Fiscal Year 2018 Report on the Selection of Eligible Countries for Fiscal Year 2018, 61036-61038 [2017-27876]
Download as PDF
61036
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2017 / Notices
III. Proposed Actions
OSHA is requesting that OMB extend
its approval of the information
collection requirements contained in the
Standard on Servicing Multi-Piece and
Single Piece Rim Wheels (29 CFR
1910.177). OSHA is proposing to retain
its current burden hour estimate of one
(1) hour. The Agency will summarize
the comments submitted in response to
this notice and will include this
summary in the request to OMB.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Title: Servicing Multi-Piece and
Single Piece Rim Wheels (29 CFR
1910.177).
OMB Control Number: 1218–0219.
Affected Public: Business or other forprofits.
Number of Respondents: 85.
Frequency of Responses: On occasion.
Average Time per Response: Various.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1.
Estimated Cost (Operation and
Maintenance): $0.
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
IV. Public Participation—Submission of
Comments on This Notice and Internet
Access to Comments and Submissions
You may submit comments in
response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at https://
regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal; (2) by facsimile
(fax); or (3) by hard copy. All comments,
attachments, and other materials must
identify the Agency name and the
OSHA docket number for the ICR
(Docket No. OSHA–2011–0189). You
may supplement electronic submissions
by uploading document files
electronically. If you wish to mail
additional materials in reference to an
electronic or facsimile submission, you
must submit them to the OSHA Docket
Office (see the section of this notice
titled ADDRESSES). The additional
materials must clearly identify your
electronic comments by your name,
date, and the docket number so the
Agency can attach them to your
comments.
Because of security procedures, the
use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of
comments. For information about
security procedures concerning the
delivery of materials by hand, express
delivery, messenger, or courier service,
please contact the OSHA Docket Office
at (202) 693–2350, (TTY (877) 889–
5627).
Comments and submissions are
posted without change at https://
www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA
cautions comments about submitting
personal information such as social
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:21 Dec 22, 2017
Jkt 244001
security numbers and dates of birth.
Although all submissions are listed in
the https://www.regulations.gov index,
some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publically available to
read or download through this website.
All submissions, including copyrighted
material, are available for inspection
and copying at the OSHA Docket Office.
Information on using the https://
www.regulations.gov website to submit
comments and access the docket is
available at the website’s ‘‘User Tips’’
link. Contact the OSHA Docket Office
for information about materials not
available through the website, and for
assistance in using the internet to locate
docket submissions.
V. Authority and Signature
Loren Sweatt, Deputy Assistant
Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, directed the
preparation of this notice. The authority
for this notice is the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3506
et seq.) and Secretary of Labor’s Order
No. 1–2012 (77 FR 3912).
Signed at Washington, DC, on December
12, 2017.
Loren Sweatt,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2017–27665 Filed 12–22–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–26–P
MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE
CORPORATION
[MCC FR 18–04]
Fiscal Year 2018 Report on the
Selection of Eligible Countries for
Fiscal Year 2018
Millennium Challenge
Corporation.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This report is provided in
accordance with section 608(d)(1) of the
Millennium Challenge Act of 2003,
Public Law 108–199, Division D, (the
‘‘Act’’), 22 U.S.C. 7708(d)(1).
SUMMARY:
Dated: December 20, 2017.
Jeanne M. Hauch,
VP/General Counsel and Corporate Secretary,
Millennium Challenge Corporation.
Report on the Selection of Eligible
Countries for Fiscal Year 2018
Summary
This report is provided in accordance
with section 608(d)(1) of the
Millennium Challenge Act of 2003, as
amended, Public Law 108–199, Division
D, (the ‘‘Act’’) (22 U.S.C. 7707(d)(1)).
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Act authorizes the provision of
assistance under section 605 of the Act
(22 U.S.C. 7704) to countries that enter
into compacts with the United States to
support policies and programs that
advance the progress of such countries
in achieving lasting economic growth
and poverty reduction, and are in
furtherance of the Act. The Act requires
the Millennium Challenge Corporation
(‘‘MCC’’) to determine the countries that
will be eligible to receive assistance for
the fiscal year, based on their
demonstrated commitment to just and
democratic governance, economic
freedom, and investing in their people,
as well as on the opportunity to reduce
poverty and generate economic growth
in the country. The Act also requires the
submission of reports to appropriate
congressional committees and the
publication of notices in the Federal
Register that identify, among other
things:
1. The countries that are ‘‘candidate
countries’’ for assistance for fiscal year
(‘‘FY’’) 2018 based on their per-capita
income levels and their eligibility to
receive assistance under U.S. law, and
countries that would be candidate
countries but for specified legal
prohibitions on assistance (section
608(a) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7707(a)));
2. The criteria and methodology that
the Board of Directors of MCC (the
‘‘Board’’) will use to measure and
evaluate the policy performance of the
‘‘candidate countries’’ consistent with
the requirements of section 607 of the
Act in order to select ‘‘eligible
countries’’ from among the ‘‘candidate
countries’’ (section 608(b) of the Act (22
U.S.C. 7707(b))); and
3. The list of countries determined by
the Board to be ‘‘eligible countries’’ for
FY 2018, with justification for eligibility
determination and selection for compact
negotiation, including with which of the
eligible countries the Board will seek to
enter into compacts (section 608(d) of
the Act (22 U.S.C. 7707(d))).
This is the third of the abovedescribed reports by MCC for FY 2018.
It identifies countries determined by the
Board to be eligible under section 607
of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7706) for FY 2018
with which the MCC will seek to enter
into compacts under section 609 of the
Act (22 U.S.C. 7708), as well as the
justification for such decisions. The
report also identifies countries selected
by the Board to receive assistance under
MCC’s threshold program pursuant to
section 616 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7715).
Eligible Countries
The Board met on December 19, 2017
to select those eligible countries with
which the United States, through MCC,
E:\FR\FM\26DEN1.SGM
26DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2017 / Notices
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
will seek to enter into a Millennium
Challenge Compact pursuant to section
607 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7706) for FY
2018. The Board selected the following
eligible country for such assistance for
FY 2018: Timor-Leste. The Board also
reselected the following countries for
compact assistance for FY 2018: Burkina
Faso, Lesotho, Mongolia, Senegal, Sri
Lanka, and Tunisia.
Criteria
In accordance with the Act and with
the ‘‘Report on the Criteria and
Methodology for Determining the
Eligibility of Candidate Countries for
Millennium Challenge Account
Assistance in Fiscal Year 2018’’
formally submitted to Congress on
September 27, 2017, selection was based
primarily on a country’s overall
performance in three broad policy
categories: Ruling Justly, Encouraging
Economic Freedom, and Investing in
People. The Board relied, to the
maximum extent possible, upon
transparent and independent indicators
to assess countries’ policy performance
and demonstrated commitment in these
three broad policy areas. The Board
compared countries’ performance on the
indicators relative to their income-level
peers, evaluating them in comparison to
either the group of low income
countries (‘‘LIC’’) or the group of lower
middle income countries (‘‘LMIC’’).
The criteria and methodology used to
assess countries on the annual
scorecards are outlined in the ‘‘Report
on the Criteria and Methodology for
Determining the Eligibility of Candidate
Countries for Millennium Challenge
Account Assistance in Fiscal Year
2018.’’ 1 Scorecards reflecting each
country’s performance on the indicators
are available on MCC’s website at
www.mcc.gov/scorecards.
The Board also considered whether
any adjustments should be made for
data gaps, data lags, or recent events
since the indicators were published, as
well as strengths or weaknesses in
particular indicators. Where
appropriate, the Board took into account
additional quantitative and qualitative
information, such as evidence of a
country’s commitment to fighting
corruption, investments in human
development outcomes, or poverty rates.
For example, for additional information
in the area of corruption, the Board
considered how a country is evaluated
by supplemental sources like
Transparency International’s Corruption
Perceptions Index, the Global Integrity
Report, Open Government Partnership
1 Available at https://www.mcc.gov/resources/
doc/report-selection-criteria-and-methodology-fy18.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:21 Dec 22, 2017
Jkt 244001
status, and the Extractive Industry
Transparency Initiative, among others,
as well as on the defined indicator. The
Board also took into account the margin
of error around an indicator, when
applicable. In keeping with legislative
directives, the Board also considered the
opportunity to reduce poverty and
promote economic growth in a country,
in light of the overall information
available, as well as the availability of
appropriated funds.
This was the ninth year the Board
considered the eligibility of countries
for subsequent compacts, as permitted
under section 609(k) of the Act (22
U.S.C. 7708(k)). As in previous years,
they considered the higher bar expected
of subsequent compact countries,
including examining the
implementation of the first compact,
and evidence of both improved
scorecard policy performance and a
commitment to reform. The Board also
considered the eligibility of countries
for initial compacts. The Board sees the
selection decision as an annual
opportunity to determine where MCC
funds can be most effectively invested
to support poverty reduction through
economic growth in relatively wellgoverned, poor countries. The Board
carefully considers the appropriate
nature of each country partnership—on
a case-by-case basis—based on factors
related to economic growth and poverty
reduction, the sustainability of MCC’s
investments, and the country’s ability to
attract and leverage public and private
resources in support of development. In
addition, this is the second year where
the Board considered an explicit higher
bar for those countries close to the
upper end of the candidate pool,
looking closely in such cases at a
country’s access to development
financing, the nature of poverty in the
country, and its policy performance.
As with previous years, a number of
countries that performed well on the
quantitative elements of the eligibility
criteria (i.e., on the policy indicators)
were not chosen to develop a compact
for FY 2018. FY 2018 was a particularly
competitive year: Several countries were
already working to develop compacts,
multiple countries passed the scorecard
(some for the first time), and funding
was limited due to budget constraints.
As a result, only one country that
passed the scorecard and related
stringent eligibility criteria was newly
selected to develop an MCC compact,
and only one country for the threshold
program.
MCC’s engagement with partner
countries is not open-ended, and the
Board is very deliberate when selecting
for follow-on partnerships. In making
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
61037
subsequent compact selection decisions,
the Board considered—in addition to
the criteria outlined above—the
country’s performance implementing its
first compact, including the nature of
the country’s partnership with MCC, the
degree to which the country has
demonstrated a commitment and
capacity to achieve program results, and
the degree to which the country has
implemented the compact in accordance
with MCC’s core policies and standards.
To the greatest extent possible, this was
assessed using pre-existing monitoring
and evaluation targets and regular
quarterly reporting. This information
was supplemented with direct surveys
and consultation with MCC staff
responsible for compact
implementation, monitoring, and
evaluation. MCC published a Guide to
Supplemental Information 2 and a Guide
to the Compact Survey Summary 3 in
order to increase transparency about the
type of supplemental information the
Board uses to assess a country’s policy
performance and compact
implementation performance. The
Board also considered a country’s
commitment to further sector reform, as
well as evidence of improved scorecard
policy performance.
Countries Newly Selected for Compact
Assistance
Using the criteria described above,
Timor-Leste was the only candidate
country under section 606(a) of the Act
(22 U.S.C. 7705(a)) that was newly
selected for assistance under section 607
of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7706).
Timor-Leste: Timor-Leste passes the
MCC scorecard with 13 of 20 indicators
met, including the hard hurdles on both
control of corruption and democratic
rights (including both Political Rights
and Civil Liberties). MCC has found
Timor-Leste to be a willing and
committed partner during development
of the threshold program over the past
year. As a result, MCC feels Timor-Leste
is now solidly exemplifying the profile
of a compact partner, and has decided
to move Timor-Leste from the threshold
program to the compact program. Work
done to date in developing the threshold
program will contribute to the compact
development process.
Countries Reselected To Continue
Compact Development
Five of the countries selected for
compact assistance for FY 2018 were
previously selected for FY 2017. These
2 Available at https://www.mcc.gov/resources/
doc/guide-to-supplemental-information-fy18.
3 Available at https://www.mcc.gov/resources/
doc/guide-to-the-compact-survey-summary-fy18.
E:\FR\FM\26DEN1.SGM
26DEN1
61038
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2017 / Notices
countries are Burkina Faso, Mongolia,
Senegal, Sri Lanka, and Tunisia. The
Board reselected these countries based
on their continued or improved policy
performance since their prior selection.
Lesotho, which had originally been
selected for compact assistance for FY
2014, received vote deferrals for
reselection in FY 2016 and FY 2017.
Due to positive actions taken by the
Government of Lesotho this year, the
Board has once again selected the
country for compact assistance for FY
2018.
Countries Selected To Receive
Threshold Program Assistance
The Board selected The Gambia to
receive threshold program assistance.
The Gambia: The Gambia offers MCC
the opportunity to support the
government as it continues its
democratic transition following the
inauguration of its new president in
early 2017 and successful legislative
elections in April 2017. While it has
historically struggled to pass the MCC
scorecard due to its performance on the
democratic rights hard hurdle, the
recent transition and reforms being
pursued suggest the country will see
strong improvements on these
indicators in the coming years. The
Gambia meets 12 of 20 indicators
overall on the scorecard and
demonstrates good performance on the
control of corruption indicator.
Ongoing Review of Partner Countries’
Policy Performance
The Board emphasized the need for
all partner countries to maintain or
improve their policy performance. If it
is determined during compact
implementation that a country has
demonstrated a significant policy
reversal, MCC can hold it accountable
by applying MCC’s Suspension and
Termination Policy.4
[FR Doc. 2017–27876 Filed 12–21–17; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 9211–03–P
NATIONAL ARCHIVES AND RECORDS
ADMINISTRATION
Office of Government Information
Services
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
[NARA–2018–011]
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
Advisory Committee
Office of Government
Information Services (OGIS), National
AGENCY:
4 Available at https://www.mcc.gov/resources/
doc/policy-on-suspension-and-termination.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:21 Dec 22, 2017
Jkt 244001
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA).
ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory
Committee Meeting.
We are announcing the
following committee meeting of the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)
Advisory Committee.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
January 16, 2018, from 10:00 a.m. to
1:00 p.m. EDT. You must register for the
meeting by 5:00 p.m. EDT on January
15, 2018.
ADDRESSES: National Archives and
Records Administration, 700
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, William G.
McGowan Theater, Washington, DC
20408.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Bennett, Designated Federal
Officer for this committee, by mail at
National Archives and Records
Administration, Office of Government
Information Services, 8601 Adelphi
Road—OGIS, College Park, MD 20740–
6001, by telephone at 202–741–5770, or
by email at foia-advisory-committee@
nara.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We
announce this advisory committee
meeting in accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App)
and the second United States Open
Government National Action Plan
(NAP) released on December 5, 2013.
Agenda and meeting materials: You
may find all meeting materials at
https://ogis.archives.gov/foia-advisorycommittee/2016-2018-term/
Meetings.htm. This will be the seventh
meeting of the second committee term.
The purpose of this meeting will be to
review the work of the committee’s
three subcommittees. Information on
them is at https://ogis.archives.gov/foiaadvisory-committee/2016-2018-term/
Subcommittees.htm.
Procedures: The meeting is open to
the public. Due to security
requirements, you must register in
advance if you wish to attend the
meeting. You will also go through
security screening when you enter the
building. Registration for the meeting
will go live via Eventbrite on December
19, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. EDT. To register
for the meeting, please do so at this
Eventbrite link: https://
www.eventbrite.com/e/freedom-ofinformation-act-foia-advisorycommittee-meeting-january-16-2018registration-37728051618.
SUMMARY:
This program will be live-streamed on the
U.S. National Archives’ YouTube channel at
https://www.youtube.com/user/
usnationalarchives/playlists. The webcast
will include a captioning option. To request
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
additional accommodations (e.g., a
transcript), email foia-advisory-committee@
nara.gov or call 202–741–5770. Members of
the media who wish to register, those who
are unable to register online, and those who
require special accommodations, should
contact Amy Bennett at the phone number,
mailing address, or email address listed
above.
Patrice Little Murray,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017–27681 Filed 12–22–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7515–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Agency Notice of Record of Decision
for the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto
Rico
National Science Foundation.
Notice of Record of Decision.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
On November 15, 2017, the
National Science Foundation (NSF)
signed a Record of Decision (ROD) for
the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico.
This important step concludes the
agency’s decision-making process with
respect to the general path forward for
facility operations in a budgetconstrained environment, and provides
the basis for a future decision regarding
a new collaborator.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth A. Pentecost, Project
Administrator, National Science
Foundation, Division of Astronomical
Sciences, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue,
Room W 9152, Alexandria, VA 22314.
Telephone: 703–292–4907, Email:
epenteco@nsf.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NSF
issued its ROD following authorization
from the National Science Board on
November 9, 2017. The ROD was
preceded by an extensive environmental
impact analysis and broad input from
the public and the scientific
community, including the National
Academies 6th Decadal Survey released
in 2010, the NSF Division of
Astronomical Sciences Portfolio Review
Committee Reportreleased in 2012, and
the NSF Geospace Sciences Portfolio
Review Committee Report released in
2016.
The ROD formalizes the selection of
NSF’s Preferred Alternative:
collaboration with interested parties to
maintain science-focused operations at
the Observatory with reduced agency
funding. The selection of this
Alternative will allow important
research to continue while
accommodating the agency’s budgetary
constraints and its core mission to
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\26DEN1.SGM
26DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61036-61038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-27876]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
MILLENNIUM CHALLENGE CORPORATION
[MCC FR 18-04]
Fiscal Year 2018 Report on the Selection of Eligible Countries
for Fiscal Year 2018
AGENCY: Millennium Challenge Corporation.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This report is provided in accordance with section 608(d)(1)
of the Millennium Challenge Act of 2003, Public Law 108-199, Division
D, (the ``Act''), 22 U.S.C. 7708(d)(1).
Dated: December 20, 2017.
Jeanne M. Hauch,
VP/General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, Millennium Challenge
Corporation.
Report on the Selection of Eligible Countries for Fiscal Year 2018
Summary
This report is provided in accordance with section 608(d)(1) of the
Millennium Challenge Act of 2003, as amended, Public Law 108-199,
Division D, (the ``Act'') (22 U.S.C. 7707(d)(1)).
The Act authorizes the provision of assistance under section 605 of
the Act (22 U.S.C. 7704) to countries that enter into compacts with the
United States to support policies and programs that advance the
progress of such countries in achieving lasting economic growth and
poverty reduction, and are in furtherance of the Act. The Act requires
the Millennium Challenge Corporation (``MCC'') to determine the
countries that will be eligible to receive assistance for the fiscal
year, based on their demonstrated commitment to just and democratic
governance, economic freedom, and investing in their people, as well as
on the opportunity to reduce poverty and generate economic growth in
the country. The Act also requires the submission of reports to
appropriate congressional committees and the publication of notices in
the Federal Register that identify, among other things:
1. The countries that are ``candidate countries'' for assistance
for fiscal year (``FY'') 2018 based on their per-capita income levels
and their eligibility to receive assistance under U.S. law, and
countries that would be candidate countries but for specified legal
prohibitions on assistance (section 608(a) of the Act (22 U.S.C.
7707(a)));
2. The criteria and methodology that the Board of Directors of MCC
(the ``Board'') will use to measure and evaluate the policy performance
of the ``candidate countries'' consistent with the requirements of
section 607 of the Act in order to select ``eligible countries'' from
among the ``candidate countries'' (section 608(b) of the Act (22 U.S.C.
7707(b))); and
3. The list of countries determined by the Board to be ``eligible
countries'' for FY 2018, with justification for eligibility
determination and selection for compact negotiation, including with
which of the eligible countries the Board will seek to enter into
compacts (section 608(d) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7707(d))).
This is the third of the above-described reports by MCC for FY
2018. It identifies countries determined by the Board to be eligible
under section 607 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7706) for FY 2018 with which
the MCC will seek to enter into compacts under section 609 of the Act
(22 U.S.C. 7708), as well as the justification for such decisions. The
report also identifies countries selected by the Board to receive
assistance under MCC's threshold program pursuant to section 616 of the
Act (22 U.S.C. 7715).
Eligible Countries
The Board met on December 19, 2017 to select those eligible
countries with which the United States, through MCC,
[[Page 61037]]
will seek to enter into a Millennium Challenge Compact pursuant to
section 607 of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7706) for FY 2018. The Board selected
the following eligible country for such assistance for FY 2018: Timor-
Leste. The Board also reselected the following countries for compact
assistance for FY 2018: Burkina Faso, Lesotho, Mongolia, Senegal, Sri
Lanka, and Tunisia.
Criteria
In accordance with the Act and with the ``Report on the Criteria
and Methodology for Determining the Eligibility of Candidate Countries
for Millennium Challenge Account Assistance in Fiscal Year 2018''
formally submitted to Congress on September 27, 2017, selection was
based primarily on a country's overall performance in three broad
policy categories: Ruling Justly, Encouraging Economic Freedom, and
Investing in People. The Board relied, to the maximum extent possible,
upon transparent and independent indicators to assess countries' policy
performance and demonstrated commitment in these three broad policy
areas. The Board compared countries' performance on the indicators
relative to their income-level peers, evaluating them in comparison to
either the group of low income countries (``LIC'') or the group of
lower middle income countries (``LMIC'').
The criteria and methodology used to assess countries on the annual
scorecards are outlined in the ``Report on the Criteria and Methodology
for Determining the Eligibility of Candidate Countries for Millennium
Challenge Account Assistance in Fiscal Year 2018.'' \1\ Scorecards
reflecting each country's performance on the indicators are available
on MCC's website at www.mcc.gov/scorecards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Available at https://www.mcc.gov/resources/doc/report-selection-criteria-and-methodology-fy18.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Board also considered whether any adjustments should be made
for data gaps, data lags, or recent events since the indicators were
published, as well as strengths or weaknesses in particular indicators.
Where appropriate, the Board took into account additional quantitative
and qualitative information, such as evidence of a country's commitment
to fighting corruption, investments in human development outcomes, or
poverty rates. For example, for additional information in the area of
corruption, the Board considered how a country is evaluated by
supplemental sources like Transparency International's Corruption
Perceptions Index, the Global Integrity Report, Open Government
Partnership status, and the Extractive Industry Transparency
Initiative, among others, as well as on the defined indicator. The
Board also took into account the margin of error around an indicator,
when applicable. In keeping with legislative directives, the Board also
considered the opportunity to reduce poverty and promote economic
growth in a country, in light of the overall information available, as
well as the availability of appropriated funds.
This was the ninth year the Board considered the eligibility of
countries for subsequent compacts, as permitted under section 609(k) of
the Act (22 U.S.C. 7708(k)). As in previous years, they considered the
higher bar expected of subsequent compact countries, including
examining the implementation of the first compact, and evidence of both
improved scorecard policy performance and a commitment to reform. The
Board also considered the eligibility of countries for initial
compacts. The Board sees the selection decision as an annual
opportunity to determine where MCC funds can be most effectively
invested to support poverty reduction through economic growth in
relatively well-governed, poor countries. The Board carefully considers
the appropriate nature of each country partnership--on a case-by-case
basis--based on factors related to economic growth and poverty
reduction, the sustainability of MCC's investments, and the country's
ability to attract and leverage public and private resources in support
of development. In addition, this is the second year where the Board
considered an explicit higher bar for those countries close to the
upper end of the candidate pool, looking closely in such cases at a
country's access to development financing, the nature of poverty in the
country, and its policy performance.
As with previous years, a number of countries that performed well
on the quantitative elements of the eligibility criteria (i.e., on the
policy indicators) were not chosen to develop a compact for FY 2018. FY
2018 was a particularly competitive year: Several countries were
already working to develop compacts, multiple countries passed the
scorecard (some for the first time), and funding was limited due to
budget constraints. As a result, only one country that passed the
scorecard and related stringent eligibility criteria was newly selected
to develop an MCC compact, and only one country for the threshold
program.
MCC's engagement with partner countries is not open-ended, and the
Board is very deliberate when selecting for follow-on partnerships. In
making subsequent compact selection decisions, the Board considered--in
addition to the criteria outlined above--the country's performance
implementing its first compact, including the nature of the country's
partnership with MCC, the degree to which the country has demonstrated
a commitment and capacity to achieve program results, and the degree to
which the country has implemented the compact in accordance with MCC's
core policies and standards. To the greatest extent possible, this was
assessed using pre-existing monitoring and evaluation targets and
regular quarterly reporting. This information was supplemented with
direct surveys and consultation with MCC staff responsible for compact
implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. MCC published a Guide to
Supplemental Information \2\ and a Guide to the Compact Survey Summary
\3\ in order to increase transparency about the type of supplemental
information the Board uses to assess a country's policy performance and
compact implementation performance. The Board also considered a
country's commitment to further sector reform, as well as evidence of
improved scorecard policy performance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Available at https://www.mcc.gov/resources/doc/guide-to-supplemental-information-fy18.
\3\ Available at https://www.mcc.gov/resources/doc/guide-to-the-compact-survey-summary-fy18.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Countries Newly Selected for Compact Assistance
Using the criteria described above, Timor-Leste was the only
candidate country under section 606(a) of the Act (22 U.S.C. 7705(a))
that was newly selected for assistance under section 607 of the Act (22
U.S.C. 7706).
Timor-Leste: Timor-Leste passes the MCC scorecard with 13 of 20
indicators met, including the hard hurdles on both control of
corruption and democratic rights (including both Political Rights and
Civil Liberties). MCC has found Timor-Leste to be a willing and
committed partner during development of the threshold program over the
past year. As a result, MCC feels Timor-Leste is now solidly
exemplifying the profile of a compact partner, and has decided to move
Timor-Leste from the threshold program to the compact program. Work
done to date in developing the threshold program will contribute to the
compact development process.
Countries Reselected To Continue Compact Development
Five of the countries selected for compact assistance for FY 2018
were previously selected for FY 2017. These
[[Page 61038]]
countries are Burkina Faso, Mongolia, Senegal, Sri Lanka, and Tunisia.
The Board reselected these countries based on their continued or
improved policy performance since their prior selection. Lesotho, which
had originally been selected for compact assistance for FY 2014,
received vote deferrals for reselection in FY 2016 and FY 2017. Due to
positive actions taken by the Government of Lesotho this year, the
Board has once again selected the country for compact assistance for FY
2018.
Countries Selected To Receive Threshold Program Assistance
The Board selected The Gambia to receive threshold program
assistance.
The Gambia: The Gambia offers MCC the opportunity to support the
government as it continues its democratic transition following the
inauguration of its new president in early 2017 and successful
legislative elections in April 2017. While it has historically
struggled to pass the MCC scorecard due to its performance on the
democratic rights hard hurdle, the recent transition and reforms being
pursued suggest the country will see strong improvements on these
indicators in the coming years. The Gambia meets 12 of 20 indicators
overall on the scorecard and demonstrates good performance on the
control of corruption indicator.
Ongoing Review of Partner Countries' Policy Performance
The Board emphasized the need for all partner countries to maintain
or improve their policy performance. If it is determined during compact
implementation that a country has demonstrated a significant policy
reversal, MCC can hold it accountable by applying MCC's Suspension and
Termination Policy.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Available at https://www.mcc.gov/resources/doc/policy-on-suspension-and-termination.
[FR Doc. 2017-27876 Filed 12-21-17; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 9211-03-P