Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, 60419-60420 [2017-27400]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2017 / Notices
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public
record for this investigation may be
viewed on the Commission’s electronic
docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Docket Services, U.S.
International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–1802.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337
and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2017).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
December 13, 2017, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain color intraoral
scanners and related hardware and
software by reason of infringement of
one or more of claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 18,
20, 21, and 26 of the ’228 patent; claims
1–8 and 15–18 of the ’456 patent; claims
1, 2, 4, and 15–21 of the ’207 patent;
claims 1, 4, 7, 10, 12, and 14 of the ’433
patent; and claims 1–12 of the ’931
patent; and claims 1–12 of the ’470
patent, and whether an industry in the
United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: Align
Technology, Inc., 2820 Orchard
Parkway, San Jose, CA 95134.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
3Shape A/S, Holmens Kanal 7, 1060
Copenhagen K, Denmark.
3Shape, Inc., 10 Independence
Boulevard, Suite 150, Warren, NJ 07059.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:36 Dec 19, 2017
Jkt 244001
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge, and the
Chief Administrative Law Judge is
authorized to consider whether to
consolidate Inv. No. 337–TA–1091 with
Inv. No. 337–TA–1090, and to
consolidate them if he deems it
appropriate.
The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations will not participate as a
party in this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 14, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
PO 00000
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–865–867 (Third
Review)]
Stainless Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings
From Italy, Malaysia, and the
Philippines
Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject five-year reviews, the
United States International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of
1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the
antidumping duty orders on stainless
steel butt-weld pipe fittings from Italy,
Malaysia, and the Philippines would be
likely to lead to continuation or
recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.
Background
The Commission, pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)),
instituted these reviews on June 1, 2017
(82 FR 25324) and determined on
September 5, 2017 that it would
conduct expedited reviews (82 FR
46524, October 5, 2017).
The Commission made these
determinations pursuant to section
751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It
completed and filed its determinations
in these reviews on January 8, 2018. The
views of the Commission are contained
in USITC Publication 4751 (January
2018), entitled Stainless Steel Butt-Weld
Pipe Fittings from Italy, Malaysia, and
the Philippines: Investigation Nos. 731–
TA–865–867 (Third Review).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 15, 2017.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2017–27391 Filed 12–19–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
[FR Doc. 2017–27321 Filed 12–19–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
60419
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act
On December 14, 2017, the
Department of Justice lodged a proposed
Consent Decree with the United States
District Court for the Northern District
of New York in the lawsuit entitled
1 The record is defined in sec. 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
60420
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2017 / Notices
United States v. Honeywell
International Inc., Civil Action No.
5:17–cv–01344–FJS–DEP. In a civil
action filed under Section 107(a) of the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act, 42 U.S.C. 9607(a) (CERCLA), on
December 14, 2017, the United States
sought recovery from Honeywell
International Inc. (‘‘Honeywell’’) of
costs of response action at the Onondaga
Lake Superfund Site (Site) in Syracuse,
New York. The proposed Consent
Decree resolves the liability of
defendant Honeywell for response costs
incurred by the United States in
connection with the Site.
The proposed Consent Decree
requires Honeywell to pay $7.3 million
in reimbursement of response costs
incurred by the United States with
respect to the Site. The proposed
Consent Decree provides Honeywell
with a covenant not to sue for response
costs incurred by the United States in
connection with the Site through the
date of lodging of the Consent Decree.
Honeywell previously entered into a
settlement with the New York State
Department of Environmental
Conservation (NYSDEC) that required
Honeywell to perform a cleanup of the
Lake Bottom portion of the Site.
The proposed Consent Decree also
resolves the liability of other potentially
responsible parties (‘‘Other Settling
Parties’’) who have previously settled
(or may settle in the future) with
Honeywell, and the United States
provides the Other Settling Parties with
a covenant not to sue for certain of the
costs incurred by the United States in
connection with the Site. The Other
Settling Parties also agree to provide a
covenant not to sue the United States for
certain costs and natural resource
damages in connection with the Site.
The proposed Consent Decree also
resolves Honeywell’s claim against the
United States under Section 113(f) of
CERCLA and requires the United States
to reimburse Honeywell $6.25 million of
Honeywell’s costs incurred in cleaning
up the Site. Honeywell alleges that
certain federal agencies were liable for
the disposal of contaminants at the Site
during World War II. Under the
proposed Consent Decree, Honeywell
provides the United States with a
covenant not to sue for response costs
and natural resource damages incurred
or to be incurred by Honeywell in
connection with the Site.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
Consent Decree. Please address
comments to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural
Resources Division and refer to United
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:36 Dec 19, 2017
Jkt 244001
States v. Honeywell International Inc.
D.J. Ref. No. 90–11–3–08348. All
comments must be submitted no later
than thirty (30) days after the
publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit comments:
pubcommentees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney
General, U.S.
DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044–
7611.
Nadene G. Kennedy,
Polar Coordination Specialist, Office of Polar
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2017–27385 Filed 12–19–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
Send them to:
By email ....................
1. Cory Wolff, Permit No. 2018–023
2. Joseph A. Covi, Permit No. 2018–024
By mail ......................
During the public comment period,
the Consent Decree may be examined
and downloaded at this Justice
Department website: https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
We will provide a paper copy of the
Consent Decree upon written request
and payment of reproduction costs.
Please mail your request and payment
to: Consent Decree Library, U.S. DOJ—
ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
Please enclose a check or money order
for $10.75 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United
States Treasury.
Robert E. Maher, Jr.,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2017–27400 Filed 12–19–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Notice of Permits Issued Under the
Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978
National Science Foundation.
Notice of permits issued.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The National Science
Foundation (NSF) is required to publish
notice of permits issued under the
Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978.
This is the required notice.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nature McGinn, ACA Permit Officer,
Office of Polar Programs, National
Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower
Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; 703–
292–8030; email: ACApermits@nsf.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 27, 2017, the National Science
Foundation published notices in the
Federal Register of a permit
applications received. The permits were
issued on December 15, 2017 to:
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 70–1257; NRC–2017–0148]
AREVA, Inc.; Richland, Washington;
Indirect Transfer of License; Order
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Indirect transfer of license;
order.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing an Order
approving the indirect transfer of
several licenses. AREVA, Inc., is the
holder of materials license no. SNM–
1227, which authorizes the possession
and use of special nuclear material
(SNM) at the AREVA, Inc. site in
Richland, Washington. AREVA, Inc. is
also the holder of export license nos.
XSNM3551, XSNM3697, XSNM3747,
XSOU8833, XCOM1202, XW015,
XCOM1304, XSNM3780, XSNM3781,
XSNM3782, and import license no.
IW009 which authorize the import and
export of licensed materials/
components to and from facilities in the
United States. The Order approves the
indirect transfer of control of the above
licenses resulting from a planned
reorganization of AREVA, Inc.’s parent
company and the sale of part of the
parent company. There will be no direct
transfer of control because AREVA, Inc.
will continue to be the license holder.
The Order became effective upon
issuance.
DATES: The Order was issued on
November 14, 2017, and is applicable
until March 31, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2017–0148 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information regarding this document.
You may obtain publicly-available
information related to this document
using any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2017–0148. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol
Gallagher; telephone: 301–415–3463;
email: Carol.Gallagher@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 20, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60419-60420]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-27400]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
On December 14, 2017, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed
Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the Northern
District of New York in the lawsuit entitled
[[Page 60420]]
United States v. Honeywell International Inc., Civil Action No. 5:17-
cv-01344-FJS-DEP. In a civil action filed under Section 107(a) of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act,
42 U.S.C. 9607(a) (CERCLA), on December 14, 2017, the United States
sought recovery from Honeywell International Inc. (``Honeywell'') of
costs of response action at the Onondaga Lake Superfund Site (Site) in
Syracuse, New York. The proposed Consent Decree resolves the liability
of defendant Honeywell for response costs incurred by the United States
in connection with the Site.
The proposed Consent Decree requires Honeywell to pay $7.3 million
in reimbursement of response costs incurred by the United States with
respect to the Site. The proposed Consent Decree provides Honeywell
with a covenant not to sue for response costs incurred by the United
States in connection with the Site through the date of lodging of the
Consent Decree. Honeywell previously entered into a settlement with the
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) that
required Honeywell to perform a cleanup of the Lake Bottom portion of
the Site.
The proposed Consent Decree also resolves the liability of other
potentially responsible parties (``Other Settling Parties'') who have
previously settled (or may settle in the future) with Honeywell, and
the United States provides the Other Settling Parties with a covenant
not to sue for certain of the costs incurred by the United States in
connection with the Site. The Other Settling Parties also agree to
provide a covenant not to sue the United States for certain costs and
natural resource damages in connection with the Site.
The proposed Consent Decree also resolves Honeywell's claim against
the United States under Section 113(f) of CERCLA and requires the
United States to reimburse Honeywell $6.25 million of Honeywell's costs
incurred in cleaning up the Site. Honeywell alleges that certain
federal agencies were liable for the disposal of contaminants at the
Site during World War II. Under the proposed Consent Decree, Honeywell
provides the United States with a covenant not to sue for response
costs and natural resource damages incurred or to be incurred by
Honeywell in connection with the Site.
The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on
the Consent Decree. Please address comments to the Assistant Attorney
General, Environment and Natural Resources Division and refer to United
States v. Honeywell International Inc. D.J. Ref. No. 90-11-3-08348. All
comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the
publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Send
To submit comments: them
to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By email.......................................................... [email protected].
By mail........................................................... Assi
stan
t
Atto
rney
Gene
ral,
U.S.
DOJ-
-ENR
D,
P.O.
Box
7611
,
Wash
ingt
on,
DC
2004
4-76
11.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
During the public comment period, the Consent Decree may be
examined and downloaded at this Justice Department website: https://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. We will provide a paper copy of
the Consent Decree upon written request and payment of reproduction
costs. Please mail your request and payment to: Consent Decree Library,
U.S. DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
Please enclose a check or money order for $10.75 (25 cents per page
reproduction cost) payable to the United States Treasury.
Robert E. Maher, Jr.,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2017-27400 Filed 12-19-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
