Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the South Atlantic Region; Temporary Measures to Reduce Overfishing of Golden Tilefish, 65-71 [2017-27966]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 2, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
65
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (d)(4)(ii)
Maximum permitted aggregate population
within ¥77.6 dBm/m2/MHz PFD contour
of earth stations
Population within Partial Economic Area (PEA) where earth station is
located
Greater than 2,250,000 ............................................................................
Between 60,000 and 2,250,000 ...............................................................
Fewer than 60,000 ...................................................................................
(iii) The area in which the earth
station generates a PFD, at 10 meters
above ground level, of greater than or
equal to ¥77.6 dBm/m2/MHz does not
contain any major event venue, any
highway classified by the U.S.
Department of Transportation under the
categories Interstate, Other Freeways
and Expressways, or Other Principal
Arterial, or an urban mass transit route,
passenger railroad, or cruise ship port;
and
(iv) The applicant has successfully
completed frequency coordination with
the UMFUS licensees within the area in
which the earth station generates a PFD,
at 10 meters above ground level, of
greater than or equal to ¥77.6 dBm/m2/
MHz with respect to existing facilities
constructed and in operation by the
UMFUS licensee. In coordinating with
UMFUS licensees, the applicant shall
use the applicable processes contained
in § 101.103(d) of this chapter.
(e) If an earth station applicant or
licensee in the 27.5–28.35 GHz, 37.5–40
GHz, or 47.2–48.2 GHz bands enters into
an agreement with an UMFUS licensee,
their operations shall be governed by
that agreement, except to the extent that
the agreement is inconsistent with the
Commission’s rules or the
Communications Act.
(f) Any earth station authorizations
issued pursuant to paragraph (a)(4), (c),
or (d)(4) of this section shall be
conditioned upon operation being in
compliance with the criteria contained
in the applicable paragraph.
PART 30—UPPER MICROWAVE
FLEXIBLE USE SERVICE
11. The authority citation for part 30
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 152, 153, 154,
301, 303, 304, 307, 309, 310, 316, 332, 1302.
12. Amend § 30.4 by redesignating
paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) as paragraphs
(b), (c), and (d) and adding new
paragraphs (a) and (e) to read to read as
follows:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
■
§ 30.4
Frequencies.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) 24.25–24.45 GHz and 24.75–25.25
GHz bands—24.25–24.35 GHz; 24.35–
24.45 GHz; 24.75–24.85 GHz; 24.85–
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:22 Dec 29, 2017
Jkt 244001
0.1 percent of population in PEA.
2,250 people.
3.75 percent of population in PEA.
24.95 GHz; 24.95–25.05 GHz; 25.05–
25.15 GHz; and 25.15–25.25 GHz.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) 47.2–48.2 GHz band—47.2–47.4
GHz; 47.4–47.6 GHz; 47.6–47.8 GHz;
47.8–48.0 GHz; and 48.0–48.2 GHz.
13. Amend § 30.6 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
■
§ 30.6
Permissible communications.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Fixed-Satellite Service shall be
provided in a manner consistent with
part 25 of this chapter. The technical
and operating rules in this part shall not
apply to Fixed-Satellite Service
operation.
§ 30.8
■
PART 101—FIXED MICROWAVE
SERVICES
16. The authority citation for part 101
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303.
§ 101.115
[Amended]
17. Section 101.115 is amended in the
table in paragraph (b)(2), in the entries
‘‘71,000 to 76,000 (co-polar),’’ ‘‘71,000
to 76,000 (cross-polar),’’ ‘‘81,000 to
86,000 (co-polar),’’ and ‘‘81,000 to
86,000 (cross-polar),’’ by removing
footnote designation ‘‘15’’ and adding
footnote designation ‘‘14’’ in its place.
■
[FR Doc. 2017–27437 Filed 12–29–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
[Remove and Reserve]
14. Remove and reserve § 30.8.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
15. Amend § 30.104 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
§ 30.104
50 CFR Part 622
■
Construction requirements.
(a) Upper Microwave Flexible Use
Service licensees must make a buildout
showing as part of their renewal
applications. Licensees relying on
mobile or point-to-multipoint service
must show that they are providing
reliable signal coverage and service to at
least 40 percent of the population
within the service area of the licensee,
and that they are using facilities to
provide service in that area either to
customers or for internal use. Licensees
relying on point-to-point service must
demonstrate that they have four links
operating and providing service, either
to customers or for internal use, if the
population within the license area is
equal to or less than 268,000. If the
population within the license area is
greater than 268,000, a licensee relying
on point-to-point service must
demonstrate it has at least one link in
operation and is providing service for
each 67,000 population within the
license area. In order to be eligible to be
counted under the point-to-point
buildout standard, a point-to-point link
must operate with a transmit power
greater than +43 dBm.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[Docket No. 170828813–7999–02]
RIN 0648–BH15
Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the South
Atlantic Region; Temporary Measures
to Reduce Overfishing of Golden
Tilefish
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final temporary rule.
AGENCY:
This final temporary rule
implements interim measures to reduce
overfishing of golden tilefish in Federal
waters of the South Atlantic. Beginning
in 2018, this temporary rule reduces the
total annual catch limit (ACL), the
commercial and recreational sector
ACLs, and the quotas for the hook-andline and longline components of the
commercial sector. This final temporary
rule is effective for 180 days, although
NMFS may extend the temporary rule’s
effectiveness for up to an additional 186
days. The purpose of this final
temporary rule is to reduce overfishing
of golden tilefish while the South
Atlantic Fishery Management Council
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02JAR1.SGM
02JAR1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
66
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 2, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
(Council) develops management
measures to end overfishing of golden
tilefish on a permanent basis.
DATES: This final temporary rule is
effective on January 2, 2018, through
July 1, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the
environmental assessment (EA)
supporting these interim measures may
be obtained from the Southeast Regional
Office website at https://
sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/sustainable_
fisheries/s_atl/sg/2017/golden_tilefish_
interim/. The EA includes a
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
analysis.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karla Gore, NMFS Southeast Regional
Office, telephone: 727–824–5305, or
email: karla.gore@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
snapper-grouper fishery in the South
Atlantic region includes golden tilefish
and is managed under the Fishery
Management Plan for Snapper-Grouper
Fishery of the South Atlantic Region
(FMP). The FMP was prepared by the
Council and is implemented by NMFS
through regulations at 50 CFR part 622
under authority of the MagnusonStevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens
Act).
On October 30, 2017, NMFS
published a proposed temporary rule in
the Federal Register and requested
public comment (82 FR 50101). The
proposed temporary rule and EA outline
the rationale for the actions contained in
this final temporary rule, and the EA is
available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES
section). A summary of the management
measures described in the EA and
implemented by this final temporary
rule is provided below.
Golden tilefish are harvested by both
commercial and recreational fishermen
throughout the South Atlantic, although
total landings are dominated by the
commercial sector using bottom
longline gear. Golden tilefish are also
harvested commercially using hookand-line gear, while the recreational
sector harvests at a much lower level
than either component of the
commercial sector.
In April 2016, an update to the 2011
Southeast Data, Assessment, and
Review stock assessment (SEDAR 25)
was completed for golden tilefish using
data through 2014 (SEDAR 25 Update
2016). While SEDAR 25 concluded that
golden tilefish was not subject to
overfishing and was not overfished, the
SEDAR 25 Update 2016 concluded that
golden tilefish is undergoing overfishing
but is not overfished. NMFS notified the
Council of the updated stock status
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:22 Dec 29, 2017
Jkt 244001
determination in a letter dated January
4, 2017. As mandated by the MagnusonStevens Act, the Council and NMFS
must prepare and implement an FMP,
FMP amendment, or regulations to end
overfishing of golden tilefish.
In May 2016, the Council’s Scientific
and Statistical Committee (SSC)
reviewed the SEDAR 25 Update 2016
and indicated that the SEDAR 25
Update 2016 was based on the best
scientific information available. During
the Council’s review of the SEDAR 25
Update 2016, Council members stated
their concern over the large differences
in biological benchmarks between
SEDAR 25 and the SEDAR 25 Update
2016 and the much lower fishing level
recommendations in the SEDAR 25
Update 2016. The Council subsequently
requested that the SSC review the
SEDAR 25 Update 2016 again as a result
of their concerns.
In May 2017, the SEDAR Steering
Committee considered a Council request
for another golden tilefish update
assessment, which was intended to
address the SEDAR 25 Update 2016
concerns raised by the Council and their
SSC during their earlier reviews. While
an update assessment could not be
included in the SEDAR schedule for
2017, the Southeast Fisheries Science
Center (SEFSC) agreed to revise the
SEDAR 25 Update 2016 to address these
Council concerns.
As requested by the Council, the 2017
revision to the SEDAR 25 Update 2016
used a newly developed model to assess
the golden tilefish stock in the South
Atlantic. The 2017 revised analysis was
reviewed by the SSC at their October
2017 meeting, and the SSC did not
recommend basing stocks status and
fishing level recommendations on the
revised analysis completed in 2017, but
rather on the SEDAR 25 Update 2016.
The Council is scheduled to discuss the
SSC recommendations at their
December 2017 meeting, and the
recommendations will be used to
develop management measures in
Amendment 45 to the FMP, which is
intended to end overfishing of golden
tilefish on a permanent basis.
Because the revised catch level
recommendations from the Council’s
SSC were not available until late
October 2017, and the majority of
golden tilefish landings typically occur
early in the fishing year, there was
insufficient time for the Council and
NMFS to develop and possibly
implement management measures,
respectively, to end overfishing of
golden tilefish on a permanent basis in
time for the start of the 2018 fishing year
beginning on January 1.
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Therefore, as a result of the limited
timeframe to develop revised catch level
recommendations, the Council sent a
letter to NMFS, dated June 27, 2017, to
request that NMFS implement interim
measures to immediately reduce
overfishing of golden tilefish while
management measures are developed
through Amendment 45 to end
overfishing of golden tilefish on a
permanent basis. For 2018, the Council
recommended setting the total ACL at
the projected yield at 75 percent of the
yield produced by the fishing mortality
rate at maximum sustainable yield,
which would be 323,000 lb (146,510 kg),
gutted weight, 361,760 lb (164,092 kg),
round weight. The interim measures in
this final temporary rule are effective for
180 days after the publication date in
the Federal Register and may be
extended one time for an additional 186
days. If NMFS does not extend the
proposed interim measures beyond 180
days, the total and sector ACLs, as well
as the quotas for the hook-and-line and
longline components of the commercial
sector, would revert to their previously
implemented values. The final rule for
Amendment 18B implemented the
previous commercial ACL and
commercial component quotas (78 FR
23858, April 23, 2013), and the final
rule for Regulatory Amendment 12
implemented the previous recreational
ACL (77 FR 61295, October 9, 2012).
The Council intends to have
Amendment 45 developed and
implemented prior to the expiration of
these interim measures.
Management Measures Contained in
This Final Temporary Rule
During the effectiveness of this final
temporary rule, which starts in the 2018
fishing year, the total ACL for golden
tilefish is 323,000 lb (146,510 kg), gutted
weight, 361,760 lb (164,092 kg), round
weight. This final temporary rule also
specifies the commercial and
recreational sector ACLs and component
commercial quotas using the existing
sector allocations. For golden tilefish, 97
percent of the total ACL is allocated to
the commercial sector, with 25 percent
of the commercial ACL available for the
hook-and-line component and 75
percent available for the longline
component. The recreational sector is
allocated three percent of the total ACL.
Therefore, during the effectiveness of
this final temporary rule, the
commercial ACL is 313,310 lb (142,115
kg), gutted weight. The commercial
quota for the hook-and-line component
is 78,328 lb (35,529 kg), gutted weight,
and the commercial quota for the
longline component is 234,982 lb
(106,586 kg), gutted weight. The
E:\FR\FM\02JAR1.SGM
02JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 2, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
recreational ACL during the
effectiveness of this final temporary rule
starting in 2018 is 2,187 fish, which is
equivalent to 9,690 lb (4,395 kg), gutted
weight.
The temporary reductions in the ACLs
and quotas being implemented through
this final temporary rule could result in
earlier in-season closures particularly
for the commercial sector. The earlier
closures would likely result in shortterm adverse socio-economic effects.
However, the temporary ACLs and
quotas are expected to minimize future
adverse socio-economic effects by
potentially reducing future reductions
in the ACLs and quotas required to end
overfishing through Amendment 45.
The temporary ACLs and quotas would
also provide biological benefits to the
golden tilefish stock by reducing the
current levels of fishing mortality.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received 23 comment
submissions from individuals, fishing
associations, and commercial, private
recreational, and charter vessel/
headboat (for-hire) recreational fishing
entities during the public comment
period on the proposed temporary rule.
Sixteen of the comments were in general
opposition to the actions in the golden
tilefish proposed temporary rule, citing
adverse socio-economic effects, and
uncertainty with the stock assessment.
Seven comments supported the need for
protection of golden tilefish. Comments
that were beyond the scope of the
proposed temporary rule and comments
that agreed with the proposed actions
have not been addressed in this final
rule. Comments that specifically relate
to the actions contained in the proposed
temporary rule, as well as NMFS’
respective responses, are summarized
below.
Comment 1: Golden tilefish are above
target fishing levels and the data, model,
and science used to make the
overfishing determination are flawed.
SEDAR 25 Update 2016 should not be
accepted as the best scientific
information available, the proposed
temporary rule should not be
implemented, and NMFS should wait
until better data become available or a
new stock assessment is completed
before making any management
decisions.
Response: NMFS disagrees. The EA
and this final temporary rule respond to
the latest stock assessment for golden
tilefish in the South Atlantic (SEDAR 25
Update 2016), which includes waters off
North Carolina through the east coast of
Florida. The SEDAR 25 Update 2016
concluded that the stock is undergoing
overfishing but is not overfished. NMFS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:22 Dec 29, 2017
Jkt 244001
notified the Council of the updated
stock status determination in a letter
dated January 4, 2017.
The SEDAR process is a peerreviewed cooperative effort to assess the
status of stocks in the jurisdictions of
the South Atlantic, Caribbean, and Gulf
of Mexico Fishery Management
Councils; as well as NMFS’ SEFSC and
Southeast Regional Office, and the
NMFS Highly Migratory Species
Division; and the Atlantic and Gulf
States Marine Fisheries Commissions.
SEDAR also relies on state agencies and
universities throughout the region for
research, data collection, and stock
assessment expertise. Fisherydependent and independent data were
utilized in the stock assessment. All of
the data sources used are further
described in the SEDAR 25 Update
2016, which is available on the SEDAR
website at https://sedarweb.org. The
SEDAR website also provides extensive
supporting documentation that
describes data collection programs and
research findings. In May 2016, the
Council’s SSC reviewed the SEDAR 25
Update 2016 and indicated that the
assessment is based on the best
scientific information available.
The Council received the results of
the assessment update from the SSC in
June 2016, and Council members
expressed concern over the large
differences in biological benchmarks
and fishing level recommendations
between SEDAR 25 Update 2016 and
SEDAR 25, and subsequently requested
an updated stock assessment for golden
tilefish.
To address the Council’s concerns, in
May 2017, the SEDAR Steering
Committee agreed to revise the SEDAR
25 Update 2016, because a new golden
tilefish stock assessment could not be
completed in 2017. The SSC reviewed
the 2017 revision to the SEDAR 25
Update 2016 at their October 2017
meeting and determined that it was
unsuitable for management. Therefore,
the best scientific information available
for golden tilefish remains the SEDAR
25 Update 2016.
NMFS and the South Atlantic Council
expect the recent level of golden tilefish
landings to continue in the near future.
Because the majority of the golden
tilefish landings are taken between
January and early spring in most years,
there was not sufficient time for the
Council and NMFS to develop and
possibly implement management
measures to end overfishing of golden
tilefish on a permanent basis in time for
the start of the 2018 fishing year
beginning on January 1. Therefore, to
reduce overfishing, the Council
recommended that NMFS implement
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67
interim measures to set the golden
tilefish total ACL for 2018 at 323,000 lb
(146,510 kg), gutted weight, while the
Council develops Amendment 45 to end
overfishing of golden tilefish on a
permanent basis. This total ACL is
expected to immediately address the
need to reduce overfishing of golden
tilefish. The SEFSC certified the EA for
these interim measures and supported
the Council’s recommendations as the
best scientific information available on
October 3, 2017.
The temporary rule will take effect in
2018 for 180 days after the date of
publication and may be extended once
for a maximum of an additional 186
days while the Council develops
management measures to end
overfishing of golden tilefish in the
South Atlantic on a permanent basis
through Amendment 45. The next
scheduled SEDAR benchmark stock
assessment is scheduled to be
completed in 2019.
Comment 2: The assessment model
used for the SEDAR 25 Update 2016,
which employed a robust multinomial
likelihood function approach, was
criticized by the Council’s SSC and
resulted in biasing the assessment
results; consequently, the SEDAR 25
Update 2016 does not constitute best
scientific information available for
golden tilefish.
Response: NMFS disagrees.
Subsequent to SEDAR 25, completed in
2011, the Council raised concerns about
the assessment’s use of a multinomial
likelihood function approach. Partly in
response to those concerns, the SEDAR
25 Update 2016 participants determined
that the use of a robust multinomial
likelihood function approach is more
appropriate for the SEDAR 25 Update
2016 than the original multinomial
likelihood function approach used in
SEDAR 25. However, the Council was
concerned with the use of the robust
multinomial likelihood function
approach in the SEDAR 25 Update 2016,
because subsequent SEDAR assessments
have raised concerns from the Council
with the ability of the original and
robust multinomial likelihood functions
to estimate composition data, and a
recent stock assessment of red grouper
used a newly developed Dirichlet
multinomial likelihood function
approach. Therefore, in June 2016, the
Council requested the SEFSC revise the
SEDAR 25 Update 2016 using the
Dirichlet multinomial likelihood
function approach in place of the robust
multinomial likelihood function
approach.
The Council’s SSC reviewed the
revision to the SEDAR 25 Update 2016
at their October 2017 meeting. After
E:\FR\FM\02JAR1.SGM
02JAR1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
68
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 2, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
consideration, the SSC did not
recommended basing stock status and
fishing level recommendations using the
Dirichlet multinomial likelihood
function approach. Instead, the SSC
recommended using the base model run
of the SEDAR 25 Update 2016, which
used the robust multinomial likelihood
function approach. The SSC determined
that the Dirichlet multinomial
likelihood function approach has not
been sufficiently tested using
composition data obtained from sparse
sampling, which is present in the 2017
revision to the SEDAR 25 Update 2016.
In addition, the SSC determined that
most model runs of the revision to the
SEDAR 25 Update 2016 did not
converge on a solution suitable for their
recommendation as management advice.
The criticisms referenced by the
comment from the October 2017 SSC
meeting were actually criticisms of the
Dirichlet multinomial likelihood
approach and not the robust
multinomial likelihood approach to
which the SSC defaulted with their final
recommendation. The use of the robust
multinomial likelihood function
approach has been accepted as a valid
stock assessment tool and has been used
in other stock assessments, such as
SEDAR 36 for snowy grouper and
SEDAR 41 for red snapper. Ultimately,
the use of the robust multinomial
likelihood function approach in the
SEDAR 25 Update 2016 was accepted by
the SSC as best scientific information
available, and has been accepted as such
by NMFS.
Comment 3: The assessment model
changes made in the SEDAR 25 Update
2016 from the SEDAR 25 benchmark
assessment were contrary to accepted
stock assessment policy, and resulted
inaccurate changes to golden tilefish
stock status results from the SEDAR 25
Update 2016.
Response: NMFS disagrees.
Performing additional analyses, and not
merely updating landings data, is not
uncommon in update assessments
completed via the SEDAR process. In
this case, the inclusion of the robust
multinomial likelihood function
approach in the SEDAR 25 Update 2016
was within the changes allowed as
specified in the Terms of Reference for
an update assessment. The Terms of
Reference provided for the SEDAR 25
Update 2016 specifically indicated that
it needed to ‘‘document any changes or
corrections made to the model and
input datasets,’’ clearly establishing that
such potential model changes were
envisioned and potentially desired.
While the SEDAR guidelines do not
provide precise guidance on the proper
scope of allowable changes in update
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:22 Dec 29, 2017
Jkt 244001
assessments, the changes made in the
SEDAR 25 Update 2016 are within the
scope of what is allowed under the
SEDAR guidelines that specify
allowable changes under different
assessment types. Further, the changes
are consistent with changes made in
other update assessments.
As noted in the response to Comment
2, the SEDAR 25 Update 2016 used
widely accepted and commonly used
analytical methods. It has been peer
reviewed, extensively discussed by the
relevant parties, and NMFS has
determined that it constitutes the best
scientific information available.
Comment 4: The interim measures
will cause additional economic
hardship on the commercial sector and
for-hire components of the recreational
sector, as well as the supporting
businesses, such as fish houses, dealers,
and restaurants. Many business
operations will fail as a result of the
proposed interim measures.
Response: As described in the EA, the
proposed temporary rule, and the
response to Comment 1, the temporary
ACL and quota reductions are necessary
to immediately reduce overfishing of
golden tilefish in the South Atlantic,
while the Council develops
management measures in Amendment
45 to end overfishing of golden tilefish
on a permanent basis. NMFS and the
Council recognize the adverse socioeconomic impacts that reducing the
ACLs and quotas could have on fishing
businesses and communities. However,
these interim measures may result in
less stringent measures that would be
considered in Amendment 45 to end
overfishing of golden tilefish on a
permanent basis.
The economic analysis developed for
this temporary rule indicates that the
temporary ACL and quota reductions
would affect the hook-and-line and
longline components of the commercial
sector, as well as for-hire operations in
the recreational sector. The amount of
the ACL and quota reductions is
proportional to each sector or
component’s current allocation of the
total ACL. Reductions to the total ACL,
the commercial and recreational sector
ACLs, and the commercial quotas for
the hook-and-line and longline
components of the commercial sector
implemented by this final temporary
rule are expected to result in adverse,
short-term economic effects directly on
the participants of the golden tilefish
commercial and recreational sectors and
indirectly on the supporting industries,
such as dealers, tackle and bait shops,
and fishing communities. In general, the
larger the sector or component’s
percentage of the allocation, the greater
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the short-term adverse economic
impacts would be. In addition, the more
dependent an area or fishing community
is on fishing for golden tilefish, the
greater would be the adverse impacts on
the area’s fishing participants and
supporting industries.
Insufficient information is available to
determine if this final temporary rule
will result in businesses exiting the
snapper-grouper fishery. The initial
regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA)
conducted for the proposed temporary
rule notes that longline fishermen
would be particularly adversely affected
because they derive approximately 74
percent of their total revenues from
golden tilefish. However, as described
previously, these impacts are expected
to be short-term and may result in less
restrictive management measures
possibly implemented through
Amendment 45.
NMFS also expects consumers and
recreational anglers to be negatively
affected by the final temporary rule.
While the effects on consumers cannot
be estimated with available information,
a good possibility exists that the
presence of substitute species would
mitigate the negative effects on
consumers. The EA provides estimates
of the loss in consumer surplus to
recreational anglers as a result of the
final temporary rule. However, no
quantitative estimates of the economic
effects on the for-hire component of the
recreational sector could be provided
due to the complexity of determining
whether potentially affected for-hire
trips would be totally lost or just
redirected to other areas or to other
species. In addition, recreational
fishermen have varied preferences and
may target or harvest a diverse mix of
snapper-grouper and other species on a
trip. The absence or reduction of the
opportunity to fish for golden tilefish
may or may not affect their overall
desire to take or pay for trips.
As discussed in the EA, NMFS
expects the reduced ACLs and quotas in
this final temporary rule to result in
diminished economic benefits in the
short-term, but also to reduce
overfishing sooner than if no interim
measures were implemented to prevent
the golden tilefish stock in the South
Atlantic from becoming overfished,
thereby resulting in greater economic
benefits in the longer term.
Comment 5: The socio-economic
analysis is inadequate because it did not
consider the impacts beyond the
commercial and recreational fishermen.
Response: NMFS disagrees. NMFS
determined that an adequate socioeconomic analysis, assessing the
impacts of the temporary rule, was
E:\FR\FM\02JAR1.SGM
02JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 2, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
performed and included in the EA.
NMFS prepared an IRFA to analyze the
economic impacts of the temporary rule
on small entities, specifically
commercial fishermen. A summary of
the IRFA was included in the proposed
temporary rule. A final regulatory
flexibility analysis (FRFA) accompanies
this final temporary rule that also
considers the comments received on
this action. The EA provides analyses of
the economic benefits and costs of each
alternative to the nation and the South
Atlantic snapper-grouper fishery as a
whole. The EA recognizes that the
temporary rule will have economic
effects on commercial and recreational
supporting industries (dealers,
wholesalers, retailers, restaurants)
beyond the harvest market. The EA
provides general information regarding
the commercial and recreational sectors’
economic impacts in terms of jobs,
sales, income, and value added on the
entire seafood industry, including the
harvest, wholesale and retail markets.
Quantifying the effects of each
alternative on the commercial and
recreational supporting industries is not
possible due to lack of sufficient
information. For the commercial sector,
reactions from dealers, wholesalers,
retailers, or restaurants to reduced
availability of golden tilefish is
uncertain, especially that substitute
species exist. For the recreational sector,
substitute species also exist and, as
described in the response to Comment
4, the reduction or absence of the
opportunity to fish for golden tilefish
may or may not affect their overall
desire to take or pay for trips. The EA
also notes that fishing communities
dependent on the golden tilefish
segment of the snapper-grouper fishery
would tend to bear a greater share of the
short-term adverse impacts. The socioeconomic analysis indicates that while
the short-term socioeconomic impacts
would be negative, ending overfishing
through Amendment 45, if
implemented, would be expected to
result in greater long-term benefits.
Future Action
NMFS determined that this final
temporary rule is necessary to reduce
overfishing of golden tilefish in the
South Atlantic. NMFS considered all
public comments received on the
proposed temporary rule in the
determination of whether to proceed
with a final temporary rule and whether
any revisions to the final temporary rule
were appropriate. This final temporary
rule is effective for 180 days after the
date of publication in the Federal
Register, as authorized by section 305(c)
of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. The final
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:22 Dec 29, 2017
Jkt 244001
temporary rule could be extended if
NMFS publishes a temporary rule
extension in the Federal Register for up
to an additional 186 days, because the
public has had an opportunity to
comment on the proposed temporary
rule, and the Council is actively
preparing an FMP amendment to
address overfishing on a permanent
basis.
Classification
The Regional Administrator for the
NMFS Southeast Region has determined
that this final temporary rule is
consistent with the Magnuson-Stevens
Act and other applicable laws.
This final temporary rule has been
determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
In compliance with section 604 of the
RFA, NMFS prepared a FRFA for this
final temporary rule. The FRFA
incorporates the IRFA, a summary of the
significant economic issues raised by
public comments, NMFS’ responses to
those comments, and a summary of the
analyses completed to support the
action. The FRFA follows.
A description of this final temporary
rule, and its rationale, objectives, and
legal basis are contained at the
beginning of this section in the
preamble and in the SUMMARY section of
the preamble. The Magnuson-Stevens
Act provides the statutory basis for this
final temporary rule. No duplicative,
overlapping, or conflicting Federal rules
have been identified. In addition, no
new reporting, record-keeping, or other
compliance requirements are introduced
by this final temporary rule.
Accordingly, this final temporary rule
does not implicate the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
No comments specific to the IRFA
were received from the public or from
the Chief Counsel for the Advocacy of
the Small Business Administration;
therefore, no public comments are
addressed in this FRFA. However, there
are comments that have economic
implications, and they are addressed in
the Comments and Responses section.
No changes to the proposed
temporary rule were made in response
to public comments. NMFS agrees that
the Council’s recommendation for the
temporary action will best achieve their
objectives for the final temporary rule
while minimizing, to the extent
practicable, the adverse effects on
fishermen, support industries, and
associated communities.
NMFS expects this final temporary
rule will directly affect all commercial
vessels that harvest South Atlantic
golden tilefish under the FMP. The
change in the recreational ACL in this
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
69
final temporary rule will not directly
affect or regulate for-hire businesses.
Any impact to the profitability or
competitiveness of for-hire fishing
businesses will be the result of changes
in for-hire angler demand and will
therefore be indirect in nature. Under
the RFA recreational anglers, who will
be directly affected by this final
temporary rule, are not considered to be
small entities, so they are outside the
scope of this analysis and only the
effects on commercial vessels were
analyzed. For RFA purposes only,
NMFS has established a small business
size standard for businesses, including
their affiliates, whose primary industry
is commercial fishing (see 50 CFR
200.2). A business primarily engaged in
commercial fishing (NAICS code 11411)
is classified as a small business if it is
independently owned and operated, is
not dominant in its field of operation
(including affiliates), and has combined
annual receipts not in excess of $11
million for all its affiliated operations
worldwide.
As of August 10, 2017, there were 544
vessels with valid or renewable Federal
South Atlantic snapper-grouper
unlimited permits, 114 valid or
renewable 225-lb trip limited permits,
and 22 golden tilefish longline
endorsements. The golden tilefish
longline endorsement system started in
2013. From 2012 through 2016, an
average of 23 longline vessels per year
landed golden tilefish in the South
Atlantic. These vessels, combined,
averaged 255 trips per year in the South
Atlantic on which golden tilefish were
landed, and 182 trips taken in the South
Atlantic on which no golden tilefish
were harvested or in areas outside the
South Atlantic. The average annual total
dockside revenue (2016 dollars) for
these vessels combined was
approximately $1.56 million from
golden tilefish, $0.10 million from other
species co-harvested with golden
tilefish (on the same trips in the South
Atlantic), and $0.43 million from trips
in the South Atlantic on which no
golden tilefish were harvested or in
areas outside the South Atlantic. Total
average annual revenue from all species
harvested by longline vessels harvesting
golden tilefish in the South Atlantic was
approximately $2.10 million, or
approximately $92,000 per vessel.
Longline vessels generated
approximately 74 percent of their total
revenues from golden tilefish. For the
same period, an average of 82 vessels
per year landed golden tilefish using
other gear types (mostly hook-and-line)
in the South Atlantic. These vessels,
combined, averaged 483 trips per year
E:\FR\FM\02JAR1.SGM
02JAR1
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
70
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 2, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
in the South Atlantic on which golden
tilefish were landed, and 2,862 trips
taken in the South Atlantic on which no
golden tilefish were harvested or in
areas outside the South Atlantic. The
average annual total dockside revenue
(2016 dollars) for these 82 vessels was
approximately $0.36 million from
golden tilefish, $0.66 million from other
species co-harvested with golden
tilefish (on the same trips in the South
Atlantic), and $4.13 million from trips
in the South Atlantic on which no
golden tilefish were harvested or in
areas outside the South Atlantic. The
total average annual revenue from all
species harvested by these 82 vessels
was approximately $5.16 million, or
approximately $62,000 per vessel.
Approximately seven percent of these
vessels’ total revenues came from
golden tilefish. Based on the foregoing
revenue information, all commercial
vessels using longlines or other gear
types (mostly hook-and-line) affected by
the final temporary rule are determined
to be small entities.
Because all entities expected to be
directly affected by this final temporary
rule are determined to be small entities,
NMFS determined that this final
temporary rule will affect a substantial
number of small entities. For the same
reason, the issue of disproportionate
effects on small versus large entities
does not arise in the present case.
Reducing the South Atlantic total
ACL for golden tilefish will reduce the
specific ACLs for the commercial and
recreational sectors. These ACL
reductions will result in ex-vessel
revenue losses of approximately
$229,000 for hook-and-line vessels and
$600,000 for longline vessels over the
entire 2018 fishing year. Ex-vessel
revenue reductions for the commercial
sector will result in profit reductions,
although this is more likely for longline
vessels as they are more dependent on
golden tilefish than hook-and-line
vessels.
The following discusses the
alternatives that the Council did not
select as preferred.
Four alternatives, including the
preferred alternative as described above,
were considered for reducing the total
and sector ACLs for South Atlantic
golden tilefish. The first alternative, the
no action alternative, would maintain
the current economic benefits to all
participants in the South Atlantic
golden tilefish component of the
snapper-grouper fishery. This
alternative, however, would not address
the need to curtail continued
overfishing of the stock, very likely
leading into the adoption of more
stringent measures in the near future.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:22 Dec 29, 2017
Jkt 244001
The second alternative would reduce
the ACLs more than the preferred
alternative, and thus would be expected
to result in larger revenue (and profit)
losses to the commercial sector. The
third alternative would establish higher
ACLs than the preferred alternative.
Although this alternative would result
in lower revenue losses to the
commercial sector, the ACLs it would
establish may not be low enough to
address the overfishing status of the
stock. To an extent, this alternative
would leave open a greater likelihood of
implementing more stringent measures
when management actions are
developed and possibly implemented
through Amendment 45 to end
overfishing of golden tilefish on a
permanent basis.
This final temporary rule responds to
the best scientific information available.
The Assistant Administrator for NOAA
Fisheries (AA) finds that the need to
immediately implement this action
constitutes good cause to waive the 30day delay in this final temporary rule’s
effectiveness, pursuant to the authority
set forth in 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), as such
procedure for this final temporary rule
is impracticable and contrary to the
public interest.
A delay in effectiveness is
impracticable, because it would
contribute to overfishing of golden
tilefish, which is contrary to National
Standard 1 of the Magnuson-Stevens
Act. National Standard 1 requires NMFS
to conserve and manage ocean resources
to prevent overfishing, while achieving
the optimum yield from each fishery.
Without this final temporary rule
becoming effective early in the 2018
fishing year, which begins on January 1,
the commercial and recreational sectors
would be able to harvest golden tilefish
under higher ACLs and quotas than
those implemented by this final
temporary rule. These harvests could
result in further overfishing of golden
tilefish, contrary to NMFS’ statutory
obligations. By implementing this final
temporary rule immediately, the total
harvest of golden tilefish would be
reduced until the Council and NMFS
can prepare and possibly implement
management measures under
Amendment 45 to end overfishing of
golden tilefish on a permanent basis.
In addition, delaying the effectiveness
of this final temporary rule for 30 days
is contrary to the public interest because
of the need to immediately implement
this action to protect golden tilefish.
The capacity of the fishing fleet allows
for rapid harvest of the ACL. Delaying
the effectiveness of this final temporary
rule would require time and could
potentially result in a harvest in excess
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of the reduced ACLs implemented by
this final temporary rule, increasing the
likelihood of future overfishing and
more restrictive measures to address it.
Accordingly, the 30-day delay in
effectiveness of the measures contained
in this final temporary rule is waived.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 622
Annual catch limit, Fisheries, Fishing,
Golden tilefish, South Atlantic.
Dated: December 21, 2017.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is amended
as follows:
PART 622—FISHERIES OF THE
CARIBBEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND
SOUTH ATLANTIC
1. The authority citation for part 622
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
2. In § 622.190, suspend paragraphs
(a)(2)(i) through (iii) and add paragraphs
(a)(2)(iv) through (vi) to read as follows:
■
§ 622.190
Quotas.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) Hook-and-line and longline
components combined—313,310 lb
(142,115 kg).
(v) Hook-and-line component—78,328
lb (35,529 kg).
(vi) Longline component—234,982 lb
(106,586 kg).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 622.193, suspend paragraphs
(a)(1)(i), (ii), and (iii) and (a)(2), and add
paragraphs (a)(1)(iv), (v), and (vi), and
(a)(3) to read as follows:
§ 622.193 Annual catch limits (ACLs),
annual catch targets (ACTs), and
accountability measures (AMs).
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) Hook-and-line component. If
commercial landings for golden tilefish,
as estimated by the SRD, reach or are
projected to reach the commercial ACL
(commercial quota) specified in
§ 622.190(a)(2)(v), the AA will file a
notification with the Office of the
Federal Register to close the hook-andline component of the commercial
sector for the remainder of the fishing
year. Applicable restrictions after a
commercial quota closure are specified
in § 622.190(c).
(v) Longline component. If
commercial landings for golden tilefish,
E:\FR\FM\02JAR1.SGM
02JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 1 / Tuesday, January 2, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
as estimated by the SRD, reach or are
projected to reach the commercial ACL
(commercial quota) specified in
§ 622.190(a)(2)(vi), the AA will file a
notification with the Office of the
Federal Register to close the longline
component of the commercial sector for
the remainder of the fishing year. After
the commercial ACL for the longline
component is reached or projected to be
reached, golden tilefish may not be
fished for or possessed by a vessel with
a golden tilefish longline endorsement.
Applicable restrictions after a
commercial quota closure are specified
in § 622.190(c).
(vi) If commercial landings of golden
tilefish, as estimated by the SRD, exceed
the commercial ACL (including both the
hook-and-line and longline component
quotas) specified in § 622.190(a)(2)(iv),
and the combined commercial and
recreational ACL of 323,000 lb (146,510
kg), gutted weight, 361,760 lb (164,092
kg), round weight, is exceeded during
the same fishing year, and golden
tilefish are overfished based on the most
recent Status of U.S. Fisheries Report to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:22 Dec 29, 2017
Jkt 244001
Congress, the AA will file a notification
with the Office of the Federal Register
to reduce the commercial ACL for that
following fishing year by the amount of
the commercial ACL overage in the
prior fishing year.
*
*
*
*
*
(3) Recreational sector. (i) If
recreational landings of golden tilefish,
as estimated by the SRD, reach or are
projected to reach the recreational ACL
of 2,187 fish, the AA will file a
notification with the Office of the
Federal Register to close the recreational
sector for the remainder of the fishing
year regardless if the stock is overfished,
unless NMFS determines that no closure
is necessary based on the best scientific
information available. On and after the
effective date of such a notification, the
bag and possession limits for golden
tilefish in or from the South Atlantic
EEZ are zero.
(ii) If recreational landings of golden
tilefish, as estimated by the SRD, exceed
the recreational ACL, then during the
following fishing year recreational
landings will be monitored for a
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
71
persistence in increased landings, and if
necessary, the AA will file a notification
with the Office of the Federal Register
to reduce the length of the recreational
fishing season and the recreational ACL
by the amount of the recreational ACL
overage, if the species is overfished
based on the most recent Status of U.S.
Fisheries Report to Congress, and if the
combined commercial and recreational
ACL of 323,000 lb (146,510 kg), gutted
weight, 361,760 lb (164,092 kg), round
weight, is exceeded during the same
fishing year. The AA will use the best
scientific information available to
determine if reducing the length of the
recreational fishing season and
recreational ACL is necessary. When the
recreational sector is closed as a result
of NMFS reducing the length of the
recreational fishing season and ACL, the
bag and possession limits for golden
tilefish in or from the South Atlantic
EEZ are zero.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2017–27966 Filed 12–29–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\02JAR1.SGM
02JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 1 (Tuesday, January 2, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 65-71]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-27966]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 170828813-7999-02]
RIN 0648-BH15
Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the South Atlantic Region; Temporary
Measures to Reduce Overfishing of Golden Tilefish
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final temporary rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final temporary rule implements interim measures to
reduce overfishing of golden tilefish in Federal waters of the South
Atlantic. Beginning in 2018, this temporary rule reduces the total
annual catch limit (ACL), the commercial and recreational sector ACLs,
and the quotas for the hook-and-line and longline components of the
commercial sector. This final temporary rule is effective for 180 days,
although NMFS may extend the temporary rule's effectiveness for up to
an additional 186 days. The purpose of this final temporary rule is to
reduce overfishing of golden tilefish while the South Atlantic Fishery
Management Council
[[Page 66]]
(Council) develops management measures to end overfishing of golden
tilefish on a permanent basis.
DATES: This final temporary rule is effective on January 2, 2018,
through July 1, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the environmental assessment (EA)
supporting these interim measures may be obtained from the Southeast
Regional Office website at https://sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/sustainable_fisheries/s_atl/sg/2017/golden_tilefish_interim/.
The EA includes a Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) analysis.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karla Gore, NMFS Southeast Regional
Office, telephone: 727-824-5305, or email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The snapper-grouper fishery in the South
Atlantic region includes golden tilefish and is managed under the
Fishery Management Plan for Snapper-Grouper Fishery of the South
Atlantic Region (FMP). The FMP was prepared by the Council and is
implemented by NMFS through regulations at 50 CFR part 622 under
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act).
On October 30, 2017, NMFS published a proposed temporary rule in
the Federal Register and requested public comment (82 FR 50101). The
proposed temporary rule and EA outline the rationale for the actions
contained in this final temporary rule, and the EA is available from
NMFS (see ADDRESSES section). A summary of the management measures
described in the EA and implemented by this final temporary rule is
provided below.
Golden tilefish are harvested by both commercial and recreational
fishermen throughout the South Atlantic, although total landings are
dominated by the commercial sector using bottom longline gear. Golden
tilefish are also harvested commercially using hook-and-line gear,
while the recreational sector harvests at a much lower level than
either component of the commercial sector.
In April 2016, an update to the 2011 Southeast Data, Assessment,
and Review stock assessment (SEDAR 25) was completed for golden
tilefish using data through 2014 (SEDAR 25 Update 2016). While SEDAR 25
concluded that golden tilefish was not subject to overfishing and was
not overfished, the SEDAR 25 Update 2016 concluded that golden tilefish
is undergoing overfishing but is not overfished. NMFS notified the
Council of the updated stock status determination in a letter dated
January 4, 2017. As mandated by the Magnuson-Stevens Act, the Council
and NMFS must prepare and implement an FMP, FMP amendment, or
regulations to end overfishing of golden tilefish.
In May 2016, the Council's Scientific and Statistical Committee
(SSC) reviewed the SEDAR 25 Update 2016 and indicated that the SEDAR 25
Update 2016 was based on the best scientific information available.
During the Council's review of the SEDAR 25 Update 2016, Council
members stated their concern over the large differences in biological
benchmarks between SEDAR 25 and the SEDAR 25 Update 2016 and the much
lower fishing level recommendations in the SEDAR 25 Update 2016. The
Council subsequently requested that the SSC review the SEDAR 25 Update
2016 again as a result of their concerns.
In May 2017, the SEDAR Steering Committee considered a Council
request for another golden tilefish update assessment, which was
intended to address the SEDAR 25 Update 2016 concerns raised by the
Council and their SSC during their earlier reviews. While an update
assessment could not be included in the SEDAR schedule for 2017, the
Southeast Fisheries Science Center (SEFSC) agreed to revise the SEDAR
25 Update 2016 to address these Council concerns.
As requested by the Council, the 2017 revision to the SEDAR 25
Update 2016 used a newly developed model to assess the golden tilefish
stock in the South Atlantic. The 2017 revised analysis was reviewed by
the SSC at their October 2017 meeting, and the SSC did not recommend
basing stocks status and fishing level recommendations on the revised
analysis completed in 2017, but rather on the SEDAR 25 Update 2016. The
Council is scheduled to discuss the SSC recommendations at their
December 2017 meeting, and the recommendations will be used to develop
management measures in Amendment 45 to the FMP, which is intended to
end overfishing of golden tilefish on a permanent basis.
Because the revised catch level recommendations from the Council's
SSC were not available until late October 2017, and the majority of
golden tilefish landings typically occur early in the fishing year,
there was insufficient time for the Council and NMFS to develop and
possibly implement management measures, respectively, to end
overfishing of golden tilefish on a permanent basis in time for the
start of the 2018 fishing year beginning on January 1.
Therefore, as a result of the limited timeframe to develop revised
catch level recommendations, the Council sent a letter to NMFS, dated
June 27, 2017, to request that NMFS implement interim measures to
immediately reduce overfishing of golden tilefish while management
measures are developed through Amendment 45 to end overfishing of
golden tilefish on a permanent basis. For 2018, the Council recommended
setting the total ACL at the projected yield at 75 percent of the yield
produced by the fishing mortality rate at maximum sustainable yield,
which would be 323,000 lb (146,510 kg), gutted weight, 361,760 lb
(164,092 kg), round weight. The interim measures in this final
temporary rule are effective for 180 days after the publication date in
the Federal Register and may be extended one time for an additional 186
days. If NMFS does not extend the proposed interim measures beyond 180
days, the total and sector ACLs, as well as the quotas for the hook-
and-line and longline components of the commercial sector, would revert
to their previously implemented values. The final rule for Amendment
18B implemented the previous commercial ACL and commercial component
quotas (78 FR 23858, April 23, 2013), and the final rule for Regulatory
Amendment 12 implemented the previous recreational ACL (77 FR 61295,
October 9, 2012). The Council intends to have Amendment 45 developed
and implemented prior to the expiration of these interim measures.
Management Measures Contained in This Final Temporary Rule
During the effectiveness of this final temporary rule, which starts
in the 2018 fishing year, the total ACL for golden tilefish is 323,000
lb (146,510 kg), gutted weight, 361,760 lb (164,092 kg), round weight.
This final temporary rule also specifies the commercial and
recreational sector ACLs and component commercial quotas using the
existing sector allocations. For golden tilefish, 97 percent of the
total ACL is allocated to the commercial sector, with 25 percent of the
commercial ACL available for the hook-and-line component and 75 percent
available for the longline component. The recreational sector is
allocated three percent of the total ACL. Therefore, during the
effectiveness of this final temporary rule, the commercial ACL is
313,310 lb (142,115 kg), gutted weight. The commercial quota for the
hook-and-line component is 78,328 lb (35,529 kg), gutted weight, and
the commercial quota for the longline component is 234,982 lb (106,586
kg), gutted weight. The
[[Page 67]]
recreational ACL during the effectiveness of this final temporary rule
starting in 2018 is 2,187 fish, which is equivalent to 9,690 lb (4,395
kg), gutted weight.
The temporary reductions in the ACLs and quotas being implemented
through this final temporary rule could result in earlier in-season
closures particularly for the commercial sector. The earlier closures
would likely result in short-term adverse socio-economic effects.
However, the temporary ACLs and quotas are expected to minimize future
adverse socio-economic effects by potentially reducing future
reductions in the ACLs and quotas required to end overfishing through
Amendment 45. The temporary ACLs and quotas would also provide
biological benefits to the golden tilefish stock by reducing the
current levels of fishing mortality.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received 23 comment submissions from individuals, fishing
associations, and commercial, private recreational, and charter vessel/
headboat (for-hire) recreational fishing entities during the public
comment period on the proposed temporary rule. Sixteen of the comments
were in general opposition to the actions in the golden tilefish
proposed temporary rule, citing adverse socio-economic effects, and
uncertainty with the stock assessment. Seven comments supported the
need for protection of golden tilefish. Comments that were beyond the
scope of the proposed temporary rule and comments that agreed with the
proposed actions have not been addressed in this final rule. Comments
that specifically relate to the actions contained in the proposed
temporary rule, as well as NMFS' respective responses, are summarized
below.
Comment 1: Golden tilefish are above target fishing levels and the
data, model, and science used to make the overfishing determination are
flawed. SEDAR 25 Update 2016 should not be accepted as the best
scientific information available, the proposed temporary rule should
not be implemented, and NMFS should wait until better data become
available or a new stock assessment is completed before making any
management decisions.
Response: NMFS disagrees. The EA and this final temporary rule
respond to the latest stock assessment for golden tilefish in the South
Atlantic (SEDAR 25 Update 2016), which includes waters off North
Carolina through the east coast of Florida. The SEDAR 25 Update 2016
concluded that the stock is undergoing overfishing but is not
overfished. NMFS notified the Council of the updated stock status
determination in a letter dated January 4, 2017.
The SEDAR process is a peer-reviewed cooperative effort to assess
the status of stocks in the jurisdictions of the South Atlantic,
Caribbean, and Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Councils; as well as
NMFS' SEFSC and Southeast Regional Office, and the NMFS Highly
Migratory Species Division; and the Atlantic and Gulf States Marine
Fisheries Commissions. SEDAR also relies on state agencies and
universities throughout the region for research, data collection, and
stock assessment expertise. Fishery-dependent and independent data were
utilized in the stock assessment. All of the data sources used are
further described in the SEDAR 25 Update 2016, which is available on
the SEDAR website at https://sedarweb.org. The SEDAR website also
provides extensive supporting documentation that describes data
collection programs and research findings. In May 2016, the Council's
SSC reviewed the SEDAR 25 Update 2016 and indicated that the assessment
is based on the best scientific information available.
The Council received the results of the assessment update from the
SSC in June 2016, and Council members expressed concern over the large
differences in biological benchmarks and fishing level recommendations
between SEDAR 25 Update 2016 and SEDAR 25, and subsequently requested
an updated stock assessment for golden tilefish.
To address the Council's concerns, in May 2017, the SEDAR Steering
Committee agreed to revise the SEDAR 25 Update 2016, because a new
golden tilefish stock assessment could not be completed in 2017. The
SSC reviewed the 2017 revision to the SEDAR 25 Update 2016 at their
October 2017 meeting and determined that it was unsuitable for
management. Therefore, the best scientific information available for
golden tilefish remains the SEDAR 25 Update 2016.
NMFS and the South Atlantic Council expect the recent level of
golden tilefish landings to continue in the near future. Because the
majority of the golden tilefish landings are taken between January and
early spring in most years, there was not sufficient time for the
Council and NMFS to develop and possibly implement management measures
to end overfishing of golden tilefish on a permanent basis in time for
the start of the 2018 fishing year beginning on January 1. Therefore,
to reduce overfishing, the Council recommended that NMFS implement
interim measures to set the golden tilefish total ACL for 2018 at
323,000 lb (146,510 kg), gutted weight, while the Council develops
Amendment 45 to end overfishing of golden tilefish on a permanent
basis. This total ACL is expected to immediately address the need to
reduce overfishing of golden tilefish. The SEFSC certified the EA for
these interim measures and supported the Council's recommendations as
the best scientific information available on October 3, 2017.
The temporary rule will take effect in 2018 for 180 days after the
date of publication and may be extended once for a maximum of an
additional 186 days while the Council develops management measures to
end overfishing of golden tilefish in the South Atlantic on a permanent
basis through Amendment 45. The next scheduled SEDAR benchmark stock
assessment is scheduled to be completed in 2019.
Comment 2: The assessment model used for the SEDAR 25 Update 2016,
which employed a robust multinomial likelihood function approach, was
criticized by the Council's SSC and resulted in biasing the assessment
results; consequently, the SEDAR 25 Update 2016 does not constitute
best scientific information available for golden tilefish.
Response: NMFS disagrees. Subsequent to SEDAR 25, completed in
2011, the Council raised concerns about the assessment's use of a
multinomial likelihood function approach. Partly in response to those
concerns, the SEDAR 25 Update 2016 participants determined that the use
of a robust multinomial likelihood function approach is more
appropriate for the SEDAR 25 Update 2016 than the original multinomial
likelihood function approach used in SEDAR 25. However, the Council was
concerned with the use of the robust multinomial likelihood function
approach in the SEDAR 25 Update 2016, because subsequent SEDAR
assessments have raised concerns from the Council with the ability of
the original and robust multinomial likelihood functions to estimate
composition data, and a recent stock assessment of red grouper used a
newly developed Dirichlet multinomial likelihood function approach.
Therefore, in June 2016, the Council requested the SEFSC revise the
SEDAR 25 Update 2016 using the Dirichlet multinomial likelihood
function approach in place of the robust multinomial likelihood
function approach.
The Council's SSC reviewed the revision to the SEDAR 25 Update 2016
at their October 2017 meeting. After
[[Page 68]]
consideration, the SSC did not recommended basing stock status and
fishing level recommendations using the Dirichlet multinomial
likelihood function approach. Instead, the SSC recommended using the
base model run of the SEDAR 25 Update 2016, which used the robust
multinomial likelihood function approach. The SSC determined that the
Dirichlet multinomial likelihood function approach has not been
sufficiently tested using composition data obtained from sparse
sampling, which is present in the 2017 revision to the SEDAR 25 Update
2016. In addition, the SSC determined that most model runs of the
revision to the SEDAR 25 Update 2016 did not converge on a solution
suitable for their recommendation as management advice. The criticisms
referenced by the comment from the October 2017 SSC meeting were
actually criticisms of the Dirichlet multinomial likelihood approach
and not the robust multinomial likelihood approach to which the SSC
defaulted with their final recommendation. The use of the robust
multinomial likelihood function approach has been accepted as a valid
stock assessment tool and has been used in other stock assessments,
such as SEDAR 36 for snowy grouper and SEDAR 41 for red snapper.
Ultimately, the use of the robust multinomial likelihood function
approach in the SEDAR 25 Update 2016 was accepted by the SSC as best
scientific information available, and has been accepted as such by
NMFS.
Comment 3: The assessment model changes made in the SEDAR 25 Update
2016 from the SEDAR 25 benchmark assessment were contrary to accepted
stock assessment policy, and resulted inaccurate changes to golden
tilefish stock status results from the SEDAR 25 Update 2016.
Response: NMFS disagrees. Performing additional analyses, and not
merely updating landings data, is not uncommon in update assessments
completed via the SEDAR process. In this case, the inclusion of the
robust multinomial likelihood function approach in the SEDAR 25 Update
2016 was within the changes allowed as specified in the Terms of
Reference for an update assessment. The Terms of Reference provided for
the SEDAR 25 Update 2016 specifically indicated that it needed to
``document any changes or corrections made to the model and input
datasets,'' clearly establishing that such potential model changes were
envisioned and potentially desired. While the SEDAR guidelines do not
provide precise guidance on the proper scope of allowable changes in
update assessments, the changes made in the SEDAR 25 Update 2016 are
within the scope of what is allowed under the SEDAR guidelines that
specify allowable changes under different assessment types. Further,
the changes are consistent with changes made in other update
assessments.
As noted in the response to Comment 2, the SEDAR 25 Update 2016
used widely accepted and commonly used analytical methods. It has been
peer reviewed, extensively discussed by the relevant parties, and NMFS
has determined that it constitutes the best scientific information
available.
Comment 4: The interim measures will cause additional economic
hardship on the commercial sector and for-hire components of the
recreational sector, as well as the supporting businesses, such as fish
houses, dealers, and restaurants. Many business operations will fail as
a result of the proposed interim measures.
Response: As described in the EA, the proposed temporary rule, and
the response to Comment 1, the temporary ACL and quota reductions are
necessary to immediately reduce overfishing of golden tilefish in the
South Atlantic, while the Council develops management measures in
Amendment 45 to end overfishing of golden tilefish on a permanent
basis. NMFS and the Council recognize the adverse socio-economic
impacts that reducing the ACLs and quotas could have on fishing
businesses and communities. However, these interim measures may result
in less stringent measures that would be considered in Amendment 45 to
end overfishing of golden tilefish on a permanent basis.
The economic analysis developed for this temporary rule indicates
that the temporary ACL and quota reductions would affect the hook-and-
line and longline components of the commercial sector, as well as for-
hire operations in the recreational sector. The amount of the ACL and
quota reductions is proportional to each sector or component's current
allocation of the total ACL. Reductions to the total ACL, the
commercial and recreational sector ACLs, and the commercial quotas for
the hook-and-line and longline components of the commercial sector
implemented by this final temporary rule are expected to result in
adverse, short-term economic effects directly on the participants of
the golden tilefish commercial and recreational sectors and indirectly
on the supporting industries, such as dealers, tackle and bait shops,
and fishing communities. In general, the larger the sector or
component's percentage of the allocation, the greater the short-term
adverse economic impacts would be. In addition, the more dependent an
area or fishing community is on fishing for golden tilefish, the
greater would be the adverse impacts on the area's fishing participants
and supporting industries.
Insufficient information is available to determine if this final
temporary rule will result in businesses exiting the snapper-grouper
fishery. The initial regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA) conducted
for the proposed temporary rule notes that longline fishermen would be
particularly adversely affected because they derive approximately 74
percent of their total revenues from golden tilefish. However, as
described previously, these impacts are expected to be short-term and
may result in less restrictive management measures possibly implemented
through Amendment 45.
NMFS also expects consumers and recreational anglers to be
negatively affected by the final temporary rule. While the effects on
consumers cannot be estimated with available information, a good
possibility exists that the presence of substitute species would
mitigate the negative effects on consumers. The EA provides estimates
of the loss in consumer surplus to recreational anglers as a result of
the final temporary rule. However, no quantitative estimates of the
economic effects on the for-hire component of the recreational sector
could be provided due to the complexity of determining whether
potentially affected for-hire trips would be totally lost or just
redirected to other areas or to other species. In addition,
recreational fishermen have varied preferences and may target or
harvest a diverse mix of snapper-grouper and other species on a trip.
The absence or reduction of the opportunity to fish for golden tilefish
may or may not affect their overall desire to take or pay for trips.
As discussed in the EA, NMFS expects the reduced ACLs and quotas in
this final temporary rule to result in diminished economic benefits in
the short-term, but also to reduce overfishing sooner than if no
interim measures were implemented to prevent the golden tilefish stock
in the South Atlantic from becoming overfished, thereby resulting in
greater economic benefits in the longer term.
Comment 5: The socio-economic analysis is inadequate because it did
not consider the impacts beyond the commercial and recreational
fishermen.
Response: NMFS disagrees. NMFS determined that an adequate socio-
economic analysis, assessing the impacts of the temporary rule, was
[[Page 69]]
performed and included in the EA. NMFS prepared an IRFA to analyze the
economic impacts of the temporary rule on small entities, specifically
commercial fishermen. A summary of the IRFA was included in the
proposed temporary rule. A final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA)
accompanies this final temporary rule that also considers the comments
received on this action. The EA provides analyses of the economic
benefits and costs of each alternative to the nation and the South
Atlantic snapper-grouper fishery as a whole. The EA recognizes that the
temporary rule will have economic effects on commercial and
recreational supporting industries (dealers, wholesalers, retailers,
restaurants) beyond the harvest market. The EA provides general
information regarding the commercial and recreational sectors' economic
impacts in terms of jobs, sales, income, and value added on the entire
seafood industry, including the harvest, wholesale and retail markets.
Quantifying the effects of each alternative on the commercial and
recreational supporting industries is not possible due to lack of
sufficient information. For the commercial sector, reactions from
dealers, wholesalers, retailers, or restaurants to reduced availability
of golden tilefish is uncertain, especially that substitute species
exist. For the recreational sector, substitute species also exist and,
as described in the response to Comment 4, the reduction or absence of
the opportunity to fish for golden tilefish may or may not affect their
overall desire to take or pay for trips. The EA also notes that fishing
communities dependent on the golden tilefish segment of the snapper-
grouper fishery would tend to bear a greater share of the short-term
adverse impacts. The socio-economic analysis indicates that while the
short-term socioeconomic impacts would be negative, ending overfishing
through Amendment 45, if implemented, would be expected to result in
greater long-term benefits.
Future Action
NMFS determined that this final temporary rule is necessary to
reduce overfishing of golden tilefish in the South Atlantic. NMFS
considered all public comments received on the proposed temporary rule
in the determination of whether to proceed with a final temporary rule
and whether any revisions to the final temporary rule were appropriate.
This final temporary rule is effective for 180 days after the date of
publication in the Federal Register, as authorized by section 305(c) of
the Magnuson-Stevens Act. The final temporary rule could be extended if
NMFS publishes a temporary rule extension in the Federal Register for
up to an additional 186 days, because the public has had an opportunity
to comment on the proposed temporary rule, and the Council is actively
preparing an FMP amendment to address overfishing on a permanent basis.
Classification
The Regional Administrator for the NMFS Southeast Region has
determined that this final temporary rule is consistent with the
Magnuson-Stevens Act and other applicable laws.
This final temporary rule has been determined to be not significant
for purposes of Executive Order 12866.
In compliance with section 604 of the RFA, NMFS prepared a FRFA for
this final temporary rule. The FRFA incorporates the IRFA, a summary of
the significant economic issues raised by public comments, NMFS'
responses to those comments, and a summary of the analyses completed to
support the action. The FRFA follows.
A description of this final temporary rule, and its rationale,
objectives, and legal basis are contained at the beginning of this
section in the preamble and in the SUMMARY section of the preamble. The
Magnuson-Stevens Act provides the statutory basis for this final
temporary rule. No duplicative, overlapping, or conflicting Federal
rules have been identified. In addition, no new reporting, record-
keeping, or other compliance requirements are introduced by this final
temporary rule. Accordingly, this final temporary rule does not
implicate the Paperwork Reduction Act.
No comments specific to the IRFA were received from the public or
from the Chief Counsel for the Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration; therefore, no public comments are addressed in this
FRFA. However, there are comments that have economic implications, and
they are addressed in the Comments and Responses section.
No changes to the proposed temporary rule were made in response to
public comments. NMFS agrees that the Council's recommendation for the
temporary action will best achieve their objectives for the final
temporary rule while minimizing, to the extent practicable, the adverse
effects on fishermen, support industries, and associated communities.
NMFS expects this final temporary rule will directly affect all
commercial vessels that harvest South Atlantic golden tilefish under
the FMP. The change in the recreational ACL in this final temporary
rule will not directly affect or regulate for-hire businesses. Any
impact to the profitability or competitiveness of for-hire fishing
businesses will be the result of changes in for-hire angler demand and
will therefore be indirect in nature. Under the RFA recreational
anglers, who will be directly affected by this final temporary rule,
are not considered to be small entities, so they are outside the scope
of this analysis and only the effects on commercial vessels were
analyzed. For RFA purposes only, NMFS has established a small business
size standard for businesses, including their affiliates, whose primary
industry is commercial fishing (see 50 CFR 200.2). A business primarily
engaged in commercial fishing (NAICS code 11411) is classified as a
small business if it is independently owned and operated, is not
dominant in its field of operation (including affiliates), and has
combined annual receipts not in excess of $11 million for all its
affiliated operations worldwide.
As of August 10, 2017, there were 544 vessels with valid or
renewable Federal South Atlantic snapper-grouper unlimited permits, 114
valid or renewable 225-lb trip limited permits, and 22 golden tilefish
longline endorsements. The golden tilefish longline endorsement system
started in 2013. From 2012 through 2016, an average of 23 longline
vessels per year landed golden tilefish in the South Atlantic. These
vessels, combined, averaged 255 trips per year in the South Atlantic on
which golden tilefish were landed, and 182 trips taken in the South
Atlantic on which no golden tilefish were harvested or in areas outside
the South Atlantic. The average annual total dockside revenue (2016
dollars) for these vessels combined was approximately $1.56 million
from golden tilefish, $0.10 million from other species co-harvested
with golden tilefish (on the same trips in the South Atlantic), and
$0.43 million from trips in the South Atlantic on which no golden
tilefish were harvested or in areas outside the South Atlantic. Total
average annual revenue from all species harvested by longline vessels
harvesting golden tilefish in the South Atlantic was approximately
$2.10 million, or approximately $92,000 per vessel. Longline vessels
generated approximately 74 percent of their total revenues from golden
tilefish. For the same period, an average of 82 vessels per year landed
golden tilefish using other gear types (mostly hook-and-line) in the
South Atlantic. These vessels, combined, averaged 483 trips per year
[[Page 70]]
in the South Atlantic on which golden tilefish were landed, and 2,862
trips taken in the South Atlantic on which no golden tilefish were
harvested or in areas outside the South Atlantic. The average annual
total dockside revenue (2016 dollars) for these 82 vessels was
approximately $0.36 million from golden tilefish, $0.66 million from
other species co-harvested with golden tilefish (on the same trips in
the South Atlantic), and $4.13 million from trips in the South Atlantic
on which no golden tilefish were harvested or in areas outside the
South Atlantic. The total average annual revenue from all species
harvested by these 82 vessels was approximately $5.16 million, or
approximately $62,000 per vessel. Approximately seven percent of these
vessels' total revenues came from golden tilefish. Based on the
foregoing revenue information, all commercial vessels using longlines
or other gear types (mostly hook-and-line) affected by the final
temporary rule are determined to be small entities.
Because all entities expected to be directly affected by this final
temporary rule are determined to be small entities, NMFS determined
that this final temporary rule will affect a substantial number of
small entities. For the same reason, the issue of disproportionate
effects on small versus large entities does not arise in the present
case.
Reducing the South Atlantic total ACL for golden tilefish will
reduce the specific ACLs for the commercial and recreational sectors.
These ACL reductions will result in ex-vessel revenue losses of
approximately $229,000 for hook-and-line vessels and $600,000 for
longline vessels over the entire 2018 fishing year. Ex-vessel revenue
reductions for the commercial sector will result in profit reductions,
although this is more likely for longline vessels as they are more
dependent on golden tilefish than hook-and-line vessels.
The following discusses the alternatives that the Council did not
select as preferred.
Four alternatives, including the preferred alternative as described
above, were considered for reducing the total and sector ACLs for South
Atlantic golden tilefish. The first alternative, the no action
alternative, would maintain the current economic benefits to all
participants in the South Atlantic golden tilefish component of the
snapper-grouper fishery. This alternative, however, would not address
the need to curtail continued overfishing of the stock, very likely
leading into the adoption of more stringent measures in the near
future. The second alternative would reduce the ACLs more than the
preferred alternative, and thus would be expected to result in larger
revenue (and profit) losses to the commercial sector. The third
alternative would establish higher ACLs than the preferred alternative.
Although this alternative would result in lower revenue losses to the
commercial sector, the ACLs it would establish may not be low enough to
address the overfishing status of the stock. To an extent, this
alternative would leave open a greater likelihood of implementing more
stringent measures when management actions are developed and possibly
implemented through Amendment 45 to end overfishing of golden tilefish
on a permanent basis.
This final temporary rule responds to the best scientific
information available. The Assistant Administrator for NOAA Fisheries
(AA) finds that the need to immediately implement this action
constitutes good cause to waive the 30-day delay in this final
temporary rule's effectiveness, pursuant to the authority set forth in
5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), as such procedure for this final temporary rule is
impracticable and contrary to the public interest.
A delay in effectiveness is impracticable, because it would
contribute to overfishing of golden tilefish, which is contrary to
National Standard 1 of the Magnuson-Stevens Act. National Standard 1
requires NMFS to conserve and manage ocean resources to prevent
overfishing, while achieving the optimum yield from each fishery.
Without this final temporary rule becoming effective early in the 2018
fishing year, which begins on January 1, the commercial and
recreational sectors would be able to harvest golden tilefish under
higher ACLs and quotas than those implemented by this final temporary
rule. These harvests could result in further overfishing of golden
tilefish, contrary to NMFS' statutory obligations. By implementing this
final temporary rule immediately, the total harvest of golden tilefish
would be reduced until the Council and NMFS can prepare and possibly
implement management measures under Amendment 45 to end overfishing of
golden tilefish on a permanent basis.
In addition, delaying the effectiveness of this final temporary
rule for 30 days is contrary to the public interest because of the need
to immediately implement this action to protect golden tilefish. The
capacity of the fishing fleet allows for rapid harvest of the ACL.
Delaying the effectiveness of this final temporary rule would require
time and could potentially result in a harvest in excess of the reduced
ACLs implemented by this final temporary rule, increasing the
likelihood of future overfishing and more restrictive measures to
address it.
Accordingly, the 30-day delay in effectiveness of the measures
contained in this final temporary rule is waived.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 622
Annual catch limit, Fisheries, Fishing, Golden tilefish, South
Atlantic.
Dated: December 21, 2017.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 622 is amended
as follows:
PART 622--FISHERIES OF THE CARIBBEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND SOUTH
ATLANTIC
0
1. The authority citation for part 622 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 622.190, suspend paragraphs (a)(2)(i) through (iii) and add
paragraphs (a)(2)(iv) through (vi) to read as follows:
Sec. 622.190 Quotas.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) Hook-and-line and longline components combined--313,310 lb
(142,115 kg).
(v) Hook-and-line component--78,328 lb (35,529 kg).
(vi) Longline component--234,982 lb (106,586 kg).
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 622.193, suspend paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (ii), and (iii) and
(a)(2), and add paragraphs (a)(1)(iv), (v), and (vi), and (a)(3) to
read as follows:
Sec. 622.193 Annual catch limits (ACLs), annual catch targets (ACTs),
and accountability measures (AMs).
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) Hook-and-line component. If commercial landings for golden
tilefish, as estimated by the SRD, reach or are projected to reach the
commercial ACL (commercial quota) specified in Sec. 622.190(a)(2)(v),
the AA will file a notification with the Office of the Federal Register
to close the hook-and-line component of the commercial sector for the
remainder of the fishing year. Applicable restrictions after a
commercial quota closure are specified in Sec. 622.190(c).
(v) Longline component. If commercial landings for golden tilefish,
[[Page 71]]
as estimated by the SRD, reach or are projected to reach the commercial
ACL (commercial quota) specified in Sec. 622.190(a)(2)(vi), the AA
will file a notification with the Office of the Federal Register to
close the longline component of the commercial sector for the remainder
of the fishing year. After the commercial ACL for the longline
component is reached or projected to be reached, golden tilefish may
not be fished for or possessed by a vessel with a golden tilefish
longline endorsement. Applicable restrictions after a commercial quota
closure are specified in Sec. 622.190(c).
(vi) If commercial landings of golden tilefish, as estimated by the
SRD, exceed the commercial ACL (including both the hook-and-line and
longline component quotas) specified in Sec. 622.190(a)(2)(iv), and
the combined commercial and recreational ACL of 323,000 lb (146,510
kg), gutted weight, 361,760 lb (164,092 kg), round weight, is exceeded
during the same fishing year, and golden tilefish are overfished based
on the most recent Status of U.S. Fisheries Report to Congress, the AA
will file a notification with the Office of the Federal Register to
reduce the commercial ACL for that following fishing year by the amount
of the commercial ACL overage in the prior fishing year.
* * * * *
(3) Recreational sector. (i) If recreational landings of golden
tilefish, as estimated by the SRD, reach or are projected to reach the
recreational ACL of 2,187 fish, the AA will file a notification with
the Office of the Federal Register to close the recreational sector for
the remainder of the fishing year regardless if the stock is
overfished, unless NMFS determines that no closure is necessary based
on the best scientific information available. On and after the
effective date of such a notification, the bag and possession limits
for golden tilefish in or from the South Atlantic EEZ are zero.
(ii) If recreational landings of golden tilefish, as estimated by
the SRD, exceed the recreational ACL, then during the following fishing
year recreational landings will be monitored for a persistence in
increased landings, and if necessary, the AA will file a notification
with the Office of the Federal Register to reduce the length of the
recreational fishing season and the recreational ACL by the amount of
the recreational ACL overage, if the species is overfished based on the
most recent Status of U.S. Fisheries Report to Congress, and if the
combined commercial and recreational ACL of 323,000 lb (146,510 kg),
gutted weight, 361,760 lb (164,092 kg), round weight, is exceeded
during the same fishing year. The AA will use the best scientific
information available to determine if reducing the length of the
recreational fishing season and recreational ACL is necessary. When the
recreational sector is closed as a result of NMFS reducing the length
of the recreational fishing season and ACL, the bag and possession
limits for golden tilefish in or from the South Atlantic EEZ are zero.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-27966 Filed 12-29-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P