Notice of Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Revisions to the Coordinated Long-Term Operation of the Central Valley Project and State Water Project, and Related Facilities, 61789-61791 [2017-28215]
Download as PDF
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 249 / Friday, December 29, 2017 / Notices
Cunningham Wash to the Graham Well,
intersecting Butler Valley Road, then
north and west on the countymaintained road to the ‘‘Bouse Y’’
intersection, 2 miles north of Bouse,
Arizona. The course proceeds north,
paralleling the Bouse-Swansea Road to
the Midway (Pit) intersection, then west
along the North Boundary (power line)
Road of the East Cactus Plain
Wilderness Area to Parker-Swansea
Road. The course turns west into
Osborne Wash crossing the CAP Canal,
along the north boundary of the Cactus
Plain Wilderness Study Area; it
continues west staying in Osborne Wash
and crossing Shea Road along the
southern boundary of Gibraltar
Wilderness, rejoining Osborne Wash at
the CRIT Reservation boundary.
Closure Restrictions: The following
acts are prohibited during the temporary
land closures in order to provide for
public and race participant safety:
1. Being present on or driving on the
designated race course or the adjacent
lands described above. All spectators
must stay within the designated
spectator areas. The spectator areas have
protective fencing and barriers. This
does not apply to race participants, race
officials, or emergency vehicles
authorized or operated by local, State, or
Federal government agencies.
Emergency medical response shall only
be conducted by personnel and vehicles
operating under the guidance of the La
Paz County Emergency Medical Services
and Fire, the Arizona Department of
Public Safety, or the BLM.
2. Vehicle parking or stopping in
areas affected by the closures, except
where such is specifically allowed
(designated spectator areas).
3. Camping in the closed area
described above, except in the
designated spectator areas.
4. Discharge of firearms.
5. Possession or use of any fireworks.
6. Cutting or collecting firewood of
any kind, including dead and down
wood or other vegetative material.
7. Operating any off-road vehicle (as
defined by 43 CFR 8340.0–7(a)).
8. Operating any vehicle in the area of
the temporary closure or on roads
within the event area at a speed of more
than 35 miles per hour. This does not
apply to registered race vehicles during
the race, while on the designated race
course.
9. Failing to obey any official sign
posted by the BLM, La Paz County, or
the race promoter.
10. Parking any vehicle in violation of
posted restrictions, or in such a manner
as to obstruct or impede normal or
emergency traffic movement or the
parking of other vehicles, create a safety
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:09 Dec 28, 2017
Jkt 244001
hazard, or endanger any person,
property, or feature. Vehicles parked in
violation are subject to citation,
removal, and/or impoundment at the
owner’s expense.
11. Failing to obey any person
authorized to direct traffic or control
access to event area including law
enforcement officers, BLM officials, and
designated race officials.
12. Failing to observe spectator area
quiet hours of 10 p.m. to 6 a.m.
13. Failing to keep campsite or race
viewing site free of trash and litter.
14. Allowing any pet or other animal
to be unrestrained. All pets must be
restrained by a leash of not more than
6 feet in length.
15. Reserving sites within the
spectator area. Spectators are prohibited
from denying other visitors or parties
the use of unoccupied portions of the
spectator area.
Exceptions to Closure: The
restrictions do not apply to emergency
or law enforcement vehicles owned by
the United States, the State of Arizona,
or La Paz County, and designated race
officials, participants, pit crews, or
persons operating on their behalf. All
BITD registered media personnel are
permitted access to existing routes 50
feet from the race course per BITD
standards. Outside of the race corridor,
other lands in the Field Office will
remain open and available for offhighway vehicle access and all other
recreation activities.
Penalties: Any person who violates
these temporary closures may be tried
before a United States Magistrate and
fined in accordance with 18 U.S.C.
3571, imprisoned no more than 12
months under 43 U.S.C. 1733(a) and 43
CFR 8360.0–7, or both. In accordance
with 43 CFR 8365.1–7, State or local
officials may also impose penalties for
violations of Arizona law.
Effect of Closure: The entire area
encompassed by the designated course
and all areas outside the course as
described above and in the time period
as described above are closed to all
vehicles. The authorized applicant or
their representatives are required to post
warning signs, control access to, and
clearly mark the event route and areas,
common access roads, and road
crossings during the closure period.
Support vehicles under permit for
operation by event participants must
follow the race permit stipulations.
Authority: 43 CFR 8364.1.
Jason West,
Field Manager.
[FR Doc. 2017–28217 Filed 12–28–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–32–P
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61789
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
[RR02800000, 18XR0680A1,
RX.17868949.0000000]
Notice of Intent To Prepare a Draft
Environmental Impact Statement,
Revisions to the Coordinated LongTerm Operation of the Central Valley
Project and State Water Project, and
Related Facilities
Bureau of Reclamation,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Reclamation
(Reclamation) intends to prepare a
programmatic environmental impact
statement (EIS) for analyzing potential
modifications to the continued longterm operation of the federal Central
Valley Project (CVP), for its authorized
purposes, in a coordinated manner with
the State Water Project (SWP), for its
authorized purposes. Reclamation
proposes to evaluate alternatives that
maximize water deliveries and optimize
marketable power generation consistent
with applicable laws, contractual
obligations, and agreements; and to
augment operational flexibility by
addressing the status of listed species.
Reclamation is seeking suggestions and
information on the alternatives and
topics to be addressed and any other
important issues related to the proposed
action.
DATES: Submit written comments on the
scope of the EIS by February 1, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to
Katrina Harrison, Project Manager,
Bureau of Reclamation, Bay-Delta
Office, 801 I Street, Suite 140,
Sacramento, CA 95814–2536; fax to
(916) 414–2425; or email at kharrison@
usbr.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katrina Harrison at (916) 414–2425; or
email at kharrison@usbr.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Agencies Involved
Reclamation will request the
following agencies participate as
cooperating agencies for preparation of
the EIS in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as
amended: U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS), National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS), U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers; Western Area Power
Administration, and U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.
Reclamation has also identified
Indian tribes and other Federal, State,
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
61790
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 249 / Friday, December 29, 2017 / Notices
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
and local agencies (e.g., public water
agencies, power marketing agencies,
power customers, etc.) as potential
cooperating agencies, and Reclamation
will invite them to participate as
cooperating agencies.
anticipated that this current
programmatic effort will be followed by
tiered project-level NEPA analyses to
implement various site specific projects
or detailed programs that were generally
described in the programmatic EIS.
II. Why We Are Taking This Action
The CVP is a major water source for
agricultural, municipal and industrial
(M&I), and fish and wildlife demands in
California. State and Federal regulatory
actions, federal trust responsibilities,
and other agreements, have significantly
reduced the water available for delivery
south of the Sacramento-San Joaquin
River Delta, in order, among other
things, to protect water quality within
the delta and prevent jeopardy and
adverse modification of critical habitat
of threatened and endangered species.
This project will evaluate alternatives to
restore, at least in part, water supply, in
consideration of all of the authorized
purposes of the CVP.
In this programmatic EIS,
Reclamation will analyze potential
modifications to the continued longterm operation of the CVP (proposed
action), in a coordinated manner with
the SWP, to achieve the following:
• Maximize water supply delivery,
consistent with applicable law,
contracts and agreements, considering
new and/or modified storage and export
facilities.
• Review and consider modifications
to regulatory requirements, including
existing Reasonable and Prudent
Alternative actions identified in the
Biological Opinions issued by the
USFWS and NMFS in 2008 and 2009,
respectively.
• Evaluate stressors on fish other than
CVP and SWP operations, beneficial
non-flow measures to decrease stressors,
and habitat restoration and other
beneficial measures for improving
targeted fish populations.
• Evaluate potential changes in laws,
regulations and infrastructure that may
benefit power marketability.
Reclamation has decided to prepare
an EIS. As an example for why NEPA
is required related to CVP operation, in
2014, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
determined that the current,
coordinated operation of the CVP and
SWP under biological opinions issued
by the USFWS and NMFS in 2008 and
2009, respectively, was a major Federal
action that affected the quality of the
human environment that required the
preparation of an EIS. San Luis & DeltaMendota Water Authority (SLDMWA) v.
Jewell, 747 F.3d 581 (9th Cir. 2014);
SLDMWA v. Locke, 776 F.3d 971 (9th
Cir. 2014). This EIS is expected to be
primarily programmatic in nature. It is
III. Purpose and Need for Action
The need for the action is to increase
operational flexibility, as further
described in Section II above. The
purpose of the action considered in this
EIS is to continue the operation of the
CVP in a coordinated manner with the
SWP, for its authorized purposes, in a
manner that enables Reclamation and
California Department of Water
Resources to maximize water deliveries
and optimize marketable power
generation consistent with applicable
laws, contractual obligations, and
agreements; and to augment operational
flexibility by addressing the status of
listed species.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:09 Dec 28, 2017
Jkt 244001
IV. Project Area (Area of Analysis)
The project area includes the existing
CVP and SWP Service Areas, proposed
CVP Service Areas, and storage and
export facilities (including potential
modifications), within the Sacramento
and San Joaquin watersheds (including
external watersheds connected through
facilities). The project area also includes
potential improvements and
developments of other water supply or
power generation programs.
The CVP is Reclamation’s largest
federal reclamation project. Reclamation
operates the CVP in coordination with
the SWP, under the Coordinated
Operation Agreement between the
federal government and the State of
California (authorized by Pub. L. 99–
546). The CVP and SWP operate
pursuant to water rights permits and
licenses issued by the State Water
Resources Control Board. The CVP and
SWP water rights allow appropriation of
water by directly using and/or diverting
water to storage for later withdrawal and
use, or use and re-diversion to storage
further downstream for later
consumptive use. Among the conditions
of their water rights, are requirements of
the projects to either bypass or
withdraw water from storage and to
help satisfy specific water quality,
quantity and operations criteria in
source rivers and within the Delta. The
CVP and SWP are currently operated in
accordance with the 2008 USFWS
Biological Opinion and the 2009 NMFS
Biological Opinion, both of which
concluded that the coordinated longterm operation of the CVP and SWP, as
proposed in Reclamation’s 2008
Biological Assessment, was likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
listed species and destroy or adversely
modify designated critical habitat. Both
Biological Opinions included
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives
designed to allow the CVP and SWP to
continue operating without causing
jeopardy to listed species or destruction
or adverse modification to designated
critical habitat. Reclamation accepted
and then began Project operations
consistent with the USFWS and NMFS
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives.
V. Alternatives To Be Considered
As required by NEPA, the EIS will
include and consider a proposed action
and a reasonable range of alternatives,
including a No Action Alternative.
Reasonable alternatives to the proposed
action may include a combination of:
• Operations in coordination with
new or proposed facilities to increase
water supply deliveries and marketable
power generation:
Æ Actions that increase storage
capacity upstream of the Delta for the
CVP
Æ Actions that increase storage
capacity south of the Delta
Æ Actions that increase export
capabilities through the Delta
Æ Actions to generate additional
water or that improve and optimize the
utilization of water such as
desalinization, water conservation, or
water reuse
• Modified operations of the CVP and
SWP with and without new or proposed
facilities including possible requests to
modify environmental and regulatory
requirements, and sharing of water and
responsibilities in the Delta
• Habitat restoration and ecosystem
improvement projects intended to
increase fish populations which would
be factored into the regulatory process
• Modification to existing state and
federal facilities to reduce impacts to
listed species
The Final EIS will identify an agencypreferred alternative.
Alternatives could affect all or various
facilities and/or operations of the CVP,
and may also include actions that affect
SWP and local project operations.
Reclamation will engage with California
Department of Water Resources and
local stakeholders in developing the
proposed action and reasonable
alternatives. Reclamation will also
consider reasonable alternatives
identified through the scoping process.
The proposed EIS will address
operations of the CVP and SWP,
operations in coordination with new or
proposed projects, and habitat
restoration in the Project area, designed
to increase operational flexibility,
increase water supply for CVP
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 249 / Friday, December 29, 2017 / Notices
authorized purposes, and/or increase
power marketability.
VI. Indian Trust Assets and
Environmental Justice
There are Indian Trust Asset issues
and there may be environmental justice
issues related to the Trinity River, as
well as potential impacts within other
areas.
VII. Statutory Authority
NEPA [42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.] requires
that Federal agencies conduct an
environmental analysis of their
proposed actions to determine if the
actions may significantly affect the
human environment. As required by
NEPA, Reclamation will develop an EIS
which will analyze the potential direct,
indirect, and cumulative environmental
effects that may result from the
implementation of the proposed action
and alternatives.
The Rivers and Harbors Act of August
26, 1937 (50 Stat. 844, as amended and
supplemented) provides for operation of
the CVP.
VIII. Request for Comments
The purposes of this notice are:
• To advise other agencies, CVP and
SWP water users and power customers,
affected tribes, and the public of our
intention to gather information to
support the preparation of an EIS;
• To obtain suggestions and
information from other agencies,
interested parties, and the public on the
scope of alternatives and issues to be
addressed in the EIS; and
• To identify important issues raised
by the public related to the development
and implementation of the proposed
action.
Reclamation invites written
comments from interested parties to
ensure that the full range of alternatives
and issues related to the development of
the proposed action are identified.
Comments during this stage of the
scoping process will only be accepted in
written form. Written comments may be
submitted by mail, electronic mail,
facsimile transmission or in person to
the contact listed in the ADDRESSES
section of this notice. Comments and
participation in the scoping process are
encouraged.
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
IX. Public Disclosure
Before including your address, phone
number, email address or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:09 Dec 28, 2017
Jkt 244001
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
X. How To Request Reasonable
Accommodation
If special assistance is required,
please contact Katrina Harrison at the
address provided above or TDD 916–
978–5608. Information regarding this
proposed action is available in
alternative formats upon request.
Dated: December 20, 2017.
David Murillo,
Regional Director, Mid-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 2017–28215 Filed 12–28–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332–90–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Notice of Receipt of Complaint;
Solicitation of Comments Relating to
the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has received a complaint
entitled Certain Subsea
Telecommunications Systems and
Components Thereof, DN 3283; the
Commission is soliciting comments on
any public interest issues raised by the
complaint or complainant’s filing
pursuant to the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa
R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
500 E Street SW, Washington, DC
20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. The
public version of the complaint can be
accessed on the Commission’s
Electronic Document Information
System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov,
and will be available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server at United
States International Trade Commission
(USITC) at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission’s
Electronic Document Information
System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61791
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal on (202)
205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission has received a complaint
and a submission pursuant to § 210.8(b)
of the Commission’s Rules of Practice
and Procedure filed on behalf of
Neptune Subsea LP Ltd.; Neptune
Subsea Acquisitions Ltd.; and Xtera,
Inc. on December 22, 2017. The
complaint alleges violations of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C.
1337) in the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the
sale within the United States after
importation of certain subsea
telecommunications systems and
components thereof. The complaint
names as respondents Nokia
Corporation, Finland; Nokia Solutions
and Networks B.V., the Netherlands;
Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy,
Finland; Alcatel-Lucent Submarine
Networks SAS, France; Nokia Solutions
and Networks US LLC, Phoenix, AZ;
NEC Corporation, Japan; NEC Networks
& System Integration Corporation,
Japan; and NEC Corporation of America,
Irving, TX. The complainant requests
that the Commission issue a limited
exclusion order, cease and desist orders,
and impose a bond upon respondents’
alleged infringing articles during the 60day Presidential review period pursuant
to 19 U.S.C. 1337(j).
Proposed respondents, other
interested parties, and members of the
public are invited to file comments, not
to exceed five (5) pages in length,
inclusive of attachments, on any public
interest issues raised by the complaint
or § 210.8(b) filing. Comments should
address whether issuance of the relief
specifically requested by the
complainant in this investigation would
affect the public health and welfare in
the United States, competitive
conditions in the United States
economy, the production of like or
directly competitive articles in the
United States, or United States
consumers.
In particular, the Commission is
interested in comments that:
(i) Explain how the articles
potentially subject to the requested
remedial orders are used in the United
States;
(ii) identify any public health, safety,
or welfare concerns in the United States
relating to the requested remedial
orders;
(iii) identify like or directly
competitive articles that complainant,
its licensees, or third parties make in the
United States which could replace the
E:\FR\FM\29DEN1.SGM
29DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 249 (Friday, December 29, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61789-61791]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28215]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Reclamation
[RR02800000, 18XR0680A1, RX.17868949.0000000]
Notice of Intent To Prepare a Draft Environmental Impact
Statement, Revisions to the Coordinated Long-Term Operation of the
Central Valley Project and State Water Project, and Related Facilities
AGENCY: Bureau of Reclamation, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) intends to prepare a
programmatic environmental impact statement (EIS) for analyzing
potential modifications to the continued long-term operation of the
federal Central Valley Project (CVP), for its authorized purposes, in a
coordinated manner with the State Water Project (SWP), for its
authorized purposes. Reclamation proposes to evaluate alternatives that
maximize water deliveries and optimize marketable power generation
consistent with applicable laws, contractual obligations, and
agreements; and to augment operational flexibility by addressing the
status of listed species. Reclamation is seeking suggestions and
information on the alternatives and topics to be addressed and any
other important issues related to the proposed action.
DATES: Submit written comments on the scope of the EIS by February 1,
2018.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Katrina Harrison, Project Manager,
Bureau of Reclamation, Bay-Delta Office, 801 I Street, Suite 140,
Sacramento, CA 95814-2536; fax to (916) 414-2425; or email at
[email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katrina Harrison at (916) 414-2425; or
email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Agencies Involved
Reclamation will request the following agencies participate as
cooperating agencies for preparation of the EIS in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), as amended: U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS), National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS),
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Western Area Power Administration, and
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Reclamation has also identified Indian tribes and other Federal,
State,
[[Page 61790]]
and local agencies (e.g., public water agencies, power marketing
agencies, power customers, etc.) as potential cooperating agencies, and
Reclamation will invite them to participate as cooperating agencies.
II. Why We Are Taking This Action
The CVP is a major water source for agricultural, municipal and
industrial (M&I), and fish and wildlife demands in California. State
and Federal regulatory actions, federal trust responsibilities, and
other agreements, have significantly reduced the water available for
delivery south of the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, in order,
among other things, to protect water quality within the delta and
prevent jeopardy and adverse modification of critical habitat of
threatened and endangered species. This project will evaluate
alternatives to restore, at least in part, water supply, in
consideration of all of the authorized purposes of the CVP.
In this programmatic EIS, Reclamation will analyze potential
modifications to the continued long-term operation of the CVP (proposed
action), in a coordinated manner with the SWP, to achieve the
following:
Maximize water supply delivery, consistent with applicable
law, contracts and agreements, considering new and/or modified storage
and export facilities.
Review and consider modifications to regulatory
requirements, including existing Reasonable and Prudent Alternative
actions identified in the Biological Opinions issued by the USFWS and
NMFS in 2008 and 2009, respectively.
Evaluate stressors on fish other than CVP and SWP
operations, beneficial non-flow measures to decrease stressors, and
habitat restoration and other beneficial measures for improving
targeted fish populations.
Evaluate potential changes in laws, regulations and
infrastructure that may benefit power marketability.
Reclamation has decided to prepare an EIS. As an example for why
NEPA is required related to CVP operation, in 2014, the Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals determined that the current, coordinated operation of
the CVP and SWP under biological opinions issued by the USFWS and NMFS
in 2008 and 2009, respectively, was a major Federal action that
affected the quality of the human environment that required the
preparation of an EIS. San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority
(SLDMWA) v. Jewell, 747 F.3d 581 (9th Cir. 2014); SLDMWA v. Locke, 776
F.3d 971 (9th Cir. 2014). This EIS is expected to be primarily
programmatic in nature. It is anticipated that this current
programmatic effort will be followed by tiered project-level NEPA
analyses to implement various site specific projects or detailed
programs that were generally described in the programmatic EIS.
III. Purpose and Need for Action
The need for the action is to increase operational flexibility, as
further described in Section II above. The purpose of the action
considered in this EIS is to continue the operation of the CVP in a
coordinated manner with the SWP, for its authorized purposes, in a
manner that enables Reclamation and California Department of Water
Resources to maximize water deliveries and optimize marketable power
generation consistent with applicable laws, contractual obligations,
and agreements; and to augment operational flexibility by addressing
the status of listed species.
IV. Project Area (Area of Analysis)
The project area includes the existing CVP and SWP Service Areas,
proposed CVP Service Areas, and storage and export facilities
(including potential modifications), within the Sacramento and San
Joaquin watersheds (including external watersheds connected through
facilities). The project area also includes potential improvements and
developments of other water supply or power generation programs.
The CVP is Reclamation's largest federal reclamation project.
Reclamation operates the CVP in coordination with the SWP, under the
Coordinated Operation Agreement between the federal government and the
State of California (authorized by Pub. L. 99-546). The CVP and SWP
operate pursuant to water rights permits and licenses issued by the
State Water Resources Control Board. The CVP and SWP water rights allow
appropriation of water by directly using and/or diverting water to
storage for later withdrawal and use, or use and re-diversion to
storage further downstream for later consumptive use. Among the
conditions of their water rights, are requirements of the projects to
either bypass or withdraw water from storage and to help satisfy
specific water quality, quantity and operations criteria in source
rivers and within the Delta. The CVP and SWP are currently operated in
accordance with the 2008 USFWS Biological Opinion and the 2009 NMFS
Biological Opinion, both of which concluded that the coordinated long-
term operation of the CVP and SWP, as proposed in Reclamation's 2008
Biological Assessment, was likely to jeopardize the continued existence
of listed species and destroy or adversely modify designated critical
habitat. Both Biological Opinions included Reasonable and Prudent
Alternatives designed to allow the CVP and SWP to continue operating
without causing jeopardy to listed species or destruction or adverse
modification to designated critical habitat. Reclamation accepted and
then began Project operations consistent with the USFWS and NMFS
Reasonable and Prudent Alternatives.
V. Alternatives To Be Considered
As required by NEPA, the EIS will include and consider a proposed
action and a reasonable range of alternatives, including a No Action
Alternative. Reasonable alternatives to the proposed action may include
a combination of:
Operations in coordination with new or proposed facilities
to increase water supply deliveries and marketable power generation:
[cir] Actions that increase storage capacity upstream of the Delta
for the CVP
[cir] Actions that increase storage capacity south of the Delta
[cir] Actions that increase export capabilities through the Delta
[cir] Actions to generate additional water or that improve and
optimize the utilization of water such as desalinization, water
conservation, or water reuse
Modified operations of the CVP and SWP with and without
new or proposed facilities including possible requests to modify
environmental and regulatory requirements, and sharing of water and
responsibilities in the Delta
Habitat restoration and ecosystem improvement projects
intended to increase fish populations which would be factored into the
regulatory process
Modification to existing state and federal facilities to
reduce impacts to listed species
The Final EIS will identify an agency-preferred alternative.
Alternatives could affect all or various facilities and/or
operations of the CVP, and may also include actions that affect SWP and
local project operations. Reclamation will engage with California
Department of Water Resources and local stakeholders in developing the
proposed action and reasonable alternatives. Reclamation will also
consider reasonable alternatives identified through the scoping
process.
The proposed EIS will address operations of the CVP and SWP,
operations in coordination with new or proposed projects, and habitat
restoration in the Project area, designed to increase operational
flexibility, increase water supply for CVP
[[Page 61791]]
authorized purposes, and/or increase power marketability.
VI. Indian Trust Assets and Environmental Justice
There are Indian Trust Asset issues and there may be environmental
justice issues related to the Trinity River, as well as potential
impacts within other areas.
VII. Statutory Authority
NEPA [42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.] requires that Federal agencies
conduct an environmental analysis of their proposed actions to
determine if the actions may significantly affect the human
environment. As required by NEPA, Reclamation will develop an EIS which
will analyze the potential direct, indirect, and cumulative
environmental effects that may result from the implementation of the
proposed action and alternatives.
The Rivers and Harbors Act of August 26, 1937 (50 Stat. 844, as
amended and supplemented) provides for operation of the CVP.
VIII. Request for Comments
The purposes of this notice are:
To advise other agencies, CVP and SWP water users and
power customers, affected tribes, and the public of our intention to
gather information to support the preparation of an EIS;
To obtain suggestions and information from other agencies,
interested parties, and the public on the scope of alternatives and
issues to be addressed in the EIS; and
To identify important issues raised by the public related
to the development and implementation of the proposed action.
Reclamation invites written comments from interested parties to
ensure that the full range of alternatives and issues related to the
development of the proposed action are identified. Comments during this
stage of the scoping process will only be accepted in written form.
Written comments may be submitted by mail, electronic mail, facsimile
transmission or in person to the contact listed in the ADDRESSES
section of this notice. Comments and participation in the scoping
process are encouraged.
IX. Public Disclosure
Before including your address, phone number, email address or other
personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware
that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
X. How To Request Reasonable Accommodation
If special assistance is required, please contact Katrina Harrison
at the address provided above or TDD 916-978-5608. Information
regarding this proposed action is available in alternative formats upon
request.
Dated: December 20, 2017.
David Murillo,
Regional Director, Mid-Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 2017-28215 Filed 12-28-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332-90-P