Confidentiality Determinations for Hazardous Waste Export and Import Documents, 60894-60901 [2017-27525]
Download as PDF
60894
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Polymer
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
A. What is the Agency’s authority for
taking this action?
40 CFR Parts 260, 261, and 262
EPA’s authority to promulgate this
rule is found in sections 1002, 2002(a),
3001–3004, and 3017 of the Solid Waste
Disposal Act, as amended by the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA), and as amended by the
Hazardous and Solid Waste
Amendments, 42 U.S.C. 6901 et seq.,
6912, 6921–6924, and 6938.
[EPA–HQ–OLEM–2016–0492; FRL–9971–
49–OLEM]
RIN 2050–AG90
Confidentiality Determinations for
Hazardous Waste Export and Import
Documents
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
B. Does this action apply to me?
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA or the Agency) is
amending existing regulations regarding
the export and import of hazardous
wastes from and into the United States.
Specifically, this rule applies a
confidentiality determination such that
no person can assert confidential
business information (CBI) claims for
documents related to the export, import,
and transit of hazardous waste and
export of excluded cathode ray tubes
(CRTs). EPA is making these changes to
apply a consistent approach in
addressing confidentiality claims for
export and import documentation. The
rule will result in cost-savings and
greater efficiency for EPA and the
regulated community as well as
facilitate transparency with respect to
the documents that are within the scope
of this rulemaking. However, EPA is not
finalizing the proposed internet posting
requirement in the proposed rule.
DATES: The final rule is effective on June
26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OLEM–2016–0492. All
documents in the docket are listed at
https://www.regulations.gov. Docket
materials are also available in hard copy
at the EPA Docket Center Reading
Room. Please see https://www.epa.gov/
dockets/epa-docket-center-reading-room
or call (202) 566–1744 for more
information on the Docket Center
Reading Room.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lia
Yohannes, Office of Resource
Conservation and Recovery; telephone
16:22 Dec 22, 2017
Jkt 244001
*
I. General Information
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
number: (703) 308–8413; email:
yohannes.lia@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[FR Doc. 2017–27805 Filed 12–22–17; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
CAS No.
The application of confidentiality
determinations to RCRA export, import,
and transit documents in this action
generally affects three (3) groups: (1) All
persons who export or import (or
arrange for the export or import of) of
hazardous waste for recycling or
disposal, including those hazardous
wastes subject to the alternate
management standards for (a) universal
waste for recycling or disposal, (b) spent
lead-acid batteries (SLABs) being
shipped for reclamation, (c) industrial
ethyl alcohol being shipped for
reclamation, (d) hazardous waste
samples of more than 25 kilograms
being shipped for waste characterization
or treatability studies, and (e) hazardous
recyclable materials being shipped for
precious metal recovery; (2) all
recycling and disposal facilities who
receive imports of such hazardous
wastes for recycling or disposal; and (3)
all persons who export (or arrange for
the export of) conditionally excluded
cathode ray tubes (CRTs) being shipped
for recycling.
Potentially affected entities may
include, but are not limited to:
NAICS
code
NAICS description
211 ......
324 ......
Oil and Gas Extraction.
Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing.
Chemical Manufacturing.
Plastics and Rubber Products Manufacturing.
Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing.
Primary Metal Manufacturing.
Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing.
Machinery Manufacturing.
325 ......
326 ......
327 ......
331 ......
332 ......
333 ......
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
NAICS
code
NAICS description
334 ......
Computer and Electronic Product
Manufacturing.
Electrical Equipment, Appliance,
and Component Manufacturing.
Transportation Equipment Manufacturing.
Miscellaneous Manufacturing.
Merchant Wholesalers, Durable
Goods.
Merchant Wholesalers, Nondurable
Goods.
Credit Intermediation and Related
Activities.
Funds, Trusts, and Other Financial
Vehicles.
Real Estate.
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services.
Administrative and Support Services.
Waste Management and Remediation Services.
Accommodation.
Religious, Grantmaking, Civic, Professional, and Similar Organizations.
Oil and Gas Extraction.
Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing.
335 ......
336 ......
339 ......
423 ......
424 ......
522 ......
525 ......
531 ......
541 ......
561 ......
562 ......
721 ......
813 ......
211 ......
324 ......
This table is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
regulated by this action. This table lists
the types of entities that EPA is now
aware could potentially be regulated by
this action. Other types of entities not
listed in the table could also be
regulated. If you have questions
regarding the applicability of this rule to
a particular entity, consult the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
II. Background
On November 28, 2016, EPA proposed
revisions to the current RCRA
regulations governing imports and
exports of hazardous waste and certain
other materials in parts 260, 262, 264,
265, and 267 in order to strengthen
public accessibility and transparency of
import and export-related
documentation to better monitor proper
compliance with EPA’s hazardous waste
regulations and help ensure that
hazardous waste shipments are properly
received and disposed (81 FR 85459).
The internet Posting of and
Confidentiality Determinations for
Hazardous Waste Export and Import
Documents Proposed Rule was a
companion action to EPA’s Hazardous
E:\FR\FM\26DER1.SGM
26DER1
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Waste Export-Import Revisions Final
Rule (‘‘Revisions Final Rule’’) published
on November 28, 2016 (81 FR 85696),
which was one of the Agency’s priority
actions under its plan for periodic
retrospective reviews of existing
regulations, as required by Executive
Order 13563. Under the Revisions Final
Rule, export notices for hazardous waste
and excluded CRTs exported for
recycling are currently required to be
submitted electronically to EPA using
EPA’s Waste Import Export Tracking
System (WIETS) as of December 31,
2016. Export annual reports for
hazardous waste and excluded CRTs
exported for recycling will be required
to be submitted electronically to EPA
using WIETS on March 1, 2019. Other
import and export documents for
hazardous waste and excluded CRTs
exported for recycling are transitioning
from paper submittal to electronic
submittal, and will be required to be
submitted electronically to EPA using
WIETS on a future compliance date to
be announced in a future, separate
Federal Register notice.
The proposed rulemaking for this
final action consisted of two parts. First,
EPA proposed requiring exporters and
receiving facilities of hazardous waste
from foreign sources to post
confirmation of receipt and
confirmation of recovery or disposal
documents on publicly accessible
websites when such documents are
required for individual export and
import shipments of hazardous wastes.
EPA proposed that the documents be
publicly accessible on company
websites by the first of March of each
year and that the websites include all of
the confirmations of receipt and
confirmations of recovery or disposal
received by the exporter or sent out by
the receiving facility related to exports
or imports of hazardous waste made
during the previous calendar year. Each
document was to be made available for
a period of at least three years following
the date on which each document was
first posted to the website. The
proposed internet posting requirement
was planned to be effective during the
interim period prior to the electronic
import-export reporting compliance
date when electronic submittal to EPA
of confirmations of receipt and
confirmations of recovery or disposal for
hazardous waste shipments will be
required in EPA’s WIETS system per the
Revisions Final Rule. The second part of
the proposed rule consisted of applying
confidentiality determinations such that
no person could assert CBI claims for
individual documents and compiled
data for required documents related to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 22, 2017
Jkt 244001
the export, import, and transit of
hazardous waste and export of
conditionally excluded cathode ray
tubes (CRTs).
III. Detailed Discussion of the Final
Rule
A. Summary of the Final Rule
This section provides an overview of
this final rule and describes the way in
which it differs from the proposal. With
this action, EPA finalizes the
application of confidentiality
determinations such that no CBI claims
may be asserted by any person with
respect to any of the following
documents related to the export, import,
and transit of hazardous waste and
export of excluded CRTs:
(1) Documents related to the export of
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) hazardous waste under 40
CFR part 262, subpart H, including but
not limited to the notifications of intent
to export, contracts submitted in
response to requests for supplemental
information from countries of import or
transit, RCRA manifests, annual reports,
EPA acknowledgements of consent, any
subsequent communication
withdrawing a prior consent or
objection, responses that neither
consent nor object, exception reports,
transit notifications, and renotifications;
(2) Documents related to the import of
hazardous waste, under 40 CFR part
262, subpart H, including but not
limited to contracts and notifications of
intent to import hazardous waste into
the U.S. from foreign countries or U.S.
importers;
(3) Documents related to the
confirmation of receipt and
confirmation of recovery or disposal of
hazardous waste exports and imports,
under 40 CFR part 262, subpart H;
(4) Documents related to the transit of
hazardous waste, under 40 CFR part
262, subpart H, including notifications
from U.S. exporters of intent to transit
through foreign countries, or
notifications from foreign countries of
intent to transit through the U.S.;
(5) Documents related to the export of
cathode ray tubes (CRTs), under 40 CFR
part 261, subpart E, including but not
limited to notifications of intent to
export CRTs;
(6) Documents related to the export
and import of non-crushed spent lead
acid batteries (SLABs) with intact
casings, under 40 CFR part 266 subpart
G, including but not limited to
notifications of intent to export SLABs;
(7) Submissions from transporters
under 40 CFR part 263, or from
treatment, storage or disposal facilities
under 40 CFR parts 264 and 265, related
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60895
to exports or imports of hazardous
waste, including but not limited to
receiving facility notices of the need to
arrange alternate management or return
of an import shipment under 40 CFR
264.12(a) and 265.12(a); and
(8) Documents related to the export
and import of RCRA universal waste
under 40 CFR part 273, subparts B, C,
D, and F.
(9) Documents required under 40 CFR
262, subparts E, F, and H and submitted
in accordance with consents issued
prior to December 31, 2016.
Unless otherwise required by Federal
law, EPA is not considering the
documents described in items (1)
through (9) in this preamble to be final
until March 1 of the year after which the
shipments occur.
These changes will be reflected in
revisions to 40 CFR part 260, as
proposed, and in conforming revisions
to 40 CFR parts 261 and 262.
EPA is not finalizing the proposed
internet posting requirement of
confirmation of receipt and
confirmation of recovery or disposal
documents where they would have been
required for individual export and
import shipments of hazardous wastes.
As required under the recordkeeping
requirements for exports and imports of
hazardous waste under 40 CFR part 262,
subpart H, exporters and receiving
facilities of hazardous waste from
foreign sources are required to retain
paper copies of such confirmations such
that copies are available for viewing and
production if requested by any EPA or
authorized state inspector. Once
electronic submittals of the
confirmation documents are required
after the electronic import-export
reporting compliance date that EPA will
establish in a separate Federal Register
notice, electronically submitted
confirmations can be retained in EPA’s
Waste Import Export Tracking System
(WIETS), or its successor system, such
that copies are available for viewing and
production if requested by any EPA or
authorized state inspector.
B. Summary of Public Comments
The Agency received seven unique
comments in response to its November
28, 2016 proposed rule. Of the seven
comments, two were submitted
anonymously, two were submitted from
individual companies, one was
submitted by a trade association
representing hazardous waste treatment,
recycling and disposal companies, one
was submitted by a coalition
representing generators of hazardous
waste, and one was submitted by a trade
association representing fuel and
petrochemical manufacturers.
E:\FR\FM\26DER1.SGM
26DER1
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
60896
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
With respect to the proposed internet
posting requirement, two anonymous
commenters expressed their support,
stating that it would improve
transparency and environmental
awareness of the potential
environmental and health risks
associated with exposure to hazardous
waste, and potentially lead to reduced
generation and improved management
of hazardous waste. The remaining five
commenters from industry expressed
concern with the proposed internet
posting requirement. These commenters
stated that EPA underestimated the
costs associated with posting
information on company websites and
were apprehensive about the burden of
complying with a temporary
requirement that would be in place for
an unspecified amount of time. Two
commenters suggested that the lag in
time between when the confirmations of
receipt and confirmations of recovery or
disposal are required to be sent and
when the documents would be posted
on company websites would cause
confusion and an incorrect perception
by the general public of
mismanagement. Two commenters also
suggested that requiring industry to
submit export and import
documentation to EPA, rather than post
on individual company websites, would
provide better consistency to the
regulated community and ensure greater
compliance with export and import
regulations. Finally, one commenter
suggested that EPA develop its own
website to post the documents to
improve public access to the
information. (See Section ‘‘II.C. Changes
to the Proposed Rule’’ of this preamble
for EPA’s rationale for not finalizing the
proposed internet posting requirement.)
EPA received only one comment on
the proposed confidentiality
determination. The commenter
expressed concerns about the
application of a confidentiality
determination to aggregate data related
to exports and imports of hazardous
waste. EPA considers aggregate data to
be a list of consolidated information
about shipments organized by company.
According to the commenter, the
application of a confidentiality
determination to aggregate data poses
different concerns from those raised by
application of confidentiality
determinations to individual
documents. The commenter was
specifically concerned about the
potential for competitive harm from
public release of customer lists and
issues related to national security if
aggregate data about shipments were
available to individuals with the intent
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 22, 2017
Jkt 244001
to do harm. Because of the substantial
effort required to compile a customer
list from individual export and import
documents, the commenter did not have
similar concerns with respect to the
release of individual hazardous waste
export and import documents. (See
response to comments document and
Section ‘‘II.D. Rationale for Final Rule’’
of this preamble for details on EPA’s
response to these comments.)
C. Changes to the Proposed Rule
After considering all the submitted
comments, EPA is finalizing, as
proposed, the application of
confidentiality determinations to
documents related to the export, import
and transit of hazardous waste and
export of excluded CRTs. We provide
our rationale in the following section.
EPA is not finalizing the proposed
internet posting requirement that
exporters and receiving facilities of
hazardous waste from foreign sources
upload confirmations of receipt and
confirmations of recovery or disposal on
their websites. This internet posting
requirement was intended to be in effect
on a temporary basis while EPA
develops its Waste Import Export
Tracking System (WIETS) to be able to
receive electronic submittals of the
documents. Recognizing that the
internet posting requirement would be
superseded when exporters and
receiving facilities are required to
submit confirmations electronically,
EPA has decided to avoid the potential
confusion as described by some
commenters, that may result from
requiring internet posting of documents
on a temporary basis on company
websites and from the time lag between
the receipt and posting of confirmations
of receipt and confirmations of recovery
or disposal.
D. Rationale for the Final Rule
This final rule applies confidentiality
determinations such that EPA will no
longer accept future CBI claims for
individual documents and/or aggregate
data related to the export, import, and
transit of hazardous waste and export of
excluded CRTs. EPA is making these
changes to apply a consistent approach
in addressing confidentiality claims for
export and import documentation
which will result in cost-savings and
greater efficiency for EPA and the
regulated community. Moreover, as
described in the proposed rulemaking,
EPA will no longer publish the annual
Federal Register notice requesting
comment from third party affected
businesses (other than original
submitters), as defined in 40 CFR
2.201(d), on their need to assert
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
confidentiality claims for documents
submitted to EPA related to hazardous
waste exports and imports as well as
data compiled from such documents,
prior to EPA considering such
documents releasable upon public
request. The Federal Register notice
covers documents related to the export,
import and transit of RCRA hazardous
waste, including those hazardous wastes
managed under the special management
standards in 40 CFR part 266 (e.g., spent
lead acid batteries) and 40 CFR part 273
(e.g., universal waste batteries, universal
waste mercury lamps), and related to
the export of CRTs under 40 CFR part
261, made during the previous calendar
year. The annual Federal Register
notices have not addressed CBI claims
likely to be made by the original
submitters, since RCRA regulations at
40 CFR 260.2(b) already address the CBI
requirements for original submitters.
Our rationale for applying
confidentiality determinations to these
documents is summarized in the
following paragraphs.
As discussed in the proposed
rulemaking, application of
confidentiality determinations is
consistent with the non-CBI treatment of
hazardous waste manifests at the
Federal and state level. Manifests
contain similar information as that
required by the documents related to the
export, import and transit of hazardous
waste and export of conditionally
excluded CRTs within the scope of this
action. On February 7, 2014, EPA
published the Hazardous Waste
Management System; Modification of
the Hazardous Waste Manifest System;
Electronic Manifests final rule (79 FR
7518) which made a categorical
determination for individual RCRA
hazardous waste manifest records and
aggregate data. In that action, EPA
concluded that information contained in
individual manifested records and
aggregate data are essentially public
information and therefore is not eligible
under Federal law for treatment as CBI.
The effect of this decision was that EPA
made a categorical determination that it
will not accept any CBI claims that
might be asserted in connection with
processing, using, or retaining
individual paper or electronic manifests
or aggregate data (see 40 CFR
260.2(c)(1)). The decision in that action
is consistent with how manifests are
treated in many states that have policies
that do not recognize CBI claims for
manifests as individual documents or as
aggregate data. Because the information
contained in RCRA hazardous waste
manifests is largely similar to the
information contained in hazardous
waste export and import documents,
E:\FR\FM\26DER1.SGM
26DER1
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
such as information about the waste
being shipped (waste codes, type,
quantity) and contact information for
the generator, transporter, and
destination or receiving facility, EPA
concludes that application of
confidentiality determinations in this
action is consistent with the categorical
determination that electronic manifests
are not CBI.
Furthermore, EPA believes that any
CBI claim that might be asserted with
respect to the hazardous waste
documents within the scope of this
action would be extremely difficult to
sustain under the substantive CBI
criteria set forth in the Agency’s CBI
regulations (40 CFR part 2, subpart B).
For example, to make a CBI claim, a
business must satisfactorily show that it
has taken reasonable measures to
protect the confidentiality of the
information, and that it intends to
continue to take such measures. The
documents related to the export, import,
and transit of hazardous waste and
export of excluded CRTs submitted to
EPA are also shared with several
commercial entities while they are being
processed and used. As a result, a
business concerned with protecting its
commercial information would find it
exceedingly difficult to protect its
records from disclosure by all the other
persons who come into contact with the
documents.
Moreover, to substantiate a CBI claim,
a business must also show that the
information is not, and has not been,
reasonably obtainable without the
business’s consent by other persons
(other than governmental bodies) by use
of legitimate means (other than
discovery based on a showing of special
need in a judicial or quasi-judicial
proceeding). Since the documents are
shared with several commercial entities
throughout the chain of custody of a
hazardous waste shipment, they are
easily accessible to other parties without
the business’s explicit consent.
For these reasons, EPA believes that
any CBI claim that might be asserted
with respect to hazardous waste export
and import documents would be
difficult to sustain under the substantive
CBI criteria (40 CFR part 2, subpart B).
EPA has also established precedent in
determining that the information
contained in certain hazardous waste
export documents is not entitled to
confidential treatment. To date, our
records indicate that EPA has received
four assertions of confidentiality for
documents within the scope of this
action and for which EPA has made a
CBI determination: One from Horizon
Environment, Inc. in 2004, two from
Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc. in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 22, 2017
Jkt 244001
2010 and 2011, and one from Waste
Technologies Industries in 1994. In
three of the four cases, the Agency
determined that the information
claimed as confidential was not entitled
to confidential treatment.
In the confidentiality claims
presented by Horizon Environment, Inc.
and Johnson Controls Battery Group,
Inc., both companies asserted
confidentiality for certain hazardous
waste export documents that were
responsive to Freedom of Information
Act (FOIA) requests to EPA. The FOIA,
5 U.S.C. 552(a), section 3007(b) of
RCRA, and EPA regulations
implementing the FOIA and RCRA
section 3007(b) generally mandate the
disclosure to the public of information
and records in the possession of
government agencies. However, there
are nine categories of information that
may be exempt from disclosure, and one
such category of information
(Exemption 4) is for ‘‘trade secrets and
commercial information obtained from a
person and privileged or confidential’’
(see 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4)). Under these
statutes and regulations, ‘‘business
information’’ means information which
pertains to the interests of a business,
was acquired or developed by the
business, and which is possessed by
EPA in a recorded form (see 40 CFR
2.201(c)). Such business information
may be claimed by an ‘‘affected
business’’ to be entitled to treatment as
CBI if the business information is a
‘‘trade secret’’ or other type of
proprietary information which produces
business or competitive advantages for
the business, such that the business has
a legally protected right to limit the use
of the information or its disclosure to
others. See § 2.201(e).
In order for information to meet the
requirements of Exemption 4, EPA must
find that the information is either (1) a
trade secret; or (2) commercial or
financial information obtained from a
person and privileged or confidential
(commonly referred to as ‘‘Confidential
Business Information’’ (CBI)). Horizon
Environment’s claims related to export
notices, and Johnson Controls Battery
Group’s claims related to annual
reports. Both companies claimed the
information to be confidential, but did
not claim that the information was
privileged. Information that is required
to be submitted to the Government is
confidential if its ‘‘disclosure would be
likely either (1) to impair the
Government’ s ability to obtain
necessary information in the future; or
(2) to cause substantial harm to the
competitive position of the person from
whom the information was obtained.’’’
Critical Mass, 975 F.2d at 878 (quoting
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60897
National Parks and Conservation
Association v. Morton, 498 F.2d 765,
770 (DC Cir. 1974)) (footnote omitted).
In these cases, the Agency had the
authority to require the submission of
the information and exercised it.
Therefore, EPA concluded that the
information was a required submission
and was not voluntary.
EPA also found that the information
the companies claimed as confidential
did not meet EPA’s CBI criteria. As set
forth in EPA’s regulations at 40 CFR
2.208, required business information is
entitled to confidential treatment if: The
business has satisfactorily shown that
disclosure of the information is likely to
cause substantial harm to the business’s
competitive position. After careful
consideration of the arguments
submitted by both companies, EPA
concluded that neither claim explained
specifically how disclosure of the
information in the submissions would
likely cause substantial competitive
harm to the companies, and therefore
did not support the claim of competitive
harm. Accordingly, EPA concluded that
release of this was not likely to cause
substantial harm to the companies’
competitive positions.
As a result of these analyses, EPA
found that the information the
companies claimed as confidential was
not within the scope of Exemption 4 of
the FOIA.
For the fourth confidentiality claim
submitted by Waste Technologies
Industries in 1994, EPA determined that
the identities and addresses of the
foreign generators listed in its import
notification letters were entitled to
confidential treatment under EPA’s
criteria (40 CFR 2.208). Since that time,
EPA promulgated the Electronic
Manifest final rule in which it was
determined that manifests and the data
contained therein are not CBI (79 FR
7518). Because the contact information
of foreign generators is a required data
element on manifests, this information
is no longer treated as confidential. EPA
found the record pertaining to this case
after the proposed rule was published.
Based on EPA’s analysis and decision
in three of the four confidentiality
claims asserted by companies for their
hazardous waste export notices and
annual reports, EPA expects to similarly
conclude that these and the other
documents within the scope of this
rulemaking are not entitled to
confidential treatment. As for the fourth
decision in the Waste Technologies
Industries’ claim, EPA’s more recent
determination that manifests are no
longer CBI supersedes the decision to
withhold the information as
confidential in 1994.
E:\FR\FM\26DER1.SGM
26DER1
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
60898
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Finally, EPA has never received a
claim of confidentiality from a thirdparty business with respect to
hazardous waste export and import
documentation. As described
previously, EPA issues a Federal
Register notice each year requesting
comment from affected businesses
(other than original submitters), as
defined in 40 CFR 2.201(d), on their
need to assert confidentiality claims for
documents submitted to EPA related to
hazardous waste exports and imports as
well as data compiled from such
documents, prior to EPA considering
such documents releasable upon public
request. To date, EPA has never
received a comment from any business
not an original submitter as a result of
the annual Federal Register notice.
EPA received one comment in
response to our request for input about
applying confidentiality determinations
to individual documents and aggregate
data related to hazardous waste export
and import shipments. In its comment,
a trade association for the hazardous
waste treatment industry expressed
concern about the ability of competitors
to gain an unfair advantage from access
to aggregate export and import data. The
commenter also indicated that access to
aggregate data could pose national
security concerns if sensitive shipment
information were available to parties
with malicious intent. The commenter
stated that aggregate shipment data are
a more efficient means to gain access to
customer lists and export and import
patterns compared to individual
documents, which would require
significant cost and labor to compile.
However, as stated previously, at the
Federal level and in many states, CBI
claims are not accepted with respect to
individual or aggregate manifest data.
The main difference between the
manifest and the export and import
documents is that the manifest provides
information on domestic management of
hazardous waste shipments, while the
export and import documents provide
information related to both the domestic
and the international part of those
shipments. Because the information
contained in hazardous waste export
and import documents is so similar to
that contained in manifests, EPA
believes that it is appropriate to treat the
domestic and international shipping
documents the same.
Nonetheless, while EPA is not
accepting CBI claims for either
individual documents or aggregate data
related to exports and imports, EPA
recognizes that the information in its
possession may not be ready for general
release to the public because it is not yet
‘‘final.’’ As with manifests, hazardous
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 22, 2017
Jkt 244001
waste exporters, importers, receiving
facilities and brokers acting on their
behalf need sufficient time to address
discrepancies or exceptions related to
hazardous waste shipments and to
verify and correct data recorded on their
documents. Until such time as these
corrections can be made and data can be
verified and finalized, the data in these
documents, just as in manifests, will be
considered ‘‘in process.’’ To that end,
unless otherwise required by Federal
law, EPA is not considering such
documents to be final until March 1 of
the year after which the shipments
occur. EPA believes this timeframe is
responsive to the concerns about
competitive harm and national security
risk with respect to access to aggregate
data. EPA believes that this relatively
long timeframe also makes it more likely
that the shipment will have been
received and the waste recovered or
disposed by the time the documents are
considered final.
Furthermore, in response to the
national security concerns raised by
commenters on the proposed rule and
on the e-manifest user fee proposed rule
(81 FR 49072, July 26, 2016), EPA has
consulted with the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS) to determine
whether public access to certain
shipment information in the e-Manifest
system poses a significant chemical
security risk and if so, the action the
Agency should take to mitigate that risk.
Because the export and import data are
similar to the data collected on
manifests, EPA will apply mitigating
measures to manage export and import
data in a manner consistent with those
implemented by the e-Manifest system.
III. Costs and Benefits of the Final Rule
A. Cost Impacts
The Agency conducted an economic
assessment for the proposed rule to this
action which evaluated costs, cost
savings, benefits, and other impacts,
such as environmental justice,
children’s health, unfunded mandates,
regulatory takings, and small entity
impacts. The costs incurred by the
regulated community under the
proposed rule were associated with the
proposed internet posting requirement
only. Because EPA is not finalizing the
proposed internet posting requirement,
there are no costs associated with this
action and the economic assessment
conducted for the proposed rule no
longer applies. Rather, the final rule
reduces burden and results in costsavings.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
B. Benefits
There are a number of qualitative
benefits associated with this final rule.
By providing a consistent approach to
addressing confidentiality claims with
respect to the documents within the
scope of this rulemaking, this action
will result in cost-savings and greater
efficiency to both the regulated
community and EPA. The Agency will
not incur the costs associated with
developing and publishing the annual
Federal Register notice requesting
comment from affected businesses
(other than original submitters), as
defined in 40 CFR 2.201(d), on their
need to assert confidentiality claims for
documents submitted to EPA related to
hazardous waste exports and imports.
Industry cost-savings result from the
avoided costs associated with reading
and responding to the Federal Register
notice. Furthermore, this action will
achieve greater transparency by
excluding export and import documents
from CBI claims.
IV. State Authorization
A. Applicability of Rules in Authorized
States
Under section 3006 of RCRA, EPA
may authorize qualified States to
administer their own hazardous waste
programs in lieu of the Federal program
within the State. Following
authorization, EPA retains enforcement
authority under sections 3008, 3013,
and 7003 of RCRA, although authorized
States have primary enforcement
responsibility. The standards and
requirements for State authorization are
found at 40 CFR part 271. Prior to
enactment of the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA), a
State with final RCRA authorization
administered its hazardous waste
program entirely in lieu of EPA
administering the Federal program in
that State. The Federal requirements no
longer applied in the authorized State,
and EPA could not issue permits for any
facilities in that State, since only the
State was authorized to issue RCRA
permits. When new, more stringent
Federal requirements were promulgated,
the State was obligated to enact
equivalent authorities within specified
time frames. However, the new Federal
requirements did not take effect in an
authorized State until the State adopted
the Federal requirements as State law.
In contrast, under RCRA section
3006(g) (42 U.S.C. 6926(g)), which was
added by HSWA, new requirements and
prohibitions imposed under HSWA
authority take effect in authorized States
at the same time that they take effect in
unauthorized States. EPA is directed by
E:\FR\FM\26DER1.SGM
26DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
the statute to implement these
requirements and prohibitions in
authorized States, including the
issuance of permits, until the State is
granted authorization to do so. While
States must still adopt HSWA related
provisions as State law to retain final
authorization, EPA implements the
HSWA provisions in authorized States
until the States do so.
Authorized States are required to
modify their programs only when EPA
enacts Federal requirements that are
more stringent or broader in scope than
existing Federal requirements. RCRA
section 3009 allows the States to impose
standards more stringent than those in
the Federal program (see also 40 CFR
271.1). Therefore, authorized States
may, but are not required to, adopt
Federal regulations, both HSWA and
non-HSWA, that are considered less
stringent than previous Federal
regulations.
B. Effect on State Authorization
Because of the Federal government’s
special role in matters of foreign policy,
EPA does not authorize States to
administer Federal import/export
functions in any section of the RCRA
hazardous waste regulations. This
approach of having Federal, rather than
State, administering of the import/
export functions promotes national
coordination, uniformity and the
expeditious transmission of information
between the United States and foreign
countries.
Although States do not receive
authorization to administer the Federal
government’s import/export functions
in 40 CFR part 262, subpart H, or the
import/export relation functions in any
other section of the RCRA hazardous
waste regulations, State programs are
still required to adopt the provisions in
this rule to maintain their equivalency
with the Federal program (see 40 CFR
271.10(e)).
This final rule contains amendments
to 40 CFR 260.2 such that no claim of
business confidentiality may be asserted
by any person with respect to
information from cathode ray tube
export documents prepared, used and
submitted under §§ 261.39(a)(5) and
261.41(a) and hazardous waste export,
import, and transit documents prepared,
used and submitted under §§ 262.82,
262.83, 262.84, 263.20, 264.12, 264.71,
265.12, 265.71, and 267.71.
The States that have previously
adopted 40 CFR part 262, subparts E, F
and H, 40 CFR part 263, 40 CFR part
264, 40 CFR part 265, and any other
import/export related regulations, and
that will be adopting the revisions in the
Hazardous Waste Export-Import
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 22, 2017
Jkt 244001
Revisions Final Rule (81 FR 85696)
must adopt the revisions to those
provisions in this final rule. But only
States that have previously adopted the
optional CRT conditional exclusion in
40 CFR 261.39 are required to adopt the
revisions related to that exclusion in
this final rule.
When a State adopts the import/
export provisions in this rule, they must
not replace Federal or international
references or terms with State references
or terms.
The provisions of this rule will take
effect in all States on the effective date
of the rule, since these export and
import requirements will be
administered by the Federal government
as a foreign policy matter, and will not
be administered by States.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Additional information about these
statutes and Executive Orders can be
found at https://www.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This final rule is a non-significant
regulatory action because it does not
have a significant economic impact nor
does it raise novel legal or policy issues.
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) waived review.
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
This action is considered an
Executive Order 13771 deregulatory
action. This final rule provides burden
reduction by providing a consistent
approach to addressing confidentiality
claims with respect to the documents
within the scope of this rulemaking. As
a result, this action will result in costsavings and greater efficiency for
industry and EPA. EPA will no longer
expend resources to publish an annual
Federal Register notice related to
confidential business information and
industry will avoid the costs and burden
associated with reading and responding
to the annual Federal Register notice.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
PRA because it does not contain any
information collection activities.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
EPA certifies that this action will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60899
under the RFA. In making this
determination, the impact of concern is
any significant adverse economic
impact on small entities. An agency may
certify that a rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities if
the rule relieves regulatory burden, has
no net burden or otherwise has a
positive economic effect on the small
entities subject to the rule. The small
entities subject to the requirements of
this action are hazardous waste
exporters, importers, receiving facilities
and brokers acting on their behalf. There
are no costs associated with this action;
rather, the final rule results in costsavings. We have therefore concluded
that this action will relieve regulatory
burden for all directly regulated small
entities.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain an
unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C.
1531–1538, and does not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments.
Thus, it is not subject to Sections 202,
203, and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4).
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications because the state and local
governments do not administer the
export and import requirements under
RCRA. It will not have substantial direct
effects on the states, on the relationship
between the national government and
the states, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13175. No exporters, importers or
transporters affected by this action are
known to be owned by Tribal
governments or located within or
adjacent to Tribal lands. Thus,
Executive Order 13175 does not apply
to this action.
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13045 because it is not
economically significant as defined in
Executive Order 12866, and because
EPA does not believe the environmental
health or safety risks addressed by this
action present a disproportionate risk to
children.
E:\FR\FM\26DER1.SGM
26DER1
60900
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: December 11, 2017.
E. Scott Pruitt,
Administrator.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
J. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
1. The authority citation for part 260
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6905, 6912(a), 6921–
6927, 6930, 6934, 6935, 6937, 6938, 6939,
and 6974.
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
2. Amend § 260.2 by revising
paragraph (b) and adding paragraph (d)
to read as follows:
■
EPA believes that this action does not
have disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority populations, lowincome populations, and/or indigenous
peoples, as specified in Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994),
because this action only applies a
confidentiality determination such that
no person can assert confidential
business information (CBI) claims for
documents related to the export, import,
and transit of hazardous waste and
export of excluded cathode ray tubes
(CRTs).
L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and
the EPA will submit a rule report to
each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United
States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 260
Environmental protection, Cathode
ray tubes (CRTs), Confidential business
information, Exports, Hazardous waste,
Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
40 CFR Part 261
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
Environmental protection, Cathode
ray tubes (CRTs), Confidential business
information, Hazardous waste,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Environmental protection,
Confidential business information,
Exports, Hazardous waste, Imports,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 22, 2017
Jkt 244001
PART 260—HAZARDOUS WASTE
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GENERAL
■
This rulemaking does not involve
technical standards.
40 CFR Part 262
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR parts
260, 261, and 262 as follows:
§ 260.2 Availability of information;
confidentiality of information.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Except as provided under
paragraphs (c) and (d) of this section,
any person who submits information to
EPA in accordance with parts 260
through 266 and 268 of this chapter may
assert a claim of business confidentiality
covering part or all of that information
by following the procedures set forth in
§ 2.203(b) of this chapter. Information
covered by such a claim will be
disclosed by EPA only to the extent, and
by means of the procedures, set forth in
part 2, subpart B, of this chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
(d)(1) After June 26, 2018, no claim of
business confidentiality may be asserted
by any person with respect to
information contained in cathode ray
tube export documents prepared, used
and submitted under §§ 261.39(a)(5) and
261.41(a) of this chapter, and with
respect to information contained in
hazardous waste export, import, and
transit documents prepared, used and
submitted under §§ 262.82, 262.83,
262.84, 263.20, 264.12, 264.71, 265.12,
265.71, and 267.71 of this chapter,
whether submitted electronically into
EPA’s Waste Import Export Tracking
System or in paper format.
(2) EPA will make any cathode ray
tube export documents prepared, used
and submitted under §§ 261.39(a)(5) and
261.41(a) of this chapter, and any
hazardous waste export, import, and
transit documents prepared, used and
submitted under §§ 262.82, 262.83,
262.84, 263.20, 264.12, 264.71, 265.12,
265.71, and 267.71 of this chapter
available to the public under this
section when these electronic or paper
documents are considered by EPA to be
final documents. These submitted
electronic and paper documents related
to hazardous waste exports, imports and
transits and cathode ray tube exports are
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
considered by EPA to be final
documents on March 1 of the calendar
year after the related cathode ray tube
exports or hazardous waste exports,
imports, or transits occur.
PART 261—IDENTIFICATION AND
LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
3. The authority citation for part 261
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6905, 6912(a), 6921,
6922, 6924(y) and 6938.
4. Amend § 261.39 by revising
paragraph (a)(5)(iv) to read as follows:
■
§ 261.39 Conditional Exclusion for Used,
Broken Cathode Ray Tubes (CRTs) and
Processed CRT Glass Undergoing
Recycling.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(5) * * *
(iv) EPA will provide a complete
notification to the receiving country and
any transit countries. A notification is
complete when EPA receives a
notification which EPA determines
satisfies the requirements of paragraph
(a)(5)(i) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 262—STANDARDS APPLICABLE
TO GENERATORS OF HAZARDOUS
WASTE
5. The authority citation for part 262
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C 6906, 6912, 6922–
6925, 6937, and 6938.
6. Amend § 262.83 by revising
paragraphs (b)(5) and (f)(9) to read as
follows:
■
§ 262.83
Exports of hazardous waste.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(5) For cases where the proposed
country of import and recovery or
disposal operations are not covered
under an international agreement to
which both the United States and the
country of import are parties, EPA will
coordinate with the Department of State
to provide the complete notification to
country of import and any countries of
transit. In all other cases, EPA will
provide the notification directly to the
country of import and any countries of
transit. A notification is complete when
EPA receives a notification which EPA
determines satisfies the requirements of
paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (xiii) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(9) Upon request by EPA, U.S.
exporters, importers, or recovery
facilities must submit to EPA copies of
E:\FR\FM\26DER1.SGM
26DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 26, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
contracts, chain of contracts, or
equivalent arrangements (when the
movement occurs between parties
controlled by the same corporate or
legal entity).
*
*
*
*
*
7. Amend § 262.84 by revising
paragraphs (b)(4) and (f)(8) to read as
follows:
■
§ 262.84
Imports of hazardous waste.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) A notification is complete when
EPA determines the notification satisfies
the requirements of paragraphs (b)(1)(i)
through (xiii) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(8) Upon request by EPA, importers or
disposal or recovery facilities must
submit to EPA copies of contracts, chain
of contracts, or equivalent arrangements
(when the movement occurs between
parties controlled by the same corporate
or legal entity).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2017–27525 Filed 12–22–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–1987–0002; FRL–9972–
38–Region 3]
National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency
Plan; National Priorities List: Deletion
of the C&D Recycling Superfund Site
Environmental Protection
Agency.
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region III is publishing a
direct final Notice of Deletion of the
C&D Recycling Superfund Site (Site),
located in Foster Township,
Pennsylvania, from the National
Priorities List (NPL). The NPL,
promulgated pursuant to section 105 of
the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is
an appendix of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP). This direct
final deletion is being published by EPA
with the concurrence of the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
(Commonwealth), through the
Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection (PADEP),
because EPA has determined that all
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:22 Dec 22, 2017
Jkt 244001
appropriate response actions under
CERCLA have been completed.
However, this deletion does not
preclude EPA from taking future actions
at the Site under Superfund.
DATES: This direct final deletion is
effective February 26, 2018 unless EPA
receives adverse comments by January
25, 2018. If adverse comments are
received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final deletion
in the Federal Register informing the
public that the deletion will not take
effect.
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
SFUND–1987–0002 at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregory Voigt, Remedial Project
Manager, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, Mail Code 3HS21,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA
19013, (215) 814–5737, email:
voigt.gregory@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Site Deletion
V. Deletion Action
I. Introduction
EPA Region III is publishing this
direct final Notice of Deletion of the
C&D Recycling Superfund Site, from the
National Priorities List (NPL). The NPL
constitutes Appendix B of 40 CFR part
300, which is the Oil and Hazardous
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
60901
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP), which EPA promulgated
pursuant to section 105 of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended.
EPA maintains the NPL as the list of
sites that appear to present a significant
risk to public health, welfare, or the
environment. Sites on the NPL may be
the subject of remedial actions financed
by the Hazardous Substance Superfund
(Fund). As described in § 300.425(e)(3)
of the NCP, sites deleted from the NPL
remain eligible for Fund-financed
remedial actions if future conditions
warrant such actions.
Section II of this document explains
the criteria for deleting sites from the
NPL. Section III discusses procedures
that EPA is using for this action. Section
IV discusses the Site and demonstrates
how it meets the deletion criteria.
Section V discusses EPA’s action to
delete the Site from the NPL unless
adverse comments are received during
the public comment period.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
The NCP establishes the criteria that
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL.
In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e),
sites may be deleted from the NPL
where no further response is
appropriate. In making such a
determination pursuant to 40 CFR
300.425(e), EPA will consider, in
consultation with the state, whether any
of the following criteria have been met:
i. Responsible parties or other persons
have implemented all appropriate
response actions required;
ii. All appropriate Fund-financed
response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and no further response
action by responsible parties is
appropriate; or
iii. The remedial investigation has
shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the
environment and, therefore, the taking
of remedial measures is not appropriate.
EPA may initiate further action to
ensure continued protectiveness at a
deleted site if new information becomes
available that indicates it is appropriate.
Whenever there is a significant release
from a site deleted from the NPL, the
deleted site may be restored to the NPL
without application of the hazard
ranking system.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to
deletion of the Site:
(1) EPA consulted with the
Commonwealth prior to developing this
direct final Notice of Deletion and the
Notice of Intent to Delete co-published
E:\FR\FM\26DER1.SGM
26DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 26, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 60894-60901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-27525]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 260, 261, and 262
[EPA-HQ-OLEM-2016-0492; FRL-9971-49-OLEM]
RIN 2050-AG90
Confidentiality Determinations for Hazardous Waste Export and
Import Documents
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) is
amending existing regulations regarding the export and import of
hazardous wastes from and into the United States. Specifically, this
rule applies a confidentiality determination such that no person can
assert confidential business information (CBI) claims for documents
related to the export, import, and transit of hazardous waste and
export of excluded cathode ray tubes (CRTs). EPA is making these
changes to apply a consistent approach in addressing confidentiality
claims for export and import documentation. The rule will result in
cost-savings and greater efficiency for EPA and the regulated community
as well as facilitate transparency with respect to the documents that
are within the scope of this rulemaking. However, EPA is not finalizing
the proposed internet posting requirement in the proposed rule.
DATES: The final rule is effective on June 26, 2018.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OLEM-2016-0492. All documents in the docket are listed at
https://www.regulations.gov. Docket materials are also available in
hard copy at the EPA Docket Center Reading Room. Please see https://www.epa.gov/dockets/epa-docket-center-reading-room or call (202) 566-
1744 for more information on the Docket Center Reading Room.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lia Yohannes, Office of Resource
Conservation and Recovery; telephone number: (703) 308-8413; email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?
EPA's authority to promulgate this rule is found in sections 1002,
2002(a), 3001-3004, and 3017 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as
amended by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and as
amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments, 42 U.S.C. 6901 et
seq., 6912, 6921-6924, and 6938.
B. Does this action apply to me?
The application of confidentiality determinations to RCRA export,
import, and transit documents in this action generally affects three
(3) groups: (1) All persons who export or import (or arrange for the
export or import of) of hazardous waste for recycling or disposal,
including those hazardous wastes subject to the alternate management
standards for (a) universal waste for recycling or disposal, (b) spent
lead-acid batteries (SLABs) being shipped for reclamation, (c)
industrial ethyl alcohol being shipped for reclamation, (d) hazardous
waste samples of more than 25 kilograms being shipped for waste
characterization or treatability studies, and (e) hazardous recyclable
materials being shipped for precious metal recovery; (2) all recycling
and disposal facilities who receive imports of such hazardous wastes
for recycling or disposal; and (3) all persons who export (or arrange
for the export of) conditionally excluded cathode ray tubes (CRTs)
being shipped for recycling.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAICS code NAICS description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
211.............................. Oil and Gas Extraction.
324.............................. Petroleum and Coal Products
Manufacturing.
325.............................. Chemical Manufacturing.
326.............................. Plastics and Rubber Products
Manufacturing.
327.............................. Nonmetallic Mineral Product
Manufacturing.
331.............................. Primary Metal Manufacturing.
332.............................. Fabricated Metal Product
Manufacturing.
333.............................. Machinery Manufacturing.
334.............................. Computer and Electronic Product
Manufacturing.
335.............................. Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and
Component Manufacturing.
336.............................. Transportation Equipment
Manufacturing.
339.............................. Miscellaneous Manufacturing.
423.............................. Merchant Wholesalers, Durable Goods.
424.............................. Merchant Wholesalers, Nondurable
Goods.
522.............................. Credit Intermediation and Related
Activities.
525.............................. Funds, Trusts, and Other Financial
Vehicles.
531.............................. Real Estate.
541.............................. Professional, Scientific, and
Technical Services.
561.............................. Administrative and Support Services.
562.............................. Waste Management and Remediation
Services.
721.............................. Accommodation.
813.............................. Religious, Grantmaking, Civic,
Professional, and Similar
Organizations.
211.............................. Oil and Gas Extraction.
324.............................. Petroleum and Coal Products
Manufacturing.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this
action. This table lists the types of entities that EPA is now aware
could potentially be regulated by this action. Other types of entities
not listed in the table could also be regulated. If you have questions
regarding the applicability of this rule to a particular entity,
consult the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
II. Background
On November 28, 2016, EPA proposed revisions to the current RCRA
regulations governing imports and exports of hazardous waste and
certain other materials in parts 260, 262, 264, 265, and 267 in order
to strengthen public accessibility and transparency of import and
export-related documentation to better monitor proper compliance with
EPA's hazardous waste regulations and help ensure that hazardous waste
shipments are properly received and disposed (81 FR 85459). The
internet Posting of and Confidentiality Determinations for Hazardous
Waste Export and Import Documents Proposed Rule was a companion action
to EPA's Hazardous
[[Page 60895]]
Waste Export-Import Revisions Final Rule (``Revisions Final Rule'')
published on November 28, 2016 (81 FR 85696), which was one of the
Agency's priority actions under its plan for periodic retrospective
reviews of existing regulations, as required by Executive Order 13563.
Under the Revisions Final Rule, export notices for hazardous waste and
excluded CRTs exported for recycling are currently required to be
submitted electronically to EPA using EPA's Waste Import Export
Tracking System (WIETS) as of December 31, 2016. Export annual reports
for hazardous waste and excluded CRTs exported for recycling will be
required to be submitted electronically to EPA using WIETS on March 1,
2019. Other import and export documents for hazardous waste and
excluded CRTs exported for recycling are transitioning from paper
submittal to electronic submittal, and will be required to be submitted
electronically to EPA using WIETS on a future compliance date to be
announced in a future, separate Federal Register notice.
The proposed rulemaking for this final action consisted of two
parts. First, EPA proposed requiring exporters and receiving facilities
of hazardous waste from foreign sources to post confirmation of receipt
and confirmation of recovery or disposal documents on publicly
accessible websites when such documents are required for individual
export and import shipments of hazardous wastes. EPA proposed that the
documents be publicly accessible on company websites by the first of
March of each year and that the websites include all of the
confirmations of receipt and confirmations of recovery or disposal
received by the exporter or sent out by the receiving facility related
to exports or imports of hazardous waste made during the previous
calendar year. Each document was to be made available for a period of
at least three years following the date on which each document was
first posted to the website. The proposed internet posting requirement
was planned to be effective during the interim period prior to the
electronic import-export reporting compliance date when electronic
submittal to EPA of confirmations of receipt and confirmations of
recovery or disposal for hazardous waste shipments will be required in
EPA's WIETS system per the Revisions Final Rule. The second part of the
proposed rule consisted of applying confidentiality determinations such
that no person could assert CBI claims for individual documents and
compiled data for required documents related to the export, import, and
transit of hazardous waste and export of conditionally excluded cathode
ray tubes (CRTs).
III. Detailed Discussion of the Final Rule
A. Summary of the Final Rule
This section provides an overview of this final rule and describes
the way in which it differs from the proposal. With this action, EPA
finalizes the application of confidentiality determinations such that
no CBI claims may be asserted by any person with respect to any of the
following documents related to the export, import, and transit of
hazardous waste and export of excluded CRTs:
(1) Documents related to the export of Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous waste under 40 CFR part 262, subpart H,
including but not limited to the notifications of intent to export,
contracts submitted in response to requests for supplemental
information from countries of import or transit, RCRA manifests, annual
reports, EPA acknowledgements of consent, any subsequent communication
withdrawing a prior consent or objection, responses that neither
consent nor object, exception reports, transit notifications, and
renotifications;
(2) Documents related to the import of hazardous waste, under 40
CFR part 262, subpart H, including but not limited to contracts and
notifications of intent to import hazardous waste into the U.S. from
foreign countries or U.S. importers;
(3) Documents related to the confirmation of receipt and
confirmation of recovery or disposal of hazardous waste exports and
imports, under 40 CFR part 262, subpart H;
(4) Documents related to the transit of hazardous waste, under 40
CFR part 262, subpart H, including notifications from U.S. exporters of
intent to transit through foreign countries, or notifications from
foreign countries of intent to transit through the U.S.;
(5) Documents related to the export of cathode ray tubes (CRTs),
under 40 CFR part 261, subpart E, including but not limited to
notifications of intent to export CRTs;
(6) Documents related to the export and import of non-crushed spent
lead acid batteries (SLABs) with intact casings, under 40 CFR part 266
subpart G, including but not limited to notifications of intent to
export SLABs;
(7) Submissions from transporters under 40 CFR part 263, or from
treatment, storage or disposal facilities under 40 CFR parts 264 and
265, related to exports or imports of hazardous waste, including but
not limited to receiving facility notices of the need to arrange
alternate management or return of an import shipment under 40 CFR
264.12(a) and 265.12(a); and
(8) Documents related to the export and import of RCRA universal
waste under 40 CFR part 273, subparts B, C, D, and F.
(9) Documents required under 40 CFR 262, subparts E, F, and H and
submitted in accordance with consents issued prior to December 31,
2016.
Unless otherwise required by Federal law, EPA is not considering
the documents described in items (1) through (9) in this preamble to be
final until March 1 of the year after which the shipments occur.
These changes will be reflected in revisions to 40 CFR part 260, as
proposed, and in conforming revisions to 40 CFR parts 261 and 262.
EPA is not finalizing the proposed internet posting requirement of
confirmation of receipt and confirmation of recovery or disposal
documents where they would have been required for individual export and
import shipments of hazardous wastes. As required under the
recordkeeping requirements for exports and imports of hazardous waste
under 40 CFR part 262, subpart H, exporters and receiving facilities of
hazardous waste from foreign sources are required to retain paper
copies of such confirmations such that copies are available for viewing
and production if requested by any EPA or authorized state inspector.
Once electronic submittals of the confirmation documents are required
after the electronic import-export reporting compliance date that EPA
will establish in a separate Federal Register notice, electronically
submitted confirmations can be retained in EPA's Waste Import Export
Tracking System (WIETS), or its successor system, such that copies are
available for viewing and production if requested by any EPA or
authorized state inspector.
B. Summary of Public Comments
The Agency received seven unique comments in response to its
November 28, 2016 proposed rule. Of the seven comments, two were
submitted anonymously, two were submitted from individual companies,
one was submitted by a trade association representing hazardous waste
treatment, recycling and disposal companies, one was submitted by a
coalition representing generators of hazardous waste, and one was
submitted by a trade association representing fuel and petrochemical
manufacturers.
[[Page 60896]]
With respect to the proposed internet posting requirement, two
anonymous commenters expressed their support, stating that it would
improve transparency and environmental awareness of the potential
environmental and health risks associated with exposure to hazardous
waste, and potentially lead to reduced generation and improved
management of hazardous waste. The remaining five commenters from
industry expressed concern with the proposed internet posting
requirement. These commenters stated that EPA underestimated the costs
associated with posting information on company websites and were
apprehensive about the burden of complying with a temporary requirement
that would be in place for an unspecified amount of time. Two
commenters suggested that the lag in time between when the
confirmations of receipt and confirmations of recovery or disposal are
required to be sent and when the documents would be posted on company
websites would cause confusion and an incorrect perception by the
general public of mismanagement. Two commenters also suggested that
requiring industry to submit export and import documentation to EPA,
rather than post on individual company websites, would provide better
consistency to the regulated community and ensure greater compliance
with export and import regulations. Finally, one commenter suggested
that EPA develop its own website to post the documents to improve
public access to the information. (See Section ``II.C. Changes to the
Proposed Rule'' of this preamble for EPA's rationale for not finalizing
the proposed internet posting requirement.)
EPA received only one comment on the proposed confidentiality
determination. The commenter expressed concerns about the application
of a confidentiality determination to aggregate data related to exports
and imports of hazardous waste. EPA considers aggregate data to be a
list of consolidated information about shipments organized by company.
According to the commenter, the application of a confidentiality
determination to aggregate data poses different concerns from those
raised by application of confidentiality determinations to individual
documents. The commenter was specifically concerned about the potential
for competitive harm from public release of customer lists and issues
related to national security if aggregate data about shipments were
available to individuals with the intent to do harm. Because of the
substantial effort required to compile a customer list from individual
export and import documents, the commenter did not have similar
concerns with respect to the release of individual hazardous waste
export and import documents. (See response to comments document and
Section ``II.D. Rationale for Final Rule'' of this preamble for details
on EPA's response to these comments.)
C. Changes to the Proposed Rule
After considering all the submitted comments, EPA is finalizing, as
proposed, the application of confidentiality determinations to
documents related to the export, import and transit of hazardous waste
and export of excluded CRTs. We provide our rationale in the following
section. EPA is not finalizing the proposed internet posting
requirement that exporters and receiving facilities of hazardous waste
from foreign sources upload confirmations of receipt and confirmations
of recovery or disposal on their websites. This internet posting
requirement was intended to be in effect on a temporary basis while EPA
develops its Waste Import Export Tracking System (WIETS) to be able to
receive electronic submittals of the documents. Recognizing that the
internet posting requirement would be superseded when exporters and
receiving facilities are required to submit confirmations
electronically, EPA has decided to avoid the potential confusion as
described by some commenters, that may result from requiring internet
posting of documents on a temporary basis on company websites and from
the time lag between the receipt and posting of confirmations of
receipt and confirmations of recovery or disposal.
D. Rationale for the Final Rule
This final rule applies confidentiality determinations such that
EPA will no longer accept future CBI claims for individual documents
and/or aggregate data related to the export, import, and transit of
hazardous waste and export of excluded CRTs. EPA is making these
changes to apply a consistent approach in addressing confidentiality
claims for export and import documentation which will result in cost-
savings and greater efficiency for EPA and the regulated community.
Moreover, as described in the proposed rulemaking, EPA will no longer
publish the annual Federal Register notice requesting comment from
third party affected businesses (other than original submitters), as
defined in 40 CFR 2.201(d), on their need to assert confidentiality
claims for documents submitted to EPA related to hazardous waste
exports and imports as well as data compiled from such documents, prior
to EPA considering such documents releasable upon public request. The
Federal Register notice covers documents related to the export, import
and transit of RCRA hazardous waste, including those hazardous wastes
managed under the special management standards in 40 CFR part 266
(e.g., spent lead acid batteries) and 40 CFR part 273 (e.g., universal
waste batteries, universal waste mercury lamps), and related to the
export of CRTs under 40 CFR part 261, made during the previous calendar
year. The annual Federal Register notices have not addressed CBI claims
likely to be made by the original submitters, since RCRA regulations at
40 CFR 260.2(b) already address the CBI requirements for original
submitters.
Our rationale for applying confidentiality determinations to these
documents is summarized in the following paragraphs.
As discussed in the proposed rulemaking, application of
confidentiality determinations is consistent with the non-CBI treatment
of hazardous waste manifests at the Federal and state level. Manifests
contain similar information as that required by the documents related
to the export, import and transit of hazardous waste and export of
conditionally excluded CRTs within the scope of this action. On
February 7, 2014, EPA published the Hazardous Waste Management System;
Modification of the Hazardous Waste Manifest System; Electronic
Manifests final rule (79 FR 7518) which made a categorical
determination for individual RCRA hazardous waste manifest records and
aggregate data. In that action, EPA concluded that information
contained in individual manifested records and aggregate data are
essentially public information and therefore is not eligible under
Federal law for treatment as CBI. The effect of this decision was that
EPA made a categorical determination that it will not accept any CBI
claims that might be asserted in connection with processing, using, or
retaining individual paper or electronic manifests or aggregate data
(see 40 CFR 260.2(c)(1)). The decision in that action is consistent
with how manifests are treated in many states that have policies that
do not recognize CBI claims for manifests as individual documents or as
aggregate data. Because the information contained in RCRA hazardous
waste manifests is largely similar to the information contained in
hazardous waste export and import documents,
[[Page 60897]]
such as information about the waste being shipped (waste codes, type,
quantity) and contact information for the generator, transporter, and
destination or receiving facility, EPA concludes that application of
confidentiality determinations in this action is consistent with the
categorical determination that electronic manifests are not CBI.
Furthermore, EPA believes that any CBI claim that might be asserted
with respect to the hazardous waste documents within the scope of this
action would be extremely difficult to sustain under the substantive
CBI criteria set forth in the Agency's CBI regulations (40 CFR part 2,
subpart B). For example, to make a CBI claim, a business must
satisfactorily show that it has taken reasonable measures to protect
the confidentiality of the information, and that it intends to continue
to take such measures. The documents related to the export, import, and
transit of hazardous waste and export of excluded CRTs submitted to EPA
are also shared with several commercial entities while they are being
processed and used. As a result, a business concerned with protecting
its commercial information would find it exceedingly difficult to
protect its records from disclosure by all the other persons who come
into contact with the documents.
Moreover, to substantiate a CBI claim, a business must also show
that the information is not, and has not been, reasonably obtainable
without the business's consent by other persons (other than
governmental bodies) by use of legitimate means (other than discovery
based on a showing of special need in a judicial or quasi-judicial
proceeding). Since the documents are shared with several commercial
entities throughout the chain of custody of a hazardous waste shipment,
they are easily accessible to other parties without the business's
explicit consent.
For these reasons, EPA believes that any CBI claim that might be
asserted with respect to hazardous waste export and import documents
would be difficult to sustain under the substantive CBI criteria (40
CFR part 2, subpart B).
EPA has also established precedent in determining that the
information contained in certain hazardous waste export documents is
not entitled to confidential treatment. To date, our records indicate
that EPA has received four assertions of confidentiality for documents
within the scope of this action and for which EPA has made a CBI
determination: One from Horizon Environment, Inc. in 2004, two from
Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc. in 2010 and 2011, and one from
Waste Technologies Industries in 1994. In three of the four cases, the
Agency determined that the information claimed as confidential was not
entitled to confidential treatment.
In the confidentiality claims presented by Horizon Environment,
Inc. and Johnson Controls Battery Group, Inc., both companies asserted
confidentiality for certain hazardous waste export documents that were
responsive to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to EPA. The
FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552(a), section 3007(b) of RCRA, and EPA regulations
implementing the FOIA and RCRA section 3007(b) generally mandate the
disclosure to the public of information and records in the possession
of government agencies. However, there are nine categories of
information that may be exempt from disclosure, and one such category
of information (Exemption 4) is for ``trade secrets and commercial
information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential''
(see 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4)). Under these statutes and regulations,
``business information'' means information which pertains to the
interests of a business, was acquired or developed by the business, and
which is possessed by EPA in a recorded form (see 40 CFR 2.201(c)).
Such business information may be claimed by an ``affected business'' to
be entitled to treatment as CBI if the business information is a
``trade secret'' or other type of proprietary information which
produces business or competitive advantages for the business, such that
the business has a legally protected right to limit the use of the
information or its disclosure to others. See Sec. 2.201(e).
In order for information to meet the requirements of Exemption 4,
EPA must find that the information is either (1) a trade secret; or (2)
commercial or financial information obtained from a person and
privileged or confidential (commonly referred to as ``Confidential
Business Information'' (CBI)). Horizon Environment's claims related to
export notices, and Johnson Controls Battery Group's claims related to
annual reports. Both companies claimed the information to be
confidential, but did not claim that the information was privileged.
Information that is required to be submitted to the Government is
confidential if its ``disclosure would be likely either (1) to impair
the Government' s ability to obtain necessary information in the
future; or (2) to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of
the person from whom the information was obtained.''' Critical Mass,
975 F.2d at 878 (quoting National Parks and Conservation Association v.
Morton, 498 F.2d 765, 770 (DC Cir. 1974)) (footnote omitted). In these
cases, the Agency had the authority to require the submission of the
information and exercised it. Therefore, EPA concluded that the
information was a required submission and was not voluntary.
EPA also found that the information the companies claimed as
confidential did not meet EPA's CBI criteria. As set forth in EPA's
regulations at 40 CFR 2.208, required business information is entitled
to confidential treatment if: The business has satisfactorily shown
that disclosure of the information is likely to cause substantial harm
to the business's competitive position. After careful consideration of
the arguments submitted by both companies, EPA concluded that neither
claim explained specifically how disclosure of the information in the
submissions would likely cause substantial competitive harm to the
companies, and therefore did not support the claim of competitive harm.
Accordingly, EPA concluded that release of this was not likely to cause
substantial harm to the companies' competitive positions.
As a result of these analyses, EPA found that the information the
companies claimed as confidential was not within the scope of Exemption
4 of the FOIA.
For the fourth confidentiality claim submitted by Waste
Technologies Industries in 1994, EPA determined that the identities and
addresses of the foreign generators listed in its import notification
letters were entitled to confidential treatment under EPA's criteria
(40 CFR 2.208). Since that time, EPA promulgated the Electronic
Manifest final rule in which it was determined that manifests and the
data contained therein are not CBI (79 FR 7518). Because the contact
information of foreign generators is a required data element on
manifests, this information is no longer treated as confidential. EPA
found the record pertaining to this case after the proposed rule was
published.
Based on EPA's analysis and decision in three of the four
confidentiality claims asserted by companies for their hazardous waste
export notices and annual reports, EPA expects to similarly conclude
that these and the other documents within the scope of this rulemaking
are not entitled to confidential treatment. As for the fourth decision
in the Waste Technologies Industries' claim, EPA's more recent
determination that manifests are no longer CBI supersedes the decision
to withhold the information as confidential in 1994.
[[Page 60898]]
Finally, EPA has never received a claim of confidentiality from a
third-party business with respect to hazardous waste export and import
documentation. As described previously, EPA issues a Federal Register
notice each year requesting comment from affected businesses (other
than original submitters), as defined in 40 CFR 2.201(d), on their need
to assert confidentiality claims for documents submitted to EPA related
to hazardous waste exports and imports as well as data compiled from
such documents, prior to EPA considering such documents releasable upon
public request. To date, EPA has never received a comment from any
business not an original submitter as a result of the annual Federal
Register notice.
EPA received one comment in response to our request for input about
applying confidentiality determinations to individual documents and
aggregate data related to hazardous waste export and import shipments.
In its comment, a trade association for the hazardous waste treatment
industry expressed concern about the ability of competitors to gain an
unfair advantage from access to aggregate export and import data. The
commenter also indicated that access to aggregate data could pose
national security concerns if sensitive shipment information were
available to parties with malicious intent. The commenter stated that
aggregate shipment data are a more efficient means to gain access to
customer lists and export and import patterns compared to individual
documents, which would require significant cost and labor to compile.
However, as stated previously, at the Federal level and in many states,
CBI claims are not accepted with respect to individual or aggregate
manifest data. The main difference between the manifest and the export
and import documents is that the manifest provides information on
domestic management of hazardous waste shipments, while the export and
import documents provide information related to both the domestic and
the international part of those shipments. Because the information
contained in hazardous waste export and import documents is so similar
to that contained in manifests, EPA believes that it is appropriate to
treat the domestic and international shipping documents the same.
Nonetheless, while EPA is not accepting CBI claims for either
individual documents or aggregate data related to exports and imports,
EPA recognizes that the information in its possession may not be ready
for general release to the public because it is not yet ``final.'' As
with manifests, hazardous waste exporters, importers, receiving
facilities and brokers acting on their behalf need sufficient time to
address discrepancies or exceptions related to hazardous waste
shipments and to verify and correct data recorded on their documents.
Until such time as these corrections can be made and data can be
verified and finalized, the data in these documents, just as in
manifests, will be considered ``in process.'' To that end, unless
otherwise required by Federal law, EPA is not considering such
documents to be final until March 1 of the year after which the
shipments occur. EPA believes this timeframe is responsive to the
concerns about competitive harm and national security risk with respect
to access to aggregate data. EPA believes that this relatively long
timeframe also makes it more likely that the shipment will have been
received and the waste recovered or disposed by the time the documents
are considered final.
Furthermore, in response to the national security concerns raised
by commenters on the proposed rule and on the e-manifest user fee
proposed rule (81 FR 49072, July 26, 2016), EPA has consulted with the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to determine whether public
access to certain shipment information in the e-Manifest system poses a
significant chemical security risk and if so, the action the Agency
should take to mitigate that risk. Because the export and import data
are similar to the data collected on manifests, EPA will apply
mitigating measures to manage export and import data in a manner
consistent with those implemented by the e-Manifest system.
III. Costs and Benefits of the Final Rule
A. Cost Impacts
The Agency conducted an economic assessment for the proposed rule
to this action which evaluated costs, cost savings, benefits, and other
impacts, such as environmental justice, children's health, unfunded
mandates, regulatory takings, and small entity impacts. The costs
incurred by the regulated community under the proposed rule were
associated with the proposed internet posting requirement only. Because
EPA is not finalizing the proposed internet posting requirement, there
are no costs associated with this action and the economic assessment
conducted for the proposed rule no longer applies. Rather, the final
rule reduces burden and results in cost-savings.
B. Benefits
There are a number of qualitative benefits associated with this
final rule. By providing a consistent approach to addressing
confidentiality claims with respect to the documents within the scope
of this rulemaking, this action will result in cost-savings and greater
efficiency to both the regulated community and EPA. The Agency will not
incur the costs associated with developing and publishing the annual
Federal Register notice requesting comment from affected businesses
(other than original submitters), as defined in 40 CFR 2.201(d), on
their need to assert confidentiality claims for documents submitted to
EPA related to hazardous waste exports and imports. Industry cost-
savings result from the avoided costs associated with reading and
responding to the Federal Register notice. Furthermore, this action
will achieve greater transparency by excluding export and import
documents from CBI claims.
IV. State Authorization
A. Applicability of Rules in Authorized States
Under section 3006 of RCRA, EPA may authorize qualified States to
administer their own hazardous waste programs in lieu of the Federal
program within the State. Following authorization, EPA retains
enforcement authority under sections 3008, 3013, and 7003 of RCRA,
although authorized States have primary enforcement responsibility. The
standards and requirements for State authorization are found at 40 CFR
part 271. Prior to enactment of the Hazardous and Solid Waste
Amendments of 1984 (HSWA), a State with final RCRA authorization
administered its hazardous waste program entirely in lieu of EPA
administering the Federal program in that State. The Federal
requirements no longer applied in the authorized State, and EPA could
not issue permits for any facilities in that State, since only the
State was authorized to issue RCRA permits. When new, more stringent
Federal requirements were promulgated, the State was obligated to enact
equivalent authorities within specified time frames. However, the new
Federal requirements did not take effect in an authorized State until
the State adopted the Federal requirements as State law.
In contrast, under RCRA section 3006(g) (42 U.S.C. 6926(g)), which
was added by HSWA, new requirements and prohibitions imposed under HSWA
authority take effect in authorized States at the same time that they
take effect in unauthorized States. EPA is directed by
[[Page 60899]]
the statute to implement these requirements and prohibitions in
authorized States, including the issuance of permits, until the State
is granted authorization to do so. While States must still adopt HSWA
related provisions as State law to retain final authorization, EPA
implements the HSWA provisions in authorized States until the States do
so.
Authorized States are required to modify their programs only when
EPA enacts Federal requirements that are more stringent or broader in
scope than existing Federal requirements. RCRA section 3009 allows the
States to impose standards more stringent than those in the Federal
program (see also 40 CFR 271.1). Therefore, authorized States may, but
are not required to, adopt Federal regulations, both HSWA and non-HSWA,
that are considered less stringent than previous Federal regulations.
B. Effect on State Authorization
Because of the Federal government's special role in matters of
foreign policy, EPA does not authorize States to administer Federal
import/export functions in any section of the RCRA hazardous waste
regulations. This approach of having Federal, rather than State,
administering of the import/export functions promotes national
coordination, uniformity and the expeditious transmission of
information between the United States and foreign countries.
Although States do not receive authorization to administer the
Federal government's import/export functions in 40 CFR part 262,
subpart H, or the import/export relation functions in any other section
of the RCRA hazardous waste regulations, State programs are still
required to adopt the provisions in this rule to maintain their
equivalency with the Federal program (see 40 CFR 271.10(e)).
This final rule contains amendments to 40 CFR 260.2 such that no
claim of business confidentiality may be asserted by any person with
respect to information from cathode ray tube export documents prepared,
used and submitted under Sec. Sec. 261.39(a)(5) and 261.41(a) and
hazardous waste export, import, and transit documents prepared, used
and submitted under Sec. Sec. 262.82, 262.83, 262.84, 263.20, 264.12,
264.71, 265.12, 265.71, and 267.71.
The States that have previously adopted 40 CFR part 262, subparts
E, F and H, 40 CFR part 263, 40 CFR part 264, 40 CFR part 265, and any
other import/export related regulations, and that will be adopting the
revisions in the Hazardous Waste Export-Import Revisions Final Rule (81
FR 85696) must adopt the revisions to those provisions in this final
rule. But only States that have previously adopted the optional CRT
conditional exclusion in 40 CFR 261.39 are required to adopt the
revisions related to that exclusion in this final rule.
When a State adopts the import/export provisions in this rule, they
must not replace Federal or international references or terms with
State references or terms.
The provisions of this rule will take effect in all States on the
effective date of the rule, since these export and import requirements
will be administered by the Federal government as a foreign policy
matter, and will not be administered by States.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This final rule is a non-significant regulatory action because it
does not have a significant economic impact nor does it raise novel
legal or policy issues. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
waived review.
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
This action is considered an Executive Order 13771 deregulatory
action. This final rule provides burden reduction by providing a
consistent approach to addressing confidentiality claims with respect
to the documents within the scope of this rulemaking. As a result, this
action will result in cost-savings and greater efficiency for industry
and EPA. EPA will no longer expend resources to publish an annual
Federal Register notice related to confidential business information
and industry will avoid the costs and burden associated with reading
and responding to the annual Federal Register notice.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA because it does not contain any information collection
activities.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
EPA certifies that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. In
making this determination, the impact of concern is any significant
adverse economic impact on small entities. An agency may certify that a
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities if the rule relieves regulatory burden, has no
net burden or otherwise has a positive economic effect on the small
entities subject to the rule. The small entities subject to the
requirements of this action are hazardous waste exporters, importers,
receiving facilities and brokers acting on their behalf. There are no
costs associated with this action; rather, the final rule results in
cost-savings. We have therefore concluded that this action will relieve
regulatory burden for all directly regulated small entities.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain an unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Thus, it is not
subject to Sections 202, 203, and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications because the state
and local governments do not administer the export and import
requirements under RCRA. It will not have substantial direct effects on
the states, on the relationship between the national government and the
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175. No exporters, importers or transporters affected
by this action are known to be owned by Tribal governments or located
within or adjacent to Tribal lands. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does
not apply to this action.
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it is
not economically significant as defined in Executive Order 12866, and
because EPA does not believe the environmental health or safety risks
addressed by this action present a disproportionate risk to children.
[[Page 60900]]
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority
populations, low-income populations, and/or indigenous peoples, as
specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994),
because this action only applies a confidentiality determination such
that no person can assert confidential business information (CBI)
claims for documents related to the export, import, and transit of
hazardous waste and export of excluded cathode ray tubes (CRTs).
L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 260
Environmental protection, Cathode ray tubes (CRTs), Confidential
business information, Exports, Hazardous waste, Imports, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
40 CFR Part 261
Environmental protection, Cathode ray tubes (CRTs), Confidential
business information, Hazardous waste, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
40 CFR Part 262
Environmental protection, Confidential business information,
Exports, Hazardous waste, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: December 11, 2017.
E. Scott Pruitt,
Administrator.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR parts
260, 261, and 262 as follows:
PART 260--HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GENERAL
0
1. The authority citation for part 260 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6905, 6912(a), 6921-6927, 6930, 6934,
6935, 6937, 6938, 6939, and 6974.
0
2. Amend Sec. 260.2 by revising paragraph (b) and adding paragraph (d)
to read as follows:
Sec. 260.2 Availability of information; confidentiality of
information.
* * * * *
(b) Except as provided under paragraphs (c) and (d) of this
section, any person who submits information to EPA in accordance with
parts 260 through 266 and 268 of this chapter may assert a claim of
business confidentiality covering part or all of that information by
following the procedures set forth in Sec. 2.203(b) of this chapter.
Information covered by such a claim will be disclosed by EPA only to
the extent, and by means of the procedures, set forth in part 2,
subpart B, of this chapter.
* * * * *
(d)(1) After June 26, 2018, no claim of business confidentiality
may be asserted by any person with respect to information contained in
cathode ray tube export documents prepared, used and submitted under
Sec. Sec. 261.39(a)(5) and 261.41(a) of this chapter, and with respect
to information contained in hazardous waste export, import, and transit
documents prepared, used and submitted under Sec. Sec. 262.82, 262.83,
262.84, 263.20, 264.12, 264.71, 265.12, 265.71, and 267.71 of this
chapter, whether submitted electronically into EPA's Waste Import
Export Tracking System or in paper format.
(2) EPA will make any cathode ray tube export documents prepared,
used and submitted under Sec. Sec. 261.39(a)(5) and 261.41(a) of this
chapter, and any hazardous waste export, import, and transit documents
prepared, used and submitted under Sec. Sec. 262.82, 262.83, 262.84,
263.20, 264.12, 264.71, 265.12, 265.71, and 267.71 of this chapter
available to the public under this section when these electronic or
paper documents are considered by EPA to be final documents. These
submitted electronic and paper documents related to hazardous waste
exports, imports and transits and cathode ray tube exports are
considered by EPA to be final documents on March 1 of the calendar year
after the related cathode ray tube exports or hazardous waste exports,
imports, or transits occur.
PART 261--IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
0
3. The authority citation for part 261 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 6905, 6912(a), 6921, 6922, 6924(y) and
6938.
0
4. Amend Sec. 261.39 by revising paragraph (a)(5)(iv) to read as
follows:
Sec. 261.39 Conditional Exclusion for Used, Broken Cathode Ray Tubes
(CRTs) and Processed CRT Glass Undergoing Recycling.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(5) * * *
(iv) EPA will provide a complete notification to the receiving
country and any transit countries. A notification is complete when EPA
receives a notification which EPA determines satisfies the requirements
of paragraph (a)(5)(i) of this section.
* * * * *
PART 262--STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO GENERATORS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
0
5. The authority citation for part 262 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C 6906, 6912, 6922-6925, 6937, and 6938.
0
6. Amend Sec. 262.83 by revising paragraphs (b)(5) and (f)(9) to read
as follows:
Sec. 262.83 Exports of hazardous waste.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(5) For cases where the proposed country of import and recovery or
disposal operations are not covered under an international agreement to
which both the United States and the country of import are parties, EPA
will coordinate with the Department of State to provide the complete
notification to country of import and any countries of transit. In all
other cases, EPA will provide the notification directly to the country
of import and any countries of transit. A notification is complete when
EPA receives a notification which EPA determines satisfies the
requirements of paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (xiii) of this section.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(9) Upon request by EPA, U.S. exporters, importers, or recovery
facilities must submit to EPA copies of
[[Page 60901]]
contracts, chain of contracts, or equivalent arrangements (when the
movement occurs between parties controlled by the same corporate or
legal entity).
* * * * *
0
7. Amend Sec. 262.84 by revising paragraphs (b)(4) and (f)(8) to read
as follows:
Sec. 262.84 Imports of hazardous waste.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) A notification is complete when EPA determines the notification
satisfies the requirements of paragraphs (b)(1)(i) through (xiii) of
this section.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(8) Upon request by EPA, importers or disposal or recovery
facilities must submit to EPA copies of contracts, chain of contracts,
or equivalent arrangements (when the movement occurs between parties
controlled by the same corporate or legal entity).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-27525 Filed 12-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P