Addition of the Wind River Indian Reservation to the List of Courts of Indian Offenses, 61448-61450 [2017-28063]
Download as PDF
61448
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 248 / Thursday, December 28, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special
controls that refer to previously
approved collections of information
found in other FDA regulations. These
collections of information are subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). The collections of information in
the guidance document ‘‘De Novo
Classification Process (Evaluation of
Automatic Class III Designation)’’ have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0844; the collections of
information in part 814, subparts A
through E, regarding premarket
approval, have been approved under
OMB control number 0910–0231; the
collections of information in part 807,
subpart E, regarding premarket
notification submissions, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0120, and the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 801,
regarding labeling, have been approved
under OMB control number 0910–0485.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) The patient contacting materials
must be evaluated to be biocompatible.
(2) Nonclinical performance data
must demonstrate that the device will
not break when subjected to the forces
it will be exposed to during labor.
(3) Performance data must validate
the sterility of the device.
(4) Performance data must support the
shelf life of the device by demonstrating
continued sterility and package integrity
over the labeled shelf life.
(5) Clinical performance data must be
provided that characterizes the rate of
skin/tissue trauma.
(6) The labeling must include:
(i) Specific instructions regarding the
proper placement and use of the device.
(ii) A shelf life.
Dated: December 22, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017–28042 Filed 12–27–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 11
[189A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.
999900]
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 884
RIN 1076–AF39
Medical devices.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 884 is
amended as follows:
Addition of the Wind River Indian
Reservation to the List of Courts of
Indian Offenses
PART 884—OBSTETRICAL AND
GYNECOLOGICAL DEVICES
SUMMARY:
1. The authority citation for part 884
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. Add § 884.5210 to subpart F to read
as follows:
■
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
§ 884.5210 Pressure wedge for the
reduction of cesarean delivery.
(a) Identification. A pressure wedge
for the reduction of cesarean delivery is
a prescription device that provides
external mechanical support to the
perianal region during the labor and
vaginal delivery process. External
mechanical support of the perianal
region is intended to help reduce the
occurrence of cesarean delivery.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Dec 27, 2017
Jkt 244001
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; confirmation.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Indian Affairs
(BIA) is confirming the interim final
rule published on October 27, 2016,
establishing a Court of Indian Offenses
(also known as a CFR Court) for the
Wind River Indian Reservation.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
December 28, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Elizabeth Appel, Director, Office of
Regulatory Affairs & Collaborative
Action—Indian Affairs, (202) 273–4680;
elizabeth.appel@bia.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Summary of Rule
II. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O.
12866)
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O.
13175 and Departmental Policy)
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
J. National Environmental Policy Act
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
L. Clarity of This Regulation
M. E.O. 13771: Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs
I. Summary of Rule
Generally, Courts of Indian Offenses
operate in those areas of Indian country
where Tribes retain jurisdiction over
Indians that is exclusive of State
jurisdiction, but where Tribal courts
have not been established to fully
exercise that jurisdiction. The Eastern
Shoshone Tribe and the Northern
Arapaho Tribe have an equal joint
interest in the Wind River Indian
Reservation. Since the publication of the
Interim Final Rule establishing the
Court of Indian Offenses for the Wind
River Indian Reservation, the Shoshone
& Arapaho Tribal Court has operated
without the legal support of the Eastern
Shoshone Tribe, and with limited
resources. The Bureau has attempted to
work with the Northern Arapaho Tribe
towards establishing a system of courts
with concurrent jurisdiction. However,
after nine months of operation, the joint
nature of the Wind River Indian
Reservation has proven establishing
such a system untenable.
Allowing the Bureau of Indian Affairs
to constitute a CFR Court will provide
all residents on the Wind River Indian
Reservation with comprehensive
judicial services, and ensure the
administration of justice and public
safety. To accomplish this, this rule
finalizes the revision of a section of 25
CFR part 11 to add the Wind River
Indian Reservation in Wyoming to the
list of areas in Indian country with
established Courts of Indian Offenses
(also known as CFR Courts). This rule
inserts the Wind River Indian
Reservation into a new paragraph (d) in
25 CFR 11.100.
An interim final rule published on
October 27, 2016 (81 FR 74675).
Comments received on the interim final
rule are addressed in Section II.H of this
preamble, below.
II. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
(E.O. 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs in the Office of Management and
Budget will review all significant rules.
The Office of Information and
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 248 / Thursday, December 28, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the
principles of E.O. 12866 while calling
for improvements in the nation’s
regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty,
and to use the best, most innovative,
and least burdensome tools for
achieving regulatory ends. The
executive order directs agencies to
consider regulatory approaches that
reduce burdens and maintain flexibility
and freedom of choice for the public
where these approaches are relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory
objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes
further that regulations must be based
on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for
public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed
this rule in a manner consistent with
these requirements.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant
economic effect on a substantial number
of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
because the rule affects only the
administration of justice on a
reservation through a CFR court.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
C. Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 804(2)). This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more;
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions;
(c) Does not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector
of more than $100 million per year. The
rule does not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector. A
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not
required.
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
This rule does not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Dec 27, 2017
Jkt 244001
Order 12630. A takings implication
assessment is not required.
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of
Executive Order 13132, this rule does
not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a federalism summary impact
statement. A federalism summary
impact statement is not required.
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the
requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a)
requiring that all regulations be
reviewed to eliminate errors and
ambiguity and be written to minimize
litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
requiring that all regulations be written
in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes
(E.O. 13175 and Departmental Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives
to strengthen its government-togovernment relationship with Indian
Tribes through a commitment to
consultation with Indian Tribes and
recognition of their right to selfgovernance and Tribal sovereignty. We
have evaluated this rule under the
department’s consultation policy under
the criteria in Executive Order 13175
and have consulted with the affected
tribes.
Prior to issuing this regulation, the
Department of the Interior and its
Agencies, Bureaus, and Offices,
communicated repeatedly with the
Eastern Shoshone Tribe and the
Northern Arapaho Tribe regarding
public safety concerns for the residents
of the Wind River Indian Reservation.
Following the withdrawal of the
Northern Arapaho Tribe from the Joint
Business Committee, the Shoshone &
Arapaho Tribal Court continued to
operate with limited resources and only
with the support of the Northern
Arapaho Tribe. The Northern Arapaho
Tribe has established its own Northern
Arapaho Tribal Code has retitled the
Shoshone & Arapaho Tribal Court as the
Northern Arapaho Tribal Court. The
Northern Arapaho Tribe and Eastern
Shoshone Tribe have responded to the
Interim Final Rule. The Northern
Arapaho Tribe provided extensive
documentation on its right to establish
an independent judiciary, without
addressing the pragmatic consequences
of having multiple courts with
concurrent jurisdiction on the
Reservation. The Eastern Shoshone
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
61449
Business Committee expressly requested
that the Department establish and
operate a Court of Indian Offenses for
the Wind River Indian Reservation.
After reviewing these comments, and
the operation of the Court of Indian
Offenses for the Wind River Indian
Reservation over the past nine months,
the Department has determined that to
ensure public safety, it is necessary to
establish a Court of Indian Offenses for
the Wind River Indian Reservation.
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements,
and a submission to the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.) is not required. We may
not conduct or sponsor, and you are not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
J. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment. A
detailed statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(‘‘NEPA’’, 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) is not
required because the rule is covered by
a categorical exclusion. This rule is
excluded from the requirement to
prepare a detailed statement because it
is a regulation of an administrative
nature. (For further information, see 43
CFR 46.210(i)) We have also determined
that the rule does not involve any of the
extraordinary circumstances listed in 43
CFR 46.215 that would require further
analysis under NEPA.
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
This rule is not a significant energy
action under the definition in Executive
Order 13211. A Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
L. Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Orders
12866 (section 1(b)(12)), and 12988
(section 3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section
1(a)), and by the Presidential
Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write
all rules in plain language. This means
that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use common, everyday words and
clear language rather than jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, send us comments by one
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
61450
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 248 / Thursday, December 28, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES
section. To better help us revise the
rule, your comments should be as
specific as possible. For example, you
should tell us the numbers of the
sections or paragraphs that you find
unclear, which sections or sentences are
too long, the sections where you think
lists or tables would be useful, etc.
M. E.O. 13771: Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs
This rule is not an E.O. 13771
regulatory action because this rule is not
significant under E.O. 12866.
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 11
Courts, Indians—law.
For the reason stated in the preamble
the Department of the Interior, Bureau
of Indian Affairs amends part 11 in Title
25 of the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PART 11—COURTS OF INDIAN
OFFENSES AND LAW AND ORDER
CODE
The interim final rule amending 25
CFR part 11 which was published at 81
FR 74675 on October 27, 2016, is
adopted as final without change.
■
Dated: December 19, 2017.
John Tahsuda,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian
Affairs, Exercising the Authority of the
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2017–28063 Filed 12–27–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 11
[189A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900]
Court of Indian Offenses Serving the
Wind River Indian Reservation
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Waiver of certain regulations.
AGENCY:
This document accompanies
the final rule establishing a Court of
Indian Offenses (also known as a CFR
Court) for the Wind River Indian
Reservation published today and waives
the application of certain regulations for
the Court of Indian Offenses serving the
Wind River Indian Reservation.
DATES: This waiver is applicable on
December 28, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Appel, Director, Office of
Regulatory Affairs & Collaborative
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Dec 27, 2017
Jkt 244001
Action—Indian Affairs, (202) 273–4680;
elizabeth.appel@bia.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Generally,
Courts of Indian Offenses operate in
those areas of Indian country where
Tribes retain jurisdiction over Indians
exclusive of State jurisdiction, but
where Tribal courts have not been
established to fully exercise that
jurisdiction. The Eastern Shoshone
Tribe and the Northern Arapaho Tribe
have an equal joint interest in the Wind
River Indian Reservation. However,
since October of 2016, the former
Shoshone & Arapaho Tribal Court has
operated only with the support of the
Northern Arapaho Tribe. The Bureau of
Indian Affairs (BIA) is taking the next
step to provide all residents on the
Wind River Indian Reservation with
comprehensive judicial services, and
ensure the permanent administration of
justice and public safety.
Therefore, the Secretary has
determined, in his discretion under 5
U.S.C. 301, 25 U.S.C. 2 and 9, that it is
necessary to waive 25 CFR 11.104(a), (b)
and 11.201(a), (e), and (f), as well as a
portion of 25 CFR 11.108, as applied to
the Wind River Indian Reservation. This
waiver will ensure that a BIA Court of
Indian Offenses can effectively operate
and serve all of the residents of the
Wind River Indian Reservation.
The Secretary has determined that, for
the Wind River Reservation, it is
necessary to waive 25 CFR 11.201(a),
(e), and (f)—requirements that a
magistrate must be confirmed by a tribal
governing body, or, in the case of multitribal courts, confirmation by a majority
of the tribal governing bodies; and
requirements regarding training or other
qualifications for CFR Court
Magistrates—to ensure that the Bureau
has the ability to hire and staff the Court
with qualified employees efficiently.
Additionally, 25 CFR 11.104, which
provides that the regulations in part 11
continue to apply until either: (1) The
BIA and the tribe enter into a contract
or compact for the tribe to provide
judicial services; or (2) [t]he tribe has
put into effect a law-and-order code that
establishes a court system, is waived in
part as applied to the Wind River Indian
Reservation. Due to the shared nature of
the Wind River Indian Reservation, the
practical consequences of separate
courts with overlapping jurisdiction
will be further confusion about the
authority of each court and
exponentially increase the difficulty of
maintaining law and order on the
Reservation. While the Tribes are free to
operate judicial systems independently,
the Department will not acknowledge or
enforce acts of those judicial systems
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
entered after the publication of this
waiver, with the exception that the
Department will acknowledge any
emergency restraining or protective
issued by the Northern Arapaho Court
within ten (10) days of the publication
of this waiver, until such time as both
tribes jointly petition under 25 CFR
11.104.
Finally, 25 CFR 11.108 is waived to
the extent necessary for the Court of
Indian Offenses for the Wind River
Indian Reservation to enforce Titles II,
III, V, VII, VIII, IX, Title XI Chapters 3
and 4, Title XII Chapter 2, Titles XIV,
and XVI of the Shoshone and Arapaho
Law and Order Code as it existed on
October 1, 2016. To the extent that the
Shoshone and Arapaho Law and Order
Code, as written, requires an action of
the Joint Business Committee as a
predicate for a criminal offense or the
regulation of an action, e.g. the
determination of the hunting season,
that authority is hereby vested in the
BIA Superintendent of the Wind River
Agency.
The authority for publication of this
document is: 5 U.S.C. 301; R.S. 463, 25
U.S.C. 2; R.S. 465, 25 U.S.C. 9; 42 Stat.
208, 25 U.S.C. 13; 38 Stat. 586, 25 U.S.C.
200.
Dated: December 5, 2017.
John Tahsuda,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian
Affairs, Exercising the Authority of the
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2017–28062 Filed 12–27–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Foreign Assets Control
31 CFR Part 576
Iraq Stabilization and Insurgency
Sanctions Regulations
Office of Foreign Assets
Control, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets
Control (OFAC) is adopting a final rule
amending the Iraq Stabilization and
Insurgency Sanctions Regulations to
implement Executive Order (E.O.) 13668
of May 27, 2014 (‘‘Ending Immunities
Granted to the Development Fund for
Iraq and Certain Other Iraqi Property
and Interests in Property Pursuant to
Executive Order 13303, as Amended’’).
These amendments also implement
certain technical and conforming
changes.
DATES: Effective: December 28, 2017.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\28DER1.SGM
28DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 248 (Thursday, December 28, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61448-61450]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28063]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
25 CFR Part 11
[189A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]
RIN 1076-AF39
Addition of the Wind River Indian Reservation to the List of
Courts of Indian Offenses
AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; confirmation.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is confirming the interim
final rule published on October 27, 2016, establishing a Court of
Indian Offenses (also known as a CFR Court) for the Wind River Indian
Reservation.
DATES: This final rule is effective on December 28, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Elizabeth Appel, Director, Office
of Regulatory Affairs & Collaborative Action--Indian Affairs, (202)
273-4680; [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Summary of Rule
II. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866)
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175 and Departmental
Policy)
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
J. National Environmental Policy Act
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
L. Clarity of This Regulation
M. E.O. 13771: Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
I. Summary of Rule
Generally, Courts of Indian Offenses operate in those areas of
Indian country where Tribes retain jurisdiction over Indians that is
exclusive of State jurisdiction, but where Tribal courts have not been
established to fully exercise that jurisdiction. The Eastern Shoshone
Tribe and the Northern Arapaho Tribe have an equal joint interest in
the Wind River Indian Reservation. Since the publication of the Interim
Final Rule establishing the Court of Indian Offenses for the Wind River
Indian Reservation, the Shoshone & Arapaho Tribal Court has operated
without the legal support of the Eastern Shoshone Tribe, and with
limited resources. The Bureau has attempted to work with the Northern
Arapaho Tribe towards establishing a system of courts with concurrent
jurisdiction. However, after nine months of operation, the joint nature
of the Wind River Indian Reservation has proven establishing such a
system untenable.
Allowing the Bureau of Indian Affairs to constitute a CFR Court
will provide all residents on the Wind River Indian Reservation with
comprehensive judicial services, and ensure the administration of
justice and public safety. To accomplish this, this rule finalizes the
revision of a section of 25 CFR part 11 to add the Wind River Indian
Reservation in Wyoming to the list of areas in Indian country with
established Courts of Indian Offenses (also known as CFR Courts). This
rule inserts the Wind River Indian Reservation into a new paragraph (d)
in 25 CFR 11.100.
An interim final rule published on October 27, 2016 (81 FR 74675).
Comments received on the interim final rule are addressed in Section
II.H of this preamble, below.
II. Procedural Requirements
A. Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866 and 13563)
Executive Order 12866 provides that the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs in the Office of Management and Budget will review
all significant rules. The Office of Information and
[[Page 61449]]
Regulatory Affairs has determined that this rule is not significant.
Executive Order 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 while
calling for improvements in the nation's regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most
innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory ends.
The executive order directs agencies to consider regulatory approaches
that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of choice for
the public where these approaches are relevant, feasible, and
consistent with regulatory objectives. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further
that regulations must be based on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed this rule in a manner consistent
with these requirements.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
This rule will not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) because the rule affects only the
administration of justice on a reservation through a CFR court.
C. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 804(2)). This rule:
(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more;
(b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions;
(c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per
year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on State,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector. A statement
containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
E. Takings (E.O. 12630)
This rule does not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
F. Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of Executive Order 13132, this rule
does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. A federalism
summary impact statement is not required.
G. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
This rule complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be
written to minimize litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all
regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal
standards.
H. Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175 and Departmental Policy)
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with Indian Tribes through a
commitment to consultation with Indian Tribes and recognition of their
right to self-governance and Tribal sovereignty. We have evaluated this
rule under the department's consultation policy under the criteria in
Executive Order 13175 and have consulted with the affected tribes.
Prior to issuing this regulation, the Department of the Interior
and its Agencies, Bureaus, and Offices, communicated repeatedly with
the Eastern Shoshone Tribe and the Northern Arapaho Tribe regarding
public safety concerns for the residents of the Wind River Indian
Reservation. Following the withdrawal of the Northern Arapaho Tribe
from the Joint Business Committee, the Shoshone & Arapaho Tribal Court
continued to operate with limited resources and only with the support
of the Northern Arapaho Tribe. The Northern Arapaho Tribe has
established its own Northern Arapaho Tribal Code has retitled the
Shoshone & Arapaho Tribal Court as the Northern Arapaho Tribal Court.
The Northern Arapaho Tribe and Eastern Shoshone Tribe have responded to
the Interim Final Rule. The Northern Arapaho Tribe provided extensive
documentation on its right to establish an independent judiciary,
without addressing the pragmatic consequences of having multiple courts
with concurrent jurisdiction on the Reservation. The Eastern Shoshone
Business Committee expressly requested that the Department establish
and operate a Court of Indian Offenses for the Wind River Indian
Reservation.
After reviewing these comments, and the operation of the Court of
Indian Offenses for the Wind River Indian Reservation over the past
nine months, the Department has determined that to ensure public
safety, it is necessary to establish a Court of Indian Offenses for the
Wind River Indian Reservation.
I. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements, and
a submission to the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) is not required. We may not
conduct or sponsor, and you are not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
J. National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment. A detailed statement
under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (``NEPA'', 42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) is not required because the rule is covered by a
categorical exclusion. This rule is excluded from the requirement to
prepare a detailed statement because it is a regulation of an
administrative nature. (For further information, see 43 CFR 46.210(i))
We have also determined that the rule does not involve any of the
extraordinary circumstances listed in 43 CFR 46.215 that would require
further analysis under NEPA.
K. Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
This rule is not a significant energy action under the definition
in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
L. Clarity of This Regulation
We are required by Executive Orders 12866 (section 1(b)(12)), and
12988 (section 3(b)(1)(B)), and 13563 (section 1(a)), and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that each rule we publish must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(c) Use common, everyday words and clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that we have not met these requirements, send us
comments by one
[[Page 61450]]
of the methods listed in the ADDRESSES section. To better help us
revise the rule, your comments should be as specific as possible. For
example, you should tell us the numbers of the sections or paragraphs
that you find unclear, which sections or sentences are too long, the
sections where you think lists or tables would be useful, etc.
M. E.O. 13771: Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs
This rule is not an E.O. 13771 regulatory action because this rule
is not significant under E.O. 12866.
List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 11
Courts, Indians--law.
For the reason stated in the preamble the Department of the
Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs amends part 11 in Title 25 of the
Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 11--COURTS OF INDIAN OFFENSES AND LAW AND ORDER CODE
0
The interim final rule amending 25 CFR part 11 which was published at
81 FR 74675 on October 27, 2016, is adopted as final without change.
Dated: December 19, 2017.
John Tahsuda,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, Exercising the
Authority of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2017-28063 Filed 12-27-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P