Expansion of the Outer Coast Plain Viticultural Area, 57657-57659 [2017-26414]
Download as PDF
57657
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 82, No. 234
Thursday, December 7, 2017
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2016–0008; T.D. TTB–148;
Re: Notice No. 162]
RIN 1513–AC32
Expansion of the Outer Coast Plain
Viticultural Area
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) is expanding
the approximately 2.25 million-acre
‘‘Outer Coastal Plain’’ viticultural area
of southeastern New Jersey by
approximately 32,932 acres. The Outer
Coastal Plain AVA includes all or
portions of Atlantic, Burlington,
Camden, Cape May, Cumberland,
Gloucester, Monmouth, Ocean, and
Salem counties. The established
viticultural area and the expansion area
are not located within any other
established viticultural area. TTB
designates viticultural areas to allow
vintners to better describe the origin of
their wines and to allow consumers to
better identify wines they may
purchase.
SUMMARY:
TTB Authority
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines
a viticultural area for American wine as
a delimited grape-growing region having
distinguishing features, as described in
part 9 of the regulations, and a name
and a delineated boundary, as
established in part 9 of the regulations.
These designations allow vintners and
consumers to attribute a given quality,
reputation, or other characteristic of a
wine made from grapes grown in an area
to the wine’s geographic origin. The
establishment of AVAs allows vintners
to describe more accurately the origin of
their wines to consumers and helps
consumers to identify wines they may
purchase. Establishment of an AVA is
neither an approval nor an endorsement
by TTB of the wine produced in that
area.
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2)) outlines
This final rule is effective
January 8, 2018.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
of the Treasury to prescribe regulations
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits,
and malt beverages. The FAA Act
provides that these regulations should,
among other things, prohibit consumer
deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that
labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product. The Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury
Department Order 120–01, dated
December 10, 2013 (superseding
Treasury Order 120–01, dated January
24, 2003), to the TTB Administrator to
perform the functions and duties in the
administration and enforcement of this
law.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
part 4) authorizes the establishment of
definitive viticultural areas and regulate
the use of their names as appellations of
origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets forth
standards for the preparation and
submission of petitions for the
establishment or modification of
American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved AVAs.
Dana Register, Regulations and Rulings
Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Box
12, Washington, DC 20005; phone (202)
453–1039, ext. 022.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:34 Dec 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the procedure for proposing an AVA
and provides that any interested party
may petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as an AVA. Petitioners
may use the same process to request
changes involving established AVAs.
Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27
CFR 9.12) prescribes standards for
petitions for modifying established
AVAs. Petitions to expand an
established AVA must include the
following:
• Evidence that the area within the
proposed expansion area boundary is
nationally or locally known by the name
of the established AVA;
• An explanation of the basis for
defining the boundary of the proposed
expansion area;
• A narrative description of the
features of the proposed expansion area
that affect viticulture, such as climate,
geology, soils, physical features, and
elevation, that make the proposed
expansion area similar to the
established AVA and distinguish it from
adjacent areas outside the established
AVA boundary;
• The appropriate United States
Geological Survey (USGS) map(s)
showing the location of the proposed
expansion area, with the boundary of
the proposed expansion area clearly
drawn thereon; and
• A detailed narrative description of
the proposed expansion area boundary
based on USGS map markings.
Petition To Expand the Outer Coast
Plain AVA
TTB received a petition from John and
Jane Giunco, owners of 4JG’s Orchards
and Vineyards in Colts Neck, New
Jersey, proposing to expand the
established ‘‘Outer Coastal Plain’’ AVA.
The Outer Coastal Plain AVA (27 CFR
9.207) was established by T.D. TTB–58,
which was published in the Federal
Register on February 9, 2007 (72 FR
6165). The Outer Coastal Plain AVA
covers approximately 2.25 million acres
in all or portions of Atlantic, Burlington,
Camden, Cape May, Cumberland,
Gloucester, Monmouth, Ocean, and
Salem Counties. The Outer Coastal Plain
AVA and the proposed expansion area
do not overlap, nor are they within, any
other established or proposed AVAs.
The proposed expansion area is
located in Monmouth County, adjacent
to the western edge of the existing Outer
Coastal Plain AVA boundary, and
covers approximately 32,932 acres.
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
Pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
57658
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
According to the petition, one
commercial vineyard covering a total of
30 acres is located within the proposed
expansion area. The vineyard also has
its own winery. The vineyard and the
winery both existed at the time the
Outer Coastal Plain AVA was
established in 2007 and are owned by
the petitioner. The petitioners for the
expansion of the AVA assert in their
petition that when the AVA was
established, the region of the proposed
expansion was intended to be included
in the AVA but was inadvertently
omitted. The petitioners state that they
only recently learned that they are not
within the AVA’s boundaries.
The petition included a letter from the
current president of the Outer Coastal
Plain Vineyard Association stating that
the Association supports the proposed
expansion, and noting that the
petitioners for the expansion have been
members of that Association since 2006.
TTB notes that the Association’s Web
site lists as a member Bellview Winery,
the original petitioner for the Outer
Coastal Plain AVA.
According to the petition, the
proposed expansion area is similar to
the established Outer Coastal Plain AVA
with regard to its primary distinguishing
features: The soils, elevations, and
climate. The most common soils of the
proposed expansion area are welldrained soils that contain large amounts
of sand and/or gravel, similar to the
soils within the Outer Coastal Plain
AVA, as described in T.D. TTB–58,
which established that AVA. The
proposed expansion area and the
established Outer Coastal Plain AVA are
also both regions of agricultural land
with low elevations. Within the Outer
Coastal Plain AVA, the elevations are
below 280 feet, and within the proposed
expansion area, the elevations primarily
range from 6 to 150 feet above sea level
with a small region along the western
edge of the proposed expansion area
reaching 250 feet. Finally, although
much of the established AVA has a
growing season ranging from 190 to 217
days, the proposed expansion area’s
growing season of 188 to 192 days is
similar to that of the adjacent portion of
the Outer Coastal Plain AVA.
The regions to the west and northwest
of the proposed expansion area are
outside the Outer Coastal Plain AVA.
These regions are marked by a belt of
hills called the cuestas. Elevations
within the cuestas can reach as high as
1,680 feet, which is significantly higher
than the elevations in both the proposed
expansion area and the Outer Coastal
Plain AVA. The growing season length
within most of the cuestas is also
shorter than the growing seasons for the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:34 Dec 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
proposed expansion area and the Outer
Coastal Plain AVA. The portion of the
cuestas immediately adjacent to the
proposed expansion area has a growing
season length of between 185 and 188
days, but moving farther west and north
within the cuestas, the growing season
shortens to between 163 and 179 days.
Finally, the soils of the cuesta region
differ from soils within the proposed
expansion area and the Outer Coastal
Plain AVA in that they have higher clay
content and less sand and gravel.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and
Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 162 in the
Federal Register on September 20, 2016
(81 FR 64368), proposing to expand the
Outer Coastal Plain AVA. In the notice,
TTB summarized the evidence from the
petition regarding the name, boundary,
and distinguishing features for the
proposed expansion area. For a detailed
description of the evidence relating to
the name, boundary, and distinguishing
features of the proposed expansion area,
and for a comparison of the
distinguishing features of the proposed
expansion area to the surrounding areas
and to the established Outer Coastal
Plain AVA, see Notice No. 162.
Comments Received
In Notice No. 162, TTB solicited
comments on the accuracy of the name,
boundary, climatic, and other required
information submitted in support of the
petition. The comment period closed on
November 21, 2016.
In response to Notice No. 162, TTB
received one comment. The commenter,
who describes himself as a past
President of the Outer Coastal Plain
Vineyard Association who was involved
with the determination of the
distinguishing features of the
established Outer Coastal Plain AVA,
supported the expansion of the Outer
Coastal Plain AVA. The commenter
stated his belief that the expansion
petition contained ‘‘valid name
evidence, boundary evidence and
distinctive features that are recognizable
features of the Outer Coastal Plain,’’ and
he specifically cited as shared features
the sandy loam and loamy sand soils,
soil drainage, and the length of growing
degree days. The commenter also stated
his belief that the proposed expansion
area should be added to the existing
AVA. The comment did not raise any
new issues concerning the proposed
AVA expansion. TTB received no
comments opposing the expansion of
the Outer Coastal Plain AVA.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition
and the comment received, TTB finds
that the evidence provided by the
petitioner sufficiently demonstrates that
the proposed expansion area shares the
characteristics of the established Outer
Coastal Plain AVA and should also be
recognized as part of that AVA.
Accordingly, under the authority of the
FAA Act, section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002, and
parts 4 and 9 of the TTB regulations,
TTB expands the 2.25 million-acre
Outer Coastal Plain AVA to include the
approximately 32,932-acre expansion
area as described in Notice No. 162,
effective 30 days from the publication
date of this document.
Boundary Description
See the narrative description of the
boundary of the AVA expansion in the
regulatory text published at the end of
this final rule.
Maps
The petitioner provided the required
maps, and they are listed below in the
regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits
any label reference on a wine that
indicates or implies an origin other than
the wine’s true place of origin. For a
wine to be labeled with an AVA name
or with a brand name that includes an
AVA name, at least 85 percent of the
wine must be derived from grapes
grown within the area represented by
that name, and the wine must meet the
other conditions listed in § 4.25(e)(3) of
the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)).
If the wine is not eligible for labeling
with an AVA name and that name
appears in the brand name, then the
label is not in compliance, and the
bottler must change the brand name and
obtain approval of a new label.
Similarly, if the AVA name appears in
another reference on the label in a
misleading manner, the bottler would
have to obtain approval of a new label.
Different rules apply if a wine has a
brand name containing an AVA name
that was used as a brand name on a
label approved before July 7, 1986. See
§ 4.39(i)(2) of the TTB regulations (27
CFR 4.39(i)(2)) for details.
The expansion of the Outer Coastal
Plain AVA will not affect any other
existing AVA, and bottlers using ‘‘Outer
Coastal Plain’’ as an appellation of
origin or in a brand name for wines
made from grapes within the Outer
Coastal Plain AVA will not be affected
by this expansion. The expansion of the
Outer Coastal Plain AVA will allow
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
vintners to use ‘‘Outer Coastal Plain’’ as
an appellation of origin for wines made
primarily from grapes grown within the
expansion area if the wines meet the
eligibility requirements for the
appellation.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. The regulation imposes no new
reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit
derived from the use of an AVA name
would be the result of a proprietor’s
efforts and consumer acceptance of
wines from that area. Therefore, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is
required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this final
rule is not a significant regulatory action
as defined by Executive Order 12866 of
September 30, 1993. Therefore, no
regulatory assessment is required.
Drafting Information
Dana Register of the Regulations and
Rulings Division drafted this final rule.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, TTB amends title 27, chapter
I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as
follows:
PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL
AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 9
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C—Approved American
Viticultural Areas
Signed: May 2, 2017.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
2. Section 9.207 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraphs (b)
introductory text and (b)(6) and (7);
■ b. Adding paragraphs (b)(8) through
(10);
■ c. Revising paragraphs (c)(16) and
(17);
■ d. Redesignating paragraphs (c)(18)
through (22) as paragraphs (c)(21)
through (25); and
■ e. Adding new paragraphs (c)(18)
through (20).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
Pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
■
■
§ 9.207
the Outer Coastal Plain viticultural area
are 10 United States Geological Survey
topographic maps. They are titled:
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Cape May, New Jersey, 1981,
1:100,000 scale;
(7) Dover, Delaware–New Jersey–
Maryland, 1984, 1:100,000 scale;
(8) Freehold, New Jersey, 2014,
1:24,000 scale;
(9) Marlboro, New Jersey, 2014,
1:24,000 scale; and
(10) Keyport, New Jersey–New York,
2014, 1:24,000 scale.
(c) * * *
(16) Continue northeasterly on CR
537, crossing onto the Freehold, New
Jersey, map, to the intersection of CR
537 (known locally as W. Main Street)
and State Route 79 (known locally as S.
Main Street) in Freehold; then
(17) Proceed northeasterly, then
northerly, along State Route 79, crossing
onto the Marlboro, New Jersey, map to
the intersection of State Route 79 and
Pleasant Valley Road in Wickatunk;
then
(18) Proceed northeasterly, then
southeasterly along Pleasant Valley
Road to the road’s intersection with
Schank Road, south of Pleasant Valley;
then
(19) Proceed easterly along Schank
Road to the road’s intersection with
Holmdel Road; then
(20) Proceed northerly along Holmdel
Road, crossing onto the Keyport, New
Jersey–New York map, to the road’s
intersection with the Garden State
Parkway, north of Crawford Corners;
then
*
*
*
*
*
Approved: October 19, 2017.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and
Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2017–26414 Filed 12–6–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
Outer Coastal Plain.
*
*
*
*
(b) Approved maps. The appropriate
maps for determining the boundary of
13:34 Dec 06, 2017
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB–2016–0009; T.D. TTB–149;
Re: Notice No. 163]
RIN 1513–AC34
Establishment of the Petaluma Gap
Viticultural Area and Modification of
the North Coast Viticultural Area
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
AGENCY:
The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax
and Trade Bureau (TTB) establishes the
approximately 202,476-acre ‘‘Petaluma
Gap’’ viticultural area in portions of
Sonoma and Marin Counties in
California. The viticultural area lies
entirely within the larger existing North
Coast viticultural area and partially
within the established Sonoma Coast
viticultural area. TTB also modifies the
boundary of the North Coast viticultural
area to eliminate a partial overlap with
the Petaluma Gap viticultural area. TTB
designates viticultural areas to allow
vintners to better describe the origin of
their wines and to allow consumers to
better identify wines they may
purchase.
SUMMARY:
This final rule is effective
January 8, 2018.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kaori Flores, Regulations and Rulings
Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW., Box
12, Washington, DC 20005; phone (202)
453–1039.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
57659
Sfmt 4700
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury to prescribe regulations
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits,
and malt beverages. The FAA Act
provides that these regulations should,
among other things, prohibit consumer
deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels, and ensure that
labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product. The Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the
Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The
Secretary has delegated various
E:\FR\FM\07DER1.SGM
07DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 234 (Thursday, December 7, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57657-57659]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26414]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 234 / Thursday, December 7, 2017 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 57657]]
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[Docket No. TTB-2016-0008; T.D. TTB-148; Re: Notice No. 162]
RIN 1513-AC32
Expansion of the Outer Coast Plain Viticultural Area
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) is
expanding the approximately 2.25 million-acre ``Outer Coastal Plain''
viticultural area of southeastern New Jersey by approximately 32,932
acres. The Outer Coastal Plain AVA includes all or portions of
Atlantic, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Gloucester,
Monmouth, Ocean, and Salem counties. The established viticultural area
and the expansion area are not located within any other established
viticultural area. TTB designates viticultural areas to allow vintners
to better describe the origin of their wines and to allow consumers to
better identify wines they may purchase.
DATES: This final rule is effective January 8, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dana Register, Regulations and Rulings
Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street NW.,
Box 12, Washington, DC 20005; phone (202) 453-1039, ext. 022.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act),
27 U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe
regulations for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, and malt
beverages. The FAA Act provides that these regulations should, among
other things, prohibit consumer deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels and ensure that labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity and quality of the product. The
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the FAA Act
pursuant to section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act of 2002,
codified at 6 U.S.C. 531(d). The Secretary has delegated various
authorities through Treasury Department Order 120-01, dated December
10, 2013 (superseding Treasury Order 120-01, dated January 24, 2003),
to the TTB Administrator to perform the functions and duties in the
administration and enforcement of this law.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) authorizes the
establishment of definitive viticultural areas and regulate the use of
their names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) sets
forth standards for the preparation and submission of petitions for the
establishment or modification of American viticultural areas (AVAs) and
lists the approved AVAs.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i))
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region having distinguishing features, as described in part 9
of the regulations, and a name and a delineated boundary, as
established in part 9 of the regulations. These designations allow
vintners and consumers to attribute a given quality, reputation, or
other characteristic of a wine made from grapes grown in an area to the
wine's geographic origin. The establishment of AVAs allows vintners to
describe more accurately the origin of their wines to consumers and
helps consumers to identify wines they may purchase. Establishment of
an AVA is neither an approval nor an endorsement by TTB of the wine
produced in that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(2))
outlines the procedure for proposing an AVA and provides that any
interested party may petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region
as an AVA. Petitioners may use the same process to request changes
involving established AVAs. Section 9.12 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
9.12) prescribes standards for petitions for modifying established
AVAs. Petitions to expand an established AVA must include the
following:
Evidence that the area within the proposed expansion area
boundary is nationally or locally known by the name of the established
AVA;
An explanation of the basis for defining the boundary of
the proposed expansion area;
A narrative description of the features of the proposed
expansion area that affect viticulture, such as climate, geology,
soils, physical features, and elevation, that make the proposed
expansion area similar to the established AVA and distinguish it from
adjacent areas outside the established AVA boundary;
The appropriate United States Geological Survey (USGS)
map(s) showing the location of the proposed expansion area, with the
boundary of the proposed expansion area clearly drawn thereon; and
A detailed narrative description of the proposed expansion
area boundary based on USGS map markings.
Petition To Expand the Outer Coast Plain AVA
TTB received a petition from John and Jane Giunco, owners of 4JG's
Orchards and Vineyards in Colts Neck, New Jersey, proposing to expand
the established ``Outer Coastal Plain'' AVA. The Outer Coastal Plain
AVA (27 CFR 9.207) was established by T.D. TTB-58, which was published
in the Federal Register on February 9, 2007 (72 FR 6165). The Outer
Coastal Plain AVA covers approximately 2.25 million acres in all or
portions of Atlantic, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland,
Gloucester, Monmouth, Ocean, and Salem Counties. The Outer Coastal
Plain AVA and the proposed expansion area do not overlap, nor are they
within, any other established or proposed AVAs.
The proposed expansion area is located in Monmouth County, adjacent
to the western edge of the existing Outer Coastal Plain AVA boundary,
and covers approximately 32,932 acres.
[[Page 57658]]
According to the petition, one commercial vineyard covering a total of
30 acres is located within the proposed expansion area. The vineyard
also has its own winery. The vineyard and the winery both existed at
the time the Outer Coastal Plain AVA was established in 2007 and are
owned by the petitioner. The petitioners for the expansion of the AVA
assert in their petition that when the AVA was established, the region
of the proposed expansion was intended to be included in the AVA but
was inadvertently omitted. The petitioners state that they only
recently learned that they are not within the AVA's boundaries.
The petition included a letter from the current president of the
Outer Coastal Plain Vineyard Association stating that the Association
supports the proposed expansion, and noting that the petitioners for
the expansion have been members of that Association since 2006. TTB
notes that the Association's Web site lists as a member Bellview
Winery, the original petitioner for the Outer Coastal Plain AVA.
According to the petition, the proposed expansion area is similar
to the established Outer Coastal Plain AVA with regard to its primary
distinguishing features: The soils, elevations, and climate. The most
common soils of the proposed expansion area are well-drained soils that
contain large amounts of sand and/or gravel, similar to the soils
within the Outer Coastal Plain AVA, as described in T.D. TTB-58, which
established that AVA. The proposed expansion area and the established
Outer Coastal Plain AVA are also both regions of agricultural land with
low elevations. Within the Outer Coastal Plain AVA, the elevations are
below 280 feet, and within the proposed expansion area, the elevations
primarily range from 6 to 150 feet above sea level with a small region
along the western edge of the proposed expansion area reaching 250
feet. Finally, although much of the established AVA has a growing
season ranging from 190 to 217 days, the proposed expansion area's
growing season of 188 to 192 days is similar to that of the adjacent
portion of the Outer Coastal Plain AVA.
The regions to the west and northwest of the proposed expansion
area are outside the Outer Coastal Plain AVA. These regions are marked
by a belt of hills called the cuestas. Elevations within the cuestas
can reach as high as 1,680 feet, which is significantly higher than the
elevations in both the proposed expansion area and the Outer Coastal
Plain AVA. The growing season length within most of the cuestas is also
shorter than the growing seasons for the proposed expansion area and
the Outer Coastal Plain AVA. The portion of the cuestas immediately
adjacent to the proposed expansion area has a growing season length of
between 185 and 188 days, but moving farther west and north within the
cuestas, the growing season shortens to between 163 and 179 days.
Finally, the soils of the cuesta region differ from soils within the
proposed expansion area and the Outer Coastal Plain AVA in that they
have higher clay content and less sand and gravel.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 162 in the Federal Register on September
20, 2016 (81 FR 64368), proposing to expand the Outer Coastal Plain
AVA. In the notice, TTB summarized the evidence from the petition
regarding the name, boundary, and distinguishing features for the
proposed expansion area. For a detailed description of the evidence
relating to the name, boundary, and distinguishing features of the
proposed expansion area, and for a comparison of the distinguishing
features of the proposed expansion area to the surrounding areas and to
the established Outer Coastal Plain AVA, see Notice No. 162.
Comments Received
In Notice No. 162, TTB solicited comments on the accuracy of the
name, boundary, climatic, and other required information submitted in
support of the petition. The comment period closed on November 21,
2016.
In response to Notice No. 162, TTB received one comment. The
commenter, who describes himself as a past President of the Outer
Coastal Plain Vineyard Association who was involved with the
determination of the distinguishing features of the established Outer
Coastal Plain AVA, supported the expansion of the Outer Coastal Plain
AVA. The commenter stated his belief that the expansion petition
contained ``valid name evidence, boundary evidence and distinctive
features that are recognizable features of the Outer Coastal Plain,''
and he specifically cited as shared features the sandy loam and loamy
sand soils, soil drainage, and the length of growing degree days. The
commenter also stated his belief that the proposed expansion area
should be added to the existing AVA. The comment did not raise any new
issues concerning the proposed AVA expansion. TTB received no comments
opposing the expansion of the Outer Coastal Plain AVA.
TTB Determination
After careful review of the petition and the comment received, TTB
finds that the evidence provided by the petitioner sufficiently
demonstrates that the proposed expansion area shares the
characteristics of the established Outer Coastal Plain AVA and should
also be recognized as part of that AVA. Accordingly, under the
authority of the FAA Act, section 1111(d) of the Homeland Security Act
of 2002, and parts 4 and 9 of the TTB regulations, TTB expands the 2.25
million-acre Outer Coastal Plain AVA to include the approximately
32,932-acre expansion area as described in Notice No. 162, effective 30
days from the publication date of this document.
Boundary Description
See the narrative description of the boundary of the AVA expansion
in the regulatory text published at the end of this final rule.
Maps
The petitioner provided the required maps, and they are listed
below in the regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a
wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true
place of origin. For a wine to be labeled with an AVA name or with a
brand name that includes an AVA name, at least 85 percent of the wine
must be derived from grapes grown within the area represented by that
name, and the wine must meet the other conditions listed in Sec.
4.25(e)(3) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(3)). If the wine is
not eligible for labeling with an AVA name and that name appears in the
brand name, then the label is not in compliance, and the bottler must
change the brand name and obtain approval of a new label. Similarly, if
the AVA name appears in another reference on the label in a misleading
manner, the bottler would have to obtain approval of a new label.
Different rules apply if a wine has a brand name containing an AVA name
that was used as a brand name on a label approved before July 7, 1986.
See Sec. 4.39(i)(2) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.39(i)(2)) for
details.
The expansion of the Outer Coastal Plain AVA will not affect any
other existing AVA, and bottlers using ``Outer Coastal Plain'' as an
appellation of origin or in a brand name for wines made from grapes
within the Outer Coastal Plain AVA will not be affected by this
expansion. The expansion of the Outer Coastal Plain AVA will allow
[[Page 57659]]
vintners to use ``Outer Coastal Plain'' as an appellation of origin for
wines made primarily from grapes grown within the expansion area if the
wines meet the eligibility requirements for the appellation.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
TTB certifies that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The
regulation imposes no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit derived from the use of an AVA
name would be the result of a proprietor's efforts and consumer
acceptance of wines from that area. Therefore, no regulatory
flexibility analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
It has been determined that this final rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866 of September 30,
1993. Therefore, no regulatory assessment is required.
Drafting Information
Dana Register of the Regulations and Rulings Division drafted this
final rule.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, TTB amends title 27,
chapter I, part 9, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas
0
2. Section 9.207 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (b) introductory text and (b)(6) and (7);
0
b. Adding paragraphs (b)(8) through (10);
0
c. Revising paragraphs (c)(16) and (17);
0
d. Redesignating paragraphs (c)(18) through (22) as paragraphs (c)(21)
through (25); and
0
e. Adding new paragraphs (c)(18) through (20).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 9.207 Outer Coastal Plain.
* * * * *
(b) Approved maps. The appropriate maps for determining the
boundary of the Outer Coastal Plain viticultural area are 10 United
States Geological Survey topographic maps. They are titled:
* * * * *
(6) Cape May, New Jersey, 1981, 1:100,000 scale;
(7) Dover, Delaware-New Jersey-Maryland, 1984, 1:100,000 scale;
(8) Freehold, New Jersey, 2014, 1:24,000 scale;
(9) Marlboro, New Jersey, 2014, 1:24,000 scale; and
(10) Keyport, New Jersey-New York, 2014, 1:24,000 scale.
(c) * * *
(16) Continue northeasterly on CR 537, crossing onto the Freehold,
New Jersey, map, to the intersection of CR 537 (known locally as W.
Main Street) and State Route 79 (known locally as S. Main Street) in
Freehold; then
(17) Proceed northeasterly, then northerly, along State Route 79,
crossing onto the Marlboro, New Jersey, map to the intersection of
State Route 79 and Pleasant Valley Road in Wickatunk; then
(18) Proceed northeasterly, then southeasterly along Pleasant
Valley Road to the road's intersection with Schank Road, south of
Pleasant Valley; then
(19) Proceed easterly along Schank Road to the road's intersection
with Holmdel Road; then
(20) Proceed northerly along Holmdel Road, crossing onto the
Keyport, New Jersey-New York map, to the road's intersection with the
Garden State Parkway, north of Crawford Corners; then
* * * * *
Signed: May 2, 2017.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: October 19, 2017.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary (Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy).
[FR Doc. 2017-26414 Filed 12-6-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P