Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes, 1579-1582 [2018-00342]
Download as PDF
1579
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 83, No. 9
Friday, January 12, 2018
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2017–1245; Product
Identifier 2017–NM–099–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Examining the AD Docket
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Airbus Model A318 series airplanes and
Model A319 series airplanes; all Model
A320–211, –212, –214, –216, –231,
–232, and –233 airplanes; and all Model
A321–111, –112, –131, –211, –212,
–213, –231, and –232 airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by an
evaluation by the design approval
holder (DAH) indicating that the holes
of the upper cleat to upper stringer
attachments at certain areas of the leftand right-hand wings are subject to
widespread fatigue damage (WFD). This
proposed AD would require modifying
the holes of the upper cleat to upper
stringer attachments at certain areas of
the left- and right-hand wings. We are
proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by February 26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Jan 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office—EIAS, 1 Rond
Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone: +33 5 61 93
36 96; fax: +33 5 61 93 44 51; email:
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com;
internet: https://www.airbus.com. You
may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601
Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
1245; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone:
800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW, Renton, WA 98057–3356;
telephone: 425–227–1405; fax: 425–
227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2017–1245; Product Identifier
2017–NM–099–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this NPRM. We will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this NPRM based
on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this NPRM.
Discussion
Fatigue damage can occur locally, in
small areas or structural design details,
or globally, in widespread areas.
Multiple-site damage is widespread
damage that occurs in a large structural
element such as a single rivet line of a
lap splice joining two large skin panels.
Widespread damage can also occur in
multiple elements such as adjacent
frames or stringers. Multiple-site
damage and multiple-element damage
cracks are typically too small initially to
be reliably detected with normal
inspection methods. Without
intervention, these cracks will grow,
and eventually compromise the
structural integrity of the airplane. This
condition is known as widespread
fatigue damage. It is associated with
general degradation of large areas of
structure with similar structural details
and stress levels. As an airplane ages,
WFD will likely occur, and will
certainly occur if the airplane is
operated long enough without any
intervention.
The FAA’s WFD final rule (75 FR
69746, November 15, 2010) became
effective on January 14, 2011. The WFD
rule requires certain actions to prevent
structural failure due to WFD
throughout the operational life of
certain existing transport category
airplanes and all of these airplanes that
will be certificated in the future. For
existing and future airplanes subject to
the WFD rule, the rule requires that
DAHs establish a limit of validity (LOV)
of the engineering data that support the
structural maintenance program.
Operators affected by the WFD rule may
not fly an airplane beyond its LOV,
unless an extended LOV is approved.
The WFD rule (75 FR 69746,
November 15, 2010) does not require
identifying and developing maintenance
actions if the DAHs can show that such
actions are not necessary to prevent
WFD before the airplane reaches the
LOV. Many LOVs, however, do depend
on accomplishment of future
maintenance actions. As stated in the
WFD rule, any maintenance actions
necessary to reach the LOV will be
mandated by airworthiness directives
through separate rulemaking actions.
In the context of WFD, this action is
necessary to enable DAHs to propose
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
1580
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 / Proposed Rules
LOVs that allow operators the longest
operational lives for their airplanes, and
still ensure that WFD will not occur.
This approach allows for an
implementation strategy that provides
flexibility to DAHs in determining the
timing of service information
development (with FAA approval),
while providing operators with certainty
regarding the LOV applicable to their
airplanes.
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA AD 2017–0117,
dated July 7, 2017 (referred to after this
as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for certain Airbus Model A318 series
airplanes; Model A319 series airplanes;
Model A320–211, –212, –214, –216,
–231, –232, and –233 airplanes; and
Model A321–111, –112, –131, –211,
–212, –213, –231, and –232 airplanes.
The MCAI states:
Within the scope of work of service life
extension for A320 aeroplanes and of
widespread fatigue damage evaluations, it
has been determined that a structural
modification is required to allow the
aeroplanes to continue operation up to the
limit of validity (LoV).
This condition, if not corrected, may affect
the structural integrity of the wing.
To address this potential unsafe condition,
Airbus issued SB A320–57–1208, providing
instructions to oversize the holes of the
upper cleat to upper stringer attachments at
Rib 2 to Rib 7 (inclusive).
For the reason described above, this
[EASA] AD requires modification of the
affected holes.
You may examine the MCAI in the
AD docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
1245.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
Airbus has issued Airbus Service
Bulletin A320–57–1208, dated
November 21, 2016. The service
information describes procedures for
modifying the stringer attachments at
rib 2 through rib 7 of the left- and righthand wings. The modification includes
oversizing the holes, doing an eddy
current inspection of the affected holes
for damage, and repair. This service
information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of these same
type designs.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 1,136 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Modification (by oversizing and doing eddy
current inspection).
125 work-hours × $85 per hour = $10,625 ....
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide cost
estimates for the on-condition actions
specified in this proposed AD.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Jan 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
Parts cost
This proposed AD is issued in
accordance with authority delegated by
the Executive Director, Aircraft
Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance
with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance
and Airworthiness Division, but during
this transition period, the Executive
Director has delegated the authority to
issue ADs applicable to transport
category airplanes to the Director of the
System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
$26,260
Cost per
product
Cost on U.S.
operators
$36,885
$41,901,360
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 / Proposed Rules
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
Airbus: Docket No. FAA–2017–1245; Product
Identifier 2017–NM–099–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by February
26, 2018.
serial numbers, except airplanes specified in
paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD.
(1) Model A318 series airplanes on which
Airbus Modification (Mod) 39195 has been
embodied in production or Airbus Service
Bulletin A320–00–1219 has been embodied
in service.
(2) Model A319 series airplanes on which
Airbus Mod 28238, Mod 28162, and Mod
28342 have been embodied in production.
1581
could result in reduced structural integrity of
the wings.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Modification
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by an evaluation by
the design approval holder indicating that
the holes of the upper cleat to upper stringer
attachments at rib 2 through rib 7 of the leftand right-hand wings are subject to
widespread fatigue damage. We are issuing
this AD to prevent fatigue cracking in the
stringer attachment holes of the wings, which
Before reaching the upper limit, but not
before reaching the lower limit, as defined in
table 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD, as
applicable: Modify the holes of the upper
cleat to upper stringer attachments at rib 2
through rib 7 inclusive, on the left- and righthand wings by oversizing the holes, doing
eddy current inspections of the holes for
damage, and repairing any damage found, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
57–1208, dated November 21, 2016, except as
required by paragraph (h) of this AD. Repair
all damage before further flight.
(h) Service Information Exception
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it
to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (j)(2) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to 9-ANM-116-AMOCREQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the
effective date of this AD, for any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by
the Manager, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA; or the European
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus’s
EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA).
If approved by the DOA, the approval must
include the DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except
as required by paragraph (h) of this AD: If
Where Airbus Service Bulletin A320–57–
1208, dated November 21, 2016, specifies to
contact Airbus for appropriate action, and
specifies that action as ‘‘RC’’ (Required for
Compliance): Before further flight,
accomplish corrective actions in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph
(i)(2) of this AD.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Jan 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
EP12JA18.000
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A318–
111, –112 –121, and –122 airplanes; Model
A319–111, –112, –113, –114, –115, –131,
–132, and –133 airplanes; Model A320–211,
–212, –214, –216, –231, –232, and –233
airplanes; and Model A321–111, –112, –131,
–211, –212, –213, –231, and –232 airplanes;
certificated in any category; all manufacturer
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 57, wings.
1582
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 / Proposed Rules
any service information contains procedures
or tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply
with this AD; any procedures or tests that are
not identified as RC are recommended. Those
procedures and tests that are not identified
as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator’s
maintenance or inspection program without
obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can
be done and the airplane can be put back in
an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
(j) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD
2017–0117, dated July 7, 2017, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the
AD docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2017–1245.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW,
Renton, WA 98057–3356; telephone: 425–
227–1405; fax: 425–227–1149.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness
Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax: +33 5 61
93 44 51; email: account.airworth-eas@
airbus.com; internet: https://www.airbus.com.
You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW, Renton, WA. For information on
the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
December 26, 2017.
John P. Piccola, Jr.,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–00342 Filed 1–11–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2017–1144; Airspace
Docket No. 16–AGL–30]
Proposed Modification of Air Traffic
Service (ATS) Routes in the Vicinity of
Richmond, IN
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
modify five VHF Omnidirectional Range
(VOR) Federal airways (V–12, V–214,
V–340, V–467, and V–517) and one low
altitude area navigation (RNAV) route
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Jan 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
(T–213) in the vicinity of Richmond, IN.
The FAA is proposing this action due to
the planned decommissioning of the
Richmond, IN (RID), VHF
Omnidirectional Range/Tactical Air
Navigation (VORTAC) navigation aid
(NAVAID) which provides navigation
guidance for portions of the affected
ATS routes. Overall, this action would
enhance the safety and management of
aircraft within the National Airspace
System (NAS).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590; telephone:
1(800) 647–5527, or (202) 366–9826.
You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA–2017–1144 and Airspace Docket
No. 16–AGL–30 at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit
comments through the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov.
FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed
online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/
publications/. For further information,
you can contact the Airspace Policy
Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone: (202) 267–8783. The Order is
also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of FAA
Order 7400.11B at NARA, call (202)
741–6030, or go to https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html.
FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on
September 15.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Colby Abbott, Airspace Policy Group,
Office of Airspace Services, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267–8783.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of the airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it would
support the route structure in the
Richmond, IN, area as necessary to
preserve the safe and efficient flow of
air traffic within the NAS.
Comments Invited
Interested parties are invited to
participate in this proposed rulemaking
by submitting such written data, views,
or arguments as they may desire.
Comments that provide the factual basis
supporting the views and suggestions
presented are particularly helpful in
developing reasoned regulatory
decisions on the proposal. Comments
are specifically invited on the overall
regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related
aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both
docket numbers (FAA Docket No. FAA–
2017–1144 and Airspace Docket No. 16–
AGL–30) and be submitted in triplicate
to the Docket Management Facility (see
ADDRESSES section for address and
phone number). You may also submit
comments through the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those
comments a self-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the following
statement is made: ‘‘Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA–2017–1144 and
Airspace Docket No. 16–AGL–30.’’ The
postcard will be date/time stamped and
returned to the commenter.
All communications received on or
before the specified comment closing
date will be considered before taking
action on the proposed rule. The
proposal contained in this action may
be changed in light of comments
received. All comments submitted will
be available for examination in the
public docket both before and after the
comment closing date. A report
summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerned
with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.
Availability of NPRMs
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through
the FAA’s web page at https://
www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/
airspace_amendments/.
E:\FR\FM\12JAP1.SGM
12JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 9 (Friday, January 12, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 1579-1582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00342]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 1579]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2017-1245; Product Identifier 2017-NM-099-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus Model A318 series airplanes and Model A319 series
airplanes; all Model A320-211, -212, -214, -216, -231, -232, and -233
airplanes; and all Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231,
and -232 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by an evaluation by
the design approval holder (DAH) indicating that the holes of the upper
cleat to upper stringer attachments at certain areas of the left- and
right-hand wings are subject to widespread fatigue damage (WFD). This
proposed AD would require modifying the holes of the upper cleat to
upper stringer attachments at certain areas of the left- and right-hand
wings. We are proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by February 26,
2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax: +33 5 61 93
44 51; email: [email protected]; internet: https://www.airbus.com. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-
227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
1245; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received,
and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone: 800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW, Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone: 425-227-1405; fax: 425-
227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2017-1245;
Product Identifier 2017-NM-099-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this NPRM based on
those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this NPRM.
Discussion
Fatigue damage can occur locally, in small areas or structural
design details, or globally, in widespread areas. Multiple-site damage
is widespread damage that occurs in a large structural element such as
a single rivet line of a lap splice joining two large skin panels.
Widespread damage can also occur in multiple elements such as adjacent
frames or stringers. Multiple-site damage and multiple-element damage
cracks are typically too small initially to be reliably detected with
normal inspection methods. Without intervention, these cracks will
grow, and eventually compromise the structural integrity of the
airplane. This condition is known as widespread fatigue damage. It is
associated with general degradation of large areas of structure with
similar structural details and stress levels. As an airplane ages, WFD
will likely occur, and will certainly occur if the airplane is operated
long enough without any intervention.
The FAA's WFD final rule (75 FR 69746, November 15, 2010) became
effective on January 14, 2011. The WFD rule requires certain actions to
prevent structural failure due to WFD throughout the operational life
of certain existing transport category airplanes and all of these
airplanes that will be certificated in the future. For existing and
future airplanes subject to the WFD rule, the rule requires that DAHs
establish a limit of validity (LOV) of the engineering data that
support the structural maintenance program. Operators affected by the
WFD rule may not fly an airplane beyond its LOV, unless an extended LOV
is approved.
The WFD rule (75 FR 69746, November 15, 2010) does not require
identifying and developing maintenance actions if the DAHs can show
that such actions are not necessary to prevent WFD before the airplane
reaches the LOV. Many LOVs, however, do depend on accomplishment of
future maintenance actions. As stated in the WFD rule, any maintenance
actions necessary to reach the LOV will be mandated by airworthiness
directives through separate rulemaking actions.
In the context of WFD, this action is necessary to enable DAHs to
propose
[[Page 1580]]
LOVs that allow operators the longest operational lives for their
airplanes, and still ensure that WFD will not occur. This approach
allows for an implementation strategy that provides flexibility to DAHs
in determining the timing of service information development (with FAA
approval), while providing operators with certainty regarding the LOV
applicable to their airplanes.
The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA AD
2017-0117, dated July 7, 2017 (referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an
unsafe condition for certain Airbus Model A318 series airplanes; Model
A319 series airplanes; Model A320-211, -212, -214, -216, -231, -232,
and -233 airplanes; and Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -
231, and -232 airplanes. The MCAI states:
Within the scope of work of service life extension for A320
aeroplanes and of widespread fatigue damage evaluations, it has been
determined that a structural modification is required to allow the
aeroplanes to continue operation up to the limit of validity (LoV).
This condition, if not corrected, may affect the structural
integrity of the wing.
To address this potential unsafe condition, Airbus issued SB
A320-57-1208, providing instructions to oversize the holes of the
upper cleat to upper stringer attachments at Rib 2 to Rib 7
(inclusive).
For the reason described above, this [EASA] AD requires
modification of the affected holes.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
1245.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
Airbus has issued Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1208, dated
November 21, 2016. The service information describes procedures for
modifying the stringer attachments at rib 2 through rib 7 of the left-
and right-hand wings. The modification includes oversizing the holes,
doing an eddy current inspection of the affected holes for damage, and
repair. This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of these
same type designs.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 1,136 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modification (by oversizing and 125 work-hours x $85 per $26,260 $36,885 $41,901,360
doing eddy current inspection). hour = $10,625.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order,
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable
to transport category airplanes to the Director of the System Oversight
Division.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
[[Page 1581]]
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2017-1245; Product Identifier 2017-NM-099-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by February 26, 2018.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Model A318-111, -112 -121, and -122
airplanes; Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -
133 airplanes; Model A320-211, -212, -214, -216, -231, -232, and -
233 airplanes; and Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -
231, and -232 airplanes; certificated in any category; all
manufacturer serial numbers, except airplanes specified in
paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD.
(1) Model A318 series airplanes on which Airbus Modification
(Mod) 39195 has been embodied in production or Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-00-1219 has been embodied in service.
(2) Model A319 series airplanes on which Airbus Mod 28238, Mod
28162, and Mod 28342 have been embodied in production.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, wings.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval
holder indicating that the holes of the upper cleat to upper
stringer attachments at rib 2 through rib 7 of the left- and right-
hand wings are subject to widespread fatigue damage. We are issuing
this AD to prevent fatigue cracking in the stringer attachment holes
of the wings, which could result in reduced structural integrity of
the wings.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Modification
Before reaching the upper limit, but not before reaching the
lower limit, as defined in table 1 to paragraph (g) of this AD, as
applicable: Modify the holes of the upper cleat to upper stringer
attachments at rib 2 through rib 7 inclusive, on the left- and
right-hand wings by oversizing the holes, doing eddy current
inspections of the holes for damage, and repairing any damage found,
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-57-1208, dated November 21, 2016, except as required
by paragraph (h) of this AD. Repair all damage before further
flight.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP12JA18.000
(h) Service Information Exception
Where Airbus Service Bulletin A320-57-1208, dated November 21,
2016, specifies to contact Airbus for appropriate action, and
specifies that action as ``RC'' (Required for Compliance): Before
further flight, accomplish corrective actions in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (i)(2) of this AD.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Section, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (j)(2) of this AD. Information
may be emailed to [email protected]. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of
this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions
from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method
approved by the Manager, International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA; or the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or
Airbus's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the
DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except as required by
paragraph (h) of this AD: If
[[Page 1582]]
any service information contains procedures or tests that are
identified as RC, those procedures and tests must be done to comply
with this AD; any procedures or tests that are not identified as RC
are recommended. Those procedures and tests that are not identified
as RC may be deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with
the operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as
RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests
identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.
(j) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA AD 2017-0117, dated July 7, 2017, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2017-1245.
(2) For more information about this AD, contact Sanjay Ralhan,
Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone:
425-227-1405; fax: 425-227-1149.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax: +33
5 61 93 44 51; email: [email protected]; internet:
https://www.airbus.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 26, 2017.
John P. Piccola, Jr.,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-00342 Filed 1-11-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P