Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 57383-57389 [2017-24811]
Download as PDF
57383
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 82, No. 232
Tuesday, December 5, 2017
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2017–1024; Product
Identifier 2017–NM–065–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all The
Boeing Company Model 737–300, –400,
–500, –600, –700, –700C, –800, –900,
and –900ER series airplanes; Model 757
airplanes; Model 767 airplanes; Model
777 airplanes; and Model 787–8 and
787–9 airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by reports of fuel crossfeed
valves failing to open when activated
during flight. This proposed AD would
require, for certain airplanes, revising
the airplane flight manual (AFM); and
for certain other airplanes, revising the
minimum equipment list (MEL) to do an
operational check of the fuel crossfeed
valve prior to each extended range
operations (ETOPS) flight if one fuel
crossfeed valve (or the fuel balancing
system on Model 787 airplanes) is
inoperative. We are proposing this AD
to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by January 19, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Dec 04, 2017
Jkt 244001
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
1024; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (phone: 800–647–
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jon
Regimbal, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6506;
fax: 425–917–6590; email:
Jon.Regimbal@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2017–1024; Product Identifier 2017–
NM–065–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this NPRM. We will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this NPRM
because of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this NPRM.
Discussion
We have received reports of fuel
crossfeed valves failing to open when
activated during flight. The fuel
crossfeed valve can fail closed due to
electrical or mechanical faults. Such a
failure would remain undiscovered
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
until an attempt is made to open the
fuel crossfeed valve. Depending on the
operational use of the airplane, such a
failure could remain latent for multiple
flights. Some of the affected airplanes
have only one fuel crossfeed valve.
Other affected airplanes have two
redundant fuel crossfeed valves, but are
allowed to be dispatched under their
MEL with one of the two fuel crossfeed
valves inoperative and locked closed.
Model 787 airplanes have a single
crossfeed valve and a separate fuel
balancing system, either of which
allows use of all of the main tank fuel
by either engine. The Model 787 MEL
allows airplanes to be dispatched with
the fuel balancing system inoperative.
If an engine failure occurs during
certain portions of the cruise phase of
an ETOPS flight and the fuel crossfeed
valve cannot be opened, the fuel in the
main tank associated with the failed
engine cannot be used by the remaining
operative engine, potentially resulting
in a forced off-airport landing due to
exhaustion of the remaining usable fuel
and consequent loss of all engine thrust.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type designs.
Proposed AD Requirements
For airplanes equipped with a single
fuel crossfeed valve, this proposed AD
would require revising the limitation
and normal procedures sections of the
AFM by adding an operational check of
the fuel crossfeed valve immediately
prior to each ETOPS flight. For
airplanes equipped with dual fuel
crossfeed valves, this proposed AD
would require revising the MEL by
adding a requirement to do an
operational check of the fuel crossfeed
valve prior to each ETOPS flight if one
fuel crossfeed valve (or the fuel
balancing system on Model 787
airplanes) is inoperative.
This proposed AD would allow
removal of the AFM limitation required
by AD 88–21–03 R1, Amendment 39–
6077 (53 FR 46605, November 18, 1988)
(‘‘88–21–03 R1’’), after the applicable
AFM limitations in this proposed AD
are incorporated in the AFM.
E:\FR\FM\05DEP1.SGM
05DEP1
57384
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 5, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Related AD
AD 88–21–03 R1 applies to, among
other airplanes, certain Model 737–200,
737–300, 757–200, 767–200, and 767–
300 series airplanes. AD 88–21–03 R1
requires revising the AFM to include an
operational check of the fuel crossfeed
valve during the last hour of cruise
flight during each ETOPS flight and log
book entry of any fuel crossfeed valve
failure conditions, and repair if
necessary.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 3,252 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to
comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
AFM Revision (2,127 airplanes) .....................
MEL Revision (1,125 airplanes) .....................
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 .................
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 .................
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
This AD is issued in accordance with
authority delegated by the Executive
Director, Aircraft Certification Service,
as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C.
In accordance with that order, issuance
of ADs is normally a function of the
Compliance and Airworthiness
Division, but during this transition
period, the Executive Director has
delegated the authority to issue ADs
applicable to transport category
airplanes to the Director of the System
Oversight Division.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Dec 04, 2017
Jkt 244001
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2017–1024; Product Identifier 2017–
NM–065–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by January 19,
2018.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD affects AD 88–21–03 R1,
Amendment 39–6077 (53 FR 46605,
November 18, 1988).
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Cost per
product
Parts cost
$0
0
$85
85
Cost on U.S.
operators
$180,795
95,625
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing
Company airplanes, certificated in any
category, identified in paragraphs (c)(1)
through (c)(5) of this AD.
(1) Model 737–300, –400, –500, –600, –700,
–700C, –800, –900, and –900ER series
airplanes.
(2) Model 757–200, –200PF, –200CB, and
–300 series airplanes.
(3) Model 767–200, –300, –300F, and
–400ER series airplanes.
(4) Model 777–200, –200LR, –300, –300ER,
and –777F series airplanes.
(5) Model 787–8 and 787–9 airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 28; Fuel.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of fuel
crossfeed valves failing to open when
activated during flight. We are issuing this
AD to prevent an airplane from being
dispatched on an extended range operations
(ETOPS) flight with a single fuel crossfeed
valve that cannot be opened. This condition
could cause the fuel in the main tank
associated with a failed engine to be
unavailable to the remaining operative
engine, potentially resulting in a forced
offairport landing due to exhaustion of the
remaining usable fuel and consequent loss of
all engine thrust.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) AFM Revisions for Model 737 Airplanes
Equipped With a Single Fuel Crossfeed
Valve
For airplanes identified in paragraph (c)(1)
of this AD: Within 120 days after the effective
date of this AD, do the actions in specified
in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD.
(1) Revise ‘‘Extended Range Operations’’
subsection of the ‘‘Fuel System Limitations’’
section of the Section 1 Certificate
Limitations of the airplane flight manual
(AFM) by incorporating the information
specified in figure 1 to paragraph (g)(1) of
this AD. This may be done by inserting a
copy of this AD into the AFM. When a
statement identical to that in figure 1 to
E:\FR\FM\05DEP1.SGM
05DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 5, 2017 / Proposed Rules
57385
into the AFM, and the copy of this AD may
be removed from the AFM.
inserting a copy of this AD into the AFM.
When a statement identical to that in figure
2 to paragraph (g)(2) of this AD has been
included in the ‘‘Extended Range
Operations’’ section of Section 3 Normal
Procedures of the AFM, the general revisions
may be inserted into the AFM, and the copy
of this AD may be removed from the AFM.
(h) AFM Revisions for Model 757 Airplanes
Equipped With a Single Fuel Crossfeed
Valve
For airplanes identified in paragraph (c)(2)
of this AD having line numbers 1 through
616 inclusive and 618 on which the actions
specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 757–28–
0029 (second fuel crossfeed valve
installation) have not been done: Within 120
days after the effective date of this AD, do the
actions specified in paragraphs (h)(1) and
(h)(2) of this AD. For Model 757 airplanes
identified in this paragraph, if the actions
specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 757–28–
0029 are done after the effective date of this
AD, then the actions specified in this
paragraph are no longer required for that
airplane and the actions specified in
paragraph (j) of this AD must be done before
further flight after performing the actions
specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 757–28–
0029.
(1) Revise the ‘‘Extended Range
Operations’’ section of the Section 1
Certificate Limitations of the AFM by
incorporating the information specified in
figure 3 to paragraph (h)(1). This may be
done by inserting a copy of this AD into the
AFM. When a statement identical to that in
figure 3 to paragraph (h)(1) of this AD has
been included in the ‘‘Extended Range
Operations’’ section of the Section 1
Certificate Limitations of the general
revisions of the AFM, the general revisions
may be inserted into the AFM, and the copy
of this AD may be removed from the AFM.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Dec 04, 2017
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\05DEP1.SGM
05DEP1
EP05DE17.000
EP05DE17.001
section of the Section 1 Certificate
Limitations of the general revisions of the
AFM, the general revisions may be inserted
(2) Revise the ‘‘Extended Range
Operations’’ section of the Section 3 Normal
Procedures of the AFM by incorporating the
information specified in figure 2 to paragraph
(g)(2) of this AD. This may be done by
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD has been included
in the ‘‘Extended Range Operations’’
subsection of the ‘‘Fuel System Limitations’’
57386
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 5, 2017 / Proposed Rules
AFM, the general revisions may be inserted
into the AFM, and the copy of this AD may
be removed from the AFM.
paragraphs (i)(1) and (i)(2) of this AD. If the
actions specified in Boeing Service Bulletin
767–28–0034 are done after the effective date
of this AD, the actions specified in this
paragraph are no longer required for that
airplane and the actions specified in
paragraph (k) of this AD must be done before
further flight.
(1) Revise the ‘‘Extended Range
Operations’’ section of the Section 1
Certificate Limitations of the AFM by
incorporating the information specified in
figure 5 to paragraph (i)(1) of this AD. This
may be done by inserting a copy of this AD
into the AFM. When a statement identical to
that in figure 5 to paragraph (i)(1) of this AD
has been included in the ‘‘Extended Range
Operations’’ section of the Section 1
Certificate Limitations of the general
revisions of the AFM, the general revisions
may be inserted into the AFM, and the copy
of this AD may be removed from the AFM.
(2) Revise the Section 3.1 Normal
Procedures of the AFM by incorporating the
information specified in figure 6 to paragraph
(i)(2) of this AD. This may be done by
inserting a copy of this AD into the AFM.
When a statement identical to that in figure
18:01 Dec 04, 2017
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\05DEP1.SGM
05DEP1
EP05DE17.002
VerDate Sep<11>2014
EP05DE17.003
EP05DE17.004
inserting a copy of this AD into the AFM.
When a statement identical to that in figure
4 to paragraph (h)(2) of this AD has been
included in the Extended Range Operations
section of Section 3 Normal Procedures of the
(i) AFM Revisions for Model 767 Airplanes
Equipped With a Single Fuel Crossfeed
Valve
For airplanes identified in paragraph (c)(3)
of this AD having line numbers 1 through
430 inclusive on which the actions specified
in Boeing Service Bulletin 767–28–0034
(second fuel crossfeed valve installation)
have not been done as of the effective date
of this AD: Within 120 days after the effective
date of this AD, do the actions specified in
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
(2) Revise the ‘‘Extended Range
Operations’’ section of Section 3 Normal
Procedures of the AFM by incorporating the
information specified in figure 4 to paragraph
(h)(2) of this AD. This may be done by
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 5, 2017 / Proposed Rules
57387
inserted into the AFM, and the copy of this
AD may be removed from the AFM.
For airplanes identified in paragraph (c)(2)
of this AD having line numbers 617, 619, and
subsequent; and for airplanes identified in
paragraph (c)(2) of this AD having line
numbers 1 through 616 inclusive and 618, on
which a second fuel crossfeed valve has been
installed before the effective date of this AD,
as specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 757–
28–0029: Within 120 days after the effective
date of this AD, revise the operator’s FAAapproved MEL by incorporating the
information specified in figure 7 to paragraph
(j) of this AD as a required operations
procedure when dispatching for ETOPS
operation with an inoperative fuel crossfeed
valve. Specific alternative MEL wording to
accomplish the actions specified in figure 7
to paragraph (j) of this AD can be approved
by the operator’s principal operations
inspector (POI).
(k) MEL Revisions for Model 767 Equipped
With Dual Fuel Crossfeed Valves
For airplanes identified in paragraph (c)(3)
of this AD having line numbers 431 and
subsequent; and for airplanes identified in
paragraph (c)(3) of this AD having line
numbers 1 through 430 inclusive on which
a second fuel crossfeed valve has been
installed before the effective date of this AD,
as specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 767–
28–0034: Within 120 days after the effective
date of this AD, revise the operator’s FAAapproved MEL by incorporating the
information specified in figure 8 to paragraph
(k) of this AD as a required operations
procedure when dispatching for ETOPS
operation with an inoperative fuel crossfeed
valve. Specific alternative MEL wording to
accomplish the actions specified in figure 8
to paragraph (k) of this AD can be approved
by the operator’s POI.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Dec 04, 2017
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\05DEP1.SGM
05DEP1
EP05DE17.005
EP05DE17.006
section of Section 3.1 Normal Procedures of
the AFM, the general revisions may be
(j) Minimum Equipment List (MEL)
Revisions for Model 757 Equipped With
Dual Fuel Crossfeed Valves
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
6 to paragraph (i)(2) of this AD has been
included in the Extended Range Operations
57388
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 5, 2017 / Proposed Rules
(l) MEL Revisions for Model 777 Airplanes
For airplanes identified in paragraph (c)(4)
of this AD: Within 120 days after the effective
date of this AD, revise the operator’s FAA-
(m) MEL Revisions for Model 787 Airplanes
paragraph (m) of this AD into the MEL
requirements for each of the inoperative
items specified in paragraphs (m)(1) through
(m)(4) of this AD. Specific alternative MEL
wording to accomplish the actions specified
in figure 10 to paragraph (m) of this AD can
be approved by the operator’s POI.
(1) 28–21–01–01 Pressure Refueling
System, Main Tank Inboard Refuel Valve.
(2) 28–22–06 Fuel Balance Switch.
(3) 28–26–01 Defuel/Isolation Valves.
(4) 28–41–01–01 Main Tank Fuel Quantity
Indication Systems.
EP05DE17.008
valve. Specific alternative MEL wording to
accomplish the actions specified in figure 9
to paragraph (l) of this AD can be approved
by the operator’s POI.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Dec 04, 2017
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\05DEP1.SGM
05DEP1
EP05DE17.007
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
For airplanes identified in paragraph (c)(5)
of this AD: Within 120 days after the effective
date of this AD, revise the operator’s FAAapproved MEL by incorporating the
information specified in figure 10 to
approved MEL by incorporating the
information specified in figure 9 to paragraph
(l) of this AD as a required operations
procedure when dispatching for ETOPS
operation with an inoperative fuel crossfeed
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 5, 2017 / Proposed Rules
(o) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Dec 04, 2017
Jkt 244001
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (p) of this
AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO
Branch, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification
deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(p) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Jon Regimbal, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057–3356; phone: 425–917–6506; fax: 425–
917–6590; email: Jon.Regimbal@faa.gov.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 6, 2017.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–24811 Filed 12–4–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\05DEP1.SGM
05DEP1
EP05DE17.009
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with PROPOSALS
(n) AD 88–21–03 R1, Amendment 39–6077
(53 FR 46605–01, November 18, 1988), AFM
Limitation Removal
After the applicable AFM limitations
specified in paragraphs (g)(1), (h)(1), and
(i)(1) of this AD are incorporated into an
airplane’s AFM, operators may remove the
AFM limitation required by AD 88–21–03 R1,
Amendment 39–6077 (53 FR 46605–01,
November 18, 1988), for that airplane.
57389
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 5, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57383-57389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24811]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 232 / Tuesday, December 5, 2017 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 57383]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2017-1024; Product Identifier 2017-NM-065-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
The Boeing Company Model 737-300, -400, -500, -600, -700, -700C, -800,
-900, and -900ER series airplanes; Model 757 airplanes; Model 767
airplanes; Model 777 airplanes; and Model 787-8 and 787-9 airplanes.
This proposed AD was prompted by reports of fuel crossfeed valves
failing to open when activated during flight. This proposed AD would
require, for certain airplanes, revising the airplane flight manual
(AFM); and for certain other airplanes, revising the minimum equipment
list (MEL) to do an operational check of the fuel crossfeed valve prior
to each extended range operations (ETOPS) flight if one fuel crossfeed
valve (or the fuel balancing system on Model 787 airplanes) is
inoperative. We are proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by January 19,
2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
1024; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received,
and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (phone:
800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available
in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jon Regimbal, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6506; fax: 425-917-6590; email:
Jon.Regimbal@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2017-1024;
Product Identifier 2017-NM-065-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this NPRM because
of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this NPRM.
Discussion
We have received reports of fuel crossfeed valves failing to open
when activated during flight. The fuel crossfeed valve can fail closed
due to electrical or mechanical faults. Such a failure would remain
undiscovered until an attempt is made to open the fuel crossfeed valve.
Depending on the operational use of the airplane, such a failure could
remain latent for multiple flights. Some of the affected airplanes have
only one fuel crossfeed valve. Other affected airplanes have two
redundant fuel crossfeed valves, but are allowed to be dispatched under
their MEL with one of the two fuel crossfeed valves inoperative and
locked closed. Model 787 airplanes have a single crossfeed valve and a
separate fuel balancing system, either of which allows use of all of
the main tank fuel by either engine. The Model 787 MEL allows airplanes
to be dispatched with the fuel balancing system inoperative.
If an engine failure occurs during certain portions of the cruise
phase of an ETOPS flight and the fuel crossfeed valve cannot be opened,
the fuel in the main tank associated with the failed engine cannot be
used by the remaining operative engine, potentially resulting in a
forced off-airport landing due to exhaustion of the remaining usable
fuel and consequent loss of all engine thrust.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type designs.
Proposed AD Requirements
For airplanes equipped with a single fuel crossfeed valve, this
proposed AD would require revising the limitation and normal procedures
sections of the AFM by adding an operational check of the fuel
crossfeed valve immediately prior to each ETOPS flight. For airplanes
equipped with dual fuel crossfeed valves, this proposed AD would
require revising the MEL by adding a requirement to do an operational
check of the fuel crossfeed valve prior to each ETOPS flight if one
fuel crossfeed valve (or the fuel balancing system on Model 787
airplanes) is inoperative.
This proposed AD would allow removal of the AFM limitation required
by AD 88-21-03 R1, Amendment 39-6077 (53 FR 46605, November 18, 1988)
(``88-21-03 R1''), after the applicable AFM limitations in this
proposed AD are incorporated in the AFM.
[[Page 57384]]
Related AD
AD 88-21-03 R1 applies to, among other airplanes, certain Model
737-200, 737-300, 757-200, 767-200, and 767-300 series airplanes. AD
88-21-03 R1 requires revising the AFM to include an operational check
of the fuel crossfeed valve during the last hour of cruise flight
during each ETOPS flight and log book entry of any fuel crossfeed valve
failure conditions, and repair if necessary.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 3,252 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed
AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AFM Revision (2,127 airplanes)........ 1 work-hour x $85 per $0 $85 $180,795
hour = $85.
MEL Revision (1,125 airplanes)........ 1 work-hour x $85 per 0 85 95,625
hour = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes to
the Director of the System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2017-1024; Product Identifier
2017-NM-065-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by January 19, 2018.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD affects AD 88-21-03 R1, Amendment 39-6077 (53 FR 46605,
November 18, 1988).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all The Boeing Company airplanes,
certificated in any category, identified in paragraphs (c)(1)
through (c)(5) of this AD.
(1) Model 737-300, -400, -500, -600, -700, -700C, -800, -900,
and -900ER series airplanes.
(2) Model 757-200, -200PF, -200CB, and -300 series airplanes.
(3) Model 767-200, -300, -300F, and -400ER series airplanes.
(4) Model 777-200, -200LR, -300, -300ER, and -777F series
airplanes.
(5) Model 787-8 and 787-9 airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 28; Fuel.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of fuel crossfeed valves failing
to open when activated during flight. We are issuing this AD to
prevent an airplane from being dispatched on an extended range
operations (ETOPS) flight with a single fuel crossfeed valve that
cannot be opened. This condition could cause the fuel in the main
tank associated with a failed engine to be unavailable to the
remaining operative engine, potentially resulting in a forced
offairport landing due to exhaustion of the remaining usable fuel
and consequent loss of all engine thrust.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) AFM Revisions for Model 737 Airplanes Equipped With a Single Fuel
Crossfeed Valve
For airplanes identified in paragraph (c)(1) of this AD: Within
120 days after the effective date of this AD, do the actions in
specified in paragraphs (g)(1) and (g)(2) of this AD.
(1) Revise ``Extended Range Operations'' subsection of the
``Fuel System Limitations'' section of the Section 1 Certificate
Limitations of the airplane flight manual (AFM) by incorporating the
information specified in figure 1 to paragraph (g)(1) of this AD.
This may be done by inserting a copy of this AD into the AFM. When a
statement identical to that in figure 1 to
[[Page 57385]]
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD has been included in the ``Extended
Range Operations'' subsection of the ``Fuel System Limitations''
section of the Section 1 Certificate Limitations of the general
revisions of the AFM, the general revisions may be inserted into the
AFM, and the copy of this AD may be removed from the AFM.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05DE17.000
(2) Revise the ``Extended Range Operations'' section of the
Section 3 Normal Procedures of the AFM by incorporating the
information specified in figure 2 to paragraph (g)(2) of this AD.
This may be done by inserting a copy of this AD into the AFM. When a
statement identical to that in figure 2 to paragraph (g)(2) of this
AD has been included in the ``Extended Range Operations'' section of
Section 3 Normal Procedures of the AFM, the general revisions may be
inserted into the AFM, and the copy of this AD may be removed from
the AFM.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05DE17.001
(h) AFM Revisions for Model 757 Airplanes Equipped With a Single Fuel
Crossfeed Valve
For airplanes identified in paragraph (c)(2) of this AD having
line numbers 1 through 616 inclusive and 618 on which the actions
specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 757-28-0029 (second fuel
crossfeed valve installation) have not been done: Within 120 days
after the effective date of this AD, do the actions specified in
paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this AD. For Model 757 airplanes
identified in this paragraph, if the actions specified in Boeing
Service Bulletin 757-28-0029 are done after the effective date of
this AD, then the actions specified in this paragraph are no longer
required for that airplane and the actions specified in paragraph
(j) of this AD must be done before further flight after performing
the actions specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 757-28-0029.
(1) Revise the ``Extended Range Operations'' section of the
Section 1 Certificate Limitations of the AFM by incorporating the
information specified in figure 3 to paragraph (h)(1). This may be
done by inserting a copy of this AD into the AFM. When a statement
identical to that in figure 3 to paragraph (h)(1) of this AD has
been included in the ``Extended Range Operations'' section of the
Section 1 Certificate Limitations of the general revisions of the
AFM, the general revisions may be inserted into the AFM, and the
copy of this AD may be removed from the AFM.
[[Page 57386]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05DE17.002
(2) Revise the ``Extended Range Operations'' section of Section
3 Normal Procedures of the AFM by incorporating the information
specified in figure 4 to paragraph (h)(2) of this AD. This may be
done by inserting a copy of this AD into the AFM. When a statement
identical to that in figure 4 to paragraph (h)(2) of this AD has
been included in the Extended Range Operations section of Section 3
Normal Procedures of the AFM, the general revisions may be inserted
into the AFM, and the copy of this AD may be removed from the AFM.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05DE17.003
(i) AFM Revisions for Model 767 Airplanes Equipped With a Single Fuel
Crossfeed Valve
For airplanes identified in paragraph (c)(3) of this AD having
line numbers 1 through 430 inclusive on which the actions specified
in Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28-0034 (second fuel crossfeed valve
installation) have not been done as of the effective date of this
AD: Within 120 days after the effective date of this AD, do the
actions specified in paragraphs (i)(1) and (i)(2) of this AD. If the
actions specified in Boeing Service Bulletin 767-28-0034 are done
after the effective date of this AD, the actions specified in this
paragraph are no longer required for that airplane and the actions
specified in paragraph (k) of this AD must be done before further
flight.
(1) Revise the ``Extended Range Operations'' section of the
Section 1 Certificate Limitations of the AFM by incorporating the
information specified in figure 5 to paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.
This may be done by inserting a copy of this AD into the AFM. When a
statement identical to that in figure 5 to paragraph (i)(1) of this
AD has been included in the ``Extended Range Operations'' section of
the Section 1 Certificate Limitations of the general revisions of
the AFM, the general revisions may be inserted into the AFM, and the
copy of this AD may be removed from the AFM.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05DE17.004
(2) Revise the Section 3.1 Normal Procedures of the AFM by
incorporating the information specified in figure 6 to paragraph
(i)(2) of this AD. This may be done by inserting a copy of this AD
into the AFM. When a statement identical to that in figure
[[Page 57387]]
6 to paragraph (i)(2) of this AD has been included in the Extended
Range Operations section of Section 3.1 Normal Procedures of the
AFM, the general revisions may be inserted into the AFM, and the
copy of this AD may be removed from the AFM.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05DE17.005
(j) Minimum Equipment List (MEL) Revisions for Model 757 Equipped With
Dual Fuel Crossfeed Valves
For airplanes identified in paragraph (c)(2) of this AD having
line numbers 617, 619, and subsequent; and for airplanes identified
in paragraph (c)(2) of this AD having line numbers 1 through 616
inclusive and 618, on which a second fuel crossfeed valve has been
installed before the effective date of this AD, as specified in
Boeing Service Bulletin 757-28-0029: Within 120 days after the
effective date of this AD, revise the operator's FAA-approved MEL by
incorporating the information specified in figure 7 to paragraph (j)
of this AD as a required operations procedure when dispatching for
ETOPS operation with an inoperative fuel crossfeed valve. Specific
alternative MEL wording to accomplish the actions specified in
figure 7 to paragraph (j) of this AD can be approved by the
operator's principal operations inspector (POI).
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05DE17.006
(k) MEL Revisions for Model 767 Equipped With Dual Fuel Crossfeed
Valves
For airplanes identified in paragraph (c)(3) of this AD having
line numbers 431 and subsequent; and for airplanes identified in
paragraph (c)(3) of this AD having line numbers 1 through 430
inclusive on which a second fuel crossfeed valve has been installed
before the effective date of this AD, as specified in Boeing Service
Bulletin 767-28-0034: Within 120 days after the effective date of
this AD, revise the operator's FAA-approved MEL by incorporating the
information specified in figure 8 to paragraph (k) of this AD as a
required operations procedure when dispatching for ETOPS operation
with an inoperative fuel crossfeed valve. Specific alternative MEL
wording to accomplish the actions specified in figure 8 to paragraph
(k) of this AD can be approved by the operator's POI.
[[Page 57388]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05DE17.007
(l) MEL Revisions for Model 777 Airplanes
For airplanes identified in paragraph (c)(4) of this AD: Within
120 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the operator's
FAA-approved MEL by incorporating the information specified in
figure 9 to paragraph (l) of this AD as a required operations
procedure when dispatching for ETOPS operation with an inoperative
fuel crossfeed valve. Specific alternative MEL wording to accomplish
the actions specified in figure 9 to paragraph (l) of this AD can be
approved by the operator's POI.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05DE17.008
(m) MEL Revisions for Model 787 Airplanes
For airplanes identified in paragraph (c)(5) of this AD: Within
120 days after the effective date of this AD, revise the operator's
FAA-approved MEL by incorporating the information specified in
figure 10 to paragraph (m) of this AD into the MEL requirements for
each of the inoperative items specified in paragraphs (m)(1) through
(m)(4) of this AD. Specific alternative MEL wording to accomplish
the actions specified in figure 10 to paragraph (m) of this AD can
be approved by the operator's POI.
(1) 28-21-01-01 Pressure Refueling System, Main Tank Inboard
Refuel Valve.
(2) 28-22-06 Fuel Balance Switch.
(3) 28-26-01 Defuel/Isolation Valves.
(4) 28-41-01-01 Main Tank Fuel Quantity Indication Systems.
[[Page 57389]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05DE17.009
(n) AD 88-21-03 R1, Amendment 39-6077 (53 FR 46605-01, November 18,
1988), AFM Limitation Removal
After the applicable AFM limitations specified in paragraphs
(g)(1), (h)(1), and (i)(1) of this AD are incorporated into an
airplane's AFM, operators may remove the AFM limitation required by
AD 88-21-03 R1, Amendment 39-6077 (53 FR 46605-01, November 18,
1988), for that airplane.
(o) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (p) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, to make those findings. To be approved,
the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation
must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval
must specifically refer to this AD.
(p) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Jon Regimbal,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6506;
fax: 425-917-6590; email: Jon.Regimbal@faa.gov.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 6, 2017.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-24811 Filed 12-4-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P