Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request, 57205 [2017-26081]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 231 / Monday, December 4, 2017 / Notices
possessed or controlled by a Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by a Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the EAR that has been or will
be exported from the United States. For
purposes of this paragraph, servicing
means installation, maintenance, repair,
modification or testing.
Third, that, after notice and
opportunity for comment as provided in
section 766.23 of the EAR, any other
person, firm, corporation, or business
organization related to a Denied Person
by affiliation, ownership, control, or
position of responsibility in the conduct
of trade or related services may also be
made subject to the provisions of this
Order.
Fourth, that this Order does not
prohibit any export, reexport, or other
transaction subject to the EAR where the
only items involved that are subject to
the EAR are the foreign-produced direct
product of U.S.-origin technology.
In accordance with the provisions of
Sections 766.24(e) of the EAR, Mahan
Airways, Al Naser Airlines, Ali
Abdullah Alhay, and/or Bahar Safwa
General Trading may, at any time,
appeal this Order by filing a full written
statement in support of the appeal with
the Office of the Administrative Law
Judge, U.S. Coast Guard ALJ Docketing
Center, 40 South Gay Street, Baltimore,
Maryland 21202–4022. In accordance
with the provisions of Sections
766.23(c)(2) and 766.24(e)(3) of the EAR,
Pejman Mahmood Kosarayanifard,
Mahmoud Amini, Kerman Aviation,
Sirjanco Trading LLC, Mahan Air
General Trading LLC, Mehdi Bahrami,
Sky Blue Bird Group, and/or Issam
Shammout may, at any time, appeal
their inclusion as a related person by
filing a full written statement in support
of the appeal with the Office of the
Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Coast
Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40 South
Gay Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202–
4022.
In accordance with the provisions of
Section 766.24(d) of the EAR, BIS may
seek renewal of this Order by filing a
written request not later than 20 days
before the expiration date. A renewal
request may be opposed by Mahan
Airways, Al Naser Airlines, Ali
Abdullah Alhay, and/or Bahar Safwa
General Trading as provided in Section
766.24(d), by filing a written submission
with the Assistant Secretary of
Commerce for Export Enforcement,
which must be received not later than
seven days before the expiration date of
the Order.
A copy of this Order shall be provided
to Mahan Airways, Al Naser Airlines,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Dec 01, 2017
Jkt 244001
Ali Abdullah Alhay, and Bahar Safwa
General Trading and each related
person, and shall be published in the
Federal Register.
This Order is effective immediately
and shall remain in effect until
December 26, 2017, unless renewed in
accordance with Section 766.24(d) of
the Regulations.
Dated: November 16, 2017.
Richard R. Majauskas,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Commerce for
Export Enforcement.
[FR Doc. 2017–25964 Filed 12–1–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will
submit to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for clearance the
following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35).
Agency: International Trade
Administration.
Title: Proposed Information
Collection; Comment Request; EU–U.S.
Privacy Shield; Invitation for
Applications for Inclusion on the List of
Arbitrators.
OMB Control Number: 0625–0277.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Request: Regular submission
(extension of a currently approved
information collection).
Number of Respondents: 60.
Average Hours per Response: 240
minutes.
Burden Hours: 240 hours.
Needs and Uses: Under the Privacy
Shield, the U.S. Department of
Commerce (DOC) and the European
Commission have committed to
implement an arbitration mechanism to
provide European individuals with the
ability to invoke binding arbitration to
determine, for residual claims, whether
an organization has violated its
obligations under the Privacy Shield.
The DOC and the European Commission
will work together to implement the
arbitration mechanism. Consistent with
applicable law, DOC and the European
Commission will develop a list of at
least 20 arbitrators, chosen on the basis
of independence, integrity, and
expertise. Parties to a binding
arbitration under this Privacy Shield
mechanism may only select arbitrators
from this list. The arbitral mechanism is
a critical component of the EU–U.S.
Privacy Shield Framework and must be
implemented as soon as possible to
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
57205
preserve the integrity of the Privacy
Shield program. More than 2,500 U.S.based organizations currently rely on
the Privacy Shield to transfer the
personal data from Europe to the United
States necessary to do business across
the Atlantic. Such a data transfer
mechanism is critically important,
because it underpins almost $300
billion in digitally deliverable services
traded across the Atlantic each year.
Affected Public: Private individuals.
Frequency: Recurrent, depending on
the number of arbitrators required to
retain an active list of 20 arbitrators.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
This information collection request
may be viewed at reginfo.gov. Follow
the instructions to view Department of
Commerce collections currently under
review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to OIRA_Submission@
omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395–5806.
Sheleen Dumas,
Departmental PRA Lead, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017–26081 Filed 12–1–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–533–838]
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From
India: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2015–2016
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is conducting an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on carbazole
violet pigment 23 (CVP 23) from India.
The period of review (POR) is December
1, 2015, through November 30, 2016.
The review covers one producer/
exporter of the subject merchandise,
Pidilite Industries Limited (Pidilite).
The Department preliminarily finds that
subject merchandise has been sold in
the United States at prices below normal
value (NV) during the POR.
DATES: Applicable December 4, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Irene Gorelik or George Ayache, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VIII,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM
04DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 231 (Monday, December 4, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 57205]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-26081]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
The Department of Commerce will submit to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for clearance the following proposal for collection of
information under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35).
Agency: International Trade Administration.
Title: Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; EU-U.S.
Privacy Shield; Invitation for Applications for Inclusion on the List
of Arbitrators.
OMB Control Number: 0625-0277.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Request: Regular submission (extension of a currently
approved information collection).
Number of Respondents: 60.
Average Hours per Response: 240 minutes.
Burden Hours: 240 hours.
Needs and Uses: Under the Privacy Shield, the U.S. Department of
Commerce (DOC) and the European Commission have committed to implement
an arbitration mechanism to provide European individuals with the
ability to invoke binding arbitration to determine, for residual
claims, whether an organization has violated its obligations under the
Privacy Shield. The DOC and the European Commission will work together
to implement the arbitration mechanism. Consistent with applicable law,
DOC and the European Commission will develop a list of at least 20
arbitrators, chosen on the basis of independence, integrity, and
expertise. Parties to a binding arbitration under this Privacy Shield
mechanism may only select arbitrators from this list. The arbitral
mechanism is a critical component of the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework and must be implemented as soon as possible to preserve the
integrity of the Privacy Shield program. More than 2,500 U.S.-based
organizations currently rely on the Privacy Shield to transfer the
personal data from Europe to the United States necessary to do business
across the Atlantic. Such a data transfer mechanism is critically
important, because it underpins almost $300 billion in digitally
deliverable services traded across the Atlantic each year.
Affected Public: Private individuals.
Frequency: Recurrent, depending on the number of arbitrators
required to retain an active list of 20 arbitrators.
Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
This information collection request may be viewed at reginfo.gov.
Follow the instructions to view Department of Commerce collections
currently under review by OMB.
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice
to OIRA_Submission@omb.eop.gov or fax to (202) 395-5806.
Sheleen Dumas,
Departmental PRA Lead, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2017-26081 Filed 12-1-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
