Pears Grown in Oregon and Washington; Increased Assessment Rate for Processed Pears, 589-592 [2017-28505]
Download as PDF
589
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 83, No. 4
Friday, January 5, 2018
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 927
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–17–0045; SC17–927–1
FR]
Pears Grown in Oregon and
Washington; Increased Assessment
Rate for Processed Pears
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule implements a
recommendation from the Processed
Pear Committee (Committee) to increase
the assessment rate established for the
2017–2018 and subsequent fiscal
periods from $7.00 to $8.00 per ton of
‘‘summer/fall’’ pears for canning. The
assessment rate will remain in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated. This rule also
makes administrative revisions to the
subpart headings to bring the language
into conformance with the Office of
Federal Register requirements.
DATES: Effective February 5, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Teresa Hutchinson or Gary Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503) 326–
2724, Fax: (503) 326–7440, or Email:
Teresa.Hutchinson@ams.usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or Email:
Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Jan 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
proposes an amendment to regulations
issued to carry out a marketing order as
defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This rule is
issued under Marketing Order No. 927,
as amended (7 CFR part 927), regulating
the handling of pears grown in Oregon
and Washington. Part 927 (hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘Order’’) is effective
under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674), hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Act.’’ The Committee locally
administers the Order and is comprised
of growers, handlers, and processors of
processed pears grown in Oregon and
Washington, and a public member.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
13563 and 13175. This action falls
within a category of regulatory actions
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive
Order 12866 review. Additionally,
because this rule does not meet the
definition of a significant regulatory
action, it does not trigger the
requirements contained in Executive
Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum
titled, ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing
Section 2 of the Executive Order of
January 30, 2017, titled, ‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the Order now in effect,
Oregon and Washington pear handlers
are subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the Order are derived from
such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as issued herein will be
applicable to all assessable ‘‘summer/
fall’’ pears for canning beginning July 1,
2017, and to continue until amended,
suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the 2017–2018 and
subsequent fiscal periods from $7.00 to
$8.00 per ton for ‘‘summer/fall’’ pears
for canning handled under the Order.
The assessment rate for ‘‘winter’’ and
‘‘other’’ pears for processing would
remain unchanged at zero.
The Order authorizes the Committee,
with the approval of USDA, to formulate
an annual budget of expenses and
collect assessments from handlers to
administer the program. The members
of the Committee are growers, handlers,
and processors of pears grown in
Oregon and Washington, and a public
member. They are familiar with the
Committee’s needs, and with the costs
for goods and services in their local
area, and are thus in a position to
formulate an appropriate budget and
assessment rate. The assessment rate is
formulated and discussed in a public
meeting. Thus, all directly affected
persons have an opportunity to
participate and provide input.
For the 2012–2013 and subsequent
fiscal periods, the Committee
recommended, and USDA approved, the
following three base rates of assessment:
(a) $7.00 per ton for any or all varieties
or subvarieties of pears for canning
classified as ‘‘summer/fall’’, excluding
pears for other methods of processing;
(b) $0.00 per ton for any or all varieties
or subvarieties of pears for processing
classified as ‘‘winter’’; and (c) $0.00 per
ton for any or all varieties or
subvarieties of pears for processing
classified as ‘‘other’’. The assessment on
‘‘summer/fall’’ pears applies only to
pears for canning and excludes pears for
other methods of processing defined in
§ 927.15, as pears for concentrate,
freezing, dehydrating, pressing, or in
any other way to convert pears into a
processed product. This rate structure
continues in effect from fiscal period to
fiscal period unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
information available to USDA.
The Committee met on May 31, 2017,
and unanimously recommended
E:\FR\FM\05JAR1.SGM
05JAR1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
590
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 4 / Friday, January 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
expenditures of $800,150 for the 2017–
2018 fiscal period. In comparison, the
previous fiscal period’s budgeted
expenditures were $855,268. The
assessment rate of $8.00 per ton for
‘‘summer/fall’’ pears for canning
established by this rule is $1.00 higher
than the rate currently in effect.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2017–2018 fiscal period include
$605,606 for promotion and paid
advertising, $147,694 for research,
$25,000 for administration, and $21,850
for Committee expenses. In comparison,
major expenditures for the 2016–2017
fiscal period included $682,130 for
promotion and paid advertising,
$127,288 for research, $25,000 for
administration, and $20,850 for
Committee expenses.
Committee members estimate the
2017–2018 crop to be 100,000 tons,
which would be less than the 2016–
2017 production of 103,000 tons by
3,000 tons. Pear production tends to
fluctuate due to the effects of weather,
pollination, and tree health. Because of
the anticipated smaller crop, the
Committee recommended to both lower
budgeted expenses and increase the
assessment rate for ‘‘summer/fall’’ pears
in order to align assessment income
with expenses.
The Committee’s recommended
assessment rate was derived by dividing
the 2017–2018 anticipated expenses by
the expected shipments of ‘‘summer/
fall’’ pears for canning, while also taking
into account interest income and the
Committee’s monetary reserve.
Shipments of ‘‘summer/fall’’ pears for
canning for 2017–2018 fiscal period are
estimated at 100,000 tons, which should
provide $800,000 (100,000 tons × $8.00
per ton) in assessment income. The
projected revenue from handler
assessments, together with funds from
interest income, should be adequate to
cover the 2017–2018 fiscal period
budgeted expenses of $800,150.
Section 927.42(a) authorizes the
Committee to carry over excess funds
into subsequent fiscal periods as a
reserve, provided that funds do not
exceed approximately one year’s
operational expenses. The Committee
expects its monetary reserve, which was
estimated to be $544,990 at the end of
the 2016–2017 fiscal period, to remain
unchanged during the 2017–2018 fiscal
period. The reserve will be kept within
the established limits of the Order and
will provide the Committee with greater
ability to absorb fluctuations in
assessment income and expenses into
the future.
The assessment rate established in
this final rule will continue in effect
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Jan 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee, or other
available information.
Although this assessment rate will be
in effect for an indefinite period, the
Committee will continue to meet prior
to or during each fiscal period to
recommend a budget of expenses and
consider recommendations for
modification of the assessment rate. The
dates and times of Committee meetings
are available from the Committee or
USDA. Committee meetings are open to
the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings.
USDA will evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available
information to determine whether
further modification of the assessment
rate is needed. Further rulemaking will
be undertaken as necessary. The
Committee’s budgets for subsequent
fiscal periods, would be reviewed and,
as appropriate, approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
rule on small entities. Accordingly,
AMS has prepared this final regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 1,200
growers of processed pears in the
regulated production area and
approximately 50 processed pear
handlers subject to regulation under the
Order. Small agricultural producers are
defined by the Small Business
Administration as those having annual
receipts of less than $750,000, and small
agricultural service firms are defined as
those whose annual receipts are less
than $7,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
According to the Noncitrus Fruits and
Nuts 2016 Summary issued in June 2017
by the National Agricultural Statistics
Service, the total farm-gate value of
‘‘summer/fall’’ processed pears grown in
Oregon and Washington for 2016 was
$27,874,000. Based on the number of
‘‘summer/fall’’ processed pear growers
in the Oregon and Washington, the
average gross revenue for each grower
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
can be estimated at approximately
$23,228 ($27,874,000 divided by 1,200).
Furthermore, based on Committee
records, the Committee has estimated
that all of the Oregon-Washington pear
handlers currently ship less than
$7,500,000 worth of processed pears
each on an annual basis. From this
information, it is concluded that the
majority of growers and handlers of
Oregon and Washington processed pears
may be classified as small entities.
This rule increases the assessment
rate collected from handlers, for the
2017–2018 and subsequent fiscal
periods from $7.00 to $8.00 per ton for
‘‘summer/fall’’ pears for canning. The
Committee unanimously recommended
2017–2018 expenditures of $800,150
and an assessment rate of $8.00 per ton
for ‘‘summer/fall’’ pears for canning.
The assessment rate of $8.00 is $1.00
higher than the rate established for the
2012–2013 fiscal period. Because of the
anticipated smaller crop, the Committee
recommended to both lower budgeted
expenses and increase the assessment
rate for ‘‘summer/fall’’ pears in order to
align assessment income with expenses.
The 2017–2018 estimate of ‘‘summer/
fall’’ pears for canning is 100,000 tons.
At the $8.00 per ton assessment rate, the
Committee anticipates that assessment
income of approximately $800,000,
along with interest income, should be
adequate to cover budgeted expenses for
the 2017–2018 fiscal period of $800,150.
With the recommended assessment rate
and budgeted expense level, the
Committee does not anticipate utilizing
any funds from the monetary reserve. As
such, reserve funds are estimated to be
$544,990 at the end of the 2017–2018
fiscal period on June 30, 2018. That
reserve level is within the maximum
permitted by the Order of approximately
one fiscal period’s operational expenses
(§ 927.42(a)).
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2017–2018 fiscal period include
$605,606 for promotion and paid
advertising; $147,694 for research;
$25,000 for administration; and $21,850
for Committee expenses. In comparison,
major expenditures for the 2016–2017
fiscal period included $682,130 for
promotion and paid advertising;
$127,288 for research; $25,000 for
administration; and $20,850 for
Committee expenses.
The Committee discussed alternatives
to this action, including recommending
alternative expenditure levels and
assessment rates. Although lower
assessment rates were considered, none
were selected because they would not
have generated sufficient income to
administer the Order. Similarly, the
E:\FR\FM\05JAR1.SGM
05JAR1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 4 / Friday, January 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Committee did not recommend lower
levels of budgeted expenditures than it
did because it would have reduced the
effectiveness of the program.
A review of historical data and
preliminary information pertaining to
the upcoming fiscal period indicates
that the grower price for the 2017–2018
fiscal period could range between $325
and $346 per ton of ‘‘summer/fall’’
processed pears. Therefore, the
estimated assessment revenue for the
2017–2018 fiscal period, as a percentage
of total grower revenue, could range
between 2.31 and 2.46 percent.
This action increases the assessment
obligation imposed on handlers. While
assessments impose some additional
costs on handlers, the costs are minimal
and uniform on all handlers. Some of
the additional costs may be passed on
to growers. However, these costs are
offset by the benefits derived by the
operation of the Order.
In addition, the Committee’s meeting
was widely publicized throughout the
processed pear industry and all
interested persons were invited to
attend the meeting and participate in
Committee deliberations on all issues.
Like all Committee meetings, the May
31, 2017, meeting was a public meeting
and all entities, both large and small,
were able to express views on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189 (Generic
Fruit Crops). No changes in those
requirements are necessary as a result of
this action. Should any changes become
necessary, they would be submitted to
OMB for approval.
This final rule imposes no additional
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on either small or large processed pear
handlers. As with all Federal marketing
order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. As noted in the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA
has not identified any relevant Federal
rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict
with this final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this
action was published in Federal
Register on September 18, 2017 (82 FR
43504). Copies of the proposed rule
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Jan 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
were emailed to the Committee office.
Finally, the proposal was made
available through the internet by USDA
and the Office of the Federal Register. A
15-day comment period ending October
3, 2017, was provided for interested
persons to respond to the proposal.
Three comments were received during
the comment period in response to the
proposed rule. One comment was
generally in support of the proposal.
The other two comments, while not
expressly opposed to the proposed
action, raised concerns regarding the
impact that the increased assessment
rate would have on growers and
consumers.
Specifically, one of the two
commenters questioned how the
increased assessment rate would affect
growers and whether the increased
assessment would lead to an increase in
farm profits. The commenter also
questioned the impact on consumers
and if the action would lead to higher
canned pear prices. Lastly, the
commenter wanted to know when
growers and handlers will receive backpay for the ‘‘summer/fall’’ pears for
canning that were sold after July 1,
2017, and before the effective date of
this final rule. The other commenter
was concerned about the impact that the
increased assessment rate would have
on small growers.
USDA considered the comments
submitted and reached the following
conclusions. First, marketing orders
assess handlers, not growers. As such,
growers will not be directly impacted by
this action. However, as mentioned
previously in this rule, some of the
additional costs to handlers as a result
of this action may be passed on to
growers. Nevertheless, USDA believes
that such additional costs would be
offset by the economic benefits derived
by the operation of the Order. Any
impact of this action on growers would
not affect small growers more than large
growers.
Additionally, as mentioned
previously in this rule, assessments
upon processed pear handlers are used
by the Committee to fund the reasonable
and necessary expenses of the Order.
Section 927.15 authorizes the
Committee, with the approval of USDA,
to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from
handlers to administer the program.
Assessments are not considered
additional payments for sold product.
Therefore, growers and handlers will
not receive back-pay for previously sold
‘‘summer/fall’’ pears for canning.
Accordingly, no changes will be made
to the rule as proposed, based on the
comments received.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
591
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Richard Lower
at the previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
This final rule also makes
administrative revisions to the subpart
headings of the regulations.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this rule, as hereinafter set forth,
will tend to effectuate the declared
policy of the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 927
Marketing agreements, Pears,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 927 is amended as
follows:
PART 927—PEARS GROWN IN
OREGON AND WASHINGTON
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 927 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
Subpart A—[Amended]
2. Designate the subpart labeled
‘‘Order Regulating Handling’’ as subpart
A.
■
Subpart B—Administrative Provisions
3. Designate the subpart labeled
‘‘Rules and Regulations’’ as subpart B
and revise the heading as shown above.
■
4. Amend § 927.237 by revising the
introductory text and paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
■
§ 927.237
rate.
Processed pear assessment
On and after July 1, 2017, the
following base rates of assessment for
pears for processing are established for
the Processed Pear Committee:
(a) $8.00 per ton for any or all
varieties or subvarieties of pears for
canning classified as ‘‘summer/fall’’
excluding pears for other methods of
processing;
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\05JAR1.SGM
05JAR1
592
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 4 / Friday, January 5, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: December 29, 2017.
Bruce Summers,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–28505 Filed 1–4–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 959
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–17–0040; SC17–959–1
FR]
Onions Grown in South Texas;
Increased Assessment Rate
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule implements a
recommendation from the South Texas
Onion Committee (Committee) to
increase the assessment rate established
for the 2017–18 and subsequent fiscal
periods from $0.05 to $0.065 per 50pound equivalent of onions handled
under the Marketing Order (Order). The
assessment rate will remain in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated.
DATES: Effective February 5, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doris Jamieson, Marketing Specialist or
Christian D. Nissen, Regional Director,
Southeast Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324–
3375, Fax: (863) 291–8614, or Email:
Doris.Jamieson@ams.usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202)720–8938, or Email:
Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
proposes an amendment to regulations
issued to carry out a marketing order as
defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This rule is
issued under Marketing Order No. 959,
as amended (7 CFR part 959), regulating
the handling of onions grown in South
Texas. Part 959 (hereinafter referred to
as the ‘‘Order’’) is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’ The
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:04 Jan 04, 2018
Jkt 244001
Committee locally administers the
Order and is comprised of producers
and handlers of onions operating within
the area of production.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
13563 and 13175. This action falls
within a category of regulatory actions
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive
Order 12866 review. Additionally,
because this rule does not meet the
definition of a significant regulatory
action, it does not trigger the
requirements contained in Executive
Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum
titled ‘‘Interim Guidance Implementing
Section 2 of the Executive Order of
January 30, 2017, titled ‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. Under the Marketing Order now
in effect, South Texas onion handlers
are subject to assessments. Funds to
administer the Order are derived from
such assessments. It is intended that the
assessment rate as issued herein will be
applicable to all assessable onions
beginning on August 1, 2017, and
continue until amended, suspended, or
terminated.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This rule increases the assessment
rate established for the 2017–18 and
subsequent fiscal periods from $0.05 to
$0.065 per 50-pound equivalent of
onions handled.
The South Texas Onion Marketing
Order provides authority for the
Committee, with the approval of USDA,
to formulate an annual budget of
expenses and collect assessments from
handlers to administer the program. The
members of the Committee are
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
producers and handlers of South Texas
onions. They are familiar with the
Committee’s needs and with the costs
for goods and services in their local area
and are thus in a position to formulate
an appropriate budget and assessment
rate. The assessment rate is formulated
and discussed in a public meeting.
Thus, all directly affected persons have
an opportunity to participate and
provide input.
For the 2015–16 and subsequent fiscal
periods, the Committee recommended,
and USDA approved, an assessment rate
that would continue in effect from fiscal
period to fiscal period unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
information available to USDA.
The Committee met on June 7, 2017,
and unanimously recommended 2017–
18 expenditures of $149,807, the same
as budgeted last fiscal year, and an
assessment rate of $0.065 per 50-pound
equivalent of onions. The assessment
rate of $0.065 is $0.015 higher than the
rate currently in effect. The Committee
recommended the increase so
assessments would be sufficient to cover
the Committee’s anticipated
expenditures while providing additional
funds to help replenish the Committee’s
reserve fund, which has been depleted
due to declines in production. With the
Committee’s recommended $0.015
increase and estimated shipments of
approximately three million 50-pound
equivalents, assessment income should
be approximately $195,000.
The major expenditures
recommended by the Committee for the
2017–18 fiscal year include $50,000 for
compliance, $37,050 for administrative,
and $32,942 for management costs.
Budgeted expenses for these items were
the same in 2016–17.
The assessment rate recommended by
the Committee was derived by
considering anticipated expenses,
expected shipments of South Texas
onions, and the level of funds in
reserve. As mentioned earlier, onion
shipments for the year are estimated at
three million 50-pound equivalents,
which should provide $195,000 in
assessment income. Income derived
from handler assessments would be
adequate to cover budgeted expenses.
The Committee currently has no money
in reserves.
The assessment rate established in
this rule will continue in effect
indefinitely unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other
available information.
E:\FR\FM\05JAR1.SGM
05JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 4 (Friday, January 5, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 589-592]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28505]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 4 / Friday, January 5, 2018 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 589]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 927
[Doc. No. AMS-SC-17-0045; SC17-927-1 FR]
Pears Grown in Oregon and Washington; Increased Assessment Rate
for Processed Pears
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule implements a recommendation from the Processed Pear
Committee (Committee) to increase the assessment rate established for
the 2017-2018 and subsequent fiscal periods from $7.00 to $8.00 per ton
of ``summer/fall'' pears for canning. The assessment rate will remain
in effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated. This
rule also makes administrative revisions to the subpart headings to
bring the language into conformance with the Office of Federal Register
requirements.
DATES: Effective February 5, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teresa Hutchinson or Gary Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (503) 326-
2724, Fax: (503) 326-7440, or Email: [email protected] or
[email protected].
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW, STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491,
Fax: (202) 720-8938, or Email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
proposes an amendment to regulations issued to carry out a marketing
order as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j). This rule is issued under Marketing
Order No. 927, as amended (7 CFR part 927), regulating the handling of
pears grown in Oregon and Washington. Part 927 (hereinafter referred to
as the ``Order'') is effective under the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), hereinafter
referred to as the ``Act.'' The Committee locally administers the Order
and is comprised of growers, handlers, and processors of processed
pears grown in Oregon and Washington, and a public member.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Orders 13563 and 13175. This action falls
within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) exempted from Executive Order 12866 review.
Additionally, because this rule does not meet the definition of a
significant regulatory action, it does not trigger the requirements
contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum titled,
``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order of
January 30, 2017, titled, `Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs' '' (February 2, 2017).
This rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. Under the Order now in effect, Oregon and Washington
pear handlers are subject to assessments. Funds to administer the Order
are derived from such assessments. It is intended that the assessment
rate as issued herein will be applicable to all assessable ``summer/
fall'' pears for canning beginning July 1, 2017, and to continue until
amended, suspended, or terminated.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the order, any provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the order or to be exempted therefrom. Such
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule increases the assessment rate established for the 2017-
2018 and subsequent fiscal periods from $7.00 to $8.00 per ton for
``summer/fall'' pears for canning handled under the Order. The
assessment rate for ``winter'' and ``other'' pears for processing would
remain unchanged at zero.
The Order authorizes the Committee, with the approval of USDA, to
formulate an annual budget of expenses and collect assessments from
handlers to administer the program. The members of the Committee are
growers, handlers, and processors of pears grown in Oregon and
Washington, and a public member. They are familiar with the Committee's
needs, and with the costs for goods and services in their local area,
and are thus in a position to formulate an appropriate budget and
assessment rate. The assessment rate is formulated and discussed in a
public meeting. Thus, all directly affected persons have an opportunity
to participate and provide input.
For the 2012-2013 and subsequent fiscal periods, the Committee
recommended, and USDA approved, the following three base rates of
assessment: (a) $7.00 per ton for any or all varieties or subvarieties
of pears for canning classified as ``summer/fall'', excluding pears for
other methods of processing; (b) $0.00 per ton for any or all varieties
or subvarieties of pears for processing classified as ``winter''; and
(c) $0.00 per ton for any or all varieties or subvarieties of pears for
processing classified as ``other''. The assessment on ``summer/fall''
pears applies only to pears for canning and excludes pears for other
methods of processing defined in Sec. 927.15, as pears for
concentrate, freezing, dehydrating, pressing, or in any other way to
convert pears into a processed product. This rate structure continues
in effect from fiscal period to fiscal period unless modified,
suspended, or terminated by USDA upon recommendation and information
submitted by the Committee or other information available to USDA.
The Committee met on May 31, 2017, and unanimously recommended
[[Page 590]]
expenditures of $800,150 for the 2017-2018 fiscal period. In
comparison, the previous fiscal period's budgeted expenditures were
$855,268. The assessment rate of $8.00 per ton for ``summer/fall''
pears for canning established by this rule is $1.00 higher than the
rate currently in effect.
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2017-
2018 fiscal period include $605,606 for promotion and paid advertising,
$147,694 for research, $25,000 for administration, and $21,850 for
Committee expenses. In comparison, major expenditures for the 2016-2017
fiscal period included $682,130 for promotion and paid advertising,
$127,288 for research, $25,000 for administration, and $20,850 for
Committee expenses.
Committee members estimate the 2017-2018 crop to be 100,000 tons,
which would be less than the 2016-2017 production of 103,000 tons by
3,000 tons. Pear production tends to fluctuate due to the effects of
weather, pollination, and tree health. Because of the anticipated
smaller crop, the Committee recommended to both lower budgeted expenses
and increase the assessment rate for ``summer/fall'' pears in order to
align assessment income with expenses.
The Committee's recommended assessment rate was derived by dividing
the 2017-2018 anticipated expenses by the expected shipments of
``summer/fall'' pears for canning, while also taking into account
interest income and the Committee's monetary reserve. Shipments of
``summer/fall'' pears for canning for 2017-2018 fiscal period are
estimated at 100,000 tons, which should provide $800,000 (100,000 tons
x $8.00 per ton) in assessment income. The projected revenue from
handler assessments, together with funds from interest income, should
be adequate to cover the 2017-2018 fiscal period budgeted expenses of
$800,150.
Section 927.42(a) authorizes the Committee to carry over excess
funds into subsequent fiscal periods as a reserve, provided that funds
do not exceed approximately one year's operational expenses. The
Committee expects its monetary reserve, which was estimated to be
$544,990 at the end of the 2016-2017 fiscal period, to remain unchanged
during the 2017-2018 fiscal period. The reserve will be kept within the
established limits of the Order and will provide the Committee with
greater ability to absorb fluctuations in assessment income and
expenses into the future.
The assessment rate established in this final rule will continue in
effect indefinitely unless modified, suspended, or terminated by USDA
upon recommendation and information submitted by the Committee, or
other available information.
Although this assessment rate will be in effect for an indefinite
period, the Committee will continue to meet prior to or during each
fiscal period to recommend a budget of expenses and consider
recommendations for modification of the assessment rate. The dates and
times of Committee meetings are available from the Committee or USDA.
Committee meetings are open to the public and interested persons may
express their views at these meetings. USDA will evaluate Committee
recommendations and other available information to determine whether
further modification of the assessment rate is needed. Further
rulemaking will be undertaken as necessary. The Committee's budgets for
subsequent fiscal periods, would be reviewed and, as appropriate,
approved by USDA.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this rule on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this final regulatory flexibility
analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and the rules issued thereunder, are unique in
that they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 1,200 growers of processed pears in the
regulated production area and approximately 50 processed pear handlers
subject to regulation under the Order. Small agricultural producers are
defined by the Small Business Administration as those having annual
receipts of less than $750,000, and small agricultural service firms
are defined as those whose annual receipts are less than $7,500,000 (13
CFR 121.201).
According to the Noncitrus Fruits and Nuts 2016 Summary issued in
June 2017 by the National Agricultural Statistics Service, the total
farm-gate value of ``summer/fall'' processed pears grown in Oregon and
Washington for 2016 was $27,874,000. Based on the number of ``summer/
fall'' processed pear growers in the Oregon and Washington, the average
gross revenue for each grower can be estimated at approximately $23,228
($27,874,000 divided by 1,200). Furthermore, based on Committee
records, the Committee has estimated that all of the Oregon-Washington
pear handlers currently ship less than $7,500,000 worth of processed
pears each on an annual basis. From this information, it is concluded
that the majority of growers and handlers of Oregon and Washington
processed pears may be classified as small entities.
This rule increases the assessment rate collected from handlers,
for the 2017-2018 and subsequent fiscal periods from $7.00 to $8.00 per
ton for ``summer/fall'' pears for canning. The Committee unanimously
recommended 2017-2018 expenditures of $800,150 and an assessment rate
of $8.00 per ton for ``summer/fall'' pears for canning. The assessment
rate of $8.00 is $1.00 higher than the rate established for the 2012-
2013 fiscal period. Because of the anticipated smaller crop, the
Committee recommended to both lower budgeted expenses and increase the
assessment rate for ``summer/fall'' pears in order to align assessment
income with expenses.
The 2017-2018 estimate of ``summer/fall'' pears for canning is
100,000 tons. At the $8.00 per ton assessment rate, the Committee
anticipates that assessment income of approximately $800,000, along
with interest income, should be adequate to cover budgeted expenses for
the 2017-2018 fiscal period of $800,150. With the recommended
assessment rate and budgeted expense level, the Committee does not
anticipate utilizing any funds from the monetary reserve. As such,
reserve funds are estimated to be $544,990 at the end of the 2017-2018
fiscal period on June 30, 2018. That reserve level is within the
maximum permitted by the Order of approximately one fiscal period's
operational expenses (Sec. 927.42(a)).
The major expenditures recommended by the Committee for the 2017-
2018 fiscal period include $605,606 for promotion and paid advertising;
$147,694 for research; $25,000 for administration; and $21,850 for
Committee expenses. In comparison, major expenditures for the 2016-2017
fiscal period included $682,130 for promotion and paid advertising;
$127,288 for research; $25,000 for administration; and $20,850 for
Committee expenses.
The Committee discussed alternatives to this action, including
recommending alternative expenditure levels and assessment rates.
Although lower assessment rates were considered, none were selected
because they would not have generated sufficient income to administer
the Order. Similarly, the
[[Page 591]]
Committee did not recommend lower levels of budgeted expenditures than
it did because it would have reduced the effectiveness of the program.
A review of historical data and preliminary information pertaining
to the upcoming fiscal period indicates that the grower price for the
2017-2018 fiscal period could range between $325 and $346 per ton of
``summer/fall'' processed pears. Therefore, the estimated assessment
revenue for the 2017-2018 fiscal period, as a percentage of total
grower revenue, could range between 2.31 and 2.46 percent.
This action increases the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. While assessments impose some additional costs on handlers,
the costs are minimal and uniform on all handlers. Some of the
additional costs may be passed on to growers. However, these costs are
offset by the benefits derived by the operation of the Order.
In addition, the Committee's meeting was widely publicized
throughout the processed pear industry and all interested persons were
invited to attend the meeting and participate in Committee
deliberations on all issues. Like all Committee meetings, the May 31,
2017, meeting was a public meeting and all entities, both large and
small, were able to express views on this issue.
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order's information collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and assigned OMB No. 0581-0189 (Generic
Fruit Crops). No changes in those requirements are necessary as a
result of this action. Should any changes become necessary, they would
be submitted to OMB for approval.
This final rule imposes no additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large processed pear handlers. As with
all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. As noted in the
initial regulatory flexibility analysis, USDA has not identified any
relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
final rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
A proposed rule concerning this action was published in Federal
Register on September 18, 2017 (82 FR 43504). Copies of the proposed
rule were emailed to the Committee office. Finally, the proposal was
made available through the internet by USDA and the Office of the
Federal Register. A 15-day comment period ending October 3, 2017, was
provided for interested persons to respond to the proposal.
Three comments were received during the comment period in response
to the proposed rule. One comment was generally in support of the
proposal. The other two comments, while not expressly opposed to the
proposed action, raised concerns regarding the impact that the
increased assessment rate would have on growers and consumers.
Specifically, one of the two commenters questioned how the
increased assessment rate would affect growers and whether the
increased assessment would lead to an increase in farm profits. The
commenter also questioned the impact on consumers and if the action
would lead to higher canned pear prices. Lastly, the commenter wanted
to know when growers and handlers will receive back-pay for the
``summer/fall'' pears for canning that were sold after July 1, 2017,
and before the effective date of this final rule. The other commenter
was concerned about the impact that the increased assessment rate would
have on small growers.
USDA considered the comments submitted and reached the following
conclusions. First, marketing orders assess handlers, not growers. As
such, growers will not be directly impacted by this action. However, as
mentioned previously in this rule, some of the additional costs to
handlers as a result of this action may be passed on to growers.
Nevertheless, USDA believes that such additional costs would be offset
by the economic benefits derived by the operation of the Order. Any
impact of this action on growers would not affect small growers more
than large growers.
Additionally, as mentioned previously in this rule, assessments
upon processed pear handlers are used by the Committee to fund the
reasonable and necessary expenses of the Order. Section 927.15
authorizes the Committee, with the approval of USDA, to formulate an
annual budget of expenses and collect assessments from handlers to
administer the program. Assessments are not considered additional
payments for sold product. Therefore, growers and handlers will not
receive back-pay for previously sold ``summer/fall'' pears for canning.
Accordingly, no changes will be made to the rule as proposed, based
on the comments received.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at the
previously mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
This final rule also makes administrative revisions to the subpart
headings of the regulations.
After consideration of all relevant material presented, including
the information and recommendation submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found that this rule, as
hereinafter set forth, will tend to effectuate the declared policy of
the Act.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 927
Marketing agreements, Pears, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 927 is
amended as follows:
PART 927--PEARS GROWN IN OREGON AND WASHINGTON
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 927 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
Subpart A--[Amended]
0
2. Designate the subpart labeled ``Order Regulating Handling'' as
subpart A.
Subpart B--Administrative Provisions
0
3. Designate the subpart labeled ``Rules and Regulations'' as subpart B
and revise the heading as shown above.
0
4. Amend Sec. 927.237 by revising the introductory text and paragraph
(a) to read as follows:
Sec. 927.237 Processed pear assessment rate.
On and after July 1, 2017, the following base rates of assessment
for pears for processing are established for the Processed Pear
Committee:
(a) $8.00 per ton for any or all varieties or subvarieties of pears
for canning classified as ``summer/fall'' excluding pears for other
methods of processing;
* * * * *
[[Page 592]]
Dated: December 29, 2017.
Bruce Summers,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-28505 Filed 1-4-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P