Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to a Pile Driving Activities for Waterfront Repairs at the U.S. Coast Guard Station Monterey, Monterey, California, 61544-61554 [2017-28029]
Download as PDF
61544
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 248 / Thursday, December 28, 2017 / Notices
notification letter and most recent
performance report may be obtained
upon request by contacting Ralph
Cantral.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Sections
312 and 315 of the Coastal Zone
Management Act (CZMA) require
NOAA to conduct periodic evaluations
of federally-approved National
Estuarine Research Reserves. The
process includes a public meeting,
consideration of written public
comments and consultations with
interested Federal, state, and local
agencies and members of the public. For
the evaluation of National Estuarine
Research Reserves, NOAA will consider
the extent to which the state has met the
national objectives, adhered to its
management plan approved by the
Secretary of Commerce, and adhered to
the terms of financial assistance under
the Coastal Zone Management Act.
When the evaluation is completed,
NOAA’s Office for Coastal Management
will place a notice in the Federal
Register announcing the availability of
the Final Evaluation Findings.
Specific information on the periodic
evaluation of reserves that are the
subject of this notice are detailed below
as follows:
RIN 0648–XF460
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Padilla Bay National Estuarine
Research Reserve Evaluation
You may participate or submit oral
comments at the public meeting
scheduled as follows:
Date: Wednesday, February 28, 2018.
Time: 7:00 p.m., local time.
Location: Padilla Bay Reserve
Interpretive Center, 10441 BayviewEdison Road, Mt. Vernon, WA 98273.
Written comments must be received
on or before March 9, 2018.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Dated: December 18, 2017.
Keelin Kuipers,
Acting Deputy Director, Office for Coastal
Management, National Ocean Service,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.
Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog
11.419
Coastal Zone Management Program
Administration
[FR Doc. 2017–28110 Filed 12–27–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–08–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Dec 27, 2017
Jkt 244001
Taking and Importing Marine
Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to a Pile Driving Activities
for Waterfront Repairs at the U.S.
Coast Guard Station Monterey,
Monterey, California
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental
harassment authorization.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
regulations implementing the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) as
amended, notification is hereby given
that NMFS has issued an incidental
harassment authorization (IHA) to the
U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) to incidentally
harass, by Level B harassment only,
marine mammals during pile driving
activities associated with waterfront
repairs at the USCG Monterey Station in
Monterey, California.
DATES: This Authorization is applicable
from December 20, 2017 through
October 15, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephanie Egger, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 427–8401.
Electronic copies of the applications
and supporting documents, as well as a
list of the references cited in this
document, may be obtained online at
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/
incidental/construction.htm. In case of
problems accessing these documents,
please call the contact listed above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct
the Secretary of Commerce (as delegated
to NMFS) to allow, upon request, the
incidental, but not intentional, taking of
small numbers of marine mammals by
U.S. citizens who engage in a specified
activity (other than commercial fishing)
within a specified geographical region if
certain findings are made and either
regulations are issued or, if the taking is
limited to harassment, a notice of a
proposed authorization is provided to
the public for review.
An authorization for incidental
takings shall be granted if NMFS finds
that the taking will have a negligible
impact on the species or stock(s), will
not have an unmitigable adverse impact
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
on the availability of the species or
stock(s) for subsistence uses (where
relevant), and if the permissible
methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring
and reporting of such takings are set
forth.
NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible
impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as an impact
resulting from the specified activity that
cannot be reasonably expected to, and is
not reasonably likely to, adversely affect
the species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival.
The MMPA states that the term ‘‘take’’
means to harass, hunt, capture, or kill,
or attempt to harass, hunt, capture, or
kill any marine mammal.
Except with respect to certain
activities not pertinent here, the MMPA
defines ‘‘harassment’’ as any act of
pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i)
has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild (Level A harassment); or (ii) has
the potential to disturb a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild by causing disruption of behavioral
patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding,
feeding, or sheltering (Level B
harassment).
National Environmental Policy Act
In compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
NOAA Administrative Order (NAO)
216–6A, NMFS reviewed our action
(i.e., the issuance of an incidental
harassment authorization) with respect
to potential impacts on the human
environment. Accordingly, NMFS
reviewed and adopted the USCG’s
Supplemental Environmental
Assessment entitled Supplemental
Environmental Assessment for
Waterfront Repairs at U.S. Coast Guard
Station Monterey, Monterey, California,
and signed a Finding of No Significant
Impact on November 9, 2017.
Summary of Request
On February 10, 2017, NMFS received
a request from the USCG for an IHA to
take marine mammals incidental to pile
driving activities for waterfront
restoration, at the USCG Station
Monterey in Monterrey, California.
USCG’s request is for take of eight
species of marine mammals, by Level B
harassment. Neither USCG nor NMFS
expect mortality to result from this
activity and, therefore, an IHA is
appropriate.
NMFS previously issued an IHA to
the USCG for similar work (79 FR
57052; September 24, 2014). However,
no work was conducted under that IHA.
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 248 / Thursday, December 28, 2017 / Notices
Description of Specific Activity
USCG Station Monterey occupies an
upland site and adjacent waterside
structures including a 1,700-foot
breakwater, a wharf constructed over
the breakwater, and floating docks to the
east of the wharf in Monterey Harbor,
Monterey, California. The USCG intends
to conduct maintenance on the existing
wharf, which is used to berth vessels
that are critical to support USCG Station
Monterey’s mission.
The planned project requires
replacement of 17 timber (16 to 18-in in
diameter) piles including removal of the
existing timber deck, replacing stringers,
steel pipe caps, steel support beams,
and hardware in order to access the
timber piles. The timber piles will be
removed using vibratory pile driving.
Each timber pile will be replaced with
a 14-in steel pipe pile installed using a
vibratory hammer (the preferred
method) and each pipe pile will be
positioned and installed in the footprint
of the extracted timber pile. Pile
proofing will be conducted via impact
hammer. If, due to substrate or
breakwater armor, a pipe pile is unable
to be driven to 30 feet below the mud
line using a vibratory hammer, then an
impact hammer will be used; and if the
pile cannot be driven with an impact
hammer, the pipe pile would be posted
onto the armor stone. The steel pipe
piles would not be filled with concrete.
Pile installation would be adjacent to a
rock jetty that would provide substantial
underwater shielding of sound
transmission to areas north (or through
the jetty).
Pile-driving activities are expected to
occur for an estimated minimum of
three to a maximum of eight days of the
total construction time. It is assumed
that driving time would be
approximately 20 minutes (min) per pile
for vibratory or impact pile driving. It is
assumed that vibratory extraction of the
existing piles would take approximately
10 min per pile. Pile driving and
extraction would therefore result in an
estimated of 240 min per day (4 hours
(hrs)); 510 min for the total project or
approximately 8.5 hrs. In-water noise
from pile driving activities will result in
the take, by Level B harassment only, of
eight species of marine mammals.
A detailed description of the planned
pile driving project is provided in the
Federal Register notice for the proposed
IHA (82 FR 42986; September 13, 2017).
Since that time, no changes have been
made to the planned USCG activities.
Therefore, a detailed description is not
provided here. Please refer to that
Federal Register notice for the
description of the specific activity.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Dec 27, 2017
Jkt 244001
Comments and Responses
A notice of NMFS’s proposal to issue
an IHA to the USCG was published in
the Federal Register on September 24,
2014 (79 FR 57052). That notice
described, in detail, USCG activity, the
marine mammal species that may be
affected by the activity, and the
anticipated effects on marine mammals.
During the 30-day public comment
period, NMFS received comments from
the Marine Mammal Commission
(Commission).
Comment 1: NMFS received a
comment from the Commission and
while the Commission agrees with
NMFS’s determinations, it recommends
that NMFS follow NMFS’s policy of a
24-hour reset for enumerating the
number of marine mammals that could
be taken during the planned activities
by applying standard rounding rules
before summing the numbers of
estimated takes across survey sites and
survey days.
Response 1: Calculating predicted
take is not an exact science and there
are arguments for using different
mathematical approaches in different
situations, and for making qualitative
adjustments in other situations. NMFS
is currently engaged in developing a
protocol to help guide its take
calculations given particular situations
and circumstances. We believe,
however, that the methodology for this
action is appropriate and is not at odds
with the 24-hour reset policy the
Commission references.
Comment 2: The Commission
recommends NMFS include previous
mitigation and monitoring measures
from the 2014 IHA (e.g., vessel based
monitoring, additional baseline
monitoring) as well as clarifying the
number of Protected Species Observers
(PSOs) that will be used for the project
and where the PSOs would be
positioned for the most effective
monitoring.
Response: As discussed with the
Commission, NMFS has incorporated or
expanded on these measures in the IHA.
D USCG shall conduct in-situ
monitoring during the installation of
five piles and removal of five piles.
USCG shall adjust Level B harassment
zones of influence (ZOIs) as necessary
where received underwater sound
pressure levels (SPLs) are higher than
160 decibels (dB) root mean square
(rms) and 120 dB (rms) re 1 micro Pascal
(mPa) for impulse noise sources (impact
pile driving) and non-impulses noise
sources (vibratory pile driving),
respectively. USCG shall adjust Level A
harassment zones based on measured
SELs as necessary.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61545
D USCG shall employ at least three
NMFS-approved PSOs to conduct
marine mammal monitoring for its
construction project.
D PSOs shall conduct baseline
monitoring for two days during the
week prior to pile removal and driving.
D During pile removal or installation,
at least three PSOs shall be used, and
positioned such that each monitor has
the best vantage point available,
including the USCG pier, jetty, adjacent
docks within the harbor, to maintain an
excellent view of the exclusion zone
and adjacent areas during the survey
period. Monitors would be equipped
with radios or cell phones for
maintaining contact with work crews.
D Vessel-based visual marine mammal
monitoring within the 120 dB and 160
dB ZOIs shall be conducted during 10
percent of the vibratory pile driving and
removal and impact pile driving
activities, respectively.
Comment 3: The Commission and
NMFS discussed effectiveness of the
sound attenuation devices, which
resulted in a change from a 10 dB
reduction to 5 dB during impact pile
driving. The adjusted source levels
decreased the zones for both Level A
and Level B harassment, but did not
change the number of authorized takes.
Response 3: As agreed upon with the
Commission, NMFS outlined the
justification for the adjusted sources
levels in the final IHA.
Comment 4: The Commission also
recommended the NMFS re-evaluate the
USCG hydroacoustic monitoring plan to
ensure the acoustic thresholds, various
metrics, and methods are current.
Response 4: As agreed upon with the
Commission, NMFS requested the
USCG update their hydroacoustic
monitoring plan to ensure it is current.
Those revisions included ensuring the
appropriate thresholds and weighting
parameters, hearing ranges, and
functional hearing group delineations
are used and distances reported
accordingly (including for cumulative
sound exposure levels), increasing the
measurement capabilities from 10 to 20
kHz, ensuring ambient conditions are
recorded appropriately (e.g., in
continuous 10-minute intervals),
ensuring the impulse duration is
reported and represents the duration
that contains 90 percent of pulse energy
(including using the appropriate
recording devices to obtain those
measurements), and reporting the depth
of the 10-m hydrophone.
Description of Marine Mammals in the
Area of Specified Activities
The marine mammal species under
NMFS’s jurisdiction that have the
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
61546
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 248 / Thursday, December 28, 2017 / Notices
potential to occur in the construction
area include California sea lion
(Zalophus californianus), Pacific harbor
seal (Phoca vitulina), harbor porpoise
(Phocoena phocoena), Risso’s dolphin
(Grampus griseus), bottlenose dolphin
(Tursiops truncates), killer whale
(Orcinus orca), gray whale (Megaptera
novaengliae), humpback whale
(Eschrichtius robustus), and southern
sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis). The
southern sea otter is managed by the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and not
discussed further in this authorization.
Humpback whales are protected under
the Endangered Species Act (ESA).
Pertinent information for each of these
species is presented in this document to
provide the necessary background to
understand their demographics and
distribution in the area.
TABLE 1—MARINE MAMMAL SPECIES POTENTIALLY PRESENT IN REGION OF ACTIVITY
Common name
Scientific name
ESA/
MMPA
status;
strategic
(Y/N) 1
Stock
Stock abundance
(CV, Nmin,
most recent
abundance
survey) 2
Annual
M/SI 3
PBR
Order Cetartiodactyla—Cetacea—Superfamily Mysticeti (baleen whales)
Family Eschrichtiidae
Gray whale ..............................
Eschrichtius robustus .............
Eastern North Pacific .............
-; N
20,990 (0.05; 20,125; 2011) ..
624
132
E; D
1,918 (0.03; 1,855; 2011) ......
11.0
≥5.5
Family Balaenidae
Humpback whale .....................
Megaptera novaeangliae
novaeangliae.
California/Oregon/Washington
Superfamily Odontoceti (toothed whales, dolphins, and porpoises)
Family Delphinidae
Killer whale ..............................
Orcinus orca ...........................
Killer whale ..............................
Risso’s dolphin ........................
Bottlenose dolphin ...................
Orcinus orca ...........................
Grampus griseus ....................
Tursiops truncatus ..................
Eastern North Pacific Offshore.
West Coast Transient ............
California/Oregon/Washington
California Coastal ...................
-; N
240 (0.49; 162; 2008) ............
1.6
0
-; N
-; N
-; N
243 (na; 243; 2009) ...............
6,336 (0.32; 4,817; 2014) ......
453 (0.06; 346; 2011) ............
2.4
46
2.7
0
≥3.7
≥2.0
3,715 (0.51; 2,480; 2011) ......
25
0
296,750 (na; 153,337; 2011)
9,200
389
30,968 (na; 27,348; 2012) .....
1,641
43
Family Phocoenidae (porpoises)
Harbor Porpoise ......................
Phocoena phocoena ..............
Monterey Bay .........................
-; N
Order Carnivora—Superfamily Pinnipedia
Family Otariidae (eared seals and sea lions)
California sea lion ....................
Zalophus californianus ...........
U.S. ........................................
Harbor seal ..............................
Phoca vitulina .........................
California ................................
-; N
Family Phocidae (earless seals)
-; N
1 Endangered
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Species Act (ESA) status: Endangered (E), Threatened (T)/MMPA status: Depleted (D). A dash (-) indicates that the species is not listed under the
ESA or designated as depleted under the MMPA. Under the MMPA, a strategic stock is one for which the level of direct human-caused mortality exceeds PBR or
which is determined to be declining and likely to be listed under the ESA within the foreseeable future. Any species or stock listed under the ESA is automatically
designated under the MMPA as depleted and as a strategic stock.
2 NMFS marine mammal stock assessment reports online at: www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/. CV is coefficient of variation; N
min is the minimum estimate of stock
abundance. In some cases, CV is not applicable.
3 These values, found in NMFS’s SARs, represent annual levels of human-caused mortality plus serious injury from all sources combined (e.g., commercial fisheries, ship strike). Annual mortality/serious injury (M/SI) often cannot be determined precisely and is in some cases presented as a minimum value or range. A CV associated with estimated mortality due to commercial fisheries is presented in some cases.
A detailed description of the of the
species likely to be affected by the
USCG’s waterfront project, including
brief introductions to the species and
relevant stocks as well as available
information regarding population trends
and threats, and information regarding
local occurrence, were provided in the
Federal Register notice for the proposed
IHA (82 FR 42986; September 13, 2017).
Since that time, we are not aware of any
changes in the status of these species
and stocks; therefore, detailed
descriptions are not provided here.
However, information on a recent rare
occurrence of offshore killer whales was
not previously included in the proposed
IHA and therefore is described below.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Dec 27, 2017
Jkt 244001
Although more of a rare occurrence,
approximately 25 offshore killer whales
were observed in December 2016 in
Monterey Bay. Offshore pods are
usually found in groups of 30–60 or
more individuals and they are seldom
seen in protected coastal waters.
However, when observed in Monterey
Bay, offshore killer whales have been
observed during the winter.
Please refer to that Federal Register
notice for all other species descriptions.
Please also refer to NMFS’ website
(www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/
mammals/) for generalized species
accounts.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Potential Effects of Specified Activities
on Marine Mammals and Their Habitat
The effects of underwater noise from
pile driving activities for the USCG’s
waterfront restoration project have the
potential to result in behavioral
harassment of marine mammals in the
vicinity of the action area. The project
would not result in permanent impacts
to habitats used directly by marine
mammals, such as the adjacent jetty that
is used as a haulout site by pinnipeds,
but may have potential short-term
impacts to food sources such as forage
fish and minor impacts on turbidity
during installation and removal of piles,
etc. In addition, a concurrence letter
was issued by NMFS (2013) (and still
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 248 / Thursday, December 28, 2017 / Notices
applies) concluding that the USCG’s
action would adversely affect EFH for
various Federally managed fish species,
including a temporary increase in
suspended sediments in the water
column from pile driving and removal,
conversion of soft bottom habitat to
artificial substrate, and an increase in
underwater sound levels in the water
column associated with pile driving.
However, the project includes measures
to avoid, minimize, or otherwise offset
adverse effects, such that NMFS has no
further EFH conservation
recommendations to provide (NOAA
2013).
The Federal Register notice for the
proposed IHA (82 FR 42986; September
13, 2017) included additional
discussion of the effects of
anthropogenic noise on marine
mammals, therefore that information is
not repeated here; please refer to the
Federal Register notice (82 FR 42986;
September 13, 2017) for that
information.
Estimated Take
This section provides an estimate of
the number of incidental takes for
authorization through this IHA, which
will inform both NMFS’s consideration
of whether the number of takes is
‘‘small’’ and the negligible impact
determination.
Harassment is the only type of take
expected to result from these activities.
Except with respect to certain activities
not pertinent here, section 3(18) of the
MMPA defines ‘‘harassment’’ as any act
of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which
(i) has the potential to injure a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild (Level A harassment); or (ii) has
the potential to disturb a marine
mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild by causing disruption of behavioral
patterns, including, but not limited to,
migration, breathing, nursing, breeding,
feeding, or sheltering (Level B
harassment).
Authorized takes would be by Level B
harassment only, in the form of
disruption of behavioral patterns for
individual marine mammals resulting
from exposure to noise from pile driving
and removal activities. Based on the
nature of the activity and the
anticipated effectiveness of the
mitigation measures (i.e., shutdown
measures—discussed in detail below in
Mitigation section), Level A harassment
is neither anticipated nor authorized.
As described previously, no mortality
is anticipated or authorized for this
activity. Below we describe how the
take is estimated.
Described in the most basic way, we
estimate take by considering: (1)
Acoustic thresholds above which NMFS
believes the best available science
indicates marine mammals will be
behaviorally harassed or incur some
degree of hearing impairment; (2) the
area or volume of water that will be
ensonified above these levels in a day;
(3) the density or occurrence of marine
mammals within these ensonified areas;
and, (4) and the number of days of
activities. Below, we describe these
components in more detail and present
the take estimate.
Acoustic Thresholds
Using the best available science,
NMFS has developed acoustic
thresholds that identify the received
level of underwater sound above which
exposed marine mammals would be
reasonably expected to be behaviorally
harassed (equated to Level B
harassment) or to incur PTS of some
degree (equated to Level A harassment).
Level B Harassment for non-explosive
sources—Though significantly driven by
received level, the onset of behavioral
disturbance from anthropogenic noise
exposure is also informed to varying
degrees by other factors related to the
source (e.g., frequency, predictability,
duty cycle), the environment (e.g.,
bathymetry), and the receiving animals
(hearing, motivation, experience,
demography, behavioral context) and
can be difficult to predict (Southall et
al., 2007, Ellison et al., 2011). Based on
61547
what the available science indicates and
the practical need to use a threshold
based on a factor that is both predictable
and measurable for most activities,
NMFS uses a generalized acoustic
threshold based on received level to
estimate the onset of behavioral
harassment. NMFS predicts that marine
mammals are likely to be behaviorally
harassed in a manner we consider Level
B harassment when exposed to
underwater anthropogenic noise above
received levels of 120 dB re 1 mPa (rms)
for continuous (e.g., vibratory piledriving, drilling) sources and above 160
dB re 1 mPa (rms) for non-explosive
impulsive (e.g., seismic airguns) or
intermittent (e.g., scientific sonar)
sources. USCG’s planned activity
includes the use of continuous
(vibratory pile driving and removal) and
impulsive (impact pile driving) sources,
and, therefore, the 120 and 160 dB re 1
mPa (rms) are applicable.
Level A harassment for non-explosive
sources—NMFS’s Technical Guidance
for Assessing the Effects of
Anthropogenic Sound on Marine
Mammal Hearing (NMFS, 2016a)
identifies dual criteria to assess auditory
injury (Level A harassment) to five
different marine mammal groups (based
on hearing sensitivity) as a result of
exposure to noise from two different
types of sources (impulsive or nonimpulsive). USCG’s planned activity
includes the use of non-impulsive
(vibratory pile driving and removal) and
impulsive (impact pile driving) sources.
These thresholds were developed by
compiling and synthesizing the best
available science and soliciting input
multiple times from both the public and
peer reviewers to inform the final
product, and are provided in Table 2
below. The references, analysis, and
methodology used in the development
of the thresholds are described in NMFS
2016 Technical Guidance, which may
be accessed at: https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/acoustics/
guidelines.htm.
TABLE 2—THRESHOLDS IDENTIFYING THE ONSET OF PERMANENT THRESHOLD SHIFT
PTS onset thresholds
Hearing group
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Impulsive
Low-Frequency (LF) Cetaceans .............
Mid-Frequency (MF) Cetaceans ............
High-Frequency (HF) Cetaceans ...........
Phocid Pinnipeds (PW) (Underwater) ....
Otariid Pinnipeds (OW) (Underwater) ....
Lpk,flat:
Lpk,flat:
Lpk,flat:
Lpk,flat:
Lpk,flat:
219
230
202
218
232
dB;
dB;
dB;
dB;
dB;
Non-impulsive
LE,LF,24h: 183 dB ..........................................
LE,MF,24h: 185 dB ..........................................
LE,HF,24h: 155 dB ..........................................
LE,PW,24h: 185 dB .........................................
LE,OW,24h: 203 dB .........................................
LE,LF,24h: 199 dB.
LE,MF,24h: 198 dB.
LE,HF,24h: 173 dB.
LE,PW,24h: 201 dB.
LE,OW,24h: 219 dB.
* Dual metric acoustic thresholds for impulsive sounds: Use whichever results in the largest isopleth for calculating PTS onset. If a non-impulsive sound has the potential of exceeding the peak sound pressure level thresholds associated with impulsive sounds, these thresholds should
also be considered.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Dec 27, 2017
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
61548
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 248 / Thursday, December 28, 2017 / Notices
Note: Peak sound pressure (Lpk) has a reference value of 1 μPa, and cumulative sound exposure level (LE) has a reference value of 1μPa2s.
In this Table, thresholds are abbreviated to reflect American National Standards Institute standards (ANSI 2013). However, peak sound pressure
is defined by ANSI as incorporating frequency weighting, which is not the intent for this Technical Guidance. Hence, the subscript ‘‘flat’’ is being
included to indicate peak sound pressure should be flat weighted or unweighted within the generalized hearing range. The subscript associated
with cumulative sound exposure level thresholds indicates the designated marine mammal auditory weighting function (LF, MF, and HF
cetaceans, and PW and OW pinnipeds) and that the recommended accumulation period is 24 hours. The cumulative sound exposure level
thresholds could be exceeded in a multitude of ways (i.e., varying exposure levels and durations, duty cycle). When possible, it is valuable for
action proponents to indicate the conditions under which these acoustic thresholds will be exceeded.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Ensonified Area
Here, we describe operational and
environmental parameters of the activity
that will feed into identifying the area
ensonified above the acoustic
thresholds.
Background noise is the sound level
that would exist without the planned
activity (pile driving and removal, in
this case), while ambient sound levels
are those without human activity
(NOAA 2009). Natural actions that
contribute to ambient noise include
waves, wind, rainfall, current
fluctuations, chemical composition, and
biological sound sources (e.g., marine
mammals, fish, and shrimp, Carr et al.,
2006). Background noise levels will be
compared to the NOAA/NMFS
threshold levels designed to protect
marine mammals to determine the Level
B Harassment Zones for noise sources.
The background noise at Monterey
Harbor is relatively high due to boat
traffic, foot traffic, and noise from the
USCG Monterey Station.
Pile installation would be adjacent to
a rock jetty that would provide
substantial underwater shielding of
sound transmission to areas north (or
through the jetty) (see Figure 1–2 of the
Application).
For vibratory pile driving in the
proposed IHA, to estimate the extent of
underwater noise, the software
modeling package SoundPlan was used
by the USCG to simulate sound
transmission for the project. However,
as part of the final IHA, NMFS
considered revised source levels to
determine the Level B Harassment zone
based on more representative sound
sources to project specifics. With a
revised source level of 162 dB SPL rms
(based on Washington State Department
of Transportation (WSDOT) Friday
Harbor data (2010) for 24-inch (in) steel
piles with a source level of 162 dB rms
at 10 meters (m) for vibratory pile
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Dec 27, 2017
Jkt 244001
driving and removal), the calculated
Level B Harassment Zone would be
6,309 m (6.3 kilometers (km)) rather
than 15,848 m (15.8 km) that would be
calculated with a 168 dB SPL rms in the
proposed IHA. NMFS will continue to
assume the USCG’s conservative
method for estimating the range through
the breakwater (north), while all other
distances are based on the sound hitting
the shoreline (Table 3).
Table 3 shows the results of the
modeled underwater noise analysis for
vibratory pile driving where 120 dB rms
(Level B threshold) levels would end,
and Figure 5–1 from the application
shows the pattern of sound expected
from vibratory pile extraction and pile
installation, taking into account
shielding from the Monterey
Breakwater. From these data, a Level B
zone of influence (ZOI) was calculated
at approximately 7.3 square kilometers
(km2). The modeled distances shown in
the table below are likely an
overestimate of the extent of underwater
noise, because practical spreading loss
(15 log10) sound propagation were
assumed, and the Monterey Breakwater
would likely reduce noise considerably
faster than assumed. Per the sound
assessment completed for the project
(included in Appendix A of the
application) the following assumptions
and parameters were used for the
analysis: For vibratory pile installation,
it is estimated that it would take
approximately 20 minutes (1,200
seconds) to vibrate in each pile.
TABLE 3—MODELED EXTENT OF LEVEL
B ZONES FROM VIBRATORY PILE
EXTRACTION AND DRIVING—Continued
Modeling scenario
Modeled east to shoreline ....
Modeled south to shoreline ..
Area of Influence ..................
Level B Zone
(distance to
120 dB rms)
1,800 m
550 m
7.3 km2
Notes: dB = decibel, RMS = root mean
square.
For impact pile driving in the
proposed IHA, to estimate the extent of
underwater noise, the software
modeling package SoundPlan was used
by the USCG to simulate sound
transmission for the project. However,
as part of the final IHA, NMFS
considered revised source levels to
determine the Level B Harassment zones
based on more representative sound
sources to project specifics. With a
revised source level of 187 SPL rms
(based on the California Department of
Transportation Compendium of Pile
Driving Sound Data Report (Caltrans
2007) for 14-in steel piles with a source
level of 187 dB SPL rms (177 dB SEL)
at 10 m for impact pile driving) minus
5 dB for using sound attenuated devices,
the source level would then be 182 SPL
rms and the calculated Level B
Harassment Zone would be 293 m rather
than 465 m that was calculated in the
proposed IHA with a 195 dB SPL rms.
A 5 dB reduction was used in the final
IHA rather than a 10 dB reduction that
TABLE 3—MODELED EXTENT OF LEVEL was used in the proposed IHA based on
B ZONES FROM VIBRATORY PILE the variability of the efficacy of sound
EXTRACTION AND DRIVING
attenuation devices. NMFS will
continue to assume the USCG’s
Level B Zone
conservative method for estimating the
Modeling scenario
(distance to
range through the breakwater (north),
120 dB rms)
while all other distances are based on
the recalculated distance of 293 m as
Modeled north ...................... 2,000 m
described above and in Table 4.
Modeled northeast shoreline 2,400 m
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
61549
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 248 / Thursday, December 28, 2017 / Notices
TABLE 4—EXTENT OF LEVEL B ZONES FROM IMPACT PILE DRIVING
Distance to marine
mammal criteria
rms
(dB re: 1μPa)
Modeling scenario
160 dB
(Level B threshold)
Modeled attenuated noise transmission north and northeast (through breakwater) ..............................................................
Recalculated attenuated noise transmission in all other directions ........................................................................................
Area of Influence .....................................................................................................................................................................
76 m
293 m
0.27 km2
Notes: Assumes 5 dB of underwater noise attenuation by using a bubble curtain during pile driving. Distances and method of calculation are
presented in Appendix A of the application.
dB = decibel, rms = root mean square (dB re: 1μPa).
The incidental take requested is Level
B harassment of any marine mammal
occurring within the 160 dB rms
disturbance threshold during impact
pile driving of 14-in steel pipe piles; the
120 dB rms disturbance threshold for
vibratory pile driving of 14-in steel pipe
piles; and the 120 dB rms disturbance
threshold for vibratory removal of 16-in
to 18-in timber piles. Level B
harassment zones have been established
as described in Tables 3 and 4 that will
be in place during active pile removal
or installation.
When NMFS Technical Guidance
(NMFS 2016) was published, in
recognition of the fact that ensonified
area/volume could be more technically
challenging to predict because of the
duration component in the new
thresholds, we developed a User
Spreadsheet that includes tools to help
predict a simple isopleth that can be
used in conjunction with marine
mammal density or occurrence to help
predict takes. We note that because of
some of the assumptions included in the
methods used for these tools, we
anticipate that isopleths produced are
typically going to be overestimates of
some degree, which will result in some
degree of overestimate of Level A take.
However, these tools offer the best way
to predict appropriate isopleths when
more sophisticated 3D modeling
methods are not available, and NMFS
continues to develop ways to
quantitatively refine these tools, and
will qualitatively address the output
where appropriate. For stationary
sources such as vibratory and impact
pile driving, NMFS’s User Spreadsheet
predicts the closest distance at which, if
a marine mammal remained at that
distance the whole duration of the
activity, it would not incur PTS. Inputs
used in the User Spreadsheet, and the
resulting isopleths are reported below
(Tables 5 and 6).
The PTS isopleths were identified for
each hearing group for impact and
vibratory installation and removal
methods that will be used in the
Monterey Station Project. The PTS
isopleth distances were calculated using
the NMFS acoustic threshold calculator
(NMFS 2016), with inputs based on
measured and surrogate noise
measurements. Tables 5 and 6 have
been revised since the proposed IHA
and uses data that is more
representative to project specifics. Data
from WSDOT Friday Harbor data (2010)
for 24-in steel piles with a source level
of 162 dB SPLrms (at 10 m) was used
to characterize the sound that would be
produced from vibratory pile driving
and removal. For impact pile driving,
data from the Caltrans (2007) with a
source level (in SEL) of 172 dB at a
distance of 10 m with an average 30
strikes per pile was used.
TABLE 5—NMFS TECHNICAL ACOUSTIC GUIDANCE USER SPREADSHEET INPUT TO PREDICT PTS ISOPLETHS
[User spreadsheet input]
Sound source 1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Source Level (rms SPL) ................................................
Source Level (Single Strike/shot SEL) ..........................
Weighting Factor Adjustment (kHz) ..............................
(a) Number of strikes in 1 h ..........................................
(a) Activity Duration (h) within 24-h period ...................
Propagation (xLogR) .....................................................
Distance of source level measurement (meters)∂ .......
Sound source 2
(A) Vibratory pile driving (removal and
installation)
Spreadsheet Tab Used
(E.1) Impact pile driving (installation)
162 dB.
.....................................................................
2.5 ...............................................................
.....................................................................
4 ..................................................................
15 ................................................................
10 ................................................................
172 dB
2
30
5
15
10
TABLE 6—NMFS TECHNICAL ACOUSTIC GUIDANCE USER SPREADSHEET OUTPUT FOR PREDICTED PTS ISOPLETHS AND
LEVEL A DAILY ENSONIFIED AREAS
[User spreadsheet output]
Low-frequency
cetaceans
Sound source type
Mid-frequency
cetaceans
High-frequency
cetaceans
Phocid
pinnipeds
Otariid
pinnipeds
PTS Isopleth (meters)
Vibratory (removal and installation) ...................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Dec 27, 2017
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
20.1
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1.8
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
29.7
28DEN1
12.2
0.9
61550
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 248 / Thursday, December 28, 2017 / Notices
TABLE 6—NMFS TECHNICAL ACOUSTIC GUIDANCE USER SPREADSHEET OUTPUT FOR PREDICTED PTS ISOPLETHS AND
LEVEL A DAILY ENSONIFIED AREAS—Continued
[User spreadsheet output]
Low-frequency
cetaceans
Sound source type
Mid-frequency
cetaceans
High-frequency
cetaceans
52.1
1.9
62.1
27.9
2.0
0.00001
0.00001
0.00277
0.01212
0.00046
0.00245
0.00000
0.00001
Impact (installation) ............................................................
Phocid
pinnipeds
Otariid
pinnipeds
Daily ensonified area (km2)
Vibratory (pile removal and installation) ............................
Impact (installation) ............................................................
Table 7 below shows the Level A
Harassment exclusion zones that were
0.00127
0.00853
rounded up slightly from the output
generated in the NMFS Technical
Acoustic Guidance User Spreadsheet
(Table 6).
TABLE 7—LEVEL A HARASSMENT EXCLUSION ZONES
Low-frequency
cetaceans
Sound source type
Mid-frequency
cetaceans
High-frequency
cetaceans
Phocid
pinnipeds
Otariid
pinnipeds
Exclusion Zone (meters)
Vibratory (removal and installation) ...................................
Impact (installation) ............................................................
Marine Mammal Occurrence and Take
Calculation and Estimation
In this section we provide the
information about the presence, density,
or group dynamics of marine mammals
that will inform the take calculation and
we describe how the marine mammal
occurrence information is brought
together to produce a quantitative take
estimate.
Take estimates are based on the
number of animals per unit area in the
project area multiplied by the area size
of ensonified zones within which
received noise levels exceed certain
thresholds (i.e., Level B harassment)
from specific activities, then multiplied
by the total number of days such
activities would occur. Local abundance
data are used for take calculations for
the authorized take where density is not
available or applicable to the project
area.
Unless otherwise described,
incidental take is estimated by the
following equation:
Incidental take estimate = species
density * zone of influence (7.3
km2) * days of pile-related activity
(8 days).
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Harbor Seals
Pacific harbor seals are much less
abundant in the project area than
California sea lions, and only two
annual surveys conducted since 1998
identified any individuals. The 2004
annual pinniped survey conducted by
NMFS counted 28 Pacific harbor seals
in Monterey Harbor in 2004, and 1 in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Dec 27, 2017
Jkt 244001
21
53
10
10
2005 (Lowry 2012). Pacific harbor seals
hauled-out along Cannery Row, north of
the Monterey Breakwater, ranged from 1
to 24 in 2002, 2004, and 2009. During
repairs on the Pier in 2009, Pacific
harbor seals were occasionally observed
in the nearby waters, but were never
observed to haul-out on the breakwater
(Harvey and Hoover 2009). The density
for harbor seals was determined by
drawing a 5 km radius in ArcGIS with
the jetty haul-out site at the center. The
area within this circle was calculated,
excluding the land, resulting in a 29
km2 foraging area. The calculation for
take of harbor seals estimate assumes 28
individuals (the most observed during
any single survey) to be in the water at
any given time within 5 km of the
breakwater (area 29 km2); therefore, the
calculated density is 0.97 seals/km2.
The estimated Level B take is 0.97 seals
multiplied by 7.3 km2 and 8 days of
activity for a total of 57 harbor seals (see
Table 7). Since the calculated Level A
zones of phocids are small and
mitigation is in place to avoid Level A
take (Table 6), we do not consider it
likely that any harbor seals would be
taken by Level A harassment.
California Sea Lions
The calculation for Level B take of
California sea lions in the water
assumes an average density of 8.62
individuals/km2. This density was
determined by drawing a 5 km radius in
ArcGIS with the jetty haul-out site at the
center. The area within this circle was
calculated, excluding the land, resulting
in a 29 km2 foraging area. An average of
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30
63
13
28
10
10
250 sea lions were assumed in the water
at any given time. Therefore, 250 sea
lions divided by 29 km2 equals 8.62 sea
lions/km2. Estimated take is then
calculated using 8.62 sea lions
multiplied by 7.3 km2 and 8 days of
activity for a total of 504 California sea
lions (see Table 7). For the additional
California sea lions that are present on
the breakwater (which we would also
expect to enter the water during the
project): The overall average number of
sea lions for all of the surveys of the
Monterey Breakwater combined was 250
individuals. Therefore, 250 animals was
multiplied by 8 days of activity for a
total of 2,000 California sea lions (see
Table 7). Since the calculated Level A
zones of otariids are all very small and
mitigation is in place to avoid Level A
take (Table 6), we do not consider it
likely that any sea lions would be taken
by Level A harassment.
Killer Whale
Due to the low frequency and
unpredictability of killer whales
entering the project area, the application
of a density equation is not reasonable
for predicting take. When transient
killer whales enter Monterey Bay, they
typically are in groups of 3 to 8 at a time
(Guzman 2016). To be conservative, the
take estimate for Level B harassment is
based on a larger group of eight
transient killer whales that may enter
the area (Table 7). Offshore killer whales
are more of a rare occurrence in
Monterey Bay; with the most recent
documentation of approximately 25
whales in December 2016. Therefore,
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
61551
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 248 / Thursday, December 28, 2017 / Notices
the take estimate for Level B harassment
is based on the possibility that a single
occurrence of a smaller pod of 25
whales may enter the area (Table 7).
Since the Level A zones of midfrequency cetaceans are small and
mitigation is in place to avoid Level A
take (Table 6), we do not consider it
likely that any killer whales would be
taken by Level A harassment.
Bottlenose Dolphin
Abundance and densities of cetaceans
in the California Current ecosystem
were conducted from 1991 to 2005
(Barlow, Forney 2007). The results of
the surveys indicate that bottlenose
dolphin population density throughout
the entire west coast shoreline is 1.78
individuals/100 km2. During the same
survey, the mean group size for
bottlenose dolphins observed in Central
California was four individuals. Other,
more recent data suggest that densities
may be up to 0.04/km2 (Weller 2016).
Even when using the higher density,
estimated take results in very low
numbers (<1 over the entire period of
construction). Rather than using density
calculations to estimate take, to be
conservative, the Level B take is a small
pod of 10 bottlenose dolphins (Table 7).
Since the Level A zones of midfrequency cetaceans are small and
mitigation is in place to avoid Level A
take (Table 6), we do not consider it
likely that any bottlenose dolphins
would be taken by Level A harassment.
Risso’s Dolphin
Because there is not reliable local data
for Monterey Bay, the Level B take
estimate for Risso’s dolphins is a single
occurrence of a small pod of 10 animals
(see Table 7) as groups of Risso’s
dolphins average between 10–30
animals. Since the Level A zones of
mid-frequency cetaceans are small and
mitigation is in place to avoid Level A
take (Table 6), we do not consider it
likely that any Risso’s dolphin would be
taken by Level A harassment.
Harbor Porpoise
An estimate of the density of harbor
porpoise in the southern portion of
Monterey Bay nearshore is
approximately 2.321 per km2 (Forney et
al., 2014). Therefore, the estimated take
for Level B harassment is 2.231 porpoise
multiplied by 7.3 km2 and 8 days of
activity for a total of 136 harbor
porpoise (see Table 7). Since the
calculated Level A zones of high
frequency cetaceans are small and
mitigation is in place to avoid Level A
take (Table 6), we do not consider it
likely that any harbor porpoise would
be taken by Level A harassment.
Humpback Whale
Humpback whales are typically found
further offshore than gray whales and
occurrence is rare; however, since 2014
greater numbers of humpback whales
have been observed in and near
Monterey Bay by whale-watching
vessels. Because USCG will shutdown
for all observed humpbacks (in Level A
and B zones), no takes of humpback
whales are authorized.
Gray Whale
The occurrence of gray whales is
extremely rare near shore in the project
area. If gray whales would approach the
project area they would be more likely
to occur during the spring migration
north, when they tend to stay closer to
shore than during the winter southern
migration. The NOAA National Center
for Coastal Ocean Science (NCCOS)
reported densities of gray whales at 0.1
to 0.5 per km2 (NCCOS 2007).
Therefore, the estimated take for Level
B harassment was calculated using the
larger density of 0.5 whales per km2
multiplied by 7.3 km2 and 8 days of
activity for a total of 4 gray whales (see
Table 7). Since the Level A zones of
low-frequency cetaceans are small and
mitigation is in place to avoid Level A
take (see Table 6) we do not consider it
likely that any gray whales would be
taken by Level A harassment during
removal or impact installation.
TABLE 7—SUMMARY OF REQUESTED INCIDENTAL TAKE BY LEVEL A AND LEVEL B HARASSMENT
Species
Pacific harbor seal (Phoca vitulina) .................
California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) .....
California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) .....
30,968
296,750
296,750
Transient killer whale (Orcinus orca) ...............
Offshore killer whale (Orcinus orca) ................
Bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) ..........
Risso’s dolphin (Grampus griseus) ..................
Harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) ...........
Gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus) .................
243
240
453
6,336
3,715
20,990
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Mitigation Measures
In order to issue an IHA under
Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA,
NMFS must set forth the permissible
methods of taking pursuant to such
activity, and other means of effecting
the least practicable impact on such
species or stock and its habitat, paying
particular attention to rookeries, mating
grounds, and areas of similar
significance, and on the availability of
such species or stock for taking for
certain subsistence uses (latter not
applicable for this action). NMFS
regulations require applicants for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Dec 27, 2017
Authorized
Level B take
Stock size
Jkt 244001
57 .....................................................................
504 (Animals already in the water) .................
2,000 (Animals that enter the water from the
breakwater).
8 .......................................................................
25 (single occurrence of a small pod) .............
10 (single occurrence of a small pod) .............
10 (single occurrence of a small pod) .............
136 ...................................................................
4 .......................................................................
incidental take authorizations to include
information about the availability and
feasibility (economic and technological)
of equipment, methods, and manner of
conducting such activity or other means
of effecting the least practicable adverse
impact upon the affected species or
stocks and their habitat (50 CFR
216.104(a)(11)).
In evaluating how mitigation may or
may not be appropriate to ensure the
least practicable adverse impact on
species or stocks and their habitat, as
well as subsistence uses where
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Authorized
total take
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Percent of
population
57
2,504
Less than 1.
Less than 1.
8
25
10
10
136
4
3.3.
10.42.
4.19.
Less than 1.
3.66.
Less than 1.
applicable, we carefully consider two
primary factors:
(1) The manner in which, and the
degree to which, the successful
implementation of the measure(s) is
expected to reduce impacts to marine
mammals, marine mammal species or
stocks, and their habitat. This considers
the nature of the potential adverse
impact being mitigated (likelihood,
scope, range). It further considers the
likelihood that the measure will be
effective if implemented (probability of
accomplishing the mitigating result if
implemented as planned) the likelihood
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
61552
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 248 / Thursday, December 28, 2017 / Notices
of effective implementation (probability
implemented as planned), and;
(2) the practicability of the measures
for applicant implementation, which
may consider such things as cost,
impact on operations, and, in the case
of a military readiness activity,
personnel safety, practicality of
implementation, and impact on the
effectiveness of the military readiness
activity.
Several measures for mitigating effects
on marine mammals from the pile
installation and removal activities at for
the USCG Monterey Station and are
described below.
Timing Restrictions
All work will be conducted during
daylight hours.
Noise Attenuation
A bubble curtain and cushion pads
will be used during pile driving
activities with an impact hammer to
reduce sound levels. In addition, the
USCG will perform ‘‘pre-drilling.’’ Predrilling will be performed and
discontinued when the pile tip is
approximately five feet (ft) above the
required pile tip elevation. Pre-drilling
is a method that starts the ‘‘hole’’ for the
new pile; the pile is inserted after the
hole has been pre-drilled which creates
less friction and overall noise and
turbidity during installation.
Exclusion Zones
Exclusion Zones calculated from the
PTS isopleths (Table 7) will be
implemented to protect marine
mammals from Level A harassment
(refer to Table 6). If a marine mammal
is observed at or within the Exclusion
Zone (Table 7), work will shut down
(stop work) until the individual has
been observed outside of the zone, or
has not been observed for at least 15
minutes for pinnipeds and small
cetaceans and 30 minutes for large
whales.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Additional Shutdown Measures
If a humpback whale is observed
within the Level A or Level B zones, the
USCG will implement shutdown
measures. Work would not commence
until 30-minutes after the last sighting
of a humpback within these zones.
USCG will implement shutdown
measures if the number of authorized
takes for any particular species reaches
the limit under the IHA and if such
marine mammals are sighted within the
vicinity of the project area and are
approaching the Level B harassment
zone during in-water construction
activities.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Dec 27, 2017
Jkt 244001
If a marine mammal species under
NMFS’ jurisdiction is observed within
the Level A or B zones that has not been
authorized for take, the USCG will
implement shutdown measures.
Level B Harassment Zones
USCG will monitor the Level B
harassment ZOIs as described in Tables
3 and 4.
Soft-Start for Impact Pile Driving
For impact pile installation,
contractors will provide an initial set of
three strikes from the impact hammer at
40 percent energy, followed by a oneminute waiting period, then two
subsequent three-strike sets. Each day,
USCG will use the soft-start technique at
the beginning of impact pile driving, or
if impact pile driving has ceased for
more than 30 minutes.
Based on our evaluation of the
applicant’s planned measures, as well as
other measures considered by NMFS,
NMFS has determined that the
mitigation measures provide the means
of effecting the least practicable impact
on the affected species or stocks and
their habitat, paying particular attention
to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas
of similar significance.
Monitoring and Reporting
In order to issue an IHA for an
activity, Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the
MMPA states that NMFS must set forth,
requirements pertaining to the
monitoring and reporting of such taking.
The MMPA implementing regulations at
50 CFR 216.104(a)(13) indicate that
requests for authorizations must include
the suggested means of accomplishing
the necessary monitoring and reporting
that will result in increased knowledge
of the species and of the level of taking
or impacts on populations of marine
mammals that are expected to be
present in the action area. Effective
reporting is critical both to compliance
as well as ensuring that the most value
is obtained from the required
monitoring.
Monitoring and reporting
requirements prescribed by NMFS
should contribute to improved
understanding of one or more of the
following:
• Occurrence of marine mammal
species or stocks in the area in which
take is anticipated (e.g., presence,
abundance, distribution, density);
• Nature, scope, or context of likely
marine mammal exposure to potential
stressors/impacts (individual or
cumulative, acute or chronic), through
better understanding of: (1) Action or
environment (e.g., source
characterization, propagation, ambient
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
noise); (2) affected species (e.g., life
history, dive patterns); (3) co-occurrence
of marine mammal species with the
action; or (4) biological or behavioral
context of exposure (e.g., age, calving or
feeding areas);
• Individual marine mammal
responses (behavioral or physiological)
to acoustic stressors (acute, chronic, or
cumulative), other stressors, or
cumulative impacts from multiple
stressors;
• How anticipated responses to
stressors impact either: (1) Long-term
fitness and survival of individual
marine mammals; or (2) populations,
species, or stocks;
• Effects on marine mammal habitat
(e.g., marine mammal prey species,
acoustic habitat, or other important
physical components of marine
mammal habitat); and
• Mitigation and monitoring
effectiveness.
Marine mammal monitoring will be
conducted in strategic locations around
the area of potential effects at all times
during in-water pile driving and
removal as described below:
D During pile removal or installation
the observer will monitor from the most
practicable vantage point possible (i.e.,
the pier itself, the breakwater, adjacent
boat docks in the harbor, or a boat) to
determine whether marine mammals
enter the Exclusion Zone and to record
take when marine mammals enter the
relevant Level B Harassment Zones
based on type of construction activity;
and
D If a marine mammal approaches an
Exclusion Zone, the observation will be
reported to the Construction Manager
and the individual will be watched
closely. If the marine mammal crosses
into an Exclusion Zone, a stop-work
order will be issued. In the event that a
stop-work order is triggered, the
observed marine mammal(s) will be
closely monitored while it remains in or
near the Exclusion Zone, and only when
it moves well outside of the Exclusion
Zone or has not been observed for at
least 15 minutes for pinnipeds and 30
minutes for whales will the lead
monitor allow work to recommence.
Protected Species Observers
USCG shall employ a minimum of
three NMFS-approved protected species
observers (PSOs) to conduct marine
mammal monitoring for its Monterey
Station Project. The PSOs will observe
and collect data on marine mammals in
and around the project area for 30
minutes before, during, and for 30
minutes after all pile removal and pile
installation work. NMFS-approved
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 248 / Thursday, December 28, 2017 / Notices
PSOs shall meet the following
requirements:
1. Visual acuity in both eyes
(correction is permissible) sufficient for
discernment of moving targets at the
water’s surface with ability to estimate
target size and distance. Use of
binoculars may be necessary to correctly
identify the target;
2. Advanced education in biological
science, wildlife management,
mammalogy or related fields (Bachelors
degree or higher is preferred), but not
required;
3. Experience or training in the field
identification of marine mammals
(cetaceans and pinnipeds);
4. Sufficient training, orientation or
experience with the construction
operation to provide for personal safety
during observations;
5. Ability to communicate orally, by
radio or in person, with project
personnel to provide real time
information on marine mammals
observed in the area as necessary;
6. Experience and ability to conduct
field observations and collect data
according to assigned protocols (this
may include academic experience);
7. Writing skills sufficient to prepare
a report of observations that would
include such information as the number
and type of marine mammals observed;
the behavior of marine mammals in the
project area during construction, dates
and times when observations were
conducted; dates and times when inwater construction activities were
conducted; and dates and times when
marine mammals were present at or
within the defined ZOI;
8. If a team of three or more observers
are required, one observer should be
designated as lead observer or
monitoring coordinator. The lead
observer must have prior experience
working as an observer;
9. NMFS will require submission and
approval of observer CVs; and
10. PSOs will monitor marine
mammals around the construction site
using high-quality binoculars (e.g.,
Zeiss, 10 x 42 power) and/or spotting
scopes.
11. If marine mammals are observed,
the following information will be
documented:
(A) Date and time that monitored
activity begins or ends;
(B) Construction activities occurring
during each observation period;
(C) Weather parameters (e.g., percent
cover, visibility);
(D) Water conditions (e.g., sea state,
tide state);
(E) Species, numbers, and, if possible,
sex and age class of marine mammals;
(F) Description of any observable
marine mammal behavior patterns,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Dec 27, 2017
Jkt 244001
including bearing and direction of travel
and distance from pile driving activity;
(G) Distance from pile driving
activities to marine mammals and
distance from the marine mammals to
the observation point;
(H) Locations of all marine mammal
observations; and
(I) Other human activity in the area.
Reporting Measures
Marine Mammal Monitoring Report
USCG will be required to submit a
draft marine mammal monitoring report
within 90 days after completion of the
in-water construction work or the
expiration of the IHA (if issued),
whichever comes earlier. The report
will include data from marine mammal
sightings as described: Date, time,
location, species, group size, and
behavior, any observed reactions to
construction, distance to operating pile
hammer, and construction activities
occurring at time of sighting and
environmental data for the period (i.e.,
wind speed and direction, sea state,
tidal state, cloud cover, and visibility).
The marine mammal monitoring report
will also include total takes, takes by
day, and stop-work orders for each
species. NMFS will have an opportunity
to provide comments on the report, and
if NMFS has comments, USCG will
address the comments and submit a
final report to NMFS within 30 days.
In the unanticipated event that the
specified activity clearly causes the take
of a marine mammal in a manner
prohibited by the IHA (if issued), such
as an injury (Level A harassment),
serious injury, or mortality, USCG will
immediately cease the specified
activities and immediately report the
incident to the Permits and
Conservation Division, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS and the
NMFS’ West Coast Stranding
Coordinator. The report must include
the following information:
• Time, date, and location (latitude/
longitude) of the incident;
• Description of the incident;
• Status of all sound source use in the
24 hrs preceding the incident;
• Water depth;
• Environmental conditions (e.g.,
wind speed and direction, sea state,
cloud cover, and visibility);
• Description of all marine mammal
observations in the 24 hrs preceding the
incident;
• Species identification or
description of the animal(s) involved;
• Fate of the animal(s); and
• Photographs or video footage of the
animal(s) (if equipment is available).
Activities will resume until NMFS is
able to review the circumstances of the
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61553
prohibited take. NMFS will work with
USCG to determine what is necessary to
minimize the likelihood of further
prohibited take and ensure MMPA
compliance. USCG may not resume
their activities until notified by NMFS
via letter, email, or telephone.
Reporting of Injured or Dead Marine
Mammals
In the event that the USCG discovers
an injured or dead marine mammal, and
the lead PSO determines that the cause
of the injury or death is unknown and
the death is relatively recent (i.e., in less
than a moderate state of decomposition
as described in the next paragraph),
USCG will immediately report the
incident to the Permits and
Conservation Division, Office of
Protected Resources, NMFS and the
NMFS’ West Coast Stranding
Coordinator. The report must include
the same information identified in the
paragraph above. Activities may
continue while NMFS reviews the
circumstances of the incident. NMFS
will work with USCG to determine
whether modifications in the activities
are appropriate.
In the event that USCG discovers an
injured or dead marine mammal, and
the lead PSO determines that the injury
or death is not associated with or related
to the activities authorized in the IHA
(e.g., previously wounded animal,
carcass with moderate to advanced
decomposition, or scavenger damage),
USCG will report the incident to the
Permits and Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS
and the NMFS Stranding Hotline and/or
by email to the NMFS’ West Coast
Stranding Coordinator within 24 hrs of
the discovery. USCG will provide
photographs or video footage (if
available) or other documentation of the
stranded animal sighting to NMFS.
Activities may continue while NMFS
reviews the circumstances of the
incident.
Negligible Impact Analysis and
Determination
NMFS has defined negligible impact
as an impact resulting from the
specified activity that cannot be
reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on
annual rates of recruitment or survival
(50 CFR 216.103). A negligible impact
finding is based on the lack of likely
adverse effects on annual rates of
recruitment or survival (i.e., populationlevel effects). An estimate of the number
of takes alone is not enough information
on which to base an impact
determination. In addition to
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
61554
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 248 / Thursday, December 28, 2017 / Notices
considering estimates of the number of
marine mammals that might be ‘‘taken’’
through harassment, NMFS considers
other factors, such as the likely nature
of any responses (e.g., intensity,
duration), the context of any responses
(e.g., critical reproductive time or
location, migration), as well as effects
on habitat, and the likely effectiveness
of the mitigation. We also assess the
number, intensity, and context of
estimated takes by evaluating this
information relative to population
status. Consistent with the 1989
preamble for NMFS’s implementing
regulations (54 FR 40338; September 29,
1989), the impacts from other past and
ongoing anthropogenic activities are
incorporated into this analysis via their
impacts on the environmental baseline
(e.g., as reflected in the regulatory status
of the species, population size and
growth rate where known, ongoing
sources of human-caused mortality, or
ambient noise levels).
No injury, serious injury or mortality
is anticipated or authorized for the
Monterey Station Project. Takes that are
anticipated and authorized are expected
to be limited to short-term Level B
harassment (behavioral) only. Marine
mammals present in the vicinity of the
action area and taken by Level B
harassment would most likely show
overt brief disturbance (startle reaction)
and avoidance of the area from elevated
noise levels during pile driving and pile
removal.
There is one endangered species that
may occur in the project area,
humpback whales. However, if any
humpbacks are detected within the
Level B harassment zone of the project
area, the USCG will shut down.
The Monterey Breakwater is a haulout
location for approximately 250
California sea lions. There no other
known critical habitat areas, haulouts or
import feeding areas in close
proximately to the project area.
The project also is not expected to
have significant adverse effects on
affected marine mammals’ habitat, as
analyzed in detail in the ‘‘Potential
Effects of Specified Activities on Marine
Mammals and their Habitat’’ section.
Project activities would not
permanently modify existing marine
mammal habitat. The activities may kill
some fish and cause other fish to leave
the area temporarily, thus impacting
marine mammals’ foraging
opportunities in a limited portion of the
foraging range; but, because of the short
duration of the activities and the
relatively small area of the habitat that
may be affected, the impacts to marine
mammal habitat are not expected to
cause significant or long-term negative
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:14 Dec 27, 2017
Jkt 244001
consequences. Therefore, given the
consideration of potential impacts to
marine mammal prey species and their
physical environment, USCG’s
Monterey Station project would not
adversely affect marine mammal habitat.
In summary and as described above,
the following factors primarily support
our determination that the impacts
resulting from this activity are not
expected to adversely affect the species
or stock through effects on annual rates
of recruitment or survival:
• No injury, serious injury or
mortality is anticipated or authorized;
• Takes that are anticipated and
authorized are expected to be limited to
short-term Level B harassment
(behavioral);
• The project also is not expected to
have significant adverse effects on
affected marine mammals’ habitat;
• There are no known important
feeding or pupping areas. There is one
haulout (the breakwater) within the
project area. There are no other known
important areas for marine mammals
with the footprint of the project area;
and
• For four out of the seven species,
take is less than one percent of the stock
abundance. Instances of take for the
other three species (killer whale,
bottlenose dolphin, and harbor
porpoise) range from 3–10 percent of the
stock abundance.
Based on the analysis contained
herein of the likely effects of the
specified activity on marine mammals
and their habitat, and taking into
consideration the implementation of the
monitoring and mitigation measures,
NMFS finds that the total marine
mammal take from the activity will have
a negligible impact on all affected
marine mammal species or stocks.
Small Numbers
As noted above, only small numbers
of incidental take may be authorized
under Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA
for specified activities other than
military readiness activities. The MMPA
does not define small numbers and so,
in practice, where estimated numbers
are available, NMFS compares the
number of individuals taken to the most
appropriate estimation of abundance of
the relevant species or stock in our
determination of whether an
authorization is limited to small
numbers of marine mammals.
Additionally, other factors may be
considered in the analysis, such as the
temporal or spatial scale of the
activities.
For four out of the seven species, take
is less than one percent of the stock
abundance. Instances of take for the
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
other three species (killer whale,
bottlenose dolphin, and harbor
porpoise) range from 3–10 percent of the
stock abundance. Based on the analysis
contained herein of the planned activity
(including the mitigation and
monitoring measures) and the
anticipated take of marine mammals,
NMFS preliminarily finds that small
numbers of marine mammals will be
taken relative to the population sizes of
the affected species or stocks.
Unmitigable Adverse Impact Analysis
and Determination
There are no relevant subsistence uses
of the affected marine mammal stocks or
species implicated by this action.
Therefore, NMFS has determined that
the total taking of affected species or
stocks would not have an unmitigable
adverse impact on the availability of
such species or stocks for taking for
subsistence purposes.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA of 1973 (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires that each
Federal agency insure that any action it
authorizes, funds, or carries out is not
likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of any endangered or
threatened species or result in the
destruction or adverse modification of
designated critical habitat. To ensure
ESA compliance for the issuance of
IHAs, NMFS consults internally, in this
case with the West Coast Regional
Office, whenever we propose to
authorize take for endangered or
threatened species.
NMFS is not authorizing take of
humpback whales, which are listed
under the ESA, as the applicant will
implement shutdown measures
whenever humpbacks are observed
(Level A or B). Therefore, consultation
under section 7 of the ESA is not
required.
Authorization
NMFS has issued an IHA to USCG for
the potential harassment of small
numbers of seven marine mammal
species incidental to pile driving and
removal activities at the USCG
Monterey Station, Monterey, California
from December 2017 to October 2018,
provided the previously mentioned
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting
requirements.
Dated: December 22, 2017.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–28029 Filed 12–27–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\28DEN1.SGM
28DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 248 (Thursday, December 28, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61544-61554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-28029]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
RIN 0648-XF460
Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals
Incidental to a Pile Driving Activities for Waterfront Repairs at the
U.S. Coast Guard Station Monterey, Monterey, California
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Notice; issuance of an incidental harassment authorization.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the regulations implementing the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) as amended, notification is hereby given
that NMFS has issued an incidental harassment authorization (IHA) to
the U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) to incidentally harass, by Level B
harassment only, marine mammals during pile driving activities
associated with waterfront repairs at the USCG Monterey Station in
Monterey, California.
DATES: This Authorization is applicable from December 20, 2017 through
October 15, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephanie Egger, Office of Protected
Resources, NMFS, (301) 427-8401. Electronic copies of the applications
and supporting documents, as well as a list of the references cited in
this document, may be obtained online at www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/permits/incidental/construction.htm. In case of problems accessing these
documents, please call the contact listed above.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.)
direct the Secretary of Commerce (as delegated to NMFS) to allow, upon
request, the incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers
of marine mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity
(other than commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region
if certain findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if
the taking is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed
authorization is provided to the public for review.
An authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS
finds that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the
availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses (where
relevant), and if the permissible methods of taking and requirements
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and reporting of such takings
are set forth.
NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 as an
impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be reasonably
expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely affect the
species or stock through effects on annual rates of recruitment or
survival.
The MMPA states that the term ``take'' means to harass, hunt,
capture, or kill, or attempt to harass, hunt, capture, or kill any
marine mammal.
Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the
MMPA defines ``harassment'' as any act of pursuit, torment, or
annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild (Level A harassment); or (ii) has the
potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild
by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not
limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering (Level B harassment).
National Environmental Policy Act
In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and NOAA Administrative Order (NAO) 216-
6A, NMFS reviewed our action (i.e., the issuance of an incidental
harassment authorization) with respect to potential impacts on the
human environment. Accordingly, NMFS reviewed and adopted the USCG's
Supplemental Environmental Assessment entitled Supplemental
Environmental Assessment for Waterfront Repairs at U.S. Coast Guard
Station Monterey, Monterey, California, and signed a Finding of No
Significant Impact on November 9, 2017.
Summary of Request
On February 10, 2017, NMFS received a request from the USCG for an
IHA to take marine mammals incidental to pile driving activities for
waterfront restoration, at the USCG Station Monterey in Monterrey,
California. USCG's request is for take of eight species of marine
mammals, by Level B harassment. Neither USCG nor NMFS expect mortality
to result from this activity and, therefore, an IHA is appropriate.
NMFS previously issued an IHA to the USCG for similar work (79 FR
57052; September 24, 2014). However, no work was conducted under that
IHA.
[[Page 61545]]
Description of Specific Activity
USCG Station Monterey occupies an upland site and adjacent
waterside structures including a 1,700-foot breakwater, a wharf
constructed over the breakwater, and floating docks to the east of the
wharf in Monterey Harbor, Monterey, California. The USCG intends to
conduct maintenance on the existing wharf, which is used to berth
vessels that are critical to support USCG Station Monterey's mission.
The planned project requires replacement of 17 timber (16 to 18-in
in diameter) piles including removal of the existing timber deck,
replacing stringers, steel pipe caps, steel support beams, and hardware
in order to access the timber piles. The timber piles will be removed
using vibratory pile driving. Each timber pile will be replaced with a
14-in steel pipe pile installed using a vibratory hammer (the preferred
method) and each pipe pile will be positioned and installed in the
footprint of the extracted timber pile. Pile proofing will be conducted
via impact hammer. If, due to substrate or breakwater armor, a pipe
pile is unable to be driven to 30 feet below the mud line using a
vibratory hammer, then an impact hammer will be used; and if the pile
cannot be driven with an impact hammer, the pipe pile would be posted
onto the armor stone. The steel pipe piles would not be filled with
concrete. Pile installation would be adjacent to a rock jetty that
would provide substantial underwater shielding of sound transmission to
areas north (or through the jetty).
Pile-driving activities are expected to occur for an estimated
minimum of three to a maximum of eight days of the total construction
time. It is assumed that driving time would be approximately 20 minutes
(min) per pile for vibratory or impact pile driving. It is assumed that
vibratory extraction of the existing piles would take approximately 10
min per pile. Pile driving and extraction would therefore result in an
estimated of 240 min per day (4 hours (hrs)); 510 min for the total
project or approximately 8.5 hrs. In-water noise from pile driving
activities will result in the take, by Level B harassment only, of
eight species of marine mammals.
A detailed description of the planned pile driving project is
provided in the Federal Register notice for the proposed IHA (82 FR
42986; September 13, 2017). Since that time, no changes have been made
to the planned USCG activities. Therefore, a detailed description is
not provided here. Please refer to that Federal Register notice for the
description of the specific activity.
Comments and Responses
A notice of NMFS's proposal to issue an IHA to the USCG was
published in the Federal Register on September 24, 2014 (79 FR 57052).
That notice described, in detail, USCG activity, the marine mammal
species that may be affected by the activity, and the anticipated
effects on marine mammals. During the 30-day public comment period,
NMFS received comments from the Marine Mammal Commission (Commission).
Comment 1: NMFS received a comment from the Commission and while
the Commission agrees with NMFS's determinations, it recommends that
NMFS follow NMFS's policy of a 24-hour reset for enumerating the number
of marine mammals that could be taken during the planned activities by
applying standard rounding rules before summing the numbers of
estimated takes across survey sites and survey days.
Response 1: Calculating predicted take is not an exact science and
there are arguments for using different mathematical approaches in
different situations, and for making qualitative adjustments in other
situations. NMFS is currently engaged in developing a protocol to help
guide its take calculations given particular situations and
circumstances. We believe, however, that the methodology for this
action is appropriate and is not at odds with the 24-hour reset policy
the Commission references.
Comment 2: The Commission recommends NMFS include previous
mitigation and monitoring measures from the 2014 IHA (e.g., vessel
based monitoring, additional baseline monitoring) as well as clarifying
the number of Protected Species Observers (PSOs) that will be used for
the project and where the PSOs would be positioned for the most
effective monitoring.
Response: As discussed with the Commission, NMFS has incorporated
or expanded on these measures in the IHA.
[ssquf] USCG shall conduct in-situ monitoring during the
installation of five piles and removal of five piles. USCG shall adjust
Level B harassment zones of influence (ZOIs) as necessary where
received underwater sound pressure levels (SPLs) are higher than 160
decibels (dB) root mean square (rms) and 120 dB (rms) re 1 micro Pascal
([micro]Pa) for impulse noise sources (impact pile driving) and non-
impulses noise sources (vibratory pile driving), respectively. USCG
shall adjust Level A harassment zones based on measured SELs as
necessary.
[ssquf] USCG shall employ at least three NMFS-approved PSOs to
conduct marine mammal monitoring for its construction project.
[ssquf] PSOs shall conduct baseline monitoring for two days during
the week prior to pile removal and driving.
[ssquf] During pile removal or installation, at least three PSOs
shall be used, and positioned such that each monitor has the best
vantage point available, including the USCG pier, jetty, adjacent docks
within the harbor, to maintain an excellent view of the exclusion zone
and adjacent areas during the survey period. Monitors would be equipped
with radios or cell phones for maintaining contact with work crews.
[ssquf] Vessel-based visual marine mammal monitoring within the 120
dB and 160 dB ZOIs shall be conducted during 10 percent of the
vibratory pile driving and removal and impact pile driving activities,
respectively.
Comment 3: The Commission and NMFS discussed effectiveness of the
sound attenuation devices, which resulted in a change from a 10 dB
reduction to 5 dB during impact pile driving. The adjusted source
levels decreased the zones for both Level A and Level B harassment, but
did not change the number of authorized takes.
Response 3: As agreed upon with the Commission, NMFS outlined the
justification for the adjusted sources levels in the final IHA.
Comment 4: The Commission also recommended the NMFS re-evaluate the
USCG hydroacoustic monitoring plan to ensure the acoustic thresholds,
various metrics, and methods are current.
Response 4: As agreed upon with the Commission, NMFS requested the
USCG update their hydroacoustic monitoring plan to ensure it is
current. Those revisions included ensuring the appropriate thresholds
and weighting parameters, hearing ranges, and functional hearing group
delineations are used and distances reported accordingly (including for
cumulative sound exposure levels), increasing the measurement
capabilities from 10 to 20 kHz, ensuring ambient conditions are
recorded appropriately (e.g., in continuous 10-minute intervals),
ensuring the impulse duration is reported and represents the duration
that contains 90 percent of pulse energy (including using the
appropriate recording devices to obtain those measurements), and
reporting the depth of the 10-m hydrophone.
Description of Marine Mammals in the Area of Specified Activities
The marine mammal species under NMFS's jurisdiction that have the
[[Page 61546]]
potential to occur in the construction area include California sea lion
(Zalophus californianus), Pacific harbor seal (Phoca vitulina), harbor
porpoise (Phocoena phocoena), Risso's dolphin (Grampus griseus),
bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncates), killer whale (Orcinus orca),
gray whale (Megaptera novaengliae), humpback whale (Eschrichtius
robustus), and southern sea otters (Enhydra lutris nereis). The
southern sea otter is managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
not discussed further in this authorization. Humpback whales are
protected under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Pertinent information
for each of these species is presented in this document to provide the
necessary background to understand their demographics and distribution
in the area.
Table 1--Marine Mammal Species Potentially Present in Region of Activity
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ESA/ MMPA status; Stock abundance (CV,
Common name Scientific name Stock strategic (Y/N) Nmin, most recent PBR Annual M/
\1\ abundance survey) \2\ SI \3\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order Cetartiodactyla--Cetacea--Superfamily Mysticeti (baleen whales)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Eschrichtiidae
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gray whale.......................... Eschrichtius robustus.. Eastern North Pacific.. -; N 20,990 (0.05; 20,125; 624 132
2011).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Balaenidae
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Humpback whale...................... Megaptera novaeangliae California/Oregon/ E; D 1,918 (0.03; 1,855; 11.0 >=5.5
novaeangliae. Washington. 2011).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Superfamily Odontoceti (toothed whales, dolphins, and porpoises)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Delphinidae
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Killer whale........................ Orcinus orca........... Eastern North Pacific -; N 240 (0.49; 162; 2008). 1.6 0
Offshore.
Killer whale........................ Orcinus orca........... West Coast Transient... -; N 243 (na; 243; 2009)... 2.4 0
Risso's dolphin..................... Grampus griseus........ California/Oregon/ -; N 6,336 (0.32; 4,817; 46 >=3.7
Washington. 2014).
Bottlenose dolphin.................. Tursiops truncatus..... California Coastal..... -; N 453 (0.06; 346; 2011). 2.7 >=2.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Phocoenidae (porpoises)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harbor Porpoise..................... Phocoena phocoena...... Monterey Bay........... -; N 3,715 (0.51; 2,480; 25 0
2011).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Order Carnivora--Superfamily Pinnipedia
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Otariidae (eared seals and sea lions)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California sea lion................. Zalophus californianus. U.S.................... -; N 296,750 (na; 153,337; 9,200 389
2011).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Family Phocidae (earless seals)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Harbor seal......................... Phoca vitulina......... California............. -; N 30,968 (na; 27,348; 1,641 43
2012).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Endangered Species Act (ESA) status: Endangered (E), Threatened (T)/MMPA status: Depleted (D). A dash (-) indicates that the species is not listed
under the ESA or designated as depleted under the MMPA. Under the MMPA, a strategic stock is one for which the level of direct human-caused mortality
exceeds PBR or which is determined to be declining and likely to be listed under the ESA within the foreseeable future. Any species or stock listed
under the ESA is automatically designated under the MMPA as depleted and as a strategic stock.
\2\ NMFS marine mammal stock assessment reports online at: www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/sars/. CV is coefficient of variation; Nmin is the minimum estimate of
stock abundance. In some cases, CV is not applicable.
\3\ These values, found in NMFS's SARs, represent annual levels of human-caused mortality plus serious injury from all sources combined (e.g.,
commercial fisheries, ship strike). Annual mortality/serious injury (M/SI) often cannot be determined precisely and is in some cases presented as a
minimum value or range. A CV associated with estimated mortality due to commercial fisheries is presented in some cases.
A detailed description of the of the species likely to be affected
by the USCG's waterfront project, including brief introductions to the
species and relevant stocks as well as available information regarding
population trends and threats, and information regarding local
occurrence, were provided in the Federal Register notice for the
proposed IHA (82 FR 42986; September 13, 2017). Since that time, we are
not aware of any changes in the status of these species and stocks;
therefore, detailed descriptions are not provided here. However,
information on a recent rare occurrence of offshore killer whales was
not previously included in the proposed IHA and therefore is described
below.
Although more of a rare occurrence, approximately 25 offshore
killer whales were observed in December 2016 in Monterey Bay. Offshore
pods are usually found in groups of 30-60 or more individuals and they
are seldom seen in protected coastal waters. However, when observed in
Monterey Bay, offshore killer whales have been observed during the
winter.
Please refer to that Federal Register notice for all other species
descriptions. Please also refer to NMFS' website (www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/species/mammals/) for generalized species accounts.
Potential Effects of Specified Activities on Marine Mammals and Their
Habitat
The effects of underwater noise from pile driving activities for
the USCG's waterfront restoration project have the potential to result
in behavioral harassment of marine mammals in the vicinity of the
action area. The project would not result in permanent impacts to
habitats used directly by marine mammals, such as the adjacent jetty
that is used as a haulout site by pinnipeds, but may have potential
short-term impacts to food sources such as forage fish and minor
impacts on turbidity during installation and removal of piles, etc. In
addition, a concurrence letter was issued by NMFS (2013) (and still
[[Page 61547]]
applies) concluding that the USCG's action would adversely affect EFH
for various Federally managed fish species, including a temporary
increase in suspended sediments in the water column from pile driving
and removal, conversion of soft bottom habitat to artificial substrate,
and an increase in underwater sound levels in the water column
associated with pile driving. However, the project includes measures to
avoid, minimize, or otherwise offset adverse effects, such that NMFS
has no further EFH conservation recommendations to provide (NOAA 2013).
The Federal Register notice for the proposed IHA (82 FR 42986;
September 13, 2017) included additional discussion of the effects of
anthropogenic noise on marine mammals, therefore that information is
not repeated here; please refer to the Federal Register notice (82 FR
42986; September 13, 2017) for that information.
Estimated Take
This section provides an estimate of the number of incidental takes
for authorization through this IHA, which will inform both NMFS's
consideration of whether the number of takes is ``small'' and the
negligible impact determination.
Harassment is the only type of take expected to result from these
activities. Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent
here, section 3(18) of the MMPA defines ``harassment'' as any act of
pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure a
marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild (Level A harassment);
or (ii) has the potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal
stock in the wild by causing disruption of behavioral patterns,
including, but not limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding,
feeding, or sheltering (Level B harassment).
Authorized takes would be by Level B harassment only, in the form
of disruption of behavioral patterns for individual marine mammals
resulting from exposure to noise from pile driving and removal
activities. Based on the nature of the activity and the anticipated
effectiveness of the mitigation measures (i.e., shutdown measures--
discussed in detail below in Mitigation section), Level A harassment is
neither anticipated nor authorized.
As described previously, no mortality is anticipated or authorized
for this activity. Below we describe how the take is estimated.
Described in the most basic way, we estimate take by considering:
(1) Acoustic thresholds above which NMFS believes the best available
science indicates marine mammals will be behaviorally harassed or incur
some degree of hearing impairment; (2) the area or volume of water that
will be ensonified above these levels in a day; (3) the density or
occurrence of marine mammals within these ensonified areas; and, (4)
and the number of days of activities. Below, we describe these
components in more detail and present the take estimate.
Acoustic Thresholds
Using the best available science, NMFS has developed acoustic
thresholds that identify the received level of underwater sound above
which exposed marine mammals would be reasonably expected to be
behaviorally harassed (equated to Level B harassment) or to incur PTS
of some degree (equated to Level A harassment).
Level B Harassment for non-explosive sources--Though significantly
driven by received level, the onset of behavioral disturbance from
anthropogenic noise exposure is also informed to varying degrees by
other factors related to the source (e.g., frequency, predictability,
duty cycle), the environment (e.g., bathymetry), and the receiving
animals (hearing, motivation, experience, demography, behavioral
context) and can be difficult to predict (Southall et al., 2007,
Ellison et al., 2011). Based on what the available science indicates
and the practical need to use a threshold based on a factor that is
both predictable and measurable for most activities, NMFS uses a
generalized acoustic threshold based on received level to estimate the
onset of behavioral harassment. NMFS predicts that marine mammals are
likely to be behaviorally harassed in a manner we consider Level B
harassment when exposed to underwater anthropogenic noise above
received levels of 120 dB re 1 [mu]Pa (rms) for continuous (e.g.,
vibratory pile-driving, drilling) sources and above 160 dB re 1 [mu]Pa
(rms) for non-explosive impulsive (e.g., seismic airguns) or
intermittent (e.g., scientific sonar) sources. USCG's planned activity
includes the use of continuous (vibratory pile driving and removal) and
impulsive (impact pile driving) sources, and, therefore, the 120 and
160 dB re 1 [mu]Pa (rms) are applicable.
Level A harassment for non-explosive sources--NMFS's Technical
Guidance for Assessing the Effects of Anthropogenic Sound on Marine
Mammal Hearing (NMFS, 2016a) identifies dual criteria to assess
auditory injury (Level A harassment) to five different marine mammal
groups (based on hearing sensitivity) as a result of exposure to noise
from two different types of sources (impulsive or non-impulsive).
USCG's planned activity includes the use of non-impulsive (vibratory
pile driving and removal) and impulsive (impact pile driving) sources.
These thresholds were developed by compiling and synthesizing the
best available science and soliciting input multiple times from both
the public and peer reviewers to inform the final product, and are
provided in Table 2 below. The references, analysis, and methodology
used in the development of the thresholds are described in NMFS 2016
Technical Guidance, which may be accessed at: https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/acoustics/guidelines.htm.
Table 2--Thresholds Identifying the Onset of Permanent Threshold Shift
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PTS onset thresholds
Hearing group ---------------------------------------
Impulsive Non-impulsive
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Low-Frequency (LF) Cetaceans.... Lpk,flat: 219 dB; LE,LF,24h: 199 dB.
LE,LF,24h: 183 dB.
Mid-Frequency (MF) Cetaceans.... Lpk,flat: 230 dB; LE,MF,24h: 198 dB.
LE,MF,24h: 185 dB.
High-Frequency (HF) Cetaceans... Lpk,flat: 202 dB; LE,HF,24h: 173 dB.
LE,HF,24h: 155 dB.
Phocid Pinnipeds (PW) Lpk,flat: 218 dB; LE,PW,24h: 201 dB.
(Underwater). LE,PW,24h: 185 dB.
Otariid Pinnipeds (OW) Lpk,flat: 232 dB; LE,OW,24h: 219 dB.
(Underwater). LE,OW,24h: 203 dB.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Dual metric acoustic thresholds for impulsive sounds: Use whichever
results in the largest isopleth for calculating PTS onset. If a non-
impulsive sound has the potential of exceeding the peak sound pressure
level thresholds associated with impulsive sounds, these thresholds
should also be considered.
[[Page 61548]]
Note: Peak sound pressure (Lpk) has a reference value of 1 [mu]Pa, and
cumulative sound exposure level (LE) has a reference value of
1[mu]Pa2s. In this Table, thresholds are abbreviated to reflect
American National Standards Institute standards (ANSI 2013). However,
peak sound pressure is defined by ANSI as incorporating frequency
weighting, which is not the intent for this Technical Guidance. Hence,
the subscript ``flat'' is being included to indicate peak sound
pressure should be flat weighted or unweighted within the generalized
hearing range. The subscript associated with cumulative sound exposure
level thresholds indicates the designated marine mammal auditory
weighting function (LF, MF, and HF cetaceans, and PW and OW pinnipeds)
and that the recommended accumulation period is 24 hours. The
cumulative sound exposure level thresholds could be exceeded in a
multitude of ways (i.e., varying exposure levels and durations, duty
cycle). When possible, it is valuable for action proponents to
indicate the conditions under which these acoustic thresholds will be
exceeded.
Ensonified Area
Here, we describe operational and environmental parameters of the
activity that will feed into identifying the area ensonified above the
acoustic thresholds.
Background noise is the sound level that would exist without the
planned activity (pile driving and removal, in this case), while
ambient sound levels are those without human activity (NOAA 2009).
Natural actions that contribute to ambient noise include waves, wind,
rainfall, current fluctuations, chemical composition, and biological
sound sources (e.g., marine mammals, fish, and shrimp, Carr et al.,
2006). Background noise levels will be compared to the NOAA/NMFS
threshold levels designed to protect marine mammals to determine the
Level B Harassment Zones for noise sources. The background noise at
Monterey Harbor is relatively high due to boat traffic, foot traffic,
and noise from the USCG Monterey Station.
Pile installation would be adjacent to a rock jetty that would
provide substantial underwater shielding of sound transmission to areas
north (or through the jetty) (see Figure 1-2 of the Application).
For vibratory pile driving in the proposed IHA, to estimate the
extent of underwater noise, the software modeling package SoundPlan was
used by the USCG to simulate sound transmission for the project.
However, as part of the final IHA, NMFS considered revised source
levels to determine the Level B Harassment zone based on more
representative sound sources to project specifics. With a revised
source level of 162 dB SPL rms (based on Washington State Department of
Transportation (WSDOT) Friday Harbor data (2010) for 24-inch (in) steel
piles with a source level of 162 dB rms at 10 meters (m) for vibratory
pile driving and removal), the calculated Level B Harassment Zone would
be 6,309 m (6.3 kilometers (km)) rather than 15,848 m (15.8 km) that
would be calculated with a 168 dB SPL rms in the proposed IHA. NMFS
will continue to assume the USCG's conservative method for estimating
the range through the breakwater (north), while all other distances are
based on the sound hitting the shoreline (Table 3).
Table 3 shows the results of the modeled underwater noise analysis
for vibratory pile driving where 120 dB rms (Level B threshold) levels
would end, and Figure 5-1 from the application shows the pattern of
sound expected from vibratory pile extraction and pile installation,
taking into account shielding from the Monterey Breakwater. From these
data, a Level B zone of influence (ZOI) was calculated at approximately
7.3 square kilometers (km\2\). The modeled distances shown in the table
below are likely an overestimate of the extent of underwater noise,
because practical spreading loss (15 log10) sound propagation were
assumed, and the Monterey Breakwater would likely reduce noise
considerably faster than assumed. Per the sound assessment completed
for the project (included in Appendix A of the application) the
following assumptions and parameters were used for the analysis: For
vibratory pile installation, it is estimated that it would take
approximately 20 minutes (1,200 seconds) to vibrate in each pile.
Table 3--Modeled Extent of Level B Zones From Vibratory Pile Extraction
and Driving
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Level B Zone (distance to 120
Modeling scenario dB rms)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modeled north........................... 2,000 m
Modeled northeast shoreline............. 2,400 m
Modeled east to shoreline............... 1,800 m
Modeled south to shoreline.............. 550 m
Area of Influence....................... 7.3 km\2\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes: dB = decibel, RMS = root mean square.
For impact pile driving in the proposed IHA, to estimate the extent
of underwater noise, the software modeling package SoundPlan was used
by the USCG to simulate sound transmission for the project. However, as
part of the final IHA, NMFS considered revised source levels to
determine the Level B Harassment zones based on more representative
sound sources to project specifics. With a revised source level of 187
SPL rms (based on the California Department of Transportation
Compendium of Pile Driving Sound Data Report (Caltrans 2007) for 14-in
steel piles with a source level of 187 dB SPL rms (177 dB SEL) at 10 m
for impact pile driving) minus 5 dB for using sound attenuated devices,
the source level would then be 182 SPL rms and the calculated Level B
Harassment Zone would be 293 m rather than 465 m that was calculated in
the proposed IHA with a 195 dB SPL rms. A 5 dB reduction was used in
the final IHA rather than a 10 dB reduction that was used in the
proposed IHA based on the variability of the efficacy of sound
attenuation devices. NMFS will continue to assume the USCG's
conservative method for estimating the range through the breakwater
(north), while all other distances are based on the recalculated
distance of 293 m as described above and in Table 4.
[[Page 61549]]
Table 4--Extent of Level B Zones From Impact Pile Driving
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Distance to marine mammal
criteria
----------------------------------
Modeling scenario rms (dB re: 1[micro]Pa)
----------------------------------
160 dB (Level B threshold)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modeled attenuated noise transmission 76 m
north and northeast (through
breakwater).
Recalculated attenuated noise 293 m
transmission in all other directions.
Area of Influence.................... 0.27 km\2\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes: Assumes 5 dB of underwater noise attenuation by using a bubble
curtain during pile driving. Distances and method of calculation are
presented in Appendix A of the application.
dB = decibel, rms = root mean square (dB re: 1[micro]Pa).
The incidental take requested is Level B harassment of any marine
mammal occurring within the 160 dB rms disturbance threshold during
impact pile driving of 14-in steel pipe piles; the 120 dB rms
disturbance threshold for vibratory pile driving of 14-in steel pipe
piles; and the 120 dB rms disturbance threshold for vibratory removal
of 16-in to 18-in timber piles. Level B harassment zones have been
established as described in Tables 3 and 4 that will be in place during
active pile removal or installation.
When NMFS Technical Guidance (NMFS 2016) was published, in
recognition of the fact that ensonified area/volume could be more
technically challenging to predict because of the duration component in
the new thresholds, we developed a User Spreadsheet that includes tools
to help predict a simple isopleth that can be used in conjunction with
marine mammal density or occurrence to help predict takes. We note that
because of some of the assumptions included in the methods used for
these tools, we anticipate that isopleths produced are typically going
to be overestimates of some degree, which will result in some degree of
overestimate of Level A take. However, these tools offer the best way
to predict appropriate isopleths when more sophisticated 3D modeling
methods are not available, and NMFS continues to develop ways to
quantitatively refine these tools, and will qualitatively address the
output where appropriate. For stationary sources such as vibratory and
impact pile driving, NMFS's User Spreadsheet predicts the closest
distance at which, if a marine mammal remained at that distance the
whole duration of the activity, it would not incur PTS. Inputs used in
the User Spreadsheet, and the resulting isopleths are reported below
(Tables 5 and 6).
The PTS isopleths were identified for each hearing group for impact
and vibratory installation and removal methods that will be used in the
Monterey Station Project. The PTS isopleth distances were calculated
using the NMFS acoustic threshold calculator (NMFS 2016), with inputs
based on measured and surrogate noise measurements. Tables 5 and 6 have
been revised since the proposed IHA and uses data that is more
representative to project specifics. Data from WSDOT Friday Harbor data
(2010) for 24-in steel piles with a source level of 162 dB SPLrms (at
10 m) was used to characterize the sound that would be produced from
vibratory pile driving and removal. For impact pile driving, data from
the Caltrans (2007) with a source level (in SEL) of 172 dB at a
distance of 10 m with an average 30 strikes per pile was used.
Table 5--NMFS Technical Acoustic Guidance User Spreadsheet Input To Predict PTS Isopleths
[User spreadsheet input]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sound source 1 Sound source 2
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Spreadsheet Tab Used (A) Vibratory pile driving (E.1) Impact pile driving
(removal and installation) (installation)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source Level (rms SPL).................. 162 dB............................
Source Level (Single Strike/shot SEL)... .................................. 172 dB
Weighting Factor Adjustment (kHz)....... 2.5............................... 2
(a) Number of strikes in 1 h............ .................................. 30
(a) Activity Duration (h) within 24-h 4................................. 5
period.
Propagation (xLogR)..................... 15................................ 15
Distance of source level measurement 10................................ 10
(meters)+.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 6--NMFS Technical Acoustic Guidance User Spreadsheet Output for Predicted PTS Isopleths and Level A Daily
Ensonified Areas
[User spreadsheet output]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Low-frequency Mid-frequency High-frequency Phocid Otariid
Sound source type cetaceans cetaceans cetaceans pinnipeds pinnipeds
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PTS Isopleth (meters)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vibratory (removal and 20.1 1.8 29.7 12.2 0.9
installation).................
[[Page 61550]]
Impact (installation).......... 52.1 1.9 62.1 27.9 2.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Daily ensonified area (km\2\)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vibratory (pile removal and 0.00127 0.00001 0.00277 0.00046 0.00000
installation).................
Impact (installation).......... 0.00853 0.00001 0.01212 0.00245 0.00001
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 7 below shows the Level A Harassment exclusion zones that
were rounded up slightly from the output generated in the NMFS
Technical Acoustic Guidance User Spreadsheet (Table 6).
Table 7--Level A Harassment Exclusion Zones
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Low-frequency Mid-frequency High-frequency Phocid Otariid
Sound source type cetaceans cetaceans cetaceans pinnipeds pinnipeds
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exclusion Zone (meters)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Vibratory (removal and 21 10 30 13 10
installation).................
Impact (installation).......... 53 10 63 28 10
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marine Mammal Occurrence and Take Calculation and Estimation
In this section we provide the information about the presence,
density, or group dynamics of marine mammals that will inform the take
calculation and we describe how the marine mammal occurrence
information is brought together to produce a quantitative take
estimate.
Take estimates are based on the number of animals per unit area in
the project area multiplied by the area size of ensonified zones within
which received noise levels exceed certain thresholds (i.e., Level B
harassment) from specific activities, then multiplied by the total
number of days such activities would occur. Local abundance data are
used for take calculations for the authorized take where density is not
available or applicable to the project area.
Unless otherwise described, incidental take is estimated by the
following equation:
Incidental take estimate = species density * zone of influence (7.3
km\2\) * days of pile-related activity (8 days).
Harbor Seals
Pacific harbor seals are much less abundant in the project area
than California sea lions, and only two annual surveys conducted since
1998 identified any individuals. The 2004 annual pinniped survey
conducted by NMFS counted 28 Pacific harbor seals in Monterey Harbor in
2004, and 1 in 2005 (Lowry 2012). Pacific harbor seals hauled-out along
Cannery Row, north of the Monterey Breakwater, ranged from 1 to 24 in
2002, 2004, and 2009. During repairs on the Pier in 2009, Pacific
harbor seals were occasionally observed in the nearby waters, but were
never observed to haul-out on the breakwater (Harvey and Hoover 2009).
The density for harbor seals was determined by drawing a 5 km radius in
ArcGIS with the jetty haul-out site at the center. The area within this
circle was calculated, excluding the land, resulting in a 29 km\2\
foraging area. The calculation for take of harbor seals estimate
assumes 28 individuals (the most observed during any single survey) to
be in the water at any given time within 5 km of the breakwater (area
29 km\2\); therefore, the calculated density is 0.97 seals/km\2\. The
estimated Level B take is 0.97 seals multiplied by 7.3 km\2\ and 8 days
of activity for a total of 57 harbor seals (see Table 7). Since the
calculated Level A zones of phocids are small and mitigation is in
place to avoid Level A take (Table 6), we do not consider it likely
that any harbor seals would be taken by Level A harassment.
California Sea Lions
The calculation for Level B take of California sea lions in the
water assumes an average density of 8.62 individuals/km\2\. This
density was determined by drawing a 5 km radius in ArcGIS with the
jetty haul-out site at the center. The area within this circle was
calculated, excluding the land, resulting in a 29 km\2\ foraging area.
An average of 250 sea lions were assumed in the water at any given
time. Therefore, 250 sea lions divided by 29 km\2\ equals 8.62 sea
lions/km\2\. Estimated take is then calculated using 8.62 sea lions
multiplied by 7.3 km\2\ and 8 days of activity for a total of 504
California sea lions (see Table 7). For the additional California sea
lions that are present on the breakwater (which we would also expect to
enter the water during the project): The overall average number of sea
lions for all of the surveys of the Monterey Breakwater combined was
250 individuals. Therefore, 250 animals was multiplied by 8 days of
activity for a total of 2,000 California sea lions (see Table 7). Since
the calculated Level A zones of otariids are all very small and
mitigation is in place to avoid Level A take (Table 6), we do not
consider it likely that any sea lions would be taken by Level A
harassment.
Killer Whale
Due to the low frequency and unpredictability of killer whales
entering the project area, the application of a density equation is not
reasonable for predicting take. When transient killer whales enter
Monterey Bay, they typically are in groups of 3 to 8 at a time (Guzman
2016). To be conservative, the take estimate for Level B harassment is
based on a larger group of eight transient killer whales that may enter
the area (Table 7). Offshore killer whales are more of a rare
occurrence in Monterey Bay; with the most recent documentation of
approximately 25 whales in December 2016. Therefore,
[[Page 61551]]
the take estimate for Level B harassment is based on the possibility
that a single occurrence of a smaller pod of 25 whales may enter the
area (Table 7). Since the Level A zones of mid-frequency cetaceans are
small and mitigation is in place to avoid Level A take (Table 6), we do
not consider it likely that any killer whales would be taken by Level A
harassment.
Bottlenose Dolphin
Abundance and densities of cetaceans in the California Current
ecosystem were conducted from 1991 to 2005 (Barlow, Forney 2007). The
results of the surveys indicate that bottlenose dolphin population
density throughout the entire west coast shoreline is 1.78 individuals/
100 km\2\. During the same survey, the mean group size for bottlenose
dolphins observed in Central California was four individuals. Other,
more recent data suggest that densities may be up to 0.04/km\2\ (Weller
2016). Even when using the higher density, estimated take results in
very low numbers (<1 over the entire period of construction). Rather
than using density calculations to estimate take, to be conservative,
the Level B take is a small pod of 10 bottlenose dolphins (Table 7).
Since the Level A zones of mid-frequency cetaceans are small and
mitigation is in place to avoid Level A take (Table 6), we do not
consider it likely that any bottlenose dolphins would be taken by Level
A harassment.
Risso's Dolphin
Because there is not reliable local data for Monterey Bay, the
Level B take estimate for Risso's dolphins is a single occurrence of a
small pod of 10 animals (see Table 7) as groups of Risso's dolphins
average between 10-30 animals. Since the Level A zones of mid-frequency
cetaceans are small and mitigation is in place to avoid Level A take
(Table 6), we do not consider it likely that any Risso's dolphin would
be taken by Level A harassment.
Harbor Porpoise
An estimate of the density of harbor porpoise in the southern
portion of Monterey Bay nearshore is approximately 2.321 per km\2\
(Forney et al., 2014). Therefore, the estimated take for Level B
harassment is 2.231 porpoise multiplied by 7.3 km\2\ and 8 days of
activity for a total of 136 harbor porpoise (see Table 7). Since the
calculated Level A zones of high frequency cetaceans are small and
mitigation is in place to avoid Level A take (Table 6), we do not
consider it likely that any harbor porpoise would be taken by Level A
harassment.
Humpback Whale
Humpback whales are typically found further offshore than gray
whales and occurrence is rare; however, since 2014 greater numbers of
humpback whales have been observed in and near Monterey Bay by whale-
watching vessels. Because USCG will shutdown for all observed humpbacks
(in Level A and B zones), no takes of humpback whales are authorized.
Gray Whale
The occurrence of gray whales is extremely rare near shore in the
project area. If gray whales would approach the project area they would
be more likely to occur during the spring migration north, when they
tend to stay closer to shore than during the winter southern migration.
The NOAA National Center for Coastal Ocean Science (NCCOS) reported
densities of gray whales at 0.1 to 0.5 per km\2\ (NCCOS 2007).
Therefore, the estimated take for Level B harassment was calculated
using the larger density of 0.5 whales per km\2\ multiplied by 7.3
km\2\ and 8 days of activity for a total of 4 gray whales (see Table
7). Since the Level A zones of low-frequency cetaceans are small and
mitigation is in place to avoid Level A take (see Table 6) we do not
consider it likely that any gray whales would be taken by Level A
harassment during removal or impact installation.
Table 7--Summary of Requested Incidental Take by Level A and Level B Harassment
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authorized Level B Authorized
Species Stock size take total take Percent of population
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pacific harbor seal (Phoca 30,968 57................... 57 Less than 1.
vitulina).
California sea lion (Zalophus 296,750 504 (Animals already 2,504 Less than 1.
californianus). in the water).
California sea lion (Zalophus 296,750 2,000 (Animals that
californianus). enter the water from
the breakwater).
Transient killer whale (Orcinus 243 8.................... 8 3.3.
orca).
Offshore killer whale (Orcinus 240 25 (single occurrence 25 10.42.
orca). of a small pod).
Bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops 453 10 (single occurrence 10 4.19.
truncatus). of a small pod).
Risso's dolphin (Grampus griseus). 6,336 10 (single occurrence 10 Less than 1.
of a small pod).
Harbor porpoise (Phocoena 3,715 136.................. 136 3.66.
phocoena).
Gray whale (Eschrichtius robustus) 20,990 4.................... 4 Less than 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mitigation Measures
In order to issue an IHA under Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA,
NMFS must set forth the permissible methods of taking pursuant to such
activity, and other means of effecting the least practicable impact on
such species or stock and its habitat, paying particular attention to
rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar significance, and on
the availability of such species or stock for taking for certain
subsistence uses (latter not applicable for this action). NMFS
regulations require applicants for incidental take authorizations to
include information about the availability and feasibility (economic
and technological) of equipment, methods, and manner of conducting such
activity or other means of effecting the least practicable adverse
impact upon the affected species or stocks and their habitat (50 CFR
216.104(a)(11)).
In evaluating how mitigation may or may not be appropriate to
ensure the least practicable adverse impact on species or stocks and
their habitat, as well as subsistence uses where applicable, we
carefully consider two primary factors:
(1) The manner in which, and the degree to which, the successful
implementation of the measure(s) is expected to reduce impacts to
marine mammals, marine mammal species or stocks, and their habitat.
This considers the nature of the potential adverse impact being
mitigated (likelihood, scope, range). It further considers the
likelihood that the measure will be effective if implemented
(probability of accomplishing the mitigating result if implemented as
planned) the likelihood
[[Page 61552]]
of effective implementation (probability implemented as planned), and;
(2) the practicability of the measures for applicant
implementation, which may consider such things as cost, impact on
operations, and, in the case of a military readiness activity,
personnel safety, practicality of implementation, and impact on the
effectiveness of the military readiness activity.
Several measures for mitigating effects on marine mammals from the
pile installation and removal activities at for the USCG Monterey
Station and are described below.
Timing Restrictions
All work will be conducted during daylight hours.
Noise Attenuation
A bubble curtain and cushion pads will be used during pile driving
activities with an impact hammer to reduce sound levels. In addition,
the USCG will perform ``pre-drilling.'' Pre-drilling will be performed
and discontinued when the pile tip is approximately five feet (ft)
above the required pile tip elevation. Pre-drilling is a method that
starts the ``hole'' for the new pile; the pile is inserted after the
hole has been pre-drilled which creates less friction and overall noise
and turbidity during installation.
Exclusion Zones
Exclusion Zones calculated from the PTS isopleths (Table 7) will be
implemented to protect marine mammals from Level A harassment (refer to
Table 6). If a marine mammal is observed at or within the Exclusion
Zone (Table 7), work will shut down (stop work) until the individual
has been observed outside of the zone, or has not been observed for at
least 15 minutes for pinnipeds and small cetaceans and 30 minutes for
large whales.
Additional Shutdown Measures
If a humpback whale is observed within the Level A or Level B
zones, the USCG will implement shutdown measures. Work would not
commence until 30-minutes after the last sighting of a humpback within
these zones.
USCG will implement shutdown measures if the number of authorized
takes for any particular species reaches the limit under the IHA and if
such marine mammals are sighted within the vicinity of the project area
and are approaching the Level B harassment zone during in-water
construction activities.
If a marine mammal species under NMFS' jurisdiction is observed
within the Level A or B zones that has not been authorized for take,
the USCG will implement shutdown measures.
Level B Harassment Zones
USCG will monitor the Level B harassment ZOIs as described in
Tables 3 and 4.
Soft-Start for Impact Pile Driving
For impact pile installation, contractors will provide an initial
set of three strikes from the impact hammer at 40 percent energy,
followed by a one-minute waiting period, then two subsequent three-
strike sets. Each day, USCG will use the soft-start technique at the
beginning of impact pile driving, or if impact pile driving has ceased
for more than 30 minutes.
Based on our evaluation of the applicant's planned measures, as
well as other measures considered by NMFS, NMFS has determined that the
mitigation measures provide the means of effecting the least
practicable impact on the affected species or stocks and their habitat,
paying particular attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of
similar significance.
Monitoring and Reporting
In order to issue an IHA for an activity, Section 101(a)(5)(D) of
the MMPA states that NMFS must set forth, requirements pertaining to
the monitoring and reporting of such taking. The MMPA implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 216.104(a)(13) indicate that requests for
authorizations must include the suggested means of accomplishing the
necessary monitoring and reporting that will result in increased
knowledge of the species and of the level of taking or impacts on
populations of marine mammals that are expected to be present in the
action area. Effective reporting is critical both to compliance as well
as ensuring that the most value is obtained from the required
monitoring.
Monitoring and reporting requirements prescribed by NMFS should
contribute to improved understanding of one or more of the following:
Occurrence of marine mammal species or stocks in the area
in which take is anticipated (e.g., presence, abundance, distribution,
density);
Nature, scope, or context of likely marine mammal exposure
to potential stressors/impacts (individual or cumulative, acute or
chronic), through better understanding of: (1) Action or environment
(e.g., source characterization, propagation, ambient noise); (2)
affected species (e.g., life history, dive patterns); (3) co-occurrence
of marine mammal species with the action; or (4) biological or
behavioral context of exposure (e.g., age, calving or feeding areas);
Individual marine mammal responses (behavioral or
physiological) to acoustic stressors (acute, chronic, or cumulative),
other stressors, or cumulative impacts from multiple stressors;
How anticipated responses to stressors impact either: (1)
Long-term fitness and survival of individual marine mammals; or (2)
populations, species, or stocks;
Effects on marine mammal habitat (e.g., marine mammal prey
species, acoustic habitat, or other important physical components of
marine mammal habitat); and
Mitigation and monitoring effectiveness.
Marine mammal monitoring will be conducted in strategic locations
around the area of potential effects at all times during in-water pile
driving and removal as described below:
[ssquf] During pile removal or installation the observer will
monitor from the most practicable vantage point possible (i.e., the
pier itself, the breakwater, adjacent boat docks in the harbor, or a
boat) to determine whether marine mammals enter the Exclusion Zone and
to record take when marine mammals enter the relevant Level B
Harassment Zones based on type of construction activity; and
[ssquf] If a marine mammal approaches an Exclusion Zone, the
observation will be reported to the Construction Manager and the
individual will be watched closely. If the marine mammal crosses into
an Exclusion Zone, a stop-work order will be issued. In the event that
a stop-work order is triggered, the observed marine mammal(s) will be
closely monitored while it remains in or near the Exclusion Zone, and
only when it moves well outside of the Exclusion Zone or has not been
observed for at least 15 minutes for pinnipeds and 30 minutes for
whales will the lead monitor allow work to recommence.
Protected Species Observers
USCG shall employ a minimum of three NMFS-approved protected
species observers (PSOs) to conduct marine mammal monitoring for its
Monterey Station Project. The PSOs will observe and collect data on
marine mammals in and around the project area for 30 minutes before,
during, and for 30 minutes after all pile removal and pile installation
work. NMFS-approved
[[Page 61553]]
PSOs shall meet the following requirements:
1. Visual acuity in both eyes (correction is permissible)
sufficient for discernment of moving targets at the water's surface
with ability to estimate target size and distance. Use of binoculars
may be necessary to correctly identify the target;
2. Advanced education in biological science, wildlife management,
mammalogy or related fields (Bachelors degree or higher is preferred),
but not required;
3. Experience or training in the field identification of marine
mammals (cetaceans and pinnipeds);
4. Sufficient training, orientation or experience with the
construction operation to provide for personal safety during
observations;
5. Ability to communicate orally, by radio or in person, with
project personnel to provide real time information on marine mammals
observed in the area as necessary;
6. Experience and ability to conduct field observations and collect
data according to assigned protocols (this may include academic
experience);
7. Writing skills sufficient to prepare a report of observations
that would include such information as the number and type of marine
mammals observed; the behavior of marine mammals in the project area
during construction, dates and times when observations were conducted;
dates and times when in-water construction activities were conducted;
and dates and times when marine mammals were present at or within the
defined ZOI;
8. If a team of three or more observers are required, one observer
should be designated as lead observer or monitoring coordinator. The
lead observer must have prior experience working as an observer;
9. NMFS will require submission and approval of observer CVs; and
10. PSOs will monitor marine mammals around the construction site
using high-quality binoculars (e.g., Zeiss, 10 x 42 power) and/or
spotting scopes.
11. If marine mammals are observed, the following information will
be documented:
(A) Date and time that monitored activity begins or ends;
(B) Construction activities occurring during each observation
period;
(C) Weather parameters (e.g., percent cover, visibility);
(D) Water conditions (e.g., sea state, tide state);
(E) Species, numbers, and, if possible, sex and age class of marine
mammals;
(F) Description of any observable marine mammal behavior patterns,
including bearing and direction of travel and distance from pile
driving activity;
(G) Distance from pile driving activities to marine mammals and
distance from the marine mammals to the observation point;
(H) Locations of all marine mammal observations; and
(I) Other human activity in the area.
Reporting Measures
Marine Mammal Monitoring Report
USCG will be required to submit a draft marine mammal monitoring
report within 90 days after completion of the in-water construction
work or the expiration of the IHA (if issued), whichever comes earlier.
The report will include data from marine mammal sightings as described:
Date, time, location, species, group size, and behavior, any observed
reactions to construction, distance to operating pile hammer, and
construction activities occurring at time of sighting and environmental
data for the period (i.e., wind speed and direction, sea state, tidal
state, cloud cover, and visibility). The marine mammal monitoring
report will also include total takes, takes by day, and stop-work
orders for each species. NMFS will have an opportunity to provide
comments on the report, and if NMFS has comments, USCG will address the
comments and submit a final report to NMFS within 30 days.
In the unanticipated event that the specified activity clearly
causes the take of a marine mammal in a manner prohibited by the IHA
(if issued), such as an injury (Level A harassment), serious injury, or
mortality, USCG will immediately cease the specified activities and
immediately report the incident to the Permits and Conservation
Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS and the NMFS' West Coast
Stranding Coordinator. The report must include the following
information:
Time, date, and location (latitude/longitude) of the
incident;
Description of the incident;
Status of all sound source use in the 24 hrs preceding the
incident;
Water depth;
Environmental conditions (e.g., wind speed and direction,
sea state, cloud cover, and visibility);
Description of all marine mammal observations in the 24
hrs preceding the incident;
Species identification or description of the animal(s)
involved;
Fate of the animal(s); and
Photographs or video footage of the animal(s) (if
equipment is available).
Activities will resume until NMFS is able to review the
circumstances of the prohibited take. NMFS will work with USCG to
determine what is necessary to minimize the likelihood of further
prohibited take and ensure MMPA compliance. USCG may not resume their
activities until notified by NMFS via letter, email, or telephone.
Reporting of Injured or Dead Marine Mammals
In the event that the USCG discovers an injured or dead marine
mammal, and the lead PSO determines that the cause of the injury or
death is unknown and the death is relatively recent (i.e., in less than
a moderate state of decomposition as described in the next paragraph),
USCG will immediately report the incident to the Permits and
Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS and the
NMFS' West Coast Stranding Coordinator. The report must include the
same information identified in the paragraph above. Activities may
continue while NMFS reviews the circumstances of the incident. NMFS
will work with USCG to determine whether modifications in the
activities are appropriate.
In the event that USCG discovers an injured or dead marine mammal,
and the lead PSO determines that the injury or death is not associated
with or related to the activities authorized in the IHA (e.g.,
previously wounded animal, carcass with moderate to advanced
decomposition, or scavenger damage), USCG will report the incident to
the Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources,
NMFS and the NMFS Stranding Hotline and/or by email to the NMFS' West
Coast Stranding Coordinator within 24 hrs of the discovery. USCG will
provide photographs or video footage (if available) or other
documentation of the stranded animal sighting to NMFS. Activities may
continue while NMFS reviews the circumstances of the incident.
Negligible Impact Analysis and Determination
NMFS has defined negligible impact as an impact resulting from the
specified activity that cannot be reasonably expected to, and is not
reasonably likely to, adversely affect the species or stock through
effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival (50 CFR 216.103). A
negligible impact finding is based on the lack of likely adverse
effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival (i.e., population-
level effects). An estimate of the number of takes alone is not enough
information on which to base an impact determination. In addition to
[[Page 61554]]
considering estimates of the number of marine mammals that might be
``taken'' through harassment, NMFS considers other factors, such as the
likely nature of any responses (e.g., intensity, duration), the context
of any responses (e.g., critical reproductive time or location,
migration), as well as effects on habitat, and the likely effectiveness
of the mitigation. We also assess the number, intensity, and context of
estimated takes by evaluating this information relative to population
status. Consistent with the 1989 preamble for NMFS's implementing
regulations (54 FR 40338; September 29, 1989), the impacts from other
past and ongoing anthropogenic activities are incorporated into this
analysis via their impacts on the environmental baseline (e.g., as
reflected in the regulatory status of the species, population size and
growth rate where known, ongoing sources of human-caused mortality, or
ambient noise levels).
No injury, serious injury or mortality is anticipated or authorized
for the Monterey Station Project. Takes that are anticipated and
authorized are expected to be limited to short-term Level B harassment
(behavioral) only. Marine mammals present in the vicinity of the action
area and taken by Level B harassment would most likely show overt brief
disturbance (startle reaction) and avoidance of the area from elevated
noise levels during pile driving and pile removal.
There is one endangered species that may occur in the project area,
humpback whales. However, if any humpbacks are detected within the
Level B harassment zone of the project area, the USCG will shut down.
The Monterey Breakwater is a haulout location for approximately 250
California sea lions. There no other known critical habitat areas,
haulouts or import feeding areas in close proximately to the project
area.
The project also is not expected to have significant adverse
effects on affected marine mammals' habitat, as analyzed in detail in
the ``Potential Effects of Specified Activities on Marine Mammals and
their Habitat'' section. Project activities would not permanently
modify existing marine mammal habitat. The activities may kill some
fish and cause other fish to leave the area temporarily, thus impacting
marine mammals' foraging opportunities in a limited portion of the
foraging range; but, because of the short duration of the activities
and the relatively small area of the habitat that may be affected, the
impacts to marine mammal habitat are not expected to cause significant
or long-term negative consequences. Therefore, given the consideration
of potential impacts to marine mammal prey species and their physical
environment, USCG's Monterey Station project would not adversely affect
marine mammal habitat.
In summary and as described above, the following factors primarily
support our determination that the impacts resulting from this activity
are not expected to adversely affect the species or stock through
effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival:
No injury, serious injury or mortality is anticipated or
authorized;
Takes that are anticipated and authorized are expected to
be limited to short-term Level B harassment (behavioral);
The project also is not expected to have significant
adverse effects on affected marine mammals' habitat;
There are no known important feeding or pupping areas.
There is one haulout (the breakwater) within the project area. There
are no other known important areas for marine mammals with the
footprint of the project area; and
For four out of the seven species, take is less than one
percent of the stock abundance. Instances of take for the other three
species (killer whale, bottlenose dolphin, and harbor porpoise) range
from 3-10 percent of the stock abundance.
Based on the analysis contained herein of the likely effects of the
specified activity on marine mammals and their habitat, and taking into
consideration the implementation of the monitoring and mitigation
measures, NMFS finds that the total marine mammal take from the
activity will have a negligible impact on all affected marine mammal
species or stocks.
Small Numbers
As noted above, only small numbers of incidental take may be
authorized under Section 101(a)(5)(D) of the MMPA for specified
activities other than military readiness activities. The MMPA does not
define small numbers and so, in practice, where estimated numbers are
available, NMFS compares the number of individuals taken to the most
appropriate estimation of abundance of the relevant species or stock in
our determination of whether an authorization is limited to small
numbers of marine mammals. Additionally, other factors may be
considered in the analysis, such as the temporal or spatial scale of
the activities.
For four out of the seven species, take is less than one percent of
the stock abundance. Instances of take for the other three species
(killer whale, bottlenose dolphin, and harbor porpoise) range from 3-10
percent of the stock abundance. Based on the analysis contained herein
of the planned activity (including the mitigation and monitoring
measures) and the anticipated take of marine mammals, NMFS
preliminarily finds that small numbers of marine mammals will be taken
relative to the population sizes of the affected species or stocks.
Unmitigable Adverse Impact Analysis and Determination
There are no relevant subsistence uses of the affected marine
mammal stocks or species implicated by this action. Therefore, NMFS has
determined that the total taking of affected species or stocks would
not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of such
species or stocks for taking for subsistence purposes.
Endangered Species Act (ESA)
Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
requires that each Federal agency insure that any action it authorizes,
funds, or carries out is not likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of any endangered or threatened species or result in the
destruction or adverse modification of designated critical habitat. To
ensure ESA compliance for the issuance of IHAs, NMFS consults
internally, in this case with the West Coast Regional Office, whenever
we propose to authorize take for endangered or threatened species.
NMFS is not authorizing take of humpback whales, which are listed
under the ESA, as the applicant will implement shutdown measures
whenever humpbacks are observed (Level A or B). Therefore, consultation
under section 7 of the ESA is not required.
Authorization
NMFS has issued an IHA to USCG for the potential harassment of
small numbers of seven marine mammal species incidental to pile driving
and removal activities at the USCG Monterey Station, Monterey,
California from December 2017 to October 2018, provided the previously
mentioned mitigation, monitoring, and reporting requirements.
Dated: December 22, 2017.
Donna S. Wieting,
Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-28029 Filed 12-27-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P