Opioid Policy Steering Committee: Prescribing Intervention-Exploring a Strategy for Implementation; Public Hearing; Request for Comments, 58572-58575 [2017-26785]
Download as PDF
58572
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Manager, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA; or the EASA; or
Airbus’s EASA DOA: Accomplish repetitive
SDIs within the compliance time defined in
those repair instructions for repetitive SDIs.
If no compliance time is identified in the
repair instructions for repetitive SDIs,
accomplish the repetitive SDIs required by
paragraph (i)(2) of this AD at the compliance
times defined in table 4 to paragraphs (i)(2)
and (l) of this AD.
(m) No Terminating Action
Modification or repair of an airplane, as
specified in paragraph (j) or (k) of this AD,
does not constitute terminating action for the
repetitive inspections required by this AD,
unless it is specified otherwise in a repair
method approved by the Manager,
International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA; or the EASA; or Airbus’s EASA
DOA.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
(n) Reporting Requirement
Submit a report of the findings (both
positive and negative) of the inspections
required by paragraphs (i) and (j) of this AD
to ‘‘Airbus Service Bulletin Reporting Online
Application’’ on Airbus World (https://
w3.airbus.com/), at the applicable time
specified in paragraph (n)(1) or (n)(2) of this
AD.
(1) If the inspection was done on or after
the effective date of this AD: Report within
30 days after that inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before the
effective date of this AD: Report within 30
days after the effective date of this AD.
(o) Other FAA AD Provisions
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the International
Section, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (p)(2) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the
effective date of this AD, for any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by
the Manager, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA; or the EASA; or
Airbus’s EASA DOA. If approved by the
DOA, the approval must include the DOAauthorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except
as specified in paragraph (k) of this AD, if
any service information contains procedures
or tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply
with this AD; any procedures or tests that are
not identified as RC are recommended. Those
procedures and tests that are not identified
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Dec 12, 2017
Jkt 244001
as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator’s
maintenance or inspection program without
obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can
be done and the airplane can be put back in
an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
(4) Reporting Requirements: A federal
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, nor
shall a person be subject to a penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of
information subject to the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that
collection of information displays a current
valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information
collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to
be approximately [XX] per response,
including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of
information. All responses to this collection
of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and
suggestions for reducing the burden should
be directed to the FAA at 800 Independence
Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer,
AES–200.
(p) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2017–0099, dated
June 8, 2017, for related information. This
MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–
2017–1102.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW,
Renton, WA 98057–3356; telephone 425–
227–1405; fax 425–227–1149.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness
Office-EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33
5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email
account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; internet
https://www.airbus.com. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 22, 2017.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–26622 Filed 12–12–17; 8:45 am]
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 15
[Docket No. FDA–2017–N–6502]
Opioid Policy Steering Committee:
Prescribing Intervention—Exploring a
Strategy for Implementation; Public
Hearing; Request for Comments
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Notification of public hearing;
request for comments.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, the Agency, or
we) is announcing a public hearing
entitled, ‘‘Opioid Policy Steering
Committee: Prescribing Intervention—
Exploring a Strategy for
Implementation.’’ The purpose of the
public hearing is to receive stakeholder
input on how FDA might, under its Risk
Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy
(REMS) authority, improve the safe use
of opioid analgesics by curbing
overprescribing to decrease the
occurrence of new addictions and limit
misuse and abuse of opioid analgesics.
DATES: The public hearing will be held
on January 30, 2018, from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m. The public hearing may be
extended or may end early depending
on the level of public participation.
Persons seeking to attend, or to present
at, the public hearing must register by
January 16, 2018. Electronic or written
comments will be accepted after the
public hearing until March 16, 2018.
See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for registration date and
information.
SUMMARY:
The public hearing will be
held at FDA White Oak Campus, 10903
New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31
Conference Center, the Great Room (Rm.
1503 B and C), Silver Spring, MD
20993–0002. Entrance for public hearing
participants (non-FDA employees) is
through Building 1 where routine
security check procedures will be
performed. For parking and security
information, please refer to https://
www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/Working
atFDA/BuildingsandFacilities/WhiteOak
CampusInformation/ucm241740.htm.
You may submit comments as
follows. Please note that late, untimely
filed comments will not be considered.
ADDRESSES:
Electronic Submissions
Electronic comments must be
submitted on or before March 16, 2018.
The https://www.regulations.gov
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PO 00000
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM
13DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
electronic filing system will accept
comments until midnight Eastern Time
at the end of March 16, 2018. Comments
received by mail/hand delivery/courier
(for written/paper submissions) will be
considered timely if they are
postmarked, or the delivery service
acceptance receipt is, on or before that
date.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2017–N–6502 for ‘‘Opioid Policy
Steering Committee: Prescribing
Intervention—Exploring a Strategy for
Implementation; Public Hearing;
Request for Comments.’’ Received
comments, those filed in a timely
manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed
in the docket and, except for those
submitted as ‘‘Confidential
Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the
Dockets Management Staff between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Dec 12, 2017
Jkt 244001
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The
Agency will review this copy, including
the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The
second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information
redacted/blacked out, will be available
for public viewing and posted on
https://www.regulations.gov. Submit
both copies to the Dockets Management
Staff. If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/
fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/201523389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kathleen Davies, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 1, Rm. 2310, Silver Spring,
MD 20993, 301–796–2205,
kathleen.davies@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On May 23, 2017, the FDA
Commissioner announced the
establishment of an Opioid Policy
Steering Committee (Steering
Committee) to explore and develop
additional approaches or strategies FDA
could consider using to combat the
opioid crisis. Given the unprecedented
nature of the opioid crisis and the role
of prescription opioids in the crisis, the
Steering Committee is considering novel
ways to reduce the number of new cases
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
58573
of addiction while continuing to ensure
the benefits of opioid products outweigh
their risks.
Recent studies suggest that
prescriptions for opioid analgesics are
frequently dispensed for a number of
tablets that exceed those needed for
adequate pain control, particularly for
acute pain. The Steering Committee is
considering whether current prescribing
patterns are contributing to the
development of new addiction in
patients, and whether the excess unused
pills are a gateway to misuse, abuse, and
addiction among family members and
others who might have access to the
unused pills. Therefore, the Steering
Committee is exploring, by means of
FDA’s REMS authorities, the option of
facilitating appropriate prescribing by
requiring sponsors to implement a
prescriber intervention at the point
when the prescriber determines an
opioid analgesic prescription is
necessary for a patient. For example, a
REMS could impact prescribing by
requiring that sponsors ensure that
prescribers provide specific
documentation for a prescription above
a specified amount, such as a statement
that the quantity prescribed is medically
necessary for the patient. The
documentation requirement would not
be intended to prevent access for
patients in whom chronic use of opioid
analgesics is the most appropriate
therapy. Instead, it would be designed
to ensure that prescribers consider
whether the amount prescribed is
appropriate for the patient and, if above
the specified amount, document that
necessity. The Steering Committee’s
view is that one way sponsors could
implement this type of prescribing
documentation requirement is through
an electronic system at the point of
prescribing (i.e., incorporated into the
prescriber’s workflow) to minimize the
burden on patient access and on the
health care delivery system. Thus, the
Steering Committee is interested in
exploring evidence-based approaches
that would encourage electronic
prescribing as a mechanism for the
prescriber to provide documentation of
a safe-use condition (e.g., that the
quantity prescribed is medically
necessary for the patient) before the
drug is dispensed by the pharmacy. The
Steering Committee also seeks input
from the public on alternative REMS
models or approaches for consideration.
II. Topics for Discussion at the Public
Hearing
In this public hearing, FDA seeks
stakeholder input on new approaches to
promote the safe use of opioid
analgesics using FDA’s REMS
E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM
13DEP1
58574
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules
authorities. FDA is seeking feedback
from a broad group of stakeholders, both
private and public, who are working on
the challenges of improving pain
management while addressing the
opioid epidemic. The Agency is also
particularly interested in ensuring that
any REMS intervention minimizes the
burden on patient access and, to the
extent practicable, on the health care
delivery system. Relevant questions for
consideration are provided below.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Prescriber Documentation
Many REMS programs rely on
pharmacies to verify that required safeuse conditions have been documented
prior to dispensing a drug product. One
alternative approach under
consideration would require sponsors to
ensure that prescribers follow specific
requirements outlined in the REMS for
each opioid analgesic prescription for a
quantity above a specified amount. This
approach could involve use of an
electronic system (e.g., electronic
prescribing integrated into a prescriber’s
workflow) that would require
prescribers to specifically document the
medical necessity of the quantity
prescribed for a particular patient. This
documentation would be verified before
the prescription reaches the pharmacy.
For prescribers who intend to prescribe
below the specified amount, no
additional documentation of medical
necessity or electronic prescription
would be required.
1. If a REMS were to specify threshold
drug amounts for opioid analgesic
prescriptions above which prescribers
would be required to provide additional
documentation of medical necessity,
what should the amounts be and how
should they be determined for various
clinical indications? What data are there
to support such amounts? What
additional data would be useful?
2. If such measures were required,
how should prescribers be made aware
of them? Within the Agency’s statutory
REMS authority, how should the
Agency require sponsors to ensure
compliance with them? How should the
Agency require sponsors to assess their
effect in reducing misuse, abuse, and
new addictions?
Additional REMS Approaches
Health care providers generally have
the capability to access state
prescription drug monitoring program
(PDMP) data that include patient
prescription history and prescribing
patterns. PDMPs are separately managed
and maintained by the individual states,
which may result in disparate data
elements and data sharing challenges.
Additionally, review of PDMP data
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Dec 12, 2017
Jkt 244001
requires health care providers to access
a database that may not be integrated
into their workflow.
Either in conjunction with, or
separate from, the prescriber
intervention approach discussed above,
the Steering Committee is considering
whether to require sponsors to create a
system that would leverage a
nationwide database to be more
effective in helping health care
providers identify potential misuse and
abuse (e.g., doctor shopping) and
facilitate safe use of opioid analgesics
(e.g., real-time identification of potential
harmful drug-drug combinations). Such
an approach could be integrated into the
health care provider’s workflow to
minimize burden on the health care
system.
3. The Steering Committee requests
input from the public on whether, in
addition to, or in conjunction with the
above described prescriber intervention,
and to the extent consistent with its
statutory authority, the Agency should
consider requiring sponsors to create a
system that utilizes a nationwide
prescription history database to
facilitate safe use of opioid analgesics.
4. If this approach were adopted, how
should the Agency require sponsors to
assess the impact of such requirements?
Additional Considerations
The Steering Committee
acknowledges that the approaches
described above emphasize specific
components within the opioid
prescribing pathway and might not
address other areas where misuse and
abuse may be occurring. The Steering
Committee seeks input from the public
on additional approaches the Agency
may consider, within its statutory
authority, to reduce misuse, abuse, and
addiction associated with opioid
analgesics.
5. The proposed Opioid Analgesics
REMS includes a Medication Guide and
a Patient Counseling Document to
educate patients. It also includes a
Blueprint for Health Care Providers
Involved in the Management or Support
of Patients with Pain that contains
information on counseling patients and
caregivers about the safe use of opioid
analgesics. Consistent with its statutory
authority, should FDA require sponsors
to take additional measures to ensure
that health care providers, their
patients, and patient caregivers and
family members are educated on safe
storage and disposal and the risks of
misuse, abuse, and addiction associated
with opioid analgesics (e.g., a public
health campaign targeted at these
groups)?
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6. Should the Agency consider
additional measures intended to
improve the safety of patient storage and
handling of opioid analgesics?
7. How might use of unit-of-use
packaging play a role in encouraging
appropriate prescribing of opioid
analgesics?
8. Should the Agency require
sponsors to create a mechanism by
which patients could return unused
pills, and if so, to whom?
III. Participating in the Public Hearing
Registration: The FDA Conference
Center at White Oak is a Federal facility
with security procedures and limited
seating. Attendance will be free and on
a first-come, first-served basis. If you
wish to attend, either in person or by
webcast (see Streaming Webcast of the
Public Hearing), and/or present at the
hearing, please register for the hearing
and/or make a request for oral
presentations or comments at https://
www.eventbrite.com/e/opioid-policysteering-committee-tickets-39490940466
by January 16, 2018, and provide
complete contact information for each
attendee, including name, title,
affiliation, address, email, and
telephone.
FDA will try to accommodate all
persons who wish to make a
presentation. Individuals wishing to
present should identify the number of
the question, or questions, they wish to
address. This will help FDA organize
the presentations. Individuals and
organizations with common interests
should consolidate or coordinate their
presentations and request time for a
joint presentation. FDA will notify
registered presenters of their scheduled
presentation times. Time allotted for
each presentation will depend on the
number of individuals who wish to
speak. Once FDA notifies registered
presenters of their scheduled times, they
are encouraged to submit an electronic
copy of their presentation (.DOC,
.DOCX, .PPT, .PPTX, .XLS, .XLSX, .PDF
formats preferred) to kathleen.davies@
fda.hhs.gov on or before January 22,
2018. No commercial or promotional
material will be permitted to be
presented or distributed at the public
hearing. Persons registered to make an
oral presentation are encouraged to
arrive at the hearing room early and
check in at the onsite registration table
to confirm their designated presentation
time. An agenda for the hearing and any
other background materials will be
made available 3 days before the hearing
at https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/
MeetingsConferencesWorkshops/ucm
583543.htm.
E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM
13DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules
If you need special accommodations
due to a disability, please contact
Kathleen Davies at least 7 days before
the hearing.
Streaming Webcast of the Public
Hearing: This public hearing will also
be webcast for those unable to attend in
person. To join the hearing via the
webcast, please go to https://
collaboration.fda.gov/opsc.
If you have never attended a Connect
Pro event before, test your connection at
https://collaboration.fda.gov/common/
help/en/support/meeting_test.htm. To
get a quick overview of the Connect Pro
program, visit https://www.adobe.com/
go/connectpro_overview. FDA has
verified the website addresses in this
document, as of the date this document
publishes in the Federal Register, but
websites are subject to change over time.
Transcripts: Please be advised that as
soon as a transcript of the public
hearing is available, it will be accessible
at https://www.regulations.gov. It may
be viewed at the Dockets Management
Staff (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Notice of Public Hearing Under 21
CFR Part 15
The Commissioner of Food and Drugs
is announcing that the public hearing
will be held in accordance with part 15
(21 CFR part 15). The hearing will be
conducted by a presiding officer,
accompanied by FDA senior
management from the Office of the
Commissioner and the relevant centers/
offices. Under § 15.30(f) (21 CFR
15.30(f)), the hearing is informal and the
rules of evidence do not apply. Only the
presiding officer and panel members
may question any person during or at
the conclusion of each presentation
(§ 15.30(e)). Public hearings under part
15 are subject to FDA’s policy and
procedures for electronic media
coverage of FDA’s public administrative
proceedings (21 CFR part 10, subpart C)
(§ 10.203(a)). Under § 10.205,
representatives of the electronic media
may be permitted, subject to certain
limitations, to videotape, film, or
otherwise record FDA’s public
administrative proceedings, including
presentations by participants. The
hearing will be transcribed as stipulated
in § 15.30(b) (see section V). To the
extent that the conditions for the
hearing as described in this document
conflict with any provisions set out in
part 15, this notice acts as a waiver of
those provisions as specified in
§ 15.30(h).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:09 Dec 12, 2017
Jkt 244001
Dated: December 4, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017–26785 Filed 12–11–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA–475]
Schedules of Controlled Substances:
Temporary Placement of Seven
Fentanyl-Related Substances in
Schedule I
Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Proposed amendment;
notification of intent.
AGENCY:
The Administrator of the Drug
Enforcement Administration is issuing
this notice of intent to publish a
temporary order to schedule seven
fentanyl-related substances in schedule
I. These seven substances are: N-(1phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)N-phenylpentanamide (valeryl
fentanyl), N-(4-fluorophenyl)N-(1-phenethylpiperidin4-yl)butyramide (para-fluorobutyryl
fentanyl), N-(4-methoxyphenyl)N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4yl)butyramide (para-methoxybutyryl
fentanyl), N-(4-chlorophenyl)N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4yl)isobutyramide (para-chloroisobutyryl
fentanyl), N-(1-phenethylpiperidin4-yl)-Nphenylisobutyramide (isobutyryl
fentanyl), N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4yl)N-phenylcyclopentane
carboxamide (cyclopentyl fentanyl), and
N-(2-fluorophenyl)2-methoxy-N-(1-phenethylpiperidin4-yl)acetamide (ocfentanil). This action
is based on a finding by the
Administrator that the placement of
these seven synthetic opioids in
schedule I of the Controlled Substances
Act (CSA) is necessary to avoid an
imminent hazard to the public safety.
When it is issued, the temporary
scheduling order will impose the
administrative, civil, and criminal
sanctions and regulatory controls
applicable to schedule I controlled
substances under the CSA on the
manufacture, distribution, reverse
distribution, possession, importation,
exportation, research, and conduct of
instructional activities, and chemical
analysis of these synthetic opioids.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
58575
December 13, 2017.
The DEA’s three-factor
analysis is available in its entirety under
‘‘Supporting and Related Material’’ of
the public docket for this action at
www.regulations.gov under Docket
Number DEA–475.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael J. Lewis, Diversion Control
Division, Drug Enforcement
Administration; Mailing Address: 8701
Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia
22152; Telephone: (202) 598–6812.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice of intent contained in this
document is issued pursuant to the
temporary scheduling provisions of 21
U.S.C. 811(h). The Drug Enforcement
Administration (DEA) intends to issue a
temporary scheduling order (in the form
of a temporary amendment) to add
valeryl fentanyl, para-fluorobutyryl
fentanyl, para-methoxybutyryl fentanyl,
para-chloroisobutyryl fentanyl,
isobutyryl fentanyl, cyclopentyl
fentanyl, and ocfentanil to schedule I of
the Controlled Substances Act.1 The
temporary scheduling order will be
published in the Federal Register, but
will not be issued before January 12,
2018.
DATES:
ADDRESSES:
Legal Authority
Section 201 of the Controlled
Substances Act (CSA), 21 U.S.C. 811,
provides the Attorney General with the
authority to temporarily place a
substance in schedule I of the CSA for
two years without regard to the
requirements of 21 U.S.C. 811(b) if he
finds that such action is necessary to
avoid an imminent hazard to the public
safety. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1). In addition,
if proceedings to control a substance are
initiated under 21 U.S.C. 811(a)(1), the
Attorney General may extend the
temporary scheduling for up to one
year. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(2).
Where the necessary findings are
made, a substance may be temporarily
scheduled if it is not listed in any other
schedule under section 202 of the CSA,
21 U.S.C. 812, or if there is no
exemption or approval in effect for the
substance under section 505 of the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FDCA), 21 U.S.C. 355. 21 U.S.C.
811(h)(1); 21 CFR part 1308. The
Attorney General has delegated
scheduling authority under 21 U.S.C.
811 to the Administrator of the DEA. 28
CFR 0.100.
1 Though DEA has used the term ‘‘final order’’
with respect to temporary scheduling orders in the
past, this notice of intent adheres to the statutory
language of 21 U.S.C. 811(h), which refers to a
‘‘temporary scheduling order.’’ No substantive
change is intended.
E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM
13DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 13, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 58572-58575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26785]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 15
[Docket No. FDA-2017-N-6502]
Opioid Policy Steering Committee: Prescribing Intervention--
Exploring a Strategy for Implementation; Public Hearing; Request for
Comments
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notification of public hearing; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is
announcing a public hearing entitled, ``Opioid Policy Steering
Committee: Prescribing Intervention--Exploring a Strategy for
Implementation.'' The purpose of the public hearing is to receive
stakeholder input on how FDA might, under its Risk Evaluation and
Mitigation Strategy (REMS) authority, improve the safe use of opioid
analgesics by curbing overprescribing to decrease the occurrence of new
addictions and limit misuse and abuse of opioid analgesics.
DATES: The public hearing will be held on January 30, 2018, from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The public hearing may be extended or may end early
depending on the level of public participation. Persons seeking to
attend, or to present at, the public hearing must register by January
16, 2018. Electronic or written comments will be accepted after the
public hearing until March 16, 2018. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for registration date and information.
ADDRESSES: The public hearing will be held at FDA White Oak Campus,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31 Conference Center, the Great Room
(Rm. 1503 B and C), Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Entrance for public
hearing participants (non-FDA employees) is through Building 1 where
routine security check procedures will be performed. For parking and
security information, please refer to https://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/WorkingatFDA/BuildingsandFacilities/WhiteOakCampusInformation/ucm241740.htm.
You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late, untimely
filed comments will not be considered.
Electronic Submissions
Electronic comments must be submitted on or before March 16, 2018.
The https://www.regulations.gov
[[Page 58573]]
electronic filing system will accept comments until midnight Eastern
Time at the end of March 16, 2018. Comments received by mail/hand
delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions) will be considered
timely if they are postmarked, or the delivery service acceptance
receipt is, on or before that date.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2017-N-6502 for ``Opioid Policy Steering Committee: Prescribing
Intervention--Exploring a Strategy for Implementation; Public Hearing;
Request for Comments.'' Received comments, those filed in a timely
manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed in the docket and, except for
those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff between
9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Davies, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 1, Rm. 2310, Silver
Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-2205, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On May 23, 2017, the FDA Commissioner announced the establishment
of an Opioid Policy Steering Committee (Steering Committee) to explore
and develop additional approaches or strategies FDA could consider
using to combat the opioid crisis. Given the unprecedented nature of
the opioid crisis and the role of prescription opioids in the crisis,
the Steering Committee is considering novel ways to reduce the number
of new cases of addiction while continuing to ensure the benefits of
opioid products outweigh their risks.
Recent studies suggest that prescriptions for opioid analgesics are
frequently dispensed for a number of tablets that exceed those needed
for adequate pain control, particularly for acute pain. The Steering
Committee is considering whether current prescribing patterns are
contributing to the development of new addiction in patients, and
whether the excess unused pills are a gateway to misuse, abuse, and
addiction among family members and others who might have access to the
unused pills. Therefore, the Steering Committee is exploring, by means
of FDA's REMS authorities, the option of facilitating appropriate
prescribing by requiring sponsors to implement a prescriber
intervention at the point when the prescriber determines an opioid
analgesic prescription is necessary for a patient. For example, a REMS
could impact prescribing by requiring that sponsors ensure that
prescribers provide specific documentation for a prescription above a
specified amount, such as a statement that the quantity prescribed is
medically necessary for the patient. The documentation requirement
would not be intended to prevent access for patients in whom chronic
use of opioid analgesics is the most appropriate therapy. Instead, it
would be designed to ensure that prescribers consider whether the
amount prescribed is appropriate for the patient and, if above the
specified amount, document that necessity. The Steering Committee's
view is that one way sponsors could implement this type of prescribing
documentation requirement is through an electronic system at the point
of prescribing (i.e., incorporated into the prescriber's workflow) to
minimize the burden on patient access and on the health care delivery
system. Thus, the Steering Committee is interested in exploring
evidence-based approaches that would encourage electronic prescribing
as a mechanism for the prescriber to provide documentation of a safe-
use condition (e.g., that the quantity prescribed is medically
necessary for the patient) before the drug is dispensed by the
pharmacy. The Steering Committee also seeks input from the public on
alternative REMS models or approaches for consideration.
II. Topics for Discussion at the Public Hearing
In this public hearing, FDA seeks stakeholder input on new
approaches to promote the safe use of opioid analgesics using FDA's
REMS
[[Page 58574]]
authorities. FDA is seeking feedback from a broad group of
stakeholders, both private and public, who are working on the
challenges of improving pain management while addressing the opioid
epidemic. The Agency is also particularly interested in ensuring that
any REMS intervention minimizes the burden on patient access and, to
the extent practicable, on the health care delivery system. Relevant
questions for consideration are provided below.
Prescriber Documentation
Many REMS programs rely on pharmacies to verify that required safe-
use conditions have been documented prior to dispensing a drug product.
One alternative approach under consideration would require sponsors to
ensure that prescribers follow specific requirements outlined in the
REMS for each opioid analgesic prescription for a quantity above a
specified amount. This approach could involve use of an electronic
system (e.g., electronic prescribing integrated into a prescriber's
workflow) that would require prescribers to specifically document the
medical necessity of the quantity prescribed for a particular patient.
This documentation would be verified before the prescription reaches
the pharmacy. For prescribers who intend to prescribe below the
specified amount, no additional documentation of medical necessity or
electronic prescription would be required.
1. If a REMS were to specify threshold drug amounts for opioid
analgesic prescriptions above which prescribers would be required to
provide additional documentation of medical necessity, what should the
amounts be and how should they be determined for various clinical
indications? What data are there to support such amounts? What
additional data would be useful?
2. If such measures were required, how should prescribers be made
aware of them? Within the Agency's statutory REMS authority, how should
the Agency require sponsors to ensure compliance with them? How should
the Agency require sponsors to assess their effect in reducing misuse,
abuse, and new addictions?
Additional REMS Approaches
Health care providers generally have the capability to access state
prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) data that include patient
prescription history and prescribing patterns. PDMPs are separately
managed and maintained by the individual states, which may result in
disparate data elements and data sharing challenges. Additionally,
review of PDMP data requires health care providers to access a database
that may not be integrated into their workflow.
Either in conjunction with, or separate from, the prescriber
intervention approach discussed above, the Steering Committee is
considering whether to require sponsors to create a system that would
leverage a nationwide database to be more effective in helping health
care providers identify potential misuse and abuse (e.g., doctor
shopping) and facilitate safe use of opioid analgesics (e.g., real-time
identification of potential harmful drug-drug combinations). Such an
approach could be integrated into the health care provider's workflow
to minimize burden on the health care system.
3. The Steering Committee requests input from the public on
whether, in addition to, or in conjunction with the above described
prescriber intervention, and to the extent consistent with its
statutory authority, the Agency should consider requiring sponsors to
create a system that utilizes a nationwide prescription history
database to facilitate safe use of opioid analgesics.
4. If this approach were adopted, how should the Agency require
sponsors to assess the impact of such requirements?
Additional Considerations
The Steering Committee acknowledges that the approaches described
above emphasize specific components within the opioid prescribing
pathway and might not address other areas where misuse and abuse may be
occurring. The Steering Committee seeks input from the public on
additional approaches the Agency may consider, within its statutory
authority, to reduce misuse, abuse, and addiction associated with
opioid analgesics.
5. The proposed Opioid Analgesics REMS includes a Medication Guide
and a Patient Counseling Document to educate patients. It also includes
a Blueprint for Health Care Providers Involved in the Management or
Support of Patients with Pain that contains information on counseling
patients and caregivers about the safe use of opioid analgesics.
Consistent with its statutory authority, should FDA require sponsors to
take additional measures to ensure that health care providers, their
patients, and patient caregivers and family members are educated on
safe storage and disposal and the risks of misuse, abuse, and addiction
associated with opioid analgesics (e.g., a public health campaign
targeted at these groups)?
6. Should the Agency consider additional measures intended to
improve the safety of patient storage and handling of opioid
analgesics?
7. How might use of unit-of-use packaging play a role in
encouraging appropriate prescribing of opioid analgesics?
8. Should the Agency require sponsors to create a mechanism by
which patients could return unused pills, and if so, to whom?
III. Participating in the Public Hearing
Registration: The FDA Conference Center at White Oak is a Federal
facility with security procedures and limited seating. Attendance will
be free and on a first-come, first-served basis. If you wish to attend,
either in person or by webcast (see Streaming Webcast of the Public
Hearing), and/or present at the hearing, please register for the
hearing and/or make a request for oral presentations or comments at
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/opioid-policy-steering-committee-tickets-39490940466 by January 16, 2018, and provide complete contact
information for each attendee, including name, title, affiliation,
address, email, and telephone.
FDA will try to accommodate all persons who wish to make a
presentation. Individuals wishing to present should identify the number
of the question, or questions, they wish to address. This will help FDA
organize the presentations. Individuals and organizations with common
interests should consolidate or coordinate their presentations and
request time for a joint presentation. FDA will notify registered
presenters of their scheduled presentation times. Time allotted for
each presentation will depend on the number of individuals who wish to
speak. Once FDA notifies registered presenters of their scheduled
times, they are encouraged to submit an electronic copy of their
presentation (.DOC, .DOCX, .PPT, .PPTX, .XLS, .XLSX, .PDF formats
preferred) to [email protected] on or before January 22,
2018. No commercial or promotional material will be permitted to be
presented or distributed at the public hearing. Persons registered to
make an oral presentation are encouraged to arrive at the hearing room
early and check in at the onsite registration table to confirm their
designated presentation time. An agenda for the hearing and any other
background materials will be made available 3 days before the hearing
at https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/MeetingsConferencesWorkshops/ucm583543.htm.
[[Page 58575]]
If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please
contact Kathleen Davies at least 7 days before the hearing.
Streaming Webcast of the Public Hearing: This public hearing will
also be webcast for those unable to attend in person. To join the
hearing via the webcast, please go to https://collaboration.fda.gov/opsc.
If you have never attended a Connect Pro event before, test your
connection at https://collaboration.fda.gov/common/help/en/support/meeting_test.htm. To get a quick overview of the Connect Pro program,
visit https://www.adobe.com/go/connectpro_overview. FDA has verified
the website addresses in this document, as of the date this document
publishes in the Federal Register, but websites are subject to change
over time.
Transcripts: Please be advised that as soon as a transcript of the
public hearing is available, it will be accessible at https://www.regulations.gov. It may be viewed at the Dockets Management Staff
(HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852.
IV. Notice of Public Hearing Under 21 CFR Part 15
The Commissioner of Food and Drugs is announcing that the public
hearing will be held in accordance with part 15 (21 CFR part 15). The
hearing will be conducted by a presiding officer, accompanied by FDA
senior management from the Office of the Commissioner and the relevant
centers/offices. Under Sec. 15.30(f) (21 CFR 15.30(f)), the hearing is
informal and the rules of evidence do not apply. Only the presiding
officer and panel members may question any person during or at the
conclusion of each presentation (Sec. 15.30(e)). Public hearings under
part 15 are subject to FDA's policy and procedures for electronic media
coverage of FDA's public administrative proceedings (21 CFR part 10,
subpart C) (Sec. 10.203(a)). Under Sec. 10.205, representatives of
the electronic media may be permitted, subject to certain limitations,
to videotape, film, or otherwise record FDA's public administrative
proceedings, including presentations by participants. The hearing will
be transcribed as stipulated in Sec. 15.30(b) (see section V). To the
extent that the conditions for the hearing as described in this
document conflict with any provisions set out in part 15, this notice
acts as a waiver of those provisions as specified in Sec. 15.30(h).
Dated: December 4, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-26785 Filed 12-11-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P