Revisions to Testing Regulations for Air Emission Sources, 3636-3656 [2018-00470]
Download as PDF
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
3636
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Committee, a statutory Federal Advisory
Committee body.3 Given the significant
role that manufactured housing plays in
providing affordable housing, HUD has
determined that it should undertake a
substantive review of all current and
planned federal regulation of
manufactured housing. This review is
intended to ensure that HUD can more
effectively meet its responsibilities to
facilitate the availability of affordable
manufactured homes and encourage
innovation and cost-effective
construction techniques for
manufactured housing while continuing
to protect consumers by ensuring
quality, durable, safe and affordable
manufactured homes.
In conducting this review, HUD
believes that it would benefit from
information and perspectives among
state, local and tribal officials, experts in
relevant disciplines, affected
stakeholders in the private sector and
the public as a whole. HUD is, therefore,
requesting comment on all current and
planned regulatory actions affecting
manufactured housing. HUD
specifically seeks comment on:
• Rules listed in its Unified Agenda
of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions
regulations, including rules to update its
Manufactured Home Construction and
Safety Standards (FR–5739), and exempt
Recreational Vehicles from its
Manufactured Home Construction and
Safety Standards and Procedural and
Enforcement Regulations (FR–5787).
• How HUD should proceed with its
Interpretative Bulletin that provides
guidance for designing and installing
manufactured home foundations in
areas subject to freezing temperatures
with seasonal ground freezing.
• The effectiveness of HUD’s on-site
completion of construction regulations,
its Subpart I notification and corrections
procedures, and its Alternative
Construction approval process, both
overall and specifically in review of
manufactured homes with a carportready design or any other similar design
that would permit the construction of an
add-on at the final home site, that is not
structurally independent from the
home’s structure, support and anchoring
systems.
HUD does not anticipate moving
forward with any manufactured housing
program regulations pending
completion of its review. HUD may
make exceptions, however, on
individual rules based on policy
priorities or revised circumstances.
3 See HUD, Manufactured Housing Consensus
Committee, https://www.hud.gov/program_offices/
housing/rmra/mhs/cc1.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jan 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
To assist in the formulation of
comments, HUD encourages
commenters to consider how HUD’s
manufactured housing regulatory
agenda may be streamlined to reduce or
eliminate costs and overall burden
while ensuring that HUD can continue
to meet its statutory responsibilities
under the Manufactured Home
construction and Safety Standards Act
of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5401 et seq.), as
amended.
Dated: January 8, 2018.
Dana T. Wade,
General Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Housing.
[FR Doc. 2018–01276 Filed 1–25–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 51, 60, and 63
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2016–0510; FRL–9972–22–
OAR]
RIN 2060–AS95
Revisions to Testing Regulations for
Air Emission Sources
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This action proposes
corrections and updates to regulations
for source testing of emissions. The
proposed rule includes corrections to
testing provisions that contain
inaccuracies, updates to outdated
procedures, and approved alternative
procedures that provide testers
enhanced flexibility. The revisions will
improve the quality of data but will not
impose new substantive requirements
on source owners or operators.
DATES: Comments. Written comments
must be received by March 27, 2018.
Public Hearing. The EPA will hold a
public hearing on this rule if requested.
Requests for a hearing must be made by
February 5, 2018. Requests for a hearing
should be made to Mrs. Lula H. Melton
via email at melton.lula@epa.gov or by
phone at (919) 541–2910. If a hearing is
requested, it will be held on February
26, 2018 at EPA Headquarters, William
Jefferson Clinton East Building, 1201
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20004.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2016–0510 at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the Web, Cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
All documents in the docket are listed
on the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed on the website,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the EPA Docket Center, Room 3334,
EPA WJC West Building, 1301
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20004. The Public Reading Room is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the EPA
Docket Center is (202) 566–1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs.
Lula H. Melton, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Air Quality
Assessment Division (E143–02),
Environmental Protection Agency,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711;
telephone number: (919) 541–2910; fax
number: (919) 541–0516; email address:
melton.lula@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The supplementary information in
this preamble is organized as follows:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. What action is the agency taking?
II. Background
III. Summary of Proposed Amendments
A. Method 201A of Appendix M of Part 51
B. Method 204 of Appendix M of Part 51
C. Method 205 of Appendix M of Part 51
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
D. General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part
60
E. Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam Generators
(Subpart D) Part 60
F. Electric Utility Steam Generating Units
(Subpart Da) Part 60
G. Industrial-Commercial-Institutional
Steam Generating Units (Subpart Db)
Part 60
H. Small Industrial-CommercialInstitutional Steam Generating Units
(Subpart Dc) Part 60
I. Municipal Waste Combustors for Which
Construction is Commenced After
December 20, 1989 and on or Before
September 20, 1994 (Subpart Ea) Part 60
J. Glass Manufacturing Plants (Subpart CC)
Part 60
K. New Residential Wood Heaters, New
Residential Hydronic Heaters and
Forced-Air Furnaces (Subpart QQQQ)
Part 60
L. Method 2B of Appendix A–1 of Part 60
M. Method 5 of Appendix A–3 of Part 60
N. Method 5B of Appendix A–3 of Part 60
O. Method 5I of Appendix A–3 of Part 60
P. Method 7 of Appendix A–4 of Part 60
Q. Method 8 of Appendix A–4 of Part 60
R. Method 18 of Appendix A–6 of Part 60
S. Method 22 of Appendix A–7 of Part 60
T. Method 26 of Appendix A–8 of Part 60
U. Method 26A of Appendix A–8 of Part
60
V. Test Method 28WHH of Appendix A–8
of Part 60
W. Performance Specification 1 of
Appendix B of Part 60
X. Performance Specification 2 of
Appendix B of Part 60
Y. Performance Specification 3 of
Appendix B of Part 60
Z. Performance Specification 11 of
Appendix B of Part 60
AA. Performance Specification 15 of
Appendix B of Part 60
BB. Performance Specification 18 of
Appendix B of Part 60
CC. Procedure 1 of Appendix F of Part 60
DD. General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part
63
EE. Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing
(Subpart NNN) Part 63
FF. Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial,
and Institutional Boilers and Process
Heaters (Subpart DDDDD) Part 63
GG. Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility
Steam Generating Units (Subpart
UUUUU) Part 63
HH. Method 303 of Appendix A of Part 63
II. Method 308 of Appendix A of Part 63
JJ. Method 320 of Appendix A of Part 63
KK. Method 323 of Appendix A of Part 63
LL. Method 325A of Appendix A of Part 63
MM. Method 325B of Appendix A of Part
63
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jan 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use
J. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act and 1 CFR Part 51
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
To Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
The proposed amendments apply to
industries that are subject to the current
provisions of parts 51, 60, and 63. We
did not list all of the specific affected
industries or their North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS)
codes herein since there are many
affected sources in numerous NAICS
categories. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action
to a particular entity, consult either the
air permitting authority for the entity or
your EPA Regional representative as
listed in 40 CFR 63.13.
B. What action is the agency taking?
This action makes corrections and
revisions to source test methods,
performance specifications (PS), quality
assurance/quality control (QA/QC)
procedures, and testing regulations. The
corrections and revisions consist
primarily of typographical errors,
updates to testing procedures, and the
addition of alternative equipment and
methods the Agency has deemed
acceptable to use.
II. Background
The EPA catalogs errors and
corrections, as well as necessary
revisions to test methods, PS, QA/QC
procedures, and associated regulations
in 40 CFR parts 51, 60, and 63 and
periodically updates and revises these
provisions. The most recent updates and
revisions were promulgated on August
30, 2016 (81 FR 59800). This proposed
rule addresses necessary corrections and
revisions identified subsequent to that
final action, many of which were
brought to our attention by regulated
sources and end-users, such as
environmental consultants and
compliance professionals. These
revisions will improve the quality of
data obtained and give source testers the
flexibility to use newly-approved
alternative procedures.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3637
III. Summary of Proposed Amendments
The following amendments are being
proposed.
A. Method 201A of Appendix M of Part
51
In Method 201A, in section 12.5, the
denominator of equation 24 would be
corrected.
B. Method 204 of Appendix M of Part
51
In Method 204, in section 8.2, the
statement regarding equation 204–2
would be corrected to ‘‘The NEAR must
be ≤0.05.’’
C. Method 205 of Appendix M of Part
51
In Method 205, section 2.1.1 would be
revised to allow the use of National
Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST)-traceable transfer standards to
calibrate the gas dilution system
because these standards are widely
available and provide the accuracy
necessary to perform the calibration.
Section 2.1.1 would also be revised to
require testers to report the results of the
calibration of the dilution system to
enable the regulatory authority to
review this information.
D. General Provisions (Subpart A) of
Part 60
In the General Provisions of part 60,
section 60.17(h) would be revised to add
American Society for Testing and
Materials (ASTM) D6216–12 to the list
of incorporations by reference and to renumber the remaining consensus
standards that are incorporated by
reference in alpha-numeric order.
E. Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam Generators
(Subpart D) Part 60
In subpart D, the allowed filter
temperature in section 60.46(b)(2)(i)
would be revised from 160 ±14 °C to 160
±5 °C resulting in increased precision of
the filterable PM measurements.
F. Electric Utility Steam Generating
Units (Subpart Da) Part 60
In subpart Da, the allowed filter
temperature in section 60.50Da
(b)(1)(ii)(A) would be revised from 160
±14 °C to 160 ±5 °C resulting in
increased precision of the filterable PM
measurements.
G. Industrial-Commercial-Institutional
Steam Generating Units (Subpart Db)
Part 60
In subpart Db, the allowed filter
temperature in section 60.46b(d)(4)
would be revised from 160 ±14 °C to 160
±5 °C resulting in increased precision of
the filterable PM measurements.
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
3638
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
N. Method 5B of Appendix A–3 of Part
60
H. Small Industrial-CommercialInstitutional Steam Generating Units
(Subpart Dc) Part 60
In subpart Dc, the allowed filter
temperature in section 60.45c(a)(5)
would be revised from 160 ±14 °C to 160
±5 °C resulting in increased precision of
the filterable PM measurements.
I. Municipal Waste Combustors for
Which Construction Is Commenced
After December 20, 1989 and on or
Before September 20, 1994 (Subpart Ea)
Part 60
In subpart Ea, the allowed filter
temperature in section 60.58a(b)(3)
would be revised from 160 ±14 °C to 160
±5 °C resulting in increased precision of
the filterable PM measurements.
J. Glass Manufacturing Plants (Subpart
CC) Part 60
In subpart CC, the allowed filter
temperature in section 60.293(f) would
be revised from 120 ±14 °C to 120 ±5 °C
resulting in increased precision of the
filterable particulate matter (PM)
measurements. The allowed filter
temperature in section 60.296(d)(2)
would be revised from 177 ±14 °C to 177
±5 °C resulting in increased precision of
the filterable PM measurements.
K. New Residential Wood Heaters, New
Residential Hydronic Heaters and
Forced-Air Furnaces Part 60
In subpart QQQQ, in Method 28WHH,
in section 13.5.1, equation 8 would be
corrected.
L. Method 2B of Appendix A–1 of Part
60
In Method 2B, in section 12.1, the
definition of ambient carbon dioxide
concentration would be revised because
the global monthly mean (CO2)a
concentration varies over time. Also, a
website link would be added to the
definition.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
M. Method 5 of Appendix A–3 of Part
60
The allowed filter temperature in
Method 5, sections 2.0, 6.1.1.2, 6.1.1.6,
6.1.1.7, and 8.5 would be revised from
120 ±14 °C to 120 ±5 °C resulting in
increased precision of the filterable PM
measurements. Section 6.1.1.9 would be
revised to allow the use of a single
temperature sensor in lieu of two
temperature sensors on the dry gas
meter as allowed by Technical
Information Document 19 (TID–19) and
the approved broadly applicable
alternative, ALT–117 (see https://
www.epa.gov/emc).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jan 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
The allowed filter temperature in
Method 5B, sections 2.0, 6.1, and 8.2
would be revised from 160 ±14 °C to 160
±5 °C resulting in increased precision of
the filterable PM measurements. Section
11.0 would be revised to replace the
reference to Method 5, section 11.0 with
specific analytical procedures and to
report the results using Figure 5B–1 for
complete data review. Section 17.0
would be revised to delete the word
‘‘Reserved’’ from the title, and Figure
5B–1 (Analytical Data Sheet) would be
added.
O. Method 5I of Appendix A–3 of Part
60
In Method 5I, sections 2.1 and 8.5.2.2
would be revised to tighten the allowed
filter temperature from 120 ±14 °C to
120 ±5 °C resulting in increased
precision of the filterable PM
measurements.
P. Method 7 of Appendix A–4 of Part 60
In Method 7, sections 10.1.2 and 11.3
reference erroneous sections; the correct
sections would be inserted.
Q. Method 8 of Appendix A–4 of Part 60
In Method 8, sections 6.1.1.1 through
6.1.1.4 would be renumbered to 6.1.1.2
through 6.1.1.5; a new section 6.1.1.1
would be added to clarify the
requirements that apply to the probe
nozzle; and Figure 8–1 (Sulfuric Acid
Sampling Train) would be corrected.
R. Method 18 of Appendix A–6 of Part
60
In Method 18, in section 13.1, the
erroneous paragraph (c) designation
would be re-designated as (b).
S. Method 22 of Appendix A–7 of Part
60
In Method 22, sections 11.2.1 and
11.2.2 would be revised to allow digital
photography to be used for a subset of
the recordkeeping requirements. Section
11.2.3 would be added to allow digital
photographic records. Note that ALT–
109 (see https://www.epa.gov/emc) is
the associated broadly applicable
alternative that allows the use of digital
photographs for specific recordkeeping
requirements.
T. Method 26 of Appendix A–8 of Part
60
In Method 26, section 6.2.2 would be
revised to allow the use of glass sample
storage containers as an option to allow
flexibility and to be consistent with
Method 26A.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
U. Method 26A of Appendix A–8 of Part
60
In Method 26A, section 6.2.1 would
be revised to remove the language
regarding sample storage containers. We
have determined that high-density
polyethylene is an acceptable material
for sample storage containers in
addition to the currently allowed glass.
Therefore, we would allow both highdensity polyethylene and glass in a new
section 6.2.4.
V. Test Method 28WHH of Appendix
A–8 of Part 60
In Test Method 28WHH, equation 8 in
section 13.5.1 would be corrected.
W. Performance Specification 1 of
Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 1,
references to ASTM D6216–98 (in
sections 2.1, 3.1, 6.1, 8.1(1), 8.1(3)(ii),
8.2(1), 8.2(2), 8.2(3), 9.0, 12.1, 13.1, 13.2,
and 16.0 reference 8. will be replaced
with ASTM D6216–12. Note: If the
initial certification of the continuous
opacity monitoring system (COMS) has
already occurred using D6216–98,
D6216–03, or D6216–07, it will not be
necessary to recertify using D6216–12.
X. Performance Specification 2 of
Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 2,
section 13.2 would be replaced with a
table that indicates the relative accuracy
performance specifications.
Y. Performance Specification 3 of
Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 3, the
two sentences in section 12.0 that read,
‘‘Calculate the arithmetic difference
between the RM and the CEMS output
for each run. The average difference of
the nine (or more) data sets constitute
the RA.’’ would be deleted; these two
sentences are no longer necessary since
equations 3–1 and 3–2 would be moved
from section 13.2 to section 12.0.
Z. Performance Specification 11 of
Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 11,
section 13.1, the word ‘‘average’’
erroneously exists in the second
sentence and would be deleted.
AA. Performance Specification 15 of
Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 15,
section 13.0 would be added as
‘‘Method Performance (Reserved).’’
BB. Performance Specification 18 of
Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 18, in
section 11.8.7, the last sentence would
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
be revised to clarify the duration of the
drift check. In Table 1, the erroneous
acronym ‘‘NO2’’ would be replaced with
‘‘NO.’’ In the appendix of Performance
Specification 18, the inadvertently
omitted reserved section 12.0 would be
added.
CC. Procedure 1 of Appendix F of Part
60
In Procedure 1, in section 5.1.2 (1),
the sentence immediately following the
table that reads, ‘‘Challenge the CEMS
three times at each audit point, and use
the average of the three responses in
determining accuracy.’’ would be
replaced with, ‘‘Inject each of the audit
gases, three times each for a total of six
injections. Inject the gases in such a
manner that the entire CEMS is
challenged. Do not inject the same gas
concentration twice in succession.’’ In
section 5.1.2 (3), the reference to EPA’s
traceability protocol for gaseous
calibration standards would be updated,
and the language regarding the use of
EPA Method 205 for dilution of audit
gases would be clarified.
DD. General Provisions (Subpart A) of
Part 63
Sections 63.7(g)(2), 63.7(g)(2)(v), and
63.8(e)(5)(i) of the General Provisions
(subpart A) of part 63 would be revised
to require the reporting of specific test
data for continuous monitoring system
performance evaluation tests and
ongoing QA tests. These data elements
would be required regardless of the
format of the report, i.e., electronic or
paper. These modifications will ensure
that performance evaluation and quality
assurance test reporting include all data
necessary for the compliance authority
to assess and assure the quality of the
reported data and that the reported
information describes and identifies the
specific unit covered by the evaluation
test report.
EE. Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing
(Subpart NNN) Part 63
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
In subpart NNN, the allowed filter
temperature in § 63.1385(a)(5) would be
revised from 120 ±14 °C to 120 ±5 °C
resulting in increased precision of the
filterable PM measurements.
FF. Major Sources: Industrial,
Commercial, and Institutional Boilers
and Process Heaters (Subpart DDDDD)
Part 63
In Table 6 of subpart DDDDD, row 1.f.
would be revised to allow the use of
EPA SW–846–7471B (for liquid
samples) in addition to EPA SW–846–
7470A for measuring mercury to allow
flexibility.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jan 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
GG. Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility
Steam Generating Units (Subpart
UUUUU) Part 63
In subpart UUUUU, the allowed filter
temperature in § 63.10010(h)(7)(i)(1)
would be revised from 160 ±14 °C to 160
±5 °C resulting in increased precision of
the filterable PM measurements. In
Table 5, Method 5I would be allowed as
a test method option because Method 5I
is designed for low PM application.
HH. Method 303 of Appendix A of Part
63
In Method 303, section 12.4, equation
303–3 would be corrected by inserting
‘‘where y = ’’ in front of the equation.
II. Method 308 of Appendix A of Part 63
In Method 308, deionized distilled
water would replace the aqueous nproponal solution; the affected sections
are 2.0, 7.2.2, 7.2.3.3, and 11.3.2.
Section 7.2.2, which defines the
aqueous n-proponal solution, would be
removed. Section 8.1.2 would be revised
to require a leak check prior to the
sampling run (in addition to after the
sampling run) for QA purposes;
requiring a leak check prior to the
sampling run would potentially save
time and money. In section 9.1,
methanol spike recovery check would
be added as a QC measure in Table 9.1.
In section 12.1, variables used in
equations 308–4 and 308–5 would be
added and section 12.5, which includes
equations 308–4 and 308–5, would be
added. In section 13.0, the title
‘‘Reserved’’ would be replaced with
‘‘Method Performance’’ and QA
requirements would be added to be
consistent with other methods.
JJ. Method 320 of Appendix A of Part 63
In section 8.2.2.4, the denominator in
equation 2 would be corrected from PSS
to PS. In section 9.2.3, the word ‘‘where’’
in the statement ‘‘Calculate the dilution
ratio using the tracer gas as follows:
where:’’ would be deleted. Also in
section 9.2.3, ‘‘dir’’ on the definition of
spike is inadvertently superscripted and
would be subscripted.
KK. Method 323 of Appendix A of Part
63
In Method 323, section 12.9, the
denominator in equation 323–8 would
be corrected.
LL. Method 325A of Appendix A of Part
63
In Method 325A, section 8.2.1.3
would be revised to clarify that only one
extra sampling site is required near
known sources of volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) when the source is
within 50 meters of the boundary and
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3639
the source is located between two
monitors. The label under Figure 8.1
would be corrected from Refinery (20%
angle) to Refinery (20° angle). Section
8.2.3.2 would be revised to include
facilities with a monitoring perimeter
length equal to 7,315 meters (24,000
feet). Section 8.2.3.3 would be added to
provide clarification and an equivalent
procedure in Option 2 (linear distance
between sites) for site locations that
parallel section 8.2.2.2.4 in Option 1
(radial distance between sites).
MM. Method 325B of Appendix A of
Part 63
In Method 325B, section 9.3.2 would
be revised to correct an error in the
number of field blank samples required
for a sampling period and to provide
consistency with the sample analysis
required in Method 325B. In sections
9.13 and 11.3.2.5, the erroneous
reference to section 10.6.3 would be
corrected to 10.0. Also in section
11.3.2.5, the erroneous reference to
section 10.9.5 would be corrected to
9.13. Section 12.2.2 would be revised to
correct the calculation of target
compound concentrations at standard
conditions. Sections 12.2.3 and 12.2.4
would be deleted because the equations
for target concentrations are incorrect.
Table 17–1 would be revised to add
inadvertently omitted QC criteria from
section 9.3.3.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Additional information about these
statutes and Executive Orders can be
found at https://www2.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under the terms of
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993) and is,
therefore, not subject to review under
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 (76
FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
This action is expected to be an
Executive Order 13771 deregulatory
action. This proposed rule is expected
to provide meaningful burden reduction
by improving data quality and providing
source testers the flexibility to use
newly-approved alternative procedures.
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
3640
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
PRA. The amendments being proposed
in this action to the test methods,
performance specifications, and testing
regulations do not substantively revise
the existing information collection
requirements but rather only make
corrections and minor updates to
existing testing methodology. In
addition, the proposed amendments
clarify performance testing
requirements.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. In making this
determination, the impact of concern is
any significant adverse economic
impact on small entities. An agency may
certify that a rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities if
the rule relieves regulatory burden, has
no net burden or otherwise has a
positive economic effect on the small
entities subject to the rule. This
proposed rule will not impose emission
measurement requirements beyond
those specified in the current
regulations, nor does it change any
emission standard. We have, therefore,
concluded that this action will have no
net regulatory burden for all directly
regulated small entities.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain any
unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does
not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. The action imposes no
enforceable duty on any state, local or
tribal governments or the private sector.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175. This action would correct
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jan 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
and update existing testing regulations.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern
environmental health or safety risks that
the EPA has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive Order. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
because it does not concern an
environmental health risk or safety risk.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
J. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act and 1 CFR Part 51
This action involves technical
standards. The EPA proposes to use
ASTM D6216–12 for continuous opacity
monitors in Performance Specification
1. The ASTM D6216–12 standard covers
the procedure for certifying continuous
opacity monitors and includes design
and performance specifications, test
procedures, and QA requirements to
ensure that continuous opacity monitors
meet minimum design and calibration
requirements, necessary in part, for
accurate opacity monitoring
measurements in regulatory
environmental opacity monitoring
applications subject to 10 percent or
higher opacity standards.
The ASTM D6216–12 standard was
developed and adopted by the American
Society for Testing and Materials. The
standard may be obtained from https://
www.astm.org or from the ASTM at 100
Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West
Conshohocken, PA 19428–2959.
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action is
not subject to Executive Order 12898 (59
FR 7629, February 16, 1994) because it
does not establish an environmental
health or safety standard. This action
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
would correct and update existing
testing regulations.
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 51
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Performance
specifications, Test methods and
procedures.
40 CFR Part 60
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Performance specifications,
Test methods and procedures.
40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Performance
specifications, Test methods and
procedures.
Dated: December 11, 2017.
E. Scott Pruitt,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Environmental Protection
Agency proposes to amend title 40,
chapter I of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 51—REQUIREMENTS FOR
PREPARATION, ADOPTION, AND
SUBMITTAL OF IMPLEMENTATION
PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 51
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 101; 42 U.S.C. 7401–
7671q.
2. Amend appendix M to part 51 as
follows:
■ a. Revise section 12.5, equation 24, in
Method 201A.
■ b. Revise the last sentence in section
8.2 in Method 204.
■ c. Revise section 2.1.1 in Method 205.
The revisions read as follows:
■
Appendix M to Part 51—Recommended
Test Methods for State Implementation
Plans
*
*
*
*
*
Method 201A—Determination of PM10 and
PM2.5 Emissions From Stationary Sources
(Constant Sampling Rate Procedure)
*
*
*
*
*
12.5 Equations. Use the following
equations to complete the calculations
required in this test method.
*
*
*
*
*
Sampling Dwell Time at Each Point. Ntp is
the total number of traverse points. You must
use the preliminary velocity traverse data.
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
*
§ 60.46
*
Method 204—Criteria for and Verification of
a Permanent or Temporary Total Enclosure
*
*
*
*
*
8.2 * * *
The NEAR must be ≤0.05.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 205—Verification of Gas Dilution
Systems for Field Instrument Calibrations
*
*
*
*
*
2.1.1 The gas dilution system shall be
recalibrated once per calendar year using
NIST-traceable flow standards with an
uncertainty ≤0.25 percent. You shall report
the results of the calibration by the person or
manufacturer who carried out the calibration
whenever the dilution system is used, listing
the date of the most recent calibration, the
due date for the next calibration, calibration
point, reference flow device (ID, S/N), and
acceptance criteria. Follow the
manufacturer’s instructions for the operation
and use of the gas dilution system. A copy
of the manufacturer’s instructions for the
operation of the instrument, as well as the
most recent calibration documentation shall
be made available for inspection at the test
site.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 60—STANDARDS OF
PERFORMANCE FOR NEW
STATIONARY SOURCES
3. The authority citation for part 60
continues to read as follows:
■
Test methods and procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) The sampling time and sample
volume for each run shall be at least 60
minutes and 0.85 dscm (30 dscf). The
probe and filter holder heating systems
in the sampling train shall be set to
provide an average gas temperature of
160 ±5 °C (320 ±9 °F).
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart Da—Standards of
Performance for Electric Utility Steam
Generating Units
6. Revise § 60.50Da (b)(1)(ii)(A) to
read as follows:
■
§ 60.50Da Compliance determination
procedures and methods.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) The sampling time and sample
volume for each run shall be at least 120
minutes and 1.70 dscm (60 dscf). The
probe and filter holder heating system
in the sampling train may be set to
provide an average gas temperature of
no greater than 160 ±5 °C (320 ±9 °F).
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart Db—Standards of
Performance for IndustrialCommercial-Institutional Steam
Generating Units
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
4. In § 60.17:
■ a. Redesignate paragraphs (h)(177)
through (h)(209) as (h)(178) through
(h)(210).
■ b. Add new paragraph (h)(177).
The addition reads as follows:
■
3641
§ 60.45c Compliance and performance test
methods and procedures for particulate
matter.
(a) * * *
(5) For Method 5 or 5B of appendix
A of this part, the temperature of the
sample gas in the probe and filter holder
shall be monitored and maintained at
160 ±5 °C (320 ±9 °F).
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart Ea—Standards of
Performance for Municipal Waste
Combustors for Which Construction Is
Commenced After December 20, 1989
and On or Before September 20, 1994
9. Revise § 60.58a(b)(3) to read as
follows:
■
§ 60.58a
testing.
Compliance and performance
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) Method 5 shall be used for
determining compliance with the
particulate matter emission limit. The
minimum sample volume shall be 1.7
cubic meters (60 cubic feet). The probe
and filter holder heating systems in the
sample train shall be set to provide a gas
temperature of 160° ±5 °C (320° ±9 °F).
An oxygen or carbon dioxide
measurement shall be obtained
simultaneously with each Method 5 run.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart CC—Standards of
Performance for Glass Manufacturing
Plants
10. Revise § 60.293(f) to read as
follows:
7. Revise § 60.46b (d)(4) to read as
follows:
■
§ 60.46b Compliance and performance test
methods and procedures for particulate
matter and nitrogen oxides.
§ 60.293 Standards for particulate matter
from glass melting furnace with modifiedprocesses.
*
*
*
Subpart D—Standards of Performance
for Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam Generators
Subpart Dc—Standards of
Performance for Small IndustrialCommercial-Institutional Steam
Generating Units
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 60.17
Incorporations by reference.
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(177) ASTM D6216–12, Standard
Practice for Opacity Monitor
Manufacturers to Certify Conformance
with Design and Performance
Specifications, IBR approved for
appendix B to part 60: Performance
Specification 1.
*
*
*
*
*
5. Revise § 60.46(b)(2)(i) to read as
follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jan 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(4) For Method 5 of appendix A of
this part, the temperature of the sample
gas in the probe and filter holder is
monitored and is maintained at 160 ±5
°C (320 ±9 °F).
*
*
*
*
*
8. Revise § 60.45c(a)(5) to read as
follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
*
(f) Test methods and procedures as
specified in § 60.296 shall be used to
determine compliance with this section
except that to determine compliance for
any glass melting furnace using
modified processes and fired with either
a gaseous fuel or a liquid fuel containing
less than 0.50 weight percent sulfur,
Method 5 shall be used with the probe
and filter holder heating system in the
sampling train set to provide a gas
temperature of 120 ±5 °C (248 ±9 °F).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 11. Revise § 60.296(d)(2) to read as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
EP26JA18.000
■
3642
§ 60.296
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
Test methods and procedures.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) Method 5 shall be used to
determine the particulate matter
concentration (cs) and volumetric flow
rate (Qsd) of the effluent gas. The
sampling time and sample volume for
each run shall be at least 60 minutes
and 0.90 dscm (31.8 dscf). The probe
and filter holder heating system may be
set to provide a gas temperature no
greater than 177 ±5 °C (350 ±9 °F),
except under the conditions specified in
§ 60.293(e).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 12. Revise ‘‘(CO2)a’’ in section 12.1 in
Method 2B of appendix A–1 to part 60
to read as follows:
Appendix A–1 to Part 60—Test
Methods 1 Through 2F
*
*
*
*
*
Method 2B—Determination of Exhaust Gas
Volume Flow Rate From Gasoline Vapor
Incinerators
*
*
12.1
*
*
*
*
*
Nomenclature.
*
*
*
(CO2)a = Ambient carbon dioxide
concentration, ppm (if not measured
during the test period, may be assumed
to equal the global monthly mean CO2
concentration posted at https://
www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/
global.html#global_data).
*
*
*
*
*
13. In appendix A–3 to part 60:
a. Revise sections 2.0, 6.1.1.2, 6.1.1.6,
6.1.1.7, 6.1.1.9, and 8.5 in Method 5.
■ b. Revise sections 2.0, 6.1, 8.2, and
11.0 in Method 5B.
■ c. Add section 17.0 in Method 5B.
■ d. Revise sections 2.1 and 8.5.2.2 in
Method 5I.
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
Appendix A–3 to Part 60—Test
Methods 4 Through 5I
*
*
*
*
*
Method 5—Determination of Particulate
Matter Emissions From Stationary Sources
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
2.0 Summary of Method. Particulate
matter is withdrawn isokinetically from the
source and collected on a glass fiber filter
maintained at a temperature of 120 ±5 °C
(248 ±9 °F) or such other temperature as
specified by an applicable subpart of the
standards or approved by the Administrator
for a particular application. The PM mass,
which includes any material that condenses
at or above the filtration temperature, is
determined gravimetrically after the removal
of uncombined water.
*
*
*
*
*
6.1.1.2 Probe Liner. Borosilicate or quartz
glass tubing with a heating system capable of
maintaining a probe gas temperature during
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jan 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
sampling of 120 ±5 °C (248 ±9 °F), or such
other temperature as specified by an
applicable subpart of the standards or as
approved by the Administrator for a
particular application. Since the actual
temperature at the outlet of the probe is not
usually monitored during sampling, probes
constructed according to APTD–0581 and
utilizing the calibration curves of APTD–
0576 (or calibrated according to the
procedure outlined in APTD–0576) will be
considered acceptable. Either borosilicate or
quartz glass probe liners may be used for
stack temperatures up to about 480 °C (900
°F); quartz glass liners shall be used for
temperatures between 480 and 900 °C (900
and 1,650 °F). Both types of liners may be
used at higher temperatures than specified
for short periods of time, subject to the
approval of the Administrator. The softening
temperature for borosilicate glass is 820 °C
(1500 °F), and for quartz glass it is 1500 °C
(2700 °F). Whenever practical, every effort
should be made to use borosilicate or quartz
glass probe liners. Alternatively, metal liners
(e.g., 316 stainless steel, Incoloy 825 or other
corrosion resistant metals) made of seamless
tubing may be used, subject to the approval
of the Administrator.
*
*
*
*
*
6.1.1.6 Filter Heating System. Any
heating system capable of monitoring and
maintaining temperature around the filter
shall be used to ensure the sample gas
temperature exiting the filter of 120 ± 5 °C
(248 ±9 °F) during sampling or such other
temperature as specified by an applicable
subpart of the standards or approved by the
Administrator for a particular application.
The monitoring and regulation of the
temperature around the filter may be done
with the filter temperature sensor or another
temperature sensor.
6.1.1.7 Filter Temperature Sensor. A
temperature sensor capable of measuring
temperature to within ±3 °C (5.4 °F) shall be
installed so that the sensing tip of the
temperature sensor is in direct contact with
the sample gas exiting the filter. The sensing
tip of the sensor may be encased in glass,
Teflon, or metal and must protrude at least 1⁄2
in. into the sample gas exiting the filter. The
filter temperature sensor must be monitored
and recorded during sampling to ensure a
sample gas temperature exiting the filter of
120 ±5 °C (248 ±9 °F), or such other
temperature as specified by an applicable
subpart of the standards or approved by the
Administrator for a particular application.
*
*
*
*
*
6.1.1.9 Metering System. Vacuum gauge,
leak-free pump, calibrated temperature
sensors, dry gas meter (DGM) capable of
measuring volume to within 2 percent, and
related equipment, as shown in Figure 5–1.
Other metering systems capable of
maintaining sampling rates within 10 percent
of isokinetic and of determining sample
volumes to within 2 percent may be used,
subject to the approval of the Administrator.
When the metering system is used in
conjunction with a pitot tube, the system
shall allow periodic checks of isokinetic
rates. The average DGM temperature for use
in the calculations of Section 12.0 may be
obtained by averaging the two temperature
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
sensors located at the inlet and outlet of the
DGM as shown in Figure 5–3 or alternatively
from a single temperature sensor located at
the immediate outlet of the DGM or the
plenum of the DGM.
*
*
*
*
*
8.5 Sampling Train Operation. During the
sampling run, maintain an isokinetic
sampling rate (within 10 percent of true
isokinetic unless otherwise specified by the
Administrator) and a sample gas temperature
through the filter of 120 ±5 °C (248 ±9 °F) or
such other temperature as specified by an
applicable subpart of the standards or
approved by the Administrator. Note: After
startup of the sampling system, it may take
several minutes to equilibrate the system and
temperature reading to within the required
temperature threshold.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 5B—Determination of Nonsulfuric
Acid Particulate Matter Emissions From
Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
2.0 Summary of Method
Particulate matter is withdrawn
isokinetically from the source and collected
on a glass fiber filter maintained at a
temperature of 160 ±5 °C (320 ±9 °F). The
collected sample is then heated in an oven
at 160 °C (320 °F) for 6 hours to volatilize any
condensed sulfuric acid that may have been
collected, and the nonsulfuric acid
particulate mass is determined
gravimetrically.
*
*
*
*
*
6.1 Sample Collection.
The probe liner heating system and filter
heating system must be capable of
maintaining a sample gas temperature of 160
±5 °C (320 ±9 °F).
*
*
*
*
*
8.2 Probe and Filter Temperatures.
Maintain the probe outlet and filter
temperatures at 160 ±5 °C (320 ±9 °F). Note:
After start-up of the sampling system, it may
take several minutes to equilibrate the system
and temperature reading to within the
required temperature threshold.
*
*
*
*
*
11.0 Analytical Procedure
11.1 Record and report the data required
on a sheet such as the one shown in Figure
5B–1.
11.2 Handle each sample container as
follows:
11.2.1 Container No. 1. Leave the
contents in the shipping container or transfer
the filter and any loose PM from the sample
container to a tared glass weighing dish.
Oven dry the filter sample at a temperature
of 160 ±5 °C (320 ±9 °F) for 6 hours. Cool in
a desiccator for 2 hours, and weigh to
constant weight. Report the results to the
nearest 0.1 mg. For the purposes of this
section, the term ‘‘constant weight’’ means a
difference of no more than 0.5 mg or 1
percent of total weight less tare weight,
whichever is greater, between two
consecutive weighings, with no less than 6
hours of desiccation time between weighings.
11.2.2 Container No. 2. Note the level of
liquid in the container, and confirm on the
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
3643
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
analysis sheet whether leakage occurred
during transport. If a noticeable amount of
leakage has occurred, either void the sample
or use methods, subject to the approval of the
Administrator, to correct the final results.
Measure the liquid in this container either
volumetrically to ±1 ml or gravimetrically to
±0.5 g. Transfer the contents to a tared 250
ml beaker, and evaporate to dryness at
ambient temperature and pressure. Then
oven dry the probe sample at a temperature
of 160 ±5 °C (320 ±9 °F) for 6 hours. Cool in
a desiccator for 2 hours, and weigh to
constant weight. Report the results to the
nearest 0.1 mg.
11.2.3 Container No. 3. Weigh the spent
silica gel (or silica gel plus impinger) to the
nearest 0.5 g using a balance. This step may
be conducted in the field.
11.2.4 Acetone Blank Container. Measure
the acetone in this container either
volumetrically or gravimetrically. Transfer
the acetone to a tared 250 ml beaker, and
evaporate to dryness at ambient temperature
and pressure. Desiccate for 24 hours, and
weigh to a constant weight. Report the results
to the nearest 0.1 mg.
Note: The contents of Container No. 2 as
well as the acetone blank container may be
evaporated at temperatures higher than
ambient. If evaporation is done at an elevated
temperature, the temperature must be below
the boiling point of the solvent; also, to
prevent ‘‘bumping,’’ the evaporation process
must be closely supervised, and the contents
of the beaker must be swirled occasionally to
maintain an even temperature. Use extreme
care, as acetone is highly flammable and has
a low flash point.
*
*
*
*
*
17.0 Tables, Diagrams, Flowcharts, and
Validation Data
Weight of particulate collected, mg
Container number
Final weight
Tare weight
Weight gain
1. ..................................................................................................................................
2. ..................................................................................................................................
Total: ............................................................................................................................
Less acetone blank ......................................................................................................
Weight of particulate matter .........................................................................................
Volume of liquid water collected
Impinger volume, ml
Final ..............................................................................................................................
Initial .............................................................................................................................
Liquid collected ............................................................................................................
Total volume collected .................................................................................................
Silica gel weight, g
.............................................
g* ml
*Convert weight of water to volume by dividing total weight increase by density of water (1 g/ml).
Method 5I—Determination of Low Level
Particulate Emissions From Stationary
Sources
each train be maintained within ±5 °C (±9 °F)
of each other. Note: After startup of the
sampling system, it may take several minutes
to equilibrate the system and temperature
reading to within the required temperature
threshold.
*
*
Figure 5B–1. Analytical Data Sheet
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
2.1. Description. The system setup and
operation is essentially identical to Method
5. Particulate is withdrawn isokinetically
from the source and collected on a 47 mm
glass fiber filter maintained at a temperature
of 120 ±5 °C (248 ±9 °F). The PM mass is
determined by gravimetric analysis after the
removal of uncombined water. Specific
measures in this procedure designed to
improve system performance at low
particulate levels include:
1. Improved sample handling procedures
2. Light weight sample filter assembly
3. Use of low residue grade acetone
Accuracy is improved through the
minimization of systemic errors associated
with sample handling and weighing
procedures. High purity reagents, all glass,
grease free, sample train components, and
light weight filter assemblies and beakers,
each contribute to the overall objective of
improved precision and accuracy at low
particulate concentrations.
*
*
*
*
*
8.5.2.2 Care should be taken to maintain
the filter box temperature of the paired trains
as close as possible to the Method required
temperature of 120 ±5 °C (248 ±9 °F). If
separate ovens are being used for
simultaneously operated trains, it is
recommended that the oven temperature of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jan 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
*
*
*
*
14. In appendix A–4 to part 60:
a. Revise sections 10.1.2 and 11.3 in
Method 7.
■ b. Redesignate sections 6.1.1.1
through 6.1.1.4 to read as sections
6.1.1.2 through 6.1.1.5 in Method 8.
■ c. Add a new section 6.1.1.1 in
Method 8.
■ d. Revise Figure 8–1 in Method 8.
■
■
Appendix A–4 to Part 60—Test
Methods 6 Through 10B
*
*
*
*
*
procedure of section 11.2 until the solution
has been transferred to the 100-ml volumetric
flask and diluted to the mark. Measure the
absorbance of each solution at the optimum
wavelength as determined in section 10.1.1.2.
This calibration procedure must be repeated
on each day that samples are analyzed.
Calculate the spectrophotometer calibration
factor as shown in section 12.2.
*
*
*
*
*
11.3 Sample Analysis. Mix the contents
of the flask thoroughly, and measure the
absorbance at the optimum wavelength used
for the standards (Section 10.1.1.2), using the
blank solution as a zero reference. Dilute the
sample and the blank with equal volumes of
water if the absorbance exceeds A4, the
absorbance of the 400-mg NO2 standard (see
section 10.1.3).
*
*
*
*
*
Method 7—Determination of Nitrogen Oxide
Emissions From Stationary Sources
Method 8—Determination of Sulfuric Acid
and Sulfur Dioxide Emissions From
Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
*
10.1.2 Determination of
Spectrophotometer Calibration Factor Kc.
Add 0 ml, 2.0 ml, 4.0 ml, 6.0 ml, and 8.0 ml
of the KNO3 working standard solution (1 ml
= 100 mg NO2) to a series of five 50-ml
volumetric flasks. To each flask, add 25 ml
of absorbing solution and 10 ml water. Add
1 N NaOH to each flask until the pH is
between 9 and 12 (about 25 to 35 drops).
Dilute to the mark with water. Mix
thoroughly, and pipette a 25-ml aliquot of
each solution into a separate porcelain
evaporating dish. Beginning with the
evaporation step, follow the analysis
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
*
6.1.1.1 Probe Nozzle. Borosilicate or
quartz glass with a sharp, tapered leading
edge and coupled to the probe liner using a
Teflon union. When the stack temperature
exceeds 210 °C (410 °F), a leak-free ground
glass fitting or other leak free, noncontaminating fitting must be used to couple
the nozzle to the probe liner. It is also
acceptable to use a one-piece glass nozzle/
liner assembly. The angle of the taper shall
be >30°, and the taper shall be on the outside
to preserve a constant internal diameter. The
probe nozzle shall be of the button-hook or
elbow design, unless otherwise specified by
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
3644
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
6.1.1.3 Filter Holder. Borosilicate glass,
with a glass frit filter support and a silicone
rubber gasket. Other gasket materials (e.g.,
Teflon or Viton) may be used, subject to the
approval of the Administrator. The holder
design shall provide a positive seal against
leakage from the outside or around the filter.
The filter holder shall be placed between the
first and second impingers. Do not heat the
filter holder.
6.1.1.4 Impingers. Four, of the GreenburgSmith design, as shown in Figure 8–1. The
first and third impingers must have standard
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
13.1 * * *
(b) Recovery. After developing an
appropriate sampling and analytical system
for the pollutants of interest, conduct the
procedure in section 8.4. Conduct the
appropriate recovery study in section 8.4 at
each sampling point where the method is
being applied. Submit the data and results of
the recovery procedure with the reporting of
results under section 8.3.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
■ 15. Redesignate paragraph (c) as
paragraph (b) in section 13.1 in Method
18 of appendix A–6 to part 60 to read
as follows:
Appendix A–6 to Part 60—Test
Methods 16 Through 18
*
*
*
*
*
Method 18—Measurement of Gaseous
Organic Compound Emissions by Gas
Chromatography
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
19:24 Jan 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
*
*
*
*
*
■ 16. In appendix A–7 to part 60:
■ a. Revise sections 11.2.1 and 11.2.2 in
Method 22.
■ b. Add section 11.2.3 in Method 22.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
tips. The second and fourth impingers must
be modified by replacing the insert with an
approximately 13-mm (1⁄2-in.) ID glass tube,
having an unconstricted tip located 13 mm
(1⁄2 in.) from the bottom of the impinger.
Similar collection systems, subject to the
approval of the Administrator, may be used.
6.1.1.5 Temperature Sensor.
Thermometer, or equivalent, to measure the
temperature of the gas leaving the impinger
train to within 1 °C (2 °F).
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
The revisions read as follows:
Appendix A–7 to Part 60—Test
Methods 19 Through 25E
*
*
*
*
*
Method 22—Visual Determination of
Fugitive Emissions From Material Sources
and Smoke Emissions From Flares
*
*
*
*
*
11.2.1 Outdoor Location. Record the
following information on the field data sheet
(Figure 22–1): Company name, industry,
process unit, observer’s name, observer’s
affiliation, and date. Record also the
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
EP26JA18.001
the Administrator. Other materials of
construction may be used, subject to the
approval of the Administrator. A range of
nozzle sizes suitable for isokinetic sampling
should be available. Typical nozzle sizes
range from 0.32 to 1.27 cm (1⁄8 to 1⁄2 in) inside
diameter (ID) in increments of 0.16 cm (1⁄16
in). Larger nozzles sizes are also available if
higher volume sampling trains are used.
6.1.1.2 Probe Liner. Borosilicate or quartz
glass, with a heating system to prevent
visible condensation during sampling. Do not
use metal probe liners.
3645
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
estimated wind speed, wind direction, and
sky condition. Sketch the process unit being
observed, and note the observer location
relative to the source and the sun. Indicate
the potential and actual emission points on
the sketch. Alternatively, digital photography
as described in Section 11.2.3 may be used
for a subset of the recordkeeping
requirements of this section.
11.2.2 Indoor Location. Record the
following information on the field data sheet
(Figure 22–2): Company name, industry,
process unit, observer’s name, observer’s
affiliation, and date. Record as appropriate
the type, location, and intensity of lighting
on the data sheet. Sketch the process unit
being observed, and note the observer
location relative to the source. Indicate the
potential and actual fugitive emission points
on the sketch. Alternatively, digital
photography as described in Section 11.2.3
may be used for a subset of the recordkeeping
requirements of this section.
11.2.3 Digital Photographic Records.
Digital photographs, annotated or unaltered,
may be used to record and report sky
conditions, observer’s location relative to the
source, observer’s location relative to the sun,
process unit being observed, potential
emission points and actual emission points
for the requirements in Sections 11.2.1 and
11.2.2. The image must have the proper
lighting, field of view and depth of field to
properly distinguish the sky condition (if
applicable), process unit, potential emission
point and actual emission point. At least one
digital photograph must be from the point of
the view of the observer. The photograph(s)
representing the environmental conditions
must be taken within reasonable time of the
observation (i.e., 15 mins). Any photographs
altered or annotated must be retained in an
unaltered format for recordkeeping purposes.
*
the design specifications in ASTM D6216–12.
The opacity monitor manufacturer must test
each opacity monitor for conformance with
the manufacturer’s performance
specifications in ASTM D6216–12. Note: If
the initial certification of the opacity monitor
occurred before January 26, 2018 using
D6216–98, D6216–03, or D6216–07, it is not
necessary to recertify using D6216–12.
Appendix B to Part 60—Performance
Specifications
*
*
*
*
*
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Performance Specification 1—Specifications
and Test Procedures for Continuous Opacity
Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
2.1 ASTM D6216–12 (incorporated by
reference, see § 60.17) is the reference for
design specifications, manufacturer’s
performance specifications, and test
procedures. The opacity monitor
manufacturer must periodically select and
test an opacity monitor, that is representative
of a group of monitors produced during a
specified period or lot, for conformance with
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jan 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
*
*
*
*
17. In appendix A–8 to part 60:
a. Revise section 6.2.2 in Method 26.
b. Revise section 6.2.1 in Method 26A.
c. Add section 6.2.4 in Method 26A.
d. Revise equation 8 in section 13.5.1
in Test Method 28WHH.
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
■
■
■
Appendix A–8 to Part 60—Test
Methods 26 Through 30B
*
*
*
*
*
Method 26—Determination of Hydrogen
Halide and Halogen Emissions From
Stationary Sources Non-Isokinetic Method
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
6.1 Continuous Opacity Monitoring
System. You, as owner or operator, are
responsible for purchasing an opacity
monitor that meets the specifications of
ASTM D6216–12, including a suitable data
recorder or automated data acquisition
handling system. Example data recorders
include an analog strip chart recorder or
more appropriately an electronic data
acquisition and reporting system with an
input signal range compatible with the
analyzer output.
*
*
*
*
*
8.1 * * *
(1) You must purchase an opacity monitor
that complies with ASTM D6216–12 and
obtain a certificate of conformance from the
opacity monitor manufacturer.
(2) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) Calibration Error Check. Conduct a
three-point calibration error test using three
calibration attenuators that produce outlet
pathlength corrected, single-pass opacity
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
*
*
*
*
Method 26A—Determination of Hydrogen
Halide and Halogen Emissions From
Stationary Sources Isokinetic Method
*
*
*
*
*
6.2.1 Probe-Liner and Probe-Nozzle
Brushes, Wash Bottles, Petri Dishes,
Graduated Cylinder and/or Balance, and
Rubber Policeman. Same as Method 5,
sections 6.2.1, 6.2.2, 6.2.4, 6.2.5, and 6.2.7.
*
*
*
*
*
6.2.4 Sample Storage Containers. Highdensity polyethylene or glass sample storage
containers with Teflon screw cap liners to
store impinger samples.
Test Method 28WHH for Measurement of
Particulate Emissions and Heating Efficiency
of Wood-Fired Hydronic Heating Appliances
*
*
13.5.1
*
*
*
* * *
*
3.1 All definitions and discussions from
section 3 of ASTM D6216–12 are applicable
to PS–1.
*
*
Sfmt 4702
values shown in ASTM D6216–12, section
7.5. If your applicable limit is less than 10
percent opacity, use attenuators as described
in ASTM D6216–12, section 7.5 for
applicable standards of 10 to 19 percent
opacity. Confirm the external audit device
produces the proper zero value on the COMS
data recorder. Separately, insert each
calibration attenuators (low, mid, and highlevel) into the external audit device. While
inserting each attenuator, (1) ensure that the
entire light beam passes through the
attenuator, (2) minimize interference from
reflected light, and (3) leave the attenuator in
place for at least two times the shortest
recording interval on the COMS data
recorder. Make a total of five nonconsecutive
readings for each attenuator. At the end of
the test, correlate each attenuator insertion to
the corresponding value from the data
recorder. Subtract the single-pass calibration
attenuator values corrected to the stack exit
conditions from the COMS responses.
Calculate the arithmetic mean difference,
standard deviation, and confidence
coefficient of the five measurements value
using equations 1–3, 1–4, and 1–5. Calculate
the calibration error as the sum of the
absolute value of the mean difference and the
95 percent confidence coefficient for each of
the three test attenuators using equation
1–6. Report the calibration error test results
for each of the three attenuators.
*
*
*
*
*
8.2 * * *
(1) Conduct the verification procedures for
design specifications in section 6 of ASTM
D6216–12.
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
EP26JA18.002
*
*
*
*
18. In appendix B to part 60:
a. Revise sections 2.1, 3.1, 6.1, 8.1(1),
8.1(3)(ii), 8.2(1), 8.2(2), 8.2(3), 9.0, 12.1,
13.1, 13.2, and 16.0 8. in Performance
Specification 1.
■ b. Revise section 13.2 in Performance
Specification 2.
■ c. Revise sections 12.0 and 13.2 in
Performance Specification 3.
■ d. Revise section 13.1 in Performance
Specification 11.
■ e. Add section 13.0 in Performance
Specification 15.
■ f. Revise section 11.8.7 and table 1 in
Performance Specification 18.
■ g. Add section 12.0 to Appendix A of
Performance Specification 18.
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
*
6.2.2 Storage Bottles. 100- or 250-ml,
high-density polyethylene or glass sample
storage containers with Teflon screw cap
liners to store impinger samples.
3646
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(2) Conduct the verification procedures for
performance specifications in section 7 of
ASTM D6216–12.
(3) Provide to the owner or operator, a
report of the opacity monitor’s conformance
to the design and performance specifications
required in sections 6 and 7 of ASTM D6216–
12 in accordance with the reporting
requirements of section 9 in ASTM D6216–
12.
*
*
*
*
*
9.0 What quality control measures are
required by PS–1?
Opacity monitor manufacturers must
initiate a quality program following the
requirements of ASTM D6216–12, section 8.
The quality program must include (1) a
quality system and (2) a corrective action
program.
*
*
*
*
*
12.1 Desired Attenuator Values. Calculate
the desired attenuator value corrected to the
emission outlet pathlength as follows:
13.2 Manufacturer’s Performance
Specifications. The opacity monitor must
comply with the manufacturer’s performance
specifications of ASTM D6216–12.
*
Where:
OP1 = Nominal opacity value of required
low-, mid-, or high-range calibration
attenuators.
OP2 = Desired attenuator opacity value from
ASTM D6216–12, section 7.5 at the
opacity limit required by the applicable
subpart.
L1 = Monitoring pathlength.
L2 = Emission outlet pathlength.
*
*
*
*
*
13.1 Design Specifications. The opacity
monitoring equipment must comply with the
design specifications of ASTM D6216–12.
*
*
*
*
16.0 * * *
8. ASTM D6216–12: Standard Practice for
Opacity Monitor Manufacturers to Certify
Conformance with Design and Performance
Specifications. American Society for Testing
and Materials (ASTM). April 1998.
*
*
*
*
*
Performance Specification 2—Specifications
and Test Procedures for SO2 and NOX
Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in
Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
*
13.2 Relative Accuracy Performance
Specification.
RA criteria
(%)
Calculate . . .
If average emissions during the RATA are ≥50% of emission
standard.
If average emissions during the RATA are <50% of emission
standard.
For SO2 emission standards <130 but> 86 ng/J (0.30 and 0.20
lb/million Btu).
For SO2 emission standards <86 ng/J (0.20 lb/million Btu) .......
*
*
*
*
<20.0
Use Eq. 2–6, emission standard in the denominator ................
<10.0
Use Eq. 2–6, emission standard in the denominator ................
<15.0
Use Eq. 2–6, emission standard in the denominator ................
<20.0
Performance Specification 3—Specifications
and Test Procedures for O2 and CO2
Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems in
Stationary Sources
*
*
*
*
12.0
Calculations and Data Analysis
Summarize the results on a data sheet
similar to that shown in Figure 2.2 of PS2.
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
13.2 CEMS Relative Accuracy
Performance Specification. The RA of the
*
19:24 Jan 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
CEMS must be no greater than 20.0 percent
of the mean value of the reference method
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
EP26JA18.003
*
EP26JA18.004
EP26JA18.005
*
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Use Eq. 2–6, with RM in the denominator ................................
3647
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
(RM) data when calculated using equation
3–1. The results are also acceptable if the
result of Equation 3–2 is less than or equal
to 1.0 percent O2 (or CO2).
*
*
*
*
13.0
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
13.1 What is the 7-day drift check
performance specification? Your daily PM
CEMS internal drift checks must demonstrate
that the daily drift of your PM CEMS does
not deviate from the value of the reference
light, optical filter, Beta attenuation signal, or
other technology-suitable reference standard
by more than 2 percent of the response range.
If your CEMS includes diluent and/or
auxiliary monitors (for temperature, pressure,
and/or moisture) that are employed as a
necessary part of this performance
specification, you must determine the
calibration drift separately for each ancillary
monitor in terms of its respective output (see
the appropriate performance specification for
the diluent CEMS specification). None of the
calibration drifts may exceed their individual
specification.
*
*
*
*
*
Performance Specification 15—Performance
Specification for Extractive FTIR Continuous
Emissions Monitor Systems in Stationary
Sources
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Performance Specification 18—Performance
Specifications and Test Procedures for
Gaseous Hydrogen Chloride (HCl)
Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems at
Stationary Sources
Performance Specification 11—
Specifications and Test Procedures for
Particulate Matter Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources
*
Method Performance [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
11.8.7 The zero-level and mid-level CD
for each day must be less than 5.0 percent of
the span value as specified in section 13.2 of
this PS. You must meet this criterion for 7
consecutive operating days.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE 1—INTERFERENCE TEST GAS
CONCENTRATIONS
Potential
interferent
gas 1
Approximate concentration
(balance N2)
CO2 ................
CO ..................
CH2O .............
CH4 ................
NH3 ................
NO ..................
SO2 ................
O2 ...................
H2O ................
N2 ...................
15% ± 1% CO2.2
100 ± 20 ppm.
20 ± 5 ppm.
100 ± 20 ppm.
10 ± 5 ppm (extractive
CEMS only).
250 ± 50 ppm.
200 ± 20 ppm.
3% ± 1% O2.2
10% ± 1% H2O.2
Balance.2
2 Gases for short path IP cell interference
tests cannot be added above 100 percent
stack equivalent concentration. Add these
gases at the indicated percentages to make
up the remaining cell volume.
*
*
*
*
12.0
*
*
*
*
*
Reserved
*
*
*
*
*
■ 19. Revise sections 5.1.2(1) and
5.1.2(3) in Procedure 1 of appendix F to
part 60 to read as follows:
Appendix F to Part 60—Quality
Assurance Procedures
Procedure 1—Quality Assurance
Requirements for Gas Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems Used for Compliance
Determination
*
1 Any of these specific gases can be tested
at a lower level if the manufacturer has provided reliable means for limiting or scrubbing
that gas to a specified level in CEMS field installations.
*
PS–18 Appendix A—Standard Addition
Procedures
*
*
*
*
5.1.2 Cylinder Gas Audit (CGA). If
applicable, a CGA may be conducted in three
of four calendar quarters, but in no more than
three quarters in succession.
To conduct a CGA: (1) Challenge the CEMS
(both pollutant and diluent portions of the
CEMS, if applicable) with an audit gas of
known concentration at two points within
the following ranges:
Audit range
Audit point
Diluent monitors for—
Pollutant monitors
CO2
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
1 ......................................
2 ......................................
20 to 30% of span value .............................
50 to 60% of span value .............................
Inject each of the audit gases, three times
each for a total of six injections. Inject the
gases in such a manner that the entire CEMS
is challenged. Do not inject the same gas
concentration twice in succession.
Use of separate audit gas cylinder for audit
points 1 and 2. Do not dilute gas from audit
cylinder when challenging the CEMS.
The monitor should be challenged at each
audit point for a sufficient period of time to
assure adsorption-desorption of the CEMS
sample transport surfaces has stabilized.
(2) * * *
(3) Use Certified Reference Materials
(CRM’s) (See Citation 1) audit gases that have
been certified by comparison to National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
Standard Reference Materials (SRM’s) or EPA
Protocol Gases following the most recent
edition of the EPA Traceability Protocol for
Assay and Certification of Gaseous
Calibration Standards (See Citation 2).
Procedures for preparation of CRM’s are
described in Citation 1. Procedures for
preparation of EPA Protocol Gases are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jan 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
5 to 8% by volume ......................................
10 to 14% by volume ..................................
described in Citation 2. In the case that a
suitable audit gas level is not commercially
available, Method 205 (See Citation 3) may
be used to dilute CRM’s or EPA Protocol
Gases to the needed level. The difference
between the actual concentration of the audit
gas and the concentration indicated by the
monitor is used to assess the accuracy of the
CEMS.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 63—NATIONAL EMISSION
STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR
POLLUTANTS FOR SOURCE
CATEGORIES
20. The authority citation for part 63
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
21. In § 63.7, revise paragraphs (g)(2)
introductory text and (g)(2)(v) to read as
follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
O2
Sfmt 4702
§ 63.7
4 to 6% by volume.
8 to 12% by volume.
Performance testing requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(2) Contents of a performance test,
CMS performance evaluation, or CMS
quality assurance test report (electronic
or paper submitted copy). Unless
otherwise specified in a relevant
standard, test method, CMS
performance specification, or quality
assurance requirement for a CMS, or as
otherwise approved by the
Administrator in writing, the report
shall include the elements identified in
paragraphs (g)(2)(i) through (vi) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
(v) Where a test method, CMS
performance specification, or on-going
quality assurance requirement for a
CMS requires you record or report, the
following shall be included in your
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
3648
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
report: Record of preparation of
standards, record of calibrations, raw
data sheets for field sampling, raw data
sheets for field and laboratory analyses,
chain-of-custody documentation, and
example calculations for reported
results.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 22. In § 63.8, revise paragraph (e)(5)(i)
to read as follows:
§ 63.8
Monitoring requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(5) * * * (i) The owner or operator
shall furnish the Administrator a copy
of a written report of the results of the
performance evaluation containing the
information specified in § 63.7(g)(2)(i)
through (vi) within 60 days of
completion of the performance
evaluation, unless otherwise specified
in a relevant standard.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart NNN—National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing
23. Revise § 63.1385(a)(5) to read as
follows:
■
§ 63.1385
Test methods and procedures.
(a) * * *
(5) Method 5 or Method 29 (40 CFR
part 60, appendix A–3) for the
concentration of total PM. When using
Method 5, each run must consist of a
minimum sample volume of 2 dry
standard cubic meters (dscm). When
using Method 29, each run must consist
of a minimum sample volume of 3
dscm. When measuring PM
concentration using either Method 5 or
29, the probe and filter holder heating
system must be set to provide a gas
temperature no greater than 120 ±5 °C
(248 ±9 °F).
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart DDDDD—National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants
for Major Sources: Industrial,
Commercial, and Institutional Boilers
and Process Heaters
*
*
*
*
*
24. Revise Table 6 to Subpart DDDDD
of part 63 to read as follows:
■
TABLE 6 TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63—FUEL ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS
[As stated in § 63.7521, you must comply with the following requirements for fuel analysis testing for existing, new or reconstructed affected
sources. However, equivalent methods (as defined in § 63.7575) may be used in lieu of the prescribed methods at the discretion of the
source owner or operator]
To conduct a fuel analysis for the
following pollutant . . .
You must . . .
Using . . .
1. Mercury .......................................
a. Collect fuel samples ..................
Procedure in § 63.7521(c) or ASTM D5192,a or ASTM D7430,a or
ASTM D6883,a or ASTM D2234/D2234M a (for coal) or EPA 1631
or EPA 1631E or ASTM D6323 a (for solid), or EPA 821–R–01–013
(for liquid or solid), or ASTM D4177 a (for liquid), or ASTM D4057 a
(for liquid), or equivalent.
Procedure in § 63.7521(d) or equivalent.
EPA SW–846–3050B a (for solid samples), ASTM D2013/D2013M a
(for coal), ASTM D5198 a (for biomass), or EPA 3050 a (for solid
fuel), or EPA 821–R–01–013 a (for liquid or solid), or equivalent.
ASTM D5865 a (for coal) or ASTM E711 a (for biomass), or ASTM
D5864 a for liquids and other solids, or ASTM D240 a or equivalent.
ASTM D3173,a ASTM E871,a or ASTM D5864,a or ASTM D240, or
ASTM D95 a (for liquid fuels), or ASTM D4006 a (for liquid fuels), or
equivalent.
ASTM D6722 a (for coal), EPA SW–846–7471B a or EPA 1631 or
EPA 1631E (for solid samples), or EPA SW–846–7470A a or EPA
SW–846–7471B a (for liquid samples), or EPA 821–R–01–013 (for
liquid or solid), or equivalent.
For fuel mixtures use Equation 8 in § 63.7530.
b. Composite fuel samples ............
c. Prepare composited fuel samples.
d. Determine heat content of the
fuel type.
e. Determine moisture content of
the fuel type.
f. Measure mercury concentration
in fuel sample.
2. HCl ..............................................
g. Convert concentration into units
of pounds of mercury per
MMBtu of heat content.
a. Collect fuel samples ..................
b. Composite fuel samples ............
c. Prepare composited fuel samples.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
d. Determine heat content of the
fuel type.
e. Determine moisture content of
the fuel type.
f. Measure chlorine concentration
in fuel sample.
g.
3. Mercury Fuel Specification for
other gas 1 fuels.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jan 25, 2018
Convert concentrations into
units of pounds of HCl per
MMBtu of heat content.
a. Measure mercury concentration
in the fuel sample and convert
to units of micrograms per cubic
meter, or.
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Procedure in § 63.7521(c) or ASTM D5192,a or ASTM D7430,a or
ASTM D6883,a or ASTM D2234/D2234M a (for coal) or ASTM
D6323 a (for coal or biomass), ASTM D4177 a (for liquid fuels) or
ASTM D4057 a (for liquid fuels), or equivalent.
Procedure in § 63.7521(d) or equivalent.
EPA SW–846–3050B a (for solid samples), ASTM D2013/D2013M a
(for coal), or ASTM D5198 a (for biomass), or EPA 3050 a or equivalent.
ASTM D5865 a (for coal) or ASTM E711 a (for biomass), ASTM
D5864, ASTM D240 a or equivalent.
ASTM D3173 a or ASTM E871,a or D5864,a or ASTM D240,a or
ASTM D95 a (for liquid fuels), or ASTM D4006 a (for liquid fuels), or
equivalent.
EPA SW–846–9250,a ASTM D6721,a ASTM D4208 a (for coal), or
EPA SW–846–5050 a or ASTM E776 a (for solid fuel), or EPA SW–
846–9056 a or SW–846–9076 a (for solids or liquids) or equivalent.
For fuel mixtures use Equation 7 in § 63.7530 and convert from chlorine to HCl by multiplying by 1.028.
Method 30B (M30B) at 40 CFR part 60, appendix A–8 of this chapter
or ASTM D5954,a ASTM D6350,a ISO 6978–1:2003(E).a or ISO
6978–2:2003(E),a or EPA–1631 a or equivalent.
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
3649
TABLE 6 TO SUBPART DDDDD OF PART 63—FUEL ANALYSIS REQUIREMENTS—Continued
[As stated in § 63.7521, you must comply with the following requirements for fuel analysis testing for existing, new or reconstructed affected
sources. However, equivalent methods (as defined in § 63.7575) may be used in lieu of the prescribed methods at the discretion of the
source owner or operator]
To conduct a fuel analysis for the
following pollutant . . .
You must . . .
Using . . .
4. TSM .............................................
b. Measure mercury concentration
in the exhaust gas when firing
only the other gas 1 fuel is fired
in the boiler or process heater.
a. Collect fuel samples ..................
Method 29, 30A, or 30B (M29, M30A, or M30B) at 40 CFR part 60,
appendix A–8 of this chapter or Method 101A or Method 102 at 40
CFR part 61, appendix B of this chapter, or ASTM Method D6784 a
or equivalent.
Procedure in § 63.7521(c) or ASTM D5192,a or ASTM D7430,a or
ASTM D6883,a or ASTM D2234/D2234M a (for coal) or ASTM
D6323 a (for coal or biomass), or ASTM D4177,a (for liquid fuels)or
ASTM D4057 a (for liquid fuels),or equivalent.
Procedure in § 63.7521(d) or equivalent.
EPA SW–846–3050B a (for solid samples), ASTM D2013/D2013M a
(for coal), ASTM D5198 a or TAPPI T266 a (for biomass), or EPA
3050 a or equivalent.
ASTM D5865 a (for coal) or ASTM E711 a (for biomass), or ASTM
D5864 a for liquids and other solids, or ASTM D240 a or equivalent.
ASTM D3173 a or ASTM E871,a or D5864, or ASTM D240,a or ASTM
D95 a (for liquid fuels), or ASTM D4006 a (for liquid fuels), or ASTM
D4177 a (for liquid fuels) or ASTM D4057 a (for liquid fuels), or
equivalent.
ASTM D3683,a or ASTM D4606,a or ASTM D6357 a or EPA 200.8 a
or EPA SW–846–6020,a or EPA SW–846–6020A,a or EPA SW–
846–6010C,a EPA 7060 a or EPA 7060A a (for arsenic only), or
EPA SW–846–7740 a (for selenium only).
For fuel mixtures use Equation 9 in § 63.7530.
b. Composite fuel samples ............
c. Prepare composited fuel samples.
d. Determine heat content of the
fuel type.
e. Determine moisture content of
the fuel type.
f. Measure TSM concentration in
fuel sample.
g.
a
*
Convert concentrations into
units of pounds of TSM per
MMBtu of heat content.
Incorporated by reference, see § 63.14.
*
*
*
*
Subpart UUUUU—National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric
Utility Steam Generating Units
25. Revise § 63.10010(h)(7)(i)(1) to
read as follows:
■
§ 63.10010 What are my monitoring,
installation, operation, and maintenance
requirements?
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(7) * * *
(i) * * *
(1) Install and certify your PM CEMS
according to the procedures and
requirements in Performance
Specification 11—Specifications and
Test Procedures for Particulate Matter
Continuous Emission Monitoring
Systems at Stationary Sources in
Appendix B to part 60 of this chapter,
using Method 5 at Appendix A–3 to part
60 of this chapter and ensuring that the
front half filter temperature shall be
160° ±5 °C (320° ±9 °F). The reportable
measurement output from the PM CEMS
must be expressed in units of the
applicable emissions limit (e.g., lb/
MMBtu, lb/MWh).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 26. Revise Table 5 to Subpart UUUUU
of part 63 to read as follows:
TABLE 5 TO SUBPART UUUUU OF PART 63—PERFORMANCE TESTING REQUIREMENTS
[As stated in § 63.10007, you must comply with the following requirements performance testing for existing, new or reconstructed affected
sources: 1]
To conduct a
performance test for
the following
pollutant . . .
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
1. Filterable Particulate
matter (PM).
You must perform the following activities, as
applicable to your input- or output-based
emission limit . . .
Using . . .
Emissions Testing ......
a. Select sampling ports location and the
number of traverse points.
b. Determine velocity and volumetric flow-rate
of the stack gas.
c. Determine oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations of the stack gas.
d. Measure the moisture content of the stack
gas.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jan 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Using . . . 2
Method 1 at appendix A–1 to part 60 of this
chapter.
Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G or 2H at appendix
A–1 or A–2 to part 60 of this chapter.
Method 3A or 3B at appendix A–2 to part 60
of this chapter, or ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10–
1981.3
Method 4 at appendix A–3 to part 60 of this
chapter.
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
3650
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 5 TO SUBPART UUUUU OF PART 63—PERFORMANCE TESTING REQUIREMENTS—Continued
[As stated in § 63.10007, you must comply with the following requirements performance testing for existing, new or reconstructed affected
sources: 1]
To conduct a
performance test for
the following
pollutant . . .
You must perform the following activities, as
applicable to your input- or output-based
emission limit . . .
Using . . .
e. Measure the filterable PM concentration ....
f. Convert emissions concentration to lb/
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions rates.
OR
PM CEMS ..................
OR
a. Install, certify, operate, and maintain the
PM CEMS.
b. Install, certify, operate, and maintain the
diluent gas, flow rate, and/or moisture monitoring systems.
c. Convert hourly emissions concentrations to
30 boiler operating day rolling average lb/
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions rates.
2. Total or individual
non-Hg HAP metals.
Emissions Testing ......
a. Select sampling ports location and the
number of traverse points.
b. Determine velocity and volumetric flow-rate
of the stack gas.
c. Determine oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations of the stack gas.
d. Measure the moisture content of the stack
gas.
e. Measure the HAP metals emissions concentrations and determine each individual
HAP metals emissions concentration, as
well as the total filterable HAP metals
emissions concentration and total HAP
metals emissions concentration.
3. Hydrogen chloride
(HCl) and hydrogen
fluoride (HF).
Emissions Testing ......
f. Convert emissions concentrations (individual HAP metals, total filterable HAP
metals, and total HAP metals) to lb/MMBtu
or lb/MWh emissions rates.
a. Select sampling ports location and the
number of traverse points.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
b. Determine velocity and volumetric flow-rate
of the stack gas.
c. Determine oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations of the stack gas.
d. Measure the moisture content of the stack
gas.
e. Measure the HCl and HF emissions concentrations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jan 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Using . . . 2
Methods 5 and 5I at appendix A–3 to part 60
of this chapter.
For positive pressure fabric filters, Method 5D
at appendix A–3 to part 60 of this chapter
for filterable PM emissions.
Note that the Method 5 or 5I front half temperature shall be 160° ±14 °C (320° ±25
°F).
Method 19 F-factor methodology at appendix
A–7 to part 60 of this chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions rate and gross output data (see § 63.10007(e)).
Performance Specification 11 at appendix B
to part 60 of this chapter and Procedure 2
at appendix F to part 60 of this chapter.
Part 75 of this chapter and § 63.10010(a), (b),
(c), and (d).
Method 19 F-factor methodology at appendix
A–7 to part 60 of this chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions rate and gross output data (see § 63.10007(e)).
Method 1 at appendix A–1 to part 60 of this
chapter.
Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G or 2H at appendix
A–1 or A–2 to part 60 of this chapter.
Method 3A or 3B at appendix A–2 to part 60
of this chapter, or ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10–
1981.3
Method 4 at appendix A–3 to part 60 of this
chapter.
Method 29 at appendix A–8 to part 60 of this
chapter. For liquid oil-fired units, Hg is included in HAP metals and you may use
Method 29, Method 30B at appendix A–8
to part 60 of this chapter; for Method 29,
you must report the front half and back half
results separately. When using Method 29,
report metals matrix spike and recovery
levels.
Method 19 F-factor methodology at appendix
A–7 to part 60 of this chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions rate and gross output data (see § 63.10007(e)).
Method 1 at appendix A–1 to part 60 of this
chapter.
Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G or 2H at appendix
A–1 or A–2 to part 60 of this chapter.
Method 3A or 3B at appendix A–2 to part 60
of this chapter, or ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10–
1981.3
Method 4 at appendix A–3 to part 60 of this
chapter.
Method 26 or Method 26A at appendix A–8
to part 60 of this chapter or Method 320 at
appendix A to part 63 of this chapter or
ASTM 6348–03 3 with
(1) the following conditions when using ASTM
D6348–03:
(A) The test plan preparation and implementation in the Annexes to ASTM D6348–03,
Sections A1 through A8 are mandatory;
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
3651
TABLE 5 TO SUBPART UUUUU OF PART 63—PERFORMANCE TESTING REQUIREMENTS—Continued
[As stated in § 63.10007, you must comply with the following requirements performance testing for existing, new or reconstructed affected
sources: 1]
To conduct a
performance test for
the following
pollutant . . .
You must perform the following activities, as
applicable to your input- or output-based
emission limit . . .
Using . . .
Using . . . 2
(B) For ASTM D6348–03 Annex A5 (Analyte
Spiking Technique), the percent (%) R
must be determined for each target analyte
(see Equation A5.5);
(C) For the ASTM D6348–03 test data to be
acceptable for a target analyte, %R must
be 70% ≥R ≤130%; and
1 Regarding
2 See
emissions data collected during periods of startup or shutdown, see §§ 63.10020(b) and (c) and 63.10021(h).
Tables 1 and 2 to this subpart for required sample volumes and/or sampling run times.
by reference, see § 63.14.
3 Incorporated
3.e.1(D) The %R value for each
compound must be reported in the test
report and all field measurements
corrected with the calculated %R value
for that compound using the following
equation:
and
Using . . . (cont’d)
You must perform the following activities, as
applicable to your input- or output-based
emission limit . . .
f. Convert emissions concentration to lb/
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions rates.
OR
HCl and/or HF CEMS
4. Mercury (Hg) ...........
Emissions Testing ......
OR
a. Install, certify, operate, and maintain the
HCl or HF CEMS.
b. Install, certify, operate, and maintain the
diluent gas, flow rate, and/or moisture monitoring systems.
c. Convert hourly emissions concentrations to
30 boiler operating day rolling average lb/
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions rates.
a. Select sampling ports location and the
number of traverse points.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
b. Determine velocity and volumetric flow-rate
of the stack gas.
c. Determine oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations of the stack gas.
d. Measure the moisture content of the stack
gas.
e. Measure the Hg emission concentration ....
f. Convert emissions concentration to lb/TBtu
or lb/GWh emission rates.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jan 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Using . . .2 (cont’d)
(2) spiking levels nominally no greater than
two times the level corresponding to the
applicable emission limit.
Method 26A must be used if there are entrained water droplets in the exhaust
stream.
Method 19 F-factor methodology at appendix
A–7 to part 60 of this chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions rate and gross output data (see § 63.10007(e)).
Appendix B of this subpart.
Part 75 of this chapter and § 63.10010(a), (b),
(c), and (d).
Method 19 F-factor methodology at appendix
A–7 to part 60 of this chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions rate and gross output data (see § 63.10007(e)).
Method 1 at appendix A–1 to part 60 of this
chapter or Method 30B at Appendix A–8
for Method 30B point selection.
Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G or 2H at appendix
A–1 or A–2 to part 60 of this chapter.
Method 3A or 3B at appendix A–1 to part 60
of this chapter, or ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10–
1981.3
Method 4 at appendix A–3 to part 60 of this
chapter.
Method 30B at appendix A–8 to part 60 of
this chapter, ASTM D6784,3 or Method 29
at appendix A–8 to part 60 of this chapter;
for Method 29, you must report the front
half and back half results separately.
Method 19 F-factor methodology at appendix
A–7 to part 60 of this chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions rate and gross output data (see § 63.10007(e)).
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
EP26JA18.006
To conduct a
performance test for
the following
pollutant . . . (cont’d)
3652
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
To conduct a
performance test for
the following
pollutant . . . (cont’d)
You must perform the following activities, as
applicable to your input- or output-based
emission limit . . .
Using . . . (cont’d)
OR
Hg CEMS ...................
OR
a. Install, certify, operate, and maintain the
CEMS.
b. Install, certify, operate, and maintain the
diluent gas, flow rate, and/or moisture monitoring systems.
c. Convert hourly emissions concentrations to
30 boiler operating day rolling average lb/
TBtu or lb/GWh emissions rates.
OR
a. Install, certify, operate, and maintain the
sorbent trap monitoring system.
b. Install, operate, and maintain the diluent
gas, flow rate, and/or moisture monitoring
systems.
c. Convert emissions concentrations to 30
boiler operating day rolling average lb/TBtu
or lb/GWh emissions rates.
OR
a. Select sampling ports location and the
number of traverse points.
OR
Sorbent trap monitoring system.
OR
LEE testing .................
b. Determine velocity and volumetric flow-rate
of the stack gas.
c. Determine oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations of the stack gas.
d. Measure the moisture content of the stack
gas.
e. Measure the Hg emission concentration ....
f. Convert emissions concentrations from the
LEE test to lb/TBtu or lb/GWh emissions
rates.
5. Sulfur dioxide (SO2)
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
2 See
g. Convert average lb/TBtu or lb/GWh Hg
emission rate to lb/year, if you are attempting to meet the 29.0 lb/year threshold.
a. Install, certify, operate, and maintain the
CEMS.
b. Install, operate, and maintain the diluent
gas, flow rate, and/or moisture monitoring
systems.
c. Convert hourly emissions concentrations to
30 boiler operating day rolling average lb/
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions rates.
SO2 CEMS .................
Using . . .2 (cont’d)
Sections 3.2.1 and 5.1 of appendix A of this
subpart.
Part 75 of this chapter and § 63.10010(a), (b),
(c), and (d).
Section 6 of appendix A to this subpart.
Sections 3.2.2 and 5.2 of appendix A to this
subpart.
Part 75 of this chapter and § 63.10010(a), (b),
(c), and (d).
Section 6 of appendix A to this subpart.
Single point located at the 10% centroidal
area of the duct at a port location per
Method 1 at appendix A–1 to part 60 of
this chapter or Method 30B at Appendix A–
8 for Method 30B point selection.
Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G, or 2H at appendix
A–1 or A–2 to part 60 of this chapter or
flow monitoring system certified per appendix A of this subpart.
Method 3A or 3B at appendix A–1 to part 60
of this chapter, or ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10–
1981,3 or diluent gas monitoring systems
certified according to part 75 of this chapter.
Method 4 at appendix A–3 to part 60 of this
chapter, or moisture monitoring systems
certified according to part 75 of this chapter.
Method 30B at appendix A–8 to part 60 of
this chapter; perform a 30 operating day
test, with a maximum of 10 operating days
per run (i.e., per pair of sorbent traps) or
sorbent trap monitoring system or Hg
CEMS certified per appendix A of this subpart.
Method 19 F-factor methodology at appendix
A–7 to part 60 of this chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions rate and gross output data (see § 63.10007(e)).
Potential maximum annual heat input in TBtu
or potential maximum electricity generated
in GWh.
Part 75 of this chapter and § 63.10010(a) and
(f).
Part 75 of this chapter and § 63.10010(a), (b),
(c), and (d).
Method 19 F-factor methodology at appendix
A–7 to part 60 of this chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions rate and gross output data (see § 63.10007(e)).
Tables 1 and 2 to this subpart for required sample volumes and/or sampling run times.
by reference, see § 63.14.
3 Incorporated
*
*
*
*
*
■ 27. In appendix A to part 63:
■ a. Revise section 12.4 in Method 303.
■ b. Revise sections 2.0, 7.2.3.3, 8.1.2,
9.1, 11.3.2, and 12.1 in Method 308.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jan 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
c. Remove and reserve section 7.2.2 in
Method 308.
■ d. Add sections 12.5 and 13.0 in
Method 308.
■ e. Revise section 9.2.3 in Method 320..
■ f. Revise section 12.9 in Method 323.
■
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
g. Revise section 8.2.1.3, Figure 8.1.
and section 8.2.3.2 in Method 325A.
■ h. Add section 8.2.3.3 in Method
325A.
■
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
3653
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
i. Revise sections 9.3.2, 9.13, 11.3.2.5,
and 12.2.2 and table 17–1 in Method
325B.
■ j. Remove sections 12.2.3 and 12.2.4
in Method 325B.
The revisions read as follows:
■
Appendix A to Part 63—Test Methods
Pollutant Measurement Methods From
Various Waste Media
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
7.2.2
*
Method 308—Procedure for Determination
of Methanol Emission From Stationary
Sources
*
*
*
Method 303—Determination of Visible
Emissions From By-Product Coke Oven
Batteries
*
*
*
*
*
[Reserved].
*
*
*
2.0 Summary of Method
A gas sample is extracted from the
sampling point in the stack. The methanol is
collected in deionized distilled water and
adsorbed on silica gel. The sample is
returned to the laboratory where the
methanol in the water fraction is separated
from other organic compounds with a gas
chromatograph (GC) and is then measured by
a flame ionization detector (FID). The
fraction adsorbed on silica gel is extracted
with deionized distilled water and is then
separated and measured by GC/FID.
7.2.3.3 Methanol Standards for Adsorbent
Tube Samples. Prepare a series of methanol
standards by first pipetting 10 ml of the
methanol working standard into a 100-ml
volumetric flask and diluting the contents to
exactly 100 ml with deionized distilled
water. This standard will contain 10 mg/ml of
methanol. Pipette 5, 15, and 25 ml of this
standard, respectively, into four 50-ml
volumetric flasks. Dilute each solution to 50
ml with deionized distilled water. These
standards will have 1, 3, and 5 mg/ml of
methanol, respectively. Transfer all four
standards into 40-ml glass vials capped with
Teflon®-lined septa and store under
refrigeration. Discard any excess solution.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
12.4 Average Duration of VE from
Charging Operations. Use Equation 303–3 to
calculate the daily 30-day rolling log average
of seconds of visible emissions from the
charging operation for each battery using
these current day’s observations and the 29
previous valid daily sets of observations.
*
8.1.2 Leak Check. A leak check before
and after the sampling run is mandatory. The
leak-check procedure is as follows:
Temporarily attach a suitable (e.g., 0- to 40ml/min) rotameter to the outlet of the DGM,
and place a vacuum gauge at or near the
probe inlet. Plug the probe inlet, pull a
vacuum of at least 250 mm (10 inch) Hg or
the highest vacuum experienced during the
sampling run, and note the flow rate as
indicated by the rotameter. A leakage rate in
excess of 2 percent of the average sampling
rate is acceptable.
Note: Carefully release the probe inlet plug
before turning off the pump.
*
*
*
*
*
9.1 Miscellaneous Quality Control
Measures. The following quality control
measures are required:
Section
Quality control measure
Effect
8.1.2, 8.1.3, 10.1 .........
10.2 .............................
13.0 .............................
Sampling equipment leak check and calibration .................
GC calibration ......................................................................
Methanol spike recovery check ...........................................
Ensures accurate measurement of sample volume.
Ensures precision of GC analysis.
Verifies all methanol in stack gas is being captured in impinge/adsorbent tube setup.
*
*
*
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
12.1 Nomenclature.
Caf = Concentration of methanol in the front
of the adsorbent tube, mg/ml.
Cab = Concentration of methanol in the back
of the adsorbent tube, mg/ml.
Ci = Concentration of methanol in the
impinger portion of the sample train, mg/
ml.
E = Mass emission rate of methanol, mg/hr
(lb/hr).
ms = Total mass of compound measured in
impinger and on adsorbent with spiked
train (mg).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jan 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
mu = Total mass of compound measured in
impinger and on adsorbent with
unspiked train (mg).
mv = Mass per volume of spiked compound
measured (mg/L).
Mtot = Total mass of methanol collected in
the sample train, mg.
Pbar = Barometric pressure at the exit orifice
of the DGM, mm Hg (in. Hg).
Pstd = Standard absolute pressure, 760 mm Hg
(29.92 in. Hg).
Qstd = Dry volumetric stack gas flow rate
corrected to standard conditions, dscm/
hr (dscf/hr).
R = fraction of spiked compound recovered
s = theoretical concentration (ppm) of spiked
target compound
Tm = Average DGM absolute temperature,
degrees K (°R).
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4725
Tstd = Standard absolute temperature, 293
degrees K (528 °R).
Vaf = Volume of front half adsorbent sample,
ml.
Vab = Volume of back half adsorbent sample,
ml.
Vi = Volume of impinger sample, ml.
Vm = Dry gas volume as measured by the
DGM, dry cubic meters (dcm), dry cubic
feet (dcf).
Vm(std) = Dry gas volume measured by the
DGM, corrected to standard conditions,
dry standard cubic meters (dscm), dry
standard cubic feet (dscf).
*
*
12.5
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
*
*
*
Recovery Fraction (R)
EP26JA18.008
*
26JAP1
EP26JA18.007
*
11.3.2 Desorption of Samples. Add 3 ml
of deionized distilled water to each of the
stoppered vials and shake or vibrate the vials
for 30 minutes.
3654
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
following spike recovery procedure at each
sampling point where the method is being
applied.
i. Methanol Spike. Set up two identical
sampling trains. Collocate the two sampling
probes in the stack. The probes shall be
placed in the same horizontal plane, where
the first probe tip is 2.5 cm from the outside
edge of the other. One of the sampling trains
shall be designated the spiked train and the
other the unspiked train. Spike methanol into
the impinger, and onto the adsorbent tube in
the spiked train prior to sampling. The total
mass of methanol shall be 40 to 60 percent
of the mass expected to be collected with the
unspiked train. Sample the stack gas into the
two trains simultaneously. Analyze the
impingers and adsorbents from the two trains
utilizing identical analytical procedures and
instrumentation. Determine the fraction of
spiked methanol recovered (R) by combining
the amount recovered in the impinger and in
the adsorbent tube, using the equations in
section 12.5. Recovery values must fall in the
range: 0.70 ≤R ≤1.30. Report the R value in
the test report.
DF = Dilution factor of the spike gas; this
value shall be ≥10.
SF6(dir) = SF6 (or tracer gas) concentration
measured directly in undiluted spike
gas.
SF6(spk) = Diluted SF6 (or tracer gas)
concentration measured in a spiked
sample.
Spikedir = Concentration of the analyte in the
spike standard measured by filling the
FTIR cell directly.
CS = Expected concentration of the spiked
samples.
Unspike = Native concentration of analytes
in unspiked samples.
Method 323—Measurment of Formaldehyde
Emissions From Natural Gas-Fired
Stationary Sources-Acetyl Acetone
Derivitization Method
*
emission source is within 50 meters (162
feet) of the boundary and the source location
is between two monitors. Measure the
distance (x) between the two monitors and
place another monitor approximately
halfway between (x/2 ±10 percent) the two
monitors. Only one extra sampler is required
between two monitors to account for the
13.0 Method Performance
Since a potential sample may contain a
variety of compounds from various sources,
a specific precision limit for the analysis of
field samples is impractical. Precision in the
range of 5 to 10 percent relative standard
deviation (RSD) is typical for gas
chromatographic techniques, but an
experienced GC operator with a reliable
instrument can readily achieve 5 percent
RSD. For this method, the following
combined GC/operator values are required.
(a) Precision. Triplicate analyses of
calibration standards fall within 5 percent of
their mean value.
(b) Recovery. After developing an
appropriate sampling and analytical system
for the pollutants of interest, conduct the
*
*
*
*
*
Method 320—Measurement of Vapor Phase
Organic and Inorganic Emissions by
Extractive Fourier Transform Infrared
(FTIR) Spectroscopy
*
*
*
*
*
9.2.3 Calculate the dilution ratio using
the tracer gas as follows:
Where:
*
*
*
*
*
Method 325A—Volatile Organic Compounds
From Fugitive and Area Sources: Sampler
Deployment and VOC Sample Collection
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
12.9 Formaldehyde Concentration
Corrected to 15% Oxygen
known source of VOCs. For example, in
Figure 8.1, the facility added three additional
monitors (i.e., light shaded sampler
locations) and in Figure 8.2, the facility
added two additional monitors to provide
sufficient coverage of all area sources.
EP26JA18.011
EP26JA18.010
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jan 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
EP26JA18.009
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
EP26JA18.012
8.2.1.3 Extra samplers must be placed
near known sources of VOCs if the potential
*
*
3655
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
*
*
*
9.3.2 Field blanks must be shipped to the
monitoring site with the sampling tubes and
must be stored at the sampling location
throughout the monitoring exercise. The field
blanks must be installed under a protective
hood/cover at the sampling location, but the
long-term storage caps must remain in place
throughout the monitoring period (see
Method 325A). The field blanks are then
shipped back to the laboratory in the same
container as the sampled tubes. Collect at
least two field blank samples per sampling
period to ensure sample integrity associated
with shipment, collection, and storage.
*
*
*
*
*
Method 325B—Volatile Organic Compounds
From Fugitive and Area Sources: Sampler
Preparation and Analysis
9.13 Routine CCV at the Start of a
Sequence. Run CCV before each sequence of
analyses and after every tenth sample to
ensure that the previous multi-level
calibration (see Section 10.0) is still valid.
*
*
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Where:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
*
*
mmeas = The mass of the compound as
measured in the sorbent tube (mg).
19:24 Jan 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11.3.2.5 Whenever the thermal
desorption—GC/MS analytical method is
changed or major equipment maintenance is
performed, you must conduct a new fivelevel calibration (see Section 10.0). System
calibration remains valid as long as results
from subsequent CCV are within 30 percent
of the most recent 5-point calibration (see
Section 9.13). Include relevant CCV data in
the supporting information in the data report
for each set of samples.
*
*
*
*
*
12.2.2 Determine the equivalent
concentrations of compounds in atmospheres
as follows. Correct target compound
concentrations determined at the sampling
site temperature and atmospheric pressure to
standard conditions (25 °C and 760 mm
mercury) using Equation 12.5.
t = The exposure time (minutes).
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
EP26JA18.014
*
8.2.3.2 For facilities with a monitoring
perimeter length greater than or equal to
7,315 meters (24,000 feet), sampling locations
are spaced 610 ±76 meters (2,000 ±250 feet)
apart.
8.2.3.3 Unless otherwise specified in an
applicable regulation, permit or other
requirement, for small disconnected subareas
with known sources within 50 meters (162
feet) of the monitoring perimeter, sampling
points need not be placed closer than 152
meters (500 feet) apart as long as a minimum
of 3 monitoring locations are used for each
subarea.
EP26JA18.013
*
3656
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 18 / Friday, January 26, 2018 / Proposed Rules
tss = The average temperature during the
collection period at the sampling site (K).
UNTP = The method defined diffusive uptake
rate (sampling rate) (mL/min).
Note: Diffusive uptake rates (Ustd) for
common VOCs, using carbon sorbents packed
into sorbent tubes of the dimensions
specified in Section 6.1, are listed in Table
12.1. Adjust analytical conditions to keep
expected sampled masses within range (see
Sections 11.3.1.3 to 11.3.1.5). Best possible
method detection limits are typically in the
order of 0.1 ppb for 1,3-butadiene and 0.05
ppb for volatile aromatics such as benzene
for 14-day monitoring. However, actual
detection limits will depend upon the
analytical conditions selected.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE 17.1—SUMMARY OF GC/MS ANALYSIS QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES
Parameter
Frequency
Acceptance criteria
Corrective action
Bromofluorobenzene
Instrument
Tune Performance Check.
Five point calibration bracketing
the expected sample concentration.
Daily a prior to sample analysis ....
Evaluation criteria presented in
Section 9.5 and Table 9.2.
(1) Percent Deviation (%DEV) of
response factors ±30%.
(2) Relative Retention Times
(RRTs) for target peaks ±0.06
units from mean RRT.
Calibration Verification (CCV Second
source
calibration
verification check).
Laboratory Blank Analysis .............
Following the calibration curve .....
(1) Retune and or
(2) Perform Maintenance.
(1) Repeat calibration sample
analysis.
(2) Repeat linearity check.
(3) Prepare new calibration standards as necessary and repeat
analysis.
(1) Repeat calibration check.
(2) Repeat calibration curve.
Blank Sorbent Tube Certification ...
Following any major change, repair or maintenance or if daily
CCV does not meet method requirements. Recalibration not to
exceed three months.
Daily a following bromofluoro- benzene and calibration check;
prior to sample analysis.
Samples—Internal Standards ........
One tube analyzed for each batch
of tubes cleaned or 10 percent
of tubes whichever is greater.
All samples ...................................
Field Blanks ...................................
Two per sampling period ..............
a Every
*
(1) Repeat analysis with new
blank tube.
(2) Check system for leaks, contamination.
(3) Analyze additional blank.
Re-clean all tubes in batch and
reanalyze.
Flag Data for possible invalidation.
Flag Data for possible invalidation
due to high blank bias.
24 hours.
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2018–00470 Filed 1–25–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA–R08–OAR–2017–0698; FRL–9972–54Region 8]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Plans for Designated Facilities and
Pollutants; North Dakota; Control of
Emissions From Existing Commercial
and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration
Units
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
The response factor ±30% DEV
from calibration curve average
response factor.
(1) ≤0.2 ppbv per analyte or ≤3
times the LOD, whichever is
greater.
(2) Internal Standard (IS) area response ±40% and IS Retention
Time (RT) ±0.33 min. of most
recent calibration check.
<0.2 ppbv per VOC targeted compound or 3 times the LOD,
whichever is greater.
IS area response ±40% and IS
RT ±0.33 min. of most recent
calibration validation.
No greater than one-third of the
measured target analyte or
compliance limit..
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
Clean Air Act (CAA) section 111(d)/129
plan (the ‘‘plan’’) submitted by the
Division of Air Quality of the North
Dakota Department of Health (the
‘‘Department’’) on June 12, 2014. The
plan would allow for the
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:24 Jan 25, 2018
Jkt 244001
implementation of emissions guidelines
for existing commercial and industrial
solid waste incineration (CISWI) units
within the jurisdiction of the State of
North Dakota. The plan creates new
enforceable emissions limits and
operating procedures for existing CISWI
units within the State of North Dakota
in accordance with the requirements
established by the revised CISWI new
source performance standards (NSPS)
and emission guidelines (EG),
promulgated by the EPA on March 21,
2011, with subsequent final
amendments to the rule promulgated on
February 7, 2013. This proposed plan
approval rulemaking is being taken in
accordance with the requirements of
sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA and
the relevant parts and subparts of the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before February 26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
OAR–2017–0698 at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
www.regulations.gov. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e., on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregory Lohrke, Air Program, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 8, Mail Code 8P–AR,
1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado
E:\FR\FM\26JAP1.SGM
26JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 18 (Friday, January 26, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3636-3656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00470]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 51, 60, and 63
[EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0510; FRL-9972-22-OAR]
RIN 2060-AS95
Revisions to Testing Regulations for Air Emission Sources
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action proposes corrections and updates to regulations
for source testing of emissions. The proposed rule includes corrections
to testing provisions that contain inaccuracies, updates to outdated
procedures, and approved alternative procedures that provide testers
enhanced flexibility. The revisions will improve the quality of data
but will not impose new substantive requirements on source owners or
operators.
DATES: Comments. Written comments must be received by March 27, 2018.
Public Hearing. The EPA will hold a public hearing on this rule if
requested. Requests for a hearing must be made by February 5, 2018.
Requests for a hearing should be made to Mrs. Lula H. Melton via email
at [email protected] or by phone at (919) 541-2910. If a hearing is
requested, it will be held on February 26, 2018 at EPA Headquarters,
William Jefferson Clinton East Building, 1201 Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20004.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2016-0510 at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the Web, Cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed on the website, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically at https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA Docket Center, Room
3334, EPA WJC West Building, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20004. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number
for the EPA Docket Center is (202) 566-1742.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Lula H. Melton, Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Assessment Division (E143-
02), Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711;
telephone number: (919) 541-2910; fax number: (919) 541-0516; email
address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The supplementary information in this preamble is organized as
follows:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
B. What action is the agency taking?
II. Background
III. Summary of Proposed Amendments
A. Method 201A of Appendix M of Part 51
B. Method 204 of Appendix M of Part 51
C. Method 205 of Appendix M of Part 51
[[Page 3637]]
D. General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part 60
E. Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam Generators (Subpart D) Part 60
F. Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (Subpart Da) Part 60
G. Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units
(Subpart Db) Part 60
H. Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating
Units (Subpart Dc) Part 60
I. Municipal Waste Combustors for Which Construction is
Commenced After December 20, 1989 and on or Before September 20,
1994 (Subpart Ea) Part 60
J. Glass Manufacturing Plants (Subpart CC) Part 60
K. New Residential Wood Heaters, New Residential Hydronic
Heaters and Forced-Air Furnaces (Subpart QQQQ) Part 60
L. Method 2B of Appendix A-1 of Part 60
M. Method 5 of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
N. Method 5B of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
O. Method 5I of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
P. Method 7 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
Q. Method 8 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
R. Method 18 of Appendix A-6 of Part 60
S. Method 22 of Appendix A-7 of Part 60
T. Method 26 of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
U. Method 26A of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
V. Test Method 28WHH of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
W. Performance Specification 1 of Appendix B of Part 60
X. Performance Specification 2 of Appendix B of Part 60
Y. Performance Specification 3 of Appendix B of Part 60
Z. Performance Specification 11 of Appendix B of Part 60
AA. Performance Specification 15 of Appendix B of Part 60
BB. Performance Specification 18 of Appendix B of Part 60
CC. Procedure 1 of Appendix F of Part 60
DD. General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part 63
EE. Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing (Subpart NNN) Part 63
FF. Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional
Boilers and Process Heaters (Subpart DDDDD) Part 63
GG. Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units
(Subpart UUUUU) Part 63
HH. Method 303 of Appendix A of Part 63
II. Method 308 of Appendix A of Part 63
JJ. Method 320 of Appendix A of Part 63
KK. Method 323 of Appendix A of Part 63
LL. Method 325A of Appendix A of Part 63
MM. Method 325B of Appendix A of Part 63
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act and 1 CFR
Part 51
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
The proposed amendments apply to industries that are subject to the
current provisions of parts 51, 60, and 63. We did not list all of the
specific affected industries or their North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) codes herein since there are many
affected sources in numerous NAICS categories. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult either the air permitting authority for the entity or
your EPA Regional representative as listed in 40 CFR 63.13.
B. What action is the agency taking?
This action makes corrections and revisions to source test methods,
performance specifications (PS), quality assurance/quality control (QA/
QC) procedures, and testing regulations. The corrections and revisions
consist primarily of typographical errors, updates to testing
procedures, and the addition of alternative equipment and methods the
Agency has deemed acceptable to use.
II. Background
The EPA catalogs errors and corrections, as well as necessary
revisions to test methods, PS, QA/QC procedures, and associated
regulations in 40 CFR parts 51, 60, and 63 and periodically updates and
revises these provisions. The most recent updates and revisions were
promulgated on August 30, 2016 (81 FR 59800). This proposed rule
addresses necessary corrections and revisions identified subsequent to
that final action, many of which were brought to our attention by
regulated sources and end-users, such as environmental consultants and
compliance professionals. These revisions will improve the quality of
data obtained and give source testers the flexibility to use newly-
approved alternative procedures.
III. Summary of Proposed Amendments
The following amendments are being proposed.
A. Method 201A of Appendix M of Part 51
In Method 201A, in section 12.5, the denominator of equation 24
would be corrected.
B. Method 204 of Appendix M of Part 51
In Method 204, in section 8.2, the statement regarding equation
204-2 would be corrected to ``The NEAR must be <=0.05.''
C. Method 205 of Appendix M of Part 51
In Method 205, section 2.1.1 would be revised to allow the use of
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)-traceable
transfer standards to calibrate the gas dilution system because these
standards are widely available and provide the accuracy necessary to
perform the calibration. Section 2.1.1 would also be revised to require
testers to report the results of the calibration of the dilution system
to enable the regulatory authority to review this information.
D. General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part 60
In the General Provisions of part 60, section 60.17(h) would be
revised to add American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) D6216-
12 to the list of incorporations by reference and to re-number the
remaining consensus standards that are incorporated by reference in
alpha-numeric order.
E. Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam Generators (Subpart D) Part 60
In subpart D, the allowed filter temperature in section
60.46(b)(2)(i) would be revised from 160 14 [deg]C to 160
5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable
PM measurements.
F. Electric Utility Steam Generating Units (Subpart Da) Part 60
In subpart Da, the allowed filter temperature in section 60.50Da
(b)(1)(ii)(A) would be revised from 160 14 [deg]C to 160
5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable
PM measurements.
G. Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units (Subpart
Db) Part 60
In subpart Db, the allowed filter temperature in section
60.46b(d)(4) would be revised from 160 14 [deg]C to 160
5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable
PM measurements.
[[Page 3638]]
H. Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units
(Subpart Dc) Part 60
In subpart Dc, the allowed filter temperature in section
60.45c(a)(5) would be revised from 160 14 [deg]C to 160
5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable
PM measurements.
I. Municipal Waste Combustors for Which Construction Is Commenced After
December 20, 1989 and on or Before September 20, 1994 (Subpart Ea) Part
60
In subpart Ea, the allowed filter temperature in section
60.58a(b)(3) would be revised from 160 14 [deg]C to 160
5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable
PM measurements.
J. Glass Manufacturing Plants (Subpart CC) Part 60
In subpart CC, the allowed filter temperature in section 60.293(f)
would be revised from 120 14 [deg]C to 120 5
[deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable particulate
matter (PM) measurements. The allowed filter temperature in section
60.296(d)(2) would be revised from 177 14 [deg]C to 177
5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable
PM measurements.
K. New Residential Wood Heaters, New Residential Hydronic Heaters and
Forced-Air Furnaces Part 60
In subpart QQQQ, in Method 28WHH, in section 13.5.1, equation 8
would be corrected.
L. Method 2B of Appendix A-1 of Part 60
In Method 2B, in section 12.1, the definition of ambient carbon
dioxide concentration would be revised because the global monthly mean
(CO2)a concentration varies over time. Also, a
website link would be added to the definition.
M. Method 5 of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
The allowed filter temperature in Method 5, sections 2.0, 6.1.1.2,
6.1.1.6, 6.1.1.7, and 8.5 would be revised from 120 14
[deg]C to 120 5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of
the filterable PM measurements. Section 6.1.1.9 would be revised to
allow the use of a single temperature sensor in lieu of two temperature
sensors on the dry gas meter as allowed by Technical Information
Document 19 (TID-19) and the approved broadly applicable alternative,
ALT-117 (see https://www.epa.gov/emc).
N. Method 5B of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
The allowed filter temperature in Method 5B, sections 2.0, 6.1, and
8.2 would be revised from 160 14 [deg]C to 160 5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable PM
measurements. Section 11.0 would be revised to replace the reference to
Method 5, section 11.0 with specific analytical procedures and to
report the results using Figure 5B-1 for complete data review. Section
17.0 would be revised to delete the word ``Reserved'' from the title,
and Figure 5B-1 (Analytical Data Sheet) would be added.
O. Method 5I of Appendix A-3 of Part 60
In Method 5I, sections 2.1 and 8.5.2.2 would be revised to tighten
the allowed filter temperature from 120 14 [deg]C to 120
5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable
PM measurements.
P. Method 7 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
In Method 7, sections 10.1.2 and 11.3 reference erroneous sections;
the correct sections would be inserted.
Q. Method 8 of Appendix A-4 of Part 60
In Method 8, sections 6.1.1.1 through 6.1.1.4 would be renumbered
to 6.1.1.2 through 6.1.1.5; a new section 6.1.1.1 would be added to
clarify the requirements that apply to the probe nozzle; and Figure 8-1
(Sulfuric Acid Sampling Train) would be corrected.
R. Method 18 of Appendix A-6 of Part 60
In Method 18, in section 13.1, the erroneous paragraph (c)
designation would be re-designated as (b).
S. Method 22 of Appendix A-7 of Part 60
In Method 22, sections 11.2.1 and 11.2.2 would be revised to allow
digital photography to be used for a subset of the recordkeeping
requirements. Section 11.2.3 would be added to allow digital
photographic records. Note that ALT-109 (see https://www.epa.gov/emc)
is the associated broadly applicable alternative that allows the use of
digital photographs for specific recordkeeping requirements.
T. Method 26 of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
In Method 26, section 6.2.2 would be revised to allow the use of
glass sample storage containers as an option to allow flexibility and
to be consistent with Method 26A.
U. Method 26A of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
In Method 26A, section 6.2.1 would be revised to remove the
language regarding sample storage containers. We have determined that
high-density polyethylene is an acceptable material for sample storage
containers in addition to the currently allowed glass. Therefore, we
would allow both high-density polyethylene and glass in a new section
6.2.4.
V. Test Method 28WHH of Appendix A-8 of Part 60
In Test Method 28WHH, equation 8 in section 13.5.1 would be
corrected.
W. Performance Specification 1 of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 1, references to ASTM D6216-98 (in
sections 2.1, 3.1, 6.1, 8.1(1), 8.1(3)(ii), 8.2(1), 8.2(2), 8.2(3),
9.0, 12.1, 13.1, 13.2, and 16.0 reference 8. will be replaced with ASTM
D6216-12. Note: If the initial certification of the continuous opacity
monitoring system (COMS) has already occurred using D6216-98, D6216-03,
or D6216-07, it will not be necessary to recertify using D6216-12.
X. Performance Specification 2 of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 2, section 13.2 would be replaced with
a table that indicates the relative accuracy performance
specifications.
Y. Performance Specification 3 of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 3, the two sentences in section 12.0
that read, ``Calculate the arithmetic difference between the RM and the
CEMS output for each run. The average difference of the nine (or more)
data sets constitute the RA.'' would be deleted; these two sentences
are no longer necessary since equations 3-1 and 3-2 would be moved from
section 13.2 to section 12.0.
Z. Performance Specification 11 of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 11, section 13.1, the word ``average''
erroneously exists in the second sentence and would be deleted.
AA. Performance Specification 15 of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 15, section 13.0 would be added as
``Method Performance (Reserved).''
BB. Performance Specification 18 of Appendix B of Part 60
In Performance Specification 18, in section 11.8.7, the last
sentence would
[[Page 3639]]
be revised to clarify the duration of the drift check. In Table 1, the
erroneous acronym ``NO2'' would be replaced with ``NO.'' In
the appendix of Performance Specification 18, the inadvertently omitted
reserved section 12.0 would be added.
CC. Procedure 1 of Appendix F of Part 60
In Procedure 1, in section 5.1.2 (1), the sentence immediately
following the table that reads, ``Challenge the CEMS three times at
each audit point, and use the average of the three responses in
determining accuracy.'' would be replaced with, ``Inject each of the
audit gases, three times each for a total of six injections. Inject the
gases in such a manner that the entire CEMS is challenged. Do not
inject the same gas concentration twice in succession.'' In section
5.1.2 (3), the reference to EPA's traceability protocol for gaseous
calibration standards would be updated, and the language regarding the
use of EPA Method 205 for dilution of audit gases would be clarified.
DD. General Provisions (Subpart A) of Part 63
Sections 63.7(g)(2), 63.7(g)(2)(v), and 63.8(e)(5)(i) of the
General Provisions (subpart A) of part 63 would be revised to require
the reporting of specific test data for continuous monitoring system
performance evaluation tests and ongoing QA tests. These data elements
would be required regardless of the format of the report, i.e.,
electronic or paper. These modifications will ensure that performance
evaluation and quality assurance test reporting include all data
necessary for the compliance authority to assess and assure the quality
of the reported data and that the reported information describes and
identifies the specific unit covered by the evaluation test report.
EE. Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing (Subpart NNN) Part 63
In subpart NNN, the allowed filter temperature in Sec.
63.1385(a)(5) would be revised from 120 14 [deg]C to 120
5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the filterable
PM measurements.
FF. Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and Institutional Boilers
and Process Heaters (Subpart DDDDD) Part 63
In Table 6 of subpart DDDDD, row 1.f. would be revised to allow the
use of EPA SW-846-7471B (for liquid samples) in addition to EPA SW-846-
7470A for measuring mercury to allow flexibility.
GG. Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units
(Subpart UUUUU) Part 63
In subpart UUUUU, the allowed filter temperature in Sec.
63.10010(h)(7)(i)(1) would be revised from 160 14 [deg]C to
160 5 [deg]C resulting in increased precision of the
filterable PM measurements. In Table 5, Method 5I would be allowed as a
test method option because Method 5I is designed for low PM
application.
HH. Method 303 of Appendix A of Part 63
In Method 303, section 12.4, equation 303-3 would be corrected by
inserting ``where y = '' in front of the equation.
II. Method 308 of Appendix A of Part 63
In Method 308, deionized distilled water would replace the aqueous
n-proponal solution; the affected sections are 2.0, 7.2.2, 7.2.3.3, and
11.3.2. Section 7.2.2, which defines the aqueous n-proponal solution,
would be removed. Section 8.1.2 would be revised to require a leak
check prior to the sampling run (in addition to after the sampling run)
for QA purposes; requiring a leak check prior to the sampling run would
potentially save time and money. In section 9.1, methanol spike
recovery check would be added as a QC measure in Table 9.1. In section
12.1, variables used in equations 308-4 and 308-5 would be added and
section 12.5, which includes equations 308-4 and 308-5, would be added.
In section 13.0, the title ``Reserved'' would be replaced with ``Method
Performance'' and QA requirements would be added to be consistent with
other methods.
JJ. Method 320 of Appendix A of Part 63
In section 8.2.2.4, the denominator in equation 2 would be
corrected from PSS to PS. In section 9.2.3, the
word ``where'' in the statement ``Calculate the dilution ratio using
the tracer gas as follows: where:'' would be deleted. Also in section
9.2.3, ``dir'' on the definition of spike is inadvertently
superscripted and would be subscripted.
KK. Method 323 of Appendix A of Part 63
In Method 323, section 12.9, the denominator in equation 323-8
would be corrected.
LL. Method 325A of Appendix A of Part 63
In Method 325A, section 8.2.1.3 would be revised to clarify that
only one extra sampling site is required near known sources of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) when the source is within 50 meters of the
boundary and the source is located between two monitors. The label
under Figure 8.1 would be corrected from Refinery (20% angle) to
Refinery (20[deg] angle). Section 8.2.3.2 would be revised to include
facilities with a monitoring perimeter length equal to 7,315 meters
(24,000 feet). Section 8.2.3.3 would be added to provide clarification
and an equivalent procedure in Option 2 (linear distance between sites)
for site locations that parallel section 8.2.2.2.4 in Option 1 (radial
distance between sites).
MM. Method 325B of Appendix A of Part 63
In Method 325B, section 9.3.2 would be revised to correct an error
in the number of field blank samples required for a sampling period and
to provide consistency with the sample analysis required in Method
325B. In sections 9.13 and 11.3.2.5, the erroneous reference to section
10.6.3 would be corrected to 10.0. Also in section 11.3.2.5, the
erroneous reference to section 10.9.5 would be corrected to 9.13.
Section 12.2.2 would be revised to correct the calculation of target
compound concentrations at standard conditions. Sections 12.2.3 and
12.2.4 would be deleted because the equations for target concentrations
are incorrect. Table 17-1 would be revised to add inadvertently omitted
QC criteria from section 9.3.3.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at https://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
terms of Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993)
and is, therefore, not subject to review under Executive Orders 12866
and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011).
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
This action is expected to be an Executive Order 13771 deregulatory
action. This proposed rule is expected to provide meaningful burden
reduction by improving data quality and providing source testers the
flexibility to use newly-approved alternative procedures.
[[Page 3640]]
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA. The amendments being proposed in this action to the test
methods, performance specifications, and testing regulations do not
substantively revise the existing information collection requirements
but rather only make corrections and minor updates to existing testing
methodology. In addition, the proposed amendments clarify performance
testing requirements.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. In
making this determination, the impact of concern is any significant
adverse economic impact on small entities. An agency may certify that a
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities if the rule relieves regulatory burden, has no
net burden or otherwise has a positive economic effect on the small
entities subject to the rule. This proposed rule will not impose
emission measurement requirements beyond those specified in the current
regulations, nor does it change any emission standard. We have,
therefore, concluded that this action will have no net regulatory
burden for all directly regulated small entities.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local or tribal governments or the private sector.
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. This action would correct and update existing
testing regulations. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this
action.
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because it does not concern an environmental
health risk or safety risk.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act and 1 CFR Part 51
This action involves technical standards. The EPA proposes to use
ASTM D6216-12 for continuous opacity monitors in Performance
Specification 1. The ASTM D6216-12 standard covers the procedure for
certifying continuous opacity monitors and includes design and
performance specifications, test procedures, and QA requirements to
ensure that continuous opacity monitors meet minimum design and
calibration requirements, necessary in part, for accurate opacity
monitoring measurements in regulatory environmental opacity monitoring
applications subject to 10 percent or higher opacity standards.
The ASTM D6216-12 standard was developed and adopted by the
American Society for Testing and Materials. The standard may be
obtained from https://www.astm.org or from the ASTM at 100 Barr Harbor
Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action is not subject to Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) because it does not establish an
environmental health or safety standard. This action would correct and
update existing testing regulations.
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 51
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Performance
specifications, Test methods and procedures.
40 CFR Part 60
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Performance specifications, Test methods and procedures.
40 CFR Part 63
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Performance
specifications, Test methods and procedures.
Dated: December 11, 2017.
E. Scott Pruitt,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental
Protection Agency proposes to amend title 40, chapter I of the Code of
Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 51--REQUIREMENTS FOR PREPARATION, ADOPTION, AND SUBMITTAL OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 51 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 101; 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.
0
2. Amend appendix M to part 51 as follows:
0
a. Revise section 12.5, equation 24, in Method 201A.
0
b. Revise the last sentence in section 8.2 in Method 204.
0
c. Revise section 2.1.1 in Method 205.
The revisions read as follows:
Appendix M to Part 51--Recommended Test Methods for State
Implementation Plans
* * * * *
Method 201A--Determination of PM10 and PM2.5
Emissions From Stationary Sources (Constant Sampling Rate Procedure)
* * * * *
12.5 Equations. Use the following equations to complete the
calculations required in this test method.
* * * * *
Sampling Dwell Time at Each Point. Ntp is the total
number of traverse points. You must use the preliminary velocity
traverse data.
[[Page 3641]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.000
* * * * *
Method 204--Criteria for and Verification of a Permanent or Temporary
Total Enclosure
* * * * *
8.2 * * *
The NEAR must be <=0.05.
* * * * *
Method 205--Verification of Gas Dilution Systems for Field Instrument
Calibrations
* * * * *
2.1.1 The gas dilution system shall be recalibrated once per
calendar year using NIST-traceable flow standards with an
uncertainty <=0.25 percent. You shall report the results of the
calibration by the person or manufacturer who carried out the
calibration whenever the dilution system is used, listing the date
of the most recent calibration, the due date for the next
calibration, calibration point, reference flow device (ID, S/N), and
acceptance criteria. Follow the manufacturer's instructions for the
operation and use of the gas dilution system. A copy of the
manufacturer's instructions for the operation of the instrument, as
well as the most recent calibration documentation shall be made
available for inspection at the test site.
* * * * *
PART 60--STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW STATIONARY SOURCES
0
3. The authority citation for part 60 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
4. In Sec. 60.17:
0
a. Redesignate paragraphs (h)(177) through (h)(209) as (h)(178) through
(h)(210).
0
b. Add new paragraph (h)(177).
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 60.17 Incorporations by reference.
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(177) ASTM D6216-12, Standard Practice for Opacity Monitor
Manufacturers to Certify Conformance with Design and Performance
Specifications, IBR approved for appendix B to part 60: Performance
Specification 1.
* * * * *
Subpart D--Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam
Generators
0
5. Revise Sec. 60.46(b)(2)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.46 Test methods and procedures.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) The sampling time and sample volume for each run shall be at
least 60 minutes and 0.85 dscm (30 dscf). The probe and filter holder
heating systems in the sampling train shall be set to provide an
average gas temperature of 160 5 [deg]C (320 9[emsp14][deg]F).
* * * * *
Subpart Da--Standards of Performance for Electric Utility Steam
Generating Units
0
6. Revise Sec. 60.50Da (b)(1)(ii)(A) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.50Da Compliance determination procedures and methods.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) The sampling time and sample volume for each run shall be at
least 120 minutes and 1.70 dscm (60 dscf). The probe and filter holder
heating system in the sampling train may be set to provide an average
gas temperature of no greater than 160 5 [deg]C (320 9[emsp14][deg]F).
* * * * *
Subpart Db--Standards of Performance for Industrial-Commercial-
Institutional Steam Generating Units
0
7. Revise Sec. 60.46b (d)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.46b Compliance and performance test methods and procedures
for particulate matter and nitrogen oxides.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(4) For Method 5 of appendix A of this part, the temperature of the
sample gas in the probe and filter holder is monitored and is
maintained at 160 5 [deg]C (320 9[emsp14][deg]F).
* * * * *
Subpart Dc--Standards of Performance for Small Industrial-
Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units
0
8. Revise Sec. 60.45c(a)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.45c Compliance and performance test methods and procedures
for particulate matter.
(a) * * *
(5) For Method 5 or 5B of appendix A of this part, the temperature
of the sample gas in the probe and filter holder shall be monitored and
maintained at 160 5 [deg]C (320 9[emsp14][deg]F).
* * * * *
Subpart Ea--Standards of Performance for Municipal Waste Combustors
for Which Construction Is Commenced After December 20, 1989 and On
or Before September 20, 1994
0
9. Revise Sec. 60.58a(b)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.58a Compliance and performance testing.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) Method 5 shall be used for determining compliance with the
particulate matter emission limit. The minimum sample volume shall be
1.7 cubic meters (60 cubic feet). The probe and filter holder heating
systems in the sample train shall be set to provide a gas temperature
of 160[deg] 5 [deg]C (320[deg] 9[emsp14][deg]F). An oxygen or carbon dioxide measurement shall
be obtained simultaneously with each Method 5 run.
* * * * *
Subpart CC--Standards of Performance for Glass Manufacturing Plants
0
10. Revise Sec. 60.293(f) to read as follows:
Sec. 60.293 Standards for particulate matter from glass melting
furnace with modified-processes.
* * * * *
(f) Test methods and procedures as specified in Sec. 60.296 shall
be used to determine compliance with this section except that to
determine compliance for any glass melting furnace using modified
processes and fired with either a gaseous fuel or a liquid fuel
containing less than 0.50 weight percent sulfur, Method 5 shall be used
with the probe and filter holder heating system in the sampling train
set to provide a gas temperature of 120 5 [deg]C (248
9[emsp14][deg]F).
* * * * *
0
11. Revise Sec. 60.296(d)(2) to read as follows:
[[Page 3642]]
Sec. 60.296 Test methods and procedures.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) Method 5 shall be used to determine the particulate matter
concentration (cs) and volumetric flow rate (Qsd)
of the effluent gas. The sampling time and sample volume for each run
shall be at least 60 minutes and 0.90 dscm (31.8 dscf). The probe and
filter holder heating system may be set to provide a gas temperature no
greater than 177 5 [deg]C (350 9[emsp14][deg]F), except under the conditions specified in Sec.
60.293(e).
* * * * *
0
12. Revise ``(CO2)a'' in section 12.1 in Method
2B of appendix A-1 to part 60 to read as follows:
Appendix A-1 to Part 60--Test Methods 1 Through 2F
* * * * *
Method 2B--Determination of Exhaust Gas Volume Flow Rate From Gasoline
Vapor Incinerators
* * * * *
12.1 Nomenclature.
* * * * *
(CO2)a = Ambient carbon dioxide concentration,
ppm (if not measured during the test period, may be assumed to equal
the global monthly mean CO2 concentration posted at
https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends/global.html#global_data).
* * * * *
0
13. In appendix A-3 to part 60:
0
a. Revise sections 2.0, 6.1.1.2, 6.1.1.6, 6.1.1.7, 6.1.1.9, and 8.5 in
Method 5.
0
b. Revise sections 2.0, 6.1, 8.2, and 11.0 in Method 5B.
0
c. Add section 17.0 in Method 5B.
0
d. Revise sections 2.1 and 8.5.2.2 in Method 5I.
The revisions read as follows:
Appendix A-3 to Part 60--Test Methods 4 Through 5I
* * * * *
Method 5--Determination of Particulate Matter Emissions From Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
2.0 Summary of Method. Particulate matter is withdrawn
isokinetically from the source and collected on a glass fiber filter
maintained at a temperature of 120 5 [deg]C (248 9 [deg]F) or such other temperature as specified by an
applicable subpart of the standards or approved by the Administrator
for a particular application. The PM mass, which includes any
material that condenses at or above the filtration temperature, is
determined gravimetrically after the removal of uncombined water.
* * * * *
6.1.1.2 Probe Liner. Borosilicate or quartz glass tubing with a
heating system capable of maintaining a probe gas temperature during
sampling of 120 5 [deg]C (248 9 [deg]F), or
such other temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of the
standards or as approved by the Administrator for a particular
application. Since the actual temperature at the outlet of the probe
is not usually monitored during sampling, probes constructed
according to APTD-0581 and utilizing the calibration curves of APTD-
0576 (or calibrated according to the procedure outlined in APTD-
0576) will be considered acceptable. Either borosilicate or quartz
glass probe liners may be used for stack temperatures up to about
480 [deg]C (900 [deg]F); quartz glass liners shall be used for
temperatures between 480 and 900 [deg]C (900 and 1,650 [deg]F). Both
types of liners may be used at higher temperatures than specified
for short periods of time, subject to the approval of the
Administrator. The softening temperature for borosilicate glass is
820 [deg]C (1500 [deg]F), and for quartz glass it is 1500 [deg]C
(2700 [deg]F). Whenever practical, every effort should be made to
use borosilicate or quartz glass probe liners. Alternatively, metal
liners (e.g., 316 stainless steel, Incoloy 825 or other corrosion
resistant metals) made of seamless tubing may be used, subject to
the approval of the Administrator.
* * * * *
6.1.1.6 Filter Heating System. Any heating system capable of
monitoring and maintaining temperature around the filter shall be
used to ensure the sample gas temperature exiting the filter of 120
5 [deg]C (248 9 [deg]F) during sampling or
such other temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of the
standards or approved by the Administrator for a particular
application. The monitoring and regulation of the temperature around
the filter may be done with the filter temperature sensor or another
temperature sensor.
6.1.1.7 Filter Temperature Sensor. A temperature sensor capable
of measuring temperature to within 3 [deg]C (5.4 [deg]F)
shall be installed so that the sensing tip of the temperature sensor
is in direct contact with the sample gas exiting the filter. The
sensing tip of the sensor may be encased in glass, Teflon, or metal
and must protrude at least \1/2\ in. into the sample gas exiting the
filter. The filter temperature sensor must be monitored and recorded
during sampling to ensure a sample gas temperature exiting the
filter of 120 5 [deg]C (248 9 [deg]F), or
such other temperature as specified by an applicable subpart of the
standards or approved by the Administrator for a particular
application.
* * * * *
6.1.1.9 Metering System. Vacuum gauge, leak-free pump,
calibrated temperature sensors, dry gas meter (DGM) capable of
measuring volume to within 2 percent, and related equipment, as
shown in Figure 5-1. Other metering systems capable of maintaining
sampling rates within 10 percent of isokinetic and of determining
sample volumes to within 2 percent may be used, subject to the
approval of the Administrator. When the metering system is used in
conjunction with a pitot tube, the system shall allow periodic
checks of isokinetic rates. The average DGM temperature for use in
the calculations of Section 12.0 may be obtained by averaging the
two temperature sensors located at the inlet and outlet of the DGM
as shown in Figure 5-3 or alternatively from a single temperature
sensor located at the immediate outlet of the DGM or the plenum of
the DGM.
* * * * *
8.5 Sampling Train Operation. During the sampling run, maintain
an isokinetic sampling rate (within 10 percent of true isokinetic
unless otherwise specified by the Administrator) and a sample gas
temperature through the filter of 120 5 [deg]C (248
9 [deg]F) or such other temperature as specified by an
applicable subpart of the standards or approved by the
Administrator. Note: After startup of the sampling system, it may
take several minutes to equilibrate the system and temperature
reading to within the required temperature threshold.
* * * * *
Method 5B--Determination of Nonsulfuric Acid Particulate Matter
Emissions From Stationary Sources
* * * * *
2.0 Summary of Method
Particulate matter is withdrawn isokinetically from the source
and collected on a glass fiber filter maintained at a temperature of
160 5 [deg]C (320 9 [deg]F). The collected
sample is then heated in an oven at 160 [deg]C (320 [deg]F) for 6
hours to volatilize any condensed sulfuric acid that may have been
collected, and the nonsulfuric acid particulate mass is determined
gravimetrically.
* * * * *
6.1 Sample Collection.
The probe liner heating system and filter heating system must be
capable of maintaining a sample gas temperature of 160 5
[deg]C (320 9 [deg]F).
* * * * *
8.2 Probe and Filter Temperatures.
Maintain the probe outlet and filter temperatures at 160 5 [deg]C (320 9 [deg]F). Note: After start-up of
the sampling system, it may take several minutes to equilibrate the
system and temperature reading to within the required temperature
threshold.
* * * * *
11.0 Analytical Procedure
11.1 Record and report the data required on a sheet such as the
one shown in Figure 5B-1.
11.2 Handle each sample container as follows:
11.2.1 Container No. 1. Leave the contents in the shipping
container or transfer the filter and any loose PM from the sample
container to a tared glass weighing dish. Oven dry the filter sample
at a temperature of 160 5 [deg]C (320 9
[deg]F) for 6 hours. Cool in a desiccator for 2 hours, and weigh to
constant weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 mg. For the
purposes of this section, the term ``constant weight'' means a
difference of no more than 0.5 mg or 1 percent of total weight less
tare weight, whichever is greater, between two consecutive
weighings, with no less than 6 hours of desiccation time between
weighings.
11.2.2 Container No. 2. Note the level of liquid in the
container, and confirm on the
[[Page 3643]]
analysis sheet whether leakage occurred during transport. If a
noticeable amount of leakage has occurred, either void the sample or
use methods, subject to the approval of the Administrator, to
correct the final results. Measure the liquid in this container
either volumetrically to 1 ml or gravimetrically to
0.5 g. Transfer the contents to a tared 250 ml beaker,
and evaporate to dryness at ambient temperature and pressure. Then
oven dry the probe sample at a temperature of 160 5
[deg]C (320 9 [deg]F) for 6 hours. Cool in a desiccator
for 2 hours, and weigh to constant weight. Report the results to the
nearest 0.1 mg.
11.2.3 Container No. 3. Weigh the spent silica gel (or silica
gel plus impinger) to the nearest 0.5 g using a balance. This step
may be conducted in the field.
11.2.4 Acetone Blank Container. Measure the acetone in this
container either volumetrically or gravimetrically. Transfer the
acetone to a tared 250 ml beaker, and evaporate to dryness at
ambient temperature and pressure. Desiccate for 24 hours, and weigh
to a constant weight. Report the results to the nearest 0.1 mg.
Note: The contents of Container No. 2 as well as the acetone
blank container may be evaporated at temperatures higher than
ambient. If evaporation is done at an elevated temperature, the
temperature must be below the boiling point of the solvent; also, to
prevent ``bumping,'' the evaporation process must be closely
supervised, and the contents of the beaker must be swirled
occasionally to maintain an even temperature. Use extreme care, as
acetone is highly flammable and has a low flash point.
* * * * *
17.0 Tables, Diagrams, Flowcharts, and Validation Data
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weight of particulate collected, mg
Container number -----------------------------------------------
Final weight Tare weight Weight gain
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.......................................................................................................
2.......................................................................................................
Total:..................................................................................................
Less acetone blank......................................................................................
Weight of particulate matter............................................................................
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Volume of liquid water
collected
-------------------------------
Impinger Silica gel
volume, ml weight, g
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final...................................................................................................................
Initial.................................................................................................................
Liquid collected........................................................................................................
Total volume collected.................................................................................................. .............. g* ml
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Convert weight of water to volume by dividing total weight increase by density of water (1 g/ml).
Figure 5B-1. Analytical Data Sheet
* * * * *
Method 5I--Determination of Low Level Particulate Emissions From
Stationary Sources
* * * * *
2.1. Description. The system setup and operation is essentially
identical to Method 5. Particulate is withdrawn isokinetically from
the source and collected on a 47 mm glass fiber filter maintained at
a temperature of 120 5 [deg]C (248 9[emsp14][deg]F). The PM mass is determined by gravimetric
analysis after the removal of uncombined water. Specific measures in
this procedure designed to improve system performance at low
particulate levels include:
1. Improved sample handling procedures
2. Light weight sample filter assembly
3. Use of low residue grade acetone
Accuracy is improved through the minimization of systemic errors
associated with sample handling and weighing procedures. High purity
reagents, all glass, grease free, sample train components, and light
weight filter assemblies and beakers, each contribute to the overall
objective of improved precision and accuracy at low particulate
concentrations.
* * * * *
8.5.2.2 Care should be taken to maintain the filter box
temperature of the paired trains as close as possible to the Method
required temperature of 120 5 [deg]C (248 9[emsp14][deg]F). If separate ovens are being used for
simultaneously operated trains, it is recommended that the oven
temperature of each train be maintained within 5 [deg]C
(9[emsp14][deg]F) of each other. Note: After startup of
the sampling system, it may take several minutes to equilibrate the
system and temperature reading to within the required temperature
threshold.
* * * * *
0
14. In appendix A-4 to part 60:
0
a. Revise sections 10.1.2 and 11.3 in Method 7.
0
b. Redesignate sections 6.1.1.1 through 6.1.1.4 to read as sections
6.1.1.2 through 6.1.1.5 in Method 8.
0
c. Add a new section 6.1.1.1 in Method 8.
0
d. Revise Figure 8-1 in Method 8.
Appendix A-4 to Part 60--Test Methods 6 Through 10B
* * * * *
Method 7--Determination of Nitrogen Oxide Emissions From Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
10.1.2 Determination of Spectrophotometer Calibration Factor
Kc. Add 0 ml, 2.0 ml, 4.0 ml, 6.0 ml, and 8.0 ml of the
KNO3 working standard solution (1 ml = 100 [mu]g
NO2) to a series of five 50-ml volumetric flasks. To each
flask, add 25 ml of absorbing solution and 10 ml water. Add 1 N NaOH
to each flask until the pH is between 9 and 12 (about 25 to 35
drops). Dilute to the mark with water. Mix thoroughly, and pipette a
25-ml aliquot of each solution into a separate porcelain evaporating
dish. Beginning with the evaporation step, follow the analysis
procedure of section 11.2 until the solution has been transferred to
the 100-ml volumetric flask and diluted to the mark. Measure the
absorbance of each solution at the optimum wavelength as determined
in section 10.1.1.2. This calibration procedure must be repeated on
each day that samples are analyzed. Calculate the spectrophotometer
calibration factor as shown in section 12.2.
* * * * *
11.3 Sample Analysis. Mix the contents of the flask thoroughly,
and measure the absorbance at the optimum wavelength used for the
standards (Section 10.1.1.2), using the blank solution as a zero
reference. Dilute the sample and the blank with equal volumes of
water if the absorbance exceeds A4, the absorbance of the
400-[mu]g NO2 standard (see section 10.1.3).
* * * * *
Method 8--Determination of Sulfuric Acid and Sulfur Dioxide Emissions
From Stationary Sources
* * * * *
6.1.1.1 Probe Nozzle. Borosilicate or quartz glass with a sharp,
tapered leading edge and coupled to the probe liner using a Teflon
union. When the stack temperature exceeds 210 [deg]C
(410[emsp14][deg]F), a leak-free ground glass fitting or other leak
free, non-contaminating fitting must be used to couple the nozzle to
the probe liner. It is also acceptable to use a one-piece glass
nozzle/liner assembly. The angle of the taper shall be >30[deg], and
the taper shall be on the outside to preserve a constant internal
diameter. The probe nozzle shall be of the button-hook or elbow
design, unless otherwise specified by
[[Page 3644]]
the Administrator. Other materials of construction may be used,
subject to the approval of the Administrator. A range of nozzle
sizes suitable for isokinetic sampling should be available. Typical
nozzle sizes range from 0.32 to 1.27 cm (\1/8\ to \1/2\ in) inside
diameter (ID) in increments of 0.16 cm (\1/16\ in). Larger nozzles
sizes are also available if higher volume sampling trains are used.
6.1.1.2 Probe Liner. Borosilicate or quartz glass, with a
heating system to prevent visible condensation during sampling. Do
not use metal probe liners.
6.1.1.3 Filter Holder. Borosilicate glass, with a glass frit
filter support and a silicone rubber gasket. Other gasket materials
(e.g., Teflon or Viton) may be used, subject to the approval of the
Administrator. The holder design shall provide a positive seal
against leakage from the outside or around the filter. The filter
holder shall be placed between the first and second impingers. Do
not heat the filter holder.
6.1.1.4 Impingers. Four, of the Greenburg-Smith design, as shown
in Figure 8-1. The first and third impingers must have standard
tips. The second and fourth impingers must be modified by replacing
the insert with an approximately 13-mm (\1/2\-in.) ID glass tube,
having an unconstricted tip located 13 mm (\1/2\ in.) from the
bottom of the impinger. Similar collection systems, subject to the
approval of the Administrator, may be used.
6.1.1.5 Temperature Sensor. Thermometer, or equivalent, to
measure the temperature of the gas leaving the impinger train to
within 1 [deg]C (2[emsp14][deg]F).
* * * * *
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.001
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
* * * * *
0
15. Redesignate paragraph (c) as paragraph (b) in section 13.1 in
Method 18 of appendix A-6 to part 60 to read as follows:
Appendix A-6 to Part 60--Test Methods 16 Through 18
* * * * *
Method 18--Measurement of Gaseous Organic Compound Emissions by Gas
Chromatography
* * * * *
13.1 * * *
(b) Recovery. After developing an appropriate sampling and
analytical system for the pollutants of interest, conduct the
procedure in section 8.4. Conduct the appropriate recovery study in
section 8.4 at each sampling point where the method is being
applied. Submit the data and results of the recovery procedure with
the reporting of results under section 8.3.
* * * * *
0
16. In appendix A-7 to part 60:
0
a. Revise sections 11.2.1 and 11.2.2 in Method 22.
0
b. Add section 11.2.3 in Method 22.
The revisions read as follows:
Appendix A-7 to Part 60--Test Methods 19 Through 25E
* * * * *
Method 22--Visual Determination of Fugitive Emissions From Material
Sources and Smoke Emissions From Flares
* * * * *
11.2.1 Outdoor Location. Record the following information on the
field data sheet (Figure 22-1): Company name, industry, process
unit, observer's name, observer's affiliation, and date. Record also
the
[[Page 3645]]
estimated wind speed, wind direction, and sky condition. Sketch the
process unit being observed, and note the observer location relative
to the source and the sun. Indicate the potential and actual
emission points on the sketch. Alternatively, digital photography as
described in Section 11.2.3 may be used for a subset of the
recordkeeping requirements of this section.
11.2.2 Indoor Location. Record the following information on the
field data sheet (Figure 22-2): Company name, industry, process
unit, observer's name, observer's affiliation, and date. Record as
appropriate the type, location, and intensity of lighting on the
data sheet. Sketch the process unit being observed, and note the
observer location relative to the source. Indicate the potential and
actual fugitive emission points on the sketch. Alternatively,
digital photography as described in Section 11.2.3 may be used for a
subset of the recordkeeping requirements of this section.
11.2.3 Digital Photographic Records. Digital photographs,
annotated or unaltered, may be used to record and report sky
conditions, observer's location relative to the source, observer's
location relative to the sun, process unit being observed, potential
emission points and actual emission points for the requirements in
Sections 11.2.1 and 11.2.2. The image must have the proper lighting,
field of view and depth of field to properly distinguish the sky
condition (if applicable), process unit, potential emission point
and actual emission point. At least one digital photograph must be
from the point of the view of the observer. The photograph(s)
representing the environmental conditions must be taken within
reasonable time of the observation (i.e., 15 mins). Any photographs
altered or annotated must be retained in an unaltered format for
recordkeeping purposes.
* * * * *
0
17. In appendix A-8 to part 60:
0
a. Revise section 6.2.2 in Method 26.
0
b. Revise section 6.2.1 in Method 26A.
0
c. Add section 6.2.4 in Method 26A.
0
d. Revise equation 8 in section 13.5.1 in Test Method 28WHH.
The revisions read as follows:
Appendix A-8 to Part 60--Test Methods 26 Through 30B
* * * * *
Method 26--Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions From
Stationary Sources Non-Isokinetic Method
* * * * *
6.2.2 Storage Bottles. 100- or 250-ml, high-density polyethylene
or glass sample storage containers with Teflon screw cap liners to
store impinger samples.
* * * * *
Method 26A--Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions From
Stationary Sources Isokinetic Method
* * * * *
6.2.1 Probe-Liner and Probe-Nozzle Brushes, Wash Bottles, Petri
Dishes, Graduated Cylinder and/or Balance, and Rubber Policeman.
Same as Method 5, sections 6.2.1, 6.2.2, 6.2.4, 6.2.5, and 6.2.7.
* * * * *
6.2.4 Sample Storage Containers. High-density polyethylene or
glass sample storage containers with Teflon screw cap liners to
store impinger samples.
Test Method 28WHH for Measurement of Particulate Emissions and Heating
Efficiency of Wood-Fired Hydronic Heating Appliances
* * * * *
13.5.1 * * *
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.002
* * * * *
0
18. In appendix B to part 60:
0
a. Revise sections 2.1, 3.1, 6.1, 8.1(1), 8.1(3)(ii), 8.2(1), 8.2(2),
8.2(3), 9.0, 12.1, 13.1, 13.2, and 16.0 8. in Performance Specification
1.
0
b. Revise section 13.2 in Performance Specification 2.
0
c. Revise sections 12.0 and 13.2 in Performance Specification 3.
0
d. Revise section 13.1 in Performance Specification 11.
0
e. Add section 13.0 in Performance Specification 15.
0
f. Revise section 11.8.7 and table 1 in Performance Specification 18.
0
g. Add section 12.0 to Appendix A of Performance Specification 18.
The revisions read as follows:
Appendix B to Part 60--Performance Specifications
* * * * *
Performance Specification 1--Specifications and Test Procedures for
Continuous Opacity Monitoring Systems in Stationary Sources
* * * * *
2.1 ASTM D6216-12 (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 60.17)
is the reference for design specifications, manufacturer's
performance specifications, and test procedures. The opacity monitor
manufacturer must periodically select and test an opacity monitor,
that is representative of a group of monitors produced during a
specified period or lot, for conformance with the design
specifications in ASTM D6216-12. The opacity monitor manufacturer
must test each opacity monitor for conformance with the
manufacturer's performance specifications in ASTM D6216-12. Note: If
the initial certification of the opacity monitor occurred before
January 26, 2018 using D6216-98, D6216-03, or D6216-07, it is not
necessary to recertify using D6216-12.
* * * * *
3.1 All definitions and discussions from section 3 of ASTM
D6216-12 are applicable to PS-1.
* * * * *
6.1 Continuous Opacity Monitoring System. You, as owner or
operator, are responsible for purchasing an opacity monitor that
meets the specifications of ASTM D6216-12, including a suitable data
recorder or automated data acquisition handling system. Example data
recorders include an analog strip chart recorder or more
appropriately an electronic data acquisition and reporting system
with an input signal range compatible with the analyzer output.
* * * * *
8.1 * * *
(1) You must purchase an opacity monitor that complies with ASTM
D6216-12 and obtain a certificate of conformance from the opacity
monitor manufacturer.
(2) * * *
(3) * * *
(ii) Calibration Error Check. Conduct a three-point calibration
error test using three calibration attenuators that produce outlet
pathlength corrected, single-pass opacity values shown in ASTM
D6216-12, section 7.5. If your applicable limit is less than 10
percent opacity, use attenuators as described in ASTM D6216-12,
section 7.5 for applicable standards of 10 to 19 percent opacity.
Confirm the external audit device produces the proper zero value on
the COMS data recorder. Separately, insert each calibration
attenuators (low, mid, and high-level) into the external audit
device. While inserting each attenuator, (1) ensure that the entire
light beam passes through the attenuator, (2) minimize interference
from reflected light, and (3) leave the attenuator in place for at
least two times the shortest recording interval on the COMS data
recorder. Make a total of five nonconsecutive readings for each
attenuator. At the end of the test, correlate each attenuator
insertion to the corresponding value from the data recorder.
Subtract the single-pass calibration attenuator values corrected to
the stack exit conditions from the COMS responses. Calculate the
arithmetic mean difference, standard deviation, and confidence
coefficient of the five measurements value using equations 1-3, 1-4,
and 1-5. Calculate the calibration error as the sum of the absolute
value of the mean difference and the 95 percent confidence
coefficient for each of the three test attenuators using equation 1-
6. Report the calibration error test results for each of the three
attenuators.
* * * * *
8.2 * * *
(1) Conduct the verification procedures for design
specifications in section 6 of ASTM D6216-12.
[[Page 3646]]
(2) Conduct the verification procedures for performance
specifications in section 7 of ASTM D6216-12.
(3) Provide to the owner or operator, a report of the opacity
monitor's conformance to the design and performance specifications
required in sections 6 and 7 of ASTM D6216-12 in accordance with the
reporting requirements of section 9 in ASTM D6216-12.
* * * * *
9.0 What quality control measures are required by PS-1?
Opacity monitor manufacturers must initiate a quality program
following the requirements of ASTM D6216-12, section 8. The quality
program must include (1) a quality system and (2) a corrective
action program.
* * * * *
12.1 Desired Attenuator Values. Calculate the desired attenuator
value corrected to the emission outlet pathlength as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.003
Where:
OP1 = Nominal opacity value of required low-, mid-, or
high-range calibration attenuators.
OP2 = Desired attenuator opacity value from ASTM D6216-
12, section 7.5 at the opacity limit required by the applicable
subpart.
L1 = Monitoring pathlength.
L2 = Emission outlet pathlength.
* * * * *
13.1 Design Specifications. The opacity monitoring equipment
must comply with the design specifications of ASTM D6216-12.
13.2 Manufacturer's Performance Specifications. The opacity
monitor must comply with the manufacturer's performance
specifications of ASTM D6216-12.
* * * * *
16.0 * * *
8. ASTM D6216-12: Standard Practice for Opacity Monitor
Manufacturers to Certify Conformance with Design and Performance
Specifications. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM).
April 1998.
* * * * *
Performance Specification 2--Specifications and Test Procedures for
SO2 and NOX Continuous Emission Monitoring
Systems in Stationary Sources
* * * * *
13.2 Relative Accuracy Performance Specification.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
RA criteria
Calculate . . . (%)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
If average emissions during the Use Eq. 2-6, with RM in <20.0
RATA are >=50% of emission the denominator.
standard.
If average emissions during the Use Eq. 2-6, emission <10.0
RATA are <50% of emission standard in the
standard. denominator.
For SO2 emission standards <130 Use Eq. 2-6, emission <15.0
but 86 ng/J (0.30 standard in the
and 0.20 lb/million Btu). denominator.
For SO2 emission standards <86 Use Eq. 2-6, emission <20.0
ng/J (0.20 lb/million Btu). standard in the
denominator.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Performance Specification 3--Specifications and Test Procedures for
O2 and CO2 Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems
in Stationary Sources
* * * * *
12.0 Calculations and Data Analysis
Summarize the results on a data sheet similar to that shown in
Figure 2.2 of PS2.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.004
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.005
* * * * *
13.2 CEMS Relative Accuracy Performance Specification. The RA of
the CEMS must be no greater than 20.0 percent of the mean value of
the reference method
[[Page 3647]]
(RM) data when calculated using equation 3-1. The results are also
acceptable if the result of Equation 3-2 is less than or equal to
1.0 percent O2 (or CO2).
* * * * *
Performance Specification 11--Specifications and Test Procedures for
Particulate Matter Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems at Stationary
Sources
* * * * *
13.1 What is the 7-day drift check performance specification?
Your daily PM CEMS internal drift checks must demonstrate that the
daily drift of your PM CEMS does not deviate from the value of the
reference light, optical filter, Beta attenuation signal, or other
technology-suitable reference standard by more than 2 percent of the
response range. If your CEMS includes diluent and/or auxiliary
monitors (for temperature, pressure, and/or moisture) that are
employed as a necessary part of this performance specification, you
must determine the calibration drift separately for each ancillary
monitor in terms of its respective output (see the appropriate
performance specification for the diluent CEMS specification). None
of the calibration drifts may exceed their individual specification.
* * * * *
Performance Specification 15--Performance Specification for Extractive
FTIR Continuous Emissions Monitor Systems in Stationary Sources
* * * * *
13.0 Method Performance [Reserved]
* * * * *
Performance Specification 18--Performance Specifications and Test
Procedures for Gaseous Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources
* * * * *
11.8.7 The zero-level and mid-level CD for each day must be less
than 5.0 percent of the span value as specified in section 13.2 of
this PS. You must meet this criterion for 7 consecutive operating
days.
* * * * *
Table 1--Interference Test Gas Concentrations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approximate concentration
Potential interferent gas \1\ (balance N2)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
CO2.................................. 15% 1% CO2.\2\
CO................................... 100 20 ppm.
CH2O................................. 20 5 ppm.
CH4.................................. 100 20 ppm.
NH3.................................. 10 5 ppm (extractive
CEMS only).
NO................................... 250 50 ppm.
SO2.................................. 200 20 ppm.
O2................................... 3% 1% O2.\2\
H2O.................................. 10% 1% H2O.\2\
N2................................... Balance.\2\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Any of these specific gases can be tested at a lower level if the
manufacturer has provided reliable means for limiting or scrubbing
that gas to a specified level in CEMS field installations.
\2\ Gases for short path IP cell interference tests cannot be added
above 100 percent stack equivalent concentration. Add these gases at
the indicated percentages to make up the remaining cell volume.
* * * * *
PS-18 Appendix A--Standard Addition Procedures
* * * * *
12.0 Reserved
* * * * *
0
19. Revise sections 5.1.2(1) and 5.1.2(3) in Procedure 1 of appendix F
to part 60 to read as follows:
Appendix F to Part 60--Quality Assurance Procedures
Procedure 1--Quality Assurance Requirements for Gas Continuous Emission
Monitoring Systems Used for Compliance Determination
* * * * *
5.1.2 Cylinder Gas Audit (CGA). If applicable, a CGA may be
conducted in three of four calendar quarters, but in no more than
three quarters in succession.
To conduct a CGA: (1) Challenge the CEMS (both pollutant and
diluent portions of the CEMS, if applicable) with an audit gas of
known concentration at two points within the following ranges:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Audit range
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Audit point Diluent monitors for--
Pollutant monitors --------------------------------------------------------
CO2 O2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1................................. 20 to 30% of span 5 to 8% by volume.. 4 to 6% by volume.
value.
2................................. 50 to 60% of span 10 to 14% by volume 8 to 12% by volume.
value.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inject each of the audit gases, three times each for a total of
six injections. Inject the gases in such a manner that the entire
CEMS is challenged. Do not inject the same gas concentration twice
in succession.
Use of separate audit gas cylinder for audit points 1 and 2. Do
not dilute gas from audit cylinder when challenging the CEMS.
The monitor should be challenged at each audit point for a
sufficient period of time to assure adsorption-desorption of the
CEMS sample transport surfaces has stabilized.
(2) * * *
(3) Use Certified Reference Materials (CRM's) (See Citation 1)
audit gases that have been certified by comparison to National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Standard Reference
Materials (SRM's) or EPA Protocol Gases following the most recent
edition of the EPA Traceability Protocol for Assay and Certification
of Gaseous Calibration Standards (See Citation 2). Procedures for
preparation of CRM's are described in Citation 1. Procedures for
preparation of EPA Protocol Gases are described in Citation 2. In
the case that a suitable audit gas level is not commercially
available, Method 205 (See Citation 3) may be used to dilute CRM's
or EPA Protocol Gases to the needed level. The difference between
the actual concentration of the audit gas and the concentration
indicated by the monitor is used to assess the accuracy of the CEMS.
* * * * *
PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES
0
20. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
0
21. In Sec. 63.7, revise paragraphs (g)(2) introductory text and
(g)(2)(v) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.7 Performance testing requirements.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(2) Contents of a performance test, CMS performance evaluation, or
CMS quality assurance test report (electronic or paper submitted copy).
Unless otherwise specified in a relevant standard, test method, CMS
performance specification, or quality assurance requirement for a CMS,
or as otherwise approved by the Administrator in writing, the report
shall include the elements identified in paragraphs (g)(2)(i) through
(vi) of this section.
* * * * *
(v) Where a test method, CMS performance specification, or on-going
quality assurance requirement for a CMS requires you record or report,
the following shall be included in your
[[Page 3648]]
report: Record of preparation of standards, record of calibrations, raw
data sheets for field sampling, raw data sheets for field and
laboratory analyses, chain-of-custody documentation, and example
calculations for reported results.
* * * * *
0
22. In Sec. 63.8, revise paragraph (e)(5)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.8 Monitoring requirements.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(5) * * * (i) The owner or operator shall furnish the Administrator
a copy of a written report of the results of the performance evaluation
containing the information specified in Sec. 63.7(g)(2)(i) through
(vi) within 60 days of completion of the performance evaluation, unless
otherwise specified in a relevant standard.
* * * * *
Subpart NNN--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Wool Fiberglass Manufacturing
0
23. Revise Sec. 63.1385(a)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.1385 Test methods and procedures.
(a) * * *
(5) Method 5 or Method 29 (40 CFR part 60, appendix A-3) for the
concentration of total PM. When using Method 5, each run must consist
of a minimum sample volume of 2 dry standard cubic meters (dscm). When
using Method 29, each run must consist of a minimum sample volume of 3
dscm. When measuring PM concentration using either Method 5 or 29, the
probe and filter holder heating system must be set to provide a gas
temperature no greater than 120 5 [deg]C (248 9
[deg]F).
* * * * *
Subpart DDDDD--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Major Sources: Industrial, Commercial, and
Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters
* * * * *
0
24. Revise Table 6 to Subpart DDDDD of part 63 to read as follows:
Table 6 to Subpart DDDDD of Part 63--Fuel Analysis Requirements
[As stated in Sec. 63.7521, you must comply with the following
requirements for fuel analysis testing for existing, new or
reconstructed affected sources. However, equivalent methods (as defined
in Sec. 63.7575) may be used in lieu of the prescribed methods at the
discretion of the source owner or operator]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To conduct a fuel analysis for
the following pollutant . . . You must . . . Using . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Mercury.................... a. Collect fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(c) or ASTM
D5192,\a\ or ASTM
D7430,\a\ or ASTM
D6883,\a\ or ASTM
D2234/D2234M \a\
(for coal) or EPA
1631 or EPA 1631E or
ASTM D6323 \a\ (for
solid), or EPA 821-R-
01-013 (for liquid
or solid), or ASTM
D4177 \a\ (for
liquid), or ASTM
D4057 \a\ (for
liquid), or
equivalent.
b. Composite fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(d) or
equivalent.
c. Prepare EPA SW-846-3050B \a\
composited fuel (for solid samples),
samples. ASTM D2013/D2013M
\a\ (for coal), ASTM
D5198 \a\ (for
biomass), or EPA
3050 \a\ (for solid
fuel), or EPA 821-R-
01-013 \a\ (for
liquid or solid), or
equivalent.
d. Determine heat ASTM D5865 \a\ (for
content of the coal) or ASTM E711
fuel type. \a\ (for biomass),
or ASTM D5864 \a\
for liquids and
other solids, or
ASTM D240 \a\ or
equivalent.
e. Determine ASTM D3173,\a\ ASTM
moisture content E871,\a\ or ASTM
of the fuel type. D5864,\a\ or ASTM
D240, or ASTM D95
\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or ASTM
D4006 \a\ (for
liquid fuels), or
equivalent.
f. Measure ASTM D6722 \a\ (for
mercury coal), EPA SW-846-
concentration in 7471B \a\ or EPA
fuel sample. 1631 or EPA 1631E
(for solid samples),
or EPA SW-846-7470A
\a\ or EPA SW-846-
7471B \a\ (for
liquid samples), or
EPA 821-R-01-013
(for liquid or
solid), or
equivalent.
g. Convert For fuel mixtures use
concentration Equation 8 in Sec.
into units of 63.7530.
pounds of
mercury per
MMBtu of heat
content.
2. HCl........................ a. Collect fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(c) or ASTM
D5192,\a\ or ASTM
D7430,\a\ or ASTM
D6883,\a\ or ASTM
D2234/D2234M \a\
(for coal) or ASTM
D6323 \a\ (for coal
or biomass), ASTM
D4177 \a\ (for
liquid fuels) or
ASTM D4057 \a\ (for
liquid fuels), or
equivalent.
b. Composite fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(d) or
equivalent.
c. Prepare EPA SW-846-3050B \a\
composited fuel (for solid samples),
samples. ASTM D2013/D2013M
\a\ (for coal), or
ASTM D5198 \a\ (for
biomass), or EPA
3050 \a\ or
equivalent.
d. Determine heat ASTM D5865 \a\ (for
content of the coal) or ASTM E711
fuel type. \a\ (for biomass),
ASTM D5864, ASTM
D240 \a\ or
equivalent.
e. Determine ASTM D3173 \a\ or
moisture content ASTM E871,\a\ or
of the fuel type. D5864,\a\ or ASTM
D240,\a\ or ASTM D95
\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or ASTM
D4006 \a\ (for
liquid fuels), or
equivalent.
f. Measure EPA SW-846-9250,\a\
chlorine ASTM D6721,\a\ ASTM
concentration in D4208 \a\ (for
fuel sample. coal), or EPA SW-846-
5050 \a\ or ASTM
E776 \a\ (for solid
fuel), or EPA SW-846-
9056 \a\ or SW-846-
9076 \a\ (for solids
or liquids) or
equivalent.
g. Convert For fuel mixtures use
concentrations Equation 7 in Sec.
into units of 63.7530 and convert
pounds of HCl from chlorine to HCl
per MMBtu of by multiplying by
heat content. 1.028.
3. Mercury Fuel Specification a. Measure Method 30B (M30B) at
for other gas 1 fuels. mercury 40 CFR part 60,
concentration in appendix A-8 of this
the fuel sample chapter or ASTM
and convert to D5954,\a\ ASTM
units of D6350,\a\ ISO 6978-
micrograms per 1:2003(E).\a\ or ISO
cubic meter, or. 6978-2:2003(E),\a\
or EPA-1631 \a\ or
equivalent.
[[Page 3649]]
b. Measure Method 29, 30A, or
mercury 30B (M29, M30A, or
concentration in M30B) at 40 CFR part
the exhaust gas 60, appendix A-8 of
when firing only this chapter or
the other gas 1 Method 101A or
fuel is fired in Method 102 at 40 CFR
the boiler or part 61, appendix B
process heater. of this chapter, or
ASTM Method D6784
\a\ or equivalent.
4. TSM........................ a. Collect fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(c) or ASTM
D5192,\a\ or ASTM
D7430,\a\ or ASTM
D6883,\a\ or ASTM
D2234/D2234M \a\
(for coal) or ASTM
D6323 \a\ (for coal
or biomass), or ASTM
D4177,\a\ (for
liquid fuels)or ASTM
D4057 \a\ (for
liquid fuels),or
equivalent.
b. Composite fuel Procedure in Sec.
samples. 63.7521(d) or
equivalent.
c. Prepare EPA SW-846-3050B \a\
composited fuel (for solid samples),
samples. ASTM D2013/D2013M
\a\ (for coal), ASTM
D5198 \a\ or TAPPI
T266 \a\ (for
biomass), or EPA
3050 \a\ or
equivalent.
d. Determine heat ASTM D5865 \a\ (for
content of the coal) or ASTM E711
fuel type. \a\ (for biomass),
or ASTM D5864 \a\
for liquids and
other solids, or
ASTM D240 \a\ or
equivalent.
e. Determine ASTM D3173 \a\ or
moisture content ASTM E871,\a\ or
of the fuel type. D5864, or ASTM
D240,\a\ or ASTM D95
\a\ (for liquid
fuels), or ASTM
D4006 \a\ (for
liquid fuels), or
ASTM D4177 \a\ (for
liquid fuels) or
ASTM D4057 \a\ (for
liquid fuels), or
equivalent.
f. Measure TSM ASTM D3683,\a\ or
concentration in ASTM D4606,\a\ or
fuel sample. ASTM D6357 \a\ or
EPA 200.8 \a\ or EPA
SW-846-6020,\a\ or
EPA SW-846-6020A,\a\
or EPA SW-846-
6010C,\a\ EPA 7060
\a\ or EPA 7060A \a\
(for arsenic only),
or EPA SW-846-7740
\a\ (for selenium
only).
g. Convert For fuel mixtures use
concentrations Equation 9 in Sec.
into units of 63.7530.
pounds of TSM
per MMBtu of
heat content.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14.
* * * * *
Subpart UUUUU--National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants: Coal- and Oil-Fired Electric Utility Steam Generating
Units
0
25. Revise Sec. 63.10010(h)(7)(i)(1) to read as follows:
Sec. 63.10010 What are my monitoring, installation, operation, and
maintenance requirements?
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(7) * * *
(i) * * *
(1) Install and certify your PM CEMS according to the procedures
and requirements in Performance Specification 11--Specifications and
Test Procedures for Particulate Matter Continuous Emission Monitoring
Systems at Stationary Sources in Appendix B to part 60 of this chapter,
using Method 5 at Appendix A-3 to part 60 of this chapter and ensuring
that the front half filter temperature shall be 160[deg] 5
[deg]C (320[deg] 9[emsp14][deg]F). The reportable
measurement output from the PM CEMS must be expressed in units of the
applicable emissions limit (e.g., lb/MMBtu, lb/MWh).
* * * * *
0
26. Revise Table 5 to Subpart UUUUU of part 63 to read as follows:
Table 5 to Subpart UUUUU of Part 63--Performance Testing Requirements
[As stated in Sec. 63.10007, you must comply with the following requirements performance testing for existing,
new or reconstructed affected sources: 1]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You must perform the
following activities, as
To conduct a performance test for Using . . . applicable to your input- Using . . . 2
the following pollutant . . . or output-based emission
limit . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Filterable Particulate matter Emissions Testing.... a. Select sampling ports Method 1 at appendix A-1
(PM). location and the number to part 60 of this
of traverse points. chapter.
b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G
volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or
the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter.
c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at
carbon dioxide appendix A-2 to part 60
concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/
stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981.3
d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3
content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this
chapter.
[[Page 3650]]
e. Measure the filterable Methods 5 and 5I at
PM concentration. appendix A-3 to part 60
of this chapter.
For positive pressure
fabric filters, Method
5D at appendix A-3 to
part 60 of this chapter
for filterable PM
emissions.
Note that the Method 5 or
5I front half
temperature shall be
160[deg] 14
[deg]C (320[deg] 25 [deg]F).
f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor
concentration to lb/MMBtu methodology at appendix
or lb/MWh emissions rates. A-7 to part 60 of this
chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions
rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
OR OR
PM CEMS.............. a. Install, certify, Performance Specification
operate, and maintain the 11 at appendix B to part
PM CEMS. 60 of this chapter and
Procedure 2 at appendix
F to part 60 of this
chapter.
b. Install, certify, Part 75 of this chapter
operate, and maintain the and Sec. 63.10010(a),
diluent gas, flow rate, (b), (c), and (d).
and/or moisture
monitoring systems.
c. Convert hourly Method 19 F-factor
emissions concentrations methodology at appendix
to 30 boiler operating A-7 to part 60 of this
day rolling average lb/ chapter, or calculate
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions using mass emissions
rates. rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
2. Total or individual non-Hg HAP Emissions Testing.... a. Select sampling ports Method 1 at appendix A-1
metals. location and the number to part 60 of this
of traverse points. chapter.
b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G
volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or
the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter.
c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at
carbon dioxide appendix A-2 to part 60
concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/
stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981.3
d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3
content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this
chapter.
e. Measure the HAP metals Method 29 at appendix A-8
emissions concentrations to part 60 of this
and determine each chapter. For liquid oil-
individual HAP metals fired units, Hg is
emissions concentration, included in HAP metals
as well as the total and you may use Method
filterable HAP metals 29, Method 30B at
emissions concentration appendix A-8 to part 60
and total HAP metals of this chapter; for
emissions concentration. Method 29, you must
report the front half
and back half results
separately. When using
Method 29, report metals
matrix spike and
recovery levels.
f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor
concentrations methodology at appendix
(individual HAP metals, A-7 to part 60 of this
total filterable HAP chapter, or calculate
metals, and total HAP using mass emissions
metals) to lb/MMBtu or lb/ rate and gross output
MWh emissions rates. data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
3. Hydrogen chloride (HCl) and Emissions Testing.... a. Select sampling ports Method 1 at appendix A-1
hydrogen fluoride (HF). location and the number to part 60 of this
of traverse points. chapter.
b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G
volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or
the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter.
c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at
carbon dioxide appendix A-2 to part 60
concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/
stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981.3
d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3
content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this
chapter.
e. Measure the HCl and HF Method 26 or Method 26A
emissions concentrations. at appendix A-8 to part
60 of this chapter or
Method 320 at appendix A
to part 63 of this
chapter or ASTM 6348-03
3 with
(1) the following
conditions when using
ASTM D6348-03:
(A) The test plan
preparation and
implementation in the
Annexes to ASTM D6348-
03, Sections A1 through
A8 are mandatory;
[[Page 3651]]
(B) For ASTM D6348-03
Annex A5 (Analyte
Spiking Technique), the
percent (%) R must be
determined for each
target analyte (see
Equation A5.5);
(C) For the ASTM D6348-03
test data to be
acceptable for a target
analyte, %R must be 70%
>=R <=130%; and
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Regarding emissions data collected during periods of startup or shutdown, see Sec. Sec. 63.10020(b) and
(c) and 63.10021(h).
\2\ See Tables 1 and 2 to this subpart for required sample volumes and/or sampling run times.
\3\ Incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14.
3.e.1(D) The %R value for each compound must be reported in the
test report and all field measurements corrected with the calculated %R
value for that compound using the following equation:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.006
and
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You must perform the
To conduct a performance test for following activities, as
the following pollutant . . . Using . . . (cont'd) applicable to your input- Using . . .2 (cont'd)
(cont'd) or output-based emission
limit . . .
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) spiking levels
nominally no greater
than two times the level
corresponding to the
applicable emission
limit.
Method 26A must be used
if there are entrained
water droplets in the
exhaust stream.
f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor
concentration to lb/MMBtu methodology at appendix
or lb/MWh emissions rates. A-7 to part 60 of this
chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions
rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
OR OR
HCl and/or HF CEMS... a. Install, certify, Appendix B of this
operate, and maintain the subpart.
HCl or HF CEMS.
b. Install, certify, Part 75 of this chapter
operate, and maintain the and Sec. 63.10010(a),
diluent gas, flow rate, (b), (c), and (d).
and/or moisture
monitoring systems.
c. Convert hourly Method 19 F-factor
emissions concentrations methodology at appendix
to 30 boiler operating A-7 to part 60 of this
day rolling average lb/ chapter, or calculate
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions using mass emissions
rates. rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
4. Mercury (Hg)................... Emissions Testing.... a. Select sampling ports Method 1 at appendix A-1
location and the number to part 60 of this
of traverse points. chapter or Method 30B at
Appendix A-8 for Method
30B point selection.
b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G
volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or
the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter.
c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at
carbon dioxide appendix A-1 to part 60
concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/
stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981.3
d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3
content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this
chapter.
e. Measure the Hg emission Method 30B at appendix A-
concentration. 8 to part 60 of this
chapter, ASTM D6784,3 or
Method 29 at appendix A-
8 to part 60 of this
chapter; for Method 29,
you must report the
front half and back half
results separately.
f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor
concentration to lb/TBtu methodology at appendix
or lb/GWh emission rates. A-7 to part 60 of this
chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions
rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
[[Page 3652]]
OR OR
Hg CEMS.............. a. Install, certify, Sections 3.2.1 and 5.1 of
operate, and maintain the appendix A of this
CEMS. subpart.
b. Install, certify, Part 75 of this chapter
operate, and maintain the and Sec. 63.10010(a),
diluent gas, flow rate, (b), (c), and (d).
and/or moisture
monitoring systems.
c. Convert hourly Section 6 of appendix A
emissions concentrations to this subpart.
to 30 boiler operating
day rolling average lb/
TBtu or lb/GWh emissions
rates.
OR OR
Sorbent trap a. Install, certify, Sections 3.2.2 and 5.2 of
monitoring system. operate, and maintain the appendix A to this
sorbent trap monitoring subpart.
system.
b. Install, operate, and Part 75 of this chapter
maintain the diluent gas, and Sec. 63.10010(a),
flow rate, and/or (b), (c), and (d).
moisture monitoring
systems.
c. Convert emissions Section 6 of appendix A
concentrations to 30 to this subpart.
boiler operating day
rolling average lb/TBtu
or lb/GWh emissions rates.
OR OR
LEE testing.......... a. Select sampling ports Single point located at
location and the number the 10% centroidal area
of traverse points. of the duct at a port
location per Method 1 at
appendix A-1 to part 60
of this chapter or
Method 30B at Appendix A-
8 for Method 30B point
selection.
b. Determine velocity and Method 2, 2A, 2C, 2F, 2G,
volumetric flow-rate of or 2H at appendix A-1 or
the stack gas. A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter or flow
monitoring system
certified per appendix A
of this subpart.
c. Determine oxygen and Method 3A or 3B at
carbon dioxide appendix A-1 to part 60
concentrations of the of this chapter, or ANSI/
stack gas. ASME PTC 19.10-1981,3 or
diluent gas monitoring
systems certified
according to part 75 of
this chapter.
d. Measure the moisture Method 4 at appendix A-3
content of the stack gas. to part 60 of this
chapter, or moisture
monitoring systems
certified according to
part 75 of this chapter.
e. Measure the Hg emission Method 30B at appendix A-
concentration. 8 to part 60 of this
chapter; perform a 30
operating day test, with
a maximum of 10
operating days per run
(i.e., per pair of
sorbent traps) or
sorbent trap monitoring
system or Hg CEMS
certified per appendix A
of this subpart.
f. Convert emissions Method 19 F-factor
concentrations from the methodology at appendix
LEE test to lb/TBtu or lb/ A-7 to part 60 of this
GWh emissions rates. chapter, or calculate
using mass emissions
rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
g. Convert average lb/TBtu Potential maximum annual
or lb/GWh Hg emission heat input in TBtu or
rate to lb/year, if you potential maximum
are attempting to meet electricity generated in
the 29.0 lb/year GWh.
threshold.
5. Sulfur dioxide (SO2)........... SO2 CEMS............. a. Install, certify, Part 75 of this chapter
operate, and maintain the and Sec. 63.10010(a)
CEMS. and (f).
b. Install, operate, and Part 75 of this chapter
maintain the diluent gas, and Sec. 63.10010(a),
flow rate, and/or (b), (c), and (d).
moisture monitoring
systems.
c. Convert hourly Method 19 F-factor
emissions concentrations methodology at appendix
to 30 boiler operating A-7 to part 60 of this
day rolling average lb/ chapter, or calculate
MMBtu or lb/MWh emissions using mass emissions
rates. rate and gross output
data (see Sec.
63.10007(e)).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 See Tables 1 and 2 to this subpart for required sample volumes and/or sampling run times.
3 Incorporated by reference, see Sec. 63.14.
* * * * *
0
27. In appendix A to part 63:
0
a. Revise section 12.4 in Method 303.
0
b. Revise sections 2.0, 7.2.3.3, 8.1.2, 9.1, 11.3.2, and 12.1 in Method
308.
0
c. Remove and reserve section 7.2.2 in Method 308.
0
d. Add sections 12.5 and 13.0 in Method 308.
0
e. Revise section 9.2.3 in Method 320..
0
f. Revise section 12.9 in Method 323.
0
g. Revise section 8.2.1.3, Figure 8.1. and section 8.2.3.2 in Method
325A.
0
h. Add section 8.2.3.3 in Method 325A.
[[Page 3653]]
0
i. Revise sections 9.3.2, 9.13, 11.3.2.5, and 12.2.2 and table 17-1 in
Method 325B.
0
j. Remove sections 12.2.3 and 12.2.4 in Method 325B.
The revisions read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 63--Test Methods Pollutant Measurement Methods From
Various Waste Media
* * * * *
Method 303--Determination of Visible Emissions From By-Product Coke
Oven Batteries
* * * * *
12.4 Average Duration of VE from Charging Operations. Use
Equation 303-3 to calculate the daily 30-day rolling log average of
seconds of visible emissions from the charging operation for each
battery using these current day's observations and the 29 previous
valid daily sets of observations.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.007
* * * * *
Method 308--Procedure for Determination of Methanol Emission From
Stationary Sources
* * * * *
2.0 Summary of Method
A gas sample is extracted from the sampling point in the stack.
The methanol is collected in deionized distilled water and adsorbed
on silica gel. The sample is returned to the laboratory where the
methanol in the water fraction is separated from other organic
compounds with a gas chromatograph (GC) and is then measured by a
flame ionization detector (FID). The fraction adsorbed on silica gel
is extracted with deionized distilled water and is then separated
and measured by GC/FID.
* * * * *
7.2.2 [Reserved].
* * * * *
7.2.3.3 Methanol Standards for Adsorbent Tube Samples. Prepare a
series of methanol standards by first pipetting 10 ml of the
methanol working standard into a 100-ml volumetric flask and
diluting the contents to exactly 100 ml with deionized distilled
water. This standard will contain 10 [micro]g/ml of methanol.
Pipette 5, 15, and 25 ml of this standard, respectively, into four
50-ml volumetric flasks. Dilute each solution to 50 ml with
deionized distilled water. These standards will have 1, 3, and 5
[micro]g/ml of methanol, respectively. Transfer all four standards
into 40-ml glass vials capped with Teflon[supreg]-lined septa and
store under refrigeration. Discard any excess solution.
* * * * *
8.1.2 Leak Check. A leak check before and after the sampling run
is mandatory. The leak-check procedure is as follows:
Temporarily attach a suitable (e.g., 0- to 40-ml/min) rotameter
to the outlet of the DGM, and place a vacuum gauge at or near the
probe inlet. Plug the probe inlet, pull a vacuum of at least 250 mm
(10 inch) Hg or the highest vacuum experienced during the sampling
run, and note the flow rate as indicated by the rotameter. A leakage
rate in excess of 2 percent of the average sampling rate is
acceptable.
Note: Carefully release the probe inlet plug before turning off
the pump.
* * * * *
9.1 Miscellaneous Quality Control Measures. The following
quality control measures are required:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quality control
Section measure Effect
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.1.2, 8.1.3, 10.1......... Sampling equipment Ensures accurate
leak check and measurement of
calibration. sample volume.
10.2....................... GC calibration....... Ensures precision of
GC analysis.
13.0....................... Methanol spike Verifies all
recovery check. methanol in stack
gas is being
captured in impinge/
adsorbent tube
setup.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
11.3.2 Desorption of Samples. Add 3 ml of deionized distilled
water to each of the stoppered vials and shake or vibrate the vials
for 30 minutes.
* * * * *
12.1 Nomenclature.
Caf = Concentration of methanol in the front of the
adsorbent tube, [micro]g/ml.
Cab = Concentration of methanol in the back of the
adsorbent tube, [micro]g/ml.
Ci = Concentration of methanol in the impinger portion of
the sample train, [micro]g/ml.
E = Mass emission rate of methanol, [micro]g/hr (lb/hr).
ms = Total mass of compound measured in impinger and on
adsorbent with spiked train (mg).
mu = Total mass of compound measured in impinger and on
adsorbent with unspiked train (mg).
mv = Mass per volume of spiked compound measured (mg/L).
Mtot = Total mass of methanol collected in the sample
train, [micro]g.
Pbar = Barometric pressure at the exit orifice of the
DGM, mm Hg (in. Hg).
Pstd = Standard absolute pressure, 760 mm Hg (29.92 in.
Hg).
Qstd = Dry volumetric stack gas flow rate corrected to
standard conditions, dscm/hr (dscf/hr).
R = fraction of spiked compound recovered
s = theoretical concentration (ppm) of spiked target compound
Tm = Average DGM absolute temperature, degrees K
([deg]R).
Tstd = Standard absolute temperature, 293 degrees K (528
[deg]R).
Vaf = Volume of front half adsorbent sample, ml.
Vab = Volume of back half adsorbent sample, ml.
Vi = Volume of impinger sample, ml.
Vm = Dry gas volume as measured by the DGM, dry cubic
meters (dcm), dry cubic feet (dcf).
Vm(std) = Dry gas volume measured by the DGM, corrected
to standard conditions, dry standard cubic meters (dscm), dry
standard cubic feet (dscf).
* * * * *
12.5 Recovery Fraction (R)
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.008
[[Page 3654]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.009
13.0 Method Performance
Since a potential sample may contain a variety of compounds from
various sources, a specific precision limit for the analysis of
field samples is impractical. Precision in the range of 5 to 10
percent relative standard deviation (RSD) is typical for gas
chromatographic techniques, but an experienced GC operator with a
reliable instrument can readily achieve 5 percent RSD. For this
method, the following combined GC/operator values are required.
(a) Precision. Triplicate analyses of calibration standards fall
within 5 percent of their mean value.
(b) Recovery. After developing an appropriate sampling and
analytical system for the pollutants of interest, conduct the
following spike recovery procedure at each sampling point where the
method is being applied.
i. Methanol Spike. Set up two identical sampling trains.
Collocate the two sampling probes in the stack. The probes shall be
placed in the same horizontal plane, where the first probe tip is
2.5 cm from the outside edge of the other. One of the sampling
trains shall be designated the spiked train and the other the
unspiked train. Spike methanol into the impinger, and onto the
adsorbent tube in the spiked train prior to sampling. The total mass
of methanol shall be 40 to 60 percent of the mass expected to be
collected with the unspiked train. Sample the stack gas into the two
trains simultaneously. Analyze the impingers and adsorbents from the
two trains utilizing identical analytical procedures and
instrumentation. Determine the fraction of spiked methanol recovered
(R) by combining the amount recovered in the impinger and in the
adsorbent tube, using the equations in section 12.5. Recovery values
must fall in the range: 0.70 <=R <=1.30. Report the R value in the
test report.
* * * * *
Method 320--Measurement of Vapor Phase Organic and Inorganic Emissions
by Extractive Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy
* * * * *
9.2.3 Calculate the dilution ratio using the tracer gas as
follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.010
Where:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.011
DF = Dilution factor of the spike gas; this value shall be >=10.
SF6(dir) = SF6 (or tracer gas) concentration
measured directly in undiluted spike gas.
SF6(spk) = Diluted SF6 (or tracer gas)
concentration measured in a spiked sample.
Spikedir = Concentration of the analyte in the spike
standard measured by filling the FTIR cell directly.
CS = Expected concentration of the spiked samples.
Unspike = Native concentration of analytes in unspiked samples.
* * * * *
Method 323--Measurment of Formaldehyde Emissions From Natural Gas-Fired
Stationary Sources-Acetyl Acetone Derivitization Method
* * * * *
12.9 Formaldehyde Concentration Corrected to 15% Oxygen
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.012
* * * * *
Method 325A--Volatile Organic Compounds From Fugitive and Area Sources:
Sampler Deployment and VOC Sample Collection
* * * * *
8.2.1.3 Extra samplers must be placed near known sources of VOCs
if the potential emission source is within 50 meters (162 feet) of
the boundary and the source location is between two monitors.
Measure the distance (x) between the two monitors and place another
monitor approximately halfway between (x/2 10 percent)
the two monitors. Only one extra sampler is required between two
monitors to account for the known source of VOCs. For example, in
Figure 8.1, the facility added three additional monitors (i.e.,
light shaded sampler locations) and in Figure 8.2, the facility
added two additional monitors to provide sufficient coverage of all
area sources.
[[Page 3655]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.013
* * * * *
8.2.3.2 For facilities with a monitoring perimeter length
greater than or equal to 7,315 meters (24,000 feet), sampling
locations are spaced 610 76 meters (2,000 250 feet) apart.
8.2.3.3 Unless otherwise specified in an applicable regulation,
permit or other requirement, for small disconnected subareas with
known sources within 50 meters (162 feet) of the monitoring
perimeter, sampling points need not be placed closer than 152 meters
(500 feet) apart as long as a minimum of 3 monitoring locations are
used for each subarea.
* * * * *
Method 325B--Volatile Organic Compounds From Fugitive and Area Sources:
Sampler Preparation and Analysis
* * * * *
9.3.2 Field blanks must be shipped to the monitoring site with
the sampling tubes and must be stored at the sampling location
throughout the monitoring exercise. The field blanks must be
installed under a protective hood/cover at the sampling location,
but the long-term storage caps must remain in place throughout the
monitoring period (see Method 325A). The field blanks are then
shipped back to the laboratory in the same container as the sampled
tubes. Collect at least two field blank samples per sampling period
to ensure sample integrity associated with shipment, collection, and
storage.
* * * * *
9.13 Routine CCV at the Start of a Sequence. Run CCV before each
sequence of analyses and after every tenth sample to ensure that the
previous multi-level calibration (see Section 10.0) is still valid.
* * * * *
11.3.2.5 Whenever the thermal desorption--GC/MS analytical
method is changed or major equipment maintenance is performed, you
must conduct a new five-level calibration (see Section 10.0). System
calibration remains valid as long as results from subsequent CCV are
within 30 percent of the most recent 5-point calibration (see
Section 9.13). Include relevant CCV data in the supporting
information in the data report for each set of samples.
* * * * *
12.2.2 Determine the equivalent concentrations of compounds in
atmospheres as follows. Correct target compound concentrations
determined at the sampling site temperature and atmospheric pressure
to standard conditions (25 [deg]C and 760 mm mercury) using Equation
12.5.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP26JA18.014
Where:
mmeas = The mass of the compound as measured in the
sorbent tube ([micro]g).
t = The exposure time (minutes).
[[Page 3656]]
tss = The average temperature during the collection
period at the sampling site (K).
UNTP = The method defined diffusive uptake rate (sampling
rate) (mL/min).
Note: Diffusive uptake rates (Ustd) for common VOCs,
using carbon sorbents packed into sorbent tubes of the dimensions
specified in Section 6.1, are listed in Table 12.1. Adjust
analytical conditions to keep expected sampled masses within range
(see Sections 11.3.1.3 to 11.3.1.5). Best possible method detection
limits are typically in the order of 0.1 ppb for 1,3-butadiene and
0.05 ppb for volatile aromatics such as benzene for 14-day
monitoring. However, actual detection limits will depend upon the
analytical conditions selected.
* * * * *
Table 17.1--Summary of GC/MS Analysis Quality Control Procedures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parameter Frequency Acceptance criteria Corrective action
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bromofluorobenzene Instrument Tune Daily \a\ prior to Evaluation criteria (1) Retune and or
Performance Check. sample analysis. presented in Section (2) Perform
9.5 and Table 9.2. Maintenance.
Five point calibration bracketing the Following any major (1) Percent Deviation (1) Repeat calibration
expected sample concentration. change, repair or (%DEV) of response sample analysis.
maintenance or if factors 30%. check.
meet method (2) Relative Retention (3) Prepare new
requirements. Times (RRTs) for calibration standards
Recalibration not to target peaks 0.06 units from repeat analysis.
mean RRT.
Calibration Verification (CCV Second Following the The response factor (1) Repeat calibration
source calibration verification calibration curve. 30% DEV check.
check). from calibration curve (2) Repeat calibration
average response curve.
factor.
Laboratory Blank Analysis............ Daily \a\ following (1) <=0.2 ppbv per (1) Repeat analysis
bromofluoro- benzene analyte or <=3 times with new blank tube.
and calibration check; the LOD, whichever is (2) Check system for
prior to sample greater. leaks, contamination.
analysis. (2) Internal Standard (3) Analyze additional
(IS) area response blank.
40% and IS
Retention Time (RT)
0.33 min.
of most recent
calibration check.
Blank Sorbent Tube Certification..... One tube analyzed for <0.2 ppbv per VOC Re-clean all tubes in
each batch of tubes targeted compound or 3 batch and reanalyze.
cleaned or 10 percent times the LOD,
of tubes whichever is whichever is greater.
greater.
Samples--Internal Standards.......... All samples............ IS area response 40% and IS RT invalidation.
0.33 min.
of most recent
calibration validation.
Field Blanks......................... Two per sampling period No greater than one- Flag Data for possible
third of the measured invalidation due to
target analyte or high blank bias.
compliance limit..
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Every 24 hours.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-00470 Filed 1-25-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P