Vessel and Aircraft Discharges From United States Coast Guard Activities in Greater Farallones and Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuaries, 55529-55535 [2017-25105]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 22, 2017 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 2 TO PARAGRAPH (c)—AFFECTED ENGINE SERIAL NUMBERS
(S/N)
Engine
Affected S/N
912 A series ..............
4 411 126 through 4
411 146 and 4 411
401 through 4 411
492.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association of America
(ATA) Code 85: Reciprocating Engine.
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI
describes the unsafe condition as defective
valve push-rod assemblies manufactured
from June 8, 2016, through October 2, 2017.
We are issuing this AD to prevent rough
engine operation, which could cause loss of
power and result in loss of control.
(f) Actions and Compliance
Unless already done, do the following
actions:
(1) For aircraft with engines that have 160
hours time-in-service (TIS) or less since first
installed: Before exceeding 170 hours TIS on
the engine since first installed or within the
next 3 months after the effective date of this
AD, whichever occurs first, visually inspect
the valve push-rod ball sockets of each valve
push-rod using the Accomplishment
Instructions in Rotax Aircraft Engines BRP
Service Bulletin SB–912 i–008 R1/SB–912–
070 R1/SB–914–052 R1 (co-published as one
document), Revision 1, dated October 12,
2017 (Rotax SB SB–912 i–008 R1/SB–912–
070 R1/SB–914–052 R1).
(2) For airplanes with engines that have
160 hours TIS or more since first installed:
Within the next 10 hours TIS after the
effective date of this AD or within the next
3 months after the effective date of this AD,
whichever occurs first, visually inspect the
valve push-rod ball sockets of each valve
push-rod using the Accomplishment
Instructions in Rotax SB SB–912 i-008 R1/
SB–912–070 R1/SB–914–052 R1.
(3) For all affected airplanes: If a valve
push-rod with a black surface is found during
the inspection required in paragraph (f)(1) or
(f)(2) of this AD, before further flight, replace
the valve push-rod and its affected parts with
airworthy parts using the Accomplishment
Instructions in Rotax SB SB–912 i-008 R1/
SB–912–070 R1/SB–914–052 R1.
(4) For all affected airplanes: As of the
effective date of this AD, do not install a
valve push-rod that was manufactured from
June 8, 2016, through October 2, 2017.
(g) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Small Airplane
Standards Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Nov 21, 2017
Jkt 244001
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Jim Rutherford,
Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane
Standards Branch, 901 Locust, Room 301,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone:
(816) 329–4165; fax: (816) 329–4090; email:
jim.rutherford@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC on any airplane to which
the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight
Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking
a PI, your local FSDO.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain corrective
actions from a manufacturer, the action must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, Small Airplane Standards
Branch, FAA; or the European Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA).
(h) Related Information
Refer to MCAI EASA AD No. 2017–0208,
dated October 13, 2017, for related
information. You may examine the MCAI on
the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–
2017–1078. For service information related to
this AD, contact BRP-Rotax GmbH & Co. KG,
Rotaxstrasse 1, A–4623 Gunskirchen, Austria;
phone: +43 7246 601 0; fax: +43 7246 6370;
Internet: https://www.flyrotax.com. You may
review this referenced service information at
the FAA, Policy and Innovation Division, 901
Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (816) 329–4148.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on
November 9, 2017.
Pat Mullen,
Acting Deputy Director, Policy & Innovation
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017–25005 Filed 11–21–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
15 CFR Part 922
[Docket No. 170315274–7274–01]
RIN 0648–BG73
Vessel and Aircraft Discharges From
United States Coast Guard Activities in
Greater Farallones and Cordell Bank
National Marine Sanctuaries
Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Ocean
Service (NOS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
With this proposed rule, the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) considers
allowing the United States Coast Guard
(USCG or Coast Guard) to carry out
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55529
certain otherwise prohibited activities
within waters of Greater Farallones
National Marine Sanctuary (GFNMS)
and Cordell Bank National Marine
Sanctuary (CBNMS) approximately 3
nautical miles (nm) from the shore, in
the areas of the sanctuaries that were
expanded in 2015. The discharges under
consideration are: Untreated vessel
sewage, vessel graywater as defined by
the Federal Water Pollution Control Act,
as amended (FWPCA), that does not
meet the definition of ‘‘clean’’ as
defined by the GFNMS and CBNMS
regulations, and ammunition and
pyrotechnic (warning projectile, flare,
smoke float and marine marker)
materials used in USCG training
exercises for use of force (live fire or
gunnery) and training exercises for
search and rescue (SAR) of vessels or
persons in distress. No change is
proposed to the regulatory prohibitions
or exceptions applicable to the preexpansion boundaries of the two
sanctuaries. A draft environmental
assessment (DEA) under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) has
been prepared for this proposed action.
NOAA is soliciting public comment on
the proposed rule and DEA.
DATES: Comments will be considered if
received by January 16, 2018. Public
hearings will be held on December 5
and 13, 2017, from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
on this document and/or on the DEA,
identified by NOAA–NOS–2017–0140,
by any of the following methods:
• Electronic Submission: Submit all
electronic public comments via the
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/#!
docketDetail;D=NOAA-NOS-2017-0140,
click the ‘‘Comment Now!’’ icon,
complete the required fields, and enter
or attach your comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments to
Maria Brown, Superintendent, Greater
Farallones National Marine Sanctuary,
991 Marine Drive, The Presidio, San
Francisco, CA 94129.
Instructions: Comments sent by any
other method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered by NOAA. All comments
received are a part of the public record
and will generally be posted for public
viewing on www.regulations.gov
without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.),
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive information
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. NOAA will
accept anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/
A’’ in the required fields if you wish to
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
55530
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 22, 2017 / Proposed Rules
remain anonymous). Attachments to
electronic comments will be accepted in
Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF
file formats only.
Copies of the DEA and proposed rule
can be downloaded or viewed on the
internet at www.regulations.gov (search
for docket # NOAA–NOS–2017–0140) or
at https://farallones.noaa.gov/manage/
regulations.html. Copies can also be
obtained by contacting the person
identified under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Public hearings will be held in the
following locations:
• December 5, 2017. 6–8 p.m. Bay
Model, 2100 Bridgeway, Sausalito, CA
94965.
• December 13, 2017. 6–8 p.m.
Gualala Community Center, 47950
Center Street, Gualala, CA 95445.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maria Brown, Greater Farallones
National Marine Sanctuary
Superintendent, at Maria.Brown@
noaa.gov or 415–561–6622.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
A. Introduction
On March 12, 2015, NOAA expanded
the boundaries of GFNMS and CBNMS
to an area north and west of their
previous boundaries. In that rule,
pursuant to a request from the USCG,
NOAA announced that it would
postpone the effective date for the
discharge requirements in both
expansion areas (defined as the areas
that were added to the existing 1981 and
1989 boundaries for GFNMS and
CBNMS, respectively) with regard to
USCG activities. NOAA stated the
purpose of the postponement was to
look at ways to address Coast Guard’s
concerns that the discharge regulations
would impair the operations of Coast
Guard vessels in, and aircraft over, the
sanctuaries, and to consider, among
other things, whether to exempt Coast
Guard activities in both sanctuary
expansion areas. This proposed rule
considers allowing the USCG to carry
out otherwise prohibited discharges
within waters of the GFNMS and
CBNMS expansion areas seaward of
approximately 3 nm from the shore, as
described in more detail below. In
formulating this proposed rule, NOAA
considered a number of factors
discussed more fully in the DEA,
including the ability of the USCG to
complete its mission requirements and
the policy of facilitating uses of the
sanctuaries to the extent compatible
with resource protection.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Nov 21, 2017
Jkt 244001
B. Greater Farallones and Cordell Bank
National Marine Sanctuaries
NOAA is charged with managing
areas of the marine environment which
are of special national significance as
the National Marine Sanctuary System
(16 U.S.C. 1431 (b)(1)). The Office of
National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS) is
the federal office within NOAA that
manages the National Marine Sanctuary
System. The mission of ONMS is to
identify, protect, conserve, and enhance
the natural and cultural resources,
values, and qualities of the National
Marine Sanctuary System (System) for
this and future generations throughout
the nation. This System includes 13
national marine sanctuaries, among
them GFNMS and CBNMS, and
¯
¯
Papahanaumokuakea and Rose Atoll
marine national monuments. GFNMS
was designated in 1981 and protects
approximately 3,295 square miles (2,488
square nautical miles). CBNMS was
designated in 1989 and protects
approximately 1,286 square miles (971
square nautical miles). NOAA expanded
both sanctuaries to their current size on
March 12, 2015 (80 FR 13078). When
referring to the expansion areas of the
sanctuaries, NOAA means the areas that
were added to the existing 1981 and
1989 boundaries for GFNMS and
CBNMS, respectively.
Both GFNMS and CBNMS’
regulations prohibit discharging or
depositing, from within or into the
sanctuary, any material or other matter
(15 CFR 922.82(a)(2) and (3) and 15 CFR
922.112(a)(2)(i) and (ii)). Both the
GFNMS and CBNMS regulations also
prohibit discharging or depositing, from
beyond the boundary of the sanctuary,
any material or other matter that
subsequently enters the sanctuary and
injures a sanctuary resource or quality
(15 CFR 922.82(a)(4); 15 CFR
922.112(a)(2)(iii)). Most national marine
sanctuaries also have similar regulatory
prohibitions. The discharge prohibitions
are aimed at maintaining and improving
water quality within national marine
sanctuaries to enhance conditions for
their living marine resources. The
discharge prohibitions include the
following exceptions relevant to the
proposed action:
• For a vessel less than 300 gross
registered tons (GRT), or a vessel 300
GRT or greater without sufficient
holding tank capacity to hold sewage
while within the sanctuary, clean
effluent generated incidental to vessel
use by an operable Type I or II marine
sanitation device that is approved in
accordance with section 312 of the
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Federal Water Pollution Control Act,1 as
amended (FWPCA); vessel operators
must lock all marine sanitation devices
in a manner that prevents discharge or
deposit of untreated sewage (15 CFR
922.82(a)(2)(ii) and 922.112(a)(2)(i)(B));
• For a vessel less than 300 GRT, or
a vessel 300 GRT or greater without
sufficient holding tank capacity to hold
graywater while within the sanctuary,
clean graywater as defined by section
312 of the FWPCA (15 CFR
922.82(a)(2)(iv) and 922.112(a)(2)(i)(D));
• Activities necessary to respond to
an emergency threatening life, property
or the environment (15 CFR 922.82(c)
and 922.112(b)).
The following definitions apply to
these exceptions:
• ‘‘Clean’’ means not containing
detectable levels of a harmful matter (15
CFR 922.81 and 922.111); and,
• ‘‘Graywater’’ means galley, bath,
and shower water (33 U.S.C.
1322(a)(11)).
The first two existing discharge
exceptions listed above apply to all
vessels other than cruise ships.
Therefore, they would apply to USCG
vessels and would continue to apply if
the regulatory changes proposed in this
rulemaking were finalized.
C. USCG Activities
The USCG, part of the U.S.
Department of Homeland Security, is a
military service and a branch of the
armed forces (14 U.S.C. 1), charged with
carrying out eleven maritime safety,
security and stewardship missions (6
U.S.C. 468(a)).
One of the missions of the USCG is to
enforce or assist in the enforcement of
all applicable federal laws on, under,
and over the high seas and waters
subject to the jurisdiction of the United
States. As part of this mission, the
USCG supports resource protection
efforts within GFNMS and CBNMS by
providing surveillance of activities
within the sanctuaries and enforcement
of the National Marine Sanctuaries Act
(NMSA) and other laws and their
implementing regulations. The USCG
has the authority to enforce the NMSA
under 14 U.S.C. 2 and 14 U.S.C. 89. Law
enforcement activities for the two
sanctuaries are also conducted by other
agencies, primarily NOAA’s Office of
Law Enforcement and the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife. In
GFNMS, the National Park Service and
several local agencies also conduct law
enforcement activities.
The USCG also leads incident
planning and response activities for oil
1 The Federal Water Pollution Control Act is more
commonly referred to as the Clean Water Act.
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 22, 2017 / Proposed Rules
spills and other incidents in U.S. coastal
and ocean waters. These activities are
necessary components of GFNMS and
CBNMS management. Other USCG
missions that are conducted inside NMS
boundaries, some of which also support
national marine sanctuary management,
include waterways and coastal security;
aids to navigation, including tending
buoys; search and rescue (SAR); living
marine resources; marine safety; and
marine environmental protection. The
USCG may concurrently conduct
activities to support more than one of its
missions when operating vessels within
or aircraft above GFNMS and CBNMS.
According to the USCG
Environmental Vessel Manual, USCG
practices allow for discharges of
untreated sewage and non-clean
graywater from USCG vessels in waters
beyond 3 nm from shore. USCG vessels
have continued these discharges beyond
3 nm from shore in the expansion areas
of GFNMS and CBNMS, due to NOAA’s
decision to temporarily delay the
effective date of applying sanctuary
discharge prohibitions with respect to
USCG activities in the expansion areas
of GFNMS and CBNMS while NOAA
assesses these activities and their
potential environmental effects.
According to other regulatory
requirements and USCG guidance and
practices, discharges are not allowed to
take place within approximately 3 nm of
the shore. The FWPCA requires (in
Section 312) that vessels with installed
toilets must only discharge sewage
through a Type I or II marine sanitation
device within three miles 2 of shore (33
U.S.C. 1322(h)(4); 33 U.S.C. 1362(7)–
(8)). The California Harbors and
Navigation Code 775 (a)(2) and (b)
require compliance with the FWPCA.
There is also a U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (USEPA) designated
No Discharge Zone (NDZ) prohibiting
sewage discharges in the marine waters
of the state that applies to specified
vessels of 300 gross tons or greater,3
which would apply to several classes of
USCG vessels. Further, the USCG Vessel
Environmental Manual includes a
restriction on discharging raw sewage
within 3.5 miles (3 nm) of land.
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
D. Need for Action
In the course of the rulemaking to
expand GFNMS and CBNMS, NOAA
2 The FWPCA refers to ‘‘miles’’ but the common
interpretation is ‘‘nautical miles’’, as statute miles
are not used by mariners, and many states use a 3
nm from shore boundary (https://www.gc.noaa.gov/
gcil_seaward.html).
3 Various laws and regulations refer to gross tons
or gross registered tons (GRT). NOAA uses the
terms in this document exactly as they appear in
the specific legal source cited.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Nov 21, 2017
Jkt 244001
received a letter dated February 4, 2013,
from the USCG stating that the
prohibitions proposed for the GFNMS
and CBNMS expansion areas had the
potential to impair USCG surface and
airborne use of force training activities,
SAR training activities, and the ability
of Coastal Patrol Boats to conduct any
mission within the sanctuaries. Of
specific concern to the USCG were the
proposed prohibitions on discharges
made during these training activities:
Vessel sewage discharges, particularly
with respect to law enforcement and
SAR missions, and the ability of the
USCG to operate and remain ‘‘mission
ready.’’
To accommodate the need for these
USCG activities to take place after the
expansion rule entered into effect,
NOAA postponed, for six months from
the effective date of the rule, the
applicability of the discharge
requirements to Coast Guard activities
in both expanded areas. NOAA
published the final rule for the
expansion of GFNMS and CBNMS on
March 12, 2015 (80 FR 13078), in the
Federal Register and the rule became
effective on June 9, 2015 (80 FR 34047).
Additional six-month postponements of
the effectiveness of the discharge
requirements in the expansion areas
were published in the Federal Register
on December 1, 2015 (80 FR 74985),
May 31, 2016 (81 FR 34268), December
6, 2016 (81 FR 87803), and June 7, 2017
(82 FR 26339) to enable completion of
the environmental assessment and to
determine NOAA’s next steps. The
effective date for the discharge
requirements in the expansion areas for
both sanctuaries with regard to USCG
activities is currently postponed until
December 9, 2017. Accordingly, without
further NOAA action, the discharge
regulations would become effective with
regard to USCG activities on December
9, 2017. Thus, a separate document
published in the Federal Register
concurrently with this proposed rule
extends the postponement of the
discharge requirements for the USCG
activities in the expansion areas until
December 9, 2018 to provide adequate
time for completion of a final
environmental assessment and final
rule, as appropriate. As described in the
separate document, the new
postponement of these discharge
requirements will terminate either on
December 9, 2018 or 30 days after
publication of a final rule, whichever
comes first.
Of primary concern to USCG are the
discharge regulations in both expanded
sanctuaries and USCG compliance with
these regulations. USCG vessels have
limited capacity to treat sewage and
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55531
some have limited capacity to hold
sewage and graywater, and are without
Type I or II marine sanitation devices
onboard to treat the wastewater prior to
discharge; accordingly, the discharges
from such vessels would not fit within
the existing regulatory exemptions for
discharge within GFNMS and CBNMS.
Training exercises designed to make
USCG personnel ready for missions
involving use of force and SAR involve
discharging live ammunition and
pyrotechnic materials. NOAA is
concerned with protecting sanctuary
resources and habitats, resolving any
conflicts that could occur among
sanctuary user groups (e.g., fishing and
USCG live fire training), and ensuring
continued USCG enforcement of
sanctuary regulations and other mission
activities that support sanctuary
management.
Prior to the expansion of GFNMS and
CBNMS, the USCG was able to comply
with the sanctuaries’ vessel discharge
regulations by discharging untreated
vessel sewage and non-clean graywater
in ocean waters outside GFNMS and
CBNMS or by pumping it out at
shoreside pump-out facilities. The
expansion of GFNMS and CBNMS, with
the resulting larger sizes of the
sanctuaries and extension of discharge
prohibitions to the expanded portions of
the sanctuaries, would make it difficult
for the USCG to both fulfill its missions
and comply with the vessel discharge
prohibitions. The USCG vessels have
constraints for treating and holding
sewage and non-clean graywater, and
crews would have to plan for the extra
time required to travel from the GFNMS
and CBNMS expansion areas to USCG
shoreside pump-out facilities in Bodega
and San Francisco bays or to ocean
waters outside national marine
sanctuary boundaries to discharge
vessel holding tanks (where allowed by
state and federal regulations).
Similarly, with regard to training
activities, prior to the expansion of
GFNMS and CBNMS, the USCG
planned and conducted these exercises
outside the sanctuaries’ boundaries and
within relatively short distances from
USCG stations without violating
sanctuary discharge regulations.
Because the USCG maritime
enforcement, defense readiness, and
SAR capabilities are enhanced by
conducting live-fire and SAR exercises
in the areas in which its personnel
normally operate, the expansion of
GFNMS and CBNMS and extension of
discharge prohibitions to the expanded
portions of the sanctuaries have the
potential to impair the ability of USCG
to operate and train to remain ‘‘mission
ready.’’
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
55532
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 22, 2017 / Proposed Rules
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
E. History of Action
Prior to the expansion of the two
sanctuaries’ boundaries, GFNMS and
USCG had been discussing potentially
allowing USCG to make discharges
within the sanctuary during live fire and
SAR training exercises. In 2012 and
2013, USCG District 11 and GFNMS
held a series of meetings focused on
discharges of flares, ammunition, and
targets related to live fire and SAR
training. During this time, GFNMS and
USCG identified several areas for
potentially allowing seasonal trainingrelated discharges as well as possible
operating protocols. The intention was
to consider allowing USCG training
discharges via a national marine
sanctuary permit, if the activities could
be conducted in a way that would
minimize potential impacts to marine
mammals and other living marine
resources. The USCG did not submit an
application for a permit, and therefore
NOAA did not issue a permit.
After receiving the USCG’s February
4, 2013 letter, the USCG and NOAA
initiated discussions to address the full
range of USCG discharges from training
activities, and untreated vessel sewage
and graywater discharges in both
GFNMS and CBNMS. As part of these
discussions, the USCG and NOAA
reviewed potential environmental
effects and various approaches to
mitigate potential harm to sanctuary
resources from these USCG discharges,
including NMS permits and best
practices for USCG discharge activities.
In January 2015, prior to the publication
of the final rule to expand GFNMS and
CBNMS, NOAA and the USCG entered
into interagency consultations to
address both agencies’ concerns. The
details of this ongoing consultation are
described above under ‘‘Need for
Action.’’
From April 21 to May 31, 2016 (81 FR
23445), NOAA accepted public
comments and information to determine
the relevant scope of issues and range of
alternatives for NOAA to address in the
environmental assessment and proposed
rule. Public and agency comments were
received via the Federal e-Rulemaking
Portal, by mail, and at three public
meetings that were held in Sausalito,
Bodega Bay and Gualala on May 10, 11
and 12, respectively. Comments
received are available at
www.regulations.gov (search for docket
NOAA–NOS–2017–0140). NOAA
considered these comments in preparing
this proposed rule and associated DEA.
F. Process
The process for this action is
composed of four major stages: (1)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Nov 21, 2017
Jkt 244001
Information collection and
characterization and public scoping
(scoping was completed on May 31,
2016); (2) preparation and release of a
draft environmental assessment under
the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), and any proposed amendments
to the regulations if appropriate; (3)
public review and comment of the
proposed amendments and the draft
environmental assessment; (4)
preparation and release of a final
environmental review document, and
any final amendments to the GFNMS
and CBNMS regulations, if appropriate.
With the publication of this proposed
rule, NOAA enters the third phase of
this process.
NOAA will fulfill its responsibilities
to complete required consultations and/
or receive necessary authorizations
under the Marine Mammal Protection
Act (MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.),
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act
(ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), Section
106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA; 54 U.S.C.
300101), and Federal Consistency
review under the Coastal Zone
Management Act (CZMA; 16 U.S.C.
1451 et seq.), along with its ongoing
NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) process
including the use of NEPA documents
and public meetings to also meet the
requirements of other federal laws.
Together with this proposed rule,
NOAA is releasing a DEA containing
more detailed information on the
considerations of this proposal,
including assessment of alternatives,
analysis of potential environmental
impacts, and references. The EA can be
found through the Web site in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
II. Summary of the Proposed
Regulations
A. Sewage and Graywater
With this proposed rule, NOAA
would amend the GFNMS and CBNMS
regulations to allow USCG vessels to
discharge untreated sewage and nonclean graywater only in the waters of the
expansion areas of GFNMS and CBNMS
seaward of approximately 3.5 miles (3
nautical miles (nm)) from the shoreline.
USCG discharges of untreated sewage
and non-clean graywater from vessels
that are not equipped with a Type I or
II marine sanitation device (MSD) and
without sufficient holding tank capacity
would continue, as per historic and
current routine USCG operational
practices in waters of both expansion
areas beyond 3 nm from shore. As
previously described, these discharges
have continued since June 2015 due to
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
NOAA’s decision to temporarily delay
the effective date of applying sanctuary
discharge prohibitions with respect to
USCG activities while NOAA assesses
these activities and their potential
environmental effects.
The current GFNMS and CBNMS
discharge prohibitions provide an
exception for clean sewage discharge
(‘‘clean effluent’’) through a Type I or II
MSD for: (1) A vessel less than 300 GRT,
or (2) a vessel 300 GRT or greater
without sufficient holding tank capacity
to hold sewage while within the
Sanctuary (15 CFR 922.82(a)(2)(ii) and
922.112(a)(2)(i)(B)). They also provide
an exception for clean graywater to be
discharged: (1) A vessel less than 300
GRT, or (2) a vessel 300 GRT or greater
without sufficient holding tank capacity
to hold graywater while within the
Sanctuary (15 CFR 922.82(a)(2)(iv) and
922.112(a)(2)(i)(D)). According to the
USCG, most of its vessels operating in
GFNMS and CBNMS do not have
capacity to treat sewage and graywater;
they are without Type I or II MSD
onboard to treat the wastewater prior to
discharge. Some classes of USCG vessels
also have limited capacity to hold
sewage and non-clean graywater until it
may be discharged outside GFNMS and
CBNMS. Thus, if the regulations were to
take effect in the expansion areas of
GFNMS and CBNMS, the vessels would
not be able to legally discharge in those
portions of the sanctuaries in a manner
consistent with these existing regulatory
exceptions. The proposed exceptions to
the GFNMS and CBNMS prohibitions
for the USCG would be in addition to
the current exceptions noted earlier.
The areas within GFNMS and CBNMS
in which these USCG vessel discharges
would be excepted from the sanctuaries’
discharge prohibitions correspond to the
waters seaward of 3 nm from shore in
the expansion areas of GFNMS and
CBNMS (i.e., the areas added when the
sanctuaries expanded in 2015). The
geographic coordinates of these areas
would be listed in an appendix to each
sanctuary’s regulations (appendix G of
subpart H and appendix C of subpart K).
Aside from the proposed exceptions for
USCG training-related discharges (see
below), the USCG would also continue
to comply with all other existing
prohibitions provided in 15 CFR 922.82
and 922.112 in both the pre-expansion
areas and the expanded sanctuaries’
boundaries and comply with the
prohibitions for vessel discharges
within the pre-expansion boundaries of
the two sanctuaries. No changes to the
regulatory prohibitions or exceptions
applicable to the pre-expansion areas of
the sanctuaries are proposed.
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 22, 2017 / Proposed Rules
B. Discharges of Ammunition and
Pyrotechnic Materials During Training
NOAA would amend the GFNMS and
CBNMS regulations to allow USCG
discharges of ammunition and
pyrotechnic materials (including
warning projectiles, flares, smoke floats
and marine markers) during live
ammunition and search and rescue
training exercises only in the federal
waters of the expansion areas of GFNMS
and CBNMS, seaward of approximately
3.5 miles (3 nautical miles (nm)) from
the shoreline. The geographic
coordinates of this designated area,
where training discharges would be
excepted from the sanctuary discharge
prohibition within GFNMS and
CBNMS, would be listed in an appendix
to each sanctuary’s regulations
(appendix G of subpart H and appendix
C of subpart K).
The USCG would also continue to
comply with all other existing
prohibitions, aside from the previously
described proposed exceptions for
USCG vessel discharges of untreated
sewage and graywater, provided in 15
CFR 922.82 and 922.112 in both the preexpansion areas and the expanded
sanctuaries’ boundaries and comply
with the prohibitions for vessel
discharges within the pre-expansion
boundaries of the two sanctuaries. No
changes to the regulatory prohibitions or
exceptions applicable to the preexpansion areas of the sanctuaries are
proposed.
Based on a request by USCG, this
proposed rule focuses on a regulatory
exception to the GFNMS and CBNMS
general discharge prohibition for the
specified USCG discharges. However,
NOAA presents in the DEA a variety of
alternatives for protecting sanctuary
resources while addressing the USCG’s
request to allow for USCG’s routine
discharges of untreated sewage and
graywater from vessels and training
discharges in GFNMS and CBNMS,
allowing the USCG to fulfill its missions
and comply with the sanctuaries’
regulations. The DEA also lays out in
more detail NOAA’s consideration and
analysis of factors pertinent to this
proposed rule, including the ability of
USCG to complete its mission
operations and in the expansion areas of
the sanctuaries, constraints in certain
USCG vessel capabilities to treat and
hold sewage and graywater, the role that
USCG live fire and search and rescue
trainings in the expansion areas of the
sanctuaries play in USCG mission
readiness, and the extent to which such
USCG activities may be conducted to
the maximum extent feasible in a
manner consistent with the sanctuaries’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Nov 21, 2017
Jkt 244001
primary objective of resource protection.
No final decision or final rulemaking
will be made until completion of the
public comment period, satisfaction of
permitting and consultation
requirements, and completion of the
NEPA analysis process.
III. Classification
A. National Environmental Policy Act
NOAA has prepared a draft
environmental assessment (DEA) to
evaluate the potential impacts on the
human environment of this proposed
rulemaking, which is the preferred
action analyzed in the DEA, as well as
alternative actions. No significant
adverse impacts to resources and the
human environment are expected, and
accordingly, under NEPA (43 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.) a draft environmental
assessment is the appropriate document
to analyze the potential impacts of this
action. Following close of the public
comment period and satisfaction of
permitting and consultation
requirements under applicable natural
and cultural resource statutes (described
below), NOAA will finalize its NEPA
analysis and findings and prepare a
final NEPA document. Copies of the
DEA are available at the address and
Web site listed in the ADDRESSES section
of this proposed rule.
B. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Impact
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant within
the meaning of Executive Order 12866.
C. Executive Order 13771: Regulatory
Reform
This proposed rule is not expected to
be an Executive Order 13771 regulatory
action because this proposed rule is not
significant under Executive Order
12866.
D. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Assessment
NOAA has concluded this regulatory
action does not have federalism
implications sufficient to warrant
preparation of a federalism assessment
under Executive Order 13132.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The purpose of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA; 5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) is to fit regulatory requirements to
the scale of the businesses,
organizations, and governmental
jurisdictions subject to the regulation.
The RFA requires that agencies
determine, to the extent feasible, the
rule’s economic impact on small
entities, explore regulatory options for
reducing any significant economic
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55533
impact on a substantial number of such
entities, and explain their ultimate
choice of regulatory approach. The
Chief Counsel for Regulation of the
Department of Commerce certifies to the
Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration (SBA) that this
proposed rule, if adopted, would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
The factual basis for this certification is
that the proposed changes are
specifically targeted to the activities of
the USCG in CBNMS and GFNMS, and
would not have an economic effect on
any small businesses. Also, this
proposed rule would not substantively
alter the rights, responsibilities, or legal
obligations pertaining to vessel
discharges for the regulated community.
As a result, an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required and
none has been prepared.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not create
any new information collection
requirement, nor does it revise the
information collection requirement that
was approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB Control
Number 0648–0141) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq. (PRA).
Notwithstanding any other provision of
the law, no person is required to
respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless
that collection of information displays a
currently valid OMB Control Number.
G. National Historic Preservation Act
In fulfilling its responsibility under
the National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA) and NEPA, NOAA intends to
determine whether the proposed rule is
the type of activity that could affect
historic properties. If so, NOAA intends
to identify consulting parties; identify
historic properties and assess the effects
of the undertaking on such properties;
assess potential adverse effects; and
resolve adverse effects. If applicable,
NOAA will initiate formal consultation
with the State Historic Preservation
Officer/Tribal Historic Preservation
Officer, the Advisory Council of Historic
Preservation, and other consulting
parties as appropriate; involve the
public in accordance with NOAA’s
NEPA procedures, and develop in
consultation with identified consulting
parties alternatives and proposed
measures that might avoid, minimize or
mitigate any adverse effects on historic
properties as appropriate and describe
them in the environmental assessment.
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
55534
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 22, 2017 / Proposed Rules
NOAA will complete applicable NHPA
requirements before finalizing its NEPA
analysis. Individuals or organizations
who wish to participate as a consulting
party should notify NOAA.
Consultation requirements for the
effects of the actual USCG training
activities and vessel discharges on
historic properties remain the
responsibility of USCG, as USCG would
be the lead agency performing these
activities.
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
H. Endangered Species Act
The Endangered Species Act (ESA) of
1973 as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531, et
seq.), provides for the conservation of
endangered and threatened species of
fish, wildlife, and plants. Federal
agencies have an affirmative mandate to
conserve ESA-listed species. Section
7(a)(2) of the ESA requires federal
agencies to, in consultation with the
National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS) and/or the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, ensure that any action
they authorize, fund, or carry out is not
likely to jeopardize the continued
existence of an ESA-listed species or
result in the destruction or adverse
modification of designated critical
habitat. NOAA’s ONMS intends to begin
informal consultation under the ESA
with NOAA’s NMFS Office of Protected
Resources (OPR) upon publication of
this proposed rule and complete
consultation prior to the publication of
the final rule or finalization of the NEPA
analysis. NOAA’s consultation will
focus on any potential adverse effects of
providing a regulatory exception to its
discharge prohibition in CBNMS and
GFNMS on threatened and endangered
species. NOAA will complete ESA
consultation before finalizing its NEPA
analysis.
Consultation requirements for the
effects of the actual USCG training
activities and vessel discharges on
threatened and endangered species
remain the responsibility of USCG, as
USCG would be the lead agency
performing the training activities. USCG
communicated to NOAA its intent to
fulfil the consultation requirements
under the ESA, specific to their training
activities and vessel discharges, with
(OPR).
of marine mammals in U.S. waters.
Section 101(a)(5)(A–D) of the MMPA
provides a mechanism for allowing,
upon request, the ‘‘incidental,’’ but not
intentional, taking, of small numbers of
marine mammals by U.S. citizens who
engage in a specified activity (other than
commercial fishing or directed research
on marine mammals) within a specified
geographic region. ONMS intends to
request technical assistance from NMFS
upon publication of this proposed rule
on ONMS’s preliminary assessment that
this action is not likely to result in take
of marine mammals. If NMFS
recommends that ONMS seek an
Incidental Harassment Authorization or
Letter of Authorization, then ONMS will
submit an application for any incidental
taking of small numbers of marine
mammals that ONMS and NMFS
conclude could occur as a result of the
discharges allowed by this proposed
rulemaking. NOAA’s request for
technical assistance will focus on the
effects of providing a regulatory
exception to its discharge prohibitions
in CBNMS and GFNMS on marine
mammals. NOAA will complete any
MMPA requirements before finalizing
its NEPA analysis.
Satisfying MMPA requirements for
the effects of the actual training
activities and vessel discharges on
marine mammals remain the
responsibility of USCG, as USCG would
be the federal agency performing these
activities. Moreover, USCG
communicated to NOAA its intent to
fulfill the consultation requirements
under the MMPA, specific to their
training activities and vessel discharges,
with OPR.
I. Marine Mammal Protection Act
The Marine Mammal Protection Act
(MMPA) of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1361 et
seq.), as amended, prohibits the ‘‘take’’ 4
J. Coastal Zone Management Act
(CZMA)
The principal objective of the CZMA
is to encourage and assist states in
developing coastal management
programs, to coordinate State activities,
and to preserve, protect, develop and,
where possible, to restore or enhance
the resources of the nation’s coastal
zone. Section 307(c) of the CZMA
requires federal activity affecting the
land or water uses or natural resources
of a state’s coastal zone to be consistent
with that state’s approved coastal
management program, to the maximum
extent practicable. NOAA will provide a
copy of this proposed rule, the DEA,
and a consistency determination to the
California Coastal Commission
4 The MMPA defines take as: ‘‘to harass, hunt,
capture, or kill, or attempt to harass, hunt, capture
or kill any marine mammal.’’ Harassment means
any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which, (1)
Has the potential to injure a marine mammal or
marine mammal stock in the wild (Level A
Harassment); or (2) has the potential to disturb a
marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild by causing disruption of behavioral patterns,
including, but not limited to, migration, breathing,
nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering (Level B
Harassment).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Nov 21, 2017
Jkt 244001
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(Commission) upon publication. NOAA
will wait for concurrence from the
Commission prior to publication of the
final rule.
Consultation requirements for the
effects of the actual USCG training
activities and vessel discharges on land
or water uses or natural resources of
California’s coastal zone remain the
responsibility of USCG, as USCG would
be the lead agency performing these
activities.
IV. Request for Comments
NOAA requests comments on this
proposed rule and the DEA. The
comment period will remain open until
January 16, 2018.
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 922
Administrative practice and
procedure, Coastal zone, Fishing gear,
Marine resources, Natural resources,
Penalties, Recreation and recreation
areas, Wildlife.
(Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog
Number 11.429 Marine Sanctuary Program)
Dated: November 14, 2017.
Nicole R. LeBoeuf,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean
Services and Coastal Zone Management,
National Ocean Service.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
above, NOAA proposes amending part
922, title 15 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 922—NATIONAL MARINE
SANCTUARY PROGRAM
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 922
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.
Subpart H—Greater Farallones
National Marine Sanctuary
2. Amend § 922.82 by revising
paragraphs (a)(2)(iv) and (v), adding
paragraph (a)(2)(vi), and revising
paragraph (a)(4) to read as follows:
■
§ 922.82 Prohibited or otherwise regulated
activities.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) For a vessel less than 300 GRT or
a vessel 300 GRT or greater without
sufficient holding capacity to hold
graywater while within the Sanctuary,
clean graywater as defined by section
312 of the FWPCA;
(v) Vessel engine or generator exhaust;
or
(vi) For a United States Coast Guard
vessel that is without sufficient holding
tank capacity and is without a Type I or
II marine sanitation device, and that is
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 22, 2017 / Proposed Rules
operating within the designated area
defined in appendix G of this subpart,
sewage and non clean graywater as
defined by section 312 of the FWPCA
generated incidental to vessel use, and
ammunition, pyrotechnics or other
materials directly related to search and
rescue and live ammunition training
activities conducted by United States
Coast Guard vessels and aircraft in the
designated areas defined in appendix G
of this subpart. Discharging or
depositing, from beyond the boundary
of the Sanctuary, any material or other
matter that subsequently enters the
Sanctuary and injures a Sanctuary
resource or quality, except for the
material or other matter excepted in
paragraphs (a)(2)(i) through (vi) and
(a)(3) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Discharging or depositing, from
beyond the boundary of the Sanctuary,
any material or other matter that
subsequently enters the Sanctuary and
injures a Sanctuary resource or quality,
except for the material or other matter
excepted in paragraphs (a)(2)(i) through
(vi) and (a)(3) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend subpart H by adding
appendix G to read as follows:
ethrower on DSK3G9T082PROD with PROPOSALS
Appendix G to Subpart H of Part 922—
Designated Area for Certain United
States Coast Guard Discharges
Coordinates listed in this appendix are
unprojected (Geographic Coordinate System)
and based on the North American Datum of
1983 (NAD83).
The portion of the Greater Farallones
National Marine Sanctuary area where the
exception for discharges from United States
Coast Guard activities applies is defined as
follows. Beginning with Point 1 identified in
the coordinate table in this appendix, the
boundary extends from Point 1 to Point 2 in
a straight line arc, and continues from Point
2 to Point 3 in a straight line arc, and from
Point 3 to Point 4 in a straight line arc. From
Point 4 the boundary extends east and north
along a straight line arc towards Point 5 until
it intersects the fixed offshore boundary
between the United States and California
(approximately 3 NM seaward of the coast as
defined in United States vs. California, 135
S. Ct. 563 (2014)). The boundary then
extends northward following the fixed
offshore boundary between the United States
and California until it intersects the line
segment formed between Point 6 and Point
7. From this intersection, the boundary
extends west along the northern boundary of
Greater Farallones National Marine
Sanctuary to Point 7 where it ends.
Point
No.
1 ................
2 ................
3 ................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Latitude
39.00000
38.29989
38.29989
17:48 Nov 21, 2017
Longitude
¥124.33350
¥123.99988
¥123.20005
Jkt 244001
Point
No.
4 ................
5 1 ..............
6 1 ..............
7 ................
Latitude
38.26390
38.29896
39.00000
39.00000
Longitude
¥123.18138
¥123.05989
¥123.75777
¥124.33350
1These coordinates are not a part of the
boundary for the Designated Area for Certain
United States Coast Guard Discharges. These
coordinates are reference points used to draw
line segments that intersect with the fixed offshore boundary between the United States
and California.
Subpart K—Cordell Bank National
Marine Sanctuary
4. Amend § 922.112 by revising
paragraphs (a)(2)(i)(D) and (E) and
adding paragraph (a)(2)(i)(F) to read as
follows:
■
§ 922.112 Prohibited or otherwise
regulated activities.
(a) * * *
(2)(i) * * *
(D) For a vessel less than 300 GRT or
a vessel 300 GRT or greater without
sufficient holding capacity to hold
graywater while within the Sanctuary,
clean graywater as defined by section
312 of the FWPCA;
(E) Vessel engine or generator
exhaust; or
(F) For a United States Coast Guard
vessel that is without sufficient holding
tank capacity and is without a Type I or
II marine sanitation device, and that is
operating within the designated area
defined in appendix C of this subpart,
sewage and non clean graywater as
defined by section 312 of the FWPCA
generated incidental to vessel use, and
ammunition, pyrotechnics or other
materials directly related to search and
rescue and live ammunition training
activities conducted by United States
Coast Guard vessels and aircraft in the
designated areas defined in appendix C
of this subpart.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Amend subpart K by adding
appendix C to read as follows:
Appendix C to Subpart K of Part 922—
Designated Area for Certain United
States Coast Guard Discharges
Coordinates listed in this appendix are
unprojected (Geographic Coordinate System)
and based on the North American Datum of
1983 (NAD83).
The portion of the Cordell Bank National
Marine Sanctuary area where the exception
for discharges from United States Coast
Guard activities applies is defined as follows.
Beginning with Point 1, identified in the
coordinate table in this appendix, the
boundary extends from Point 1 to Point 2 in
a straight line arc and continues in numerical
order through each subsequent point to Point
38. From Point 38 the boundary extends west
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
55535
along the northern boundary of Cordell Bank
National Marine Sanctuary to Point 39 where
it ends.
Point
No.
1 ................
2 ................
3 ................
4 ................
5 ................
6 ................
7 ................
8 ................
9 ................
10 ..............
11 ..............
12 ..............
13 ..............
14 ..............
15 ..............
16 ..............
17 ..............
18 ..............
19 ..............
20 ..............
21 ..............
22 ..............
23 ..............
24 ..............
25 ..............
26 ..............
27 ..............
28 ..............
29 ..............
30 ..............
31 ..............
32 ..............
33 ..............
34 ..............
35 ..............
36 ..............
37 ..............
38 ..............
39 ..............
Latitude
38.29989
37.76687
37.76716
37.77033
37.78109
37.78383
37.79487
37.80094
37.81026
37.81365
37.82296
37.84988
37.86189
37.87637
37.88541
37.90725
37.92288
37.93858
37.94901
37.95528
37.96683
37.97761
37.98678
37.99847
38.01366
38.01987
38.02286
38.02419
38.03409
38.04614
38.05308
38.06188
38.07451
38.08289
38.11256
38.13219
38.26390
38.29989
38.29989
Longitude
¥123.99988
¥123.75143
¥123.42758
¥123.43466
¥123.44694
¥123.45466
¥123.46721
¥123.47313
¥123.46897
¥123.47906
¥123.49280
¥123.51749
¥123.52197
¥123.52192
¥123.52967
¥123.53937
¥123.54360
¥123.54701
¥123.54777
¥123.56199
¥123.57859
¥123.58746
¥123.59988
¥123.61331
¥123.62494
¥123.62450
¥123.61531
¥123.59864
¥123.59904
¥123.60611
¥123.60549
¥123.61546
¥123.62162
¥123.62065
¥123.63344
¥123.64265
¥123.18138
¥123.20005
¥123.99988
[FR Doc. 2017–25105 Filed 11–21–17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–NK–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
18 CFR Part 40
[Docket No. RM16–22–000]
Coordination of Protection Systems for
Performance During Faults and
Specific Training for Personnel
Reliability Standards
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, DOE.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission (Commission)
proposes to approve Reliability
Standards PRC–027–1 (Coordination of
Protection Systems for Performance
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22NOP1.SGM
22NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 22, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 55529-55535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2017-25105]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
15 CFR Part 922
[Docket No. 170315274-7274-01]
RIN 0648-BG73
Vessel and Aircraft Discharges From United States Coast Guard
Activities in Greater Farallones and Cordell Bank National Marine
Sanctuaries
AGENCY: Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS), National Ocean
Service (NOS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: With this proposed rule, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA) considers allowing the United States Coast Guard
(USCG or Coast Guard) to carry out certain otherwise prohibited
activities within waters of Greater Farallones National Marine
Sanctuary (GFNMS) and Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuary (CBNMS)
approximately 3 nautical miles (nm) from the shore, in the areas of the
sanctuaries that were expanded in 2015. The discharges under
consideration are: Untreated vessel sewage, vessel graywater as defined
by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (FWPCA), that
does not meet the definition of ``clean'' as defined by the GFNMS and
CBNMS regulations, and ammunition and pyrotechnic (warning projectile,
flare, smoke float and marine marker) materials used in USCG training
exercises for use of force (live fire or gunnery) and training
exercises for search and rescue (SAR) of vessels or persons in
distress. No change is proposed to the regulatory prohibitions or
exceptions applicable to the pre-expansion boundaries of the two
sanctuaries. A draft environmental assessment (DEA) under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) has been prepared for this proposed
action. NOAA is soliciting public comment on the proposed rule and DEA.
DATES: Comments will be considered if received by January 16, 2018.
Public hearings will be held on December 5 and 13, 2017, from 6 p.m. to
8 p.m.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on this document and/or on the DEA,
identified by NOAA-NOS-2017-0140, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submission: Submit all electronic public
comments via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=NOAA-NOS-2017-0140, click the
``Comment Now!'' icon, complete the required fields, and enter or
attach your comments.
Mail: Submit written comments to Maria Brown,
Superintendent, Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary, 991
Marine Drive, The Presidio, San Francisco, CA 94129.
Instructions: Comments sent by any other method, to any other
address or individual, or received after the end of the comment period,
may not be considered by NOAA. All comments received are a part of the
public record and will generally be posted for public viewing on
www.regulations.gov without change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.), confidential business
information, or otherwise sensitive information submitted voluntarily
by the sender will be publicly accessible. NOAA will accept anonymous
comments (enter ``N/A'' in the required fields if you wish to
[[Page 55530]]
remain anonymous). Attachments to electronic comments will be accepted
in Microsoft Word, Excel, or Adobe PDF file formats only.
Copies of the DEA and proposed rule can be downloaded or viewed on
the internet at www.regulations.gov (search for docket # NOAA-NOS-2017-
0140) or at https://farallones.noaa.gov/manage/regulations.html. Copies
can also be obtained by contacting the person identified under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Public hearings will be held in the following locations:
December 5, 2017. 6-8 p.m. Bay Model, 2100 Bridgeway,
Sausalito, CA 94965.
December 13, 2017. 6-8 p.m. Gualala Community Center,
47950 Center Street, Gualala, CA 95445.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria Brown, Greater Farallones
National Marine Sanctuary Superintendent, at Maria.Brown@noaa.gov or
415-561-6622.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Introduction
On March 12, 2015, NOAA expanded the boundaries of GFNMS and CBNMS
to an area north and west of their previous boundaries. In that rule,
pursuant to a request from the USCG, NOAA announced that it would
postpone the effective date for the discharge requirements in both
expansion areas (defined as the areas that were added to the existing
1981 and 1989 boundaries for GFNMS and CBNMS, respectively) with regard
to USCG activities. NOAA stated the purpose of the postponement was to
look at ways to address Coast Guard's concerns that the discharge
regulations would impair the operations of Coast Guard vessels in, and
aircraft over, the sanctuaries, and to consider, among other things,
whether to exempt Coast Guard activities in both sanctuary expansion
areas. This proposed rule considers allowing the USCG to carry out
otherwise prohibited discharges within waters of the GFNMS and CBNMS
expansion areas seaward of approximately 3 nm from the shore, as
described in more detail below. In formulating this proposed rule, NOAA
considered a number of factors discussed more fully in the DEA,
including the ability of the USCG to complete its mission requirements
and the policy of facilitating uses of the sanctuaries to the extent
compatible with resource protection.
B. Greater Farallones and Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuaries
NOAA is charged with managing areas of the marine environment which
are of special national significance as the National Marine Sanctuary
System (16 U.S.C. 1431 (b)(1)). The Office of National Marine
Sanctuaries (ONMS) is the federal office within NOAA that manages the
National Marine Sanctuary System. The mission of ONMS is to identify,
protect, conserve, and enhance the natural and cultural resources,
values, and qualities of the National Marine Sanctuary System (System)
for this and future generations throughout the nation. This System
includes 13 national marine sanctuaries, among them GFNMS and CBNMS,
and Papah[amacr]naumoku[amacr]kea and Rose Atoll marine national
monuments. GFNMS was designated in 1981 and protects approximately
3,295 square miles (2,488 square nautical miles). CBNMS was designated
in 1989 and protects approximately 1,286 square miles (971 square
nautical miles). NOAA expanded both sanctuaries to their current size
on March 12, 2015 (80 FR 13078). When referring to the expansion areas
of the sanctuaries, NOAA means the areas that were added to the
existing 1981 and 1989 boundaries for GFNMS and CBNMS, respectively.
Both GFNMS and CBNMS' regulations prohibit discharging or
depositing, from within or into the sanctuary, any material or other
matter (15 CFR 922.82(a)(2) and (3) and 15 CFR 922.112(a)(2)(i) and
(ii)). Both the GFNMS and CBNMS regulations also prohibit discharging
or depositing, from beyond the boundary of the sanctuary, any material
or other matter that subsequently enters the sanctuary and injures a
sanctuary resource or quality (15 CFR 922.82(a)(4); 15 CFR
922.112(a)(2)(iii)). Most national marine sanctuaries also have similar
regulatory prohibitions. The discharge prohibitions are aimed at
maintaining and improving water quality within national marine
sanctuaries to enhance conditions for their living marine resources.
The discharge prohibitions include the following exceptions relevant to
the proposed action:
For a vessel less than 300 gross registered tons (GRT), or
a vessel 300 GRT or greater without sufficient holding tank capacity to
hold sewage while within the sanctuary, clean effluent generated
incidental to vessel use by an operable Type I or II marine sanitation
device that is approved in accordance with section 312 of the Federal
Water Pollution Control Act,\1\ as amended (FWPCA); vessel operators
must lock all marine sanitation devices in a manner that prevents
discharge or deposit of untreated sewage (15 CFR 922.82(a)(2)(ii) and
922.112(a)(2)(i)(B));
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Federal Water Pollution Control Act is more commonly
referred to as the Clean Water Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For a vessel less than 300 GRT, or a vessel 300 GRT or
greater without sufficient holding tank capacity to hold graywater
while within the sanctuary, clean graywater as defined by section 312
of the FWPCA (15 CFR 922.82(a)(2)(iv) and 922.112(a)(2)(i)(D));
Activities necessary to respond to an emergency
threatening life, property or the environment (15 CFR 922.82(c) and
922.112(b)).
The following definitions apply to these exceptions:
``Clean'' means not containing detectable levels of a
harmful matter (15 CFR 922.81 and 922.111); and,
``Graywater'' means galley, bath, and shower water (33
U.S.C. 1322(a)(11)).
The first two existing discharge exceptions listed above apply to
all vessels other than cruise ships. Therefore, they would apply to
USCG vessels and would continue to apply if the regulatory changes
proposed in this rulemaking were finalized.
C. USCG Activities
The USCG, part of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, is a
military service and a branch of the armed forces (14 U.S.C. 1),
charged with carrying out eleven maritime safety, security and
stewardship missions (6 U.S.C. 468(a)).
One of the missions of the USCG is to enforce or assist in the
enforcement of all applicable federal laws on, under, and over the high
seas and waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. As
part of this mission, the USCG supports resource protection efforts
within GFNMS and CBNMS by providing surveillance of activities within
the sanctuaries and enforcement of the National Marine Sanctuaries Act
(NMSA) and other laws and their implementing regulations. The USCG has
the authority to enforce the NMSA under 14 U.S.C. 2 and 14 U.S.C. 89.
Law enforcement activities for the two sanctuaries are also conducted
by other agencies, primarily NOAA's Office of Law Enforcement and the
California Department of Fish and Wildlife. In GFNMS, the National Park
Service and several local agencies also conduct law enforcement
activities.
The USCG also leads incident planning and response activities for
oil
[[Page 55531]]
spills and other incidents in U.S. coastal and ocean waters. These
activities are necessary components of GFNMS and CBNMS management.
Other USCG missions that are conducted inside NMS boundaries, some of
which also support national marine sanctuary management, include
waterways and coastal security; aids to navigation, including tending
buoys; search and rescue (SAR); living marine resources; marine safety;
and marine environmental protection. The USCG may concurrently conduct
activities to support more than one of its missions when operating
vessels within or aircraft above GFNMS and CBNMS.
According to the USCG Environmental Vessel Manual, USCG practices
allow for discharges of untreated sewage and non-clean graywater from
USCG vessels in waters beyond 3 nm from shore. USCG vessels have
continued these discharges beyond 3 nm from shore in the expansion
areas of GFNMS and CBNMS, due to NOAA's decision to temporarily delay
the effective date of applying sanctuary discharge prohibitions with
respect to USCG activities in the expansion areas of GFNMS and CBNMS
while NOAA assesses these activities and their potential environmental
effects.
According to other regulatory requirements and USCG guidance and
practices, discharges are not allowed to take place within
approximately 3 nm of the shore. The FWPCA requires (in Section 312)
that vessels with installed toilets must only discharge sewage through
a Type I or II marine sanitation device within three miles \2\ of shore
(33 U.S.C. 1322(h)(4); 33 U.S.C. 1362(7)-(8)). The California Harbors
and Navigation Code 775 (a)(2) and (b) require compliance with the
FWPCA. There is also a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)
designated No Discharge Zone (NDZ) prohibiting sewage discharges in the
marine waters of the state that applies to specified vessels of 300
gross tons or greater,\3\ which would apply to several classes of USCG
vessels. Further, the USCG Vessel Environmental Manual includes a
restriction on discharging raw sewage within 3.5 miles (3 nm) of land.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The FWPCA refers to ``miles'' but the common interpretation
is ``nautical miles'', as statute miles are not used by mariners,
and many states use a 3 nm from shore boundary (https://www.gc.noaa.gov/gcil_seaward.html).
\3\ Various laws and regulations refer to gross tons or gross
registered tons (GRT). NOAA uses the terms in this document exactly
as they appear in the specific legal source cited.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Need for Action
In the course of the rulemaking to expand GFNMS and CBNMS, NOAA
received a letter dated February 4, 2013, from the USCG stating that
the prohibitions proposed for the GFNMS and CBNMS expansion areas had
the potential to impair USCG surface and airborne use of force training
activities, SAR training activities, and the ability of Coastal Patrol
Boats to conduct any mission within the sanctuaries. Of specific
concern to the USCG were the proposed prohibitions on discharges made
during these training activities: Vessel sewage discharges,
particularly with respect to law enforcement and SAR missions, and the
ability of the USCG to operate and remain ``mission ready.''
To accommodate the need for these USCG activities to take place
after the expansion rule entered into effect, NOAA postponed, for six
months from the effective date of the rule, the applicability of the
discharge requirements to Coast Guard activities in both expanded
areas. NOAA published the final rule for the expansion of GFNMS and
CBNMS on March 12, 2015 (80 FR 13078), in the Federal Register and the
rule became effective on June 9, 2015 (80 FR 34047). Additional six-
month postponements of the effectiveness of the discharge requirements
in the expansion areas were published in the Federal Register on
December 1, 2015 (80 FR 74985), May 31, 2016 (81 FR 34268), December 6,
2016 (81 FR 87803), and June 7, 2017 (82 FR 26339) to enable completion
of the environmental assessment and to determine NOAA's next steps. The
effective date for the discharge requirements in the expansion areas
for both sanctuaries with regard to USCG activities is currently
postponed until December 9, 2017. Accordingly, without further NOAA
action, the discharge regulations would become effective with regard to
USCG activities on December 9, 2017. Thus, a separate document
published in the Federal Register concurrently with this proposed rule
extends the postponement of the discharge requirements for the USCG
activities in the expansion areas until December 9, 2018 to provide
adequate time for completion of a final environmental assessment and
final rule, as appropriate. As described in the separate document, the
new postponement of these discharge requirements will terminate either
on December 9, 2018 or 30 days after publication of a final rule,
whichever comes first.
Of primary concern to USCG are the discharge regulations in both
expanded sanctuaries and USCG compliance with these regulations. USCG
vessels have limited capacity to treat sewage and some have limited
capacity to hold sewage and graywater, and are without Type I or II
marine sanitation devices onboard to treat the wastewater prior to
discharge; accordingly, the discharges from such vessels would not fit
within the existing regulatory exemptions for discharge within GFNMS
and CBNMS. Training exercises designed to make USCG personnel ready for
missions involving use of force and SAR involve discharging live
ammunition and pyrotechnic materials. NOAA is concerned with protecting
sanctuary resources and habitats, resolving any conflicts that could
occur among sanctuary user groups (e.g., fishing and USCG live fire
training), and ensuring continued USCG enforcement of sanctuary
regulations and other mission activities that support sanctuary
management.
Prior to the expansion of GFNMS and CBNMS, the USCG was able to
comply with the sanctuaries' vessel discharge regulations by
discharging untreated vessel sewage and non-clean graywater in ocean
waters outside GFNMS and CBNMS or by pumping it out at shoreside pump-
out facilities. The expansion of GFNMS and CBNMS, with the resulting
larger sizes of the sanctuaries and extension of discharge prohibitions
to the expanded portions of the sanctuaries, would make it difficult
for the USCG to both fulfill its missions and comply with the vessel
discharge prohibitions. The USCG vessels have constraints for treating
and holding sewage and non-clean graywater, and crews would have to
plan for the extra time required to travel from the GFNMS and CBNMS
expansion areas to USCG shoreside pump-out facilities in Bodega and San
Francisco bays or to ocean waters outside national marine sanctuary
boundaries to discharge vessel holding tanks (where allowed by state
and federal regulations).
Similarly, with regard to training activities, prior to the
expansion of GFNMS and CBNMS, the USCG planned and conducted these
exercises outside the sanctuaries' boundaries and within relatively
short distances from USCG stations without violating sanctuary
discharge regulations. Because the USCG maritime enforcement, defense
readiness, and SAR capabilities are enhanced by conducting live-fire
and SAR exercises in the areas in which its personnel normally operate,
the expansion of GFNMS and CBNMS and extension of discharge
prohibitions to the expanded portions of the sanctuaries have the
potential to impair the ability of USCG to operate and train to remain
``mission ready.''
[[Page 55532]]
E. History of Action
Prior to the expansion of the two sanctuaries' boundaries, GFNMS
and USCG had been discussing potentially allowing USCG to make
discharges within the sanctuary during live fire and SAR training
exercises. In 2012 and 2013, USCG District 11 and GFNMS held a series
of meetings focused on discharges of flares, ammunition, and targets
related to live fire and SAR training. During this time, GFNMS and USCG
identified several areas for potentially allowing seasonal training-
related discharges as well as possible operating protocols. The
intention was to consider allowing USCG training discharges via a
national marine sanctuary permit, if the activities could be conducted
in a way that would minimize potential impacts to marine mammals and
other living marine resources. The USCG did not submit an application
for a permit, and therefore NOAA did not issue a permit.
After receiving the USCG's February 4, 2013 letter, the USCG and
NOAA initiated discussions to address the full range of USCG discharges
from training activities, and untreated vessel sewage and graywater
discharges in both GFNMS and CBNMS. As part of these discussions, the
USCG and NOAA reviewed potential environmental effects and various
approaches to mitigate potential harm to sanctuary resources from these
USCG discharges, including NMS permits and best practices for USCG
discharge activities. In January 2015, prior to the publication of the
final rule to expand GFNMS and CBNMS, NOAA and the USCG entered into
interagency consultations to address both agencies' concerns. The
details of this ongoing consultation are described above under ``Need
for Action.''
From April 21 to May 31, 2016 (81 FR 23445), NOAA accepted public
comments and information to determine the relevant scope of issues and
range of alternatives for NOAA to address in the environmental
assessment and proposed rule. Public and agency comments were received
via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal, by mail, and at three public
meetings that were held in Sausalito, Bodega Bay and Gualala on May 10,
11 and 12, respectively. Comments received are available at
www.regulations.gov (search for docket NOAA-NOS-2017-0140). NOAA
considered these comments in preparing this proposed rule and
associated DEA.
F. Process
The process for this action is composed of four major stages: (1)
Information collection and characterization and public scoping (scoping
was completed on May 31, 2016); (2) preparation and release of a draft
environmental assessment under the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), and any proposed amendments to the regulations if appropriate;
(3) public review and comment of the proposed amendments and the draft
environmental assessment; (4) preparation and release of a final
environmental review document, and any final amendments to the GFNMS
and CBNMS regulations, if appropriate. With the publication of this
proposed rule, NOAA enters the third phase of this process.
NOAA will fulfill its responsibilities to complete required
consultations and/or receive necessary authorizations under the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.), section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), Section 106 of
the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA; 54 U.S.C. 300101), and
Federal Consistency review under the Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA;
16 U.S.C. 1451 et seq.), along with its ongoing NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321 et
seq.) process including the use of NEPA documents and public meetings
to also meet the requirements of other federal laws. Together with this
proposed rule, NOAA is releasing a DEA containing more detailed
information on the considerations of this proposal, including
assessment of alternatives, analysis of potential environmental
impacts, and references. The EA can be found through the Web site in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
II. Summary of the Proposed Regulations
A. Sewage and Graywater
With this proposed rule, NOAA would amend the GFNMS and CBNMS
regulations to allow USCG vessels to discharge untreated sewage and
non-clean graywater only in the waters of the expansion areas of GFNMS
and CBNMS seaward of approximately 3.5 miles (3 nautical miles (nm))
from the shoreline. USCG discharges of untreated sewage and non-clean
graywater from vessels that are not equipped with a Type I or II marine
sanitation device (MSD) and without sufficient holding tank capacity
would continue, as per historic and current routine USCG operational
practices in waters of both expansion areas beyond 3 nm from shore. As
previously described, these discharges have continued since June 2015
due to NOAA's decision to temporarily delay the effective date of
applying sanctuary discharge prohibitions with respect to USCG
activities while NOAA assesses these activities and their potential
environmental effects.
The current GFNMS and CBNMS discharge prohibitions provide an
exception for clean sewage discharge (``clean effluent'') through a
Type I or II MSD for: (1) A vessel less than 300 GRT, or (2) a vessel
300 GRT or greater without sufficient holding tank capacity to hold
sewage while within the Sanctuary (15 CFR 922.82(a)(2)(ii) and
922.112(a)(2)(i)(B)). They also provide an exception for clean
graywater to be discharged: (1) A vessel less than 300 GRT, or (2) a
vessel 300 GRT or greater without sufficient holding tank capacity to
hold graywater while within the Sanctuary (15 CFR 922.82(a)(2)(iv) and
922.112(a)(2)(i)(D)). According to the USCG, most of its vessels
operating in GFNMS and CBNMS do not have capacity to treat sewage and
graywater; they are without Type I or II MSD onboard to treat the
wastewater prior to discharge. Some classes of USCG vessels also have
limited capacity to hold sewage and non-clean graywater until it may be
discharged outside GFNMS and CBNMS. Thus, if the regulations were to
take effect in the expansion areas of GFNMS and CBNMS, the vessels
would not be able to legally discharge in those portions of the
sanctuaries in a manner consistent with these existing regulatory
exceptions. The proposed exceptions to the GFNMS and CBNMS prohibitions
for the USCG would be in addition to the current exceptions noted
earlier.
The areas within GFNMS and CBNMS in which these USCG vessel
discharges would be excepted from the sanctuaries' discharge
prohibitions correspond to the waters seaward of 3 nm from shore in the
expansion areas of GFNMS and CBNMS (i.e., the areas added when the
sanctuaries expanded in 2015). The geographic coordinates of these
areas would be listed in an appendix to each sanctuary's regulations
(appendix G of subpart H and appendix C of subpart K). Aside from the
proposed exceptions for USCG training-related discharges (see below),
the USCG would also continue to comply with all other existing
prohibitions provided in 15 CFR 922.82 and 922.112 in both the pre-
expansion areas and the expanded sanctuaries' boundaries and comply
with the prohibitions for vessel discharges within the pre-expansion
boundaries of the two sanctuaries. No changes to the regulatory
prohibitions or exceptions applicable to the pre-expansion areas of the
sanctuaries are proposed.
[[Page 55533]]
B. Discharges of Ammunition and Pyrotechnic Materials During Training
NOAA would amend the GFNMS and CBNMS regulations to allow USCG
discharges of ammunition and pyrotechnic materials (including warning
projectiles, flares, smoke floats and marine markers) during live
ammunition and search and rescue training exercises only in the federal
waters of the expansion areas of GFNMS and CBNMS, seaward of
approximately 3.5 miles (3 nautical miles (nm)) from the shoreline. The
geographic coordinates of this designated area, where training
discharges would be excepted from the sanctuary discharge prohibition
within GFNMS and CBNMS, would be listed in an appendix to each
sanctuary's regulations (appendix G of subpart H and appendix C of
subpart K).
The USCG would also continue to comply with all other existing
prohibitions, aside from the previously described proposed exceptions
for USCG vessel discharges of untreated sewage and graywater, provided
in 15 CFR 922.82 and 922.112 in both the pre-expansion areas and the
expanded sanctuaries' boundaries and comply with the prohibitions for
vessel discharges within the pre-expansion boundaries of the two
sanctuaries. No changes to the regulatory prohibitions or exceptions
applicable to the pre-expansion areas of the sanctuaries are proposed.
Based on a request by USCG, this proposed rule focuses on a
regulatory exception to the GFNMS and CBNMS general discharge
prohibition for the specified USCG discharges. However, NOAA presents
in the DEA a variety of alternatives for protecting sanctuary resources
while addressing the USCG's request to allow for USCG's routine
discharges of untreated sewage and graywater from vessels and training
discharges in GFNMS and CBNMS, allowing the USCG to fulfill its
missions and comply with the sanctuaries' regulations. The DEA also
lays out in more detail NOAA's consideration and analysis of factors
pertinent to this proposed rule, including the ability of USCG to
complete its mission operations and in the expansion areas of the
sanctuaries, constraints in certain USCG vessel capabilities to treat
and hold sewage and graywater, the role that USCG live fire and search
and rescue trainings in the expansion areas of the sanctuaries play in
USCG mission readiness, and the extent to which such USCG activities
may be conducted to the maximum extent feasible in a manner consistent
with the sanctuaries' primary objective of resource protection. No
final decision or final rulemaking will be made until completion of the
public comment period, satisfaction of permitting and consultation
requirements, and completion of the NEPA analysis process.
III. Classification
A. National Environmental Policy Act
NOAA has prepared a draft environmental assessment (DEA) to
evaluate the potential impacts on the human environment of this
proposed rulemaking, which is the preferred action analyzed in the DEA,
as well as alternative actions. No significant adverse impacts to
resources and the human environment are expected, and accordingly,
under NEPA (43 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) a draft environmental assessment is
the appropriate document to analyze the potential impacts of this
action. Following close of the public comment period and satisfaction
of permitting and consultation requirements under applicable natural
and cultural resource statutes (described below), NOAA will finalize
its NEPA analysis and findings and prepare a final NEPA document.
Copies of the DEA are available at the address and Web site listed in
the ADDRESSES section of this proposed rule.
B. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Impact
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant within
the meaning of Executive Order 12866.
C. Executive Order 13771: Regulatory Reform
This proposed rule is not expected to be an Executive Order 13771
regulatory action because this proposed rule is not significant under
Executive Order 12866.
D. Executive Order 13132: Federalism Assessment
NOAA has concluded this regulatory action does not have federalism
implications sufficient to warrant preparation of a federalism
assessment under Executive Order 13132.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The purpose of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA; 5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) is to fit regulatory requirements to the scale of the businesses,
organizations, and governmental jurisdictions subject to the
regulation. The RFA requires that agencies determine, to the extent
feasible, the rule's economic impact on small entities, explore
regulatory options for reducing any significant economic impact on a
substantial number of such entities, and explain their ultimate choice
of regulatory approach. The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the
Department of Commerce certifies to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of
the Small Business Administration (SBA) that this proposed rule, if
adopted, would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The factual basis for this certification is
that the proposed changes are specifically targeted to the activities
of the USCG in CBNMS and GFNMS, and would not have an economic effect
on any small businesses. Also, this proposed rule would not
substantively alter the rights, responsibilities, or legal obligations
pertaining to vessel discharges for the regulated community. As a
result, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis is not required and
none has been prepared.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not create any new information collection
requirement, nor does it revise the information collection requirement
that was approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB Control
Number 0648-0141) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, 44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq. (PRA). Notwithstanding any other provision of the law, no
person is required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the PRA, unless that collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.
G. National Historic Preservation Act
In fulfilling its responsibility under the National Historic
Preservation Act (NHPA) and NEPA, NOAA intends to determine whether the
proposed rule is the type of activity that could affect historic
properties. If so, NOAA intends to identify consulting parties;
identify historic properties and assess the effects of the undertaking
on such properties; assess potential adverse effects; and resolve
adverse effects. If applicable, NOAA will initiate formal consultation
with the State Historic Preservation Officer/Tribal Historic
Preservation Officer, the Advisory Council of Historic Preservation,
and other consulting parties as appropriate; involve the public in
accordance with NOAA's NEPA procedures, and develop in consultation
with identified consulting parties alternatives and proposed measures
that might avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse effects on historic
properties as appropriate and describe them in the environmental
assessment.
[[Page 55534]]
NOAA will complete applicable NHPA requirements before finalizing its
NEPA analysis. Individuals or organizations who wish to participate as
a consulting party should notify NOAA.
Consultation requirements for the effects of the actual USCG
training activities and vessel discharges on historic properties remain
the responsibility of USCG, as USCG would be the lead agency performing
these activities.
H. Endangered Species Act
The Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973 as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531, et seq.), provides for the conservation of endangered and
threatened species of fish, wildlife, and plants. Federal agencies have
an affirmative mandate to conserve ESA-listed species. Section 7(a)(2)
of the ESA requires federal agencies to, in consultation with the
National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) and/or the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, ensure that any action they authorize, fund, or carry
out is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of an ESA-
listed species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of
designated critical habitat. NOAA's ONMS intends to begin informal
consultation under the ESA with NOAA's NMFS Office of Protected
Resources (OPR) upon publication of this proposed rule and complete
consultation prior to the publication of the final rule or finalization
of the NEPA analysis. NOAA's consultation will focus on any potential
adverse effects of providing a regulatory exception to its discharge
prohibition in CBNMS and GFNMS on threatened and endangered species.
NOAA will complete ESA consultation before finalizing its NEPA
analysis.
Consultation requirements for the effects of the actual USCG
training activities and vessel discharges on threatened and endangered
species remain the responsibility of USCG, as USCG would be the lead
agency performing the training activities. USCG communicated to NOAA
its intent to fulfil the consultation requirements under the ESA,
specific to their training activities and vessel discharges, with
(OPR).
I. Marine Mammal Protection Act
The Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) of 1972 (16 U.S.C. 1361 et
seq.), as amended, prohibits the ``take'' \4\ of marine mammals in U.S.
waters. Section 101(a)(5)(A-D) of the MMPA provides a mechanism for
allowing, upon request, the ``incidental,'' but not intentional,
taking, of small numbers of marine mammals by U.S. citizens who engage
in a specified activity (other than commercial fishing or directed
research on marine mammals) within a specified geographic region. ONMS
intends to request technical assistance from NMFS upon publication of
this proposed rule on ONMS's preliminary assessment that this action is
not likely to result in take of marine mammals. If NMFS recommends that
ONMS seek an Incidental Harassment Authorization or Letter of
Authorization, then ONMS will submit an application for any incidental
taking of small numbers of marine mammals that ONMS and NMFS conclude
could occur as a result of the discharges allowed by this proposed
rulemaking. NOAA's request for technical assistance will focus on the
effects of providing a regulatory exception to its discharge
prohibitions in CBNMS and GFNMS on marine mammals. NOAA will complete
any MMPA requirements before finalizing its NEPA analysis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The MMPA defines take as: ``to harass, hunt, capture, or
kill, or attempt to harass, hunt, capture or kill any marine
mammal.'' Harassment means any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance
which, (1) Has the potential to injure a marine mammal or marine
mammal stock in the wild (Level A Harassment); or (2) has the
potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the
wild by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but
not limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or
sheltering (Level B Harassment).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Satisfying MMPA requirements for the effects of the actual training
activities and vessel discharges on marine mammals remain the
responsibility of USCG, as USCG would be the federal agency performing
these activities. Moreover, USCG communicated to NOAA its intent to
fulfill the consultation requirements under the MMPA, specific to their
training activities and vessel discharges, with OPR.
J. Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA)
The principal objective of the CZMA is to encourage and assist
states in developing coastal management programs, to coordinate State
activities, and to preserve, protect, develop and, where possible, to
restore or enhance the resources of the nation's coastal zone. Section
307(c) of the CZMA requires federal activity affecting the land or
water uses or natural resources of a state's coastal zone to be
consistent with that state's approved coastal management program, to
the maximum extent practicable. NOAA will provide a copy of this
proposed rule, the DEA, and a consistency determination to the
California Coastal Commission (Commission) upon publication. NOAA will
wait for concurrence from the Commission prior to publication of the
final rule.
Consultation requirements for the effects of the actual USCG
training activities and vessel discharges on land or water uses or
natural resources of California's coastal zone remain the
responsibility of USCG, as USCG would be the lead agency performing
these activities.
IV. Request for Comments
NOAA requests comments on this proposed rule and the DEA. The
comment period will remain open until January 16, 2018.
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 922
Administrative practice and procedure, Coastal zone, Fishing gear,
Marine resources, Natural resources, Penalties, Recreation and
recreation areas, Wildlife.
(Federal Domestic Assistance Catalog Number 11.429 Marine Sanctuary
Program)
Dated: November 14, 2017.
Nicole R. LeBoeuf,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone
Management, National Ocean Service.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth above, NOAA proposes
amending part 922, title 15 of the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PART 922--NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY PROGRAM REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 922 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1431 et seq.
Subpart H--Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary
0
2. Amend Sec. 922.82 by revising paragraphs (a)(2)(iv) and (v), adding
paragraph (a)(2)(vi), and revising paragraph (a)(4) to read as follows:
Sec. 922.82 Prohibited or otherwise regulated activities.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(iv) For a vessel less than 300 GRT or a vessel 300 GRT or greater
without sufficient holding capacity to hold graywater while within the
Sanctuary, clean graywater as defined by section 312 of the FWPCA;
(v) Vessel engine or generator exhaust; or
(vi) For a United States Coast Guard vessel that is without
sufficient holding tank capacity and is without a Type I or II marine
sanitation device, and that is
[[Page 55535]]
operating within the designated area defined in appendix G of this
subpart, sewage and non clean graywater as defined by section 312 of
the FWPCA generated incidental to vessel use, and ammunition,
pyrotechnics or other materials directly related to search and rescue
and live ammunition training activities conducted by United States
Coast Guard vessels and aircraft in the designated areas defined in
appendix G of this subpart. Discharging or depositing, from beyond the
boundary of the Sanctuary, any material or other matter that
subsequently enters the Sanctuary and injures a Sanctuary resource or
quality, except for the material or other matter excepted in paragraphs
(a)(2)(i) through (vi) and (a)(3) of this section.
* * * * *
(4) Discharging or depositing, from beyond the boundary of the
Sanctuary, any material or other matter that subsequently enters the
Sanctuary and injures a Sanctuary resource or quality, except for the
material or other matter excepted in paragraphs (a)(2)(i) through (vi)
and (a)(3) of this section.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend subpart H by adding appendix G to read as follows:
Appendix G to Subpart H of Part 922--Designated Area for Certain United
States Coast Guard Discharges
Coordinates listed in this appendix are unprojected (Geographic
Coordinate System) and based on the North American Datum of 1983
(NAD83).
The portion of the Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary
area where the exception for discharges from United States Coast
Guard activities applies is defined as follows. Beginning with Point
1 identified in the coordinate table in this appendix, the boundary
extends from Point 1 to Point 2 in a straight line arc, and
continues from Point 2 to Point 3 in a straight line arc, and from
Point 3 to Point 4 in a straight line arc. From Point 4 the boundary
extends east and north along a straight line arc towards Point 5
until it intersects the fixed offshore boundary between the United
States and California (approximately 3 NM seaward of the coast as
defined in United States vs. California, 135 S. Ct. 563 (2014)). The
boundary then extends northward following the fixed offshore
boundary between the United States and California until it
intersects the line segment formed between Point 6 and Point 7. From
this intersection, the boundary extends west along the northern
boundary of Greater Farallones National Marine Sanctuary to Point 7
where it ends.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point No. Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1....................................... 39.00000 -124.33350
2....................................... 38.29989 -123.99988
3....................................... 38.29989 -123.20005
4....................................... 38.26390 -123.18138
5 \1\................................... 38.29896 -123.05989
6 \1\................................... 39.00000 -123.75777
7....................................... 39.00000 -124.33350
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\These coordinates are not a part of the boundary for the Designated
Area for Certain United States Coast Guard Discharges. These
coordinates are reference points used to draw line segments that
intersect with the fixed offshore boundary between the United States
and California.
Subpart K--Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuary
0
4. Amend Sec. 922.112 by revising paragraphs (a)(2)(i)(D) and (E) and
adding paragraph (a)(2)(i)(F) to read as follows:
Sec. 922.112 Prohibited or otherwise regulated activities.
(a) * * *
(2)(i) * * *
(D) For a vessel less than 300 GRT or a vessel 300 GRT or greater
without sufficient holding capacity to hold graywater while within the
Sanctuary, clean graywater as defined by section 312 of the FWPCA;
(E) Vessel engine or generator exhaust; or
(F) For a United States Coast Guard vessel that is without
sufficient holding tank capacity and is without a Type I or II marine
sanitation device, and that is operating within the designated area
defined in appendix C of this subpart, sewage and non clean graywater
as defined by section 312 of the FWPCA generated incidental to vessel
use, and ammunition, pyrotechnics or other materials directly related
to search and rescue and live ammunition training activities conducted
by United States Coast Guard vessels and aircraft in the designated
areas defined in appendix C of this subpart.
* * * * *
0
5. Amend subpart K by adding appendix C to read as follows:
Appendix C to Subpart K of Part 922--Designated Area for Certain United
States Coast Guard Discharges
Coordinates listed in this appendix are unprojected (Geographic
Coordinate System) and based on the North American Datum of 1983
(NAD83).
The portion of the Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuary area
where the exception for discharges from United States Coast Guard
activities applies is defined as follows. Beginning with Point 1,
identified in the coordinate table in this appendix, the boundary
extends from Point 1 to Point 2 in a straight line arc and continues
in numerical order through each subsequent point to Point 38. From
Point 38 the boundary extends west along the northern boundary of
Cordell Bank National Marine Sanctuary to Point 39 where it ends.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point No. Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1....................................... 38.29989 -123.99988
2....................................... 37.76687 -123.75143
3....................................... 37.76716 -123.42758
4....................................... 37.77033 -123.43466
5....................................... 37.78109 -123.44694
6....................................... 37.78383 -123.45466
7....................................... 37.79487 -123.46721
8....................................... 37.80094 -123.47313
9....................................... 37.81026 -123.46897
10...................................... 37.81365 -123.47906
11...................................... 37.82296 -123.49280
12...................................... 37.84988 -123.51749
13...................................... 37.86189 -123.52197
14...................................... 37.87637 -123.52192
15...................................... 37.88541 -123.52967
16...................................... 37.90725 -123.53937
17...................................... 37.92288 -123.54360
18...................................... 37.93858 -123.54701
19...................................... 37.94901 -123.54777
20...................................... 37.95528 -123.56199
21...................................... 37.96683 -123.57859
22...................................... 37.97761 -123.58746
23...................................... 37.98678 -123.59988
24...................................... 37.99847 -123.61331
25...................................... 38.01366 -123.62494
26...................................... 38.01987 -123.62450
27...................................... 38.02286 -123.61531
28...................................... 38.02419 -123.59864
29...................................... 38.03409 -123.59904
30...................................... 38.04614 -123.60611
31...................................... 38.05308 -123.60549
32...................................... 38.06188 -123.61546
33...................................... 38.07451 -123.62162
34...................................... 38.08289 -123.62065
35...................................... 38.11256 -123.63344
36...................................... 38.13219 -123.64265
37...................................... 38.26390 -123.18138
38...................................... 38.29989 -123.20005
39...................................... 38.29989 -123.99988
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2017-25105 Filed 11-21-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-NK-P