Availability of Elizabeth River and Southern Branch Navigation Improvements Draft General Reevaluation Report/Environmental Assessment, 58381-58382 [2017-26724]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 12, 2017 / Notices on the results of the 2016 ACS Content Test. Concurrently, Federal agencies that are the principal sponsors of these nine questions are invited to respond either directly to the Census Bureau or through this notice. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE III. Data Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request OMB Control Number: 0607–0810. Form Number(s): ACS–1(2019). Type of Review: Regular submission. Affected Public: Federal and legislative agencies, individuals, households, and businesses. Estimated Time per Response: 40 minutes for the average household questionnaire. Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: The Census Bureau plans to contact the following number of respondents each year: 3,540,000 households; 200,000 persons in group quarters; 20,000 contacts in group quarters; 43,000 households for reinterview; and 1,500 group quarters contacts for reinterview. The estimate is an annual average of 2,337,900 burden hours. Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $0. Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory. Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C. Sections 141 and 193. ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES IV. Request for Comments Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden (including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information collection; they also will become a matter of public record. Sheleen Dumas, Departmental PRA Lead, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2017–26726 Filed 12–11–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–07–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:03 Dec 11, 2017 Jkt 244001 Defense Acquisition Regulations System [Docket Number DARS–2016–0024; OMB Control Number 0704–0332] ACTION: Notice. The Department of Defense has submitted to OMB, for clearance, the following proposal for collection of information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act. DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by January 11, 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title, Associated Form, and OMB Number: Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Appendix I, DoD Pilot Mentor-Protege Program; OMB Control Number 0704– 0332. Type of Request: Reinstatement with change. Number of Respondents: 122. Responses per Respondent: Approximately 2. Annual Responses: 240. Average Burden per Response: 1 hour. Annual Response Burden Hours: 240. Reporting Frequency: Two times per year for mentor firms; one time per year for protege firms. Needs and Uses: DoD needs this information to ensure that participants in the Mentor-Protege Program (‘‘the Program’’) are fulfilling their obligations under the mentor-protege agreements and that the Government is receiving value for the benefits it provides through the Program. DoD uses the information as source data for reports to Congress required by section 811(d) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000 (Pub. L. 106–65). Participation in the Program is voluntary. Affected Public: Businesses and other for-profit entities and not-for-profit institutions. Respondent’s Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits. OMB Desk Officer: Ms. Jasmeet Seehra. Written comments and recommendations on the proposed information collection should be sent to Ms. Seehra at the Office of Management and Budget, Desk Officer for DoD, Room 10236, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503. You may also submit comments, identified by docket number and title, by the following method: Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 58381 www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name, docket number, and title for the Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other public submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information provided. To confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check https://www.regulations.gov approximately two to three days after submission to verify posting (except allow 30 days for posting of comments submitted by mail). DoD Clearance Officer: Mr. Frederick C. Licari. Written requests for copies of the information collection proposal should be sent to Mr. Licari at: Information Collections Program, WHS/ ESD Office of Information Management, 4800 Mark Center Drive, 3rd Floor, East Tower, Suite 03F09, Alexandria, VA 22350–3100. Jennifer L. Hawes, Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System. [FR Doc. 2017–26715 Filed 12–11–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001–06–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers Availability of Elizabeth River and Southern Branch Navigation Improvements Draft General Reevaluation Report/Environmental Assessment Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD. ACTION: Notice of availability. AGENCY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in association with the nonfederal sponsor, the Virginia Port Authority, an agent of the Commonwealth of Virginia, announces the availability of the Elizabeth River and Southern Branch Navigation Improvements Draft General Reevaluation Report/Environmental Assessment (GRR/EA) for public review and comment. The purpose of this Draft GRR/EA is to evaluate alternatives that have the potential to improve the current and future operational efficiency of commercial vessels currently using the Norfolk Harbor federal channel in the Elizabeth River. Channel deepening alternatives were evaluated as well as SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM 12DEN1 ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES 58382 Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 12, 2017 / Notices the No Action/Future without Project Alternative. Pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the USACE developed the draft GRR/EA to examine and assess the impacts of the project alternatives and determined that implementation of the Proposed Action would not result in significant impacts. DATES: The Draft GRR/EA is available for a 30-day review period. Written comments, pursuant to the NEPA, will be accepted until the close of public review at the close of business on January 15, 2018. ADDRESSES: Written comments or questions from the public may be submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District, ATTN: Mr. David Schulte, Planning Branch, Environmental Analysis Section (CENAO–WR–PE), 803 Front Street, Norfolk, VA 23510 or via email to david.m.schulte@usace.army.mil. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Schulte, 757–201–7007. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The document is available at the following locations: (1) Elizabeth River and Southern Branch Navigation Improvements website: https://www.nao. usace.army.mil/About/Projects/ ElizabethRiverSouthernBranch Nav.aspx, (2) Slover Public Library, 235 East Plume Street, Norfolk, VA 23510. (3) Copies may also be requested in writing at (see ADDRESSES). Proposed Action. The Study Area is located in Hampton Roads, a 25 squaremile natural harbor serving port facilities in the cities of Norfolk, Newport News, Portsmouth, Chesapeake, and Hampton in southeastern Virginia. The study area consists of a of a federally improved channel extending from Lamberts Bend (on the main stem of the Elizabeth River) to the Chesapeake Extension in the southern branch of the Elizabeth River. The Action Alternative consists of constructing and maintaining the following features: • Deepening the channel from Lamberts Bend to Perdue Farms (Segment 1a) from a required depth of 40 feet to 45 feet deep in Segment 1a, and deepening the channel from Perdue Farms to the Norfolk Southern Lift Bridge (Segment 1b) from a required depth of 40 feet to 42 feet. • Deepening the channel from the Norfolk Southern Lift Bridge to the Gilmerton Bridge (Segment 2), from a required depth of 35 feet to 39 feet deep; and • Continuing to maintain the channel from the Gilmerton Bridge to the VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:03 Dec 11, 2017 Jkt 244001 Chesapeake Extension to a required depth of 35 feet (Segment 3). Implementation of the Preferred Alternative would have the potential to impact water quality, benthic resources, cultural resources, floodplains, federally listed threatened and endangered species, marine mammals, and other natural resources. The Proposed Action must be located in a floodplain in order to use the Craney Island Dredged Material Management Area (CIDMMA) as a dredged material placement site. The Proposed Action will adhere to the 8-step process as outlined under Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management. Alternatives. The Draft GRR/EA considers a reasonable range deepening alternatives in the project channels to meet the proposed action’s purpose and need. It also incorporates measures to avoid and minimize impacts to threatened and endangered species, fish and wildlife species, estuarine and marine habitat, and other resources. In response to problems and opportunities, a range of alternatives was evaluated through an iterative screening and formulation process, resulting in identification of a Preferred Alternative. Public Involvement. On September 22, 2015, a Notice of Intent to publish an EA was published, along with information on a NEPA public scoping meeting on September 24, 2015. A Federal Register Notice was also published to announce the initiation of the feasibility study and also the public NEPA scoping meeting. As part of the public involvement process, all affected federal, Commonwealth of Virginia, and local agencies, private organizations, and the public were invited to the Public Scoping Meeting on September 24, 2015 in Norfolk, Virginia. This study is authorized under Section 216 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (Pub. L. 91–611), which authorizes the review of completed projects in the interest of navigation and related purposes to determine the feasibility of further port deepening. Brenda S. Bowen, Army Federal Register Liaison Officer. [FR Doc. 2017–26724 Filed 12–11–17; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3720–58–P PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION [Docket No.: ED–2017–ICCD–0083] Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Evaluation of the ESEA Title VI Indian Education LEA Grants Program Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development (OPEPD), Department of Education (ED). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ED is proposing a new information collection. DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before January 11, 2018. ADDRESSES: To access and review all the documents related to the information collection listed in this notice, please use https://www.regulations.gov by searching the Docket ID number ED– 2017–ICCD–0083. Comments submitted in response to this notice should be submitted electronically through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https:// www.regulations.gov by selecting the Docket ID number or via postal mail, commercial delivery, or hand delivery. Please note that comments submitted by fax or email and those submitted after the comment period will not be accepted. Written requests for information or comments submitted by postal mail or delivery should be addressed to the Director of the Information Collection Clearance Division, U.S. Department of Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, LBJ, Room 216–34, Washington, DC 20202–4537. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For specific questions related to collection activities, please contact Joanne Bogart, 202–205–7855. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department of Education (ED), in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general public and Federal agencies with an opportunity to comment on proposed, revised, and continuing collections of information. This helps the Department assess the impact of its information collection requirements and minimize the public’s reporting burden. It also helps the public understand the Department’s information collection requirements and provide the requested data in the desired format. ED is soliciting comments on the proposed information collection request (ICR) that is described below. The Department of Education is especially interested in SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\12DEN1.SGM 12DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58381-58382]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26724]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers


Availability of Elizabeth River and Southern Branch Navigation 
Improvements Draft General Reevaluation Report/Environmental Assessment

AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) in association with 
the nonfederal sponsor, the Virginia Port Authority, an agent of the 
Commonwealth of Virginia, announces the availability of the Elizabeth 
River and Southern Branch Navigation Improvements Draft General 
Reevaluation Report/Environmental Assessment (GRR/EA) for public review 
and comment. The purpose of this Draft GRR/EA is to evaluate 
alternatives that have the potential to improve the current and future 
operational efficiency of commercial vessels currently using the 
Norfolk Harbor federal channel in the Elizabeth River. Channel 
deepening alternatives were evaluated as well as

[[Page 58382]]

the No Action/Future without Project Alternative. Pursuant to the 
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, the USACE 
developed the draft GRR/EA to examine and assess the impacts of the 
project alternatives and determined that implementation of the Proposed 
Action would not result in significant impacts.

DATES: The Draft GRR/EA is available for a 30-day review period. 
Written comments, pursuant to the NEPA, will be accepted until the 
close of public review at the close of business on January 15, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Written comments or questions from the public may be 
submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Norfolk District, ATTN: 
Mr. David Schulte, Planning Branch, Environmental Analysis Section 
(CENAO-WR-PE), 803 Front Street, Norfolk, VA 23510 or via email to 
[email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David Schulte, 757-201-7007.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The document is available at the following 
locations: (1) Elizabeth River and Southern Branch Navigation 
Improvements website: https://www.nao.usace.army.mil/About/Projects/ElizabethRiverSouthernBranchNav.aspx, (2) Slover Public Library, 235 
East Plume Street, Norfolk, VA 23510. (3) Copies may also be requested 
in writing at (see ADDRESSES).
    Proposed Action. The Study Area is located in Hampton Roads, a 25 
square-mile natural harbor serving port facilities in the cities of 
Norfolk, Newport News, Portsmouth, Chesapeake, and Hampton in 
southeastern Virginia. The study area consists of a of a federally 
improved channel extending from Lamberts Bend (on the main stem of the 
Elizabeth River) to the Chesapeake Extension in the southern branch of 
the Elizabeth River.
    The Action Alternative consists of constructing and maintaining the 
following features:
     Deepening the channel from Lamberts Bend to Perdue Farms 
(Segment 1a) from a required depth of 40 feet to 45 feet deep in 
Segment 1a, and deepening the channel from Perdue Farms to the Norfolk 
Southern Lift Bridge (Segment 1b) from a required depth of 40 feet to 
42 feet.
     Deepening the channel from the Norfolk Southern Lift 
Bridge to the Gilmerton Bridge (Segment 2), from a required depth of 35 
feet to 39 feet deep; and
     Continuing to maintain the channel from the Gilmerton 
Bridge to the Chesapeake Extension to a required depth of 35 feet 
(Segment 3).

Implementation of the Preferred Alternative would have the potential to 
impact water quality, benthic resources, cultural resources, 
floodplains, federally listed threatened and endangered species, marine 
mammals, and other natural resources. The Proposed Action must be 
located in a floodplain in order to use the Craney Island Dredged 
Material Management Area (CIDMMA) as a dredged material placement site. 
The Proposed Action will adhere to the 8-step process as outlined under 
Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management.
    Alternatives. The Draft GRR/EA considers a reasonable range 
deepening alternatives in the project channels to meet the proposed 
action's purpose and need. It also incorporates measures to avoid and 
minimize impacts to threatened and endangered species, fish and 
wildlife species, estuarine and marine habitat, and other resources. In 
response to problems and opportunities, a range of alternatives was 
evaluated through an iterative screening and formulation process, 
resulting in identification of a Preferred Alternative.
    Public Involvement. On September 22, 2015, a Notice of Intent to 
publish an EA was published, along with information on a NEPA public 
scoping meeting on September 24, 2015. A Federal Register Notice was 
also published to announce the initiation of the feasibility study and 
also the public NEPA scoping meeting. As part of the public involvement 
process, all affected federal, Commonwealth of Virginia, and local 
agencies, private organizations, and the public were invited to the 
Public Scoping Meeting on September 24, 2015 in Norfolk, Virginia.
    This study is authorized under Section 216 of the Flood Control Act 
of 1970 (Pub. L. 91-611), which authorizes the review of completed 
projects in the interest of navigation and related purposes to 
determine the feasibility of further port deepening.

Brenda S. Bowen,
Army Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-26724 Filed 12-11-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3720-58-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.