Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes, 55757-55760 [2017-23998]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 225 / Friday, November 24, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
procedures specified in paragraph (i)(2) of
this AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD becomes effective December 11,
2017.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to the ATR—GIE Avions
´
de Transport Regional airplanes identified in
paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD,
certificated in any category.
(1) Model ATR42–500 airplanes, serial
numbers (S/Ns) 1014, 1016 through 1019
inclusive, and 1201 through 1212 inclusive.
(2) Model ATR72–212A airplanes, S/Ns
1165 through 1200 inclusive, 1220 through
1340 inclusive, 1342 through 1353 inclusive,
1355 through 1366 inclusive, 1368 through
1376 inclusive, 1378 through 1380 inclusive,
1382, 1385, and 1388.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 92, Electrical System
Installation.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of
electrical harness bundle chafing with a
window blinding panel in the fuselage. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct
missing routing attachments of fuselage
electrical harness bundles, which could
result in wire failure (cut or shorted) and, in
case of several failures in combination, the
loss of systems, possibly resulting in reduced
control of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
(g) Inspection
Within 6 months or 500 flight hours after
the effective date of this AD, whichever
occurs first: Do a detailed inspection for
missing brackets and damage (including but
not limited to chafing and electrical shorting)
to wire bundles of the Route 1M and Route
2M electrical harness, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of ATR Service
Bulletin ATR42–92–0033, dated May 3, 2017
(for Model ATR42–500 airplanes); or ATR
Service Bulletin ATR72–92–1044, dated May
3, 2017 (for Model ATR72–212A airplanes);
as applicable.
(h) Corrective Action
If the inspection required by paragraph (g)
of this AD reveals that any bracket is missing
or any wire is damaged: Before further flight,
do applicable corrective actions, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of ATR Service Bulletin ATR42–
92–0033, dated May 3, 2017 (for Model
ATR42–500 airplanes); or ATR Service
Bulletin ATR72–92–1044, dated May 3, 2017
(for Model ATR72–212A airplanes); as
applicable. Where ATR Service Bulletin
ATR42–92–0033, dated May 3, 2017; or ATR
Service Bulletin ATR72–92–1044, dated May
3, 2017; specifies to contact ATR—GIE
´
Avions de Transport Regional for appropriate
action: Before further flight, accomplish
corrective actions in accordance with the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Nov 22, 2017
Jkt 244001
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the International
Branch, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (j)(2) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ANM-116AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Section,
Transport Standards Branch, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or
´
ATR—GIE Avions de Transport Regional’s
EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA).
If approved by the DOA, the approval must
include the DOA-authorized signature.
(j) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA AD
2017–0118, dated July 7, 2017, for related
information. You may examine the MCAI on
the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–
2017–1027.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace
Engineer, International Section, Transport
Standards Branch, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; telephone
425–227–1112; fax 425–227–1149.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) ATR Service Bulletin ATR42–92–0033,
dated May 3, 2017.
(ii) ATR Service Bulletin ATR72–92–1044,
dated May 3, 2017.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact ATR—GIE Avions de
´
´
Transport Regional, 1, Allee Pierre Nadot,
31712 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33
(0) 5 62 21 62 21; fax +33 (0) 5 62 21 67 18;
email continued.airworthiness@atraircraft.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
55757
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on
November 8, 2017.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–25004 Filed 11–22–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2017–0499; Product
Identifier 2016–NM–205–AD; Amendment
39–19090; AD 2017–22–10]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing
Company Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 747–400,
747–400F, and 747–8F series airplanes.
This AD was prompted by reports of
failure of the fastener assemblies on the
crew access ladder handrails. This AD
requires replacing the fastener
assemblies. We are issuing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these
products.
SUMMARY:
This AD is effective December
29, 2017.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of December 29, 2017.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes,
Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC
110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You
may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
It is also available on the Internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
0499.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\24NOR1.SGM
24NOR1
55758
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 225 / Friday, November 24, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2017–
0499; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this final rule, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the
Docket Office (phone: 800–647–5527) is
Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan L. Monroe, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental
Systems Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA; phone: 425–917–6457; fax: 425–
917–6590; email: susan.l.monroe@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would
apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 747–400, 747–400F, and 747–8F
series airplanes. The NPRM published
in the Federal Register on May 30, 2017
(82 FR 24595). The NPRM was
prompted by reports of failure of the
fastener assemblies on the crew access
ladder handrails. The NPRM proposed
to require replacing the fastener
assemblies. We are issuing this AD to
prevent the fastener assemblies from
coming loose on the crew access ladder
handrails, which could result in serious
or fatal injury to personnel.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this final rule.
The following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA’s
response to each comment.
Request To Withdraw the NPRM
United Parcel Service (UPS) requested
that the NPRM be withdrawn. UPS
pointed out that the crew access ladder
is stowed during flight and stated that
failure of the ladder does not affect
safety of flight of the airplane.
Therefore, UPS stated that the failure of
the crew access ladder should not be the
subject of an AD as it is outside the
scope of 14 CFR part 39.
We do not agree with UPS’s request.
Title 14 part 39.5 states: ‘‘FAA issues an
airworthiness directive addressing a
product when we find that: (a) An
unsafe condition exists in the product;
and (b) The condition is likely to exist
or develop in other products of the same
type design.’’ This action does fall
within the scope of 14 CFR part 39
because an unsafe condition exists in a
product that is likely to exist in other
products of the same design. In
addition, the ladder is accessible to, and
in some cases may be used by, the flight
crew during flight. Incapacitation of a
flight crew member during flight is
considered a safety of flight issue. We
have not changed this AD in this regard.
Requests To Revise Applicability To
Match the Service Information
Boeing requested that we remove the
‘‘Differences Between this Proposed AD
and the Service Information’’ section of
the NPRM. Boeing explained that this
information implies that airplanes
delivered with compliant rotable
hardware could have the rotable
hardware subsequently replaced with
non-compliant hardware. Boeing stated
that this is very unlikely because
compliant airplanes have the compliant
rotable hardware sealed within a
permanent protective cover.
UPS requested that we revise the
applicability to remove Model 747–8F
series airplanes, line numbers (L/Ns)
1540 and on, specified in paragraphs
(c)(2) and (c)(3) of the proposed AD.
UPS asserted that Boeing has confirmed
that those airplanes will have the
compliant parts installed during
production.
We partially agree with the
commenters’ requests. We do not agree
to remove the ‘‘Differences Between this
Proposed AD and the Service
Information’’ section of the NPRM. This
section is not restated in the final rule,
so no change is necessary in this regard.
We agree that the likelihood of
discrepant parts being installed on an
airplane that is outside the applicability
of Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 747–25–3693, dated November
10, 2016, is sufficiently low. Therefore,
we have revised the applicability of this
AD accordingly. We also removed
paragraph (h) of the proposed AD from
this AD and redesignated subsequent
paragraphs accordingly.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data,
considered the comments received, and
determined that air safety and the
public interest require adopting this
final rule with the changes described
previously and minor editorial changes.
We have determined that these minor
changes:
• Are consistent with the intent that
was proposed in the NPRM for
correcting the unsafe condition; and
• Do not add any additional burden
upon the public than was already
proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these
changes will not increase the economic
burden on any operator or increase the
scope of this final rule.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 747–25–
3693, dated November 10, 2016. The
service information describes
procedures for replacing the existing
fastener assemblies with new assemblies
on the crew access ladder handrails.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect
84 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply
with this AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Action
Labor cost
Replacement ...................................................
3 work-hours × $85 per hour = $255 .............
According to the manufacturer, some
of the costs of this AD may be covered
under warranty, thereby reducing the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Nov 22, 2017
Jkt 244001
Parts cost
cost impact on affected individuals. We
do not control warranty coverage for
affected individuals. As a result, we
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
$2,418
Cost per
product
$2,673
Cost on U.S.
operators
$224,532
have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
E:\FR\FM\24NOR1.SGM
24NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 225 / Friday, November 24, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
Authority for This Rulemaking
Adoption of the Amendment
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
This AD is issued in accordance with
authority delegated by the Executive
Director, Aircraft Certification Service,
as authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C.
In accordance with that order, issuance
of ADs is normally a function of the
Compliance and Airworthiness
Division, but during this transition
period, the Executive Director has
delegated the authority to issue ADs
applicable to transport category
airplanes to the Director of the System
Oversight Division.
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Nov 22, 2017
Jkt 244001
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
2017–22–10 The Boeing Company:
Amendment 39–19090; Docket No.
FAA–2017–0499; Product Identifier
2016–NM–205–AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective December 29, 2017.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company
Model 747–400, 747–400F, and 747–8F series
airplanes, certificated in any category, as
identified in Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 747–25–3693, dated
November 10, 2016.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 25; Equipment/furnishings.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of failure
of the fastener assemblies on the crew access
ladder handrails. We are issuing this AD to
prevent the fastener assemblies from coming
loose on the crew access ladder handrails,
which could result in serious or fatal injury
to personnel.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Replacement
Within 36 months after the effective date
of this AD, replace the fastener assemblies in
the crew access ladder handrails with new
fastener assemblies, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing
Special Attention Service Bulletin 747–25–
3693, dated November 10, 2016.
(h) Parts Installation Limitation
As of the effective date of this AD, no
person may install the discrepant fastener
hardware identified in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention
Service Bulletin 747–25–3693, dated
November 10, 2016, on a crew access ladder
on any airplane.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
55759
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (j) of this
AD. Information may be emailed to: 9-ANMSeattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable
level of safety may be used for any repair,
modification, or alteration required by this
AD if it is approved by the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has
been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO
Branch, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification
deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) For service information that contains
steps that are labeled as Required for
Compliance (RC), the provisions of
paragraphs (i)(4)(i) and (i)(4)(ii) of this AD
apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including
substeps under an RC step and any figures
identified in an RC step, must be done to
comply with the AD. If a step or substep is
labeled ‘‘RC Exempt,’’ then the RC
requirement is removed from that step or
substep. An AMOC is required for any
deviations to RC steps, including substeps
and identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the RC steps,
including substeps and identified figures, can
still be done as specified, and the airplane
can be put back in an airworthy condition.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Susan L. Monroe, Aerospace
Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental
Systems Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA; phone:
425–917–6457; fax: 425–917–6590; email:
susan.l.monroe@faa.gov.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 747–25–3693, dated November 10,
2016.
(ii) Reserved.
E:\FR\FM\24NOR1.SGM
24NOR1
55760
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 225 / Friday, November 24, 2017 / Rules and Regulations
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd.,
MC 110–SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740–5600;
telephone 562–797–1717; Internet https://
www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221.
(5) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October
19, 2017.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–23998 Filed 11–22–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 122
[CBP Dec. 17–18]
Technical Amendment to List of User
Fee Airports: Removal of Meadows
Field Airport, Bakersfield, CA and the
Addition of Griffiss International
Airport, Rome, NY; Van Nuys Airport,
Van Nuys, CA; Cobb County AirportMcCollum Field, Kennesaw, GA; and
Charlotte-Monroe Executive Airport,
Monroe, NC
U.S. Customs and Border
Protection, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule; technical
amendment.
AGENCY:
This document amends U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
regulations by revising the list of user
fee airports to reflect the removal of user
fee status for Meadows Field Airport in
Bakersfield, California and the
designation of user fee status for four
additional airports: Griffiss International
Airport in Rome, New York; Van Nuys
Airport in Van Nuys, California; Cobb
County Airport-McCollum Field in
Kennesaw, Georgia; and CharlotteMonroe Executive Airport in Monroe,
North Carolina. User fee airports are
those airports which, while not
qualifying for designation as
international or landing rights airports,
have been approved by the
sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:12 Nov 22, 2017
Jkt 244001
Commissioner of CBP to receive, for a
fee, the services of CBP officers for the
processing of aircraft entering the
United States, and the passengers and
cargo of those aircraft.
DATES: Effective Date: November 24,
2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chris Sullivan, Director, Alternative
Funding Program, Office of Field
Operations, U.S. Customs and Border
Protection at Christopher.J.Sullivan@
cbp.dhs.gov or 202–344–3907.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Title 19, part 122 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (19 CFR part 122)
sets forth regulations relating to the
entry and clearance of aircraft in
international commerce and the
transportation of persons and cargo by
aircraft in international commerce.
Generally, a civil aircraft arriving from
a place outside of the United States is
required to land at an airport designated
as an international airport.
Alternatively, the pilot of a civil aircraft
may request permission to land at a
specific airport and, if landing rights are
granted, the civil aircraft may land at
that landing rights airport.
Section 236 of the Trade and Tariff
Act of 1984 (Pub. L. 98–573, 98 stat.
2948, 2994 (1984)), codified at 19 U.S.C.
58b, created an option for civil aircraft
desiring to land at an airport other than
an international airport or a landing
rights airport. A civil aircraft arriving
from a place outside of the United States
may ask for permission to land at an
airport designated by the Secretary of
Homeland Security 1 as a user fee
airport.
Pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 58b, an airport
may be designated as a user fee airport
if the Commissioner of CBP, as
delegated by the Secretary of Homeland
Security, determines that the volume or
value of business at the airport is
insufficient to justify the availability of
customs services at the airport and the
governor of the state in which the
airport is located approves the
designation.2 As the volume or value of
business anticipated at this type of
airport is insufficient to justify its
designation as an international or
landing rights airport, the availability of
1 Sections 403(1) and 411 of the Homeland
Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107–296, 116 stat.
2135, 2178–79 (2002)), codified at 6 U.S.C. 203(1)
and 211, transferred certain functions, including the
authority to designate user fee facilities, from the
U.S. Customs Service of the Department of the
Treasury to the Department of Homeland Security.
2 In addition to airports, 19 U.S.C. 58b also
authorizes the designation of seaports or other
facilities as user fee facilities.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
customs services is not paid for out of
appropriations from the general treasury
of the United States. Instead, customs
services are provided on a fully
reimbursable basis to be paid for by the
user fee airport. The fees charged must
be paid by the user fee airport and must
be in the amount equal to the expenses
incurred by the Commissioner of CBP in
providing customs services at such
airport, including the salary and
expenses of those employed by the
Commissioner of CBP to provide the
customs services. See 19 U.S.C. 58b.
The Commissioner of CBP designates
airports as user fee airports in
accordance with 19 U.S.C. 58b and
pursuant to 19 CFR 122.15. If the
Commissioner decides that the
conditions for designation as a user fee
airport are satisfied, a Memorandum of
Agreement (MOA) is executed between
the Commissioner of CBP and the user
fee airport sponsor. The user fee status
designation may be withdrawn if either
CBP or the airport authority provides
120 days written notice of termination
to the other party. See 19 CFR
122.15(c)(1). In this manner, user fee
airports are designated and withdrawn
on a case-by-case basis.
Section 122.15 of CBP’s regulations
also sets forth the list of designated user
fee airports. Periodically, CBP updates
the list of user fee airports at 19 CFR
122.15(b) to reflect those that are
currently designated by the
Commissioner of CBP.
Recent Changes Requiring Updates to
the List of User Fee Airports
This document updates the list of user
fee airports in 19 CFR 122.15(b) by
adding Griffiss International Airport in
Rome, New York; Van Nuys Airport in
Van Nuys, California; Cobb County
Airport-McCollum Field in Kennesaw,
Georgia; and Charlotte-Monroe
Executive Airport in Monroe, North
Carolina. The Commissioner of CBP has
signed an MOA designating each of
these four airports as a user fee airport.3
Additionally, this document updates
the list of user fee airports by removing
Meadows Field Airport in Bakersfield,
California. After an initial request by the
airport authority of Meadows Field
Airport to withdraw its user fee status,
the airport authority and CBP agreed to
terminate their MOA and the user fee
status of Meadows Field Airport. On
November 23, 2016, the Commissioner
3 The Commissioner of CBP signed an MOA
designating Griffiss International Airport on March
3, 2015, an MOA designating Van Nuys Airport on
April, 17, 2015, an MOA designating Cobb County
Airport-McCollum Field on June 8, 2015, and an
MOA designating Charlotte-Monroe Executive
Airport on July 28, 2014.
E:\FR\FM\24NOR1.SGM
24NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 225 (Friday, November 24, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 55757-55760]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23998]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2017-0499; Product Identifier 2016-NM-205-AD; Amendment
39-19090; AD 2017-22-10]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 747-400, 747-400F, and 747-8F series
airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of failure of the fastener
assemblies on the crew access ladder handrails. This AD requires
replacing the fastener assemblies. We are issuing this AD to address
the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective December 29, 2017.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of December 29,
2017.
ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone 562-797-1717; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-
227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0499.
[[Page 55758]]
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0499; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office
(phone: 800-647-5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan L. Monroe, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Section, FAA, Seattle ACO
Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA; phone: 425-917-6457; fax:
425-917-6590; email: susan.l.monroe@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 747-400, 747-400F, and 747-8F series airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on May 30, 2017 (82 FR 24595). The
NPRM was prompted by reports of failure of the fastener assemblies on
the crew access ladder handrails. The NPRM proposed to require
replacing the fastener assemblies. We are issuing this AD to prevent
the fastener assemblies from coming loose on the crew access ladder
handrails, which could result in serious or fatal injury to personnel.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the
NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.
Request To Withdraw the NPRM
United Parcel Service (UPS) requested that the NPRM be withdrawn.
UPS pointed out that the crew access ladder is stowed during flight and
stated that failure of the ladder does not affect safety of flight of
the airplane. Therefore, UPS stated that the failure of the crew access
ladder should not be the subject of an AD as it is outside the scope of
14 CFR part 39.
We do not agree with UPS's request. Title 14 part 39.5 states:
``FAA issues an airworthiness directive addressing a product when we
find that: (a) An unsafe condition exists in the product; and (b) The
condition is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same
type design.'' This action does fall within the scope of 14 CFR part 39
because an unsafe condition exists in a product that is likely to exist
in other products of the same design. In addition, the ladder is
accessible to, and in some cases may be used by, the flight crew during
flight. Incapacitation of a flight crew member during flight is
considered a safety of flight issue. We have not changed this AD in
this regard.
Requests To Revise Applicability To Match the Service Information
Boeing requested that we remove the ``Differences Between this
Proposed AD and the Service Information'' section of the NPRM. Boeing
explained that this information implies that airplanes delivered with
compliant rotable hardware could have the rotable hardware subsequently
replaced with non-compliant hardware. Boeing stated that this is very
unlikely because compliant airplanes have the compliant rotable
hardware sealed within a permanent protective cover.
UPS requested that we revise the applicability to remove Model 747-
8F series airplanes, line numbers (L/Ns) 1540 and on, specified in
paragraphs (c)(2) and (c)(3) of the proposed AD. UPS asserted that
Boeing has confirmed that those airplanes will have the compliant parts
installed during production.
We partially agree with the commenters' requests. We do not agree
to remove the ``Differences Between this Proposed AD and the Service
Information'' section of the NPRM. This section is not restated in the
final rule, so no change is necessary in this regard.
We agree that the likelihood of discrepant parts being installed on
an airplane that is outside the applicability of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 747-25-3693, dated November 10, 2016, is
sufficiently low. Therefore, we have revised the applicability of this
AD accordingly. We also removed paragraph (h) of the proposed AD from
this AD and redesignated subsequent paragraphs accordingly.
Conclusion
We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this final rule with the changes described previously and minor
editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and
Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
We reviewed Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-25-3693,
dated November 10, 2016. The service information describes procedures
for replacing the existing fastener assemblies with new assemblies on
the crew access ladder handrails. This service information is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section.
Costs of Compliance
We estimate that this AD will affect 84 airplanes of U.S. registry.
We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replacement........................... 3 work-hours x $85 per $2,418 $2,673 $224,532
hour = $255.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this AD may be
covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on affected
individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.
[[Page 55759]]
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes to
the Director of the System Oversight Division.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
2017-22-10 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-19090; Docket No. FAA-
2017-0499; Product Identifier 2016-NM-205-AD.
(a) Effective Date
This AD is effective December 29, 2017.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-400, 747-400F,
and 747-8F series airplanes, certificated in any category, as
identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-25-3693,
dated November 10, 2016.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 25; Equipment/
furnishings.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of failure of the fastener
assemblies on the crew access ladder handrails. We are issuing this
AD to prevent the fastener assemblies from coming loose on the crew
access ladder handrails, which could result in serious or fatal
injury to personnel.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Replacement
Within 36 months after the effective date of this AD, replace
the fastener assemblies in the crew access ladder handrails with new
fastener assemblies, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-25-
3693, dated November 10, 2016.
(h) Parts Installation Limitation
As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install the
discrepant fastener hardware identified in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-25-
3693, dated November 10, 2016, on a crew access ladder on any
airplane.
(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (j) of this AD. Information may be
emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization
Designation Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the
Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, to make those findings. To be approved,
the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation
must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval
must specifically refer to this AD.
(4) For service information that contains steps that are labeled
as Required for Compliance (RC), the provisions of paragraphs
(i)(4)(i) and (i)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.
(i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
(ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD, contact Susan L. Monroe,
Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Section,
FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA; phone:
425-917-6457; fax: 425-917-6590; email: susan.l.monroe@faa.gov.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 747-25-3693, dated
November 10, 2016.
(ii) Reserved.
[[Page 55760]]
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone 562-797-1717; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-227-1221.
(5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on October 19, 2017.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-23998 Filed 11-22-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P