Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed Rule Change To List and Trade the Shares of the ProShares Bitcoin ETF and the ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF Under NYSE Arca Rule 8.200-E, Commentary .02, 4941-4942 [2018-02130]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 23 / Friday, February 2, 2018 / Notices
the fund’s annual income tax returns,
and as a normal business custom.
Rule 12d1–1 also requires
unregistered money market funds in
which registered funds invest to adopt
procedures designed to ensure that the
unregistered money market funds
comply with sections 17(a), (d), (e), and
22(e) of the Act. This is a one-time
collection of information requirement
that applies to unregistered money
market funds that intend to comply with
the requirements of rule 12d1–1. As
discussed above, based on a projection
of 10 new money market funds per year,
the staff estimates that, similarly, there
will be 10 new unregistered money
market funds that undertake the above
burden to establish written procedures
and guidelines designed to ensure that
the unregistered money market funds
comply with sections 17(a), (d), (e), and
22(e) of the Act. The staff estimates the
burden as follows:
Establish written procedures and
guidelines designed to ensure that the
unregistered money market funds
comply with sections 17(a), (d), (e), and
22(e) of the Act:
1 response
15.5 hours of director, legal, and
support staff time
Cost: $6,328 39
Accordingly, the staff estimates that
10 unregistered money market funds
will comply with this collection of
information requirement and engage in
10 annual responses under rule
12d1–1,40 the aggregate annual burden
hours associated with these responses is
155,41 and the aggregate annual cost to
funds is $62,380.42
Commission staff also estimates that
unregistered money market funds will
incur costs to preserve records, as
required under rule 2a–7. These costs
will vary significantly for individual
funds, depending on the amount of
assets under fund management and
whether the fund preserves its records
in a storage facility in hard copy or has
developed and maintains a computer
system to create and preserve
compliance records. In the rule 2a–7
submission, Commission staff estimated
that the amount an individual money
market fund may spend ranges from
$100 per year to $300,000. We have no
reason to believe the range is different
for unregistered money market funds.
Based on Form PF data as of the fourth
calendar quarter 2016, private liquidity
funds have $293 billion in gross asset
value.43 The Commission does not have
specific information about the
proportion of assets held in small,
medium-sized, or large unregistered
money market funds. Because private
liquidity funds are often used as cash
management vehicles, the staff estimates
that each private liquidity fund is a
‘‘large’’ fund (i.e., more than $1 billion
in assets under management). Based on
a cost of $0.0000009 per dollar of assets
under management (for large funds),44
the staff estimates compliance with rule
2a–7 for these unregistered money
market funds totals $263,700
annually.45
Consistent with estimates made in the
rule 2a–7 submission, Commission staff
estimates that unregistered money
market funds also incur capital costs to
create computer programs for
maintaining and preserving compliance
records for rule 2a–7 of $0.0000132 per
dollar of assets under management.
Based on the assets under management
figures described above, staff estimates
annual capital costs for all unregistered
money market funds of $3.87 million.46
Commission staff further estimates
that, even absent the requirements of
rule 2a–7, money market funds would
spend at least half of the amounts
described above for record preservation
($131,850) and for capital costs ($1.94
million). Commission staff concludes
that the aggregate annual costs of
compliance with the rule are $131,850
for record preservation and $1.94
million for capital costs.
The collections of information
required for unregistered money market
funds by rule 12d1–1 are necessary in
order for acquiring funds to be able to
obtain the benefits described above.
Notices to the Commission will not be
kept confidential. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
43 See
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
39 This
estimate is based on the following
calculation: (0.5 hours × $4,500 per hour for board
time) + (7.2 hours × $378 per hour for an attorney)
+ (7.8 hours × $174 per hour for support staff) =
$6,328 per response.
40 The estimate is based on the following
calculations: (10 funds × 1 response) = 10
responses.
41 This estimate is based on the following
calculations: (10 funds × 15.5 hours) = 155 hours.
42 This estimate is based on the following
calculations: (10 funds × $6,238) = $62,380.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:03 Feb 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
supra note 12.
recordkeeping cost estimates are
$0.0051295 per dollar of assets under management
for small funds, and $0.0005041 per dollar of assets
under management for medium-sized funds. The
cost estimates are the same as those used in the
most recently approved rule 2a–7 submission.
45 This estimate is based on the following
calculation: ($293 billion × $0.0000009) = $263,700
billion for small funds.
46 This estimate is based on the following
calculation: ($293 billion × 0.0000132) = $3.87
million.
44 The
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4941
Written comments are invited on: (a)
Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology. Consideration will be given
to comments and suggestions submitted
in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
Please direct your written comments
to Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, C/O Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549; or send an email
to: PRA_Mailbox@sec.gov.
Dated: January 30, 2018.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–02118 Filed 2–1–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–82602; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2017–139]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Designation of a
Longer Period for Commission Action
on a Proposed Rule Change To List
and Trade the Shares of the ProShares
Bitcoin ETF and the ProShares Short
Bitcoin ETF Under NYSE Arca Rule
8.200–E, Commentary .02
January 30, 2018.
On December 4, 2017, NYSE Arca,
Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
list and trade the shares of the
ProShares Bitcoin ETF and the
ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF under
NYSE Arca Rule 8.200–E, Commentary
.02. The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on December 26, 2017.3 The
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82350
(Dec. 19, 2017), 82 FR 61100.
2 17
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
4942
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 23 / Friday, February 2, 2018 / Notices
Commission has received one comment
letter on the proposed rule change.4
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 5 provides
that within 45 days of the publication of
notice of the filing of a proposed rule
change, or within such longer period up
to 90 days as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the
self-regulatory organization consents,
the Commission shall either approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule change should be
disapproved. The Commission is
extending this 45-day time period. The
Commission finds that it is appropriate
to designate a longer period within
which to take action on the proposed
rule change so that it has sufficient time
to consider the proposed rule change.
Accordingly, the Commission,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,6
designates March 26, 2018, as the date
by which the Commission shall either
approve or disapprove, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rule change
(File No. SR–NYSEArca–2017–139).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.7
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018–02130 Filed 2–1–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–82597; File No. SR–BX–
2018–007]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
BX, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Relocate the
Consolidated Audit Trail Compliance
Rules
January 30, 2018.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January
24, 2018, Nasdaq BX, Inc. (‘‘BX’’ or
4 See Letter from Abe Kohen, AK Financial
Engineering Consultants, LLC (Dec. 27, 2017). All
comments on the proposed rule change are
available on the Commission’s website at: https://
www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nysearca-2017-139/
nysearca2017139.htm.
5 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
6 Id.
7 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(31).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:03 Feb 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to relocate the
Consolidated Audit Trail Compliance
rules (‘‘CAT Rules’’), currently under
the 6800 Series (Rules 6810 through
6896), to General 7, Sections 1 through
13 in the Exchange’s rulebook’s
(‘‘Rulebook’’) shell structure.3
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://nasdaqbx.cchwallstreet.com/, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to relocate the
CAT Rules, currently under the 6800
Series, Rules 6810 through 6896, to
General 7, Sections 1 through 13 of the
Rulebook’s shell structure.
The Exchange adopted the CAT Rules
to implement a consolidated audit trail
in order to capture customer and order
event information to comply with the
provisions of the National Market
3 Recently, the Exchange added a shell structure
to its Rulebook with the purpose of improving
efficiency and readability and to align its rules
closer to those of its five sister exchanges, The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Nasdaq PHLX LLC;
Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Nasdaq GEMX, LLC; and Nasdaq
MRX, LLC (‘‘Affiliated Exchanges’’). See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 82174 (November 29,
2017), 82 FR 57492 (December 5, 2017) (SR–BX–
2017–054).
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
System Plan Governing the
Consolidated Audit Trail.4 Because the
CAT Rules apply across all markets and
to all products,5 the Exchange believes
it is pertinent that they be located in the
General section of the Rulebook’s shell;
therefore, the Exchange will amend the
shell structure, creating a new ‘‘General
7 Consolidated Audit Trail Compliance’’
title under ‘‘General Equity and Options
Rules,’’ and make conforming changes
to the ‘‘Options Rules’’ titles; moreover,
this proposal is consistent with similar
filings concurrently submitted by the
Affiliated Exchanges.
The relocation of the CAT Rules is
part of the Exchange’s continued effort
to promote efficiency and conformity of
its processes with those of its Affiliated
Exchanges.6 The Exchange believes that
the migration of the CAT Rules to their
new location will facilitate the use of
the Rulebook by Members 7 of the
Exchange who are members of other
Affiliated Exchanges. Moreover, the
proposed changes are of a nonsubstantive nature and will not amend
the relocated rules other than to update
their numbers and make conforming
cross-reference changes.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,8 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,9
in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest, by
promoting efficiency and conformity of
the Exchange’s processes with those of
the Affiliated Exchanges and to make
the Exchange’s Rulebook easier to read
and more accessible to its Members. The
Exchange believes that the relocation of
the CAT Rules and cross-reference
updates are of a non-substantive nature.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80256
(March 15, 2017), 82 FR 14526 (March 21, 2017)
(SR–BX–2017–007) (Order Approving Proposed
Rule Changes To Adopt Consolidated Audit Trail
Compliance Rules).
5 Id.
6 See footnote 3.
7 Exchange Rule 0120(i).
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\02FEN1.SGM
02FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 23 (Friday, February 2, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4941-4942]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02130]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-82602; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2017-139]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed Rule
Change To List and Trade the Shares of the ProShares Bitcoin ETF and
the ProShares Short Bitcoin ETF Under NYSE Arca Rule 8.200-E,
Commentary .02
January 30, 2018.
On December 4, 2017, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to list and trade
the shares of the ProShares Bitcoin ETF and the ProShares Short Bitcoin
ETF under NYSE Arca Rule 8.200-E, Commentary .02. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on December
26, 2017.\3\ The
[[Page 4942]]
Commission has received one comment letter on the proposed rule
change.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 82350 (Dec. 19,
2017), 82 FR 61100.
\4\ See Letter from Abe Kohen, AK Financial Engineering
Consultants, LLC (Dec. 27, 2017). All comments on the proposed rule
change are available on the Commission's website at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nysearca-2017-139/nysearca2017139.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \5\ provides that within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
Commission is extending this 45-day time period. The Commission finds
that it is appropriate to designate a longer period within which to
take action on the proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time
to consider the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\6\ designates March 26, 2018, as the date by which the Commission
shall either approve or disapprove, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No. SR-
NYSEArca-2017-139).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Id.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-02130 Filed 2-1-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P