Indian Gaming; Approval of an Amendment to a Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact in the State of Washington, 2462-2463 [2018-00637]
Download as PDF
2462
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2018 / Notices
declining and is likely to be listed as a
threatened species under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, [as
amended] (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) [the
‘‘ESA’’], within the foreseeable future;
or (C) which is listed as a threatened
species or endangered species under the
[ESA], or is designated as depleted
under [the MMPA]’’ 16 U.S.C. 1362(19).
Stock Assessment Report History for
the Northern Sea Otter in Washington
review the stock assessment at least
once every 3 years. The Service
reviewed the Washington sea otter SAR
in 2011 and concluded that a revision
was not warranted because the status of
the stock had not changed, nor could it
be more accurately determined.
However, upon review in 2016, the
Service determined that revision was
warranted because of changes in
population estimates and distribution.
The Washington sea otter SAR was
last revised in August 2008. The
Washington sea otter is not a strategic
stock, thus the Service is required to
Summary of Draft Revised Stock
Assessment Report for the Northern Sea
Otter in the State of Washington
The following table summarizes some
of the information contained in the draft
revised SAR for northern sea otters in
Washington State, which includes the
stock’s Nmin, Rmax, Fr, PBR, annual
estimated human-caused mortality and
serious injury, and status. After
consideration of any public comments
we receive, the Service will revise and
finalize the SAR, as appropriate. We
will publish a notice of availability and
summary of the final SAR, including
responses to submitted comments.
SUMMARY—DRAFT STOCK ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR THE NORTHERN SEA OTTER IN WASHINGTON STATE
Stock
Nmin
Northern Sea Otter
(Washington
State).
Rmax
1,806
0.20
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
References
In accordance with the MMPA, we
include in this notice a list of the
information sources and public reports
upon which we based the SAR:
Bigg, M.A. and I.B. MacAskie. 1978. Sea
otters re-established in British Columbia. J.
Mammalogy 59 (4):874–876.
Department Fisheries and Oceans, Canada
(DFO). 2015. Trends in the abundance and
distribution of sea otters (Enhydra lutris) in
British Columbia updated with 2013
survey results. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec.
Sci. Advis. Rep. 2015/043.
DeMaster, D.P., C. Marzin, and R.J. Jameson.
1996. Estimating the historical abundance
of sea otters in California. Endangered
Species Update 13(12):79–81.
Estes, J.A. 1990. Growth and equilibrium in
sea otter populations. J. Anim. Ecol.
59:358–401.
Hatfield, B.B., J.A. Ames, J.A. Estes, M.T.
Tinker, A.B. Johnson, M.M Staelder, and
M.D. Harris. 2011. Sea otter mortality in
fish and shellfish traps: estimated potential
impacts and exploring possible solutions.
Endangered Species Research 13:219–229.
Hatfield, B.B. and J.A. Estes. 2000.
Preliminary results of an evaluation of the
potential threat to sea otters posed by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Jan 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
Fr
Annual estimated human-caused
mortality and serious injury
PBR
0.1
18
Figures by specific source, where
known, are provided in the SAR.
nearshore finfish trap fishery.
Unpublished, 6 pp. + appendices.
Jameson, R.J., K.W. Kenyon, A.M. Johnson,
and H.M. Wight. 1982. History and status
of translocated sea otter populations in
North America. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 10:100–
107.
Jameson, R.J., K.W. Kenyon, S.Jeffries and
G.R. VanBlaricom. 1986. Status of a
translocated sea otter and its habitat in
Washington. Murrelet 67:84–87.
Jameson, R.J. 1996. Status reports: West Coast
translocation projects, Oregon and
Washington. The Otter Raft No. 55, Page 8.
Jameson, R.J., and S. Jeffries. 1999. Results of
the 1999 Survey of the Washington Sea
Otter
Population. Unpublished Report. 5 pp.
Jeffries, S., D. Lynch, and S. Thomas. 2016.
Results of the 2016 Survey of the
Reintroduced Sea Otter Population in
Washington State. Unpublished Report. 9
pp. Copies may be obtained from the
Washington Department of Fish and
Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s
Washington Fish and Wildlife Office.
Laidre, K., R.J. Jameson, S.J. Jeffries, and E.
Gurarie. 2011. Updated estimates of
carrying capacity for sea otters in
Washington state. Unpublished final
contract report, December 31, 2011, 12 pp.
+ appendix.
Lance, M.M., S.A. Richardson, and H. Allen.
2004. State of Washington sea otter
recovery plan. WDFW, Olympia WA. 91
pp.
Riedman, M.L., and J.A. Estes. 1990. The sea
otter (Enhydra lutris): behavior, ecology,
and natural history. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Washington, DC, Biological Report
90(14). 126 pp.
Scheffer, V.B. 1940. The sea otter on the
Washington coast. Pacific Northwest
Quarterly, 3:370–388.
Taylor, B.L., M. Scott, J. Heyning, and J.
Barlow. 2003. Suggested guidelines for
recovery factors for endangered marine
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Stock status
Non-Strategic.
mammals. NOAA Technical Memorandum
NOAA–TM–NMFS–SWFSC–354,
September 2003. 6 pp.
Wilson, D.E., M.A. Bogan, R.L. Brownell, Jr.,
A.M. Burdin, and M.K. Maminov. 1991.
Geographic variation in sea otters, Enhydra
lutris. J. Mammal. 72(1):22–36.
Authority
The authority for this action is the
Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972,
as amended (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.).
Dated: November 30, 2017.
James W. Kurth,
Deputy Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Exercising the Authority of the
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–00672 Filed 1–16–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[189A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900 253G]
Indian Gaming; Approval of an
Amendment to a Tribal-State Class III
Gaming Compact in the State of
Washington
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Puyallup Tribe of the
Puyallup Reservation negotiated the
Fifth Amendment to the Tribal-State
Compact for Class III Gaming between
the Puyallup Indian Tribe and the State
of Washington governing Class III
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 11 / Wednesday, January 17, 2018 / Notices
gaming; this notice announces approval
of the amended Compact.
DATES: This compact takes effect on
January 17, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian
Gaming, Office of the Assistant
Secretary—Indian Affairs, Washington,
DC 20240, (202) 219–4066.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 11
of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
(IGRA) requires the Secretary of the
Interior to publish in the Federal
Register notice of approved Tribal-State
compacts that are for the purpose of
engaging in Class III gaming activities
on Indian lands. See Public Law 100–
497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq. All TribalState Class III compacts, including
amendments, are subject to review and
approval by the Secretary under 25 CFR
293.4. The Fifth Amendment to the
Tribal-State Compact for Class III
Gaming between the Puyallup Indian
Tribe and the State of Washington
amends the previous compact. The
Amendment adds to and revises the
definition section; modifies Appendix
X2 to increase the Tribe’s allocation of
player terminals; changes the
calculation of State regulatory costs;
clarifies the timing for payment to
Problem Gambling and Smoking
Cessation and Prevention Programs; and
prohibits the acceptance of Electronic
Benefit Cards. The Fifth Amendment to
the Tribal-State Compact for Class III
Gaming between the Puyallup Indian
Tribe and the State of Washington is
approved. See 25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(8)(A).
Dated: December 22, 2017.
John Tahsuda,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian
Affairs, Exercising the Authority of the
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2018–00637 Filed 1–16–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of the Secretary
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
[18XD4523WU, DWUCM0000.000000,
DS62400000, DX62432; OMB Control
Number 1084–0034]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Documenting, Managing
and Preserving Department of the
Interior Museum Collections Housed in
Non-Federal Repositories
Office of Acquisition and
Property Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of information collection;
request for public comments.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we,
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:14 Jan 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
the Office of Acquisition and Property
Management, Office of the Secretary,
Department of the Interior are proposing
to renew an information collection.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before March
19, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments on
this information collection request (ICR)
by mail to Elizabeth Varner, Office of
Acquisition and Property Management,
U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C
Street NW, MS 4262–MIB, Washington,
DC 20240; fax (202) 513–7634; or by
email to Elizabeth_Varner@ios.doi.gov.
Please reference OMB Control Number
1084–0034 in the subject line of your
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: To
request additional information about
this ICR, contact Elizabeth Varner by
email at Elizabeth_Varner@ios.doi.gov,
or by telephone at (202) 513–7564.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, we provide the
general public and other Federal
agencies with an opportunity to
comment on new, proposed, revised,
and continuing collections of
information. This helps us assess the
impact of our information collection
requirements and minimize the public’s
reporting burden. It also helps the
public understand our information
collection requirements and provide the
requested data in the desired format.
We are soliciting comments on the
proposed ICR that is described below.
We are especially interested in public
comment addressing the following
issues: (1) Is the collection necessary to
the proper functions of the Office of
Acquisition and Property Management;
(2) will this information be processed
and used in a timely manner; (3) is the
estimate of burden accurate; (4) how
might the Office of Acquisition and
Property Management enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Office of Acquisition and
Property Management minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or
summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this ICR. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2463
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Abstract: The Department of the
Interior (DOI) owns and manages over
204 million artifacts, scientific
specimens, and documents in trust for
the American public. This diverse
collection consists of archaeological
artifacts, archives, art, biological
specimens, ethnographic objects,
geological specimens, historic objects,
and paleontological specimens that are
held by ten of DOI’s bureaus and offices.
The majority of DOI’s collections are
housed in bureau facilities; however,
over ten percent (more than 25 million
objects and 19,000 cubic feet of objects)
are housed by at least 882 non-Federal
repositories, the majority of which are
museums associated with, or
departments of, U.S. colleges and
universities. Most are scientific
collections from the disciplines of
archaeology, biology, geology, and
paleontology and include associated
archival records.
DOI museum collections, regardless of
where they are housed, must be
managed according to preservation,
documentation, educational, and other
requirements in the public interest.
These requirements are mandated by a
number of Federal laws, notably:
Archaeological Resources Protection Act
of 1979, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470aa–
mm); Paleontological Resources
Preservation Act of 2009 (16 U.S.C.
470aaa–4); Migratory Bird Treaty Act of
1918 (16 U.S.C. 703–712); Marine
Mammal Protection Act of 1972 (16
U.S.C. 1361–1407); Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531–1543); Lacy Act of 1900 (16 U.S.C.
3371–3378; 18 U.S.C. 43–44); Native
American Graves Protection and
Repatriation Act of 1990 (25 U.S.C.
3001–3013); Federal Property and
Administrative Services Act of 1949, as
amended (40 U.S.C. 524); National Park
Service Organic Act of 1916 (54 U.S.C.
100101); Management of Museum
Properties Act of 1955, as amended (54
U.S.C. 102501–102504); National
Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as
amended (54 U.S.C. 300101 et seq.);
Historic Sites Act of 1935 (54 U.S.C.
320101–320104, 320106); and
Monuments, Ruins, Sites, and Objects of
Antiquity (Act for the Preservation of
American Antiquities of 1906
(‘‘Antiquities Act’’)) (54 U.S.C. 320301–
320303). Pertinent regulations are
Curation of Federally-Owned and
Administered Archaeological
Collections (36 CFR part 79); Federal
Management Regulation, Subchapter B:
E:\FR\FM\17JAN1.SGM
17JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 11 (Wednesday, January 17, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2462-2463]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00637]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[189A2100DD/AAKC001030/ A0A501010.999900 253G]
Indian Gaming; Approval of an Amendment to a Tribal-State Class
III Gaming Compact in the State of Washington
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Puyallup Tribe of the Puyallup Reservation negotiated the
Fifth Amendment to the Tribal-State Compact for Class III Gaming
between the Puyallup Indian Tribe and the State of Washington governing
Class III
[[Page 2463]]
gaming; this notice announces approval of the amended Compact.
DATES: This compact takes effect on January 17, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of
Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs,
Washington, DC 20240, (202) 219-4066.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory
Act (IGRA) requires the Secretary of the Interior to publish in the
Federal Register notice of approved Tribal-State compacts that are for
the purpose of engaging in Class III gaming activities on Indian lands.
See Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq. All Tribal-State Class
III compacts, including amendments, are subject to review and approval
by the Secretary under 25 CFR 293.4. The Fifth Amendment to the Tribal-
State Compact for Class III Gaming between the Puyallup Indian Tribe
and the State of Washington amends the previous compact. The Amendment
adds to and revises the definition section; modifies Appendix X2 to
increase the Tribe's allocation of player terminals; changes the
calculation of State regulatory costs; clarifies the timing for payment
to Problem Gambling and Smoking Cessation and Prevention Programs; and
prohibits the acceptance of Electronic Benefit Cards. The Fifth
Amendment to the Tribal-State Compact for Class III Gaming between the
Puyallup Indian Tribe and the State of Washington is approved. See 25
U.S.C. 2710(d)(8)(A).
Dated: December 22, 2017.
John Tahsuda,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, Exercising the
Authority of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2018-00637 Filed 1-16-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P