Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 216-219 [2017-28379]
Download as PDF
216
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by
removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2011–04–05, Amendment 39–16605 (76
FR 8612, February 15, 2011), and adding
the following new AD:
■
2018–01–04 Airbus: Amendment 39–19145;
Docket No. FAA–2017–1181; Product
Identifier 2014–NM–037–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective January 18,
2018.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2011–04–05,
Amendment 39–16605 (76 FR 8612, February
15, 2011) (‘‘AD 2011–04–05’’).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes
specified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(4)
of this AD, certificated in any category, all
manufacturer serial numbers.
(1) Model A340–211, –212, and –213
airplanes.
(2) Model A340–311, –312, and –313
airplanes.
(3) Model A340–541 airplanes.
(4) Model A340–642 airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 05, Periodic inspections.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES
(g) Required Action(s)
Within 30 days after the effective date of
this AD, request instructions from the
Manager, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, to address the
unsafe condition specified in paragraph (e) of
this AD; and accomplish the action(s) at the
times specified in, and in accordance with,
those instructions. Guidance can be found in
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information (MCAI) European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2014–0009, dated
January 8, 2014.
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
The Manager, International Section,
Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Section, send it to the
15:15 Jan 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
(i) Related Information
(1) Refer to MCAI EASA AD 2014–0009,
dated January 8, 2014, for related
information. You may examine the MCAI on
the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–
2017–1181.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace
Engineer, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW, Renton, WA 98057–3356; telephone
425–227–1138; fax 425–227–1149.
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference
None.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
December 26, 2017.
John P. Piccola, Jr.,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–28381 Filed 1–2–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by the revision of
certain airworthiness limitation items (ALIs),
which specify more restrictive instructions or
airworthiness limitations. We are issuing this
AD to prevent the failure of certain lifelimited parts, which could result in reduced
structural integrity of the airplane.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (i)(2) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: 9-ANM-116-AMOCREQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2017–0500; Product
Identifier 2017–NM–009–AD; Amendment
39–19142; AD 2018–01–01]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model MD–11
and MD–11F airplanes. This AD was
prompted by fuel system reviews
conducted by the manufacturer. This
AD requires a one-time inspection of the
wire assemblies of the tail fuel tank
transfer pumps to determine if metallic
transitions are installed at the wire
harness breakouts, and corrective
actions if necessary. We are issuing this
AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.
DATES: This AD is effective February 7,
2018.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of February 7, 2018.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes,
Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC
110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740;
telephone 562–797–1717; internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601
Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
It is also available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
0500.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
0500; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this final rule, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590.
´
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Serj
Harutunian, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, Los Angeles ACO
Branch, FAA, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, California
90712–4137; phone: 562–627–5254; fax:
562–627–5210; email: serj.harutunian@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model MD–11 and MD–11F airplanes.
The NPRM published in the Federal
Register on May 30, 2017 (82 FR 24597).
The NPRM was prompted by fuel
system reviews conducted by the
manufacturer. The NPRM proposed to
require a one-time inspection of the
wire assemblies of the tail fuel tank
transfer pumps to determine if metallic
transitions are installed at the wire
harness breakouts, and corrective
actions if necessary. We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct potential
ignition sources inside the tail fuel tank,
E:\FR\FM\03JAR1.SGM
03JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
which, in combination with flammable
vapors, could result in a fuel tank fire
or explosion, and consequent loss of the
airplane.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this final rule.
The following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA’s
response to each comment.
Supportive Comment
The Air Line Pilots Association
International stated that it agreed with
the intent of the NPRM.
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES
Request To Clarify the Description of
the Unsafe Condition
Boeing asked that we clarify the
description of the unsafe condition
identified in paragraph (e) of the
proposed AD to add the potential of fuel
starvation as the end-level effect. Boeing
stated that referenced service
information specifies that the unsafe
condition could result in engine fuel
starvation.
We agree that damaged wires could
result in fuel starvation as a potential
unsafe condition. However, we have no
SFAR88 analysis or service difficulty
reports associated with the loss of
system functions or fuel starvation from
the chafed or damaged wires identified
in this AD. We do have previous Special
Federal Aviation Regulation 88
(SFAR88) ADs for wire harnesses in the
same area that were issued to prevent
wire chafing and potential ignition
sources inside the fuel tank. The actions
required by this AD are intended
primarily to reduce the risk of other
incidents of wires chafing and
subsequent fuel tank fire or explosion.
Therefore, we have made no change to
this AD in this regard.
Request To Change Certain Estimates in
Costs of Compliance Section
FedEx asked that the work-hours
under the On-Condition Costs for the
replacement be increased from 16 to
100. FedEx stated that the replacement
cost specifies 16 work-hours, but noted
that replacement of only one affected
part will actually take about 100 hours.
FedEx added that 100 work-hours is
only for one damaged wire assembly.
United Parcel Service (UPS) asked
that the work-hours under the OnCondition Costs for the replacement be
increased from 16 to 244. UPS stated
that it has previously replaced this wire
harness and it required 244 work hours
to complete the replacement. UPS also
asked that the cost for parts for the
repair be added. UPS stated that it has
sourced the materials and the cost is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:15 Jan 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
$1,680 per airplane (or $168 per
transition location).
We agree to revise the estimated oncondition work-hours. When issuing a
service bulletin, Boeing estimates workhours under expected conditions for
direct labor only. As operators
implement the service bulletin, they
may find the actual work-hours are
higher or lower than estimated. We have
updated the Costs of Compliance
section of this AD to reflect between 100
and 244 work-hours. We have also
included the parts cost estimate
provided for repairs.
Request To Add Information Notice To
Service Information Citation
FedEx asked that Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin MD11–28A150 IN 02, dated
February 24, 2017, be added to the
service information cited in paragraph
(g) of the proposed AD. FedEx stated
that the one-time inspection and
corrective actions in paragraph (g)
specify performing a detailed inspection
in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin MD11–28A150, dated October
6, 2016. FedEx added that since the
referenced service information was
issued, Boeing released an information
notice (IN 02) with part numbers for
three new wire assembly kits.
We disagree with the commenter’s
request. Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
MD11–28A150 IN 02, dated February
24, 2017, provides updated kit
information for the operators. The
individual wire assembly part numbers
in the new kits are the same wire
assembly part numbers needed for the
replacement required by this AD as
specified in the figures in Part 3 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin MD11–28A150,
dated October 6, 2016. Since this AD
only requires the replacement of certain
individual wire assembly part numbers
and not the kit part numbers that consist
of the individual wire assembly part
numbers, we have made no change to
this AD in this regard.
Request To Clarify Paragraph (h) of the
Proposed AD
FedEx and UPS requested that we
clarify the actions specified in
paragraph (h) of the proposed AD.
FedEx stated that paragraph (h) of the
proposed AD provides information to
perform different tests than those listed
in steps 1.f, 1.g., and 1.h. of Part 4 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin MD11–28A150,
dated October 6, 2016. FedEx stated it
is not clear if the required test after
rework is in accordance with steps 1.a.
through 1.j. of Part 4 of Boeing Alert
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
217
Service Bulletin MD11–28A150, dated
October 6, 2016, or per the actions
specified in (h)(1), (h)(2), and (h)(3) of
this AD only. FedEx and UPS also stated
that the proposed AD should require
test procedures only for the section that
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11–
28A150, dated October 6, 2016, is
addressing and not all the systems
associated with wire assemblies
AJS9013 and AJS9014. FedEx and UPS
also noted that the airplane
maintenance manual (AMM) references
in paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of the
proposed AD are incorrect (AMM 28–
28–01 should be AMM 28–08–01; AMM
26–21–02 should be AMM 28–21–02).
We agree to clarify which actions are
required by this AD. Steps 1.f, 1.g., and
1.h. of Part 4 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin MD11–28A150, dated October
6, 2016, are required for compliance
(RC) after any rework is done and only
address the system affected by this AD.
The other steps identified as ‘‘RC
exempt’’ as specified in Part 4 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin MD11–28A150,
dated October 6, 2016, are not a part of
the requirements of this AD.
The intent of paragraph (h) of the
proposed AD was to specify the
corrective action for RC tests. Steps 1.f,
1.g., and 1.h. of Part 4 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin MD11–28A150,
dated October 6, 2016, specify to
accomplish tests but the steps do not
specify corrective actions if the tests
fail. To clarify that the tests themselves
are not exceptions to Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD11–28A150, dated
October 6, 2016, we have removed
paragraph (h) of the proposed AD and
included the corrective action statement
for the tests in paragraph (g) of this AD.
We acknowledge that the AMM
references in paragraphs (h)(1) and
(h)(2) of the proposed AD were incorrect
and note that the AMM references for
the tests are identified correctly in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11–
28A150, dated October 6, 2016.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this
final rule with the changes described
previously and minor editorial changes.
We have determined that these minor
changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM for
correcting the unsafe condition; and
E:\FR\FM\03JAR1.SGM
03JAR1
218
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of this final rule.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin MD11–28A150, dated October
6, 2016. The service information
describes procedures for a one-time
detailed inspection of the wire
assemblies of the tail fuel tank transfer
pumps to determine if metallic
transitions are installed at the wire
harness breakouts, and corrective
actions that include repair and
replacement of the wire assembly. This
service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 110
airplanes of U.S. registry. We estimate
the following costs to comply with this
AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
Cost on U.S.
operators
Inspection ................................
4 work-hours × $85 per hour = $340 .....................................
$0
$340
$37,400
We estimate the following costs to do
any necessary repairs/replacements that
will be required based on the results of
the inspection. We have no way of
determining the number of aircraft that
might need these repairs/replacements:
ON-CONDITION COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Repair ..........................
Replacement ...............
9 work-hours × $85 per hour = $765 ..............
Between 100 and 244 work-hours × $85 per
hour = between $8,500 and $20,740.
Up to $1,680 ..............
$57,526 ......................
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
This AD is issued in accordance with
authority delegated by the Executive
Director, Aircraft Certification Service,
as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C.
In accordance with that order, issuance
of ADs is normally a function of the
Compliance and Airworthiness
Division, but during this transition
period, the Executive Director has
delegated the authority to issue ADs
applicable to transport category
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Jan 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
Cost per product
Up to $2,445.
Between $66,026 and $78,266.
airplanes to the Director of the System
Oversight Division.
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
Regulatory Findings
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2018–01–01 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–19142; Docket No.
FAA–2017–0500; Product Identifier
2017–NM–009–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective February 7, 2018.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the Boeing Company
Model MD–11 and MD–11F airplanes,
certificated in any category, as identified in
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11–28A150,
dated October 6, 2016.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 28; Fuel.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by fuel system
reviews conducted by the manufacturer. We
E:\FR\FM\03JAR1.SGM
03JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 2 / Wednesday, January 3, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
are issuing this AD to detect and correct
potential ignition sources inside the tail fuel
tank, which, in combination with flammable
vapors, could result in a fuel tank fire or
explosion, and consequent loss of the
airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES
(g) One-Time Inspection and Corrective
Actions
Within 27 months after the effective date
of this AD, do a one-time detailed inspection
of the wire assemblies of the tail fuel tank
transfer pumps to determine if metallic
transitions are installed at the wire harness
breakouts, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD11–28A150, dated
October 6, 2016. If metallic transitions are
installed, no further action is required by this
paragraph. If metallic transitions are not
installed, do the corrective actions required
by paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, as
applicable, and if, after any repair or
replacement is done, any test fails, before
further flight, do corrective actions, repeat
the test, and do applicable corrective actions
until the test is passed.
(1) Repair any affected wire assembly
before further flight, in accordance with Part
2 of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11–28A150,
dated October 6, 2016, or replace any affected
wire assembly with a new wire assembly
before further flight, in accordance with Part
3 of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11–28A150,
dated October 6, 2016. If the replacement is
done, no further action is required for that
wire assembly only.
(2) Within 24 months after
accomplishment of the repair required by
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD: Replace any
repaired wire assembly with a new wire
assembly, in accordance with Part 3 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD11–28A150, dated
October 6, 2016.
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (i) of this
AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMLAACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:15 Jan 02, 2018
Jkt 244001
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Los Angeles
ACO Branch, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification
deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) For service information that contains
steps that are labeled as Required for
Compliance (RC), the provisions of
paragraphs (h)(4)(i) and (h)(4)(ii) of this AD
apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. If a step or substep is
labeled ‘‘RC Exempt,’’ then the RC
requirement is removed from that step or
substep. An AMOC is required for any
deviations to RC steps, including substeps
and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
(i) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
´
contact Serj Harutunian, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, Los Angeles ACO
Branch, FAA, 3960 Paramount Boulevard,
Lakewood, California 90712–4137; phone:
562–627–5254; fax: 562–627–5210; email:
serj.harutunian@faa.gov.
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11–
28A150, dated October 6, 2016.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740;
telephone 562–797–1717; internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
219
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
December 26, 2017.
John P. Piccola, Jr.,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–28379 Filed 1–2–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2017–0698; Product
Identifier 2017–NM–047–AD; Amendment
39–19143; AD 2018–01–02]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are superseding
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2017–02–
03, which applied to certain The Boeing
Company Model 767–200, –300, and
–400ER series airplanes. AD 2017–02–
03 required inspection of the plastic
potable water coupling, and corrective
actions if necessary; installation of new
spray shrouds; and inspection of
previously installed spray shields, and
related investigative and corrective
actions if necessary. This AD adds
airplanes to the applicability and, for
certain airplanes, requires hose
assembly removals and installations.
This AD was prompted by a report of a
malfunction of the engine indication
and crew alerting system (EICAS)
during flight. We are issuing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these
products.
SUMMARY:
This AD is effective February 7,
2018.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of February 7, 2018.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes,
Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC
110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone: 562–797–1717; internet:
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601
Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
It is also available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\03JAR1.SGM
03JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 2 (Wednesday, January 3, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 216-219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28379]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2017-0500; Product Identifier 2017-NM-009-AD; Amendment
39-19142; AD 2018-01-01]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model MD-11 and MD-11F airplanes. This AD was
prompted by fuel system reviews conducted by the manufacturer. This AD
requires a one-time inspection of the wire assemblies of the tail fuel
tank transfer pumps to determine if metallic transitions are installed
at the wire harness breakouts, and corrective actions if necessary. We
are issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective February 7, 2018.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of February 7,
2018.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740; telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Standards
Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221. It is also
available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-0500.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0500; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800-647-5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: S[eacute]rj Harutunian, Aerospace
Engineer, Propulsion Section, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, 3960
Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-
5254; fax: 562-627-5210; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model MD-11 and MD-11F airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal
Register on May 30, 2017 (82 FR 24597). The NPRM was prompted by fuel
system reviews conducted by the manufacturer. The NPRM proposed to
require a one-time inspection of the wire assemblies of the tail fuel
tank transfer pumps to determine if metallic transitions are installed
at the wire harness breakouts, and corrective actions if necessary. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct potential ignition sources
inside the tail fuel tank,
[[Page 217]]
which, in combination with flammable vapors, could result in a fuel
tank fire or explosion, and consequent loss of the airplane.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the
NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.
Supportive Comment
The Air Line Pilots Association International stated that it agreed
with the intent of the NPRM.
Request To Clarify the Description of the Unsafe Condition
Boeing asked that we clarify the description of the unsafe
condition identified in paragraph (e) of the proposed AD to add the
potential of fuel starvation as the end-level effect. Boeing stated
that referenced service information specifies that the unsafe condition
could result in engine fuel starvation.
We agree that damaged wires could result in fuel starvation as a
potential unsafe condition. However, we have no SFAR88 analysis or
service difficulty reports associated with the loss of system functions
or fuel starvation from the chafed or damaged wires identified in this
AD. We do have previous Special Federal Aviation Regulation 88 (SFAR88)
ADs for wire harnesses in the same area that were issued to prevent
wire chafing and potential ignition sources inside the fuel tank. The
actions required by this AD are intended primarily to reduce the risk
of other incidents of wires chafing and subsequent fuel tank fire or
explosion. Therefore, we have made no change to this AD in this regard.
Request To Change Certain Estimates in Costs of Compliance Section
FedEx asked that the work-hours under the On-Condition Costs for
the replacement be increased from 16 to 100. FedEx stated that the
replacement cost specifies 16 work-hours, but noted that replacement of
only one affected part will actually take about 100 hours. FedEx added
that 100 work-hours is only for one damaged wire assembly.
United Parcel Service (UPS) asked that the work-hours under the On-
Condition Costs for the replacement be increased from 16 to 244. UPS
stated that it has previously replaced this wire harness and it
required 244 work hours to complete the replacement. UPS also asked
that the cost for parts for the repair be added. UPS stated that it has
sourced the materials and the cost is $1,680 per airplane (or $168 per
transition location).
We agree to revise the estimated on-condition work-hours. When
issuing a service bulletin, Boeing estimates work-hours under expected
conditions for direct labor only. As operators implement the service
bulletin, they may find the actual work-hours are higher or lower than
estimated. We have updated the Costs of Compliance section of this AD
to reflect between 100 and 244 work-hours. We have also included the
parts cost estimate provided for repairs.
Request To Add Information Notice To Service Information Citation
FedEx asked that Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-28A150 IN 02,
dated February 24, 2017, be added to the service information cited in
paragraph (g) of the proposed AD. FedEx stated that the one-time
inspection and corrective actions in paragraph (g) specify performing a
detailed inspection in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated October 6, 2016.
FedEx added that since the referenced service information was issued,
Boeing released an information notice (IN 02) with part numbers for
three new wire assembly kits.
We disagree with the commenter's request. Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin MD11-28A150 IN 02, dated February 24, 2017, provides updated
kit information for the operators. The individual wire assembly part
numbers in the new kits are the same wire assembly part numbers needed
for the replacement required by this AD as specified in the figures in
Part 3 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated October 6, 2016. Since this AD only
requires the replacement of certain individual wire assembly part
numbers and not the kit part numbers that consist of the individual
wire assembly part numbers, we have made no change to this AD in this
regard.
Request To Clarify Paragraph (h) of the Proposed AD
FedEx and UPS requested that we clarify the actions specified in
paragraph (h) of the proposed AD. FedEx stated that paragraph (h) of
the proposed AD provides information to perform different tests than
those listed in steps 1.f, 1.g., and 1.h. of Part 4 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-
28A150, dated October 6, 2016. FedEx stated it is not clear if the
required test after rework is in accordance with steps 1.a. through
1.j. of Part 4 of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated
October 6, 2016, or per the actions specified in (h)(1), (h)(2), and
(h)(3) of this AD only. FedEx and UPS also stated that the proposed AD
should require test procedures only for the section that Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated October 6, 2016, is addressing and
not all the systems associated with wire assemblies AJS9013 and
AJS9014. FedEx and UPS also noted that the airplane maintenance manual
(AMM) references in paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of the proposed AD are
incorrect (AMM 28-28-01 should be AMM 28-08-01; AMM 26-21-02 should be
AMM 28-21-02).
We agree to clarify which actions are required by this AD. Steps
1.f, 1.g., and 1.h. of Part 4 of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated October 6, 2016, are
required for compliance (RC) after any rework is done and only address
the system affected by this AD. The other steps identified as ``RC
exempt'' as specified in Part 4 of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated October 6, 2016, are
not a part of the requirements of this AD.
The intent of paragraph (h) of the proposed AD was to specify the
corrective action for RC tests. Steps 1.f, 1.g., and 1.h. of Part 4 of
the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-
28A150, dated October 6, 2016, specify to accomplish tests but the
steps do not specify corrective actions if the tests fail. To clarify
that the tests themselves are not exceptions to Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated October 6, 2016, we have removed paragraph
(h) of the proposed AD and included the corrective action statement for
the tests in paragraph (g) of this AD.
We acknowledge that the AMM references in paragraphs (h)(1) and
(h)(2) of the proposed AD were incorrect and note that the AMM
references for the tests are identified correctly in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated October 6, 2016.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this final rule with the changes described previously and minor
editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
[[Page 218]]
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated
October 6, 2016. The service information describes procedures for a
one-time detailed inspection of the wire assemblies of the tail fuel
tank transfer pumps to determine if metallic transitions are installed
at the wire harness breakouts, and corrective actions that include
repair and replacement of the wire assembly. This service information
is reasonably available because the interested parties have access to
it through their normal course of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD affects 110 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection........................ 4 work-hours x $85 per $0 $340 $37,400
hour = $340.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs/
replacements that will be required based on the results of the
inspection. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that
might need these repairs/replacements:
On-condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repair............................ 9 work-hours x $85 per Up to $1,680......... Up to $2,445.
hour = $765.
Replacement....................... Between 100 and 244 work- $57,526.............. Between $66,026 and
hours x $85 per hour = $78,266.
between $8,500 and
$20,740.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes to
the Director of the System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2018-01-01 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-19142; Docket No. FAA-
2017-0500; Product Identifier 2017-NM-009-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective February 7, 2018.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the Boeing Company Model MD-11 and MD-11F
airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated October 6, 2016.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28; Fuel.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by fuel system reviews conducted by the
manufacturer. We
[[Page 219]]
are issuing this AD to detect and correct potential ignition sources
inside the tail fuel tank, which, in combination with flammable
vapors, could result in a fuel tank fire or explosion, and
consequent loss of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) One-Time Inspection and Corrective Actions
Within 27 months after the effective date of this AD, do a one-
time detailed inspection of the wire assemblies of the tail fuel
tank transfer pumps to determine if metallic transitions are
installed at the wire harness breakouts, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-
28A150, dated October 6, 2016. If metallic transitions are
installed, no further action is required by this paragraph. If
metallic transitions are not installed, do the corrective actions
required by paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD, as applicable,
and if, after any repair or replacement is done, any test fails,
before further flight, do corrective actions, repeat the test, and
do applicable corrective actions until the test is passed.
(1) Repair any affected wire assembly before further flight, in
accordance with Part 2 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated October 6, 2016, or
replace any affected wire assembly with a new wire assembly before
further flight, in accordance with Part 3 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated
October 6, 2016. If the replacement is done, no further action is
required for that wire assembly only.
(2) Within 24 months after accomplishment of the repair required
by paragraph (g)(1) of this AD: Replace any repaired wire assembly
with a new wire assembly, in accordance with Part 3 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-
28A150, dated October 6, 2016.
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (i) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration
deviation must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) For service information that contains steps that are labeled
as Required for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs
(h)(4)(i) and (h)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
(i) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact S[eacute]rj
Harutunian, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Section, Los Angeles ACO
Branch, FAA, 3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, California 90712-
4137; phone: 562-627-5254; fax: 562-627-5210; email:
[email protected].
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin MD11-28A150, dated October 6,
2016.
(ii) Reserved.
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740;
telephone 562-797-1717; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on December 26, 2017.
John P. Piccola, Jr.,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-28379 Filed 1-2-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P