Safety Zone; Pacific Ocean, Kilauea Lava Flow Ocean Entry on Southeast Side of Island of Hawaii, HI, 60341-60348 [2017-27297]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2017 / Proposed Rules
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
the ‘‘actual delivery’’ exception is
available?
Question 4: As noted above, CEA
sections 4(a), 4(b), and 4b apply to retail
commodity transactions ‘‘as if’’ the
transaction was a futures contract.74
Therefore, absent an exception, a retail
commodity transaction must be offered
on or subject to the rules of a designated
contract market (‘‘DCM’’).75 Separately,
an entity soliciting or accepting orders
for retail commodity transactions and
accepting money, securities, or property
(or extending credit in lieu thereof) to
margin, guarantee, or secure such
transactions must register with the
Commission as a futures commission
merchant (‘‘FCM’’).76 As a result of
these requirements, the Commission
recognizes that certain entities or
platforms will choose not to offer virtual
currency retail commodity transactions.
This business decision is not unique to
any particular commodity. However, as
noted earlier, the Commission does not
intend to stifle innovation. Rather, it is
acting to protect U.S. retail customers
regarding transactions that fall within
its jurisdiction. Therefore, the
Commission requests comments as to
what factors may be relevant to consider
regarding the Commission’s potential
use of its exemptive authority under
CEA section 4(c) 77 in this regard. For
example, please note any advantages
and disadvantages regarding the
potential to establish a distinct
registration and compliance regime for
entities that seek to offer retail
commodity transactions in virtual
currency. Why would such treatment be
uniquely warranted 78 in the context of
virtual currency? Please also note any
other issues that the Commission should
consider regarding such an analysis.
What other alternatives should the
Commission consider instead of
establishing a distinct registration and
compliance regime?
Question 5: In Example 2, the
Commission sets forth a proposed set of
facts that permits actual delivery to a
depository instead of the purchaser.
What should the Commission consider
in further clarifying the meaning of
‘‘depository’’ for purposes of this
interpretation? For example, could the
depository maintain certain licenses or
registrations in order to qualify for this
example? In addition, should the
74 7
U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(D)(iii).
75 7 U.S.C. 6(a).
76 7 U.S.C. 1a(28); 7 U.S.C. 6d(a).
77 7 U.S.C. 6(c).
78 Arguably, beyond the distributed ledger
technologies, entities offering virtual currency retail
commodity transactions operate in a similar manner
to any other entity offering retail commodity
transactions online.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:03 Dec 19, 2017
Jkt 244001
Commission further prohibit the
depository from being owned or
operated by the offeror (including any
offeror parent company, partner, agent,
and other affiliates)? Please note any
factors the Commission should consider
in making this determination (such as
the effect of contractual agreements
between the depository and the offeror).
Question 6: Example 2 also requires
the purchaser to secure full control over
the virtual currency once it is deposited
in a depository in order for the fact
pattern to constitute actual delivery.
The Commission requests comment
regarding what types of circumstances
would ensure a purchaser has obtained
‘‘full control’’ of the commodity. For
example, is possession of a unique key
or other credentials that allow full
access and ability to transfer virtual
currency sufficient to provide full
control? Similarly, how should the
Commission view full control by a user
in light of commonly used cybersecurity
techniques and money transmitter
procedures otherwise required by law?
Question 7: Example 2 also requires
that no liens resulting from the use of
margin, leverage, or financing used to
obtain the entire quantity of the
commodity purchased by the buyer
continue forward at the expiration of 28
days from the date of the transaction.
The Commission requests comment
regarding circumstances under which a
lien would be considered terminated for
purposes of this interpretation. For
example, are there circumstances where
the Commission should consider
allowing ‘‘forced sale’’ scenarios,
whereby the purchased virtual currency
is used to satisfy any resulting liens
from the retail commodity transaction,
while still interpreting the transaction
as having resulted in actual delivery to
the purchaser? Should the Commission
consider other types of lien scenarios or
interests, such as those liens that would
not provide a right to repossession of
the commodity?
Question 8: As noted above, the status
of ‘‘title’’ is one of the factors the
Commission considers in an actual
delivery determination for retail
commodity transactions.79 In Examples
1 and 2, this interpretation notes that
‘‘title’’ may be reflected by linking an
individual purchaser with proof of
ownership of the particular wallet or
wallets that contain the purchased
virtual currency. What additional
examples, if any, should the
Commission consider to address the
status of ‘‘title’’ for the purposes of an
actual delivery determination?
79 See
PO 00000
78 FR at 52428.
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60341
Question 9: While this interpretation
is solely focused on the actual delivery
exception to CEA section 2(c)(2)(D), the
Commission recognizes other
exceptions may be available.80
Specifically, the Commission recognizes
that the SEC recently issued a statement
regarding the application of federal
securities laws to certain initial coin
offerings (‘‘ICOs’’).81 Depending on their
use, the tokens or units issued in an ICO
may be commodities, commodity
options, derivatives, or otherwise fall
within the Commission’s virtual
currency definition described in this
interpretation. However, any such
tokens that are deemed securities (and
trade in a manner that qualifies as a
retail commodity transaction) would be
excepted from the retail commodity
transaction definition pursuant to
section 2(c)(2)(D)(ii)(II) of the Act. Are
there concerns with the scope of this
exception with regard to retail
commodity transactions? What factors
should the Commission consider if it
were to issue further guidance regarding
this exception?
Issued in Washington, DC, on December
15, 2017 by the Commission.
Christopher J. Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission.
Appendix to Retail Commodity
Transactions Involving Virtual
Currency—Commission Voting
Summary
On this matter, Chairman Giancarlo and
Commissioners Quintenz and Behnam voted
in the affirmative. No Commissioner voted in
the negative.
[FR Doc. 2017–27421 Filed 12–19–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2017–0234]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Pacific Ocean, Kilauea
Lava Flow Ocean Entry on Southeast
Side of Island of Hawaii, HI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
80 See
generally 7 U.S.C. 2(c)(2)(D)(ii).
of Investigation Pursuant to Section
21(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: The
DAO, Exchange Act Release No. 81207 (Jul. 25,
2017).
81 Report
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
60342
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2017 / Proposed Rules
On April 3, 2017, the Coast
Guard published a notice of proposed
rulemaking to establish a permanent
safety zone surrounding the entry of
lava from the Kilauea volcano into the
Pacific Ocean on the southeast side of
the Island of Hawaii, HI. The safety zone
is needed to protect persons and vessels
from the potential hazards associated
with molten lava entering the ocean.
After considering comments received
from the public, the Coast Guard
analyzed the economic impact of the
proposed rule and made minor
modifications to the proposed rule. This
supplemental notice requests comments
on the analysis and revised proposal.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before February 20, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit and view
comments identified by docket number
USCG–2017–0234 using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
further instructions on submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions about this proposed
rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant
Commander John Bannon, Waterways
Management Division, Coast Guard;
telephone 808–541–4359, email
John.E.Bannon@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
BLS Bureau of Labor Statistics
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
IRFA Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
NAICS North American Industry
Classification System
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
OMB Office of Management and Budget
RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act
§ Section symbol
SNPRM Supplemental notice of proposed
rulemaking
TFR Temporary final rule
U.S.C. United States Code
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
II. Background
Lava flow that enters the ocean is
potentially hazardous to anyone near it,
particularly when lava deltas collapse.
A lava delta is new land that forms
when lava accumulates above sea level,
and extends from the existing base of a
sea cliff. Persons and vessels near active
lava flow ocean-entry sites face
potential hazards, which include, but
are not limited to: Plumes of hot,
corrosive seawater laden with
hydrochloric acid and fine volcanic
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:03 Dec 19, 2017
Jkt 244001
particles that can irritate the skin, eyes,
and lungs; explosions of debris and
eruptions of scalding water from hot
rock entering the ocean; sudden lava
delta collapses; and waves associated
with these explosions and collapses.
Lava has been entering the ocean at
the Kamokuna lava delta on Kilauea
volcano’s south coast since July 2016.
On December 31, 2016, a large portion
of the new lava delta collapsed into the
ocean, producing waves and explosions
of debris near 19°19′12″ N, 155°02′24″
W at the Kamokuna entry point.
Following this collapse, portions of the
adjacent sea cliff continued to collapse
into the ocean, producing localized
waves and showers of debris. The lava
delta continues to undergo a series of
formation and subsequent collapses as
lava pours into the Pacific Ocean.
Additionally, cracks parallel to the sea
cliff in the surrounding area persist,
indicating further collapses with very
little or no warning are possible. As of
March 2017, a new delta began to form
at the Kamokuna ocean-entry point. As
it continues to grow and collapse, cracks
parallel to the sea cliff surrounding it
persist, indicating the possibility of
further collapses.
On March 28, 2017, the Captain of the
Port (COTP) Honolulu issued a
temporary final rule (TFR) under docket
USCG–2017–0172. The TFR was
published in the Federal Register (82
FR 16109) on April 3, 2017 and an
extension of the TFR was published in
the Federal Register (82 FR 45461) on
September 29, 2017. The TFR
established a safety zone to immediately
protect persons and vessels from the
potential hazards associated molten lava
entering the ocean. The safety zone
encompassed all waters extending 300
meters (984 feet) in every direction
around all ocean-entry points of lava.
The Coast Guard prohibited entry of
persons or vessels into the safety zone,
unless authorized by the COTP
Honolulu, or his designated
representative.
In addition to the TFR, the Coast
Guard also published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on April
3, 2017, proposing to make the
temporary safety zone a final rule. Its
purpose was to mitigate the potential
threats that molten lava posed to the
maritime public when it entered the
ocean by implementing the safety zone
as a permanent control measure for
vessels operating near the lava entry
points. The NPRM addressed these
concerns, and invited the public to
comment during the comment period,
which ended June 2, 2017.
Subsequently, the Coast Guard extended
the TFR to allow the Coast Guard to
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
analyze the economic impact of the
safety zone and allow for public
comments on this supplemental NPRM.
The TFR will remain in effect through
March 28, 2018, unless the COTP
Honolulu cancels or modifies the TFR.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is proposing this
SNPRM under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231. The COTP Honolulu has
determined that there are potential
hazards associated with the molten lava
at the Kamokuna lava delta, which pose
potential safety concerns for anyone
within 300 meters of the ocean-entry
point. The purpose of this proposed rule
is to clarify the regulatory language for
the entry requirements of the safety
zone, and emphasize the safety concerns
related to boating near lava ocean-entry
points. The regulatory text we are
proposing appears at the end of this
document. It differs from the text
proposed in the NPRM, primarily in its
discussion of enforcement and how to
gain permission to enter the safety zone.
This proposed rule would establish a
permanent safety zone around the lava
flow at the Kamokuna lava delta.
Additionally, this proposed rule would
allow the Coast Guard to impose and
enforce restrictions on vessels operating
near the lava flow that enters the ocean.
This action is necessary to promote safe
navigation, and to preserve the safety of
life and property. Vessels capable of
safely operating inside the safety zone
may be authorized to enter by the COTP
Honolulu, or his designated
representative. Vessels approved for
transiting within the safety zone, such
as approved lava tour-boat operations,
are required to adhere to specific
conditions set by the COTP Honolulu.
Mariners who seek first time
authorization to enter the safety zone
must submit a written request, by email
or letter. The request must explain how
the vessel will operate safely in
proximity to lava. A typical request
should note the vessel’s condition, the
operator’s familiarity with the
surrounding waters, and any specific
safety practices for operating near the
lava ocean-entry points. Once initial
authorization is received, a vessel owner
or operator only needs to contact COTP
Honolulu by phone or radio to request
permission to enter the safety zone.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
In response to the NPRM, the Coast
Guard received 67 public comments. On
May 8, 2017, at a public meeting held
in Hilo, HI, meeting participants
discussed the proposed rule as well as
the dangers associated with lava ocean-
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2017 / Proposed Rules
entry points. The public comments and
meeting summary are available in the
public docket for this proposed rule
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
Because several comments raised
similar concerns, we will address the
main comment topic, followed by our
responses. Unless we receive
recommendations for change during the
SNPRM comment period, we plan to
adopt the regulations proposed in the
NPRM with minor modifications as
reflected in this SNPRM. The SNPRM
provides an additional comment period
to shape the final regulatory action.
Concerns received in the NPRM and this
SNPRM will be addressed in the final
rule.
The Coast Guard received nine
comments in support of the proposed
rule. One commenter noted that he had
taken a lava boat tour and felt that the
vessel got too close to the entry point
and that he experienced adverse health
symptoms from being in the lava plume.
Several commenters agreed that the
safety zone should be consistent with
that of the landside restriction of 300
meters. Other commenters supported
the safety zone due to the hazards
resulting from the entry of volcanic lava
into the ocean.
The Coast Guard received 18
comments regarding the safety zone’s
size and location. These comments
ranged from being in favor of the 300meter safety zone as well as opposed.
Nine opposing views stated that 300
meters is excessively restrictive. One
comment from the National Oceanic
Atmospheric Administration stated that
the Coast Guard should ‘‘provide
definitive bounding coordinates for the
safety zone, instead of a general
statement that the safety zone will
encompass all waters extending 300
meters in all directions around the entry
point of lava flow into the ocean
associated with the lava flow at the
Kamokuna lava delta.’’
We believe that because of the
unpredictable and varying nature of the
active lava flowing into the ocean at this
area, the Coast Guard cannot issue
specific geographic coordinates of the
safety zone in the final rulemaking, but
will discuss the current entry site in the
final rule. We have noted, with the
concurrence of NOAA’s Nautical Data
Branch, Marine Chart Division, the
position 19°19′08″ N, 155°02′36″ W for
their charting systems. That is the
coordinate provided for Kamokuna
Beach in the U.S. Geological Survey’s
Geographic Names Information System.
Additionally, because of the varying
dangers of the lava entry and fragile
bench shelf development, the Coast
Guard cannot provide a specific
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:03 Dec 19, 2017
Jkt 244001
distance at which a vessel can safely
operate. However, the COTP Honolulu
has permitted vessels to operate within
the 300-meter safety zone under certain
conditions.
The Coast Guard received one
comment from Hawaii Volcanoes
National Park supporting a safety zone
‘‘that is flexible to account for whatever
location the lava may occur since it is
not a static event in time or space. As
such, we recommend that the proposed
rule apply not just to the Kamokuna
ocean-entry point, but any location in
the future where lava enters the ocean.’’
We agree, and the proposed final rule
includes language stating that all
locations associated with the Kilauea
lava flow entering the Pacific Ocean on
the eastern side of the Island of Hawaii,
HI, are included under the safety zone.
Sixteen commenters recommended
that the Coast Guard reduce the 300meter radius of the safety zone.
We believe that based on Sector
Honolulu’s review of the historical
observations of delta collapses and
ejecta distances from the Hawaii
Volcano Observatory (HVO) records, a
radius of 300 meters remains a safe and
reasonable distance for a high-hazard
zone for the general boating public. The
Hawaiian Volcano Observatory reports
that explosions from delta collapses
‘‘have hurled hot rocks nearly a meter
(yard) in size as far as about 250 m (273
yards) inland from the collapsed delta
and scattered rock debris onshore over
an area the size of several football fields.
These explosions also hurl rocks
seaward, probably to similar
distances.’’ 1
The 300-meter safety zone also
mirrors land and air restrictions for lava
flow viewing. Furthermore, the 300
meter restriction was discussed at the
public meeting held on this rulemaking
and staff from the Hawaiian Volcano
Observatory reiterated the need for a
300 meter restriction. Accordingly, the
Coast Guard proposes to maintain the
safety zone’s 300-meter radius, with the
option of allowing operators to request
authorization to enter the safety zone
from the COTP Honolulu.
The Coast Guard received 30
comments in favor of allowing the lava
tour-boat owners and operators to enter
and operate in the safety zone.
Prior to the NPRM, the Coast Guard
promulgated a TFR for a 300-meter
safety zone at the Kamokuna lava delta.
Pursuant to the TFR, the COTP
Honolulu granted four lava tour-boat
owners and operators and one
photographer access to operate within
1 https://volcanoes.usgs.gov/observatories/hvo/
hawaii_ocean_entry.html.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60343
the safety zone. We believe that because
of the potential hazards associated with
the active lava flow and cliff fragility at
lava ocean-entry points, specific
distances from the lava flow a vessel can
safely operate cannot be provided.
Under this proposed final rule, any
vessel owner or operator may submit a
written request to the COTP Honolulu,
or his designated representative, for
authorization to enter the safety zone.
Such written requests must explain how
the vessel will operate safely in
proximity to lava. A typical request
should note the vessel’s condition, the
operator’s familiarity with the
surrounding waters, and any specific
safety practices for operating near the
lava ocean-entry points. Once initial
authorization is received, a vessel owner
or operator only needs to contact COTP
Honolulu by phone or radio to request
permission to enter the safety zone.
The Coast Guard received three
comments regarding access or exclusive
access to the lava flow by Hawaiian
natives. This rule is concerned with the
safety aspect of access to the lava flow
area. Mandating exclusive access to the
lava flow is outside the scope of this
rulemaking and is outside the Coast
Guard’s authority. This proposed rule
provides for access after requesting
permission from the COTP to enter the
zone. We encourage persons or vessel
owners and operators seeking access to
the safety zone to make their request by
following the guidance above.
The Coast Guard received one
comment regarding the lack of reliable
VHF radio communications near the
lava flow area, thereby, preventing lava
tour-boat owners and operators from
hailing the Coast Guard via VHF radio.
We are aware of the VHF radio
limitations in this area, and are
currently researching how to improve
radio coverage. The COTP Honolulu and
Coast Guard Base Honolulu are
attempting to install equipment in the
vicinity to enhance communications in
this area. In the meantime, vessel
owners and operators are encouraged to
use alternate means to communicate
effectively near the lava flow oceanentry points. They are also encouraged
to contact the Coast Guard in advance
of their transits to the lava ocean-entry
points in order to facilitate effective
communications as well as timely
processing any written request for
authorization to enter the safety zone.
The Coast Guard received four
comments regarding general unsafe
conditions at the boat ramp where tour
operators launch.
Boat ramps and associated safe
boating concerns are a state
management issue. We have forwarded
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
60344
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2017 / Proposed Rules
this comment to the appropriate state
office.
One comment proposed the safety
zone be stationary, and move with the
lava shelf, essentially creating a moving
safety zone.
Title 33 CFR 165.20 defines a safety
zone as a water area to which, for safety
purposes, access is limited to authorized
persons or vessels. It further states that
a safety zone may be stationary and
described by fixed limits. We believe
that in this situation, the entry point of
the lava changes based on flow, and as
such, the safety zone would encompass
all waters extending 300 meters (984
feet) in all directions around the entry
point of lava flow into the ocean. The
Coast Guard does not define this as a
moving safety zone around a moving
object, but rather as a necessary
adjustment to a dynamic environmental
occurrence, which may have multiple
lava entry points.
The Coast Guard also received a
comment stating that our certification
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), concerning the
economic impact on small entities, was
potentially arbitrary as it lacked any
factual basis for the certification. This
SNPRM includes an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) in Section V.
B. in accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612).
The Coast Guard received two
comments regarding Executive Order
13771 (‘‘Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs’’) directing
a reduction of the promulgation of new
regulations. As discussed in the next
section, this rule is exempt from this
Executive order.
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below, we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders and discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review,’’ and 13563,
‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review,’’ direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771, ‘‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs,’’ directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting
process. This rule has not been
designated a ‘‘significant regulatory
action,’’ under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:03 Dec 19, 2017
Jkt 244001
by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) and pursuant to OMB
guidance it is exempt from the
requirements of Executive Order 13771.
See OMB’s Memorandum ‘‘Guidance
Implementing Executive Order 13771,
Titled ‘Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs’ ’’ (April 5,
2017).
Costs
This SNPRM proposes to make
permanent the existing TFR safety zone
for the navigable waters surrounding the
entry of lava from Kilauea volcano into
the Pacific Ocean. The safety zone
would remain to include waters within
300 meters (984 feet) of where lava
enters the ocean. Entry of persons or
vessels into the safety zone may only
occur if granted permission by the
COTP Honolulu, or his designated
representative.
Lava has been entering the ocean at
Kamokuna lava delta on Kilauea
volcano’s south coast since July of 2016
and will continue to do so in the future.
When lava enters the ocean, hazards
emerge. The hazards include, but are
not limited to, plumes of corrosive
seawater, which can irritate the skin,
eyes, and lungs; explosions of debris
and scalding water, which can injure
passengers; and sudden collapses of
lava deltas, which can cause large waves
potentially capsizing vessels. This
SNPRM seeks to establish a minimum
safe operating distance to protect
individuals and vessel owners and
operators from the hazards of the
Kilauea lava flow at sea.
Prior to the original TFR, any vessel
could enter within 300 meters of the
point where lava reaches the ocean.
This SNPRM proposes to make
permanent the original TFR so that any
vessel wishing to enter the safety zone
must request permission in writing to
enter the safety zone from the COTP
Honolulu.
Therefore, this proposed rule affects
any vessel that would normally travel
within 300 meters of points where lava
reaches the ocean. Due to the hazards
and relative remoteness of such an area,
the Coast Guard is not aware of any
vessel operations within 300 meters of
a point where lava enters the ocean
other than those by lava tour-boat
owners and operators. So far, the COTP
Honolulu has granted four lava tourboat owners and operators as well as
one photographer authorization to enter
the safety zone under certain conditions
while the TFR is still in effect. These
entities are required to notify the COTP
Honolulu by phone before departing for
each tour in which they plan on
entering the 300-meter safety zone.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
When the Coast Guard published the
original TFR concurrently with the
NPRM on April 3, 2017, vessel owners
and operators were required to prepare
and submit a written request to the
COTP Honolulu to enter the safety zone.
Because this SNPRM is consistent with
the requirements in the TFR, we are
presenting the costs associated with this
SNPRM.
The written request requirement was
contained in the previous TFR and each
lava tour-boat owner and operator
seeking authorization to enter the safety
zone has complied. Based on
discussions with COTP Honolulu
personnel, we estimated it takes about
4-hours for a vessel owner or operator
to submit a written request to enter the
safety zone. This includes the time it
would take lava tour-boat owners and
operators to respond to questions from
the COTP concerning the written
request. Lava tour-boat owners and
operators would only be required to
make a written request once rather than
for each voyage. The Coast Guard is not
aware that any voyages were terminated
due to a lack of authorization to enter
the safety zone during the period
operators requested to enter.
We obtained the mean hourly wage
rate for a captain of a lava tour-boat
from the May 2016 Bureau of Labor
Statistics (BLS) Occupational
Employment Statistics National
Occupational Employment and Wage
Estimates. Based on BLS’ data, the mean
hourly wage rate for captains, mates,
and pilots of water vessels with the
North American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) occupational code of
53–5021 in the ‘‘Scenic and Sightseeing
Transportation, Water’’ industry is
$24.42.2 Because this is an unloaded
hourly wage rate, we added a load factor
of 1.52 derived from the May 2016 BLS
‘‘Employer Cost for Compensation’’
databases to obtain a loaded hourly
wage rate of $37.12.3 Using this
2 Captains, mates, and pilots may work in
numerous industries. We use the BLS industryspecific mean hourly wage rate for the affected tour
boat operators from the ‘‘Scenic and Sightseeing
Transportation, Water’’ industry. See https://
www.bls.gov/oes/2016/may/oes535021.htm.
3 A loaded wage rate is what a company pays per
hour to employ a person, not an hourly wage. The
loaded wage rate includes the cost of benefits
(health insurance, vacation, etc.). The load factor for
wages is calculated by dividing total compensation
by wages and salaries. For this analysis, we used
BLS Employer cost of employee compensation/
Transportation and Materials Moving Occupations,
Private Industry Report (Series IDs, CMU2010000
520000D and CMU2020000520000D) for all workers
using the multi-screen data search. Using 2016 Q4
data for the cost of compensation per hour worked,
we divided the total compensation amount of
$28.15 by the wage and salary amount of $18.53 to
obtain the load factor of about 1.52, rounded. See
the following websites: https://beta.bls.gov/data
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2017 / Proposed Rules
information, we estimated the one-time
initial cost for an owner or operator to
prepare a written request and respond to
comments from the Coast Guard to be
about $148.47 ($37.12 per hour × 4
hours). Therefore, we estimated the total
cost of the proposed rule on industry to
be about $593.88 ($148.47 × 4 lava tourboat owners or operators).
Since all four lava tour-boat owners
and operators (and one photographer,
who this proposed rule would not
affect) were each granted permission to
enter the safety zone through an initial
written request, the only potential cost
to these lava tour-boat owners and
operators would be the cost of the initial
request. Each owner or operator would
also be required to notify the COTP
Honolulu by phone during the normal
course of their duty before entering the
safety zone. These entities shall notify
the Coast Guard by phone; however, we
did not estimate a cost for the call
because the equipment already exists
onboard the vessel.
The Federal government would also
incur costs of this proposed rule.
Government costs to implement this
proposed rule include the one-time cost
of reviewing the written requests (we
did not estimate a cost for the time to
60345
receive a call from an owner or operator
to when entering a safety zone because
the COTP Honolulu conducts this
review in the normal course of the
COTP duties). To process the written
request, we estimated one noncommissioned officer with a rank of
E–7, and three officers with ranks of O–
4, O–5, and O–6 would take about one
hour each to review the written request.
Based on the labor rates listed in Table
1,4 we estimated the total cost of the
proposed rule to the Federal
government to be about $378.00.
TABLE 1—TOTAL GOVERNMENT COSTS OF THE TEMPORARY FINAL RULE
Rank
Wage rate
Labor hours
Total cost
E–7 ...............................................................................................................................................
O–4 ..............................................................................................................................................
O–5 ..............................................................................................................................................
O–6 ..............................................................................................................................................
$65
92
104
117
1
1
1
1
$65
92
104
117
Total ......................................................................................................................................
........................
4
378
We estimated the total cost of this
proposed rule to lava tour-boat owners
and operators and the government to be
about $972 ($593.88 for lava tour-boat
owners or operators + $378 for the
government).
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Benefits
Lava flow that enters the ocean is
potentially hazardous and presents a
danger to vessels navigating within
close proximity of where the flow enters
the ocean, particularly when lava deltas
collapse.5 These hazards include, but
are not limited to, plumes of hot,
corrosive seawater laden with
hydrochloric acid and fine volcanic
particles that can irritate the skin, eyes,
and lungs; explosions of debris and
eruptions of scalding water from hot
rock entering the ocean; sudden lava
delta collapses; and waves associated
with these explosions and collapses.
The primary benefit of this SNPRM is
to promote safe navigation, and preserve
the safety of life and property. If vessel
operators wish to transit through the
safety zone they will be required to first
contact the COTP Honolulu for
permission with an explanation of how
their safety and lifesaving equipment is
adequate to meet the greater risks
present.
Query/find?fq=survey:[oe]s=popularity:D and
https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/dsrv?cm. Multiplying
1.52 by $24.42, we obtained a loaded hourly wage
rate of about $37.12, rounded.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:03 Dec 19, 2017
Jkt 244001
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), the
Coast Guard prepared this Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
that examines the impacts of the rule on
small entities (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Due
to the proposed rule’s anticipated
impacts on small entities, the Coast
Guard is including an analysis of the
SNPRM requirements for informational
purposes.
A small entity may be: A small
independent business, defined as
independently owned and operated, is
organized for profit, and is not
dominant in its field per the Small
Business Act (5 U.S.C. 632); a small notfor-profit organization (any not-forprofit enterprise which is independently
owned and operated and is not
dominant in its field); or a small
governmental jurisdiction (locality with
fewer than 50,000 people) per the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5
U.S.C. 601–612.
An IRFA addresses the following:
(1) A description of the reasons why
action by the agency is being
considered;
(2) A succinct statement of the
objectives of, and legal basis for, the
rule;
(3) A description of and, where
feasible, an estimate of the number of
small entities to which the rule would
apply;
(4) A description of the projected
reporting, recordkeeping and other
compliance requirements of the rule,
including an estimate of the classes of
small entities that would be subject to
the requirement and the type of
professional skills necessary for
preparation of the report or record;
(5) An identification, to the extent
practicable, of all relevant Federal rules
that may duplicate, overlap or conflict
with the rule; and
(6) A description of any significant
alternatives to the rule that accomplish
the stated objectives of applicable
statutes and that minimize any
significant economic impact of the rule
on small entities.
We address each of these six elements
below:
1. A description of the reasons why
action by the agency is being
considered.
Lava has been entering the ocean at
Kamokuna on Kilauea volcano’s south
coast since July of 2016 and will
continue to do so in the foreseeable
future. When lava enters the ocean,
potential hazards emerge such as:
Plumes of corrosive seawater can irritate
the skin, eyes, and lungs; explosions of
debris and scalding water can injure
passengers; collapses of lava deltas can
cause large waves potentially capsizing
4 We obtained the hourly wage rates from
Enclosure (2) of Commandant Instruction 7310.1R
(29 March 2017) using the ‘‘In Government Rate.’’
5 A lava delta is new land that forms when lava
accumulates above sea level and extends from an
existing base of a sea cliff.
B. Impact on Small Entities
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
60346
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2017 / Proposed Rules
vessels. Unless vessels have the proper
equipment and their operators take
sufficient precautions, passengers, and
operators face significant hazards to
their lives as well as property. This
SNPRM is necessary to promote
navigational safety, provide for the
safety of life and property, and facilitate
and accommodate the reasonable
demands of commerce related to
tourism surrounding the lava oceanentry points.
2. A succinct statement of the
objective of, and legal basis for, the
proposed rule.
This safety zone proposes to protect
the safety of mariners, lava tour-boat
passengers, and the protection of
property by establishing a 300 meter
safety zone from every direction and all
points where lava enters the ocean.
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50
U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1,
6.04–6, and 160.5; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1. The COTP Honolulu has
determined that potential hazards exist
that are associated with Kilauea’s active
lava flow entry into the Pacific Ocean
on the southeast side of the Island of
Hawaii, HI. The Coast Guard considers
this area to be a safety concern for
anyone who transits within 300 meters
(984 feet) in every direction and around
all points where the lava flow enters the
ocean. The objective of this proposed
rule is to protect the public including
mariners and passengers aboard lava
tour-boat owners and operators traveling
in the navigable waters inside the safety
zone.
3. A description of and, where
feasible, an estimate of the number of
small entities to which the proposed
rule would apply.
This proposed rule affects any vessel
that would normally travel within 300
meters of points where lava reaches the
ocean. Due to the hazards and relative
remoteness of such an area, the Coast
Guard believes only lava tour operators
would regularly operate within 300
meters of a point where lava enters the
ocean. Based on the Coast Guard’s
understanding, there are four known
lava tour-boat owners and operators
(and one photographer) who regularly
come within 300 meters of the Kilauea
lava flow.
Of the four lava tour-boat owners and
operators who would transit within the
safety zone, we could not find
publically available information such as
annual revenues and number of
employees for three of the four
operators. We assumed these three
operators qualified as small entities. We
found revenue information on the fourth
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:03 Dec 19, 2017
Jkt 244001
lava tour-boat owner. Using Manta, a
publicly available database for
businesses in the United States, we
found this lava tour-boat owner to have
annual revenues of $220,000 and a
NAICS code of 561520, ‘‘Tour
Operators.’’ 6 This NAICS code has a
size threshold of $20.5 million for
annual revenues, based on the Small
Business Administration’s table of size
standards.7 Based on this information,
this lava tour-boat operator also
qualified as a small entity.
Based on discussions with COTP
Honolulu personnel and using the wage
rates and labor hour estimates as
established above, we estimated it
would take about 4-hours for an owner
or operator of a lava tour-boat to prepare
a written request to enter the safety
zone. This includes the time it would
take lava tour-boat owners or operators
to respond to questions from the COTP
concerning the written request. Lava
tour-boat owners and operators would
be only required to make this request
once rather than for every voyage.
Above we obtained a loaded hourly
wage rate of $37.12 for captains, mates,
and pilots of water vessels. We
estimated the one-time initial cost for an
owner or operator to prepare a written
request and respond to comments from
the Coast Guard to be about $148.47
($37.12 per hour × 4 hours). We
estimated the total cost of the SNPRM
to be about $593.88 ($148.47 × 4 lava
tour-boat owners or operators).
As mentioned above, we only found
revenue data on one of the four
operators. Therefore, we estimate the
initial revenue impact of this proposed
rule on this lava tour-boat owner to be
about $148.47, which is 0.07% of the
company’s revenue. There are no annual
revenue impacts because the written
request needs to be made once, after
which each lava tour-boat operator
would notify the COTP Honolulu by
phone to obtain permission to enter the
safety on a given day.
4. A description of the projected
reporting, recordkeeping, and other
compliance requirements of the
proposed rule, including an estimate of
the classes of small entities, which
would be subject to the requirements
and the type of professional skills
necessary for preparation of the report
or record.
This proposed rule calls for no new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.
6 Accessed July 17, 2017 from https://
www.manta.com.
7 https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/files/
Size_Standards_Table.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5. An identification, to the extent
practicable, of all relevant Federal rules,
which may duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with the rule.
There are no relevant Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
this SNPRM.
6. A description of any significant
alternatives to the rule which
accomplish the stated objectives of
applicable statutes and which minimize
any significant economic impact of the
rule on small entities.
The Coast Guard considered the
alternative of not establishing a safety
zone. However, without a safety zone,
vessel owners and operators would be
unprepared for the greater hazards that
are present near the Kilauea lava flow
ocean-entry point. These vessel owners
and operators and passengers could
suffer grave injury or in the extreme
case death, in addition to damage to or
loss of property, if adequate protection
is not provided. Therefore, the Coast
Guard decided a safety zone was
necessary to promote navigational
safety, provide for the safety of life and
property, and to accommodate and
facilitate the reasonable demands of
commerce relating to tourism
surrounding the lava entry points. No
cost to industry or government would be
associated with this alternative;
nevertheless, we rejected this alternative
because it would not ensure that the
boating public would operate within a
safe distance of where the lava flow
enters the ocean.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. We are
interested in the potential impacts from
this proposed rule on small businesses
and we request public comment on
these potential impacts. If you think that
this proposed rule would have a
significant economic impact on you,
your business, or your organization,
please submit a comment to the docket
at the address under ADDRESSES in the
proposed rule. In your comment,
explain why, how, and to what degree
you think this rule would have an
economic impact on you.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for
a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2017 / Proposed Rules
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it is
consistent with the fundamental
federalism principles and preemption
requirements described in Executive
Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has
implications for federalism or Indian
tribes, please contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this
proposed rule would not result in such
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023–01,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that this
action is one of a category of actions that
do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. This proposed rule
involves establishing a safety zone that
would prohibit persons and vessels
from entry into the 300 meters (984 feet)
safety zone extending in all directions
around the entry of lava flow into the
Pacific Ocean. Normally such actions
are categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1, of DHS
Instruction Manual 023–01–001–01,
Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this
determination is available in the docket
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:03 Dec 19, 2017
Jkt 244001
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We
seek any comments or information that
may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from
this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
VI. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We view public participation as
essential to effective rulemaking, and
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period.
Your comment can help shape the
outcome of this rulemaking. If you
submit a comment, please include the
docket number for this rulemaking,
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation.
We encourage you to submit
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov. If your material
cannot be submitted using https://
www.regulations.gov, contact the person
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, and will include
any personal information you have
provided. For more about privacy and
the docket, you may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding the Federal Docket
Management System in the March 24,
2005, issue of the Federal Register (70
FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM
are available in the docket, and all
public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov
and can be viewed by following that
website’s instructions. Additionally, if
you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified
when comments are posted or a final
rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, and
Waterways.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
60347
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
■
2. Add § 165.1414 to read as follows:
§ 165.1414 Safety Zone; Pacific Ocean,
Kilauea Lava Flow Ocean Entry on
Southeast Side of Island of Hawaii, HI.
(a) Location. The safety zone area is
located within the Captain of the Port
(COTP) Honolulu Zone (See 33 CFR
3.70–10) and encompasses all primary
areas from the surface of the water to the
ocean floor at the Kilauea active lava
flow entry into the Pacific Ocean on the
southeast side of the Island of Hawaii,
HI. The entry point of the lava may
change based on flow. The safety zone
encompasses all waters extending 300
meters (984 feet) in all directions
around entry points of lava flow into the
ocean associated with the lava flow at
the Kamokuna lava delta.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer who has been
authorized by the COTP Honolulu to
assist in enforcing the safety zone
described in paragraph (a).
(c) Regulations. The general
regulations governing safety zones
contained in § 165.23 apply to the safety
zone created by this notice of proposed
rulemaking.
(1) All persons and vessels are
required to comply with the general
regulations governing safety zones
found this part.
(2) Entry into or remaining in this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the COTP Honolulu, or
his designated representative.
(3) Persons or vessels desiring to enter
the safety zone identified in paragraph
(a) should submit a written request to
the COTP Honolulu before initial entry
into the safety zone. The request must
explain how the vessel will operate
safely in proximity to lava. A typical
request should note the vessel’s
condition, the operator’s familiarity
with the surrounding waters, and any
specific safety practices for operating
near the lava ocean-entry points.
Persons authorized initial entry may,
thereafter, contact the COTP Honolulu
through his designated representatives
at the Command Center via telephone:
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
60348
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 243 / Wednesday, December 20, 2017 / Proposed Rules
808–842–2600 and 808–842–2601; fax:
808–842–2642; or on VHF channel 16
(156.8 Mhz) to request permission to
transit the safety zone.
(4) If permission is granted, all
persons and vessels must comply with
the instructions of the COTP Honolulu,
or his designated representative, and
proceed at the minimum speed
necessary to maintain a safe course
while transiting through or in the safety
zone as well as maintain a safe distance
from the lava hazards.
(5) The COTP Honolulu will provide
notice of enforcement of the safety zone
described in this section by verbal radio
broadcasts and written notice to
mariners. The Coast Guard vessels
enforcing this section can be contacted
on marine band radio VHF–FM channel
16 (156.8 MHZ). The COTP and his or
her designated representatives can be
contacted at telephone number listed in
(c)(3) of this section.
(6) The Coast Guard may be assisted
in the patrol and enforcement of the
safety zone by Federal, State, and local
agencies.
Dated: December 13, 2017.
M.C. Long,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Honolulu.
[FR Doc. 2017–27297 Filed 12–19–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2017–0140; FRL–9972–31–
Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan
Revisions, San Diego County Air
Pollution Control District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Proposed rule.
section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the San Diego County Air
Pollution Control District (SDCAPCD)
portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions from
polyester resin operations. We are
proposing to approve a local rule to
regulate these emission sources under
the Clean Air Act (CAA or ‘‘the Act’’),
as well as a rule rescission. We are
taking comments on this proposal and
plan to follow with a final action.
DATES: Any comments must arrive by
January 19, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2017–0140 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
Doris Lo, Rulemaking Office Chief at
lo.doris@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be removed or edited from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, (415)
972–3024, lazarus.arnold@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule and rule rescission?
II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
B. Do the rule and rule rescission meet the
evaluation criteria?
C. The EPA’s Recommendations to Further
Improve the Rule
D. Public Comment and Proposed Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rules addressed by
this action with the date that they were
adopted and repealed by the local air
agency and submitted by the California
Air Resources Board (CARB).
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
Local agency
Rule No.
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
SDCAPCD ........................................
SDCAPCD ........................................
67.12
67.12.1
On September 27, 2016, the EPA
determined that the submittals for
SDCAPCD Rules 67.12 and 67.12.1 met
the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part
51 Appendix V, which must be met
before formal review by the EPA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:03 Dec 19, 2017
Jkt 244001
Adopted/
amended
Rule title
Polyester Resin Operations .............
Polyester Resin Operations .............
B. Are there other versions of these
rules?
There are no previous versions of
Rule 67.12.1 in the SIP. We approved
Rule 67.12 on March 27, 1997 (62 FR
14639).
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
5/15/1996
5/11/2016
Repealed/
rescinded
5/11/2016
........................
Submitted
8/22/16
8/22/16
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule and rule rescission?
VOCs help produce ground-level
ozone, smog and particulate matter,
which harm human health and the
environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA
requires states to submit regulations that
control VOC emissions. Rule 67.12.1,
and the rescinded Rule 67.12, control
VOCs emitted from polyester resin
E:\FR\FM\20DEP1.SGM
20DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 20, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60341-60348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-27297]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2017-0234]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Pacific Ocean, Kilauea Lava Flow Ocean Entry on
Southeast Side of Island of Hawaii, HI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 60342]]
SUMMARY: On April 3, 2017, the Coast Guard published a notice of
proposed rulemaking to establish a permanent safety zone surrounding
the entry of lava from the Kilauea volcano into the Pacific Ocean on
the southeast side of the Island of Hawaii, HI. The safety zone is
needed to protect persons and vessels from the potential hazards
associated with molten lava entering the ocean. After considering
comments received from the public, the Coast Guard analyzed the
economic impact of the proposed rule and made minor modifications to
the proposed rule. This supplemental notice requests comments on the
analysis and revised proposal.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before February 20, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit and view comments identified by docket number
USCG-2017-0234 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email Lieutenant Commander John Bannon,
Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard; telephone 808-541-4359,
email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
BLS Bureau of Labor Statistics
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
IRFA Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
NAICS North American Industry Classification System
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
OMB Office of Management and Budget
RFA Regulatory Flexibility Act
Sec. Section symbol
SNPRM Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking
TFR Temporary final rule
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background
Lava flow that enters the ocean is potentially hazardous to anyone
near it, particularly when lava deltas collapse. A lava delta is new
land that forms when lava accumulates above sea level, and extends from
the existing base of a sea cliff. Persons and vessels near active lava
flow ocean-entry sites face potential hazards, which include, but are
not limited to: Plumes of hot, corrosive seawater laden with
hydrochloric acid and fine volcanic particles that can irritate the
skin, eyes, and lungs; explosions of debris and eruptions of scalding
water from hot rock entering the ocean; sudden lava delta collapses;
and waves associated with these explosions and collapses.
Lava has been entering the ocean at the Kamokuna lava delta on
Kilauea volcano's south coast since July 2016. On December 31, 2016, a
large portion of the new lava delta collapsed into the ocean, producing
waves and explosions of debris near 19[deg]19'12'' N, 155[deg]02'24'' W
at the Kamokuna entry point. Following this collapse, portions of the
adjacent sea cliff continued to collapse into the ocean, producing
localized waves and showers of debris. The lava delta continues to
undergo a series of formation and subsequent collapses as lava pours
into the Pacific Ocean. Additionally, cracks parallel to the sea cliff
in the surrounding area persist, indicating further collapses with very
little or no warning are possible. As of March 2017, a new delta began
to form at the Kamokuna ocean-entry point. As it continues to grow and
collapse, cracks parallel to the sea cliff surrounding it persist,
indicating the possibility of further collapses.
On March 28, 2017, the Captain of the Port (COTP) Honolulu issued a
temporary final rule (TFR) under docket USCG-2017-0172. The TFR was
published in the Federal Register (82 FR 16109) on April 3, 2017 and an
extension of the TFR was published in the Federal Register (82 FR
45461) on September 29, 2017. The TFR established a safety zone to
immediately protect persons and vessels from the potential hazards
associated molten lava entering the ocean. The safety zone encompassed
all waters extending 300 meters (984 feet) in every direction around
all ocean-entry points of lava. The Coast Guard prohibited entry of
persons or vessels into the safety zone, unless authorized by the COTP
Honolulu, or his designated representative.
In addition to the TFR, the Coast Guard also published a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on April 3, 2017, proposing to make the
temporary safety zone a final rule. Its purpose was to mitigate the
potential threats that molten lava posed to the maritime public when it
entered the ocean by implementing the safety zone as a permanent
control measure for vessels operating near the lava entry points. The
NPRM addressed these concerns, and invited the public to comment during
the comment period, which ended June 2, 2017. Subsequently, the Coast
Guard extended the TFR to allow the Coast Guard to analyze the economic
impact of the safety zone and allow for public comments on this
supplemental NPRM. The TFR will remain in effect through March 28,
2018, unless the COTP Honolulu cancels or modifies the TFR.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is proposing this SNPRM under authority in 33
U.S.C. 1231. The COTP Honolulu has determined that there are potential
hazards associated with the molten lava at the Kamokuna lava delta,
which pose potential safety concerns for anyone within 300 meters of
the ocean-entry point. The purpose of this proposed rule is to clarify
the regulatory language for the entry requirements of the safety zone,
and emphasize the safety concerns related to boating near lava ocean-
entry points. The regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end
of this document. It differs from the text proposed in the NPRM,
primarily in its discussion of enforcement and how to gain permission
to enter the safety zone.
This proposed rule would establish a permanent safety zone around
the lava flow at the Kamokuna lava delta. Additionally, this proposed
rule would allow the Coast Guard to impose and enforce restrictions on
vessels operating near the lava flow that enters the ocean. This action
is necessary to promote safe navigation, and to preserve the safety of
life and property. Vessels capable of safely operating inside the
safety zone may be authorized to enter by the COTP Honolulu, or his
designated representative. Vessels approved for transiting within the
safety zone, such as approved lava tour-boat operations, are required
to adhere to specific conditions set by the COTP Honolulu. Mariners who
seek first time authorization to enter the safety zone must submit a
written request, by email or letter. The request must explain how the
vessel will operate safely in proximity to lava. A typical request
should note the vessel's condition, the operator's familiarity with the
surrounding waters, and any specific safety practices for operating
near the lava ocean-entry points. Once initial authorization is
received, a vessel owner or operator only needs to contact COTP
Honolulu by phone or radio to request permission to enter the safety
zone.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule
In response to the NPRM, the Coast Guard received 67 public
comments. On May 8, 2017, at a public meeting held in Hilo, HI, meeting
participants discussed the proposed rule as well as the dangers
associated with lava ocean-
[[Page 60343]]
entry points. The public comments and meeting summary are available in
the public docket for this proposed rule where indicated under
ADDRESSES. Because several comments raised similar concerns, we will
address the main comment topic, followed by our responses. Unless we
receive recommendations for change during the SNPRM comment period, we
plan to adopt the regulations proposed in the NPRM with minor
modifications as reflected in this SNPRM. The SNPRM provides an
additional comment period to shape the final regulatory action.
Concerns received in the NPRM and this SNPRM will be addressed in the
final rule.
The Coast Guard received nine comments in support of the proposed
rule. One commenter noted that he had taken a lava boat tour and felt
that the vessel got too close to the entry point and that he
experienced adverse health symptoms from being in the lava plume.
Several commenters agreed that the safety zone should be consistent
with that of the landside restriction of 300 meters. Other commenters
supported the safety zone due to the hazards resulting from the entry
of volcanic lava into the ocean.
The Coast Guard received 18 comments regarding the safety zone's
size and location. These comments ranged from being in favor of the
300-meter safety zone as well as opposed. Nine opposing views stated
that 300 meters is excessively restrictive. One comment from the
National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration stated that the Coast Guard
should ``provide definitive bounding coordinates for the safety zone,
instead of a general statement that the safety zone will encompass all
waters extending 300 meters in all directions around the entry point of
lava flow into the ocean associated with the lava flow at the Kamokuna
lava delta.''
We believe that because of the unpredictable and varying nature of
the active lava flowing into the ocean at this area, the Coast Guard
cannot issue specific geographic coordinates of the safety zone in the
final rulemaking, but will discuss the current entry site in the final
rule. We have noted, with the concurrence of NOAA's Nautical Data
Branch, Marine Chart Division, the position 19[deg]19'08'' N,
155[deg]02'36'' W for their charting systems. That is the coordinate
provided for Kamokuna Beach in the U.S. Geological Survey's Geographic
Names Information System.
Additionally, because of the varying dangers of the lava entry and
fragile bench shelf development, the Coast Guard cannot provide a
specific distance at which a vessel can safely operate. However, the
COTP Honolulu has permitted vessels to operate within the 300-meter
safety zone under certain conditions.
The Coast Guard received one comment from Hawaii Volcanoes National
Park supporting a safety zone ``that is flexible to account for
whatever location the lava may occur since it is not a static event in
time or space. As such, we recommend that the proposed rule apply not
just to the Kamokuna ocean-entry point, but any location in the future
where lava enters the ocean.''
We agree, and the proposed final rule includes language stating
that all locations associated with the Kilauea lava flow entering the
Pacific Ocean on the eastern side of the Island of Hawaii, HI, are
included under the safety zone.
Sixteen commenters recommended that the Coast Guard reduce the 300-
meter radius of the safety zone.
We believe that based on Sector Honolulu's review of the historical
observations of delta collapses and ejecta distances from the Hawaii
Volcano Observatory (HVO) records, a radius of 300 meters remains a
safe and reasonable distance for a high-hazard zone for the general
boating public. The Hawaiian Volcano Observatory reports that
explosions from delta collapses ``have hurled hot rocks nearly a meter
(yard) in size as far as about 250 m (273 yards) inland from the
collapsed delta and scattered rock debris onshore over an area the size
of several football fields. These explosions also hurl rocks seaward,
probably to similar distances.'' \1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ https://volcanoes.usgs.gov/observatories/hvo/hawaii_ocean_entry.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The 300-meter safety zone also mirrors land and air restrictions
for lava flow viewing. Furthermore, the 300 meter restriction was
discussed at the public meeting held on this rulemaking and staff from
the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory reiterated the need for a 300 meter
restriction. Accordingly, the Coast Guard proposes to maintain the
safety zone's 300-meter radius, with the option of allowing operators
to request authorization to enter the safety zone from the COTP
Honolulu.
The Coast Guard received 30 comments in favor of allowing the lava
tour-boat owners and operators to enter and operate in the safety zone.
Prior to the NPRM, the Coast Guard promulgated a TFR for a 300-
meter safety zone at the Kamokuna lava delta. Pursuant to the TFR, the
COTP Honolulu granted four lava tour-boat owners and operators and one
photographer access to operate within the safety zone. We believe that
because of the potential hazards associated with the active lava flow
and cliff fragility at lava ocean-entry points, specific distances from
the lava flow a vessel can safely operate cannot be provided. Under
this proposed final rule, any vessel owner or operator may submit a
written request to the COTP Honolulu, or his designated representative,
for authorization to enter the safety zone. Such written requests must
explain how the vessel will operate safely in proximity to lava. A
typical request should note the vessel's condition, the operator's
familiarity with the surrounding waters, and any specific safety
practices for operating near the lava ocean-entry points. Once initial
authorization is received, a vessel owner or operator only needs to
contact COTP Honolulu by phone or radio to request permission to enter
the safety zone.
The Coast Guard received three comments regarding access or
exclusive access to the lava flow by Hawaiian natives. This rule is
concerned with the safety aspect of access to the lava flow area.
Mandating exclusive access to the lava flow is outside the scope of
this rulemaking and is outside the Coast Guard's authority. This
proposed rule provides for access after requesting permission from the
COTP to enter the zone. We encourage persons or vessel owners and
operators seeking access to the safety zone to make their request by
following the guidance above.
The Coast Guard received one comment regarding the lack of reliable
VHF radio communications near the lava flow area, thereby, preventing
lava tour-boat owners and operators from hailing the Coast Guard via
VHF radio.
We are aware of the VHF radio limitations in this area, and are
currently researching how to improve radio coverage. The COTP Honolulu
and Coast Guard Base Honolulu are attempting to install equipment in
the vicinity to enhance communications in this area. In the meantime,
vessel owners and operators are encouraged to use alternate means to
communicate effectively near the lava flow ocean-entry points. They are
also encouraged to contact the Coast Guard in advance of their transits
to the lava ocean-entry points in order to facilitate effective
communications as well as timely processing any written request for
authorization to enter the safety zone.
The Coast Guard received four comments regarding general unsafe
conditions at the boat ramp where tour operators launch.
Boat ramps and associated safe boating concerns are a state
management issue. We have forwarded
[[Page 60344]]
this comment to the appropriate state office.
One comment proposed the safety zone be stationary, and move with
the lava shelf, essentially creating a moving safety zone.
Title 33 CFR 165.20 defines a safety zone as a water area to which,
for safety purposes, access is limited to authorized persons or
vessels. It further states that a safety zone may be stationary and
described by fixed limits. We believe that in this situation, the entry
point of the lava changes based on flow, and as such, the safety zone
would encompass all waters extending 300 meters (984 feet) in all
directions around the entry point of lava flow into the ocean. The
Coast Guard does not define this as a moving safety zone around a
moving object, but rather as a necessary adjustment to a dynamic
environmental occurrence, which may have multiple lava entry points.
The Coast Guard also received a comment stating that our
certification under 5 U.S.C. 605(b), concerning the economic impact on
small entities, was potentially arbitrary as it lacked any factual
basis for the certification. This SNPRM includes an Initial Regulatory
Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) in Section V. B. in accordance with the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612).
The Coast Guard received two comments regarding Executive Order
13771 (``Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs'')
directing a reduction of the promulgation of new regulations. As
discussed in the next section, this rule is exempt from this Executive
order.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below, we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,'' and
13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' direct agencies
to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives
and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that
maximize net benefits. Executive Order 13771, ``Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs,'' directs agencies to control regulatory
costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been designated a
``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt from the
requirements of Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum ``Guidance
Implementing Executive Order 13771, Titled `Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs' '' (April 5, 2017).
Costs
This SNPRM proposes to make permanent the existing TFR safety zone
for the navigable waters surrounding the entry of lava from Kilauea
volcano into the Pacific Ocean. The safety zone would remain to include
waters within 300 meters (984 feet) of where lava enters the ocean.
Entry of persons or vessels into the safety zone may only occur if
granted permission by the COTP Honolulu, or his designated
representative.
Lava has been entering the ocean at Kamokuna lava delta on Kilauea
volcano's south coast since July of 2016 and will continue to do so in
the future. When lava enters the ocean, hazards emerge. The hazards
include, but are not limited to, plumes of corrosive seawater, which
can irritate the skin, eyes, and lungs; explosions of debris and
scalding water, which can injure passengers; and sudden collapses of
lava deltas, which can cause large waves potentially capsizing vessels.
This SNPRM seeks to establish a minimum safe operating distance to
protect individuals and vessel owners and operators from the hazards of
the Kilauea lava flow at sea.
Prior to the original TFR, any vessel could enter within 300 meters
of the point where lava reaches the ocean. This SNPRM proposes to make
permanent the original TFR so that any vessel wishing to enter the
safety zone must request permission in writing to enter the safety zone
from the COTP Honolulu.
Therefore, this proposed rule affects any vessel that would
normally travel within 300 meters of points where lava reaches the
ocean. Due to the hazards and relative remoteness of such an area, the
Coast Guard is not aware of any vessel operations within 300 meters of
a point where lava enters the ocean other than those by lava tour-boat
owners and operators. So far, the COTP Honolulu has granted four lava
tour-boat owners and operators as well as one photographer
authorization to enter the safety zone under certain conditions while
the TFR is still in effect. These entities are required to notify the
COTP Honolulu by phone before departing for each tour in which they
plan on entering the 300-meter safety zone.
When the Coast Guard published the original TFR concurrently with
the NPRM on April 3, 2017, vessel owners and operators were required to
prepare and submit a written request to the COTP Honolulu to enter the
safety zone. Because this SNPRM is consistent with the requirements in
the TFR, we are presenting the costs associated with this SNPRM.
The written request requirement was contained in the previous TFR
and each lava tour-boat owner and operator seeking authorization to
enter the safety zone has complied. Based on discussions with COTP
Honolulu personnel, we estimated it takes about 4-hours for a vessel
owner or operator to submit a written request to enter the safety zone.
This includes the time it would take lava tour-boat owners and
operators to respond to questions from the COTP concerning the written
request. Lava tour-boat owners and operators would only be required to
make a written request once rather than for each voyage. The Coast
Guard is not aware that any voyages were terminated due to a lack of
authorization to enter the safety zone during the period operators
requested to enter.
We obtained the mean hourly wage rate for a captain of a lava tour-
boat from the May 2016 Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) Occupational
Employment Statistics National Occupational Employment and Wage
Estimates. Based on BLS' data, the mean hourly wage rate for captains,
mates, and pilots of water vessels with the North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) occupational code of 53-5021 in the
``Scenic and Sightseeing Transportation, Water'' industry is $24.42.\2\
Because this is an unloaded hourly wage rate, we added a load factor of
1.52 derived from the May 2016 BLS ``Employer Cost for Compensation''
databases to obtain a loaded hourly wage rate of $37.12.\3\ Using this
[[Page 60345]]
information, we estimated the one-time initial cost for an owner or
operator to prepare a written request and respond to comments from the
Coast Guard to be about $148.47 ($37.12 per hour x 4 hours). Therefore,
we estimated the total cost of the proposed rule on industry to be
about $593.88 ($148.47 x 4 lava tour-boat owners or operators).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Captains, mates, and pilots may work in numerous industries.
We use the BLS industry-specific mean hourly wage rate for the
affected tour boat operators from the ``Scenic and Sightseeing
Transportation, Water'' industry. See https://www.bls.gov/oes/2016/may/oes535021.htm.
\3\ A loaded wage rate is what a company pays per hour to employ
a person, not an hourly wage. The loaded wage rate includes the cost
of benefits (health insurance, vacation, etc.). The load factor for
wages is calculated by dividing total compensation by wages and
salaries. For this analysis, we used BLS Employer cost of employee
compensation/Transportation and Materials Moving Occupations,
Private Industry Report (Series IDs, CMU2010000520000D and
CMU2020000520000D) for all workers using the multi-screen data
search. Using 2016 Q4 data for the cost of compensation per hour
worked, we divided the total compensation amount of $28.15 by the
wage and salary amount of $18.53 to obtain the load factor of about
1.52, rounded. See the following websites: https://beta.bls.gov/dataQuery/find?fq=survey:[oe]s=popularity:D and https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/dsrv?cm. Multiplying 1.52 by $24.42, we
obtained a loaded hourly wage rate of about $37.12, rounded.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Since all four lava tour-boat owners and operators (and one
photographer, who this proposed rule would not affect) were each
granted permission to enter the safety zone through an initial written
request, the only potential cost to these lava tour-boat owners and
operators would be the cost of the initial request. Each owner or
operator would also be required to notify the COTP Honolulu by phone
during the normal course of their duty before entering the safety zone.
These entities shall notify the Coast Guard by phone; however, we did
not estimate a cost for the call because the equipment already exists
onboard the vessel.
The Federal government would also incur costs of this proposed
rule. Government costs to implement this proposed rule include the one-
time cost of reviewing the written requests (we did not estimate a cost
for the time to receive a call from an owner or operator to when
entering a safety zone because the COTP Honolulu conducts this review
in the normal course of the COTP duties). To process the written
request, we estimated one non-commissioned officer with a rank of E-7,
and three officers with ranks of O-4, O-5, and O-6 would take about one
hour each to review the written request. Based on the labor rates
listed in Table 1,\4\ we estimated the total cost of the proposed rule
to the Federal government to be about $378.00.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ We obtained the hourly wage rates from Enclosure (2) of
Commandant Instruction 7310.1R (29 March 2017) using the ``In
Government Rate.''
Table 1--Total Government Costs of the Temporary Final Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rank Wage rate Labor hours Total cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E-7............................................................. $65 1 $65
O-4............................................................. 92 1 92
O-5............................................................. 104 1 104
O-6............................................................. 117 1 117
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... .............. 4 378
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We estimated the total cost of this proposed rule to lava tour-boat
owners and operators and the government to be about $972 ($593.88 for
lava tour-boat owners or operators + $378 for the government).
Benefits
Lava flow that enters the ocean is potentially hazardous and
presents a danger to vessels navigating within close proximity of where
the flow enters the ocean, particularly when lava deltas collapse.\5\
These hazards include, but are not limited to, plumes of hot, corrosive
seawater laden with hydrochloric acid and fine volcanic particles that
can irritate the skin, eyes, and lungs; explosions of debris and
eruptions of scalding water from hot rock entering the ocean; sudden
lava delta collapses; and waves associated with these explosions and
collapses.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ A lava delta is new land that forms when lava accumulates
above sea level and extends from an existing base of a sea cliff.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The primary benefit of this SNPRM is to promote safe navigation,
and preserve the safety of life and property. If vessel operators wish
to transit through the safety zone they will be required to first
contact the COTP Honolulu for permission with an explanation of how
their safety and lifesaving equipment is adequate to meet the greater
risks present.
B. Impact on Small Entities
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-
612), the Coast Guard prepared this Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (IRFA) that examines the impacts of the rule on small entities
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Due to the proposed rule's anticipated impacts
on small entities, the Coast Guard is including an analysis of the
SNPRM requirements for informational purposes.
A small entity may be: A small independent business, defined as
independently owned and operated, is organized for profit, and is not
dominant in its field per the Small Business Act (5 U.S.C. 632); a
small not-for-profit organization (any not-for-profit enterprise which
is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field);
or a small governmental jurisdiction (locality with fewer than 50,000
people) per the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612.
An IRFA addresses the following:
(1) A description of the reasons why action by the agency is being
considered;
(2) A succinct statement of the objectives of, and legal basis for,
the rule;
(3) A description of and, where feasible, an estimate of the number
of small entities to which the rule would apply;
(4) A description of the projected reporting, recordkeeping and
other compliance requirements of the rule, including an estimate of the
classes of small entities that would be subject to the requirement and
the type of professional skills necessary for preparation of the report
or record;
(5) An identification, to the extent practicable, of all relevant
Federal rules that may duplicate, overlap or conflict with the rule;
and
(6) A description of any significant alternatives to the rule that
accomplish the stated objectives of applicable statutes and that
minimize any significant economic impact of the rule on small entities.
We address each of these six elements below:
1. A description of the reasons why action by the agency is being
considered.
Lava has been entering the ocean at Kamokuna on Kilauea volcano's
south coast since July of 2016 and will continue to do so in the
foreseeable future. When lava enters the ocean, potential hazards
emerge such as: Plumes of corrosive seawater can irritate the skin,
eyes, and lungs; explosions of debris and scalding water can injure
passengers; collapses of lava deltas can cause large waves potentially
capsizing
[[Page 60346]]
vessels. Unless vessels have the proper equipment and their operators
take sufficient precautions, passengers, and operators face significant
hazards to their lives as well as property. This SNPRM is necessary to
promote navigational safety, provide for the safety of life and
property, and facilitate and accommodate the reasonable demands of
commerce related to tourism surrounding the lava ocean-entry points.
2. A succinct statement of the objective of, and legal basis for,
the proposed rule.
This safety zone proposes to protect the safety of mariners, lava
tour-boat passengers, and the protection of property by establishing a
300 meter safety zone from every direction and all points where lava
enters the ocean.
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority 33 U.S.C.
1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. The COTP
Honolulu has determined that potential hazards exist that are
associated with Kilauea's active lava flow entry into the Pacific Ocean
on the southeast side of the Island of Hawaii, HI. The Coast Guard
considers this area to be a safety concern for anyone who transits
within 300 meters (984 feet) in every direction and around all points
where the lava flow enters the ocean. The objective of this proposed
rule is to protect the public including mariners and passengers aboard
lava tour-boat owners and operators traveling in the navigable waters
inside the safety zone.
3. A description of and, where feasible, an estimate of the number
of small entities to which the proposed rule would apply.
This proposed rule affects any vessel that would normally travel
within 300 meters of points where lava reaches the ocean. Due to the
hazards and relative remoteness of such an area, the Coast Guard
believes only lava tour operators would regularly operate within 300
meters of a point where lava enters the ocean. Based on the Coast
Guard's understanding, there are four known lava tour-boat owners and
operators (and one photographer) who regularly come within 300 meters
of the Kilauea lava flow.
Of the four lava tour-boat owners and operators who would transit
within the safety zone, we could not find publically available
information such as annual revenues and number of employees for three
of the four operators. We assumed these three operators qualified as
small entities. We found revenue information on the fourth lava tour-
boat owner. Using Manta, a publicly available database for businesses
in the United States, we found this lava tour-boat owner to have annual
revenues of $220,000 and a NAICS code of 561520, ``Tour Operators.''
\6\ This NAICS code has a size threshold of $20.5 million for annual
revenues, based on the Small Business Administration's table of size
standards.\7\ Based on this information, this lava tour-boat operator
also qualified as a small entity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Accessed July 17, 2017 from https://www.manta.com.
\7\ https://www.sba.gov/sites/default/files/files/Size_Standards_Table.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on discussions with COTP Honolulu personnel and using the
wage rates and labor hour estimates as established above, we estimated
it would take about 4-hours for an owner or operator of a lava tour-
boat to prepare a written request to enter the safety zone. This
includes the time it would take lava tour-boat owners or operators to
respond to questions from the COTP concerning the written request. Lava
tour-boat owners and operators would be only required to make this
request once rather than for every voyage.
Above we obtained a loaded hourly wage rate of $37.12 for captains,
mates, and pilots of water vessels. We estimated the one-time initial
cost for an owner or operator to prepare a written request and respond
to comments from the Coast Guard to be about $148.47 ($37.12 per hour x
4 hours). We estimated the total cost of the SNPRM to be about $593.88
($148.47 x 4 lava tour-boat owners or operators).
As mentioned above, we only found revenue data on one of the four
operators. Therefore, we estimate the initial revenue impact of this
proposed rule on this lava tour-boat owner to be about $148.47, which
is 0.07% of the company's revenue. There are no annual revenue impacts
because the written request needs to be made once, after which each
lava tour-boat operator would notify the COTP Honolulu by phone to
obtain permission to enter the safety on a given day.
4. A description of the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and
other compliance requirements of the proposed rule, including an
estimate of the classes of small entities, which would be subject to
the requirements and the type of professional skills necessary for
preparation of the report or record.
This proposed rule calls for no new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.
5. An identification, to the extent practicable, of all relevant
Federal rules, which may duplicate, overlap, or conflict with the rule.
There are no relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this SNPRM.
6. A description of any significant alternatives to the rule which
accomplish the stated objectives of applicable statutes and which
minimize any significant economic impact of the rule on small entities.
The Coast Guard considered the alternative of not establishing a
safety zone. However, without a safety zone, vessel owners and
operators would be unprepared for the greater hazards that are present
near the Kilauea lava flow ocean-entry point. These vessel owners and
operators and passengers could suffer grave injury or in the extreme
case death, in addition to damage to or loss of property, if adequate
protection is not provided. Therefore, the Coast Guard decided a safety
zone was necessary to promote navigational safety, provide for the
safety of life and property, and to accommodate and facilitate the
reasonable demands of commerce relating to tourism surrounding the lava
entry points. No cost to industry or government would be associated
with this alternative; nevertheless, we rejected this alternative
because it would not ensure that the boating public would operate
within a safe distance of where the lava flow enters the ocean.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that
this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. We are interested in the
potential impacts from this proposed rule on small businesses and we
request public comment on these potential impacts. If you think that
this proposed rule would have a significant economic impact on you,
your business, or your organization, please submit a comment to the
docket at the address under ADDRESSES in the proposed rule. In your
comment, explain why, how, and to what degree you think this rule would
have an economic impact on you.
C. Collection of Information
This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
[[Page 60347]]
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and have determined that
it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and
preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01, which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C.
4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action
is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
proposed rule involves establishing a safety zone that would prohibit
persons and vessels from entry into the 300 meters (984 feet) safety
zone extending in all directions around the entry of lava flow into the
Pacific Ocean. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1, of DHS
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact
from this proposed rule.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
VI. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov, and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).
Documents mentioned in this NPRM are available in the docket, and
all public comments, will be in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, and Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.1414 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.1414 Safety Zone; Pacific Ocean, Kilauea Lava Flow Ocean
Entry on Southeast Side of Island of Hawaii, HI.
(a) Location. The safety zone area is located within the Captain of
the Port (COTP) Honolulu Zone (See 33 CFR 3.70-10) and encompasses all
primary areas from the surface of the water to the ocean floor at the
Kilauea active lava flow entry into the Pacific Ocean on the southeast
side of the Island of Hawaii, HI. The entry point of the lava may
change based on flow. The safety zone encompasses all waters extending
300 meters (984 feet) in all directions around entry points of lava
flow into the ocean associated with the lava flow at the Kamokuna lava
delta.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has
been authorized by the COTP Honolulu to assist in enforcing the safety
zone described in paragraph (a).
(c) Regulations. The general regulations governing safety zones
contained in Sec. 165.23 apply to the safety zone created by this
notice of proposed rulemaking.
(1) All persons and vessels are required to comply with the general
regulations governing safety zones found this part.
(2) Entry into or remaining in this safety zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the COTP Honolulu, or his designated
representative.
(3) Persons or vessels desiring to enter the safety zone identified
in paragraph (a) should submit a written request to the COTP Honolulu
before initial entry into the safety zone. The request must explain how
the vessel will operate safely in proximity to lava. A typical request
should note the vessel's condition, the operator's familiarity with the
surrounding waters, and any specific safety practices for operating
near the lava ocean-entry points. Persons authorized initial entry may,
thereafter, contact the COTP Honolulu through his designated
representatives at the Command Center via telephone:
[[Page 60348]]
808-842-2600 and 808-842-2601; fax: 808-842-2642; or on VHF channel 16
(156.8 Mhz) to request permission to transit the safety zone.
(4) If permission is granted, all persons and vessels must comply
with the instructions of the COTP Honolulu, or his designated
representative, and proceed at the minimum speed necessary to maintain
a safe course while transiting through or in the safety zone as well as
maintain a safe distance from the lava hazards.
(5) The COTP Honolulu will provide notice of enforcement of the
safety zone described in this section by verbal radio broadcasts and
written notice to mariners. The Coast Guard vessels enforcing this
section can be contacted on marine band radio VHF-FM channel 16 (156.8
MHZ). The COTP and his or her designated representatives can be
contacted at telephone number listed in (c)(3) of this section.
(6) The Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement
of the safety zone by Federal, State, and local agencies.
Dated: December 13, 2017.
M.C. Long,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Honolulu.
[FR Doc. 2017-27297 Filed 12-19-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P