United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef, 57569-57570 [2017-26273]
Download as PDF
57569
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 82, No. 233
Wednesday, December 6, 2017
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
Comments
[Doc. No. AMS–LPS–16–0060–0001]
United States Standards for Grades of
Carcass Beef
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Agricultural Marketing
Service of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture is revising the United States
Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef
(beef standards) to allow dentition and
documentation of actual age as
additional methods of classifying
maturity of carcasses presented to
USDA for official quality grading.
DATES: These new standards shall be
implemented on December 18, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bucky Gwartney, Standardization
Branch, Quality Assessment Division,
Livestock, Poultry, and Seed Program,
AMS, USDA; 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0258; Washington,
DC 20250–0258; phone (202) 720–1424.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
In order to update certain elements in
the United States Standards for Grades
of Carcass Beef (beef standards), this
document makes changes that allow
dentition and documentation of actual
age as additional methods of classifying
maturity of carcasses presented to
USDA for official quality grading.
Section 203(c) of the Agricultural
Marketing Act of 1946, as amended (7
U.S.C. 1621 et seq.), directs and
authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture
‘‘to develop and improve standards of
quality, condition, quantity, grade, and
packaging and recommend and
demonstrate such standards in order to
encourage uniformity and consistency
in commercial practices.’’ AMS is
committed to carrying out this authority
in a manner that facilitates the
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 Dec 05, 2017
Jkt 244001
marketing of agricultural commodities
and makes copies of official standards
available upon request. While the beef
standards do not appear in the Code of
Federal regulations, the updated beef
standards—along with other official
standards—are maintained by USDA at:
https://www.ams.usda.gov/gradesstandards. To change the beef standards,
AMS utilized the procedures it
published in the August 13, 1997,
Federal Register and that appear in 7
CFR part 36.
A public request for comment on
potential changes to the beef standards
was published by AMS in a Notice in
the Federal Register (81 FR 57877) on
August 24, 2016. AMS received 236
total comments, of which 179
commenters favored revising the beef
standards to include dentition and
documented age as additional methods
for maturity classification and 53
commenters did not support making the
changes. Two comments were submitted
in duplicate and one comment was
submitted in triplicate; each of these
respective submissions was counted
only once. It is noteworthy that 160 of
the 179 favorable comments were the
same form letter and were from
producers. Using this public feedback,
AMS published a notice in the Federal
Register on June 19, 2017 (82 FR 27782),
requesting comments on a specific
change to the beef standards as well as
addressing some of the questions raised
during the first comment period.
AMS received 21 total comments on
the June 19, 2017, notice. Fourteen
comments were in favor of the proposed
changes as written and highlighted the
positive effect this would have on beef
producers and the industry. The
supporting comments represented a
large packer/processor, a producer, and
several state and national farm-related
associations. Commenters who
supported the changes cited an
anticipated increase in the number of
carcasses that would qualify for USDA
grades of Prime, Choice, and Select
without a significant reduction in
palatability for those grades; the
anticipated profitability producers
would gain by having more carcasses
receiving a higher grade; and support for
the science-based Cattlemen’s Beef
Promotion and Research Board-funded
research that commenters showed in the
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
previous notices. Many agricultural
associations that represent cattle
producers provided favorable comments
in support of the changes. Several
organizations urged AMS to make the
revisions quickly because the process
has been ongoing for some time.
Seven of the comments were opposed
to the changes and provided a range of
reasons. One of the negative
commenters identified themselves as a
producer. Several commenters asserted
that the research studies cited in the
previous notices were not significant or
large enough or representative enough
to make this change. In response, AMS
determined that all studies referenced in
the previous notices—including those
that found that carcasses exhibiting
advanced skeletal maturity when
determined by dentition to be under 30
months of age (MOA) produced meat
that was as palatable in taste tests as
meat produced from carcasses that did
not exhibit signs of advanced skeletal
maturity—were peer-reviewed and
adequately designed to answer the study
objectives and hypotheses. Statistical
significance and statistical power of the
test will increase with an increased
sample size, in small increments, but
add significant costs. Several
commenters stated that the changes
would produce an inferior product as
related to the current grade standards
and that this change would benefit only
the packing industry and not producers.
In response, AMS notes that the
majority of grain-finished cattle are
harvested at 12 to 24 MOA and usually
produce A-maturity beef. In other
words, the vast majority of cattle offered
for grading will not be affected by this
proposed change. That said, a
percentage of carcasses that currently
are evaluated as B- or C-maturity but are
produced from cattle under 30 MOA
would be eligible for grading under the
proposed system. Based on AMS’s
estimates outlined in ‘‘Economic
Assessment of the Request to Modernize
the U.S. Standards for Grades of Carcass
Beef,’’ roughly an additional 1 percent
of cattle would be eligible for grading.
The research outlined here does not
show any trends towards an inferior
product being produced if dentition is
implemented.
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
57570
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 6, 2017 / Notices
These comments can be accessed at:
https://www.regulations.gov/
docketBrowser?rpp=50&
so=DESC&sb=postedDate&po=0&dct=
PS&D=AMS-LPS-16-0060.
The amendments to the beef
standards are described below:
United States Standards for Grades of
Carcass Beef
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with NOTICES
54.104—Application of Standards for
Grades of Carcass Beef
1. Amend 54.104 by revising
paragraph (k) to read as follows:
(k) For steer, heifer, and cow beef,
quality of the lean is evaluated by
considering its marbling, color, and
firmness as observed in a cut surface, in
relation to carcass evidences of
maturity. The maturity of the carcass is
determined through one of three
methods:
(1) Dentition as monitored by the
Food Safety and Inspection Service
(FSIS). Carcasses determined to be less
than 30 months of age (MOA) will be
classified as A-maturity, and with the
exception of dark cutting lean
characteristics, the final quality grade
will be determined by the degree of
marbling. Any carcasses under 30 MOA
exhibiting advanced skeletal maturity
traits (as described for D- and Ematurity) will not be eligible for the
Prime, Choice, Select, or Standard
grades and will be graded according to
their skeletal, lean, and marbling traits
accordingly;
(2) Documentation of age as verified
through USDA-approved programs and
by FSIS at the slaughter facility.
Carcasses determined to be less than 30
MOA by age verification will be
classified as A-maturity and, with the
exception of dark cutting lean
characteristics, the final quality grade
will be determined by the degree of
marbling. Any carcasses under 30 MOA
exhibiting advanced skeletal maturity
traits (as described for D- and Ematurity) will not be eligible for the
Prime, Choice, Select, or Standard
grades and will be graded according to
their skeletal, lean, and marbling traits
accordingly; or
(3) Through evaluation of the size,
shape, and ossification of the bones and
cartilages, especially the split chine
bones, and the color and texture of the
lean flesh. Carcasses determined to be
greater than 30 MOA will be eligible for
all quality grade classifications with the
final quality grade being determined by
the evaluation of the degree of marbling
and any adjustment factors based on
advanced skeletal maturity
characteristics. In the split chine bones,
ossification changes occur at an earlier
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 Dec 05, 2017
Jkt 244001
stage of maturity in the posterior portion
of the vertebral column (sacral
vertebrae) and at progressively later
stages of maturity in the lumbar and
thoracic vertebrae. The ossification
changes that occur in the cartilages on
the ends of the split thoracic vertebrae
are especially useful in evaluating
maturity and these vertebrae are referred
to frequently in the standards. Unless
otherwise specified in the standards,
whenever reference is made to the
ossification of cartilages on the thoracic
vertebrae, it shall be construed to refer
to the cartilages attached to the thoracic
vertebrae at the posterior end of the
forequarter. The size and shape of the
rib bones are also important
considerations in evaluating differences
in maturity. In the very youngest
carcasses considered as ‘‘beef,’’ the
cartilages on the ends of the chine bones
show no ossification, cartilage is evident
on all of the vertebrae of the spinal
column, and the sacral vertebrae show
distinct separation. In addition, the split
vertebrae usually are soft and porous
and very red in color. In such carcasses,
the rib bones have only a slight
tendency toward flatness. In
progressively more mature carcasses,
ossification changes become evident
first in the bones and cartilages of the
sacral vertebrae, then in the lumbar
vertebrae, and still later in the thoracic
vertebrae. In beef that is very advanced
in maturity, all the split vertebrae will
be devoid of red color and very hard
and flinty, and the cartilages on the
ends of all the vertebrae will be entirely
ossified. Likewise, with advancing
maturity, the rib bones will become
progressively wider and flatter, which is
shown in very mature beef whose ribs
will be very wide and flat.
*
*
*
*
*
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627.
Dated: December 1, 2017.
Bruce Summers,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–26273 Filed 12–5–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Utilities Service
Publication of Depreciation Rates
Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of Depreciation Rates for
Telecommunications Plant.
AGENCY:
The United States Department
of Agriculture (USDA) Rural Utilities
Service (RUS) administers rural utilities
programs, including the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Telecommunications Program. RUS
announces the depreciation rates for
telecommunications plant for the period
ending December 31, 2016.
DATES: These rates are effective
immediately and will remain in effect
until rates are available for the period
ending December 31, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chad Parker, Assistant Administrator,
Telecommunications Program, Rural
Utilities Service, STOP 1590—Room
5151, 1400 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–1590.
Telephone: (202) 720–9556.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 7 CFR
part 1737, Pre-Loan Policies and
Procedures Common to Insured and
Guaranteed Telecommunications Loans,
§ 1737.70(e) explains the depreciation
rates that are used by RUS in its
feasibility studies. Section 1737.70(e)(2)
refers to median depreciation rates
published by RUS for all borrowers. The
following chart provides those rates,
compiled by RUS, for the reporting
period ending December 31, 2016:
MEDIAN DEPRECIATION RATES OF
RURAL UTILITIES SERVICE BORROWERS BY EQUIPMENT CATEGORY
FOR PERIOD ENDING DECEMBER 31,
2016
Telecommunications plant
category
1. Land and Support Assets:
a. Motor vehicles ...............
b. Aircraft ...........................
c. Special purpose vehicles ................................
d. Garage and other work
equipment ......................
e. Buildings .......................
f. Furniture and office
equipment ......................
g. General purpose computers .............................
2. Central Office Switching:
a. Digital ............................
b. Analog & Electro-mechanical .........................
c. Operator Systems .........
3. Central Office Transmission:
a. Radio Systems ..............
b. Circuit equipment ..........
4. Information origination/termination:
a. Station apparatus ..........
b. Customer premises wiring ..................................
c. Large private branch exchanges .........................
d. Public telephone terminal equipment ............
e. Other terminal equipment ...............................
5. Cable and wire facilities:
a. Aerial cable—poles .......
b. Aerial cable—metal .......
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
Depreciation
rate
16.67
11.70
12.50
10.00
3.30
10.00
20.00
9.44
10.00
9.55
10.00
10.00
11.90
10.30
10.96
11.78
10.20
6.00
6.00
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 233 (Wednesday, December 6, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57569-57570]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26273]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 233 / Wednesday, December 6, 2017 /
Notices
[[Page 57569]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
[Doc. No. AMS-LPS-16-0060-0001]
United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Agricultural Marketing Service of the U.S. Department of
Agriculture is revising the United States Standards for Grades of
Carcass Beef (beef standards) to allow dentition and documentation of
actual age as additional methods of classifying maturity of carcasses
presented to USDA for official quality grading.
DATES: These new standards shall be implemented on December 18, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bucky Gwartney, Standardization
Branch, Quality Assessment Division, Livestock, Poultry, and Seed
Program, AMS, USDA; 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0258;
Washington, DC 20250-0258; phone (202) 720-1424.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
In order to update certain elements in the United States Standards
for Grades of Carcass Beef (beef standards), this document makes
changes that allow dentition and documentation of actual age as
additional methods of classifying maturity of carcasses presented to
USDA for official quality grading.
Section 203(c) of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as
amended (7 U.S.C. 1621 et seq.), directs and authorizes the Secretary
of Agriculture ``to develop and improve standards of quality,
condition, quantity, grade, and packaging and recommend and demonstrate
such standards in order to encourage uniformity and consistency in
commercial practices.'' AMS is committed to carrying out this authority
in a manner that facilitates the marketing of agricultural commodities
and makes copies of official standards available upon request. While
the beef standards do not appear in the Code of Federal regulations,
the updated beef standards--along with other official standards--are
maintained by USDA at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/grades-standards. To
change the beef standards, AMS utilized the procedures it published in
the August 13, 1997, Federal Register and that appear in 7 CFR part 36.
Comments
A public request for comment on potential changes to the beef
standards was published by AMS in a Notice in the Federal Register (81
FR 57877) on August 24, 2016. AMS received 236 total comments, of which
179 commenters favored revising the beef standards to include dentition
and documented age as additional methods for maturity classification
and 53 commenters did not support making the changes. Two comments were
submitted in duplicate and one comment was submitted in triplicate;
each of these respective submissions was counted only once. It is
noteworthy that 160 of the 179 favorable comments were the same form
letter and were from producers. Using this public feedback, AMS
published a notice in the Federal Register on June 19, 2017 (82 FR
27782), requesting comments on a specific change to the beef standards
as well as addressing some of the questions raised during the first
comment period.
AMS received 21 total comments on the June 19, 2017, notice.
Fourteen comments were in favor of the proposed changes as written and
highlighted the positive effect this would have on beef producers and
the industry. The supporting comments represented a large packer/
processor, a producer, and several state and national farm-related
associations. Commenters who supported the changes cited an anticipated
increase in the number of carcasses that would qualify for USDA grades
of Prime, Choice, and Select without a significant reduction in
palatability for those grades; the anticipated profitability producers
would gain by having more carcasses receiving a higher grade; and
support for the science-based Cattlemen's Beef Promotion and Research
Board-funded research that commenters showed in the previous notices.
Many agricultural associations that represent cattle producers provided
favorable comments in support of the changes. Several organizations
urged AMS to make the revisions quickly because the process has been
ongoing for some time.
Seven of the comments were opposed to the changes and provided a
range of reasons. One of the negative commenters identified themselves
as a producer. Several commenters asserted that the research studies
cited in the previous notices were not significant or large enough or
representative enough to make this change. In response, AMS determined
that all studies referenced in the previous notices--including those
that found that carcasses exhibiting advanced skeletal maturity when
determined by dentition to be under 30 months of age (MOA) produced
meat that was as palatable in taste tests as meat produced from
carcasses that did not exhibit signs of advanced skeletal maturity--
were peer-reviewed and adequately designed to answer the study
objectives and hypotheses. Statistical significance and statistical
power of the test will increase with an increased sample size, in small
increments, but add significant costs. Several commenters stated that
the changes would produce an inferior product as related to the current
grade standards and that this change would benefit only the packing
industry and not producers. In response, AMS notes that the majority of
grain-finished cattle are harvested at 12 to 24 MOA and usually produce
A-maturity beef. In other words, the vast majority of cattle offered
for grading will not be affected by this proposed change. That said, a
percentage of carcasses that currently are evaluated as B- or C-
maturity but are produced from cattle under 30 MOA would be eligible
for grading under the proposed system. Based on AMS's estimates
outlined in ``Economic Assessment of the Request to Modernize the U.S.
Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef,'' roughly an additional 1 percent
of cattle would be eligible for grading. The research outlined here
does not show any trends towards an inferior product being produced if
dentition is implemented.
[[Page 57570]]
These comments can be accessed at: https://www.regulations.gov/docketBrowser?rpp=50&so=DESC&sb=postedDate&po=0&dct=PS&D=AMS-LPS-16-0060.
The amendments to the beef standards are described below:
United States Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef
54.104--Application of Standards for Grades of Carcass Beef
1. Amend 54.104 by revising paragraph (k) to read as follows:
(k) For steer, heifer, and cow beef, quality of the lean is
evaluated by considering its marbling, color, and firmness as observed
in a cut surface, in relation to carcass evidences of maturity. The
maturity of the carcass is determined through one of three methods:
(1) Dentition as monitored by the Food Safety and Inspection
Service (FSIS). Carcasses determined to be less than 30 months of age
(MOA) will be classified as A-maturity, and with the exception of dark
cutting lean characteristics, the final quality grade will be
determined by the degree of marbling. Any carcasses under 30 MOA
exhibiting advanced skeletal maturity traits (as described for D- and
E-maturity) will not be eligible for the Prime, Choice, Select, or
Standard grades and will be graded according to their skeletal, lean,
and marbling traits accordingly;
(2) Documentation of age as verified through USDA-approved programs
and by FSIS at the slaughter facility. Carcasses determined to be less
than 30 MOA by age verification will be classified as A-maturity and,
with the exception of dark cutting lean characteristics, the final
quality grade will be determined by the degree of marbling. Any
carcasses under 30 MOA exhibiting advanced skeletal maturity traits (as
described for D- and E-maturity) will not be eligible for the Prime,
Choice, Select, or Standard grades and will be graded according to
their skeletal, lean, and marbling traits accordingly; or
(3) Through evaluation of the size, shape, and ossification of the
bones and cartilages, especially the split chine bones, and the color
and texture of the lean flesh. Carcasses determined to be greater than
30 MOA will be eligible for all quality grade classifications with the
final quality grade being determined by the evaluation of the degree of
marbling and any adjustment factors based on advanced skeletal maturity
characteristics. In the split chine bones, ossification changes occur
at an earlier stage of maturity in the posterior portion of the
vertebral column (sacral vertebrae) and at progressively later stages
of maturity in the lumbar and thoracic vertebrae. The ossification
changes that occur in the cartilages on the ends of the split thoracic
vertebrae are especially useful in evaluating maturity and these
vertebrae are referred to frequently in the standards. Unless otherwise
specified in the standards, whenever reference is made to the
ossification of cartilages on the thoracic vertebrae, it shall be
construed to refer to the cartilages attached to the thoracic vertebrae
at the posterior end of the forequarter. The size and shape of the rib
bones are also important considerations in evaluating differences in
maturity. In the very youngest carcasses considered as ``beef,'' the
cartilages on the ends of the chine bones show no ossification,
cartilage is evident on all of the vertebrae of the spinal column, and
the sacral vertebrae show distinct separation. In addition, the split
vertebrae usually are soft and porous and very red in color. In such
carcasses, the rib bones have only a slight tendency toward flatness.
In progressively more mature carcasses, ossification changes become
evident first in the bones and cartilages of the sacral vertebrae, then
in the lumbar vertebrae, and still later in the thoracic vertebrae. In
beef that is very advanced in maturity, all the split vertebrae will be
devoid of red color and very hard and flinty, and the cartilages on the
ends of all the vertebrae will be entirely ossified. Likewise, with
advancing maturity, the rib bones will become progressively wider and
flatter, which is shown in very mature beef whose ribs will be very
wide and flat.
* * * * *
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621-1627.
Dated: December 1, 2017.
Bruce Summers,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-26273 Filed 12-5-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P