Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; West Virginia; Removal of Source-Specific Requirements for Permanently Shutdown Facilities, 57418-57419 [2017-26183]
Download as PDF
57418
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 5, 2017 / Proposed Rules
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: November 13, 2017.
Deborah A. Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA New
England.
[FR Doc. 2017–26182 Filed 12–4–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2017–0555; FRL–9971–57–
Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; West
Virginia; Removal of Source-Specific
Requirements for Permanently
Shutdown Facilities
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
SUMMARY:
state implementation plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the State of West Virginia.
This revision pertains to the removal of
source-specific SIP requirements for the
following five facilities in West Virginia
that have permanently shutdown:
Mountaineer Carbon Company;
Standard Lafarge; Follansbee Steel
Corporation; International Mill Service,
Inc.; and Columbian Chemicals
Company. These sources have
permanently ceased operation;
therefore, SIP requirements for these
sources are obsolete and no longer
necessary for attaining and maintaining
the national ambient air quality
standards (NAAQS). This action is being
taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before January 4, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
OAR–2017–0555 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
pino.maria@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
confidential business information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Irene Shandruk, (215) 814–2166, or by
email at shandruk.irene@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
INFORMATION CONTACT
I. Background
The West Virginia SIP at 40 Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part 52,
subpart XX, § 52.2520(d) contains
source-specific requirements, which
were incorporated into the West
Virginia SIP over the course of many
years to allow the State to demonstrate
attainment with various NAAQS.
Subsequently, several of these sources
have permanently ceased operation
rendering source-specific requirements
for these facilities obsolete.
SIP revisions pertaining to the
removal of obsolete SIP requirements for
sources that have permanently
shutdown are considered
administrative, non-substantive
changes. If a source has permanently
shutdown, the emissions are
permanently reduced to zero, so
removing source-specific SIP
requirements for that source will not
interfere with attainment and
maintenance of any NAAQS, reasonable
further progress or any other applicable
CAA requirement. See CAA section
110(l).
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA
Analysis
On August 25, 2017, West Virginia
submitted a SIP revision requesting that
the consent orders for the sources listed
in Table 1 be removed from the West
Virginia SIP located at 40 CFR part 52,
subpart XX, § 52.2520(d).
TABLE 1—SOURCE-SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS PROPOSED FOR REMOVAL FROM THE WEST VIRGINIA SIP
State effective
date
Order
Mountaineer Carbon Company ............................
Consent Order ......................................................
7/2/82
Standard Lafarge ..................................................
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Source name
Consent Order ......................................................
CO–SIP–91–30 ....................................................
Consent Order ......................................................
CO–SIP–91–31 ....................................................
Consent Order ......................................................
CO–SIP–91–33 ....................................................
Consent Order ......................................................
CO–SIP–2000–3 ..................................................
11/14/91
Follansbee Steel Corporation ...............................
International Mill Service, Inc ...............................
Columbian Chemicals Company ..........................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Dec 04, 2017
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\05DEP1.SGM
11/14/91
11/14/91
1/31/00
05DEP1
EPA Approval date/
Federal Register (FR)
citation
9/1/82,
47 FR 38532
7/25/94,
59 FR 37696
7/25/94,
59 FR 37696
7/25/94,
59 FR 37696
8/2/00,
65 FR 47339
57419
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 5, 2017 / Proposed Rules
provides relevant documentation
verifying the permanent closure of these
sources (see Table 2). EPA has
confirmed that all permits, where
applicable, have been surrendered and
are inactive (see Table 2). Because these
According to West Virginia, the five
facilities listed in Table 1 have
permanently shutdown and ceased
operation. West Virginia’s August 25,
2017 submittal lists the dates of facility
closures and closure inspections, and
five sources have permanently ceased
operation and their emissions have been
permanently reduced to zero, their
source-specific SIP requirements have
been rendered obsolete.
TABLE 2—CLOSURE DATES AND CLOSURE INSPECTION DATES FOR FIVE PERMANENTLY SHUTDOWN FACILITIES
Source name
Source location
Title V facility
Mountaineer Carbon Company ...
Standard Lafarge .........................
Follansbee Steel Corporation ......
International Mill Service, Inc ......
Columbian Chemicals Company
Marshall County ...........................
Hancock County ..........................
Brooke County .............................
Brooke County .............................
Marshall County ...........................
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
Permanent
closure date
Verification of
closure
inspection
conducted by
West Virginia
10/9/2015
7/20/2011
7/12/2012
6/27/2000
10/9/2015
6/2/2017
6/2/2017
5/31/2017
5/31/2017
6/2/2017
Permit surrendered
Yes.
Yes.
Not applicable.1
Not applicable.2
Yes.
1 Follansbee Steel Corporation was grandfathered into the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection—Division of Air Quality’s
(WVDEP—DAQ) permitting program. Therefore, no permits were ever issued for this facility.
2 International Mill Service, Inc. was grandfathered into the WVDEP—DAQ permitting program. Therefore, no permits were ever issued for this
facility.
III. Proposed Action
EPA has reviewed West Virginia’s SIP
revision seeking removal of obsolete
source-specific SIP requirements from
the West Virginia SIP. These five
sources have permanently ceased
operation, rendering source-specific SIP
requirements for these sources obsolete.
EPA has confirmed that all permits have
been surrendered and are inactive.
Therefore, EPA is proposing to approve
the West Virginia August 25, 2017 SIP
revision, which sought removal of
source-specific revisions related to five
now closed facilities in accordance with
section 110 of the CAA. EPA is
soliciting public comments on the
issues discussed in this document.
These comments will be considered
before taking final action.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
CAA and applicable federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:11 Dec 04, 2017
Jkt 244001
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule,
pertaining to removal of source-specific
requirements from the West Virginia
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
SIP, does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because
the SIP is not approved to apply in
Indian country located in the state, and
EPA notes that it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: November 22, 2017.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2017–26183 Filed 12–4–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 600
[Docket No. 160908833–7999–01]
RIN 0648–BG34
Requirements of the Vessel Monitoring
System Type-Approval
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\05DEP1.SGM
05DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 5, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57418-57419]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26183]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2017-0555; FRL-9971-57-Region 3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
West Virginia; Removal of Source-Specific Requirements for Permanently
Shutdown Facilities
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
State of West Virginia. This revision pertains to the removal of
source-specific SIP requirements for the following five facilities in
West Virginia that have permanently shutdown: Mountaineer Carbon
Company; Standard Lafarge; Follansbee Steel Corporation; International
Mill Service, Inc.; and Columbian Chemicals Company. These sources have
permanently ceased operation; therefore, SIP requirements for these
sources are obsolete and no longer necessary for attaining and
maintaining the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). This
action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before January 4, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2017-0555 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
pino.maria@epa.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow
the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Shandruk, (215) 814-2166, or by
email at shandruk.irene@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The West Virginia SIP at 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part
52, subpart XX, Sec. 52.2520(d) contains source-specific requirements,
which were incorporated into the West Virginia SIP over the course of
many years to allow the State to demonstrate attainment with various
NAAQS. Subsequently, several of these sources have permanently ceased
operation rendering source-specific requirements for these facilities
obsolete.
SIP revisions pertaining to the removal of obsolete SIP
requirements for sources that have permanently shutdown are considered
administrative, non-substantive changes. If a source has permanently
shutdown, the emissions are permanently reduced to zero, so removing
source-specific SIP requirements for that source will not interfere
with attainment and maintenance of any NAAQS, reasonable further
progress or any other applicable CAA requirement. See CAA section
110(l).
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis
On August 25, 2017, West Virginia submitted a SIP revision
requesting that the consent orders for the sources listed in Table 1 be
removed from the West Virginia SIP located at 40 CFR part 52, subpart
XX, Sec. 52.2520(d).
Table 1--Source-Specific Requirements Proposed for Removal From the West Virginia SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA Approval date/
Source name Order State Federal Register (FR)
effective date citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mountaineer Carbon Company............... Consent Order............... 7/2/82 9/1/82,
47 FR 38532
Standard Lafarge......................... Consent Order............... 11/14/91 7/25/94,
CO-SIP-91-30................ 59 FR 37696
Follansbee Steel Corporation............. Consent Order............... 11/14/91 7/25/94,
CO-SIP-91-31................ 59 FR 37696
International Mill Service, Inc.......... Consent Order............... 11/14/91 7/25/94,
CO-SIP-91-33................ 59 FR 37696
Columbian Chemicals Company.............. Consent Order............... 1/31/00 8/2/00,
CO-SIP-2000-3............... 65 FR 47339
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 57419]]
According to West Virginia, the five facilities listed in Table 1
have permanently shutdown and ceased operation. West Virginia's August
25, 2017 submittal lists the dates of facility closures and closure
inspections, and provides relevant documentation verifying the
permanent closure of these sources (see Table 2). EPA has confirmed
that all permits, where applicable, have been surrendered and are
inactive (see Table 2). Because these five sources have permanently
ceased operation and their emissions have been permanently reduced to
zero, their source-specific SIP requirements have been rendered
obsolete.
Table 2--Closure Dates and Closure Inspection Dates for Five Permanently Shutdown Facilities
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Verification
of closure
Source name Source location Title V Permanent inspection Permit surrendered
facility closure date conducted by
West Virginia
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mountaineer Carbon Company............. Marshall County........... Yes 10/9/2015 6/2/2017 Yes.
Standard Lafarge....................... Hancock County............ No 7/20/2011 6/2/2017 Yes.
Follansbee Steel Corporation........... Brooke County............. No 7/12/2012 5/31/2017 Not applicable.\1\
International Mill Service, Inc........ Brooke County............. No 6/27/2000 5/31/2017 Not applicable.\2\
Columbian Chemicals Company............ Marshall County........... Yes 10/9/2015 6/2/2017 Yes.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Follansbee Steel Corporation was grandfathered into the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection--Division of Air Quality's (WVDEP--DAQ)
permitting program. Therefore, no permits were ever issued for this facility.
\2\ International Mill Service, Inc. was grandfathered into the WVDEP--DAQ permitting program. Therefore, no permits were ever issued for this facility.
III. Proposed Action
EPA has reviewed West Virginia's SIP revision seeking removal of
obsolete source-specific SIP requirements from the West Virginia SIP.
These five sources have permanently ceased operation, rendering source-
specific SIP requirements for these sources obsolete. EPA has confirmed
that all permits have been surrendered and are inactive. Therefore, EPA
is proposing to approve the West Virginia August 25, 2017 SIP revision,
which sought removal of source-specific revisions related to five now
closed facilities in accordance with section 110 of the CAA. EPA is
soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this document.
These comments will be considered before taking final action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this proposed rule, pertaining to removal of source-
specific requirements from the West Virginia SIP, does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian
country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: November 22, 2017.
Cosmo Servidio,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2017-26183 Filed 12-4-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P