Opioid Policy Steering Committee: Prescribing Intervention-Exploring a Strategy for Implementation; Public Hearing; Request for Comments, 58572-58575 [2017-26785]

Download as PDF 58572 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules Manager, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the EASA; or Airbus’s EASA DOA: Accomplish repetitive SDIs within the compliance time defined in those repair instructions for repetitive SDIs. If no compliance time is identified in the repair instructions for repetitive SDIs, accomplish the repetitive SDIs required by paragraph (i)(2) of this AD at the compliance times defined in table 4 to paragraphs (i)(2) and (l) of this AD. (m) No Terminating Action Modification or repair of an airplane, as specified in paragraph (j) or (k) of this AD, does not constitute terminating action for the repetitive inspections required by this AD, unless it is specified otherwise in a repair method approved by the Manager, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the EASA; or Airbus’s EASA DOA. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS (n) Reporting Requirement Submit a report of the findings (both positive and negative) of the inspections required by paragraphs (i) and (j) of this AD to ‘‘Airbus Service Bulletin Reporting Online Application’’ on Airbus World (https:// w3.airbus.com/), at the applicable time specified in paragraph (n)(1) or (n)(2) of this AD. (1) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of this AD: Report within 30 days after that inspection. (2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this AD: Report within 30 days after the effective date of this AD. (o) Other FAA AD Provisions (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the International Section, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (p)(2) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office. (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: As of the effective date of this AD, for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the EASA; or Airbus’s EASA DOA. If approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOAauthorized signature. (3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except as specified in paragraph (k) of this AD, if any service information contains procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and tests that are not identified VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:09 Dec 12, 2017 Jkt 244001 as RC may be deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the operator’s maintenance or inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC require approval of an AMOC. (4) Reporting Requirements: A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to be approximately [XX] per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the collection of information. All responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to the FAA at 800 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES–200. (p) Related Information (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2017–0099, dated June 8, 2017, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA– 2017–1102. (2) For more information about this AD, contact Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA 98057–3356; telephone 425– 227–1405; fax 425–227–1149. (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness Office-EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@airbus.com; internet https://www.airbus.com. You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW, Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 22, 2017. Jeffrey E. Duven, Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2017–26622 Filed 12–12–17; 8:45 am] Frm 00007 Fmt 4702 Food and Drug Administration 21 CFR Part 15 [Docket No. FDA–2017–N–6502] Opioid Policy Steering Committee: Prescribing Intervention—Exploring a Strategy for Implementation; Public Hearing; Request for Comments AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. Notification of public hearing; request for comments. ACTION: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is announcing a public hearing entitled, ‘‘Opioid Policy Steering Committee: Prescribing Intervention— Exploring a Strategy for Implementation.’’ The purpose of the public hearing is to receive stakeholder input on how FDA might, under its Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) authority, improve the safe use of opioid analgesics by curbing overprescribing to decrease the occurrence of new addictions and limit misuse and abuse of opioid analgesics. DATES: The public hearing will be held on January 30, 2018, from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The public hearing may be extended or may end early depending on the level of public participation. Persons seeking to attend, or to present at, the public hearing must register by January 16, 2018. Electronic or written comments will be accepted after the public hearing until March 16, 2018. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for registration date and information. SUMMARY: The public hearing will be held at FDA White Oak Campus, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31 Conference Center, the Great Room (Rm. 1503 B and C), Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002. Entrance for public hearing participants (non-FDA employees) is through Building 1 where routine security check procedures will be performed. For parking and security information, please refer to https:// www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/Working atFDA/BuildingsandFacilities/WhiteOak CampusInformation/ucm241740.htm. You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late, untimely filed comments will not be considered. ADDRESSES: Electronic Submissions Electronic comments must be submitted on or before March 16, 2018. The https://www.regulations.gov BILLING CODE 4910–13–P PO 00000 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM 13DEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS electronic filing system will accept comments until midnight Eastern Time at the end of March 16, 2018. Comments received by mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions) will be considered timely if they are postmarked, or the delivery service acceptance receipt is, on or before that date. • Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted electronically, including attachments, to https:// www.regulations.gov will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment does not include any confidential information that you or a third party may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone else’s Social Security number, or confidential business information, such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov. • If you want to submit a comment with confidential information that you do not wish to be made available to the public, submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’). Written/Paper Submissions Submit written/paper submissions as follows: • Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. • For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified, as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’ Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No. FDA– 2017–N–6502 for ‘‘Opioid Policy Steering Committee: Prescribing Intervention—Exploring a Strategy for Implementation; Public Hearing; Request for Comments.’’ Received comments, those filed in a timely manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as ‘‘Confidential Submissions,’’ publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:09 Dec 12, 2017 Jkt 244001 • Confidential Submissions—To submit a comment with confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states ‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ The Agency will review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov. Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of your comments and you must identify this information as ‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA’s posting of comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/ fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/201523389.pdf. Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https:// www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into the ‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Davies, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 1, Rm. 2310, Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301–796–2205, kathleen.davies@fda.hhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background On May 23, 2017, the FDA Commissioner announced the establishment of an Opioid Policy Steering Committee (Steering Committee) to explore and develop additional approaches or strategies FDA could consider using to combat the opioid crisis. Given the unprecedented nature of the opioid crisis and the role of prescription opioids in the crisis, the Steering Committee is considering novel ways to reduce the number of new cases PO 00000 Frm 00008 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 58573 of addiction while continuing to ensure the benefits of opioid products outweigh their risks. Recent studies suggest that prescriptions for opioid analgesics are frequently dispensed for a number of tablets that exceed those needed for adequate pain control, particularly for acute pain. The Steering Committee is considering whether current prescribing patterns are contributing to the development of new addiction in patients, and whether the excess unused pills are a gateway to misuse, abuse, and addiction among family members and others who might have access to the unused pills. Therefore, the Steering Committee is exploring, by means of FDA’s REMS authorities, the option of facilitating appropriate prescribing by requiring sponsors to implement a prescriber intervention at the point when the prescriber determines an opioid analgesic prescription is necessary for a patient. For example, a REMS could impact prescribing by requiring that sponsors ensure that prescribers provide specific documentation for a prescription above a specified amount, such as a statement that the quantity prescribed is medically necessary for the patient. The documentation requirement would not be intended to prevent access for patients in whom chronic use of opioid analgesics is the most appropriate therapy. Instead, it would be designed to ensure that prescribers consider whether the amount prescribed is appropriate for the patient and, if above the specified amount, document that necessity. The Steering Committee’s view is that one way sponsors could implement this type of prescribing documentation requirement is through an electronic system at the point of prescribing (i.e., incorporated into the prescriber’s workflow) to minimize the burden on patient access and on the health care delivery system. Thus, the Steering Committee is interested in exploring evidence-based approaches that would encourage electronic prescribing as a mechanism for the prescriber to provide documentation of a safe-use condition (e.g., that the quantity prescribed is medically necessary for the patient) before the drug is dispensed by the pharmacy. The Steering Committee also seeks input from the public on alternative REMS models or approaches for consideration. II. Topics for Discussion at the Public Hearing In this public hearing, FDA seeks stakeholder input on new approaches to promote the safe use of opioid analgesics using FDA’s REMS E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM 13DEP1 58574 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules authorities. FDA is seeking feedback from a broad group of stakeholders, both private and public, who are working on the challenges of improving pain management while addressing the opioid epidemic. The Agency is also particularly interested in ensuring that any REMS intervention minimizes the burden on patient access and, to the extent practicable, on the health care delivery system. Relevant questions for consideration are provided below. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS Prescriber Documentation Many REMS programs rely on pharmacies to verify that required safeuse conditions have been documented prior to dispensing a drug product. One alternative approach under consideration would require sponsors to ensure that prescribers follow specific requirements outlined in the REMS for each opioid analgesic prescription for a quantity above a specified amount. This approach could involve use of an electronic system (e.g., electronic prescribing integrated into a prescriber’s workflow) that would require prescribers to specifically document the medical necessity of the quantity prescribed for a particular patient. This documentation would be verified before the prescription reaches the pharmacy. For prescribers who intend to prescribe below the specified amount, no additional documentation of medical necessity or electronic prescription would be required. 1. If a REMS were to specify threshold drug amounts for opioid analgesic prescriptions above which prescribers would be required to provide additional documentation of medical necessity, what should the amounts be and how should they be determined for various clinical indications? What data are there to support such amounts? What additional data would be useful? 2. If such measures were required, how should prescribers be made aware of them? Within the Agency’s statutory REMS authority, how should the Agency require sponsors to ensure compliance with them? How should the Agency require sponsors to assess their effect in reducing misuse, abuse, and new addictions? Additional REMS Approaches Health care providers generally have the capability to access state prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) data that include patient prescription history and prescribing patterns. PDMPs are separately managed and maintained by the individual states, which may result in disparate data elements and data sharing challenges. Additionally, review of PDMP data VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:09 Dec 12, 2017 Jkt 244001 requires health care providers to access a database that may not be integrated into their workflow. Either in conjunction with, or separate from, the prescriber intervention approach discussed above, the Steering Committee is considering whether to require sponsors to create a system that would leverage a nationwide database to be more effective in helping health care providers identify potential misuse and abuse (e.g., doctor shopping) and facilitate safe use of opioid analgesics (e.g., real-time identification of potential harmful drug-drug combinations). Such an approach could be integrated into the health care provider’s workflow to minimize burden on the health care system. 3. The Steering Committee requests input from the public on whether, in addition to, or in conjunction with the above described prescriber intervention, and to the extent consistent with its statutory authority, the Agency should consider requiring sponsors to create a system that utilizes a nationwide prescription history database to facilitate safe use of opioid analgesics. 4. If this approach were adopted, how should the Agency require sponsors to assess the impact of such requirements? Additional Considerations The Steering Committee acknowledges that the approaches described above emphasize specific components within the opioid prescribing pathway and might not address other areas where misuse and abuse may be occurring. The Steering Committee seeks input from the public on additional approaches the Agency may consider, within its statutory authority, to reduce misuse, abuse, and addiction associated with opioid analgesics. 5. The proposed Opioid Analgesics REMS includes a Medication Guide and a Patient Counseling Document to educate patients. It also includes a Blueprint for Health Care Providers Involved in the Management or Support of Patients with Pain that contains information on counseling patients and caregivers about the safe use of opioid analgesics. Consistent with its statutory authority, should FDA require sponsors to take additional measures to ensure that health care providers, their patients, and patient caregivers and family members are educated on safe storage and disposal and the risks of misuse, abuse, and addiction associated with opioid analgesics (e.g., a public health campaign targeted at these groups)? PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 6. Should the Agency consider additional measures intended to improve the safety of patient storage and handling of opioid analgesics? 7. How might use of unit-of-use packaging play a role in encouraging appropriate prescribing of opioid analgesics? 8. Should the Agency require sponsors to create a mechanism by which patients could return unused pills, and if so, to whom? III. Participating in the Public Hearing Registration: The FDA Conference Center at White Oak is a Federal facility with security procedures and limited seating. Attendance will be free and on a first-come, first-served basis. If you wish to attend, either in person or by webcast (see Streaming Webcast of the Public Hearing), and/or present at the hearing, please register for the hearing and/or make a request for oral presentations or comments at https:// www.eventbrite.com/e/opioid-policysteering-committee-tickets-39490940466 by January 16, 2018, and provide complete contact information for each attendee, including name, title, affiliation, address, email, and telephone. FDA will try to accommodate all persons who wish to make a presentation. Individuals wishing to present should identify the number of the question, or questions, they wish to address. This will help FDA organize the presentations. Individuals and organizations with common interests should consolidate or coordinate their presentations and request time for a joint presentation. FDA will notify registered presenters of their scheduled presentation times. Time allotted for each presentation will depend on the number of individuals who wish to speak. Once FDA notifies registered presenters of their scheduled times, they are encouraged to submit an electronic copy of their presentation (.DOC, .DOCX, .PPT, .PPTX, .XLS, .XLSX, .PDF formats preferred) to kathleen.davies@ fda.hhs.gov on or before January 22, 2018. No commercial or promotional material will be permitted to be presented or distributed at the public hearing. Persons registered to make an oral presentation are encouraged to arrive at the hearing room early and check in at the onsite registration table to confirm their designated presentation time. An agenda for the hearing and any other background materials will be made available 3 days before the hearing at https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/ MeetingsConferencesWorkshops/ucm 583543.htm. E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM 13DEP1 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 13, 2017 / Proposed Rules If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please contact Kathleen Davies at least 7 days before the hearing. Streaming Webcast of the Public Hearing: This public hearing will also be webcast for those unable to attend in person. To join the hearing via the webcast, please go to https:// collaboration.fda.gov/opsc. If you have never attended a Connect Pro event before, test your connection at https://collaboration.fda.gov/common/ help/en/support/meeting_test.htm. To get a quick overview of the Connect Pro program, visit https://www.adobe.com/ go/connectpro_overview. FDA has verified the website addresses in this document, as of the date this document publishes in the Federal Register, but websites are subject to change over time. Transcripts: Please be advised that as soon as a transcript of the public hearing is available, it will be accessible at https://www.regulations.gov. It may be viewed at the Dockets Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS IV. Notice of Public Hearing Under 21 CFR Part 15 The Commissioner of Food and Drugs is announcing that the public hearing will be held in accordance with part 15 (21 CFR part 15). The hearing will be conducted by a presiding officer, accompanied by FDA senior management from the Office of the Commissioner and the relevant centers/ offices. Under § 15.30(f) (21 CFR 15.30(f)), the hearing is informal and the rules of evidence do not apply. Only the presiding officer and panel members may question any person during or at the conclusion of each presentation (§ 15.30(e)). Public hearings under part 15 are subject to FDA’s policy and procedures for electronic media coverage of FDA’s public administrative proceedings (21 CFR part 10, subpart C) (§ 10.203(a)). Under § 10.205, representatives of the electronic media may be permitted, subject to certain limitations, to videotape, film, or otherwise record FDA’s public administrative proceedings, including presentations by participants. The hearing will be transcribed as stipulated in § 15.30(b) (see section V). To the extent that the conditions for the hearing as described in this document conflict with any provisions set out in part 15, this notice acts as a waiver of those provisions as specified in § 15.30(h). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:09 Dec 12, 2017 Jkt 244001 Dated: December 4, 2017. Leslie Kux, Associate Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. 2017–26785 Filed 12–11–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4164–01–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration 21 CFR Part 1308 [Docket No. DEA–475] Schedules of Controlled Substances: Temporary Placement of Seven Fentanyl-Related Substances in Schedule I Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice. ACTION: Proposed amendment; notification of intent. AGENCY: The Administrator of the Drug Enforcement Administration is issuing this notice of intent to publish a temporary order to schedule seven fentanyl-related substances in schedule I. These seven substances are: N-(1phenethylpiperidin-4-yl)N-phenylpentanamide (valeryl fentanyl), N-(4-fluorophenyl)N-(1-phenethylpiperidin4-yl)butyramide (para-fluorobutyryl fentanyl), N-(4-methoxyphenyl)N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4yl)butyramide (para-methoxybutyryl fentanyl), N-(4-chlorophenyl)N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4yl)isobutyramide (para-chloroisobutyryl fentanyl), N-(1-phenethylpiperidin4-yl)-Nphenylisobutyramide (isobutyryl fentanyl), N-(1-phenethylpiperidin-4yl)N-phenylcyclopentane carboxamide (cyclopentyl fentanyl), and N-(2-fluorophenyl)2-methoxy-N-(1-phenethylpiperidin4-yl)acetamide (ocfentanil). This action is based on a finding by the Administrator that the placement of these seven synthetic opioids in schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) is necessary to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety. When it is issued, the temporary scheduling order will impose the administrative, civil, and criminal sanctions and regulatory controls applicable to schedule I controlled substances under the CSA on the manufacture, distribution, reverse distribution, possession, importation, exportation, research, and conduct of instructional activities, and chemical analysis of these synthetic opioids. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 58575 December 13, 2017. The DEA’s three-factor analysis is available in its entirety under ‘‘Supporting and Related Material’’ of the public docket for this action at www.regulations.gov under Docket Number DEA–475. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael J. Lewis, Diversion Control Division, Drug Enforcement Administration; Mailing Address: 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152; Telephone: (202) 598–6812. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice of intent contained in this document is issued pursuant to the temporary scheduling provisions of 21 U.S.C. 811(h). The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) intends to issue a temporary scheduling order (in the form of a temporary amendment) to add valeryl fentanyl, para-fluorobutyryl fentanyl, para-methoxybutyryl fentanyl, para-chloroisobutyryl fentanyl, isobutyryl fentanyl, cyclopentyl fentanyl, and ocfentanil to schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act.1 The temporary scheduling order will be published in the Federal Register, but will not be issued before January 12, 2018. DATES: ADDRESSES: Legal Authority Section 201 of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), 21 U.S.C. 811, provides the Attorney General with the authority to temporarily place a substance in schedule I of the CSA for two years without regard to the requirements of 21 U.S.C. 811(b) if he finds that such action is necessary to avoid an imminent hazard to the public safety. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1). In addition, if proceedings to control a substance are initiated under 21 U.S.C. 811(a)(1), the Attorney General may extend the temporary scheduling for up to one year. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(2). Where the necessary findings are made, a substance may be temporarily scheduled if it is not listed in any other schedule under section 202 of the CSA, 21 U.S.C. 812, or if there is no exemption or approval in effect for the substance under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), 21 U.S.C. 355. 21 U.S.C. 811(h)(1); 21 CFR part 1308. The Attorney General has delegated scheduling authority under 21 U.S.C. 811 to the Administrator of the DEA. 28 CFR 0.100. 1 Though DEA has used the term ‘‘final order’’ with respect to temporary scheduling orders in the past, this notice of intent adheres to the statutory language of 21 U.S.C. 811(h), which refers to a ‘‘temporary scheduling order.’’ No substantive change is intended. E:\FR\FM\13DEP1.SGM 13DEP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 13, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 58572-58575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26785]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 15

[Docket No. FDA-2017-N-6502]


Opioid Policy Steering Committee: Prescribing Intervention--
Exploring a Strategy for Implementation; Public Hearing; Request for 
Comments

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notification of public hearing; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is 
announcing a public hearing entitled, ``Opioid Policy Steering 
Committee: Prescribing Intervention--Exploring a Strategy for 
Implementation.'' The purpose of the public hearing is to receive 
stakeholder input on how FDA might, under its Risk Evaluation and 
Mitigation Strategy (REMS) authority, improve the safe use of opioid 
analgesics by curbing overprescribing to decrease the occurrence of new 
addictions and limit misuse and abuse of opioid analgesics.

DATES: The public hearing will be held on January 30, 2018, from 8:30 
a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The public hearing may be extended or may end early 
depending on the level of public participation. Persons seeking to 
attend, or to present at, the public hearing must register by January 
16, 2018. Electronic or written comments will be accepted after the 
public hearing until March 16, 2018. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION 
section for registration date and information.

ADDRESSES: The public hearing will be held at FDA White Oak Campus, 
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31 Conference Center, the Great Room 
(Rm. 1503 B and C), Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Entrance for public 
hearing participants (non-FDA employees) is through Building 1 where 
routine security check procedures will be performed. For parking and 
security information, please refer to https://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/WorkingatFDA/BuildingsandFacilities/WhiteOakCampusInformation/ucm241740.htm.
    You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late, untimely 
filed comments will not be considered.

Electronic Submissions

    Electronic comments must be submitted on or before March 16, 2018. 
The https://www.regulations.gov

[[Page 58573]]

electronic filing system will accept comments until midnight Eastern 
Time at the end of March 16, 2018. Comments received by mail/hand 
delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions) will be considered 
timely if they are postmarked, or the delivery service acceptance 
receipt is, on or before that date.
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. 
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted 
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov 
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be 
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment 
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party 
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone 
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information, 
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your 
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in 
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential 
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public, 
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner 
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper 
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug 
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets 
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any 
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified, 
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No. 
FDA-2017-N-6502 for ``Opioid Policy Steering Committee: Prescribing 
Intervention--Exploring a Strategy for Implementation; Public Hearing; 
Request for Comments.'' Received comments, those filed in a timely 
manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed in the docket and, except for 
those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at 
https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff between 
9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with 
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly 
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You 
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information 
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states 
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will 
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in 
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the 
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be 
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov. 
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish 
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you 
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of 
your comments and you must identify this information as 
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not 
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other 
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of 
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or 
access the information at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or 
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in 
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the 
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, 
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathleen Davies, Food and Drug 
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 1, Rm. 2310, Silver 
Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-2205, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On May 23, 2017, the FDA Commissioner announced the establishment 
of an Opioid Policy Steering Committee (Steering Committee) to explore 
and develop additional approaches or strategies FDA could consider 
using to combat the opioid crisis. Given the unprecedented nature of 
the opioid crisis and the role of prescription opioids in the crisis, 
the Steering Committee is considering novel ways to reduce the number 
of new cases of addiction while continuing to ensure the benefits of 
opioid products outweigh their risks.
    Recent studies suggest that prescriptions for opioid analgesics are 
frequently dispensed for a number of tablets that exceed those needed 
for adequate pain control, particularly for acute pain. The Steering 
Committee is considering whether current prescribing patterns are 
contributing to the development of new addiction in patients, and 
whether the excess unused pills are a gateway to misuse, abuse, and 
addiction among family members and others who might have access to the 
unused pills. Therefore, the Steering Committee is exploring, by means 
of FDA's REMS authorities, the option of facilitating appropriate 
prescribing by requiring sponsors to implement a prescriber 
intervention at the point when the prescriber determines an opioid 
analgesic prescription is necessary for a patient. For example, a REMS 
could impact prescribing by requiring that sponsors ensure that 
prescribers provide specific documentation for a prescription above a 
specified amount, such as a statement that the quantity prescribed is 
medically necessary for the patient. The documentation requirement 
would not be intended to prevent access for patients in whom chronic 
use of opioid analgesics is the most appropriate therapy. Instead, it 
would be designed to ensure that prescribers consider whether the 
amount prescribed is appropriate for the patient and, if above the 
specified amount, document that necessity. The Steering Committee's 
view is that one way sponsors could implement this type of prescribing 
documentation requirement is through an electronic system at the point 
of prescribing (i.e., incorporated into the prescriber's workflow) to 
minimize the burden on patient access and on the health care delivery 
system. Thus, the Steering Committee is interested in exploring 
evidence-based approaches that would encourage electronic prescribing 
as a mechanism for the prescriber to provide documentation of a safe-
use condition (e.g., that the quantity prescribed is medically 
necessary for the patient) before the drug is dispensed by the 
pharmacy. The Steering Committee also seeks input from the public on 
alternative REMS models or approaches for consideration.

II. Topics for Discussion at the Public Hearing

    In this public hearing, FDA seeks stakeholder input on new 
approaches to promote the safe use of opioid analgesics using FDA's 
REMS

[[Page 58574]]

authorities. FDA is seeking feedback from a broad group of 
stakeholders, both private and public, who are working on the 
challenges of improving pain management while addressing the opioid 
epidemic. The Agency is also particularly interested in ensuring that 
any REMS intervention minimizes the burden on patient access and, to 
the extent practicable, on the health care delivery system. Relevant 
questions for consideration are provided below.

Prescriber Documentation

    Many REMS programs rely on pharmacies to verify that required safe-
use conditions have been documented prior to dispensing a drug product. 
One alternative approach under consideration would require sponsors to 
ensure that prescribers follow specific requirements outlined in the 
REMS for each opioid analgesic prescription for a quantity above a 
specified amount. This approach could involve use of an electronic 
system (e.g., electronic prescribing integrated into a prescriber's 
workflow) that would require prescribers to specifically document the 
medical necessity of the quantity prescribed for a particular patient. 
This documentation would be verified before the prescription reaches 
the pharmacy. For prescribers who intend to prescribe below the 
specified amount, no additional documentation of medical necessity or 
electronic prescription would be required.
    1. If a REMS were to specify threshold drug amounts for opioid 
analgesic prescriptions above which prescribers would be required to 
provide additional documentation of medical necessity, what should the 
amounts be and how should they be determined for various clinical 
indications? What data are there to support such amounts? What 
additional data would be useful?
    2. If such measures were required, how should prescribers be made 
aware of them? Within the Agency's statutory REMS authority, how should 
the Agency require sponsors to ensure compliance with them? How should 
the Agency require sponsors to assess their effect in reducing misuse, 
abuse, and new addictions?

Additional REMS Approaches

    Health care providers generally have the capability to access state 
prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) data that include patient 
prescription history and prescribing patterns. PDMPs are separately 
managed and maintained by the individual states, which may result in 
disparate data elements and data sharing challenges. Additionally, 
review of PDMP data requires health care providers to access a database 
that may not be integrated into their workflow.
    Either in conjunction with, or separate from, the prescriber 
intervention approach discussed above, the Steering Committee is 
considering whether to require sponsors to create a system that would 
leverage a nationwide database to be more effective in helping health 
care providers identify potential misuse and abuse (e.g., doctor 
shopping) and facilitate safe use of opioid analgesics (e.g., real-time 
identification of potential harmful drug-drug combinations). Such an 
approach could be integrated into the health care provider's workflow 
to minimize burden on the health care system.
    3. The Steering Committee requests input from the public on 
whether, in addition to, or in conjunction with the above described 
prescriber intervention, and to the extent consistent with its 
statutory authority, the Agency should consider requiring sponsors to 
create a system that utilizes a nationwide prescription history 
database to facilitate safe use of opioid analgesics.
    4. If this approach were adopted, how should the Agency require 
sponsors to assess the impact of such requirements?

Additional Considerations

    The Steering Committee acknowledges that the approaches described 
above emphasize specific components within the opioid prescribing 
pathway and might not address other areas where misuse and abuse may be 
occurring. The Steering Committee seeks input from the public on 
additional approaches the Agency may consider, within its statutory 
authority, to reduce misuse, abuse, and addiction associated with 
opioid analgesics.
    5. The proposed Opioid Analgesics REMS includes a Medication Guide 
and a Patient Counseling Document to educate patients. It also includes 
a Blueprint for Health Care Providers Involved in the Management or 
Support of Patients with Pain that contains information on counseling 
patients and caregivers about the safe use of opioid analgesics. 
Consistent with its statutory authority, should FDA require sponsors to 
take additional measures to ensure that health care providers, their 
patients, and patient caregivers and family members are educated on 
safe storage and disposal and the risks of misuse, abuse, and addiction 
associated with opioid analgesics (e.g., a public health campaign 
targeted at these groups)?
    6. Should the Agency consider additional measures intended to 
improve the safety of patient storage and handling of opioid 
analgesics?
    7. How might use of unit-of-use packaging play a role in 
encouraging appropriate prescribing of opioid analgesics?
    8. Should the Agency require sponsors to create a mechanism by 
which patients could return unused pills, and if so, to whom?

III. Participating in the Public Hearing

    Registration: The FDA Conference Center at White Oak is a Federal 
facility with security procedures and limited seating. Attendance will 
be free and on a first-come, first-served basis. If you wish to attend, 
either in person or by webcast (see Streaming Webcast of the Public 
Hearing), and/or present at the hearing, please register for the 
hearing and/or make a request for oral presentations or comments at 
https://www.eventbrite.com/e/opioid-policy-steering-committee-tickets-39490940466 by January 16, 2018, and provide complete contact 
information for each attendee, including name, title, affiliation, 
address, email, and telephone.
    FDA will try to accommodate all persons who wish to make a 
presentation. Individuals wishing to present should identify the number 
of the question, or questions, they wish to address. This will help FDA 
organize the presentations. Individuals and organizations with common 
interests should consolidate or coordinate their presentations and 
request time for a joint presentation. FDA will notify registered 
presenters of their scheduled presentation times. Time allotted for 
each presentation will depend on the number of individuals who wish to 
speak. Once FDA notifies registered presenters of their scheduled 
times, they are encouraged to submit an electronic copy of their 
presentation (.DOC, .DOCX, .PPT, .PPTX, .XLS, .XLSX, .PDF formats 
preferred) to [email protected] on or before January 22, 
2018. No commercial or promotional material will be permitted to be 
presented or distributed at the public hearing. Persons registered to 
make an oral presentation are encouraged to arrive at the hearing room 
early and check in at the onsite registration table to confirm their 
designated presentation time. An agenda for the hearing and any other 
background materials will be made available 3 days before the hearing 
at https://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/MeetingsConferencesWorkshops/ucm583543.htm.

[[Page 58575]]

    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please 
contact Kathleen Davies at least 7 days before the hearing.
    Streaming Webcast of the Public Hearing: This public hearing will 
also be webcast for those unable to attend in person. To join the 
hearing via the webcast, please go to https://collaboration.fda.gov/opsc.
    If you have never attended a Connect Pro event before, test your 
connection at https://collaboration.fda.gov/common/help/en/support/meeting_test.htm. To get a quick overview of the Connect Pro program, 
visit https://www.adobe.com/go/connectpro_overview. FDA has verified 
the website addresses in this document, as of the date this document 
publishes in the Federal Register, but websites are subject to change 
over time.
    Transcripts: Please be advised that as soon as a transcript of the 
public hearing is available, it will be accessible at https://www.regulations.gov. It may be viewed at the Dockets Management Staff 
(HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, 
Rockville, MD 20852.

IV. Notice of Public Hearing Under 21 CFR Part 15

    The Commissioner of Food and Drugs is announcing that the public 
hearing will be held in accordance with part 15 (21 CFR part 15). The 
hearing will be conducted by a presiding officer, accompanied by FDA 
senior management from the Office of the Commissioner and the relevant 
centers/offices. Under Sec.  15.30(f) (21 CFR 15.30(f)), the hearing is 
informal and the rules of evidence do not apply. Only the presiding 
officer and panel members may question any person during or at the 
conclusion of each presentation (Sec.  15.30(e)). Public hearings under 
part 15 are subject to FDA's policy and procedures for electronic media 
coverage of FDA's public administrative proceedings (21 CFR part 10, 
subpart C) (Sec.  10.203(a)). Under Sec.  10.205, representatives of 
the electronic media may be permitted, subject to certain limitations, 
to videotape, film, or otherwise record FDA's public administrative 
proceedings, including presentations by participants. The hearing will 
be transcribed as stipulated in Sec.  15.30(b) (see section V). To the 
extent that the conditions for the hearing as described in this 
document conflict with any provisions set out in part 15, this notice 
acts as a waiver of those provisions as specified in Sec.  15.30(h).

    Dated: December 4, 2017.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2017-26785 Filed 12-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.