Elimination of Main Studio Rule, 57876-57884 [2017-24982]
Download as PDF
57876
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 235 / Friday, December 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
language of this rule on the Federal
Plain Language Guidelines.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 1601
Administrative practice and
procedure, Archives and records,
Confidential business information,
Freedom of information, Privacy.
Accordingly, the interim rule
amending 40 CFR part 1601, which was
published at 82 FR 45502 on September
29, 2017, is adopted as final without
change.
Ray Porfiri,
Deputy General Counsel, Chemical Safety and
Hazard Investigation Board.
[FR Doc. 2017–26438 Filed 12–7–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6350–01–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 1 and 73
[MB Docket No. 17–106; FCC 17–137]
Elimination of Main Studio Rule
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, the Federal
Communications Commission (FCC or
Commission) eliminates the rule that
requires each AM, FM, and television
broadcast station to maintain a main
studio located in or near its community
of license. The FCC also eliminates
existing requirements associated with
the rule, including the requirement that
the main studio have full-time
management and staff present during
normal business hours, and that it have
program origination capability.
DATES: Effective January 8, 2018, except
for §§ 73.3526(c)(1) and 73.3527(c)(1),
which contain new or modified
information collection requirements,
and which shall become effective after
the Commission publishes a document
in the Federal Register announcing
OMB approval and the relevant effective
date.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information on this
proceeding, contact Diana Sokolow,
Diana.Sokolow@fcc.gov, of the Policy
Division, Media Bureau, (202) 418–
2120.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
This is a
summary of the Commission’s Report
and Order (R&O), FCC 17–137, adopted
and released on October 24, 2017. The
full text of this document is available for
public inspection and copying during
regular business hours in the FCC
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Dec 07, 2017
Jkt 244001
Reference Center, Federal
Communications Commission, 445 12th
Street SW., Room CY–A257,
Washington, DC 20554. This document
will also be available via ECFS at https://
fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/. Documents will
be available electronically in ASCII,
Microsoft Word, and/or Adobe Acrobat.
Copies of the materials can be obtained
from the FCC’s Reference Information
Center at (202) 418–0270. Alternative
formats are available for people with
disabilities (Braille, large print,
electronic files, audio format), by
sending an email to fcc504@fcc.gov or
calling the Commission’s Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202)
418–0530 (voice), (202) 418–0432
(TTY).
Synopsis
1. The Commission in this R&O
adopts the proposal in the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), 82 FR
25590 (June 2, 2017), to eliminate the
Commission rule requiring AM, FM,
and television broadcast stations to
maintain a local main studio.1 We also
adopt the proposal to eliminate the
associated staffing and program
origination capability requirements that
apply to main studios. To ensure that
community members retain the ability
to communicate with and obtain
information regarding their local
stations, we retain the existing
requirement that broadcasters maintain
a local or toll-free telephone number.
We also require stations to maintain any
portion of their public file that is not
part of the online public file at a
publicly accessible location within the
station’s community of license. Finally,
we make conforming edits to other
Commission rules that are necessitated
by the elimination of the main studio
rule.
2. We agree with the vast majority of
commenters 2 in this proceeding that the
main studio rule should be eliminated.
We are persuaded that eliminating the
rule will result in significant cost
savings for broadcasters and other
public interest benefits. For example,
the record shows that in some small
towns and rural areas the cost of
complying with the current main studio
1 Because we are eliminating the main studio
rule, we need not address one commenter’s
argument that the current main studio rule is
unenforceable under the Administrative Procedure
Act. We also decline to address herein arguments
that are outside the scope of this proceeding, which
is limited to elimination of the main studio rule and
the associated staffing and program origination
capability requirements.
2 Contrary to the suggestion of Common
Frequency, the ample record in this proceeding
provides the Commission with sufficient
information to proceed to this R&O.
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
rule dissuades broadcasters from
launching a station, even if the
broadcaster has already obtained a
construction permit for the station.
Eliminating the rule thus may lead to
increased broadcast service in those
areas. In addition, as commenters
suggest, eliminating the main studio
rule will provide broadcasters with the
same flexibility as Internet radio
stations and cable and satellite
providers, none of which are subject to
a main studio requirement. While we
recognize the importance of local
broadcast television and radio stations
as a source of news and information, we
agree with NAB that the record does not
provide any ‘‘evidence that the physical
location of a station’s main studio is the
reason local broadcasters are able to
deliver content that meets the needs and
interest[s] of their communities, or that
the location and staffing of the studio
has any relationship to the ability of a
station to serve its local audience.’’
3. We affirm the tentative conclusion
in the NPRM that technological
innovations have rendered local studios
unnecessary as a means for viewers and
listeners to communicate with or access
their local stations and to carry out the
other traditional functions that they
have served. The record shows that it is
exceedingly rare for a member of the
public to visit a station’s main studio,
with community members
overwhelmingly choosing instead to
communicate with stations through
more efficient means such as email,
station Web sites, social media, mail, or
telephone.3 This has been the case even
more so since the Commission created
the online public inspection file. Once
broadcasters fully transition to the
online public file in early 2018,
requiring stations to maintain a fully
staffed main studio for purposes of
providing access to the file will no
longer be practical or justifiable. It is
also relevant that community members
already participate in station shows
from outside the main studio, for
example by appearing via telephone or
Skype. As some commenters state, inperson visits from community members
are now ‘‘unnecessary, if not obsolete,’’
as a result of the ‘‘near ubiquity of
remote communication.’’ 4
3 Although broadcast licensees are obligated to
serve ‘‘the public interest, convenience, and
necessity,’’ we find that ‘‘convenience’’ need not
include reasonable physical access to the station’s
facilities in the community of license, contrary to
the suggestion of one commenter, given how rarely
community members today opt to access such
facilities.
4 In addition, some commenters point to the
legitimate public safety concerns that are associated
with allowing uninvited members of the public to
visit a station’s main studio.
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 235 / Friday, December 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
4. We disagree with arguments that in
the absence of a local main studio, the
Commission will be unable to ensure
that a station serves its local
community. Broadcast licensees still
will be required to include in their
public inspection files, on a quarterly
basis, a list of those ‘‘programs that have
provided the station’s most significant
treatment of community issues during
the preceding three month period,’’
including a brief description of each
relevant program. Further, as part of the
broadcast station license renewal
process, the Commission is required to
find that ‘‘the station has served the
public interest, convenience, and
necessity’’ during its preceding license
term. In particular, ‘‘[o]ne of a television
broadcaster’s fundamental public
interest obligations is to air
programming responsive to the needs
and interests of its community of
license.’’
5. We also are not persuaded by
contentions that broadcasters’ local
community involvement or the
provision of local news will
significantly decline if we eliminate the
main studio rule. Broadcast commenters
explain that they keep apprised of local
needs and issues to distinguish
themselves from their competitors, to
gain popularity and thus advertising
dollars or, in the case of noncommercial
educational (NCE) stations,
contributions, and to fulfill their public
interest obligations.5 Broadcasters will
retain these incentives even in the
absence of the main studio rule.6 In
addition, we agree with Univision that
today, ‘‘providing service to, interacting
with, and maintaining awareness of a
community is not dependent upon
locating a station’s offices within certain
arbitrary geographic boundaries
imposed by the’’ main studio rule. To
the contrary, broadcasters can interact
with local community members by
using technology such as social media,
and even without a local main studio,
broadcasters can use modern technology
to broadcast information about local
events. The main studio rule does not
require broadcasters to provide any
particular level of local coverage or
5 We note that the main studio rule does not
require broadcasters to provide coverage of their
local communities; rather, the rule simply governs
the permissible location of a station’s main studio.
6 The record suggests that not all stations will
choose to eliminate their current main studios after
the main studio rule is repealed. Those stations that
do choose to eliminate their current main studios
likely will often maintain an office or studio that
is convenient to their viewers or listeners, so that,
among other things, community members can
appear in person to serve as on-air guests or attend
in-studio events, and so that contest prize winners
can visit the station to retrieve their prizes.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Dec 07, 2017
Jkt 244001
involvement in the local community,
and there is no evidence in the record
that elimination of this rule will cause
a decrease in such involvement or
coverage.
6. We reject claims that the
elimination of the main studio rule will
have a negative impact on broadcasters’
ability to broadcast emergency and timesensitive information. One commenter
explains that in terms of ‘‘a station’s
ability to communicate time-sensitive or
emergency information to the public,’’
today telephone and Internet
communications are more efficient than
an in-person interaction at a local
studio. In furtherance of their obligation
to serve their communities of license,
commenters state that broadcasters will
continue providing timely emergency
information to their viewers and
listeners. Additionally, we note that the
elimination of the main studio rule will
not in any way alter a station’s
obligations to transmit emergency alerts
received via the emergency alert system
(EAS).7
7. Because we find that technological
innovations have eliminated the need
for a local main studio, the costs of
complying with the main studio rule
substantially outweigh any benefits.8
Broadcasters detail the significant costs
that they face under the main studio
rule, including such expenses as: (a)
Rent, utilities, insurance, and
maintenance costs for the studio itself;
(b) equipment and transmission
facilities; and (c) salaries, taxes,
insurance, and benefits for the main
studio’s two full-time employees.
Broadcasters claim that main studiorelated costs range from $20,000 per
year to several hundred thousand
dollars per year.9 One broadcaster states
that it could consolidate main studios
and save more than $10 million
annually. The main studio rule imposes
significant and burdensome costs on
broadcasters, particularly smaller
broadcasters and NCE stations.10
7 As explained below, broadcasters already have
processes in place to ensure that they are
responsive to emergency situations.
8 This rationale for eliminating the main studio
rule applies to all broadcast stations, and we thus
will eliminate the rule in its entirety rather than
eliminating it only for a certain subset of stations.
9 Due to the specific information broadcasters
have provided regarding costs of compliance with
the current main studio rule and associated
requirements, we are not persuaded by commenters’
unsupported arguments that maintaining a local
main studio ‘‘has never been more affordable’’ and
that broadcasters do not need relief from the
Commission in this regard.
10 Some commenters claim, without evidence,
that small and independent broadcasters will not
benefit from the elimination of the main studio rule
because they likely will not relocate their existing
studios and will become unable to compete against
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57877
8. The cost savings broadcasters may
achieve following elimination of the
main studio rule will enable them to
allocate greater resources to local
programming and other matters such as
community outreach, newsgathering,
equipment upgrades, and attracting new
talent and personnel. According to some
commenters, such savings could even
prevent some stations from going dark.
Stations will have the flexibility to
operate studios in the most efficient
manner, and some stations that are coowned or jointly operated may find it to
be more efficient for them to co-locate
their studios.11 We conclude that
providing stations with the maximum
flexibility by eliminating the main
studio rule in its entirety is preferable
to the more limited approaches
proposed by some commenters, which
could still impose significant cost
burdens on some stations and would not
entirely address concerns that the costs
of complying with the main studio rule
are no longer justified today.
9. Eliminating the main studio rule
and associated requirements is not
inconsistent with section 307(b) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended (the Act), which requires the
Commission to ‘‘make such distribution
of licenses, frequencies, hours of
operation, and of power among the
several States and communities as to
provide for a fair, efficient, and
equitable distribution of radio service to
each of the same.’’ In the absence of the
main studio rule, broadcast stations still
will be licensed to a specific community
of license, and they will be obligated to
place a certain signal contour over that
community. As noted above,
broadcasters also will remain subject to
license renewal and quarterly issues/
programs list requirements. Moreover,
programming designed to meet a
community’s needs and interests can be
produced anywhere today. For the
reasons discussed herein, the record
supports our finding that a local main
studio is no longer necessary to ensure
that broadcast stations serve their local
communities,12 and thus eliminating
consolidated multi-station broadcasters. The factbased statements of small broadcasters in this
proceeding, detailing the costs of compliance with
the main studio rule and the potential benefits to
them of the elimination of the rule, belie these
claims.
11 Contrary to the suggestion of one commenter,
we see no evidence in the record that any broadcast
station would attempt to move its studio outside of
this country, and we question whether doing so
would be feasible or economical.
12 We thus reject claims that the main studio rule
is still needed to meet the obligations in section
307(b) of the Act. In addition, we agree with NAB
that any assertion that the main studio rule is
needed to enforce the ‘‘transmission service’’
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
Continued
08DER1
57878
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 235 / Friday, December 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
the main studio requirement will not
prevent compliance with the
distribution directive in section 307(b)
of the Act.
10. We note that the Commission or
Media Bureau has previously granted
waivers of the main studio rule. Our
decision to eliminate the main studio
requirement supersedes these waiver
grants, including pledges that the
licensees made in connection with those
waivers, with one exception discussed
below.13 Accordingly, as of the effective
date of the rules adopted in this R&O,
stations that have previously received a
waiver of the main studio rule must
comply with the Commission’s rules,
including the requirement to maintain a
local or toll-free number, rather than the
licensee pledges, if any, associated with
their superseded waiver grants. Upon
the elimination of the main studio rule,
it would not make sense to continue
subjecting stations to the commitments
they made in obtaining a waiver of the
main studio rule, including any related
recordkeeping requirements.
11. In addition to eliminating the
main studio rule itself, we adopt our
NPRM proposal to eliminate the staffing
requirements currently associated with
the rule. This will provide broadcasters
with more flexibility to staff their
operations as they see fit. Pursuant to
Commission precedent, there currently
must be two employees (one
management and one staff) present on a
full-time basis at a main studio during
normal business hours. Given the
technological advances that enable
remote monitoring and control of
broadcast stations, commenters attest
that some main studio employees have
nothing to do but sit at the main studio
in fulfillment of this requirement.
Commenters persuasively state that it
can be difficult for small or rural
stations and for financially-challenged
AM stations to support two full-time
employees. For example, station
KIHT(FM) is licensed to Amboy,
California (population: four) and serves
motorists traveling through the Mojave
Desert. One employee travels over an
hour each way each day to staff the
main studio.
requirement is misplaced because ‘‘[t]he
Commission effectively abandoned this definition
of transmission service when it eliminated the
program origination requirement.’’
13 The main studio waiver grants are superseded
by this R&O because there will no longer be a main
studio rule to be waived. Given that waivers of the
main studio rule will no longer be necessary, we
need not address one commenter’s claim that the
current waiver process leads to an unfair and
inefficient distribution of radio services. Below we
explain one type of main studio waiver for which
we will grandfather the station’s current main
studio as a permissible location for its local public
file.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Dec 07, 2017
Jkt 244001
12. We find that decisions regarding
location and number of staff members
should be left to broadcast licensees.14
Although we acknowledge that
elimination of the main studio staffing
requirement possibly could lead to
fewer employees available to interact
person to person at the physical station
office, we have explained above that
technology enables broadcasters to
interact with the local community and
to broadcast information about local
events even without a local main studio.
Eliminating the main studio
requirement and associated staffing
requirement promotes our statutory
goals by allowing broadcasters to
allocate greater resources to
programming and other matters,
promoting increased broadcast service
in small towns and rural areas, and
preventing stations from going dark. To
the extent commenters express concerns
about potential job loss following the
elimination of the main studio rule and
the associated staffing requirement, we
do not believe we are required to
disregard our statutory goals to prevent
such loss. Further, preventing stations
from going dark and enabling
broadcasters to launch stations that they
otherwise may not launch may promote
employment.
13. In addition to the foregoing, we
also adopt our NPRM proposal to
eliminate the program origination
capability requirement currently
associated with the main studio rule.
This will provide broadcasters greater
flexibility with respect to their
programming operations. Pursuant to
Commission precedent, the main studio
currently must be capable of
transmitting programming and must be
equipped with production and
transmission facilities. When the
Commission decided thirty years ago to
eliminate its rule requiring stations to
actually originate programming at their
main studios, it concluded that ‘‘the
main studio no longer plays the central
role in the production of a station’s
programming and programming
originated from within the political
boundaries of the community is not
necessarily responsive to the needs and
interests of the community.’’ 15
Conversely, the Commission has
recognized for decades that non-locally
produced programming can serve the
needs of a community. Those statements
are only more true today. Technology
makes it easier than ever before to
originate locally relevant programming
from locations outside of the station’s
community of license, and the existence
of technology that enables stations to
provide local broadcast coverage
without a local main studio also moots
concerns that licensees need a local
main studio to broadcast emergency
information.
14. There is no evidence in the record
that the current program origination
capability requirement has enhanced
local programming or otherwise served
the public interest. Commenters state
that many broadcasters that currently
originate programming locally will
continue to do so in the absence of the
current program origination capability
requirement. In any case, it appears that
the location from which programming is
originated is irrelevant to whether the
programing serves a community’s needs
and interests. We agree with broadcast
commenters ‘‘that a licensee’s
understanding of the needs and
concerns of its station’s audience,’’ not
the physical location of its studio or
program production equipment,
‘‘promotes the broadcast of issueresponsive programming.’’ 16
15. As proposed in the NPRM, we
retain § 73.1125(e) of our rules, which
requires ‘‘[e]ach AM, FM, TV and Class
A TV broadcast station [to] maintain a
local telephone number in its
community of license or a toll-free
number.’’ NAB supports this
requirement, which it says ‘‘keep[s] the
community well-informed and [is] not
unduly burdensome.’’ The telephone
number rule permits station owners to
provide one telephone number for
multiple stations, provided that the
number is toll-free or local to each
station’s community of license.17 Some
consumers are subject to an additional
fee for non-local calls, and we thus
retain the requirement for a local or tollfree number. Retaining the telephone
number rule will help promote
continued access to local broadcast
14 We caution that the deletion of the main studio
rule does not in any way limit or reduce broadcast
licensees’ obligation and responsibility to retain
and maintain control over essential station matters,
such as personnel, programming, and finances. The
Commission expects that broadcast licensees will
continue to be able to demonstrate such control
notwithstanding the elimination of the main studio
rule and the staffing requirements associated with
the main studio rule.
15 In that order, the Commission recognized the
limited utility of the program origination
requirement by deleting its rule requiring each
broadcast station to originate more than 50 percent
of its non-network programs from its main studio
or other points within its community of license.
16 For this reason, we reject the assertion that a
main studio’s most important function is program
origination capability.
17 Implicit in the requirement to maintain a local
or toll-free number is the requirement that phone
calls made to this number be answered during
business hours. We encourage broadcasters to use
voicemail or another way for consumers to leave
messages outside of stations’ normal business
hours.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 235 / Friday, December 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
stations by community members upon
elimination of the main studio rule.18
We find that retaining the existing rule
is an appropriate means to ensure that
members of the public can easily
contact station representatives and
receive timely responses.19
16. Stations currently are required to
post their telephone numbers in their
online public files.20 We retain that
requirement and do not require stations
to publicize their phone numbers in any
additional ways. We agree with
commenters that broadcasters have
extensive marketplace incentives and
license obligations to be accessible and
responsive to their audience, and we
note that telephone numbers by their
nature generally are accessible in other
ways. Broadcasters will retain the
flexibility to determine whether they
want to publicize their telephone
numbers in additional ways. For
example, most stations already choose
to post their telephone numbers on their
Web sites.
17. Furthermore, in the NPRM, the
Commission sought comment on
whether additional requirements are
needed to ensure that broadcasters are
responsive to time-sensitive and
emergency information. Because
broadcasters already coordinate with
federal, state, and local emergency
management officials, as well as law
enforcement officials, to address
emergencies that occur at any time of
day, we conclude that there is no need
to adopt additional requirements
pertaining to broadcast station
responsiveness to time-sensitive or
emergency information.21 While some
commenters reference such
18 We recognize that there is some cost to stations
of maintaining a local or toll-free telephone
number, but we find that on balance the relatively
limited cost is outweighed by the benefit of
ensuring that the station remains accessible to local
community members.
19 NFIB has proposed instead that the
Commission adopt a functional requirement that
each station ‘‘ensure that persons in its community
of license have a reasonable opportunity to
communicate with the station through at least one
generally available means of communication at no
charge.’’ We find that such an approach would be
unworkable for consumers who do not use email
and thus would have no way to contact a station
if the station eliminates its local main studio.
Accordingly, maintenance of the current telephone
number requirement is a more practical approach.
20 These rules also currently require a station to
include its main studio address, and as discussed
below we modify them to require the public file to
include the station’s address (rather than its main
studio address). The posted address should be a
location at which the licensee may be contacted by
mail and in person, for example, a studio, office,
or headquarters.
21 Nothing in this R&O is intended to alter the
obligation on licensees to post a written document
designating the station’s Chief Operator along with
the posted copy of the station’s license, as set forth
in 47 CFR 73.1870(b)(3).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Dec 07, 2017
Jkt 244001
requirements, other commenters
persuasively explain that broadcasters
already have processes in place to
ensure that station personnel are
available to receive and broadcast timesensitive emergency information. On
balance, we conclude that the adoption
of additional rules would not
necessarily improve broadcasters’
responsiveness to local emergencies,
and we thus find that there is no
evidence that the cost of such
obligations would be justified by any
purported benefits.
18. As discussed below, and as
supported by NAB and other
broadcasters, we require every broadcast
station applicant, permittee, or licensee
to maintain any portion of its public file
that is not part of the online public file
at an accessible place within its
community of license. Pursuant to the
Commission’s online public file rules,
in the very near future there will be only
limited instances in which any portion
of a station’s public inspection file will
be permitted to be maintained at the
station’s main studio rather than
online.22 In 2012, the Commission
adopted rules requiring television
broadcasters to utilize an online public
file hosted by the Commission, rather
than maintaining the public file locally,
and television stations completed their
transition to the online public file in
2014. In 2016, the Commission adopted
rules expanding the online public file
requirement to broadcast radio
licensees. As of June 24, 2016,
commercial broadcast radio stations in
the top 50 Nielsen Audio radio markets
with five or more full-time employees
were required to place new public and
political file documents in the online
public file on a going-forward basis. By
December 24, 2016, these entities were
required to upload their existing public
file documents to the online file, except
for existing political file material which
they may either upload or maintain
locally until the expiration of the twoyear retention period for such political
file material. Beginning March 1, 2018,
all other broadcast radio stations 23 must
place new public and political file
documents in the online public file on
a going-forward basis. They must also
22 Sections 73.3526(e) and 73.3527(e) of the
Commission’s rules set forth the required contents
of the station’s public inspection file. These
contents include the ‘‘political file,’’ which consists
of the records required to be maintained under
§ 73.1943 of our rules concerning broadcasts by
candidates for public office.
23 This includes NCE broadcast radio stations,
commercial broadcast radio stations in the top 50
Nielsen Audio radio markets with fewer than five
full-time employees, and commercial broadcast
radio stations in markets below the top 50 or
outside all markets.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57879
upload their existing public file
documents to the online file by that
date, except for existing political file
material which they may either upload
or maintain locally until the expiration
of the two-year retention period for such
political file material. In other words,
community members already have
online access to television station public
files, and by March 1, 2018 they will
have online access to radio station
public files, with the potential
exception of preexisting portions of the
political file that the station may retain
locally until the expiration of the twoyear retention period for such materials.
19. Nonetheless, we recognize the
need to ensure that community
members have local access to a station’s
public file for any timeframe during
which all or a portion of that file is not
available via the online public file.
Accordingly, we require every broadcast
station applicant, permittee, or licensee
to maintain any portion of its public file
that is not part of the online public file
at an accessible place within its
community of license. NAB and other
broadcasters support this approach. The
‘‘accessible place’’ could be a station
office or studio, if it is located within
the community of license, or it could be
a different location such as a local
library or another station’s office or
studio. The file must be available for
public inspection at any time during
regular business hours, as is currently
the case with regard to access to a
public file maintained at a station’s
main studio.24 If a station has
transitioned to the online public file
with the exception of its existing
political file materials, which certain
stations may maintain locally until the
two-year retention period expires as
discussed above, then the station must
maintain a copy of its existing political
file materials at an accessible place
within its community of license until it
is no longer required to retain those
materials.25 We note that any station
24 The other requirements of existing
§§ 73.3526(c)(1) and 73.3527(c)(1) of our rules also
will apply to the selected location of the public file
within the community of license. Sections
73.3526(b) and 73.3527(b) of our rules currently
contain multiple references to the hard copy public
inspection file maintained at a station or at the
station’s main studio, and we will revise this
language instead to reference retention of the file at
an accessible place in the community of license
(with the exception of references that are limited to
timeframes in the past).
25 Urban One states, ‘‘a radio station that has
voluntarily uploaded all political materials that are
required to be maintained to its online file should
have no obligation to make public file material
available other than online.’’ As explained above,
certain stations may locally retain political file
materials that were existing as of a certain date,
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
Continued
08DER1
57880
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 235 / Friday, December 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
that wishes to avoid this requirement
has the option to instead fully transition
to the Commission’s online public file
system.
20. In addition, if a broadcast station
currently maintains its local public file
at a main studio that complies with the
current main studio rule but is not
within the station’s community of
license, and if the station retains that
studio, we will grandfather that studio
as a permissible location for the
station’s local public file for the period
before completion of the station’s
transition to the online public file.26
Similarly, some existing waivers of the
main studio rule permit stations to
maintain their public files at the
station’s main studio outside the
community of license.27 We also will
grandfather any such studio as a
permissible location for the station’s
local public file for the period before
completion of the station’s transition to
the online public file. This approach
will ensure that stations with current
waivers do not face increased burdens
as a result of the elimination of the main
studio rule.
21. A community member seeking
access to a station’s public inspection
file in the community of license may
contact the station to inquire as to the
location of the file, for example via its
required telephone number or email.
Stations must promptly provide
information regarding the location of the
file within one business day of a
request. In addition, we encourage
stations that make public file materials
rather than uploading them to the online public file,
until the expiration of the two-year retention period
for those materials. To the extent Urban One is
arguing that we should permit stations to include
new political file materials in the online public file,
but not to make existing political file materials
available either locally or through the online public
file, we disagree. To the contrary, we find that it
is important to ensure that community members
have local access to all portions of the public
inspection file that are not part of the online public
file. If it is too inconvenient or costly to maintain
these materials locally, then a station may choose
to post them to the online public file instead. In
addition, we note that a change to the material that
is required to be part of a station’s public file is
outside the scope of this proceeding.
26 Sections 73.3526(c)(2) and 73.3527(c)(2) of our
rules currently govern access to material in the
public file by mail where the applicant, permittee,
or licensee maintains its main studio and public file
outside its community of license. These current
rules will remain in place, but we will delete the
phrase ‘‘main studio and,’’ such that the provisions
will be triggered if an applicant, permittee, or
licensee maintains its public file outside its
community of license because the station’s studio
is grandfathered as a permissible location for the
file, as discussed herein.
27 Some main studio waivers reference a licensee
pledge to maintain the public file in the community
of license, while others permit the licensee to
maintain the public file at the main studio subject
to the waiver.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Dec 07, 2017
Jkt 244001
available at an accessible place in the
community to provide that location on
their Web site, if they have a Web site,
and by any other means that the station
deems effective.
22. In the NPRM, the Commission
sought comment on whether
alternatively it should only eliminate
the main studio rule for stations that
have fully transitioned all public file
material to the online public file,
including existing political file
materials. While some commenters
support this alternate approach, we
agree with NAB that we should not limit
in this manner the public interest
benefits that will follow the elimination
of the main studio rule.28 The later
March 1, 2018 online public file
deadline generally applies to smaller
stations.29 Some of these entities may be
most adversely impacted by the costs of
complying with the current main studio
rule, and we conclude that we should
not disadvantage them by denying them
the benefits of the repeal of the rule. As
discussed above, the costs savings of
eliminating the rule will be significant
and will apply to all types of broadcast
stations. Given our decision to require
maintenance of paper files at an
accessible location in the community if
they are not available via the online
public file, the benefits of retaining the
main studio rule for those stations that
do not use the online public file would
be minimal, if they exist at all. Indeed,
in many cases the station may locate its
file at its current main studio, and in
other cases we expect that the selected
local file location will be equally, if not
more, convenient to residents as
compared to the station’s current main
studio. For example, if a station
previously maintained its main studio
outside of its community of license, as
permitted under the current rule, and
the station chooses to cease operating
that local studio as a result of this R&O,
then it may be more convenient for
community members to access the local
file at a location within the community
of license, as we require here.
28 In addition, we will not adopt the proposal of
one commenter that we only permit stations to
eliminate their current main studios if they make
their public file available both online and at a
business or library in the station’s community of
license. Given that it is sufficient for a station
currently to make its public file available online
only, we see no reason to require an additional
means of access if the station eliminates its current
main studio and its entire public file is available
through the Commission’s online public file.
29 The deadline applies to NCE broadcast radio
stations, commercial broadcast radio stations in the
top 50 Nielsen Audio radio markets with fewer than
five full-time employees, and commercial broadcast
radio stations in markets below the top 50 or
outside all markets.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
23. As a result of our repeal of the
main studio rule, we also will make the
following conforming rule revisions as
shown in the Final Rules:
• In § 1.80, delete the row of the chart
detailing the base forfeiture amount for
violations of the main studio rule.30
• In § 1.1104, delete the four rows
detailing the schedule of charges for a
‘‘Main Studio Request,’’ and re-letter the
remaining listings accordingly.
• In the definition of ‘‘equipment
performance measurements’’ in § 73.14
of our rules, delete ‘‘at main studio.’’
• Delete § 73.761(d) of our rules,
which currently governs formal
applications for a change in main studio
location, and renumber the remainder of
the rule.
• In § 73.1400(a)(1)(ii) of our rules,
change the reference to ‘‘the main studio
or other location’’ to ‘‘a studio or other
location.’’
• Delete § 73.1690(c)(8)(ii) of our
rules, which currently states that both
commercial and NCE FM stations must
comply with the main studio rule, and
renumber the remainder of the rule.
• Delete § 73.1690(d)(1) of our rules,
which currently governs permissive
changes in studio location, and
renumber the remainder of the rule.
• Modify §§ 73.3526(b)(2)(ii) and
73.3527(b)(2)(iii) of our rules, which
currently require the public file to
include the station’s main studio
address and telephone number, instead
to require the public file to include the
station’s address and telephone
number.31
• Delete the reference to ‘‘main
studio’’ in §§ 73.3526(e)(4) and
73.3527(e)(3) of our rules, which
currently require inclusion of
information showing service contours
and/or main studio and transmitter
location in the public file.
• Delete § 73.3538(b)(2) of our rules,
which currently governs informal
applications to relocate a main studio,
and renumber the remainder of the rule.
• Delete § 73.3544(b)(3) of our rules,
which currently governs informal
applications for a change in location of
the main studio, and renumber the
remainder of the rule.32
30 We will continue to rely on the base forfeiture
amount of $7000 as a starting point in assessing a
forfeiture for any violations of the main studio rule
that occurred before the effective date of the
elimination of the rule.
31 As stated above, the posted address should be
a location at which the licensee may be contacted
by mail and in person, for example, a studio, office,
or headquarters.
32 We also adopt the proposal to delete the
outdated reference in § 73.1690(d)(2) to § 73.1410,
which has been deleted.
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 235 / Friday, December 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
• In the alphabetical index to part 73,
delete the four rows that reference
§ 73.1125.
24. We also will delete § 73.6000(3) of
our rules and will require Class A
stations to meet the required quantity of
‘‘locally produced programming’’
through programming that complies
with § 73.6000(1) or (2). Consistent with
the Community Broadcasters Protection
Act of 1999, § 73.6001(b)(2) requires
Class A stations to broadcast an average
of at least three hours of locally
produced programming per week each
quarter. Section 73.6000 defines locally
produced programming for these
purposes as programming that is:
(1) Produced within the predicted
Grade B contour of the station
broadcasting the program or within the
contiguous predicted Grade B contours
of any of the stations in a commonly
owned group; or
(2) Produced within the predicted
DTV noise-limited contour . . . of a
digital Class A station broadcasting the
program or within the contiguous
predicted DTV noise-limited contours of
any of the digital Class A stations in a
commonly owned group; or
(3) Programming produced at the
station’s main studio.
Upon deletion of the main studio rule,
we find that it is appropriate to delete
option (3). Options (1) and (2) are
sufficiently broad that it should not be
difficult for Class A stations to meet the
required quantity of locally produced
programming.33 Our approach will
alleviate the concern of Free Press that
eliminating the main studio rule would
‘‘effectively nullify’’ the Class A
requirement pertaining to the quantity
of locally produced programming.
25. As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended
(RFA), an Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (IRFA) was incorporated in the
NPRM. The Commission sought written
public comments on proposals in the
NPRM, including comment on the IRFA.
The Commission received no comments
on the IRFA, although some
commenters discussed the effect of the
proposals on smaller entities. The
present Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (FRFA) conforms to the RFA.
In summary, the R&O adopts the
proposal to eliminate the Commission’s
33 The Commission grandfathered certain main
studios that did not comply with the main studio
rule when it implemented the Community
Broadcasters Protection Act of 1999 creating the
Class A service. For those Class A stations currently
operating at grandfathered main studios that are
outside the locations described in § 73.6000(1)–(2)
of our rules, we will continue to consider
programming produced at that previously
grandfathered main studio to be locally produced.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Dec 07, 2017
Jkt 244001
main studio rule and existing
requirements associated with the main
studio rule. The R&O is authorized
pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 303,
307(b), and 336(f) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 303,
307(b), 336(f). The types of small
entities that may be affected by the R&O
fall within the following categories:
Television Broadcasting, Radio Stations.
The projected reporting, recordkeeping,
and other compliance requirements are:
(1) The elimination of the rule requiring
each AM, FM, and television broadcast
station to maintain a local main studio;
(2) the elimination of the associated
staffing and program origination
capability requirements; (3) retention of
the existing requirement that
broadcasters maintain a local or toll-free
telephone number; (4) a requirement
that stations maintain any portion of
their public file that is not part of the
online public file at a publicly
accessible location within the
community of license, unless the
current main studio is grandfathered as
a permissible location for the station’s
local public file for the period before
completion of the station’s transition to
the online public file because (a) the
station currently maintains its local
public file at a main studio that
complies with the current main studio
rule but is not within the station’s
community of license, or (b) the station
has an existing waiver of the main
studio rule that permits the station to
maintain its public files at the station’s
main studio outside the community of
license. The Chief Counsel for Advocacy
of the Small Business Administration
(SBA) did not file any comments in
response to the proposed rules in this
proceeding. Elimination of the existing
requirements pertaining to the location
of the main studio of each AM, FM, and
television broadcast station, as well as
the elimination of associated staffing
and program origination requirements,
will eliminate requirements that may be
outdated and unnecessarily burdensome
on all broadcast stations, including
small entities. The Commission
considered whether it should adopt
additional requirements pertaining to
publicizing or staffing the required
telephone number or responding to
time-sensitive or emergency
information. While some commenters
advocated such alternative approaches,
the Commission concluded that the
burdens of any such additional
requirements are unjustified. Separately,
while the Commission could simply
adopt the requirement pertaining to the
location of the public file, instead it has
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57881
taken the alternate approach of
providing broadcast stations with
additional flexibility that will reduce
costs by grandfathering certain existing
studios as a permissible location for the
station’s local public file. In the R&O,
the Commission explains its rejection of
an alternate approach pursuant to which
it could only eliminate the main studio
rule for stations that have fully
transitioned all public file material to
the online public file material, stating
that such an approach would
disadvantage the smaller entities that
may be most impacted by the costs of
complying with the current main studio
rule.
26. This document contains new
information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104–13.34 It
will be submitted to OMB for review
under section 3507(d) of the PRA. In
addition, we note that pursuant to the
Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of
2002, Public Law 107–198, we
previously sought specific comment on
how the Commission might further
reduce the information collection
burden for small business concerns with
fewer than 25 employees.
27. The Commission will send a copy
of this R&O in a report to be sent to
Congress and the Government
Accountability Office pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C.
801(a)(1)(A).
28. Accordingly, it is ordered that,
pursuant to the authority found in
sections 4(i), 4(j), 303, 307(b), and 336(f)
of the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 303,
307(b), and 336(f), this Report and Order
is hereby adopted.
29. It is further ordered that parts 1
and 73 of the Commission’s rules, 47
CFR parts 1 and 73, are amended, and
such rule amendments shall be effective
January 8, 2018, except for
§§ 73.3526(c)(1) and 73.3527(c)(1),
which contain new or modified
information collection requirements,
and which shall become effective after
the Commission publishes a document
in the Federal Register announcing
OMB approval and the relevant effective
date.
34 See attached Final Rules, revising
§§ 73.3526(c)(1) and 73.3527(c)(1) of our rules to
add, ‘‘The applicant, permittee, or licensee must
provide information regarding the location of the
file, or the applicable portion of the file, within one
business day of a request for such information.’’ In
addition to those new information collection
requirements, which we will submit to OMB via a
non-substantive change request, following adoption
of this R&O the Commission also will submit to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) a notice
of discontinuance to reflect the deletion of the main
studio rule and its associated information collection
requirements.
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
57882
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 235 / Friday, December 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
30. It is further ordered that the
Commission shall send a copy of this
Report and Order in a report to be sent
to Congress and the Government
Accountability Office pursuant to the
Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C.
801(a)(1)(A).
■
List of Subjects
■
Administrative practice and
procedure, Penalties, Radio, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Television.
47 CFR Part 73
Radio, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Television.
Federal Communications Commission.
Katura Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Office of the
Secretary.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission amends 47 CFR parts 1 and
73 as follows:
AM broadcast definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Equipment performance
measurements. The measurements
performed to determine the overall
performance characteristics of a
broadcast transmission system from
point of program origination to
sampling of signal as radiated. (See
§ 73.1590)
*
*
*
*
*
1. The authority citation for part 1
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j),
155, 157, 160, 201, 225, 227, 303, 309, 310,
332, 1403, 1404, 1451, 1452, and 1455.
6. In § 73.761, remove paragraph (d)
and redesignate paragraphs (e) through
(g) as paragraphs (d) through (f).
■ 7. Revise § 73.1125 to read as follows:
■
Station telephone number.
§ 73.1400 Transmission system
monitoring and control.
[Amended]
*
2. In § 1.80, the table titled ‘‘Violations
Unique to the Service’’ is amended by
removing the entry for ‘‘Violation of
main studio rule.’’
■
[Amended]
3. In § 1.1104, the table is amended as
follows:
■ a. Under ‘‘1. Commercial TV
Services,’’ remove the entry for ‘‘c. Main
Studio Request’’ and redesignate entries
‘‘d’’ through ‘‘k’’ as entries ‘‘c’’ through
‘‘j;’’
■ b. Under ‘‘2. Commercial AM Radio
Stations,’’ remove the entry for ‘‘c. Main
Studio Request (per request)’’ and
redesignate entries ‘‘d’’ through ‘‘l’’ as
entries ‘‘c’’ through ‘‘k;’’
■ c. Under ‘‘3. Commercial FM Radio
Stations,’’ remove the entry for ‘‘c. Main
Studio Request (per request)’’ and
redesignate entries ‘‘d’’ through ‘‘l’’ as
entries ‘‘c’’ through ‘‘k;’’ and
■ d. Under ‘‘8. Class A TV Services,’’
remove the entry for ‘‘g. Main Studio
Request’’ and redesignate entry ‘‘h’’ as
entry ‘‘g.’’
■
16:24 Dec 07, 2017
[Amended]
Each AM, FM, TV, and Class A TV
broadcast station shall maintain a local
telephone number in its community of
license or a toll-free number.
■ 8. In § 73.1400, revise paragraph
(a)(1)(ii) to read as follows:
■
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
§ 73.14
§ 73.1125
PART 1—PRACTICE AND
PROCEDURE
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 309, 310,
334, 336, and 339.
§ 73.761
Final Rules
§ 1.1104
4. The authority citation for part 73
continues to read as follows:
5. In § 73.14, revise the definition of
‘‘Equipment performance
measurements’’ to read as follows:
47 CFR Part 1
§ 1.80
PART 73—RADIO BROADCAST
SERVICES
Jkt 244001
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Remote control of the transmission
system by a person at a studio or other
location. The remote control system
must provide sufficient transmission
system monitoring and control
capability so as to ensure compliance
with § 73.1350.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Amend § 73.1690 as follows:
■ a. Revise paragraph (c)(8) introductory
text;
■ b. Remove paragraph (c)(8)(ii);
■ c. Redesignate paragraphs (c)(8)(iii)
through (vi) as paragraphs (c)(8)(ii)
through (v);
■ d. Remove paragraph (d)(1);
■ e. Redesignate paragraphs (d)(2) and
(3) as paragraphs (d)(1) and (2); and
■ f. Revise newly redesignated
paragraph (d)(1).
The revisions read as follows.
§ 73.1690
systems.
*
Modification of transmission
*
*
(c) * * *
PO 00000
Frm 00064
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
(8) FM commercial stations and FM
noncommercial educational stations
may decrease ERP on a modification of
license application provided that
exhibits are included to demonstrate
that all five of the following
requirements are met:
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) Commencement of remote control
operation pursuant to § 73.1400.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 10. In § 73.3526:
■ a. Revise paragraphs (b)(1) and (2);
■ b. In paragraph (b)(3)(i), remove ‘‘the
station’’ and add in its place ‘‘an
accessible place in the community of
license’’; and
■ c. Revise paragraphs (b)(3)(ii) and (iii),
(c)(1), (c)(2) introductory text, and (e)(4).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 73.3526 Local public inspection file of
commercial stations.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) For radio licensees temporarily
exempt from the online public file
hosted by the Commission, as discussed
in paragraph (b)(2) of this section, a
hard copy of the public inspection file
shall be maintained at an accessible
place in the community of license,
unless the licensee elects voluntarily to
place the file online as discussed in
paragraph (b)(2) of this section. An
applicant for a new station or change of
community shall maintain its file at an
accessible place in the proposed
community of license. If as of January 8,
2018 a broadcast station maintains a
hard copy of all or a portion of its public
inspection file at a main studio that
either complied with the Commission’s
main studio rule (47 CFR 73.1125
(2016)) but is not within the station’s
community of license, or was deemed a
permissible location for the station’s
public inspection file pursuant to a
waiver of the main studio rule, and if
the station retains that studio, then that
studio is a permissible location for the
station’s hard copy public inspection
file. Any reference in this section to ‘‘an
accessible place in the community of
license’’ shall be deemed to include
such a studio.
(2)(i) A television station licensee or
applicant, and any radio station licensee
or applicant not temporarily exempt as
described in this paragraph (b)(2)(i),
shall place the contents required by
paragraph (e) of this section of its public
inspection file in the online public file
hosted by the Commission, with the
exception of the political file as required
by paragraph (e)(6) of this section, as
discussed in paragraph (b)(3) of this
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 235 / Friday, December 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
section. Any radio station not in the top
50 Nielsen Audio markets, and any
radio station with fewer than five fulltime employees, shall continue to retain
the public inspection file at an
accessible place in the community of
license in the manner discussed in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section until
March 1, 2018. However, any radio
station that is not required to place its
public inspection file in the online
public file hosted by the Commission
before March 1, 2018 may choose to do
so, instead of retaining the public
inspection file at an accessible place in
the community of license in the manner
discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section.
(ii) A station must provide a link to
the public inspection file hosted on the
Commission’s Web site from the home
page of its own Web site, if the station
has a Web site, and provide contact
information on its Web site for a station
representative that can assist any person
with disabilities with issues related to
the content of the public files. A station
also is required to include in the online
public file the station’s address and
telephone number, and the email
address of the station’s designated
contact for questions about the public
file. To the extent this section refers to
the local public inspection file, it refers
to the public file of an individual
station, which is either maintained at an
accessible place in the community of
license or on the Commission’s Web
site, depending upon where the
documents are required to be
maintained under the Commission’s
rules.
(3) * * *
(ii) Any television station not in the
top 50 DMAs, and any station not
affiliated with one of the top four
broadcast networks, regardless of the
size of the market it serves, shall
continue to retain the political file at the
station in the manner discussed in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section until July
1, 2014. For these stations, effective July
1, 2014, any new political file material
shall be placed in the online file hosted
by the Commission, while the material
in the political file as of July 1, 2014, if
not placed in the Commission’s Web
site, shall continue to be retained at the
station in the manner discussed in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section until the
end of its retention period. However,
any station that is not required to place
its political file in the online file hosted
by the Commission before July 1, 2014
may choose to do so, instead of
retaining the political file at the station
in the manner discussed in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section. For purposes of
this paragraph (b)(3)(ii), the ‘‘manner
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Dec 07, 2017
Jkt 244001
discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section’’ refers to maintaining a hard
copy of the public inspection file at the
main studio of the station as described
in paragraph (b)(1) prior to January 8,
2018. See 47 CFR 73.3526(b)(1) (2016).
(iii) Any radio station not in the top
50 Nielsen Audio markets, and any
radio station with fewer than five fulltime employees, shall continue to retain
the political file at an accessible place
in the community of license in the
manner discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of
this section until March 1, 2018. For
these stations, effective March 1, 2018,
any new political file material shall be
placed in the online public file hosted
by the Commission, while the material
already existing in the political file as of
March 1, 2018, if not placed in the
online public file hosted by the
Commission, shall continue to be
retained at an accessible place in the
community of license in the manner
discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section until the end of its retention
period. However, any station that is not
required to place its political file on the
Commission’s Web site before March 1,
2018, may choose to do so, instead of
retaining the political file at an
accessible place in the community of
license in the manner discussed in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) For any applicant, permittee, or
licensee that does not include all
material described in paragraph (e) of
this section in the online public file
hosted by the Commission, the portion
of the file that is not included in the
online public file shall be available for
public inspection at any time during
regular business hours at an accessible
place in the community of license. The
applicant, permittee, or licensee must
provide information regarding the
location of the file, or the applicable
portion of the file, within one business
day of a request for such information.
All or part of the file may be maintained
in a computer database, as long as a
computer terminal is made available, at
the location of the file, to members of
the public who wish to review the file.
Material in the public inspection file
shall be made available for printing or
machine reproduction upon request
made in person. The applicant,
permittee, or licensee may specify the
location for printing or reproduction,
require the requesting party to pay the
reasonable cost thereof, and may require
guarantee of payment in advance (e.g.,
by requiring a deposit, obtaining credit
card information, or any other
reasonable method). Requests for copies
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57883
shall be fulfilled within a reasonable
period of time, which generally should
not exceed 7 days.
(2) The applicant, permittee, or
licensee who maintains its public file
outside its community of license (see
paragraph (b)(1) of this section) shall:
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(4) Contour maps. A copy of any
service contour maps, submitted with
any application tendered for filing with
the FCC, together with any other
information in the application showing
service contours and/or transmitter
location (State, county, city, street
address, or other identifying
information). These documents shall be
retained for as long as they reflect
current, accurate information regarding
the station.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 11. In § 73.3527, revise paragraphs
(b)(1) and (2), (c)(1), (c)(2) introductory
text, and (e)(3) to read as follows:
§ 73.3527 Local public inspection file of
noncommercial educational stations.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) For radio licensees, a hard copy of
the public inspection file shall be
maintained at an accessible place in the
community of license until March 1,
2018, except that, as discussed in
paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section, any
radio station may voluntarily place its
public inspection file in the online
public file hosted by the Commission
before March 1, 2018, if it chooses to do
so, instead of retaining the file at an
accessible place in the community of
license. An applicant for a new station
or change of community shall maintain
its file at an accessible place in the
proposed community of license. If as of
January 8, 2018 a broadcast station
maintains a hard copy of all or a portion
of its public inspection file at a main
studio that either complied with the
Commission’s main studio rule (47 CFR
73.1125 (2016)) but is not within the
station’s community of license, or was
deemed a permissible location for the
station’s public inspection file pursuant
to a waiver of the main studio rule, and
if the station retains that studio, then
that studio is a permissible location for
the station’s hard copy public
inspection file. Any reference in this
section to ‘‘an accessible place in the
community of license’’ shall be deemed
to include such a studio.
(2)(i) A noncommercial educational
television station licensee or applicant
shall place the contents required by
paragraph (e) of this section of its public
inspection file in the online public file
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
57884
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 235 / Friday, December 8, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
hosted by the Commission, with the
exception of the political file as required
by paragraph (e)(5) of this section,
which may be retained at the station in
the manner discussed in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section until July 1, 2014.
Effective July 1, 2014, any new political
file material shall be placed in the
online public file hosted by the
Commission, while the material in the
political file as of July 1, 2014, if not
placed in the Commission’s online
public file, shall continue to be retained
at the station in the manner discussed
in paragraph (b)(1) of this section until
the end of its retention period. However,
any noncommercial educational station
that is not required to place its political
file in the online public file hosted by
the Commission before July 1, 2014 may
choose to do so instead of retaining the
political file at the station in the manner
discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section. For purposes of this paragraph
(b)(2)(i), the ‘‘manner discussed in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section’’ refers to
maintaining a hard copy of the public
inspection file at the main studio of the
station as described in paragraph (b)(1)
prior to January 8, 2018. See 47 CFR
73.3527(b)(1) (2016).
(ii) Beginning March 1, 2018,
noncommercial educational radio
station licensees and applicants shall
place the contents required by
paragraph (e) of this section in the
online public inspection file hosted by
the Commission. For these stations,
effective March 1, 2018, any new
political file material shall be placed in
the Commission’s online public file,
while the material in the political file as
of March 1, 2018, if not placed in the
Commission’s online public file, shall
continue to be retained at an accessible
place in the community of license in the
manner discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of
this section until the end of its retention
period. However, any radio station that
is not required to place its public
inspection file in the online public file
hosted by the Commission before March
1, 2018, may choose to do so, instead of
retaining the public inspection file at an
accessible place in the community of
license in the manner discussed in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section.?≤
(iii) A station must provide a link to
the online public inspection file hosted
by the Commission from the home page
of its own Web site, if the station has a
Web site, and provide contact
information for a station representative
on its Web site that can assist any
person with disabilities with issues
related to the content of the public files.
A station also is required to include in
the online public file hosted by the
Commission the station’s address and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Dec 07, 2017
Jkt 244001
telephone number, and the email
address of the station’s designated
contact for questions about the public
file. To the extent this section refers to
the local public inspection file, it refers
to the public file of an individual
station, which is either maintained at an
accessible place in the community of
license or on the Commission’s Web
site, depending upon where the
documents are required to be
maintained under the Commission’s
rules.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) For any applicant, permittee, or
licensee that does not include all
material described in paragraph (e) of
this section in the online public file
hosted by the Commission, the portion
of the file that is not included in the
online public file shall be available for
public inspection at any time during
regular business hours at an accessible
place in the community of license. The
applicant, permittee, or licensee must
provide information regarding the
location of the file, or the applicable
portion of the file, within one business
day of a request for such information.
All or part of the file may be maintained
in a computer database, as long as a
computer terminal is made available, at
the location of the file, to members of
the public who wish to review the file.
Material in the public inspection file
shall be made available for printing or
machine reproduction upon request
made in person. The applicant,
permittee, or licensee may specify the
location for printing or reproduction,
require the requesting party to pay the
reasonable cost thereof, and may require
guarantee of payment in advance (e.g.,
by requiring a deposit, obtaining credit
card information, or any other
reasonable method). Requests for copies
shall be fulfilled within a reasonable
period of time, which generally should
not exceed 7 days.
(2) The applicant, permittee, or
licensee who maintains its public file
outside its community of license (see
paragraph (b)(1) of this section) shall:
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(3) Contour maps. A copy of any
service contour maps, submitted with
any application tendered for filing with
the FCC, together with any other
information in the application showing
service contours and/or transmitter
location (State, county, city, street
address, or other identifying
information). These documents shall be
retained for as long as they reflect
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
current, accurate information regarding
the station.
*
*
*
*
*
12. In § 73.3538, revise paragraph (b)
to read as follows:
■
§ 73.3538 Application to make changes in
an existing station.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) An informal application filed in
accordance with § 73.3511 is to be used
to obtain authority to modify or
discontinue the obstruction marking or
lighting of the antenna supporting
structure where that specified on the
station authorization either differs from
that specified in 47 CFR part 17, or is
not appropriate for other reasons.
§ 73.3544
[Amended]
13. In § 73.3544, remove paragraph
(b)(3) and redesignate paragraph (b)(4)
as paragraph (b)(3).
■
14. Revise § 73.6000 to read as
follows:
■
§ 73.6000
Definitions.
For the purpose of this subpart, the
following definition applies:
Locally produced programming is
programming:
(1) Produced within the predicted
Grade B contour of the station
broadcasting the program or within the
contiguous predicted Grade B contours
of any of the stations in a commonly
owned group; or
(2) Produced within the predicted
DTV noise-limited contour (see
§ 73.622(e)) of a digital Class A station
broadcasting the program or within the
contiguous predicted DTV noise-limited
contours of any of the digital Class A
stations in a commonly owned group.
Note to § 73.6000: See Report and Order,
In the Matter of Establishment of a Class A
Television Service, MM Docket No. 00–10,
released April 4, 2000; Memorandum
Opinion and Order on Reconsideration, In
the Matter of Establishment of a Class A
Television Service, MM Docket No. 00–10,
released April 13, 2001; Report and Order, In
the Matter of Elimination of Main Studio
Rule, MB Docket No. 17–106, released
October 24, 2017.
Alphabetical Index—[Amended]
15. In the alphabetical index for part
73, remove the entries for ‘‘Location,
Main studio,’’ ‘‘Main studio location,’’
‘‘Station, main studio location,’’ and
‘‘Studio location, Main.’’
■
[FR Doc. 2017–24982 Filed 12–7–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\08DER1.SGM
08DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 235 (Friday, December 8, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57876-57884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24982]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 1 and 73
[MB Docket No. 17-106; FCC 17-137]
Elimination of Main Studio Rule
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC
or Commission) eliminates the rule that requires each AM, FM, and
television broadcast station to maintain a main studio located in or
near its community of license. The FCC also eliminates existing
requirements associated with the rule, including the requirement that
the main studio have full-time management and staff present during
normal business hours, and that it have program origination capability.
DATES: Effective January 8, 2018, except for Sec. Sec. 73.3526(c)(1)
and 73.3527(c)(1), which contain new or modified information collection
requirements, and which shall become effective after the Commission
publishes a document in the Federal Register announcing OMB approval
and the relevant effective date.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information on this
proceeding, contact Diana Sokolow, [email protected], of the Policy
Division, Media Bureau, (202) 418-2120.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's Report
and Order (R&O), FCC 17-137, adopted and released on October 24, 2017.
The full text of this document is available for public inspection and
copying during regular business hours in the FCC Reference Center,
Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW., Room CY-A257,
Washington, DC 20554. This document will also be available via ECFS at
https://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/. Documents will be available
electronically in ASCII, Microsoft Word, and/or Adobe Acrobat. Copies
of the materials can be obtained from the FCC's Reference Information
Center at (202) 418-0270. Alternative formats are available for people
with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio
format), by sending an email to [email protected] or calling the
Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at (202) 418-0530
(voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY).
Synopsis
1. The Commission in this R&O adopts the proposal in the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), 82 FR 25590 (June 2, 2017), to eliminate
the Commission rule requiring AM, FM, and television broadcast stations
to maintain a local main studio.\1\ We also adopt the proposal to
eliminate the associated staffing and program origination capability
requirements that apply to main studios. To ensure that community
members retain the ability to communicate with and obtain information
regarding their local stations, we retain the existing requirement that
broadcasters maintain a local or toll-free telephone number. We also
require stations to maintain any portion of their public file that is
not part of the online public file at a publicly accessible location
within the station's community of license. Finally, we make conforming
edits to other Commission rules that are necessitated by the
elimination of the main studio rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Because we are eliminating the main studio rule, we need not
address one commenter's argument that the current main studio rule
is unenforceable under the Administrative Procedure Act. We also
decline to address herein arguments that are outside the scope of
this proceeding, which is limited to elimination of the main studio
rule and the associated staffing and program origination capability
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. We agree with the vast majority of commenters \2\ in this
proceeding that the main studio rule should be eliminated. We are
persuaded that eliminating the rule will result in significant cost
savings for broadcasters and other public interest benefits. For
example, the record shows that in some small towns and rural areas the
cost of complying with the current main studio rule dissuades
broadcasters from launching a station, even if the broadcaster has
already obtained a construction permit for the station. Eliminating the
rule thus may lead to increased broadcast service in those areas. In
addition, as commenters suggest, eliminating the main studio rule will
provide broadcasters with the same flexibility as Internet radio
stations and cable and satellite providers, none of which are subject
to a main studio requirement. While we recognize the importance of
local broadcast television and radio stations as a source of news and
information, we agree with NAB that the record does not provide any
``evidence that the physical location of a station's main studio is the
reason local broadcasters are able to deliver content that meets the
needs and interest[s] of their communities, or that the location and
staffing of the studio has any relationship to the ability of a station
to serve its local audience.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Contrary to the suggestion of Common Frequency, the ample
record in this proceeding provides the Commission with sufficient
information to proceed to this R&O.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. We affirm the tentative conclusion in the NPRM that
technological innovations have rendered local studios unnecessary as a
means for viewers and listeners to communicate with or access their
local stations and to carry out the other traditional functions that
they have served. The record shows that it is exceedingly rare for a
member of the public to visit a station's main studio, with community
members overwhelmingly choosing instead to communicate with stations
through more efficient means such as email, station Web sites, social
media, mail, or telephone.\3\ This has been the case even more so since
the Commission created the online public inspection file. Once
broadcasters fully transition to the online public file in early 2018,
requiring stations to maintain a fully staffed main studio for purposes
of providing access to the file will no longer be practical or
justifiable. It is also relevant that community members already
participate in station shows from outside the main studio, for example
by appearing via telephone or Skype. As some commenters state, in-
person visits from community members are now ``unnecessary, if not
obsolete,'' as a result of the ``near ubiquity of remote
communication.'' \4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Although broadcast licensees are obligated to serve ``the
public interest, convenience, and necessity,'' we find that
``convenience'' need not include reasonable physical access to the
station's facilities in the community of license, contrary to the
suggestion of one commenter, given how rarely community members
today opt to access such facilities.
\4\ In addition, some commenters point to the legitimate public
safety concerns that are associated with allowing uninvited members
of the public to visit a station's main studio.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 57877]]
4. We disagree with arguments that in the absence of a local main
studio, the Commission will be unable to ensure that a station serves
its local community. Broadcast licensees still will be required to
include in their public inspection files, on a quarterly basis, a list
of those ``programs that have provided the station's most significant
treatment of community issues during the preceding three month
period,'' including a brief description of each relevant program.
Further, as part of the broadcast station license renewal process, the
Commission is required to find that ``the station has served the public
interest, convenience, and necessity'' during its preceding license
term. In particular, ``[o]ne of a television broadcaster's fundamental
public interest obligations is to air programming responsive to the
needs and interests of its community of license.''
5. We also are not persuaded by contentions that broadcasters'
local community involvement or the provision of local news will
significantly decline if we eliminate the main studio rule. Broadcast
commenters explain that they keep apprised of local needs and issues to
distinguish themselves from their competitors, to gain popularity and
thus advertising dollars or, in the case of noncommercial educational
(NCE) stations, contributions, and to fulfill their public interest
obligations.\5\ Broadcasters will retain these incentives even in the
absence of the main studio rule.\6\ In addition, we agree with
Univision that today, ``providing service to, interacting with, and
maintaining awareness of a community is not dependent upon locating a
station's offices within certain arbitrary geographic boundaries
imposed by the'' main studio rule. To the contrary, broadcasters can
interact with local community members by using technology such as
social media, and even without a local main studio, broadcasters can
use modern technology to broadcast information about local events. The
main studio rule does not require broadcasters to provide any
particular level of local coverage or involvement in the local
community, and there is no evidence in the record that elimination of
this rule will cause a decrease in such involvement or coverage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ We note that the main studio rule does not require
broadcasters to provide coverage of their local communities; rather,
the rule simply governs the permissible location of a station's main
studio.
\6\ The record suggests that not all stations will choose to
eliminate their current main studios after the main studio rule is
repealed. Those stations that do choose to eliminate their current
main studios likely will often maintain an office or studio that is
convenient to their viewers or listeners, so that, among other
things, community members can appear in person to serve as on-air
guests or attend in-studio events, and so that contest prize winners
can visit the station to retrieve their prizes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. We reject claims that the elimination of the main studio rule
will have a negative impact on broadcasters' ability to broadcast
emergency and time-sensitive information. One commenter explains that
in terms of ``a station's ability to communicate time-sensitive or
emergency information to the public,'' today telephone and Internet
communications are more efficient than an in-person interaction at a
local studio. In furtherance of their obligation to serve their
communities of license, commenters state that broadcasters will
continue providing timely emergency information to their viewers and
listeners. Additionally, we note that the elimination of the main
studio rule will not in any way alter a station's obligations to
transmit emergency alerts received via the emergency alert system
(EAS).\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ As explained below, broadcasters already have processes in
place to ensure that they are responsive to emergency situations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
7. Because we find that technological innovations have eliminated
the need for a local main studio, the costs of complying with the main
studio rule substantially outweigh any benefits.\8\ Broadcasters detail
the significant costs that they face under the main studio rule,
including such expenses as: (a) Rent, utilities, insurance, and
maintenance costs for the studio itself; (b) equipment and transmission
facilities; and (c) salaries, taxes, insurance, and benefits for the
main studio's two full-time employees. Broadcasters claim that main
studio-related costs range from $20,000 per year to several hundred
thousand dollars per year.\9\ One broadcaster states that it could
consolidate main studios and save more than $10 million annually. The
main studio rule imposes significant and burdensome costs on
broadcasters, particularly smaller broadcasters and NCE stations.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ This rationale for eliminating the main studio rule applies
to all broadcast stations, and we thus will eliminate the rule in
its entirety rather than eliminating it only for a certain subset of
stations.
\9\ Due to the specific information broadcasters have provided
regarding costs of compliance with the current main studio rule and
associated requirements, we are not persuaded by commenters'
unsupported arguments that maintaining a local main studio ``has
never been more affordable'' and that broadcasters do not need
relief from the Commission in this regard.
\10\ Some commenters claim, without evidence, that small and
independent broadcasters will not benefit from the elimination of
the main studio rule because they likely will not relocate their
existing studios and will become unable to compete against
consolidated multi-station broadcasters. The fact-based statements
of small broadcasters in this proceeding, detailing the costs of
compliance with the main studio rule and the potential benefits to
them of the elimination of the rule, belie these claims.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. The cost savings broadcasters may achieve following elimination
of the main studio rule will enable them to allocate greater resources
to local programming and other matters such as community outreach,
newsgathering, equipment upgrades, and attracting new talent and
personnel. According to some commenters, such savings could even
prevent some stations from going dark. Stations will have the
flexibility to operate studios in the most efficient manner, and some
stations that are co-owned or jointly operated may find it to be more
efficient for them to co-locate their studios.\11\ We conclude that
providing stations with the maximum flexibility by eliminating the main
studio rule in its entirety is preferable to the more limited
approaches proposed by some commenters, which could still impose
significant cost burdens on some stations and would not entirely
address concerns that the costs of complying with the main studio rule
are no longer justified today.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Contrary to the suggestion of one commenter, we see no
evidence in the record that any broadcast station would attempt to
move its studio outside of this country, and we question whether
doing so would be feasible or economical.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. Eliminating the main studio rule and associated requirements is
not inconsistent with section 307(b) of the Communications Act of 1934,
as amended (the Act), which requires the Commission to ``make such
distribution of licenses, frequencies, hours of operation, and of power
among the several States and communities as to provide for a fair,
efficient, and equitable distribution of radio service to each of the
same.'' In the absence of the main studio rule, broadcast stations
still will be licensed to a specific community of license, and they
will be obligated to place a certain signal contour over that
community. As noted above, broadcasters also will remain subject to
license renewal and quarterly issues/programs list requirements.
Moreover, programming designed to meet a community's needs and
interests can be produced anywhere today. For the reasons discussed
herein, the record supports our finding that a local main studio is no
longer necessary to ensure that broadcast stations serve their local
communities,\12\ and thus eliminating
[[Page 57878]]
the main studio requirement will not prevent compliance with the
distribution directive in section 307(b) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ We thus reject claims that the main studio rule is still
needed to meet the obligations in section 307(b) of the Act. In
addition, we agree with NAB that any assertion that the main studio
rule is needed to enforce the ``transmission service'' requirement
is misplaced because ``[t]he Commission effectively abandoned this
definition of transmission service when it eliminated the program
origination requirement.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
10. We note that the Commission or Media Bureau has previously
granted waivers of the main studio rule. Our decision to eliminate the
main studio requirement supersedes these waiver grants, including
pledges that the licensees made in connection with those waivers, with
one exception discussed below.\13\ Accordingly, as of the effective
date of the rules adopted in this R&O, stations that have previously
received a waiver of the main studio rule must comply with the
Commission's rules, including the requirement to maintain a local or
toll-free number, rather than the licensee pledges, if any, associated
with their superseded waiver grants. Upon the elimination of the main
studio rule, it would not make sense to continue subjecting stations to
the commitments they made in obtaining a waiver of the main studio
rule, including any related recordkeeping requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The main studio waiver grants are superseded by this R&O
because there will no longer be a main studio rule to be waived.
Given that waivers of the main studio rule will no longer be
necessary, we need not address one commenter's claim that the
current waiver process leads to an unfair and inefficient
distribution of radio services. Below we explain one type of main
studio waiver for which we will grandfather the station's current
main studio as a permissible location for its local public file.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
11. In addition to eliminating the main studio rule itself, we
adopt our NPRM proposal to eliminate the staffing requirements
currently associated with the rule. This will provide broadcasters with
more flexibility to staff their operations as they see fit. Pursuant to
Commission precedent, there currently must be two employees (one
management and one staff) present on a full-time basis at a main studio
during normal business hours. Given the technological advances that
enable remote monitoring and control of broadcast stations, commenters
attest that some main studio employees have nothing to do but sit at
the main studio in fulfillment of this requirement. Commenters
persuasively state that it can be difficult for small or rural stations
and for financially-challenged AM stations to support two full-time
employees. For example, station KIHT(FM) is licensed to Amboy,
California (population: four) and serves motorists traveling through
the Mojave Desert. One employee travels over an hour each way each day
to staff the main studio.
12. We find that decisions regarding location and number of staff
members should be left to broadcast licensees.\14\ Although we
acknowledge that elimination of the main studio staffing requirement
possibly could lead to fewer employees available to interact person to
person at the physical station office, we have explained above that
technology enables broadcasters to interact with the local community
and to broadcast information about local events even without a local
main studio. Eliminating the main studio requirement and associated
staffing requirement promotes our statutory goals by allowing
broadcasters to allocate greater resources to programming and other
matters, promoting increased broadcast service in small towns and rural
areas, and preventing stations from going dark. To the extent
commenters express concerns about potential job loss following the
elimination of the main studio rule and the associated staffing
requirement, we do not believe we are required to disregard our
statutory goals to prevent such loss. Further, preventing stations from
going dark and enabling broadcasters to launch stations that they
otherwise may not launch may promote employment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ We caution that the deletion of the main studio rule does
not in any way limit or reduce broadcast licensees' obligation and
responsibility to retain and maintain control over essential station
matters, such as personnel, programming, and finances. The
Commission expects that broadcast licensees will continue to be able
to demonstrate such control notwithstanding the elimination of the
main studio rule and the staffing requirements associated with the
main studio rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
13. In addition to the foregoing, we also adopt our NPRM proposal
to eliminate the program origination capability requirement currently
associated with the main studio rule. This will provide broadcasters
greater flexibility with respect to their programming operations.
Pursuant to Commission precedent, the main studio currently must be
capable of transmitting programming and must be equipped with
production and transmission facilities. When the Commission decided
thirty years ago to eliminate its rule requiring stations to actually
originate programming at their main studios, it concluded that ``the
main studio no longer plays the central role in the production of a
station's programming and programming originated from within the
political boundaries of the community is not necessarily responsive to
the needs and interests of the community.'' \15\ Conversely, the
Commission has recognized for decades that non-locally produced
programming can serve the needs of a community. Those statements are
only more true today. Technology makes it easier than ever before to
originate locally relevant programming from locations outside of the
station's community of license, and the existence of technology that
enables stations to provide local broadcast coverage without a local
main studio also moots concerns that licensees need a local main studio
to broadcast emergency information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ In that order, the Commission recognized the limited
utility of the program origination requirement by deleting its rule
requiring each broadcast station to originate more than 50 percent
of its non-network programs from its main studio or other points
within its community of license.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
14. There is no evidence in the record that the current program
origination capability requirement has enhanced local programming or
otherwise served the public interest. Commenters state that many
broadcasters that currently originate programming locally will continue
to do so in the absence of the current program origination capability
requirement. In any case, it appears that the location from which
programming is originated is irrelevant to whether the programing
serves a community's needs and interests. We agree with broadcast
commenters ``that a licensee's understanding of the needs and concerns
of its station's audience,'' not the physical location of its studio or
program production equipment, ``promotes the broadcast of issue-
responsive programming.'' \16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ For this reason, we reject the assertion that a main
studio's most important function is program origination capability.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
15. As proposed in the NPRM, we retain Sec. 73.1125(e) of our
rules, which requires ``[e]ach AM, FM, TV and Class A TV broadcast
station [to] maintain a local telephone number in its community of
license or a toll-free number.'' NAB supports this requirement, which
it says ``keep[s] the community well-informed and [is] not unduly
burdensome.'' The telephone number rule permits station owners to
provide one telephone number for multiple stations, provided that the
number is toll-free or local to each station's community of
license.\17\ Some consumers are subject to an additional fee for non-
local calls, and we thus retain the requirement for a local or toll-
free number. Retaining the telephone number rule will help promote
continued access to local broadcast
[[Page 57879]]
stations by community members upon elimination of the main studio
rule.\18\ We find that retaining the existing rule is an appropriate
means to ensure that members of the public can easily contact station
representatives and receive timely responses.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ Implicit in the requirement to maintain a local or toll-
free number is the requirement that phone calls made to this number
be answered during business hours. We encourage broadcasters to use
voicemail or another way for consumers to leave messages outside of
stations' normal business hours.
\18\ We recognize that there is some cost to stations of
maintaining a local or toll-free telephone number, but we find that
on balance the relatively limited cost is outweighed by the benefit
of ensuring that the station remains accessible to local community
members.
\19\ NFIB has proposed instead that the Commission adopt a
functional requirement that each station ``ensure that persons in
its community of license have a reasonable opportunity to
communicate with the station through at least one generally
available means of communication at no charge.'' We find that such
an approach would be unworkable for consumers who do not use email
and thus would have no way to contact a station if the station
eliminates its local main studio. Accordingly, maintenance of the
current telephone number requirement is a more practical approach.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
16. Stations currently are required to post their telephone numbers
in their online public files.\20\ We retain that requirement and do not
require stations to publicize their phone numbers in any additional
ways. We agree with commenters that broadcasters have extensive
marketplace incentives and license obligations to be accessible and
responsive to their audience, and we note that telephone numbers by
their nature generally are accessible in other ways. Broadcasters will
retain the flexibility to determine whether they want to publicize
their telephone numbers in additional ways. For example, most stations
already choose to post their telephone numbers on their Web sites.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ These rules also currently require a station to include its
main studio address, and as discussed below we modify them to
require the public file to include the station's address (rather
than its main studio address). The posted address should be a
location at which the licensee may be contacted by mail and in
person, for example, a studio, office, or headquarters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
17. Furthermore, in the NPRM, the Commission sought comment on
whether additional requirements are needed to ensure that broadcasters
are responsive to time-sensitive and emergency information. Because
broadcasters already coordinate with federal, state, and local
emergency management officials, as well as law enforcement officials,
to address emergencies that occur at any time of day, we conclude that
there is no need to adopt additional requirements pertaining to
broadcast station responsiveness to time-sensitive or emergency
information.\21\ While some commenters reference such requirements,
other commenters persuasively explain that broadcasters already have
processes in place to ensure that station personnel are available to
receive and broadcast time-sensitive emergency information. On balance,
we conclude that the adoption of additional rules would not necessarily
improve broadcasters' responsiveness to local emergencies, and we thus
find that there is no evidence that the cost of such obligations would
be justified by any purported benefits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ Nothing in this R&O is intended to alter the obligation on
licensees to post a written document designating the station's Chief
Operator along with the posted copy of the station's license, as set
forth in 47 CFR 73.1870(b)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
18. As discussed below, and as supported by NAB and other
broadcasters, we require every broadcast station applicant, permittee,
or licensee to maintain any portion of its public file that is not part
of the online public file at an accessible place within its community
of license. Pursuant to the Commission's online public file rules, in
the very near future there will be only limited instances in which any
portion of a station's public inspection file will be permitted to be
maintained at the station's main studio rather than online.\22\ In
2012, the Commission adopted rules requiring television broadcasters to
utilize an online public file hosted by the Commission, rather than
maintaining the public file locally, and television stations completed
their transition to the online public file in 2014. In 2016, the
Commission adopted rules expanding the online public file requirement
to broadcast radio licensees. As of June 24, 2016, commercial broadcast
radio stations in the top 50 Nielsen Audio radio markets with five or
more full-time employees were required to place new public and
political file documents in the online public file on a going-forward
basis. By December 24, 2016, these entities were required to upload
their existing public file documents to the online file, except for
existing political file material which they may either upload or
maintain locally until the expiration of the two-year retention period
for such political file material. Beginning March 1, 2018, all other
broadcast radio stations \23\ must place new public and political file
documents in the online public file on a going-forward basis. They must
also upload their existing public file documents to the online file by
that date, except for existing political file material which they may
either upload or maintain locally until the expiration of the two-year
retention period for such political file material. In other words,
community members already have online access to television station
public files, and by March 1, 2018 they will have online access to
radio station public files, with the potential exception of preexisting
portions of the political file that the station may retain locally
until the expiration of the two-year retention period for such
materials.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ Sections 73.3526(e) and 73.3527(e) of the Commission's
rules set forth the required contents of the station's public
inspection file. These contents include the ``political file,''
which consists of the records required to be maintained under Sec.
73.1943 of our rules concerning broadcasts by candidates for public
office.
\23\ This includes NCE broadcast radio stations, commercial
broadcast radio stations in the top 50 Nielsen Audio radio markets
with fewer than five full-time employees, and commercial broadcast
radio stations in markets below the top 50 or outside all markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
19. Nonetheless, we recognize the need to ensure that community
members have local access to a station's public file for any timeframe
during which all or a portion of that file is not available via the
online public file. Accordingly, we require every broadcast station
applicant, permittee, or licensee to maintain any portion of its public
file that is not part of the online public file at an accessible place
within its community of license. NAB and other broadcasters support
this approach. The ``accessible place'' could be a station office or
studio, if it is located within the community of license, or it could
be a different location such as a local library or another station's
office or studio. The file must be available for public inspection at
any time during regular business hours, as is currently the case with
regard to access to a public file maintained at a station's main
studio.\24\ If a station has transitioned to the online public file
with the exception of its existing political file materials, which
certain stations may maintain locally until the two-year retention
period expires as discussed above, then the station must maintain a
copy of its existing political file materials at an accessible place
within its community of license until it is no longer required to
retain those materials.\25\ We note that any station
[[Page 57880]]
that wishes to avoid this requirement has the option to instead fully
transition to the Commission's online public file system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ The other requirements of existing Sec. Sec. 73.3526(c)(1)
and 73.3527(c)(1) of our rules also will apply to the selected
location of the public file within the community of license.
Sections 73.3526(b) and 73.3527(b) of our rules currently contain
multiple references to the hard copy public inspection file
maintained at a station or at the station's main studio, and we will
revise this language instead to reference retention of the file at
an accessible place in the community of license (with the exception
of references that are limited to timeframes in the past).
\25\ Urban One states, ``a radio station that has voluntarily
uploaded all political materials that are required to be maintained
to its online file should have no obligation to make public file
material available other than online.'' As explained above, certain
stations may locally retain political file materials that were
existing as of a certain date, rather than uploading them to the
online public file, until the expiration of the two-year retention
period for those materials. To the extent Urban One is arguing that
we should permit stations to include new political file materials in
the online public file, but not to make existing political file
materials available either locally or through the online public
file, we disagree. To the contrary, we find that it is important to
ensure that community members have local access to all portions of
the public inspection file that are not part of the online public
file. If it is too inconvenient or costly to maintain these
materials locally, then a station may choose to post them to the
online public file instead. In addition, we note that a change to
the material that is required to be part of a station's public file
is outside the scope of this proceeding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
20. In addition, if a broadcast station currently maintains its
local public file at a main studio that complies with the current main
studio rule but is not within the station's community of license, and
if the station retains that studio, we will grandfather that studio as
a permissible location for the station's local public file for the
period before completion of the station's transition to the online
public file.\26\ Similarly, some existing waivers of the main studio
rule permit stations to maintain their public files at the station's
main studio outside the community of license.\27\ We also will
grandfather any such studio as a permissible location for the station's
local public file for the period before completion of the station's
transition to the online public file. This approach will ensure that
stations with current waivers do not face increased burdens as a result
of the elimination of the main studio rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ Sections 73.3526(c)(2) and 73.3527(c)(2) of our rules
currently govern access to material in the public file by mail where
the applicant, permittee, or licensee maintains its main studio and
public file outside its community of license. These current rules
will remain in place, but we will delete the phrase ``main studio
and,'' such that the provisions will be triggered if an applicant,
permittee, or licensee maintains its public file outside its
community of license because the station's studio is grandfathered
as a permissible location for the file, as discussed herein.
\27\ Some main studio waivers reference a licensee pledge to
maintain the public file in the community of license, while others
permit the licensee to maintain the public file at the main studio
subject to the waiver.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
21. A community member seeking access to a station's public
inspection file in the community of license may contact the station to
inquire as to the location of the file, for example via its required
telephone number or email. Stations must promptly provide information
regarding the location of the file within one business day of a
request. In addition, we encourage stations that make public file
materials available at an accessible place in the community to provide
that location on their Web site, if they have a Web site, and by any
other means that the station deems effective.
22. In the NPRM, the Commission sought comment on whether
alternatively it should only eliminate the main studio rule for
stations that have fully transitioned all public file material to the
online public file, including existing political file materials. While
some commenters support this alternate approach, we agree with NAB that
we should not limit in this manner the public interest benefits that
will follow the elimination of the main studio rule.\28\ The later
March 1, 2018 online public file deadline generally applies to smaller
stations.\29\ Some of these entities may be most adversely impacted by
the costs of complying with the current main studio rule, and we
conclude that we should not disadvantage them by denying them the
benefits of the repeal of the rule. As discussed above, the costs
savings of eliminating the rule will be significant and will apply to
all types of broadcast stations. Given our decision to require
maintenance of paper files at an accessible location in the community
if they are not available via the online public file, the benefits of
retaining the main studio rule for those stations that do not use the
online public file would be minimal, if they exist at all. Indeed, in
many cases the station may locate its file at its current main studio,
and in other cases we expect that the selected local file location will
be equally, if not more, convenient to residents as compared to the
station's current main studio. For example, if a station previously
maintained its main studio outside of its community of license, as
permitted under the current rule, and the station chooses to cease
operating that local studio as a result of this R&O, then it may be
more convenient for community members to access the local file at a
location within the community of license, as we require here.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ In addition, we will not adopt the proposal of one
commenter that we only permit stations to eliminate their current
main studios if they make their public file available both online
and at a business or library in the station's community of license.
Given that it is sufficient for a station currently to make its
public file available online only, we see no reason to require an
additional means of access if the station eliminates its current
main studio and its entire public file is available through the
Commission's online public file.
\29\ The deadline applies to NCE broadcast radio stations,
commercial broadcast radio stations in the top 50 Nielsen Audio
radio markets with fewer than five full-time employees, and
commercial broadcast radio stations in markets below the top 50 or
outside all markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
23. As a result of our repeal of the main studio rule, we also will
make the following conforming rule revisions as shown in the Final
Rules:
In Sec. 1.80, delete the row of the chart detailing the
base forfeiture amount for violations of the main studio rule.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ We will continue to rely on the base forfeiture amount of
$7000 as a starting point in assessing a forfeiture for any
violations of the main studio rule that occurred before the
effective date of the elimination of the rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In Sec. 1.1104, delete the four rows detailing the
schedule of charges for a ``Main Studio Request,'' and re-letter the
remaining listings accordingly.
In the definition of ``equipment performance
measurements'' in Sec. 73.14 of our rules, delete ``at main studio.''
Delete Sec. 73.761(d) of our rules, which currently
governs formal applications for a change in main studio location, and
renumber the remainder of the rule.
In Sec. 73.1400(a)(1)(ii) of our rules, change the
reference to ``the main studio or other location'' to ``a studio or
other location.''
Delete Sec. 73.1690(c)(8)(ii) of our rules, which
currently states that both commercial and NCE FM stations must comply
with the main studio rule, and renumber the remainder of the rule.
Delete Sec. 73.1690(d)(1) of our rules, which currently
governs permissive changes in studio location, and renumber the
remainder of the rule.
Modify Sec. Sec. 73.3526(b)(2)(ii) and 73.3527(b)(2)(iii)
of our rules, which currently require the public file to include the
station's main studio address and telephone number, instead to require
the public file to include the station's address and telephone
number.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ As stated above, the posted address should be a location at
which the licensee may be contacted by mail and in person, for
example, a studio, office, or headquarters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Delete the reference to ``main studio'' in Sec. Sec.
73.3526(e)(4) and 73.3527(e)(3) of our rules, which currently require
inclusion of information showing service contours and/or main studio
and transmitter location in the public file.
Delete Sec. 73.3538(b)(2) of our rules, which currently
governs informal applications to relocate a main studio, and renumber
the remainder of the rule.
Delete Sec. 73.3544(b)(3) of our rules, which currently
governs informal applications for a change in location of the main
studio, and renumber the remainder of the rule.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ We also adopt the proposal to delete the outdated reference
in Sec. 73.1690(d)(2) to Sec. 73.1410, which has been deleted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 57881]]
In the alphabetical index to part 73, delete the four rows
that reference Sec. 73.1125.
24. We also will delete Sec. 73.6000(3) of our rules and will
require Class A stations to meet the required quantity of ``locally
produced programming'' through programming that complies with Sec.
73.6000(1) or (2). Consistent with the Community Broadcasters
Protection Act of 1999, Sec. 73.6001(b)(2) requires Class A stations
to broadcast an average of at least three hours of locally produced
programming per week each quarter. Section 73.6000 defines locally
produced programming for these purposes as programming that is:
(1) Produced within the predicted Grade B contour of the station
broadcasting the program or within the contiguous predicted Grade B
contours of any of the stations in a commonly owned group; or
(2) Produced within the predicted DTV noise-limited contour . . .
of a digital Class A station broadcasting the program or within the
contiguous predicted DTV noise-limited contours of any of the digital
Class A stations in a commonly owned group; or
(3) Programming produced at the station's main studio.
Upon deletion of the main studio rule, we find that it is appropriate
to delete option (3). Options (1) and (2) are sufficiently broad that
it should not be difficult for Class A stations to meet the required
quantity of locally produced programming.\33\ Our approach will
alleviate the concern of Free Press that eliminating the main studio
rule would ``effectively nullify'' the Class A requirement pertaining
to the quantity of locally produced programming.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ The Commission grandfathered certain main studios that did
not comply with the main studio rule when it implemented the
Community Broadcasters Protection Act of 1999 creating the Class A
service. For those Class A stations currently operating at
grandfathered main studios that are outside the locations described
in Sec. 73.6000(1)-(2) of our rules, we will continue to consider
programming produced at that previously grandfathered main studio to
be locally produced.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
25. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as
amended (RFA), an Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) was
incorporated in the NPRM. The Commission sought written public comments
on proposals in the NPRM, including comment on the IRFA. The Commission
received no comments on the IRFA, although some commenters discussed
the effect of the proposals on smaller entities. The present Final
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) conforms to the RFA. In summary,
the R&O adopts the proposal to eliminate the Commission's main studio
rule and existing requirements associated with the main studio rule.
The R&O is authorized pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), 303, 307(b), and
336(f) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i),
154(j), 303, 307(b), 336(f). The types of small entities that may be
affected by the R&O fall within the following categories: Television
Broadcasting, Radio Stations. The projected reporting, recordkeeping,
and other compliance requirements are: (1) The elimination of the rule
requiring each AM, FM, and television broadcast station to maintain a
local main studio; (2) the elimination of the associated staffing and
program origination capability requirements; (3) retention of the
existing requirement that broadcasters maintain a local or toll-free
telephone number; (4) a requirement that stations maintain any portion
of their public file that is not part of the online public file at a
publicly accessible location within the community of license, unless
the current main studio is grandfathered as a permissible location for
the station's local public file for the period before completion of the
station's transition to the online public file because (a) the station
currently maintains its local public file at a main studio that
complies with the current main studio rule but is not within the
station's community of license, or (b) the station has an existing
waiver of the main studio rule that permits the station to maintain its
public files at the station's main studio outside the community of
license. The Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) did not file any comments in response to the
proposed rules in this proceeding. Elimination of the existing
requirements pertaining to the location of the main studio of each AM,
FM, and television broadcast station, as well as the elimination of
associated staffing and program origination requirements, will
eliminate requirements that may be outdated and unnecessarily
burdensome on all broadcast stations, including small entities. The
Commission considered whether it should adopt additional requirements
pertaining to publicizing or staffing the required telephone number or
responding to time-sensitive or emergency information. While some
commenters advocated such alternative approaches, the Commission
concluded that the burdens of any such additional requirements are
unjustified. Separately, while the Commission could simply adopt the
requirement pertaining to the location of the public file, instead it
has taken the alternate approach of providing broadcast stations with
additional flexibility that will reduce costs by grandfathering certain
existing studios as a permissible location for the station's local
public file. In the R&O, the Commission explains its rejection of an
alternate approach pursuant to which it could only eliminate the main
studio rule for stations that have fully transitioned all public file
material to the online public file material, stating that such an
approach would disadvantage the smaller entities that may be most
impacted by the costs of complying with the current main studio rule.
26. This document contains new information collection requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104-
13.\34\ It will be submitted to OMB for review under section 3507(d) of
the PRA. In addition, we note that pursuant to the Small Business
Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, we previously sought
specific comment on how the Commission might further reduce the
information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer
than 25 employees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ See attached Final Rules, revising Sec. Sec. 73.3526(c)(1)
and 73.3527(c)(1) of our rules to add, ``The applicant, permittee,
or licensee must provide information regarding the location of the
file, or the applicable portion of the file, within one business day
of a request for such information.'' In addition to those new
information collection requirements, which we will submit to OMB via
a non-substantive change request, following adoption of this R&O the
Commission also will submit to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) a notice of discontinuance to reflect the deletion of the main
studio rule and its associated information collection requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
27. The Commission will send a copy of this R&O in a report to be
sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to
the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
28. Accordingly, it is ordered that, pursuant to the authority
found in sections 4(i), 4(j), 303, 307(b), and 336(f) of the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 303,
307(b), and 336(f), this Report and Order is hereby adopted.
29. It is further ordered that parts 1 and 73 of the Commission's
rules, 47 CFR parts 1 and 73, are amended, and such rule amendments
shall be effective January 8, 2018, except for Sec. Sec. 73.3526(c)(1)
and 73.3527(c)(1), which contain new or modified information collection
requirements, and which shall become effective after the Commission
publishes a document in the Federal Register announcing OMB approval
and the relevant effective date.
[[Page 57882]]
30. It is further ordered that the Commission shall send a copy of
this Report and Order in a report to be sent to Congress and the
Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
List of Subjects
47 CFR Part 1
Administrative practice and procedure, Penalties, Radio, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Television.
47 CFR Part 73
Radio, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Television.
Federal Communications Commission.
Katura Jackson,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, Office of the Secretary.
Final Rules
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal
Communications Commission amends 47 CFR parts 1 and 73 as follows:
PART 1--PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
0
1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), 154(j), 155, 157, 160, 201,
225, 227, 303, 309, 310, 332, 1403, 1404, 1451, 1452, and 1455.
Sec. 1.80 [Amended]
0
2. In Sec. 1.80, the table titled ``Violations Unique to the Service''
is amended by removing the entry for ``Violation of main studio rule.''
Sec. 1.1104 [Amended]
0
3. In Sec. 1.1104, the table is amended as follows:
0
a. Under ``1. Commercial TV Services,'' remove the entry for ``c. Main
Studio Request'' and redesignate entries ``d'' through ``k'' as entries
``c'' through ``j;''
0
b. Under ``2. Commercial AM Radio Stations,'' remove the entry for ``c.
Main Studio Request (per request)'' and redesignate entries ``d''
through ``l'' as entries ``c'' through ``k;''
0
c. Under ``3. Commercial FM Radio Stations,'' remove the entry for ``c.
Main Studio Request (per request)'' and redesignate entries ``d''
through ``l'' as entries ``c'' through ``k;'' and
0
d. Under ``8. Class A TV Services,'' remove the entry for ``g. Main
Studio Request'' and redesignate entry ``h'' as entry ``g.''
PART 73--RADIO BROADCAST SERVICES
0
4. The authority citation for part 73 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 309, 310, 334, 336, and 339.
0
5. In Sec. 73.14, revise the definition of ``Equipment performance
measurements'' to read as follows:
Sec. 73.14 AM broadcast definitions.
* * * * *
Equipment performance measurements. The measurements performed to
determine the overall performance characteristics of a broadcast
transmission system from point of program origination to sampling of
signal as radiated. (See Sec. 73.1590)
* * * * *
Sec. 73.761 [Amended]
0
6. In Sec. 73.761, remove paragraph (d) and redesignate paragraphs (e)
through (g) as paragraphs (d) through (f).
0
7. Revise Sec. 73.1125 to read as follows:
Sec. 73.1125 Station telephone number.
Each AM, FM, TV, and Class A TV broadcast station shall maintain a
local telephone number in its community of license or a toll-free
number.
0
8. In Sec. 73.1400, revise paragraph (a)(1)(ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 73.1400 Transmission system monitoring and control.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) Remote control of the transmission system by a person at a
studio or other location. The remote control system must provide
sufficient transmission system monitoring and control capability so as
to ensure compliance with Sec. 73.1350.
* * * * *
0
9. Amend Sec. 73.1690 as follows:
0
a. Revise paragraph (c)(8) introductory text;
0
b. Remove paragraph (c)(8)(ii);
0
c. Redesignate paragraphs (c)(8)(iii) through (vi) as paragraphs
(c)(8)(ii) through (v);
0
d. Remove paragraph (d)(1);
0
e. Redesignate paragraphs (d)(2) and (3) as paragraphs (d)(1) and (2);
and
0
f. Revise newly redesignated paragraph (d)(1).
The revisions read as follows.
Sec. 73.1690 Modification of transmission systems.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(8) FM commercial stations and FM noncommercial educational
stations may decrease ERP on a modification of license application
provided that exhibits are included to demonstrate that all five of the
following requirements are met:
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) Commencement of remote control operation pursuant to Sec.
73.1400.
* * * * *
0
10. In Sec. 73.3526:
0
a. Revise paragraphs (b)(1) and (2);
0
b. In paragraph (b)(3)(i), remove ``the station'' and add in its place
``an accessible place in the community of license''; and
0
c. Revise paragraphs (b)(3)(ii) and (iii), (c)(1), (c)(2) introductory
text, and (e)(4).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 73.3526 Local public inspection file of commercial stations.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) For radio licensees temporarily exempt from the online public
file hosted by the Commission, as discussed in paragraph (b)(2) of this
section, a hard copy of the public inspection file shall be maintained
at an accessible place in the community of license, unless the licensee
elects voluntarily to place the file online as discussed in paragraph
(b)(2) of this section. An applicant for a new station or change of
community shall maintain its file at an accessible place in the
proposed community of license. If as of January 8, 2018 a broadcast
station maintains a hard copy of all or a portion of its public
inspection file at a main studio that either complied with the
Commission's main studio rule (47 CFR 73.1125 (2016)) but is not within
the station's community of license, or was deemed a permissible
location for the station's public inspection file pursuant to a waiver
of the main studio rule, and if the station retains that studio, then
that studio is a permissible location for the station's hard copy
public inspection file. Any reference in this section to ``an
accessible place in the community of license'' shall be deemed to
include such a studio.
(2)(i) A television station licensee or applicant, and any radio
station licensee or applicant not temporarily exempt as described in
this paragraph (b)(2)(i), shall place the contents required by
paragraph (e) of this section of its public inspection file in the
online public file hosted by the Commission, with the exception of the
political file as required by paragraph (e)(6) of this section, as
discussed in paragraph (b)(3) of this
[[Page 57883]]
section. Any radio station not in the top 50 Nielsen Audio markets, and
any radio station with fewer than five full-time employees, shall
continue to retain the public inspection file at an accessible place in
the community of license in the manner discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of
this section until March 1, 2018. However, any radio station that is
not required to place its public inspection file in the online public
file hosted by the Commission before March 1, 2018 may choose to do so,
instead of retaining the public inspection file at an accessible place
in the community of license in the manner discussed in paragraph (b)(1)
of this section.
(ii) A station must provide a link to the public inspection file
hosted on the Commission's Web site from the home page of its own Web
site, if the station has a Web site, and provide contact information on
its Web site for a station representative that can assist any person
with disabilities with issues related to the content of the public
files. A station also is required to include in the online public file
the station's address and telephone number, and the email address of
the station's designated contact for questions about the public file.
To the extent this section refers to the local public inspection file,
it refers to the public file of an individual station, which is either
maintained at an accessible place in the community of license or on the
Commission's Web site, depending upon where the documents are required
to be maintained under the Commission's rules.
(3) * * *
(ii) Any television station not in the top 50 DMAs, and any station
not affiliated with one of the top four broadcast networks, regardless
of the size of the market it serves, shall continue to retain the
political file at the station in the manner discussed in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section until July 1, 2014. For these stations,
effective July 1, 2014, any new political file material shall be placed
in the online file hosted by the Commission, while the material in the
political file as of July 1, 2014, if not placed in the Commission's
Web site, shall continue to be retained at the station in the manner
discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section until the end of its
retention period. However, any station that is not required to place
its political file in the online file hosted by the Commission before
July 1, 2014 may choose to do so, instead of retaining the political
file at the station in the manner discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section. For purposes of this paragraph (b)(3)(ii), the ``manner
discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section'' refers to maintaining a
hard copy of the public inspection file at the main studio of the
station as described in paragraph (b)(1) prior to January 8, 2018. See
47 CFR 73.3526(b)(1) (2016).
(iii) Any radio station not in the top 50 Nielsen Audio markets,
and any radio station with fewer than five full-time employees, shall
continue to retain the political file at an accessible place in the
community of license in the manner discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of
this section until March 1, 2018. For these stations, effective March
1, 2018, any new political file material shall be placed in the online
public file hosted by the Commission, while the material already
existing in the political file as of March 1, 2018, if not placed in
the online public file hosted by the Commission, shall continue to be
retained at an accessible place in the community of license in the
manner discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section until the end of
its retention period. However, any station that is not required to
place its political file on the Commission's Web site before March 1,
2018, may choose to do so, instead of retaining the political file at
an accessible place in the community of license in the manner discussed
in paragraph (b)(1) of this section.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) For any applicant, permittee, or licensee that does not include
all material described in paragraph (e) of this section in the online
public file hosted by the Commission, the portion of the file that is
not included in the online public file shall be available for public
inspection at any time during regular business hours at an accessible
place in the community of license. The applicant, permittee, or
licensee must provide information regarding the location of the file,
or the applicable portion of the file, within one business day of a
request for such information. All or part of the file may be maintained
in a computer database, as long as a computer terminal is made
available, at the location of the file, to members of the public who
wish to review the file. Material in the public inspection file shall
be made available for printing or machine reproduction upon request
made in person. The applicant, permittee, or licensee may specify the
location for printing or reproduction, require the requesting party to
pay the reasonable cost thereof, and may require guarantee of payment
in advance (e.g., by requiring a deposit, obtaining credit card
information, or any other reasonable method). Requests for copies shall
be fulfilled within a reasonable period of time, which generally should
not exceed 7 days.
(2) The applicant, permittee, or licensee who maintains its public
file outside its community of license (see paragraph (b)(1) of this
section) shall:
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(4) Contour maps. A copy of any service contour maps, submitted
with any application tendered for filing with the FCC, together with
any other information in the application showing service contours and/
or transmitter location (State, county, city, street address, or other
identifying information). These documents shall be retained for as long
as they reflect current, accurate information regarding the station.
* * * * *
0
11. In Sec. 73.3527, revise paragraphs (b)(1) and (2), (c)(1), (c)(2)
introductory text, and (e)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 73.3527 Local public inspection file of noncommercial
educational stations.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) For radio licensees, a hard copy of the public inspection file
shall be maintained at an accessible place in the community of license
until March 1, 2018, except that, as discussed in paragraph (b)(2)(ii)
of this section, any radio station may voluntarily place its public
inspection file in the online public file hosted by the Commission
before March 1, 2018, if it chooses to do so, instead of retaining the
file at an accessible place in the community of license. An applicant
for a new station or change of community shall maintain its file at an
accessible place in the proposed community of license. If as of January
8, 2018 a broadcast station maintains a hard copy of all or a portion
of its public inspection file at a main studio that either complied
with the Commission's main studio rule (47 CFR 73.1125 (2016)) but is
not within the station's community of license, or was deemed a
permissible location for the station's public inspection file pursuant
to a waiver of the main studio rule, and if the station retains that
studio, then that studio is a permissible location for the station's
hard copy public inspection file. Any reference in this section to ``an
accessible place in the community of license'' shall be deemed to
include such a studio.
(2)(i) A noncommercial educational television station licensee or
applicant shall place the contents required by paragraph (e) of this
section of its public inspection file in the online public file
[[Page 57884]]
hosted by the Commission, with the exception of the political file as
required by paragraph (e)(5) of this section, which may be retained at
the station in the manner discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section
until July 1, 2014. Effective July 1, 2014, any new political file
material shall be placed in the online public file hosted by the
Commission, while the material in the political file as of July 1,
2014, if not placed in the Commission's online public file, shall
continue to be retained at the station in the manner discussed in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section until the end of its retention period.
However, any noncommercial educational station that is not required to
place its political file in the online public file hosted by the
Commission before July 1, 2014 may choose to do so instead of retaining
the political file at the station in the manner discussed in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section. For purposes of this paragraph (b)(2)(i), the
``manner discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section'' refers to
maintaining a hard copy of the public inspection file at the main
studio of the station as described in paragraph (b)(1) prior to January
8, 2018. See 47 CFR 73.3527(b)(1) (2016).
(ii) Beginning March 1, 2018, noncommercial educational radio
station licensees and applicants shall place the contents required by
paragraph (e) of this section in the online public inspection file
hosted by the Commission. For these stations, effective March 1, 2018,
any new political file material shall be placed in the Commission's
online public file, while the material in the political file as of
March 1, 2018, if not placed in the Commission's online public file,
shall continue to be retained at an accessible place in the community
of license in the manner discussed in paragraph (b)(1) of this section
until the end of its retention period. However, any radio station that
is not required to place its public inspection file in the online
public file hosted by the Commission before March 1, 2018, may choose
to do so, instead of retaining the public inspection file at an
accessible place in the community of license in the manner discussed in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section.?>
(iii) A station must provide a link to the online public inspection
file hosted by the Commission from the home page of its own Web site,
if the station has a Web site, and provide contact information for a
station representative on its Web site that can assist any person with
disabilities with issues related to the content of the public files. A
station also is required to include in the online public file hosted by
the Commission the station's address and telephone number, and the
email address of the station's designated contact for questions about
the public file. To the extent this section refers to the local public
inspection file, it refers to the public file of an individual station,
which is either maintained at an accessible place in the community of
license or on the Commission's Web site, depending upon where the
documents are required to be maintained under the Commission's rules.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) For any applicant, permittee, or licensee that does not include
all material described in paragraph (e) of this section in the online
public file hosted by the Commission, the portion of the file that is
not included in the online public file shall be available for public
inspection at any time during regular business hours at an accessible
place in the community of license. The applicant, permittee, or
licensee must provide information regarding the location of the file,
or the applicable portion of the file, within one business day of a
request for such information. All or part of the file may be maintained
in a computer database, as long as a computer terminal is made
available, at the location of the file, to members of the public who
wish to review the file. Material in the public inspection file shall
be made available for printing or machine reproduction upon request
made in person. The applicant, permittee, or licensee may specify the
location for printing or reproduction, require the requesting party to
pay the reasonable cost thereof, and may require guarantee of payment
in advance (e.g., by requiring a deposit, obtaining credit card
information, or any other reasonable method). Requests for copies shall
be fulfilled within a reasonable period of time, which generally should
not exceed 7 days.
(2) The applicant, permittee, or licensee who maintains its public
file outside its community of license (see paragraph (b)(1) of this
section) shall:
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(3) Contour maps. A copy of any service contour maps, submitted
with any application tendered for filing with the FCC, together with
any other information in the application showing service contours and/
or transmitter location (State, county, city, street address, or other
identifying information). These documents shall be retained for as long
as they reflect current, accurate information regarding the station.
* * * * *
0
12. In Sec. 73.3538, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 73.3538 Application to make changes in an existing station.
* * * * *
(b) An informal application filed in accordance with Sec. 73.3511
is to be used to obtain authority to modify or discontinue the
obstruction marking or lighting of the antenna supporting structure
where that specified on the station authorization either differs from
that specified in 47 CFR part 17, or is not appropriate for other
reasons.
Sec. 73.3544 [Amended]
0
13. In Sec. 73.3544, remove paragraph (b)(3) and redesignate paragraph
(b)(4) as paragraph (b)(3).
0
14. Revise Sec. 73.6000 to read as follows:
Sec. 73.6000 Definitions.
For the purpose of this subpart, the following definition applies:
Locally produced programming is programming:
(1) Produced within the predicted Grade B contour of the station
broadcasting the program or within the contiguous predicted Grade B
contours of any of the stations in a commonly owned group; or
(2) Produced within the predicted DTV noise-limited contour (see
Sec. 73.622(e)) of a digital Class A station broadcasting the program
or within the contiguous predicted DTV noise-limited contours of any of
the digital Class A stations in a commonly owned group.
Note to Sec. 73.6000: See Report and Order, In the Matter of
Establishment of a Class A Television Service, MM Docket No. 00-10,
released April 4, 2000; Memorandum Opinion and Order on
Reconsideration, In the Matter of Establishment of a Class A
Television Service, MM Docket No. 00-10, released April 13, 2001;
Report and Order, In the Matter of Elimination of Main Studio Rule,
MB Docket No. 17-106, released October 24, 2017.
Alphabetical Index--[Amended]
0
15. In the alphabetical index for part 73, remove the entries for
``Location, Main studio,'' ``Main studio location,'' ``Station, main
studio location,'' and ``Studio location, Main.''
[FR Doc. 2017-24982 Filed 12-7-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P