Safety Zone; Oregon Inlet, Dare County, NC, 2910-2912 [2018-00883]
Download as PDF
2910
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 14 / Monday, January 22, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
document is issued under authority of
33 U.S.C. 1223 and 5 U.S.C. 552.
II. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, visit https://
www.regulations.gov/privacynotice.
All previously published documents
mentioned in this document along with
all public comments will be in our
online docket at https://
www.regulations.gov and can be viewed
by following that website’s instructions.
Additionally, if you go to the online
docket and sign up for email alerts, you
will be notified when comments are
posted or a final rule is published.
Dated: January 12, 2018.
Hal R. Pitts,
Bridge Program Manager, Fifth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2018–00894 Filed 1–19–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2017–0964]
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Oregon Inlet, Dare
County, NC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:52 Jan 19, 2018
Jkt 244001
the navigable waters of Oregon Inlet in
Dare County, North Carolina in support
of construction of the new Herbert C.
Bonner Bridge. This temporary safety
zone is intended to protect mariners,
vessels, and construction crews from the
hazards associated with installing the
navigation span, and will restrict vessel
traffic from the bridge’s navigation span
as it is under construction by preventing
vessel traffic on a portion of Oregon
Inlet. Entry of vessels or persons into
this safety zone is prohibited.
DATES: This rule is effective from
January 29, 2018, through March 24,
2018, with alternate dates of March 25,
2018, through May 6, 2018.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2017–
0964 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Petty Officer Matthew Tyson,
Waterways Management Division, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector North Carolina,
Wilmington, NC; telephone: (910) 772–
2221, email: Matthew.I.Tyson@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Captain of the Port
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
On October 10, 2017, the North
Carolina Department of Transportation
notified the Coast Guard that they will
be installing the navigation span of the
new Herbert C. Bonner Bridge in Oregon
Inlet in Dare County, North Carolina on
January 29 through March 24, 2018,
with alternate dates of March 25
through May 6, 2018. The construction
will take place over an estimated 33
days during this period. In response, on
December 5, 2017, the Coast Guard
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) titled Safety Zone;
Oregon Inlet, Dare County, NC (82 FR
57413). There we stated why we issued
the NPRM, and invited comments on
our proposed regulatory action related
to this fireworks display. During the
comment period that ended December
20, 2017, we received 5 comments.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable
because immediate action is needed
protect persons, vessels, and the marine
environment on the navigable waters in
Oregon Inlet during this construction
phase. A Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking was published in order to
inform the public and solicit comments.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231. The
COTP North Carolina has determined
that potential safety hazards associated
with the construction would be a
concern for anyone transiting the
Oregon Inlet navigation channel. The
purpose of this rule is to protect
persons, vessels, and the marine
environment on the navigable waters in
Oregon Inlet during this construction
phase.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
As noted above, we received 5
comments on our NPRM published
December 5, 2017. Most of the
submissions were not relevant to this
rulemaking.
The first comment inquired about the
benefits of the new bridge construction
and its impact on the human
environment. This rule pertains only to
the creation of a safety zone for the
navigation span construction phase and
not the entire bridge construction
project. The environmental impact
analysis and other regulatory analyses
for this rule are based only on the
creation of this safety zone. This safety
zone is necessary to protect persons,
vessels, and the marine environment on
the navigable waters in Oregon Inlet
during this construction phase. The
impact on the human environment is
considered not significant because the
closure is only for a two hour period on
each construction day and the safety
zone will not be active until after the
normal morning traffic typically transits
and will end before the evening traffic
typically transits.
The second comment mentioned
bridge safety and its obstruction to the
waterway. This comment is outside the
scope of this rulemaking dealing with
the establishment of a safety zone.
However, the Coast Guard would like to
take this opportunity to state that this
bridge will have the same horizontal
clearance of the original Bonner Bridge.
The new bridge is also designed with
multiple spans that can be used if the
waterway conditions change due to
shoaling.
E:\FR\FM\22JAR1.SGM
22JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 14 / Monday, January 22, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
The third comment thanks the Coast
Guard for a clear summary of the safety
zone and includes commentary not
related to the safety zone.
The fourth comment refers to the
Unfunded Mandates Act analysis. The
comment does not appear to refer
specifically to this safety zone. The
Unfunded Mandates Act was reviewed
during the rulemaking process and is
discussed in Section V of this rule.
The dates in the regulatory text of this
rule have changed from the proposed
rule in the NPRM.
The Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone to be enforced from January
29 through March 24, 2018, with
alternate dates of March 25 through May
6, 2018. Construction is expected to take
place on 33 separate days during this
period. The safety zone will be active
for 2 hours each of those days, with the
exact times announced via Broadcast
Notices to Mariners at least 48 hours
prior to enforcement. The safety zone
will include all navigable waters of
Oregon Inlet from approximate position
35°46′23″ N, 75°32′18″ W, thence
southeast to 35°46′18″ N, 75°32′12″ W,
thence southwest to 35°46′16″ N,
75°32′16″ W, thence northwest to
35°46′20″ N, 75°32′23″ W, thence
northeast back to the point of origin,
(NAD 1983). This zone is intended to
protect persons, vessels, and the marine
environment on the navigable waters in
Oregon Inlet during this construction
phase. No vessel or person will be
permitted to enter the safety zone
during the designated times.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:52 Jan 19, 2018
Jkt 244001
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, and
duration of the proposed safety zone.
Vessel traffic will not be allowed to
enter or transit a portion of Oregon Inlet
during specific two hour periods on 33
separate days from January 29 through
March 24, 2018, with alternate dates of
March 25 through May 6, 2018. The
specific 2 hour period for each work day
will be broadcast at least 48 hours in
advance and vessels will be able to
transit Oregon Inlet at all other times.
The Coast Guard will issue a Local
Notice to Mariners and transmit a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF–
FM marine channel 16 regarding the
safety zone. This portion of Oregon Inlet
has been determined to be a medium to
low traffic area at this time of the year.
This rule does not allow vessels to
request permission to enter the safety
zone covering the Oregon Inlet
navigation channel during the
designated times.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received no comments
from the Small Business Administration
on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2911
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
E:\FR\FM\22JAR1.SGM
22JAR1
2912
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 14 / Monday, January 22, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Directive 023–01, which guides the
Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone lasting for 2 hours on 33 separate
days that would prohibit entry into a
portion of Oregon Inlet for bridge
construction. It is categorically excluded
from further review under paragraph
L60 (a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T05–0964 to read as
follows:
■
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
§ 165.T05–0964 Safety Zone; Oregon Inlet,
Dare County, NC.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: all navigable waters of
Oregon Inlet, from approximate position
35°46′23″ N, 75°32′18″ W, thence
southeast to 35°46′18″ N, 75°32′12″ W,
thence southwest to 35°46′16″ N,
75°32′16″ W, thence northwest to
35°46′20″ N, 75°32′23″ W, thence
northeast back to the point of origin
(NAD 1983) in Dare County, NC.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section—
Designated representative means a
Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:52 Jan 19, 2018
Jkt 244001
including a Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer designated by
the Captain of the Port North Carolina
(COTP) for the enforcement of the safety
zone.
Captain of the Port means the
Commander, Sector North Carolina.
Construction crews means persons
and vessels involved in support of
construction.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations governing safety zones in
§ 165.23 apply to the area described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
(2) With the exception of construction
crews, entry into or remaining in this
safety zone is prohibited.
(3) All vessels within this safety zone
when this section becomes effective
must depart the zone immediately.
(4) The Captain of the Port, North
Carolina can be reached through the
Coast Guard Sector North Carolina
Command Duty Officer, Wilmington,
North Carolina at telephone number
910–343–3882.
(5) The Coast Guard and designated
security vessels enforcing the safety
zone can be contacted on VHF–FM
marine band radio channel 13 (165.65
MHz) and channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the safety zone by
Federal, State, and local agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This
regulation will be enforced from January
29, 2018, through March 24, 2018, with
alternate dates of March 25, 2018,
through May 6, 2018.
(f) Public notification. The Coast
Guard will notify the public of the
specific two hour closures at least 48
hours in advance by transmitting
Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF–
FM marine channel 16.
Dated: January 8, 2018.
Bion B. Stewart,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the
Port North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2018–00883 Filed 1–19–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ARCHITECTURAL AND
TRANSPORTATION BARRIERS
COMPLIANCE BOARD
36 CFR Part 1194
[Docket No. ATBCB–2015–0002]
RIN 3014–AA37
Information and Communication
Technology (ICT) Standards and
Guidelines
Architectural and
Transportation Barriers Compliance
Board.
ACTION: Direct final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Architectural and
Transportation Barriers Compliance
Board (we, Access Board, or Board) is
issuing this direct final rule to amend its
regulations addressing accessibility
requirements for information and
communication technology to correct
several inadvertent drafting errors in a
final rule published in the Federal
Register on January 18, 2017.
Specifically, this direct final rule
corrects two typographical errors and
the unintentional deletion of
longstanding requirements for TTY
compatibility and functionality that
have been in place for nearly two
decades. These minor amendments
neither establish new substantive
accessibility requirements, nor impose
any costs on regulated entities. The
Access Board is issuing these
amendments directly as a final rule
because we believe they are
noncontroversial, unlikely to receive
adverse comment, and will prevent
confusion.
SUMMARY:
This direct final rule is effective
March 23, 2018, without further action,
unless adverse comment is received by
February 21, 2018. If timely adverse
comment is received, the Access Board
will publish a notification of
withdrawal of the rule in the Federal
Register before the effective date. Such
notification may withdraw the direct
final rule in whole or in part.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments by any
one of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
The identifier for this docket is ATBCB–
2015–0002.
• Email: docket@access-board.gov.
Include ATBCB–2015–0002 in the
subject line of the message.
• Facsimile: 202–272–0081.
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Office
of Technical and Information Services,
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\22JAR1.SGM
22JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 14 (Monday, January 22, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2910-2912]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00883]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2017-0964]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Oregon Inlet, Dare County, NC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the
navigable waters of Oregon Inlet in Dare County, North Carolina in
support of construction of the new Herbert C. Bonner Bridge. This
temporary safety zone is intended to protect mariners, vessels, and
construction crews from the hazards associated with installing the
navigation span, and will restrict vessel traffic from the bridge's
navigation span as it is under construction by preventing vessel
traffic on a portion of Oregon Inlet. Entry of vessels or persons into
this safety zone is prohibited.
DATES: This rule is effective from January 29, 2018, through March 24,
2018, with alternate dates of March 25, 2018, through May 6, 2018.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2017-0964 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Petty Officer Matthew Tyson, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard Sector North Carolina, Wilmington, NC;
telephone: (910) 772-2221, email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Captain of the Port
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
On October 10, 2017, the North Carolina Department of
Transportation notified the Coast Guard that they will be installing
the navigation span of the new Herbert C. Bonner Bridge in Oregon Inlet
in Dare County, North Carolina on January 29 through March 24, 2018,
with alternate dates of March 25 through May 6, 2018. The construction
will take place over an estimated 33 days during this period. In
response, on December 5, 2017, the Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled Safety Zone; Oregon Inlet, Dare
County, NC (82 FR 57413). There we stated why we issued the NPRM, and
invited comments on our proposed regulatory action related to this
fireworks display. During the comment period that ended December 20,
2017, we received 5 comments.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable because immediate action is needed
protect persons, vessels, and the marine environment on the navigable
waters in Oregon Inlet during this construction phase. A Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking was published in order to inform the public and
solicit comments.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231. The COTP North Carolina has determined that potential safety
hazards associated with the construction would be a concern for anyone
transiting the Oregon Inlet navigation channel. The purpose of this
rule is to protect persons, vessels, and the marine environment on the
navigable waters in Oregon Inlet during this construction phase.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule
As noted above, we received 5 comments on our NPRM published
December 5, 2017. Most of the submissions were not relevant to this
rulemaking.
The first comment inquired about the benefits of the new bridge
construction and its impact on the human environment. This rule
pertains only to the creation of a safety zone for the navigation span
construction phase and not the entire bridge construction project. The
environmental impact analysis and other regulatory analyses for this
rule are based only on the creation of this safety zone. This safety
zone is necessary to protect persons, vessels, and the marine
environment on the navigable waters in Oregon Inlet during this
construction phase. The impact on the human environment is considered
not significant because the closure is only for a two hour period on
each construction day and the safety zone will not be active until
after the normal morning traffic typically transits and will end before
the evening traffic typically transits.
The second comment mentioned bridge safety and its obstruction to
the waterway. This comment is outside the scope of this rulemaking
dealing with the establishment of a safety zone. However, the Coast
Guard would like to take this opportunity to state that this bridge
will have the same horizontal clearance of the original Bonner Bridge.
The new bridge is also designed with multiple spans that can be used if
the waterway conditions change due to shoaling.
[[Page 2911]]
The third comment thanks the Coast Guard for a clear summary of the
safety zone and includes commentary not related to the safety zone.
The fourth comment refers to the Unfunded Mandates Act analysis.
The comment does not appear to refer specifically to this safety zone.
The Unfunded Mandates Act was reviewed during the rulemaking process
and is discussed in Section V of this rule.
The dates in the regulatory text of this rule have changed from the
proposed rule in the NPRM.
The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone to be enforced from
January 29 through March 24, 2018, with alternate dates of March 25
through May 6, 2018. Construction is expected to take place on 33
separate days during this period. The safety zone will be active for 2
hours each of those days, with the exact times announced via Broadcast
Notices to Mariners at least 48 hours prior to enforcement. The safety
zone will include all navigable waters of Oregon Inlet from approximate
position 35[deg]46'23'' N, 75[deg]32'18'' W, thence southeast to
35[deg]46'18'' N, 75[deg]32'12'' W, thence southwest to 35[deg]46'16''
N, 75[deg]32'16'' W, thence northwest to 35[deg]46'20'' N,
75[deg]32'23'' W, thence northeast back to the point of origin, (NAD
1983). This zone is intended to protect persons, vessels, and the
marine environment on the navigable waters in Oregon Inlet during this
construction phase. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the
safety zone during the designated times.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the proposed safety zone. Vessel traffic will
not be allowed to enter or transit a portion of Oregon Inlet during
specific two hour periods on 33 separate days from January 29 through
March 24, 2018, with alternate dates of March 25 through May 6, 2018.
The specific 2 hour period for each work day will be broadcast at least
48 hours in advance and vessels will be able to transit Oregon Inlet at
all other times. The Coast Guard will issue a Local Notice to Mariners
and transmit a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel
16 regarding the safety zone. This portion of Oregon Inlet has been
determined to be a medium to low traffic area at this time of the year.
This rule does not allow vessels to request permission to enter the
safety zone covering the Oregon Inlet navigation channel during the
designated times.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
[[Page 2912]]
Directive 023-01, which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the
human environment. This rule involves a safety zone lasting for 2 hours
on 33 separate days that would prohibit entry into a portion of Oregon
Inlet for bridge construction. It is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L60 (a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T05-0964 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-0964 Safety Zone; Oregon Inlet, Dare County, NC.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: all navigable
waters of Oregon Inlet, from approximate position 35[deg]46'23'' N,
75[deg]32'18'' W, thence southeast to 35[deg]46'18'' N, 75[deg]32'12''
W, thence southwest to 35[deg]46'16'' N, 75[deg]32'16'' W, thence
northwest to 35[deg]46'20'' N, 75[deg]32'23'' W, thence northeast back
to the point of origin (NAD 1983) in Dare County, NC.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section--
Designated representative means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
including a Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
designated by the Captain of the Port North Carolina (COTP) for the
enforcement of the safety zone.
Captain of the Port means the Commander, Sector North Carolina.
Construction crews means persons and vessels involved in support of
construction.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general regulations governing safety zones
in Sec. 165.23 apply to the area described in paragraph (a) of this
section.
(2) With the exception of construction crews, entry into or
remaining in this safety zone is prohibited.
(3) All vessels within this safety zone when this section becomes
effective must depart the zone immediately.
(4) The Captain of the Port, North Carolina can be reached through
the Coast Guard Sector North Carolina Command Duty Officer, Wilmington,
North Carolina at telephone number 910-343-3882.
(5) The Coast Guard and designated security vessels enforcing the
safety zone can be contacted on VHF-FM marine band radio channel 13
(165.65 MHz) and channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol
and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and local
agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This regulation will be enforced from
January 29, 2018, through March 24, 2018, with alternate dates of March
25, 2018, through May 6, 2018.
(f) Public notification. The Coast Guard will notify the public of
the specific two hour closures at least 48 hours in advance by
transmitting Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16.
Dated: January 8, 2018.
Bion B. Stewart,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port North Carolina.
[FR Doc. 2018-00883 Filed 1-19-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P