Semiannual Regulatory Agenda, 1950-1961 [2017-28242]
Download as PDF
1950
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 / Unified Agenda
48 CFR Ch. 1
FR 9339 (2017), EO 13777, ‘‘Enforcing
the Regulatory Reform Agenda,’’ 82 FR
12285, and the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 to 612. The purpose
of publishing this agenda is to give
notice of regulatory activity being
undertaken by FAR Council in order to
provide the public an opportunity to
participate in the rulemaking process.
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
Department of Defense (DoD),
General Services Administration (GSA),
and National Aeronautics and Space
Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda.
AGENCY:
This agenda provides
summary descriptions of regulations
being developed by the Civilian Agency
Acquisition Council and the Defense
Acquisition Regulations Council
pursuant to Executive Order 12866
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review,’’ 58
FR 51735 (1993), with particular
adherence to EO 13771, ‘‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Costs,’’ 82
SUMMARY:
Lois
Mandell, Division Director, Regulatory
Secretariat Division, 1800 F Street NW,
2nd Floor, Washington, DC 20405–0001,
202–501–2735.
DoD, GSA,
and NASA, under the Office of Federal
Procurement Policy (OFPP) Act (41
U.S.C. 1303) and the agencies’ several
statutory authorities, jointly issue and
maintain the FAR through periodic
issuance of changes published in the
Federal Register and produced
electronically as Federal Acquisition
Circulars (FACs).
The electronic version of the FAR,
including changes, can be accessed on
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
the FAR website at https://
www.acquisition.gov/far.
The information provided in the
Unified Agenda (Agenda) previews the
rulemaking activities that we expect to
undertake in the immediate future. The
Agenda focuses primarily on those
actions expected to result in publication
of Advanced Notices of Proposed
Rulemaking, Notices of Proposed
Rulemaking, or Final Rules within the
next 12 months.
A fully searchable e-Agenda is
available for viewing in its entirety at
www.reginfo.gov. Agenda information is
also available at www.regulations.gov,
the government-wide website for
submission of comments on proposed
regulations. Our fall 2017 agenda
follows.
Dated: November 29, 2017.
William F. Clark,
Director, Office of Government-wide,
Acquisition Policy, Office of Acquisition
Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.
DOD/GSA/NASA (FAR)—PRERULE STAGE
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
348 ....................
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017–014, Use of Acquisition 360 to Encourage Vendor
Feedback.
9000–AN43
DOD/GSA/NASA (FAR)—PROPOSED RULE STAGE
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
349 ....................
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015–021; Determination of Fair and Reasonable Prices
on Orders Under Multiple Award Contracts.
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015–014; Prohibition on Providing Funds to the Enemy
FAR Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015–038, Reverse Auction Guidance .................................
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017–005, Whistleblower Protection for Contractor Employees.
Federal Acquisition Regulation; FAR Case 2016–002, Applicability of Small Business Regulations Outside
the United States.
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2016–013, Tax on Certain Foreign Procurement ............
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017–003; Individual Sureties .........................................
Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR); FAR Case 2015–002, Requirements for DD Form 254, Contract
Security Classification Specification.
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017–013, Breaches of Personally Identifiable Information.
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017–011, Section 508-Based Standards in Information
and Communication Technology.
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2016–012, Incremental Funding of Fixed-Price Contracting Actions.
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015–037, Definition of ‘‘Information Technology’’ ..........
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015–028, Performance-Based Payments ......................
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); Far Case 2015–004, Provisions and Clauses for Acquisitions of
Commercial Items and Acquisitions That do not Exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold.
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017–006, Exception From Certified Cost or Pricing
Data Requirements-Adequate Price Competition.
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017–010, Evaluation Factors for Multiple-Award Contracts.
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017–016, Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) .....
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017–018, Violation of Arms Control Treaties or Agreements with the United States.
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR 2017–020, Ombudsman for Indefinite-Delivery Contracts ........
Federal Regulation Acquisition (FAR); FAR Case 2017–019, Policy on Joint Ventures ................................
350 ....................
351 ....................
352 ....................
353 ....................
354 ....................
355 ....................
356 ....................
357 ....................
358 ....................
359 ....................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
360 ....................
361 ....................
362 ....................
363 ....................
364 ....................
365 ....................
366 ....................
367 ....................
368 ....................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Jan 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12JAP19.SGM
12JAP19
9000–AM94
9000–AN03
9000–AN31
9000–AN32
9000–AN34
9000–AN38
9000–AN39
9000–AN40
9000–AN44
9000–AN46
9000–AN47
9000–AN48
9000–AN49
9000–AN51
9000–AN53
9000–AN54
9000–AN56
9000–AN57
9000–AN58
9000–AN59
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 / Unified Agenda
1951
DOD/GSA/NASA (FAR)—PROPOSED RULE STAGE—Continued
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
369 ....................
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2018–003, Credit for Lower-Tier Small Business Subcontracting.
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2018–002, Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance
(Reg Plan Seq No. 136).
370 ....................
9000–AN61
9000–AN62
References in boldface appear in The Regulatory Plan in part II of this issue of the Federal Register.
DOD/GSA/NASA (FAR)—FINAL RULE STAGE
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
371 ....................
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2013–002; Reporting of Nonconforming Items to the
Government-Industry Data Exchange Program.
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015–015; Strategic Sourcing Documentation ................
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2013–018; Clarification of Requirement for Justifications
for 8(a) Sole Source Contracts.
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2014–002; Set-Asides Under Multiple Award Contracts
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015–017; Combating Trafficking in Persons—Definition
of ‘‘Recruitment Fees’’.
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2016–007, Non-Retaliation for Disclosure of Compensation Information.
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015–005, System for Award Management Registration
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015–039, Audit of Settlement Proposals .......................
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017–001, Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors ......
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015–033, Sustainable Acquisition ..................................
Federal Acquisition Regulation: FAR Case 2016–005; Effective Communication Between Government and
Industry.
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2016–011, (S) Revision of Limitations on Subcontracting
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017–004, Rate Adjustment of Liquidated Damages ......
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017–007, Task- and Delivery-Order Protests ................
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017–009, Special Emergency Procurement Authority ...
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017–012, Increased Micro-Purchase Threshold for
Certain Procurement Activities.
372 ....................
373 ....................
374 ....................
375 ....................
376 ....................
377
378
379
380
381
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
382
383
384
385
386
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
9000–AM58
9000–AM89
9000–AM90
9000–AM93
9000–AN02
9000–AN10
9000–AN19
9000–AN26
9000–AN27
9000–AN28
9000–AN29
9000–AN35
9000–AN37
9000–AN41
9000–AN45
9000–AN50
DOD/GSA/NASA (FAR)—COMPLETED ACTIONS
Regulation
Identifier No.
Sequence No.
Title
387 ....................
388 ....................
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015–031, Policy on 8(a) Joint Ventures ........................
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017–015, Removal of Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces
Rule.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE/
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION/NATIONAL
AERONAUTICS AND SPACE
ADMINISTRATION (FAR)
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Prerule Stage
348. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2017–014, Use of
Acquisition 360 To Encourage Vendor
Feedback
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to address
the solicitation of contractor feedback
on both contract formation and contract
administration activities. Agencies
would consider this feedback, as
appropriate, to improve the efficiency
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Jan 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
and effectiveness of their acquisition
activities. The rule would create FAR
policy to encourage regular feedback in
accordance with agency practice (both
on contract formation and
administration activities) and a standard
FAR solicitation provision to support a
sustainable model for broadened use of
Acquisition 360 survey to elicit
feedback on the pre-award and
debriefing processes in a consistent and
standardized manner. Agencies would
be able to use the solicitation provision
to notify interested sources that a
procurement is part of the Acquisition
360 survey and encourage stakeholders
to voluntarily provide feedback on their
experiences on the pre-award process.
Timetable:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Action
ANPRM ...............
ANPRM Comment
Period End.
Date
9000–AN33
9000–AN52
FR Cite
04/00/18
06/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Curtis E. Glover Sr.,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 501–1448, Email:
curtis.glover@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN43
E:\FR\FM\12JAP19.SGM
12JAP19
1952
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 / Unified Agenda
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE/
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION/NATIONAL
AERONAUTICS AND SPACE
ADMINISTRATION (FAR)
Proposed Rule Stage
349. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2015–021;
Determination of Fair and Reasonable
Prices on Orders Under Multiple
Award Contracts
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to direct
ordering activity contracting officers to
make a determination of fair and
reasonable pricing when placing an
order against using GSA’s Federal
Supply Schedules (FSS). The Federal
Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA) of
1994 established a preference for the
types of information used to assess price
reasonableness.
This rule establishes a practice that
will ensure that prices are fair and
reasonable at the time the order is
placed under the GSA’s Federal Supply
Schedules. This government-wide FAR
rule will ensure uniform
implementation of this FAR change
across FAR-based contracts and avoid
the proliferation of agency-wide rules
and actions (e.g. revisions to FAR
supplements or issuance of policy
guidance) implementing this
requirement.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FR Cite
05/00/18
07/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Curtis E. Glover Sr.,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 501–1448, Email:
curtis.glover@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AM94
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
350. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2015–014; Prohibition
on Providing Funds to the Enemy
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement subtitle E of title VIII of the
Carl Levin and Howard P. ‘‘Buck’’
McKeon National Defense Authorization
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Jan 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2015,
which prohibits the Government from
providing funds to the enemy. The Act
requires the Secretary of Defense to
notify executive agencies of persons or
entities providing funds under certain
contracts to persons or entities that are
actively opposing the United States or
coalition forces where the Armed Forces
are actively engaged in a contingency
operation; or has failed to exercise due
diligence to ensure that none of the
funds under certain contracts are
provided to those persons or entities.
After receiving such notification, the
executive agency’s Head of the
Contracting Activity (HCA) may rescind,
void the contract or terminate for
default. The HCA’s decision is entered
into the Federal Awardee Performance
and Integrity Information System
(FAPIIS), or other formal system of
records. Since, review of FAPIIS is
required before making certain award
decision, this rule helps to prevent the
flow of funds to such persons or
entities. The statute does not apply to
contracts that are equal to or less than
$50,000, and contracts performed inside
the United States or its outlying areas,
or contracts subject to a national
security exception.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FR Cite
02/00/18
04/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Cecelia L. Davis,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 219–0202, Email:
cecelia.davis@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN03
351. FAR Acquisition Regulation (FAR);
FAR Case 2015–038, Reverse Auction
Guidance
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement policies addressing the
effective use of reverse auctions.
Reverse auctions involve offerors
lowering their pricing over rounds of
bidding in order to win federal
contracts. This change incorporates
guidance from the Office of Federal
Procurement Policy (OFPP)
memorandum, ‘‘Effective Use of Reverse
Auctions,’’ which was issued in
response to recommendations from the
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
GAO report, Reverse Auctions:
Guidance is Needed to Maximize
Competition and Achieve Cost Savings
(GAO–14–108). Reverse auctions are
one tool used by federal agencies to
increase competition and reduce the
cost of certain items. Reverse auctions
differ from traditional auctions in that
sellers compete against one another to
provide the lowest price or highestvalue offer to a buyer. This change to
the FAR will include guidance that will
standardize agencies’ use of reverse
auctions help agencies maximize
competition and savings when using
reverse auctions.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Date
FR Cite
02/00/18
04/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Curtis E. Glover Sr.,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 501–1448, Email:
curtis.glover@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN31
352. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2017–005,
Whistleblower Protection for
Contractor Employees
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement 41 U.S.C. 4712,
Enhancement of contractor protection
from reprisal for disclosure of certain
information and makes the pilot
program permanent. The pilot was
enacted on January 2, 2013, by section
828 of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal
Year (FY) 2013. The rule makes clear
that contractors and subcontractors are
prohibited from discharging, demoting,
or otherwise discriminating against an
employee as a reprisal for disclosing, to
any of the entities such as agency
Inspector Generals and Congress,
information the employee reasonably
believes is evidence of gross
mismanagement of a Federal contract; a
gross waste of Federal funds; an abuse
of authority relating to a Federal
contract; a substantial and specific
danger to public health or safety; or
violation of law, rule, or regulation
related to a Federal contract (including
the competition for or negotiation of a
contract. This rule enhances
E:\FR\FM\12JAP19.SGM
12JAP19
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 / Unified Agenda
whistleblower protections for contractor
employees, by making permanent the
protection for disclosure of the
aforementioned information, and
ensuring that the prohibition on
reimbursement for legal fees accrued in
defense against reprisal claims applies
to subcontractors, as well as contractors.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FR Cite
03/00/18
05/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Cecelia L. Davis,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 219–0202, Email:
cecelia.davis@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN32
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
353. Federal Acquisition Regulation;
FAR Case 2016–002, Applicability of
Small Business Regulations Outside the
United States
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) consistent
with SBA’s regulation at 13 CFR 125.2
as finalized in their rule Acquisition
Process: Task and Delivery Order
Contracts, Bundling, Consolidation’’
issued on October 2, 2013, to clarify that
overseas contracting is not excluded
from agency responsibilities to foster
small business participation (78 FR
61113).
In its final rule, SBA has clarified
that, as a general matter, its small
business contracting regulations apply
regardless of the place of performance.
In light of these changes, there is a need
to amend the FAR both to bring its
coverage into alignment with SBA’s
regulation and to give agencies the tools
they need especially the ability to use
set-asides to maximize opportunities for
small businesses overseas.
SBA intends to include contracts
performed outside of the United States
in agencies’ prime contracting goals
beginning in FY 2016. Although
inclusion for goaling purposes is not
dependent on FAR changes, amending
FAR part 19 will allow agencies to take
advantage of the tools authorized for
providing small business opportunities
for contracts awarded outside of the
United States.
This rule will allow agencies to take
advantage of the tools authorized for
providing small business opportunities
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Jan 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
for contracts awarded outside of the
United States. This will make it easier
for small businesses to receive
additional opportunities for contracts
performed outside of the United States.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FR Cite
02/00/18
04/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Mahruba Uddowla,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 703 605–2868, Email:
mahruba.uddowla@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN34
354. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2016–013, Tax on
Certain Foreign Procurement
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 37; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement a final rule issued by the
Department of the Treasury (published
at 81 FR 55133) that implements section
301 of the James Zadroga 9/11 Health
and Compensation Act of 2010, Public
Law 111347. This section imposes on
any foreign person that receives a
specified Federal procurement payment
a tax equal to two percent of the amount
such payment. This rule applies to
Federal Government contracts for goods
or services that are awarded to foreign
persons.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FR Cite
04/00/18
06/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Zenaida Delgado,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405. Phone: 202 969–7207, Email:
zenaida.delgado@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN38
355. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2017–003; Individual
Sureties
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD,GSA, and NASA are is
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to change
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
1953
the kinds of assets that individual
sureties must use as security for their
individual surety bonds. This change
will implement section 874 of the
NDAA for FY 2016 (Pub. L. 114–92),
codified at 31 U.S.C. 9310, Individual
Sureties. Individual sureties will no
longer be able to pledge real property,
corporate stocks, corporate bonds, or
irrevocable letters of credit. The
requirements of 31 U.S.C. 9310 are
intended to strengthen the assets
pledged by individual sureties, thereby
mitigating risk to the Government.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Date
FR Cite
04/00/18
06/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Zenaida Delgado,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 969–7207, Email:
zenaida.delgado@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN39
356. Federal Acquisition Regulations
(FAR); FAR Case 2015–002,
Requirements for DD FORM 254,
Contract Security Classification
Specification
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to require
the use of Department of Defense (DoD)
Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) for the
electronic submission of the DD Form
254, Contract Security Classification
Specification. This form is used to
convey security requirements regarding
classified information to contractors and
subcontractors and must be submitted to
the Defense Security Services (DSS)
when contractors or subcontractors
require access to classified information
under contracts awarded by agencies
covered by the National Industrial
Security Program (NISP). By changing
the submittal process of the form from
a manual process to an automated one,
the government will reduce the cost of
maintaining the forms, while also
providing a centralized repository for
classified contract security requirements
and supporting data.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
E:\FR\FM\12JAP19.SGM
12JAP19
Date
03/00/18
05/00/18
FR Cite
1954
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 / Unified Agenda
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Curtis E. Glover Sr.,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 501–1448, Email:
curtis.glover@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN40
357. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2017–013, Breaches of
Personally Identifiable Information
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to create
and implement appropriate contract
clauses and regulatory coverage to
address contractor requirements for
breach response consistent with the
requirements. This FAR change will
implement the requirements outlined in
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Memorandum, M–17–12
‘‘Preparing for and Responding to a
Breach of Personally Identifiable
Information’’ section V part B.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FR Cite
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
358. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2017–011, Section
508–Based Standards in Information
and Communication Technology
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
incorporate revisions and updates to
standards in section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, developed
by the Architectural and Transportation
Barriers Compliance Board (also
referred to as the ‘‘Access Board’’). This
FAR change incorporates the U.S.
Access Board’s final rule, Information
and Communication Technology (ICT)
Standards and Guidelines, published on
January 18, 2017 , which implemented
revisions and updates to the section
508-based standards and section 255-
20:01 Jan 11, 2018
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FR Cite
02/00/18
04/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Camara Francis,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 550–0935, Email:
camara.francis@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN46
359. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2016–012,
Incremental Funding of Fixed-Price
Contracting Actions
03/00/18
05/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Camara Francis,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 550–0935, Email:
camara.francis@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN44
VerDate Sep<11>2014
based guidelines. This rule is expected
to impose additional costs on federal
agencies. The purpose is to increase
productivity for federal employees with
disabilities, time savings due to
improved accessibility of federal
websites for members of the public with
disabilities, and reduced call volumes to
federal agencies. Additionally, this rule
harmonizes standards with national and
international consensus standards
which would assist American ICT
companies by helping to achieve
economies of scale created by wider use
of these technical standards.
Timetable:
Jkt 244001
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to allow
for incrementally funding of certain
fixed-price contracting action to help
minimize disruptions to agency
operations, and provide Federal
acquisition professionals with new
funding flexibility for fixed-price
contracting actions. The FAR addresses
incremental funding on cost
reimbursement contracts, however, does
not provide coverage on fixed price
contracts. Because the FAR is silent on
the incremental funding of fixed-price
contracts, contracting professionals
endorse the full funding of fixed-price
contracts as a best practice, however, in
many cases full funding is not possible.
Implementing this policy will provide
the flexibility sought by several
agencies. Although individual agencies
have implemented policy changes for
themselves, making this change to the
FAR will provide consistency across
Government agencies, from both policy
and procedural perspectives.
Timetable:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Date
FR Cite
02/00/18
04/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Camara Francis,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 550–0935, Email:
camara.francis@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN47
360. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2015–037, Definition
of ‘‘Information Technology’’
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to update
the definition of ‘‘information
technology,’’ as directed in the Office of
Management and Budget Memo, M–15–
14, entitled Management Oversight of
Federal Information Technology.’’
Specifically, the rule broadens the
definition of information technology to
include services such as cloud
computing and to remove an exemption
for information technology embedded in
other systems.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Date
FR Cite
06/00/18
08/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Camara Francis,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 550–0935, Email:
camara.francis@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN48
361. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2015–028,
Performance-Based Payments
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA and NASA are
proposing to amend the FAR Clause
52.232–32, Performance-Based
Payments, to include the text for
subcontract flowdown addressed at FAR
32.504(f), but not currently specified in
the clause itself. No new requirements
are added. This rule takes guidance to
prime contractors on the terms and
conditions for flowdown of
performance-based payments currently
in the FAR text and places it in the
E:\FR\FM\12JAP19.SGM
12JAP19
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 / Unified Agenda
applicable contract clause so that the
contractor can readily see what language
is to be used in subcontracts authoring
performance-based payments.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FR Cite
04/00/18
06/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Zenaida Delgado,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 969–7207, Email:
zenaida.delgado@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN49
362. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2015–004, Provisions
and Clauses for Acquisitions of
Commercial Items and Acquisitions
That Do Not Exceed the Simplified
Acquisition Threshold
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) with an
internal administrative change to
support the use of automated contract
writing systems and reduce FAR
maintenance when clauses are updated.
Currently, the FAR provides a single,
consolidated list of all provisions and
clauses applicable to the acquisition of
commercial items. When new clauses
applicable to commercial items are
added the FAR, a manual process of
cross checking and renumbering of the
list is employed to conform the FAR,
The process is cumbersome and
inefficient, and challenging to maintain,
especially for contract writing systems.
The proposed rule would propose a
change to each clause prescription and
each clause flowdown for commercial
items to specify required information
within the prescription/clause itself,
without having to cross-check another
clause, list or other parts of the FAR.
Timetable:
Action
Date
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FR Cite
04/00/18
06/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael O. Jackson,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 208–4949, Email:
michaelo.jackson@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN51
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Jan 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
363. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2017–006, Exception
From Certified Cost or Pricing Data
Requirements—Adequate Price
Competition
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: The proposed rule
implements section 822 of the NDAA
for FY 2017 (Pub. L . 114–328) to
modify the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) for DoD, NASA, and
the Coast Guard to amend the FAR to
implement exceptions from certified
cost or pricing data requirements when
price is based on adequate price
competition at FAR 15.403(c)(1). This
rule also limits the exception for price
based on adequate price competition to
circumstances in which there is
adequate competition that results in at
least two or more responsive and viable
competing bids.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FR Cite
04/00/18
06/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael O. Jackson,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 208–4949, Email:
michaelo.jackson@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN53
364. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2017–010, Evaluation
Factors for Multiple-Award Contracts
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement section 825 of the NDAA for
FY 17 (Pub. L. 114–328). Section 825
amends 10 U.S.C. 2305(a)(3) to change
the requirement regarding the
consideration of cost or price to the
Government as a factor in the evaluation
of proposals for certain multiple-award
task order contracts awarded by DoD,
NASA, or the Coast Guard. At the
Government’s discretion, solicitations
for multiple-award contracts, which
intend to award the same or similar
services to each qualifying offeror, do
not require price or cost as an
evaluation factor for the base contract
award. This will streamline the award of
contracts for DoD, NASA, and Coast
Guard because they won’t have to
consider cost or price in the evaluation
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
1955
of the award decision. Relieving the
requirement to account for cost or price
when evaluating proposals for these
types of contracts, which feature
competitive orders, will enable
procurement officials to focus their
energy on establishing and evaluating
the non-price factors that will result in
more meaningful distinctions among
offerors.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Date
FR Cite
04/00/18
06/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael O. Jackson,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 208–4949, Email:
michaelo.jackson@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN54
365. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2017–016, Controlled
Unclassified Information (CUI)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA)
Controlled Unclassified Information
(CUI) program of Executive Order 13556
of Nov 4, 2010. As the executive agent
designated to oversee the
Governmentwide CUI program, NARA
issued implementing regulations in late
2016 designed to address agency
policies for designating, safeguarding,
disseminating, marking, decontrolling
and disposing of CUI. The NARA rule
affects contractors that handle, possess,
use, share or receive CUI. The NARA
regulation is codified at 32 CFR 2002.
This FAR rule is necessary to ensure
uniform implementation of the
requirements of the CUI program in
contracts across the government,
thereby avoiding potentially
inconsistent agency-level action.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Date
FR Cite
04/00/18
06/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Camara Francis,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
E:\FR\FM\12JAP19.SGM
12JAP19
1956
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 / Unified Agenda
DC 20405, Phone: 202 550–0935, Email:
camara.francis@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN56
366. • Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2017–018, Violation of
Arms Control Treaties or Agreements
With the United States
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement section 1290(c)(3) of the
NDAA for FY 2017, which requires the
offeror to certify or any of its
subsidiaries to certify that it does not
engage in any activity that contributed
to or is a significant factor in the
determination that a country is not in
full compliance with its obligations
undertaken in all arms control,
nonproliferation, and disarmament
agreements or commitments to which
the United States is a participating state.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FR Cite
03/00/18
05/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Cecelia L. Davis,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 219–0202, Email:
cecelia.davis@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN57
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
367. • Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR 2017–020, Ombudsman for
Indefinite-Delivery Contracts
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) by
providing a new clause with contact
information for the agency task and
delivery order ombudsman as required
by FAR.). Specifically, FAR
16.504(a)(4)(v) requires that the name,
address, telephone number, facsimile
number, and email address of the
agency task and delivery order
ombudsman be included in solicitations
and contracts for an indefinite quantity
requirement, if multiple awards may be
made for uniformity and consistency.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
FR Cite
02/00/18
20:01 Jan 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
Action
Date
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FR Cite
04/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael O. Jackson,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 208–4949, Email:
michaelo.jackson@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN58
368. • Federal Regulation Acquisition
(FAR); FAR Case 2017–019, Policy on
Joint Ventures
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement regulatory changes made by
the Small Business Administration
´ ´
(SBA), Small Business Mentor Protege
Programs, published on July 25, 2016
(81 FR 48557), regarding joint ventures
and to clarify policy on 8(a) joint
ventures. The regulatory changes
provide industry with a new way to
compete for small business or
socioeconomic set-asides using a joint
venture made up of a mentor and a
´ ´
protege. The 8(a) joint venture
clarification prevents confusion on an
8(a) joint venture’s eligibility to compete
for an 8(a) competitive procurement.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
FR Cite
06/00/18
08/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Janet Fry, Program
Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA (FAR), 1800
F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405,
Phone: 703 605–3167, Email: janet.fry@
gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN59
369. • Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2018–003, Credit for
Lower-Tier Small Business
Subcontracting
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation to implement
section 1614 of the National Defense
Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2014,
as implemented in the Small Business
Administration’s final rule issued on
December 23, 2016. Section 1614 allows
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
other than small prime contractors to
receive small business subcontracting
credit for subcontracts their
subcontractors award to small
businesses.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Date
FR Cite
04/00/18
06/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Janet Fry, Program
Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA (FAR), 1800
F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405,
Phone: 703 605–3167, Email: janet.fry@
gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN61
370. • Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2018–002, Protecting
Life in Global Health Assistance
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq.
No. 136 in part II of this issue of the
Federal Register.
RIN: 9000–AN62
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE/
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION/NATIONAL
AERONAUTICS AND SPACE
ADMINISTRATION (FAR)
Final Rule Stage
371. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2013–002; Reporting
of Nonconforming Items to the
Government-Industry Data Exchange
Program
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to expand
Government and contractor
requirements for reporting of
nonconforming items. This rule
partially implements section 818 of the
National Defense Authorization Act
(NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 and
implement requirements of the Office of
Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP)
Policy Letter 91–3, entitled Reporting
Nonconforming Products,’’ dated April
9, 1991. This change will help mitigate
the growing threat that counterfeit items
pose when used in systems vital to an
agency’s mission. The primary benefit of
this rule is to reduce the risk of
counterfeit items entering the supply
chain by ensuring that contractors
report suspect items to a widely
available database. This will allow the
E:\FR\FM\12JAP19.SGM
12JAP19
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 / Unified Agenda
contracting officer to provide
disposition instructions for counterfeit
or suspect counterfeit items in
accordance with agency policy. In some
cases, agency policy may require the
contracting officer to direct the
contractor to retain such items for
investigative or evidentiary purposes.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Final Rule ............
06/10/14
08/11/14
FR Cite
79 FR 33164
06/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Camara Francis,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 550–0935, Email:
camara.francis@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AM58
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
372. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2015–015; Strategic
Sourcing Documentation
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement a section of the Carl Levin
and Howard P. ‘‘Buck’’ McKeon
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2015. This section requires
the contract file shall contain certain
documentation if the Federal
Government makes a purchase of
supplies and services offered under the
Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative
(FSSI), but the FSSI is not used. The
contract file for the purchase shall
include a brief analysis of the
comparative value, including price and
non-price factors, between the supplies
and services offered under the FSSI and
those offered under the source(s) to be
used for the purchase.
The rule will raise the visibility of
these strategic sourcing solutions, the
analysis used when not using an FSSI
contract vehicle, promote their use, and
help to better leverage the Government’s
buying power when using FSSI
vehicles. Strategic Sourcing drives both
dollar savings and process
improvements. The Federal
Government, suppliers and ultimately
the U.S. taxpayers benefit when
government can better articulate its
requirements and provide committed
purchase volumes, and in return,
industry suppliers can provide better
pricing and more valuable solutions.
Timetable:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Jan 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Final Rule ............
06/20/16
08/19/16
FR Cite
81 FR 39883
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael O. Jackson,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 208–4949, Email:
michaelo.jackson@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AM89
373. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2013–018;
Clarification of Requirement for
Justifications for 8(a) Sole Source
Contracts
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to clarify
the guidance for sole source 8(a)
contract awards exceeding $22 million.
This rule implements guidance from a
Government Accountability Office
(GAO) report entitled Federal
Contracting: Slow Start to
Implementation of Justifications for 8(a)
Sole-Source Contracts’’ (GA0–13–118,
December 2012). Sole-source
contracting regulations are statutory and
are found in section 811 of the National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2010 (Pub. L. 11184) (see 77 FR
23369). These clarifications improve the
contracting officer’s ability to comply
with the sole source contracts statutory
requirements by providing guidance,
including when justification is
necessary, how contracting officers
should comply, and when a separate
sole-source justification is necessary for
out-of-scope modifications to 8(a) solesource contracts. The GAO report
indicates that the FAR needed
additional clarification of the
justification requirement to help ensure
that agencies are applying the
requirement consistently.
Timetable:
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Final Rule ............
11/15/16
01/17/17
FR Cite
Frm 00009
03/00/18
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement regulatory changes regarding
procedures for the use of small business
partial set-asides, reserves, and orders
placed under multiple-award contracts.
This rule incorporates statutory
requirements discussed at section 1331
of the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010
(15 U.S.C. 644(r)) and the Small
Business Administration’s final rule at
78 FR 61114, dated October 2, 2013.
Multiple-award contracts, due to their
inherent flexibility, competitive nature,
and administrative efficiency, are
commonly used in Federal
procurement. They have proven to be an
effective means of contracting for large
quantities of supplies and services for
which the quantity and delivery
requirements cannot be definitively
determined at contract award. However,
prior to 2011, the FAR was largely silent
on the use of acquisition strategies to
promote small business participation in
conjunction with multiple-award
contracts. This rule increases small
business participation in Federal prime
contracts by ensuring that small
businesses have greater access to
multiple award contracts and clarifying
the procedures for partially setting aside
and reserving multiple-award contracts
for small business, and setting aside
orders placed under multiple-award
contracts for small business, thereby
ensuring that small businesses have
greater access to these commonly used
vehicles.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Final Rule ............
Date
12/06/16
02/06/17
FR Cite
81 FR 88072
03/00/18
81 FR 80012
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Mahruba Uddowla,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
PO 00000
DC 20405, Phone: 703 605–2868, Email:
mahruba.uddowla@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AM90
374. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2014–002; Set-Asides
Under Multiple Award Contracts
04/00/18
Action
1957
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Mahruba Uddowla,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 703 605–2868, Email:
mahruba.uddowla@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AM93
E:\FR\FM\12JAP19.SGM
12JAP19
1958
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 / Unified Agenda
375. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2015–017; Combating
Trafficking in Persons—Definition of
‘‘Recruitment Fees’’
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement Executive Order (E.O.)
13627, Strengthening Protections
Against Trafficking in Persons in
Federal Contracts, and title XVII of the
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2013. The rule adds a
definition of ‘‘recruitment fees’’ to FAR
subpart 22.17, Combating Trafficking in
Persons, and the associated clauses in
order to clarify how the Government
uses recruitment fees in the treatment of
this prohibited practice that has been
associated with labor trafficking under
contracts and subcontracts. The purpose
of the rule is to provide a standardized
definition that clarifies prohibited
recruitment to help fight against human
trafficking.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Final Rule ............
05/11/16
07/11/16
FR Cite
81 FR 29244
02/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Cecelia L. Davis,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 219–0202, Email:
cecelia.davis@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN02
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
376. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2016–007, NonRetaliation for Disclosure of
Compensation Information
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement Executive Order (E.O.)
13665, entitled ‘‘Non-Retaliation for
Disclosure of Compensation
Information,’’ (79 FR 20749) and the
final rule issued by the Office of Federal
Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP)
of the Department of Labor (DOL) at 80
FR 54934, entitled ‘‘Government
Contractors, Prohibitions Against Pay
Secrecy Policies and Actions.’’
This rule provides for a uniform
policy for the Federal Government to
prohibit Federal contractors from
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Jan 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
discriminating against employees and
job applicants who inquire about,
discuss, or disclose their own
compensation or the compensation of
other employees or applicants.
Timetable:
Action
Date
Interim Final Rule
Interim Final Rule
Comment Period End.
Final Rule ............
09/30/16
11/29/16
FR Cite
81 FR 67732
02/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Zenaida Delgado,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 969–7207, Email:
zenaida.delgado@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN10
377. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2015–005, System for
Award Management Registration
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
update the instructions for System for
Award Management (SAM) registration
requirements and to correct an
inconsistency with offeror
representation and certification
requirements. The language in the FAR
was not consistent in terms of whether
offerors need to register in SAM prior to
submitting an offer or prior to award of
a contract. This rule clarifies and makes
the language consistent by requiring
offerors’ registration in SAM prior to
submitting an offer. The rule does not
place any new requirements on
businesses and is considered
administrative because the only change
is when the requirement for registering
in SAM must occur. Registering in SAM
eliminates the need for potential
offerors to complete representations and
certifications multiple times a year
when responding to solicitations, which
reduces the burden on both the
contractor and the government.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Final Rule ............
05/20/16
07/19/16
FR Cite
81 FR 31895
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
378. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2015–039, Audit of
Settlement Proposals
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule to amends the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
raise the dollar threshold requirement
for the audit of prime contract
settlement proposals and subcontract
settlements from $100,000 to the Truth
In Negotiation Act (TINA) threshold of
$750,000 to help alleviate the backlog of
contract close-outs and to enable
contracting officers to more quickly
deobligate excess funds from terminated
contracts.
Timetable:
Action
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Final Rule ............
Date
09/14/16
11/14/16
FR Cite
81 FR 63158
02/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Camara Francis,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 550–0935, Email:
camara.francis@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN26
379. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2017–001, Paid Sick
Leave for Federal Contractors
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) requiring
Federal Government contractors to
ensure that employees on those
contracts can earn up to seven days or
more of paid sick leave annually,
including paid sick leave for family
care. This rule implements the objective
of Executive Order 13706, Establishing
Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors
and Department of Labor’s final rule (81
FR 91627).
Timetable:
Action
02/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Curtis E. Glover Sr.,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
PO 00000
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 501–1448, Email:
curtis.glover@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN19
Interim Final Rule
Interim Final Rule
Effective.
Interim Final Rule
Comment Period End.
E:\FR\FM\12JAP19.SGM
12JAP19
Date
12/16/16
01/01/17
02/14/17
FR Cite
81 FR 91627
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 / Unified Agenda
Action
Date
Final Rule ............
FR Cite
02/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Zenaida Delgado,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 969–7207, Email:
zenaida.delgado@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN27
380. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2015–033, Sustainable
Acquisition
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA and NASA are
issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
add a new definition for sustainable
products and services and update
several existing definitions germane to
sustainable acquisition. This rule will
also provide two new websites to help
contractors understand the sustainable
acquisition requirements and gain
access to a listing of sustainable
products and services as determined by
the Federal Government. The rule
implements Executive Order 13693,
Planning for Federal Sustainability in
the Next Decade (supersedes Executive
Orders 13423 and 13514), and the
biobased product acquisition provisions
of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (also
known as the 2014 Farm Bill).
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Final Rule ............
01/18/17
03/20/17
FR Cite
82 FR 5490
04/00/18
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Charles Gray,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 703 795–6328, Email:
chuck.gray@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN28
381. Federal Acquisition Regulation:
FAR Case 2016–005; Effective
Communication Between Government
and Industry
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA and NASA are
issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement section 887 of the NDAA for
FY 2016 (Pub. L. 114–92). This law
provides that agency acquisition
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Jan 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
personnel are permitted and encouraged
to engage in responsible and
constructive exchanges with industry.
This change will permit and encourage
government acquisition personnel to
engage in responsible and constructive
exchanges with industry as part of
market research as long as those
exchanges are consistent with existing
laws, regulations, and promote a fair
competitive environment.
Timetable:
Action
Date
NPRM ..................
NPRM Comment
Period End.
Final Rule ............
11/29/16
03/02/17
FR Cite
81 FR 85914
04/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael O. Jackson,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 208–4949, Email:
michaelo.jackson@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN29
382. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2016–011, (S)
Revision of Limitations on
Subcontracting
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
revise and standardize the limitations
on subcontracting (LOS), including the
nonmanufacturer rule (NMR), which
apply to small business concerns under
FAR part 19 procurements. This FAR
change incorporates SBA’s final rule at
81 FR 34243, which implemented the
statutory requirements of section 1651
of the National Defense Authorization
Act for Fiscal Year 2013. This action is
necessary to meet the Congressional
intent of clarifying the limitations on
subcontracting with which small
businesses must comply, as well as the
ways in which they can comply. The
rule will benefits small businesses and
agencies. Prompt implementation of this
rule will allow small businesses to take
advantage of subcontracts with similarly
situated entities. As a result, these small
businesses will be able to compete for
larger contracts, which would positively
affect their potential for growth as well
as that of their potential subcontractors.
Timetable:
Action
Date
Interim Final Rule
PO 00000
Frm 00011
01/00/18
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
FR Cite
Action
Interim Final Rule
Comment Period End.
Date
1959
FR Cite
03/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Mahruba Uddowla,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 703 605–2868, Email:
mahruba.uddowla@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN35
383. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2017–004, Rate
Adjustment of Liquidated Damages
E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or
Partially Exempt.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
adjust the civil monetary penalties for
inflation pursuant to the Inflation
Adjustment Act Improvements Act. This
Act requires agencies to adjust the levels
of civil monetary penalties with an
initial catch-up adjustment, followed by
the annual adjustment for inflation.
This rule implements the Department
of Labor (DOL) interim final rule
published in the Federal Register at 81
FR 43430 on July 1, 2016, finalized at
82 FR 5373 on January 18, 2017. The
DOL rule adjusted the civil monetary
penalties for inflation pursuant to the
Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act of 1990 as amended by
the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation
Adjustment Act Improvements Act of
2015 (Sec. 701 of Pub. L. 114–74).
Timetable:
Action
Interim Final Rule
Date
FR Cite
01/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Zenaida Delgado,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 969–7207, Email:
zenaida.delgado@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN37
384. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2017–007, Task– and
Delivery–Order Protests
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
raise the threshold for task- and
delivery-order protests from $10 million
E:\FR\FM\12JAP19.SGM
12JAP19
1960
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 / Unified Agenda
to $25 million for DoD and make
permanent the General Accountability
Office’s authority to hear protests on
civilian task or delivery contracts
valued in excess of $10 million. The
rule implements sections 835 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for
FY 2017 (Pub. L. 114–328) and Public
Law 114–260 835(a).
Timetable:
Action
Date
Final Rule ............
FR Cite
02/00/18
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Charles Gray,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 703 795–6328, Email:
chuck.gray@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN41
385. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2017–009, Special
Emergency Procurement Authority
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to
implement sections 816 and 1641 of the
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2017 (Pub. L. 114–328).
Section 816 adds international disaster
assistance under the Foreign Assistance
Act of 1961 and emergency or disaster
under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act.
Section 1641 adds special emergency
procurement authority to facilitate
defense against or recovery from a
cyber-attack. Adding these authorities
enables a more effective and immediate
response to emergency or major
disasters, cyber attacks, and
international disasters. For example,
certain authorities would be available to
the contracting officer based on agency
procedures, the micropurchase
threshold may be increased to $20,000
for any contract to be awarded and
performed, or purchase to be made in
support of the designated areas; and the
simplified acquisition threshold (SAT)
may be increased to $750,000, or
$13,000,000 for commercial items, for
any contract to be awarded and
performed, or purchased in support of
the designated areas.
Timetable:
Action
Date
Interim Final Rule
FR Cite
02/00/18
Agency Contact: Camara Francis,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 550–0935, Email:
camara.francis@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN45
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE/
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION/NATIONAL
AERONAUTICS AND SPACE
ADMINISTRATION (FAR)
386. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2017–012, Increased
Micro-Purchase Threshold for Certain
Procurement Activities
387. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2015–031, Policy on
8(A) Joint Ventures
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are
issuing a final rule to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to update
the definition of micro-purchase
threshold’’ in FAR 2.101 to implement
the higher micro-purchase threshold
provided by section 217(b) of the NDAA
for FY 2017 (Pub. L. 114–328).
Specifically, section 217(b) amends 41
U.S.C. 1902 to increase the micropurchase threshold for acquisitions from
institutions of higher education or
related or affiliated nonprofit entities, or
from nonprofit research organizations or
independent research institutes, to
$10,000, or a higher amount as
determined appropriate by the head of
the relevant executive agency and
consistent with clean audit findings
under 31 U.S.C. chapter 75, an internal
institutional risk assessment, or state
law. As a result of this rule, affected
contractors will no longer receive a
written request for quote (RFQ) and/or
a Government purchase order for
requirements valued between $3,501
and $10,000. Instead, the order can be
placed online, by phone, in person, or
by fax via the Government purchase
card (GPC). Therefore, the contractor
will no longer be required to read the
RFQ and/or purchase order for various
Government-provided information.
Timetable:
Action
Date
Interim Final Rule
03/00/18
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael O. Jackson,
Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
DC 20405, Phone: 202 208–4949, Email:
michaelo.jackson@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN50
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Jan 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
FR Cite
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Completed Actions
E.O. 13771 Designation:
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: This case has been merged
into FAR Case 2017–019.
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing
to amend the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) to be consistent with
the guidance in SBA regulations at 13
CFR 124 8(A) Business Development/
Small Disadvantaged Business Status
Determinations (77 FR 28237). These
clarifications are expected to relieve
burden on both industry and
government by reducing the number of
protests related to inappropriate
elimination from competition of offers
from 8(a) joint ventures and
inappropriate awards to ineligible 8(a)
joint ventures. This will reduce the risk
for fraud by clarifying the role of SBA
as the authority for making eligibility
determination. The rule is also expected
to facilitate competition by clarifying
the circumstances under which a joint
venture is eligible for award under the
8(a) program.
Completed:
Reason
Merged With Policy on Joint
Ventures
(2017–019).
Date
FR Cite
09/12/17
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Mahruba Uddowla,
Phone: 703 605–2868, Email:
mahruba.uddowla@gsa.gov.
RIN: 9000–AN33
388. Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR); FAR Case 2017–015, Removal of
Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Rule
E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10
U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA and NASA plan
to issue a final rule to repeal the
implementation of Executive Order
13673 on Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces
since Executive Order 13673 was
officially nullified on March 27, 2017
(see Pub. L. 115–11). Additionally,
Executive Order 13782 of March 30,
2017, revoked Executive Order 13673,
section 3 of Executive Order 13683 of
E:\FR\FM\12JAP19.SGM
12JAP19
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 / Unified Agenda
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
December 11, 2014, and Executive
Order 13738 of August 23, 2016. This
action was made to have no force or
effect by an enacted joint resolution of
disapproval under the Congressional
Review Act, H.J. Res.37 (Pub. L. 115–
11).
Completed:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:01 Jan 11, 2018
Jkt 244001
Reason
Date
Final Rule, CRA
Revocation.
11/06/17
FR Cite
82 FR 51773
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Required: Yes.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
1961
Agency Contact: Zenaida Delgado,
Phone: 202 969–7207, Email:
zenaida.delgado@gsa.gov/.
RIN: 9000–AN52
[FR Doc. 2017–28242 Filed 1–11–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
E:\FR\FM\12JAP19.SGM
12JAP19
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 9 (Friday, January 12, 2018)]
[Unknown Section]
[Pages 1950-1961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28242]
[[Page 1949]]
Vol. 83
Friday,
No. 9
January 12, 2018
Part XIX
Department of Defense
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
General Services Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda
Federal Register / Vol. 83 , No. 9 / Friday, January 12, 2018 /
Unified Agenda
[[Page 1950]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Ch. 1
Semiannual Regulatory Agenda
AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Semiannual regulatory agenda.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This agenda provides summary descriptions of regulations being
developed by the Civilian Agency Acquisition Council and the Defense
Acquisition Regulations Council pursuant to Executive Order 12866
``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' 58 FR 51735 (1993), with particular
adherence to EO 13771, ``Reducing Regulation and Controlling Costs,''
82 FR 9339 (2017), EO 13777, ``Enforcing the Regulatory Reform
Agenda,'' 82 FR 12285, and the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
to 612. The purpose of publishing this agenda is to give notice of
regulatory activity being undertaken by FAR Council in order to provide
the public an opportunity to participate in the rulemaking process.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lois Mandell, Division Director,
Regulatory Secretariat Division, 1800 F Street NW, 2nd Floor,
Washington, DC 20405-0001, 202-501-2735.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: DoD, GSA, and NASA, under the Office of
Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) Act (41 U.S.C. 1303) and the
agencies' several statutory authorities, jointly issue and maintain the
FAR through periodic issuance of changes published in the Federal
Register and produced electronically as Federal Acquisition Circulars
(FACs).
The electronic version of the FAR, including changes, can be
accessed on the FAR website at https://www.acquisition.gov/far.
The information provided in the Unified Agenda (Agenda) previews
the rulemaking activities that we expect to undertake in the immediate
future. The Agenda focuses primarily on those actions expected to
result in publication of Advanced Notices of Proposed Rulemaking,
Notices of Proposed Rulemaking, or Final Rules within the next 12
months.
A fully searchable e-Agenda is available for viewing in its
entirety at www.reginfo.gov. Agenda information is also available at
www.regulations.gov, the government-wide website for submission of
comments on proposed regulations. Our fall 2017 agenda follows.
Dated: November 29, 2017.
William F. Clark,
Director, Office of Government-wide, Acquisition Policy, Office of
Acquisition Policy, Office of Government-wide Policy.
DOD/GSA/NASA (FAR)--Prerule Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
348....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN43
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2017-014, Use of
Acquisition 360 to
Encourage Vendor Feedback.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOD/GSA/NASA (FAR)--Proposed Rule Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
349....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AM94
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2015-021;
Determination of Fair and
Reasonable Prices on
Orders Under Multiple
Award Contracts.
350....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN03
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2015-014;
Prohibition on Providing
Funds to the Enemy.
351....................... FAR Acquisition Regulation 9000-AN31
(FAR); FAR Case 2015-038,
Reverse Auction Guidance.
352....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN32
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2017-005,
Whistleblower Protection
for Contractor Employees.
353....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN34
Regulation; FAR Case 2016-
002, Applicability of
Small Business
Regulations Outside the
United States.
354....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN38
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2016-013, Tax on
Certain Foreign
Procurement.
355....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN39
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2017-003; Individual
Sureties.
356....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN40
Regulations (FAR); FAR
Case 2015-002,
Requirements for DD Form
254, Contract Security
Classification
Specification.
357....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN44
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2017-013, Breaches
of Personally
Identifiable Information.
358....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN46
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2017-011, Section
508-Based Standards in
Information and
Communication Technology.
359....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN47
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2016-012,
Incremental Funding of
Fixed-Price Contracting
Actions.
360....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN48
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2015-037, Definition
of ``Information
Technology''.
361....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN49
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2015-028,
Performance-Based
Payments.
362....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN51
Regulation (FAR); Far
Case 2015-004, Provisions
and Clauses for
Acquisitions of
Commercial Items and
Acquisitions That do not
Exceed the Simplified
Acquisition Threshold.
363....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN53
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2017-006, Exception
From Certified Cost or
Pricing Data Requirements-
Adequate Price
Competition.
364....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN54
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2017-010, Evaluation
Factors for Multiple-
Award Contracts.
365....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN56
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2017-016, Controlled
Unclassified Information
(CUI).
366....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN57
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2017-018, Violation
of Arms Control Treaties
or Agreements with the
United States.
367....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN58
Regulation (FAR); FAR
2017-020, Ombudsman for
Indefinite-Delivery
Contracts.
368....................... Federal Regulation 9000-AN59
Acquisition (FAR); FAR
Case 2017-019, Policy on
Joint Ventures.
[[Page 1951]]
369....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN61
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2018-003, Credit for
Lower-Tier Small Business
Subcontracting.
370....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN62
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2018-002, Protecting
Life in Global Health
Assistance (Reg Plan Seq
No. 136).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
References in boldface appear in The Regulatory Plan in part II of this
issue of the Federal Register.
DOD/GSA/NASA (FAR)--Final Rule Stage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
371....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AM58
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2013-002; Reporting
of Nonconforming Items to
the Government-Industry
Data Exchange Program.
372....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AM89
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2015-015; Strategic
Sourcing Documentation.
373....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AM90
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2013-018;
Clarification of
Requirement for
Justifications for 8(a)
Sole Source Contracts.
374....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AM93
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2014-002; Set-Asides
Under Multiple Award
Contracts.
375....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN02
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2015-017; Combating
Trafficking in Persons--
Definition of
``Recruitment Fees''.
376....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN10
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2016-007, Non-
Retaliation for
Disclosure of
Compensation Information.
377....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN19
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2015-005, System for
Award Management
Registration.
378....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN26
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2015-039, Audit of
Settlement Proposals.
379....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN27
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2017-001, Paid Sick
Leave for Federal
Contractors.
380....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN28
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2015-033,
Sustainable Acquisition.
381....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN29
Regulation: FAR Case 2016-
005; Effective
Communication Between
Government and Industry.
382....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN35
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2016-011, (S)
Revision of Limitations
on Subcontracting.
383....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN37
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2017-004, Rate
Adjustment of Liquidated
Damages.
384....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN41
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2017-007, Task- and
Delivery-Order Protests.
385....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN45
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2017-009, Special
Emergency Procurement
Authority.
386....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN50
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2017-012, Increased
Micro-Purchase Threshold
for Certain Procurement
Activities.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DOD/GSA/NASA (FAR)--Completed Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation
Sequence No. Title Identifier No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
387....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN33
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2015-031, Policy on
8(a) Joint Ventures.
388....................... Federal Acquisition 9000-AN52
Regulation (FAR); FAR
Case 2017-015, Removal of
Fair Pay and Safe
Workplaces Rule.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE/GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION/NATIONAL
AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (FAR)
Prerule Stage
348. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017-014, Use of
Acquisition 360 To Encourage Vendor Feedback
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to address the solicitation of contractor
feedback on both contract formation and contract administration
activities. Agencies would consider this feedback, as appropriate, to
improve the efficiency and effectiveness of their acquisition
activities. The rule would create FAR policy to encourage regular
feedback in accordance with agency practice (both on contract formation
and administration activities) and a standard FAR solicitation
provision to support a sustainable model for broadened use of
Acquisition 360 survey to elicit feedback on the pre-award and
debriefing processes in a consistent and standardized manner. Agencies
would be able to use the solicitation provision to notify interested
sources that a procurement is part of the Acquisition 360 survey and
encourage stakeholders to voluntarily provide feedback on their
experiences on the pre-award process.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANPRM............................... 04/00/18
ANPRM Comment Period End............ 06/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Curtis E. Glover Sr., Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/
NASA (FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 501-
1448, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN43
[[Page 1952]]
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE/GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION/NATIONAL
AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (FAR)
Proposed Rule Stage
349. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015-021;
Determination of Fair and Reasonable Prices on Orders Under Multiple
Award Contracts
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to direct ordering activity contracting
officers to make a determination of fair and reasonable pricing when
placing an order against using GSA's Federal Supply Schedules (FSS).
The Federal Acquisition Streamlining Act (FASA) of 1994 established a
preference for the types of information used to assess price
reasonableness.
This rule establishes a practice that will ensure that prices are
fair and reasonable at the time the order is placed under the GSA's
Federal Supply Schedules. This government-wide FAR rule will ensure
uniform implementation of this FAR change across FAR-based contracts
and avoid the proliferation of agency-wide rules and actions (e.g.
revisions to FAR supplements or issuance of policy guidance)
implementing this requirement.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 05/00/18
NPRM Comment Period End............. 07/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Curtis E. Glover Sr., Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/
NASA (FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 501-
1448, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AM94
350. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015-014;
Prohibition on Providing Funds to the Enemy
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement subtitle E of title VIII of
the Carl Levin and Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2015, which prohibits the
Government from providing funds to the enemy. The Act requires the
Secretary of Defense to notify executive agencies of persons or
entities providing funds under certain contracts to persons or entities
that are actively opposing the United States or coalition forces where
the Armed Forces are actively engaged in a contingency operation; or
has failed to exercise due diligence to ensure that none of the funds
under certain contracts are provided to those persons or entities.
After receiving such notification, the executive agency's Head of the
Contracting Activity (HCA) may rescind, void the contract or terminate
for default. The HCA's decision is entered into the Federal Awardee
Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), or other formal
system of records. Since, review of FAPIIS is required before making
certain award decision, this rule helps to prevent the flow of funds to
such persons or entities. The statute does not apply to contracts that
are equal to or less than $50,000, and contracts performed inside the
United States or its outlying areas, or contracts subject to a national
security exception.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 02/00/18
NPRM Comment Period End............. 04/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Cecelia L. Davis, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 219-0202,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN03
351. FAR Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015-038, Reverse
Auction Guidance
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement policies addressing the
effective use of reverse auctions. Reverse auctions involve offerors
lowering their pricing over rounds of bidding in order to win federal
contracts. This change incorporates guidance from the Office of Federal
Procurement Policy (OFPP) memorandum, ``Effective Use of Reverse
Auctions,'' which was issued in response to recommendations from the
GAO report, Reverse Auctions: Guidance is Needed to Maximize
Competition and Achieve Cost Savings (GAO-14-108). Reverse auctions are
one tool used by federal agencies to increase competition and reduce
the cost of certain items. Reverse auctions differ from traditional
auctions in that sellers compete against one another to provide the
lowest price or highest-value offer to a buyer. This change to the FAR
will include guidance that will standardize agencies' use of reverse
auctions help agencies maximize competition and savings when using
reverse auctions.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 02/00/18
NPRM Comment Period End............. 04/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Curtis E. Glover Sr., Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/
NASA (FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 501-
1448, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN31
352. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017-005,
Whistleblower Protection for Contractor Employees
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement 41 U.S.C. 4712, Enhancement
of contractor protection from reprisal for disclosure of certain
information and makes the pilot program permanent. The pilot was
enacted on January 2, 2013, by section 828 of the National Defense
Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013. The rule makes
clear that contractors and subcontractors are prohibited from
discharging, demoting, or otherwise discriminating against an employee
as a reprisal for disclosing, to any of the entities such as agency
Inspector Generals and Congress, information the employee reasonably
believes is evidence of gross mismanagement of a Federal contract; a
gross waste of Federal funds; an abuse of authority relating to a
Federal contract; a substantial and specific danger to public health or
safety; or violation of law, rule, or regulation related to a Federal
contract (including the competition for or negotiation of a contract.
This rule enhances
[[Page 1953]]
whistleblower protections for contractor employees, by making permanent
the protection for disclosure of the aforementioned information, and
ensuring that the prohibition on reimbursement for legal fees accrued
in defense against reprisal claims applies to subcontractors, as well
as contractors.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 03/00/18
NPRM Comment Period End............. 05/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Cecelia L. Davis, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 219-0202,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN32
353. Federal Acquisition Regulation; FAR Case 2016-002, Applicability
of Small Business Regulations Outside the United States
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) consistent with SBA's regulation at 13 CFR
125.2 as finalized in their rule Acquisition Process: Task and Delivery
Order Contracts, Bundling, Consolidation'' issued on October 2, 2013,
to clarify that overseas contracting is not excluded from agency
responsibilities to foster small business participation (78 FR 61113).
In its final rule, SBA has clarified that, as a general matter, its
small business contracting regulations apply regardless of the place of
performance. In light of these changes, there is a need to amend the
FAR both to bring its coverage into alignment with SBA's regulation and
to give agencies the tools they need especially the ability to use set-
asides to maximize opportunities for small businesses overseas.
SBA intends to include contracts performed outside of the United
States in agencies' prime contracting goals beginning in FY 2016.
Although inclusion for goaling purposes is not dependent on FAR
changes, amending FAR part 19 will allow agencies to take advantage of
the tools authorized for providing small business opportunities for
contracts awarded outside of the United States.
This rule will allow agencies to take advantage of the tools
authorized for providing small business opportunities for contracts
awarded outside of the United States. This will make it easier for
small businesses to receive additional opportunities for contracts
performed outside of the United States.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 02/00/18
NPRM Comment Period End............. 04/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Mahruba Uddowla, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 703 605-2868,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN34
354. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2016-013, Tax on
Certain Foreign Procurement
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 37; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement a final rule issued by the
Department of the Treasury (published at 81 FR 55133) that implements
section 301 of the James Zadroga 9/11 Health and Compensation Act of
2010, Public Law 111347. This section imposes on any foreign person
that receives a specified Federal procurement payment a tax equal to
two percent of the amount such payment. This rule applies to Federal
Government contracts for goods or services that are awarded to foreign
persons.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 04/00/18
NPRM Comment Period End............. 06/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Zenaida Delgado, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405. Phone: 202 969-7207,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN38
355. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017-003;
Individual Sureties
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. 137; 51 U.S.C. 20113
Abstract: DoD,GSA, and NASA are is proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to change the kinds of assets that
individual sureties must use as security for their individual surety
bonds. This change will implement section 874 of the NDAA for FY 2016
(Pub. L. 114-92), codified at 31 U.S.C. 9310, Individual Sureties.
Individual sureties will no longer be able to pledge real property,
corporate stocks, corporate bonds, or irrevocable letters of credit.
The requirements of 31 U.S.C. 9310 are intended to strengthen the
assets pledged by individual sureties, thereby mitigating risk to the
Government.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 04/00/18
NPRM Comment Period End............. 06/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Zenaida Delgado, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 969-7207,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN39
356. Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR); FAR Case 2015-002,
Requirements for DD FORM 254, Contract Security Classification
Specification
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to require the use of Department of
Defense (DoD) Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) for the electronic submission
of the DD Form 254, Contract Security Classification Specification.
This form is used to convey security requirements regarding classified
information to contractors and subcontractors and must be submitted to
the Defense Security Services (DSS) when contractors or subcontractors
require access to classified information under contracts awarded by
agencies covered by the National Industrial Security Program (NISP). By
changing the submittal process of the form from a manual process to an
automated one, the government will reduce the cost of maintaining the
forms, while also providing a centralized repository for classified
contract security requirements and supporting data.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 03/00/18
NPRM Comment Period End............. 05/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 1954]]
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Curtis E. Glover Sr., Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/
NASA (FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 501-
1448, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN40
357. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017-013, Breaches
of Personally Identifiable Information
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to create and implement appropriate
contract clauses and regulatory coverage to address contractor
requirements for breach response consistent with the requirements. This
FAR change will implement the requirements outlined in Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) Memorandum, M-17-12 ``Preparing for and
Responding to a Breach of Personally Identifiable Information'' section
V part B.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 03/00/18
NPRM Comment Period End............. 05/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Camara Francis, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 550-0935,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN44
358. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017-011, Section
508-Based Standards in Information and Communication Technology
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to incorporate revisions and updates to
standards in section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, developed
by the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (also
referred to as the ``Access Board''). This FAR change incorporates the
U.S. Access Board's final rule, Information and Communication
Technology (ICT) Standards and Guidelines, published on January 18,
2017 , which implemented revisions and updates to the section 508-based
standards and section 255-based guidelines. This rule is expected to
impose additional costs on federal agencies. The purpose is to increase
productivity for federal employees with disabilities, time savings due
to improved accessibility of federal websites for members of the public
with disabilities, and reduced call volumes to federal agencies.
Additionally, this rule harmonizes standards with national and
international consensus standards which would assist American ICT
companies by helping to achieve economies of scale created by wider use
of these technical standards.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 02/00/18
NPRM Comment Period End............. 04/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Camara Francis, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 550-0935,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN46
359. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2016-012,
Incremental Funding of Fixed-Price Contracting Actions
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to allow for incrementally funding of
certain fixed-price contracting action to help minimize disruptions to
agency operations, and provide Federal acquisition professionals with
new funding flexibility for fixed-price contracting actions. The FAR
addresses incremental funding on cost reimbursement contracts, however,
does not provide coverage on fixed price contracts. Because the FAR is
silent on the incremental funding of fixed-price contracts, contracting
professionals endorse the full funding of fixed-price contracts as a
best practice, however, in many cases full funding is not possible.
Implementing this policy will provide the flexibility sought by several
agencies. Although individual agencies have implemented policy changes
for themselves, making this change to the FAR will provide consistency
across Government agencies, from both policy and procedural
perspectives.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 02/00/18
NPRM Comment Period End............. 04/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Camara Francis, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 550-0935,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN47
360. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015-037,
Definition of ``Information Technology''
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to update the definition of ``information
technology,'' as directed in the Office of Management and Budget Memo,
M-15-14, entitled Management Oversight of Federal Information
Technology.'' Specifically, the rule broadens the definition of
information technology to include services such as cloud computing and
to remove an exemption for information technology embedded in other
systems.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 06/00/18
NPRM Comment Period End............. 08/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Camara Francis, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 550-0935,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN48
361. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015-028,
Performance-Based Payments
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA and NASA are proposing to amend the FAR Clause
52.232-32, Performance-Based Payments, to include the text for
subcontract flowdown addressed at FAR 32.504(f), but not currently
specified in the clause itself. No new requirements are added. This
rule takes guidance to prime contractors on the terms and conditions
for flowdown of performance-based payments currently in the FAR text
and places it in the
[[Page 1955]]
applicable contract clause so that the contractor can readily see what
language is to be used in subcontracts authoring performance-based
payments.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 04/00/18
NPRM Comment Period End............. 06/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Zenaida Delgado, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 969-7207,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN49
362. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015-004,
Provisions and Clauses for Acquisitions of Commercial Items and
Acquisitions That Do Not Exceed the Simplified Acquisition Threshold
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: Not Yet Determined
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) with an internal administrative change to
support the use of automated contract writing systems and reduce FAR
maintenance when clauses are updated. Currently, the FAR provides a
single, consolidated list of all provisions and clauses applicable to
the acquisition of commercial items. When new clauses applicable to
commercial items are added the FAR, a manual process of cross checking
and renumbering of the list is employed to conform the FAR, The process
is cumbersome and inefficient, and challenging to maintain, especially
for contract writing systems. The proposed rule would propose a change
to each clause prescription and each clause flowdown for commercial
items to specify required information within the prescription/clause
itself, without having to cross-check another clause, list or other
parts of the FAR.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 04/00/18
NPRM Comment Period End............. 06/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael O. Jackson, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/
NASA (FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 208-
4949, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN51
363. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017-006, Exception
From Certified Cost or Pricing Data Requirements--Adequate Price
Competition
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: The proposed rule implements section 822 of the NDAA for
FY 2017 (Pub. L . 114-328) to modify the Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR) for DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard to amend the FAR to implement
exceptions from certified cost or pricing data requirements when price
is based on adequate price competition at FAR 15.403(c)(1). This rule
also limits the exception for price based on adequate price competition
to circumstances in which there is adequate competition that results in
at least two or more responsive and viable competing bids.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 04/00/18
NPRM Comment Period End............. 06/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael O. Jackson, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/
NASA (FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 208-
4949, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN53
364. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017-010,
Evaluation Factors for Multiple-Award Contracts
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement section 825 of the NDAA for
FY 17 (Pub. L. 114-328). Section 825 amends 10 U.S.C. 2305(a)(3) to
change the requirement regarding the consideration of cost or price to
the Government as a factor in the evaluation of proposals for certain
multiple-award task order contracts awarded by DoD, NASA, or the Coast
Guard. At the Government's discretion, solicitations for multiple-award
contracts, which intend to award the same or similar services to each
qualifying offeror, do not require price or cost as an evaluation
factor for the base contract award. This will streamline the award of
contracts for DoD, NASA, and Coast Guard because they won't have to
consider cost or price in the evaluation of the award decision.
Relieving the requirement to account for cost or price when evaluating
proposals for these types of contracts, which feature competitive
orders, will enable procurement officials to focus their energy on
establishing and evaluating the non-price factors that will result in
more meaningful distinctions among offerors.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 04/00/18
NPRM Comment Period End............. 06/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael O. Jackson, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/
NASA (FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 208-
4949, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN54
365. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017-016,
Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA) Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)
program of Executive Order 13556 of Nov 4, 2010. As the executive agent
designated to oversee the Governmentwide CUI program, NARA issued
implementing regulations in late 2016 designed to address agency
policies for designating, safeguarding, disseminating, marking,
decontrolling and disposing of CUI. The NARA rule affects contractors
that handle, possess, use, share or receive CUI. The NARA regulation is
codified at 32 CFR 2002. This FAR rule is necessary to ensure uniform
implementation of the requirements of the CUI program in contracts
across the government, thereby avoiding potentially inconsistent
agency-level action.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 04/00/18
NPRM Comment Period End............. 06/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Camara Francis, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington,
[[Page 1956]]
DC 20405, Phone: 202 550-0935, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN56
366. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017-018,
Violation of Arms Control Treaties or Agreements With the United States
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement section 1290(c)(3) of the
NDAA for FY 2017, which requires the offeror to certify or any of its
subsidiaries to certify that it does not engage in any activity that
contributed to or is a significant factor in the determination that a
country is not in full compliance with its obligations undertaken in
all arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament agreements or
commitments to which the United States is a participating state.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 03/00/18
NPRM Comment Period End............. 05/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Cecelia L. Davis, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 219-0202,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN57
367. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR 2017-020,
Ombudsman for Indefinite-Delivery Contracts
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) by providing a new clause with contact
information for the agency task and delivery order ombudsman as
required by FAR.). Specifically, FAR 16.504(a)(4)(v) requires that the
name, address, telephone number, facsimile number, and email address of
the agency task and delivery order ombudsman be included in
solicitations and contracts for an indefinite quantity requirement, if
multiple awards may be made for uniformity and consistency.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 02/00/18
NPRM Comment Period End............. 04/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael O. Jackson, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/
NASA (FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 208-
4949, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN58
368. Federal Regulation Acquisition (FAR); FAR Case 2017-019,
Policy on Joint Ventures
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement regulatory changes made by
the Small Business Administration (SBA), Small Business Mentor
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Programs, published on July 25, 2016 (81 FR
48557), regarding joint ventures and to clarify policy on 8(a) joint
ventures. The regulatory changes provide industry with a new way to
compete for small business or socioeconomic set-asides using a joint
venture made up of a mentor and a prot[eacute]g[eacute]. The 8(a) joint
venture clarification prevents confusion on an 8(a) joint venture's
eligibility to compete for an 8(a) competitive procurement.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 06/00/18
NPRM Comment Period End............. 08/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Janet Fry, Program Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA (FAR),
1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 703 605-3167, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN59
369. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2018-003,
Credit for Lower-Tier Small Business Subcontracting
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal
Acquisition Regulation to implement section 1614 of the National
Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2014, as implemented in the
Small Business Administration's final rule issued on December 23, 2016.
Section 1614 allows other than small prime contractors to receive small
business subcontracting credit for subcontracts their subcontractors
award to small businesses.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 04/00/18
NPRM Comment Period End............. 06/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Janet Fry, Program Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA (FAR),
1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 703 605-3167, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN61
370. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2018-002,
Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance
Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No. 136 in part II of this
issue of the Federal Register.
RIN: 9000-AN62
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE/GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION/NATIONAL
AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (FAR)
Final Rule Stage
371. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2013-002; Reporting
of Nonconforming Items to the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program
E.O. 13771 Designation: Regulatory.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing a final rule to amend the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to expand Government and
contractor requirements for reporting of nonconforming items. This rule
partially implements section 818 of the National Defense Authorization
Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year (FY) 2012 and implement requirements of the
Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) Policy Letter 91-3,
entitled Reporting Nonconforming Products,'' dated April 9, 1991. This
change will help mitigate the growing threat that counterfeit items
pose when used in systems vital to an agency's mission. The primary
benefit of this rule is to reduce the risk of counterfeit items
entering the supply chain by ensuring that contractors report suspect
items to a widely available database. This will allow the
[[Page 1957]]
contracting officer to provide disposition instructions for counterfeit
or suspect counterfeit items in accordance with agency policy. In some
cases, agency policy may require the contracting officer to direct the
contractor to retain such items for investigative or evidentiary
purposes.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 06/10/14 79 FR 33164
NPRM Comment Period End............. 08/11/14
Final Rule.......................... 06/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Camara Francis, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 550-0935,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AM58
372. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015-015; Strategic
Sourcing Documentation
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement a section of the Carl
Levin and Howard P. ``Buck'' McKeon National Defense Authorization Act
for Fiscal Year 2015. This section requires the contract file shall
contain certain documentation if the Federal Government makes a
purchase of supplies and services offered under the Federal Strategic
Sourcing Initiative (FSSI), but the FSSI is not used. The contract file
for the purchase shall include a brief analysis of the comparative
value, including price and non-price factors, between the supplies and
services offered under the FSSI and those offered under the source(s)
to be used for the purchase.
The rule will raise the visibility of these strategic sourcing
solutions, the analysis used when not using an FSSI contract vehicle,
promote their use, and help to better leverage the Government's buying
power when using FSSI vehicles. Strategic Sourcing drives both dollar
savings and process improvements. The Federal Government, suppliers and
ultimately the U.S. taxpayers benefit when government can better
articulate its requirements and provide committed purchase volumes, and
in return, industry suppliers can provide better pricing and more
valuable solutions.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 06/20/16 81 FR 39883
NPRM Comment Period End............. 08/19/16
Final Rule.......................... 04/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael O. Jackson, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/
NASA (FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 208-
4949, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AM89
373. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2013-018;
Clarification of Requirement for Justifications for 8(a) Sole Source
Contracts
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing a final rule to amend the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to clarify the guidance for sole
source 8(a) contract awards exceeding $22 million. This rule implements
guidance from a Government Accountability Office (GAO) report entitled
Federal Contracting: Slow Start to Implementation of Justifications for
8(a) Sole-Source Contracts'' (GA0-13-118, December 2012). Sole-source
contracting regulations are statutory and are found in section 811 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (Pub. L.
11184) (see 77 FR 23369). These clarifications improve the contracting
officer's ability to comply with the sole source contracts statutory
requirements by providing guidance, including when justification is
necessary, how contracting officers should comply, and when a separate
sole-source justification is necessary for out-of-scope modifications
to 8(a) sole-source contracts. The GAO report indicates that the FAR
needed additional clarification of the justification requirement to
help ensure that agencies are applying the requirement consistently.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 11/15/16 81 FR 80012
NPRM Comment Period End............. 01/17/17
Final Rule.......................... 03/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Mahruba Uddowla, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 703 605-2868,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AM90
374. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2014-002; Set-
Asides Under Multiple Award Contracts
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement regulatory changes
regarding procedures for the use of small business partial set-asides,
reserves, and orders placed under multiple-award contracts. This rule
incorporates statutory requirements discussed at section 1331 of the
Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (15 U.S.C. 644(r)) and the Small
Business Administration's final rule at 78 FR 61114, dated October 2,
2013.
Multiple-award contracts, due to their inherent flexibility,
competitive nature, and administrative efficiency, are commonly used in
Federal procurement. They have proven to be an effective means of
contracting for large quantities of supplies and services for which the
quantity and delivery requirements cannot be definitively determined at
contract award. However, prior to 2011, the FAR was largely silent on
the use of acquisition strategies to promote small business
participation in conjunction with multiple-award contracts. This rule
increases small business participation in Federal prime contracts by
ensuring that small businesses have greater access to multiple award
contracts and clarifying the procedures for partially setting aside and
reserving multiple-award contracts for small business, and setting
aside orders placed under multiple-award contracts for small business,
thereby ensuring that small businesses have greater access to these
commonly used vehicles.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 12/06/16 81 FR 88072
NPRM Comment Period End............. 02/06/17
Final Rule.......................... 03/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Mahruba Uddowla, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 703 605-2868,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AM93
[[Page 1958]]
375. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015-017; Combating
Trafficking in Persons--Definition of ``Recruitment Fees''
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing a final rule to amend the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement Executive Order
(E.O.) 13627, Strengthening Protections Against Trafficking in Persons
in Federal Contracts, and title XVII of the National Defense
Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013. The rule adds a definition of
``recruitment fees'' to FAR subpart 22.17, Combating Trafficking in
Persons, and the associated clauses in order to clarify how the
Government uses recruitment fees in the treatment of this prohibited
practice that has been associated with labor trafficking under
contracts and subcontracts. The purpose of the rule is to provide a
standardized definition that clarifies prohibited recruitment to help
fight against human trafficking.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 05/11/16 81 FR 29244
NPRM Comment Period End............. 07/11/16
Final Rule.......................... 02/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Cecelia L. Davis, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 219-0202,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN02
376. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2016-007, Non-
Retaliation for Disclosure of Compensation Information
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement Executive Order
(E.O.) 13665, entitled ``Non-Retaliation for Disclosure of Compensation
Information,'' (79 FR 20749) and the final rule issued by the Office of
Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) of the Department of Labor
(DOL) at 80 FR 54934, entitled ``Government Contractors, Prohibitions
Against Pay Secrecy Policies and Actions.''
This rule provides for a uniform policy for the Federal Government
to prohibit Federal contractors from discriminating against employees
and job applicants who inquire about, discuss, or disclose their own
compensation or the compensation of other employees or applicants.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interim Final Rule.................. 09/30/16 81 FR 67732
Interim Final Rule Comment Period 11/29/16
End.
Final Rule.......................... 02/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Zenaida Delgado, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 969-7207,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN10
377. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015-005, System
for Award Management Registration
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to update the instructions for
System for Award Management (SAM) registration requirements and to
correct an inconsistency with offeror representation and certification
requirements. The language in the FAR was not consistent in terms of
whether offerors need to register in SAM prior to submitting an offer
or prior to award of a contract. This rule clarifies and makes the
language consistent by requiring offerors' registration in SAM prior to
submitting an offer. The rule does not place any new requirements on
businesses and is considered administrative because the only change is
when the requirement for registering in SAM must occur. Registering in
SAM eliminates the need for potential offerors to complete
representations and certifications multiple times a year when
responding to solicitations, which reduces the burden on both the
contractor and the government.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 05/20/16 81 FR 31895
NPRM Comment Period End............. 07/19/16
Final Rule.......................... 02/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Curtis E. Glover Sr., Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/
NASA (FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 501-
1448, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN19
378. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015-039, Audit of
Settlement Proposals
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing a final rule to amends the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to raise the dollar threshold
requirement for the audit of prime contract settlement proposals and
subcontract settlements from $100,000 to the Truth In Negotiation Act
(TINA) threshold of $750,000 to help alleviate the backlog of contract
close-outs and to enable contracting officers to more quickly
deobligate excess funds from terminated contracts.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 09/14/16 81 FR 63158
NPRM Comment Period End............. 11/14/16
Final Rule.......................... 02/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Camara Francis, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 550-0935,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN26
379. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017-001, Paid Sick
Leave for Federal Contractors
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing a final rule to amend the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) requiring Federal Government
contractors to ensure that employees on those contracts can earn up to
seven days or more of paid sick leave annually, including paid sick
leave for family care. This rule implements the objective of Executive
Order 13706, Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors and
Department of Labor's final rule (81 FR 91627).
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interim Final Rule.................. 12/16/16 81 FR 91627
Interim Final Rule Effective........ 01/01/17
Interim Final Rule Comment Period 02/14/17
End.
[[Page 1959]]
Final Rule.......................... 02/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Zenaida Delgado, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 969-7207,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN27
380. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015-033,
Sustainable Acquisition
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA and NASA are issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to add a new definition for
sustainable products and services and update several existing
definitions germane to sustainable acquisition. This rule will also
provide two new websites to help contractors understand the sustainable
acquisition requirements and gain access to a listing of sustainable
products and services as determined by the Federal Government. The rule
implements Executive Order 13693, Planning for Federal Sustainability
in the Next Decade (supersedes Executive Orders 13423 and 13514), and
the biobased product acquisition provisions of the Agricultural Act of
2014 (also known as the 2014 Farm Bill).
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 01/18/17 82 FR 5490
NPRM Comment Period End............. 03/20/17
Final Rule.......................... 04/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Charles Gray, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 703 795-6328,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN28
381. Federal Acquisition Regulation: FAR Case 2016-005; Effective
Communication Between Government and Industry
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA and NASA are issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement section 887 of the
NDAA for FY 2016 (Pub. L. 114-92). This law provides that agency
acquisition personnel are permitted and encouraged to engage in
responsible and constructive exchanges with industry. This change will
permit and encourage government acquisition personnel to engage in
responsible and constructive exchanges with industry as part of market
research as long as those exchanges are consistent with existing laws,
regulations, and promote a fair competitive environment.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPRM................................ 11/29/16 81 FR 85914
NPRM Comment Period End............. 03/02/17
Final Rule.......................... 04/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael O. Jackson, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/
NASA (FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 208-
4949, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN29
382. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2016-011, (S)
Revision of Limitations on Subcontracting
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to revise and standardize the
limitations on subcontracting (LOS), including the nonmanufacturer rule
(NMR), which apply to small business concerns under FAR part 19
procurements. This FAR change incorporates SBA's final rule at 81 FR
34243, which implemented the statutory requirements of section 1651 of
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013. This
action is necessary to meet the Congressional intent of clarifying the
limitations on subcontracting with which small businesses must comply,
as well as the ways in which they can comply. The rule will benefits
small businesses and agencies. Prompt implementation of this rule will
allow small businesses to take advantage of subcontracts with similarly
situated entities. As a result, these small businesses will be able to
compete for larger contracts, which would positively affect their
potential for growth as well as that of their potential subcontractors.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interim Final Rule.................. 01/00/18
Interim Final Rule Comment Period 03/00/18
End.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Mahruba Uddowla, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 703 605-2868,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN35
383. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017-004, Rate
Adjustment of Liquidated Damages
E.O. 13771 Designation: Fully or Partially Exempt.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to adjust the civil monetary
penalties for inflation pursuant to the Inflation Adjustment Act
Improvements Act. This Act requires agencies to adjust the levels of
civil monetary penalties with an initial catch-up adjustment, followed
by the annual adjustment for inflation.
This rule implements the Department of Labor (DOL) interim final
rule published in the Federal Register at 81 FR 43430 on July 1, 2016,
finalized at 82 FR 5373 on January 18, 2017. The DOL rule adjusted the
civil monetary penalties for inflation pursuant to the Federal Civil
Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990 as amended by the Federal
Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (Sec.
701 of Pub. L. 114-74).
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interim Final Rule.................. 01/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Zenaida Delgado, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 969-7207,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN37
384. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017-007, Task- and
Delivery-Order Protests
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing a final rule amending the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to raise the threshold for task-
and delivery-order protests from $10 million
[[Page 1960]]
to $25 million for DoD and make permanent the General Accountability
Office's authority to hear protests on civilian task or delivery
contracts valued in excess of $10 million. The rule implements sections
835 of the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2017 (Pub. L. 114-
328) and Public Law 114-260 835(a).
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Rule.......................... 02/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Charles Gray, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 703 795-6328,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN41
385. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017-009, Special
Emergency Procurement Authority
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing a final rule to amend the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to implement sections 816 and 1641
of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 (Pub. L.
114-328). Section 816 adds international disaster assistance under the
Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 and emergency or disaster under the
Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act.
Section 1641 adds special emergency procurement authority to facilitate
defense against or recovery from a cyber-attack. Adding these
authorities enables a more effective and immediate response to
emergency or major disasters, cyber attacks, and international
disasters. For example, certain authorities would be available to the
contracting officer based on agency procedures, the micropurchase
threshold may be increased to $20,000 for any contract to be awarded
and performed, or purchase to be made in support of the designated
areas; and the simplified acquisition threshold (SAT) may be increased
to $750,000, or $13,000,000 for commercial items, for any contract to
be awarded and performed, or purchased in support of the designated
areas.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interim Final Rule.................. 02/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Camara Francis, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/NASA
(FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 550-0935,
Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN45
386. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017-012, Increased
Micro-Purchase Threshold for Certain Procurement Activities
E.O. 13771 Designation: Other.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA, and NASA are issuing a final rule to amend the
Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to update the definition of micro-
purchase threshold'' in FAR 2.101 to implement the higher micro-
purchase threshold provided by section 217(b) of the NDAA for FY 2017
(Pub. L. 114-328). Specifically, section 217(b) amends 41 U.S.C. 1902
to increase the micro-purchase threshold for acquisitions from
institutions of higher education or related or affiliated nonprofit
entities, or from nonprofit research organizations or independent
research institutes, to $10,000, or a higher amount as determined
appropriate by the head of the relevant executive agency and consistent
with clean audit findings under 31 U.S.C. chapter 75, an internal
institutional risk assessment, or state law. As a result of this rule,
affected contractors will no longer receive a written request for quote
(RFQ) and/or a Government purchase order for requirements valued
between $3,501 and $10,000. Instead, the order can be placed online, by
phone, in person, or by fax via the Government purchase card (GPC).
Therefore, the contractor will no longer be required to read the RFQ
and/or purchase order for various Government-provided information.
Timetable:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interim Final Rule.................. 03/00/18
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Michael O. Jackson, Procurement Analyst, DOD/GSA/
NASA (FAR), 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, Phone: 202 208-
4949, Email: [email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN50
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE/GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION/NATIONAL
AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (FAR)
Completed Actions
387. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2015-031, Policy on
8(A) Joint Ventures
E.O. 13771 Designation:
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: This case has been merged into FAR Case 2017-019.
DoD, GSA, and NASA are proposing to amend the Federal Acquisition
Regulation (FAR) to be consistent with the guidance in SBA regulations
at 13 CFR 124 8(A) Business Development/Small Disadvantaged Business
Status Determinations (77 FR 28237). These clarifications are expected
to relieve burden on both industry and government by reducing the
number of protests related to inappropriate elimination from
competition of offers from 8(a) joint ventures and inappropriate awards
to ineligible 8(a) joint ventures. This will reduce the risk for fraud
by clarifying the role of SBA as the authority for making eligibility
determination. The rule is also expected to facilitate competition by
clarifying the circumstances under which a joint venture is eligible
for award under the 8(a) program.
Completed:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reason Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Merged With Policy on Joint Ventures 09/12/17
(2017-019).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Mahruba Uddowla, Phone: 703 605-2868, Email:
[email protected].
RIN: 9000-AN33
388. Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR); FAR Case 2017-015, Removal
of Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces Rule
E.O. 13771 Designation: Deregulatory.
Legal Authority: 40 U.S.C. 121(c); 10 U.S.C. ch. 137; 51 U.S.C.
20113
Abstract: DoD, GSA and NASA plan to issue a final rule to repeal
the implementation of Executive Order 13673 on Fair Pay and Safe
Workplaces since Executive Order 13673 was officially nullified on
March 27, 2017 (see Pub. L. 115-11). Additionally, Executive Order
13782 of March 30, 2017, revoked Executive Order 13673, section 3 of
Executive Order 13683 of
[[Page 1961]]
December 11, 2014, and Executive Order 13738 of August 23, 2016. This
action was made to have no force or effect by an enacted joint
resolution of disapproval under the Congressional Review Act, H.J.
Res.37 (Pub. L. 115-11).
Completed:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reason Date FR Cite
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Rule, CRA Revocation.......... 11/06/17 82 FR 51773
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis Required: Yes.
Agency Contact: Zenaida Delgado, Phone: 202 969-7207, Email:
[email protected]/.
RIN: 9000-AN52
[FR Doc. 2017-28242 Filed 1-11-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-EP-P