Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 55958-55963 [2017-24502]
Download as PDF
55958
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 226 / Monday, November 27, 2017 / Proposed Rules
paragraph (g) of this AD: Within 24 months
after the effective date of this AD, modify the
repair using a method approved by the
Manager, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch FAA; or EASA; or Airbus’s
EASA DOA. If approved by the DOA, the
approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature.
(k) Optional Terminating Action for
Airplanes Post-Modification 20416 or PostModification 21999
Modification of an airplane postmodification 20416 or post-modification
21999 in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–53–1295, including
Appendixes 01 and 02, dated June 29, 2015,
constitutes terminating action for the
repetitive inspections required by paragraph
(g) of this AD for that airplane.
(l) Post-Repair Actions for Certain Airplanes
For an airplane that has been inspected per
ALI task 531110 and repaired before the
effective date of this AD using the
instructions in an Airbus Repair Design
Approval Sheet (RDAS): Within 30 days after
the effective date of this AD, contact the
Manager, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA; or EASA; or
Airbus’s EASA DOA for instructions and
accomplish those instructions accordingly. If
approved by the DOA, the approval must
include the DOA-authorized signature.
Accomplishment of the instructions required
by this paragraph, does not constitute
terminating action for the repetitive
inspections required by paragraph (g) of this
AD for that airplane, unless specified
otherwise in the instructions.
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
(m) Partial Terminating Action for Airplanes
Post-Modification 20416 or PostModification 21999
For an airplane post-modification 20416 or
post-modification 21999, modification in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
53–1295, including Appendixes 01 and 02,
dated June 29, 2015, for the applicable
fastener holes, where no damage or cracks
were detected (i.e., those not repaired) during
the latest inspection as required by paragraph
(g) of this AD, constitutes terminating action
for the repetitive inspections of those fastener
holes as required by paragraph (g) of this AD
for that airplane.
(n) Actions for Airplanes With Certain
Repairs
For an airplane that has been repaired
before the effective date of this AD in the
areas described in this AD using the
instructions in an Airbus RDAS unrelated to
ALI task 531110: Before exceeding the
compliance times specified in table 1 to
paragraph (g) of this AD or table 2 to
paragraph (g) of this AD, as applicable,
contact the Manager, International Section,
Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or EASA;
or Airbus’s EASA DOA for corrective action
instructions and accomplish those
instructions accordingly. If approved by the
DOA, the approval must include the DOAauthorized signature. Accomplishment of
corrective action(s) on an airplane, as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Nov 24, 2017
Jkt 244001
required by this paragraph, does not
constitute terminating action for the
repetitive inspections required by paragraph
(g) of this AD for that airplane, as applicable,
unless specified otherwise in the
instructions.
(o) Terminating Action for ALI Tasks
(1) Accomplishment of an inspection as
required by paragraph (g) of this AD or
instructions as required by paragraph (l) of
this AD, as applicable, constitutes
terminating action for the inspection
requirements of ALI task 531110, for that
airplane.
(2) Modification of the two upper rows of
fasteners of the crossbeam splicing at FR16
and FR20 on both LH and RH sides of an
airplane, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320–53–1295, including
Appendixes 01 and 02, dated June 29, 2015,
as specified in paragraphs (k) and (m) of this
AD, constitutes terminating action for the
inspection requirements of ALI task 531110,
for those holes for that airplane.
(p) No Reporting Requirement
Although Airbus Service Bulletin A320–
53–1286, Revision 01, dated December 22,
2015, specifies to submit certain information
to the manufacturer, and specifies that action
as ‘‘RC’’ (Required for Compliance), this AD
does not include that requirement.
(q) Credit for Previous Actions
This paragraph provides credit for actions
required by paragraph (g) and (h) of this AD,
if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Airbus Service
Bulletin A320–53–1286, dated June 29, 2015.
(r) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the International
Section, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (s)(2) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Section,
Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or EASA;
or Airbus’s EASA DOA. If approved by the
DOA, the approval must include the DOAauthorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except
as required by paragraphs (h)(1) and (p) of
this AD: If any service information contains
procedures or tests that are identified as RC,
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
those procedures and tests must be done to
comply with this AD; any procedures or tests
that are not identified as RC are
recommended. Those procedures and tests
that are not identified as RC may be deviated
from using accepted methods in accordance
with the operator’s maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the
procedures and tests identified as RC can be
done and the airplane can be put back in an
airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
(s) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2016–0139, dated
July 14, 2016, for related information. This
MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–
2017–1093.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA 98057–3356; telephone 425–
227–1405; fax 425–227–1149.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus, Airworthiness
Office—EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 44 51; email account.airworth-eas@
airbus.com; Internet https://www.airbus.com.
You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 7, 2017.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–25252 Filed 11–24–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–1421; Product
Identifier 2014–NM–177–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (SNPRM);
reopening of comment period.
AGENCY:
We are revising an earlier
proposal for certain The Boeing
Company Model 767–300 and –300F
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27NOP1.SGM
27NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 226 / Monday, November 27, 2017 / Proposed Rules
series airplanes. This action revises the
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
by adding new high frequency eddy
current (HFEC) inspections for cracking
of an expanded area of the lower
outboard wing skin for certain airplanes.
We are proposing this airworthiness
directive (AD) to address the unsafe
condition on these products. Since these
actions would impose an additional
burden over those in the NPRM, we are
reopening the comment period to allow
the public the chance to comment on
these changes.
DATES: The comment period for the
NPRM published in the Federal
Register on June 5, 2015 (80 FR 32066),
is reopened.
We must receive comments on this
SNPRM by January 11, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this SNPRM, contact Aviation Partners
Boeing, 2811 S. 102nd Street, Suite 200,
Seattle, WA 98168; telephone 206–762–
1171; Internet https://
www.aviationpartnersboeing.com. You
may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
1421; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this SNPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Office (phone: 800–647–
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Nov 24, 2017
Jkt 244001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Allen Rauschendorfer, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA,
Seattle ACO Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone:
425–917–6450; fax: 425–917–6590;
email: allen.rauschendorfer@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposal. Send your comments to
an address listed under the ADDRESSES
section. Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–
2015–1421; Product Identifier 2014–
NM–177–AD’’ at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this SNPRM. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
SNPRM because of those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this SNPRM.
Discussion
We issued an NPRM to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 767–300 and –300F series
airplanes. The NPRM published in the
Federal Register on June 5, 2015 (80 FR
32066). The NPRM was prompted by
reports of fatigue cracking on airplanes
with Aviation Partners Boeing winglets
installed. The NPRM proposed to
require an HFEC inspection for cracking
of the lower outboard wing skin, and
repair or modification if necessary. The
NPRM also proposed to require one of
three follow-on actions: repeating the
HFEC inspections; modifying certain
internal stringers and oversizing and
plugging the existing fastener holes of
the lower wing; or modifying the
external doubler/tripler and doing
repetitive post-modification inspections.
Actions Since the NPRM Was Issued
Since we issued the NPRM, we have
determined that new HFEC inspections
for cracking of an expanded area of the
lower outboard wing skin are necessary
to address the identified unsafe
condition for certain airplanes.
Aviation Partners Boeing (APB) has
released Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017. In
the NPRM, we refer to APB Service
Bulletin AP767–57–010, Revision 7,
dated November 4, 2014, as the
appropriate source of service
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55959
information for accomplishing the
proposed actions. APB Service Bulletin
AP767–57–010, Revision 11, dated
April 3, 2017, corrects certain errors and
omissions that were in the
Accomplishment Instructions of APB
Service Bulletin AP767–57–010,
Revision 7, dated November 4, 2014,
and provides clarification of certain
procedures. APB Service Bulletin
AP767–57–010, Revision 11, dated
April 3, 2017, also removes all work
related to stringer L–6.5 due to recent
analysis that the modification was not
sufficient to meet the 767 design service
objective.
In light of this analysis, new repetitive
post-modification HFEC inspections
have been added for airplanes on which
the optional terminating modification of
the existing skin or external skin
doubler has been done. We have revised
this proposed AD to refer to APB
Service Bulletin AP767–57–010,
Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017, for
accomplishing proposed actions for
stringer L–9.5.
APB has also released Service
Bulletin AP767–57–014, Revision 1,
dated April 12, 2017. APB Service
Bulletin AP767–57–014, Revision 1,
dated April 12, 2017, includes
procedures for inspections, repair
(modification), and repair of stringer L–
6.5 of the lower outboard wing skin
(which replace the actions that were
removed from APB Service Bulletin
AP767–57–010, Revision 11, dated
April 3, 2017).
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed APB Service Bulletin
AP767–57–010, Revision 11, dated
April 3, 2017. The service information
describes procedures for an HFEC
inspection for cracking of the external
surface of the lower outboard wing skin
at stringer L–9.5 and on-condition
actions that include repetitive HFEC
inspections; modification by oversizing
and plugging the existing fastener holes
of the wing skin; repair (modification) of
the stringer with new stringer; repair
(modification) of the stringer with
external doubler/tripler; repetitive postrepair inspections for cracking; and
repair.
We also reviewed APB Service
Bulletin AP767–57–014, Revision 1,
dated April 12, 2017. The service
information describes procedures for an
HFEC inspection for cracking of the
lower outboard wing skin at stringer L–
6.5 and on-condition actions that
include repetitive HFEC inspections;
repair (modification) of the stringer with
new stringer; repetitive post-repair
E:\FR\FM\27NOP1.SGM
27NOP1
55960
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 226 / Monday, November 27, 2017 / Proposed Rules
HFEC inspections for cracking; and
repair.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this proposed
AD. We considered the comments
received.
Request To Clarify Service Information
and Actions in the Proposed AD
Multiple commenters (United
Airlines, Delta Air Lines, American
Airlines, Japan Airlines, FedEx, Boeing)
requested that the actions specified in
APB Service Bulletin AP767–57–010,
Revision 7, dated November 4, 2014, be
revised. Commenters noted that APB
Service Bulletin AP767–57–010,
Revision 7, dated November 4, 2014,
contained multiple errors. United
Airlines, Delta Air Lines, American
Airlines and Boeing also requested that
the actions specified in the proposed
AD be revised for clarity because certain
language in the proposed AD did not
match the language in APB Service
Bulletin AP767–57–010, Revision 7,
dated November 4, 2014. APB stated
APB Service Bulletin AP767–57–010,
Revision 7, dated November 4, 2014, is
being revised to include corrections and
clarifications and additional work. APB
recommend that we refer to updated
service information.
We acknowledge the commenters’
request and have revised this SNPRM to
refer to the updated service information
in APB Service Bulletin AP767–57–010,
Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017, and
APB Service Bulletin AP767–57–014,
Revision 1, dated April 12, 2017.
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
Request To Allow Previously Approved
Repairs
American Airlines, APB, and Boeing
requested that we give credit for repairs
in the subject area that had received
8100–9 approval prior to the effective
date of the AD.
We agree to give credit for repairs that
we have determined will address the
identified unsafe condition. We
replaced the content of paragraph (i) of
the proposed AD (in the NPRM) with
new content in this proposed AD to
specify that repairs of the lower
outboard wing skin done after June 15,
2017, and before the effective date of
this AD, that are approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that
has been authorized by the Manager,
Seattle ACO Branch, are approved for
the applicable repairs required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD.
Request To Allow Previous
Modifications
Air New Zealand requested that we
give credit for accomplishing the
proposed modification before the
effective date of the AD by adding the
required service information to
paragraph (i) of the proposed AD, which
specifies credit for previous actions.
We acknowledge the comment.
However, no change to this proposed
AD is necessary. Operators who
accomplish the actions required by an
AD using the required service
information before the effective date of
an AD are in compliance with the AD.
Paragraph (f) of this proposed AD states
‘‘comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless
already done.’’ Credit for previous
actions in ADs is used primarily to give
credit for earlier revisions of required
service information that are also
acceptable for compliance if done before
the effective date of the AD.
FAA’s Determination
We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop in other products of the same
type design. Certain changes described
above expand the scope of the NPRM.
As a result, we have determined that it
is necessary to reopen the comment
period to provide additional
opportunity for the public to comment
on this SNPRM.
Proposed Requirements of This SNPRM
This SNPRM would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described
previously, except as discussed under
‘‘Differences Between this Proposed
Rule and the Service Information.’’
The compliance times vary depending
on airplane configuration and
inspection area. The shortest initial
compliance time is the later of: 1,500
flight cycles or 7,500 flight hours after
winglet installation, whichever occurs
first; or 18 months after the effective
date of the AD. Except for one group of
airplanes, the longest initial compliance
time is the later of: 7,800 flight cycles
or 23,400 flight hours after installation
of a certain modification, whichever
occurs first; or 18 months after the
effective date of the AD. For one group
of airplanes, the longest initial
compliance time is 29,000 total flight
cycles or 111,000 total flight hours,
whichever occurs first.
The shortest repetitive interval is
1,500 flight cycles or 7,500 flight hours,
whichever occurs first. The longest
repetitive interval is 12,000 flight cycles
or 36,000 flight hours, whichever occurs
first.
Differences Between Proposed Rule and
Service Information
APB Service Bulletin AP767–57–010,
Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017, and
APB Service Bulletin AP767–57–014,
Revision 1, dated April 12, 2017, specify
to contact the manufacturer for
instructions on how to repair certain
conditions, but this proposed AD would
require repairing those conditions in
one of the following ways:
• In accordance with a method that
we approve; or
• Using data that meet the
certification basis of the airplane, and
that have been approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes ODA whom we
have authorized to make those findings.
Table 5a of paragraph 1.E.,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of APB Service Bulletin
AP767–57–010, Revision 11, dated
April 3, 2017, does not provide a grace
period for airplanes that have exceeded
a certain compliance time. We have
added a grace period of 6 months to
paragraph (g)(2) of this proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD
affects 140 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply
with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS—REQUIRED ACTIONS
Action
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
Cost on U.S.
operators
HFEC Inspections ...................
6 work-hours × $85 per hour = $510 .....................................
$0
$510
$71,400
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Nov 24, 2017
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\27NOP1.SGM
27NOP1
55961
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 226 / Monday, November 27, 2017 / Proposed Rules
We estimate the following costs to do
any necessary on-condition actions that
would be required based on the results
of the proposed inspection. We have no
way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need these oncondition actions.
ESTIMATED COSTS—ON-CONDITION ACTIONS
Action
Labor cost
Post-repair Inspections ....................
Repair/Modification ..........................
6 work-hours × $85 per hour = $510 per inspection cycle .......................
262 work-hours × 85 per hour = 22,270 ...................................................
We have received no definitive data
that would enable us to provide cost
estimates for on-condition repairs for
the post-repair inspections specified in
this proposed AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
This proposed AD is issued in
accordance with authority delegated by
the Executive Director, Aircraft
Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance
with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance
and Airworthiness Division, but during
this transition period, the Executive
Director has delegated the authority to
issue ADs applicable to transport
category airplanes to the Director of the
System Oversight Division.
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Nov 24, 2017
Jkt 244001
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
the DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26,
1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA–
2015–1421; Product Identifier 2014–NM–
177–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by January 11,
2018.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 767–300 and –300F series airplanes,
certificated in any category, with Aviation
Partners Boeing winglets installed; as
identified in Aviation Partners Boeing
Service Bulletin AP767–57–010, Revision 11,
dated April 3, 2017; and Aviation Partners
Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–014,
Revision 1, dated April 12, 2017.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Cost per
product
Parts cost
$0
0
$510
22,270
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 57, Wings.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of
fatigue cracking in the lower outboard wing
skin at the inboard fastener of stringer L–9.5,
and the lower outboard wing skin of stringer
L–6.5, on airplanes with winglets installed
per Supplemental Type Certificate
ST01920SE. We are issuing this AD to
prevent fatigue cracking in the lower
outboard wing skin, which could result in
failure and subsequent separation of the wing
and winglet and consequent reduced
controllability of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Repetitive Stringer L–9.5 Inspections,
Modification, Repair (Modification),
Repetitive Post-Repair Inspections, and
Repair
(1) For Group 1 and Group 2 airplanes
identified in Aviation Partners Boeing
Service Bulletin AP767–57–010, Revision 11,
dated April 3, 2017: At the applicable time
specified in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of
Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin
AP767–57–010, Revision 11, dated April 3,
2017, except as required by paragraph (j)(1)
of this AD: Do a high frequency eddy current
(HFEC) inspection for cracking of the lower
outboard wing skin at stringer L–9.5, in
accordance with Part 1 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(i) For airplanes on which ‘‘Condition 1’’
is found, as defined in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Aviation Partners Boeing
Service Bulletin AP767–57–010, Revision 11,
dated April 3, 2017, during any inspection
required by paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(1)(i)(A) of
this AD: Do the applicable actions required
by paragraph (g)(1)(i)(A), (g)(1)(i)(B),
(g)(1)(i)(C), or (g)(1)(i)(D) of this AD.
(A) Repeat the inspection specified in
paragraph (g)(1) of this AD thereafter at the
applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E.,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of Aviation Partners Boeing
Service Bulletin AP767–57–010, Revision 11,
dated April 3, 2017.
(B) Do the applicable actions required by
paragraphs (g)(1)(i)(B)(1), (g)(1)(i)(B)(2), and
(g)(1)(i)(B)(3) of this AD.
(1) Before further flight, do actions
(modifications and repair (modification)) in
E:\FR\FM\27NOP1.SGM
27NOP1
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
55962
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 226 / Monday, November 27, 2017 / Proposed Rules
accordance with Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, and
Part 5, as applicable, of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Aviation Partners Boeing
Service Bulletin AP767–57–010, Revision 11,
dated April 3, 2017.
(2) For airplanes on which the repair
(modification) specified in Part 5 of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010 was done: At the applicable time
specified in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of
Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin
AP767–57–010, Revision 11, dated April 3,
2017, do a post-repair HFEC inspection for
cracking, in accordance with Part 12 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017; and
repeat the inspection thereafter at the
applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E.,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of Aviation Partners Boeing
Service Bulletin AP767–57–010, Revision 11,
dated April 3, 2017.
(3) If any crack is found during any
inspection required by paragraph
(g)(1)(i)(B)(2) of this AD, repair before further
flight using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (k) of this AD.
(C) Do the actions required by paragraphs
(g)(1)(i)(C)(1) and (g)(1)(i)(C)(2) of this AD,
and do all applicable actions required by
paragraph (g)(1)(i)(C)(3) of this AD.
(1) Before further flight, repair (modify) in
accordance with Part 8 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(2) At the applicable time specified in
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017, do a
post-repair HFEC inspection for cracking, in
accordance with Part 9 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017; and
repeat the inspection thereafter at the
applicable times specified in in paragraph
1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Aviation Partners
Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–010,
Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(3) If any crack is found during any
inspection required by paragraph
(g)(1)(i)(C)(2) of this AD, repair before further
flight using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (k) of this AD.
(D) Do the actions required by paragraphs
(g)(1)(i)(D)(1) and (g)(1)(i)(D)(2) of this AD,
and do all applicable actions required by
paragraph (g)(1)(i)(D)(3) of this AD.
(1) Before further flight, repair (modify) in
accordance with Part 11 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(2) At the applicable time specified in
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017, do a
post-repair HFEC inspection for cracking, in
accordance with Part 13 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017; and
repeat the inspection thereafter at the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Nov 24, 2017
Jkt 244001
applicable times specified in in paragraph
1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Aviation Partners
Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–010,
Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(3) If any crack is found during any
inspection required by paragraph
(g)(1)(i)(D)(2) of this AD, repair before further
flight using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (k) of this AD.
(ii) For airplanes on which ‘‘Condition 2’’
is found, as defined in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Aviation Partners Boeing
Service Bulletin AP767–57–010, Revision 11,
dated April 3, 2017, during any inspection
required by paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(1)(i)(A) of
this AD: Do the actions required by
paragraph (g)(1)(ii)(A) or (g)(1)(ii)(B) of this
AD.
(A) Do the actions required by paragraphs
(g)(1)(ii)(A)(1) and (g)(1)(ii)(A)(2) of this AD,
and do all applicable actions required by
paragraph (g)(1)(ii)(A)(3) of this AD.
(1) Before further flight, repair (modify) in
accordance with Part 8 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(2) At the applicable time specified in
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017, do a
post-repair HFEC inspection for cracking, in
accordance with Part 9 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017; and
repeat the inspection thereafter at the
applicable times specified in in paragraph
1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Aviation Partners
Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–010,
Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(3) If any crack is found during any
inspection required by paragraph
(g)(1)(ii)(A)(2) of this AD, repair before
further flight using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (k) of this AD.
(B) Do the actions required by paragraphs
(g)(1)(ii)(B)(1) and (g)(1)(ii)(B)(2) of this AD,
and do all applicable actions required by
paragraph (g)(1)(ii)(B)(3) of this AD.
(1) Before further flight, repair (modify) in
accordance with Part 11 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(2) At the applicable time specified in
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017, do a
post-repair HFEC inspection for cracking, in
accordance with Part 13 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017; and
repeat the inspection thereafter at the
applicable times specified in in paragraph
1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Aviation Partners
Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–010,
Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(3) If any crack is found during any
inspection required by paragraph
(g)(1)(ii)(B)(2) of this AD, repair before
further flight using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (k) of this AD.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(iii) For airplanes on which ‘‘Condition 3’’
is found, as defined in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Aviation Partners Boeing
Service Bulletin AP767–57–010, Revision 11,
dated April 3, 2017, during the actions
specified in paragraph (g)(1)(i)(B)(1) of this
AD: Do the actions required by paragraph
(g)(1)(iii)(A) or (g)(1)(iii)(B) of this AD.
(A) Do the actions required by paragraphs
(g)(1)(iii)(A)(1) and (g)(1)(iii)(A)(2) of this AD,
and do all applicable actions required by
paragraph (g)(1)(iii)(A)(3) of this AD.
(1) Before further flight, repair (modify) in
accordance with Part 8 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(2) At the applicable time specified in
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017, do a
post-repair HFEC inspection for cracking, in
accordance with Part 9 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017; and
repeat the inspection thereafter at the
applicable times specified in in paragraph
1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Aviation Partners
Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–010,
Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(3) If any crack is found during any
inspection required by paragraph
(g)(1)(iii)(A)(2) of this AD, repair before
further flight using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (k) of this AD.
(B) Do the actions required by paragraphs
(g)(1)(iii)(B)(1) and (g)(1)(iii)(B)(2) of this AD,
and do all applicable actions required by
paragraph (g)(1)(iii)(B)(3) of this AD.
(1) Before further flight, repair (modify) in
accordance with Part 11 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(2) At the applicable time specified in
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017, do a
post-repair HFEC inspection for cracking, in
accordance with Part 13 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017; and
repeat the inspection thereafter at the
applicable times specified in in paragraph
1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Aviation Partners
Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–010,
Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(3) If any crack is found during any
inspection required by paragraph
(g)(1)(iii)(B)(2) of this AD, repair before
further flight using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (k) of this AD.
(iv) For airplanes on which ‘‘Condition 4’’
is found, as defined in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Aviation Partners Boeing
Service Bulletin AP767–57–010, Revision 11,
dated April 3, 2017, during any action
specified in paragraph (g)(1)(i)(C)(1),
(g)(1)(i)(D)(1), (g)(1)(ii)(A)(1), (g)(1)(ii)(B)(1),
(g)(1)(iii)(A)(1), and (g)(1)(iii)(B)(1) of this
AD: Repair before further flight using a
method approved in accordance with the
E:\FR\FM\27NOP1.SGM
27NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 226 / Monday, November 27, 2017 / Proposed Rules
pmangrum on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS1
procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this
AD.
(2) For Group 3 airplanes identified in
Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin
AP767–57–010, Revision 11, dated April 3,
2017: At the applicable time specified in
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017, or
within 6 months after the effective date of
this AD, whichever occurs later, do an HFEC
inspection for cracking of the lower outboard
wing skin at stringer L–9.5, in accordance
with Part 7 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Aviation Partners Boeing
Service Bulletin AP767–57–010, Revision 11,
dated April 3, 2017. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at the applicable time specified in
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017. If any
cracking is found during any inspection,
repair before further flight using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (k) of this AD. An
approved repair terminates the repetitive
inspections required by paragraph (g)(2) of
this AD.
(h) Repetitive Stringer L–6.5 Inspections,
Repair (Modification), Repetitive PostRepair Inspections, and Repair
(1) For airplanes identified in Boeing
Service Bulletin AP767–57–014, Revision 1,
dated April 12, 2017: At the applicable time
specified in paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of
Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin
AP767–57–014, Revision 1, dated April 12,
2017, except as required by paragraph (j)(2)
of this AD: Do an HFEC inspection for
cracking of stringer L–6.5 of the lower
outboard wing skin, in accordance with Part
1 of Aviation Partners Boeing Service
Bulletin AP767–57–014, Revision 1, dated
April 12, 2017. If no cracking is found, repeat
the inspection thereafter at the applicable
times specified in paragraph 1.E.,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of Aviation Partners Boeing
Service Bulletin AP767–57–014, Revision 1,
dated April 12, 2017, except as provided by
paragraph (h)(3) of this AD.
(2) If any crack is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (h)(1) of
this AD, do the actions required by
paragraphs (h)(2)(i) and (h)(2)(ii) of this AD,
and do all applicable actions required by
paragraph (h)(2)(iii) of this AD.
(i) Before further flight, repair (modify)
stringer L–6.5, in accordance with Part 2 of
the Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
014, Revision 1, dated April 12, 2017.
(ii) At the applicable time specified in
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
014, Revision 1, dated April 12, 2017, except
as required by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD, do
an HFEC post-repair inspection for cracking,
in accordance with Part 3 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
014, Revision 1, dated April 12, 2017, and
repeat the inspection thereafter at the
applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E.,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of Aviation Partners Boeing
Service Bulletin AP767–57–014, Revision 1,
dated April 12, 2017.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:12 Nov 24, 2017
Jkt 244001
(iii) If any crack is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (h)(2)(ii) of
this AD, repair before further flight using a
method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this
AD.
(3) As an option to the repetitive
inspections required by paragraph (h)(1) of
this AD, do the actions required by
paragraphs (h)(3)(i) and (h)(3)(ii) of this AD,
and do all applicable actions required by
paragraph (h)(3)(iii) of this AD.
(i) Before further flight after accomplishing
the most recent inspection required by
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, repair (modify)
stringer L–6.5, in accordance with Part 2 of
the Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
014, Revision 1, dated April 12, 2017.
(ii) At the applicable time specified in
paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
014, Revision 1, dated April 12, 2017, except
as required by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD, do
a post-repair HFEC inspection for cracking,
in accordance with Part 3 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767–57–
014, Revision 1, dated April 12, 2017, and
repeat the inspection thereafter at the
applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E.,
‘‘Compliance,’’ of Aviation Partners Boeing
Service Bulletin AP767–57–014, Revision 1,
dated April 12, 2017.
(iii) If any crack is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (h)(3)(ii) of
this AD, repair before further flight using a
method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this
AD.
(i) Repair Approval
Repairs of the lower outboard wing skin
done after June 15, 2017, and before the
effective date of this AD, that are approved
by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, are approved
for the applicable repairs required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD.
(j) Exceptions to Service Information
Specifications
(1) Where paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of
Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin
AP767–57–010, Revision 11, dated April 3,
2017, specifies a compliance time of ‘‘after
the issue date of Revision 11 of this service
bulletin,’’ this AD requires compliance
within the specified compliance time after
the effective date of this AD.
(2) Where paragraph 1.E., ‘‘Compliance,’’ of
Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin
AP767–57–014, Revision 1, dated April 12,
2017, specifies a compliance time of ‘‘after
the initial issue date of this service bulletin,’’
this AD requires compliance within the
specified compliance time after the effective
date of this AD.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
55963
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (l)(1) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to: 9–
ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes ODA that has been
authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO
Branch, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification
deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) Except as required by paragraphs
(g)(1)(i)(B)(3), (g)(1)(i)(C)(3), (g)(1)(i)(D)(3),
(g)(1)(ii)(A)(3), (g)(1)(ii)(B)(3), (g)(1)(iii)(A)(3),
(g)(1)(iii)(B)(3), (g)(1)(iv), (g)(2), (h)(2)(iii),
and (h)(3)(iii) of this AD: For service
information that contains steps that are
labeled as Required for Compliance (RC), the
provisions of paragraphs (k)(4)(i) and
(k)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. If a step or substep is
labeled ‘‘RC Exempt,’’ then the RC
requirement is removed from that step or
substep. An AMOC is required for any
deviations to RC steps, including substeps
and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
(l) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Allen Rauschendorfer, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle
ACO Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA 98057–3356; phone: 425–917–
6450; fax: 425–917–6590; email:
allen.rauschendorfer@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Aviation Partners Boeing,
2811 S. 102nd Street, Suite 200, Seattle, WA
98168; telephone 206–762–1171; Internet
https://www.aviationpartnersboeing.com.
You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Standards
Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 3, 2017.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–24502 Filed 11–24–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\27NOP1.SGM
27NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 226 (Monday, November 27, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55958-55963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24502]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2015-1421; Product Identifier 2014-NM-177-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM); reopening
of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are revising an earlier proposal for certain The Boeing
Company Model 767-300 and -300F
[[Page 55959]]
series airplanes. This action revises the notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) by adding new high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections for
cracking of an expanded area of the lower outboard wing skin for
certain airplanes. We are proposing this airworthiness directive (AD)
to address the unsafe condition on these products. Since these actions
would impose an additional burden over those in the NPRM, we are
reopening the comment period to allow the public the chance to comment
on these changes.
DATES: The comment period for the NPRM published in the Federal
Register on June 5, 2015 (80 FR 32066), is reopened.
We must receive comments on this SNPRM by January 11, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this SNPRM, contact Aviation
Partners Boeing, 2811 S. 102nd Street, Suite 200, Seattle, WA 98168;
telephone 206-762-1171; Internet https://www.aviationpartnersboeing.com. You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425-227-1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2015-
1421; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this SNPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received,
and other information. The street address for the Docket Office (phone:
800-647-5527) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available
in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Allen Rauschendorfer, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-917-6450; fax: 425-917-6590;
email: allen.rauschendorfer@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2015-1421;
Product Identifier 2014-NM-177-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this SNPRM. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this SNPRM because
of those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this SNPRM.
Discussion
We issued an NPRM to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that
would apply to certain The Boeing Company Model 767-300 and -300F
series airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on June 5,
2015 (80 FR 32066). The NPRM was prompted by reports of fatigue
cracking on airplanes with Aviation Partners Boeing winglets installed.
The NPRM proposed to require an HFEC inspection for cracking of the
lower outboard wing skin, and repair or modification if necessary. The
NPRM also proposed to require one of three follow-on actions: repeating
the HFEC inspections; modifying certain internal stringers and
oversizing and plugging the existing fastener holes of the lower wing;
or modifying the external doubler/tripler and doing repetitive post-
modification inspections.
Actions Since the NPRM Was Issued
Since we issued the NPRM, we have determined that new HFEC
inspections for cracking of an expanded area of the lower outboard wing
skin are necessary to address the identified unsafe condition for
certain airplanes.
Aviation Partners Boeing (APB) has released Service Bulletin AP767-
57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017. In the NPRM, we refer to APB
Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 7, dated November 4, 2014, as
the appropriate source of service information for accomplishing the
proposed actions. APB Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated
April 3, 2017, corrects certain errors and omissions that were in the
Accomplishment Instructions of APB Service Bulletin AP767-57-010,
Revision 7, dated November 4, 2014, and provides clarification of
certain procedures. APB Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11,
dated April 3, 2017, also removes all work related to stringer L-6.5
due to recent analysis that the modification was not sufficient to meet
the 767 design service objective.
In light of this analysis, new repetitive post-modification HFEC
inspections have been added for airplanes on which the optional
terminating modification of the existing skin or external skin doubler
has been done. We have revised this proposed AD to refer to APB Service
Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017, for
accomplishing proposed actions for stringer L-9.5.
APB has also released Service Bulletin AP767-57-014, Revision 1,
dated April 12, 2017. APB Service Bulletin AP767-57-014, Revision 1,
dated April 12, 2017, includes procedures for inspections, repair
(modification), and repair of stringer L-6.5 of the lower outboard wing
skin (which replace the actions that were removed from APB Service
Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017).
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed APB Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated
April 3, 2017. The service information describes procedures for an HFEC
inspection for cracking of the external surface of the lower outboard
wing skin at stringer L-9.5 and on-condition actions that include
repetitive HFEC inspections; modification by oversizing and plugging
the existing fastener holes of the wing skin; repair (modification) of
the stringer with new stringer; repair (modification) of the stringer
with external doubler/tripler; repetitive post-repair inspections for
cracking; and repair.
We also reviewed APB Service Bulletin AP767-57-014, Revision 1,
dated April 12, 2017. The service information describes procedures for
an HFEC inspection for cracking of the lower outboard wing skin at
stringer L-6.5 and on-condition actions that include repetitive HFEC
inspections; repair (modification) of the stringer with new stringer;
repetitive post-repair
[[Page 55960]]
HFEC inspections for cracking; and repair.
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this proposed AD. We considered the comments received.
Request To Clarify Service Information and Actions in the Proposed AD
Multiple commenters (United Airlines, Delta Air Lines, American
Airlines, Japan Airlines, FedEx, Boeing) requested that the actions
specified in APB Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 7, dated
November 4, 2014, be revised. Commenters noted that APB Service
Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 7, dated November 4, 2014, contained
multiple errors. United Airlines, Delta Air Lines, American Airlines
and Boeing also requested that the actions specified in the proposed AD
be revised for clarity because certain language in the proposed AD did
not match the language in APB Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision
7, dated November 4, 2014. APB stated APB Service Bulletin AP767-57-
010, Revision 7, dated November 4, 2014, is being revised to include
corrections and clarifications and additional work. APB recommend that
we refer to updated service information.
We acknowledge the commenters' request and have revised this SNPRM
to refer to the updated service information in APB Service Bulletin
AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017, and APB Service
Bulletin AP767-57-014, Revision 1, dated April 12, 2017.
Request To Allow Previously Approved Repairs
American Airlines, APB, and Boeing requested that we give credit
for repairs in the subject area that had received 8100-9 approval prior
to the effective date of the AD.
We agree to give credit for repairs that we have determined will
address the identified unsafe condition. We replaced the content of
paragraph (i) of the proposed AD (in the NPRM) with new content in this
proposed AD to specify that repairs of the lower outboard wing skin
done after June 15, 2017, and before the effective date of this AD,
that are approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, are approved for the applicable repairs
required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD.
Request To Allow Previous Modifications
Air New Zealand requested that we give credit for accomplishing the
proposed modification before the effective date of the AD by adding the
required service information to paragraph (i) of the proposed AD, which
specifies credit for previous actions.
We acknowledge the comment. However, no change to this proposed AD
is necessary. Operators who accomplish the actions required by an AD
using the required service information before the effective date of an
AD are in compliance with the AD. Paragraph (f) of this proposed AD
states ``comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.'' Credit for previous actions in ADs is used
primarily to give credit for earlier revisions of required service
information that are also acceptable for compliance if done before the
effective date of the AD.
FAA's Determination
We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
Certain changes described above expand the scope of the NPRM. As a
result, we have determined that it is necessary to reopen the comment
period to provide additional opportunity for the public to comment on
this SNPRM.
Proposed Requirements of This SNPRM
This SNPRM would require accomplishing the actions specified in the
service information described previously, except as discussed under
``Differences Between this Proposed Rule and the Service Information.''
The compliance times vary depending on airplane configuration and
inspection area. The shortest initial compliance time is the later of:
1,500 flight cycles or 7,500 flight hours after winglet installation,
whichever occurs first; or 18 months after the effective date of the
AD. Except for one group of airplanes, the longest initial compliance
time is the later of: 7,800 flight cycles or 23,400 flight hours after
installation of a certain modification, whichever occurs first; or 18
months after the effective date of the AD. For one group of airplanes,
the longest initial compliance time is 29,000 total flight cycles or
111,000 total flight hours, whichever occurs first.
The shortest repetitive interval is 1,500 flight cycles or 7,500
flight hours, whichever occurs first. The longest repetitive interval
is 12,000 flight cycles or 36,000 flight hours, whichever occurs first.
Differences Between Proposed Rule and Service Information
APB Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3,
2017, and APB Service Bulletin AP767-57-014, Revision 1, dated April
12, 2017, specify to contact the manufacturer for instructions on how
to repair certain conditions, but this proposed AD would require
repairing those conditions in one of the following ways:
In accordance with a method that we approve; or
Using data that meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and that have been approved by the Boeing Commercial
Airplanes ODA whom we have authorized to make those findings.
Table 5a of paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of APB Service Bulletin
AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017, does not provide a
grace period for airplanes that have exceeded a certain compliance
time. We have added a grace period of 6 months to paragraph (g)(2) of
this proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this proposed AD affects 140 airplanes of U.S.
registry. We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed
AD:
Estimated Costs--Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HFEC Inspections.................. 6 work-hours x $85 per $0 $510 $71,400
hour = $510.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 55961]]
We estimate the following costs to do any necessary on-condition
actions that would be required based on the results of the proposed
inspection. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that
might need these on-condition actions.
Estimated Costs--On-Condition Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post-repair Inspections.................... 6 work-hours x $85 per hour = $510 $0 $510
per inspection cycle.
Repair/Modification........................ 262 work-hours x 85 per hour = 0 22,270
22,270.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for on-condition repairs for the post-repair inspections
specified in this proposed AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs''
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order,
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable
to transport category airplanes to the Director of the System Oversight
Division.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2015-1421; Product Identifier
2014-NM-177-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
We must receive comments by January 11, 2018.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 767-300 and -300F
series airplanes, certificated in any category, with Aviation
Partners Boeing winglets installed; as identified in Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated
April 3, 2017; and Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-
57-014, Revision 1, dated April 12, 2017.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of fatigue cracking in the lower
outboard wing skin at the inboard fastener of stringer L-9.5, and
the lower outboard wing skin of stringer L-6.5, on airplanes with
winglets installed per Supplemental Type Certificate ST01920SE. We
are issuing this AD to prevent fatigue cracking in the lower
outboard wing skin, which could result in failure and subsequent
separation of the wing and winglet and consequent reduced
controllability of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Repetitive Stringer L-9.5 Inspections, Modification, Repair
(Modification), Repetitive Post-Repair Inspections, and Repair
(1) For Group 1 and Group 2 airplanes identified in Aviation
Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated
April 3, 2017: At the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-
57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017, except as required by
paragraph (j)(1) of this AD: Do a high frequency eddy current (HFEC)
inspection for cracking of the lower outboard wing skin at stringer
L-9.5, in accordance with Part 1 of the Accomplishment Instructions
of Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision
11, dated April 3, 2017.
(i) For airplanes on which ``Condition 1'' is found, as defined
in the Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation Partners Boeing
Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017,
during any inspection required by paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(1)(i)(A)
of this AD: Do the applicable actions required by paragraph
(g)(1)(i)(A), (g)(1)(i)(B), (g)(1)(i)(C), or (g)(1)(i)(D) of this
AD.
(A) Repeat the inspection specified in paragraph (g)(1) of this
AD thereafter at the applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-
57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(B) Do the applicable actions required by paragraphs
(g)(1)(i)(B)(1), (g)(1)(i)(B)(2), and (g)(1)(i)(B)(3) of this AD.
(1) Before further flight, do actions (modifications and repair
(modification)) in
[[Page 55962]]
accordance with Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, and Part 5, as applicable,
of the Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation Partners Boeing
Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(2) For airplanes on which the repair (modification) specified
in Part 5 of Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-010
was done: At the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-
57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017, do a post-repair HFEC
inspection for cracking, in accordance with Part 12 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation Partners Boeing Service
Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017; and repeat
the inspection thereafter at the applicable times specified in
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners Boeing Service
Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(3) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (g)(1)(i)(B)(2) of this AD, repair before further flight
using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified
in paragraph (k) of this AD.
(C) Do the actions required by paragraphs (g)(1)(i)(C)(1) and
(g)(1)(i)(C)(2) of this AD, and do all applicable actions required
by paragraph (g)(1)(i)(C)(3) of this AD.
(1) Before further flight, repair (modify) in accordance with
Part 8 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation Partners
Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3,
2017.
(2) At the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-
57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017, do a post-repair HFEC
inspection for cracking, in accordance with Part 9 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation Partners Boeing Service
Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017; and repeat
the inspection thereafter at the applicable times specified in in
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners Boeing Service
Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(3) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (g)(1)(i)(C)(2) of this AD, repair before further flight
using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified
in paragraph (k) of this AD.
(D) Do the actions required by paragraphs (g)(1)(i)(D)(1) and
(g)(1)(i)(D)(2) of this AD, and do all applicable actions required
by paragraph (g)(1)(i)(D)(3) of this AD.
(1) Before further flight, repair (modify) in accordance with
Part 11 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation Partners
Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3,
2017.
(2) At the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-
57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017, do a post-repair HFEC
inspection for cracking, in accordance with Part 13 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation Partners Boeing Service
Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017; and repeat
the inspection thereafter at the applicable times specified in in
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners Boeing Service
Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(3) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (g)(1)(i)(D)(2) of this AD, repair before further flight
using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified
in paragraph (k) of this AD.
(ii) For airplanes on which ``Condition 2'' is found, as defined
in the Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation Partners Boeing
Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017,
during any inspection required by paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(1)(i)(A)
of this AD: Do the actions required by paragraph (g)(1)(ii)(A) or
(g)(1)(ii)(B) of this AD.
(A) Do the actions required by paragraphs (g)(1)(ii)(A)(1) and
(g)(1)(ii)(A)(2) of this AD, and do all applicable actions required
by paragraph (g)(1)(ii)(A)(3) of this AD.
(1) Before further flight, repair (modify) in accordance with
Part 8 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation Partners
Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3,
2017.
(2) At the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-
57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017, do a post-repair HFEC
inspection for cracking, in accordance with Part 9 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation Partners Boeing Service
Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017; and repeat
the inspection thereafter at the applicable times specified in in
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners Boeing Service
Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(3) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (g)(1)(ii)(A)(2) of this AD, repair before further flight
using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified
in paragraph (k) of this AD.
(B) Do the actions required by paragraphs (g)(1)(ii)(B)(1) and
(g)(1)(ii)(B)(2) of this AD, and do all applicable actions required
by paragraph (g)(1)(ii)(B)(3) of this AD.
(1) Before further flight, repair (modify) in accordance with
Part 11 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation Partners
Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3,
2017.
(2) At the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-
57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017, do a post-repair HFEC
inspection for cracking, in accordance with Part 13 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation Partners Boeing Service
Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017; and repeat
the inspection thereafter at the applicable times specified in in
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners Boeing Service
Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(3) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (g)(1)(ii)(B)(2) of this AD, repair before further flight
using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified
in paragraph (k) of this AD.
(iii) For airplanes on which ``Condition 3'' is found, as
defined in the Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation Partners
Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3,
2017, during the actions specified in paragraph (g)(1)(i)(B)(1) of
this AD: Do the actions required by paragraph (g)(1)(iii)(A) or
(g)(1)(iii)(B) of this AD.
(A) Do the actions required by paragraphs (g)(1)(iii)(A)(1) and
(g)(1)(iii)(A)(2) of this AD, and do all applicable actions required
by paragraph (g)(1)(iii)(A)(3) of this AD.
(1) Before further flight, repair (modify) in accordance with
Part 8 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation Partners
Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3,
2017.
(2) At the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-
57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017, do a post-repair HFEC
inspection for cracking, in accordance with Part 9 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation Partners Boeing Service
Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017; and repeat
the inspection thereafter at the applicable times specified in in
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners Boeing Service
Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(3) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (g)(1)(iii)(A)(2) of this AD, repair before further flight
using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified
in paragraph (k) of this AD.
(B) Do the actions required by paragraphs (g)(1)(iii)(B)(1) and
(g)(1)(iii)(B)(2) of this AD, and do all applicable actions required
by paragraph (g)(1)(iii)(B)(3) of this AD.
(1) Before further flight, repair (modify) in accordance with
Part 11 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation Partners
Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3,
2017.
(2) At the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-
57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017, do a post-repair HFEC
inspection for cracking, in accordance with Part 13 of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation Partners Boeing Service
Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017; and repeat
the inspection thereafter at the applicable times specified in in
paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners Boeing Service
Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017.
(3) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (g)(1)(iii)(B)(2) of this AD, repair before further flight
using a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified
in paragraph (k) of this AD.
(iv) For airplanes on which ``Condition 4'' is found, as defined
in the Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation Partners Boeing
Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017,
during any action specified in paragraph (g)(1)(i)(C)(1),
(g)(1)(i)(D)(1), (g)(1)(ii)(A)(1), (g)(1)(ii)(B)(1),
(g)(1)(iii)(A)(1), and (g)(1)(iii)(B)(1) of this AD: Repair before
further flight using a method approved in accordance with the
[[Page 55963]]
procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this AD.
(2) For Group 3 airplanes identified in Aviation Partners Boeing
Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3, 2017: At
the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of
Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11,
dated April 3, 2017, or within 6 months after the effective date of
this AD, whichever occurs later, do an HFEC inspection for cracking
of the lower outboard wing skin at stringer L-9.5, in accordance
with Part 7 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Aviation Partners
Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3,
2017. Repeat the inspection thereafter at the applicable time
specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners
Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3,
2017. If any cracking is found during any inspection, repair before
further flight using a method approved in accordance with the
procedures specified in paragraph (k) of this AD. An approved repair
terminates the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (g)(2)
of this AD.
(h) Repetitive Stringer L-6.5 Inspections, Repair (Modification),
Repetitive Post-Repair Inspections, and Repair
(1) For airplanes identified in Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-
57-014, Revision 1, dated April 12, 2017: At the applicable time
specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners
Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-014, Revision 1, dated April 12,
2017, except as required by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD: Do an HFEC
inspection for cracking of stringer L-6.5 of the lower outboard wing
skin, in accordance with Part 1 of Aviation Partners Boeing Service
Bulletin AP767-57-014, Revision 1, dated April 12, 2017. If no
cracking is found, repeat the inspection thereafter at the
applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of
Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-014, Revision 1,
dated April 12, 2017, except as provided by paragraph (h)(3) of this
AD.
(2) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, do the actions required by paragraphs
(h)(2)(i) and (h)(2)(ii) of this AD, and do all applicable actions
required by paragraph (h)(2)(iii) of this AD.
(i) Before further flight, repair (modify) stringer L-6.5, in
accordance with Part 2 of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-014, Revision 1,
dated April 12, 2017.
(ii) At the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-
57-014, Revision 1, dated April 12, 2017, except as required by
paragraph (j)(2) of this AD, do an HFEC post-repair inspection for
cracking, in accordance with Part 3 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-
014, Revision 1, dated April 12, 2017, and repeat the inspection
thereafter at the applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-
57-014, Revision 1, dated April 12, 2017.
(iii) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (h)(2)(ii) of this AD, repair before further flight using
a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (k) of this AD.
(3) As an option to the repetitive inspections required by
paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, do the actions required by paragraphs
(h)(3)(i) and (h)(3)(ii) of this AD, and do all applicable actions
required by paragraph (h)(3)(iii) of this AD.
(i) Before further flight after accomplishing the most recent
inspection required by paragraph (h)(1) of this AD, repair (modify)
stringer L-6.5, in accordance with Part 2 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-
014, Revision 1, dated April 12, 2017.
(ii) At the applicable time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-
57-014, Revision 1, dated April 12, 2017, except as required by
paragraph (j)(2) of this AD, do a post-repair HFEC inspection for
cracking, in accordance with Part 3 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-
014, Revision 1, dated April 12, 2017, and repeat the inspection
thereafter at the applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-
57-014, Revision 1, dated April 12, 2017.
(iii) If any crack is found during any inspection required by
paragraph (h)(3)(ii) of this AD, repair before further flight using
a method approved in accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (k) of this AD.
(i) Repair Approval
Repairs of the lower outboard wing skin done after June 15,
2017, and before the effective date of this AD, that are approved by
the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO Branch, are approved for the applicable repairs required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD.
(j) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications
(1) Where paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners
Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-010, Revision 11, dated April 3,
2017, specifies a compliance time of ``after the issue date of
Revision 11 of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance
within the specified compliance time after the effective date of
this AD.
(2) Where paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of Aviation Partners
Boeing Service Bulletin AP767-57-014, Revision 1, dated April 12,
2017, specifies a compliance time of ``after the initial issue date
of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance within the
specified compliance time after the effective date of this AD.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes ODA that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, to make those
findings. To be approved, the repair method, modification deviation,
or alteration deviation must meet the certification basis of the
airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) Except as required by paragraphs (g)(1)(i)(B)(3),
(g)(1)(i)(C)(3), (g)(1)(i)(D)(3), (g)(1)(ii)(A)(3),
(g)(1)(ii)(B)(3), (g)(1)(iii)(A)(3), (g)(1)(iii)(B)(3), (g)(1)(iv),
(g)(2), (h)(2)(iii), and (h)(3)(iii) of this AD: For service
information that contains steps that are labeled as Required for
Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs (k)(4)(i) and
(k)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
(l) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Allen
Rauschendorfer, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle
ACO Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-
917-6450; fax: 425-917-6590; email: allen.rauschendorfer@faa.gov.
(2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Aviation Partners Boeing, 2811 S. 102nd Street, Suite 200, Seattle,
WA 98168; telephone 206-762-1171; Internet https://www.aviationpartnersboeing.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 3, 2017.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-24502 Filed 11-24-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P