killed or Injured on the
High Seas
NMFS adds the Hawaii stock of Kogia spp. (Pygmy or dwarf sperm
whale) to the list of species and/or stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category I Western Pacific Pelagic (HI deep-set
component) longline fishery.
NMFS adds the Central North Pacific stock of humpback whale to the
list of
[[Page 5361]]
species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category I
Western Pacific Pelagic (HI deep-set component) longline fishery.
List of Fisheries
The following tables set forth the list of U.S. commercial
fisheries according to their classification under section 118 of the
MMPA. Table 1 lists commercial fisheries in the Pacific Ocean
(including Alaska), Table 2 lists commercial fisheries in the Atlantic
Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean, Table 3 lists commercial
fisheries on the high seas, and Table 4 lists fisheries affected by
TRPs or TRTs.
In Tables 1 and 2, the estimated number of vessels or persons
participating in fisheries operating within U.S. waters is expressed in
terms of the number of active participants in the fishery, when
possible. If this information is not available, the estimated number of
vessels or persons licensed for a particular fishery is provided. If no
recent information is available on the number of participants, vessels,
or persons licensed in a fishery, then the number from the most recent
LOF is used for the estimated number of vessels or persons in the
fishery. NMFS acknowledges that, in some cases, these estimates may be
inflations of actual effort. For example, the State of Hawaii does not
issue fishery-specific licenses, and the number of participants
reported in the LOF represents the number of commercial marine license
holders who reported using a particular fishing gear type/method at
least once in a given year, without considering how many times the gear
was used. For these fisheries, effort by a single participant is
counted the same whether the fisherman used the gear only once or every
day. In the Mid-Atlantic and New England fisheries, the numbers
represent the potential effort for each fishery, given the multiple
gear types for which several state permits may allow. Changes made to
Mid-Atlantic and New England fishery participants will not affect
observer coverage or bycatch estimates, as observer coverage and
bycatch estimates are based on vessel trip reports and landings data.
Tables 1 and 2 serve to provide a description of the fishery's
potential effort (state and Federal). If NMFS is able to extract more
accurate information on the gear types used by state permit holders in
the future, the numbers will be updated to reflect this change. For
additional information on fishing effort in fisheries found on Table 1
or 2, contact the relevant regional office (contact information
included above in SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
For high seas fisheries, Table 3 lists the number of valid HSFCA
permits currently held. Although this likely overestimates the number
of active participants in many of these fisheries, the number of valid
HSFCA permits is the most reliable data on the potential effort in high
seas fisheries at this time. As noted previously in this LOF, the
number of HSFCA permits listed in Table 3 for the high seas components
of fisheries that also operate within U.S. waters does not necessarily
represent additional effort that is not accounted for in Tables 1 and
2. Many vessels holding HSFCA permits also fish within U.S. waters and
are included in the number of vessels and participants operating within
those fisheries in Tables 1 and 2.
Tables 1, 2, and 3 also list the marine mammal species and/or
stocks incidentally killed or injured (seriously or non-seriously) in
each fishery based on SARs, injury determination reports, bycatch
estimation reports, observer data, logbook data, stranding data,
disentanglement network data, fishermen self-reports (i.e., MMPA
reports), and anecdotal reports. The best available scientific
information included in these reports is based on data through 2012.
This list includes all species and/or stocks known to be killed or
injured in a given fishery but also includes species and/or stocks for
which there are anecdotal records of a mortality or injury.
Additionally, species identified by logbook entries, stranding data, or
fishermen self-reports (i.e., MMPA reports) may not be verified. In
Tables 1 and 2, NMFS has designated those species/stocks driving a
fishery's classification (i.e., the fishery is classified based on
mortalities and serious injuries of a marine mammal stock that are
greater than or equal to 50 percent (Category I), or greater than 1
percent and less than 50 percent (Category II), of a stock's PBR) by a
``\1\'' after the stock's name.
In Tables 1 and 2, there are several fisheries classified as
Category II that have no recent documented mortalities or serious
injuries of marine mammals, or fisheries that did not result in a
mortality or serious injury rate greater than 1 percent of a stock's
PBR level based on known interactions. NMFS has classified these
fisheries by analogy to other Category I or II fisheries that use
similar fishing techniques or gear that are known to cause mortality or
serious injury of marine mammals, as discussed in the final LOF for
1996 (60 FR 67063; December 28, 1995), and according to factors listed
in the definition of a ``Category II fishery'' in 50 CFR 229.2 (i.e.,
fishing techniques, gear types, methods used to deter marine mammals,
target species, seasons and areas fished, qualitative data from
logbooks or fishermen reports, stranding data, and the species and
distribution of marine mammals in the area). NMFS has designated those
fisheries listed by analogy in Tables 1 and 2 by a ``\2\'' after the
fishery's name.
There are several fisheries in Tables 1, 2, and 3 in which a
portion of the fishing vessels cross the exclusive economic zone (EEZ)
boundary and therefore operate both within U.S. waters and on the high
seas. These fisheries, though listed separately between Table 1 or 2
and Table 3, are considered the same fisheries on either side of the
EEZ boundary. NMFS has designated those fisheries in each table by a
``*'' after the fishery's name.
[[Page 5362]]
Table 1--List of Fisheries--Commercial Fisheries in the Pacific Ocean
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marine mammal
Estimated number of species and/or
Fishery description vessels/ persons stocks incidentally
killed or injured
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CATEGORY I
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LONGLINE/SET LINE FISHERIES:
HI deep-set longline * 143................ Bottlenose dolphin,
[caret]. HI Pelagic, False
killer whale, MHI
Insular,\1\ False
killer whale, HI
Pelagic,\1\ False
killer whale, NWHI,
Humpback whale.
Central North
Pacific, Kogia spp.
(Pygmy or dwarf
sperm whale), HI,
Pygmy killer whale,
HI, Risso's
dolphin, HI, Short-
finned pilot whale,
HI, Sperm whale,
HI, Striped
dolphin, HI.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CATEGORY II
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GILLNET FISHERIES:
CA thresher shark/ 18................. Bottlenose dolphin,
swordfish drift gillnet CA/OR/WA offshore,
(>=14 in mesh) *. California sea
lion, U.S., Dall's
porpoise, CA/OR/WA,
Humpback whale, CA/
OR/WA, Long-beaked
common dolphin, CA,
Minke whale, CA/OR/
WA, Northern
elephant seal, CA
breeding, Northern
right-whale
dolphin, CA/OR/WA,
Pacific white-sided
dolphin, CA/OR/WA,
Risso's dolphin, CA/
OR/WA, Short-beaked
common dolphin, CA/
OR/WA, Short-finned
pilot whale, CA/OR/
WA, Sperm Whale, CA/
OR/WA.\1\
CA halibut/white seabass 50................. California sea lion,
and other species set U.S., Harbor seal,
gillnet (>3.5 in mesh). CA, Humpback whale,
CA/OR/WA \1\, Long-
beaked common
dolphin, CA,
Northern elephant
seal, CA breeding,
Sea otter, CA,
Short-beaked common
dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
CA yellowtail, barracuda, 30................. California sea lion,
and white seabass drift U.S., Long-beaked
gillnet (mesh size >=3.5 common dolphin, CA,
in and <14 in) \2\. Short-beaked common
dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
AK Bristol Bay salmon 1,862.............. Beluga whale,
drift gillnet \2\. Bristol Bay, Gray
whale, Eastern
North Pacific,
Harbor seal, Bering
Sea, Northern fur
seal, Eastern
Pacific, Pacific
white-sided
dolphin, North
Pacific, Spotted
seal, AK, Steller
sea lion, Western
U.S.
AK Bristol Bay salmon set 979................ Beluga whale,
gillnet \2\. Bristol Bay, Gray
whale, Eastern
North Pacific,
Harbor seal, Bering
Sea, Northern fur
seal, Eastern
Pacific, Spotted
seal, AK.
AK Kodiak salmon set 188................ Harbor porpoise, GOA
gillnet. \1\, Harbor seal,
GOA, Sea otter,
Southwest AK,
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
AK Cook Inlet salmon set 736................ Beluga whale, Cook
gillnet. Inlet, Dall's
porpoise, AK,
Harbor porpoise,
GOA, Harbor seal,
GOA, Humpback
whale, Central
North Pacific \1\,
Sea otter, South
central AK, Steller
sea lion, Western
U.S.
AK Cook Inlet salmon 569................ Beluga whale, Cook
drift gillnet. Inlet, Dall's
porpoise, AK,
Harbor porpoise,
GOA \1\, Harbor
seal, GOA, Steller
sea lion, Western
U.S.
AK Peninsula/Aleutian 162................ Dall's porpoise, AK,
Islands salmon drift Harbor porpoise,
gillnet \2\. GOA, Harbor seal,
GOA, Northern fur
seal, Eastern
Pacific.
AK Peninsula/Aleutian 113................ Harbor porpoise,
Islands salmon set Bering Sea,
gillnet \2\. Northern sea otter,
Southwest AK,
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
AK Prince William Sound 537................ Dall's porpoise, AK,
salmon drift gillnet. Harbor porpoise,
GOA \1\, Harbor
seal, GOA, Northern
fur seal, Eastern
Pacific, Pacific
white-sided
dolphin, North
Pacific, Sea otter,
South central AK,
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.\1\
AK Southeast salmon drift 474................ Dall's porpoise, AK,
gillnet. Harbor porpoise,
Southeast AK,
Harbor seal,
Southeast AK,
Humpback whale,
Central North
Pacific \1\,
Pacific white-sided
dolphin, North
Pacific, Steller
sea lion, Eastern
U.S.
AK Yakutat salmon set 168................ Gray whale, Eastern
gillnet \2\. North Pacific,
Harbor Porpoise,
Southeastern AK,
Harbor seal,
Southeast AK,
Humpback whale,
Central North
Pacific (Southeast
AK).
WA Puget Sound Region 210................ Dall's porpoise, CA/
salmon drift gillnet OR/WA, Harbor
(includes all inland porpoise, inland WA
waters south of US- \1\, Harbor seal,
Canada border and WA inland.
eastward of the Bonilla-
Tatoosh line-Treaty
Indian fishing is
excluded).
TRAWL FISHERIES:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 32................. Bearded seal, AK,
Islands flatfish trawl. Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific,
Harbor porpoise,
Bering Sea, Harbor
seal, Bering Sea,
Humpback whale,
Western North
Pacific \1\, Killer
whale, AK
resident,\1\ Killer
whale, GOA, AI, BS
transient,\1\
Northern fur seal,
Eastern Pacific,
Ringed seal, AK,
Ribbon seal, AK,
Spotted seal, AK,
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S. \1\,
Walrus, AK.
[[Page 5363]]
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 102................ Bearded Seal, AK,
Islands pollock trawl. Dall's porpoise,
AK, Harbor seal,
AK, Humpback whale,
Central North
Pacific, Humpback
whale, Western
North Pacific,
Northern fur seal,
Eastern Pacific,
Ribbon seal, AK,
Ringed seal, AK,
Spotted seal, AK,
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S. \1\
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 17................. Killer whale, ENP AK
Islands rockfish trawl. resident \1\,
Killer whale, GOA,
AI, BS
transient.\1\
POT, RING NET, AND TRAP
FISHERIES:
CA spiny lobster......... 194................ Bottlenose dolphin,
CA/OR/WA offshore,
Humpback whale, CA/
OR/WA \1\, Gray
whale, Eastern
North Pacific.
CA spot prawn pot........ 25................. Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific,
Humpback whale, CA/
OR/WA \1\.
CA Dungeness crab pot.... 570................ Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific,
Humpback whale, CA/
OR/WA \1\.
OR Dungeness crab pot.... 433................ Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific,
Humpback whale, CA/
OR/WA \1\.
WA/OR/CA sablefish pot... 309................ Humpback whale, CA/
OR/WA \1\.
WA coastal Dungeness crab 228................ Gray whale, Eastern
pot. North Pacific,
Humpback whale, CA/
OR/WA \1\.
LONGLINE/SET LINE FISHERIES:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 45................. Dall's Porpoise, AK,
Islands Pacific cod Killer whale, GOA,
longline. BSAI transient \1\.
Northern fur seal,
Eastern Pacific,
Ringed seal, AK.
AK Gulf of Alaska 295................ Sperm whale, North
sablefish longline. Pacific.
HI shallow-set longline * 22................. Blainville's beaked
whale, HI,
Bottlenose dolphin,
HI Pelagic, False
killer whale, HI
Pelagic \1\.
Humpback whale,
Central North
Pacific, Risso's
dolphin, HI, Rough-
toothed dolphin,
HI, Short-finned
pilot whale, HI,
Striped dolphin,
HI.
American Samoa longline 18................. Bottlenose dolphin,
\2\. unknown, Cuvier's
beaked whale,
unknown, False
killer whale,
American Samoa,
Rough-toothed
dolphin, American
Samoa, Short-finned
pilot whale,
unknown.
HI shortline \2\......... 9.................. None documented.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CATEGORY III
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GILLNET FISHERIES:
AK Kuskokwim, Yukon, 1,778.............. Harbor porpoise,
Norton Sound, Kotzebue Bering Sea.
salmon gillnet.
AK Prince William Sound 29................. Harbor seal, GOA,
salmon set gillnet. Sea otter, South
central AK, Steller
sea lion, Western
U.S.
AK roe herring and food/ 920................ None documented.
bait herring gillnet.
CA set gillnet (mesh size 296................ None documented.
<3.5 in).
HI inshore gillnet....... 36................. Bottlenose dolphin,
HI, Spinner
dolphin, HI.
WA Grays Harbor salmon 24................. Harbor seal, OR/WA
drift gillnet (excluding coast.
treaty Tribal fishing).
WA/OR Mainstem Columbia 15................. None documented.
River eulachon gillnet.
WA/OR lower Columbia 110................ California sea lion,
River (includes U.S., Harbor seal,
tributaries) drift OR/WA coast.
gillnet.
WA Willapa Bay drift 82................. Harbor seal, OR/WA
gillnet. coast, Northern
elephant seal, CA
breeding.
MISCELLANEOUS NET FISHERIES:
AK Cook Inlet salmon 83................. Humpback whale,
purse seine. Central North
Pacific.
AK Kodiak salmon purse 376................ Humpback whale,
seine. Central North
Pacific.
AK Southeast salmon purse 315................ None documented in
seine. the most recent
five years of data.
AK Metlakatla salmon 10................. None documented.
purse seine.
AK roe herring and food/ 10................. None documented.
bait herring beach seine.
AK roe herring and food/ 356................ None documented.
bait herring purse seine.
AK salmon beach seine.... 31................. None documented.
AK salmon purse seine 936................ Harbor seal, GOA,
(Prince William Sound, Harbor seal, Prince
Chignik, Alaska William Sound.
Peninsula).
WA/OR sardine purse seine 42................. None documented.
CA anchovy, mackerel, 65................. California sea lion,
sardine purse seine. U.S., Harbor seal,
CA.
CA squid purse seine..... 80................. Long-beaked common
dolphin, CA Short-
beaked common
dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
CA tuna purse seine *.... 10................. None documented.
WA/OR Lower Columbia 10................. None documented.
River salmon seine.
WA/OR herring, smelt, 130................ None documented.
squid purse seine or
lampara.
WA salmon purse seine.... 75................. None documented.
WA salmon reef net....... 11................. None documented.
[[Page 5364]]
HI lift net.............. 17................. None documented.
HI inshore purse seine... <3................. None documented.
HI throw net, cast net... 23................. None documented.
HI seine net............. 24................. None documented.
DIP NET FISHERIES:
CA squid dip net......... 115................ None documented.
MARINE AQUACULTURE FISHERIES:
CA marine shellfish unknown............ None documented.
aquaculture.
CA salmon enhancement >1................. None documented.
rearing pen.
CA white seabass 13................. California sea lion,
enhancement net pens. U.S.
HI offshore pen culture.. 2.................. None documented.
WA salmon net pens....... 14................. California sea lion,
U.S., Harbor seal,
WA inland waters.
WA/OR shellfish 23................. None documented.
aquaculture.
TROLL FISHERIES:
WA/OR/CA albacore surface 705................ None documented.
hook and line/troll.
CA halibut hook and line/ unknown............ None documented.
handline.
CA white seabass hook and unknown............ None documented.
line/handline.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian unknown............ None documented.
Islands groundfish hand
troll and dinglebar
troll.
AK Gulf of Alaska unknown............ None documented.
groundfish hand troll
and dinglebar troll.
AK salmon troll.......... 1,908.............. Steller sea lion,
Eastern U.S.,
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
American Samoa tuna troll 13................. None documented.
CA/OR/WA salmon troll.... 4,300.............. None documented.
HI troll................. 2,117.............. Pantropical spotted
dolphin, HI.
HI rod and reel.......... 322................ None documented.
Commonwealth of the 40................. None documented.
Northern Mariana Islands
tuna troll.
Guam tuna troll.......... 432................ None documented.
LONGLINE/SET LINE FISHERIES:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 4.................. Killer whale, AK
Islands Greenland turbot resident.
longline.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 22................. None documented.
Islands sablefish
longline.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 127................ None documented.
Islands halibut longline.
AK Gulf of Alaska halibut 855................ None documented.
longline.
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific 92................. Steller sea lion,
cod longline. Western U.S.
AK octopus/squid longline 3.................. None documented.
AK state-managed waters 464................ None documented.
longline/setline
(including sablefish,
rockfish, lingcod, and
miscellaneous finfish).
WA/OR/CA groundfish, 367................ Bottlenose dolphin,
bottomfish longline/set CA/OR/WA offshore.
line.
WA/OR Pacific halibut 350................ None documented.
longline.
CA pelagic longline...... 1.................. None documented in
the most recent
five years of data.
HI kaka line............. 15................. None documented.
HI vertical line......... 3.................. None documented.
TRAWL FISHERIES:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 13................. Ribbon seal, AK,
Islands Atka mackerel Steller sea lion,
trawl. Western U.S.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 72................. Ringed seal, AK,
Islands Pacific cod Steller sea lion,
trawl. Western U.S.
AK Gulf of Alaska 36................. Northern elephant
flatfish trawl. seal, North
Pacific.
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific 55................. Steller sea lion,
cod trawl. Western U.S.
AK Gulf of Alaska pollock 67................. Dall's porpoise, AK,
trawl. Fin whale,
Northeast Pacific,
Northern elephant
seal, North
Pacific, Steller
sea lion, Western
U.S.
AK Gulf of Alaska 43................. None documented.
rockfish trawl.
AK Kodiak food/bait 4.................. None documented.
herring otter trawl.
AK shrimp otter trawl and 38................. None documented.
beam trawl.
AK state-managed waters 2.................. None documented.
of Prince William Sound
groundfish trawl.
CA halibut bottom trawl.. 47................. California sea lion,
U.S., Harbor
porpoise, unknown,
Harbor seal,
unknown, Northern
elephant seal, CA
breeding, Steller
sea lion, unknown.
CA sea cucumber trawl.... 16................. None documented.
WA/OR/CA shrimp trawl.... 300................ None documented.
WA/OR/CA groundfish trawl 160-180............ California sea lion,
U.S., Dall's
porpoise, CA/OR/WA,
Harbor seal, OR/WA
coast, Northern fur
seal, Eastern
Pacific, Pacific
white-sided
dolphin, CA/OR/WA,
Steller sea lion,
Eastern U.S.
POT, RING NET, AND TRAP
FISHERIES:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 6.................. None documented.
Islands sablefish pot.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 59................. None documented.
Islands Pacific cod pot.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 540................ Gray whale, Eastern
Islands crab pot. North Pacific.
AK Gulf of Alaska crab 271................ None documented.
pot.
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific 116................ Harbor seal, GOA.
cod pot.
AK Gulf of Alaska 248................ None documented.
sablefish pot.
[[Page 5365]]
AK Southeast Alaska crab 375................ Humpback whale,
pot. Central North
Pacific (Southeast
AK).
AK Southeast Alaska 99................. Humpback whale,
shrimp pot. Central North
Pacific (Southeast
AK).
AK shrimp pot, except 141................ None documented.
Southeast.
AK octopus/squid pot..... 15................. None documented.
CA/OR coonstripe shrimp 36................. Gray whale, Eastern
pot. North Pacific,
Harbor seal, CA.
CA rock crab pot......... 124................ Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific,
Harbor seal, CA.
WA/OR/CA hagfish pot..... 54................. None documented.
WA/OR shrimp pot/trap.... 254................ None documented.
WA Puget Sound Dungeness 249................ None documented.
crab pot/trap.
HI crab trap............. 5.................. Humpback whale,
Central North
Pacific.
HI fish trap............. 9.................. None documented.
HI lobster trap.......... <3................. None documented in
recent years.
HI shrimp trap........... 10................. None documented.
HI crab net.............. 4.................. None documented.
HI Kona crab loop net.... 33................. None documented.
HOOK-AND-LINE, HANDLINE, AND
JIG FISHERIES:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 2.................. None documented.
Islands groundfish jig.
AK Gulf of Alaska 214................ Fin whale, Northeast
groundfish jig. Pacific.
AK halibut jig........... 71................. None documented.
American Samoa bottomfish 17................. None documented.
Commonwealth of the 28................. None documented.
Northern Mariana Islands
bottomfish.
Guam bottomfish.......... >300............... None documented.
HI aku boat, pole, and <3................. None documented.
line.
HI bottomfish handline... 578................ None documented in
recent years.
HI inshore handline...... 357................ None documented.
HI pelagic handline...... 534................ None documented.
WA groundfish, bottomfish 679................ None documented.
jig.
Western Pacific squid jig 0.................. None documented.
HARPOON FISHERIES:
CA swordfish harpoon..... 6.................. None documented.
POUND NET/WEIR FISHERIES:
AK herring spawn on kelp 291................ None documented.
pound net.
AK Southeast herring roe/ 2.................. None documented.
food/bait pound net.
HI bullpen trap.......... 3.................. None documented.
BAIT PENS:
WA/OR/CA bait pens....... 13................. California sea lion,
U.S.
DREDGE FISHERIES:
AK scallop dredge........ 108 (5 AK)......... None documented.
DIVE, HAND/MECHANICAL
COLLECTION FISHERIES:
AK clam.................. 130................ None documented.
AK Dungeness crab........ 2.................. None documented.
AK herring spawn on kelp. 266................ None documented.
AK miscellaneous 214................ None documented.
invertebrates handpick.
HI black coral diving.... <3................. None documented.
HI fish pond............. 5.................. None documented.
HI handpick.............. 46................. None documented.
HI lobster diving........ 19................. None documented.
HI spearfishing.......... 163................ None documented.
WA/CA kelp............... 4.................. None documented.
WA/OR bait shrimp, clam 201................ None documented.
hand, dive, or
mechanical collection.
OR/CA sea urchin, sea 10................. None documented.
cucumber hand, dive, or
mechanical collection.
COMMERCIAL PASSENGER FISHING
VESSEL (CHARTER BOAT)
FISHERIES:
AK/WA/OR/CA commercial >7,000 (1,006 AK).. Killer whale,
passenger fishing vessel. unknown, Steller
sea lion, Eastern
U.S., Steller sea
lion, Western U.S.
LIVE FINFISH/SHELLFISH
FISHERIES:
CA nearshore finfish live 93................. None documented.
trap/hook-and-line.
HI aquarium collecting... 90................. None documented.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Abbreviations and Symbols Used in Table 1: AI--Aleutian Islands;
AK--Alaska; BS--Bering Sea; CA--California; ENP--Eastern North
Pacific; GOA--Gulf of Alaska; HI--Hawaii; MHI--Main Hawaiian Islands;
OR--Oregon; WA--Washington.
\1\ Fishery classified based on mortalities and serious injuries of this
stock, which are greater than or equal to 50 percent (Category I) or
greater than 1 percent and less than 50 percent (Category II) of the
stock's PBR.
\2\ Fishery classified by analogy.
* Fishery has an associated high seas component listed in Table 3.
[[Page 5366]]
[caret] The list of marine mammal species and/or stocks killed or
injured in this fishery is identical to the list of species and/or
stocks killed or injured in high seas component of the fishery, minus
species and/or stocks that have geographic ranges exclusively on the
high seas. The species and/or stocks are found, and the fishery
remains the same, on both sides of the EEZ boundary. Therefore, the
EEZ components of these fisheries pose the same risk to marine mammals
as the components operating on the high seas.
Table 2--List of Fisheries--Commercial Fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean,
Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marine mammal
Estimated number of species and/or
Fishery description vessels/ persons stocks incidentally
killed or injured
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CATEGORY I
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GILLNET FISHERIES:
Mid-Atlantic gillnet..... 3,950.............. Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern Migratory
coastal \1\,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern Migratory
coastal \1\,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern NC
estuarine system
\1\, Bottlenose
dolphin, Southern
NC estuarine system
\1\, Bottlenose
dolphin, WNA
offshore, Common
dolphin, WNA, Gray
seal, WNA, Harbor
porpoise, GME/BF,
Harbor seal, WNA,
Harp seal, WNA,
Humpback whale,
Gulf of Maine,
Minke whale,
Canadian east
coast.
Northeast sink gillnet... 4,332.............. Bottlenose dolphin,
WNA offshore,
Common dolphin,
WNA, Fin whale,
WNA, Gray seal,
WNA, Harbor
porpoise, GME/BF
\1\, Harbor seal,
WNA, Harp seal,
WNA, Hooded seal,
WNA, Humpback
whale, Gulf of
Maine, Long-finned
pilot whale, WNA,
Minke whale,
Canadian east
coast, North
Atlantic right
whale, WNA, Risso's
dolphin, WNA, White-
sided dolphin, WNA.
TRAP/POT FISHERIES:
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic 10,163............. Humpback whale, Gulf
American lobster trap/ of Maine, Minke
pot. whale, Canadian
east coast, North
Atlantic right
whale, WNA \1\.
LONGLINE FISHERIES:
Atlantic Ocean, 280................ Atlantic spotted
Caribbean, Gulf of dolphin, Northern
Mexico large pelagics GMX, Bottlenose
longline *. dolphin, Northern
GMX oceanic,
Bottlenose dolphin,
WNA offshore,
Common dolphin,
WNA, Cuvier's
beaked whale, WNA,
False killer whale,
WNA, Harbor
porpoise, GME, BF,
Kogia spp. (Pygmy
or dwarf sperm
whale), WNA, Long-
finned pilot whale,
WNA \1\, Mesoplodon
beaked whale, WNA,
Minke whale,
Canadian East
coast, Pantropical
spotted dolphin,
Northern GMX, Pygmy
sperm whale, GMX,
Risso's dolphin,
Northern GMX,
Risso's dolphin,
WNA, Rough-toothed
dolphin, Northern
GMX, Short-finned
pilot whale,
Northern GMX, Short-
finned pilot whale,
WNA\1\.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CATEGORY II
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GILLNET FISHERIES:
Chesapeake Bay inshore 248................ Bottlenose dolphin,
gillnet \2\. unknown (Northern
migratory coastal
or Southern
migratory coastal).
Gulf of Mexico gillnet 248................ Bottlenose dolphin,
\2\. GMX bay, sound, and
estuarine,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX
coastal, Bottlenose
dolphin, Western
GMX coastal.
NC inshore gillnet....... 2,850.............. Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern NC
estuarine system
\1\, Bottlenose
dolphin, Southern
NC estuarine system
\1\.
Northeast anchored float 852................ Harbor seal, WNA,
gillnet \2\. Humpback whale,
Gulf of Maine,
White-sided
dolphin, WNA.
Northeast drift gillnet 1,036.............. None documented.
\2\.
Southeast Atlantic 273................ Bottlenose dolphin,
gillnet \2\. Central FL coastal,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern FL
coastal, Bottlenose
dolphin, SC/GA
coastal, Bottlenose
dolphin, Southern
migratory coastal.
Southeastern U.S. 23................. Bottlenose dolphin,
Atlantic shark gillnet. unknown (Central
FL, Northern FL, SC/
GA coastal, or
Southern migratory
coastal), North
Atlantic right
whale, WNA.
TRAWL FISHERIES:
Mid-Atlantic mid-water 382................ Gray seal, WNA,
trawl (including pair Harbor seal, WNA.
trawl).
Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl 785................ Bottlenose dolphin,
WNA offshore,
Common dolphin, WNA
\1\, Gray seal,
WNA, Harbor seal,
WNA, Risso's
dolphin, WNA \1\,
White-sided
dolphin, WNA.
Northeast mid-water trawl 1,087.............. Common dolphin, WNA,
(including pair trawl). Gray seal, WNA,
Harbor seal, WNA,
Long-finned pilot
whale, WNA \1\,
Minke whale,
Canadian East
Coast.
[[Page 5367]]
Northeast bottom trawl... 2,238.............. Bottlenose dolphin,
WNA offshore,
Common dolphin,
WNA, Gray seal,
WNA, Harbor
porpoise, GME/BF,
Harbor seal, WNA,
Harp seal, WNA,
Long-finned pilot
whale, WNA, Risso's
dolphin, WNA, White-
sided dolphin, WNA
\1\.
Southeastern U.S. 4,950.............. Atlantic spotted
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico dolphin, GMX
shrimp trawl. continental and
oceanic, Bottlenose
dolphin, Charleston
estuarine system,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Eastern GMX coastal
\1\, Bottlenose
dolphin, GMX bay,
sound, estuarine
\1\, Bottlenose
dolphin, GMX
continental shelf,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX
coastal, Bottlenose
dolphin, SC/GA
coastal \1\,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern migratory
coastal, Bottlenose
dolphin, Western
GMX coastal\1\,
West Indian
manatee, Florida.
TRAP/POT FISHERIES:
Southeastern U.S. 1,384.............. Bottlenose dolphin,
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico Biscayne Bay
stone crab trap/pot \2\. estuarine,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Central FL coastal,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Eastern GMX
coastal, Bottlenose
dolphin, FL Bay,
Bottlenose dolphin,
GMX bay, sound,
estuarine (FL west
coast portion),
Bottlenose dolphin,
Indian River Lagoon
estuarine system,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Jacksonville
estuarine system,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX
coastal.
Atlantic mixed species 3,436.............. Fin whale, WNA,
trap/pot \2\. Humpback whale,
Gulf of Maine.
Atlantic blue crab trap/ 7,714.............. Bottlenose dolphin,
pot. Central FL coastal,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Central GA
estuarine system,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Charleston
estuarine system
\1\, Bottlenose
dolphin, Indian
River Lagoon
estuarine system,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Jacksonville
estuarine system,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern FL coastal
\1\, Bottlenose
dolphin, Northern
GA/Southern SC
estuarine system,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern Migratory
coastal, Bottlenose
dolphin, Northern
NC estuarine system
\1\, Bottlenose
dolphin, Northern
SC estuarine
system, Bottlenose
dolphin, SC/GA
coastal, Bottlenose
dolphin, Southern
GA estuarine
system, Bottlenose
dolphin, Southern
Migratory coastal,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern NC
estuarine system,
West Indian
manatee, FL.
PURSE SEINE FISHERIES:
Gulf of Mexico menhaden 40-42.............. Bottlenose dolphin,
purse seine. GMX bay, sound,
estuarine,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Mississippi Sound,
Lake Borgne, Bay
Boudreau,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX
coastal \1\,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Western GMX coastal
\1\.
Mid-Atlantic menhaden 19................. Bottlenose dolphin,
purse seine \2\. Northern Migratory
coastal, Bottlenose
dolphin, Southern
Migratory coastal.
HAUL/BEACH SEINE FISHERIES:
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach 359................ Bottlenose dolphin,
seine. Northern Migratory
coastal \1\,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern NC
estuarine system
\1\, Bottlenose
dolphin, Southern
Migratory coastal
\1\.
NC long haul seine....... 30................. Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern NC
estuarine system
\1\, Bottlenose
dolphin, Southern
NC estuarine
system.
STOP NET FISHERIES:
NC roe mullet stop net... 1.................. Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern NC
estuarine system,
Bottlenose dolphin,
unknown (Southern
migratory coastal
or Southern NC
estuarine system).
POUND NET FISHERIES:
VA pound net............. 26................. Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern migratory
coastal, Bottlenose
dolphin, Northern
NC estuarine
system, Bottlenose
dolphin, Southern
Migratory coastal
\1\.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CATEGORY III
------------------------------------------------------------------------
GILLNET FISHERIES:
Caribbean gillnet........ >991............... None documented in
the most recent
five years of data.
DE River inshore gillnet. unknown............ None documented in
the most recent
five years of data.
Long Island Sound inshore unknown............ None documented in
gillnet. the most recent
five years of data.
RI, southern MA (to unknown............ None documented in
Monomoy Island), and NY the most recent
Bight (Raritan and Lower five years of data.
NY Bays) inshore gillnet.
Southeast Atlantic unknown............ Bottlenose dolphin,
inshore gillnet. Northern SC
estuarine system.
TRAWL FISHERIES:
Atlantic shellfish bottom >58................ None documented.
trawl.
[[Page 5368]]
Gulf of Mexico butterfish 2.................. Bottlenose dolphin,
trawl. Northern GMX
oceanic, Bottlenose
dolphin, Northern
GMX continental
shelf.
Gulf of Mexico mixed 20................. None documented.
species trawl.
GA cannonball jellyfish 1.................. Bottlenose dolphin,
trawl. SC/GA coastal.
MARINE AQUACULTURE FISHERIES:
Finfish aquaculture...... 48................. Harbor seal, WNA.
Shellfish aquaculture.... unknown............ None documented.
PURSE SEINE FISHERIES:
Gulf of Maine Atlantic >7................. Harbor seal, WNA,
herring purse seine. Gray seal, WNA.
Gulf of Maine menhaden >2................. None documented.
purse seine.
FL West Coast sardine 10................. Bottlenose dolphin,
purse seine. Eastern GMX
coastal.
U.S. Atlantic tuna purse 5.................. Long-finned pilot
seine *. whale, WNA, Short-
finned pilot whale,
WNA.
LONGLINE/HOOK-AND-LINE
FISHERIES:
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic >1,207............. None documented.
bottom longline/hook-and-
line.
Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid- 2,846.............. Bottlenose dolphin,
Atlantic tuna, shark, WNA offshore,
swordfish hook-and-line/ Humpback whale,
harpoon.. Gulf of Maine.
Southeastern U.S. >5,000............. Bottlenose dolphin,
Atlantic, Gulf of GMX continental
Mexico, and Caribbean shelf.
snapper-grouper and
other reef fish bottom
longline/hook-and-line.
Southeastern U.S. 39................. Bottlenose dolphin,
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico Eastern GMX
shark bottom longline/ coastal, Bottlenose
hook-and-line. dolphin, Northern
GMX continental
shelf.
Southeastern U.S. 680................ None documented.
Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico, and Caribbean
pelagic hook-and-line/
harpoon.
U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of unknown............ None documented.
Mexico trotline.
TRAP/POT FISHERIES:
Caribbean mixed species >501............... None documented.
trap/pot.
Caribbean spiny lobster >197............... None documented.
trap/pot.
FL spiny lobster trap/pot 1,268.............. Bottlenose dolphin,
Biscayne Bay
estuarine
Bottlenose dolphin,
Central FL coastal,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Eastern GMX
coastal, Bottlenose
dolphin, FL Bay
estuarine,
Bottlenose dolphin,
FL Keys.
Gulf of Mexico blue crab 4,113.............. Bottlenose dolphin,
trap/pot. Barataria Bay,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Eastern GMX
coastal, Bottlenose
dolphin, GMX bay,
sound, estuarine,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Mississippi Sound,
Lake Borgne, Bay
Boudreau,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX
coastal, Bottlenose
dolphin, Western
GMX coastal, West
Indian manatee, FL.
Gulf of Mexico mixed unknown............ None documented.
species trap/pot.
Southeastern U.S. 10................. None documented.
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico
golden crab trap/pot.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic eel unknown............ None documented.
trap/pot.
STOP SEINE/WEIR/POUND NET/
FLOATING TRAP/FYKE NET
FISHERIES:
Gulf of Maine herring and >1................. Harbor porpoise, GME/
Atlantic mackerel stop BF, Harbor seal,
seine/weir. WNA, Minke whale,
Canadian east
coast, Atlantic
white-sided
dolphin, WNA.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic crab 2,600.............. None documented.
stop seine/weir.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic mixed unknown............ Bottlenose dolphin,
species stop seine/weir/ Northern NC
pound net (except the NC estuarine system.
roe mullet stop net).
RI floating trap......... 9.................. None documented.
Northeast and Mid- unknown............ None documented.
Atlantic fyke net.
DREDGE FISHERIES:
Gulf of Maine sea urchin unknown............ None documented.
dredge.
Gulf of Maine mussel unknown............ None documented.
dredge.
Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid- >403............... None documented.
Atlantic sea scallop
dredge.
Mid-Atlantic blue crab unknown............ None documented.
dredge.
Mid-Atlantic soft-shell unknown............ None documented.
clam dredge.
Mid-Atlantic whelk dredge unknown............ None documented.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic/Gulf of 7,000.............. None documented.
Mexico oyster dredge.
New England and Mid- unknown............ None documented.
Atlantic offshore surf
clam/quahog dredge.
HAUL/BEACH SEINE FISHERIES:
Caribbean haul/beach 15................. None documented in
seine. the most recent
five years of data.
Gulf of Mexico haul/beach unknown............ None documented.
seine.
Southeastern U.S. 25................. None documented.
Atlantic haul/beach
seine.
DIVE, HAND/MECHANICAL
COLLECTION FISHERIES:
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of 20,000............. None documented.
Mexico, Caribbean
shellfish dive, hand/
mechanical collection.
Gulf of Maine urchin unknown............ None documented.
dive, hand/mechanical
collection.
[[Page 5369]]
Gulf of Mexico, Southeast unknown............ None documented.
Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic,
and Caribbean cast net.
COMMERCIAL PASSENGER FISHING
VESSEL (CHARTER BOAT)
FISHERIES:
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of 4,000.............. Bottlenose dolphin,
Mexico, Caribbean Barataria Bay
commercial passenger estuarine system,
fishing vessel. Bottlenose dolphin,
Biscayne Bay
estuarine,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Central FL coastal,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Choctawhatchee Bay,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Eastern GMX
coastal, Bottlenose
dolphin, FL Bay,
Bottlenose dolphin,
GMX bay, sound,
estuarine,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Indian River Lagoon
estuarine system,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Jacksonville
estuarine system,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Mississippi Sound,
Lake Borgne, Bay
Boudreau,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern FL
coastal, Bottlenose
dolphin, Northern
GA/Southern SC
estuarine,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX
coastal, Bottlenose
dolphin, Northern
migratory coastal,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern NC
estuarine,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern migratory
coastal, Bottlenose
dolphin, Southern
NC estuarine
system, Bottlenose
dolphin, SC/GA
coastal, Bottlenose
dolphin, Western
GMX coastal, Short-
finned pilot whale,
WNA.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Abbreviations and Symbols Used in Table 2: DE--Delaware; FL--
Florida; GA--Georgia; GME/BF--Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy; GMX--Gulf of
Mexico; MA--Massachusetts; NC--North Carolina; NY--New York; RI--Rhode
Island; SC--South Carolina; VA--Virginia; WNA--Western North Atlantic.
\1\ Fishery classified based on mortalities and serious injuries of this
stock, which are greater than or equal to 50 percent (Category I) or
greater than 1 percent and less than 50 percent (Category II) of the
stock's PBR.
\2\ Fishery classified by analogy.
* Fishery has an associated high seas component listed in Table 3.
Table 3--List of Fisheries--Commercial Fisheries on the High Seas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marine mammal species
Number of and/or stocks
Fishery description HSFCA permits incidentally killed or
injured
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CATEGORY I
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LONGLINE FISHERIES:
Atlantic Highly Migratory 79 Atlantic spotted
Species *. dolphin, WNA,
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX oceanic,
Bottlenose dolphin,
WNA offshore, Common
dolphin, WNA, Cuvier's
beaked whale, WNA,
False killer whale,
WNA, Killer whale, GMX
oceanic, Kogia spp.
whale (Pygmy or dwarf
sperm whale), WNA,
Long-finned pilot
whale, WNA, Mesoplodon
beaked whale, WNA,
Minke whale, Canadian
East coast,
Pantropical spotted
dolphin, WNA, Risso's
dolphin, GMX, Risso's
dolphin, WNA, Short-
finned pilot whale,
WNA.
Western Pacific Pelagic (HI 143 Bottlenose dolphin, HI
Deep-set component) * Pelagic, False killer
[caret]. whale, HI Pelagic,
Humpback whale,
Central North Pacific,
Kogia spp. (Pygmy or
dwarf sperm whale),
HI, Pygmy killer
whale, HI, Risso's
dolphin, HI, Short-
finned pilot whale,
HI, Sperm whale, HI,
Striped dolphin, HI.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CATEGORY II
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DRIFT GILLNET FISHERIES:
Pacific Highly Migratory 4 Long-beaked common
Species * [caret]. dolphin, CA, Humpback
whale, CA/OR/WA,
Northern right-whale
dolphin, CA/OR/WA,
Pacific white-sided
dolphin, CA/OR/WA,
Risso's dolphin, CA/OR/
WA, Short-beaked
common dolphin, CA/OR/
WA.
TRAWL FISHERIES:
Atlantic Highly Migratory 2 No information.
Species * *.
CCAMLR..................... 0 Antarctic fur seal.
PURSE SEINE FISHERIES:
South Pacific Tuna 35 No information.
Fisheries.
Western Pacific Pelagic.... 1 No information.
LONGLINE FISHERIES:
CCAMLR..................... 0 None documented.
[[Page 5370]]
South Pacific Albacore 9 No information.
Troll.
South Pacific Tuna 4 No information.
Fisheries * *.
Western Pacific Pelagic (HI 22 Blainville's beaked
Shallow-set component) * whale, HI, Bottlenose
[caret]. dolphin, HI Pelagic,
False killer whale, HI
Pelagic, Humpback
whale, Central North
Pacific, Northern
elephant seal, CA
breeding, Risso's
dolphin, HI, Rough-
toothed dolphin, HI,
Short-beaked common
dolphin, CA/OR/WA,
Short-finned pilot
whale, HI, Striped
dolphin, HI.
HANDLINE/POLE AND LINE
FISHERIES:
Atlantic Highly Migratory 2 No information.
Species.
Pacific Highly Migratory 42 No information.
Species.
South Pacific Albacore 11 No information.
Troll.
Western Pacific Pelagic.... 5 No information.
TROLL FISHERIES:
Atlantic Highly Migratory 1 No information.
Species.
South Pacific Albacore 22 No information.
Troll.
South Pacific Tuna 4 No information.
Fisheries * *.
Western Pacific Pelagic.... 6 No information.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CATEGORY III
------------------------------------------------------------------------
LONGLINE FISHERIES:
Northwest Atlantic Bottom 1 None documented.
Longline.
Pacific Highly Migratory 105 None documented in the
Species. most recent 5 years of
data.
PURSE SEINE FISHERIES:
Pacific Highly Migratory 7 None documented.
Species * [caret].
TRAWL FISHERIES:
Northwest Atlantic......... 2 None documented.
TROLL FISHERIES:
Pacific Highly Migratory 149 None documented.
Species *.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Terms, Abbreviations, and Symbols Used in Table 3: CA-
California; GMX-Gulf of Mexico; HI-Hawaii; OR-Oregon; WA-Washington;
WNA-Western North Atlantic.
* Fishery is an extension/component of an existing fishery operating
within U.S. waters listed in Table 1 or 2. The number of permits
listed in Table 3 represents only the number of permits for the high
seas component of the fishery.
* * These gear types are not authorized under the Pacific HMS FMP
(2004), the Atlantic HMS FMP (2006), or without a South Pacific Tuna
Treaty license (in the case of the South Pacific Tuna fisheries).
Because HSFCA permits are valid for five years, permits obtained in
past years exist in the HSFCA permit database for gear types that are
now unauthorized. Therefore, while HSFCA permits exist for these gear
types, it does not represent effort. In order to land fish species,
fishers must be using an authorized gear type. Once these permits for
unauthorized gear types expire, the permit-holder will be required to
obtain a permit for an authorized gear type.
[caret] The list of marine mammal species and/or stocks killed or
injured in this fishery is identical to the list of marine mammal
species and/or stocks killed or injured in U.S. waters component of
the fishery, minus species and/or stocks that have geographic ranges
exclusively in coastal waters, because the marine mammal species and/
or stocks are also found on the high seas and the fishery remains the
same on both sides of the EEZ boundary. Therefore, the high seas
components of these fisheries pose the same risk to marine mammals as
the components of these fisheries operating in U.S. waters.
Table 4--Fisheries Affected by Take Reduction Teams and Plans
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take reduction plans Affected fisheries
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Category I:
Plan (ALWTRP)--50 CFR 229.32. Mid-Atlantic gillnet, Northeast/
Mid-Atlantic American lobster
trap/pot, Northeast sink
gillnet.
Category II:
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot,
Atlantic mixed species trap/
pot, Northeast anchored float
gillnet, Northeast drift
gillnet, Southeast Atlantic
gillnet, Southeastern U.S.
Atlantic shark gillnet *,
Southeastern, U.S. Atlantic,
Gulf of Mexico stone crab trap/
pot. [caret]
Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Plan Category I:
(BDTRP)--50 CFR 229.35. Mid-Atlantic gillnet.
Category II:
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot,
Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet
fishery, Mid-Atlantic haul/
beach seine, Mid-Atlantic
menhaden purse seine, NC
inshore gillnet, NC long haul
seine, NC roe mullet stop net,
Southeast Atlantic gillnet,
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic
shark gillnet, Southeastern
U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico
shrimp trawl [caret],
Southeastern, U.S. Atlantic,
Gulf of Mexico stone crab trap/
pot [caret], VA pound net.
False Killer Whale Take Reduction Plan Category I:
(FKWTRP)--50 CFR 229.37. HI deep-set longline.
Category II:
HI shallow-set longline.
[[Page 5371]]
Harbor Porpoise Take Reduction Plan Category I:
(HPTRP)--50 CFR 229.33 (New England) Mid-Atlantic gillnet, Northeast
and 229.34 (Mid-Atlantic). sink gillnet.
Pelagic Longline Take Reduction Plan Category I:
(PLTRP)--50 CFR 229.36. Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf
of Mexico large pelagics
longline.
Pacific Offshore Cetacean Take Category I:
Reduction Plan (POCTRP)--50 CFR 229.31. CA thresher shark/swordfish
drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh).
Atlantic Trawl Gear Take Reduction Team Category II:
(ATGTRT). Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl, Mid-
Atlantic mid-water trawl
(including pair trawl),
Northeast bottom trawl,
Northeast mid-water trawl
(including pair trawl).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Only applicable to the portion of the fishery operating in U.S.
waters; [caret]Only applicable to the portion of the fishery operating
in the Atlantic Ocean.
Classification
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) at the proposed rule stage that this rule would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. No comments were received on that certification, and no new
information has been discovered to change that conclusion. Accordingly,
no regulatory flexibility analysis is required, and none has been
prepared.
This rule contains collection-of-information (COI) requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act. The COI for the registration of
individuals under the MMPA has been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under OMB control number 0648-0293 (0.15
hours per report for new registrants). The requirement for reporting
marine mammal mortalities or injuries has been approved by OMB under
OMB control number 0648-0292 (0.15 hours per report). These estimates
include the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and
reviewing the COI. Send comments regarding these reporting burden
estimates or any other aspect of the COI, including suggestions for
reducing burden, to NMFS and OMB (see ADDRESSES and SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with a COI, subject to the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, unless that COI displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
This rule has been determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Orders 12866 and 13563.
This rule is not expected to be an E.O. 13771 regulatory action
because this rule is not significant under E.O. 12866.
In accordance with the Companion Manual for NAO 216-6A, NMFS
determined that publishing this LOF qualifies to be categorically
excluded from further NEPA review. Issuance of this final rule is
consistent with categories of activities identified in Categorical
Exclusion G7 of the Companion Manual, and we have not identified any
extraordinary circumstances listed in Chapter 4 of the Companion Manual
for NAO 216-6A that would preclude application of this categorical
exclusion. If NMFS takes a management action, for example, through the
development of a TRP, NMFS would first prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) or Environmental Assessment (EA), as required under
NEPA, specific to that action.
This rule would not affect species listed as threatened or
endangered under the ESA or their associated critical habitat. The
impacts of numerous fisheries have been analyzed in various biological
opinions, and this rule will not affect the conclusions of those
opinions. The classification of fisheries on the LOF is not considered
to be a management action that would adversely affect threatened or
endangered species. If NMFS takes a management action, for example,
through the development of a TRP, NMFS would consult under ESA section
7 on that action.
This rule would have no adverse impacts on marine mammals and may
have a positive impact on marine mammals by improving knowledge of
marine mammals and the fisheries interacting with marine mammals
through information collected from observer programs, stranding and
sighting data, or take reduction teams.
This rule would not affect the land or water uses or natural
resources of the coastal zone, as specified under section 307 of the
Coastal Zone Management Act.
References
Allen, B.M. and R.P. Angliss, editors. 2016. Alaska Marine Mammal
Stock Assessments, 2015. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-AFSC-323. 309 p.
Breiwick, J.M. 2013. North Pacific Marine Mammal Bycatch Estimation
Methodology and Results, 2007-2011. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-AFSC-260.
40 p.
Carretta, J.V., E. Oleson, D.W. Weller, A.R. Lang, K.A. Forney, J.
Baker, M.M. Muto, B. Hanson, A.J. Orr, H. Huber, M.S. Lowry, J.
Barlow, J.E. Moore, D. Lynch, L. Carswell, and R.L. Brownell Jr.
2015. U.S. Pacific Marine Mammal Stock Assessments: 2014. NOAA
Technical Memorandum NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-549. 414 p.
Carretta, J.V., K.A. Forney, E. Oleson, D.W. Weller, A.R. Lang, J.
Baker, M.M. Muto, B. Hanson, A.J. Orr, H. Huber, M.S. Lowry, J.
Barlow, J.E. Moore, D. Lynch, L. Carswell, and R.L. Brownell Jr.
2017a. U.S. Pacific Marine Mammal Stock Assessments: 2016. NOAA
Technical Memorandum NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-577. 414 p.
Carretta, J.V., J.E. Moore, and K.A. Forney. 2017. Regression tree
and ratio estimates of marine mammal, sea turtle, and seabird
bycatch in the California drift gillnet fishery: 1990-2015. NOAA
Technical Memorandum, NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-568. 83 p. doi:10.7289/V5/
TM-SWFSC-568.
Carretta, J.V., M.M. Muto, S. Wilkin, J. Greenman, K. Wilkinson, D.
Lawson, J. Viezbicke, and J. Jannot. 2017b. Sources of human-related
injury and mortality for U.S. Pacific west coast marine mammal
stocks assessments, 2011-2015. NOAA Technical Memorandum, NOAA-TM-
NMFS-SWFSC-579. 126 p.
Hayes, S.A., E. Josephson, K. Maze-Foley, and P.E. Rosel, editors.
2017. U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Marine Mammal Stocks
Assessments, 2016. NOAA Technical Memorandum, NOAA-TM-NE-241. 274 p.
Helker, V.T., M.M. Muto, and L.A. Jemison. 2016. Human-Caused Injury
and Mortality of NMFS-managed Alaska Marine Mammal Stocks, 2010-
2014.
[[Page 5372]]
NOAA Technical Memorandum, NOAA-NMFS-AFSC-315. 89 p.
Jannot, J.E., V. Tuttle, K. Somers, Y-W. Lee, J. McVeigh. 2016.
Marine Mammal, Seabird, and Sea Turtle Summary of Observed
Interactions, 2002-2014. Fisheries Observation Science, Fishery
Resource Analysis and Monitoring Division, Northwest Fisheries
Science Center.
McCracken, M.L. 2016. Assessment of Incidental Interactions with
Marine Mammals in the Hawaii Deep and Shallow Set Fisheries from
2010 through 2014. NMFS Pacific Islands Fisheries Science Center,
PIFSC Internal Report IR-16-008. 2 p. + Excel spreadsheet.
Moore, J.E. and D.W. Weller. 2013. Probability of taking a western
North Pacific gray whale during the proposed Makah hunt. NOAA Tech.
Memo. NMFS-SWFSC-506. 13 p.
Muto, M.M, V.T. Helker, R.P. Angliss, B.A. Allen, P.L. Boveng, J.M.
Breiwick, M.F. Cameron, P.J. Clapham, S.P. Dahle, M.E. Dahlheim,
B.S. Fadely, M.C. Ferguson, L.W. Fritz, R.C. Hobbs, Y.V.
Ivashchenko, A.S. Kennedy, J.M. London, S.A. Mizroch, R.R. Ream,
E.L. Richmond, K.E.W. Shelden, R.G. Towell, P.R. Wade, J.M. Waite,
and A.N. Zerbini. 2017. Alaska Marine Mammal Stock Assessments,
2016. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOAA-TM-NMFS-AFSC-355. 367 p.
National Marine Fisheries Service. 2012. National Marine Fisheries
Service Policy Directive 02-238. Process for Distinguishing Serious
from Non-Serious Injury of Marine Mammals, 4 p. (Available at:
https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/op/pds/documents/02/02-238.pdf).
Rone, B. K., A. N. Zerbini, A.B. Douglas, D.W. Weller, and P.J.
Clapham. 2016. Abundance and distribution of cetaceans in the Gulf
of Alaska. Marine Biology 164:23.
Waring, G.T., E. Josephson, K. Maze-Foley, and P.E. Rosel, editors.
2016. U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Marine Mammal Stocks
Assessments, 2015. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOAA-NE-238. 512 p.
Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council (WPRFMC). 2015a.
Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation (SAFE) Report Pacific Island
Pelagic Fisheries. 396 p.
Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council (WPRFMC). 2015b.
Annual Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation Report: Fishery
Ecosystem Plan for the American Samoa Archipelago. 202 p.
Dated: February 2, 2018.
Samuel D. Rauch, III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-02442 Filed 2-6-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P