Medical Devices; Radiology Devices; Classification of the Rectal Balloon for Prostate Immobilization, 61170-61171 [2017-27856]
Download as PDF
61170
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 27, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 892
[Docket No. FDA–2017–N–6855]
Medical Devices; Radiology Devices;
Classification of the Rectal Balloon for
Prostate Immobilization
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Final order.
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) is
classifying the rectal balloon for prostate
immobilization into class II (special
controls). The special controls that
apply to the device type are identified
in this order and will be part of the
codified language for the rectal balloon
for prostate immobilization’s
classification. We are taking this action
because we have determined that
classifying the device into class II
(special controls) will provide a
reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness of the device. We believe
this action will also enhance patients’
access to beneficial innovative devices,
in part by reducing regulatory burdens.
DATES: This order is effective December
27, 2017. The classification was
applicable on January 28, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steven Tjoe, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4550, Silver Spring,
MD 20993–0002, 301–796–5866,
steven.tjoe@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the
rectal balloon for prostate
immobilization as class II (special
controls), which we have determined
will provide a reasonable assurance of
safety and effectiveness. In addition, we
believe this action will enhance
patients’ access to beneficial innovation,
in part by reducing regulatory burdens
by placing the device into a lower
device class than the automatic class III
assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III
occurs by operation of law and without
any action by FDA, regardless of the
level of risk posed by the new device.
Any device that was not in commercial
distribution before May 28, 1976, is
automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:49 Dec 26, 2017
Jkt 244001
approval unless and until FDA takes an
action to classify or reclassify the device
(see 21 U.S.C. 360c(f)(1)). We refer to
these devices as ‘‘postamendments
devices’’ because they were not in
commercial distribution prior to the
date of enactment of the Medical Device
Amendments of 1976, which amended
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in
appropriate circumstances to classify or
reclassify a device into class I or II. We
may issue an order finding a new device
to be substantially equivalent under
section 513(i) of the FD&C Act (see 21
U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device that
does not require premarket approval.
We determine whether a new device is
substantially equivalent to a predicate
by means of the procedures for
premarket notification under section
510(k) of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device
through ‘‘De Novo’’ classification, a
common name for the process
authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and
Drug Administration Modernization Act
of 1997 established the first procedure
for De Novo classification (Pub. L. 105–
115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug
Administration Safety and Innovation
Act modified the De Novo application
process by adding a second procedure
(Pub. L. 112–144). A device sponsor
may utilize either procedure for De
Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person
submits a 510(k) for a device that has
not previously been classified. After
receiving an order from FDA classifying
the device into class III under section
513(f)(1) of the FD&C Act, the person
then requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather
than first submitting a 510(k) and then
a request for classification, if the person
determines that there is no legally
marketed device upon which to base a
determination of substantial
equivalence, that person requests a
classification under section 513(f)(2) of
the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo
classification, FDA is required to
classify the device by written order
within 120 days. The classification will
be according to the criteria under
section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
Although the device was automatically
placed within class III, the De Novo
classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
We believe this De Novo classification
will enhance patients’ access to
beneficial innovation, in part by
reducing regulatory burdens. When FDA
classifies a device into class I or II via
the De Novo process, the device can
serve as a predicate for future devices of
that type, including for 510(k)s. As a
result, other device sponsors do not
have to submit a De Novo request or
PMA in order to market a substantially
equivalent device (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i),
defining ‘‘substantial equivalence’’).
Instead, sponsors can use the lessburdensome 510(k) process, when
necessary, to market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On July 15, 2013, RadiaDyne, LLC
submitted a request for De Novo
classification of the prostate
immobilizer rectal balloon. FDA
reviewed the request in order to classify
the device under the criteria for
classification set forth in section
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if
general controls by themselves are
insufficient to provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness,
but there is sufficient information to
establish special controls that, in
combination with the general controls,
provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request,
we determined that the device can be
classified into class II with the
establishment of special controls. FDA
has determined that these special
controls, in addition to general controls,
will provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on January 28, 2014, FDA
issued an order to the requestor
classifying the device into class II. FDA
is codifying the classification of the
device by adding 21 CFR 892.5720. We
have named the generic type of device
rectal balloon for prostate
immobilization, and it is identified as a
single use, inflatable, non-powered
positioning device placed in the rectum
to immobilize the prostate in patients
undergoing radiation therapy. The
device is intended to be used during all
the phases of radiation therapy,
including treatment planning, image
verification, and radiotherapy delivery.
FDA has identified the following risks
to health associated specifically with
this type of device and the measures
required to mitigate these risks in table
1.
E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM
27DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 27, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
61171
TABLE 1—RECTAL BALLOON FOR PROSTATE IMMOBILIZATION RISKS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
Identified risks
Mitigation measures/21 CFR section
Anorectal Toxicity ...................................
Special controls (1)(i) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(1)(i)), (1)(ii) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(1)(ii)), (1)(iii) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(1)(iii)), (1)(iv) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(1)(iv)), (2)(i)(D) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(2)(i)(D)),
(2)(ii) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(2)(ii)), (2)(iii) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(2)(iii)), and (2)(iv) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(iv)).
Special controls (1)(iv) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(1)(iv)), (1)(v) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(1)(v)), (2)(i)(A) (21
CFR 892.5720(b)(2)(i)(A)), (2)(i)(D) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(2)(i)(D)), (2)(ii) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(ii)), (2)(iii) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(2)(iii)), and (2)(iv) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(2)(iv)).
Special controls (1)(v)(A) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(1)(v)(A)), (1)(v)(B) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(1)(v)(B)),
(2)(i)(A) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(2)(i)(A)), (2)(i)(D) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(2)(i)(D)), (2)(ii) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(ii)), (2)(iii) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(2)(iii)), and (2)(iv) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(2)(iv)).
Special controls (1)(v)(A) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(1)(v)(A)), (1)(v)(B) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(1)(v)(B)),
(2)(i)(B) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(2)(i)(B)), (2)(ii) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(2)(ii)), (2)(iii) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(iii)), and (2)(iv) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(2)(iv)).
Special controls (1)(v)(A) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(1)(v)(A)), (2)(i)(A) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(2)(i)(A)),
(2)(i)(C) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(2)(i)(C)), (2)(ii) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(2)(ii)), (2)(iii) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(iii)), and (2)(iv) (21 CFR 892.5720(b)(2)(iv)).
Tissue Damage ......................................
Perforation of the Rectum ......................
Irradiation of Healthy Tissue ..................
Patient Intolerance .................................
FDA has determined that special
controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to
health and provide reasonable assurance
of safety and effectiveness. For a device
to fall within this classification, and
thus avoid automatic classification in
class III, it would have to comply with
the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls
appear in the regulation codified by this
order. This device is subject to
premarket notification requirements
under section 510(k).
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with RULES
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21
CFR 25.34(b) that this action is of a type
that does not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. Therefore,
neither an environmental assessment
nor an environmental impact statement
is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special
controls that refer to previously
approved collections of information
found in other FDA regulations. These
collections of information are subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520). The collections of information in
the guidance document ‘‘De Novo
Classification Process (Evaluation of
Automatic Class III Designation)’’ have
been approved under OMB control
number 0910–0844; the collections of
information in 21 CFR part 814,
subparts A through E, regarding
premarket approval, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0231; the collections of
information in part 807, subpart E,
regarding premarket notification
submissions, have been approved under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:49 Dec 26, 2017
Jkt 244001
OMB control number 0910–0120; and
the collections of information in 21 CFR
part 801, regarding labeling, have been
approved under OMB control number
0910–0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 892
Medical devices, Radiation
protection, X-rays.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part 892 is
amended as follows:
PART 892—RADIOLOGY DEVICES
1. The authority citation for part 892
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e,
360j, 360l, 371.
2. Add § 892.5720 to subpart F to read
as follows:
■
§ 892.5720 Rectal balloon for prostate
immobilization.
(a) Identification. A rectal balloon for
prostate immobilization is a single use,
inflatable, non-powered positioning
device placed in the rectum to
immobilize the prostate in patients
undergoing radiation therapy. The
device is intended to be used during all
the phases of radiation therapy,
including treatment planning, image
verification, and radiotherapy delivery.
(b) Classification. Class II (special
controls). The special controls for this
device are:
(1) The premarket notification
submission must include methodology
and results of the following non-clinical
and clinical performance testing:
(i) Biocompatibility testing of the final
finished device;
(ii) If provided sterile, sterilization
validation;
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
(iii) If not provided sterile, bioburden
testing of the final finished device;
(iv) Shelf life and expiration date
validation; and
(v) Performance testing including but
not limited to:
(A) Venting mechanism (if device has
a vent mechanism);
(B) Safety mechanism(s) to prevent
advancement beyond its intended safe
placement; and
(C) Structural integrity testing (e.g.,
tensile strength, balloon leakage and
burst strength).
(2) Labeling that includes:
(i) Appropriate warnings and
contraindications, including, but not
limited to the following statements:
(A) ‘‘Do not transport the patient with
the rectal balloon inserted. The balloon
should be removed prior to transport.’’;
(B) ‘‘Failure to perform the standard
imaging position verification protocol
may cause the device to not perform as
intended.’’;
(C) ‘‘Reduce the rectal balloon fill
volume if the patient experiences
discomfort due to the rectal balloon
inflation.’’; and
(D) ‘‘Do not apply excessive pressure/
force on the shaft or tubing of the rectal
balloon.’’
(ii) Adequate instructions for use on
the proper insertion procedure,
positioning, and inflation of the rectal
balloon;
(iii) Whether the device is sterile or
non-sterile; and
(iv) An expiration date.
Dated: December 20, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017–27856 Filed 12–26–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
E:\FR\FM\27DER1.SGM
27DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 27, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61170-61171]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-27856]
[[Page 61170]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 892
[Docket No. FDA-2017-N-6855]
Medical Devices; Radiology Devices; Classification of the Rectal
Balloon for Prostate Immobilization
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is classifying
the rectal balloon for prostate immobilization into class II (special
controls). The special controls that apply to the device type are
identified in this order and will be part of the codified language for
the rectal balloon for prostate immobilization's classification. We are
taking this action because we have determined that classifying the
device into class II (special controls) will provide a reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness of the device. We believe this
action will also enhance patients' access to beneficial innovative
devices, in part by reducing regulatory burdens.
DATES: This order is effective December 27, 2017. The classification
was applicable on January 28, 2014.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Tjoe, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 4550, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-5866,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Upon request, FDA has classified the rectal balloon for prostate
immobilization as class II (special controls), which we have determined
will provide a reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness. In
addition, we believe this action will enhance patients' access to
beneficial innovation, in part by reducing regulatory burdens by
placing the device into a lower device class than the automatic class
III assignment.
The automatic assignment of class III occurs by operation of law
and without any action by FDA, regardless of the level of risk posed by
the new device. Any device that was not in commercial distribution
before May 28, 1976, is automatically classified as, and remains
within, class III and requires premarket approval unless and until FDA
takes an action to classify or reclassify the device (see 21 U.S.C.
360c(f)(1)). We refer to these devices as ``postamendments devices''
because they were not in commercial distribution prior to the date of
enactment of the Medical Device Amendments of 1976, which amended the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act).
FDA may take a variety of actions in appropriate circumstances to
classify or reclassify a device into class I or II. We may issue an
order finding a new device to be substantially equivalent under section
513(i) of the FD&C Act (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i)) to a predicate device
that does not require premarket approval. We determine whether a new
device is substantially equivalent to a predicate by means of the
procedures for premarket notification under section 510(k) of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 360(k)) and part 807 (21 CFR part 807).
FDA may also classify a device through ``De Novo'' classification,
a common name for the process authorized under section 513(f)(2) of the
FD&C Act. Section 207 of the Food and Drug Administration Modernization
Act of 1997 established the first procedure for De Novo classification
(Pub. L. 105-115). Section 607 of the Food and Drug Administration
Safety and Innovation Act modified the De Novo application process by
adding a second procedure (Pub. L. 112-144). A device sponsor may
utilize either procedure for De Novo classification.
Under the first procedure, the person submits a 510(k) for a device
that has not previously been classified. After receiving an order from
FDA classifying the device into class III under section 513(f)(1) of
the FD&C Act, the person then requests a classification under section
513(f)(2).
Under the second procedure, rather than first submitting a 510(k)
and then a request for classification, if the person determines that
there is no legally marketed device upon which to base a determination
of substantial equivalence, that person requests a classification under
section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act.
Under either procedure for De Novo classification, FDA is required
to classify the device by written order within 120 days. The
classification will be according to the criteria under section
513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act. Although the device was automatically placed
within class III, the De Novo classification is considered to be the
initial classification of the device.
We believe this De Novo classification will enhance patients'
access to beneficial innovation, in part by reducing regulatory
burdens. When FDA classifies a device into class I or II via the De
Novo process, the device can serve as a predicate for future devices of
that type, including for 510(k)s. As a result, other device sponsors do
not have to submit a De Novo request or PMA in order to market a
substantially equivalent device (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(i), defining
``substantial equivalence''). Instead, sponsors can use the less-
burdensome 510(k) process, when necessary, to market their device.
II. De Novo Classification
On July 15, 2013, RadiaDyne, LLC submitted a request for De Novo
classification of the prostate immobilizer rectal balloon. FDA reviewed
the request in order to classify the device under the criteria for
classification set forth in section 513(a)(1) of the FD&C Act.
We classify devices into class II if general controls by themselves
are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and
effectiveness, but there is sufficient information to establish special
controls that, in combination with the general controls, provide
reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device for
its intended use (see 21 U.S.C. 360c(a)(1)(B)). After review of the
information submitted in the request, we determined that the device can
be classified into class II with the establishment of special controls.
FDA has determined that these special controls, in addition to general
controls, will provide reasonable assurance of the safety and
effectiveness of the device.
Therefore, on January 28, 2014, FDA issued an order to the
requestor classifying the device into class II. FDA is codifying the
classification of the device by adding 21 CFR 892.5720. We have named
the generic type of device rectal balloon for prostate immobilization,
and it is identified as a single use, inflatable, non-powered
positioning device placed in the rectum to immobilize the prostate in
patients undergoing radiation therapy. The device is intended to be
used during all the phases of radiation therapy, including treatment
planning, image verification, and radiotherapy delivery.
FDA has identified the following risks to health associated
specifically with this type of device and the measures required to
mitigate these risks in table 1.
[[Page 61171]]
Table 1--Rectal Balloon for Prostate Immobilization Risks and Mitigation
Measures
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mitigation measures/
Identified risks 21 CFR section
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anorectal Toxicity............................... Special controls
(1)(i) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(1)(i)),
(1)(ii) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(1)(ii)),
(1)(iii) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(1)(iii))
, (1)(iv) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(1)(iv)),
(2)(i)(D) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(i)(D)
), (2)(ii) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(ii)),
(2)(iii) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(iii))
, and (2)(iv) (21
CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(iv)).
Tissue Damage.................................... Special controls
(1)(iv) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(1)(iv)),
(1)(v) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(1)(v)),
(2)(i)(A) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(i)(A)
), (2)(i)(D) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(i)(D)
), (2)(ii) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(ii)),
(2)(iii) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(iii))
, and (2)(iv) (21
CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(iv)).
Perforation of the Rectum........................ Special controls
(1)(v)(A) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(1)(v)(A)
), (1)(v)(B) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(1)(v)(B)
), (2)(i)(A) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(i)(A)
), (2)(i)(D) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(i)(D)
), (2)(ii) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(ii)),
(2)(iii) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(iii))
, and (2)(iv) (21
CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(iv)).
Irradiation of Healthy Tissue.................... Special controls
(1)(v)(A) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(1)(v)(A)
), (1)(v)(B) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(1)(v)(B)
), (2)(i)(B) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(i)(B)
), (2)(ii) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(ii)),
(2)(iii) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(iii))
, and (2)(iv) (21
CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(iv)).
Patient Intolerance.............................. Special controls
(1)(v)(A) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(1)(v)(A)
), (2)(i)(A) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(i)(A)
), (2)(i)(C) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(i)(C)
), (2)(ii) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(ii)),
(2)(iii) (21 CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(iii))
, and (2)(iv) (21
CFR
892.5720(b)(2)(iv)).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA has determined that special controls, in combination with the
general controls, address these risks to health and provide reasonable
assurance of safety and effectiveness. For a device to fall within this
classification, and thus avoid automatic classification in class III,
it would have to comply with the special controls named in this final
order. The necessary special controls appear in the regulation codified
by this order. This device is subject to premarket notification
requirements under section 510(k).
III. Analysis of Environmental Impact
The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.34(b) that this action is
of a type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final order establishes special controls that refer to
previously approved collections of information found in other FDA
regulations. These collections of information are subject to review by
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The collections of information in
the guidance document ``De Novo Classification Process (Evaluation of
Automatic Class III Designation)'' have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0844; the collections of information in 21 CFR part 814,
subparts A through E, regarding premarket approval, have been approved
under OMB control number 0910-0231; the collections of information in
part 807, subpart E, regarding premarket notification submissions, have
been approved under OMB control number 0910-0120; and the collections
of information in 21 CFR part 801, regarding labeling, have been
approved under OMB control number 0910-0485.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 892
Medical devices, Radiation protection, X-rays.
Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, 21 CFR part
892 is amended as follows:
PART 892--RADIOLOGY DEVICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 892 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 351, 360, 360c, 360e, 360j, 360l, 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 892.5720 to subpart F to read as follows:
Sec. 892.5720 Rectal balloon for prostate immobilization.
(a) Identification. A rectal balloon for prostate immobilization is
a single use, inflatable, non-powered positioning device placed in the
rectum to immobilize the prostate in patients undergoing radiation
therapy. The device is intended to be used during all the phases of
radiation therapy, including treatment planning, image verification,
and radiotherapy delivery.
(b) Classification. Class II (special controls). The special
controls for this device are:
(1) The premarket notification submission must include methodology
and results of the following non-clinical and clinical performance
testing:
(i) Biocompatibility testing of the final finished device;
(ii) If provided sterile, sterilization validation;
(iii) If not provided sterile, bioburden testing of the final
finished device;
(iv) Shelf life and expiration date validation; and
(v) Performance testing including but not limited to:
(A) Venting mechanism (if device has a vent mechanism);
(B) Safety mechanism(s) to prevent advancement beyond its intended
safe placement; and
(C) Structural integrity testing (e.g., tensile strength, balloon
leakage and burst strength).
(2) Labeling that includes:
(i) Appropriate warnings and contraindications, including, but not
limited to the following statements:
(A) ``Do not transport the patient with the rectal balloon
inserted. The balloon should be removed prior to transport.'';
(B) ``Failure to perform the standard imaging position verification
protocol may cause the device to not perform as intended.'';
(C) ``Reduce the rectal balloon fill volume if the patient
experiences discomfort due to the rectal balloon inflation.''; and
(D) ``Do not apply excessive pressure/force on the shaft or tubing
of the rectal balloon.''
(ii) Adequate instructions for use on the proper insertion
procedure, positioning, and inflation of the rectal balloon;
(iii) Whether the device is sterile or non-sterile; and
(iv) An expiration date.
Dated: December 20, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-27856 Filed 12-26-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P