Requests for Documents and Testimony, 4827-4829 [2018-01731]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 22 / Thursday, February 1, 2018 / Proposed Rules
issue of the Federal Register, LSC
proposes to add to part 1603 a
regulation governing requests for
testimony and subpoenas for documents
in cases to which LSC is not a party.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1603
Advisory committees; Legal services.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble and under the authority of 42
U.S.C. 2996g(e), LSC proposes to
remove 45 CFR part 1603.
■
PART 1603—[REMOVED AND
RESERVED]
Dated: January 25, 2018.
Stefanie K. Davis,
Assistant General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2018–01733 Filed 1–31–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7050–01–P
LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
45 CFR Part 1603
Requests for Documents and
Testimony
Legal Services Corporation.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Legal Services
Corporation (LSC) proposes to create a
rule governing subpoenas and requests
for LSC documents and testimony by
non-federal litigants in cases in which
LSC is not a party. Currently, LSC has
no internal or external procedures in
place to process such requests. This rule
provides the public with guidance on
where to send requests and establishes
procedures by which those requests will
be processed.
DATES: Comments must be received by
March 5, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: Follow
the instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: lscrulemaking@lsc.gov.
Include ‘‘Touhy Rulemaking’’ in the
subject line of the message.
• Fax: (202) 337–6519.
• Mail: Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant
General Counsel, Legal Services
Corporation, 3333 K Street NW,
Washington, DC 20007, ATTN: Touhy
Rulemaking.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Stefanie K.
Davis, Assistant General Counsel, Legal
Services Corporation, 3333 K Street NW,
Washington, DC 20007, ATTN: Touhy
Rulemaking.
• Instructions: LSC prefers electronic
submissions via email with attachments
in Acrobat PDF format. LSC will not
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS3
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Jan 31, 2018
Jkt 244001
consider written comments sent to any
other address or received after the end
of the comment period.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant General
Counsel, 202–295–1563, sdavis@lsc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
LSC proposes to create a new
regulation, known as a Touhy
regulation, that will establish a process
by which litigants in cases where LSC
is not a party may obtain documents or
testimony from LSC and its employees.
Arising from the Supreme Court’s
decision in U.S. ex rel Touhy v. Ragen,
340 U.S. 462 (1951), Touhy regulations
define agencies’ procedures for
responding to document or testimony
requests, as well as individual agency
employees’ obligation to follow such
procedures.
Between 2013 and 2017, LSC and its
Office of the Inspector General (OIG)
received several subpoenas and requests
for testimony or documents, but did not
have internal or external guidance in
place regarding such requests. At the
OIG’s recommendation, LSC added
rulemaking on requests for documents
and testimony to its rulemaking agenda
in 2015. On October 15, 2017, the
Operations and Regulations Committee
(Committee) of LSC’s Board of Directors
(Board) voted to recommend that the
Board authorize rulemaking on part
1603. On October 17, 2017, the Board
authorized LSC to begin rulemaking.
Regulatory action is justified for four
reasons. First, a Touhy regulation will
promote efficiency and timeliness by
identifying those LSC officials with the
authority to respond to requests or
subpoenas for documents or testimony
and establishing a procedure for LSC’s
consideration of such requests. Second,
it will minimize the possibility of
involving LSC in controversies not
related to its functions. Third, it will
prevent the misuse of LSC’s employees
as involuntary expert witnesses for
private interests or as inappropriate
expert witnesses as to the state of the
law. Fourth, it will maintain LSC’s
impartiality toward private litigants.
On January 21, 2018, the Committee
voted to recommend that the Board
approve this notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) for publication. On
January 23, 2018, the Board accepted
the Committee’s recommendation and
voted to approve publication of this
NPRM with a 30-day comment period.
II. Discussion of Proposed Rule
In an NPRM published elsewhere in
this issue of the Federal Register, LSC
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
4827
proposes to remove the existing version
of part 1603 pertaining to state advisory
councils. In its place, LSC proposes to
add this regulation.
1603.1 Scope, Purpose, and
Applicability
LSC proposes to prescribe which
proceedings and employees will be
governed by the rule. All LSC
employees, including former employees,
members of the Board of Directors, and
employees of the OIG, are governed by
this rule concerning information
acquired during the performance of
official duties or because of such
person’s official capacity with LSC. This
rule applies to all non-federal litigants
in civil, criminal, or administrative
proceedings to which LSC is not a party.
Congress created LSC through the
Legal Services Corporation Act, 42
U.S.C. 2996 et seq. and appropriates
funds for LSC annually. See, e.g.,
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017,
Public Law 115–31, 131 Stat. 135
(2017). These funds are appropriated for
LSC to fulfill its congressionallymandated mission. Therefore, it is
appropriate to mirror traditional federal
entities in creating LSC’s Touhy
regulation.
1603.2 Definitions
LSC proposes to define the following
terms.
Certify: LSC proposes to define this
term to mean that it will authenticate
copies of any document produced by
affixing its seal to the document.
Employee: LSC proposes to define this
term to include current and former
employees of LSC and the OIG, as well
as members of its Board of Directors.
LSC: Consistent with the § 1602.2
definition, LSC refers to both the Legal
Services Corporation and the LSC Office
of the Inspector General, unless
otherwise specified.
Testify and testimony: LSC proposes
to define these terms to mean written or
oral statements made under oath before
any tribunal or official body.
1603.3 What is LSC’s policy on
presentation of testimony and
production of documents?
LSC proposes to prohibit current and
former employees from providing
documents or testimony in response to
requests covered by this rule without
prior authorization from the General
Counsel or OIG Legal Counsel.
1603.4 How does a person request
voluntary testimony from an employee?
LSC proposes to require parties to
submit requests for testimony from LSC
employees to its General Counsel as
E:\FR\FM\01FEP3.SGM
01FEP3
4828
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 22 / Thursday, February 1, 2018 / Proposed Rules
LSC’s chief legal officer. LSC proposes
to direct parties to submit requests for
OIG employees’ testimony to the OIG
Legal Counsel.
Requests must state the nature of the
requested testimony, why the
information sought is unavailable by
any other means, and the reasons why
providing the testimony would further
LSC’s interests. This information will
assist the General Counsel and the OIG
Legal Counsel in their decision making.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS3
1603.5 How will LSC respond to a
request for expert testimony from an
employee?
LSC proposes to prohibit its
employees from serving as expert
witnesses without authorization from
the General Counsel or OIG Legal
Counsel, as appropriate. This section
prevents public resources from being
used for private litigation. Even if
employees and LSC are compensated,
time spent preparing and delivering
testimony is time diverted from support
of LSC’s mission.
1603.6 How will LSC respond to a
subpoena for documents?
LSC proposes procedures for its
employees to follow if they are
personally served with subpoenas
requesting information acquired in the
course of performing official duties or
because of their official capacity. This
provision has the dual benefits of
providing guidance for subpoenaed
employees and instructing members of
the public how to request the
information they seek.
Consistent with Federal agencies’
Touhy regulations, LSC proposes to treat
legally insufficient subpoenas as FOIA
requests. Thus, LSC may work toward
honoring the spirit of the subpoena
without violating its obligations and
privileges. Furthermore, LSC’s interests
in remaining transparent and in
conserving the public’s trust are best
served by providing public information
when requested. LSC also proposes to
direct employees to appear before the
court and state that they cannot,
consistent with these rules, provide the
required documents when the General
Counsel or OIG Legal Counsel has not
made a decision about the legal
sufficiency of a subpoena by the date on
which an LSC or OIG employee is
commanded to appear. Without this
provision, such individuals would be
faced with violating a court order or
violating LSC rules and policies when
responding to a subpoena. LSC proposes
that the General Counsel or OIG Legal
Counsel may determine that responding
to the subpoena is not appropriate and
direct an employee not to respond.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Jan 31, 2018
Jkt 244001
Examples of when responding may be
inappropriate include instances where
the subpoena was not validly issued or
served, where the subpoena has been
withdrawn, or where discovery has been
stayed.
1603.7 When will LSC certify the
authenticity of records?
LSC proposes to certify, upon request,
the authenticity of records to be
disclosed. Such a service does not
generally use significant resources.
1603.8 Does this part give individuals
any rights?
LSC proposes this section to make
clear that no private rights arise from
this rule.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1603
Administrative practice and
procedure; Archives and records;
Courts.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Legal Services
Corporation proposes to add 45 CFR
part 1603 to read as follows:
PART 1603—TESTIMONY BY
EMPLOYEES AND PRODUCTION OF
DOCUMENTS IN PROCEEDINGS
WHERE THE UNITED STATES IS NOT
A PARTY
Sec.
1603.1 Scope, purpose, and applicability.
1603.2 Definitions.
1603.3 What is LSC’s policy on
presentation of testimony and
production of documents?
1603.4 How does a person request
voluntary testimony from an employee?
1603.5 How will LSC respond to a request
for expert testimony from an employee?
1603.6 How will LSC respond to a
subpoena for documents?
1603.7 When will LSC certify the
authenticity of records?
1603.8 Does this part give individuals any
rights?
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2996g(e).
§ 1603.1
Scope, purpose, and applicability.
(a) This part sets forth rules to be
followed when a litigant requests an
employee of the Legal Services
Corporation (LSC), including LSC’s
Office of the Inspector General (OIG), to
provide testimony in a deposition, trial,
or other similar proceeding concerning
information acquired in the course of
performing official duties or because of
such person’s official capacity with
LSC. This part also sets forth procedures
for the handling of subpoenas for
documents and other requests for
documents in the possession of LSC or
the OIG, and for the processing of
requests for certification of copies of
documents.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
(b) It is LSC’s policy to provide
information, data, and records to nonfederal litigants to the same extent and
in the same manner that they are made
available to the public. When subject to
the jurisdiction of a court or other
tribunal presiding over litigation
between non-federal parties, LSC will
follow all applicable procedural and
substantive rules relating to the
production of information, data, and
records by a non-party. The availability
of LSC employees to testify in litigation
not involving federal parties is governed
by LSC’s policy to maintain strict
impartiality with respect to private
litigants and to minimize the disruption
of official duties.
(c) This part applies to state, local,
and tribal judicial, administrative, and
legislative proceedings, and to federal
judicial and administrative proceedings.
(d) This part does not apply to:
(1) Any civil or criminal proceedings
to which LSC is a party.
(2) Congressional requests or
subpoenas for testimony or documents.
(3) Consultative services and
technical assistance provided by LSC in
carrying out its normal program
activities.
(4) Employees serving as expert
witnesses in connection with
professional and consultative services as
approved outside activities. In cases
where employees are providing such
outside services, they must state for the
record that the testimony represents
their own views and does not
necessarily represent the official
position of LSC.
(5) Employees making appearances in
their private capacity in legal or
administrative proceedings that do not
relate to LSC, such as cases arising out
of traffic accidents, crimes, domestic
relations, etc., and not involving
professional and consultative services.
(6) Any civil or criminal proceedings
in State court brought on behalf of LSC.
(7) Any criminal proceeding brought
as a result of a referral for prosecution
by the OIG or by any other Inspector
General in connection with a case
worked jointly with the OIG.
§ 1603.2
Definitions.
(a) Certify means to authenticate
official LSC documents.
(b) Employee means current and
former LSC employees, including
temporary employees, OIG employees,
and members of the Board of Directors.
(c) LSC means the Legal Services
Corporation. Unless explicitly stated
otherwise, LSC includes the OIG.
(d) Testify and testimony include inperson, oral statements before a court,
legislative or administrative body and
E:\FR\FM\01FEP3.SGM
01FEP3
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 22 / Thursday, February 1, 2018 / Proposed Rules
statements made pursuant to
depositions, interrogatories,
declarations, affidavits, or other formal
participation.
§ 1603.3 What is LSC’s policy on
presentation of testimony and production of
documents?
In any proceedings to which this part
applies, no employee may provide
testimony or produce documents
concerning information acquired in the
course of performing official duties or
because of the person’s official
relationship with LSC unless authorized
by the General Counsel or the OIG Legal
Counsel pursuant to this part based on
his determination that compliance with
the request would promote LSC’s
objectives.
§ 1603.4 How does a person request
voluntary testimony from an employee?
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS3
(a) All requests for testimony by an
employee in his or her official capacity
and not subject to the exceptions set
forth in § 1603.1(d) of this part must be
in writing and addressed to the General
Counsel.
(b) All requests for testimony by an
employee of the OIG must be in writing
and addressed to the OIG Legal Counsel.
(c) Requests must state the nature of
the requested testimony, why the
information sought is unavailable by
any other means, and the reasons why
the testimony would be in the interest
of LSC.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:53 Jan 31, 2018
Jkt 244001
§ 1603.5 How will LSC respond to a
request for expert testimony from an
employee?
No employee shall serve as an expert
witness in any proceeding described in
§ 1603.1(c) or before a court or agency
of the United States unless the General
Counsel or the OIG Legal Counsel
authorizes the employee’s participation.
§ 1603.6 How will LSC respond to a
subpoena for documents?
(a) Whenever a subpoena
commanding the production of any LSC
record has been served upon an
employee, the employee shall refer the
subpoena to the General Counsel or the
OIG Legal Counsel, as appropriate. The
General Counsel or the OIG Legal
Counsel shall determine whether the
subpoena is legally sufficient, whether
the subpoena was properly served, and
whether the issuing court or other
tribunal has jurisdiction over LSC. If the
General Counsel or the OIG Legal
Counsel determines that the subpoena
satisfies all three factors, LSC shall
comply with the terms of the subpoena
unless LSC takes affirmative action to
modify or quash the subpoena in
accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 (c).
(b) If a subpoena commanding the
production of any record served upon
an employee is determined by the
General Counsel or the OIG Legal
Counsel to be legally insufficient,
improperly served, or from a tribunal
not having jurisdiction, LSC shall deem
the subpoena a request for records
under the Freedom of Information Act.
LSC shall handle the subpoena pursuant
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
4829
to the rules governing public disclosure
established in 45 CFR part 1602.
(c) If the General Counsel or the OIG
Legal Counsel denies approval to
comply with a subpoena for testimony
or has not acted by the return date, the
employee will be directed to appear at
the stated time and place, unless
advised by the General Counsel or the
OIG Legal Counsel that responding to
the subpoena would be inappropriate.
The employee will be directed to
produce a copy of these regulations and
respectfully decline to testify or produce
any documents on the basis of these
regulations.
§ 1603.7 When will LSC certify the
authenticity of records?
Upon request, LSC will certify the
authenticity of copies of records that are
to be disclosed. The requesting party
will be responsible for reasonable fees
for copying and certification.
§ 1603.8 Does this part give individuals
any rights?
This part is intended only to provide
a process for receipt and processing of
private litigants’ requests for LSC
documents and testimony. It does not,
and may not be relied upon, to create a
right or benefit, substantive or
procedural, enforceable at law by a
party against LSC.
Dated: January 25, 2018.
Stefanie K. Davis,
Assistant General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2018–01731 Filed 1–31–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7050–01–P
E:\FR\FM\01FEP3.SGM
01FEP3
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 22 (Thursday, February 1, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 4827-4829]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-01731]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LEGAL SERVICES CORPORATION
45 CFR Part 1603
Requests for Documents and Testimony
AGENCY: Legal Services Corporation.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Legal Services Corporation (LSC) proposes to create a rule
governing subpoenas and requests for LSC documents and testimony by
non-federal litigants in cases in which LSC is not a party. Currently,
LSC has no internal or external procedures in place to process such
requests. This rule provides the public with guidance on where to send
requests and establishes procedures by which those requests will be
processed.
DATES: Comments must be received by March 5, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Portal: Follow the instructions for
submitting comments.
Email: [email protected]. Include ``Touhy Rulemaking''
in the subject line of the message.
Fax: (202) 337-6519.
Mail: Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant General Counsel, Legal
Services Corporation, 3333 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20007, ATTN:
Touhy Rulemaking.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant
General Counsel, Legal Services Corporation, 3333 K Street NW,
Washington, DC 20007, ATTN: Touhy Rulemaking.
Instructions: LSC prefers electronic submissions via email
with attachments in Acrobat PDF format. LSC will not consider written
comments sent to any other address or received after the end of the
comment period.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stefanie K. Davis, Assistant General
Counsel, 202-295-1563, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
LSC proposes to create a new regulation, known as a Touhy
regulation, that will establish a process by which litigants in cases
where LSC is not a party may obtain documents or testimony from LSC and
its employees. Arising from the Supreme Court's decision in U.S. ex rel
Touhy v. Ragen, 340 U.S. 462 (1951), Touhy regulations define agencies'
procedures for responding to document or testimony requests, as well as
individual agency employees' obligation to follow such procedures.
Between 2013 and 2017, LSC and its Office of the Inspector General
(OIG) received several subpoenas and requests for testimony or
documents, but did not have internal or external guidance in place
regarding such requests. At the OIG's recommendation, LSC added
rulemaking on requests for documents and testimony to its rulemaking
agenda in 2015. On October 15, 2017, the Operations and Regulations
Committee (Committee) of LSC's Board of Directors (Board) voted to
recommend that the Board authorize rulemaking on part 1603. On October
17, 2017, the Board authorized LSC to begin rulemaking.
Regulatory action is justified for four reasons. First, a Touhy
regulation will promote efficiency and timeliness by identifying those
LSC officials with the authority to respond to requests or subpoenas
for documents or testimony and establishing a procedure for LSC's
consideration of such requests. Second, it will minimize the
possibility of involving LSC in controversies not related to its
functions. Third, it will prevent the misuse of LSC's employees as
involuntary expert witnesses for private interests or as inappropriate
expert witnesses as to the state of the law. Fourth, it will maintain
LSC's impartiality toward private litigants.
On January 21, 2018, the Committee voted to recommend that the
Board approve this notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for
publication. On January 23, 2018, the Board accepted the Committee's
recommendation and voted to approve publication of this NPRM with a 30-
day comment period.
II. Discussion of Proposed Rule
In an NPRM published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal
Register, LSC proposes to remove the existing version of part 1603
pertaining to state advisory councils. In its place, LSC proposes to
add this regulation.
1603.1 Scope, Purpose, and Applicability
LSC proposes to prescribe which proceedings and employees will be
governed by the rule. All LSC employees, including former employees,
members of the Board of Directors, and employees of the OIG, are
governed by this rule concerning information acquired during the
performance of official duties or because of such person's official
capacity with LSC. This rule applies to all non-federal litigants in
civil, criminal, or administrative proceedings to which LSC is not a
party.
Congress created LSC through the Legal Services Corporation Act, 42
U.S.C. 2996 et seq. and appropriates funds for LSC annually. See, e.g.,
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2017, Public Law 115-31, 131 Stat. 135
(2017). These funds are appropriated for LSC to fulfill its
congressionally-mandated mission. Therefore, it is appropriate to
mirror traditional federal entities in creating LSC's Touhy regulation.
1603.2 Definitions
LSC proposes to define the following terms.
Certify: LSC proposes to define this term to mean that it will
authenticate copies of any document produced by affixing its seal to
the document.
Employee: LSC proposes to define this term to include current and
former employees of LSC and the OIG, as well as members of its Board of
Directors.
LSC: Consistent with the Sec. 1602.2 definition, LSC refers to
both the Legal Services Corporation and the LSC Office of the Inspector
General, unless otherwise specified.
Testify and testimony: LSC proposes to define these terms to mean
written or oral statements made under oath before any tribunal or
official body.
1603.3 What is LSC's policy on presentation of testimony and production
of documents?
LSC proposes to prohibit current and former employees from
providing documents or testimony in response to requests covered by
this rule without prior authorization from the General Counsel or OIG
Legal Counsel.
1603.4 How does a person request voluntary testimony from an employee?
LSC proposes to require parties to submit requests for testimony
from LSC employees to its General Counsel as
[[Page 4828]]
LSC's chief legal officer. LSC proposes to direct parties to submit
requests for OIG employees' testimony to the OIG Legal Counsel.
Requests must state the nature of the requested testimony, why the
information sought is unavailable by any other means, and the reasons
why providing the testimony would further LSC's interests. This
information will assist the General Counsel and the OIG Legal Counsel
in their decision making.
1603.5 How will LSC respond to a request for expert testimony from an
employee?
LSC proposes to prohibit its employees from serving as expert
witnesses without authorization from the General Counsel or OIG Legal
Counsel, as appropriate. This section prevents public resources from
being used for private litigation. Even if employees and LSC are
compensated, time spent preparing and delivering testimony is time
diverted from support of LSC's mission.
1603.6 How will LSC respond to a subpoena for documents?
LSC proposes procedures for its employees to follow if they are
personally served with subpoenas requesting information acquired in the
course of performing official duties or because of their official
capacity. This provision has the dual benefits of providing guidance
for subpoenaed employees and instructing members of the public how to
request the information they seek.
Consistent with Federal agencies' Touhy regulations, LSC proposes
to treat legally insufficient subpoenas as FOIA requests. Thus, LSC may
work toward honoring the spirit of the subpoena without violating its
obligations and privileges. Furthermore, LSC's interests in remaining
transparent and in conserving the public's trust are best served by
providing public information when requested. LSC also proposes to
direct employees to appear before the court and state that they cannot,
consistent with these rules, provide the required documents when the
General Counsel or OIG Legal Counsel has not made a decision about the
legal sufficiency of a subpoena by the date on which an LSC or OIG
employee is commanded to appear. Without this provision, such
individuals would be faced with violating a court order or violating
LSC rules and policies when responding to a subpoena. LSC proposes that
the General Counsel or OIG Legal Counsel may determine that responding
to the subpoena is not appropriate and direct an employee not to
respond. Examples of when responding may be inappropriate include
instances where the subpoena was not validly issued or served, where
the subpoena has been withdrawn, or where discovery has been stayed.
1603.7 When will LSC certify the authenticity of records?
LSC proposes to certify, upon request, the authenticity of records
to be disclosed. Such a service does not generally use significant
resources.
1603.8 Does this part give individuals any rights?
LSC proposes this section to make clear that no private rights
arise from this rule.
List of Subjects in 45 CFR Part 1603
Administrative practice and procedure; Archives and records;
Courts.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Legal Services
Corporation proposes to add 45 CFR part 1603 to read as follows:
PART 1603--TESTIMONY BY EMPLOYEES AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS IN
PROCEEDINGS WHERE THE UNITED STATES IS NOT A PARTY
Sec.
1603.1 Scope, purpose, and applicability.
1603.2 Definitions.
1603.3 What is LSC's policy on presentation of testimony and
production of documents?
1603.4 How does a person request voluntary testimony from an
employee?
1603.5 How will LSC respond to a request for expert testimony from
an employee?
1603.6 How will LSC respond to a subpoena for documents?
1603.7 When will LSC certify the authenticity of records?
1603.8 Does this part give individuals any rights?
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2996g(e).
Sec. 1603.1 Scope, purpose, and applicability.
(a) This part sets forth rules to be followed when a litigant
requests an employee of the Legal Services Corporation (LSC), including
LSC's Office of the Inspector General (OIG), to provide testimony in a
deposition, trial, or other similar proceeding concerning information
acquired in the course of performing official duties or because of such
person's official capacity with LSC. This part also sets forth
procedures for the handling of subpoenas for documents and other
requests for documents in the possession of LSC or the OIG, and for the
processing of requests for certification of copies of documents.
(b) It is LSC's policy to provide information, data, and records to
non-federal litigants to the same extent and in the same manner that
they are made available to the public. When subject to the jurisdiction
of a court or other tribunal presiding over litigation between non-
federal parties, LSC will follow all applicable procedural and
substantive rules relating to the production of information, data, and
records by a non-party. The availability of LSC employees to testify in
litigation not involving federal parties is governed by LSC's policy to
maintain strict impartiality with respect to private litigants and to
minimize the disruption of official duties.
(c) This part applies to state, local, and tribal judicial,
administrative, and legislative proceedings, and to federal judicial
and administrative proceedings.
(d) This part does not apply to:
(1) Any civil or criminal proceedings to which LSC is a party.
(2) Congressional requests or subpoenas for testimony or documents.
(3) Consultative services and technical assistance provided by LSC
in carrying out its normal program activities.
(4) Employees serving as expert witnesses in connection with
professional and consultative services as approved outside activities.
In cases where employees are providing such outside services, they must
state for the record that the testimony represents their own views and
does not necessarily represent the official position of LSC.
(5) Employees making appearances in their private capacity in legal
or administrative proceedings that do not relate to LSC, such as cases
arising out of traffic accidents, crimes, domestic relations, etc., and
not involving professional and consultative services.
(6) Any civil or criminal proceedings in State court brought on
behalf of LSC.
(7) Any criminal proceeding brought as a result of a referral for
prosecution by the OIG or by any other Inspector General in connection
with a case worked jointly with the OIG.
Sec. 1603.2 Definitions.
(a) Certify means to authenticate official LSC documents.
(b) Employee means current and former LSC employees, including
temporary employees, OIG employees, and members of the Board of
Directors.
(c) LSC means the Legal Services Corporation. Unless explicitly
stated otherwise, LSC includes the OIG.
(d) Testify and testimony include in-person, oral statements before
a court, legislative or administrative body and
[[Page 4829]]
statements made pursuant to depositions, interrogatories, declarations,
affidavits, or other formal participation.
Sec. 1603.3 What is LSC's policy on presentation of testimony and
production of documents?
In any proceedings to which this part applies, no employee may
provide testimony or produce documents concerning information acquired
in the course of performing official duties or because of the person's
official relationship with LSC unless authorized by the General Counsel
or the OIG Legal Counsel pursuant to this part based on his
determination that compliance with the request would promote LSC's
objectives.
Sec. 1603.4 How does a person request voluntary testimony from an
employee?
(a) All requests for testimony by an employee in his or her
official capacity and not subject to the exceptions set forth in Sec.
1603.1(d) of this part must be in writing and addressed to the General
Counsel.
(b) All requests for testimony by an employee of the OIG must be in
writing and addressed to the OIG Legal Counsel.
(c) Requests must state the nature of the requested testimony, why
the information sought is unavailable by any other means, and the
reasons why the testimony would be in the interest of LSC.
Sec. 1603.5 How will LSC respond to a request for expert testimony
from an employee?
No employee shall serve as an expert witness in any proceeding
described in Sec. 1603.1(c) or before a court or agency of the United
States unless the General Counsel or the OIG Legal Counsel authorizes
the employee's participation.
Sec. 1603.6 How will LSC respond to a subpoena for documents?
(a) Whenever a subpoena commanding the production of any LSC record
has been served upon an employee, the employee shall refer the subpoena
to the General Counsel or the OIG Legal Counsel, as appropriate. The
General Counsel or the OIG Legal Counsel shall determine whether the
subpoena is legally sufficient, whether the subpoena was properly
served, and whether the issuing court or other tribunal has
jurisdiction over LSC. If the General Counsel or the OIG Legal Counsel
determines that the subpoena satisfies all three factors, LSC shall
comply with the terms of the subpoena unless LSC takes affirmative
action to modify or quash the subpoena in accordance with Fed. R. Civ.
P. 45 (c).
(b) If a subpoena commanding the production of any record served
upon an employee is determined by the General Counsel or the OIG Legal
Counsel to be legally insufficient, improperly served, or from a
tribunal not having jurisdiction, LSC shall deem the subpoena a request
for records under the Freedom of Information Act. LSC shall handle the
subpoena pursuant to the rules governing public disclosure established
in 45 CFR part 1602.
(c) If the General Counsel or the OIG Legal Counsel denies approval
to comply with a subpoena for testimony or has not acted by the return
date, the employee will be directed to appear at the stated time and
place, unless advised by the General Counsel or the OIG Legal Counsel
that responding to the subpoena would be inappropriate. The employee
will be directed to produce a copy of these regulations and
respectfully decline to testify or produce any documents on the basis
of these regulations.
Sec. 1603.7 When will LSC certify the authenticity of records?
Upon request, LSC will certify the authenticity of copies of
records that are to be disclosed. The requesting party will be
responsible for reasonable fees for copying and certification.
Sec. 1603.8 Does this part give individuals any rights?
This part is intended only to provide a process for receipt and
processing of private litigants' requests for LSC documents and
testimony. It does not, and may not be relied upon, to create a right
or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party
against LSC.
Dated: January 25, 2018.
Stefanie K. Davis,
Assistant General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2018-01731 Filed 1-31-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7050-01-P