Pecans Grown in the States of Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas; Establishment of Reporting Requirements and New Information Collection, 57166-57172 [2017-25738]
Download as PDF
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
57166
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 231 / Monday, December 4, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Committee determined that assessment
revenue, along with funds from reserves
and interest income, would be adequate
to cover budgeted expenses for the
2017–18 fiscal period.
A review of historical information and
preliminary information pertaining to
the upcoming fiscal period indicates
that the average grower price for the
2017–18 season should be
approximately $15.50 per 7/10-bushel
carton or equivalent of oranges and
grapefruit. Therefore, the estimated
assessment revenue for the 2017–18
crop year as a percentage of total grower
revenue would be about 0.1 percent.
This proposed rule would decrease
the assessment obligation imposed on
handlers. Assessments are applied
uniformly on all handlers, and some of
the costs may be passed on to
producers. However, decreasing the
assessment rate reduces the burden on
handlers and may also reduce the
burden on producers.
The Committee’s meeting was widely
publicized throughout the Texas citrus
industry. All interested persons were
invited to attend the meeting and
participate in Committee deliberations
on all issues. Like all Committee
meetings, the August 8, 2017, meeting
was a public meeting and all entities,
both large and small, were able to
express views on this issue. Finally,
interested persons are invited to submit
comments on this proposed rule,
including the regulatory and
informational impacts of this action on
small businesses.
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), the Order’s information
collection requirements have been
previously approved by the OMB and
assigned OMB No. 0581–0189, Fruit
Crops. No changes in those
requirements would be necessary as a
result of this proposed rule. Should any
changes become necessary, they would
be submitted to OMB for approval.
This proposed rule would not impose
any additional reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on either
small or large Texas orange and
grapefruit handlers. As with all Federal
marketing order programs, reports and
forms are periodically reviewed to
reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Dec 01, 2017
Jkt 244001
USDA has not identified any relevant
Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this rule.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Richard Lower
at the previously mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
A 30-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposal. Thirty days is deemed
appropriate since the fiscal period began
August 1, 2017, and the Order requires
that the rate of assessment apply to all
assessable oranges and grapefruit
handled during such fiscal period. All
written comments timely received will
be considered before a final
determination is made on this rule.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 906
Grapefruit, Marketing agreements,
Oranges, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 906 is amended as
follows:
PART 906—ORANGES AND
GRAPEFRUIT GROWN IN LOWER RIO
GRANDE VALLEY IN TEXAS
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 906 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
[Subpart Redesignated as Subpart A]
2. Redesignate ‘‘Subpart—Order
Regulating Handling’’ as ‘‘Subpart A—
Order Regulating Handling.’’
■
[Subpart Redesignated as Subpart B
and Amended]
3. Redesignate ‘‘Subpart—Rules and
Regulations’’ as Subpart B and revise
heading to read as follows:
■
Subpart B—Administrative
Requirements
4. Section 906.235 is revised to read
as follows:
Assessment rate.
On and after August 1, 2017, an
assessment rate of $0.02 per 7/10-bushel
carton or equivalent is established for
oranges and grapefruit grown in the
Lower Rio Grande Valley in Texas.
[Subpart Redesignated as Subpart C]
5. Redesignate ‘‘Subpart—Container
and Pack Requirements’’ as ‘‘Subpart
C—Container and Pack Requirements.’’
■
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[FR Doc. 2017–25737 Filed 12–1–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 986
[Doc. No. AMS–SC–17–0039; SC17–986–3
PR]
Pecans Grown in the States of
Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona,
California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas,
Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi, North
Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma,
South Carolina, and Texas;
Establishment of Reporting
Requirements and New Information
Collection
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
This proposed rule invites
comments on the establishment of
reporting requirements under the
Federal marketing order for pecans
(Order). These reporting requirements
would enable collection of information
from handlers on: Pecans received;
pecans purchased outside the United
States; shipments and inventory of
pecans; pecans exported by country of
destination; and pecans exported for
shelling and returned to the United
States. This information would be used
to provide important statistical reports
to the industry, meet requirements
under the Order, and to help guide
future marketing efforts. This proposal
also announces the Agricultural
Marketing Service’s intention to request
approval from the Office of Management
and Budget of a new information
collection.
SUMMARY:
Comments must be received by
February 2, 2018. Pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act, comments on
the information collection burden must
be received by February 2, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments
must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the
DATES:
■
§ 906.235
Dated: November 22, 2017.
Bruce Summers,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
E:\FR\FM\04DEP1.SGM
04DEP1
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 231 / Monday, December 4, 2017 / Proposed Rules
document number and the date and
page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be made available for
public inspection in the Office of the
Docket Clerk during regular business
hours, or can be viewed at: https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
submitted in response to this proposal
will be included in the record and will
be made available to the public. Please
be advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
Internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennie M. Varela, Marketing Specialist,
or Christian D. Nissen, Regional
Director, Southeast Marketing Field
Office, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324–
3375, Fax: (863) 291–8614, or Email:
Jennie.Varela@ams.usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower,
Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202)720–8938, or Email:
Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
proposes an amendment to regulations
issued to carry out a marketing order as
defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j).This proposal
is issued under Marketing Agreement
and Order No. 986, (7 CFR part 986),
regulating the handling of pecans grown
in the states of Alabama, Arkansas,
Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia,
Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri,
Mississippi, North Carolina, New
Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and
Texas, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘Order.’’ The Order is effective under
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement
Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–
674), hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘Act.’’ The American Pecan Council
(Council) locally administers the Order
and is comprised of growers and
handlers of pecans operating within the
production area and one public
member.
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this proposed rule in
conformance with Executive Orders
13563 and 13175. This action falls
within a category of regulatory actions
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted from
Executive Order 12866 review.
Additionally, because this proposed
rule does not meet the definition of a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Dec 01, 2017
Jkt 244001
significant regulatory action it does not
trigger the requirements contained in
Executive Order 13771. See OMB’s
Memorandum titled ‘‘Interim Guidance
Implementing Section 2 of the Executive
Order of January 30, 2017 titled
‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs’ ’’ (February 2, 2017).
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This proposed rule is
not intended to have retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an Order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
Order, any provision of the Order, or
any obligation imposed in connection
with the Order is not in accordance with
law and request a modification of the
Order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for
a hearing on the petition. After the
hearing, USDA would rule on the
petition. The Act provides that the
district court of the United States in any
district in which the handler is an
inhabitant, or has his or her principal
place of business, has jurisdiction to
review USDA’s ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than
20 days after the date of the entry of the
ruling.
This proposed rule would establish
reporting requirements under the Order.
This proposed action would require all
pecan handlers to submit to the Council
reports on pecans received, shipped,
held in inventory, exported for sale or
shelling, and purchased from outside
the United States. This information
would be used by the Council to
provide statistical reports to the
industry, meet requirements under the
Order, and help guide future marketing
efforts. This proposal was unanimously
recommended by the Council at its
April 17, 2017, meeting.
Section 2(4) of the Act specifies that
one of its stated policies is to establish
and maintain orderly marketing
conditions for certain agricultural
commodities that will provide, in the
interests of producers and consumers,
an orderly flow of the supply of such
commodities to market to avoid
unreasonable fluctuations in supply and
prices. Section 8(d)(1) of the Act
specifies that the Secretary may require
all handlers subject to a marketing order
to provide USDA with such information
as is necessary for it to ascertain and
determine the degree to which the
agreement has been carried out or
effectuated the declared policy of the
Act.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57167
Sections 986.75, 986.76, and 986.77 of
the Order provide authority to the
Council to require handlers to submit
reports of inventory, merchantable
pecans handled, and pecans received by
handlers, respectively, on such dates as
the Council may prescribe. Section
986.78 further provides, with the
approval of the Secretary, authority for
the Council to collect other reports and
information from handlers needed to
perform its duties. This proposed rule
would use these authorities to establish
new §§ 986.177 and 986.178 under the
administrative provisions of the Order.
These new sections would require
handlers of pecans to report to the
Council on a monthly basis: Pecans
received, shipped, held in inventory,
exported for sale or shelling, and
purchased from outside the United
States, using five specific Council forms.
At its November 16, 2016, meeting,
the first meeting following the
promulgation of the Order, the Council
discussed its initial budget, assessment
rates, and necessary reporting
requirements to establish a program that
is efficient and responsive to industry
needs. During these discussions, the
Council appointed a Statistics and
Reporting Committee (Committee) to
develop reporting requirements.
Members of the Committee discussed
the reporting needs of the industry,
reviewed examples of reporting forms
from other marketing orders, and met
and worked with the staff of another
marketing order in developing the
proposed reporting requirements. The
Committee also worked with USDA to
ensure the recommended information
collection would provide the
information necessary to facilitate the
administration of the Order.
At its February 23, 2017, meeting, the
Council reviewed drafts of seven
reporting forms as developed and
recommended by the Committee. The
Council expressed its interest in having
as much electronic reporting as
possible, but recognized that many
handlers may prefer a paper submission.
The Council also considered the timing
of when forms would be due and
submission dates that would work for
all parts of the industry. After a
thorough review and some
modifications, seven forms were
approved by the Council.
At a meeting on April 17, 2017, the
Council revisited the recommended
reporting requirements and the
accompanying forms. Acknowledging
that the industry was more than halfway
through the fiscal year at that time, the
Council recommended dividing the
reporting requirements into the five
forms needed beginning with the 2017–
E:\FR\FM\04DEP1.SGM
04DEP1
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
57168
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 231 / Monday, December 4, 2017 / Proposed Rules
2018 fiscal year and the two forms
needed beginning with the 2016–2017
fiscal year. The two forms required for
the 2016–2017 fiscal year are being
considered in a separate rulemaking
action.
This proposed rule would add five
new reporting requirements and five
new forms to the administrative
provisions under the Order by adding
§§ 986.177 and 986.178. Detailed
information on the reporting burden
that would be created by these new
forms is discussed later in this
document.
During the formal rulemaking hearing
to promulgate the Order, it was stated
that the data collection component was
one of the most important aspects of the
Order. Concerns were also expressed
regarding the accuracy and availability
of industry data, and the impact those
have on making good business
decisions.
Currently, most available reports on
domestic pecan production are issued
annually and often long after the
marketing year has been completed.
Additionally, the reporting of this
information is currently voluntary, so
not all handlers are reporting, which
impacts the accuracy of the available
information. Some aggregate import and
export data are available, but this
information too is usually available on
an annual basis, or reported several
months after the shipments have been
made. Additionally, some domestic
production is shipped outside of the
country for shelling and then returned
to the United States for sale or further
processing. There is concern this
volume is not being properly accounted
for, and is negatively impacting the
accuracy of the industry information
currently available.
The Council agreed these reporting
requirements would be necessary to
develop accurate reports for the
industry regarding pecans being
produced and handled in the United
States, and recognized the value to the
industry of such reports. Having
accurate and timely information on the
total supply of pecans moving into and
out of the country would also assist the
industry in managing available supply
and in making marketing decisions.
Further, collecting this information
monthly would allow the Council to
provide key data regarding total supply
and inventory to the industry in a more
timely fashion throughout the season.
The Council also recognized that
§ 986.65 of the Order requires the
Council to provide a report and
recommendation to the Secretary on the
Council’s proposed marketing policy for
the next fiscal year. The report is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Dec 01, 2017
Jkt 244001
required to include, in part, an estimate
of production; improved, native, and
substandard pecans; handler inventory;
and trade supply, taking into
consideration imported pecans. In
addition to providing important
information for industry reports, the
reporting requirements covered in this
proposed action would provide the
information needed to develop the
marketing policy.
Two specific monthly reporting
requirements would be added to the
administrative provisions under the
Order in a new § 986.177, a summary
report of domestic pecans received, and
a report of pecans purchased outside the
United States. The summary report of
domestic pecans received would
include information on the handler
submitting the form, the month covered
by the report, the total weight and type
of inshell pecans received, and the
weight by variety of improved pecans
received. In addition, the form would
also include information regarding total
assessments owed and total pounds
reported to date.
The information on this form would
provide the Council with the volume of
pecans received by handlers each month
throughout the season. This information
would be used to track the available
supply of pecans each month, and the
overall crop as it is delivered to
handlers. The Council would then be
able to use the information to develop
its own reports that would provide the
industry with an overview of market
information for the predominant
varieties, including volume by variety,
which could assist in the development
of marketing strategies.
The Council also intends to use this
form to facilitate the collection of
assessments on a monthly basis
throughout the season. Using the form,
handlers would be able to calculate
their assessments due based on the
pecans received as listed on the report.
Handlers would be required to pay to
the Council the assessments owed on
the pecans received by the due date of
the summary report.
In its discussion of the report of
pecans purchased outside the United
States, the Council agreed it would be
important to have information regarding
the volume of pecans being imported by
production area handlers. The monthly
report of pecans purchased outside the
United States would include the name
of the handler importing pecans, the
month covered by the report, the date
imported, country of origin, volume,
and variety of pecans imported.
As production of pecans abroad has
increased, there has been an increase in
pecans imported into the United States.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
One Council member stated that the
domestic industry is currently shelling
and processing as much as 70 to 75
percent of Mexican-grown pecans, and
that Mexican pecans now account for
nearly 50 percent of sales in the United
States. Consequently, having
information regarding the volume of
imported pecans is essential when
calculating available supply. Collecting
this information would greatly improve
the accuracy of reports to the industry
as it would include information
regarding both domestic and imported
pecans.
One of the Council’s main goals in
developing these reporting requirements
is to deliver to the industry accurate
reports regarding the marketplace and
supply of pecans to assist the industry
in making its marketing decisions
throughout the year. The Council
believes having accurate information
regarding imported pecans is an
essential part of reaching this goal.
Further, collecting this information
would provide the industry with
valuable data regarding the timing and
volume of pecans imported into the
United States. Members also agreed
having this information would assist the
Council in developing its marketing
policy as required under the Order.
Three additional reporting
requirements would be added to the
administrative provisions in a new
§ 986.178: Reports of shipments and
inventory, exports by country of
destination, and inshell pecans exported
to Mexico for shelling. The report of
shipments and inventory would include
information on the handler submitting
the form, the month covered by the
report, shipments of shelled and inshell
pecans, current inventory, and pecans
in inventory already committed for
shipment.
The Council believes this form would
provide beneficial information regarding
shipments completed and volume in
inventory. While there is currently some
limited information available regarding
pecans in cold storage, this information
does not delineate between available
inventory and inventory that is already
committed for shipment. By collecting
this information from handlers, this
report, in conjunction with the data
regarding pecans received, would allow
the Council to provide the industry with
inventory reports that are more accurate,
and that provide a clearer picture of
available supply. This data on the
available volume of pecans would
provide the industry with the
information needed to make better
marketing decisions.
When discussing a reporting
requirement for exported pecans, the
E:\FR\FM\04DEP1.SGM
04DEP1
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 231 / Monday, December 4, 2017 / Proposed Rules
Council expressed the industry’s need
for more information concerning
international trade markets and export
trends. The report of exports by country
of destination would include
information on the handler submitting
the report, the month of the report, and
the weight of all shipments of pecans,
inshell or shelled, by classification, and
by country of destination.
The Council estimated that prior to
2005, around 10 percent of domestic
production was being exported. Since
then, exports have grown considerably
and now account for between 40 and 50
percent of production. The
recommended form would be used to
generate reports throughout the season
providing industry members with
information on where product is being
sold and in what volume. Further, the
Council could use this information to
determine the effectiveness of any
international promotional efforts and to
consider opportunities for promotion
and market expansion.
Some of the pecans shipped outside
the United States are exported just for
shelling and then returned to the United
States for further use. The Council
recommended an additional reporting
form to capture this information.
Specifically, the Council recommended
collecting information on pecans
exported to Mexico for shelling and
then returned to the United States. The
Council decided to limit the reporting to
Mexico since the vast majority of pecans
exported for this purpose are being sent
to Mexico because of its proximity and
cost efficiencies. The report of inshell
pecans exported to Mexico for shelling
would include information on the
handler submitting the report, the
month covered by the report, dates of
shipments, the total weight of inshell
pecans shipped for shelling, and the
weight of shelled pecans returned to the
United States.
In discussing this reporting
requirement, the Council recognized
that in addition to shelling some pecans
from the production area, Mexico also
exports pecans to the United States.
This makes it difficult to determine how
much of the import volume reported
from Mexico is represented by domestic
product after shelling. It was expressed
that without this report, the accuracy of
data regarding both reported exported
and imported product could be
compromised. Pecans exported for
shelling could be counted as exports,
and then counted again as imports when
returned to the United States. This
reporting requirement would help
reduce the possibility of double
counting of these pecans, and would
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Dec 01, 2017
Jkt 244001
help improve the accuracy of the overall
information on supply.
The Council selected the tenth day of
the month following the month of the
activity as the due date for all five
reports. Should the tenth day of the
month fall on a weekend or holiday,
reports would be due by the first
business day following the tenth day of
the month. The five monthly reports
would be used during the 2017–2018
and subsequent seasons.
This proposed action would require
pecan handlers to provide the Council
with monthly reports on pecans
received, shipped, held in inventory,
exported for sale or shelling, and
purchased from outside the United
States. By establishing these reporting
requirements, the Council would be able
to gather and disseminate this
information in accurate market reports.
Further, this information would be used
to create a marketing policy each year as
required under the Order.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601–612), the Agricultural
Marketing Service (AMS) has
considered the economic impact of this
proposed action on small entities.
Accordingly, AMS has prepared this
initial regulatory flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit
regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in
order that small businesses will not be
unduly or disproportionately burdened.
Marketing orders issued pursuant to the
Act, and rules issued thereunder, are
unique in that they are brought about
through group action of essentially
small entities acting on their own
behalf.
There are approximately 2,500
growers of pecans in the production
area and approximately 250 handlers
subject to regulation under the pecan
marketing Order. Small agricultural
growers are defined by the Small
Business Administration as those
having annual receipts less than
$750,000, and small agricultural service
firms are defined as those whose annual
receipts are less than $7,500,000 (13
CFR 121.201).
According to information from the
National Agricultural Statistics Service
(NASS), the average grower price for
pecans during the 2015–2016 season
was $2.20 per pound and 254 million
pounds were utilized. The value for
pecans that year totaled $558.8 million
($2.20 per pound multiplied by 254
million pounds). Taking the total value
of production for pecans and dividing it
by the total number of pecan growers
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57169
provides an average return per grower of
$223,520. Using the average price and
utilization information, and assuming a
normal bell-curve distribution of
receipts among growers, the majority of
growers receive less than $750,000
annually.
Evidence presented at the formal
rulemaking hearing indicates an average
handler margin of $0.58 per pound.
Adding this margin to the average
grower price of $2.20 per pound of
inshell pecans results in an estimated
handler price of $2.78 per pound. With
a total 2015 production of 254 million
pounds, ($2.78 per pound multiplied by
254 million pounds) the total value of
production in 2015 was $706.12
million. Taking the total value of
production for pecans and dividing it by
the total number of pecan handlers
provides an average return per handler
of $2,824,480. Using this estimated
price, the utilization volume, number of
handlers, and assuming a normal bellcurve distribution of receipts among
handlers, the majority of handlers have
annual receipts of less than $7,500,000.
Thus, the majority (a substantial
number) of growers and handlers of
pecans grown in the states of Alabama,
Arkansas, Arizona, California, Florida,
Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri,
Mississippi, North Carolina, New
Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and
Texas may be classified as small
entities.
This proposed rule would establish
reporting requirements under the Order.
This proposed action would require
pecan handlers to provide the Council
with reports of pecans received,
shipped, held in inventory, exported for
sale or shelling, and purchased from
outside the United States. The Council
would use this information to provide
important statistical reports to the
industry, to meet requirements under
the Order, and to help guide future
marketing efforts. This rule would
establish new §§ 986.177 and 986.178
under the administrative provisions of
the Order. The authority for this
proposed action is provided for in
Section 8(d)(1) of the Act and §§ 986.75,
986.76, 986.77, and 986.78 of the Order.
Requiring monthly reports of pecans
received, shipped, held in inventory,
exported for sale or shelling, and
purchased from outside the United
States would impose an increase in the
reporting burden on all pecan handlers.
However, this data is already recorded
and maintained by handlers as a part of
their daily business. Handlers,
regardless of size, should be able to
readily access this information.
Consequently, any additional costs
associated with this change would be
E:\FR\FM\04DEP1.SGM
04DEP1
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
57170
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 231 / Monday, December 4, 2017 / Proposed Rules
minimal (not significant) and apply
equally to all handlers.
This proposed action should also help
the entire industry by providing
comprehensive data on pecans received,
shipped, held in inventory, exported for
sale or shelling, and purchased from
outside the United States. Collection of
this data was one of the industry’s goals
in promulgating the Order as there is no
other source for this type of data. This
information would provide accurate
information regarding available
inventory, help with marketing and
planning for the industry, provide
important information for the collection
of assessments, and assist with
preparing the annual marketing policy
required by the Order. The benefits of
this proposed rule are expected to be
equally available to all pecan growers
and handlers, regardless of their size.
The Council discussed other
alternatives to this proposed action. The
Council considered listing additional
varieties on the summary report of
pecans received. However, after
discussion the Council determined a
simpler version with the major
commercial varieties and room for
handlers to enter additional varieties as
needed would be less burdensome. The
Council also considered different due
dates for these monthly reports,
including a due date of the first, the
third and the fifth day after the month
of the activity. However, after some
discussion, it was determined some
handlers may have difficulty meeting
these time frames. The 15th day of the
month was also suggested, but Council
members thought this would delay the
issuance of reports, and negatively
impact their value. Consequently, the
Council agreed to set the due date for all
five forms at the tenth of the month. The
Council also considered the value and
importance of each of the forms, and if
all should be approved. However, the
Council agreed each of the forms
recommended provide important
information for the industry and for
administering the Order. Therefore, the
alternatives were rejected.
This proposal would establish five
new reporting requirements and five
new Council forms. Therefore, this
proposed rule would impose an increase
in the reporting burden for all handlers,
which is discussed in the Paperwork
Reduction Act section of this document.
As with all Federal marketing order
programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce
information requirements and
duplication by industry and public
sector agencies. USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Dec 01, 2017
Jkt 244001
that duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
this proposed rule.
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Further, the Council’s meetings were
widely publicized throughout the pecan
industry and all interested persons were
invited to attend the meetings and
participate in Council deliberations on
all issues. Additionally, the Council’s
Committee meetings held February 23,
2017, and April 17, 2017, were also
public meetings and all entities, both
large and small, were able to express
views on this issue. Finally, interested
persons are invited to submit comments
on this proposed rule, including the
regulatory and information collection
impacts of this proposed action on small
businesses.
A small business guide on complying
with fruit, vegetable, and specialty crop
marketing agreements and orders may
be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/
rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses.
Any questions about the compliance
guide should be sent to Richard Lower
at the previously-mentioned address in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
A 60-day comment period is provided
to allow interested persons to respond
to this proposal. All written comments
timely received will be considered
before a final determination is made on
this matter.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), this notice announces
AMS’s intent to request approval from
OMB for a new information collection
under OMB No. 0581–NEW. It will be
merged with the forms currently
approved under OMB No. 0581–0291
‘‘Federal Marketing Order for Pecans.’’
Title: Pecans Grown in the States of
Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California,
Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana,
Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina,
New Mexico, Oklahoma, South
Carolina, and Texas; Marketing Order
No. 986.
OMB Number: 0581–NEW.
Type of Request: New Collection.
Abstract: The information
requirements in this request are
essential to carry out the intent of the
Act, to provide the respondents the type
of service they request, and to
administer the pecan marketing order
program.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
On April 17, 2017, the Council
unanimously recommended that all
pecan handlers subject to the Order
provide the Council with a monthly
record of pecans received. This form,
titled ‘‘Summary Report U.S. Pecans
Received for Your Own Account,’’
would be submitted directly to the
Council by handlers by the tenth day of
the month following the month the
pecans were received. This information
collection would gather data on the total
pounds received each month by variety
and on the related assessments due.
The Council also recommended that
all handlers subject to the Order submit
a monthly report of product shipped,
transferred, or committed. This form,
titled ‘‘Report of Shipments and
Inventory on Hand,’’ would be
submitted directly to the Council by
handlers by the tenth day of the month
following the activity. This information
collection would provide the Council
with a monthly record of how much of
the current crop has been shipped, is
committed to be shipped or is being
held in inventory. It would provide the
volume of available inventory, which
would be needed to make marketing
decisions.
The Council also recommended that
handlers provide the Council with a
record of exports by type and
destination. This form, titled ‘‘Exports
by Country of Destination,’’ would be
submitted directly to the Council by
handlers by the tenth day of the month
following the shipment(s). This
information collection would provide
the Council with up-to-date information
on where exported pecans are being
sold. This information would improve
data collection by accounting for pecans
moving outside the United States and is
necessary for developing the Council’s
marketing policy as required by the
Order.
The Council also recommended that
handlers submit a report of pecans
exported to Mexico for the purpose of
shelling and then returned to the United
States. This form, titled ‘‘Inshell Pecans
Exported to Mexico for Shelling and
Returned to the United States as Shelled
Meats,’’ would be submitted directly to
the Council by handlers by the tenth
day of the month following the
shipment(s) out of and into the United
States. This reporting requirement
would help reduce the possibility of
double counting of these pecans as both
exported and imported product, and
would help improve the accuracy of the
overall information on supply.
The Council also recommended that
all handlers subject to the Order submit
a monthly report that would capture
information on the volume of imported
E:\FR\FM\04DEP1.SGM
04DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 231 / Monday, December 4, 2017 / Proposed Rules
pecans. This form, titled ‘‘Pecans
Purchased Outside the United States,’’
would be submitted directly to the
Council by handlers by the tenth day of
the month following the receipt of such
pecans. This information collection
would assist in quantifying the volume
of imported pecans on the market,
provide the industry with a more
accurate estimate of total supply, and
assist with the development of the
marketing policy required under the
Order.
The information collected would only
be used by authorized representatives of
the USDA, including the AMS Specialty
Crops Program regional and
headquarters staff, and authorized
employees of the Council. Authorized
Council employees would be the
primary users of the information, and
the AMS would be the secondary users.
The Council’s staff would compile the
information and utilize it to account for
pecans received, shipped, held in
inventory, exported for sale or shelling,
and purchased from outside the United
States. All proprietary information
would be kept confidential in
accordance with the Act and the Order.
The proposed request for new
information collection under the Order
is as follows:
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Summary Report—U.S. Pecans
Received for Your Own Account
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to be an average of 0.33
hours per response.
Respondents: Handlers of pecans in
Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California,
Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana,
Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina,
New Mexico, Oklahoma, South
Carolina, and Texas.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
250.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 12.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 990 hours.
Pecans Purchased Outside the United
States
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to be an average of 0.33
hours per response.
Respondents: Handlers of pecans in
Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California,
Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana,
Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina,
New Mexico, Oklahoma, South
Carolina, and Texas.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
15.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 12.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Dec 01, 2017
Jkt 244001
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 59.4 hours.
Report of Shipments and Inventory on
Hand
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to be an average of 0.33
hours per response.
Respondents: Handlers of pecans in
Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California,
Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana,
Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina,
New Mexico, Oklahoma, South
Carolina, and Texas.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
250.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 12.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 990 hours.
Exports by Country of Destination
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to be an average of 0.25
hours per response.
Respondents: Handlers of pecans in
Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California,
Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana,
Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina,
New Mexico, Oklahoma, South
Carolina, and Texas.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
35.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 12.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 105 hours.
Inshell Pecans Exported to Mexico for
Shelling and Returned to the United
States as Shelled Meats
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to be an average of 0.5
hours per response.
Respondents: Handlers of pecans in
Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California,
Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana,
Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina,
New Mexico, Oklahoma, South
Carolina, and Texas.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
15.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 12.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 90 hours.
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3)
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
57171
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (4) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments should reference OMB No.
0581–NEW and the Marketing Order for
Pecans Grown in the states of Alabama,
Arkansas, Arizona, California, Florida,
Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri,
Mississippi, North Carolina, New
Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and
Texas, and should be sent to the USDA
in care of the Docket Clerk at the
previously-mentioned address or at
https://www.regulations.gov.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments
received will become a matter of public
record and will be available for public
inspection during regular business
hours at the address of the Docket Clerk
or at https://www.regulations.gov.
If this proposed rule is finalized, this
information collection will be merged
with the forms currently approved
under OMB No. 0581–0291 ‘‘Federal
Marketing Order for Pecans.’’
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 986
Marketing agreements, Nuts, Pecans,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 7 CFR part 986 is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 986—PECANS GROWN IN THE
STATES OF ALABAMA, ARKANSAS,
ARIZONA, CALIFORNIA, FLORIDA,
GEORGIA, KANSAS, LOUISIANA,
MISSOURI, MISSISSIPPI, NORTH
CAROLINA, NEW MEXICO,
OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, AND
TEXAS
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 986 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674.
2. Add § 986.177 to Subpart B—
Administrative Provisions to read as
follows:
■
§ 986.177
handlers
Reports of pecans received by
(a) Summary report U.S. pecans
received for your own account. Handlers
shall submit to the Council, by the tenth
day of the month, a summary report of
inshell domestic pecans received during
the preceding month. Should the tenth
day of the month fall on a weekend or
holiday, reports are due by the first
business day following the tenth day of
E:\FR\FM\04DEP1.SGM
04DEP1
57172
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 231 / Monday, December 4, 2017 / Proposed Rules
the month. The report shall be
submitted to the Council on APC Form
1 and contain the following information:
(1) The name and address of the
handler;
(2) The month covered by the report;
(3) The total weight and type of
inshell pecans received, and the weight
by variety for improved pecans received
during the reporting period;
(4) The total weight and type of
inshell pecans received, and the weight
by variety for improved pecans received
year to date; and,
(5) Assessments due on pecans
received during the reporting period to
be paid by the due date of the report.
(b) Pecans purchased outside the
United States. Handlers shall submit to
the Council, by the tenth day of the
month, a summary report of shelled and
inshell pecans imported during the
preceding month. Should the tenth day
of the month fall on a weekend or
holiday, reports are due by the first
business day following the tenth day of
the month. The report shall be
submitted to the Council on APC Form
6 and contain the following information:
(1) The name and address of the
handler;
(1) The month covered by the report;
(3) The date the pecans were
imported;
(4) The country of origin; and,
(5) The total weight of shelled and
inshell pecans received, and the weight
by variety for improved pecans
received.
■ 3. Add § 986.178 to Subpart B—
Administrative Provisions to read as
follows:
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 986.178
Other reports
(a) Report of shipments and inventory
on hand. Handlers shall submit to the
Council, by the tenth day of the month
following the month of activity, a report
of all shipments, inventory, and
committed inventory for pecans. Should
the tenth day of the month fall on a
weekend or holiday, reports are due by
the first business day following the
tenth day of the month. The report shall
be submitted to the Council on APC
Form 2 and contain the following
information:
(1) The name and address of the
handler;
(2) The month covered by the report;
(3) The weight of all shipments of
pecans, inshell and shelled, and interhandler transfers shipped and received
during the reporting period;
(4) The weight of all shipments of
pecans, inshell and shelled, and interhandler transfers shipped and received
in the previous month and year to date;
(5) Total inventory held by handler;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:46 Dec 01, 2017
Jkt 244001
(6) All the inventory committed
(pecans not shipped, but sold or
otherwise obligated) whether for
domestic sale or export; and,
(7) The weight of all shelled or inshell
pecans under contract for purchase from
other handlers.
(b) Exports by country of destination.
Handlers shall submit to the Council, by
the tenth day of the month following the
month of shipment, a report of exports.
Should the tenth day of the month fall
on a weekend or holiday, reports are
due by the first business day following
the tenth day of the month. The report
shall be reported to the Council on APC
Form 3 and contain the following
information:
(1) The name and address of the
handler;
(2) The month covered by the report;
(3) The total weight of pecans shipped
for export, whether inshell, shelled, or
substandard during the reporting
period;
(4) The total weight of pecans shipped
for export, whether inshell, shelled, or
substandard during the previous period
and year to date; and,
(5) The destination(s) of such exports.
(c) Inshell pecans exported to Mexico
for shelling and returned to the United
States as shelled meats. Handlers shall
submit to the Council, by the tenth day
of the month following the month of
shipment, a report of all inshell pecans
exported to Mexico for shelling and
returned to the United States as shelled
pecans. Should the tenth day of the
month fall on a weekend or holiday,
reports are due by the first business day
following the tenth day of the month.
The report shall be submitted to the
Council on APC Form 5 and contain the
following information:
(1) The name and address of the
handler;
(2) The month covered by the report;
(3) The date of inshell shipment(s);
(4) The weight of pecans exported for
shelling;
(5) The date shelled pecans returned
to the United States after shelling;
(6) The weight of shelled pecans
returned to the United States after
shelling; and
(7) The total weight of inshell pecans
exported to Mexico for shelling, and
shelled pecans returned from Mexico,
year to date.
Dated: November 22, 2017.
Bruce Summers,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–25738 Filed 12–1–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2017–1119; Product
Identifier 2017–CE–037–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Embraer S.A.
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for
Embraer S.A. Models EMB–500 and
EMB–505 airplanes. This proposed AD
results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as improperly tied castle nuts
on the aileron, rudder, and elevator trim
tab (or autotab) attachment bolts. We are
issuing this proposed AD to require
actions to address the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by January 18, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Embraer S.A.,
Phenom Maintenance Support, Avenida
´
˜
Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2170, Sao Jose
dos Campos—SP—12227–901, P.O. Box
36/2, Brasil; phone: +55 12 3927 1000;
fax: +55 12 3927–2619; email:
phenom.reliability@embraer.com.br;
Internet: https://www.embraer.com.br/
en-US/Pages/home.aspx. You may
review this referenced service
information at the FAA, Policy and
Innovation Division, 901 Locust, Kansas
City, Missouri 64106. For information
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04DEP1.SGM
04DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 231 (Monday, December 4, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 57166-57172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-25738]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 986
[Doc. No. AMS-SC-17-0039; SC17-986-3 PR]
Pecans Grown in the States of Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona,
California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi,
North Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas;
Establishment of Reporting Requirements and New Information Collection
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule invites comments on the establishment of
reporting requirements under the Federal marketing order for pecans
(Order). These reporting requirements would enable collection of
information from handlers on: Pecans received; pecans purchased outside
the United States; shipments and inventory of pecans; pecans exported
by country of destination; and pecans exported for shelling and
returned to the United States. This information would be used to
provide important statistical reports to the industry, meet
requirements under the Order, and to help guide future marketing
efforts. This proposal also announces the Agricultural Marketing
Service's intention to request approval from the Office of Management
and Budget of a new information collection.
DATES: Comments must be received by February 2, 2018. Pursuant to the
Paperwork Reduction Act, comments on the information collection burden
must be received by February 2, 2018.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments must be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order and Agreement Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS,
USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-
0237; Fax: (202) 720-8938; or Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the
[[Page 57167]]
document number and the date and page number of this issue of the
Federal Register and will be made available for public inspection in
the Office of the Docket Clerk during regular business hours, or can be
viewed at: https://www.regulations.gov. All comments submitted in
response to this proposal will be included in the record and will be
made available to the public. Please be advised that the identity of
the individuals or entities submitting the comments will be made public
on the Internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennie M. Varela, Marketing
Specialist, or Christian D. Nissen, Regional Director, Southeast
Marketing Field Office, Marketing Order and Agreement Division,
Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324-3375, Fax:
(863) 291-8614, or Email: Jennie.Varela@ams.usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@ams.usda.gov.
Small businesses may request information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Richard Lower, Marketing Order and Agreement
Division, Specialty Crops Program, AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue
SW., STOP 0237, Washington, DC 20250-0237; Telephone: (202) 720-2491,
Fax: (202)720-8938, or Email: Richard.Lower@ams.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This action, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553,
proposes an amendment to regulations issued to carry out a marketing
order as defined in 7 CFR 900.2(j).This proposal is issued under
Marketing Agreement and Order No. 986, (7 CFR part 986), regulating the
handling of pecans grown in the states of Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona,
California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi,
North Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas,
hereinafter referred to as the ``Order.'' The Order is effective under
the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C.
601-674), hereinafter referred to as the ``Act.'' The American Pecan
Council (Council) locally administers the Order and is comprised of
growers and handlers of pecans operating within the production area and
one public member.
The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is issuing this proposed rule
in conformance with Executive Orders 13563 and 13175. This action falls
within a category of regulatory actions that the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) has exempted from Executive Order 12866 review.
Additionally, because this proposed rule does not meet the definition
of a significant regulatory action it does not trigger the requirements
contained in Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum titled
``Interim Guidance Implementing Section 2 of the Executive Order of
January 30, 2017 titled `Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs'[thinsp]'' (February 2, 2017).
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. This proposed rule is not intended to have
retroactive effect.
The Act provides that administrative proceedings must be exhausted
before parties may file suit in court. Under section 608c(15)(A) of the
Act, any handler subject to an Order may file with USDA a petition
stating that the Order, any provision of the Order, or any obligation
imposed in connection with the Order is not in accordance with law and
request a modification of the Order or to be exempted therefrom. A
handler is afforded the opportunity for a hearing on the petition.
After the hearing, USDA would rule on the petition. The Act provides
that the district court of the United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his or her principal place of
business, has jurisdiction to review USDA's ruling on the petition,
provided an action is filed not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This proposed rule would establish reporting requirements under the
Order. This proposed action would require all pecan handlers to submit
to the Council reports on pecans received, shipped, held in inventory,
exported for sale or shelling, and purchased from outside the United
States. This information would be used by the Council to provide
statistical reports to the industry, meet requirements under the Order,
and help guide future marketing efforts. This proposal was unanimously
recommended by the Council at its April 17, 2017, meeting.
Section 2(4) of the Act specifies that one of its stated policies
is to establish and maintain orderly marketing conditions for certain
agricultural commodities that will provide, in the interests of
producers and consumers, an orderly flow of the supply of such
commodities to market to avoid unreasonable fluctuations in supply and
prices. Section 8(d)(1) of the Act specifies that the Secretary may
require all handlers subject to a marketing order to provide USDA with
such information as is necessary for it to ascertain and determine the
degree to which the agreement has been carried out or effectuated the
declared policy of the Act.
Sections 986.75, 986.76, and 986.77 of the Order provide authority
to the Council to require handlers to submit reports of inventory,
merchantable pecans handled, and pecans received by handlers,
respectively, on such dates as the Council may prescribe. Section
986.78 further provides, with the approval of the Secretary, authority
for the Council to collect other reports and information from handlers
needed to perform its duties. This proposed rule would use these
authorities to establish new Sec. Sec. 986.177 and 986.178 under the
administrative provisions of the Order. These new sections would
require handlers of pecans to report to the Council on a monthly basis:
Pecans received, shipped, held in inventory, exported for sale or
shelling, and purchased from outside the United States, using five
specific Council forms.
At its November 16, 2016, meeting, the first meeting following the
promulgation of the Order, the Council discussed its initial budget,
assessment rates, and necessary reporting requirements to establish a
program that is efficient and responsive to industry needs. During
these discussions, the Council appointed a Statistics and Reporting
Committee (Committee) to develop reporting requirements.
Members of the Committee discussed the reporting needs of the
industry, reviewed examples of reporting forms from other marketing
orders, and met and worked with the staff of another marketing order in
developing the proposed reporting requirements. The Committee also
worked with USDA to ensure the recommended information collection would
provide the information necessary to facilitate the administration of
the Order.
At its February 23, 2017, meeting, the Council reviewed drafts of
seven reporting forms as developed and recommended by the Committee.
The Council expressed its interest in having as much electronic
reporting as possible, but recognized that many handlers may prefer a
paper submission. The Council also considered the timing of when forms
would be due and submission dates that would work for all parts of the
industry. After a thorough review and some modifications, seven forms
were approved by the Council.
At a meeting on April 17, 2017, the Council revisited the
recommended reporting requirements and the accompanying forms.
Acknowledging that the industry was more than halfway through the
fiscal year at that time, the Council recommended dividing the
reporting requirements into the five forms needed beginning with the
2017-
[[Page 57168]]
2018 fiscal year and the two forms needed beginning with the 2016-2017
fiscal year. The two forms required for the 2016-2017 fiscal year are
being considered in a separate rulemaking action.
This proposed rule would add five new reporting requirements and
five new forms to the administrative provisions under the Order by
adding Sec. Sec. 986.177 and 986.178. Detailed information on the
reporting burden that would be created by these new forms is discussed
later in this document.
During the formal rulemaking hearing to promulgate the Order, it
was stated that the data collection component was one of the most
important aspects of the Order. Concerns were also expressed regarding
the accuracy and availability of industry data, and the impact those
have on making good business decisions.
Currently, most available reports on domestic pecan production are
issued annually and often long after the marketing year has been
completed. Additionally, the reporting of this information is currently
voluntary, so not all handlers are reporting, which impacts the
accuracy of the available information. Some aggregate import and export
data are available, but this information too is usually available on an
annual basis, or reported several months after the shipments have been
made. Additionally, some domestic production is shipped outside of the
country for shelling and then returned to the United States for sale or
further processing. There is concern this volume is not being properly
accounted for, and is negatively impacting the accuracy of the industry
information currently available.
The Council agreed these reporting requirements would be necessary
to develop accurate reports for the industry regarding pecans being
produced and handled in the United States, and recognized the value to
the industry of such reports. Having accurate and timely information on
the total supply of pecans moving into and out of the country would
also assist the industry in managing available supply and in making
marketing decisions. Further, collecting this information monthly would
allow the Council to provide key data regarding total supply and
inventory to the industry in a more timely fashion throughout the
season.
The Council also recognized that Sec. 986.65 of the Order requires
the Council to provide a report and recommendation to the Secretary on
the Council's proposed marketing policy for the next fiscal year. The
report is required to include, in part, an estimate of production;
improved, native, and substandard pecans; handler inventory; and trade
supply, taking into consideration imported pecans. In addition to
providing important information for industry reports, the reporting
requirements covered in this proposed action would provide the
information needed to develop the marketing policy.
Two specific monthly reporting requirements would be added to the
administrative provisions under the Order in a new Sec. 986.177, a
summary report of domestic pecans received, and a report of pecans
purchased outside the United States. The summary report of domestic
pecans received would include information on the handler submitting the
form, the month covered by the report, the total weight and type of
inshell pecans received, and the weight by variety of improved pecans
received. In addition, the form would also include information
regarding total assessments owed and total pounds reported to date.
The information on this form would provide the Council with the
volume of pecans received by handlers each month throughout the season.
This information would be used to track the available supply of pecans
each month, and the overall crop as it is delivered to handlers. The
Council would then be able to use the information to develop its own
reports that would provide the industry with an overview of market
information for the predominant varieties, including volume by variety,
which could assist in the development of marketing strategies.
The Council also intends to use this form to facilitate the
collection of assessments on a monthly basis throughout the season.
Using the form, handlers would be able to calculate their assessments
due based on the pecans received as listed on the report. Handlers
would be required to pay to the Council the assessments owed on the
pecans received by the due date of the summary report.
In its discussion of the report of pecans purchased outside the
United States, the Council agreed it would be important to have
information regarding the volume of pecans being imported by production
area handlers. The monthly report of pecans purchased outside the
United States would include the name of the handler importing pecans,
the month covered by the report, the date imported, country of origin,
volume, and variety of pecans imported.
As production of pecans abroad has increased, there has been an
increase in pecans imported into the United States. One Council member
stated that the domestic industry is currently shelling and processing
as much as 70 to 75 percent of Mexican-grown pecans, and that Mexican
pecans now account for nearly 50 percent of sales in the United States.
Consequently, having information regarding the volume of imported
pecans is essential when calculating available supply. Collecting this
information would greatly improve the accuracy of reports to the
industry as it would include information regarding both domestic and
imported pecans.
One of the Council's main goals in developing these reporting
requirements is to deliver to the industry accurate reports regarding
the marketplace and supply of pecans to assist the industry in making
its marketing decisions throughout the year. The Council believes
having accurate information regarding imported pecans is an essential
part of reaching this goal. Further, collecting this information would
provide the industry with valuable data regarding the timing and volume
of pecans imported into the United States. Members also agreed having
this information would assist the Council in developing its marketing
policy as required under the Order.
Three additional reporting requirements would be added to the
administrative provisions in a new Sec. 986.178: Reports of shipments
and inventory, exports by country of destination, and inshell pecans
exported to Mexico for shelling. The report of shipments and inventory
would include information on the handler submitting the form, the month
covered by the report, shipments of shelled and inshell pecans, current
inventory, and pecans in inventory already committed for shipment.
The Council believes this form would provide beneficial information
regarding shipments completed and volume in inventory. While there is
currently some limited information available regarding pecans in cold
storage, this information does not delineate between available
inventory and inventory that is already committed for shipment. By
collecting this information from handlers, this report, in conjunction
with the data regarding pecans received, would allow the Council to
provide the industry with inventory reports that are more accurate, and
that provide a clearer picture of available supply. This data on the
available volume of pecans would provide the industry with the
information needed to make better marketing decisions.
When discussing a reporting requirement for exported pecans, the
[[Page 57169]]
Council expressed the industry's need for more information concerning
international trade markets and export trends. The report of exports by
country of destination would include information on the handler
submitting the report, the month of the report, and the weight of all
shipments of pecans, inshell or shelled, by classification, and by
country of destination.
The Council estimated that prior to 2005, around 10 percent of
domestic production was being exported. Since then, exports have grown
considerably and now account for between 40 and 50 percent of
production. The recommended form would be used to generate reports
throughout the season providing industry members with information on
where product is being sold and in what volume. Further, the Council
could use this information to determine the effectiveness of any
international promotional efforts and to consider opportunities for
promotion and market expansion.
Some of the pecans shipped outside the United States are exported
just for shelling and then returned to the United States for further
use. The Council recommended an additional reporting form to capture
this information. Specifically, the Council recommended collecting
information on pecans exported to Mexico for shelling and then returned
to the United States. The Council decided to limit the reporting to
Mexico since the vast majority of pecans exported for this purpose are
being sent to Mexico because of its proximity and cost efficiencies.
The report of inshell pecans exported to Mexico for shelling would
include information on the handler submitting the report, the month
covered by the report, dates of shipments, the total weight of inshell
pecans shipped for shelling, and the weight of shelled pecans returned
to the United States.
In discussing this reporting requirement, the Council recognized
that in addition to shelling some pecans from the production area,
Mexico also exports pecans to the United States. This makes it
difficult to determine how much of the import volume reported from
Mexico is represented by domestic product after shelling. It was
expressed that without this report, the accuracy of data regarding both
reported exported and imported product could be compromised. Pecans
exported for shelling could be counted as exports, and then counted
again as imports when returned to the United States. This reporting
requirement would help reduce the possibility of double counting of
these pecans, and would help improve the accuracy of the overall
information on supply.
The Council selected the tenth day of the month following the month
of the activity as the due date for all five reports. Should the tenth
day of the month fall on a weekend or holiday, reports would be due by
the first business day following the tenth day of the month. The five
monthly reports would be used during the 2017-2018 and subsequent
seasons.
This proposed action would require pecan handlers to provide the
Council with monthly reports on pecans received, shipped, held in
inventory, exported for sale or shelling, and purchased from outside
the United States. By establishing these reporting requirements, the
Council would be able to gather and disseminate this information in
accurate market reports. Further, this information would be used to
create a marketing policy each year as required under the Order.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601-612), the Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
has considered the economic impact of this proposed action on small
entities. Accordingly, AMS has prepared this initial regulatory
flexibility analysis.
The purpose of the RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the scale of
businesses subject to such actions in order that small businesses will
not be unduly or disproportionately burdened. Marketing orders issued
pursuant to the Act, and rules issued thereunder, are unique in that
they are brought about through group action of essentially small
entities acting on their own behalf.
There are approximately 2,500 growers of pecans in the production
area and approximately 250 handlers subject to regulation under the
pecan marketing Order. Small agricultural growers are defined by the
Small Business Administration as those having annual receipts less than
$750,000, and small agricultural service firms are defined as those
whose annual receipts are less than $7,500,000 (13 CFR 121.201).
According to information from the National Agricultural Statistics
Service (NASS), the average grower price for pecans during the 2015-
2016 season was $2.20 per pound and 254 million pounds were utilized.
The value for pecans that year totaled $558.8 million ($2.20 per pound
multiplied by 254 million pounds). Taking the total value of production
for pecans and dividing it by the total number of pecan growers
provides an average return per grower of $223,520. Using the average
price and utilization information, and assuming a normal bell-curve
distribution of receipts among growers, the majority of growers receive
less than $750,000 annually.
Evidence presented at the formal rulemaking hearing indicates an
average handler margin of $0.58 per pound. Adding this margin to the
average grower price of $2.20 per pound of inshell pecans results in an
estimated handler price of $2.78 per pound. With a total 2015
production of 254 million pounds, ($2.78 per pound multiplied by 254
million pounds) the total value of production in 2015 was $706.12
million. Taking the total value of production for pecans and dividing
it by the total number of pecan handlers provides an average return per
handler of $2,824,480. Using this estimated price, the utilization
volume, number of handlers, and assuming a normal bell-curve
distribution of receipts among handlers, the majority of handlers have
annual receipts of less than $7,500,000. Thus, the majority (a
substantial number) of growers and handlers of pecans grown in the
states of Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Florida, Georgia,
Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi, North Carolina, New Mexico,
Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas may be classified as small
entities.
This proposed rule would establish reporting requirements under the
Order. This proposed action would require pecan handlers to provide the
Council with reports of pecans received, shipped, held in inventory,
exported for sale or shelling, and purchased from outside the United
States. The Council would use this information to provide important
statistical reports to the industry, to meet requirements under the
Order, and to help guide future marketing efforts. This rule would
establish new Sec. Sec. 986.177 and 986.178 under the administrative
provisions of the Order. The authority for this proposed action is
provided for in Section 8(d)(1) of the Act and Sec. Sec. 986.75,
986.76, 986.77, and 986.78 of the Order.
Requiring monthly reports of pecans received, shipped, held in
inventory, exported for sale or shelling, and purchased from outside
the United States would impose an increase in the reporting burden on
all pecan handlers. However, this data is already recorded and
maintained by handlers as a part of their daily business. Handlers,
regardless of size, should be able to readily access this information.
Consequently, any additional costs associated with this change would be
[[Page 57170]]
minimal (not significant) and apply equally to all handlers.
This proposed action should also help the entire industry by
providing comprehensive data on pecans received, shipped, held in
inventory, exported for sale or shelling, and purchased from outside
the United States. Collection of this data was one of the industry's
goals in promulgating the Order as there is no other source for this
type of data. This information would provide accurate information
regarding available inventory, help with marketing and planning for the
industry, provide important information for the collection of
assessments, and assist with preparing the annual marketing policy
required by the Order. The benefits of this proposed rule are expected
to be equally available to all pecan growers and handlers, regardless
of their size.
The Council discussed other alternatives to this proposed action.
The Council considered listing additional varieties on the summary
report of pecans received. However, after discussion the Council
determined a simpler version with the major commercial varieties and
room for handlers to enter additional varieties as needed would be less
burdensome. The Council also considered different due dates for these
monthly reports, including a due date of the first, the third and the
fifth day after the month of the activity. However, after some
discussion, it was determined some handlers may have difficulty meeting
these time frames. The 15th day of the month was also suggested, but
Council members thought this would delay the issuance of reports, and
negatively impact their value. Consequently, the Council agreed to set
the due date for all five forms at the tenth of the month. The Council
also considered the value and importance of each of the forms, and if
all should be approved. However, the Council agreed each of the forms
recommended provide important information for the industry and for
administering the Order. Therefore, the alternatives were rejected.
This proposal would establish five new reporting requirements and
five new Council forms. Therefore, this proposed rule would impose an
increase in the reporting burden for all handlers, which is discussed
in the Paperwork Reduction Act section of this document.
As with all Federal marketing order programs, reports and forms are
periodically reviewed to reduce information requirements and
duplication by industry and public sector agencies. USDA has not
identified any relevant Federal rules that duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with this proposed rule.
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
Further, the Council's meetings were widely publicized throughout
the pecan industry and all interested persons were invited to attend
the meetings and participate in Council deliberations on all issues.
Additionally, the Council's Committee meetings held February 23, 2017,
and April 17, 2017, were also public meetings and all entities, both
large and small, were able to express views on this issue. Finally,
interested persons are invited to submit comments on this proposed
rule, including the regulatory and information collection impacts of
this proposed action on small businesses.
A small business guide on complying with fruit, vegetable, and
specialty crop marketing agreements and orders may be viewed at: https://www.ams.usda.gov/rules-regulations/moa/small-businesses. Any questions
about the compliance guide should be sent to Richard Lower at the
previously-mentioned address in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
A 60-day comment period is provided to allow interested persons to
respond to this proposal. All written comments timely received will be
considered before a final determination is made on this matter.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35), this notice announces AMS's intent to request approval
from OMB for a new information collection under OMB No. 0581-NEW. It
will be merged with the forms currently approved under OMB No. 0581-
0291 ``Federal Marketing Order for Pecans.''
Title: Pecans Grown in the States of Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona,
California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi,
North Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas;
Marketing Order No. 986.
OMB Number: 0581-NEW.
Type of Request: New Collection.
Abstract: The information requirements in this request are
essential to carry out the intent of the Act, to provide the
respondents the type of service they request, and to administer the
pecan marketing order program.
On April 17, 2017, the Council unanimously recommended that all
pecan handlers subject to the Order provide the Council with a monthly
record of pecans received. This form, titled ``Summary Report U.S.
Pecans Received for Your Own Account,'' would be submitted directly to
the Council by handlers by the tenth day of the month following the
month the pecans were received. This information collection would
gather data on the total pounds received each month by variety and on
the related assessments due.
The Council also recommended that all handlers subject to the Order
submit a monthly report of product shipped, transferred, or committed.
This form, titled ``Report of Shipments and Inventory on Hand,'' would
be submitted directly to the Council by handlers by the tenth day of
the month following the activity. This information collection would
provide the Council with a monthly record of how much of the current
crop has been shipped, is committed to be shipped or is being held in
inventory. It would provide the volume of available inventory, which
would be needed to make marketing decisions.
The Council also recommended that handlers provide the Council with
a record of exports by type and destination. This form, titled
``Exports by Country of Destination,'' would be submitted directly to
the Council by handlers by the tenth day of the month following the
shipment(s). This information collection would provide the Council with
up-to-date information on where exported pecans are being sold. This
information would improve data collection by accounting for pecans
moving outside the United States and is necessary for developing the
Council's marketing policy as required by the Order.
The Council also recommended that handlers submit a report of
pecans exported to Mexico for the purpose of shelling and then returned
to the United States. This form, titled ``Inshell Pecans Exported to
Mexico for Shelling and Returned to the United States as Shelled
Meats,'' would be submitted directly to the Council by handlers by the
tenth day of the month following the shipment(s) out of and into the
United States. This reporting requirement would help reduce the
possibility of double counting of these pecans as both exported and
imported product, and would help improve the accuracy of the overall
information on supply.
The Council also recommended that all handlers subject to the Order
submit a monthly report that would capture information on the volume of
imported
[[Page 57171]]
pecans. This form, titled ``Pecans Purchased Outside the United
States,'' would be submitted directly to the Council by handlers by the
tenth day of the month following the receipt of such pecans. This
information collection would assist in quantifying the volume of
imported pecans on the market, provide the industry with a more
accurate estimate of total supply, and assist with the development of
the marketing policy required under the Order.
The information collected would only be used by authorized
representatives of the USDA, including the AMS Specialty Crops Program
regional and headquarters staff, and authorized employees of the
Council. Authorized Council employees would be the primary users of the
information, and the AMS would be the secondary users. The Council's
staff would compile the information and utilize it to account for
pecans received, shipped, held in inventory, exported for sale or
shelling, and purchased from outside the United States. All proprietary
information would be kept confidential in accordance with the Act and
the Order.
The proposed request for new information collection under the Order
is as follows:
Summary Report--U.S. Pecans Received for Your Own Account
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to be an average of 0.33 hours per response.
Respondents: Handlers of pecans in Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona,
California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi,
North Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 250.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 12.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 990 hours.
Pecans Purchased Outside the United States
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to be an average of 0.33 hours per response.
Respondents: Handlers of pecans in Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona,
California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi,
North Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 15.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 12.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 59.4 hours.
Report of Shipments and Inventory on Hand
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to be an average of 0.33 hours per response.
Respondents: Handlers of pecans in Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona,
California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi,
North Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 250.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 12.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 990 hours.
Exports by Country of Destination
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to be an average of 0.25 hours per response.
Respondents: Handlers of pecans in Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona,
California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi,
North Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 35.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 12.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 105 hours.
Inshell Pecans Exported to Mexico for Shelling and Returned to the
United States as Shelled Meats
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to be an average of 0.5 hours per response.
Respondents: Handlers of pecans in Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona,
California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi,
North Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 15.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 12.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 90 hours.
Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology.
Comments should reference OMB No. 0581-NEW and the Marketing Order
for Pecans Grown in the states of Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona,
California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Mississippi,
North Carolina, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, and Texas, and
should be sent to the USDA in care of the Docket Clerk at the
previously-mentioned address or at https://www.regulations.gov.
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the
request for OMB approval. All comments received will become a matter of
public record and will be available for public inspection during
regular business hours at the address of the Docket Clerk or at https://www.regulations.gov.
If this proposed rule is finalized, this information collection
will be merged with the forms currently approved under OMB No. 0581-
0291 ``Federal Marketing Order for Pecans.''
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 986
Marketing agreements, Nuts, Pecans, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 7 CFR part 986 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 986--PECANS GROWN IN THE STATES OF ALABAMA, ARKANSAS, ARIZONA,
CALIFORNIA, FLORIDA, GEORGIA, KANSAS, LOUISIANA, MISSOURI,
MISSISSIPPI, NORTH CAROLINA, NEW MEXICO, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA,
AND TEXAS
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 986 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601-674.
0
2. Add Sec. 986.177 to Subpart B--Administrative Provisions to read as
follows:
Sec. 986.177 Reports of pecans received by handlers
(a) Summary report U.S. pecans received for your own account.
Handlers shall submit to the Council, by the tenth day of the month, a
summary report of inshell domestic pecans received during the preceding
month. Should the tenth day of the month fall on a weekend or holiday,
reports are due by the first business day following the tenth day of
[[Page 57172]]
the month. The report shall be submitted to the Council on APC Form 1
and contain the following information:
(1) The name and address of the handler;
(2) The month covered by the report;
(3) The total weight and type of inshell pecans received, and the
weight by variety for improved pecans received during the reporting
period;
(4) The total weight and type of inshell pecans received, and the
weight by variety for improved pecans received year to date; and,
(5) Assessments due on pecans received during the reporting period
to be paid by the due date of the report.
(b) Pecans purchased outside the United States. Handlers shall
submit to the Council, by the tenth day of the month, a summary report
of shelled and inshell pecans imported during the preceding month.
Should the tenth day of the month fall on a weekend or holiday, reports
are due by the first business day following the tenth day of the month.
The report shall be submitted to the Council on APC Form 6 and contain
the following information:
(1) The name and address of the handler;
(1) The month covered by the report;
(3) The date the pecans were imported;
(4) The country of origin; and,
(5) The total weight of shelled and inshell pecans received, and
the weight by variety for improved pecans received.
0
3. Add Sec. 986.178 to Subpart B--Administrative Provisions to read as
follows:
Sec. 986.178 Other reports
(a) Report of shipments and inventory on hand. Handlers shall
submit to the Council, by the tenth day of the month following the
month of activity, a report of all shipments, inventory, and committed
inventory for pecans. Should the tenth day of the month fall on a
weekend or holiday, reports are due by the first business day following
the tenth day of the month. The report shall be submitted to the
Council on APC Form 2 and contain the following information:
(1) The name and address of the handler;
(2) The month covered by the report;
(3) The weight of all shipments of pecans, inshell and shelled, and
inter-handler transfers shipped and received during the reporting
period;
(4) The weight of all shipments of pecans, inshell and shelled, and
inter-handler transfers shipped and received in the previous month and
year to date;
(5) Total inventory held by handler;
(6) All the inventory committed (pecans not shipped, but sold or
otherwise obligated) whether for domestic sale or export; and,
(7) The weight of all shelled or inshell pecans under contract for
purchase from other handlers.
(b) Exports by country of destination. Handlers shall submit to the
Council, by the tenth day of the month following the month of shipment,
a report of exports. Should the tenth day of the month fall on a
weekend or holiday, reports are due by the first business day following
the tenth day of the month. The report shall be reported to the Council
on APC Form 3 and contain the following information:
(1) The name and address of the handler;
(2) The month covered by the report;
(3) The total weight of pecans shipped for export, whether inshell,
shelled, or substandard during the reporting period;
(4) The total weight of pecans shipped for export, whether inshell,
shelled, or substandard during the previous period and year to date;
and,
(5) The destination(s) of such exports.
(c) Inshell pecans exported to Mexico for shelling and returned to
the United States as shelled meats. Handlers shall submit to the
Council, by the tenth day of the month following the month of shipment,
a report of all inshell pecans exported to Mexico for shelling and
returned to the United States as shelled pecans. Should the tenth day
of the month fall on a weekend or holiday, reports are due by the first
business day following the tenth day of the month. The report shall be
submitted to the Council on APC Form 5 and contain the following
information:
(1) The name and address of the handler;
(2) The month covered by the report;
(3) The date of inshell shipment(s);
(4) The weight of pecans exported for shelling;
(5) The date shelled pecans returned to the United States after
shelling;
(6) The weight of shelled pecans returned to the United States
after shelling; and
(7) The total weight of inshell pecans exported to Mexico for
shelling, and shelled pecans returned from Mexico, year to date.
Dated: November 22, 2017.
Bruce Summers,
Acting Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-25738 Filed 12-1-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P