Medical Devices; Neurological Devices; Classification of the Percutaneous Nerve Stimulator for Substance Use Disorders, 5033-5035 [2018-02202]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 24 / Monday, February 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
market. There is pent up demand for
additional Far West Native spearmint
oil that will not be available under the
volume regulation provisions of the
Order until this final rule is effective.
Handlers want to take advantage of the
relaxation of the limitation on the
salable quantity of oil as soon as
possible, as delay will likely result in
the loss of marketing opportunities, in
both the short and long term. Native
spearmint oil demand that cannot be
satisfied from spearmint oil from the Far
West production area may be fulfilled
from other U.S. production areas or
imported product. The loss of
immediate business resulting from a
delayed implementation of this rule
could result in customers entering into
long term contracts with other Native
spearmint oil providers. There is
therefore a risk that delayed
implementation of this rule would have
a negative impact on Far West
spearmint oil handlers’ sales in future
marketing years.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 985
Marketing agreements, Oils and fats,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Spearmint oil.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 985 is amended as
follows:
PART 985—MARKETING ORDER
REGULATING THE HANDLING OF
SPEARMINT OIL PRODUCED IN THE
FAR WEST
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 985 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
[Subpart Redesignated as Subpart A]
2. Redesignate ‘‘Subpart-Order
Regulating Handling’’ as ‘‘Subpart AOrder Regulating Handling’’.
■
[Subpart Redesignated as Subpart B
and Amended]
3. Redesignate ‘‘SubpartAdministrative Rules and Regulations’’
as subpart B and revise the heading to
read as follows:
■
Subpart B—Administrative
Requirements
4. In § 985.236, revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
■
§ 985.236 Salable quantities and allotment
percentages—2017–2018 marketing year.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Class 3 (Native) oil—a salable
quantity of 1,514,902 pounds and an
allotment percentage of 62 percent.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:20 Feb 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
Dated: January 31, 2018.
Bruce Summers,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–02264 Filed 2–2–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 882
[Docket No. FDA–2018–N–0371]
Medical Devices; Neurological
Devices; Classification of the
Percutaneous Nerve Stimulator for
Substance Use Disorders
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) is
classifying the percutaneous nerve
stimulator for substance use disorders
into class II (special controls). The
special controls that apply to the device
type are identified in this order and will
be part of the codified language for the
percutaneous nerve stimulator for
substance use disorders’ classification.
We are taking this action because we
have determined that classifying the
device into class II (special controls)
will provide a reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness of the device.
We believe this action will also enhance
patients’ access to beneficial innovative
devices, in part by reducing regulatory
burdens.
DATES: This order is effective February
5, 2018. The classification was
applicable on November 15, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric
Franca, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 2684, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–6285,
Eric.Franca@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the
percutaneous nerve stimulator for
substance use disorders as class II
(special controls), which we have
determined will provide a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness. In
addition, we believe this action will
enhance patients’ access to beneficial
innovation, in part by reducing
regulatory burdens by placing the
device into a lower device class than the
automatic class III assignment.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5033
The automatic assignment of class III
occurs by operation of law and without
any action by FDA, regardless of the
level of risk posed by the new device.
Any device that was not in commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, is
automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket
approval unless and until FDA takes an
action to classify or reclassify the device
(see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to
these devices as ‘‘postamendments
devices’’ because they were not in
commercial distribution prior to the
date of enactment of the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976, which amended
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in
appropriate circumstances to classify or
reclassify a device into class I or II. We
may issue an order finding a new device
to be substantially equivalent under
section 513(i) of the FD&C Act to a
predicate device that does not require
premarket approval (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(i)). We determine whether a new
device is substantially equivalent to a
predicate by means of the procedures
for premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act and part 807 (21
U.S.C. 360(k) and 21 CFR part 807,
respectively).
FDA may also classify a device
through ‘‘De Novo’’ classification, a
common name for the process
authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and
Drug Administration Modernization Act
of 1997 established the first procedure
for De Novo classification (Pub. L. 105–
115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation
Act modified the De Novo application
process by adding a second procedure
(Pub. L. 112–144). A device sponsor
may utilize either procedure for De
Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person
submits a 510(k) for a device that has
not previously been classified. After
receiving an order from FDA classifying
the device into class III under section
513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person
then requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather
than first submitting a 510(k) and then
a request for classification, if the person
determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial
equivalence, that person requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo
classification, FDA shall classify the
device by written order within 120 days.
The classification will be according to
E:\FR\FM\05FER1.SGM
05FER1
5034
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 24 / Monday, February 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
the criteria under section 513(a)(1) of
the FD&C Act. Although the device was
automatically placed within class III,
the De Novo classification is considered
to be the initial classification of the
device.
We believe this De Novo classification
will enhance patients’ access to
beneficial innovation, in part by
reducing regulatory burdens. When FDA
classifies a device into class I or II via
the De Novo process, the device can
serve as a predicate for future devices of
that type, including for 510(k)s (see 21
U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)(B)(i)). As a result, other
device sponsors do not have to submit
a De Novo request or premarket
approval application in order to market
a substantially equivalent device (see 21
U.S.C. 360c(i), defining ‘‘substantial
equivalence’’). Instead, sponsors can use
the less-burdensome 510(k) process,
when necessary, to market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On March 17, 2017, Innovative Health
Solutions, Inc., submitted a request for
De Novo classification of the NSS–2
BRIDGE. FDA reviewed the request in
order to classify the device under the
criteria for classification set forth in
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if
general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness,
but there is sufficient information to
establish special controls that, in
combination with the general controls,
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request,
we determined that the device can be
classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA
has determined that these special
controls, in addition to the general
controls, will provide reasonable
assurance of the safety and effectiveness
of the device.
Therefore, on November 15, 2017,
FDA issued an order to the requester
classifying the device into class II. FDA
is codifying the classification of the
device by adding 21 CFR 882.5896. We
have named the generic type of device
percutaneous nerve stimulator for
substance use disorders, and it is
identified as a device that stimulates
nerves percutaneously to aid in the
reduction of withdrawal symptoms
associated with substance use disorders.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated specifically with
this type of device and the measures
required to mitigate these risks in table
1.
TABLE 1—PERCUTANEOUS NERVE STIMULATOR FOR SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Identified risks
Mitigation measures
Adverse tissue reaction ......................................
Electrical, mechanical, or thermal hazards leading to user discomfort or injury.
Biocompatibility evaluation and Labeling.
Electromagnetic compatibility testing; Electrical, mechanical, and thermal safety testing; Nonclinical performance testing; Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis; and Labeling.
Sterility testing, Shelf life testing, and Labeling.
Infection ..............................................................
FDA has determined that special
controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to
health and provide reasonable assurance
of safety and effectiveness. In order for
a device to fall within this classification,
and thus avoid automatic classification
in class III, it would have to comply
with the special controls named in this
final order. The necessary special
controls appear in the regulation
codified by this order. This device is
subject to premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k).
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special
controls that refer to previously
approved collections of information
found in other FDA regulations and
guidance. These collections of
information are subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:20 Feb 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). The
collections of information in the
guidance document ‘‘De Novo
Classification Process (Evaluation of
Automatic Class III Designation)’’ have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0844; the collections of
information in part 814, subparts A
through E, regarding premarket
approval, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0231; the
collections of information in part 807,
subpart E, regarding premarket
notification submissions, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0120, and the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 801,
regarding labeling, have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 882
Medical devices, Neurological
devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 882 is
amended as follows:
PART 882—NEUROLOGICAL DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 882
continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. Add § 882.5896 to subpart F to read
as follows:
■
§ 882.5896 Percutaneous nerve stimulator
for substance use disorders.
(a) Identification. A percutaneous
nerve stimulator for substance use
disorders is a device that stimulates
nerves percutaneously to aid in the
reduction of withdrawal symptoms
associated with substance use disorders.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) The patient-contacting
components of the device must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(2) Electromagnetic compatibility and
electrical, mechanical, and thermal
safety testing must be performed.
(3) Electrical performance testing of
the device and electrodes must be
conducted to validate the specified
electrical output and duration of
stimulation of the device.
(4) Software verification, validation,
and hazard analysis must be performed.
(5) Sterility testing of the
percutaneous components of the device
must be performed.
(6) Shelf life testing must be
performed to demonstrate continued
E:\FR\FM\05FER1.SGM
05FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 24 / Monday, February 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
sterility, package integrity, and device
functionality over the specified shelf
life.
(7) Labeling must include the
following:
(i) A detailed summary of the device
technical parameters;
(ii) A warning stating that the device
is only for use on clean, intact skin;
(iii) Instructions for use, including
placement of the device on the patient;
and
(iv) A shelf life.
Dated: January 31, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018–02202 Filed 2–2–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG–2018–0009]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation; Black
Warrior River; Tuscaloosa, AL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary special local
regulation on the Black Warrior River
extending the entire width of the river
from mile marker 339.0 to mile marker
341.5 in Tuscaloosa, AL. The special
local regulation is needed to protect the
persons participating in the NCAA
Collegiate Rowing Competition marine
event. Entry into, transiting through, or
exiting from this regulated area is
prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Sector Mobile, or a designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective from 6 a.m.
until noon on February 24, 2018.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2018–
0009 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Kyle D. Berry, Sector
Mobile, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
251–441–5940, email Kyle.D.Berry@
uscg.mil.
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:20 Feb 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
vessels during the rowing event on
navigable waters.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port Sector Mobile
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
PATCOM Patrol Commander
§§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing
so would be impracticable. The event
sponsors have informed the U.S. Coast
Guard that a marine event will occur on
February 24, 2018. After gathering all
necessary information, including safety
needs related to this event, the Coast
Guard determined that this special local
regulation is necessary for this event. It
is impracticable to publish an NPRM
because we must establish this special
local regulation by February 24, 2018
and lack sufficient time to provide a
reasonable comment period and then
consider those comments before issuing
this rule.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this temporary rule effective less
than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register. Delaying the effective
date of this rule would be impracticable
and contrary to the public interest
because immediate action is necessary
to protect persons and property from the
dangers associated with the rowing
event.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1233. The
Captain of the Port Sector Mobile
(COTP) has determined that potential
hazards associated with the rowing
event on February 24, 2018 will be a
safety concern for anyone within the
area of the Black Warrior River between
mile markers 339.0 and 341.5. This rule
is needed to protect participants,
spectators, and other persons and
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
5035
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a special local
regulation on February 24, 2018, which
will be enforced between the 6 a.m. and
noon. The special local regulation takes
place on the Black Warrior River
between mile markers 339.0 and 341.5,
extending the entire width of the
navigable channel. The duration of the
regulation is intended to protect
participants, spectators, and other
persons and vessels before, during, and
after the rowing event. No vessel or
person will be permitted to enter into,
transit through, or exist the regulated
area without obtaining permission from
the COTP or a designated
representative.
The Coast Guard will patrol the
regatta area under the direction of the
COTP, or a designated representative. A
designated representative may be a
Coast Guard Patrol Commander
(PATCOM). Patrol Commander
(PATCOM) means a Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
who has been designated by the COTP
to monitor the rowing area, permit entry
into the area, give legally enforceable
orders to persons or vessels within the
area, and take other actions authorized
by the COTP. The PATCOM will be
aboard either a Coast Guard or Coast
Guard Auxiliary vessel. The PATCOM
may be contacted on Channel 16 (156.8
MHZ) by the call sign ‘‘Coast Guard
Patrol Commander.’’
All persons and vessels not registered
with the event sponsor as participants
or official patrol vessels are considered
spectators. The ‘‘official patrol vessels’’
consist of any Coast Guard, state, or
local law enforcement and sponsor
provided vessels assigned or approved
by the COTP to patrol the regulated
area.
Spectator vessels desiring to enter,
transit through or within, or exit the
regulated area may request permission
to do so from the COTP or a PATCOM.
When permitted to transit the area
vessels must follow restrictions within
the regulated area as directed by the
Coast Guard, and must operate at a
minimum safe navigation speed in a
manner which will not endanger
participants in the regulated area or any
other vessels.
No spectator vessel shall anchor,
block, loiter, or impede the through
transit of participants or official patrol
vessels in the regulated area during the
effective dates and times, unless cleared
for entry by or through an official patrol
vessel.
E:\FR\FM\05FER1.SGM
05FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 24 (Monday, February 5, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5033-5035]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02202]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 882
[Docket No. FDA-2018-N-0371]
Medical Devices; Neurological Devices; Classification of the
Percutaneous Nerve Stimulator for Substance Use Disorders
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is classifying
the percutaneous nerve stimulator for substance use disorders into
class II (special controls). The special controls that apply to the
device type are identified in this order and will be part of the
codified language for the percutaneous nerve stimulator for substance
use disorders' classification. We are taking this action because we
have determined that classifying the device into class II (special
controls) will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device. We believe this action will also enhance
patients' access to beneficial innovative devices, in part by reducing
regulatory burdens.
DATES: This order is effective February 5, 2018. The classification was
applicable on November 15, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Franca, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 2684, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-6285,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the percutaneous nerve stimulator
for substance use disorders as class II (special controls), which we
have determined will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness. In addition, we believe this action will enhance
patients' access to beneficial innovation, in part by reducing
regulatory burdens by placing the device into a lower device class than
the automatic class III assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law
and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by
the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution
before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA
takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as ``postamendments devices''
because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to
classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an
order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section
513(i) of the FD&C Act to a predicate device that does not require
premarket approval (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i)). We determine whether a new
device is substantially equivalent to a predicate by means of the
procedures for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C
Act and part 807 (21 U.S.C. 360(k) and 21 CFR part 807, respectively).
FDA may also classify a device through ``De Novo'' classification,
a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization
Act of 1997 established the first procedure for De Novo classification
(Pub. L. 105-115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration
Safety and Innovation Act modified the De Novo application process by
adding a second procedure (Pub. L. 112-144). A device sponsor may
utilize either procedure for De Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device
that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from
FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section
513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k)
and then a request for classification, if the person determines that
there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination
of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA shall
classify the device by written order within 120 days. The
classification will be according to
[[Page 5034]]
the criteria under section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the
device was automatically placed within class III, the De Novo
classification is considered to be the initial classification of the
device.
We believe this De Novo classification will enhance patients'
access to beneficial innovation, in part by reducing regulatory
burdens. When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De
Novo process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of
that type, including for 510(k)s (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(2)(B)(i)). As a
result, other device sponsors do not have to submit a De Novo request
or premarket approval application in order to market a substantially
equivalent device (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i), defining ``substantial
equivalence''). Instead, sponsors can use the less-burdensome 510(k)
process, when necessary, to market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On March 17, 2017, Innovative Health Solutions, Inc., submitted a
request for De Novo classification of the NSS-2 BRIDGE. FDA reviewed
the request in order to classify the device under the criteria for
classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special
controls that, in combination with the general controls, provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request, we determined that the device can
be classified into class II with the establishment of special controls.
FDA has determined that these special controls, in addition to the
general controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on November 15, 2017, FDA issued an order to the
requester classifying the device into class II. FDA is codifying the
classification of the device by adding 21 CFR 882.5896. We have named
the generic type of device percutaneous nerve stimulator for substance
use disorders, and it is identified as a device that stimulates nerves
percutaneously to aid in the reduction of withdrawal symptoms
associated with substance use disorders.
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated
specifically with this type of device and the measures required to
mitigate these risks in table 1.
Table 1--Percutaneous Nerve Stimulator for Substance Use Disorders Risks
and Mitigation Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identified risks Mitigation measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Adverse tissue reaction...... Biocompatibility evaluation and Labeling.
Electrical, mechanical, or Electromagnetic compatibility testing;
thermal hazards leading to Electrical, mechanical, and thermal
user discomfort or injury. safety testing; Non-clinical performance
testing; Software verification,
validation, and hazard analysis; and
Labeling.
Infection.................... Sterility testing, Shelf life testing,
and Labeling.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness. In order for a device to fall
within this classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in
class III, it would have to comply with the special controls named in
this final order. The necessary special controls appear in the
regulation codified by this order. This device is subject to premarket
notification requirements under section 510(k).
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special controls that refer to
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA
regulations and guidance. These collections of information are subject
to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections
of information in the guidance document ``De Novo Classification
Process (Evaluation of Automatic Class III Designation)'' have been
approved under OMB control number 0910-0844; the collections of
information in part 814, subparts A through E, regarding premarket
approval, have been approved under OMB control number 0910-0231; the
collections of information in part 807, subpart E, regarding premarket
notification submissions, have been approved under OMB control number
0910-0120, and the collections of information in 21 CFR part 801,
regarding labeling, have been approved under OMB control number 0910-
0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 882
Medical devices, Neurological devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
882 is amended as follows:
PART 882--NEUROLOGICAL DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 882 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 882.5896 to subpart F to read as follows:
Sec. 882.5896 Percutaneous nerve stimulator for substance use
disorders.
(a) Identification. A percutaneous nerve stimulator for substance
use disorders is a device that stimulates nerves percutaneously to aid
in the reduction of withdrawal symptoms associated with substance use
disorders.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(1) The patient-contacting components of the device must be
demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(2) Electromagnetic compatibility and electrical, mechanical, and
thermal safety testing must be performed.
(3) Electrical performance testing of the device and electrodes
must be conducted to validate the specified electrical output and
duration of stimulation of the device.
(4) Software verification, validation, and hazard analysis must be
performed.
(5) Sterility testing of the percutaneous components of the device
must be performed.
(6) Shelf life testing must be performed to demonstrate continued
[[Page 5035]]
sterility, package integrity, and device functionality over the
specified shelf life.
(7) Labeling must include the following:
(i) A detailed summary of the device technical parameters;
(ii) A warning stating that the device is only for use on clean,
intact skin;
(iii) Instructions for use, including placement of the device on
the patient; and
(iv) A shelf life.
Dated: January 31, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-02202 Filed 2-2-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P