Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; KEYTRUDA, 4492-4494 [2018-01890]
Download as PDF
4492
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 21 / Wednesday, January 31, 2018 / Notices
myelopathy due to a single-level
abnormality localized to the level of the
disc space and at least one of the
following conditions confirmed by
radiographic imaging (CT, MRI, X-rays):
herniated nucleus pulposus,
spondylosis (defined by the presence of
osteophytes), and/or visible loss of disc
height compared to adjacent levels.
Subsequent to this approval, the USPTO
received a patent term restoration
application for MOBI–C CERVICAL
DISC PROSTHESIS (U.S. Patent No.
8,627,999) from Beaurain et al., and the
USPTO requested FDA’s assistance in
determining this patent’s eligibility for
patent term restoration. In a letter dated
November 5, 2015, FDA advised the
USPTO that this medical device had
undergone a regulatory review period
and that the approval of MOBI–C
CERVICAL DISC PROSTHESIS
represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the
product. Thereafter, the USPTO
requested that FDA determine the
product’s regulatory review period.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
II. Determination of Regulatory Review
Period
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
MOBI–C CERVICAL DISC PROSTHESIS
is 2,758 days. Of this time, 1,821 days
occurred during the testing phase of the
regulatory review period, while 937
days occurred during the approval
phase. These periods of time were
derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 520(g) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C.
360j(g)) involving this device became
effective: January 20, 2006. The
applicant claims that the investigational
device exemption (IDE) required under
section 520(g) of the FD&C Act for
human tests to begin became effective
on October 14, 2005. However, FDA
records indicate that the IDE was
determined substantially complete for
clinical studies to begin on January 20,
2006, which represents the IDE effective
date.
2. The date an application was
initially submitted with respect to the
device under section 515 of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 360e): January 14, 2011.
FDA has verified the applicant’s claim
that the premarket approval application
(PMA) for MOBI–C CERVICAL DISC
PROSTHESIS (PMA P110002) was
initially submitted January 14, 2011.
3. The date the application was
approved: August 7, 2013. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that PMA
P110002 was approved on August 7,
2013.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Jan 30, 2018
Jkt 244001
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the USPTO applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 323 days of patent
term extension.
III. Petitions
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit either electronic or written
comments and, under 21 CFR 60.24, ask
for a redetermination (see DATES).
Furthermore, as specified in § 60.30 (21
CFR 60.30), any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period. To
meet its burden, the petition must
comply with all the requirements of
§ 60.30, including but not limited to:
Must be timely (see DATES), must be
filed in accordance with § 10.20, must
contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA
investigation, and must certify that a
true and complete copy of the petition
has been served upon the patent
applicant. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th
Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.)
Petitions should be in the format
specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Submit petitions electronically to
https://www.regulations.gov at Docket
No. FDA–2013–S–0610. Submit written
petitions (two copies are required) to the
Dockets Management Staff (HFA–305),
Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD
20852.
Dated: January 24, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018–01889 Filed 1–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2015–E–2661]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; KEYTRUDA
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or the Agency) has
determined the regulatory review period
for KEYTRUDA and is publishing this
notice of that determination as required
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the
submission of an application to the
Director of the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), Department
of Commerce, for the extension of a
patent which claims that human
biological product.
DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any
of the dates as published (in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section) are
incorrect may submit either electronic
or written comments and ask for a
redetermination by April 2, 2018. See
‘‘Petitions’’ in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for more
information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be
considered. Electronic comments must
be submitted on or before April 2, 2018.
The https://www.regulations.gov
electronic filing system will accept
comments until midnight Eastern Time
at the end of April 2, 2018. Comments
received by mail/hand delivery/courier
(for written/paper submissions) will be
considered timely if they are
postmarked or the delivery service
acceptance receipt is on or before that
date. Furthermore, any interested
person may petition FDA for a
determination regarding whether the
applicant for extension acted with due
diligence during the regulatory review
period by July 30, 2018. See ‘‘Petitions’’
in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for more information.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 21 / Wednesday, January 31, 2018 / Notices
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2015–E–2661 for ‘‘Determination of
Regulatory Review Period for Purposes
of Patent Extension; KEYTRUDA.’’
Received comments, those filed in a
timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be
placed in the docket and, except for
those submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with § 10.20 (21
CFR 10.20) and other applicable
disclosure law. For more information
about FDA’s posting of comments to
public dockets, see 80 FR 56469,
September 18, 2015, or access the
information at: https://www.gpo.gov/
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Jan 30, 2018
Jkt 244001
fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/201523389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51,
Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993,
301–796–3600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Drug Price Competition and
Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
(Pub. L. 98–417) and the Generic
Animal Drug and Patent Term
Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100–670)
generally provide that a patent may be
extended for a period of up to 5 years
so long as the patented item (human
drug product, animal drug product,
medical device, food additive, or color
additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was
marketed. Under these acts, a product’s
regulatory review period forms the basis
for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human
biological products, the testing phase
begins when the exemption to permit
the clinical investigations of the
biological product becomes effective
and runs until the approval phase
begins. The approval phase starts with
the initial submission of an application
to market the human biological product
and continues until FDA grants
permission to market the biological
product. Although only a portion of a
regulatory review period may count
toward the actual amount of extension
that the Director of USPTO may award
(for example, half the testing phase must
be subtracted as well as any time that
may have occurred before the patent
was issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a human biological product will include
all of the testing phase and approval
phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(1)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the
human biologic product KEYTRUDA
(pembrolizumab). KEYTRUDA is a
programmed death receptor-1 (PD–1)-
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
4493
blocking antibody indicated for the
treatment of:
• Patients with unresectable or
metastatic melanoma.
• Patients with metastatic non-small
cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors
have high PD-ligand 1 (PD–L1)
expression (Tumor Proportion Score
(TPS) ≥ 50%) as determined by an FDAapproved test, with no epidermal
growth factor receptor (EGFR) or
anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)
genomic tumor aberrations, and no prior
systemic chemotherapy treatment for
metastatic NSCLC.
• Patients with metastatic NSCLC
whose tumors express PD–L1 (TPS ≥
1%) as determined by an FDA-approved
test, with disease progression on or after
platinum-containing chemotherapy.
Patients with EGFR or ALK genomic
tumor aberrations should have disease
progression on FDA-approved therapy
for these aberrations prior to receiving
KEYTRUDA.
• Patients with recurrent or
metastatic head and neck squamous cell
carcinoma with disease progression on
or after platinum-containing
chemotherapy. This indication is
approved under accelerated approval
based on tumor response rate and
durability of response. Continued
approval for this indication may be
contingent upon verification and
description of clinical benefit in the
confirmatory trials.
• Adult and pediatric patients with
refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma,
or who have relapsed after three or more
prior lines of therapy. This indication is
approved under accelerated approval
based on tumor response and durability
of response. Continued approval for this
indication may be contingent upon
verification and description of clinical
benefit in the confirmatory trials.
Subsequent to this approval, the
USPTO received a patent term
restoration application for KEYTRUDA
(U.S. Patent No. 8,354,509) from Merck
Sharp & Dohme B.V., and the USPTO
requested FDA’s assistance in
determining this patent’s eligibility for
patent term restoration. In a letter dated
October 15, 2015, FDA advised the
USPTO that this human biological
product had undergone a regulatory
review period and that the approval of
KEYTRUDA represented the first
permitted commercial marketing or use
of the product. Thereafter, the USPTO
requested that FDA determine the
product’s regulatory review period.
II. Determination of Regulatory Review
Period
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
4494
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 21 / Wednesday, January 31, 2018 / Notices
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
KEYTRUDA is 1,338 days. Of this time,
1,148 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 190 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i))
became effective: January 7, 2011. The
applicant claims January 8, 2011, as the
date the investigational new drug
application (IND) became effective.
However, FDA records indicate that the
IND effective date was January 7, 2011,
which was the first date after FDA
receipt of the IND that the
investigational studies were allowed to
proceed.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human biological product under section
351 of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 262): February 27, 2014. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that the
biologics license application (BLA) for
KEYTRUDA (BLA 125514/0) was
initially submitted on February 27,
2014.
3. The date the application was
approved: September 4, 2014. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that BLA
125514/0 was approved on September 4,
2014.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the USPTO applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 83 days of patent
term extension.
III. Petitions
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit either electronic or written
comments and, under 21 CFR 60.24 ask
for a redetermination (see DATES).
Furthermore, as specified in § 60.30 (21
CFR 60.30), any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period. To
meet its burden, the petition must
comply with all the requirements of
§ 60.30, including but not limited to:
Must be timely (see DATES), must be
filed in accordance with § 10.20, must
contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA
investigation, and must certify that a
true and complete copy of the petition
has been served upon the patent
applicant. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th
Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41–42, 1984.)
Petitions should be in the format
specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:36 Jan 30, 2018
Jkt 244001
Submit petitions electronically to
https://www.regulations.gov at Docket
No. FDA–2013–S–0610. Submit written
petitions (two copies are required) to the
Dockets Management Staff (HFA–305),
Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD
20852.
Dated: January 24, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018–01890 Filed 1–30–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket Nos. FDA–2016–E–1586 and FDA–
2017–E–4452]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; CRESEMBA—New Drug
Application 207501
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or the Agency) has
determined the regulatory review period
for CRESEMBA as approved under new
drug application (NDA) 207501 and is
publishing this notice of that
determination as required by law. FDA
has made the determination because of
the submission of applications to the
Director of the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office (USPTO), Department
of Commerce, for the extension of a
patent which claims that human drug
product as approved under NDA
207501.
DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any
of the dates as published (in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section) are
incorrect may submit either electronic
or written comments and ask for a
redetermination by April 2, 2018.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
July 30, 2018. See ‘‘Petitions’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
more information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be
considered. Electronic comments must
be submitted on or before April 2, 2018.
The https://www.regulations.gov
electronic filing system will accept
comments until midnight Eastern Time
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
at the end of April 2, 2018. Comments
received by mail/hand delivery/courier
(for written/paper submissions) will be
considered timely if they are
postmarked or the delivery service
acceptance receipt is on or before that
date.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket Nos. FDA–
2016–E–1586 and FDA–2017–E–4452
for ‘‘Determination of Regulatory
Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; CRESEMBA—NDA 207501.’’
Received comments, those filed in a
timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be
placed in the dockets and, except for
those submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
E:\FR\FM\31JAN1.SGM
31JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 21 (Wednesday, January 31, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4492-4494]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-01890]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2015-E-2661]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; KEYTRUDA
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) has
determined the regulatory review period for KEYTRUDA and is publishing
this notice of that determination as required by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the submission of an application to the
Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Department of
Commerce, for the extension of a patent which claims that human
biological product.
DATES: Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published (in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section) are incorrect may submit either
electronic or written comments and ask for a redetermination by April
2, 2018. See ``Petitions'' in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
more information.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be considered. Electronic comments
must be submitted on or before April 2, 2018. The https://www.regulations.gov electronic filing system will accept comments until
midnight Eastern Time at the end of April 2, 2018. Comments received by
mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions) will be
considered timely if they are postmarked or the delivery service
acceptance receipt is on or before that date. Furthermore, any
interested person may petition FDA for a determination regarding
whether the applicant for extension acted with due diligence during the
regulatory review period by July 30, 2018. See ``Petitions'' in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for more information.
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a
[[Page 4493]]
written/paper submission and in the manner detailed (see ``Written/
Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2015-E-2661 for ``Determination of Regulatory Review Period for
Purposes of Patent Extension; KEYTRUDA.'' Received comments, those
filed in a timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed in the docket
and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,''
publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets
Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with Sec. 10.20 (21 CFR 10.20) and
other applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's
posting of comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18,
2015, or access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
51, Rm. 6250, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-3600.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
(Pub. L. 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term
Restoration Act (Pub. L. 100-670) generally provide that a patent may
be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as the patented item
(human drug product, animal drug product, medical device, food
additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory review by FDA
before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a product's regulatory
review period forms the basis for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human biological products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the biological product becomes effective and runs
until the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the
initial submission of an application to market the human biological
product and continues until FDA grants permission to market the
biological product. Although only a portion of a regulatory review
period may count toward the actual amount of extension that the
Director of USPTO may award (for example, half the testing phase must
be subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the
patent was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory
review period for a human biological product will include all of the
testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(1)(B).
FDA has approved for marketing the human biologic product KEYTRUDA
(pembrolizumab). KEYTRUDA is a programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)-
blocking antibody indicated for the treatment of:
Patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma.
Patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
(NSCLC) whose tumors have high PD-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (Tumor
Proportion Score (TPS) >= 50%) as determined by an FDA-approved test,
with no epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or anaplastic lymphoma
kinase (ALK) genomic tumor aberrations, and no prior systemic
chemotherapy treatment for metastatic NSCLC.
Patients with metastatic NSCLC whose tumors express PD-L1
(TPS >= 1%) as determined by an FDA-approved test, with disease
progression on or after platinum-containing chemotherapy. Patients with
EGFR or ALK genomic tumor aberrations should have disease progression
on FDA-approved therapy for these aberrations prior to receiving
KEYTRUDA.
Patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck
squamous cell carcinoma with disease progression on or after platinum-
containing chemotherapy. This indication is approved under accelerated
approval based on tumor response rate and durability of response.
Continued approval for this indication may be contingent upon
verification and description of clinical benefit in the confirmatory
trials.
Adult and pediatric patients with refractory classical
Hodgkin lymphoma, or who have relapsed after three or more prior lines
of therapy. This indication is approved under accelerated approval
based on tumor response and durability of response. Continued approval
for this indication may be contingent upon verification and description
of clinical benefit in the confirmatory trials.
Subsequent to this approval, the USPTO received a patent term
restoration application for KEYTRUDA (U.S. Patent No. 8,354,509) from
Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V., and the USPTO requested FDA's assistance in
determining this patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a
letter dated October 15, 2015, FDA advised the USPTO that this human
biological product had undergone a regulatory review period and that
the approval of KEYTRUDA represented the first permitted commercial
marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the USPTO requested that
FDA determine the product's regulatory review period.
II. Determination of Regulatory Review Period
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
[[Page 4494]]
KEYTRUDA is 1,338 days. Of this time, 1,148 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 190 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: January 7,
2011. The applicant claims January 8, 2011, as the date the
investigational new drug application (IND) became effective. However,
FDA records indicate that the IND effective date was January 7, 2011,
which was the first date after FDA receipt of the IND that the
investigational studies were allowed to proceed.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human biological product under section 351 of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262): February 27, 2014. FDA has verified the
applicant's claim that the biologics license application (BLA) for
KEYTRUDA (BLA 125514/0) was initially submitted on February 27, 2014.
3. The date the application was approved: September 4, 2014. FDA
has verified the applicant's claim that BLA 125514/0 was approved on
September 4, 2014.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the USPTO
applies several statutory limitations in its calculations of the actual
period for patent extension. In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 83 days of patent term extension.
III. Petitions
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit either electronic or written comments and, under
21 CFR 60.24 ask for a redetermination (see DATES). Furthermore, as
specified in Sec. 60.30 (21 CFR 60.30), any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review period.
To meet its burden, the petition must comply with all the requirements
of Sec. 60.30, including but not limited to: Must be timely (see
DATES), must be filed in accordance with Sec. 10.20, must contain
sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation, and must certify that a
true and complete copy of the petition has been served upon the patent
applicant. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42,
1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Submit petitions electronically to https://www.regulations.gov at
Docket No. FDA-2013-S-0610. Submit written petitions (two copies are
required) to the Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Dated: January 24, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-01890 Filed 1-30-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P