Milk in the Florida Marketing Area; Notification of Hearing, 58135-58137 [2017-26632]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 236 / Monday, December 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
were able to express views on this issue.
Finally, interested persons are invited to
submit comments on this proposed rule,
including the regulatory and
information collection impacts of this
action on small businesses.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by OMB and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0178 Vegetable
and Specialty Crops. No changes in
those requirements are necessary as a
result of this action. Should any changes
become necessary, they would be
submitted to OMB for approval.
This proposal does not impose any
additional reporting or recordkeeping
requirements on either small or large
Florida tomato handlers. As with all
Federal marketing order programs,
reports and forms are periodically
reviewed to reduce information
requirements and duplication by
industry and public sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this proposed rule.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Richard Lower
at the previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
After consideration of all relevant
material presented, including the
information and recommendation
submitted by the Committee and other
available information, it is hereby found
that this proposed rule, as hereinafter
set forth, would tend to effectuate the
declared policy of the Act.
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 966
Marketing agreements, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Tomatoes.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 966 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 966—TOMATOES GROWN IN
FLORIDA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 966 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Dec 08, 2017
Jkt 244001
[Subpart Redesignated as Subpart A]
■ 2. Redesignate ‘‘Subpart—Order
Regulating Handling’’ as ‘‘Subpart A—
Order Regulating Handling’’.
58135
Agricultural Marketing Service
The hearing will convene at 9:00
a.m. on December 12, 2017, December
13, 2017 and December 14, 2017.
ADDRESSES: The hearing will be held at
the Embassy Suites by Hilton Tampa
Downtown Convention Center, 513
South Florida Avenue, Tampa, Florida
33602; telephone (813) 769–8326.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin
Taylor, Acting Director, Order
Formulation and Enforcement Division,
USDA/AMS/Dairy Program, Stop
0231—Room 2963, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250–
0231; (202) 720–7311; email address:
erin.taylor@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
December 7, 2017, a Notice of Hearing
was placed on public inspection at the
Federal Register (Document Number
2017–26632) announcing a hearing to
begin on December 12, 2017. That
notice is scheduled to be published
December 11, 2017. The Rules of
Practice and Procedure Governing
Proceedings to Formulate Marketing
Agreements and Marketing Orders
require that the time of a hearing cannot
be less than 3 days after the date of
publication of the notice in the Federal
Register (7 CFR 900.4).
Therefore, notice is hereby given that
the public hearing to be held at the
Embassy Suites by Hilton Tampa
Downtown Convention Center, 513
South Florida Avenue, Tampa, Florida
33602, will be held December 12, 2017,
through December 14, 2017. The hearing
will begin at 9:00 a.m. on each hearing
day. If no interested persons appear to
present testimony or evidence by noon
on December 13, 2017 or December 14,
2017, the hearing will conclude at noon
on that day.
7 CFR Part 1006
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1006
Milk marketing orders.
[Subpart Redesignated as Subpart B and
Amended]
■ 3. Redesignate ‘‘Subpart—Rules and
Regulations’’ as subpart B and revise the
heading to read as follows:
Subpart B—Administrative
Requirements
[Subpart Redesignated as Subpart C]
4. Redesignate ‘‘Subpart—Assessment
Rates’’ as ‘‘Subpart C—Assessment
Rates’’.
■
[Subpart Redesignated as Subpart D and
Amended]
■ 5. Redesignate ‘‘Subpart—Handling
Regulations’’ as subpart D and revise the
heading to read as follows:
Subpart D—Handling Requirements
6. Section 966.234 is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 966.234
Assessment rate.
On and after August 1, 2017, an
assessment rate of $0.025 per 25-pound
container is established for Florida
tomatoes.
Dated: December 4, 2017.
Bruce Summers,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–26373 Filed 12–8–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
[AMS–DA–17–0068; AO–18–0008]
Milk in the Florida Marketing Area;
Supplemental Notification of Hearing
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule; supplemental
notification of public hearing.
AGENCY:
A public hearing is being
held, on an emergency basis, to consider
a proposal submitted by Southeast Milk,
Inc., Dairy Farmers of America, Inc.,
Premier Milk, Inc., Maryland and
Virginia Milk Producers Cooperative
Association, Inc., and Lone Star Milk
Producers, L.C. This supplemental
notice extends the hearing from
December 12, 2017, through December
14, 2017, in order to provide adequate
public notification.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DATES:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674, and 7253.
Dated: December 7, 2017.
Bruce Summers,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–26717 Filed 12–8–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1006
[AMS–DA–17–0068; AO–18–0008]
Milk in the Florida Marketing Area;
Notification of Hearing
AGENCY:
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
58136
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 236 / Monday, December 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Proposed rule: notification of
public hearing.
ACTION:
A public hearing is being
held, on an emergency basis, to consider
a proposal submitted by Southeast Milk,
Inc., Dairy Farmers of America, Inc.,
Premier Milk, Inc., Maryland and
Virginia Milk Producers Cooperative
Association, Inc., and Lone Star Milk
Producers, L.C. The proposal seeks a
temporary supplemental charge on Class
I milk to provide emergency
reimbursement to handlers and
producers for costs incurred as a result
of market disruptions stemming from
Hurricane Irma in September 2017
which caused extensive damage in the
United States.
DATES: The hearing will convene at 9:00
a.m. on December 12, 2017.
ADDRESSES: The hearing will be held at
the Embassy Suites by Hilton Tampa
Downtown Convention Center, 513
South Florida Avenue, Tampa, Florida
33602; telephone (813) 769–8326.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin
Taylor, Acting Director, Order
Formulation and Enforcement Division,
USDA/AMS/Dairy Program, Stop 0231Room 2963, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20250–0231; (202)
720–7311; email address: erin.taylor@
ams.usda.gov.
Persons requiring a sign language
interpreter or other special
accommodations should contact Sherry
Swanson, AMS Dairy Program, at (470)
767–5084, email: sswanson@
fmmatlanta.com, at least 3 days before
the hearing begins.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
proposed rule is governed by the
provisions of Sections 556 and 557 of
Title 5 of the United States Code and,
therefore, is not subject to the
requirements of Executive Order 12866.
This proposed rule is not expected to
be an Executive Order 13771 regulatory
action because this proposed rule is
exempt from the definition of
‘‘regulation’’ or ‘‘rule’’ in Executive
Order 12866 and, thus, is not a
regulatory action.
The hearing is called pursuant to the
provisions of the Agricultural Marketing
Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7
U.S.C. 601–674) (Act), and the
applicable rules of practice and
procedure governing the formulation of
marketing agreements and marketing
orders (7 CFR part 900).
Notice is hereby given of a public
hearing to be held at the Embassy Suites
by Hilton Tampa Downtown
Convention Center, 513 South Florida
Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33602,
beginning at 9:00 a.m. on December 12,
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Dec 08, 2017
Jkt 244001
2017, with respect to proposed
amendments to the tentative marketing
agreements and order regulating the
handling of milk in the Florida milk
marketing area.
The purpose of the hearing is to
receive evidence with respect to the
economic and marketing conditions
which relate to the proposed
amendments, hereinafter set forth, and
any appropriate modifications thereof,
to the tentative marketing agreements
and to the order.
Actions under the Federal milk order
program are subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612)
(RFA). The RFA seeks to ensure that,
within the statutory authority of a
program, the regulatory and information
collection requirements are tailored to
the size and nature of small businesses.
For the purpose of the RFA, a dairy farm
is a ‘‘small business’’ if it has an annual
gross revenue of less than $750,000, and
a dairy products manufacturer is a
‘‘small business’’ if it has fewer than 500
employees (13 CFR 121.201). Most
parties subject to a milk order are
considered small businesses.
Accordingly, interested parties are
invited to present evidence on the
probable regulatory and informational
impact of the hearing proposals on
small businesses. Also, parties may offer
modifications of these proposals for the
purpose of tailoring their applicability
to small businesses.
The amendments proposed herein
have been reviewed under Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. They
are not intended to have a retroactive
effect. If adopted, the proposed
amendments would not preempt any
State or local laws, regulations, or
policies, unless they present an
irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
Section 8c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may request
modification or exemption from such
order by filing with the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA) a
petition stating that the order, any
provision of the order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the order is
not in accordance with the law. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After a
hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has its principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review
USDA’s decision on the petition,
provided a complaint is filed not later
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
than 20 days after the date of the entry
of the ruling.
The public hearing is being conducted
to collect evidence for the record
concerning the potential need for
emergency payments to reimburse
handlers and producers for costs they
incurred as a result of disruptions
stemming from Hurricane Irma. The
payments as proposed would be through
a temporary $0.09 per hundredweight
increase in the Class I price under the
order. The increase would only be
applicable for the number of months
necessary to cover the documented
costs.
Evidence also will be taken at the
hearing to determine whether
emergency marketing conditions exist
that would warrant omission of a
recommended decision under the rules
of practice and procedure (7 CFR
900.12(d)) with respect to any proposed
amendments.
Interested parties who wish to
introduce exhibits should provide the
Administrative Law Judge at the hearing
with four (4) copies of such exhibits for
the official record. Additional copies
should be made available for the use of
other hearing participants. Any party
that has submitted a proposal noticed
herein, when participating as a witness,
is required to make their testimony—if
prepared as an exhibit—and any other
exhibits, available to USDA officials
prior to the start of the hearing on the
day of their appearance. Individual
dairy farmers are not subject to this
requirement.
Copies of this notification of hearing
may be obtained online at, https://
www.ams.usda.gov/dairy, or from the
Hearing Clerk, United States
Department of Agriculture, STOP
9200—Room 1031, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250–
9200.
Copies of the transcript of testimony
and exhibits taken at the hearing will be
made available for viewing at https://
www.ams.usda.gov/dairy after the
hearing adjourns. If you wish to
purchase a copy, arrangements may be
made with the reporter at the hearing.
From the time that a hearing notice is
issued and until the issuance of a final
decision in a proceeding, Department
employees involved in the decision
making process are prohibited from
discussing the merits of the hearing
issues on an ex parte basis with any
person having an interest in the
proceeding. For this particular
proceeding, the prohibition applies to
employees in the following
organizational units: Office of the
Secretary of Agriculture; Office of the
Administrator, AMS; Office of the
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 236 / Monday, December 11, 2017 / Proposed Rules
General Counsel; and the AMS Dairy
Program (Washington, DC office), and
the offices of all Market Administrators.
Procedural matters are not subject to the
above prohibition and may be discussed
at any time.
Testimony is invited on the following
proposal or appropriate modifications to
such proposal. The proposed
amendment, as set forth below, has not
received the approval of the
Department.
Proposal Number 1
Proposed by Southeast Milk, Inc.,
Dairy Farmers of America, Inc., Premier
Milk, Inc., Maryland and Virginia Milk
Producers Cooperative Association, Inc.,
and Lone Star Milk Producers, L.C.
The proposal details substantial and
extraordinary losses to the Florida dairy
industry as a result of physical damages;
heat stress to animals; market losses;
and additional transportation costs
stemming from Hurricane Irma. The
proposal would provide for emergency
relief for Florida handlers and
producers for costs incurred September
6 through September 15, 2017. The
categories of recovery costs requested
include: (1) The minimum class price
value of whole and skim milk dumped
due to market unavailability during
plant shutdowns; (2) additional
transportation costs associated with
milk movements resulting from the
hurricane; (3) lost minimum location
price value on milk movements out of
market; and (4) price losses on distress
sales of milk. Proposed amendments to
the Florida Federal Milk Marketing
Order are set out in the regulatory text
below.
Proposal Number 2
Proposed by Dairy Program,
Agricultural Marketing Service.
Make such changes as may be
necessary to make the entire marketing
agreement and the order conform with
any amendments thereto that may result
from this hearing.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1006
Milk marketing orders.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, AMS proposes to amend 7
CFR part 1006 as follow:
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
PART 1006—MILK IN THE FLORIDA
MILK MARKETING AREA
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 1006 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674, and 7253.
2. Section 1006.60 is amended by
revising paragraphs (a) and (g) and
adding paragraphs (h) and (i) to read as
follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:10 Dec 08, 2017
Jkt 244001
§ 1006.60
Handler’s value of milk.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Multiply the pounds of skim milk
and butterfat in producer milk that were
classified in each class pursuant to
§ 1000.44(c) by the applicable skim milk
and butterfat prices, and add the
resulting amounts; except that for the
months of __2018 through __2018, the
Class I skim milk price for this purpose
shall be the Class I skim milk price as
determined in § 1000.50(b) plus $0.09
per hundredweight, and the Class I
butterfat price for this purpose shall be
the Class I butterfat price as determined
in § 1000.50(c) plus $0. _____per pound.
The adjustments to the Class I skim milk
and butterfat prices provided herein
may be reduced by the market
administrator for any month if the
market administrator determines that
the payments yet unpaid computed
pursuant to paragraphs (g)(1) through
paragraph (g)(6) of this section will be
less than the amount computed
pursuant to paragraph (g)(6) of this
section. The adjustments to the Class I
skim milk and butterfat prices provided
herein during the months of _____shall
be announced along with the prices
announced in § 1000.53(b).
*
*
*
*
*
(g) For transactions occurring during
the period of September 6, 2017 through
September 15, 2017, for handlers who
have submitted proof satisfactory to the
market administrator to determine
eligibility for reimbursement of
hurricane-imposed costs, subtract an
amount equal to:
(1) The cost of transportation on loads
of producer milk rerouted from pool
distributing plants to plants outside the
state of Florida which were rerouted as
a result of Hurricane Irma. The
reimbursement of transportation costs
pursuant to this section shall be the
actual demonstrated cost of such
transportation of bulk milk or the miles
of transportation on such loads of bulk
milk multiplied by $3.75 per loaded
mile, whichever is less.
(2) The lost location value on loads of
producer milk rerouted to plants outside
the state of Florida as a result of
Hurricane Irma. The lost location value
shall be the difference per
hundredweight between the value stated
in part 1000.52 at the plant to which the
milk would have gone and the value in
part 1000.52 at the plant to which the
milk was rerouted;
(3) The value per hundredweight at
the lowest classified price for the month
of September 2017 for milk dumped at
the farm and classified as other use milk
pursuant to section 1000.40(e) as a
result of Hurricane Irma;
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
58137
(4) The value per hundredweight at
the lowest classified price for the month
of September 2017 for milk dumped
from milk tankers after being moved offfarm and classified as other use milk
pursuant to section 1000.40(e) as a
result of Hurricane Irma;
(5) The value per hundredweight at
the lowest classified price for the month
of September 2017 for skim milk
dumped and classified as other use milk
pursuant to Section 1000.40(e) as a
result of Hurricane Irma; and
(6) The difference between the lowest
class price for the month of September
2017 and the actual price received for
distress milk moved to nonpool plants
as a result of Hurricane Irma;
(h) The total amount of payment to all
handlers under this section shall be
limited for each month to an amount
determined by multiplying the total
Class I producer milk for all handlers
pursuant to § 1000.44(c) times $0.09 per
hundredweight;
(i) If the cost of payments computed
pursuant to paragraphs (g)(1) through (6)
of this section exceeds the amount
computed pursuant to paragraph (h) of
this section, the market administrator
shall prorate such payments to each
handler based on each handler’s
proportion of transportation and other
use milk costs submitted pursuant to
paragraphs (g)(1) through (6). Costs
submitted pursuant to paragraphs (g)(1)
through (6) which are not paid as a
result of such a proration shall be paid
in subsequent months until all costs
incurred and documented through (g)(1)
through (6) have been paid.
Dated: December 6, 2017.
Bruce Summers,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–26632 Filed 12–6–17; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2017–0688; Product
Identifier 2017–NE–23–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Zodiac Seats
France, Cabin Attendant Seats
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 236 (Monday, December 11, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 58135-58137]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26632]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 1006
[AMS-DA-17-0068; AO-18-0008]
Milk in the Florida Marketing Area; Notification of Hearing
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
[[Page 58136]]
ACTION: Proposed rule: notification of public hearing.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: A public hearing is being held, on an emergency basis, to
consider a proposal submitted by Southeast Milk, Inc., Dairy Farmers of
America, Inc., Premier Milk, Inc., Maryland and Virginia Milk Producers
Cooperative Association, Inc., and Lone Star Milk Producers, L.C. The
proposal seeks a temporary supplemental charge on Class I milk to
provide emergency reimbursement to handlers and producers for costs
incurred as a result of market disruptions stemming from Hurricane Irma
in September 2017 which caused extensive damage in the United States.
DATES: The hearing will convene at 9:00 a.m. on December 12, 2017.
ADDRESSES: The hearing will be held at the Embassy Suites by Hilton
Tampa Downtown Convention Center, 513 South Florida Avenue, Tampa,
Florida 33602; telephone (813) 769-8326.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin Taylor, Acting Director, Order
Formulation and Enforcement Division, USDA/AMS/Dairy Program, Stop
0231-Room 2963, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250-
0231; (202) 720-7311; email address: [email protected].
Persons requiring a sign language interpreter or other special
accommodations should contact Sherry Swanson, AMS Dairy Program, at
(470) 767-5084, email: [email protected], at least 3 days before
the hearing begins.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed rule is governed by the
provisions of Sections 556 and 557 of Title 5 of the United States Code
and, therefore, is not subject to the requirements of Executive Order
12866.
This proposed rule is not expected to be an Executive Order 13771
regulatory action because this proposed rule is exempt from the
definition of ``regulation'' or ``rule'' in Executive Order 12866 and,
thus, is not a regulatory action.
The hearing is called pursuant to the provisions of the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601-
674) (Act), and the applicable rules of practice and procedure
governing the formulation of marketing agreements and marketing orders
(7 CFR part 900).
Notice is hereby given of a public hearing to be held at the
Embassy Suites by Hilton Tampa Downtown Convention Center, 513 South
Florida Avenue, Tampa, Florida 33602, beginning at 9:00 a.m. on
December 12, 2017, with respect to proposed amendments to the tentative
marketing agreements and order regulating the handling of milk in the
Florida milk marketing area.
The purpose of the hearing is to receive evidence with respect to
the economic and marketing conditions which relate to the proposed
amendments, hereinafter set forth, and any appropriate modifications
thereof, to the tentative marketing agreements and to the order.
Actions under the Federal milk order program are subject to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612) (RFA). The RFA seeks to
ensure that, within the statutory authority of a program, the
regulatory and information collection requirements are tailored to the
size and nature of small businesses. For the purpose of the RFA, a
dairy farm is a ``small business'' if it has an annual gross revenue of
less than $750,000, and a dairy products manufacturer is a ``small
business'' if it has fewer than 500 employees (13 CFR 121.201). Most
parties subject to a milk order are considered small businesses.
Accordingly, interested parties are invited to present evidence on the
probable regulatory and informational impact of the hearing proposals
on small businesses. Also, parties may offer modifications of these
proposals for the purpose of tailoring their applicability to small
businesses.
The amendments proposed herein have been reviewed under Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. They are not intended to have a
retroactive effect. If adopted, the proposed amendments would not
preempt any State or local laws, regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with this rule.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under Section 8c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an order may request modification or
exemption from such order by filing with the United States Department
of Agriculture (USDA) a petition stating that the order, any provision
of the order, or any obligation imposed in connection with the order is
not in accordance with the law. A handler is afforded the opportunity
for a hearing on the petition. After a hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the district court of the United States
in any district in which the handler is an inhabitant, or has its
principal place of business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's decision
on the petition, provided a complaint is filed not later than 20 days
after the date of the entry of the ruling.
The public hearing is being conducted to collect evidence for the
record concerning the potential need for emergency payments to
reimburse handlers and producers for costs they incurred as a result of
disruptions stemming from Hurricane Irma. The payments as proposed
would be through a temporary $0.09 per hundredweight increase in the
Class I price under the order. The increase would only be applicable
for the number of months necessary to cover the documented costs.
Evidence also will be taken at the hearing to determine whether
emergency marketing conditions exist that would warrant omission of a
recommended decision under the rules of practice and procedure (7 CFR
900.12(d)) with respect to any proposed amendments.
Interested parties who wish to introduce exhibits should provide
the Administrative Law Judge at the hearing with four (4) copies of
such exhibits for the official record. Additional copies should be made
available for the use of other hearing participants. Any party that has
submitted a proposal noticed herein, when participating as a witness,
is required to make their testimony--if prepared as an exhibit--and any
other exhibits, available to USDA officials prior to the start of the
hearing on the day of their appearance. Individual dairy farmers are
not subject to this requirement.
Copies of this notification of hearing may be obtained online at,
https://www.ams.usda.gov/dairy, or from the Hearing Clerk, United States
Department of Agriculture, STOP 9200--Room 1031, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250-9200.
Copies of the transcript of testimony and exhibits taken at the
hearing will be made available for viewing at https://www.ams.usda.gov/dairy after the hearing adjourns. If you wish to purchase a copy,
arrangements may be made with the reporter at the hearing.
From the time that a hearing notice is issued and until the
issuance of a final decision in a proceeding, Department employees
involved in the decision making process are prohibited from discussing
the merits of the hearing issues on an ex parte basis with any person
having an interest in the proceeding. For this particular proceeding,
the prohibition applies to employees in the following organizational
units: Office of the Secretary of Agriculture; Office of the
Administrator, AMS; Office of the
[[Page 58137]]
General Counsel; and the AMS Dairy Program (Washington, DC office), and
the offices of all Market Administrators. Procedural matters are not
subject to the above prohibition and may be discussed at any time.
Testimony is invited on the following proposal or appropriate
modifications to such proposal. The proposed amendment, as set forth
below, has not received the approval of the Department.
Proposal Number 1
Proposed by Southeast Milk, Inc., Dairy Farmers of America, Inc.,
Premier Milk, Inc., Maryland and Virginia Milk Producers Cooperative
Association, Inc., and Lone Star Milk Producers, L.C.
The proposal details substantial and extraordinary losses to the
Florida dairy industry as a result of physical damages; heat stress to
animals; market losses; and additional transportation costs stemming
from Hurricane Irma. The proposal would provide for emergency relief
for Florida handlers and producers for costs incurred September 6
through September 15, 2017. The categories of recovery costs requested
include: (1) The minimum class price value of whole and skim milk
dumped due to market unavailability during plant shutdowns; (2)
additional transportation costs associated with milk movements
resulting from the hurricane; (3) lost minimum location price value on
milk movements out of market; and (4) price losses on distress sales of
milk. Proposed amendments to the Florida Federal Milk Marketing Order
are set out in the regulatory text below.
Proposal Number 2
Proposed by Dairy Program, Agricultural Marketing Service.
Make such changes as may be necessary to make the entire marketing
agreement and the order conform with any amendments thereto that may
result from this hearing.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 1006
Milk marketing orders.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, AMS proposes to amend 7
CFR part 1006 as follow:
PART 1006--MILK IN THE FLORIDA MILK MARKETING AREA
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 1006 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674, and 7253.
0
2. Section 1006.60 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (g) and
adding paragraphs (h) and (i) to read as follows:
Sec. 1006.60 Handler's value of milk.
* * * * *
(a) Multiply the pounds of skim milk and butterfat in producer milk
that were classified in each class pursuant to Sec. 1000.44(c) by the
applicable skim milk and butterfat prices, and add the resulting
amounts; except that for the months of __2018 through __2018, the Class
I skim milk price for this purpose shall be the Class I skim milk price
as determined in Sec. 1000.50(b) plus $0.09 per hundredweight, and the
Class I butterfat price for this purpose shall be the Class I butterfat
price as determined in Sec. 1000.50(c) plus $0. _____per pound. The
adjustments to the Class I skim milk and butterfat prices provided
herein may be reduced by the market administrator for any month if the
market administrator determines that the payments yet unpaid computed
pursuant to paragraphs (g)(1) through paragraph (g)(6) of this section
will be less than the amount computed pursuant to paragraph (g)(6) of
this section. The adjustments to the Class I skim milk and butterfat
prices provided herein during the months of _____shall be announced
along with the prices announced in Sec. 1000.53(b).
* * * * *
(g) For transactions occurring during the period of September 6,
2017 through September 15, 2017, for handlers who have submitted proof
satisfactory to the market administrator to determine eligibility for
reimbursement of hurricane-imposed costs, subtract an amount equal to:
(1) The cost of transportation on loads of producer milk rerouted
from pool distributing plants to plants outside the state of Florida
which were rerouted as a result of Hurricane Irma. The reimbursement of
transportation costs pursuant to this section shall be the actual
demonstrated cost of such transportation of bulk milk or the miles of
transportation on such loads of bulk milk multiplied by $3.75 per
loaded mile, whichever is less.
(2) The lost location value on loads of producer milk rerouted to
plants outside the state of Florida as a result of Hurricane Irma. The
lost location value shall be the difference per hundredweight between
the value stated in part 1000.52 at the plant to which the milk would
have gone and the value in part 1000.52 at the plant to which the milk
was rerouted;
(3) The value per hundredweight at the lowest classified price for
the month of September 2017 for milk dumped at the farm and classified
as other use milk pursuant to section 1000.40(e) as a result of
Hurricane Irma;
(4) The value per hundredweight at the lowest classified price for
the month of September 2017 for milk dumped from milk tankers after
being moved off-farm and classified as other use milk pursuant to
section 1000.40(e) as a result of Hurricane Irma;
(5) The value per hundredweight at the lowest classified price for
the month of September 2017 for skim milk dumped and classified as
other use milk pursuant to Section 1000.40(e) as a result of Hurricane
Irma; and
(6) The difference between the lowest class price for the month of
September 2017 and the actual price received for distress milk moved to
nonpool plants as a result of Hurricane Irma;
(h) The total amount of payment to all handlers under this section
shall be limited for each month to an amount determined by multiplying
the total Class I producer milk for all handlers pursuant to Sec.
1000.44(c) times $0.09 per hundredweight;
(i) If the cost of payments computed pursuant to paragraphs (g)(1)
through (6) of this section exceeds the amount computed pursuant to
paragraph (h) of this section, the market administrator shall prorate
such payments to each handler based on each handler's proportion of
transportation and other use milk costs submitted pursuant to
paragraphs (g)(1) through (6). Costs submitted pursuant to paragraphs
(g)(1) through (6) which are not paid as a result of such a proration
shall be paid in subsequent months until all costs incurred and
documented through (g)(1) through (6) have been paid.
Dated: December 6, 2017.
Bruce Summers,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-26632 Filed 12-6-17; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P