Centralized Partnership Audit Regime: Adjusting Tax Attributes, 4868-4882 [2018-01989]
Download as PDF
4868
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 23 / Friday, February 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Class E airspace designations are
published in paragraph 6002, and 6005,
respectively, of FAA Order 7400.11B,
dated August 3, 2017 and effective
September 15, 2017, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designation
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current, is noncontroversial and unlikely to result in
adverse or negative comments. It,
therefore: (1) Is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant
rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February
26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a regulatory evaluation as
the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will
only affect air traffic procedures and air
navigation, it is certified that this
proposed rule, when promulgated,
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
effective September 15, 2017, is
amended as follows:
Paragraph 5000
Class D Airspace.
*
*
*
*
AWP CA D
*
Atwater, CA [Amended]
Castle Airport, CA
(Lat. 37°22′50″ N, long. 120°34′06″ W)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface up to but not including 2,000 feet
MSL within a 4.6-mile radius of Castle
Airport beginning at the 297° bearing from
the airport clockwise to the 164° bearing,
thence to the point of beginning. This Class
D airspace area is effective during the
specific dates and times established in
advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective
date and time will thereafter be continuously
published in the Chart Supplement.
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth
*
*
*
*
*
AWP CA E5 Atwater, CA [Amended]
Castle Airport, CA
(Lat. 37°22′50″ N, long. 120°34′06″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 7.2-mile
radius of Castle Airport.
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on January
11, 2018.
Shawn M. Kozica,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western
Service Center.
Environmental Review
This proposal will be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F,
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
[FR Doc. 2018–02012 Filed 2–1–18; 8:45 am]
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
26 CFR Parts 1 and 301
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11B,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 3, 2017, and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Feb 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
■
■
RIN 1545–BO00
Centralized Partnership Audit Regime:
Adjusting Tax Attributes
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
§ 71.1
[REG–118067–17]
This document contains
proposed regulations implementing
section 1101 of the Bipartisan Budget
Act of 2015, which was enacted into law
on November 2, 2015. The Bipartisan
Budge Act repeals the current rules
governing partnership audits and
replaces them with a new centralized
partnership audit regime that, in
general, determines, assesses and
collects tax at the partnership level.
These proposed regulations provide
rules addressing how partnerships and
their partners adjust tax attributes to
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
take into account partnership
adjustments under the centralized
partnership audit regime.
DATES: Written or electronic comments
and requests for a public hearing must
be received by May 3, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to:
CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–118067–17), Room
5207, Internal Revenue Service, P.O.
Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions
may be hand delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8:00 a.m.
and 4:00 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG–
118067–17), Courier’s Desk, Internal
Revenue Service, 1111 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20224.
Alternatively, taxpayers may submit
comments electronically via the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov (REG–118067–17).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the proposed regulations,
Allison R. Carmody or Meghan M.
Howard of the Office of Associate Chief
Counsel (Passthroughs and Special
Industries), (202) 317–5279; concerning
the submission of comments, Regina L.
Johnson, (202) 317–6901 (not toll-free
numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains proposed
regulations that supplement the
regulations proposed in the notice of
proposed rulemaking (REG–136118–15)
published in the Federal Register on
June 14, 2017 (82 FR 27334) (the ‘‘June
14 NPRM’’) and amend the Income Tax
Regulations (26 CFR part 1) under
Subpart—Partners and Partnerships and
the Procedure and Administration
Regulations (26 CFR part 301) under
Subpart—Tax Treatment of Partnership
Items to implement the centralized
partnership audit regime. Furthermore,
certain provisions of the June 14 NPRM
are being amended.
1. The New Centralized Partnership
Audit Regime
For information relating to (1) the new
centralized partnership audit regime
enacted by the Bipartisan Budget Act
(BBA), Public Law 114–74 (129 Stat. 58
(2015)) (as amended by the Protecting
Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015,
Pub. L. 114–113 (129 Stat. 2242 (2015)));
(2) Notice 2016–23 (2016–13 I.R.B. 490
(March 28, 2016)), which requested
comments on the new partnership audit
regime enacted by the BBA; and (3) the
temporary regulations (TD 9780, 81 FR
51795 (August 5, 2016)) and a notice of
proposed rulemaking (REG–105005–16,
81 FR 51835 (August 5, 2016)), which
provided the time, form, and manner for
E:\FR\FM\02FEP1.SGM
02FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 23 / Friday, February 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
a partnership to make an election into
the centralized partnership audit regime
for a partnership taxable year beginning
before the general effective date of the
regime, see the Background section of
the June 14 NPRM.
2. Proposed Regulations Implementing
the Centralized Partnership Audit
Regime
The June 14 NPRM addressed various
issues concerning the scope and process
of the new centralized partnership audit
regime. Unless otherwise noted, all
references to proposed regulations in
this preamble refer to the regulations
proposed by the June 14 NPRM.
Proposed §§ 301.6225–1, 301.6225–2,
and 301.6225–3 provide rules relating to
partnership adjustments, including the
computation of the imputed
underpayment, modification of the
imputed underpayment, and the
treatment of adjustments that do not
result in an imputed underpayment.
Proposed § 301.6225–1 sets forth rules
for computing the imputed
underpayment, and proposed
§ 301.6225–2 sets forth the rules under
which the partnership may request a
modification to adjust the imputed
underpayment calculated under
proposed § 301.6225–1. The
modification rules contained in
proposed § 301.6225–2 generally allow:
(1) Modifications that result in the
exclusion of certain adjustments, or
portions thereof, from the calculation of
the imputed underpayment (such as a
modification under proposed
§ 301.6225–2(d)(2) (amended returns by
partners), (d)(3) (tax-exempt partners),
(d)(5) (certain passive losses of publicly
traded partnerships), (d)(7)
(partnerships with partners that are
qualified investment entities described
in section 860 of the Internal Revenue
Code (Code)), (d)(8) (partner closing
agreements), and, if applicable, (d)(9)
(other modifications)); (2) rate
modifications, which affect only the
taxable rate applied to the total netted
partnership adjustment (described in
proposed § 301.6225–2(d)(4)); and (3)
modifications to the number and
composition of imputed underpayments
(described in proposed § 301.6225–
2(d)(6)).
Proposed § 301.6225–3 sets forth rules
for the treatment of adjustments that do
not result in an imputed underpayment.
In general, pursuant to proposed
§ 301.6225–3(b)(1) the partnership takes
the adjustment into account in the
adjustment year as a reduction in nonseparately stated income or as an
increase in non-separately stated loss
depending on whether the adjustment is
to an item of income or loss. Proposed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Feb 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
§ 301.6225–3(b)(2) provides that if an
adjustment is to an item that is required
to be separately stated under section 702
of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) the
adjustment shall be taken into account
by the partnership on its adjustment
year return as an adjustment to such
separately stated item. Proposed
§ 301.6225–3(b)(3) provides that an
adjustment to a credit is taken into
account as a separately stated item.
Proposed §§ 301.6226–1, 301.6226–2,
and 301.6226–3 provide rules relating to
the election under section 6226 by a
partnership to have its reviewed year
partners take into account the
partnership adjustments in lieu of
paying the imputed underpayment
determined under section 6225, the
statements the partnership must send to
its partners, and the rules for how the
partners take into account the
adjustments, including the computation
and payment of the partners’ liability. If
a partnership makes the election under
section 6226 to ‘‘push out’’ adjustments
to its reviewed year partners, the
partnership is not liable for the imputed
underpayment. Instead, under proposed
§ 301.6226–3, reviewed year partners
must pay any additional chapter 1 tax
that results from taking the adjustments
reflected on the statements into account
in the reviewed year and from changes
to the tax attributes in the intervening
years. In addition to being liable for the
additional tax, the partner must also
calculate and pay any penalties,
additions to tax, or additional amounts
determined to be applicable during the
partnership-level proceeding, and any
interest determined in accordance with
proposed § 301.6226–3(d).
Finally, proposed § 301.6241–1
provides definitions for purposes of the
centralized partnership audit regime.
On December 19, 2017, proposed
rules (REG–120232–17 and REG–
120233–17) were published in the
Federal Register (82 FR 60144) that
would allow tiered partnerships to push
out audit adjustments through to the
ultimate taxpayers and provides rules
implementing the procedural and
administrative aspects of the
partnership audit regime. For proposed
rules regarding international provisions
under the centralized partnership audit
regime, see (REG–119337–17) published
in the Federal Register on November 30,
2017 (82 FR 56765).
Explanation of Provisions
1. In General
These proposed regulations provide
rules that were reserved in the June 14
NPRM under proposed §§ 301.6225–4
and 301.6226–4. It also provides related
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4869
proposed amendments to §§ 1.704–1,
1.705–1, and 1.706–4. Specifically,
these rules address how and when
partnerships and their partners adjust
tax attributes to take into account
partnership adjustments under both
sections 6225 and 6226. The public
provided comments in response to the
June 14 NPRM, and some comments
discussed issues relevant to the reserved
sections under proposed §§ 301.6225–4
and 301.6226–4, which were taken into
consideration in drafting these proposed
regulations.
Because these regulations are
supplementing the regulations
published in the June 14 NPRM, the
numbering and ordering of some of the
provisions do not follow typical
conventions. The Department of the
Treasury (Treasury Department) and the
IRS anticipate that these provisions will
be appropriately integrated when both
these regulations and the proposed
regulations in the June 14 NPRM are
finalized.
These proposed rules are consistent
with the policy described in ‘‘The
General Explanation of Tax Legislation
Enacted for 2015’’ (Bluebook), which
explained that ‘‘[u]nder the centralized
partnership audit regime, the
flowthrough nature of the partnership
under subchapter K of the Code is
unchanged, but the partnership is
treated as a point of collection of
underpayments that would otherwise be
the responsibility of partners.’’ Joint
Comm. on Taxation, JCS–1–16, ‘‘General
Explanations of Tax Legislation Enacted
in 2015’’, 57 (2016).
The preamble to the June 14 NPRM
announced that the Treasury
Department and the IRS intended to
provide additional rules providing for
adjustments to the basis of partnership
property and book value of any
partnership property if the partnership
adjustment is a change to an item of
gain, loss, amortization or depreciation
(i.e., the change is basis derivative).
These proposed regulations, when
finalized, will provide this guidance.
2. Provisions Relating to Section 6225
A. In General
The June 14 NPRM defines a
partnership adjustment as any
adjustment to any item of income, gain,
loss, deduction, or credit of a
partnership (as defined in proposed
§ 301.6221(a)–1(b)(1)), or any partner’s
distributive share thereof (as described
in proposed § 301.6221(a)–1(b)(2)). See
proposed § 301.6241–1(a)(6). Under the
rules in proposed § 301.6225–1, each
partnership adjustment is either (i)
taken into account in the determination
E:\FR\FM\02FEP1.SGM
02FEP1
4870
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 23 / Friday, February 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
of an imputed underpayment, or (ii)
considered a partnership adjustment
that does not give rise to an imputed
underpayment. For a partnership
adjustment that is taken into account in
the determination of the imputed
underpayment, these proposed
regulations provide rules for adjusting
partnership asset basis and book value,
rules for the creation of notional items,
rules for allocating these notional items
under section 704(b), successor rules for
situations in which reviewed year
partners (as defined in proposed
§ 301.6241–1(a)(9)) are not adjustment
year partners (as defined in proposed
§ 301.6241–1(a)(2)), and rules for
determining the impact of notional
items on tax attributes in certain
situations. See section (2)(B) of this
preamble. These regulations also
provide rules for the allocation of any
partnership expenditure related to the
imputed underpayment. See section
(2)(B)(vii) of this preamble. Finally,
these regulations provide guidance in
the case of a partnership adjustment that
does not give rise to an imputed
underpayment. See section (2)(C) of this
preamble.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Adjustments in the Case of a
Partnership Adjustment That Results in
an Imputed Underpayment
i. In General
Prior to the enactment of the
centralized partnership audit regime, in
the case of an adjustment to an item of
income, gain, loss, deduction or credit
in the context of an examination by the
IRS for or related to a partnership,
partnership adjustments were generally
taken into account by the partners of the
partnership for the year under
examination by a new or corrected
allocation of the relevant item, and
partners took those items into account
with respect to the partnership year
under examination. In contrast, under
the centralized partnership audit
regime, for a partnership adjustment
that is taken into account in the
determination of an imputed
underpayment, the partnership
adjustment is generally taken into
account by the partnership in the year
in which the related payment obligation
(the imputed underpayment) arises.
Further, in light of the fact that these
partnership adjustments are with
respect to a partnership year that is
earlier than the year in which the
imputed underpayment arises, the
partners of the partnership may have
changed in the later year.
Under subchapter K, a partnership
generally computes items of income,
gain, loss, deduction or credit under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Feb 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
section 703, which are then allocated to
the partners under section 704. Under
section 705, a partner increases its basis
in its partnership interest (outside basis)
by its distributive share of taxable
income of the partnership as determined
under section 703(a). However, in the
case of a positive partnership
adjustment that is taken into account in
the determination of an imputed
underpayment, section 6225 does not
itself provide for an item of taxable
income under section 703(a) to be
allocated to partners. Instead,
calculations are made at the partnership
level and the partnership pays the
liability in the form of an imputed
underpayment. Failure to provide
adjustments to outside basis that reflect
the partnership adjustments that
resulted in the imputed underpayment
could lead to a partner being effectively
taxed twice on the same item of income,
once indirectly on payment of the
imputed underpayment and again on a
disposition of the partnership interest or
on a distribution of cash by the
partnership. Taxing the same item of
income twice is not consistent with the
flowthrough nature of partnerships
under subchapter K. Thus, these
proposed regulations provide for
adjustment to a partner’s basis in its
interest—and certain other tax attributes
that are interdependent with basis
under subchapter K—in order to prevent
effective double taxation or other
distortions.
Specifically, under proposed
§ 301.6225–4(a)(1), when there is a
partnership adjustment (as defined in
proposed § 301.6241–1(a)(6)), the
partnership and its adjustment year
partners (as defined in proposed
§ 301.6241–1(a)(2)) generally must
adjust their specified tax attributes (as
defined in proposed § 301.6225–4(a)(2)).
Specified tax attributes are the tax basis
and book value of a partnership’s
property, amounts determined under
section 704(c), adjustment year partners’
bases in their partnership interests, and
adjustment year partners’ capital
accounts determined and maintained in
accordance with § 1.704–1(b)(2). See
proposed § 301.6225–4(a)(2).
In the case of a partnership
adjustment that results in an imputed
underpayment, the adjustments to
specified tax attributes must be made on
a partnership-adjustment-bypartnership-adjustment basis, and thus
are created separately for each
partnership adjustment (whether a
negative adjustment or a positive
adjustment) without regard to their
summation as part of the determination
of the total netted partnership
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
adjustment in proposed § 301.6225–
1(c)(3). See proposed § 301.6225–4(b)(1).
ii. Manner of Adjusting Specified Tax
Attributes
The partnership must first make
appropriate adjustments to the book
value and basis of property to take into
account any partnership adjustment.
See proposed § 301.6225–4(b)(2). This
rule also requires amounts determined
under section 704(c) to be adjusted to
take into account the partnership
adjustment. The partnership does not
make any adjustments to the book value
or basis of partnership property with
respect to property that was held by the
partnership in the reviewed year but is
no longer held by the partnership in the
adjustment year. Comments are
requested as to whether, in these
situations, a partnership should be
allowed to adjust the basis (or book
value) of other partnership property
(such as in a manner similar to the rules
that apply in allocating section 734(b)
adjustments under section 755 (i.e.,
§ 1.755–1(c))).
Proposed § 301.6225–4(b)(3) provides
that notional items are then created with
respect to the partnership adjustment,
and these notional items are then
allocated according to the rules
described in section (2)(B)(iii) of this
preamble. The items are considered
notional items because their sole
purpose is to affect partner-level
specified tax attributes, and thus they
are not considered to be items for
purposes of adjusting other tax
attributes.
In the case of a partnership
adjustment that is an increase to income
or gain, a notional item of income or
gain is created in an amount equal to the
partnership adjustment. Similarly, in
the case of a partnership adjustment that
is an increase to an expense or a loss,
a notional item of expense or loss is
created in an amount equal to the
partnership adjustment. See proposed
§ 301.6225–4(b)(3)(ii) and (iii).
However, in the case of a partnership
adjustment that is a decrease to income
or gain, a notional item of expense or
loss is created in an amount equal to the
partnership adjustment. Similarly, in
the case of a partnership adjustment that
is a decrease to an expense or a loss, a
notional item of income or gain is
created in an amount equal to the
partnership adjustment. See proposed
§ 301.6225–4(b)(3)(iv) and (v). These
rules have the effect of reversing out the
reviewed year allocation to the extent
necessary to reflect the partnership
adjustment.
Thus, under these proposed
regulations, an adjustment year partner
E:\FR\FM\02FEP1.SGM
02FEP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 23 / Friday, February 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
increases its outside basis for notional
income that is allocated to it. Similarly,
a partnership that determines and
maintains capital accounts in
accordance with § 1.704–1(b)(2)(iv) also
adjusts capital accounts for notional
items. See proposed § 301.6225–4(e),
Example 1. In the case of a partnership
adjustment that reflects a net increase or
net decrease in credits as determined
under proposed § 301.6225–1(d), the
partnership creates one or more notional
items of income, gain, loss, or deduction
that reflects the change in the item
giving rise to the credit. See proposed
§ 301.6225–4(b)(3)(vi).
Under these proposed regulations,
only specified tax attributes are
adjusted. Treasury Department and the
IRS considered proposing broader rules
for adjusting other tax attributes than
those included in these proposed
regulations. Tax attributes are defined in
the June 14 NPRM as anything that can
affect, with respect to a partnership or
a partner, the amount or timing of an
item of income, gain, loss, deduction, or
credit (as defined in proposed
§ 301.6221(a)–1(b)(1)) or that can affect
the amount of tax due in any taxable
year. Examples of tax attributes include,
but are not limited to, basis and holding
period, as well as the character of items
of income, gain, loss, deduction, or
credit and carryovers and carrybacks of
such items. See proposed § 301.6241–
1(a)(10).
Comments are requested as to
whether tax attributes other than
specified tax attributes should be
adjusted, at either the partner or the
partnership level, when the partnership
pays an imputed underpayment.
Specifically, commenters are requested
to address whether guidance should
provide a general rule that partnership
adjustments and notional items are
taken into account as items for all
purposes of Subtitle A, except to the
extent of the partner’s actual tax due.
For example, guidance could provide
that the partner level tax calculation
includes notional items for purposes of
calculating the tentative tax due, but
that for purposes of determining the
ultimate tax due, the partner’s share of
the imputed underpayment would be
subtracted. Alternatively, guidance
could provide a list of tax attributes that
are generally adjusted, and a list of
those that are not.
Specific tax attributes for which
comments are requested include gross
income rules for publicly traded
partnerships under section 7704(b) and
qualified investment entities described
in section 860. Other tax attributes for
which comments are requested include
net operating loss carryforwards, other
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Feb 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
tax accounting under subchapter K, and
those that contain limitations based on
adjusted gross income (for example, the
earned income credit allowed under
section 32, the child tax credit allowed
under section 24). Comments are also
requested as to whether any special
rules should be provided for
adjustments to tax attributes in the
cross-border context, and how those
adjustments should differ, if at all, from
adjustments to tax attributes made in
the domestic context.
These regulations also contain rules to
coordinate the changes to specified tax
attributes made under these rules with
other rules of the Code, including the
rest of the centralized partnership audit
regime. See proposed § 301.6225–
4(a)(4). To the extent a partner or
partnership appropriately adjusted tax
attributes prior to a final determination
under subchapter C of chapter 63 with
respect to a partnership adjustment (for
example, in the context of an amended
return modification described in
proposed § 301.6225–2(d)(2) or a closing
agreement described in proposed
§ 301.6225–2(d)(8)), those tax attributes
are not adjusted under this section. For
example, when a partnership requests a
modification of the imputed
underpayment with respect to a partnerspecific tax attribute (for example, a net
operating loss) by the filing of an
amended return by a partner or by
entering into a closing agreement, the
partner-specific tax attribute must be
reduced to the extent it is used to
modify the imputed underpayment.
The IRS is considering providing in
forms, instructions, or other guidance
that partnerships will be required to
provide information to their partners
about the amount and nature of changes
to tax attributes and any other
information needed by the partners.
iii. Allocation of Notional Items
Under section 704(b), a partner’s
distributive share of income, gain, loss,
deduction, or credit (or item thereof) is
determined under the partnership
agreement if the allocation under the
agreement has substantial economic
effect. Section 1.704–1(b)(2)(i) provides
that the determination of whether an
allocation of income, gain, loss, or
deduction (or item thereof) to a partner
has substantial economic effect involves
a two-part analysis that is made at the
end of the partnership year to which the
allocation relates. In order for an
allocation to have substantial economic
effect, the allocation must have both
economic effect (within the meaning of
§ 1.704–1(b)(2)(ii)) and be substantial
(within the meaning of § 1.704–
1(b)(2)(iii)). If the allocation does not
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4871
have substantial economic effect, or the
partnership agreement does not provide
for the allocation, then the allocation
must be made in accordance with the
partners’ interest in the partnership
under § 1.704–1(b)(3).
Commenters recommended applying
the existing rules in subchapter K,
including section 704(b), in the context
of section 6225. While the basic
principles of section 704(b) remain
sound in the context of notional items,
the unique nature of partnership
adjustments under section 6225 requires
the application of these principles to be
modified. See proposed § 1.704–
1(b)(1)(viii)(a). Specifically, the
allocation of notional items cannot have
substantial economic effect because the
allocation relates to two different
years—while generally determined with
respect to the reviewed year, notional
items are taken into account in the
adjustment year. Thus, the proposed
regulations provide that the allocation
of a notional item does not have
substantial economic effect, but, to
address this issue, further provide that
the allocation will be deemed to be in
accordance with the partners’ interests
in the partnership if the allocation of a
notional item of income or gain
described in proposed § 301.6225–
4(b)(3)(ii), or expense or loss described
in proposed § 301.6225–4(b)(3)(iii), is
made in the manner in which the
corresponding actual item would have
been allocated in the reviewed year
under the section 704 regulations.
Additionally, the allocation of a
notional item of expense or loss
described in proposed § 301.6225–
4(b)(3)(iv), or a notional item of income
or gain described in proposed
§ 301.6225–4(b)(3)(v), must be allocated
to the reviewed year partners that were
originally allocated that excess item in
the reviewed year (or their successors).
See proposed § 1.704–1(b)(4)(xi). As
described in section (2)(B)(iv) of this
preamble, however, these rules require
treating successors as reviewed year
partners.
iv. Successors
While the determination of
partnership adjustments under section
6225 is made with respect to reviewed
year partners, it is the adjustment year
partners that bear the economic burden
(or benefit) of a partnership adjustment.
As noted in section (2)(B)(i) of this
preamble, outside basis adjustments
must be made to avoid effectively taxing
the same item of income twice. While
this concern is clearest when a reviewed
year partner remains a partner in the
adjustment year, the same concern
generally exists when the interest is
E:\FR\FM\02FEP1.SGM
02FEP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
4872
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 23 / Friday, February 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
transferred as the failure to provide
outside basis would result in effectively
taxing the same item of income twice,
just with respect to two different
taxpayers. Thus, these regulations
provide successor rules under proposed
§ 1.704–1(b)(1)(viii)(b) for purposes of
adjusting specified tax attributes,
including outside basis.
A reviewed year partner’s successor is
generally defined as either a transferee
that succeeds to the transferor partner’s
capital account under proposed § 1.704–
1(b)(2)(iv)(l), or, in the case of a
complete liquidation of a partner’s
interest, as the remaining partners to the
extent their interests increased as a
result of the liquidated partner’s
departure. See proposed §§ 1.704–
1(b)(1)(viii)(b) and 301.6225–4(e),
Example 3.
The June 14 NPRM provides that if
any reviewed year partner with respect
to whom an amount was reallocated is
not also an adjustment year partner, the
portion of the adjustment that would
otherwise be allocated to such reviewed
year partner is allocated instead to the
adjustment year partner or partners who
are the successor or successors to the
reviewed year partner. See proposed
§ 301.6225–3(b)(4). Further, this rule
provides that if the partnership cannot
identify an adjustment year partner that
is a successor to the reviewed year
partner described in the previous
sentence or if a successor does not exist,
the portion of the adjustment that would
otherwise be allocated to that reviewed
year partner is allocated among the
adjustment year partners according to
the adjustment year partners’
distributive shares.
A commenter stated that this rule in
the June 14 NPRM allocating a
reallocation adjustment that does not
result in an imputed underpayment
could result in situations in which
partners in a publicly traded
partnership described in section 7704(b)
own units that are not fungible. In
response to this comment and due to
administrability concerns, the Treasury
Department and the IRS reconsidered
this rule and have concluded that it is
appropriate to provide rules in these
proposed regulations relating to any
situation in which a partnership is
unable, after exercising reasonable
diligence, to determine a successor for
a partnership adjustment under section
6225 (not only reallocation
adjustments). These rules require that
the proposed standard in the June 14
NPRM be replaced with a new proposed
regulation. Therefore, these regulations
amend proposed § 301.6225–3(b)(4) by
removing the final two sentences and
provide a rule in proposed § 1.704–
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Feb 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
1(b)(1)(viii)(b)(3) that if a partnership
cannot determine the transferee for a
partnership interest under proposed
§ 1.704–1(b)(1)(viii)(b)(2), the successor
is deemed to be those partners in the
adjustment year who were not also
partners in the reviewed year or
otherwise identifiable as successors to
reviewed year partners, in proportion to
their respective interests in the
partnership.
Comments are requested as to
whether these new proposed rules
would similarly result in issues with
respect to the fungibility of these
partnership interests and, if so, specific
recommendations for the final
regulations to address fungibility
concerns consistent with the centralized
partnership audit regime, the rules of
subchapter K, and the general
framework of these proposed
regulations. Specifically, commenters
are requested to consider how the
successor rules should operate when,
due to the redemption of all reviewed
year partners, there are no identifiable
successors to reviewed year partners in
the adjustment year.
Treasury and the IRS considered other
alternatives to the successor rules in
these proposed regulations, including
allocating notional items only to
adjustment year partners that were
reviewed year partners, either solely in
the amount for which they would have
been allocated the notional item, or
allocating to them (and no other
partners) the full amount of the notional
items. These proposed rules contain
successor rules because that approach
preserves the economics of the partners
that were partners in both the reviewed
and the adjustment year, and also
facilitates any necessary private
contracts between buyers and sellers of
partnership interests. Comments are
requested as to whether an approach
other than successor rules are better
suited to preserving the single-layer of
tax in subchapter K while avoiding
potential for abuse or other
inappropriate tax results.
Comments are also requested as to
how these successor rules should apply
in the case of partnership mergers and
divisions.
Finally, comments are requested on
issues similar to those noted in the June
14 NPRM in section (5)(D)(ii) of the
preamble, namely whether the
allocation of adjustments to a successor
of a reviewed year partner that was a
tax-exempt partner may raise issues
concerning private benefit to a person
other than a tax-exempt partner,
including issues that might affect the
tax-exempt partner’s status under
section 501(c); excise taxes under
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
chapter 42 of subtitle D of the Code or
under sections 4975, 4976, or 4980; or
requirements under title I of the
Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974, Public Law 93–406 (88 Stat.
829 (1974)) as amended (ERISA), such
as the fiduciary responsibility rules
under part 4 thereof. The Treasury
Department and the IRS request
comments from the public on whether
these potential issues may be adequately
addressed in partnership agreements or
whether guidance is needed to address
these potential issues. Any comments
related to title I of ERISA will be shared
with the Department of Labor.
v. Adjusting Specified Tax Attributes in
Certain Circumstances
For certain types of partnership
adjustments, notional items are not
created. Specifically, notional items are
not created for a partnership adjustment
that does not derive from items that
would have been allocated in the
reviewed year under section 704(b),
such as a partnership adjustment based
upon a partner’s failure to report gain
under section 731, a partnership
adjustment that is a change of an item
of deduction to a section 705(a)(2)(B)
expenditure, or a partnership
adjustment to an item of tax-exempt
income. See proposed § 301.6225–
4(b)(4). Nevertheless, in these situations
specified tax attributes are adjusted for
the partnership and its reviewed year
partners (or their successors) in a
manner that is consistent with how the
partnership adjustment would have
been taken into account under the
partnership agreement in effect for the
reviewed year taking into account all
facts and circumstances. See proposed
§ 301.6225–4(e), Example 5.
vi. Special Rules for Outside Basis in
Certain Cases
As noted in section (2)(B)(i) of this
preamble, partners normally adjust their
outside bases for notional items that are
allocated to them. However, in certain
cases, the proposed rules do not provide
for adjustments to outside basis.
Specifically, when a tax-exempt partner
transfers its interest to a partner that is
not tax-exempt (taxable partner)
between the reviewed year and the
adjustment year and the partnership
requests a modification because of the
reviewed year partner’s status as a taxexempt entity, the successor taxable
partner is disallowed a basis
adjustment. See proposed § 301.6225–
4(b)(6)(iii)(B). Without this rule, a
taxable successor partner would have a
basis increase when no imputed
underpayment was paid with respect to
the partner’s share of the partnership
E:\FR\FM\02FEP1.SGM
02FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 23 / Friday, February 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
adjustment. Comments are requested as
to whether this rule should be extended
to rate modifications described in
proposed § 301.6225–2(d)(4) as well. A
basis adjustment is also disallowed
when a reviewed year partner transfers
its interest to a related party in a
transaction in which not all gain or loss
is recognized during an administrative
proceeding under subchapter C of
chapter 63 of the Code (subchapter C of
chapter 63) and a principal purpose of
the transfer was to shift the economic
burden of the imputed underpayment
among related parties. Comments are
requested regarding whether basis
adjustments should be disallowed in
any other circumstances.
vii. Accounting and Allocation of
Partnership Section 705(a)(2)(B)
Expenditures
Proposed § 301.6225–4(c) describes
how the partnership’s expenditure
arising from an imputed underpayment
and any other amount under subchapter
C of chapter 63 is taken into account by
the partnership and its partners. No
deduction is allowed under subtitle A of
the Code for any payment required to be
made by a partnership under subchapter
C of chapter 63 and the amount is
treated as an expenditure described in
section 705(a)(2)(B). See proposed
§ 301.6241–4(a).
For an allocation to have economic
effect, it must be consistent with the
underlying economic arrangement of the
partners. This means that, in the event
that there is an economic benefit or
burden that corresponds to the
allocation, the partner to whom the
allocation is made must receive such
economic benefit or bear such economic
burden. See § 1.704–1(b)(2)(ii).
Generally, an allocation of income, gain,
loss, or deduction (or item thereof) to a
partner will have economic effect if, and
only if, throughout the full term of the
partnership, the partnership agreement
provides: (1) For the determination and
maintenance of the partners’ capital
accounts in accordance with § 1.704–
1(b)(2)(iv); (2) for liquidating
distributions to the partners to be made
in accordance with the positive capital
account balances of the partners; and (3)
for each partner to be unconditionally
obligated to restore the deficit balance
in the partner’s capital account
following the liquidation of the
partner’s partnership interest. In lieu of
satisfying the third criterion, the
partnership may satisfy the qualified
income offset rules set forth in § 1.704–
1(b)(2)(ii)(d).
Section 1.704–1(b)(2)(iv)(i) provides
specific rules for determining whether
an allocation of a section 705(a)(2)(B)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Feb 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
expenditure has substantial economic
effect. Specifically, it requires that a
partner’s capital account be decreased
by allocations made to such partner of
expenditures described in section
705(a)(2)(B). See also § 1.704–
1(b)(2)(iv)(b). Further, under section
705(a)(2)(B), the adjusted basis of a
partner’s interest in a partnership is
decreased (but not below zero) by
expenditures of the partnership that are
not deductible in computing its taxable
income and not properly chargeable to
capital account.
Several commenters addressed how
the partnership’s payment of an
imputed underpayment should be
allocated among its partners and how
the payment should be given effect.
With respect to the payment’s
allocation, commenters recommended
that the expenditure be allocated among
the partners in accordance with their
partnership agreement, subject to the
rules of section 704(b) (including the
regulatory requirements for substantial
economic effect). The Treasury
Department and the IRS agree with the
commenters that the expenditure should
be allocated under section 704. These
proposed regulations contain special
rules for allocating the expenditure
under section 704(b).
With respect to book capital account
adjustments for the imputed
underpayment, commenters
recommended that partners’ capital
accounts be adjusted to reflect the
partnership’s payment of the imputed
underpayment. The Treasury
Department and the IRS agree with this
comment but conclude that because the
expenditure is treated as an expenditure
under section 705(a)(2)(B) pursuant to
the June 14 NPRM (proposed
§ 301.6241–4(a)), existing rules provide
this result.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
have concluded, however, that the
existing rules that determine whether
the economic effect of an allocation is
substantial should be modified to take
into account the unique nature of these
expenditures. When a partnership pays
an imputed underpayment under
section 6225, it has the effect of
converting what would have been a
non-deductible partner-level
expenditure into a non-deductible
partnership-level expenditure. The
proposed regulations provide that an
allocation of the nondeductible
expenditure will be considered to be
substantial only if the partnership
allocates the expenditure in proportion
to the notional item to which it relates,
taking into account appropriate
modifications. See proposed §§ 1.704–
1(b)(2)(iii)(a) and (f), 301.6225–4(c) and
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4873
301.6225–4(e), Example 4. This rule
aligns the economics of the income
allocation (in this case, the notional
income allocation) with the directly
associated imputed underpayment
expense in a manner consistent with the
flowthrough nature of partnerships
under subchapter K. Absent this
substantiality rule in the regulations,
partnerships could inappropriately
allocate expenses to partners in the
adjustment year in a manner
inconsistent with the underlying
economic arrangement of the partners.
These new substantiality rules also
apply to a payment made by a passthrough partner under proposed
§ 301.6226–3(e)(4).
Similarly, for partnerships that do not
maintain capital accounts, the allocation
of the expenditure cannot be in
accordance with the partners’ interests
in the partnership to the extent it shifts
the economic burden of the payment of
the imputed underpayment away from a
partner (or its successor) that would
have been allocated the corresponding
notional income item. However, the
regulations provide that an allocation of
an expense that satisfies the new
substantiality rule and in which the
partner’s distribution rights are reduced
by the partner’s share of the imputed
underpayment is deemed to be in
accordance with the partners’ interests
in the partnership. See proposed
§ 1.704–1(b)(4)(xii). These proposed
regulations do not address the extent to
which the partnership may later reverse
this allocation with a special chargeback
or similar provision. Comments are
requested on this issue.
One commenter recommended rules
specifying that a partner’s contribution
of funds to the partnership for payment
of an imputed underpayment will result
in an increase in that partner’s capital
account. This comment is not adopted
because the existing rules in subchapter
K provide sufficient guidance for this
circumstance. A commenter also
recommended rules addressing the
availability of a corporation’s deduction
under temporary § 1.163–9T(b)(2) for a
payment of interest in respect of an
underpayment of tax. This comment is
not adopted because it is beyond the
scope of these proposed regulations.
The proposed regulations also provide
that in order for an allocation of an
expenditure for interest, penalties,
additions to tax, or additional amounts
as determined under section 6233 to be
substantial, it must be allocated to the
reviewed year partner in proportion to
the allocation of the related imputed
underpayment, the related payment
made by a pass-through partner under
proposed § 301.6226–3(e)(4), or the
E:\FR\FM\02FEP1.SGM
02FEP1
4874
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 23 / Friday, February 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
related notional item to which it relates
(whichever is appropriate), taking into
account modifications under proposed
§ 301.6225–2 attributable to that partner.
See proposed § 1.704–1(b)(2)(iii)(f)(3).
This rule has a similar purpose as the
rule in proposed § 1.704–1(b)(2)(iii)(f)(2)
in that it aligns the economics of these
expenses with the partnership items to
which they relate. Under this rule, an
expense for interest imposed under the
Code will generally be allocated in
proportion to the imputed
underpayment from which it derives.
Also, an expense arising from a
substantial understatement of tax under
section 6662(d) for an imputed
underpayment will generally be
allocated in proportion to the notional
income item to which it relates.
In situations in which the reviewed
year partner is not an adjustment year
partner, the successor rules in proposed
§ 1.704–1(b)(1)(viii)(b) apply to the
allocation of these expenditures. Under
those rules, a partner admitted after the
reviewed year will not ordinarily be
allocated any section 705(a)(2)(B)
expenditure in the adjustment year.
C. Partnership Adjustments That Do Not
Result in an Imputed Underpayment
The June 14 NPRM provides that the
rules under subchapter K apply in the
case of a partnership adjustment that
does not result in an imputed
underpayment. See proposed
§ 301.6225–3(c). Further, proposed
§ 1.704–1(b)(4)(xiii) of these regulations
provides that an allocation of an item
arising from a partnership adjustment
that does not result in an imputed
underpayment (as defined in proposed
§ 301.6225–1(c)(2)) does not have
substantial economic effect but will be
deemed to be in accordance with the
partners’ interests in the partnership if
it is allocated in the manner in which
the item would have been allocated in
the reviewed year under the regulations
under section 704, taking into account
the successor rules described in section
(2)(B)(iv) of this preamble.
3. Provisions Relating to Section 6226
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
A. In General
Section 6226(b) describes how
partnership adjustments are taken into
account by the reviewed year partners if
a partnership makes an election under
section 6226(a). Under section
6226(b)(1), each partner’s tax imposed
by chapter 1 of subtitle A of the Code
(chapter 1 tax) is increased by the
aggregate of the adjustment amounts as
determined under section 6226(b)(2).
This increase in chapter 1 tax is
reported on the return for the partner’s
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Feb 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
taxable year that includes the date the
statement described under section
6226(a) is furnished to the partner by
the partnership (reporting year). The
aggregate of the adjustment amounts is
the aggregate of the correction amounts.
See proposed § 301.6226–3(b).
The adjustment amounts determined
under section 6226(b)(2) fall into two
categories. Under section 6226(b)(2)(A),
in the case of the taxable year of the
partner that includes the end of the
partnership’s reviewed year (first
affected year), the adjustment amount is
the amount by which the partner’s
chapter 1 tax would increase for the
partner’s first affected year if the
partner’s share of the adjustments were
taken into account in that year. Under
section 6226(b)(2)(B), in the case of any
taxable year after the first affected year,
and before the reporting year (that is,
the intervening years), the adjustment
amount is the amount by which the
partner’s chapter 1 tax would increase
by reason of the adjustment to tax
attributes determined under section
6226(b)(3) in each of the intervening
years. The adjustment amounts
determined under section 6226(b)(2)(A)
and (B) are added together to determine
the aggregate of the adjustment amounts
for purposes of determining additional
reporting year tax, which is the increase
to the partner’s chapter 1 tax in
accordance with section 6226(b)(1).
Section 6226(b)(3) provides two rules
regarding adjustments to tax attributes
that would have been affected if the
partner’s share of adjustments were
taken into account in the first affected
year. First, under section 6226(b)(3)(A),
in the case of an intervening year, any
tax attribute must be appropriately
adjusted for purposes of determining the
adjustment amount for that intervening
year in accordance with section
6226(b)(2)(B). Second, under section
6226(b)(3)(B), in the case of any
subsequent taxable year (that is, a year,
including the reporting year, that is
subsequent to the intervening years
referenced in 6226(b)(3)(A)), any tax
attribute must be appropriately
adjusted.
Under the June 14 NPRM, a reviewed
year partner’s share of the adjustments
that must be taken into account by the
reviewed year partner must be reported
to the reviewed year partner in the same
manner as originally reported on the
return filed by the partnership for the
reviewed year. See proposed
§ 301.6226–2(f). If the adjusted item was
not reflected in the partnership’s
reviewed year return, the adjustment
must be reported in accordance with the
rules that apply with respect to
partnership allocations, including under
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the partnership agreement. However,
under proposed § 301.6226–2(f)(1), if
the adjustments, as finally determined,
are allocated to a specific partner or in
a specific manner, the partner’s share of
the adjustment must follow how the
adjustment is allocated in that final
determination.
Section 301.6226–4(b) of these
proposed regulations provides that the
reviewed year partners or affected
partners (as described in § 301.6226–
3(e)(3)(i)) must take into account items
of income, gain, loss, deduction or
credit with respect to their share of the
partnership adjustments as contained on
the statements described in proposed
§ 301.6226–2 (pushed-out items) in the
reporting year (as defined in proposed
§ 301.6226–3(a)). Similarly, partnerships
adjust tax attributes affected by reason
of a pushed-out item in the reviewed
year. In the case of a reviewed year
partner that disposed of its partnership
interest prior to the reporting year, that
partner may take into account any
outside basis adjustment under these
rules in an amended return to the extent
otherwise allowable under the Code.
Unlike the proposed rules under
section 6225 and subchapter K
described in section 2 of this preamble,
under section 6226, all tax attributes (as
defined in proposed § 301.6241–
1(a)(10)) are adjusted for pushed out
items of income, gain, deduction, loss or
credit.
B. Section 704(b)
Section (2)(B)(iii) of this preamble
discusses the general mechanics of
section 704(b). In accordance with the
principles set forth in section 704(b), an
allocation of a pushed-out item does not
have substantial economic effect within
the meaning of section 704(b)(2).
However, the allocation of such an item
will be deemed to be in accordance with
the partners’ interests in the partnership
if it is allocated in the adjustment year
in the manner in which the item would
have been allocated under the rules of
section 704(b), including § 1.704–
1(b)(1)(i) (or otherwise taken into
account under subtitle A) in the
reviewed year (as defined in proposed
§ 301.6241–1(a)(8)), followed by any
subsequent taxable years, concluding
with the adjustment year (as defined in
proposed § 301.6241–1(a)(1)). See
proposed § 1.704–1(b)(4)(xiv).
C. Timing
Under the June 14 NPRM, a reviewed
year partner that is furnished a
statement under proposed § 301.6226–2
is required to pay any additional
chapter 1 tax (additional reporting year
tax) for the partner’s taxable year which
E:\FR\FM\02FEP1.SGM
02FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 23 / Friday, February 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
includes the date the statement was
furnished to the partner in accordance
with proposed § 301.6226–2 (the
reporting year) that results from taking
into account the adjustments reflected
in the statement. See proposed
§ 301.6226–3. The additional reporting
year tax is the aggregate of the
adjustment amounts, as determined in
proposed § 301.6226–3(b) and described
in (3)(A) of this preamble.
A commenter recommended that
adjustments to capital accounts and
basis should be made to the reviewed
year partners in the reviewed year to
prevent distortions. This comment is
not adopted because, in this context,
section 6226 clearly applies to the
adjustment year. These proposed
regulations provide that adjustments to
partnership-level tax attributes are
calculated with respect to each year
beginning with the reviewed year,
followed by subsequent taxable years,
concluding with the adjustment year.
See proposed § 301.6226–4(b).
D. Effect of a Payment by Pass-Through
Partner
These proposed regulations provide
that to the extent a pass-through partner
(as defined in proposed § 301.6241–
1(a)(5)) makes a payment in lieu of
issuing statements to its owners
described in proposed § 301.6226–
3(e)(4), that payment will be treated
similarly to the payment of an amount
under subchapter C of chapter 63 for
purposes of any adjustments to bases
and capital accounts, and accordingly,
the rules contained in proposed
§ 301.6225–4 will apply to determine
any appropriate adjustments to bases
and capital accounts. See proposed
§ 301.6226–3(e). To the extent that the
pass-through partner continues to push
out the partnership adjustments to its
partners in accordance with proposed
§ 301.6226–3(e)(3), the partners
receiving those adjustments will adjust
their bases and capital accounts in
accordance with the guidance provided
in proposed § 301.6226–4.
Comments are requested as to how S
corporations, trusts, and estates that are
pass-through partners that pay an
amount under proposed § 301.6226–
3(e), and their shareholders and
beneficiaries, respectively, should take
these payments into account and adjust
tax attributes.
Special Analyses
Certain IRS regulations, including this
one, are exempt from the requirements
of Executive Order 12866, as
supplemented and reaffirmed by
Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a
regulatory impact assessment is not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Feb 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
required. Because the proposed
regulations would not impose a
collection of information on small
entities, the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply.
Pursuant to section 7805(f), this
notice of proposed rulemaking has been
submitted to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business.
Statement of Availability of IRS
Documents
IRS Revenue Procedures, Revenue
Rulings, Notices and other guidance
cited in this preamble are published in
the Internal Revenue Bulletin (or
Cumulative Bulletin) and are available
from the Superintendent of Documents,
U.S. Government Publishing Office,
Washington, DC 20402, or by visiting
the IRS website at https://www.irs.gov.
Comments and Requests for Public
Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are
adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any
electronic and written comments that
are submitted timely to the IRS as
prescribed in this preamble under the
ADDRESSES heading. The Treasury
Department and the IRS request
comments on all aspects of the proposed
rules. All comments will be available at
https://www.regulations.gov or upon
request. A public hearing will be
scheduled if requested in writing by any
person that timely submits written
comments. If a public hearing is
scheduled, then notice of the date, time,
and place for the public hearing will be
published in the Federal Register.
List of Subjects
26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
26 CFR Part 301
Employment taxes, Estate taxes,
Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income taxes,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR parts 1 and 301
are proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAX
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.704–1 is amended
by:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4875
1. Adding paragraph (b)(1)(viii).
2. Adding a sentence to the end of
paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(a).
■ 3. Adding paragraphs (b)(2)(iii)(f),
(b)(2)(iv)(i)(4), and (b)(4)(xi), (xii), (xiii),
(xiv), and (xv).
The additions read as follows:
■
■
§ 1.704–1
Partner’s distributive share.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(viii) Items relating to a final
determination under the centralized
partnership audit regime—(a) In
general. Certain items of income, gain,
loss, deduction or credit may result
from a final determination under
subchapter C of chapter 63 of the
Internal Revenue Code (subchapter C of
chapter 63) (relating to the centralized
partnership audit regime). Special rules
under section 704(b) and § 1.704–1(b)
apply to these items that take into
account that the item relates to the
reviewed year (as defined in
§ 301.6241–1(a)(8) of this chapter) but
occurs in the adjustment year (as
defined in § 301.6241–1(a)(1) of this
chapter). See paragraphs (b)(2)(iii)(a)
and (f), (b)(2)(iv)(i)(4), and (b)(4)(xi),
(xii), (xiii), (xiv), and (xv) of this section.
(b) Successors—(1) In general. In the
case of a transfer or liquidation of a
partnership interest subsequent to a
reviewed year, a successor has the
meaning provided in paragraph
(b)(1)(viii)(b) of this section. In the case
of a subsequent transfer by a successor
of a partnership interest, the principles
of paragraph (b)(1)(viii)(b) of this section
will also apply to the new successor.
(2) Identifiable transferee partner.
Except as otherwise provided in
paragraph (b)(1)(viii)(b)(3) of this
section, in the case of a transfer of all
or part of a partnership interest during
or subsequent to the reviewed year, a
successor is the partner to which the
reviewed year transferor partner’s
capital account carried over (or would
carry over if the partnership maintained
capital accounts) under paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(l) of this section (an
identifiable transferee partner).
(3) Unidentifiable transferee partner.
If, after exercising reasonable diligence,
the partnership cannot determine an
identifiable transferee partner under
paragraph (b)(1)(viii)(b)(2) of this
section, each partner in the adjustment
year that is not an identifiable transferee
partner and was not a partner in the
reviewed year, (an unidentifiable
transferee partner) is a successor to the
extent of the proportion of its interest in
the partnership to the total interests of
unidentifiable transferee partners in the
E:\FR\FM\02FEP1.SGM
02FEP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
4876
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 23 / Friday, February 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
partnership (considering all facts and
circumstances).
(4) Liquidation of partnership interest.
In the case of a liquidation of a partner’s
entire interest in the partnership during
or subsequent to the reviewed year, the
successors to the liquidated partner are
certain adjustment year partners (as
defined in § 301.6241–1(a)(2) of this
chapter) as provided in this paragraph
(b)(1)(viii)(b)(4). The determination of
the extent to which the adjustment year
partners are treated as successors under
this section must be made in a manner
that reflects the extent to which the
adjustment year partners’ interests in
the partnership increased as a result of
the liquidating distribution (considering
all facts and circumstances).
(2) * * *
(iii) * * *
(a) * * * Notwithstanding any other
sentence of this paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(a),
an allocation of any of the following
will be substantial only if the allocation
is described in paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(f) of
this section: An expenditure for any
payment required to be made by a
partnership under subchapter C of
chapter 63 (relating to the centralized
partnership audit regime), adjustments
reflected on a statement furnished to a
pass-through partner (as defined in
§ 301.6241–1(a)(5) of this chapter) under
§ 301.6226–3(e)(4) of this chapter, or
interest, penalties, additions to tax, or
additional amounts described in section
6233.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Certain expenditures under the
centralized partnership audit regime—
(1) In general. The economic effect of an
allocation of an expenditure for any
payment required to be made by a
partnership under subchapter C of
chapter 63 (as described in § 301.6241–
4(a) of this chapter) is substantial only
if the expenditure is allocated in the
manner described in this paragraph
(b)(2)(iii)(f). For partnerships with
allocations that do not satisfy paragraph
(b)(2)(ii) of this section, see paragraph
(b)(4)(xi) of this section.
(2) Expenditures for imputed
underpayments or similar amounts.
Except as otherwise provided, an
expenditure for an imputed
underpayment under § 301.6225–1 of
this chapter (or for an amount computed
in the same manner as an imputed
underpayment under § 301.6226–
3(e)(4)(iii) of this chapter) is allocated to
the reviewed year partner (or its
successor, as defined in paragraph
(b)(1)(viii)(b) of this section) in
proportion to the allocation of the
notional item (as described in
§ 301.6225–4(b) of this chapter) to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Feb 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
which the expenditure relates, taking
into account modifications under
§ 301.6225–2 of this chapter attributable
to that partner.
(3) Interest, penalties, additions to
tax, or additional amounts described in
section 6233. An expenditure for
interest, penalties, additions to tax, or
additional amounts as determined
under section 6233 (or penalties and
interest described in § 301.6226–
3(e)(4)(iv) of this chapter) is allocated to
the reviewed year partner (or its
successor, as defined in paragraph
(b)(1)(viii)(b) of this section) in
proportion to the allocation of the
portion of the imputed underpayment
with respect to which the penalty
applies (or amount computed in the
same manner as an imputed
underpayment under § 301.6226–3(e)(4)
of this chapter) or related notional item
to which it relates (whichever is
appropriate), taking into account
modifications under § 301.6225–2 of
this chapter attributable to that partner.
(4) Imputed underpayments unrelated
to notional items. In the case of an
imputed underpayment that results
from a partnership adjustment for which
no notional items are created under
§ 301.6225–4(b)(2) of this chapter, the
expenditure must be allocated to the
reviewed year partner (or its successor,
as defined in paragraph (b)(1)(viii)(b) of
this section) that would have borne the
economic benefit or burden of the
partnership adjustment if the
partnership and its partners had
originally reported in a manner
consistent with the partnership
adjustment that resulted in the imputed
underpayment with respect to the
reviewed year.
(iv) * * *
(i) * * *
(4) Certain expenditures under the
centralized partnership audit regime.
Notwithstanding paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(i)(1) of this section, the
economic effect of an allocation of an
expenditure for any payment required to
be made by a partnership under
subchapter C of chapter 63 (as described
in § 301.6241–4(a) of this chapter) is
substantial only if the expenditure is
allocated in the manner described in
paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(f) of this section.
For partnerships with allocations that
do not satisfy paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this
section, see paragraph (b)(4)(xii) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) * * *
(xi) Notional items under the
centralized partnership audit regime.
An allocation of a notional item (as
described in § 301.6225–4(b) of this
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
chapter) does not have substantial
economic effect within the meaning of
paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
However, the allocation of a notional
item of income or gain described in
§ 301.6225–4(b)(1)(ii) of this chapter, or
expense or loss described in § 301.6225–
4(b)(1)(iii) of this chapter, will be
deemed to be in accordance with the
partners’ interests in the partnership if
the notional item is allocated in the
manner in which the corresponding
actual item would have been allocated
in the reviewed year under the rules of
this section, treating successors (as
defined in paragraph (b)(1)(viii)(b) of
this section) as reviewed year partners.
Additionally, the allocation of a
notional item of expense or loss
described in § 301.6225–4(b)(3)(iv) of
this chapter, or a notional item of
income or gain described in § 301.6225–
4(b)(3)(v) of this chapter, will be
deemed to be in accordance with the
partners’ interests in the partnership if
the notional item is allocated to the
reviewed year partners (or their
successors as defined in paragraph
(b)(1)(viii)(b) of this section) in the
manner in which the excess item was
allocated in the reviewed year.
(xii) Certain section 705(a)(2)(B)
expenditures under the centralized
partnership audit regime. An allocation
of an expenditure for any payment
required to be made by a partnership
under subchapter C of chapter 63
(relating to the centralized partnership
audit regime and as described in
§ 301.6241–4(a) of this chapter) will be
deemed to be in accordance with the
partners’ interests in the partnership, as
provided in paragraph (b)(3) of this
section, only if the expenditure is
allocated in the manner described in
paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(f) of this section
and if the partners’ distribution rights
are reduced by the partners’ shares of
the imputed underpayment.
(xiii) Partnership adjustments that do
not result in an imputed underpayment
under the centralized partnership audit
regime. An allocation of an item arising
from a partnership adjustment that does
not result in an imputed underpayment
(as defined in § 301.6225–1(c)(2) of this
chapter) does not have substantial
economic effect within the meaning of
paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
However, the allocation of such an item
will be deemed to be in accordance with
the partners’ interests in the partnership
if allocated in the manner in which the
item would have been allocated in the
reviewed year under the rules of this
section, treating successors as defined in
paragraph (b)(1)(viii)(b) of this section
as reviewed year partners.
E:\FR\FM\02FEP1.SGM
02FEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 23 / Friday, February 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(xiv) Partnership adjustments subject
to an election under section 6226. An
allocation of an item arising from a
partnership adjustment that results in
an imputed underpayment for which an
election is made under § 301.6226–1 of
this chapter does not have substantial
economic effect within the meaning of
paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
However, the allocation of such an item
will be deemed to be in accordance with
the partners’ interests in the partnership
if allocated in the adjustment year (as
defined in § 301.6241–1(a)(1) of this
chapter) in the manner in which the
item would have been allocated under
the rules of this section (or otherwise
taken into account under subtitle A of
the Code) in the reviewed year (as
defined in § 301.6241–1(a)(8) of this
chapter), followed by any subsequent
taxable years, concluding with the
adjustment year (as defined in
§ 301.6241–1(a)(1) of this chapter).
(xv) Substantial economic effect
under sections 168(h) and
514(c)(9)(E)(i)(ll). An allocation
described in paragraphs (b)(4)(xi)
through (xiv) of this section will be
deemed to have substantial economic
effect for purposes of sections 168(h)
and 514(c)(9)(E)(i)(ll) if the allocation is
deemed to be in accordance with the
partners’ interests in the partnership
under the applicable rules set forth in
paragraphs (b)(4)(xi) through (xiv) of
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ Par. 3. Section 1.705–1 is amended by
adding paragraph (a)(10) to read as
follows:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 1.705–1 Determination of basis of
partner’s interest.
(a) * * *
(10) For rules relating to determining
the adjusted basis of a partner’s interest
in a partnership following a final
determination under subchapter C of
chapter 63 of the Internal Revenue Code
(relating to the centralized partnership
audit regime), see §§ 301.6225–4 and
301.6226–4 of this chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
■ Par. 4. Section 1.706–4 is amended by
redesignating paragraphs (e)(2)(viii)
through (xi) as paragraphs (e)(2)(ix)
through (xii), respectively, and adding a
new paragraph (e)(2)(viii) to read as
follows:
§ 1.706–4 Determination of distributive
share when a partner’s interest varies.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(viii) Any item arising from a final
determination under subchapter C of
chapter 63 of the Internal Revenue Code
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Feb 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
(relating to the centralized partnership
audit regime) with respect to a
partnership adjustment resulting in an
imputed underpayment for which no
election is made under § 301.6226–1 of
this chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 301—PROCEDURE AND
ADMINISTRATION
Par. 5. The authority citation for part
301 continues to read in part as follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par 6. Section 301.6225–3 as
proposed to be amended at 82 FR 27334
(June 14, 2017) is further amended by
revising paragraph (b)(4) to read as
follows:
■
§ 301.6225–3 Treatment of partnership
adjustments that do not result in an
imputed underpayment.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) Reallocation adjustments. A
partnership adjustment that does not
result in an imputed underpayment
pursuant to § 301.6225–1(c)(2)(i) is
taken into account by the partnership in
the adjustment year as a separately
stated item or a non-separately stated
item, as required by section 702. The
portion of an adjustment allocated
under this paragraph (b)(4) is allocated
to adjustment year partners (as defined
in § 301.6241–1(a)(2)) who are also
reviewed year partners (as defined in
§ 301.6241–1(a)(9)) with respect to
whom the amount was reallocated.
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 7. Section 301.6225–4 is added to
read as follows:
§ 301.6225–4 Effect of a partnership
adjustment on specified tax attributes of
partnerships and their partners.
(a) Adjustments to specified tax
attributes—(1) In general. When there is
a partnership adjustment (as defined in
§ 301.6241–1(a)(6)), the partnership and
its adjustment year partners (as defined
in § 301.6241–1(a)(2)) generally must
adjust their specified tax attributes (as
defined in paragraph (a)(2) of this
section) in accordance with the rules in
this section. For a partnership
adjustment that results in an imputed
underpayment (as defined in
§ 301.6241–1(a)(3)), specified tax
attributes are generally adjusted by
making appropriate adjustments to the
book value and basis of partnership
property under paragraph (b)(2) of this
section, creating notional items based
on the partnership adjustment under
paragraph (b)(3) of this section,
allocating those notional items as
described in paragraph (b)(5) of this
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
4877
section, and determining the effect of
those notional items for the partnership
and its reviewed year partners (as
defined in § 301.6241–1(a)(9)) or their
successors (as defined in § 1.704–
1(b)(1)(viii)(b) of this chapter) under
paragraph (b)(6) of this section.
Paragraph (c) of this section describes
how to treat an expenditure for any
payment required to be made by a
partnership under subchapter C of
chapter 63 of the Internal Revenue Code
(subchapter C of chapter 63) including
any imputed underpayment. Paragraph
(d) of this section describes adjustments
to tax attributes in the case of a
partnership adjustment that does not
result in an imputed underpayment (as
described in § 301.6225–1(c)(2)).
(2) Specified tax attributes. Specified
tax attributes are the tax basis and book
value of a partnership’s property,
amounts determined under section
704(c), adjustment year partners’ bases
in their partnership interests, and
adjustment year partners’ capital
accounts determined and maintained in
accordance with § 1.704–1(b)(2) of this
chapter.
(3) Timing. Adjustments to specified
tax attributes under this section are
made in the adjustment year (as defined
in § 301.6241–1(a)(1)). Thus, to the
extent that an adjustment to a specified
tax attribute under this section is
reflected on a federal tax return, the
partnership adjustment is generally first
reflected on any return filed with
respect to the adjustment year.
(4) Effect of other sections. The
determination of specified tax attributes
under this section is not conclusive as
to tax attributes determined under other
sections of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code), including the centralized
partnership audit regime. For example,
a partnership that files an
administrative adjustment request
(AAR) under section 6227 adjusts tax
attributes as appropriate. Further, to the
extent a partner or partnership
appropriately adjusted tax attributes
prior to a final determination under
subchapter C of chapter 63 with respect
to a partnership adjustment (for
example, in the context of an amended
return modification described in
§ 301.6225–2(d)(2) or a closing
agreement described in § 301.6225–
2(d)(8)), those tax attributes are not
adjusted under this section. Similarly,
to the extent a partner filed a return
inconsistent with the treatment of items
on a partnership return, a reviewed year
partner (or its successor) does not adjust
tax attributes to the extent the partner’s
prior return was consistent with the
partnership adjustment. For the rules
E:\FR\FM\02FEP1.SGM
02FEP1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
4878
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 23 / Friday, February 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
regarding consistent treatment by
partners, see § 301.6222–1.
(5) Election under section 6226—(i) In
general. Except as otherwise provided
in paragraph (a)(5)(ii) of this section, tax
attributes are adjusted for a partnership
adjustment that results in an imputed
underpayment with respect to which an
election is made under § 301.6226–1 in
accordance with § 301.6226–4, and not
the rules of this section.
(ii) Pass-through partners and indirect
partners. A pass-through partner (as
defined in § 301.6241–1(a)(5)) that is a
partnership and pays an amount under
§ 301.6226–3(e)(4) treats its share of
each partnership adjustment reflected
on the relevant statement as a
partnership adjustment described in
paragraph (a)(1) of this section, treats
the amount computed in the same
manner as an imputed underpayment
under § 301.6226–3(e)(4)(iii) as an
imputed underpayment determined
under § 301.6225–1 for purposes of
§ 1.704–1(b)(2)(iii)(a) and (f) of this
chapter, treats items arising from an
adjustment that does not result in an
imputed underpayment as an item
under paragraph (d) of this section, and
finally treats amounts with respect to
any penalties, additions to tax, and
additional amounts and interest
computed as an amount described in
§ 1.704–1(b)(2)(iii)(f)(3) of this chapter.
(6) Reflection of economic
arrangement. This section and the rules
in § 1.704–1(b)(1)(viii), (b)(2)(iii)(a) and
(f), (b)(2)(iv)(i)(4), and (b)(4)(xi), (xii),
(xiii), (xiv), and (xv) of this chapter must
be interpreted in a manner that reflects
the economic arrangement of the parties
and the principles of subchapter K of
the Code, taking into account the rules
of the centralized partnership audit
regime.
(b) Adjusting specified tax attributes
in the case of a partnership adjustment
that results in an imputed
underpayment—(1) In general. This
paragraph (b) applies with respect to
each partnership adjustment that was
taken into account in the calculation of
the imputed underpayment under
§ 301.6225–1(c).
(2) Book value and basis of
partnership property—Partnership-level
specified tax attributes must be adjusted
under this paragraph (b)(2). Specifically,
the partnership must make appropriate
adjustments to the book value and basis
of property to take into account any
partnership adjustment. No adjustments
are made with respect to property that
was held by the partnership in the
reviewed year but is no longer held by
the partnership in the adjustment year.
Amounts determined under section
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Feb 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
704(c) must also be adjusted to take into
account the partnership adjustment.
(3) Creation of notional items based
on partnership adjustment—(i) In
general. In order to give appropriate
effect to each partnership adjustment for
partner-level specified tax attributes,
notional items are created with respect
to each partnership adjustment, except
as provided in paragraph (b)(4) of this
section.
(ii) Increase in income or gain. In the
case of a partnership adjustment that is
an increase to income or gain, a notional
item of income or gain is created in an
amount equal to the partnership
adjustment.
(iii) Increase in expense or loss. In the
case of a partnership adjustment that is
an increase to an expense or a loss, a
notional item of an expense or loss is
created in an amount equal to the
partnership adjustment.
(iv) Decrease in income or gain. In the
case of a partnership adjustment that is
a decrease to income or gain, a notional
item of expense or loss is created in an
amount equal to the partnership
adjustment.
(v) Decrease in expense or loss. In the
case of a partnership adjustment that is
a decrease to an expense or to a loss, a
notional item of income or gain is
created in an amount equal to the
partnership adjustment.
(vi) Credits. If a partnership
adjustment reflects a net increase or net
decrease in credits as determined under
§ 301.6225–1(d), the partnership may
have one or more notional items of
income, gain, loss, or deduction that
reflects the change in the item that gives
rise to the credit, and those items are
treated as items in paragraph (b)(3)(ii),
(iii), (iv), or (v) of this section. For
example, if a partnership adjustment is
to a credit, a notional item of deduction
may be created when appropriate. See
section 280C.
(4) Situations in which notional items
are not created—(i) In general. In the
case of a partnership adjustment
described in this paragraph (b)(4), or
when the creation of a notional item
would duplicate a specified tax attribute
or an actual item already taken into
account, notional items are not created.
Nevertheless, in these situations
specified tax attributes are adjusted for
the partnership and its reviewed year
partners or their successors (as defined
in § 1.704–1(b)(i)(viii)(b) of this chapter)
in a manner that is consistent with how
the partnership adjustment would have
been taken into account under the
partnership agreement in effect for the
reviewed year taking into account all
facts and circumstances. See § 1.704–
1(b)(2)(iii)(f)(4) of this chapter for rules
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
for allocating the expenditure for an
imputed underpayment in these
circumstances.
(ii) Adjustments for non-section
704(b) items. Notional items are not
created for a partnership adjustment
that does not derive from items that
would have been allocated in the
reviewed year under section 704(b). See
paragraph (e) of this section, Example 5.
(iii) Section 705(a)(2)(B) expenditures.
Notional items are not created for a
partnership adjustment that is a change
of an item of deduction to a section
705(a)(2)(B) expenditure.
(iv) Tax-exempt income. Notional
items are not created for a partnership
adjustment to an item of income of a
partnership exempt from tax under
subtitle A of the Code.
(5) Allocation of the notional items.
Notional items are allocated to the
reviewed year partners or their
successors under § 1.704–1(b)(4)(xi) of
this chapter.
(6) Effect of notional items—(i) In
general. The partnership creates
notional items of income, gain, loss,
deduction, or credit in order to make
appropriate adjustments to specified tax
attributes. See paragraph (e) of this
section, Example 1.
(ii) Partner capital accounts. For
purposes of capital accounts determined
and maintained in accordance with
§ 1.704–1(b)(2) of this chapter, a
notional item of income, gain, loss,
deduction or credit is treated as an item
of income, gain, loss, deduction or
credit (including for purposes of
determining book value). Similar
adjustments may be appropriate for
partnerships that do not determine and
maintain capital accounts in accordance
with § 1.704–1(b)(2) of this chapter.
(iii) Partner’s basis in its interest—(A)
In general. Except as otherwise
provided, the basis of a partner’s
interest in a partnership is adjusted (but
not below zero) to reflect any notional
item allocated to the partner by treating
the notional item as an item described
in section 705(a).
(B) Special basis rules. The basis of a
partner’s interest in a partnership is not
adjusted for any notional items
allocated to the partner—
(1) When a partner that is not a taxexempt entity (as defined in § 301.6225–
2(d)(3)(iii)) is a successor under § 1.704–
1(b)(1)(viii)(b) of this chapter to a
reviewed year tax-exempt partner (as
defined in § 301.6225–2(d)(3)(iii)), to the
extent that the IRS approved a
modification under § 301.6225–2
because the tax-exempt partner was not
subject to tax; or
(2) When the notional item would be
allocated to a successor that is related
E:\FR\FM\02FEP1.SGM
02FEP1
4879
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 23 / Friday, February 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(within the meaning of sections 267(b)
or 707(b)) to the reviewed year partner,
the successor acquired its interest from
the reviewed year partner in a
transaction (or series of transactions) in
which not all gain or loss is recognized
during an administrative adjustment
proceeding with respect to the
partnership’s reviewed year under
subchapter C of chapter 63, and a
principal purpose of the interest transfer
(or transfers) was to shift the economic
burden of the imputed underpayment
among the related parties.
(c) Determining a partner’s share of
an expenditure for any payment
required to be made by a partnership
under subchapter C of chapter 63.
Payment by a partnership of any amount
required to be paid under subchapter C
of chapter 63 as described in
§ 301.6241–4(a) is treated as an
expenditure described in section
705(a)(2)(B). Rules for determining
whether the economic effect of an
allocation of these expenses is
substantial are provided in § 1.704–
1(b)(2)(iii)(f) of this chapter and rules for
determining whether an allocation of
these expenses is deemed to be in
accordance with the partners’ interests
in the partnership are provided in
§ 1.704–1(b)(4)(xii) of this chapter.
(d) Adjusting tax attributes for a
partnership adjustment that does not
result in an imputed underpayment.
The rules under subchapter K apply in
the case of a partnership adjustment that
does not result in an imputed
underpayment. See § 301.6225–3(c).
Accordingly, tax attributes (as defined
in § 301.6241–1(a)(10)) are adjusted
under those rules. An item arising from
a partnership adjustment that does not
result in an imputed underpayment (as
defined in § 301.6225–1(c)(2)) is
allocated under § 1.704–1(b)(4)(xiii) of
this chapter.
(e) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the rules of this section. For
purposes of these examples, unless
otherwise stated, Partnership is subject
to the provisions of subchapter C of
chapter 63, Partnership and its partners
Partnership
basis
Book
Value
Cash .............................
Whiteacre .....................
$2,000
400
........................
$2,000
1,000
........................
$2,000
1,000
........................
Totals ....................
2,400
3,000
3,000
are calendar year taxpayers, all partners
are U.S. persons, and the highest rate of
income tax in effect for all taxpayers is
40 percent for all relevant periods.
Example 1. (i) In 2019, A, B, and C are
individuals that form Partnership. A
contributes Whiteacre, which is unimproved
land with an adjusted basis of $400 and a fair
market value of $1000, and B and C each
contribute $1000 in cash. The partnership
agreement provides that all income, gain,
loss, and deduction will be allocated in equal
1⁄3 shares among the partners. The
partnership agreement also provides that the
partners’ capital accounts will be determined
and maintained in accordance with § 1.704–
1(b)(2)(iv) of this chapter, distributions in
liquidation of the partnership (or any
partner’s interest) will be made in accordance
with the partners’ positive capital account
balances, and any partner with a deficit
balance in his capital account following the
liquidation of his interest must restore that
deficit to the partnership (as provided in
§ 1.704–1(b)(2)(ii)(b)(2) and (3) of this
chapter).
(ii) Upon formation, Partnership has the
following assets and capital accounts:
Outside basis
Book
Value
A
B
C
$400
1,000
1,000
$1,000
1,000
1,000
$1,000
1,000
1,000
........................
2,400
3,000
3,000
(iii) In 2019, Partnership makes a $120
payment for Asset that it treats as a
deductible expense on its partnership return.
Partnership
basis
Book
Value
Outside basis
Book
Value
$1,880
400
0
$1,880
1,000
0
$1,880
1,000
120
A
B
C
$360
960
960
$960
960
960
$1,000
1,000
1,000
Totals ....................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Cash .............................
Whiteacre .....................
Asset ............................
2,280
2,880
3,000
........................
2,280
2,880
3,000
(iv) Partnership does not file an AAR for
2020. The IRS determines in 2021 (the
adjustment year) that Partnership’s $120
expenditure was not allowed as a deduction
in 2019 (the reviewed year), but rather was
the acquisition of an asset for which cost
recovery deductions are unavailable.
Accordingly, the IRS makes a partnership
adjustment that disallows the entire $120
deduction, which results in an imputed
underpayment of $48 ($120 × 40 percent).
Partnership does not request modification
under § 301.6225–2. Partnership pays the $48
imputed underpayment.
(v) Partnership first determines its tax
attribute adjustments resulting from the
partnership adjustment by applying
paragraph (b) of this section. Pursuant to
paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section, Partnership
must re-state the basis and book value of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Feb 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
Asset to $120. Further, pursuant to paragraph
(b)(3)(ii) of this section, a $120 notional item
of income is created. The $120 item of
notional income is allocated in equal shares
($40) to A, B, and C in 2021 under § 1.704–
1(b)(4)(xi) of this chapter. Accordingly, in
2021 Partnership increases the capital
accounts of A, B, and C by $40 each, and
increases A, B, and C’s outside bases by $40
each under paragraph (b)(5)(ii) and (iii) of
this section, respectively.
(vi) As described in paragraph (c) of this
section, Partnership’s payment of the $48
imputed underpayment is treated as an
expenditure described in section 705(a)(2)(B)
under § 301.6241–4. Under § 1.704–
1(b)(4)(xii) of this chapter, Partnership
determines each partner’s properly allocable
share of this expenditure in 2021 by
allocating the expenditure in proportion to
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the allocations of the notional item to which
the expenditure relates. Accordingly, each of
A, B, and C have a properly allocable share
of $16 each, which is the same proportion (1⁄3
each) in which A, B, and C share the $120
item of notional income. Thus, A, B and C’s
capital accounts are each decreased by $16 in
2021 and A, B and C’s outside bases are each
decreased by $16 in 2021. The allocation of
the expenditure under the partnership
agreement has economic effect under
§ 1.704–1(b)(2)(ii) of this chapter and,
because the allocation of the expenditure is
determined in accordance with § 1.704–
1(b)(2)(iii)(f) of this chapter, the economic
effect of these allocations is deemed to be
substantial.
(vii) The payment is also reflected by a $48
decrease in partnership cash for book
purposes under § 1.704–1(b)(4)(ii) of this
E:\FR\FM\02FEP1.SGM
02FEP1
4880
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 23 / Friday, February 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
chapter. Therefore, in 2021, A’s basis in
Partnership is $384 and his capital account
Partnership
basis
is $984. B and C each have a basis and capital
account of $984.
Book
Value
Outside basis
Book
Value
Cash .............................
Whiteacre .....................
Asset ............................
$1,832
400
120
$1,832
1,000
120
$1,832
1,000
120
A
B
C
$384
984
984
$984
984
984
$984
984
984
Totals ....................
2,352
2,952
2,952
........................
2,352
2,952
2,952
Example 2. (i) The facts are the same as
in Example 1 of this paragraph (e), except the
IRS approves modification under § 301.6225–
2(d)(3) with respect to A, which is a taxexempt entity, and under § 301.6225–2(d)(4)
with respect to C, which is a corporation
subject to a tax rate of 35%. These
modifications reduce Partnership’s overall
imputed underpayment from $48 to $30.
(ii) As in Example 1 of this paragraph (e),
Partnership determines its tax attribute
adjustments resulting from the partnership
adjustment by applying paragraph (b) of this
section. Pursuant to paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of
this section, a $120 notional item of income
is created. The $120 item of notional income
is allocated in equal shares ($40) to A, B, and
C in 2021 under § 1.704–1(b)(4)(xi) of this
Partnership
basis
chapter. Accordingly, in 2021 Partnership
increases the capital accounts of A, B, and C
by $40 each, and increases A, B, and C’s
outside bases by $40 each under paragraph
(b)(5) (ii) and (iii) of this section,
respectively.
(iii) However, the modifications affect how
Partnership must allocate the imputed
underpayment expenditure among A, B, and
C in 2021 (the adjustment year) pursuant to
§ 1.704–1(b)(2)(iii)(f) of this chapter.
Specifically, Partnership allocates the $30
expenditure in 2021 in proportion to the
allocation of the notional item to which it
relates (which is 1⁄3 each as in Example 1 of
this paragraph (e)), but it must also take into
account modifications attributable to each
partner. Accordingly, B’s allocation is $16
Book
Value
(its share of the imputed underpayment, for
which no modification occurred), and A and
C have properly allocable shares of $0 and
$14, respectively (their shares, taking into
account modification). Thus, A’s capital
account is decreased by $0, B’s capital
account is decreased by $16, and C’s capital
account is decreased by $14 in 2021 and their
respective outside bases are decreased by the
same amounts in 2021.
(iv) The payment is also reflected by a $30
decrease in partnership cash for book
purposes. Therefore, in 2021, A’s basis in
Partnership is $400 and his capital account
is $1000, B’s basis and capital account are
both $984, and C’s basis and capital account
are both $986.
Outside basis
Book
Value
$1,850
400
120
$1,850
1,000
120
$1,850
1,000
120
A
B
C
$400
984
986
$1,000
984
986
$1,000
984
986
Totals ....................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Cash .............................
Whiteacre .....................
Asset ............................
2,370
2,970
2,970
........................
2,370
2,970
2,970
Example 3. The facts are the same as in
Example 1 of this paragraph (e). However, in
2020, C transfers its entire interest in
Partnership to D (an individual) for cash.
Under § 1.704–1(b)(2)(iv)(l) of this chapter,
C’s capital account carries over to D. In 2021,
the year the IRS determines that
Partnership’s $120 expense is not allowed as
a deduction, D is C’s successor under
§ 1.704–1(b)(1)(viii)(b)(2) of this chapter with
respect to specified tax attributes and the
payment of the imputed underpayment
treated as an expenditure under section
705(a)(2)(B).
Example 4. The facts are the same as in
Example 1 of this paragraph (e), except that
the partnership agreement provides that the
section 705(a)(2)(B) expenditure for imputed
underpayments made by the partnership are
specially allocated to A (all other items
continue to be allocated in equal shares).
Accordingly, in 2021, the section 705(a)(2)(B)
expenditure is allocated entirely to A, which
reduces its capital account by $120, which
has economic effect under § 1.704–1(b)(2)(ii)
of this chapter. However, the economic effect
of this allocation is not substantial under
§ 1.704–1(b)(2)(iii)(a) of this chapter because
it is not allocated in the manner described in
§ 1.704–1(b)(2)(iii)(f) of this chapter. The
allocation will also not be deemed to be in
accordance with the partners’ interests in the
partnership under § 1.704–1(b)(3)(ix) of this
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Feb 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
chapter because it is not allocated pursuant
to the rules under § 1.704–1(b)(4)(xii) of this
chapter.
Example 5. (i) In 2019, Partnership has
two partners, A and B. Both A and B have
a $0 basis in their interests in Partnership.
Further, Partnership has a $200 liability as
defined in § 1.752–1(a)(4) of this chapter. The
liability is treated as a nonrecourse liability
as defined in § 1.752–1(a)(2) of this chapter
so that A and B both are treated as having
a $100 share of the liability under § 1.752–
3 of this chapter. In 2021 (the adjustment
year), the IRS determines that the liability
was inappropriately classified as a
nonrecourse liability, should have been
classified as a recourse liability as defined in
§ 1.752–1(a)(1) of this chapter, and that A
should have no share of the recourse liability
under § 1.752–2 of this chapter. As a result
of the liability misclassification, the IRS
assesses an imputed underpayment of $40
($100 × 40%) resulting from the $100
decrease in A’s share of partnership
liabilities under §§ 1.752–1(c) and 1.731–
1(a)(1)(i) of this chapter. Partnership does not
request modification under § 301.6225–2.
Partnership pays the $40 imputed
underpayment.
(ii) Pursuant to paragraph (b)(4)(ii) of this
of this section, notional items are not created
with respect to this partnership adjustment.
Instead, under paragraph (b)(4)(i) of this
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
section, specified tax attributes are adjusted
in a manner that is consistent with how the
partnership adjustment would have been
taken into account under the partnership
agreement in effect for the reviewed year
taking into account all facts and
circumstances. In this case, no specified tax
attributes are adjusted.
(iii) However, because A would have borne
the economic burden of the partnership
adjustment if the partnership and its partners
had originally reported in a manner
consistent with the partnership adjustment,
the $40 imputed underpayment section
705(a)(2)(B) expenditure is allocated to A
under § 1.704–1(b)(2)(iii)(f)(4) of this chapter.
(f) Applicability date—(1) In general.
Except as provided in paragraph (f)(2) of
this section, this section applies to
partnership taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2017.
(2) Election under § 301.9100–22T in
effect. This section applies to any
partnership taxable year beginning after
November 2, 2015 and before January 1,
2018 for which a valid election under
§ 301.9100–22T is in effect.
■ Par. 8. Section 301.6226–4 is added to
read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\02FEP1.SGM
02FEP1
4881
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 23 / Friday, February 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
§ 301.6226–4 Effect of a partnership
adjustment on tax attributes of partnerships
and their partners.
(a) Adjustments to tax attributes—(1)
In general. When a partnership
adjustment (as defined in § 301.6241–
1(a)(6)) is taken into account by the
reviewed year partners (as defined in
§ 301.6241–1(a)(9)) or affected partners
(as described in § 301.6226–3(e)(3)(i))
pursuant to an election made by a
partnership under § 301.6226–1, the
partnership and its reviewed year
partners or affected partners must adjust
their tax attributes (as defined in
§ 301.6241–1(a)(10)) in accordance with
the rules in this section.
(2) Application to pass-through
partners and indirect partners. To the
extent a pass-through partner (as
defined in § 301.6241–1(a)(5)) pays an
amount computed in the same manner
as an imputed underpayment under
§ 301.6226–3(e)(4)(iii) (paying
partnership), the paying partnership and
its affected partners (as defined in
§ 301.6226–3(e)(3)(i)) or their successors
must make adjustments to their tax
attributes in accordance with the rules
in § 301.6225–4.
(3) Allocation of partnership
adjustments. Partnership adjustments
are allocated to the reviewed year
partners or affected partners under
§ 1.704–1(b)(4)(xiv) of this chapter.
(b) Adjusting tax attributes when an
election under section 6226 is made. For
partnership adjustments that are taken
into account by the reviewed year
partners or affected partners because an
election is made under § 301.6226–1,
each partner’s share of the partnership
adjustments are determined under
§ 301.6226–2(f). Accordingly, the
reviewed year partners or affected
partners must take into account items of
income, gain, loss, deduction or credit
with respect to their share of the
partnership adjustments as reflected on
the statements described in § 301.6226–
2 or § 301.6226–3(e)(3) (pushed-out
items) in the reporting year (as defined
in § 301.6226–3(a)). Similarly,
partnerships adjust tax attributes
affected by reason of a pushed-out item
in the adjustment year (as defined in
§ 301.6241–1(a)(1)), but these
adjustments are calculated with respect
to each year beginning with the
reviewed year (as defined in
Partnership
basis
Book
Value
Asset ............................
$1,200
........................
........................
$1,200
........................
........................
$1,500
........................
........................
Totals ....................
1,200
1,200
1,500
(ii) The IRS initiates an administrative
proceeding with respect to Partnership’s
2021 taxable year (reviewed year) in 2023
(adjustment year) and determines that Asset
should have been depreciated with a 20-year
recovery period beginning in 2021, resulting
in a $75 partnership adjustment that results
in an imputed underpayment. The IRS does
not initiate an administrative proceeding
with respect to Partnership’s 2022 taxable
year, and Partnership does not file an
administrative adjustment request for that
taxable year. Partnership makes an election
under § 301.6226–1 with respect to the
imputed underpayment. Therefore, J, K and
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Asset ............................
$1,275
........................
........................
$1,275
........................
........................
1,275
1,275
1,500
Jkt 244001
$500
500
500
........................
1,200
1,200
1,500
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
with respect to 2022, as an intervening year.
Specifically, J, K and L must increase their
outside bases and capital accounts by $25
each with respect to the 2022 tax year. As a
result, J, K and L each have an outside basis
and capital account of $425 ($400 minus $25
of depreciation for 2023 plus $25 of income
realized with respect to 2021 plus $25 of
income realized with respect to 2022).
Asset’s basis and book value must also be
changed in 2023. Thus, after adjusting tax
attributes to take into account the election
under § 301.6225–1 and taking into account
other activities of Partnership in 2023,
accounts are stated as follows:
Outside basis
Book
Value
J
K
L
$425
425
425
$425
425
425
$500
500
500
........................
1,275
1,275
1,500
partnership taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2017.
(2) Election under § 301.9100–22T in
effect. This section applies to any
PO 00000
Value
$400
400
400
$1,500
........................
........................
Totals ....................
Book
$400
400
400
Value
16:38 Feb 01, 2018
Example. (i) In 2021, J, K and L form
Partnership by each contributing $500 in
exchange for partnership interests that share
all items of income, gain, loss and deduction
in identical shares. Partnership immediately
purchases Asset on January 1, 2021 for
$1500, which it depreciates using the
straight-line method with a 10-year recovery
period beginning in 2021 ($150) so that each
partner has a $50 distributive share of the
depreciation, resulting in an outside basis of
$450 for each partner. Accordingly, at the
end of 2022, J, K and L have an outside basis
and capital account of $400 each ($500 less
$50 of their respective allocable shares of
depreciation in 2021 and $50 in 2022).
J
K
L
L each are furnished a statement described in
§ 301.6226–2 by Partnership reflecting the
$25 income adjustment for 2021. Pursuant to
§ 301.6226–2(e)(6), the statement furnished
by Partnership to J, K, and L also reflects a
$25 income adjustment to the 2022
intervening year.
(iii) Tax attributes must be adjusted to
reflect the $75 pushed-out item of income
that is taken into account in equal shares
($25) by J, K, and L with respect to 2021.
Specifically, J, K and L’s outside bases and
capital accounts must be increased $25 each
with respect to the 2021 tax year.
Additionally, tax attributes must be adjusted
Book
VerDate Sep<11>2014
(c) Example. The following example
illustrates the rules of this section. For
purposes of this example, Partnership is
subject to the provisions of subchapter
C of chapter 63 of the Internal Revenue
Code, Partnership and its partners are
calendar year taxpayers, all partners are
U.S. persons, and the highest rate of
income tax in effect for all taxpayers is
40% for all relevant periods.
Outside basis
Partnership
basis
(d) Applicability date—(1) In general.
Except as provided in paragraph (d)(2)
of this section, this section applies to
§ 301.6241–1(a)(8)), followed by any
subsequent taxable years, concluding
with the adjustment year (as defined in
§ 301.6241–1(a)(1)).
Sfmt 4702
partnership taxable year beginning after
November 2, 2015 and before January 1,
E:\FR\FM\02FEP1.SGM
02FEP1
4882
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 23 / Friday, February 2, 2018 / Proposed Rules
U.S.C.
2018 for which a valid election under
§ 301.9100–22T is in effect.
II. Background, Purpose, and Legal
Basis
Kirsten Wielobob,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2018–01989 Filed 2–1–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[Docket Number USCG–2017–1125]
RIN 1625–AA01
Anchorage Grounds; Saint Lawrence
Seaway, Cape Vincent, New York
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard proposes to
establish at the request of the Saint
Lawrence Seaway Development
Corporation, two separate anchorage
grounds, Carleton Island Anchorage and
Tibbetts Point Anchorage, near Cape
Vincent, New York. The Federal
Anchorage Ground designations will
enable a pilot to disembark a safely
anchored vessel which will help reduce
pilot fatigue, increase pilot availability,
and reduce costs incurred by vessels
transiting the Seaway. We invite your
comments on this proposed rulemaking.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 3, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2017–1125 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
Jason Radcliffe, Ninth District,
Waterways Operations, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone 216–902–6060, email
jason.a.radcliffe2@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Pub. L. Public Law
§ Section
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:38 Feb 01, 2018
Jkt 244001
United States Code
The Coast Guard proposes to establish
two anchorage grounds one in the
vicinity of Carleton Island, New York
and the second near Tibbetts Point, New
York. Each area has historically been
used as an anchorage and the Saint
Lawrence Seaway Development
Corporation, at the request of its
waterway users, has requested each area
to be officially designated as Federal
Anchorage Grounds.
Without this designation, pilots who
anchor a ship in the respective areas are
unable to disembark during sustained
delay periods which hinder compliance
with rest requirements and complicate
pilot availability and logistics for other
vessels. The Coast Guard proposes this
rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C.
471, 1221 through 1236, 2071; 33 CFR
1.05–1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
III. Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard is proposing to
establish two new anchorage areas to be
known as Carleton Island Anchorage
and Tibbetts Point Anchorage.
The Carleton Island Anchorage would
be located just northeast and adjacent to
Carleton Island and Millen Bay. The
boundaries of Carleton Island
Anchorage are presented in the
proposed regulatory text at the end of
this document. The anchorage would be
approximately .75 square miles.
Proposed Carleton Island Anchorage is
primarily intended for use by up-bound
inland or ocean going bulk freight and
tank ships, towing vessels and barges
that need to anchor and wait for the
availability of a Lake Ontario Pilot.
Under this proposed rule no anchors
would be allowed to be placed in the
channel and no portion of the hull or
rigging would be allowed to extend
outside the limits of the anchorage area.
The Tibbetts Point Anchorage would
be located just west and adjacent to
Tibbetts Point and Fuller Bay. The
boundaries of Tibbett’s Point Anchorage
are presented in the proposed regulatory
text at the end of this document. The
anchorage would be approximately 1.5
square miles. Proposed Tibbett’s Point
Anchorage is primarily intended for use
by down-bound inland or ocean going
bulk freight and tank ships, towing
vessels and barges that need to anchor
and wait for the availability of a River
Pilot. Under this proposed rule no
anchors would be allowed to be placed
in the channel and no portion of the
hull or rigging would be allowed to
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
extend outside the limits of the
anchorage area.
Whenever the maritime or
commercial interests of the United
States so require, the Saint Lawrence
Seaway Development Corporation or
their designated representative may
direct the movement of any vessel
anchored or moored within the
anchorage area. The Coast Guard has
ascertained the view of the Buffalo, New
York District and Division Engineer,
Corps of Engineers, U.S. Army, about
the specific provisions of this proposed
rule.
IV. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility.
Executive Order 13771 directs
agencies to control regulatory costs
through a budgeting process. This
NPRM has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
the NPRM has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget, and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
We conclude that this proposed rule
is not a significant regulatory action
based on the location and size of the
proposed anchorage grounds, as well as
the historical automatic identification
system (AIS) data. The impacts on
routine navigation are expected to be
minimal because the proposed
anchorage grounds are located outside
the navigational channel. When not
occupied, vessels would be able to
maneuver in, around and through the
anchorage.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
E:\FR\FM\02FEP1.SGM
02FEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 23 (Friday, February 2, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 4868-4882]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-01989]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Parts 1 and 301
[REG-118067-17]
RIN 1545-BO00
Centralized Partnership Audit Regime: Adjusting Tax Attributes
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains proposed regulations implementing
section 1101 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, which was enacted
into law on November 2, 2015. The Bipartisan Budge Act repeals the
current rules governing partnership audits and replaces them with a new
centralized partnership audit regime that, in general, determines,
assesses and collects tax at the partnership level. These proposed
regulations provide rules addressing how partnerships and their
partners adjust tax attributes to take into account partnership
adjustments under the centralized partnership audit regime.
DATES: Written or electronic comments and requests for a public hearing
must be received by May 3, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Send submissions to: CC:PA:LPD:PR (REG-118067-17), Room
5207, Internal Revenue Service, P.O. Box 7604, Ben Franklin Station,
Washington, DC 20044. Submissions may be hand delivered Monday through
Friday between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to CC:PA:LPD:PR
(REG-118067-17), Courier's Desk, Internal Revenue Service, 1111
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20224. Alternatively, taxpayers
may submit comments electronically via the Federal eRulemaking Portal
at https://www.regulations.gov (REG-118067-17).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the proposed regulations,
Allison R. Carmody or Meghan M. Howard of the Office of Associate Chief
Counsel (Passthroughs and Special Industries), (202) 317-5279;
concerning the submission of comments, Regina L. Johnson, (202) 317-
6901 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document contains proposed regulations that supplement the
regulations proposed in the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-136118-
15) published in the Federal Register on June 14, 2017 (82 FR 27334)
(the ``June 14 NPRM'') and amend the Income Tax Regulations (26 CFR
part 1) under Subpart--Partners and Partnerships and the Procedure and
Administration Regulations (26 CFR part 301) under Subpart--Tax
Treatment of Partnership Items to implement the centralized partnership
audit regime. Furthermore, certain provisions of the June 14 NPRM are
being amended.
1. The New Centralized Partnership Audit Regime
For information relating to (1) the new centralized partnership
audit regime enacted by the Bipartisan Budget Act (BBA), Public Law
114-74 (129 Stat. 58 (2015)) (as amended by the Protecting Americans
from Tax Hikes Act of 2015, Pub. L. 114-113 (129 Stat. 2242 (2015)));
(2) Notice 2016-23 (2016-13 I.R.B. 490 (March 28, 2016)), which
requested comments on the new partnership audit regime enacted by the
BBA; and (3) the temporary regulations (TD 9780, 81 FR 51795 (August 5,
2016)) and a notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-105005-16, 81 FR 51835
(August 5, 2016)), which provided the time, form, and manner for
[[Page 4869]]
a partnership to make an election into the centralized partnership
audit regime for a partnership taxable year beginning before the
general effective date of the regime, see the Background section of the
June 14 NPRM.
2. Proposed Regulations Implementing the Centralized Partnership Audit
Regime
The June 14 NPRM addressed various issues concerning the scope and
process of the new centralized partnership audit regime. Unless
otherwise noted, all references to proposed regulations in this
preamble refer to the regulations proposed by the June 14 NPRM.
Proposed Sec. Sec. 301.6225-1, 301.6225-2, and 301.6225-3 provide
rules relating to partnership adjustments, including the computation of
the imputed underpayment, modification of the imputed underpayment, and
the treatment of adjustments that do not result in an imputed
underpayment.
Proposed Sec. 301.6225-1 sets forth rules for computing the
imputed underpayment, and proposed Sec. 301.6225-2 sets forth the
rules under which the partnership may request a modification to adjust
the imputed underpayment calculated under proposed Sec. 301.6225-1.
The modification rules contained in proposed Sec. 301.6225-2 generally
allow: (1) Modifications that result in the exclusion of certain
adjustments, or portions thereof, from the calculation of the imputed
underpayment (such as a modification under proposed Sec. 301.6225-
2(d)(2) (amended returns by partners), (d)(3) (tax-exempt partners),
(d)(5) (certain passive losses of publicly traded partnerships), (d)(7)
(partnerships with partners that are qualified investment entities
described in section 860 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code)), (d)(8)
(partner closing agreements), and, if applicable, (d)(9) (other
modifications)); (2) rate modifications, which affect only the taxable
rate applied to the total netted partnership adjustment (described in
proposed Sec. 301.6225-2(d)(4)); and (3) modifications to the number
and composition of imputed underpayments (described in proposed Sec.
301.6225-2(d)(6)).
Proposed Sec. 301.6225-3 sets forth rules for the treatment of
adjustments that do not result in an imputed underpayment. In general,
pursuant to proposed Sec. 301.6225-3(b)(1) the partnership takes the
adjustment into account in the adjustment year as a reduction in non-
separately stated income or as an increase in non-separately stated
loss depending on whether the adjustment is to an item of income or
loss. Proposed Sec. 301.6225-3(b)(2) provides that if an adjustment is
to an item that is required to be separately stated under section 702
of the Internal Revenue Code (Code) the adjustment shall be taken into
account by the partnership on its adjustment year return as an
adjustment to such separately stated item. Proposed Sec. 301.6225-
3(b)(3) provides that an adjustment to a credit is taken into account
as a separately stated item.
Proposed Sec. Sec. 301.6226-1, 301.6226-2, and 301.6226-3 provide
rules relating to the election under section 6226 by a partnership to
have its reviewed year partners take into account the partnership
adjustments in lieu of paying the imputed underpayment determined under
section 6225, the statements the partnership must send to its partners,
and the rules for how the partners take into account the adjustments,
including the computation and payment of the partners' liability. If a
partnership makes the election under section 6226 to ``push out''
adjustments to its reviewed year partners, the partnership is not
liable for the imputed underpayment. Instead, under proposed Sec.
301.6226-3, reviewed year partners must pay any additional chapter 1
tax that results from taking the adjustments reflected on the
statements into account in the reviewed year and from changes to the
tax attributes in the intervening years. In addition to being liable
for the additional tax, the partner must also calculate and pay any
penalties, additions to tax, or additional amounts determined to be
applicable during the partnership-level proceeding, and any interest
determined in accordance with proposed Sec. 301.6226-3(d).
Finally, proposed Sec. 301.6241-1 provides definitions for
purposes of the centralized partnership audit regime.
On December 19, 2017, proposed rules (REG-120232-17 and REG-120233-
17) were published in the Federal Register (82 FR 60144) that would
allow tiered partnerships to push out audit adjustments through to the
ultimate taxpayers and provides rules implementing the procedural and
administrative aspects of the partnership audit regime. For proposed
rules regarding international provisions under the centralized
partnership audit regime, see (REG-119337-17) published in the Federal
Register on November 30, 2017 (82 FR 56765).
Explanation of Provisions
1. In General
These proposed regulations provide rules that were reserved in the
June 14 NPRM under proposed Sec. Sec. 301.6225-4 and 301.6226-4. It
also provides related proposed amendments to Sec. Sec. 1.704-1, 1.705-
1, and 1.706-4. Specifically, these rules address how and when
partnerships and their partners adjust tax attributes to take into
account partnership adjustments under both sections 6225 and 6226. The
public provided comments in response to the June 14 NPRM, and some
comments discussed issues relevant to the reserved sections under
proposed Sec. Sec. 301.6225-4 and 301.6226-4, which were taken into
consideration in drafting these proposed regulations.
Because these regulations are supplementing the regulations
published in the June 14 NPRM, the numbering and ordering of some of
the provisions do not follow typical conventions. The Department of the
Treasury (Treasury Department) and the IRS anticipate that these
provisions will be appropriately integrated when both these regulations
and the proposed regulations in the June 14 NPRM are finalized.
These proposed rules are consistent with the policy described in
``The General Explanation of Tax Legislation Enacted for 2015''
(Bluebook), which explained that ``[u]nder the centralized partnership
audit regime, the flowthrough nature of the partnership under
subchapter K of the Code is unchanged, but the partnership is treated
as a point of collection of underpayments that would otherwise be the
responsibility of partners.'' Joint Comm. on Taxation, JCS-1-16,
``General Explanations of Tax Legislation Enacted in 2015'', 57 (2016).
The preamble to the June 14 NPRM announced that the Treasury
Department and the IRS intended to provide additional rules providing
for adjustments to the basis of partnership property and book value of
any partnership property if the partnership adjustment is a change to
an item of gain, loss, amortization or depreciation (i.e., the change
is basis derivative). These proposed regulations, when finalized, will
provide this guidance.
2. Provisions Relating to Section 6225
A. In General
The June 14 NPRM defines a partnership adjustment as any adjustment
to any item of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit of a
partnership (as defined in proposed Sec. 301.6221(a)-1(b)(1)), or any
partner's distributive share thereof (as described in proposed Sec.
301.6221(a)-1(b)(2)). See proposed Sec. 301.6241-1(a)(6). Under the
rules in proposed Sec. 301.6225-1, each partnership adjustment is
either (i) taken into account in the determination
[[Page 4870]]
of an imputed underpayment, or (ii) considered a partnership adjustment
that does not give rise to an imputed underpayment. For a partnership
adjustment that is taken into account in the determination of the
imputed underpayment, these proposed regulations provide rules for
adjusting partnership asset basis and book value, rules for the
creation of notional items, rules for allocating these notional items
under section 704(b), successor rules for situations in which reviewed
year partners (as defined in proposed Sec. 301.6241-1(a)(9)) are not
adjustment year partners (as defined in proposed Sec. 301.6241-
1(a)(2)), and rules for determining the impact of notional items on tax
attributes in certain situations. See section (2)(B) of this preamble.
These regulations also provide rules for the allocation of any
partnership expenditure related to the imputed underpayment. See
section (2)(B)(vii) of this preamble. Finally, these regulations
provide guidance in the case of a partnership adjustment that does not
give rise to an imputed underpayment. See section (2)(C) of this
preamble.
B. Adjustments in the Case of a Partnership Adjustment That Results in
an Imputed Underpayment
i. In General
Prior to the enactment of the centralized partnership audit regime,
in the case of an adjustment to an item of income, gain, loss,
deduction or credit in the context of an examination by the IRS for or
related to a partnership, partnership adjustments were generally taken
into account by the partners of the partnership for the year under
examination by a new or corrected allocation of the relevant item, and
partners took those items into account with respect to the partnership
year under examination. In contrast, under the centralized partnership
audit regime, for a partnership adjustment that is taken into account
in the determination of an imputed underpayment, the partnership
adjustment is generally taken into account by the partnership in the
year in which the related payment obligation (the imputed underpayment)
arises. Further, in light of the fact that these partnership
adjustments are with respect to a partnership year that is earlier than
the year in which the imputed underpayment arises, the partners of the
partnership may have changed in the later year.
Under subchapter K, a partnership generally computes items of
income, gain, loss, deduction or credit under section 703, which are
then allocated to the partners under section 704. Under section 705, a
partner increases its basis in its partnership interest (outside basis)
by its distributive share of taxable income of the partnership as
determined under section 703(a). However, in the case of a positive
partnership adjustment that is taken into account in the determination
of an imputed underpayment, section 6225 does not itself provide for an
item of taxable income under section 703(a) to be allocated to
partners. Instead, calculations are made at the partnership level and
the partnership pays the liability in the form of an imputed
underpayment. Failure to provide adjustments to outside basis that
reflect the partnership adjustments that resulted in the imputed
underpayment could lead to a partner being effectively taxed twice on
the same item of income, once indirectly on payment of the imputed
underpayment and again on a disposition of the partnership interest or
on a distribution of cash by the partnership. Taxing the same item of
income twice is not consistent with the flowthrough nature of
partnerships under subchapter K. Thus, these proposed regulations
provide for adjustment to a partner's basis in its interest--and
certain other tax attributes that are interdependent with basis under
subchapter K--in order to prevent effective double taxation or other
distortions.
Specifically, under proposed Sec. 301.6225-4(a)(1), when there is
a partnership adjustment (as defined in proposed Sec. 301.6241-
1(a)(6)), the partnership and its adjustment year partners (as defined
in proposed Sec. 301.6241-1(a)(2)) generally must adjust their
specified tax attributes (as defined in proposed Sec. 301.6225-
4(a)(2)). Specified tax attributes are the tax basis and book value of
a partnership's property, amounts determined under section 704(c),
adjustment year partners' bases in their partnership interests, and
adjustment year partners' capital accounts determined and maintained in
accordance with Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2). See proposed Sec. 301.6225-
4(a)(2).
In the case of a partnership adjustment that results in an imputed
underpayment, the adjustments to specified tax attributes must be made
on a partnership-adjustment-by-partnership-adjustment basis, and thus
are created separately for each partnership adjustment (whether a
negative adjustment or a positive adjustment) without regard to their
summation as part of the determination of the total netted partnership
adjustment in proposed Sec. 301.6225-1(c)(3). See proposed Sec.
301.6225-4(b)(1).
ii. Manner of Adjusting Specified Tax Attributes
The partnership must first make appropriate adjustments to the book
value and basis of property to take into account any partnership
adjustment. See proposed Sec. 301.6225-4(b)(2). This rule also
requires amounts determined under section 704(c) to be adjusted to take
into account the partnership adjustment. The partnership does not make
any adjustments to the book value or basis of partnership property with
respect to property that was held by the partnership in the reviewed
year but is no longer held by the partnership in the adjustment year.
Comments are requested as to whether, in these situations, a
partnership should be allowed to adjust the basis (or book value) of
other partnership property (such as in a manner similar to the rules
that apply in allocating section 734(b) adjustments under section 755
(i.e., Sec. 1.755-1(c))).
Proposed Sec. 301.6225-4(b)(3) provides that notional items are
then created with respect to the partnership adjustment, and these
notional items are then allocated according to the rules described in
section (2)(B)(iii) of this preamble. The items are considered notional
items because their sole purpose is to affect partner-level specified
tax attributes, and thus they are not considered to be items for
purposes of adjusting other tax attributes.
In the case of a partnership adjustment that is an increase to
income or gain, a notional item of income or gain is created in an
amount equal to the partnership adjustment. Similarly, in the case of a
partnership adjustment that is an increase to an expense or a loss, a
notional item of expense or loss is created in an amount equal to the
partnership adjustment. See proposed Sec. 301.6225-4(b)(3)(ii) and
(iii).
However, in the case of a partnership adjustment that is a decrease
to income or gain, a notional item of expense or loss is created in an
amount equal to the partnership adjustment. Similarly, in the case of a
partnership adjustment that is a decrease to an expense or a loss, a
notional item of income or gain is created in an amount equal to the
partnership adjustment. See proposed Sec. 301.6225-4(b)(3)(iv) and
(v). These rules have the effect of reversing out the reviewed year
allocation to the extent necessary to reflect the partnership
adjustment.
Thus, under these proposed regulations, an adjustment year partner
[[Page 4871]]
increases its outside basis for notional income that is allocated to
it. Similarly, a partnership that determines and maintains capital
accounts in accordance with Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(iv) also adjusts
capital accounts for notional items. See proposed Sec. 301.6225-4(e),
Example 1. In the case of a partnership adjustment that reflects a net
increase or net decrease in credits as determined under proposed Sec.
301.6225-1(d), the partnership creates one or more notional items of
income, gain, loss, or deduction that reflects the change in the item
giving rise to the credit. See proposed Sec. 301.6225-4(b)(3)(vi).
Under these proposed regulations, only specified tax attributes are
adjusted. Treasury Department and the IRS considered proposing broader
rules for adjusting other tax attributes than those included in these
proposed regulations. Tax attributes are defined in the June 14 NPRM as
anything that can affect, with respect to a partnership or a partner,
the amount or timing of an item of income, gain, loss, deduction, or
credit (as defined in proposed Sec. 301.6221(a)-1(b)(1)) or that can
affect the amount of tax due in any taxable year. Examples of tax
attributes include, but are not limited to, basis and holding period,
as well as the character of items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or
credit and carryovers and carrybacks of such items. See proposed Sec.
301.6241-1(a)(10).
Comments are requested as to whether tax attributes other than
specified tax attributes should be adjusted, at either the partner or
the partnership level, when the partnership pays an imputed
underpayment. Specifically, commenters are requested to address whether
guidance should provide a general rule that partnership adjustments and
notional items are taken into account as items for all purposes of
Subtitle A, except to the extent of the partner's actual tax due. For
example, guidance could provide that the partner level tax calculation
includes notional items for purposes of calculating the tentative tax
due, but that for purposes of determining the ultimate tax due, the
partner's share of the imputed underpayment would be subtracted.
Alternatively, guidance could provide a list of tax attributes that are
generally adjusted, and a list of those that are not.
Specific tax attributes for which comments are requested include
gross income rules for publicly traded partnerships under section
7704(b) and qualified investment entities described in section 860.
Other tax attributes for which comments are requested include net
operating loss carryforwards, other tax accounting under subchapter K,
and those that contain limitations based on adjusted gross income (for
example, the earned income credit allowed under section 32, the child
tax credit allowed under section 24). Comments are also requested as to
whether any special rules should be provided for adjustments to tax
attributes in the cross-border context, and how those adjustments
should differ, if at all, from adjustments to tax attributes made in
the domestic context.
These regulations also contain rules to coordinate the changes to
specified tax attributes made under these rules with other rules of the
Code, including the rest of the centralized partnership audit regime.
See proposed Sec. 301.6225-4(a)(4). To the extent a partner or
partnership appropriately adjusted tax attributes prior to a final
determination under subchapter C of chapter 63 with respect to a
partnership adjustment (for example, in the context of an amended
return modification described in proposed Sec. 301.6225-2(d)(2) or a
closing agreement described in proposed Sec. 301.6225-2(d)(8)), those
tax attributes are not adjusted under this section. For example, when a
partnership requests a modification of the imputed underpayment with
respect to a partner-specific tax attribute (for example, a net
operating loss) by the filing of an amended return by a partner or by
entering into a closing agreement, the partner-specific tax attribute
must be reduced to the extent it is used to modify the imputed
underpayment.
The IRS is considering providing in forms, instructions, or other
guidance that partnerships will be required to provide information to
their partners about the amount and nature of changes to tax attributes
and any other information needed by the partners.
iii. Allocation of Notional Items
Under section 704(b), a partner's distributive share of income,
gain, loss, deduction, or credit (or item thereof) is determined under
the partnership agreement if the allocation under the agreement has
substantial economic effect. Section 1.704-1(b)(2)(i) provides that the
determination of whether an allocation of income, gain, loss, or
deduction (or item thereof) to a partner has substantial economic
effect involves a two-part analysis that is made at the end of the
partnership year to which the allocation relates. In order for an
allocation to have substantial economic effect, the allocation must
have both economic effect (within the meaning of Sec. 1.704-
1(b)(2)(ii)) and be substantial (within the meaning of Sec. 1.704-
1(b)(2)(iii)). If the allocation does not have substantial economic
effect, or the partnership agreement does not provide for the
allocation, then the allocation must be made in accordance with the
partners' interest in the partnership under Sec. 1.704-1(b)(3).
Commenters recommended applying the existing rules in subchapter K,
including section 704(b), in the context of section 6225. While the
basic principles of section 704(b) remain sound in the context of
notional items, the unique nature of partnership adjustments under
section 6225 requires the application of these principles to be
modified. See proposed Sec. 1.704-1(b)(1)(viii)(a). Specifically, the
allocation of notional items cannot have substantial economic effect
because the allocation relates to two different years--while generally
determined with respect to the reviewed year, notional items are taken
into account in the adjustment year. Thus, the proposed regulations
provide that the allocation of a notional item does not have
substantial economic effect, but, to address this issue, further
provide that the allocation will be deemed to be in accordance with the
partners' interests in the partnership if the allocation of a notional
item of income or gain described in proposed Sec. 301.6225-
4(b)(3)(ii), or expense or loss described in proposed Sec. 301.6225-
4(b)(3)(iii), is made in the manner in which the corresponding actual
item would have been allocated in the reviewed year under the section
704 regulations. Additionally, the allocation of a notional item of
expense or loss described in proposed Sec. 301.6225-4(b)(3)(iv), or a
notional item of income or gain described in proposed Sec. 301.6225-
4(b)(3)(v), must be allocated to the reviewed year partners that were
originally allocated that excess item in the reviewed year (or their
successors). See proposed Sec. 1.704-1(b)(4)(xi). As described in
section (2)(B)(iv) of this preamble, however, these rules require
treating successors as reviewed year partners.
iv. Successors
While the determination of partnership adjustments under section
6225 is made with respect to reviewed year partners, it is the
adjustment year partners that bear the economic burden (or benefit) of
a partnership adjustment. As noted in section (2)(B)(i) of this
preamble, outside basis adjustments must be made to avoid effectively
taxing the same item of income twice. While this concern is clearest
when a reviewed year partner remains a partner in the adjustment year,
the same concern generally exists when the interest is
[[Page 4872]]
transferred as the failure to provide outside basis would result in
effectively taxing the same item of income twice, just with respect to
two different taxpayers. Thus, these regulations provide successor
rules under proposed Sec. 1.704-1(b)(1)(viii)(b) for purposes of
adjusting specified tax attributes, including outside basis.
A reviewed year partner's successor is generally defined as either
a transferee that succeeds to the transferor partner's capital account
under proposed Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(iv)(l), or, in the case of a
complete liquidation of a partner's interest, as the remaining partners
to the extent their interests increased as a result of the liquidated
partner's departure. See proposed Sec. Sec. 1.704-1(b)(1)(viii)(b) and
301.6225-4(e), Example 3.
The June 14 NPRM provides that if any reviewed year partner with
respect to whom an amount was reallocated is not also an adjustment
year partner, the portion of the adjustment that would otherwise be
allocated to such reviewed year partner is allocated instead to the
adjustment year partner or partners who are the successor or successors
to the reviewed year partner. See proposed Sec. 301.6225-3(b)(4).
Further, this rule provides that if the partnership cannot identify an
adjustment year partner that is a successor to the reviewed year
partner described in the previous sentence or if a successor does not
exist, the portion of the adjustment that would otherwise be allocated
to that reviewed year partner is allocated among the adjustment year
partners according to the adjustment year partners' distributive
shares.
A commenter stated that this rule in the June 14 NPRM allocating a
reallocation adjustment that does not result in an imputed underpayment
could result in situations in which partners in a publicly traded
partnership described in section 7704(b) own units that are not
fungible. In response to this comment and due to administrability
concerns, the Treasury Department and the IRS reconsidered this rule
and have concluded that it is appropriate to provide rules in these
proposed regulations relating to any situation in which a partnership
is unable, after exercising reasonable diligence, to determine a
successor for a partnership adjustment under section 6225 (not only
reallocation adjustments). These rules require that the proposed
standard in the June 14 NPRM be replaced with a new proposed
regulation. Therefore, these regulations amend proposed Sec. 301.6225-
3(b)(4) by removing the final two sentences and provide a rule in
proposed Sec. 1.704-1(b)(1)(viii)(b)(3) that if a partnership cannot
determine the transferee for a partnership interest under proposed
Sec. 1.704-1(b)(1)(viii)(b)(2), the successor is deemed to be those
partners in the adjustment year who were not also partners in the
reviewed year or otherwise identifiable as successors to reviewed year
partners, in proportion to their respective interests in the
partnership.
Comments are requested as to whether these new proposed rules would
similarly result in issues with respect to the fungibility of these
partnership interests and, if so, specific recommendations for the
final regulations to address fungibility concerns consistent with the
centralized partnership audit regime, the rules of subchapter K, and
the general framework of these proposed regulations. Specifically,
commenters are requested to consider how the successor rules should
operate when, due to the redemption of all reviewed year partners,
there are no identifiable successors to reviewed year partners in the
adjustment year.
Treasury and the IRS considered other alternatives to the successor
rules in these proposed regulations, including allocating notional
items only to adjustment year partners that were reviewed year
partners, either solely in the amount for which they would have been
allocated the notional item, or allocating to them (and no other
partners) the full amount of the notional items. These proposed rules
contain successor rules because that approach preserves the economics
of the partners that were partners in both the reviewed and the
adjustment year, and also facilitates any necessary private contracts
between buyers and sellers of partnership interests. Comments are
requested as to whether an approach other than successor rules are
better suited to preserving the single-layer of tax in subchapter K
while avoiding potential for abuse or other inappropriate tax results.
Comments are also requested as to how these successor rules should
apply in the case of partnership mergers and divisions.
Finally, comments are requested on issues similar to those noted in
the June 14 NPRM in section (5)(D)(ii) of the preamble, namely whether
the allocation of adjustments to a successor of a reviewed year partner
that was a tax-exempt partner may raise issues concerning private
benefit to a person other than a tax-exempt partner, including issues
that might affect the tax-exempt partner's status under section 501(c);
excise taxes under chapter 42 of subtitle D of the Code or under
sections 4975, 4976, or 4980; or requirements under title I of the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, Public Law 93-406 (88
Stat. 829 (1974)) as amended (ERISA), such as the fiduciary
responsibility rules under part 4 thereof. The Treasury Department and
the IRS request comments from the public on whether these potential
issues may be adequately addressed in partnership agreements or whether
guidance is needed to address these potential issues. Any comments
related to title I of ERISA will be shared with the Department of
Labor.
v. Adjusting Specified Tax Attributes in Certain Circumstances
For certain types of partnership adjustments, notional items are
not created. Specifically, notional items are not created for a
partnership adjustment that does not derive from items that would have
been allocated in the reviewed year under section 704(b), such as a
partnership adjustment based upon a partner's failure to report gain
under section 731, a partnership adjustment that is a change of an item
of deduction to a section 705(a)(2)(B) expenditure, or a partnership
adjustment to an item of tax-exempt income. See proposed Sec.
301.6225-4(b)(4). Nevertheless, in these situations specified tax
attributes are adjusted for the partnership and its reviewed year
partners (or their successors) in a manner that is consistent with how
the partnership adjustment would have been taken into account under the
partnership agreement in effect for the reviewed year taking into
account all facts and circumstances. See proposed Sec. 301.6225-4(e),
Example 5.
vi. Special Rules for Outside Basis in Certain Cases
As noted in section (2)(B)(i) of this preamble, partners normally
adjust their outside bases for notional items that are allocated to
them. However, in certain cases, the proposed rules do not provide for
adjustments to outside basis. Specifically, when a tax-exempt partner
transfers its interest to a partner that is not tax-exempt (taxable
partner) between the reviewed year and the adjustment year and the
partnership requests a modification because of the reviewed year
partner's status as a tax-exempt entity, the successor taxable partner
is disallowed a basis adjustment. See proposed Sec. 301.6225-
4(b)(6)(iii)(B). Without this rule, a taxable successor partner would
have a basis increase when no imputed underpayment was paid with
respect to the partner's share of the partnership
[[Page 4873]]
adjustment. Comments are requested as to whether this rule should be
extended to rate modifications described in proposed Sec. 301.6225-
2(d)(4) as well. A basis adjustment is also disallowed when a reviewed
year partner transfers its interest to a related party in a transaction
in which not all gain or loss is recognized during an administrative
proceeding under subchapter C of chapter 63 of the Code (subchapter C
of chapter 63) and a principal purpose of the transfer was to shift the
economic burden of the imputed underpayment among related parties.
Comments are requested regarding whether basis adjustments should be
disallowed in any other circumstances.
vii. Accounting and Allocation of Partnership Section 705(a)(2)(B)
Expenditures
Proposed Sec. 301.6225-4(c) describes how the partnership's
expenditure arising from an imputed underpayment and any other amount
under subchapter C of chapter 63 is taken into account by the
partnership and its partners. No deduction is allowed under subtitle A
of the Code for any payment required to be made by a partnership under
subchapter C of chapter 63 and the amount is treated as an expenditure
described in section 705(a)(2)(B). See proposed Sec. 301.6241-4(a).
For an allocation to have economic effect, it must be consistent
with the underlying economic arrangement of the partners. This means
that, in the event that there is an economic benefit or burden that
corresponds to the allocation, the partner to whom the allocation is
made must receive such economic benefit or bear such economic burden.
See Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii). Generally, an allocation of income, gain,
loss, or deduction (or item thereof) to a partner will have economic
effect if, and only if, throughout the full term of the partnership,
the partnership agreement provides: (1) For the determination and
maintenance of the partners' capital accounts in accordance with Sec.
1.704-1(b)(2)(iv); (2) for liquidating distributions to the partners to
be made in accordance with the positive capital account balances of the
partners; and (3) for each partner to be unconditionally obligated to
restore the deficit balance in the partner's capital account following
the liquidation of the partner's partnership interest. In lieu of
satisfying the third criterion, the partnership may satisfy the
qualified income offset rules set forth in Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii)(d).
Section 1.704-1(b)(2)(iv)(i) provides specific rules for
determining whether an allocation of a section 705(a)(2)(B) expenditure
has substantial economic effect. Specifically, it requires that a
partner's capital account be decreased by allocations made to such
partner of expenditures described in section 705(a)(2)(B). See also
Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(iv)(b). Further, under section 705(a)(2)(B), the
adjusted basis of a partner's interest in a partnership is decreased
(but not below zero) by expenditures of the partnership that are not
deductible in computing its taxable income and not properly chargeable
to capital account.
Several commenters addressed how the partnership's payment of an
imputed underpayment should be allocated among its partners and how the
payment should be given effect. With respect to the payment's
allocation, commenters recommended that the expenditure be allocated
among the partners in accordance with their partnership agreement,
subject to the rules of section 704(b) (including the regulatory
requirements for substantial economic effect). The Treasury Department
and the IRS agree with the commenters that the expenditure should be
allocated under section 704. These proposed regulations contain special
rules for allocating the expenditure under section 704(b).
With respect to book capital account adjustments for the imputed
underpayment, commenters recommended that partners' capital accounts be
adjusted to reflect the partnership's payment of the imputed
underpayment. The Treasury Department and the IRS agree with this
comment but conclude that because the expenditure is treated as an
expenditure under section 705(a)(2)(B) pursuant to the June 14 NPRM
(proposed Sec. 301.6241-4(a)), existing rules provide this result.
The Treasury Department and the IRS have concluded, however, that
the existing rules that determine whether the economic effect of an
allocation is substantial should be modified to take into account the
unique nature of these expenditures. When a partnership pays an imputed
underpayment under section 6225, it has the effect of converting what
would have been a non-deductible partner-level expenditure into a non-
deductible partnership-level expenditure. The proposed regulations
provide that an allocation of the nondeductible expenditure will be
considered to be substantial only if the partnership allocates the
expenditure in proportion to the notional item to which it relates,
taking into account appropriate modifications. See proposed Sec. Sec.
1.704-1(b)(2)(iii)(a) and (f), 301.6225-4(c) and 301.6225-4(e), Example
4. This rule aligns the economics of the income allocation (in this
case, the notional income allocation) with the directly associated
imputed underpayment expense in a manner consistent with the
flowthrough nature of partnerships under subchapter K. Absent this
substantiality rule in the regulations, partnerships could
inappropriately allocate expenses to partners in the adjustment year in
a manner inconsistent with the underlying economic arrangement of the
partners. These new substantiality rules also apply to a payment made
by a pass-through partner under proposed Sec. 301.6226-3(e)(4).
Similarly, for partnerships that do not maintain capital accounts,
the allocation of the expenditure cannot be in accordance with the
partners' interests in the partnership to the extent it shifts the
economic burden of the payment of the imputed underpayment away from a
partner (or its successor) that would have been allocated the
corresponding notional income item. However, the regulations provide
that an allocation of an expense that satisfies the new substantiality
rule and in which the partner's distribution rights are reduced by the
partner's share of the imputed underpayment is deemed to be in
accordance with the partners' interests in the partnership. See
proposed Sec. 1.704-1(b)(4)(xii). These proposed regulations do not
address the extent to which the partnership may later reverse this
allocation with a special chargeback or similar provision. Comments are
requested on this issue.
One commenter recommended rules specifying that a partner's
contribution of funds to the partnership for payment of an imputed
underpayment will result in an increase in that partner's capital
account. This comment is not adopted because the existing rules in
subchapter K provide sufficient guidance for this circumstance. A
commenter also recommended rules addressing the availability of a
corporation's deduction under temporary Sec. 1.163-9T(b)(2) for a
payment of interest in respect of an underpayment of tax. This comment
is not adopted because it is beyond the scope of these proposed
regulations.
The proposed regulations also provide that in order for an
allocation of an expenditure for interest, penalties, additions to tax,
or additional amounts as determined under section 6233 to be
substantial, it must be allocated to the reviewed year partner in
proportion to the allocation of the related imputed underpayment, the
related payment made by a pass-through partner under proposed Sec.
301.6226-3(e)(4), or the
[[Page 4874]]
related notional item to which it relates (whichever is appropriate),
taking into account modifications under proposed Sec. 301.6225-2
attributable to that partner. See proposed Sec. 1.704-
1(b)(2)(iii)(f)(3). This rule has a similar purpose as the rule in
proposed Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(iii)(f)(2) in that it aligns the economics
of these expenses with the partnership items to which they relate.
Under this rule, an expense for interest imposed under the Code will
generally be allocated in proportion to the imputed underpayment from
which it derives. Also, an expense arising from a substantial
understatement of tax under section 6662(d) for an imputed underpayment
will generally be allocated in proportion to the notional income item
to which it relates.
In situations in which the reviewed year partner is not an
adjustment year partner, the successor rules in proposed Sec. 1.704-
1(b)(1)(viii)(b) apply to the allocation of these expenditures. Under
those rules, a partner admitted after the reviewed year will not
ordinarily be allocated any section 705(a)(2)(B) expenditure in the
adjustment year.
C. Partnership Adjustments That Do Not Result in an Imputed
Underpayment
The June 14 NPRM provides that the rules under subchapter K apply
in the case of a partnership adjustment that does not result in an
imputed underpayment. See proposed Sec. 301.6225-3(c). Further,
proposed Sec. 1.704-1(b)(4)(xiii) of these regulations provides that
an allocation of an item arising from a partnership adjustment that
does not result in an imputed underpayment (as defined in proposed
Sec. 301.6225-1(c)(2)) does not have substantial economic effect but
will be deemed to be in accordance with the partners' interests in the
partnership if it is allocated in the manner in which the item would
have been allocated in the reviewed year under the regulations under
section 704, taking into account the successor rules described in
section (2)(B)(iv) of this preamble.
3. Provisions Relating to Section 6226
A. In General
Section 6226(b) describes how partnership adjustments are taken
into account by the reviewed year partners if a partnership makes an
election under section 6226(a). Under section 6226(b)(1), each
partner's tax imposed by chapter 1 of subtitle A of the Code (chapter 1
tax) is increased by the aggregate of the adjustment amounts as
determined under section 6226(b)(2). This increase in chapter 1 tax is
reported on the return for the partner's taxable year that includes the
date the statement described under section 6226(a) is furnished to the
partner by the partnership (reporting year). The aggregate of the
adjustment amounts is the aggregate of the correction amounts. See
proposed Sec. 301.6226-3(b).
The adjustment amounts determined under section 6226(b)(2) fall
into two categories. Under section 6226(b)(2)(A), in the case of the
taxable year of the partner that includes the end of the partnership's
reviewed year (first affected year), the adjustment amount is the
amount by which the partner's chapter 1 tax would increase for the
partner's first affected year if the partner's share of the adjustments
were taken into account in that year. Under section 6226(b)(2)(B), in
the case of any taxable year after the first affected year, and before
the reporting year (that is, the intervening years), the adjustment
amount is the amount by which the partner's chapter 1 tax would
increase by reason of the adjustment to tax attributes determined under
section 6226(b)(3) in each of the intervening years. The adjustment
amounts determined under section 6226(b)(2)(A) and (B) are added
together to determine the aggregate of the adjustment amounts for
purposes of determining additional reporting year tax, which is the
increase to the partner's chapter 1 tax in accordance with section
6226(b)(1).
Section 6226(b)(3) provides two rules regarding adjustments to tax
attributes that would have been affected if the partner's share of
adjustments were taken into account in the first affected year. First,
under section 6226(b)(3)(A), in the case of an intervening year, any
tax attribute must be appropriately adjusted for purposes of
determining the adjustment amount for that intervening year in
accordance with section 6226(b)(2)(B). Second, under section
6226(b)(3)(B), in the case of any subsequent taxable year (that is, a
year, including the reporting year, that is subsequent to the
intervening years referenced in 6226(b)(3)(A)), any tax attribute must
be appropriately adjusted.
Under the June 14 NPRM, a reviewed year partner's share of the
adjustments that must be taken into account by the reviewed year
partner must be reported to the reviewed year partner in the same
manner as originally reported on the return filed by the partnership
for the reviewed year. See proposed Sec. 301.6226-2(f). If the
adjusted item was not reflected in the partnership's reviewed year
return, the adjustment must be reported in accordance with the rules
that apply with respect to partnership allocations, including under the
partnership agreement. However, under proposed Sec. 301.6226-2(f)(1),
if the adjustments, as finally determined, are allocated to a specific
partner or in a specific manner, the partner's share of the adjustment
must follow how the adjustment is allocated in that final
determination.
Section 301.6226-4(b) of these proposed regulations provides that
the reviewed year partners or affected partners (as described in Sec.
301.6226-3(e)(3)(i)) must take into account items of income, gain,
loss, deduction or credit with respect to their share of the
partnership adjustments as contained on the statements described in
proposed Sec. 301.6226-2 (pushed-out items) in the reporting year (as
defined in proposed Sec. 301.6226-3(a)). Similarly, partnerships
adjust tax attributes affected by reason of a pushed-out item in the
reviewed year. In the case of a reviewed year partner that disposed of
its partnership interest prior to the reporting year, that partner may
take into account any outside basis adjustment under these rules in an
amended return to the extent otherwise allowable under the Code.
Unlike the proposed rules under section 6225 and subchapter K
described in section 2 of this preamble, under section 6226, all tax
attributes (as defined in proposed Sec. 301.6241-1(a)(10)) are
adjusted for pushed out items of income, gain, deduction, loss or
credit.
B. Section 704(b)
Section (2)(B)(iii) of this preamble discusses the general
mechanics of section 704(b). In accordance with the principles set
forth in section 704(b), an allocation of a pushed-out item does not
have substantial economic effect within the meaning of section
704(b)(2). However, the allocation of such an item will be deemed to be
in accordance with the partners' interests in the partnership if it is
allocated in the adjustment year in the manner in which the item would
have been allocated under the rules of section 704(b), including Sec.
1.704-1(b)(1)(i) (or otherwise taken into account under subtitle A) in
the reviewed year (as defined in proposed Sec. 301.6241-1(a)(8)),
followed by any subsequent taxable years, concluding with the
adjustment year (as defined in proposed Sec. 301.6241-1(a)(1)). See
proposed Sec. 1.704-1(b)(4)(xiv).
C. Timing
Under the June 14 NPRM, a reviewed year partner that is furnished a
statement under proposed Sec. 301.6226-2 is required to pay any
additional chapter 1 tax (additional reporting year tax) for the
partner's taxable year which
[[Page 4875]]
includes the date the statement was furnished to the partner in
accordance with proposed Sec. 301.6226-2 (the reporting year) that
results from taking into account the adjustments reflected in the
statement. See proposed Sec. 301.6226-3. The additional reporting year
tax is the aggregate of the adjustment amounts, as determined in
proposed Sec. 301.6226-3(b) and described in (3)(A) of this preamble.
A commenter recommended that adjustments to capital accounts and
basis should be made to the reviewed year partners in the reviewed year
to prevent distortions. This comment is not adopted because, in this
context, section 6226 clearly applies to the adjustment year. These
proposed regulations provide that adjustments to partnership-level tax
attributes are calculated with respect to each year beginning with the
reviewed year, followed by subsequent taxable years, concluding with
the adjustment year. See proposed Sec. 301.6226-4(b).
D. Effect of a Payment by Pass-Through Partner
These proposed regulations provide that to the extent a pass-
through partner (as defined in proposed Sec. 301.6241-1(a)(5)) makes a
payment in lieu of issuing statements to its owners described in
proposed Sec. 301.6226-3(e)(4), that payment will be treated similarly
to the payment of an amount under subchapter C of chapter 63 for
purposes of any adjustments to bases and capital accounts, and
accordingly, the rules contained in proposed Sec. 301.6225-4 will
apply to determine any appropriate adjustments to bases and capital
accounts. See proposed Sec. 301.6226-3(e). To the extent that the
pass-through partner continues to push out the partnership adjustments
to its partners in accordance with proposed Sec. 301.6226-3(e)(3), the
partners receiving those adjustments will adjust their bases and
capital accounts in accordance with the guidance provided in proposed
Sec. 301.6226-4.
Comments are requested as to how S corporations, trusts, and
estates that are pass-through partners that pay an amount under
proposed Sec. 301.6226-3(e), and their shareholders and beneficiaries,
respectively, should take these payments into account and adjust tax
attributes.
Special Analyses
Certain IRS regulations, including this one, are exempt from the
requirements of Executive Order 12866, as supplemented and reaffirmed
by Executive Order 13563. Therefore, a regulatory impact assessment is
not required. Because the proposed regulations would not impose a
collection of information on small entities, the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) does not apply.
Pursuant to section 7805(f), this notice of proposed rulemaking has
been submitted to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its impact on small business.
Statement of Availability of IRS Documents
IRS Revenue Procedures, Revenue Rulings, Notices and other guidance
cited in this preamble are published in the Internal Revenue Bulletin
(or Cumulative Bulletin) and are available from the Superintendent of
Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20402, or
by visiting the IRS website at https://www.irs.gov.
Comments and Requests for Public Hearing
Before these proposed regulations are adopted as final regulations,
consideration will be given to any electronic and written comments that
are submitted timely to the IRS as prescribed in this preamble under
the ADDRESSES heading. The Treasury Department and the IRS request
comments on all aspects of the proposed rules. All comments will be
available at https://www.regulations.gov or upon request. A public
hearing will be scheduled if requested in writing by any person that
timely submits written comments. If a public hearing is scheduled, then
notice of the date, time, and place for the public hearing will be
published in the Federal Register.
List of Subjects
26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
26 CFR Part 301
Employment taxes, Estate taxes, Excise taxes, Gift taxes, Income
taxes, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Proposed Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR parts 1 and 301 are proposed to be amended as
follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAX
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
0
Par. 2. Section 1.704-1 is amended by:
0
1. Adding paragraph (b)(1)(viii).
0
2. Adding a sentence to the end of paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(a).
0
3. Adding paragraphs (b)(2)(iii)(f), (b)(2)(iv)(i)(4), and (b)(4)(xi),
(xii), (xiii), (xiv), and (xv).
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 1.704-1 Partner's distributive share.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(viii) Items relating to a final determination under the
centralized partnership audit regime--(a) In general. Certain items of
income, gain, loss, deduction or credit may result from a final
determination under subchapter C of chapter 63 of the Internal Revenue
Code (subchapter C of chapter 63) (relating to the centralized
partnership audit regime). Special rules under section 704(b) and Sec.
1.704-1(b) apply to these items that take into account that the item
relates to the reviewed year (as defined in Sec. 301.6241-1(a)(8) of
this chapter) but occurs in the adjustment year (as defined in Sec.
301.6241-1(a)(1) of this chapter). See paragraphs (b)(2)(iii)(a) and
(f), (b)(2)(iv)(i)(4), and (b)(4)(xi), (xii), (xiii), (xiv), and (xv)
of this section.
(b) Successors--(1) In general. In the case of a transfer or
liquidation of a partnership interest subsequent to a reviewed year, a
successor has the meaning provided in paragraph (b)(1)(viii)(b) of this
section. In the case of a subsequent transfer by a successor of a
partnership interest, the principles of paragraph (b)(1)(viii)(b) of
this section will also apply to the new successor.
(2) Identifiable transferee partner. Except as otherwise provided
in paragraph (b)(1)(viii)(b)(3) of this section, in the case of a
transfer of all or part of a partnership interest during or subsequent
to the reviewed year, a successor is the partner to which the reviewed
year transferor partner's capital account carried over (or would carry
over if the partnership maintained capital accounts) under paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(l) of this section (an identifiable transferee partner).
(3) Unidentifiable transferee partner. If, after exercising
reasonable diligence, the partnership cannot determine an identifiable
transferee partner under paragraph (b)(1)(viii)(b)(2) of this section,
each partner in the adjustment year that is not an identifiable
transferee partner and was not a partner in the reviewed year, (an
unidentifiable transferee partner) is a successor to the extent of the
proportion of its interest in the partnership to the total interests of
unidentifiable transferee partners in the
[[Page 4876]]
partnership (considering all facts and circumstances).
(4) Liquidation of partnership interest. In the case of a
liquidation of a partner's entire interest in the partnership during or
subsequent to the reviewed year, the successors to the liquidated
partner are certain adjustment year partners (as defined in Sec.
301.6241-1(a)(2) of this chapter) as provided in this paragraph
(b)(1)(viii)(b)(4). The determination of the extent to which the
adjustment year partners are treated as successors under this section
must be made in a manner that reflects the extent to which the
adjustment year partners' interests in the partnership increased as a
result of the liquidating distribution (considering all facts and
circumstances).
(2) * * *
(iii) * * *
(a) * * * Notwithstanding any other sentence of this paragraph
(b)(2)(iii)(a), an allocation of any of the following will be
substantial only if the allocation is described in paragraph
(b)(2)(iii)(f) of this section: An expenditure for any payment required
to be made by a partnership under subchapter C of chapter 63 (relating
to the centralized partnership audit regime), adjustments reflected on
a statement furnished to a pass-through partner (as defined in Sec.
301.6241-1(a)(5) of this chapter) under Sec. 301.6226-3(e)(4) of this
chapter, or interest, penalties, additions to tax, or additional
amounts described in section 6233.
* * * * *
(f) Certain expenditures under the centralized partnership audit
regime--(1) In general. The economic effect of an allocation of an
expenditure for any payment required to be made by a partnership under
subchapter C of chapter 63 (as described in Sec. 301.6241-4(a) of this
chapter) is substantial only if the expenditure is allocated in the
manner described in this paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(f). For partnerships
with allocations that do not satisfy paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this
section, see paragraph (b)(4)(xi) of this section.
(2) Expenditures for imputed underpayments or similar amounts.
Except as otherwise provided, an expenditure for an imputed
underpayment under Sec. 301.6225-1 of this chapter (or for an amount
computed in the same manner as an imputed underpayment under Sec.
301.6226-3(e)(4)(iii) of this chapter) is allocated to the reviewed
year partner (or its successor, as defined in paragraph (b)(1)(viii)(b)
of this section) in proportion to the allocation of the notional item
(as described in Sec. 301.6225-4(b) of this chapter) to which the
expenditure relates, taking into account modifications under Sec.
301.6225-2 of this chapter attributable to that partner.
(3) Interest, penalties, additions to tax, or additional amounts
described in section 6233. An expenditure for interest, penalties,
additions to tax, or additional amounts as determined under section
6233 (or penalties and interest described in Sec. 301.6226-3(e)(4)(iv)
of this chapter) is allocated to the reviewed year partner (or its
successor, as defined in paragraph (b)(1)(viii)(b) of this section) in
proportion to the allocation of the portion of the imputed underpayment
with respect to which the penalty applies (or amount computed in the
same manner as an imputed underpayment under Sec. 301.6226-3(e)(4) of
this chapter) or related notional item to which it relates (whichever
is appropriate), taking into account modifications under Sec.
301.6225-2 of this chapter attributable to that partner.
(4) Imputed underpayments unrelated to notional items. In the case
of an imputed underpayment that results from a partnership adjustment
for which no notional items are created under Sec. 301.6225-4(b)(2) of
this chapter, the expenditure must be allocated to the reviewed year
partner (or its successor, as defined in paragraph (b)(1)(viii)(b) of
this section) that would have borne the economic benefit or burden of
the partnership adjustment if the partnership and its partners had
originally reported in a manner consistent with the partnership
adjustment that resulted in the imputed underpayment with respect to
the reviewed year.
(iv) * * *
(i) * * *
(4) Certain expenditures under the centralized partnership audit
regime. Notwithstanding paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(i)(1) of this section, the
economic effect of an allocation of an expenditure for any payment
required to be made by a partnership under subchapter C of chapter 63
(as described in Sec. 301.6241-4(a) of this chapter) is substantial
only if the expenditure is allocated in the manner described in
paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(f) of this section. For partnerships with
allocations that do not satisfy paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section,
see paragraph (b)(4)(xii) of this section.
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(xi) Notional items under the centralized partnership audit regime.
An allocation of a notional item (as described in Sec. 301.6225-4(b)
of this chapter) does not have substantial economic effect within the
meaning of paragraph (b)(2) of this section. However, the allocation of
a notional item of income or gain described in Sec. 301.6225-
4(b)(1)(ii) of this chapter, or expense or loss described in Sec.
301.6225-4(b)(1)(iii) of this chapter, will be deemed to be in
accordance with the partners' interests in the partnership if the
notional item is allocated in the manner in which the corresponding
actual item would have been allocated in the reviewed year under the
rules of this section, treating successors (as defined in paragraph
(b)(1)(viii)(b) of this section) as reviewed year partners.
Additionally, the allocation of a notional item of expense or loss
described in Sec. 301.6225-4(b)(3)(iv) of this chapter, or a notional
item of income or gain described in Sec. 301.6225-4(b)(3)(v) of this
chapter, will be deemed to be in accordance with the partners'
interests in the partnership if the notional item is allocated to the
reviewed year partners (or their successors as defined in paragraph
(b)(1)(viii)(b) of this section) in the manner in which the excess item
was allocated in the reviewed year.
(xii) Certain section 705(a)(2)(B) expenditures under the
centralized partnership audit regime. An allocation of an expenditure
for any payment required to be made by a partnership under subchapter C
of chapter 63 (relating to the centralized partnership audit regime and
as described in Sec. 301.6241-4(a) of this chapter) will be deemed to
be in accordance with the partners' interests in the partnership, as
provided in paragraph (b)(3) of this section, only if the expenditure
is allocated in the manner described in paragraph (b)(2)(iii)(f) of
this section and if the partners' distribution rights are reduced by
the partners' shares of the imputed underpayment.
(xiii) Partnership adjustments that do not result in an imputed
underpayment under the centralized partnership audit regime. An
allocation of an item arising from a partnership adjustment that does
not result in an imputed underpayment (as defined in Sec. 301.6225-
1(c)(2) of this chapter) does not have substantial economic effect
within the meaning of paragraph (b)(2) of this section. However, the
allocation of such an item will be deemed to be in accordance with the
partners' interests in the partnership if allocated in the manner in
which the item would have been allocated in the reviewed year under the
rules of this section, treating successors as defined in paragraph
(b)(1)(viii)(b) of this section as reviewed year partners.
[[Page 4877]]
(xiv) Partnership adjustments subject to an election under section
6226. An allocation of an item arising from a partnership adjustment
that results in an imputed underpayment for which an election is made
under Sec. 301.6226-1 of this chapter does not have substantial
economic effect within the meaning of paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
However, the allocation of such an item will be deemed to be in
accordance with the partners' interests in the partnership if allocated
in the adjustment year (as defined in Sec. 301.6241-1(a)(1) of this
chapter) in the manner in which the item would have been allocated
under the rules of this section (or otherwise taken into account under
subtitle A of the Code) in the reviewed year (as defined in Sec.
301.6241-1(a)(8) of this chapter), followed by any subsequent taxable
years, concluding with the adjustment year (as defined in Sec.
301.6241-1(a)(1) of this chapter).
(xv) Substantial economic effect under sections 168(h) and
514(c)(9)(E)(i)(ll). An allocation described in paragraphs (b)(4)(xi)
through (xiv) of this section will be deemed to have substantial
economic effect for purposes of sections 168(h) and 514(c)(9)(E)(i)(ll)
if the allocation is deemed to be in accordance with the partners'
interests in the partnership under the applicable rules set forth in
paragraphs (b)(4)(xi) through (xiv) of this section.
* * * * *
0
Par. 3. Section 1.705-1 is amended by adding paragraph (a)(10) to read
as follows:
Sec. 1.705-1 Determination of basis of partner's interest.
(a) * * *
(10) For rules relating to determining the adjusted basis of a
partner's interest in a partnership following a final determination
under subchapter C of chapter 63 of the Internal Revenue Code (relating
to the centralized partnership audit regime), see Sec. Sec. 301.6225-4
and 301.6226-4 of this chapter.
* * * * *
0
Par. 4. Section 1.706-4 is amended by redesignating paragraphs
(e)(2)(viii) through (xi) as paragraphs (e)(2)(ix) through (xii),
respectively, and adding a new paragraph (e)(2)(viii) to read as
follows:
Sec. 1.706-4 Determination of distributive share when a partner's
interest varies.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(2) * * *
(viii) Any item arising from a final determination under subchapter
C of chapter 63 of the Internal Revenue Code (relating to the
centralized partnership audit regime) with respect to a partnership
adjustment resulting in an imputed underpayment for which no election
is made under Sec. 301.6226-1 of this chapter.
* * * * *
PART 301--PROCEDURE AND ADMINISTRATION
0
Par. 5. The authority citation for part 301 continues to read in part
as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
0
Par 6. Section 301.6225-3 as proposed to be amended at 82 FR 27334
(June 14, 2017) is further amended by revising paragraph (b)(4) to read
as follows:
Sec. 301.6225-3 Treatment of partnership adjustments that do not
result in an imputed underpayment.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) Reallocation adjustments. A partnership adjustment that does
not result in an imputed underpayment pursuant to Sec.
[thinsp]301.6225-1(c)(2)(i) is taken into account by the partnership in
the adjustment year as a separately stated item or a non-separately
stated item, as required by section 702. The portion of an adjustment
allocated under this paragraph (b)(4) is allocated to adjustment year
partners (as defined in Sec. 301.6241-1(a)(2)) who are also reviewed
year partners (as defined in Sec. [thinsp]301.6241-1(a)(9)) with
respect to whom the amount was reallocated.
* * * * *
Par. 7. Section 301.6225-4 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 301.6225-4 Effect of a partnership adjustment on specified tax
attributes of partnerships and their partners.
(a) Adjustments to specified tax attributes--(1) In general. When
there is a partnership adjustment (as defined in Sec. 301.6241-
1(a)(6)), the partnership and its adjustment year partners (as defined
in Sec. 301.6241-1(a)(2)) generally must adjust their specified tax
attributes (as defined in paragraph (a)(2) of this section) in
accordance with the rules in this section. For a partnership adjustment
that results in an imputed underpayment (as defined in Sec. 301.6241-
1(a)(3)), specified tax attributes are generally adjusted by making
appropriate adjustments to the book value and basis of partnership
property under paragraph (b)(2) of this section, creating notional
items based on the partnership adjustment under paragraph (b)(3) of
this section, allocating those notional items as described in paragraph
(b)(5) of this section, and determining the effect of those notional
items for the partnership and its reviewed year partners (as defined in
Sec. 301.6241-1(a)(9)) or their successors (as defined in Sec. 1.704-
1(b)(1)(viii)(b) of this chapter) under paragraph (b)(6) of this
section. Paragraph (c) of this section describes how to treat an
expenditure for any payment required to be made by a partnership under
subchapter C of chapter 63 of the Internal Revenue Code (subchapter C
of chapter 63) including any imputed underpayment. Paragraph (d) of
this section describes adjustments to tax attributes in the case of a
partnership adjustment that does not result in an imputed underpayment
(as described in Sec. 301.6225-1(c)(2)).
(2) Specified tax attributes. Specified tax attributes are the tax
basis and book value of a partnership's property, amounts determined
under section 704(c), adjustment year partners' bases in their
partnership interests, and adjustment year partners' capital accounts
determined and maintained in accordance with Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2) of
this chapter.
(3) Timing. Adjustments to specified tax attributes under this
section are made in the adjustment year (as defined in Sec. 301.6241-
1(a)(1)). Thus, to the extent that an adjustment to a specified tax
attribute under this section is reflected on a federal tax return, the
partnership adjustment is generally first reflected on any return filed
with respect to the adjustment year.
(4) Effect of other sections. The determination of specified tax
attributes under this section is not conclusive as to tax attributes
determined under other sections of the Internal Revenue Code (Code),
including the centralized partnership audit regime. For example, a
partnership that files an administrative adjustment request (AAR) under
section 6227 adjusts tax attributes as appropriate. Further, to the
extent a partner or partnership appropriately adjusted tax attributes
prior to a final determination under subchapter C of chapter 63 with
respect to a partnership adjustment (for example, in the context of an
amended return modification described in Sec. 301.6225-2(d)(2) or a
closing agreement described in Sec. 301.6225-2(d)(8)), those tax
attributes are not adjusted under this section. Similarly, to the
extent a partner filed a return inconsistent with the treatment of
items on a partnership return, a reviewed year partner (or its
successor) does not adjust tax attributes to the extent the partner's
prior return was consistent with the partnership adjustment. For the
rules
[[Page 4878]]
regarding consistent treatment by partners, see Sec. 301.6222-1.
(5) Election under section 6226--(i) In general. Except as
otherwise provided in paragraph (a)(5)(ii) of this section, tax
attributes are adjusted for a partnership adjustment that results in an
imputed underpayment with respect to which an election is made under
Sec. 301.6226-1 in accordance with Sec. 301.6226-4, and not the rules
of this section.
(ii) Pass-through partners and indirect partners. A pass-through
partner (as defined in Sec. 301.6241-1(a)(5)) that is a partnership
and pays an amount under Sec. 301.6226-3(e)(4) treats its share of
each partnership adjustment reflected on the relevant statement as a
partnership adjustment described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section,
treats the amount computed in the same manner as an imputed
underpayment under Sec. 301.6226-3(e)(4)(iii) as an imputed
underpayment determined under Sec. 301.6225-1 for purposes of Sec.
1.704-1(b)(2)(iii)(a) and (f) of this chapter, treats items arising
from an adjustment that does not result in an imputed underpayment as
an item under paragraph (d) of this section, and finally treats amounts
with respect to any penalties, additions to tax, and additional amounts
and interest computed as an amount described in Sec. 1.704-
1(b)(2)(iii)(f)(3) of this chapter.
(6) Reflection of economic arrangement. This section and the rules
in Sec. 1.704-1(b)(1)(viii), (b)(2)(iii)(a) and (f), (b)(2)(iv)(i)(4),
and (b)(4)(xi), (xii), (xiii), (xiv), and (xv) of this chapter must be
interpreted in a manner that reflects the economic arrangement of the
parties and the principles of subchapter K of the Code, taking into
account the rules of the centralized partnership audit regime.
(b) Adjusting specified tax attributes in the case of a partnership
adjustment that results in an imputed underpayment--(1) In general.
This paragraph (b) applies with respect to each partnership adjustment
that was taken into account in the calculation of the imputed
underpayment under Sec. 301.6225-1(c).
(2) Book value and basis of partnership property--Partnership-level
specified tax attributes must be adjusted under this paragraph (b)(2).
Specifically, the partnership must make appropriate adjustments to the
book value and basis of property to take into account any partnership
adjustment. No adjustments are made with respect to property that was
held by the partnership in the reviewed year but is no longer held by
the partnership in the adjustment year. Amounts determined under
section 704(c) must also be adjusted to take into account the
partnership adjustment.
(3) Creation of notional items based on partnership adjustment--(i)
In general. In order to give appropriate effect to each partnership
adjustment for partner-level specified tax attributes, notional items
are created with respect to each partnership adjustment, except as
provided in paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
(ii) Increase in income or gain. In the case of a partnership
adjustment that is an increase to income or gain, a notional item of
income or gain is created in an amount equal to the partnership
adjustment.
(iii) Increase in expense or loss. In the case of a partnership
adjustment that is an increase to an expense or a loss, a notional item
of an expense or loss is created in an amount equal to the partnership
adjustment.
(iv) Decrease in income or gain. In the case of a partnership
adjustment that is a decrease to income or gain, a notional item of
expense or loss is created in an amount equal to the partnership
adjustment.
(v) Decrease in expense or loss. In the case of a partnership
adjustment that is a decrease to an expense or to a loss, a notional
item of income or gain is created in an amount equal to the partnership
adjustment.
(vi) Credits. If a partnership adjustment reflects a net increase
or net decrease in credits as determined under Sec. 301.6225-1(d), the
partnership may have one or more notional items of income, gain, loss,
or deduction that reflects the change in the item that gives rise to
the credit, and those items are treated as items in paragraph
(b)(3)(ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) of this section. For example, if a
partnership adjustment is to a credit, a notional item of deduction may
be created when appropriate. See section 280C.
(4) Situations in which notional items are not created--(i) In
general. In the case of a partnership adjustment described in this
paragraph (b)(4), or when the creation of a notional item would
duplicate a specified tax attribute or an actual item already taken
into account, notional items are not created. Nevertheless, in these
situations specified tax attributes are adjusted for the partnership
and its reviewed year partners or their successors (as defined in Sec.
1.704-1(b)(i)(viii)(b) of this chapter) in a manner that is consistent
with how the partnership adjustment would have been taken into account
under the partnership agreement in effect for the reviewed year taking
into account all facts and circumstances. See Sec. 1.704-
1(b)(2)(iii)(f)(4) of this chapter for rules for allocating the
expenditure for an imputed underpayment in these circumstances.
(ii) Adjustments for non-section 704(b) items. Notional items are
not created for a partnership adjustment that does not derive from
items that would have been allocated in the reviewed year under section
704(b). See paragraph (e) of this section, Example 5.
(iii) Section 705(a)(2)(B) expenditures. Notional items are not
created for a partnership adjustment that is a change of an item of
deduction to a section 705(a)(2)(B) expenditure.
(iv) Tax-exempt income. Notional items are not created for a
partnership adjustment to an item of income of a partnership exempt
from tax under subtitle A of the Code.
(5) Allocation of the notional items. Notional items are allocated
to the reviewed year partners or their successors under Sec. 1.704-
1(b)(4)(xi) of this chapter.
(6) Effect of notional items--(i) In general. The partnership
creates notional items of income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit in
order to make appropriate adjustments to specified tax attributes. See
paragraph (e) of this section, Example 1.
(ii) Partner capital accounts. For purposes of capital accounts
determined and maintained in accordance with Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2) of
this chapter, a notional item of income, gain, loss, deduction or
credit is treated as an item of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit
(including for purposes of determining book value). Similar adjustments
may be appropriate for partnerships that do not determine and maintain
capital accounts in accordance with Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2) of this
chapter.
(iii) Partner's basis in its interest--(A) In general. Except as
otherwise provided, the basis of a partner's interest in a partnership
is adjusted (but not below zero) to reflect any notional item allocated
to the partner by treating the notional item as an item described in
section 705(a).
(B) Special basis rules. The basis of a partner's interest in a
partnership is not adjusted for any notional items allocated to the
partner--
(1) When a partner that is not a tax-exempt entity (as defined in
Sec. 301.6225-2(d)(3)(iii)) is a successor under Sec. 1.704-
1(b)(1)(viii)(b) of this chapter to a reviewed year tax-exempt partner
(as defined in Sec. 301.6225-2(d)(3)(iii)), to the extent that the IRS
approved a modification under Sec. 301.6225-2 because the tax-exempt
partner was not subject to tax; or
(2) When the notional item would be allocated to a successor that
is related
[[Page 4879]]
(within the meaning of sections 267(b) or 707(b)) to the reviewed year
partner, the successor acquired its interest from the reviewed year
partner in a transaction (or series of transactions) in which not all
gain or loss is recognized during an administrative adjustment
proceeding with respect to the partnership's reviewed year under
subchapter C of chapter 63, and a principal purpose of the interest
transfer (or transfers) was to shift the economic burden of the imputed
underpayment among the related parties.
(c) Determining a partner's share of an expenditure for any payment
required to be made by a partnership under subchapter C of chapter 63.
Payment by a partnership of any amount required to be paid under
subchapter C of chapter 63 as described in Sec. 301.6241-4(a) is
treated as an expenditure described in section 705(a)(2)(B). Rules for
determining whether the economic effect of an allocation of these
expenses is substantial are provided in Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(iii)(f) of
this chapter and rules for determining whether an allocation of these
expenses is deemed to be in accordance with the partners' interests in
the partnership are provided in Sec. 1.704-1(b)(4)(xii) of this
chapter.
(d) Adjusting tax attributes for a partnership adjustment that does
not result in an imputed underpayment. The rules under subchapter K
apply in the case of a partnership adjustment that does not result in
an imputed underpayment. See Sec. 301.6225-3(c). Accordingly, tax
attributes (as defined in Sec. 301.6241-1(a)(10)) are adjusted under
those rules. An item arising from a partnership adjustment that does
not result in an imputed underpayment (as defined in Sec. 301.6225-
1(c)(2)) is allocated under Sec. 1.704-1(b)(4)(xiii) of this chapter.
(e) Examples. The following examples illustrate the rules of this
section. For purposes of these examples, unless otherwise stated,
Partnership is subject to the provisions of subchapter C of chapter 63,
Partnership and its partners are calendar year taxpayers, all partners
are U.S. persons, and the highest rate of income tax in effect for all
taxpayers is 40 percent for all relevant periods.
Example 1. (i) In 2019, A, B, and C are individuals that form
Partnership. A contributes Whiteacre, which is unimproved land with
an adjusted basis of $400 and a fair market value of $1000, and B
and C each contribute $1000 in cash. The partnership agreement
provides that all income, gain, loss, and deduction will be
allocated in equal \1/3\ shares among the partners. The partnership
agreement also provides that the partners' capital accounts will be
determined and maintained in accordance with Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(iv)
of this chapter, distributions in liquidation of the partnership (or
any partner's interest) will be made in accordance with the
partners' positive capital account balances, and any partner with a
deficit balance in his capital account following the liquidation of
his interest must restore that deficit to the partnership (as
provided in Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii)(b)(2) and (3) of this chapter).
(ii) Upon formation, Partnership has the following assets and
capital accounts:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partnership
basis Book Value Outside basis Book Value
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash................................... $2,000 $2,000 $2,000 A $400 $1,000 $1,000
Whiteacre.............................. 400 1,000 1,000 B 1,000 1,000 1,000
.............. .............. .............. C 1,000 1,000 1,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals............................. 2,400 3,000 3,000 ............... 2,400 3,000 3,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(iii) In 2019, Partnership makes a $120 payment for Asset that
it treats as a deductible expense on its partnership return.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partnership
basis Book Value Outside basis Book Value
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash................................... $1,880 $1,880 $1,880 A $360 $960 $1,000
Whiteacre.............................. 400 1,000 1,000 B 960 960 1,000
Asset.................................. 0 0 120 C 960 960 1,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals............................. 2,280 2,880 3,000 ............... 2,280 2,880 3,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(iv) Partnership does not file an AAR for 2020. The IRS
determines in 2021 (the adjustment year) that Partnership's $120
expenditure was not allowed as a deduction in 2019 (the reviewed
year), but rather was the acquisition of an asset for which cost
recovery deductions are unavailable. Accordingly, the IRS makes a
partnership adjustment that disallows the entire $120 deduction,
which results in an imputed underpayment of $48 ($120 x 40 percent).
Partnership does not request modification under Sec. 301.6225-2.
Partnership pays the $48 imputed underpayment.
(v) Partnership first determines its tax attribute adjustments
resulting from the partnership adjustment by applying paragraph (b)
of this section. Pursuant to paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section,
Partnership must re-state the basis and book value of Asset to $120.
Further, pursuant to paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section, a $120
notional item of income is created. The $120 item of notional income
is allocated in equal shares ($40) to A, B, and C in 2021 under
Sec. 1.704-1(b)(4)(xi) of this chapter. Accordingly, in 2021
Partnership increases the capital accounts of A, B, and C by $40
each, and increases A, B, and C's outside bases by $40 each under
paragraph (b)(5)(ii) and (iii) of this section, respectively.
(vi) As described in paragraph (c) of this section,
Partnership's payment of the $48 imputed underpayment is treated as
an expenditure described in section 705(a)(2)(B) under Sec.
301.6241-4. Under Sec. 1.704-1(b)(4)(xii) of this chapter,
Partnership determines each partner's properly allocable share of
this expenditure in 2021 by allocating the expenditure in proportion
to the allocations of the notional item to which the expenditure
relates. Accordingly, each of A, B, and C have a properly allocable
share of $16 each, which is the same proportion (\1/3\ each) in
which A, B, and C share the $120 item of notional income. Thus, A, B
and C's capital accounts are each decreased by $16 in 2021 and A, B
and C's outside bases are each decreased by $16 in 2021. The
allocation of the expenditure under the partnership agreement has
economic effect under Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii) of this chapter and,
because the allocation of the expenditure is determined in
accordance with Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(iii)(f) of this chapter, the
economic effect of these allocations is deemed to be substantial.
(vii) The payment is also reflected by a $48 decrease in
partnership cash for book purposes under Sec. 1.704-1(b)(4)(ii) of
this
[[Page 4880]]
chapter. Therefore, in 2021, A's basis in Partnership is $384 and
his capital account is $984. B and C each have a basis and capital
account of $984.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partnership
basis Book Value Outside basis Book Value
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash................................... $1,832 $1,832 $1,832 A $384 $984 $984
Whiteacre.............................. 400 1,000 1,000 B 984 984 984
Asset.................................. 120 120 120 C 984 984 984
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals............................. 2,352 2,952 2,952 ............... 2,352 2,952 2,952
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Example 2. (i) The facts are the same as in Example 1 of this
paragraph (e), except the IRS approves modification under Sec.
301.6225-2(d)(3) with respect to A, which is a tax-exempt entity,
and under Sec. 301.6225-2(d)(4) with respect to C, which is a
corporation subject to a tax rate of 35%. These modifications reduce
Partnership's overall imputed underpayment from $48 to $30.
(ii) As in Example 1 of this paragraph (e), Partnership
determines its tax attribute adjustments resulting from the
partnership adjustment by applying paragraph (b) of this section.
Pursuant to paragraph (b)(3)(ii) of this section, a $120 notional
item of income is created. The $120 item of notional income is
allocated in equal shares ($40) to A, B, and C in 2021 under Sec.
1.704-1(b)(4)(xi) of this chapter. Accordingly, in 2021 Partnership
increases the capital accounts of A, B, and C by $40 each, and
increases A, B, and C's outside bases by $40 each under paragraph
(b)(5) (ii) and (iii) of this section, respectively.
(iii) However, the modifications affect how Partnership must
allocate the imputed underpayment expenditure among A, B, and C in
2021 (the adjustment year) pursuant to Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(iii)(f)
of this chapter. Specifically, Partnership allocates the $30
expenditure in 2021 in proportion to the allocation of the notional
item to which it relates (which is \1/3\ each as in Example 1 of
this paragraph (e)), but it must also take into account
modifications attributable to each partner. Accordingly, B's
allocation is $16 (its share of the imputed underpayment, for which
no modification occurred), and A and C have properly allocable
shares of $0 and $14, respectively (their shares, taking into
account modification). Thus, A's capital account is decreased by $0,
B's capital account is decreased by $16, and C's capital account is
decreased by $14 in 2021 and their respective outside bases are
decreased by the same amounts in 2021.
(iv) The payment is also reflected by a $30 decrease in
partnership cash for book purposes. Therefore, in 2021, A's basis in
Partnership is $400 and his capital account is $1000, B's basis and
capital account are both $984, and C's basis and capital account are
both $986.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partnership
basis Book Value Outside basis Book Value
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash................................... $1,850 $1,850 $1,850 A $400 $1,000 $1,000
Whiteacre.............................. 400 1,000 1,000 B 984 984 984
Asset.................................. 120 120 120 C 986 986 986
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals............................. 2,370 2,970 2,970 ............... 2,370 2,970 2,970
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Example 3. The facts are the same as in Example 1 of this
paragraph (e). However, in 2020, C transfers its entire interest in
Partnership to D (an individual) for cash. Under Sec. 1.704-
1(b)(2)(iv)(l) of this chapter, C's capital account carries over to
D. In 2021, the year the IRS determines that Partnership's $120
expense is not allowed as a deduction, D is C's successor under
Sec. 1.704-1(b)(1)(viii)(b)(2) of this chapter with respect to
specified tax attributes and the payment of the imputed underpayment
treated as an expenditure under section 705(a)(2)(B).
Example 4. The facts are the same as in Example 1 of this
paragraph (e), except that the partnership agreement provides that
the section 705(a)(2)(B) expenditure for imputed underpayments made
by the partnership are specially allocated to A (all other items
continue to be allocated in equal shares). Accordingly, in 2021, the
section 705(a)(2)(B) expenditure is allocated entirely to A, which
reduces its capital account by $120, which has economic effect under
Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii) of this chapter. However, the economic
effect of this allocation is not substantial under Sec. 1.704-
1(b)(2)(iii)(a) of this chapter because it is not allocated in the
manner described in Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(iii)(f) of this chapter. The
allocation will also not be deemed to be in accordance with the
partners' interests in the partnership under Sec. 1.704-1(b)(3)(ix)
of this chapter because it is not allocated pursuant to the rules
under Sec. 1.704-1(b)(4)(xii) of this chapter.
Example 5. (i) In 2019, Partnership has two partners, A and B.
Both A and B have a $0 basis in their interests in Partnership.
Further, Partnership has a $200 liability as defined in Sec. 1.752-
1(a)(4) of this chapter. The liability is treated as a nonrecourse
liability as defined in Sec. 1.752-1(a)(2) of this chapter so that
A and B both are treated as having a $100 share of the liability
under Sec. 1.752-3 of this chapter. In 2021 (the adjustment year),
the IRS determines that the liability was inappropriately classified
as a nonrecourse liability, should have been classified as a
recourse liability as defined in Sec. 1.752-1(a)(1) of this
chapter, and that A should have no share of the recourse liability
under Sec. 1.752-2 of this chapter. As a result of the liability
misclassification, the IRS assesses an imputed underpayment of $40
($100 x 40%) resulting from the $100 decrease in A's share of
partnership liabilities under Sec. Sec. 1.752-1(c) and 1.731-
1(a)(1)(i) of this chapter. Partnership does not request
modification under Sec. 301.6225-2. Partnership pays the $40
imputed underpayment.
(ii) Pursuant to paragraph (b)(4)(ii) of this of this section,
notional items are not created with respect to this partnership
adjustment. Instead, under paragraph (b)(4)(i) of this section,
specified tax attributes are adjusted in a manner that is consistent
with how the partnership adjustment would have been taken into
account under the partnership agreement in effect for the reviewed
year taking into account all facts and circumstances. In this case,
no specified tax attributes are adjusted.
(iii) However, because A would have borne the economic burden of
the partnership adjustment if the partnership and its partners had
originally reported in a manner consistent with the partnership
adjustment, the $40 imputed underpayment section 705(a)(2)(B)
expenditure is allocated to A under Sec. 1.704-1(b)(2)(iii)(f)(4)
of this chapter.
(f) Applicability date--(1) In general. Except as provided in
paragraph (f)(2) of this section, this section applies to partnership
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017.
(2) Election under Sec. 301.9100-22T in effect. This section
applies to any partnership taxable year beginning after November 2,
2015 and before January 1, 2018 for which a valid election under Sec.
301.9100-22T is in effect.
0
Par. 8. Section 301.6226-4 is added to read as follows:
[[Page 4881]]
Sec. 301.6226-4 Effect of a partnership adjustment on tax attributes
of partnerships and their partners.
(a) Adjustments to tax attributes--(1) In general. When a
partnership adjustment (as defined in Sec. 301.6241-1(a)(6)) is taken
into account by the reviewed year partners (as defined in Sec.
301.6241-1(a)(9)) or affected partners (as described in Sec. 301.6226-
3(e)(3)(i)) pursuant to an election made by a partnership under Sec.
301.6226-1, the partnership and its reviewed year partners or affected
partners must adjust their tax attributes (as defined in Sec.
301.6241-1(a)(10)) in accordance with the rules in this section.
(2) Application to pass-through partners and indirect partners. To
the extent a pass-through partner (as defined in Sec. 301.6241-
1(a)(5)) pays an amount computed in the same manner as an imputed
underpayment under Sec. 301.6226-3(e)(4)(iii) (paying partnership),
the paying partnership and its affected partners (as defined in Sec.
301.6226-3(e)(3)(i)) or their successors must make adjustments to their
tax attributes in accordance with the rules in Sec. 301.6225-4.
(3) Allocation of partnership adjustments. Partnership adjustments
are allocated to the reviewed year partners or affected partners under
Sec. 1.704-1(b)(4)(xiv) of this chapter.
(b) Adjusting tax attributes when an election under section 6226 is
made. For partnership adjustments that are taken into account by the
reviewed year partners or affected partners because an election is made
under Sec. 301.6226-1, each partner's share of the partnership
adjustments are determined under Sec. 301.6226-2(f). Accordingly, the
reviewed year partners or affected partners must take into account
items of income, gain, loss, deduction or credit with respect to their
share of the partnership adjustments as reflected on the statements
described in Sec. 301.6226-2 or Sec. 301.6226-3(e)(3) (pushed-out
items) in the reporting year (as defined in Sec. 301.6226-3(a)).
Similarly, partnerships adjust tax attributes affected by reason of a
pushed-out item in the adjustment year (as defined in Sec. 301.6241-
1(a)(1)), but these adjustments are calculated with respect to each
year beginning with the reviewed year (as defined in Sec. 301.6241-
1(a)(8)), followed by any subsequent taxable years, concluding with the
adjustment year (as defined in Sec. 301.6241-1(a)(1)).
(c) Example. The following example illustrates the rules of this
section. For purposes of this example, Partnership is subject to the
provisions of subchapter C of chapter 63 of the Internal Revenue Code,
Partnership and its partners are calendar year taxpayers, all partners
are U.S. persons, and the highest rate of income tax in effect for all
taxpayers is 40% for all relevant periods.
Example. (i) In 2021, J, K and L form Partnership by each
contributing $500 in exchange for partnership interests that share
all items of income, gain, loss and deduction in identical shares.
Partnership immediately purchases Asset on January 1, 2021 for
$1500, which it depreciates using the straight-line method with a
10-year recovery period beginning in 2021 ($150) so that each
partner has a $50 distributive share of the depreciation, resulting
in an outside basis of $450 for each partner. Accordingly, at the
end of 2022, J, K and L have an outside basis and capital account of
$400 each ($500 less $50 of their respective allocable shares of
depreciation in 2021 and $50 in 2022).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partnership
basis Book Value Outside basis Book Value
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Asset.................................. $1,200 $1,200 $1,500 J $400 $400 $500
.............. .............. .............. K 400 400 500
.............. .............. .............. L 400 400 500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals............................. 1,200 1,200 1,500 ............... 1,200 1,200 1,500
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(ii) The IRS initiates an administrative proceeding with respect
to Partnership's 2021 taxable year (reviewed year) in 2023
(adjustment year) and determines that Asset should have been
depreciated with a 20-year recovery period beginning in 2021,
resulting in a $75 partnership adjustment that results in an imputed
underpayment. The IRS does not initiate an administrative proceeding
with respect to Partnership's 2022 taxable year, and Partnership
does not file an administrative adjustment request for that taxable
year. Partnership makes an election under Sec. 301.6226-1 with
respect to the imputed underpayment. Therefore, J, K and L each are
furnished a statement described in Sec. 301.6226-2 by Partnership
reflecting the $25 income adjustment for 2021. Pursuant to Sec.
301.6226-2(e)(6), the statement furnished by Partnership to J, K,
and L also reflects a $25 income adjustment to the 2022 intervening
year.
(iii) Tax attributes must be adjusted to reflect the $75 pushed-
out item of income that is taken into account in equal shares ($25)
by J, K, and L with respect to 2021. Specifically, J, K and L's
outside bases and capital accounts must be increased $25 each with
respect to the 2021 tax year. Additionally, tax attributes must be
adjusted with respect to 2022, as an intervening year. Specifically,
J, K and L must increase their outside bases and capital accounts by
$25 each with respect to the 2022 tax year. As a result, J, K and L
each have an outside basis and capital account of $425 ($400 minus
$25 of depreciation for 2023 plus $25 of income realized with
respect to 2021 plus $25 of income realized with respect to 2022).
Asset's basis and book value must also be changed in 2023. Thus,
after adjusting tax attributes to take into account the election
under Sec. 301.6225-1 and taking into account other activities of
Partnership in 2023, accounts are stated as follows:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partnership
basis Book Value Outside basis Book Value
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Asset.................................. $1,275 $1,275 $1,500 J $425 $425 $500
.............. .............. .............. K 425 425 500
.............. .............. .............. L 425 425 500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Totals............................. 1,275 1,275 1,500 ............... 1,275 1,275 1,500
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(d) Applicability date--(1) In general. Except as provided in
paragraph (d)(2) of this section, this section applies to partnership
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017.
(2) Election under Sec. 301.9100-22T in effect. This section
applies to any partnership taxable year beginning after November 2,
2015 and before January 1,
[[Page 4882]]
2018 for which a valid election under Sec. 301.9100-22T is in effect.
Kirsten Wielobob,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2018-01989 Filed 2-1-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P