Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plans, 1025-1027 [2018-00208]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 9, 2018 / Notices
and (3) a list of issues to be discussed.
Issues raised in the hearing will be
limited to issues raised in the briefs. If
a request for a hearing is made, parties
will be notified of the time and date for
the hearing to be held at the U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230.13
Commerce intends to issue the final
results of this administrative review,
including the results of its analysis
raised in any written briefs, not later
than 120 days after the publication of
these preliminary results in the Federal
Register, unless otherwise extended.14
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a
preliminary reminder to importers of
their responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding
the reimbursement of antidumping
duties prior to liquidation of the
relevant entries during this review
period. Failure to comply with this
requirement could result in Commerce’s
presumption that reimbursement of
antidumping duties occurred and the
subsequent assessment of double
antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing these
results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: January 2, 2018.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Discussion of the Methodology
A. Normal Value Comparisons
1. Determination of Comparison Method
2. Results of the Differential Pricing
Analysis
B. Product Comparisons
C. Export Price and Constructed Export
Price
D. Normal Value
1. Particular Market Situation
2. Home Market Viability and Selection of
Comparison Market
3. Affiliated Party Transactions and Arm’sLength Test
4. Level of Trade
5. Cost of Production Analysis
6. Calculation of NV Based on Comparison
Market Prices
7. Calculation of NV Based on CV
E. Currency Conversion
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2018–00183 Filed 1–8–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
13 Id.
14 See
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:58 Jan 08, 2018
Jkt 244001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–877, A–570–064]
Stainless Steel Flanges From India and
the People’s Republic of China:
Postponement of Preliminary
Determinations in the Less-Than-FairValue Investigations
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATE: Applicable January 9, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Courtney Canales at (202) 482–4997
(India) and Ian Hamilton at (202) 482–
4798 (the People’s Republic of China
(China)), AD/CVD Operations,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On September 5, 2017, the
Department of Commerce (Commerce)
initiated less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
investigations of imports of stainless
steel flanges from India and China.1
Currently, the preliminary
determinations are due no later than
January 23, 2018.
Postponement of Preliminary
Determinations
Section 733(b)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires
Commerce to issue the preliminary
determination in a LTFV investigation
within 140 days after the date on which
Commerce initiated the investigation.
However, section 733(c)(1)(A)(b)(1) of
the Act permits Commerce to postpone
the preliminary determination until no
later than 190 days after the date on
which Commerce initiated the
investigation if: (A) The petitioners 2
submit a timely request for a
postponement; or (B) Commerce
concludes that the parties concerned are
cooperating, that the investigation is
extraordinarily complicated, and that
additional time is necessary to make a
preliminary determination. Under 19
CFR 351.205(e), the petitioners must
submit a request for postponement 25
days or more before the scheduled date
of the preliminary determination and
1 See
Stainless Steel Flanges from India and the
People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Less-ThanFair-Value Investigations, 82 FR 42649 (September
11, 2017).
2 The petitioners are the Coalition of American
Flange Producers and its individual members, Core
Pipe Products, Inc. and Maass Flange Corporation.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1025
must state the reasons for the request.
Commerce will grant the request unless
it finds compelling reasons to deny the
request.
On December 18, 2017, the petitioners
submitted a timely request that
Commerce postpone the preliminary
determinations in these LTFV
investigations.3 The petitioners stated
that they request postponement ‘‘in
order to ensure that {Commerce} has
sufficient time to review all
questionnaire responses and request
clarification and/or additional
information as necessary, so that the
preliminary determinations will reflect
the most accurate results possible.’’ 4
For the reasons stated above and
because there are no compelling reasons
to deny the request, Commerce, in
accordance with section 733(c)(1)(A) of
the Act, is postponing the deadline for
the preliminary determinations by 50
days (i.e., 190 days after the date on
which these investigations were
initiated). As a result, Commerce will
issue its preliminary determinations no
later than March 14, 2018. In
accordance with section 735(a)(1) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(1), the
deadline for the final determinations of
these investigations will continue to be
75 days after the date of publication of
the preliminary determinations, unless
postponed at a later date.
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to section 733(c)(2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.205(f)(1).
Dated: January 3, 2018.
Christian Marsh,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2018–00189 Filed 1–8–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
RIN 0648–XF897
Endangered and Threatened Species;
Recovery Plans
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
AGENCY:
3 See the Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Stainless Steel
Flanges from India: the Petitioners’ Request to
Extend the Preliminary Determination,’’ dated
December 18, 2017; Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Stainless
Steel Flanges from the People’s Republic of China:
the Petitioners’ Request to Extend the Preliminary
Determination,’’ dated December 18, 2017.
4 Id.
E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM
09JAN1
1026
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 9, 2018 / Notices
Notice of availability; request
for comments.
ACTION:
This notice announces the
availability of the Southern Distinct
Population Segment of Green Sturgeon
(Acipenser medirostris) Draft Recovery
Plan (Plan) for public review. NMFS is
soliciting review and comment from the
public and all interested parties on the
Plan, and will consider all substantive
comments received during the review
period before submitting the Plan for
final approval.
DATES: Comments and information on
the draft Plan must be received by close
of business on March 12, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document by either of the
following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments to
GreenSturgeon.Comments@noaa.gov.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
the National Marine Fisheries Service,
Attn: GS Recovery Plan Team, 650
Capitol Mall, Suite 5–100, Sacramento,
CA 95814.
Instructions: You must submit
comments by one of the above methods
to ensure that we receive, document,
and consider them. Comments sent by
any other method, to any other address
or individual, or received after the end
of the comment period, may not be
considered. All comments received are
a part of the public record and will
generally be posted for public viewing
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible.
The draft recovery plan is available
online at: https://
www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/
protected_species/green_sturgeon/
green_sturgeon_pg.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe
Heublein, NMFS Green Sturgeon
Recovery Coordinator, at (916) 930–
3719, or joe.heublein@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Background
On April 7, 2006, we, NMFS, listed
the southern distinct population
segment (sDPS) of green sturgeon as a
threatened species under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) (71 FR
17757). This determination was based
on: (1) The fact that the spawning adult
population occurred in only one river
system (i.e., Sacramento River); (2)
evidence of lost spawning habitat in the
Sacramento and Feather rivers; (3)
threats to habitat quality and quantity in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:58 Jan 08, 2018
Jkt 244001
the Sacramento River and Delta System;
and (4) fish salvage data exhibiting a
negative trend in juvenile sDPS green
sturgeon abundance. The final critical
habitat rule for sDPS green sturgeon was
published in the Federal Register on
October 9, 2009 (74 FR 52300). In 2010,
we appointed a recovery team to assist
the NMFS West Coast Region with the
development of research and recovery
actions for the recovery plan. A recovery
outline was completed in 2010. In 2012,
we announced initiation of a 5-year
review (77 FR 64959; October 24, 2012)
for sDPS green sturgeon. Based on the
5-year review, sDPS green sturgeon
remains listed as threatened under the
ESA. The 5-year review (NMFS 2014a)
was completed November 20, 2014, and
is available at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/pr/species/fish/
green-sturgeon.html
Draft Recovery Plan
Recovery plans describe actions
beneficial to the conservation and
recovery of species listed under the ESA
of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.). Section 4(f)(1) of the ESA requires
that recovery plans incorporate, to the
maximum extent practicable: (1)
Objective, measurable criteria which,
when met, would result in a
determination that the species is no
longer threatened or endangered; (2)
site-specific management actions
necessary to achieve the Plan’s goals;
and (3) estimates of the time required
and costs to implement recovery
actions. The ESA requires the
development of recovery plans for each
listed species unless such a plan would
not promote its recovery.
The Plan for sDPS green sturgeon was
developed by NMFS in cooperation
with a recovery team made up of experts
from the California Department of Fish
and Wildlife, California Department of
Water Resources, Oregon Department of
Fish and Wildlife, NMFS Northwest and
Southwest Fisheries Science Center, R2
Resource Consultants, U.S. Bureau of
Reclamation, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, and U.S. Geological Survey.
NMFS’s goal is to restore the
threatened sDPS green sturgeon to the
point where it is a self-sustaining
species that no longer needs the
protections of the ESA. The Plan
provides background on the natural
history of green sturgeon, population
status, and threats to their viability,
based on a formal threats assessment.
The Plan lays out a recovery strategy to
address the threats based on the best
available science, identifies site-specific
actions with time lines and costs, and
includes recovery goals and criteria.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In order to recover sDPS green
sturgeon, recovery actions within the
Plan aim to restore passage and habitat,
reduce mortality and poaching, address
threats in the areas of contaminants,
predation, and sediment loading, and
forecast sDPS habitat and distribution
changes with climate change. Most of
the recovery efforts focus on the
Sacramento River Basin and San
Francisco Bay Delta Estuary
environments, as threats in spawning
and rearing habitats were considered the
greatest impediments to recovery. To
better inform the recovery process, the
Plan further characterizes research
priorities in these areas as well as in the
areas of competition for habitat, altered
prey base, non-native species, oil and
chemical spills, and disease.
The Plan is not regulatory, but
presents guidance for use by agencies
and interested parties to assist in the
recovery of sDPS green sturgeon. The
Plan identifies substantive actions
needed to achieve recovery by assessing
the species’ population abundance,
distribution, and diversity and
addressing the threats to the species.
When determining recovery actions, the
Plan prioritized actions that address the
most important threats, improve
understanding of whether a particular
threat is limiting recovery, and improve
our understanding of, and ability to
manage, that threat. The actions in the
Plan include research, management,
monitoring, and outreach efforts,
because a comprehensive approach to
green sturgeon recovery is likely to have
greater success than focusing on any one
type of action.
We expect the Plan to inform section
7 consultations with Federal agencies
under the ESA and to support other ESA
decisions, such as considering permits
under section 10. We have already
begun implementation of several actions
and research priorities as described in
the plan, such as partnering with the
California Department of Fish and
Wildlife to reduce poaching and
stranding of green sturgeon and improve
knowledge of the impacts of fisheries
bycatch. After public comment and the
adoption of the Final Recovery Plan, we
will continue to implement actions in
the plan for which we have authority,
encourage other Federal and state
agencies to implement recovery actions
for which they have responsibility and
authority, and work cooperatively with
them on the implementation of those
actions.
The total time and cost to recovery are
difficult to predict. The Plan outlines 19
recovery actions, as well as 17 research,
eight monitoring, and two education
and outreach priorities. An estimated
E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM
09JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 6 / Tuesday, January 9, 2018 / Notices
cost is provided for an initial 20-year
period. Projections of when certain
actions could occur are provided based
on five year increments. Assuming all
recovery actions are implemented, the
cost of the first 20 years of recovery is
approximately $236 million. Given a
generation time for sDPS green sturgeon
of approximately 22 years, a substantial
increase in adult abundance in response
to habitat-based recovery actions may
not be observed for 66–88 years.
Additional funds will thus likely be
needed to monitor adult abundance
after the first 20 years, with a total
added projected cost of $25–40 million.
Many of the most costly recovery
actions (e.g., barrier removal, increased
enforcement, addressing entrainment at
diversions) have multi-species benefits
and may be covered under recovery
efforts for other species. For example,
the recovery plan for ESA-listed Central
Valley salmonids (NMFS 2014b)
includes recovery actions designed to
improve watershed-wide processes that
will likely benefit sDPS green sturgeon
by restoring natural ecosystem
functions. Specific actions to improve
delta habitat, remove barriers, and
reduce entrainment could aid in the
recovery of sDPS green sturgeon and
reduce the recovery plan cost by $17
million.
We are unable to quantify the
economic benefits of sDPS green
sturgeon recovery actions, but full
recovery or delisting will provide
multiple benefits to the ecosystem and
economy. Delisting of the sDPS will
enhance fishing opportunities by lifting
fisheries restrictions aimed at reducing
direct or incidental sDPS mortality. The
ESA regulatory burden will also be
eased for fisheries, water resource,
industrial, and commercial activities.
Accomplishing the habitat restoration
measures will also result in more
functional ecosystems that support
other economic activities and contribute
to delisting of other species.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
References Cited
The complete citations for the
references used in this document can be
obtained by contacting NMFS (see
ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT) or online at:
https://
www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/
protected_species/green_sturgeon/
green_sturgeon_pg.html.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:58 Jan 08, 2018
Jkt 244001
Dated: January 4, 2018.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–00208 Filed 1–8–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
National Estuarine Research Reserve
System
Office for Coastal Management,
National Ocean Service, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of public comment
period for the Jacques Cousteau
National Estuarine Research Reserve
Management Plan revision.
AGENCY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nina Garfield at (240) 533–0817 or Kim
Texeira at (240) 533–0781 of NOAA’s
Office for Coastal Management, 1305
East-West Highway, N/ORM5, 10th
floor, Silver Spring, MD 20910.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATON: Notice is
hereby given that the Office for Coastal
Management, National Ocean Service,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce is announcing a thirty-day
public comment period for the Jacques
Cousteau National Estuarine Research
Reserve Management Plan revision.
Pursuant to 15 CFR 921.33(c), the
revised plan will bring the reserve into
compliance. The Jacques Cousteau
Reserve revised plan will replace the
plan approved in 2009.
The revised management plan
outlines the administrative structure;
the research/monitoring, stewardship,
education, and training programs and
priorities of the reserve; plans for a
proposed future boundary expansion
through inclusion of past and future
land acquisition; and facility
development priorities to support
reserve operations.
The Jacques Cousteau Reserve takes
an integrated approach to management,
linking research and education, coastal
training, and stewardship functions.
The Rutgers University has outlined
how it will administer the reserve and
its core programs by providing detailed
actions that will enable it to accomplish
specific goals and objectives. Since the
last management plan, the reserve has:
Provided technical expertise to coastal
communities to reduce risks to natural
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1027
hazards; expanded monitoring
programs; installed a sentinel site for
monitoring marsh ecosystem response
to sea level rise; upgraded exhibits;
conducted training workshops;
implemented K–12 education programs;
purchased a marsh; installed a trail; and
promoted reclamation of ghost crab
pots.
The total number of acres within the
boundary is 116,116 acres, which is a
modification of the original 114,665
acres identified in the previous
management plan. The revised acreage
is a result of updated mapping
techniques rather than a boundary
expansion resulting from inclusion of
new habitats. The revised management
plan will serve as the guiding document
for the Jacques Cousteau Reserve for the
next five years.
NOAA’s Office Coastal Management
will be conducting an environmental
analysis in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act on
the proposed approval of the Reserve’s
revised management plan. The public is
invited to provide comment or
information about any potential
environmental impacts of the proposed
action, and these comments will be used
to inform the decision making process.
View the Jacques Cousteau Reserve
Management Plan revision at (https://
jcnerr.org/JCNERR_MNGMTPLAN_
2018to2023.pdf) and provide comments
to the Reserve’s Assistant Manager, Lisa
Auermuller (auermull@
marine.rutgers.edu).
Keelin Kuipers,
Acting Deputy Director, Office for Coastal
Management National Ocean Service,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2018–00182 Filed 1–8–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–08–P
CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meeting Notice
Monday, January 8,
2018; 1:00 p.m.*
PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda
Towers, 4330 East West Highway,
Bethesda, MD 20814.
STATUS: Commission Meeting—Closed
to the Public.
MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED: Compliance
Matter: The Commission staff will brief
the Commission on the status of a
compliance matter.
TIME AND DATE:
* The Commission unanimously determined by
recorded vote that Agency business requires calling
the meeting without seven calendar days advance
public notice.
E:\FR\FM\09JAN1.SGM
09JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 6 (Tuesday, January 9, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1025-1027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00208]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XF897
Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plans
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
[[Page 1026]]
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of the Southern
Distinct Population Segment of Green Sturgeon (Acipenser medirostris)
Draft Recovery Plan (Plan) for public review. NMFS is soliciting review
and comment from the public and all interested parties on the Plan, and
will consider all substantive comments received during the review
period before submitting the Plan for final approval.
DATES: Comments and information on the draft Plan must be received by
close of business on March 12, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document by either of the
following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments to [email protected].
Mail: Submit written comments to the National Marine
Fisheries Service, Attn: GS Recovery Plan Team, 650 Capitol Mall, Suite
5-100, Sacramento, CA 95814.
Instructions: You must submit comments by one of the above methods
to ensure that we receive, document, and consider them. Comments sent
by any other method, to any other address or individual, or received
after the end of the comment period, may not be considered. All
comments received are a part of the public record and will generally be
posted for public viewing without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible.
The draft recovery plan is available online at: https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/protected_species/green_sturgeon/green_sturgeon_pg.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joe Heublein, NMFS Green Sturgeon
Recovery Coordinator, at (916) 930-3719, or [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 7, 2006, we, NMFS, listed the southern distinct population
segment (sDPS) of green sturgeon as a threatened species under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) (71 FR 17757). This determination was
based on: (1) The fact that the spawning adult population occurred in
only one river system (i.e., Sacramento River); (2) evidence of lost
spawning habitat in the Sacramento and Feather rivers; (3) threats to
habitat quality and quantity in the Sacramento River and Delta System;
and (4) fish salvage data exhibiting a negative trend in juvenile sDPS
green sturgeon abundance. The final critical habitat rule for sDPS
green sturgeon was published in the Federal Register on October 9, 2009
(74 FR 52300). In 2010, we appointed a recovery team to assist the NMFS
West Coast Region with the development of research and recovery actions
for the recovery plan. A recovery outline was completed in 2010. In
2012, we announced initiation of a 5-year review (77 FR 64959; October
24, 2012) for sDPS green sturgeon. Based on the 5-year review, sDPS
green sturgeon remains listed as threatened under the ESA. The 5-year
review (NMFS 2014a) was completed November 20, 2014, and is available
at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/pr/species/fish/green-sturgeon.html
Draft Recovery Plan
Recovery plans describe actions beneficial to the conservation and
recovery of species listed under the ESA of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.). Section 4(f)(1) of the ESA requires that recovery plans
incorporate, to the maximum extent practicable: (1) Objective,
measurable criteria which, when met, would result in a determination
that the species is no longer threatened or endangered; (2) site-
specific management actions necessary to achieve the Plan's goals; and
(3) estimates of the time required and costs to implement recovery
actions. The ESA requires the development of recovery plans for each
listed species unless such a plan would not promote its recovery.
The Plan for sDPS green sturgeon was developed by NMFS in
cooperation with a recovery team made up of experts from the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife, California Department of Water
Resources, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, NMFS Northwest and
Southwest Fisheries Science Center, R2 Resource Consultants, U.S.
Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and U.S.
Geological Survey.
NMFS's goal is to restore the threatened sDPS green sturgeon to the
point where it is a self-sustaining species that no longer needs the
protections of the ESA. The Plan provides background on the natural
history of green sturgeon, population status, and threats to their
viability, based on a formal threats assessment. The Plan lays out a
recovery strategy to address the threats based on the best available
science, identifies site-specific actions with time lines and costs,
and includes recovery goals and criteria.
In order to recover sDPS green sturgeon, recovery actions within
the Plan aim to restore passage and habitat, reduce mortality and
poaching, address threats in the areas of contaminants, predation, and
sediment loading, and forecast sDPS habitat and distribution changes
with climate change. Most of the recovery efforts focus on the
Sacramento River Basin and San Francisco Bay Delta Estuary
environments, as threats in spawning and rearing habitats were
considered the greatest impediments to recovery. To better inform the
recovery process, the Plan further characterizes research priorities in
these areas as well as in the areas of competition for habitat, altered
prey base, non-native species, oil and chemical spills, and disease.
The Plan is not regulatory, but presents guidance for use by
agencies and interested parties to assist in the recovery of sDPS green
sturgeon. The Plan identifies substantive actions needed to achieve
recovery by assessing the species' population abundance, distribution,
and diversity and addressing the threats to the species. When
determining recovery actions, the Plan prioritized actions that address
the most important threats, improve understanding of whether a
particular threat is limiting recovery, and improve our understanding
of, and ability to manage, that threat. The actions in the Plan include
research, management, monitoring, and outreach efforts, because a
comprehensive approach to green sturgeon recovery is likely to have
greater success than focusing on any one type of action.
We expect the Plan to inform section 7 consultations with Federal
agencies under the ESA and to support other ESA decisions, such as
considering permits under section 10. We have already begun
implementation of several actions and research priorities as described
in the plan, such as partnering with the California Department of Fish
and Wildlife to reduce poaching and stranding of green sturgeon and
improve knowledge of the impacts of fisheries bycatch. After public
comment and the adoption of the Final Recovery Plan, we will continue
to implement actions in the plan for which we have authority, encourage
other Federal and state agencies to implement recovery actions for
which they have responsibility and authority, and work cooperatively
with them on the implementation of those actions.
The total time and cost to recovery are difficult to predict. The
Plan outlines 19 recovery actions, as well as 17 research, eight
monitoring, and two education and outreach priorities. An estimated
[[Page 1027]]
cost is provided for an initial 20-year period. Projections of when
certain actions could occur are provided based on five year increments.
Assuming all recovery actions are implemented, the cost of the first 20
years of recovery is approximately $236 million. Given a generation
time for sDPS green sturgeon of approximately 22 years, a substantial
increase in adult abundance in response to habitat-based recovery
actions may not be observed for 66-88 years. Additional funds will thus
likely be needed to monitor adult abundance after the first 20 years,
with a total added projected cost of $25-40 million.
Many of the most costly recovery actions (e.g., barrier removal,
increased enforcement, addressing entrainment at diversions) have
multi-species benefits and may be covered under recovery efforts for
other species. For example, the recovery plan for ESA-listed Central
Valley salmonids (NMFS 2014b) includes recovery actions designed to
improve watershed-wide processes that will likely benefit sDPS green
sturgeon by restoring natural ecosystem functions. Specific actions to
improve delta habitat, remove barriers, and reduce entrainment could
aid in the recovery of sDPS green sturgeon and reduce the recovery plan
cost by $17 million.
We are unable to quantify the economic benefits of sDPS green
sturgeon recovery actions, but full recovery or delisting will provide
multiple benefits to the ecosystem and economy. Delisting of the sDPS
will enhance fishing opportunities by lifting fisheries restrictions
aimed at reducing direct or incidental sDPS mortality. The ESA
regulatory burden will also be eased for fisheries, water resource,
industrial, and commercial activities. Accomplishing the habitat
restoration measures will also result in more functional ecosystems
that support other economic activities and contribute to delisting of
other species.
References Cited
The complete citations for the references used in this document can
be obtained by contacting NMFS (see ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT) or online at: https://www.westcoast.fisheries.noaa.gov/protected_species/green_sturgeon/green_sturgeon_pg.html.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.
Dated: January 4, 2018.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Conservation Division, Office of Protected
Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-00208 Filed 1-8-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P