Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Charter/Headboat Permit Commercial Sale Provision, 57543-57551 [2017-26275]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 6, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on
November 21, 2017.
Brian J. Johnson,
Acting Group Manager, Operations Support
Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2017–26202 Filed 12–5–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 170901859–7999–02]
RIN 0648–BH19
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species;
Charter/Headboat Permit Commercial
Sale Provision
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule creates a
separate permit endorsement provision
for the commercial sale of Atlantic
highly migratory species (HMS) by HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders. Prior
to implementation of this final rule, all
vessels issued an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit could be categorized as
commercial fishing vessels and could be
subject to United States Coast Guard
(USCG) commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements regardless of whether the
permit holder engages or intends to
engage in commercial fishing. Under
this final rule, HMS Charter/Headboat
permit holders will be prohibited from
selling Atlantic tunas, swordfish, or
sharks unless they obtain a commercial
sale endorsement for their permit. This
final rule will clarify which HMS
Charter/Headboat permitted vessels are
properly categorized as commercial
fishing vessels for purposes of USCG
safety requirements. This action is
administrative in nature and will not
affect fishing practices or result in any
significant environmental effects or
economic impacts.
DATES: Effective January 5, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the supporting
documents—including the 2006
Consolidated HMS Fishery Management
Plan (FMP) and its amendments and
associated documents—are available
from the HMS Management Division
Web site at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/
sfa/hms/ or by contacting Dianne
Stephan by phone at 978–281–9260.
Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:51 Dec 05, 2017
Jkt 244001
of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this final rule
may be submitted to the HMS
Management Division and by email to
OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax
to (202) 395–7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dianne Stephan or Tobey Curtis by
phone at 978–281–9260, or Steve
Durkee by phone at 202–670–6637.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Atlantic
HMS are managed under the dual
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) and the
Atlantic Tunas Convention Act (ATCA).
Under the Magnuson-Stevens Act,
NMFS must ensure consistency with 10
National Standards and manage
fisheries to maintain optimum yield,
rebuild overfished fisheries, and prevent
overfishing. Under ATCA, the Secretary
of Commerce is required to promulgate
regulations, as necessary and
appropriate, to implement measures
adopted by the International
Commission for the Conservation of
Atlantic Tunas. The implementing
regulations for Atlantic HMS are at 50
CFR part 635.
Background
Atlantic HMS regulations at 50 CFR
635.4(b) require that charter/headboat
vessels (i.e., vessels taking fee-paying
passengers) used to fish for, take, retain,
or possess Atlantic HMS must obtain an
HMS Charter/Headboat permit. In
addition to carrying paying passengers,
the permit also allows charter/headboat
fishermen to diversify their operations
by fishing commercially for Atlantic
tunas and swordfish. They may sell
sharks if they also have a commercial
shark permit in addition to the Charter/
Headboat permit. Relatively few permit
holders use the commercial sale
provision. From 2012–2016, an annual
average of only seven percent of HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders sold
any tuna or swordfish. USCG
commercial vessel safety requirement
therefore may result in an unnecessary
‘‘commercial vessel’’ compliance
burden for HMS Charter/Headboat
permitted vessels.
Commercial fishing vessel safety
provisions contained in the Coast Guard
Authorization Act of 2010 (CGAA) and
the Coast Guard and Maritime
Transportation Act of 2012 were the
subject of a Marine Safety Information
Bulletin (MSIB 12–15) issued by the
USCG on October 20, 2015. MSIB 12–15
clarified that the law would require
mandatory dockside safety exams for a
broader population of commercial
fishing vessels. As clarified in the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57543
notice, that broader community
included HMS Charter/Headboat vessels
that were authorized by the permit to
sell fish commercially (i.e., all Charter/
Headboat vessels). The mandatory safety
exam includes a check for required
commercial fishing vessel safety
equipment such as life rafts, emergency
beacons, and survival suits, and other
requirements found in 46 CFR part 28.
Outfitting a vessel with these items
comes at a substantial cost. Mandatory
dockside safety exams for vessels
operating beyond three nautical miles
from shore began October 15, 2015
under this program.
These mandatory commercial vessel
safety requirements had overly broad
application to all Charter/Headboat
permit holders, whether they engaged in
commercial sales or not, absent a more
effective way to identify which HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders engage
in commercial fishing. After questions
about applicability from NMFS and the
regulated community, on July 10, 2017,
the USCG issued Marine Safety
Information Bulletin (MSIB 008–17) in
an attempt to clarify the applicability of
commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements for vessels with HMS
permits, including HMS Charter/
Headboat permits. USCG regulations at
46 CFR 28.50 define a commercial
fishing vessel as a vessel that
commercially engages in the catching,
taking, or harvesting of fish, or an
activity that can reasonably be expected
to result in the catching, taking, or
harvesting of fish. According to the
MSIB 008–17, if an individual has an
HMS Charter/Headboat permit (which
allows commercial sale) and a state
permit to sell catch, the vessel is
considered subject to commercial
fishing vessel safety regulations.
Many HMS Charter/Headboat
operators that neither sell, nor intend to
sell, their catch but hold a permit to sell
have thus found that the USCG policy
identifies their operations as a
‘‘commercial fishing vessel,’’ and
requires them to adhere to USCG
commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements. For example, even small
charter vessels (i.e., less than 20 feet in
length) operating in the warm waters of
the Gulf of Mexico and with no intent
to sell HMS, may be required under the
USCG regulations to carry an inflatable
life raft that can cost approximately
$1,750. In addition to the cost burden,
a vessel of this size has minimal space
to store such gear. These smaller HMS
Charter/Headboat permitted vessels
were previously subject to the USCG
safety regulations for uninspected
passenger vessels of less than 100 gross
E:\FR\FM\06DER1.SGM
06DER1
57544
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 6, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES
tons and carrying six or less passengers,
which are less extensive and less costly.
In late 2016 and early 2017, NMFS
and the USCG staff informally discussed
how to more effectively categorize HMS
charter/headboat vessels under USCG
regulations. The HMS Advisory Panel
discussed this issue at length at its May
and September 2017 meetings. Many
HMS Advisory Panel members,
including commercial, recreational, and
council/state representatives, supported
creating a separate regulatory provision
for charter/headboat vessels that intend
to sell HMS and to thus specify that
other such vessels were not engaged in
commercial sale and not subject to
expensive USCG commercial vessel
compliance obligations. Panel members
stated that creating a separate sale
provision would support more
appropriate application and
enforcement of USCG commercial
fishing vessel safety requirements in the
Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat fishery,
and would better clarify for permit
holders the specific USCG regulations
that apply to their vessels and fishing
operations. On October 6, 2017, the
USCG formally reviewed the proposed
rule of this action and concurred with
the approach to provide clarity on the
applicability on their requirements.
HMS Charter/Headboat Permit
Commercial Sale Endorsement
This final rule creates a ‘‘commercial
sale’’ endorsement that can be placed on
the existing HMS Charter/Headboat
permit. Under this action, HMS Charter/
Headboat permit holders will be
prohibited from selling any catch of
HMS unless they first obtain a
‘‘commercial sale’’ endorsement on their
permit. Only those HMS Charter/
Headboat permit holders with the
endorsement will be permitted to sell
Atlantic tunas, swordfish, or sharks if
they also have the additionally required
commercial shark permit.
This final rule clarifies that any HMS
Charter/Headboat vessel issued a
Charter/Headboat permit with a
commercial sale endorsement will be
categorized as a commercial fishing
vessel under USCG criteria, and
therefore could be subject to USCG
commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements. A vessel issued an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit without a
‘‘commercial sale’’ endorsement will not
be categorized as a commercial fishing
vessel and should not be subject to the
USCG commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements. HMS Charter/Headboat
permit holders with the commercial sale
endorsement allowing the sale of tunas
or swordfish must adhere to the
applicable Atlantic Tunas General
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:51 Dec 05, 2017
Jkt 244001
Category or General Commercial
Swordfish permit possession limits and
restrictions; any landings will be
applied against the appropriate
commercial quota. HMS Charter/
Headboat permit holders that sell or
intend to sell sharks must obtain the
commercial sale endorsement on their
permit as well as a commercial shark
permit. This final rule would only
change the permit category under which
certain vessels are fishing. It will not
affect quotas, gear types, or time/area
restrictions, and neither increase or
decrease fishing effort or affect fishing
timing nor implement other measures
that will potentially have any
environmental effects.
Response to Comments
During the public comment period,
NMFS held a public hearing via
webinar. Two members of the public
provided comments during the hearing.
Additionally, NMFS received 14 written
comments. All written comments can be
found at https://www.regulations.gov/.
The summarized comments and NMFS’
response to those comments can be
found below.
Comment 1: NMFS received
comments, including from the South
Atlantic Fishery Management Council,
in support of the HMS Charter/Headboat
permit commercial sales endorsement
considered in the proposed rule. We
also received a comment stating a
commercial sale endorsement would not
be useful since a lot of charter/headboat
fishing occurs in state waters. Another
commenter requested clarification on
the cost of the commercial sales
endorsement.
Response: NMFS believes that the
commercial sales endorsement will
effectively delineate between HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders that
intend to sell HMS catch and those that
do not. This clarification should
facilitate USCG’s application of
commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements. Regarding the comment
that charter/headboat fishing occurs
primarily in state waters, and the
apparent concern that USCG
requirements therefore would not apply
nor be ‘‘useful,’’ we note that as a
condition of the HMS Charter/Headboat
permit, permit holders are required to
abide by federal HMS regulations
regardless of where fishing occurs,
including in state waters, unless state
regulations are stricter. With respect to
Atlantic tunas, NMFS manages the tuna
fisheries to the shore even if a vessel
holds no Federal permit, except in the
States of Maine, Connecticut, and
Mississippi. Regarding the cost, the cost
of the HMS Charter/Headboat permit
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
with and without the commercial sale
endorsement will be the same; there
will be no additional cost to obtain the
commercial sales endorsement.
Comment 2: The Atlantic States
Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC)
submitted a comment stating the HMS
Charter/Headboat permit commercial
sale endorsement could make it more
difficult to differentiate between
recreational and commercial fishing
activities, particularly in the coastal
shark fishery. ASMFC also stated that
State commercial fishing permits
already identify those individuals that
are able to sell sharks.
Response: NMFS disagrees that the
HMS Charter/Headboat permit
commercial sale endorsement would
make it more difficult to differentiate
between recreational and commercial
fishing activities. Instead, the
commercial sale endorsement will
effectively identify HMS Charter/
Headboat permit holders that intend to
sell HMS catch. HMS Charter/Headboat
permit holders that do not obtain the
commercial sale endorsement will
clearly not be engaging in commercial
fishing. As detailed in the background
information section above,
approximately 93 percent of HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders do not
sell HMS catch. These permit holders
are unlikely to obtain the commercial
sale endorsement; thus, the vast
majority of HMS charter/headboat
activity would be easily categorized as
recreational. Furthermore, State
commercial fishing permits do not
authorize HMS Charter/Headboat permit
holders to sell sharks. HMS Charter/
Headboat permit holders that intend to
sell sharks must obtain a Federal
Atlantic commercial shark permit in
addition to the commercial sale
endorsement created in this action.
Furthermore, the action is specifically
taken with regard to categorization for
USCG regulatory purposes.
Comment 3: NMFS received
comments expressing concern that
defining a charter/headboat as a
commercial vessel for the entire year is
overly burdensome on the owner and
captain. Instead, commenters stated that
commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements should be enforced on a
trip-by-trip basis and that when an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holder intends
to sell HMS catch, that trip should be
categorized as a commercial trip, subject
to the USCG commercial fishing vessel
safety requirements. Commenters stated
that if an HMS Charter/Headboat permit
holder is on a for-hire trip, that trip
should be categorized as a noncommercial trip and not be subject to
the USCG commercial fishing vessel
E:\FR\FM\06DER1.SGM
06DER1
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 6, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
safety requirements. Commenters
included examples of hardships, such as
requiring safety drills with clients and
requesting customers’ clothing sizes to
ensure immersion suits are properly
sized. One commenter stated that NMFS
should require proof of a USCG
commercial fishing vessel safety sticker
when applying for the HMS Charter/
Headboat permit commercial sales
endorsement and should conduct a
review of compliance of HMS Charter/
Headboat vessels with commercial
fishing vessel safety exam requirements.
Another commenter stated that all
commercial vessels should be subject to
the same commercial fishing vessel
safety requirements regardless of vessel
size or where fishing occurs.
Response: The purpose of this action
is to clarify which HMS Charter/
Headboat permitted vessels are
authorized to sell Atlantic HMS and
thus are appropriately categorized as
commercial fishing vessels for purposes
of the USCG commercial safety
requirements. Doing so will facilitate
USCG’s appropriate application of
commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements. The mandatory USCG
safety requirements arguably may have
been overly broad as currently applied
because it is difficult to identify which
HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders
engage in commercial fishing and,
therefore, should appropriately be
subject to the requirements. This action
is not intended to address, nor
otherwise consider, the effectiveness of
USCG commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements. Regarding the comment
that NMFS should require compliance
with USCG regulations before issuing an
HMS Charter/Headboat permit and
should conduct a review of compliance
with commercial fishing vessel safety
exam requirements, NMFS may
consider requiring proof of compliance
(e.g., submission of sticker number) as a
condition of obtaining the endorsement
in the future, after additional
consultation with USCG. NMFS will
coordinate with USCG Commercial
Safety Exam program staff to conduct a
review of compliance of HMS permitted
vessels with CFVS exam requirements.
The proper application of USCG
commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements based on trip type, vessel
size, or fishing location is outside the
purview of NMFS. NMFS will share
these comments and concerns with
USCG Commercial Fishing Vessel Safety
program staff.
Comment 4: NMFS also received a
comment suggesting increased reporting
requirements for vessels landing and
selling bigeye, albacore, and yellowfin
tunas and to prohibit the sale of HMS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:51 Dec 05, 2017
Jkt 244001
caught on charter/headboats while
engaged in a for-hire trip.
Response: This comment is outside
the scope of this rulemaking, which
focuses on overly burdensome and
unnecessary application of USCG
commercial vessel requirements to HMS
vessels that do not sell or intend to sell
their catch. However, NMFS will
consider these suggestions regarding
increased reporting requirements and
whether to propose further regulations
modifying HMS charter/headboat
commercial sale provisions in the
future, as appropriate. Any such new
management measures and regulations
would be presented in a proposed rule,
and the public would have an
opportunity to provide comment.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
The final rule contains no changes
from the proposed rule.
Classification
The Assistant Administrator for
Fisheries (AA) has determined that the
final rule is consistent with the 2006
Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments, other provisions of the
Magnuson-Stevens Act, ATCA, and
other applicable law.
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
For the reasons described in the
preamble, this final rule is expected to
be deregulatory under Executive Order
13771.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This final rule contains a collectionof-information requirement subject to
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that
has been approved by OMB under
control number 0648–0327. Public
reporting burden for Atlantic HMS
Permit Family of Forms is estimated to
average 34 minutes per respondent for
initial permit applicants, and 10
minutes for permit renewals, including
the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing
the collection of information. Send
comments regarding these burden
estimates or any other aspect of this data
collection, including suggestions for
reducing the burden, to NMFS (see
ADDRESSES) and by email to OIRA_
Submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax to
202–395–7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision
of the law, no person is required to
respond to, and no person shall be
subject to penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57545
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
A final regulatory flexibility analysis
(FRFA) was prepared for this rule. The
FRFA incorporates the initial regulatory
flexibility analysis (IRFA) and a
summary of the analyses completed to
support the action. NMFS did not
receive any public comment on the
IRFA. The full FRFA is available from
NMFS (see ADDRESSES). A summary is
provided below.
Statement of the Need for and
Objectives of This Final Rule
A description of the action and the
legal basis for this action are contained
in the Background section of the
preamble and in the SUMMARY of this
final rule.
Description and Estimate of the Number
of Small Entities to Which the Final
Rule Will Apply
Section 604(a)(4) of the RFA requires
agencies to provide an estimate of the
number of small entities to which the
rule will apply. The Small Business
Administration (SBA) has established
size criteria for all major industry
sectors in the United States, including
for-hire charter/headboat businesses.
For-hire charter/headboat business fit
into the ‘‘Scenic and Sightseeing
Transportation, Water’’ industry under
NAICS code 487210. SBA has
established that the small entity size
standard for that industry is $7.5
million in average annual receipts.
Provision is made under SBA’s
regulations for an agency to develop its
own industry-specific size standards
after consultation with Advocacy and an
opportunity for public comment (see 13
CFR 121.903(c)). Under this provision,
NMFS may establish size standards that
differ from those established by the SBA
Office of Size Standards, but only for
use by NMFS and only for the purpose
of conducting an analysis of economic
effects in fulfillment of the agency’s
obligations under the RFA. To utilize
this provision, NMFS must publish such
size standards in the Federal Register
(FR), which NMFS did on December 29,
2015 (80 FR 81194, December 29, 2015).
In this final rule effective on July 1,
2016, NMFS established a small
business size standard of $11 million in
annual gross receipts for all businesses
in the commercial fishing industry
(NAICS 11411) for RFA compliance
purposes.
NMFS considers all HMS Charter/
Headboat permit holders (3,594 as of
October 2016) to be small entities
because these vessels have reported
E:\FR\FM\06DER1.SGM
06DER1
57546
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 6, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
annual gross receipts of less than $11
million for commercial fishing or earn
less than $7.5 million from for-hire
fishing trips.
NMFS has determined that this rule
will apply to the small businesses
associated with the approximately seven
percent of HMS Charter/Headboat
permit holders that also commercially
fish for swordfish and tuna. Based on
the most recent number of permit
holders, NMFS estimates that this rule
will apply to approximately 252 HMS
charter/headboat vessel owners. NMFS
has determined that this action would
not likely directly affect any small
organizations or small government
jurisdictions defined under the RFA.
Description of the Projected Reporting,
Record-Keeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements of the Final Rule,
Including an Estimate of the Classes of
Small Entities Which Would Be Subject
to the Requirements of the Report or
Record
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES
Section 604(a)(5) of the RFA requires
Agencies to describe any new reporting,
record-keeping and other compliance
requirements. This rule will create a
commercial sale endorsement for the
HMS Charter/Headboat permit. Under
the rule, HMS Charter/Headboat permit
holders will be prohibited from selling
any catch of HMS unless they obtain a
commercial sale endorsement on their
permit. The commercial sale
endorsement could be added to the
Charter/Headboat permit at the time of
the permit application or renewal, or
anytime thereafter. Only Charter/
Headboat permit holders with the
endorsement will be allowed to sell
HMS although they would not be
obligated to sell any HMS. There will be
no additional charge for the commercial
sale endorsement above the cost of the
HMS Charter/Headboat permit; the
endorsement will add less than a
minute more of labor effort to the
normal HMS Charter/Headboat permit
process. Those vessels issued an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit with a
commercial sale endorsement will be
categorized as a commercial vessel for
the purposes of USCG commercial
fishing vessel safety requirements.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:51 Dec 05, 2017
Jkt 244001
Description of the Steps the Agency Has
Taken To Minimize the Significant
Economic Impact on Small Entities
Consistent With the Stated Objectives of
Applicable Statutes, Including a
Statement of the Factual, Policy, and
Legal Reasons for Selecting the
Alternative Adopted in the Final Rule
and the Reason That Each One of the
Other Significant Alternatives to the
Rule Considered by the Agency Which
Affect Small Entities Was Rejected
One of the requirements of an FRFA
is to describe any significant
alternatives to the rule which
accomplish the stated objectives of
applicable statutes and which minimize
any significant economic impact of the
rule on small entities. The analysis shall
discuss significant alternatives such as:
(1) Establishment of differing
compliance or reporting requirements or
timetables that take into account the
resources available to small entities; (2)
clarification, consolidation, or
simplification of compliance and
reporting requirements under the rule
for such small entities; (3) use of
performance rather than design
standards; and (4) exemptions from
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof,
for small entities.
These categories of alternatives are
described at 5 U.S.C. 603(c)(1)–(4).
NMFS examined each of these
categories of alternatives. Regarding the
first and fourth categories, NMFS cannot
establish differing compliance or
reporting requirements for small entities
or exempt small entities from coverage
of the rule or parts of it because all of
the businesses impacted by this rule are
considered small entities and thus the
requirements are already designed for
small entities. NMFS examined
alternatives that fall under the second
category, which requires agencies to
consider whether they can clarify,
consolidate, or simplify compliance and
reporting requirements under the rule
for small entities. NMFS does examine
alternatives that fall under the second
category described above that clarify
which HMS charter/headboat vessels
should be considered commercial
fishing vessels for USCG safety
requirements. The use of a performance
standard, the third category, to
determine whether the USCG
commercial fishing safety gear
requirements would apply would be too
difficult to effectively monitor for
enforcement, so they were not
considered by NMFS. Thus, NMFS has
considered the significant alternatives to
the rule and focused on simplifying
compliance and reporting requirements
associated with the charter/headboat
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
commercial sale provision and USCG
commercial fishing safety gear
requirements in order to minimize any
significant economic impact of the rule
on small entities.
NMFS considered four different
alternatives to separate the commercial
sale provision from the HMS Charter/
Headboat permit, and thus relieve some
HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders
from the changes in USCG commercial
fishing vessel safety requirements.
Alternative 1, the status quo/no action
alternative, would make no changes to
current HMS regulations. Alternative 2,
the preferred alternative, would create
an endorsement for the HMS Charter/
Headboat permit that allows commercial
sale of Atlantic tunas and swordfish.
Alternative 3 would remove the
commercial sale provision of the HMS
Charter/Headboat permit. Alternative 4
would create two separate HMS Charter/
Headboat permits; one that allows
commercial sale of Atlantic tunas and
swordfish, and one that does not.
Under the ‘‘no action’’ Alternative 1,
NMFS would maintain the current
regulations regarding the Atlantic HMS
Charter/Headboat permit. Under current
regulations at 635.4(b), permit holders
taking fee-paying passengers to fish for
HMS (i.e. charter boats or headboats)
must obtain the HMS Charter/Headboat
permit. Since HMS Charter/Headboat
permits allow the commercial sale of
Atlantic tunas and swordfish, the
vessels would now be subject to USCG
commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements, regardless of whether the
permit holder intends to sell HMS.
However, without a change to the HMS
Charter/Headboat permit regulations,
USCG will consider all HMS charter/
headboat vessels as commercial fishing
vessels that must adhere to the to USCG
commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements. HMS Charter/Headboat
permitted vessels were previously
subject to the USCG safety regulations
for uninspected passenger vessels of less
than 100 gross tons and carrying six or
less passengers, which are less extensive
and less costly.
Under the USCG commercial fishing
vessel safety requirements, many
Atlantic HMS charter/headboats would
have to comply with four rule
requirements for survival craft, records
keeping, examinations and certificates
of compliance, and classing of vessels.
The survival craft requirement
establishes that all fishing industry
vessels operating beyond 3 nautical
miles must carry survival craft that will
meet a new performance standard for
primary lifesaving equipment. The use
of ‘‘lifeboats or liferafts’’ are required for
commercial vessels, whereas strictly for-
E:\FR\FM\06DER1.SGM
06DER1
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 6, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
hire vessels are only required to a have
‘‘a survival craft that ensures that no
part of an individual is immersed in
water.’’ This means that lifefloats and
buoyant apparatus will no longer be
accepted as survival craft on any
commercial fishing vessel operating
beyond 3 nautical miles once the most
recent USCG guidance in fully enforced.
Some HMS Charter/Headboat permitted
vessels would incorrectly be identified
as commercial vessels, subject to the
more stringent lifeboat/liferaft
requirements. USCG estimates that the
maximum initial cost of this
requirement per vessel would be $1,740
and have a recurring annual cost of
$300. The records provision requires the
individual in charge of a vessel
operating beyond 3 nautical miles to
maintain a record of lifesaving and fire
equipment maintenance. It would be
incumbent upon the master/individual
in charge of the vessel to maintain these
records onboard. The USCG estimates
this record keeping requirement would
cost $18 annually per vessel.
The examinations and certificates of
compliance provision requires a
dockside safety examination at least
once every 5 years for vessels, such as
HMS charter/headboats that engage in
commercial fishing, operating beyond 3
nautical miles with the first exam
statutorily required by October 15, 2015.
A ‘‘certificate of compliance’’ will be
issued to a vessel successfully
completing the exam. Voluntary exams
will continue to be promoted for vessel
operating inside 3 nautical miles. USCG
estimates that the maximum initial cost
of this requirement per vessel will be
$600 and have a recurring cost of $600.
The classing of vessels provision
requires the survey and classification of
a fishing vessel that is at least 50 feet
overall in length, was built after July 1,
2013, and operates beyond 3 nautical
miles. It is unlikely that this
requirement will impact many Atlantic
HMS charter/headboat vessels because
the vessels are typically less than 50 feet
overall in length.
In sum, all 3,594 Atlantic HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders would
face an initial per vessel cost of $2,358.
The annual cost savings per vessel in
subsequent years would be
approximately $300 for the survival
craft, $18 for record keeping, and $120
($600/5 yrs) for examinations and
certificates of completion. The total
annual recurring cost saving per vessel
would be $438 for these three
requirements. These costs could be
higher for some individual vessels that
are too small or have too little storage
space for the survival craft requirement
because those vessels might require
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:51 Dec 05, 2017
Jkt 244001
extensive modifications to
accommodate the storage space for the
gear.
Under Alternative 2, the preferred
alternative, NMFS would modify the
regulations so that the HMS Charter/
Headboat permit alone does not allow
commercial sale and also create an
endorsement for the HMS Charter/
Headboat permit that allows commercial
sale of Atlantic tunas and swordfish.
Currently, charter/headboat vessels are
able, though not obligated, to sell
swordfish and tunas with an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit. Consequently,
vessels that hold an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit are categorized as
commercial fishing vessels subject to
USCG commercial vessel fishing safety
requirements if they also possess a state
commercial sale permit, regardless of
whether the permit holder sells or
intends to sell HMS. Under Alternative
2, NMFS would create a ‘‘commercial
sale’’ endorsement for the HMS Charter/
Headboat permit. Under this action,
HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders
would be prohibited from selling any
catch of HMS unless they apply for a
commercial sale endorsement to be
added to their permit. The commercial
sale endorsement could be added to the
Charter/Headboat permit at the time of
the permit application or renewal. Only
charter/headboat vessels with the
endorsement would be permitted to sell
HMS although they would not be
obligated to sell any HMS. Those vessels
holding an HMS Charter/Headboat
permit without a commercial sale
endorsement would not be categorized
as a commercial fishing vessel and
would not be subject to the USCG
commercial safety gear requirements.
Those vessels that hold an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit with a
‘‘commercial sale’’ endorsement would
be categorized as commercial vessels for
the purposes of USCG commercial
fishing safety requirements.
The cost savings associated with
implementing a commercial
endorsement option for Atlantic HMS
Charter/Headboat permits would be that
approximately 93 percent of the permit
holders would not have to comply with
the USCG commercial fishing vessel
safety requirements, because Atlantic
HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders
would not be considered commercial
fishing vessels unless they were issued
the commercial endorsement. These
vessels would have no costs associated
with the USCG commercial fishing
vessel safety requirements. This would
result in a reduction in costs per vessel
initially of approximately $1,740 for the
survival craft, $18 for record keeping,
and $600 for examinations and
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57547
certificates of completion. The total
initial costs saved per vessel would be
$2,358. The annual cost savings per
vessel in subsequent years would be
approximately $300 for the survival
craft, $18 for record keeping, and $120
($600/5 yrs) for examinations and
certificates of completion. The total
annual recurring cost savings per vessel
would be $438 for these three
requirements. In addition to the reduced
costs associated with complying with
the USCG commercial fishing vessel
safety requirements for those HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders that do
not intend to obtain the endorsement to
fish commercially, most Atlantic HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders would
have to do nothing different when
obtaining their permits unless they want
to commercially sell tunas or swordfish.
The approximately 7 percent of
Atlantic Charter/Headboat permit
holders that want to continue selling
tunas and swordfish in addition to
complying with the USCG commercial
fishing vessel safety requirements,
would need to obtain an endorsement
for the commercial sale of Atlantic tunas
and swordfish. This would likely add
less than a minute to the time it takes
to obtain the Atlantic HMS Charter/
Headboat permit and it would not add
to the cost of obtaining the permit. HMS
charter/headboat permit holders who
sell sharks must obtain a commercial
shark permit in addition to an
endorsement on an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit. NMFS would incur
some costs associated with altering the
online permit application to
accommodate the endorsement, along
with some customer service changes.
Under Alternative 3, NMFS would
remove the commercial sale provision of
the HMS Charter/Headboat permit.
Currently, charter/headboat vessels are
able, though not obligated, to sell
swordfish and tunas as a condition of
the HMS Charter/Headboat permit, and
may sell sharks if they also have a
commercial shark permit. Consequently,
vessels that hold an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit are currently being
categorized by USCG as commercial
fishing vessels and subject to USCG
commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements if they also hold a state
commercial sale permit, regardless of
whether the permit holder sells or
intends to sell HMS. Under Alternative
3, NMFS would remove the provision
that allows commercial sales under the
HMS Charter/Headboat permit. Thus,
holding an HMS Charter/Headboat
permit would no longer categorize a
vessel as a commercial fishing vessel for
the purposes of USCG regulations.
Charter/headboat vessel owners or
E:\FR\FM\06DER1.SGM
06DER1
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES
57548
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 6, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
operators that wish to engage in
commercial sale of tunas and swordfish
would instead need to obtain an
Atlantic tunas General category and/or
Swordfish General Commercial permit.
The Atlantic Tunas General category
and Swordfish General Commercial
permits could be held in conjunction
with the HMS Charter/Headboat permit.
Those vessels with an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit that do not intend to
sell HMS and do not possess an Atlantic
Tunas General category, Swordfish
General Commercial, or commercial
shark permit (which permit commercial
sale) would not be subject to USCG
commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements.
The benefits of Alternative 3 versus
the No Action alternative would be
identical to those of Alternative 2.
Approximately 93 percent of the permit
holders would not have to face the costs
associated with the USCG commercial
fishing safety requirements, because
Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat permit
holders would not be considered to
commercially fish. The costs for the
fleet would be approximately $594,216
initially, and then $231,336 annually
thereafter, which are significantly lower
than the costs for the fleet under No
Action. The 7 percent that wish to
engage in commercial sale of tunas and
swordfish would instead need to obtain
an Atlantic tunas General category and/
or Swordfish General Commercial
permit. This would cost them $20 to
obtain either the Atlantic Tunas General
category permit or the Swordfish
General Commercial permit. For the
approximately 252 vessel owners that
might obtain these $20 permits, the total
cost would be $5,040 to $10,080
annually depending on whether they
obtain one or both permits. In addition,
vessel owners may need to expend a bit
more time to complete the application
for these additional permits. NMFS
would incur costs associated with the
substantial permits site and customer
service changes that would be required
for this change. NMFS prefers
Alternative 2 over Alternative 3 because
a commercial sale endorsement
requirement more closely matches
current fishing practices and would
minimize disruptions. Currently, HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders can
sell some HMS and Alternative 2 would
allow them to continue by simply
obtaining an endorsement on their
Charter/Headboat permit. Alternative 3
would be more disruptive since it
would require fishermen to obtain
additional permits. NMFS would need
to develop new regulatory text to
describe these new requirements and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:51 Dec 05, 2017
Jkt 244001
fishery participants would have to learn
and adapt to these changes.
Under Alternative 4, NMFS would
create two separate Atlantic HMS
Charter/Headboat permits; one that
allows commercial sale of Atlantic tunas
and swordfish, and one that does not.
Currently, charter/headboat vessels are
able, though not obligated, to sell
swordfish and tunas as a condition of
the HMS Charter/Headboat permit.
Consequently, vessels that hold an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit could be
categorized as commercial fishing
vessels and subject to USCG commercial
fishing vessel safety requirements,
regardless of whether the permit holder
sells or intends to sell HMS. Under
Alternative 4, NMFS would create two
separate HMS Charter/Headboat
permits; one that would allow
commercial sale of HMS, and one that
would not. Those vessels holding an
HMS Charter/Headboat permit that does
not allow commercial sale would not be
categorized as a commercial fishing
vessel and would not be subject to the
USCG commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements. Those vessels that hold
an HMS Charter/Headboat permit that
allows commercial sale would be
categorized as commercial vessels for
the purposes of USCG commercial
fishing vessel safety requirements.
The benefits of Alternative 4 versus
the No Action alternative would be
identical to those of Alternative 2.
Approximately 93 percent of the permit
holders would not have to face the costs
associated with the USCG commercial
fishing safety requirements, since
Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat permit
holders would not be considered
commercial fishing. The costs for the
fleet would be approximately $594,216
initially, and then $231,336 annually
thereafter, which is significantly lower
than the costs for the fleet under No
Action. Under this alternative, each of
the 3,594 Atlantic HMS Charter/
Headboat permit holders would have to
determine which type of Charter/
Headboat permit they wish to obtain for
the year, and all of charter/headboat
vessel owners would have to learn the
new permit process. Unlike Alternative
3, there would be no additional costs
associated with obtaining a commercial
permit, because under this alternative,
each would pick either the no-sale HMS
Charter/Headboat permit or the
commercial sale Charter/Headboat
permit. NMFS would incur costs
associated with the substantial permits
site and customer service changes that
would be required for this change.
NMFS would need to develop new
regulatory text to describe these two
new permits and fishery participants
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
would have to learn of and adapt to
these changes.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 635
Fisheries, Fishing, Fishing vessels,
Foreign relations, Imports, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Treaties.
Dated: December 1, 2017.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For reasons set out in the preamble,
50 CFR part 635 is amended as follows:
PART 635—ATLANTIC HIGHLY
MIGRATORY SPECIES
1. The authority citation for part 635
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C.
1801 et seq.
2. In § 635.2, add a new definition for
‘‘Charter/headboat commercial sale
endorsement’’ in alphabetical order to
read as follows:
■
§ 635.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Charter/headboat commercial sale
endorsement means an authorization
added to an HMS Charter/Headboat
permit that is required for vessels that
sell or intend to sell Atlantic tunas,
sharks, and swordfish, provided that all
other requirements in this part are also
met.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 635.4:
■ a. Revise paragraph (a)(5);
■ b. Add paragraph (b)(3);
■ c. Revise paragraphs (d)(1) and (2);
■ d. Remove the introductory text of
paragraph (f); and
■ e. Revise paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2), and
(m)(2).
The addition and revisions read as
follows:
§ 635.4
Permits and fees.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(5) Display upon offloading. Upon
offloading of Atlantic HMS for sale, the
owner or operator of the harvesting
vessel must present for inspection the
vessel’s HMS Charter/Headboat permit
with a commercial sale endorsement;
Atlantic tunas, shark, or swordfish
permit; Incidental HMS squid trawl;
HMS Commercial Caribbean Small Boat
permit; and/or the shark research permit
to the first receiver. The permit(s) must
be presented prior to completing any
applicable landing report specified at
§ 635.5(a)(1), (a)(2), and (b)(2)(i).
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\06DER1.SGM
06DER1
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 6, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
(b) * * *
(3) The owner of a charter boat or
headboat that intends to sell Atlantic
tunas or swordfish must obtain a
commercial sale endorsement for the
vessel’s HMS Charter/Headboat permit.
The owner of a charter boat or headboat
that intends to sell Atlantic sharks must
obtain a commercial sale endorsement
for the vessel’s HMS Charter/Headboat
permit at the time of permit renewal or
when the permit is obtained and must
also obtain any applicable Atlantic
commercial shark permits. A vessel
owner that has obtained an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit without a
commercial sale endorsement is
prohibited from selling any Atlantic
HMS.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) The owner of each vessel used to
fish for or take Atlantic tunas
commercially or on which Atlantic
tunas are retained or possessed with the
intention of sale must obtain an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit with a
commercial sale endorsement issued
under paragraph (b) of this section, an
HMS Commercial Caribbean Small Boat
permit issued under paragraph (o) of
this section, or an Atlantic tunas permit
in one, and only one, of the following
categories: General, Harpoon, Longline,
Purse Seine, or Trap.
(2) Persons aboard a vessel with a
valid Atlantic Tunas, HMS Angling,
HMS Charter/Headboat, or an HMS
Commercial Caribbean Small Boat
permit may fish for, take, retain, or
possess Atlantic tunas, but only in
compliance with the quotas, catch
limits, size classes, and gear applicable
to the permit or permit category of the
vessel from which he or she is fishing.
Persons may sell Atlantic tunas only if
the harvesting vessel has a valid permit
in the General, Harpoon, Longline,
Purse Seine, or Trap category of the
Atlantic Tunas permit, a valid HMS
Charter/Headboat permit with a
commercial sale endorsement, or an
HMS Commercial Caribbean Small Boat
permit.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Swordfish vessel permits. (1)
Except as specified in paragraphs (n)
and (o) of this section, the owner of a
vessel of the United States used to fish
for or take swordfish commercially from
the management unit, or on which
swordfish from the management unit are
retained or possessed with an intention
to sell, or from which swordfish are
sold, must obtain an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit with a commercial sale
endorsement issued under paragraph (b)
of this section, or one of the following
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:51 Dec 05, 2017
Jkt 244001
swordfish permits: A swordfish directed
limited access permit, swordfish
incidental limited access permit,
swordfish handgear limited access
permit, or a Swordfish General
Commercial permit. These permits
cannot be held in combination with
each other on the same vessel, except
that an HMS Charter/Headboat permit
with a commercial sale endorsement
may be held in combination with a
swordfish handgear limited access
permit on the same vessel. It is a
rebuttable presumption that the owner
or operator of a vessel on which
swordfish are possessed in excess of the
recreational retention limits intends to
sell the swordfish.
(2) The only valid commercial Federal
vessel permits for swordfish are the
HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a
commercial sale endorsement issued
under paragraph (b) of this section (and
only when on a non for-hire trip), the
Swordfish General Commercial permit
issued under paragraph (f) of this
section, a swordfish limited access
permit issued consistent with
paragraphs (l) and (m) of this section, or
permits issued under paragraphs (n) and
(o) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) * * *
(2) Shark and swordfish permits. A
vessel owner must obtain the applicable
limited access permit(s) issued pursuant
to the requirements in paragraphs (e)
and (f) of this section and/or a Federal
commercial smoothhound permit issued
under paragraph (e) of this section; or an
HMS Commercial Caribbean Small Boat
permit issued under paragraph (o) of
this section, if: The vessel is used to fish
for or take sharks commercially from the
management unit; sharks from the
management unit are retained or
possessed on the vessel with an
intention to sell; or sharks from the
management unit are sold from the
vessel. A vessel owner must obtain the
applicable limited access permit(s)
issued pursuant to the requirements in
paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section, a
Swordfish General Commercial permit
issued under paragraph (f) of this
section, an Incidental HMS Squid Trawl
permit issued under paragraph (n) of
this section, an HMS Commercial
Caribbean Small Boat permit issued
under paragraph (o) of this section, or
an HMS Charter/Headboat permit with
a commercial sale endorsement issued
under paragraph (b) of this section,
which authorizes a Charter/Headboat to
fish commercially for swordfish on a
non for-hire trip subject to the retention
limits at § 635.24(b)(4) if: The vessel is
used to fish for or take swordfish
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
57549
commercially from the management
unit; swordfish from the management
unit are retained or possessed on the
vessel with an intention to sell; or
swordfish from the management unit are
sold from the vessel. The commercial
retention and sale of swordfish from
vessels issued an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit with a commercial sale
endorsement is permissible only when
the vessel is on a non for-hire trip. Only
persons holding non-expired shark and
swordfish limited access permit(s) in
the preceding year are eligible to renew
those limited access permit(s).
Transferors may not renew limited
access permits that have been
transferred according to the procedures
in paragraph (l) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. In § 635.19, revise paragraph (d)(4)
to read as follows:
§ 635.19
Authorized gears.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(4) Persons on a vessel issued a permit
with a shark endorsement under § 635.4
may possess a shark only if the shark
was taken by rod and reel or handline,
except that persons on a vessel issued
both an HMS Charter/Headboat permit
with a commercial sale endorsement
(with or without a shark endorsement)
and a Federal Atlantic commercial shark
permit may possess sharks taken by rod
and reel, handline, bandit gear, longline,
or gillnet if the vessel is engaged in a
non for-hire fishing trip and the
commercial shark fishery is open
pursuant to § 635.28(b).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. In § 635.22, revise the introductory
text of paragraph (f), and paragraphs
(f)(1) and (2) to read as follows:
§ 635.22
Recreational retention limits.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) North Atlantic swordfish. The
recreational retention limits for North
Atlantic swordfish apply to persons
who fish in any manner, except to
persons aboard a vessel that has been
issued an HMS Charter/Headboat permit
with a commercial sale endorsement
under § 635.4(b) and only when on a
non for-hire trip; a directed, incidental
or handgear limited access swordfish
permit under § 635.4(e) and (f); a
Swordfish General Commercial permit
under § 635.4(f); an Incidental HMS
Squid Trawl permit under § 635.4(n); or
an HMS Commercial Caribbean Small
boat permit under § 635.4(o).
(1) When on a for-hire trip as defined
at § 635.2, vessels issued an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit under
§ 635.4(b), that are charter boats as
E:\FR\FM\06DER1.SGM
06DER1
57550
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 6, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
defined under § 600.10 of this chapter,
may retain, possess, or land no more
than one North Atlantic swordfish per
paying passenger and up to six North
Atlantic swordfish per vessel per trip.
When such vessels have been issued a
commercial sale endorsement and are
on a non for-hire trip, they must comply
with the commercial retention limits for
swordfish specified at § 635.24(b)(4).
(2) When on a for-hire trip as defined
at § 635.2, vessels issued an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit under
§ 635.4(b), that are headboats as defined
under § 600.10 of this chapter, may
retain, possess, or land no more than
one North Atlantic swordfish per paying
passenger and up to 15 North Atlantic
swordfish per vessel per trip. When
such vessels have been issued a
commercial sale endorsement and are
on a non for-hire trip, they may land no
more than the commercial retention
limits for swordfish specified at
§ 635.24(b)(4).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. In § 635.23, revise paragraph (c)(3)
to read as follows:
§ 635.23
Retention limits for bluefin tuna.
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) When fishing other than in the
Gulf of Mexico and when the fishery
under the General category has not been
closed under § 635.28, a person aboard
a vessel that has been issued an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit with a
commercial sale endorsement may fish
under either the retention limits
applicable to the General category
specified in paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of
this section or the retention limits
applicable to the Angling category
specified in paragraphs (b)(2) and (3) of
this section. The size category of the
first BFT retained will determine the
fishing category applicable to the vessel
that day. A person aboard a vessel that
has been issued an HMS Charter/
Headboat without a commercial sale
endorsement permit may fish only
under the retention limits applicable to
the Angling category.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. In § 635.24, add introductory text to
paragraph (b)(4), and revise paragraph
(b)(4)(ii) to read as follows:
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES
*
§ 635.24 Commercial retention limits for
sharks, swordfish, and BAYS tunas.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) Persons aboard a vessel that has
been issued a Swordfish General
Commercial permit or an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit with a commercial sale
endorsement (and only when on a non
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:51 Dec 05, 2017
Jkt 244001
for-hire trip) are subject to the regional
swordfish retention limits specified at
paragraph (b)(4)(iii) of this section,
which may be adjusted during the
fishing year based upon the inseason
regional retention limit adjustment
criteria identified in paragraph (b)(4)(iv)
of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) Vessels that have been issued a
Swordfish General Commercial permit
or an HMS Charter/Headboat permit
with a commercial sale endorsement
(and only when on a non for-hire trip),
as a condition of these permits, may not
possess, retain, or land any more
swordfish than is specified for the
region in which the vessel is located.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. In § 635.27, revise paragraph
(a)(1)(i) introductory text, and
paragraphs (c)(1)(i)(A) and (B) to read as
follows:
§ 635.27
Quotas.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Catches from vessels for which
General category Atlantic Tunas permits
have been issued and certain catches
from vessels for which an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit with a commercial sale
endorsement has been issued are
counted against the General category
quota in accordance with § 635.23(c)(3).
Pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section,
the amount of large medium and giant
bluefin tuna that may be caught,
retained, possessed, landed, or sold
under the General category quota is
466.7 mt, and is apportioned as follows,
unless modified as described under
paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section:
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) A swordfish from the North
Atlantic stock caught prior to the
directed fishery closure by a vessel for
which a directed swordfish limited
access permit, a swordfish handgear
limited access permit, a HMS
Commercial Caribbean Small Boat
permit, a Swordfish General
Commercial open access permit, or an
HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a
commercial sale endorsement (and only
when on a non for-hire trip) has been
issued or is required to have been issued
is counted against the directed fishery
quota. The total baseline annual fishery
quota, before any adjustments, is 2,937.6
mt dw for each fishing year. Consistent
with applicable ICCAT
recommendations, a portion of the total
baseline annual fishery quota may be
used for transfers to another ICCAT
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
contracting party. The annual directed
category quota is calculated by adjusting
for over- or under harvests, dead
discards, any applicable transfers, the
incidental category quota, the reserve
quota and other adjustments as needed,
and is subdivided into two equal semiannual periods: One for January 1
through June 30, and the other for July
1 through December 31.
(B) A swordfish from the North
Atlantic swordfish stock landed by a
vessel for which an incidental swordfish
limited access permit, an incidental
HMS Squid Trawl permit, an HMS
Angling permit, or an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit (and only when on a
for-hire trip) has been issued, or a
swordfish from the North Atlantic stock
caught after the effective date of a
closure of the directed fishery from a
vessel for which a swordfish directed
limited access permit, a swordfish
handgear limited access permit, a HMS
Commercial Caribbean Small Boat
permit, a Swordfish General
Commercial open access permit, or an
HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a
commercial sale endorsement (when on
a non for-hire trip) has been issued, is
counted against the incidental category
quota. The annual incidental category
quota is 300 mt dw for each fishing year.
*
*
*
*
*
9. In § 635.31, revise paragraphs (a)(1)
and (c)(6) to read as follows:
■
§ 635.31 Restrictions on sale and
purchase.
(a) * * *
(1) A person that owns or operates a
vessel from which an Atlantic tuna is
landed or offloaded may sell such
Atlantic tuna only if that vessel has a
valid HMS Charter/Headboat permit
with a commercial sale endorsement; a
valid General, Harpoon, Longline, Purse
Seine, or Trap category permit for
Atlantic tunas; or a valid HMS
Commercial Caribbean Small Boat
permit issued under this part, and the
appropriate category has not been
closed, as specified at § 635.28(a).
However, no person may sell a bluefin
tuna smaller than the large medium size
class. Also, no large medium or giant
bluefin tuna taken by a person aboard a
vessel with an Atlantic HMS Charter/
Headboat permit fishing in the Gulf of
Mexico at any time, or fishing outside
the Gulf of Mexico when the fishery
under the General category has been
closed, may be sold (see § 635.23(c)). A
person may sell Atlantic bluefin tuna
only to a dealer that has a valid permit
for purchasing Atlantic bluefin tuna
issued under this part. A person may
E:\FR\FM\06DER1.SGM
06DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 6, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
not sell or purchase Atlantic tunas
harvested with speargun fishing gear.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(6) A dealer issued a permit under
this part may not first receive silky
sharks, oceanic whitetip sharks or
scalloped, smooth, or great hammerhead
sharks from an owner or operator of a
fishing vessel with pelagic longline gear
on board, or from the owner of a fishing
vessel issued both a HMS Charter/
Headboat permit with a commercial sale
endorsement and a commercial shark
permit when tuna, swordfish or billfish
are on board the vessel, offloaded from
the vessel, or being offloaded from the
vessel.
*
*
*
*
*
10. In § 635.71, revise paragraph (a)(2)
and add paragraph (a)(62) to read as
follows:
■
§ 635.71
Prohibitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(2) Fish for, catch, possess, retain,
land, or sell Atlantic HMS without the
appropriate valid vessel permit with the
appropriate endorsements, LAP, EFP,
scientific research permit, display
permit, chartering permit, or shark
research permit on board the vessel, as
specified in §§ 635.4 and 635.32.
*
*
*
*
*
(62) A vessel owner or operator that
has an HMS Charter/Headboat permit
without a commercial sale endorsement
is prohibited from selling any Atlantic
HMS.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2017–26275 Filed 12–5–17; 8:45 am]
jstallworth on DSKBBY8HB2PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
12:51 Dec 05, 2017
Jkt 244001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 665
RIN 0648–XF156
Pacific Island Pelagic Fisheries; 2017
U.S. Territorial Longline Bigeye Tuna
Catch Limits for the Territory of
American Samoa
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Announcement of a valid
specified fishing agreement.
AGENCY:
NMFS announces a valid
specified fishing agreement that
allocates up to 1,000 metric tons (t) of
the 2017 bigeye tuna limit for the
Territory of American Samoa to
identified U.S. longline fishing vessels.
The agreement supports the long-term
sustainability of fishery resources of the
U.S. Pacific Islands, and fisheries
development in the CNMI.
DATES: The specified fishing agreement
is valid on December 1, 2017.
ADDRESSES: NMFS prepared
environmental analyses that describe
the potential impacts on the human
environment that would result from the
action. Copies of those analyses,
identified by NOAA–NMFS–2017–0004,
are available from www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NMFS-20170004, or from Michael D. Tosatto,
Regional Administrator, NMFS Pacific
Islands Region (PIR), 1845 Wasp Blvd.,
Bldg. 176, Honolulu, HI 96818.
Copies of the Fishery Ecosystem Plan
for Pelagic Fisheries of the Western
Pacific Region (Pelagic FEP) are
available from the Western Pacific
Fishery Management Council (Council),
1164 Bishop St., Suite 1400, Honolulu,
HI 96813, tel 808–522–8220, fax 808–
522–8226, or www.wpcouncil.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jarad Makaiau, NMFS PIRO Sustainable
Fisheries, 808–725–5176.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
57551
In a final
rule published on October 13, 2017,
NMFS specified a 2017 limit of 2,000 t
of longline-caught bigeye tuna for the
U.S. Pacific Island territories of
American Samoa, Guam and the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands (CNMI) (82 FR 47642). Of the
2,000 t limit, NMFS allows each
territory to allocate up to 1,000 t to U.S.
longline fishing vessels identified in a
valid specified fishing agreement.
On November 17, 2017, NMFS
received from the Council a specified
fishing agreement between the
Government of American Samoa and
Quota Management, Inc. In the
transmittal memorandum, the Council’s
Executive Director advised that the
specified fishing agreement was
consistent with the criteria set forth in
50 CFR 665.819(c)(1). NMFS reviewed
the agreement and determined that it is
consistent with the Pelagic FEP, the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act,
implementing regulations, and other
applicable laws.
In accordance with 50 CFR 300.224(d)
and 50 CFR 665.819(c)(9), vessels
identified in the agreement may retain
and land bigeye tuna in the western and
central Pacific Ocean under the
American Samoa limit. NMFS will
begin attributing bigeye tuna caught by
vessels identified in the agreement with
American Samoa starting on November
30, 2017. This date is seven days before
December 6, 2017, which is the date
NMFS forecasted the fishery would
reach the CNMI bigeye tuna allocation.
If NMFS determines that the fishery will
reach American Samoa 1,000-mt
allocation limit, we would restrict the
retention of bigeye tuna caught by
vessels identified in the agreement, and
publish a notice to that effect in the
Federal Register.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: November 30, 2017.
Emily H. Menashes,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–26227 Filed 12–1–17; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\06DER1.SGM
06DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 6, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 57543-57551]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26275]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 635
[Docket No. 170901859-7999-02]
RIN 0648-BH19
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species; Charter/Headboat Permit
Commercial Sale Provision
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule creates a separate permit endorsement
provision for the commercial sale of Atlantic highly migratory species
(HMS) by HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders. Prior to implementation
of this final rule, all vessels issued an HMS Charter/Headboat permit
could be categorized as commercial fishing vessels and could be subject
to United States Coast Guard (USCG) commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements regardless of whether the permit holder engages or intends
to engage in commercial fishing. Under this final rule, HMS Charter/
Headboat permit holders will be prohibited from selling Atlantic tunas,
swordfish, or sharks unless they obtain a commercial sale endorsement
for their permit. This final rule will clarify which HMS Charter/
Headboat permitted vessels are properly categorized as commercial
fishing vessels for purposes of USCG safety requirements. This action
is administrative in nature and will not affect fishing practices or
result in any significant environmental effects or economic impacts.
DATES: Effective January 5, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the supporting documents--including the 2006
Consolidated HMS Fishery Management Plan (FMP) and its amendments and
associated documents--are available from the HMS Management Division
Web site at https://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/hms/ or by contacting Dianne
Stephan by phone at 978-281-9260. Written comments regarding the
burden-hour estimates or other aspects of the collection-of-information
requirements contained in this final rule may be submitted to the HMS
Management Division and by email to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax
to (202) 395-7285.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dianne Stephan or Tobey Curtis by
phone at 978-281-9260, or Steve Durkee by phone at 202-670-6637.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Atlantic HMS are managed under the dual
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act) and the Atlantic Tunas Convention Act
(ATCA). Under the Magnuson-Stevens Act, NMFS must ensure consistency
with 10 National Standards and manage fisheries to maintain optimum
yield, rebuild overfished fisheries, and prevent overfishing. Under
ATCA, the Secretary of Commerce is required to promulgate regulations,
as necessary and appropriate, to implement measures adopted by the
International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas. The
implementing regulations for Atlantic HMS are at 50 CFR part 635.
Background
Atlantic HMS regulations at 50 CFR 635.4(b) require that charter/
headboat vessels (i.e., vessels taking fee-paying passengers) used to
fish for, take, retain, or possess Atlantic HMS must obtain an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit. In addition to carrying paying passengers, the
permit also allows charter/headboat fishermen to diversify their
operations by fishing commercially for Atlantic tunas and swordfish.
They may sell sharks if they also have a commercial shark permit in
addition to the Charter/Headboat permit. Relatively few permit holders
use the commercial sale provision. From 2012-2016, an annual average of
only seven percent of HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders sold any tuna
or swordfish. USCG commercial vessel safety requirement therefore may
result in an unnecessary ``commercial vessel'' compliance burden for
HMS Charter/Headboat permitted vessels.
Commercial fishing vessel safety provisions contained in the Coast
Guard Authorization Act of 2010 (CGAA) and the Coast Guard and Maritime
Transportation Act of 2012 were the subject of a Marine Safety
Information Bulletin (MSIB 12-15) issued by the USCG on October 20,
2015. MSIB 12-15 clarified that the law would require mandatory
dockside safety exams for a broader population of commercial fishing
vessels. As clarified in the notice, that broader community included
HMS Charter/Headboat vessels that were authorized by the permit to sell
fish commercially (i.e., all Charter/Headboat vessels). The mandatory
safety exam includes a check for required commercial fishing vessel
safety equipment such as life rafts, emergency beacons, and survival
suits, and other requirements found in 46 CFR part 28. Outfitting a
vessel with these items comes at a substantial cost. Mandatory dockside
safety exams for vessels operating beyond three nautical miles from
shore began October 15, 2015 under this program.
These mandatory commercial vessel safety requirements had overly
broad application to all Charter/Headboat permit holders, whether they
engaged in commercial sales or not, absent a more effective way to
identify which HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders engage in commercial
fishing. After questions about applicability from NMFS and the
regulated community, on July 10, 2017, the USCG issued Marine Safety
Information Bulletin (MSIB 008-17) in an attempt to clarify the
applicability of commercial fishing vessel safety requirements for
vessels with HMS permits, including HMS Charter/Headboat permits. USCG
regulations at 46 CFR 28.50 define a commercial fishing vessel as a
vessel that commercially engages in the catching, taking, or harvesting
of fish, or an activity that can reasonably be expected to result in
the catching, taking, or harvesting of fish. According to the MSIB 008-
17, if an individual has an HMS Charter/Headboat permit (which allows
commercial sale) and a state permit to sell catch, the vessel is
considered subject to commercial fishing vessel safety regulations.
Many HMS Charter/Headboat operators that neither sell, nor intend
to sell, their catch but hold a permit to sell have thus found that the
USCG policy identifies their operations as a ``commercial fishing
vessel,'' and requires them to adhere to USCG commercial fishing vessel
safety requirements. For example, even small charter vessels (i.e.,
less than 20 feet in length) operating in the warm waters of the Gulf
of Mexico and with no intent to sell HMS, may be required under the
USCG regulations to carry an inflatable life raft that can cost
approximately $1,750. In addition to the cost burden, a vessel of this
size has minimal space to store such gear. These smaller HMS Charter/
Headboat permitted vessels were previously subject to the USCG safety
regulations for uninspected passenger vessels of less than 100 gross
[[Page 57544]]
tons and carrying six or less passengers, which are less extensive and
less costly.
In late 2016 and early 2017, NMFS and the USCG staff informally
discussed how to more effectively categorize HMS charter/headboat
vessels under USCG regulations. The HMS Advisory Panel discussed this
issue at length at its May and September 2017 meetings. Many HMS
Advisory Panel members, including commercial, recreational, and
council/state representatives, supported creating a separate regulatory
provision for charter/headboat vessels that intend to sell HMS and to
thus specify that other such vessels were not engaged in commercial
sale and not subject to expensive USCG commercial vessel compliance
obligations. Panel members stated that creating a separate sale
provision would support more appropriate application and enforcement of
USCG commercial fishing vessel safety requirements in the Atlantic HMS
Charter/Headboat fishery, and would better clarify for permit holders
the specific USCG regulations that apply to their vessels and fishing
operations. On October 6, 2017, the USCG formally reviewed the proposed
rule of this action and concurred with the approach to provide clarity
on the applicability on their requirements.
HMS Charter/Headboat Permit Commercial Sale Endorsement
This final rule creates a ``commercial sale'' endorsement that can
be placed on the existing HMS Charter/Headboat permit. Under this
action, HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders will be prohibited from
selling any catch of HMS unless they first obtain a ``commercial sale''
endorsement on their permit. Only those HMS Charter/Headboat permit
holders with the endorsement will be permitted to sell Atlantic tunas,
swordfish, or sharks if they also have the additionally required
commercial shark permit.
This final rule clarifies that any HMS Charter/Headboat vessel
issued a Charter/Headboat permit with a commercial sale endorsement
will be categorized as a commercial fishing vessel under USCG criteria,
and therefore could be subject to USCG commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements. A vessel issued an HMS Charter/Headboat permit without a
``commercial sale'' endorsement will not be categorized as a commercial
fishing vessel and should not be subject to the USCG commercial fishing
vessel safety requirements. HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders with
the commercial sale endorsement allowing the sale of tunas or swordfish
must adhere to the applicable Atlantic Tunas General Category or
General Commercial Swordfish permit possession limits and restrictions;
any landings will be applied against the appropriate commercial quota.
HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders that sell or intend to sell sharks
must obtain the commercial sale endorsement on their permit as well as
a commercial shark permit. This final rule would only change the permit
category under which certain vessels are fishing. It will not affect
quotas, gear types, or time/area restrictions, and neither increase or
decrease fishing effort or affect fishing timing nor implement other
measures that will potentially have any environmental effects.
Response to Comments
During the public comment period, NMFS held a public hearing via
webinar. Two members of the public provided comments during the
hearing. Additionally, NMFS received 14 written comments. All written
comments can be found at https://www.regulations.gov/. The summarized
comments and NMFS' response to those comments can be found below.
Comment 1: NMFS received comments, including from the South
Atlantic Fishery Management Council, in support of the HMS Charter/
Headboat permit commercial sales endorsement considered in the proposed
rule. We also received a comment stating a commercial sale endorsement
would not be useful since a lot of charter/headboat fishing occurs in
state waters. Another commenter requested clarification on the cost of
the commercial sales endorsement.
Response: NMFS believes that the commercial sales endorsement will
effectively delineate between HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders that
intend to sell HMS catch and those that do not. This clarification
should facilitate USCG's application of commercial fishing vessel
safety requirements. Regarding the comment that charter/headboat
fishing occurs primarily in state waters, and the apparent concern that
USCG requirements therefore would not apply nor be ``useful,'' we note
that as a condition of the HMS Charter/Headboat permit, permit holders
are required to abide by federal HMS regulations regardless of where
fishing occurs, including in state waters, unless state regulations are
stricter. With respect to Atlantic tunas, NMFS manages the tuna
fisheries to the shore even if a vessel holds no Federal permit, except
in the States of Maine, Connecticut, and Mississippi. Regarding the
cost, the cost of the HMS Charter/Headboat permit with and without the
commercial sale endorsement will be the same; there will be no
additional cost to obtain the commercial sales endorsement.
Comment 2: The Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC)
submitted a comment stating the HMS Charter/Headboat permit commercial
sale endorsement could make it more difficult to differentiate between
recreational and commercial fishing activities, particularly in the
coastal shark fishery. ASMFC also stated that State commercial fishing
permits already identify those individuals that are able to sell
sharks.
Response: NMFS disagrees that the HMS Charter/Headboat permit
commercial sale endorsement would make it more difficult to
differentiate between recreational and commercial fishing activities.
Instead, the commercial sale endorsement will effectively identify HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders that intend to sell HMS catch. HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders that do not obtain the commercial sale
endorsement will clearly not be engaging in commercial fishing. As
detailed in the background information section above, approximately 93
percent of HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders do not sell HMS catch.
These permit holders are unlikely to obtain the commercial sale
endorsement; thus, the vast majority of HMS charter/headboat activity
would be easily categorized as recreational. Furthermore, State
commercial fishing permits do not authorize HMS Charter/Headboat permit
holders to sell sharks. HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders that intend
to sell sharks must obtain a Federal Atlantic commercial shark permit
in addition to the commercial sale endorsement created in this action.
Furthermore, the action is specifically taken with regard to
categorization for USCG regulatory purposes.
Comment 3: NMFS received comments expressing concern that defining
a charter/headboat as a commercial vessel for the entire year is overly
burdensome on the owner and captain. Instead, commenters stated that
commercial fishing vessel safety requirements should be enforced on a
trip-by-trip basis and that when an HMS Charter/Headboat permit holder
intends to sell HMS catch, that trip should be categorized as a
commercial trip, subject to the USCG commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements. Commenters stated that if an HMS Charter/Headboat permit
holder is on a for-hire trip, that trip should be categorized as a non-
commercial trip and not be subject to the USCG commercial fishing
vessel
[[Page 57545]]
safety requirements. Commenters included examples of hardships, such as
requiring safety drills with clients and requesting customers' clothing
sizes to ensure immersion suits are properly sized. One commenter
stated that NMFS should require proof of a USCG commercial fishing
vessel safety sticker when applying for the HMS Charter/Headboat permit
commercial sales endorsement and should conduct a review of compliance
of HMS Charter/Headboat vessels with commercial fishing vessel safety
exam requirements. Another commenter stated that all commercial vessels
should be subject to the same commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements regardless of vessel size or where fishing occurs.
Response: The purpose of this action is to clarify which HMS
Charter/Headboat permitted vessels are authorized to sell Atlantic HMS
and thus are appropriately categorized as commercial fishing vessels
for purposes of the USCG commercial safety requirements. Doing so will
facilitate USCG's appropriate application of commercial fishing vessel
safety requirements. The mandatory USCG safety requirements arguably
may have been overly broad as currently applied because it is difficult
to identify which HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders engage in
commercial fishing and, therefore, should appropriately be subject to
the requirements. This action is not intended to address, nor otherwise
consider, the effectiveness of USCG commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements. Regarding the comment that NMFS should require compliance
with USCG regulations before issuing an HMS Charter/Headboat permit and
should conduct a review of compliance with commercial fishing vessel
safety exam requirements, NMFS may consider requiring proof of
compliance (e.g., submission of sticker number) as a condition of
obtaining the endorsement in the future, after additional consultation
with USCG. NMFS will coordinate with USCG Commercial Safety Exam
program staff to conduct a review of compliance of HMS permitted
vessels with CFVS exam requirements. The proper application of USCG
commercial fishing vessel safety requirements based on trip type,
vessel size, or fishing location is outside the purview of NMFS. NMFS
will share these comments and concerns with USCG Commercial Fishing
Vessel Safety program staff.
Comment 4: NMFS also received a comment suggesting increased
reporting requirements for vessels landing and selling bigeye,
albacore, and yellowfin tunas and to prohibit the sale of HMS caught on
charter/headboats while engaged in a for-hire trip.
Response: This comment is outside the scope of this rulemaking,
which focuses on overly burdensome and unnecessary application of USCG
commercial vessel requirements to HMS vessels that do not sell or
intend to sell their catch. However, NMFS will consider these
suggestions regarding increased reporting requirements and whether to
propose further regulations modifying HMS charter/headboat commercial
sale provisions in the future, as appropriate. Any such new management
measures and regulations would be presented in a proposed rule, and the
public would have an opportunity to provide comment.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
The final rule contains no changes from the proposed rule.
Classification
The Assistant Administrator for Fisheries (AA) has determined that
the final rule is consistent with the 2006 Consolidated HMS FMP and its
amendments, other provisions of the Magnuson-Stevens Act, ATCA, and
other applicable law.
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
For the reasons described in the preamble, this final rule is
expected to be deregulatory under Executive Order 13771.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This final rule contains a collection-of-information requirement
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) that has been approved by
OMB under control number 0648-0327. Public reporting burden for
Atlantic HMS Permit Family of Forms is estimated to average 34 minutes
per respondent for initial permit applicants, and 10 minutes for permit
renewals, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and
completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments
regarding these burden estimates or any other aspect of this data
collection, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to NMFS (see
ADDRESSES) and by email to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov, or fax to 202-
395-7285.
Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no person is
required to respond to, and no person shall be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
A final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) was prepared for
this rule. The FRFA incorporates the initial regulatory flexibility
analysis (IRFA) and a summary of the analyses completed to support the
action. NMFS did not receive any public comment on the IRFA. The full
FRFA is available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES). A summary is provided
below.
Statement of the Need for and Objectives of This Final Rule
A description of the action and the legal basis for this action are
contained in the Background section of the preamble and in the SUMMARY
of this final rule.
Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the
Final Rule Will Apply
Section 604(a)(4) of the RFA requires agencies to provide an
estimate of the number of small entities to which the rule will apply.
The Small Business Administration (SBA) has established size criteria
for all major industry sectors in the United States, including for-hire
charter/headboat businesses. For-hire charter/headboat business fit
into the ``Scenic and Sightseeing Transportation, Water'' industry
under NAICS code 487210. SBA has established that the small entity size
standard for that industry is $7.5 million in average annual receipts.
Provision is made under SBA's regulations for an agency to develop
its own industry-specific size standards after consultation with
Advocacy and an opportunity for public comment (see 13 CFR 121.903(c)).
Under this provision, NMFS may establish size standards that differ
from those established by the SBA Office of Size Standards, but only
for use by NMFS and only for the purpose of conducting an analysis of
economic effects in fulfillment of the agency's obligations under the
RFA. To utilize this provision, NMFS must publish such size standards
in the Federal Register (FR), which NMFS did on December 29, 2015 (80
FR 81194, December 29, 2015). In this final rule effective on July 1,
2016, NMFS established a small business size standard of $11 million in
annual gross receipts for all businesses in the commercial fishing
industry (NAICS 11411) for RFA compliance purposes.
NMFS considers all HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders (3,594 as of
October 2016) to be small entities because these vessels have reported
[[Page 57546]]
annual gross receipts of less than $11 million for commercial fishing
or earn less than $7.5 million from for-hire fishing trips.
NMFS has determined that this rule will apply to the small
businesses associated with the approximately seven percent of HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders that also commercially fish for
swordfish and tuna. Based on the most recent number of permit holders,
NMFS estimates that this rule will apply to approximately 252 HMS
charter/headboat vessel owners. NMFS has determined that this action
would not likely directly affect any small organizations or small
government jurisdictions defined under the RFA.
Description of the Projected Reporting, Record-Keeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements of the Final Rule, Including an Estimate of the
Classes of Small Entities Which Would Be Subject to the Requirements of
the Report or Record
Section 604(a)(5) of the RFA requires Agencies to describe any new
reporting, record-keeping and other compliance requirements. This rule
will create a commercial sale endorsement for the HMS Charter/Headboat
permit. Under the rule, HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders will be
prohibited from selling any catch of HMS unless they obtain a
commercial sale endorsement on their permit. The commercial sale
endorsement could be added to the Charter/Headboat permit at the time
of the permit application or renewal, or anytime thereafter. Only
Charter/Headboat permit holders with the endorsement will be allowed to
sell HMS although they would not be obligated to sell any HMS. There
will be no additional charge for the commercial sale endorsement above
the cost of the HMS Charter/Headboat permit; the endorsement will add
less than a minute more of labor effort to the normal HMS Charter/
Headboat permit process. Those vessels issued an HMS Charter/Headboat
permit with a commercial sale endorsement will be categorized as a
commercial vessel for the purposes of USCG commercial fishing vessel
safety requirements.
Description of the Steps the Agency Has Taken To Minimize the
Significant Economic Impact on Small Entities Consistent With the
Stated Objectives of Applicable Statutes, Including a Statement of the
Factual, Policy, and Legal Reasons for Selecting the Alternative
Adopted in the Final Rule and the Reason That Each One of the Other
Significant Alternatives to the Rule Considered by the Agency Which
Affect Small Entities Was Rejected
One of the requirements of an FRFA is to describe any significant
alternatives to the rule which accomplish the stated objectives of
applicable statutes and which minimize any significant economic impact
of the rule on small entities. The analysis shall discuss significant
alternatives such as: (1) Establishment of differing compliance or
reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the
resources available to small entities; (2) clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting
requirements under the rule for such small entities; (3) use of
performance rather than design standards; and (4) exemptions from
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, for small entities.
These categories of alternatives are described at 5 U.S.C.
603(c)(1)-(4). NMFS examined each of these categories of alternatives.
Regarding the first and fourth categories, NMFS cannot establish
differing compliance or reporting requirements for small entities or
exempt small entities from coverage of the rule or parts of it because
all of the businesses impacted by this rule are considered small
entities and thus the requirements are already designed for small
entities. NMFS examined alternatives that fall under the second
category, which requires agencies to consider whether they can clarify,
consolidate, or simplify compliance and reporting requirements under
the rule for small entities. NMFS does examine alternatives that fall
under the second category described above that clarify which HMS
charter/headboat vessels should be considered commercial fishing
vessels for USCG safety requirements. The use of a performance
standard, the third category, to determine whether the USCG commercial
fishing safety gear requirements would apply would be too difficult to
effectively monitor for enforcement, so they were not considered by
NMFS. Thus, NMFS has considered the significant alternatives to the
rule and focused on simplifying compliance and reporting requirements
associated with the charter/headboat commercial sale provision and USCG
commercial fishing safety gear requirements in order to minimize any
significant economic impact of the rule on small entities.
NMFS considered four different alternatives to separate the
commercial sale provision from the HMS Charter/Headboat permit, and
thus relieve some HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders from the changes
in USCG commercial fishing vessel safety requirements. Alternative 1,
the status quo/no action alternative, would make no changes to current
HMS regulations. Alternative 2, the preferred alternative, would create
an endorsement for the HMS Charter/Headboat permit that allows
commercial sale of Atlantic tunas and swordfish. Alternative 3 would
remove the commercial sale provision of the HMS Charter/Headboat
permit. Alternative 4 would create two separate HMS Charter/Headboat
permits; one that allows commercial sale of Atlantic tunas and
swordfish, and one that does not.
Under the ``no action'' Alternative 1, NMFS would maintain the
current regulations regarding the Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat permit.
Under current regulations at 635.4(b), permit holders taking fee-paying
passengers to fish for HMS (i.e. charter boats or headboats) must
obtain the HMS Charter/Headboat permit. Since HMS Charter/Headboat
permits allow the commercial sale of Atlantic tunas and swordfish, the
vessels would now be subject to USCG commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements, regardless of whether the permit holder intends to sell
HMS. However, without a change to the HMS Charter/Headboat permit
regulations, USCG will consider all HMS charter/headboat vessels as
commercial fishing vessels that must adhere to the to USCG commercial
fishing vessel safety requirements. HMS Charter/Headboat permitted
vessels were previously subject to the USCG safety regulations for
uninspected passenger vessels of less than 100 gross tons and carrying
six or less passengers, which are less extensive and less costly.
Under the USCG commercial fishing vessel safety requirements, many
Atlantic HMS charter/headboats would have to comply with four rule
requirements for survival craft, records keeping, examinations and
certificates of compliance, and classing of vessels.
The survival craft requirement establishes that all fishing
industry vessels operating beyond 3 nautical miles must carry survival
craft that will meet a new performance standard for primary lifesaving
equipment. The use of ``lifeboats or liferafts'' are required for
commercial vessels, whereas strictly for-
[[Page 57547]]
hire vessels are only required to a have ``a survival craft that
ensures that no part of an individual is immersed in water.'' This
means that lifefloats and buoyant apparatus will no longer be accepted
as survival craft on any commercial fishing vessel operating beyond 3
nautical miles once the most recent USCG guidance in fully enforced.
Some HMS Charter/Headboat permitted vessels would incorrectly be
identified as commercial vessels, subject to the more stringent
lifeboat/liferaft requirements. USCG estimates that the maximum initial
cost of this requirement per vessel would be $1,740 and have a
recurring annual cost of $300. The records provision requires the
individual in charge of a vessel operating beyond 3 nautical miles to
maintain a record of lifesaving and fire equipment maintenance. It
would be incumbent upon the master/individual in charge of the vessel
to maintain these records onboard. The USCG estimates this record
keeping requirement would cost $18 annually per vessel.
The examinations and certificates of compliance provision requires
a dockside safety examination at least once every 5 years for vessels,
such as HMS charter/headboats that engage in commercial fishing,
operating beyond 3 nautical miles with the first exam statutorily
required by October 15, 2015. A ``certificate of compliance'' will be
issued to a vessel successfully completing the exam. Voluntary exams
will continue to be promoted for vessel operating inside 3 nautical
miles. USCG estimates that the maximum initial cost of this requirement
per vessel will be $600 and have a recurring cost of $600.
The classing of vessels provision requires the survey and
classification of a fishing vessel that is at least 50 feet overall in
length, was built after July 1, 2013, and operates beyond 3 nautical
miles. It is unlikely that this requirement will impact many Atlantic
HMS charter/headboat vessels because the vessels are typically less
than 50 feet overall in length.
In sum, all 3,594 Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders
would face an initial per vessel cost of $2,358. The annual cost
savings per vessel in subsequent years would be approximately $300 for
the survival craft, $18 for record keeping, and $120 ($600/5 yrs) for
examinations and certificates of completion. The total annual recurring
cost saving per vessel would be $438 for these three requirements.
These costs could be higher for some individual vessels that are too
small or have too little storage space for the survival craft
requirement because those vessels might require extensive modifications
to accommodate the storage space for the gear.
Under Alternative 2, the preferred alternative, NMFS would modify
the regulations so that the HMS Charter/Headboat permit alone does not
allow commercial sale and also create an endorsement for the HMS
Charter/Headboat permit that allows commercial sale of Atlantic tunas
and swordfish. Currently, charter/headboat vessels are able, though not
obligated, to sell swordfish and tunas with an HMS Charter/Headboat
permit. Consequently, vessels that hold an HMS Charter/Headboat permit
are categorized as commercial fishing vessels subject to USCG
commercial vessel fishing safety requirements if they also possess a
state commercial sale permit, regardless of whether the permit holder
sells or intends to sell HMS. Under Alternative 2, NMFS would create a
``commercial sale'' endorsement for the HMS Charter/Headboat permit.
Under this action, HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders would be
prohibited from selling any catch of HMS unless they apply for a
commercial sale endorsement to be added to their permit. The commercial
sale endorsement could be added to the Charter/Headboat permit at the
time of the permit application or renewal. Only charter/headboat
vessels with the endorsement would be permitted to sell HMS although
they would not be obligated to sell any HMS. Those vessels holding an
HMS Charter/Headboat permit without a commercial sale endorsement would
not be categorized as a commercial fishing vessel and would not be
subject to the USCG commercial safety gear requirements. Those vessels
that hold an HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a ``commercial sale''
endorsement would be categorized as commercial vessels for the purposes
of USCG commercial fishing safety requirements.
The cost savings associated with implementing a commercial
endorsement option for Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat permits would be
that approximately 93 percent of the permit holders would not have to
comply with the USCG commercial fishing vessel safety requirements,
because Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders would not be
considered commercial fishing vessels unless they were issued the
commercial endorsement. These vessels would have no costs associated
with the USCG commercial fishing vessel safety requirements. This would
result in a reduction in costs per vessel initially of approximately
$1,740 for the survival craft, $18 for record keeping, and $600 for
examinations and certificates of completion. The total initial costs
saved per vessel would be $2,358. The annual cost savings per vessel in
subsequent years would be approximately $300 for the survival craft,
$18 for record keeping, and $120 ($600/5 yrs) for examinations and
certificates of completion. The total annual recurring cost savings per
vessel would be $438 for these three requirements. In addition to the
reduced costs associated with complying with the USCG commercial
fishing vessel safety requirements for those HMS Charter/Headboat
permit holders that do not intend to obtain the endorsement to fish
commercially, most Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders would
have to do nothing different when obtaining their permits unless they
want to commercially sell tunas or swordfish.
The approximately 7 percent of Atlantic Charter/Headboat permit
holders that want to continue selling tunas and swordfish in addition
to complying with the USCG commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements, would need to obtain an endorsement for the commercial
sale of Atlantic tunas and swordfish. This would likely add less than a
minute to the time it takes to obtain the Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat
permit and it would not add to the cost of obtaining the permit. HMS
charter/headboat permit holders who sell sharks must obtain a
commercial shark permit in addition to an endorsement on an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit. NMFS would incur some costs associated with
altering the online permit application to accommodate the endorsement,
along with some customer service changes.
Under Alternative 3, NMFS would remove the commercial sale
provision of the HMS Charter/Headboat permit. Currently, charter/
headboat vessels are able, though not obligated, to sell swordfish and
tunas as a condition of the HMS Charter/Headboat permit, and may sell
sharks if they also have a commercial shark permit. Consequently,
vessels that hold an HMS Charter/Headboat permit are currently being
categorized by USCG as commercial fishing vessels and subject to USCG
commercial fishing vessel safety requirements if they also hold a state
commercial sale permit, regardless of whether the permit holder sells
or intends to sell HMS. Under Alternative 3, NMFS would remove the
provision that allows commercial sales under the HMS Charter/Headboat
permit. Thus, holding an HMS Charter/Headboat permit would no longer
categorize a vessel as a commercial fishing vessel for the purposes of
USCG regulations. Charter/headboat vessel owners or
[[Page 57548]]
operators that wish to engage in commercial sale of tunas and swordfish
would instead need to obtain an Atlantic tunas General category and/or
Swordfish General Commercial permit. The Atlantic Tunas General
category and Swordfish General Commercial permits could be held in
conjunction with the HMS Charter/Headboat permit. Those vessels with an
HMS Charter/Headboat permit that do not intend to sell HMS and do not
possess an Atlantic Tunas General category, Swordfish General
Commercial, or commercial shark permit (which permit commercial sale)
would not be subject to USCG commercial fishing vessel safety
requirements.
The benefits of Alternative 3 versus the No Action alternative
would be identical to those of Alternative 2. Approximately 93 percent
of the permit holders would not have to face the costs associated with
the USCG commercial fishing safety requirements, because Atlantic HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders would not be considered to commercially
fish. The costs for the fleet would be approximately $594,216
initially, and then $231,336 annually thereafter, which are
significantly lower than the costs for the fleet under No Action. The 7
percent that wish to engage in commercial sale of tunas and swordfish
would instead need to obtain an Atlantic tunas General category and/or
Swordfish General Commercial permit. This would cost them $20 to obtain
either the Atlantic Tunas General category permit or the Swordfish
General Commercial permit. For the approximately 252 vessel owners that
might obtain these $20 permits, the total cost would be $5,040 to
$10,080 annually depending on whether they obtain one or both permits.
In addition, vessel owners may need to expend a bit more time to
complete the application for these additional permits. NMFS would incur
costs associated with the substantial permits site and customer service
changes that would be required for this change. NMFS prefers
Alternative 2 over Alternative 3 because a commercial sale endorsement
requirement more closely matches current fishing practices and would
minimize disruptions. Currently, HMS Charter/Headboat permit holders
can sell some HMS and Alternative 2 would allow them to continue by
simply obtaining an endorsement on their Charter/Headboat permit.
Alternative 3 would be more disruptive since it would require fishermen
to obtain additional permits. NMFS would need to develop new regulatory
text to describe these new requirements and fishery participants would
have to learn and adapt to these changes.
Under Alternative 4, NMFS would create two separate Atlantic HMS
Charter/Headboat permits; one that allows commercial sale of Atlantic
tunas and swordfish, and one that does not. Currently, charter/headboat
vessels are able, though not obligated, to sell swordfish and tunas as
a condition of the HMS Charter/Headboat permit. Consequently, vessels
that hold an HMS Charter/Headboat permit could be categorized as
commercial fishing vessels and subject to USCG commercial fishing
vessel safety requirements, regardless of whether the permit holder
sells or intends to sell HMS. Under Alternative 4, NMFS would create
two separate HMS Charter/Headboat permits; one that would allow
commercial sale of HMS, and one that would not. Those vessels holding
an HMS Charter/Headboat permit that does not allow commercial sale
would not be categorized as a commercial fishing vessel and would not
be subject to the USCG commercial fishing vessel safety requirements.
Those vessels that hold an HMS Charter/Headboat permit that allows
commercial sale would be categorized as commercial vessels for the
purposes of USCG commercial fishing vessel safety requirements.
The benefits of Alternative 4 versus the No Action alternative
would be identical to those of Alternative 2. Approximately 93 percent
of the permit holders would not have to face the costs associated with
the USCG commercial fishing safety requirements, since Atlantic HMS
Charter/Headboat permit holders would not be considered commercial
fishing. The costs for the fleet would be approximately $594,216
initially, and then $231,336 annually thereafter, which is
significantly lower than the costs for the fleet under No Action. Under
this alternative, each of the 3,594 Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat
permit holders would have to determine which type of Charter/Headboat
permit they wish to obtain for the year, and all of charter/headboat
vessel owners would have to learn the new permit process. Unlike
Alternative 3, there would be no additional costs associated with
obtaining a commercial permit, because under this alternative, each
would pick either the no-sale HMS Charter/Headboat permit or the
commercial sale Charter/Headboat permit. NMFS would incur costs
associated with the substantial permits site and customer service
changes that would be required for this change. NMFS would need to
develop new regulatory text to describe these two new permits and
fishery participants would have to learn of and adapt to these changes.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 635
Fisheries, Fishing, Fishing vessels, Foreign relations, Imports,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Treaties.
Dated: December 1, 2017.
Alan D. Risenhoover,
Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National
Marine Fisheries Service.
For reasons set out in the preamble, 50 CFR part 635 is amended as
follows:
PART 635--ATLANTIC HIGHLY MIGRATORY SPECIES
0
1. The authority citation for part 635 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 971 et seq.; 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 635.2, add a new definition for ``Charter/headboat
commercial sale endorsement'' in alphabetical order to read as follows:
Sec. 635.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Charter/headboat commercial sale endorsement means an authorization
added to an HMS Charter/Headboat permit that is required for vessels
that sell or intend to sell Atlantic tunas, sharks, and swordfish,
provided that all other requirements in this part are also met.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 635.4:
0
a. Revise paragraph (a)(5);
0
b. Add paragraph (b)(3);
0
c. Revise paragraphs (d)(1) and (2);
0
d. Remove the introductory text of paragraph (f); and
0
e. Revise paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2), and (m)(2).
The addition and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 635.4 Permits and fees.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(5) Display upon offloading. Upon offloading of Atlantic HMS for
sale, the owner or operator of the harvesting vessel must present for
inspection the vessel's HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a commercial
sale endorsement; Atlantic tunas, shark, or swordfish permit;
Incidental HMS squid trawl; HMS Commercial Caribbean Small Boat permit;
and/or the shark research permit to the first receiver. The permit(s)
must be presented prior to completing any applicable landing report
specified at Sec. 635.5(a)(1), (a)(2), and (b)(2)(i).
* * * * *
[[Page 57549]]
(b) * * *
(3) The owner of a charter boat or headboat that intends to sell
Atlantic tunas or swordfish must obtain a commercial sale endorsement
for the vessel's HMS Charter/Headboat permit. The owner of a charter
boat or headboat that intends to sell Atlantic sharks must obtain a
commercial sale endorsement for the vessel's HMS Charter/Headboat
permit at the time of permit renewal or when the permit is obtained and
must also obtain any applicable Atlantic commercial shark permits. A
vessel owner that has obtained an HMS Charter/Headboat permit without a
commercial sale endorsement is prohibited from selling any Atlantic
HMS.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(1) The owner of each vessel used to fish for or take Atlantic
tunas commercially or on which Atlantic tunas are retained or possessed
with the intention of sale must obtain an HMS Charter/Headboat permit
with a commercial sale endorsement issued under paragraph (b) of this
section, an HMS Commercial Caribbean Small Boat permit issued under
paragraph (o) of this section, or an Atlantic tunas permit in one, and
only one, of the following categories: General, Harpoon, Longline,
Purse Seine, or Trap.
(2) Persons aboard a vessel with a valid Atlantic Tunas, HMS
Angling, HMS Charter/Headboat, or an HMS Commercial Caribbean Small
Boat permit may fish for, take, retain, or possess Atlantic tunas, but
only in compliance with the quotas, catch limits, size classes, and
gear applicable to the permit or permit category of the vessel from
which he or she is fishing. Persons may sell Atlantic tunas only if the
harvesting vessel has a valid permit in the General, Harpoon, Longline,
Purse Seine, or Trap category of the Atlantic Tunas permit, a valid HMS
Charter/Headboat permit with a commercial sale endorsement, or an HMS
Commercial Caribbean Small Boat permit.
* * * * *
(f) Swordfish vessel permits. (1) Except as specified in paragraphs
(n) and (o) of this section, the owner of a vessel of the United States
used to fish for or take swordfish commercially from the management
unit, or on which swordfish from the management unit are retained or
possessed with an intention to sell, or from which swordfish are sold,
must obtain an HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a commercial sale
endorsement issued under paragraph (b) of this section, or one of the
following swordfish permits: A swordfish directed limited access
permit, swordfish incidental limited access permit, swordfish handgear
limited access permit, or a Swordfish General Commercial permit. These
permits cannot be held in combination with each other on the same
vessel, except that an HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a commercial
sale endorsement may be held in combination with a swordfish handgear
limited access permit on the same vessel. It is a rebuttable
presumption that the owner or operator of a vessel on which swordfish
are possessed in excess of the recreational retention limits intends to
sell the swordfish.
(2) The only valid commercial Federal vessel permits for swordfish
are the HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a commercial sale endorsement
issued under paragraph (b) of this section (and only when on a non for-
hire trip), the Swordfish General Commercial permit issued under
paragraph (f) of this section, a swordfish limited access permit issued
consistent with paragraphs (l) and (m) of this section, or permits
issued under paragraphs (n) and (o) of this section.
* * * * *
(m) * * *
(2) Shark and swordfish permits. A vessel owner must obtain the
applicable limited access permit(s) issued pursuant to the requirements
in paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section and/or a Federal commercial
smoothhound permit issued under paragraph (e) of this section; or an
HMS Commercial Caribbean Small Boat permit issued under paragraph (o)
of this section, if: The vessel is used to fish for or take sharks
commercially from the management unit; sharks from the management unit
are retained or possessed on the vessel with an intention to sell; or
sharks from the management unit are sold from the vessel. A vessel
owner must obtain the applicable limited access permit(s) issued
pursuant to the requirements in paragraphs (e) and (f) of this section,
a Swordfish General Commercial permit issued under paragraph (f) of
this section, an Incidental HMS Squid Trawl permit issued under
paragraph (n) of this section, an HMS Commercial Caribbean Small Boat
permit issued under paragraph (o) of this section, or an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit with a commercial sale endorsement issued under
paragraph (b) of this section, which authorizes a Charter/Headboat to
fish commercially for swordfish on a non for-hire trip subject to the
retention limits at Sec. 635.24(b)(4) if: The vessel is used to fish
for or take swordfish commercially from the management unit; swordfish
from the management unit are retained or possessed on the vessel with
an intention to sell; or swordfish from the management unit are sold
from the vessel. The commercial retention and sale of swordfish from
vessels issued an HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a commercial sale
endorsement is permissible only when the vessel is on a non for-hire
trip. Only persons holding non-expired shark and swordfish limited
access permit(s) in the preceding year are eligible to renew those
limited access permit(s). Transferors may not renew limited access
permits that have been transferred according to the procedures in
paragraph (l) of this section.
* * * * *
0
4. In Sec. 635.19, revise paragraph (d)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 635.19 Authorized gears.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(4) Persons on a vessel issued a permit with a shark endorsement
under Sec. 635.4 may possess a shark only if the shark was taken by
rod and reel or handline, except that persons on a vessel issued both
an HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a commercial sale endorsement (with
or without a shark endorsement) and a Federal Atlantic commercial shark
permit may possess sharks taken by rod and reel, handline, bandit gear,
longline, or gillnet if the vessel is engaged in a non for-hire fishing
trip and the commercial shark fishery is open pursuant to Sec.
635.28(b).
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 635.22, revise the introductory text of paragraph (f), and
paragraphs (f)(1) and (2) to read as follows:
Sec. 635.22 Recreational retention limits.
* * * * *
(f) North Atlantic swordfish. The recreational retention limits for
North Atlantic swordfish apply to persons who fish in any manner,
except to persons aboard a vessel that has been issued an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit with a commercial sale endorsement under Sec. 635.4(b)
and only when on a non for-hire trip; a directed, incidental or
handgear limited access swordfish permit under Sec. 635.4(e) and (f);
a Swordfish General Commercial permit under Sec. 635.4(f); an
Incidental HMS Squid Trawl permit under Sec. 635.4(n); or an HMS
Commercial Caribbean Small boat permit under Sec. 635.4(o).
(1) When on a for-hire trip as defined at Sec. 635.2, vessels
issued an HMS Charter/Headboat permit under Sec. 635.4(b), that are
charter boats as
[[Page 57550]]
defined under Sec. 600.10 of this chapter, may retain, possess, or
land no more than one North Atlantic swordfish per paying passenger and
up to six North Atlantic swordfish per vessel per trip. When such
vessels have been issued a commercial sale endorsement and are on a non
for-hire trip, they must comply with the commercial retention limits
for swordfish specified at Sec. 635.24(b)(4).
(2) When on a for-hire trip as defined at Sec. 635.2, vessels
issued an HMS Charter/Headboat permit under Sec. 635.4(b), that are
headboats as defined under Sec. 600.10 of this chapter, may retain,
possess, or land no more than one North Atlantic swordfish per paying
passenger and up to 15 North Atlantic swordfish per vessel per trip.
When such vessels have been issued a commercial sale endorsement and
are on a non for-hire trip, they may land no more than the commercial
retention limits for swordfish specified at Sec. 635.24(b)(4).
* * * * *
0
6. In Sec. 635.23, revise paragraph (c)(3) to read as follows:
Sec. 635.23 Retention limits for bluefin tuna.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) When fishing other than in the Gulf of Mexico and when the
fishery under the General category has not been closed under Sec.
635.28, a person aboard a vessel that has been issued an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit with a commercial sale endorsement may fish under
either the retention limits applicable to the General category
specified in paragraphs (a)(2) and (3) of this section or the retention
limits applicable to the Angling category specified in paragraphs
(b)(2) and (3) of this section. The size category of the first BFT
retained will determine the fishing category applicable to the vessel
that day. A person aboard a vessel that has been issued an HMS Charter/
Headboat without a commercial sale endorsement permit may fish only
under the retention limits applicable to the Angling category.
* * * * *
0
7. In Sec. 635.24, add introductory text to paragraph (b)(4), and
revise paragraph (b)(4)(ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 635.24 Commercial retention limits for sharks, swordfish, and
BAYS tunas.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) Persons aboard a vessel that has been issued a Swordfish
General Commercial permit or an HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a
commercial sale endorsement (and only when on a non for-hire trip) are
subject to the regional swordfish retention limits specified at
paragraph (b)(4)(iii) of this section, which may be adjusted during the
fishing year based upon the inseason regional retention limit
adjustment criteria identified in paragraph (b)(4)(iv) of this section.
* * * * *
(ii) Vessels that have been issued a Swordfish General Commercial
permit or an HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a commercial sale
endorsement (and only when on a non for-hire trip), as a condition of
these permits, may not possess, retain, or land any more swordfish than
is specified for the region in which the vessel is located.
* * * * *
0
8. In Sec. 635.27, revise paragraph (a)(1)(i) introductory text, and
paragraphs (c)(1)(i)(A) and (B) to read as follows:
Sec. 635.27 Quotas.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) Catches from vessels for which General category Atlantic Tunas
permits have been issued and certain catches from vessels for which an
HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a commercial sale endorsement has been
issued are counted against the General category quota in accordance
with Sec. 635.23(c)(3). Pursuant to paragraph (a) of this section, the
amount of large medium and giant bluefin tuna that may be caught,
retained, possessed, landed, or sold under the General category quota
is 466.7 mt, and is apportioned as follows, unless modified as
described under paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section:
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) A swordfish from the North Atlantic stock caught prior to the
directed fishery closure by a vessel for which a directed swordfish
limited access permit, a swordfish handgear limited access permit, a
HMS Commercial Caribbean Small Boat permit, a Swordfish General
Commercial open access permit, or an HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a
commercial sale endorsement (and only when on a non for-hire trip) has
been issued or is required to have been issued is counted against the
directed fishery quota. The total baseline annual fishery quota, before
any adjustments, is 2,937.6 mt dw for each fishing year. Consistent
with applicable ICCAT recommendations, a portion of the total baseline
annual fishery quota may be used for transfers to another ICCAT
contracting party. The annual directed category quota is calculated by
adjusting for over- or under harvests, dead discards, any applicable
transfers, the incidental category quota, the reserve quota and other
adjustments as needed, and is subdivided into two equal semi-annual
periods: One for January 1 through June 30, and the other for July 1
through December 31.
(B) A swordfish from the North Atlantic swordfish stock landed by a
vessel for which an incidental swordfish limited access permit, an
incidental HMS Squid Trawl permit, an HMS Angling permit, or an HMS
Charter/Headboat permit (and only when on a for-hire trip) has been
issued, or a swordfish from the North Atlantic stock caught after the
effective date of a closure of the directed fishery from a vessel for
which a swordfish directed limited access permit, a swordfish handgear
limited access permit, a HMS Commercial Caribbean Small Boat permit, a
Swordfish General Commercial open access permit, or an HMS Charter/
Headboat permit with a commercial sale endorsement (when on a non for-
hire trip) has been issued, is counted against the incidental category
quota. The annual incidental category quota is 300 mt dw for each
fishing year.
* * * * *
0
9. In Sec. 635.31, revise paragraphs (a)(1) and (c)(6) to read as
follows:
Sec. 635.31 Restrictions on sale and purchase.
(a) * * *
(1) A person that owns or operates a vessel from which an Atlantic
tuna is landed or offloaded may sell such Atlantic tuna only if that
vessel has a valid HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a commercial sale
endorsement; a valid General, Harpoon, Longline, Purse Seine, or Trap
category permit for Atlantic tunas; or a valid HMS Commercial Caribbean
Small Boat permit issued under this part, and the appropriate category
has not been closed, as specified at Sec. 635.28(a). However, no
person may sell a bluefin tuna smaller than the large medium size
class. Also, no large medium or giant bluefin tuna taken by a person
aboard a vessel with an Atlantic HMS Charter/Headboat permit fishing in
the Gulf of Mexico at any time, or fishing outside the Gulf of Mexico
when the fishery under the General category has been closed, may be
sold (see Sec. 635.23(c)). A person may sell Atlantic bluefin tuna
only to a dealer that has a valid permit for purchasing Atlantic
bluefin tuna issued under this part. A person may
[[Page 57551]]
not sell or purchase Atlantic tunas harvested with speargun fishing
gear.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(6) A dealer issued a permit under this part may not first receive
silky sharks, oceanic whitetip sharks or scalloped, smooth, or great
hammerhead sharks from an owner or operator of a fishing vessel with
pelagic longline gear on board, or from the owner of a fishing vessel
issued both a HMS Charter/Headboat permit with a commercial sale
endorsement and a commercial shark permit when tuna, swordfish or
billfish are on board the vessel, offloaded from the vessel, or being
offloaded from the vessel.
* * * * *
0
10. In Sec. 635.71, revise paragraph (a)(2) and add paragraph (a)(62)
to read as follows:
Sec. 635.71 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(2) Fish for, catch, possess, retain, land, or sell Atlantic HMS
without the appropriate valid vessel permit with the appropriate
endorsements, LAP, EFP, scientific research permit, display permit,
chartering permit, or shark research permit on board the vessel, as
specified in Sec. Sec. 635.4 and 635.32.
* * * * *
(62) A vessel owner or operator that has an HMS Charter/Headboat
permit without a commercial sale endorsement is prohibited from selling
any Atlantic HMS.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-26275 Filed 12-5-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P