Approval of Arizona Air Plan Revision; San Manuel, Arizona; Second 10-Year Sulfur Dioxide Maintenance Plan, 59521-59523 [2017-26971]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 240 / Friday, December 15, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
22a–174–30a, see paragraph
(c)(117)(i)(B).
*
*
*
*
*
(117) Revisions to the State
Implementation Plan submitted by the
Connecticut Department of Energy and
Environmental Protection on September
14, 2015.
(i) Incorporation by reference
(A) ‘‘Control of Organic Compound
Emissions,’’ Regulation 22a–174–20, the
sections listed below, effective July 8,
2015, as published in the Connecticut
Law Journal on November 24, 2015.
(1) Section 20(a)(7);
(2) Section (b)(10);
(3) Sections (b)(12) through (b)(16);
(4) Section (20)(ee)
(B) ‘‘Control of Organic Compound
Emissions,’’ Regulation 22a–174–30a
‘‘Stage I Vapor Recovery,’’ effective July
8, 2015, as published in the Connecticut
Law Journal on November 24, 2015.
(C) ‘‘Control of Organic Compound
Emissions,’’ Regulation 22a–174–
32(b)(3), effective July 8, 2015, as
published in the Connecticut Law
Journal on November 24, 2015.
(D) House Bill No. 6534, Public Act
No. 13–120, ‘‘An Act Concerning
Gasoline Vapor Recovery Systems,’’
approved June 18, 2013.
(ii) Additional materials.
(A) Letter from the Connecticut
Department of Energy and
59521
Environmental Protection, dated
September 14, 2015, submitting a
revision to the Connecticut State
Implementation Plan.
3. In § 52.385, Table 52.385 is
amended by: Adding entries under
existing state citations 22a–174–20 and
22a–174–30; adding an entry for state
citation 22a–174–30a; adding an entry
under existing state citation 22a–174–
32, and adding a new entry for new
Connecticut Public Act 13–120 to the
end of the table to read as follows:
■
§ 52.385 EPA-approved Connecticut
regulations.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE 52.385—EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS
Dates
Connecticut State
citation
Title/subject
Date
adopted by
State
Date
approved by
EPA
Federal Register
citation
Section 52.370
Comments/description
*
22a–174–20 ................
*
Control of Organic
Compound Emissions.
*
7/8/15
12/15/2017
*
[Insert Federal Register citation].
*
(c)117 ..............
*
*
Removes sections (b)(6)–(b)(9) and (b)(11),
Revises sections (a)(7), (b)(10), sections
(b)(12)–(b)(16), and section (ee).
*
22a–174–30 ................
*
Dispensing of Gasoline/Stage II Vapor
Recovery.
Stage I Vapor Recovery.
*
7/8/15
12/15/2017
*
[Insert Federal Register citation].
*
(c)117 ..............
7/8/15
12/15/2017
[Insert Federal Register citation].
(c)117 ..............
*
*
22a–174–30 was repealed by CT and withdrawn from the SIP and replaced by
22a–174–30a.
Replaces the repealed section 22a–174–
30.
22a–174–30a ..............
*
22a–174–32 ................
*
Reasonably available
control technology
for volatile organic
compounds.
*
7/8/15
12/15/2017
*
[Insert Federal Register citation].
*
(c)117 ..............
*
*
Revises section (b)(3).
*
Connecticut Public Act
No. 13–120.
*
An act concerning
gasoline Vapor recovery systems.
*
6/18/13
12/15/2017
*
[Insert Federal Register citation].
*
(c)117 ..............
*
*
Revises section 22a–174e of the Connecticut General Statutes to require decommissioning of Stage II Vapor Recovery Systems.
[FR Doc. 2017–26900 Filed 12–14–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2017–0377; FRL–9972–03–
Region 9]
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
Approval of Arizona Air Plan Revision;
San Manuel, Arizona; Second 10-Year
Sulfur Dioxide Maintenance Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking final rulemaking
action to approve, as part of the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for the State
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:15 Dec 14, 2017
Jkt 244001
of Arizona, the second 10-year
maintenance plan for the San Manuel
area for the 1971 National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (‘‘standards’’) for
sulfur dioxide (SO2).
DATES: This final rule is effective on
January 16, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2017–0377. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ashley Graham, EPA Region IX, (415)
972–3877, graham.ashleyr@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, the words
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On October 5, 2017 (82 FR 46444), the
EPA proposed to approve the second 10year maintenance plan for the San
E:\FR\FM\15DER1.SGM
15DER1
59522
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 240 / Friday, December 15, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Manuel, Arizona SO2 maintenance area.
Submitted by the Arizona Department of
Environmental Quality on April 21,
2017, the San Manuel second 10-year
maintenance plan (‘‘plan’’)
demonstrates maintenance of the 1971
SO2 standards through the second
maintenance period of 2018–2028.
We proposed to approve the plan
because we determined that it complied
with the relevant Clean Air Act (CAA or
‘‘Act’’) requirements. Our proposed
action contains more information on the
plan and our evaluation (82 FR 46444,
October 5, 2017).
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received one anonymous
comment on October 10, 2017. The
comment raised issues that are outside
the scope of our proposed approval of
the San Manuel second 10-year
maintenance plan.
III. EPA Action
The EPA is taking final rulemaking
action to approve the San Manuel
second 10-year SO2 maintenance plan
under sections 110 and 175A of the
CAA. As authorized in section 110(k)(3)
of the Act, the EPA is approving the
submitted SIP revision because it fulfills
all relevant requirements.
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C.
7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as
meeting federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:15 Dec 14, 2017
Jkt 244001
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where the EPA or
an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this action
and other required information to the
U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it publishes in the
Federal Register. This action is not a
‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by February 13, 2018. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action
approving the revision to the State of
Arizona’s SIP may not be challenged
later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur dioxide.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 5, 2017.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region
IX.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart D—Arizona
2. In § 52.120, table 1 in paragraph (e)
is amended by adding the entry ‘‘San
Manuel Sulfur Dioxide Maintenance
Plan Renewal, 1971 Sulfur Dioxide
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(April 2017)’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.120
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
E:\FR\FM\15DER1.SGM
15DER1
*
*
59523
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 240 / Friday, December 15, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—EPA-APPROVED NON-REGULATORY AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
[Excluding certain resolutions and statutes, which are listed in tables 2 and 3, respectively] 1
Applicable geographic or
nonattainment area or title/
subject
Name of SIP provision
*
*
*
Part D
*
EPA approval date
*
Explanation
*
*
Elements and Plans (Other than for the Metropolitan Phoenix or Tucson Areas)
*
*
*
San Manuel Sulfur Dioxide
San Manuel Sulfur Dioxide
Maintenance Plan ReAir Quality Planning Area.
newal, 1971 Sulfur Dioxide
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (April 2017).
*
State submittal date
*
*
*
April 21, 2017 ........
*
*
*
*
December 15, 2017, [insert
Adopted by the Arizona DeFederal Register citation].
partment of Environmental
Quality on April 21, 2017.
Fulfills requirements for
second 10-year maintenance plan.
*
*
*
1 Table
1 is divided into three parts: Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2) State Implementation Plan Elements (excluding Part D Elements and
Plans), Part D Elements and Plans (other than for the Metropolitan Phoenix or Tucson Areas), and Part D Elements and Plans for the Metropolitan Phoenix and Tucson Areas.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2017–26971 Filed 12–14–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 622
[Docket No. 170505465–7999–02]
RIN 0648–BG87
Reef Fish Fishery of the Gulf of
Mexico; Gray Triggerfish Management
Measures; Amendment 46
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
NMFS issues regulations to
implement management measures
described in Amendment 46 to the
Fishery Management Plan for the Reef
Fish Resources of the Gulf of Mexico
(FMP), as prepared by the Gulf of
Mexico Fishery Management Council
(Council) (Amendment 46). For gray
triggerfish, this final rule revises the
recreational fixed closed season,
recreational bag limit, recreational
minimum size limit, and commercial
trip limit. Additionally, Amendment 46
establishes a new rebuilding time period
for the Gulf of Mexico (Gulf) gray
triggerfish stock. The purpose of this
final rule is to implement management
measures to assist in rebuilding the Gulf
nshattuck on DSK9F9SC42PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:15 Dec 14, 2017
Jkt 244001
gray triggerfish stock and achieve
optimum yield (OY).
DATES: This final rule is effective
January 16, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of
Amendment 46, which includes an
environmental assessment, a fishery
impact statement, a Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) analysis, and a
regulatory impact review, may be
obtained from the Southeast Regional
Office website at https://
sero.nmfs.noaa.gov/sustainable_
fisheries/gulf_fisheries/reef_fish/2017/
am46_gray_trigger/documents/pdfs/
gulf_reef_am46_gray_trigg_final.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lauren Waters, Southeast Regional
Office, NMFS, telephone: 727–824–
5305; email: Lauren.Waters@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS and
the Council manage the Gulf reef fish
fishery, which includes gray triggerfish,
under the FMP. The Council prepared
the FMP and NMFS implements the
FMP through regulations at 50 CFR part
622 under the authority of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act) (16 U.S.C. 1801
et seq.).
On August 30, 2017, NMFS published
a notice of availability for Amendment
46 and requested public comment (82
FR 41205). On September 25, 2017,
NMFS published a proposed rule for
Amendment 46 and requested public
comment (82 FR 44551). The proposed
rule and Amendment 46 outline the
rationale for the actions contained in
this final rule. A summary of the
management measures described in
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Amendment 46 and implemented by
this final rule is provided below.
The most recent Southeast Data,
Assessment, and Review (SEDAR) stock
assessment for gray triggerfish was
completed and reviewed by the
Council’s Scientific and Statistical
Committee (SSC) in October 2015
(SEDAR 43). SEDAR 43 indicated that
the gray triggerfish stock was not
experiencing overfishing but remained
overfished and would not be rebuilt by
the end of 2017 as previously projected.
On November 2, 2015, NMFS notified
the Council that the gray triggerfish
stock was not making adequate progress
toward rebuilding, and the Council
subsequently began development of
Amendment 46 to establish a new
rebuilding time period and other
management measures to achieve OY
and rebuild the stock.
Management Measures Contained in
This Final Rule
For gray triggerfish, this final rule
revises the recreational fixed closed
season, recreational bag limit,
recreational minimum size limit, and
commercial trip limit. NMFS and the
Council are implementing changes to
the recreational management measures
to help constrain recreational landings
to the recreational annual catch target
(ACT) and to avoid triggering
accountability measures (AMs) resulting
in an in-season closure or post-season
payback that would occur if landings
exceed the recreational annual catch
limit (ACL). The increase in the
commercial trip limit will allow those
commercial fishermen who encounter
gray triggerfish to harvest more fish per
trip while continuing to constrain
E:\FR\FM\15DER1.SGM
15DER1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 240 (Friday, December 15, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 59521-59523]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26971]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2017-0377; FRL-9972-03-Region 9]
Approval of Arizona Air Plan Revision; San Manuel, Arizona;
Second 10-Year Sulfur Dioxide Maintenance Plan
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
rulemaking action to approve, as part of the State Implementation Plan
(SIP) for the State of Arizona, the second 10-year maintenance plan for
the San Manuel area for the 1971 National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(``standards'') for sulfur dioxide (SO2).
DATES: This final rule is effective on January 16, 2018.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2017-0377. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ashley Graham, EPA Region IX, (415)
972-3877, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, the words ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On October 5, 2017 (82 FR 46444), the EPA proposed to approve the
second 10-year maintenance plan for the San
[[Page 59522]]
Manuel, Arizona SO2 maintenance area. Submitted by the
Arizona Department of Environmental Quality on April 21, 2017, the San
Manuel second 10-year maintenance plan (``plan'') demonstrates
maintenance of the 1971 SO2 standards through the second
maintenance period of 2018-2028.
We proposed to approve the plan because we determined that it
complied with the relevant Clean Air Act (CAA or ``Act'') requirements.
Our proposed action contains more information on the plan and our
evaluation (82 FR 46444, October 5, 2017).
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received one anonymous comment on October 10,
2017. The comment raised issues that are outside the scope of our
proposed approval of the San Manuel second 10-year maintenance plan.
III. EPA Action
The EPA is taking final rulemaking action to approve the San Manuel
second 10-year SO2 maintenance plan under sections 110 and
175A of the CAA. As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA
is approving the submitted SIP revision because it fulfills all
relevant requirements.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it publishes in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by February 13, 2018. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action approving the revision to the State of Arizona's
SIP may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur dioxide.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 5, 2017.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region IX.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart D--Arizona
0
2. In Sec. 52.120, table 1 in paragraph (e) is amended by adding the
entry ``San Manuel Sulfur Dioxide Maintenance Plan Renewal, 1971 Sulfur
Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standards (April 2017)'' to read
as follows:
Sec. 52.120 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
[[Page 59523]]
Table 1--EPA-Approved Non-Regulatory and Quasi-Regulatory Measures
[Excluding certain resolutions and statutes, which are listed in tables 2 and 3, respectively] \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable
geographic or
Name of SIP provision nonattainment State submittal date EPA approval Explanation
area or title/ date
subject
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part D Elements and Plans (Other than for the Metropolitan Phoenix or Tucson Areas)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
San Manuel Sulfur Dioxide San Manuel Sulfur April 21, 2017........... December 15, Adopted by the
Maintenance Plan Renewal, Dioxide Air 2017, [insert Arizona
1971 Sulfur Dioxide National Quality Planning Federal Department of
Ambient Air Quality Standards Area. Register Environmental
(April 2017). citation]. Quality on
April 21, 2017.
Fulfills
requirements
for second 10-
year
maintenance
plan.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Table 1 is divided into three parts: Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2) State Implementation Plan Elements
(excluding Part D Elements and Plans), Part D Elements and Plans (other than for the Metropolitan Phoenix or
Tucson Areas), and Part D Elements and Plans for the Metropolitan Phoenix and Tucson Areas.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-26971 Filed 12-14-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
